What a sickening spectacle. I'd have had some respect for the Dems if they hadn't tried to cloak their sociopathy with cloying claims to justice and fairness. Jesus Christ, they fabricated charges so nonsensical that they should have been dismissed without consideration as the malevolent ravings of a cock-crazed whore. I'd have had some respect had they brought the issue to a trial of political strength based on the unacceptability of his judicial record and/or political views rather than cynically destroy the reputation of a good man.
Why were the accusations from this whore (on her own admission she shagged 57 men even before she went to university, where shagging begins in earnest) given any attention when there was virtually no supporting evidence and the supposed attack took place in 1982? Why, after testimony that was riddled with contradictions and refusals to answer (*see below), did Trump claim she was a credible witness? For the love of Jesus what was he playing at? And why are the FBI being called in? To investigate what? She said/he said and with her witnesses denying her story? The only genuine reason would be to charge her with malicious perjury. But we know that won't happen. You can bet that already more women are being lined up to fabricate further accusations whom the deeply corrupt FBI - you know, the people who 'investigated' the Clinton emails - will deem to be 'credible witnesses' as well.
Why did the Republicans choose an incompetent and potentially double-crossing prosecutor to conduct Ford's cross-examination? Well we know, don't we children? It's because she's a woman. And we can't have a nasty White male (and especially, God forbid, a straight one) upset the po' little innocent Ms. Ford. Which underlines that we're quickly reaching the stage where women are virtually above the law, amenable to a radically different set of standards to their male counterparts,
And what to make of the transfiguration of Lindsey Graham? I always saw him as one of the most despicable politicians but my God what a performance! The guy really has ability. I genuinely believe his contribution did more than anything else to bolster Kavanaugh's position. I was transfixed. Seriously.
And is anyone anywhere going to point out that the attack on Kavanaugh is being driven by Jews? The charges were conjured up by Feinstien who also, with Blumentha, leads the attack on Committee while Schumer eggs them on from the sidelines. As far as I can see every single Jewish Senator has come out against Kavanaugh. Ford's lawyers are Jewish as are two of the three accusers. There's wall-to-wall negative (((MSM)))coverage as well as articles openly exposing Jewish opposition to him. Is Brett Kavanaugh Bad for the Jews? (WSJ) Jewish groups respond fiercely to nomination of Kavanaugh (Haaretz), The Jewish Case Against Brett Kavanaugh (The Forward) ......all (((their))) media is the same. So my question is will anyone shine the light on this glaring attempt by a small subversive minority to thwart the appointment of someone representing traditional American stock. Well, you know the answer to that, don't you?
Why were the accusations from this whore (on her own admission she shagged 57 men even before she went to university, where shagging begins in earnest) given any attention when there was virtually no supporting evidence and the supposed attack took place in 1982? Why, after testimony that was riddled with contradictions and refusals to answer (*see below), did Trump claim she was a credible witness? For the love of Jesus what was he playing at? And why are the FBI being called in? To investigate what? She said/he said and with her witnesses denying her story? The only genuine reason would be to charge her with malicious perjury. But we know that won't happen. You can bet that already more women are being lined up to fabricate further accusations whom the deeply corrupt FBI - you know, the people who 'investigated' the Clinton emails - will deem to be 'credible witnesses' as well.
Why did the Republicans choose an incompetent and potentially double-crossing prosecutor to conduct Ford's cross-examination? Well we know, don't we children? It's because she's a woman. And we can't have a nasty White male (and especially, God forbid, a straight one) upset the po' little innocent Ms. Ford. Which underlines that we're quickly reaching the stage where women are virtually above the law, amenable to a radically different set of standards to their male counterparts,
And what to make of the transfiguration of Lindsey Graham? I always saw him as one of the most despicable politicians but my God what a performance! The guy really has ability. I genuinely believe his contribution did more than anything else to bolster Kavanaugh's position. I was transfixed. Seriously.
