Sunday, 21 July 2019

Russia commemorates the Romanovs. But not everyone's happy

Last year Russia saw massive numbers of its people commemorate the centennial of the murders  (Wikipedia calls them 'executions') of the last Czar and his family. (And by the way the same project saw to the virtual extermination of the country's whole ruling class and its intellectual elties, providing Lenin with his desired population of 'white niggers'.) According to Russia Insider "This year, 60,000 Orthodox faithful gathered for the nighttime Liturgy at Church on the Blood in Ekaterinburg, built on the site where the Royal Family and their faithful servants were brutally slain, and the following procession to the Monastery of the Holy Royal Passion-Bearers in Ganina Yama, built on the site where their holy bodies were discarded".

But not everyone was happy, as the following bizarre headline in Western propaganda outfit The Moscow Times indicated:

A Conspiracy Around the Romanovs’ Murder Has Alarmed Russian Jews

Almost 100 years have passed, but the Russian Orthodox Church cannot let it rest

Doesn't that beggar belief? In any event the Tribe has good reason to feel uncomfortable about the Romanovs' fate because just about everyone associated with it - from the killers themselves right up through the chain of command to the very top - was Jewish.  The murders were carried out under the direct command of Yakov Yurovsky, who had armed himself with several revolvers, a bayonet and a short-handled axe. Presumably because young girls are hard to finish off.  Aleksandr Beloborodov (Vaysbart) was Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Ural Regional Council which controlled the region where Filipp Isayevich Goloshchyokin* was Military Commissar. Nothing happened there without their approval. The direct order for the murders came from Yakov Sverdlov (Yankel-Aaron Movshevich Solomon), Chairman of the Communist Party Central Executive Committee in Moscow. It's not a well known fact but around this time Sverdlov was better known and more powerful than either Trotsky or Stalin. All of these were Jewish, while Lenin, the man who gave the final sign-off, was quarter Jewish and grew up in a Yiddish-speaking household.

Well maybe the chain of command went even higher than Lenin.

"The order to murder the Tsar and his family actually came from New York. The Bolsheviks had been forced to flee from Yekaterinburg in such haste that they had no time to destroy all the telegraph strips. Those strips were later found in the telegraph house. [White leader] Nikolai Sokolov took care of them but could not decipher them. This was done only in 1922 by a group of experts in Paris. Sokolov then discovered that the strips were extremely revealing, since they dealt with the murder of the Tsar and his family.......... The chairman of the Central Executive Committee, Yakov Sverdlov, had sent a message to Yakov Yurovsky where he relayed that after he had told [Bolshevik financier] Jacob Schiff in New York about the approach of the White army, he had received orders from Schiff to liquidate the Tsar and his entire family at once."


So maybe the Tribe have reason to be worried. I guess we can expect a call from Bibi to his BFF Putin to clamp down on such dangerous developments.

* Not many people can claim to have had their own personal genocide named after them but Goloshchyokin is one (the Goloshchyokin Genocide). His was in Kazakhstan where up to one third of the population starved to death under his  forced collectivation programme. His mom must have been so proud.

Friday, 19 July 2019

Shock as well-known actor comes out


The entertainment industry has reacted in shock to the news that Robin Banks has 'come out'. "I just had to do it" he admitted at a press conference.  "The rumours and innuendo and the stress of hiding one's sexual orientation were becoming too much to bear.  If this damages my career or if colleagues find it offensive....then so be it. But the more people who come out, the easier it will be for others to follow."

The reaction to Banks' disclosure ranged from mild approval to open hostility. While his parents admitted "we still love our son" a distraught Tanya Hyde, Chairzir of the Gay And Lesbian Alliance admitted that "I feel like I've been physically beaten". "To discover after all those years that Robin Banks is a straight white male is literally the worst thing that ever happened in my life. After the wonderful progress that's been made, gay marriage, paedophiles adopting children, transgender programming in schools...this has come as a horrible surprise." Drying zir's tears Hyde added "under no circumstances must he be allowed to play the part of a non-straight zir again".  

A clearly distressed Da’Quonde King’Kong’Quisha (pictured left), Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury and Professor of Moral Theology at Cambridge University exclaimed 'Oogabooga! Eek! Eek!".  Jonathan Silverplatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) referred ominously to "this terrifying development". "Be under no illusion" he warned, "this puts us on a slippery slope to a new Holocaust.  For me it conjures up images of Nazi Germany where heterosexual white youths spent their Summers in the countryside, working and innocently playing.  So you can understand why I'm literally shaking".

