Wednesday, 8 April 2020

Boris' deputies

Poor old Boris Johnson has really got a bad dose of 'the virus' and is clearly incapacitated. So a temporary leader had to be appointed. This anointed one had to come from one of the three major Cabinet positions: Home Secretary, Foreign Secretary or Chancellor of the Exchequer. It's interesting that none of the current occupants - and probably future ones well - is a True Brit. By far the closest is the current Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab whose mother  is British but whose father was a Jew from Czechoslovakia. The other two are Indian. A bit like Ireland's PM. Isn't it extraordinary - or is it, really - that nobody of traditional British stock is up to the job? 

And. whatever about Raab, what feeling or empathy can Patel or Sunak have for the people they lead?  Well here's what prominent "British" journalist Ash Sarkar, wrote a few weeks ago: ‘The white British population has decreased by 600,000, while the minority population has increased by 1.2million. So yes, lads, we’re winning!’. At which point she went into the street and had a shit. And this by the way from a woman who claims to be driven by 'anti-racism'.

Britain's in safe hands.

Monday, 6 April 2020

Covid-19. Random observations

Some truly bizarre features with this ongoing Covid farce. For a start - just like the Holocau$t™ - the numbers just don't stack up. The evidence from country after country indicates this to be little worse than a bad flu epidemic. Not that TPTB aren't trying. For instance the American CDC has in effect instructed hospitals to assign every death to the virus. It remains to be seen whether the general public will react in outrage when the extent of the fraud dawns or whether, as usual, they'll go back to bread and circuses.

California is always the place to go if you want woke madness and they don't let us down with Covid-19. Any Californian caught outdoors for non-essential reasons (e.g. sex-change operation, anti-Trump demo) can be jailed and/or fined. 
At the same time they're throwing open the jail gates and letting the inmates run riot among the population.  I suppose they need the cells for the quarantine-breakers. Logical in a Cali sense. And note that this is the state that has rescinded legal penalties for knowingly infecting someone with the AIDS virus.

And boy, aren't the Chinese starting to really look bad? Not alone did they almost certainly initiate the virus (deliberately or otherwise) but they've lied and deceived throughout the epidemic. Now they're trying to make up by 'donating' masks, most of which are faulty. And not just faulty. Videos have emerged of Chinese workers spitting on and otherwise degrading the products due for export. And did you read about that Chinese woman in Florida who bought up all of the available masks from locals who 'didn't know about the limits'. “It feels so awesome to buy all the masks!,” she gloated “I didn’t leave a single mask for the Americans!”  Yup, these are the people to whom America has handed over its manufacturing capabilities, allowed flood its top universities at the expense of White Americans, and stood by as they robbed American intellectual capital.

Talking about intellectual capital, is there a bigger moron in America than that  "Surgeon General"? Sweet Jesus, he should be permanently quarantined. Affirmative action gone mad.

Anyway, let us finish this stream of thought on a positive note. You'll be pleased to learn that America's Favourite Lady has been using the gym of her new $14 million mansion to keep in shape during quarantine.

Saturday, 4 April 2020

And another one bites the dust

Despite being an American Icon the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) has been on death row for a long time now. Fifty years of unrelenting attack and subversion by the Usual Suspects has culminated in the organisation recently filling for bankruptcy. Yes, the BSA is bankrupt. The straw that broke the camel's back was a lawsuit filed by 2,000 ex-members as compensation for alleged for sex abuse. But as I say its fate was sealed a long time ago. The attacks came in waves, initially focused on allowing girls to join - despite their having their own direct equivalent - and finally opening its doors, and the bodies of their members, to sodomites and perverts of various persuasions. Sex abuse cases soared while membership plummeted. Corporate supporters were induced to withdraw sponsorship and lawfare from well-financed nation-wreckers administered the death blow.

Why the relentless and ultimately fatal warfare? It's very simple. The BSA was male, patriotic, Christian and almost exclusively White. They saluted the flag, encouraged honesty, duty and self-reliance. Their oath is, or was: “On my honor I will do my best to do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law; to help other people at all times; to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight.”  Now do you see why they were targeted for destruction?

And you can see the irony here in that pretty much the same people who pushed so hard for gay scoutmasters are the very ones bankrupting the BSA for not doing more to protect the boys. There's a word for that. What is it? Ah yes, chutzpah. The lawyers have got rich but young members are now cut adrift. But this was never about the girls or even the gays. No more than the Civil Rights project was about blacks. It was all about the Long March Through The Institutions, about destroying a vital pillar of Traditional America.