And is anyone anywhere going to point out that the attack on Kavanaugh is being driven by Jews? The charges were conjured up by Feinstien who also, with Blumentha, leads the attack on Committee while Schumer eggs them on from the sidelines. As far as I can see every single Jewish Senator has come out against Kavanaugh. Ford's lawyers are Jewish as are two of the three accusers. There's wall-to-wall negative (((MSM)))coverage as well as articles openly exposing Jewish opposition to him. Is Brett Kavanaugh Bad for the Jews? (WSJ) Jewish groups respond fiercely to nomination of Kavanaugh (Haaretz), The Jewish Case Against Brett Kavanaugh (The Forward) ......all (((their))) media is the same. So my question is will anyone shine the light on this glaring attempt by a small subversive minority to thwart the appointment of someone representing traditional American stock. Well, you know the answer to that, don't you?
Let me close by admitting that I want to see the bastards behind this lynching to suffer in every way possible. I'd rejoice to see them rotting with disease, bankrupted living as beggars under a bridge.
* Cock-crazed whore's credibility
1. She contradicted herself a minimum of 15 time during her testimony.
2. Ford could not even remember her own address of the house she lived in when this incident supposedly occurred. She had to be reminded by her attorney during questioning.
3. She can’t remember when this happened but knows for certain that Judge Kavanaugh and Mark Judge had been drinking before they arrive at the mystery house.
4. Claims she does not remember how she got to the house or how she got home but knows for certain that Judge Kavanaugh and Mark Judge had been drinking before they arrive at the mystery house.
5. Claims she does not know where this party was but knows what other people were doing before they got there (refer to #1 & 2 above).
6. Originally claimed there were 2 boys at the party, changed that to 4 boys, then changed that to 3 boys + 1 girl. In testimony claimed a) several people were at the house, b) changed that to 5 boys + 1 girl all in the same sentence. But does not name the 5th boy.
7. Claimed she could hear others talking downstairs before she left the house. Changed that to, No, she could not hear people talking downstairs, then changed it again that she might have heard others talking downstairs. All within one statement.
8. She stated that the party was "unremarkable" but later says it “scarred her for life”. Really? Which was it?
9. Stated that she went to other parties after this where Brett Kavanaugh was present and that nothing ever happened. (Brett Kavanaugh stated he has never even met her.)
10. Said that she never told her therapist Judge Kavanaugh’s name. Contradicted herself five minutes later and said she did tell her therapist his name.
11. Does not remember if she gave the Washington Post her therapy records or if she just told the reporter about them. WAPO reporter has stated she was given all of her therapy records.
12. Refused to allow her therapist records to be part of the proceeding.
13. Claimed she had “academic problems” in college because of this alleged incident. So how did she get a BA, an MA and a PhD if she was so academically challenged?
14. Can’t remember what she told people last month, but wants us to believe her memories from 35 years ago. (Refer to # 11)
15. Claimed her polygraph exam was “stressful”. The exam consisted of two questions which Ford was allowed to dictate. They were these: a) Is any part of your statement false? b) Did you make up any part of your statement? That’s it. The whole exam.
16. Refused to have the full videotaped polygraph meeting placed as part of the record.
17. Stated that she met Mark Judge sometime later in life. Can’t remember when that happened and says HE should be able to fill in those blanks for her. Think about that. She wants a person she accused of a crime, to fill in her memory gaps for her. Who does that?
18. Before hearing her lawyers said she could not testify due to fear of flying. In testimony admits she has flown all over the world. Flew to DC for this meeting. Flew back and forth several times to meet with her attorneys before yesterday.
19. Claims she has PTSD because of allegedly being groped in high school. But she spent the last 35 years becoming a PhD, gives lectures all over the world, has no problem flying all over the globe for her job and vacations and marching on Washington wearing a vagina hat.
20. Stated she “did not understand what that meant” when the JC offered to send investigators to her home to interview her in private. How much clearer does “We will come to you” did they need to be?.
21. She testified that she did not know how to contact her Senators with her story. This is a flat out lie. As an Anti-Trump activist, she knows exactly how to contact her Senators. She has protested during the Women’s March and the Science March with various representatives. Also, she knows how to Google.
22. Spent the entire testimonial time fake crying and shuffling papers after every question in order to use up time and avoid answering questions.