Banks has remained out of the public eye since making his shock announcement and time will tell how it impacts his career. Given the prevailing revulsion towards straight white males the omens are not good for him.

Epstein on suicide watch


Wednesday, 17 July 2019

Black intellectuals

As many of you know I spent a fair amount of time working in Africa, an experience which my wife claims transformed me from a liberal to a Nazi. Being in the technology field my interactions were largely with 'the best and the brightest' that those countries offered. Remarkably these people, though dispersed from South Africa to Ivory Coast, all demonstrated a number of common characteristics, characteristics which they even share with black 'intellectuals' in the West such as Michael Eric Dyson. This interview between JF Gariepy and the son of an Ethiopian immigrant to America provides a perfect illustration. 

Viz....

An attitude of supreme (but totally unjustified) narcissistic confidence. Loud, assertive and patronising. Whether this is just posturing or whether they actually realise their inadequacies is unclear but the spurious confidence probably derives from being unused to questioning from their less intelligent fellow blacks and White libtards. In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king and all that.

An inability to process a logical and coherent argument. Similarly they're unable to anticipate when they're painting themselves into a corner, when an averagely intelligent White person could see it coming a mile off. And they never prepare adequately....which probably derives from their narcissism and delusional confidence. For instance Nimrod talks down to JP on the issue of eugenics only to discover that it's a field in which the latter is an acknowledged expert.

Their apparent expertise is skin deep. Always. Despite the confident assertions their expertise quickly dissolves in the face of informed counter-arguments. I've seen this so many times. It seems - truly - that blacks are unable to build deep expertise in any subject.

Rhetorical devices which they wield as required to get themselves out of a corner and/or to put down their opponent. These include constant interruptions, throwing out 'big words' to make themselves appear intelligent, snickering, dismissing semantic consistency as 'word magic', and saying 'I don't even know what you're arguing' or 'hey, that was funny' or 'it's called xxx. Do you know what xyz is? Look it up'. For the record, we could make some use of these devices ourselves.

On a closing note I see that despite the firestorm that followed Trump's 'go back to where you came from' suggestion his popularity has actually gone up among Republicans (and I imagine a lot of White Democrats as well).

Saturday, 13 July 2019

Some random thoughts on the Epstein case


The ongoing Epstein saga is fascinating beyond measure. Will it result in the exposure and disempowerment of the Devil-worshipping paedophile cabal that rules over us? I doubt it. But first let me ask how we got to this stage. Why didn't the (almost) all-powerful cabal kill this off before it got traction? Just like they did with the first attempt to bring Epstein to justice. They have the wealth, power and information access to have strangled it at birth. Yet now they're in damage control mode.

Will they be brought to justice? I doubt it. For sure Epstein is going to the slammer but I find it hard to believe that the likes of Clinton, Prince Andrew, the Rothschilds and God knows who else will have their collars felt. They might deploy the same bait and switch strategy they're using in the 9/11 Grand Jury case. I wrote here that "the GJ can act only on the evidence provided by the US Attorney's office. That means that a US Attorney with a lot of skin in the game could spike the investigation from the outset. And who'll be the one overseeing this investigation? Why one (((Geoffrey Berman))). Not only is Geoffrey a (((Geoffrey))) he was also John McStain's personal lawyers. He can select the jury members and determine what evidence is presented to them. And finding suitable members is unlikely to present him with too many difficulties as Manhattan is Zio Central. And in the unlikely event that his selected GJ fails to comply he can simply replace them with a new jury. All of which will remain secret to the general public.

I hope I'm wrong but I can't see the Deep State that orchestrated and covered up the 911 attacks allowing the full truth to emerge from this exercise. Here's a more likely scenario. The GJ will be used to foist the Saudis with the complete blame while carefully avoiding the Mossad/Jewish elephant in the room. This will be seized on the the media and the political system as a once-and-for-all clearing of the decks. Now let's look for some Saudi fall guys and get on with out lives." In the Epstein case one of the lead prosecutors is Comey's daughter while the judge is a Jew with a record of twisting the law against conservative causes. The New York South jurisdiction will ensure it's more of a jewry than a jury!  They'll know the danger of the goyim connecting the J-dots.