Like the 1964 Immigration Act this destruction was a largely Jewish project. The ACLU was heavily involved throughout the campaign and the lawyer who fought the case against the BSA in the US Supreme Court in 2000 was Jewish. The three Jewish judges on that court all voted against the BSA. The lawyer who bankrupted the BSA is Tim Kosnoff, a Jewish left-wing activist. From a 2019 Washington Post article by Kayla Epstein: “This year, Kosnoff, in collaboration with the Eisenberg Rothweiler law firm and San Diego attorney Andrew Van Arsdale, began running television ads and launched a website…where victims could contact the lawyers with their stories.” And “Tim Kosnoff, a lawyer for an Abused in Scouting group that now has close to 2,000 clients, said that while he’s open to hearing how the organization intends to reform itself, he finds it “difficult to impossible” to envision the Boy Scouts finding a way to continue to operate” (NY Times, Feb. 18). Job done. The by now totally Jewish-controlled American Psychological Association did their bit as well. Obama himself quoted them in a 2013 interview “Gays and lesbians should have access and opportunity the same way everybody else does.  The American Psychological Association has studied the issue that you just mentioned. Homosexuals aren’t any more likely to molest kids than straight men.”

So there you have it. Yet another iconic institution gets marched through. Not too many left, are there?

Thursday, 2 April 2020

Soldier F and the British justice system

So Soldier F is to get his day in court to face murder charges. For those of you who don't know, Soldier F belonged to the British Parachute Regiment that shot dead 14 civilians during the Bloody Sunday protest march in Derry in 1972. It seems pretty certain that he personally shot at least three unarmed protesters and there's no statute of limitations on murder. So that's clear enough then.

In some ways yes. But understand that the Paras are the toughest of the tough, trained to shoot first and ask questions afterwards. That's why they were so effective in the Falklands War and in other arenas. Paras are singularly unsuited for civilian peace-keeping. Add to that they were a de facto if not de jure occupation army. And soldiers in occupation armies always behave the same way. Americans in Vietnam, Israelis in the West Bank, the Wehrmacht in the USSR, the Red Army in Germany. Doesn't justify bad behaviour but that's the way it goes.

So now, nearly fifty years after the event, Soldier F gets hauled into court. This has been hailed by Guardianistas and their ilk as a ringing endorsement of British justice. And that's because Soldier F, we can reasonably infer, is of the White working class while the Paras epitomise Rule Britannia. In other words they represent traditional Britain. Justice? Well the paramilitaries, who between them were responsible for literally thousands of deaths in this tiny enclave, all walked free as part of the terms of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement.  Now I think it was a price worth paying as the Troubles could have gone on indefinitely. Many of the militants on both sides were idealists fighting for what they perceived to be a just cause. But many were just murderous thugs, an assessment confirmed by the ease with which they segued into gangsterism after their release. Meanwhile an ex-soldier, in his seventies, is hauled before the courts on a murder charge even though the militants claimed they were an army and that they were fighting a war.

These developments follow what's now become a familiar pattern in that Britain's justice system has been taken over by hostile outsiders and traitorous insiders. It works against the interests of the British people in the same way a declared foreign enemy would. Thus Muslim paedophile rape gangs were allowed to run riot against White girls for decades as police looked the other way. A father seeking to rescue his young daughter from them was himself arrested by police. Where a 13 year-old White girl reporting her abusers to the authorities was harried and bullied by police into dropping her complaint. Where Tommy Robinson was jailed without trial for filming on the street and who was subsequently accosted by police as he tried to rescue an elderly woman being assaulted by a Muslim gang. Where a British man gets jailed for throwing bacon into a mosque but four Somali women who beat a White woman to pulp (accompanied by religious and racial slurs) walked free from court. These are not carefully chosen exceptions. They're the norm under British justice today.

Meanwhile black gangs have turned London and other cities into replicas of Detroit or Baltimore as knife murders spiral out of control. The police cite lack of resources for their abysmal failure to respond. But say something unflattering about a 'minority' on social media and the police will arrive hot-foot at your door, sirens blazing, resources no problem at all. Shout a racial insult at a football match and police will spend man-weeks (sorry, person-weeks) painstakingly seeking out the offender in footage of the 60,000 crowd. And then ensure he suffers a variety of social, custodial and financial punishments.

Is 'traitors' too strong a word? I bet Soldier F doesn't think so.

Tuesday, 31 March 2020

Lies, damned lies....and statistics

Well we haven't all died yet. In fact my readership has gone up over the last few weeks. So what's going on? I don't know but I repeat what I said in an earlier post: A mind-fuck is underway. So very many things don't add up, not least the absolutely hysterical reaction. And for sure the figures don't add up. RT has a particularly good analysis by Irish journalist Peter Andrews. Worth a read.

"You can bet that the institutions of international government, and the “experts” advising them, will try to massage and cherry-pick statistics to present the version of events that most closely matches their worst-case scenarios. The fact is, according to their early predictions, we are already long overdue millions of Covid-19 deaths that have failed to materialise. But even when Covid-19 deaths are recorded, we have seen how it could be that people are dying with coronavirus rather than dying of it."

On The Spectator website Dr John Lee, a recently retired NHS consultant and professor of pathology said that ‘’we have yet to see any statistical evidence for excess deaths, in any part of the world’’. To check this out, I looked at the British government’s own statistics on total deaths registered weekly across the UK. It shows that in the week ending on the 8th of March 2019, 10,898 people died in total in the UK. This year, in the week ending the 6th of March 2020, the equivalent figure was almost identical: 10,895. Make of that what you will."

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter, chair of the Winton Centre for Evidence and Risk Communication at Cambridge University says that if the deaths are towards the lower end of the current estimates, say at around 20,000 in the UK, Covid-19 will end up having ‘’a minimal impact on overall mortality for 2020’’. He told R4 that his findings showed, to his own professed astonishment, that if someone contracts the coronavirus, they’ve got almost exactly the same chance of dying over the ensuing few weeks as they would normally have of dying over the next year, no matter what their age or background health."

In Ireland heroic patriot Gemma O'Doherty shows on twitter that "the Dublin Docklands have never been quieter. Nobody is even bothering to man the ‘testing centre’ which is supposed to be overwhelmed while some HSE [Health Service Executive] insiders are quietly admitting Coronavirus is a ‘spook exercise.’"

So there you have it. Now go back into hibernation.

Meanwhile future British Home Secretary Dianne Abbot is on the case:

Sunday, 29 March 2020


Undoubtedly you've heard about last year's Netflix mini-series which 'dramatises' (i.e. fabricates and distorts) the events surrounding the brutal 1989 rape of a White woman in NY's Central Park. It's made a huge impression and left viewers shaking their heads in sorrow and anger at the mistreatment of black children by the justice system. Virtually all comment refers to the yoofs, sometimes the children, as being falsely imprisoned and acquitted only when the actual rapist confessed.

Given that many if not most of us will encounter some libtard bloviating on the series I provide below a very basic series of Hate Facts which show that the Central Park Five (have you ever noticed the magic power of assumed innocence by describing a criminal gang by way of a location and a numeral?) were criminal thugs who most certainly participated in the rape itself and the physical assault on several other victims that night in CP.

The five 'children' - Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray, Raymond Santana, Yusef Salaam and Kharey Wise - had been convicted by two multi-racial juries who had spent nearly two weeks assessing the evidence before finding them guilty. Not surprising as the evidence against them was overwhelming. They were part of a 25-30 strong black gang that had been terrorising that part of CP all night. Several passers-by had been brutally attacked and robbed. The rape victim herself was kicked and beaten to the point where she lost three quarters of her blood and narrowly avoided death. So even if these thugs were not involved in the rape - and they were - they did enough to be put away for a long long time.

Here are some of the reasons the juries convicted them of the rape:

They confessed, providing details of the rape only participants or observers could have known. After being picked up by the cops shortly after the rape Santana blurted out 'I didn't do the rape. I just felt her tits'. This was before any details of a rape had emerged. The cops at that point had not even found the rape victim. Around the same time Richardson told police that McCray had 'done the murder'. Again, the victim had not been found at this point. At the scene the following morning Wise exclaimed "Damn, damn, that's a lot of blood. ... I knew she was bleeding, but I didn't know how bad she was. It was really dark. I couldn't see how much blood there was at night.”

The criminals admitted their guilt in recorded interviews in the presence of their parents or other family members. McCray's statement contained the following admission: "Everybody started hitting her and stuff. She was on the ground, everybody stompin' and everything. ... I grabbed one arm, some other kid grabbed one arm and we grabbed her legs and stuff. Then we all took turns getting on her, getting on top of her. ... I just like, my penis wasn't in her. I didn't do nothing to her ... I was just doing it so everybody ... Everybody would just like, would know I did it." That in itself is damning but also consider that as far as the police knew the victim would recover and be in a position to identify her assailants. How would they look had they forced false confessions from innocent children? (The victim did recover but was traumatised to the point where all memory of the events became blacked put)

Blood and semen were found in the underwear of all of the accused. There was also a range of other evidence including testimony from friends and acquaintances of the accused claiming that they'd bragged about their actions. The accumulation of such evidence was used by the - multi-racial - juries to arrive at their guilty verdicts. DNA played little or no part in the case because back then DNA-based evidence was in its infancy.

But then in 2002 one Mattias Reyes, a 'vulnerable' (I love how the chattering classes use that word to describe the dregs of society) young man who had previously been convicted of a string of rapes (including that of his dear mother), brutal assaults and murder confessed that he had been the rapist, and the only one at that. DNA taken from the victim matched his. So why did this paragon of virtue take so long to do the right thing? According to a NY Post exclusive "Cops suspect Matias Reyes confessed to raping the Central Park jogger to win protection from a Muslim prison leader who was serving time for the horrific attack". This Muslim leader was Kharey Wise, he of the  "I knew she was bleeding, but I didn't know how bad she was.”  If you were in prison with a guy like that you'd be very very careful to keep him on your side. What better way than by arranging his release and a massive financial payout?

Based on this 'confession' and little else District Attorney Robert Morgenthau (good to see the Irish still active in NY) 'vacated' the conviction. Given the centrality of the confession you'd imagine it was subjected to the most rigorous investigation by the authorities. If you did you'd be wrong. Morgenthau not alone  prohibited the police from interviewing Reyes or giving him a polygraph, but ordered other inmates not to talk to any police investigators about their conversations with Reyes. Can you credit that? Of course you can.

Remember that it wasn't the DNA evidence that convicted the thugs. DNA was barely used back then and in fact had become permissible in NY courts less than a year before the trials. Thus the investigators would not have been particularly diligent about collecting and handling this evidence. In any event all it proved was that Reyes was one of the rapists. It does not exculpate anyone. Especially not the Five with blood and semen in their jocks.
So the Five were released and have now become wealthy celebrities. The Netflix fantasy is the least of it. Mayor De Blasio ordered that no less than $40 million be paid out of city coffers to compensate the rapists. This happy ending is captured in this pic which shows the film-makers and their inspiration in jovial mood. And why not?

Thursday, 26 March 2020

No modus vivendi possible

There was a time - many years ago - when I believed that Whites and Jews could coexist peacefully and in a symbiotic way. That we were kind of in the same side against the Third World hordes menacing us. To put it mildly I no longer believe that. Despite some brave and honourable Jews out there it's clear to me now that as a people they're biologically programmed to undermine their White host nations and nothing we can do will ever change that. As soon as they get a foothold in any organisation they will, like termites, burrow away until it's reduced to a hollowed-out simulacrum of the original, usually serving an agenda diametrically opposed to that of its founders.

The examples are unlimited. I noticed just recently that the last non-Jewish President of Harvard took office in 1953. And we know what Harvard has become, with the people for whom it was founded representing a small and declining proportion of the faculty and student body resulting, inter alia, in plummeting academic standards. A similar transformation of another institution - National Geographic - was brought home to me recently as I waited in a medical surgery. They had stacks of the magazine dating back to 2009. Back then it was prestigious to the point of being an acceptable academic reference. It's articles were informative, well-written and politically neutral. Its photography was the stuff of legend.

Then in 2014 Susan Goldberg took over as Editor. And destroyed the journal by  transforming it into a platform for anti-White, anti-Christian propaganda. Goldberg makes a great deal of her anti-racism and devoted one whole edition to the topic. Professing herself horrified at NG's past racism she apologised on behalf of her predecessors. 

That such racism was based on scientific fact was irrelevant as when she sorrowfully admitted that it was 'very hard to read' an earlier edition that ranked Australian aborigines as "the lowest in intelligence of all human beings.”  Sort of Hate Fact I suppose.

By now NG has now become unrecognisable, obsessively focused on race. Or more to the point debunking the concept. An article by Jewish geneticist David Reich claimed that 'there are no indigenous people—anyone who hearkens back to racial purity is confronted with the meaninglessness of the concept'. This is not only untrue - it's a downright lie because no geneticist believes such nonsense. 

No surprise that Goldberg's anti-racism doesn't apply to her own tribe. She strongly identifies as Jewish. Her husband is a Jewish real estate lawyer - what a benefit to society - and she spent time in a kibbutz in her teenage years. Articles on Israel are invariably favourable and strangely, the multiculturalism that seems to be so good for the goyim doesn't - according to NG - work in Israel for some unspecified reason. No surprise either that NG circulation has nosedived being now little more than half of what it was ten years ago. 

But Goldberg and her ilk don't care.  Like every parasite she'll flee to richer pickings when her host dies. Or succumbs to the parasites to put it more accurately.

She takes great pride in being the first Jewish editor of NG. If Harvard is anything to go by she'll be the first of a long line. Providing NG survives their depredations.

Note that Mike Bloomberg used his position as a major donor to NG to get her the job. That's how they operate. That's how they get control of The Narrative, by way of their magic money.