End world poverty now!

In a recent issue of the Rothschild-owned Economist Professor Bryan Caplan argued that labour is the world’s most valuable commodity and its value depends on location. Apparently if borders were open, a world of free movement would be $78 trillion richer than it is now. Mexican labourers would earn 150% more in the West while an unskilled Nigerian worker in Europe could make 1000 times (sic) as much in Germany as he would back home, adding 100 times more to global GDP than he would by the same work in Nigeria. 

Wouldn't that be wonderful? Well, no, as most readers quickly pointed out, and for a number of reasons. For a start where would we accommodate them, how would we build and staff the thousands of new welfare offices such enrichers would require and treat the explosion of tropical disease accompanying their arrival?

Caplan (changing the 'K' to a 'C' doesn't fool us Prof.) coyly avoids being too specific on such issues, not least because he isn't interested in the goyims' economic welfare. What he wants is to render White nations into atomised and dumbed-down abstractions with no unifying racial, moral, cultural or historical identity. Because in such a miasma an intelligent endogamous tribe will triumph and prosper without fear of exposure. Isn't that right Bryan?

Such a programme is underpinned by the following syllogism:

Free movement of produce = Good (more choice at cheaper prices)

Free movement of produce = free movement of people

Therefore free movement of people = Good

But people and goods are not the same, a fact so self-evident that even an economist or sociology professor could see it. Your Chinese fridge does not yearn for its factory of origin in Shanghai, it works productively from the time it arrives and you won't see it followed into your house by an assortment of cookers and fridges from the same factory. And crucially, you can throw it out when it gives trouble.

Then the most basic question: Why are the Nigerians 1000 times more productive in Germany than they are in Nigeria? Caplan has an answer for that: The infrastructure in White countries. Which in turn makes one ask why our infrastructure is so superior. We know the answer. But we won't hear it from Caplan any more than we did from (((Jared Diamond))) in Guns, Germs and Steel.

To bolster my point I now cite a few recent media reports.

Mother, 27, arrested after charred remains of her daughter found on a barbecue. Neighbours called police in Zemst, Belgium, on Sunday after seeing smoke. She is reported to have told officers 'we had to burn together to get into heaven' . The woman, believed to be of African descent, had reportedly been depressed for some time after going through a divorce.

Witch doctors are sacrificing children in drought-stricken Uganda. Jackline Mukisa sobbed as she described how her 8-year-old son was found in a nearby swamp in February without teeth, lips, ears and genitals. His remains suggest he was slowly killed as part of a human sacrifice ritual performed by witch doctors, apparently to appease the spirits.

A Bronx student stabbed a classmate to death with a switchblade and seriously injured another in front of more than a dozen classmates inside their high school Wednesday morning after being accidentally hit by a flying pencil. 

And this bastion of learning's name? The Urban Assembly School for Wildlife Conservation.

Truly fact is stranger than fiction!

What would you do?

Douglas Murray is coming under increasing odium in WN circles for his repeated failure to finger the Jewish role in Europe's ongoing destruction.  In this interview he actually deemed anti-Semites (i.e. those who refuse to buy into The Narrative) as mentally ill.

Having studied the destruction of Europe, the strange death of Europe in fact, he knows the deal. He understand the Jewish role as well as anyone does. Yet he resolutely refuses to identify it. What does that make him? Well before we become too judgemental put yourself in his position for a moment. At present he enjoys fame and fortune and the future is roses all the way. But should he do a David Irving or an Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn that would change. Change utterly and immediately. 

Irving and Solzhenitsyn went from being celebrated wealthy writers to oblivion almost overnight. Now ask yourself honestly what you'd do in his position. Especially if, unlike him, you had a family to provide for. I'll disappoint you by admitting I'd be unlikely to bite the bullet. Not sure that I'd consign myself and my family to the impoverishment and persecution that would inevitably follow.

However biting your tongue or a little bit of dissimulation is one thing, actively obscuring the source of the problem is something else entirely. And that's what Douglas Murray's been doing. So he's a fair-weather friend at best.

The key issue is not his personal bravely or integrity, it's how we Whites can regain control of our own destiny from the hostile minority which has seized it.

In God we trust. Not

If you want to understand the deep and complex issues of the day your first port of call should always be a Hollywood actor, some bubble-dwelling coke-head who makes his living dressing up and playing make-believe. And obviously Hollywood director Rob Reiner feels the same way because he's commissioned God himself - Morgan Freeman - to explain how Russia (a foreign country, he helpfully informs us) is undermining the American democratic process with potentially disastrous consequences. But Freeman is again just being an actor here, reading out his lines. Because a cursory examination reveals that this whole anti-Trump project, from Reiner himself to most of the talking heads on the video are Israeli-supporting Jews.

And that's really ironic because Russia's impact on the American democratic process is minuscule compared to that of Israel and its dual-citizen sayanim in America. For a start this whole Russian interference charge has been characterised from the beginning by a complete lack of supporting evidence. There's virtually nothing. Now compare that to the role of the dual-loyalty.....let me stop right there: Most of the sayanim, especially the Neocons, are single-loyalty. And it's not to America which they see as just a tool to advance Israeli interests. (In passing note that an avid supporter of Israeli settler interests has been appointed "American" Ambassador to that country where I'm sure he holds America's interests uppermost at all times.)

For a start nobody gets elected to public office unless they profess undying and unalloyed loyalty to Israel. And deliver on that profession of loyalty. Organised Jewish groups like AIPAC (there are dozens more) and wealthy individuals wield almost total control over the so-called people's representatives. This is enforced by Jewish dominance in banking, media, the courts, entertainment, think tanks and the universities. Anyone who doesn't unequivocally toe the line is consigned to obscurity. Or worse.

And this subversion, unlike that of Russia, has been spectacularly successful, to the extent of literally destroying traditional America via mass Third World immigration and Frankfurt School-induced societal degradation. In terms of putting Israel first the billions handed over annually to that country on behalf of American taxpayers is small change. The real payoff comes in terms of using American blood and treasure to fight Israel's wars in the Middle East. The catastrophes of Iraq and Syria have been masterminded by the Israeli-first Neocons and now the very same people, utterly unabashed and bereft of guilt, are trying to embroil America in a war with Iran. They might well succeed.

So Morgan, if you're really interested in the American democratic process forget about Russia and concentrate instead on Israel. Otherwise - God - go back to fucking your granddaughter.

A picture tells a thousand words

Cry me a paddy-field

Myanmar (formerly Burma) is under severe attack from the "international community" (read NWO Globo-homos) for so-called genocide against the Rohingya Muslims. The United Nations calls them the “most persecuted minority group in the world”. Imagine that. Also amazing to see Muslims not getting on with their neighbours, isn't it? All respectable opinion, every 'international body', all the mainstream media see this conflict as truly Manichean. There are the good guys (Muslims) and the bad guys (Buddhists) and nothing in between. And whenever you encounter such unanimity from such sources you know that a new mind-fuck is underway. And the Rohingya campaign is no exception.

You'll be amazed to learn that the Rohingya Muslims have always had bad relations with their Buddhist neighbours. This was fuelled by not alone traditional Muslim out-group hostility but by massive long-standing growth in their numbers, derived not just from breeding like rabbits but through mass cross-border migration from what's now Bangladesh (previously East Pakistan and India before that). SOP in such circumstances is for Muslims to create their own Dar-al-Islam (even though they fled their previous one) which inevitably leads to clashes with the natives. This does not apply of course in cucked Europe where the locals just roll over.

But the Burmese Buddhists didn't roll over and widespread communal unrest resulted. "The massive rate at which they entered Arakan was a cause of great resentment among the local population, among whom a strong sense of nationalism developed." The problem was somewhat manageable until the onset of WW II when the British got the idea of enlisting the Rohingya in the war against Japan. Armed to the teeth by the Brits they duly went off to war. But against their fellow countrymen, not against the Japs. And with more than 20,000 fatalities they weren't holding back. 

Here's one contemporaneous account: "By night fall we could see rolling flames on the Maungdaw side from Taknaff Town across the wide Naff River. Later we heard the depressing news that tens of thousands of Bengali-Muslims had entered Maungdaw after the town was abandoned and burned down the whole town after taking away everything removable from the Yakhine houses including rice, cooking oil, salt, and every single piece of furniture. All the Yakhine villages, there were hundreds of them Buddhist villages, on the extremely fertile strip south of Maungdaw Town between the Naff River and Mayu Ranges were completely wiped out by the rioting Bengali Muslims within few days."

As you can imagine this didn't exactly endear them to the Burmese, especially as the mass cross-border influx continued unabated after the war. In response the Government imposed severe restrictions including a law that gave national citizenship to only those Burmese who could prove having ancestors residing in the country before British colonial rule. Which strikes me as a thoroughly splendid idea. But of course it's the antithesis of everything our NWO Globo-homo overlords stand for. Hence the international hue and cry.

We can now expect the invading army of European-based head-choppers (rested and replenished courtesy of the European taxpayers after their exertions in Syria and Iraq) to head off to Myanmar on their latest jihad. Aided and abetted once again by the peace-loving Gulf states and the freedom-loving Western democracies.

Just watch.

Lord Of The Flies in Paradise

Developments in the Caribbean island of St. Martin after hurricane Irma surely substantiate William Golding's pessimistic take on human nature. It was Lord Of The Flies redux. (As an aside, I see there are plans afoot for a remake of the earlier film versions but this time with an all-female cast. This in turn has provided the feminazis with yet another opportunity to display their unfathomable ignorance, hypocrisy and inconsistency. For decades we've been beaten over the head with demands for women to take on the roles traditionally played by men. We're all the same you see. But now we're indignantly told that girls would never turn into little savages like the boys did.)

Even the New York Slimes came perilously close to honest reporting. "In the few, long days since Irma pummeled the northeast Caribbean, killing more than two dozen people..... the social fabric has begun to fray in some of the hardest-hit communities At dawn, people began to gather, quietly planning for survival". To which any normal person would respond "well why the hell did they not quietly plan for survival before the storm hit?" As one local Dutch guy commented 'you can fill a cooler with $20 in rice and beans and eat for 3 weeks'. In any event 'quietly planning' actually meant opportunistically looting (or as the Slimes put it 'ad hoc provisioning'!). "They started with the grocery stores, scavenging what they needed for sustenance: water, crackers, fruit. But by nightfall on Thursday, what had been a search for food took a more menacing turn, as groups of people, some of them armed, swooped in and took whatever of value was left: electronics, appliances and vehicles." “All the food is gone now,” Jacques Charbonnier, a 63-year-old resident of St. Martin, said in an interview on Sunday. “People are fighting in the streets for what is left.” Latest news is that the local zoo is being plundered and the animals eaten.

We all know that blacks cannot sustain a techno-industrial society, let alone create one. In natural disasters blacks loot and pillage, Whites prepare and rescue. Blacks survive only as parasites, which is why they follow - all the time loudly complaining  - their White prey wherever we flee. But here's a question. What happens if and when YT is unable or unwilling to sustain them? What happens if and when White societies get over-run by Third World bottom feeders and become Third World themselves or when and if the financial money-printing ponzi that now artificially sustains us finally collapses?

Well, these events, and those with Katrina, have given us a pretty good idea.

Pessimism? I rest my case

Many on here took me to task a few posts back when I expressed despair at the power of International Jewry. But the approach of a new September 11 anniversary starkly reminds us of that power because 9/11 (arguably the most traumatic event in American history since the Civil War) was a blatant false flag with Israeli hands all over it. The official explanation is so implausible as to be almost laughable. Yet at an official level it has never been subjected to any meaningful examination. Any single one of the following blow open the official case, taken in combination they render it  literally  beyond belief.

1. The collapse of WTC7, the only steel framed building in history for which fire - and a very small fire at that - was allegedly the sole cause of its collapse. This preposterous explanation, taken to its logical conclusion would result in all such buildings throughout the country being closed down. None were. (And the collapse was described in graphic detail by the BBC twenty minutes before it happened!).

2. That Larry Silverstein, despite his "pull it" (a common term for a demolition) admission live on TV has never been called on to even explain his remark, let alone been charged with mass murder.

3. That the 'dancing Israelis', subsequently revealed to be Mossad operatives, openly admitted they were present on the day 'to record the event'. Self-evidently they knew it was going to take place yet they were released by US authorities while the Israeli Government were never called on to explain their role.

4. And one of my own favorites, the 'terrorist passport', miraculously surviving the plane explosion and subsequently found in perfect condition in the midst of thousands of tons of smoldering rubble.

There's a ton of additional evidence to show that 911 was a false flag and that Israel together with the mainly Jewish Neocons were behind it. Yet not only did they get clean away with it they used the event to embroil America in a disastrous war to take out one of Israel's most dangerous enemies. How bizarre is that? Yet to this day nobody in any official position questions it. If that doesn't demonstrate their almost supernatural power then what does?

Actually there was one attempt. And here's what happened. 'A revealing, four-part investigative series was aired by Fox News in December, 2001, dealing with the arrests of several hundred Israeli nationals as well as some of the incriminating circumstances surrounding their activities in the United States. In response, every major media outlet in America received a visit from Abraham Foxman, the head of the Anti-Defamation League. A phrase he used was, “What are you doing putting this stuff out there? You’re killing us!” Executives at the highest levels of the various networks were inundated with phone calls, letters and emails. Members of the most powerful Jewish groups in the country – ADL, AIPAC with its 60,000 members, and the misnamed Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America CAMERA – visited the White House and petitioned officials at the highest levels to close down investigations of the Israeli spies.'

The series was cancelled and removed from the Fox archives. Nobody else touched the subject.

I rest my case!

Conservative journals

Are there any conservative English-language journals left? The Spectator had held on longer than most but has been careering over the "liberal" cliff in recent times. Take Carola Binney (please do!) who taught English in China for a year and who was absolutely horrified by the race realism racism there. This 'conservative' journalist, when seeking a pictorial exemplar for the word 'wife' chose......Michelle Obama!  Yes, a six-foot tall black American who looks like (and possibly is) a man was chosen rather than, well, a Chinese wife. Poor Carola was devastated by the eruption of revulsion that followed. 'Oh, so ugly!' 'Looks like a monkey'. 'So black!'

She was also astonished to learn that the Chinese believed Africans belonged in Africa. What a crazy thought! Shaking her head she writes that their 'ideas about racial hierarchies are not outdated pseudo-science but unquestioned belief'. (Note: 'pseudo-science' is libtard-speak for...'science'). This reached its logical conclusion when a prominent national politician asked rhetorically whether pressure to allow in Africans would 'change China from a yellow country to a yellow and black country'. In case there was any doubt about his own views he explained that Africans brought 'poverty, drugs, sexual assault and infectious diseases'. Which of course had the writer clutching her pearls in horror.

She ends up (after reciting a further series of shocking racist incidents) sternly warning the Chinese of a grim future unless 'they sort out their race problem'. No, you idiot, China does not have a race problem for the simple reason that 99% of them are of the same race. However they would have one in the unlikely event that they listened to you, you preening, sanctimonious, virtue-signalling, close-minded, non-thinking drone, comfortably enveloped in your personal cloud of invincible ignorance.

Anyway it doesn't matter because the Chinese are pouring huge resources into eugenics based on gene editing. They're about to produce a new Master Race of, I guess, highly intelligent, tall, blond blue-eyed, merciless sperg-like automatons....... while formerly White nations turn into Brazil.

An afterthought: That journalist doesn't do irony, does she? Because the article is just loaded with cultural imperialism. It hasn't dawned on her that, just like Cecil Rhodes, she's lecturing the natives on what's good and bad about their culture and prescribing remedies which reflect the latest Western fads. How ironic is that?