Saturday, 13 July 2019

Some random thoughts on the Epstein case

The ongoing Epstein saga is fascinating beyond measure. Will it result in the exposure and disempowerment of the Devil-worshipping paedophile cabal that rules over us? I doubt it. But first let me ask how we got to this stage. Why didn't the (almost) all-powerful cabal kill this off before it got traction? Just like they did with the first attempt to bring Epstein to justice. They have the wealth, power and information access to have strangled it at birth. Yet now they're in damage control mode.

Will they be brought to justice? I doubt it. For sure Epstein is going to the slammer but I find it hard to believe that the likes of Clinton, Prince Andrew, the Rothschilds and God knows who else will have their collars felt. They might deploy the same bait and switch strategy they're using in the 9/11 Grand Jury case. I wrote here that "the GJ can act only on the evidence provided by the US Attorney's office. That means that a US Attorney with a lot of skin in the game could spike the investigation from the outset. And who'll be the one overseeing this investigation? Why one (((Geoffrey Berman))). Not only is Geoffrey a (((Geoffrey))) he was also John McStain's personal lawyers. He can select the jury members and determine what evidence is presented to them. And finding suitable members is unlikely to present him with too many difficulties as Manhattan is Zio Central. And in the unlikely event that his selected GJ fails to comply he can simply replace them with a new jury. All of which will remain secret to the general public.

I hope I'm wrong but I can't see the Deep State that orchestrated and covered up the 911 attacks allowing the full truth to emerge from this exercise. Here's a more likely scenario. The GJ will be used to foist the Saudis with the complete blame while carefully avoiding the Mossad/Jewish elephant in the room. This will be seized on the the media and the political system as a once-and-for-all clearing of the decks. Now let's look for some Saudi fall guys and get on with out lives." In the Epstein case one of the lead prosecutors is Comey's daughter while the judge is a Jew with a record of twisting the law against conservative causes. The New York South jurisdiction will ensure it's more of a jewry than a jury!  They'll know the danger of the goyim connecting the J-dots.

Which brings me to the strange case of Alan Dershowitz and his campaign to have the Epstein case papers made public. Given that he's almost certainly guilty (just look at him) why would he do that? My theory is that he wants to identify the accusers at which point he can unleash his buddies in the media to traduce them and undermine their credibility. For sure he doesn't want to see justice done.

Anyway, these are just a few thoughts on the case which has the - slight -  potential to bring the House Of Satan crashing down.

Tuesday, 9 July 2019

The McElligots - a step too far?

The McElligots, a new soap opera which RTE has described as 'brave, ground-breaking and edgy' has attracted a storm of criticism from multiple sources. Tintin O'Foole, Culture Critic at the Irish Times described the series as 'sickening'. 'In a throwback to Ireland's darkest days The McElligotts features an all-white Irish household in which the father works while the mother stays at home to look after the family, all of whom go to Mass every Sunday. Hello!!!  The Current Year is 2019. I'm a proud and tolerant liberal but everyone associated with this should be fired, if not prosecuted for hate'.

Ivan Aikenhead of the LGBTQVBRXNL Alliance admitted 'I literally cried' after watching the first series, adding wistfully 'I wish it reflected real life like Eastenders, which handled the recent multiracial mother-father-daughter menage-a-trois episode with such taste and sensitivity' Oogabooga Bambaluba of the Irish Immigrant Association, speaking from his Government-funded apartment in swanky Dublin 4, condemned the 'total lack of diversity' in the series and - ominously - warned that the show's 'exclusion and hate' could drive many people of colour back to Africa.

Former Justice Minister Alan Shatter admitted to being, well, shattered by the series.'There's only one word to describe this abomination: Hate. For instance a Crucifix is openly visible in one of the scenes and the priest in the series - a white priest - is neither gay nor a child-molester. What kind of message does this send? I literally see this ending in another Holocaust. I'm reminded of Brecht's chilling warning on Hitler 'Although the world stood up and stopped the bastard, the bitch that bore him is in heat again'. As a proud Jew and Irishman I despair”

Annie Price, spokesperson for RTE, defended the show. "Our idea was to add diversity. I mean, where else on TV will you see a straight White middle-class heterosexual self-supporting family? But obviously we went too far. RTE apologises for any hurt or offence and has made available support services and safe rooms for those affected'.  

Sunday, 7 July 2019

The case for democratic eugenics

Eugenics has been getting a bad rap for a long time, especially from the left and from "liberals". But it wasn't always so. And that's not surprising given that its promise of long-term improvement of the human species fused neatly with the concept of Communism's New Man. Little surprise then that many if not most of the early 20th century's 'progressive' luminaries actively espoused it. These included Margaret Sanger, H.G. Wells, Bernard Shaw, the Webbs, Harold Laski and many more. But then came (shudder) the Nazis. And the rest is (fake) history.

Eugenics is now seen as a kind of Frankenscience, a subject not to be broached in polite circles. Especially among GoodWhites. But how could any of them object to the following proposal?

Anyone of child-bearing age who volunteers for sterilisation gets a cheque for €5,000. 

Simple as that. No incentives or restrictions based on race, religion, culture or economic class. On what basis could any virtue-signalling hypocrite object?  Well they would be mighty unhappy with the proposal. Because they know, even though they wouldn't directly admit it, that the beneficiaries would overwhelmingly be characterised by low intelligence and high time-preference. Which means fast-breeding White welfarists and blacks. They'd take up the offer in huge numbers and within a few generations their defective genes would start to disappear from our gene pool.

The luvvies might find this concept abhorrent but for sure the Chinese do not. They're already, at both Government and private levels, working to produce future generations of high IQ children. Meanwhile the long-term trend of increasing average IQ levels in White countries (the Flynn Effect) has gone into reverse. Yes, IQ levels in White countries are declining. And the decline is directly attributable to the relative growth in the numbers of black immigrants and of welfarists incentivised by the system to breed with all the foresight of stray dogs. This has catastrophic implications given that wealth and livability are directly correlated with intelligence. That's why the Chinese are so interested in the subject.

So my proposal literally has zero down-side. We'd reduce welfare dependency and its attendant pathologies as well as the proportion of blacks in our populations. But that's why our NWO overlords will never allow it.  Bertrand Russell, being one of them, explained it thus: "Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton."

Friday, 5 July 2019

Announcing the David Lammy Mastermind Award

I wrote a few months back that David Lammy, MP, could justifiably claim the title of Britain's Stupidest Person. But this didn't stop him getting on the BBC's elite Mastermind quiz, where his performance became the stuff of legend. Even for his 'specialised subject' (Bob Marley, not nucular fizzix)) other contestants answered more than he did. Recognising his humiliation the moderator took the unprecedented step of prompting an answer to the identity of the first female Nobel Prize winner for physics. 'Marie.....' the host ventured, to which Lammy brightly responded 'Antionette'. He went on to say that Henry VIII was succeeded, somehow, by Henry VII. He's on record as complaining bitterly at the racism of Papal Elections in which black smoke is seen as bad, having never heard of the ancient electoral process.

Now in honour of his unique achievements I hereby announce the establishment of the David Lammy Mastermind Award, which goes to the stupidest quiz answer of the year. Here are a few suggestions.

Ben Shephard: "Between 1991 and 1999, Peter Schmeichel was the goalkeeper for which English football club?"
Contestant: "Germany?"

Jeremy Paxman: "What is another name for 'cherrypickers' and 'cheesemongers'?"
Contestant: "Homosexuals."
Paxman: "No. They're regiments in the British Army, who will be very upset with you."

DJ: "What was Hitler's first name?"
Contestant: "Heil."

Jamie Theakston: "Where do you think Cambridge University is?"
Contestant: "Geography isn't my strong point."
Theakston: "There's a clue in the title."
Contestant: "Leicester?"

DJ: "Name a film starring Bob Hoskins that is also the name of a famous painting by Leonardo da Vinci."
Contestant: "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?"

Bradley Walsh: What is the only planet in the universe known to support life?
Contestant Jack: Mars?

Alexander Armstrong: Name a country that ends in two consonants?
Contestant Sarah: "I did Geography at A-Level but that's about as far as it goes. Oh.. erm... Paris?"

Host: "Which European country is Budapest the capital of?"
Contestant: "This might be a stupid question. I thought Europe was a country? I know they speak French there, don't they? Is France a country?"

Bradley: "Complete the popular saying, 'Always a bridesmaid, never the…'"
Contestant: "Groom."

Bradley: "In 2009, Sunderland scored against Liverpool when the ball deflected off what object? A beach ball, an ice cream van or a sunbathing German."
Contestant: "Ice Cream Van."

I'm sure Lammy is nodding his head in approval of such erudition.

(By the way, this genius was given admission to Harvard and was Minister for Higher Education at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills in the last Labour Government.)

Monday, 1 July 2019

The happy carefree life of a cultural enricher

The young Irishman pictured here has been very naughty. Specifically he, along with two other Nigerians, raped and otherwise sexually assaulted a 14 year-old girl a few years back. The girl told police that the three accused took it in turns to pin her to the ground and forcefully have sex with her. She said she was still on anti-depressants and had suicidal ideation four years on as a direct result of the abuse.  A very serious offence, one for which an Irish offender would get ten years in the slammer at a minimum. 

But these offenders are black, and Muslim. Right at the pinnacle of the Victimhood Hierarchy.  And they're being tried in a Western court. So they walked. That's right, they walked. Judge Mary Ellen Ring noted that the three men will carry a sexual offence conviction with them, which may “cause them not to get employment, or to lose employment.” She said this was punishment in itself and was likely to come back against them in many years to come. Yes, she actually said that. Judge, for a Nigerian parasite in welfare-rich Ireland work is just about the last thing he thinks about. What were the other mitigating factors? Akinade 'showed remorse' and was 'co-operative with police'.

So there!

Akinade was due to be deported after the conviction but, wait for it, another bewigged imbecile not alone blocked the deportation but granted him asylum. Why? Because according to Justice Bernard Barton he was a ‘hot prospect for the future for Irish football’.  Not content with this the rapist then, with the help of publicly-funded hot-shot lawyers, got injunctions against five newspapers preventing them from publishing his name. And who presided over these cases? The same Justice Barton. 

And did these splendid young gentlemen suffer the torment of guilt, sleepless anguished nights where their crimes came back to haunt them as feared by Judge Ring? No. In fact after the court case they took to social media to mock and abuse the victim. This by the way was in flagrant breach of a restraining order issued by the courts and for which breach they suffered no repercussions.   

The happy carefree life of a cultural enricher in today's Ireland.

Saturday, 29 June 2019

The unimaginable becomes prosaic

I can remember, and it wasn't so long ago, when getting into the US represented a significant challenge. First you had to apply for a visa (which contained a raft of tricky questions along the lines of 'are you a terrorist or do you intend to commit acts of terrorism while in the US?') and if memory serves me correctly you even had to do an interview with some steely-eyed bureaucrat. My niece overstayed her visa and was summarily deported, never to return. A friend of my wife who lived in America, was married to an American and whose kids were born there was, together with her kids, refused permission to board the plane at Shannon due to some technical glitch in their documentation.

That was little more than twenty years ago. Now the detritus from every hell-hole on the globe can almost freely cross the southern 'border' and once across usually qualify for some form of residency. Sure, people are still stopped and others get deported, but literally millions have, over the last few decades, crossed illegally and now roost in the US. This says nothing of the legal immigrants (mainly from Asia) who have been flooding in by the millions over the same period. Despite the campaign promises Trump has utterly failed to make a difference. The staggering scale of the problem was graphically illustrated at the recent Democratic debate when close to a majority of the candidates, hands raised in the air, stood in favour of free medical care for people illegally residing in the country. Just think about that. Free medical care for people illegally residing in the country, when a few decades back they'd have immediately been punted back over the border - assuming they had somehow managed to get across in the first place.

Some time ago I wrote 'Am I alone in thinking that this is another sign of a general quickening? Not just gun control but all elements of the anti-White project seem to have suddenly gone into overdrive. Third World immigration, the spread of "hate" (read anti-White) legislation, the blocking of pro-White websites, White displacement in the workplace, antifa aggression and provocations, depravity and degeneration in the public sphere, the rewriting of history. It's like the way the flow of a river speeds up as it approaches a waterfall. It's a good analogy because it seems we are headed towards some precipitous event, the nature and outcome of which, to me at least, are unknown.'

They still are.