Which brings me to the strange case of Alan Dershowitz and his campaign to have the Epstein case papers made public. Given that he's almost certainly guilty (just look at him) why would he do that? My theory is that he wants to identify the accusers at which point he can unleash his buddies in the media to traduce them and undermine their credibility. For sure he doesn't want to see justice done.

Anyway, these are just a few thoughts on the case which has the - slight -  potential to bring the House Of Satan crashing down.

Tuesday, 9 July 2019

The McElligots - a step too far?

The McElligots, a new soap opera which RTE has described as 'brave, ground-breaking and edgy' has attracted a storm of criticism from multiple sources. Tintin O'Foole, Culture Critic at the Irish Times described the series as 'sickening'. 'In a throwback to Ireland's darkest days The McElligotts features an all-white Irish household in which the father works while the mother stays at home to look after the family, all of whom go to Mass every Sunday. Hello!!!  The Current Year is 2019. I'm a proud and tolerant liberal but everyone associated with this should be fired, if not prosecuted for hate'.

Ivan Aikenhead of the LGBTQVBRXNL Alliance admitted 'I literally cried' after watching the first series, adding wistfully 'I wish it reflected real life like Eastenders, which handled the recent multiracial mother-father-daughter menage-a-trois episode with such taste and sensitivity' Oogabooga Bambaluba of the Irish Immigrant Association, speaking from his Government-funded apartment in swanky Dublin 4, condemned the 'total lack of diversity' in the series and - ominously - warned that the show's 'exclusion and hate' could drive many people of colour back to Africa.

Former Justice Minister Alan Shatter admitted to being, well, shattered by the series.'There's only one word to describe this abomination: Hate. For instance a Crucifix is openly visible in one of the scenes and the priest in the series - a white priest - is neither gay nor a child-molester. What kind of message does this send? I literally see this ending in another Holocaust. I'm reminded of Brecht's chilling warning on Hitler 'Although the world stood up and stopped the bastard, the bitch that bore him is in heat again'. As a proud Jew and Irishman I despair”

Annie Price, spokesperson for RTE, defended the show. "Our idea was to add diversity. I mean, where else on TV will you see a straight White middle-class heterosexual self-supporting family? But obviously we went too far. RTE apologises for any hurt or offence and has made available support services and safe rooms for those affected'.  

Sunday, 7 July 2019

The case for democratic eugenics

Eugenics has been getting a bad rap for a long time, especially from the left and from "liberals". But it wasn't always so. And that's not surprising given that its promise of long-term improvement of the human species fused neatly with the concept of Communism's New Man. Little surprise then that many if not most of the early 20th century's 'progressive' luminaries actively espoused it. These included Margaret Sanger, H.G. Wells, Bernard Shaw, the Webbs, Harold Laski and many more. But then came (shudder) the Nazis. And the rest is (fake) history.

Eugenics is now seen as a kind of Frankenscience, a subject not to be broached in polite circles. Especially among GoodWhites. But how could any of them object to the following proposal?

Anyone of child-bearing age who volunteers for sterilisation gets a cheque for €5,000. 

Simple as that. No incentives or restrictions based on race, religion, culture or economic class. On what basis could any virtue-signalling hypocrite object?  Well they would be mighty unhappy with the proposal. Because they know, even though they wouldn't directly admit it, that the beneficiaries would overwhelmingly be characterised by low intelligence and high time-preference. Which means fast-breeding White welfarists and blacks. They'd take up the offer in huge numbers and within a few generations their defective genes would start to disappear from our gene pool.

The luvvies might find this concept abhorrent but for sure the Chinese do not. They're already, at both Government and private levels, working to produce future generations of high IQ children. Meanwhile the long-term trend of increasing average IQ levels in White countries (the Flynn Effect) has gone into reverse. Yes, IQ levels in White countries are declining. And the decline is directly attributable to the relative growth in the numbers of black immigrants and of welfarists incentivised by the system to breed with all the foresight of stray dogs. This has catastrophic implications given that wealth and livability are directly correlated with intelligence. That's why the Chinese are so interested in the subject.

So my proposal literally has zero down-side. We'd reduce welfare dependency and its attendant pathologies as well as the proportion of blacks in our populations. But that's why our NWO overlords will never allow it.  Bertrand Russell, being one of them, explained it thus: "Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton."