Thursday, 8 February 2018

The comment issue

This blog is unusual in that its ratio of comments to page views is extraordinarily high with an average of about 5,000 views per day generally attracting more than 100 comments per post. This is an extremely high ratio (RamZPaul for instance generally gets about half a dozen). Maybe Paul gets a lot more comments and just doesn't publish them but I don't think that's the case as I've seen advertorial stuff masquerading as comments a few times.

Despite - or maybe because of - the high number of comments many readers have complained that the section has shown a decline in quality and interest over the last few years. So this post is a simple one: I want your advice. A good blog in my opinion is made up of both the posts themselves but also the comments on that post. So I want your input on the following issues and any others you deem valuable:

- should we publish only on-topic comments?

- should the length of comments be restricted?

- how do we identify trolling?

- should certain commentators be banned?

- should anonymous commentators be banned?

- should we become more restrictive still and not publish comments deemed to add little value?

This is by no means a complete list and please add anything you want. Your opinions much appreciated and don't be afraid to name names if needs be.

Thanks.

160 comments:

Anonymous said...

I would like to see only the comments that add more than little value. But who is going to weed out the little value comments? I trust you on this, Savant, if you are willing to do that.

Clogheen said...

The big difference that I notice from a few years back is that the really good commentators are getting drowned out in a lot of dross. As with the previous comment Sav I think you should just maybe weed out the stuff that does not add value.

Hope this helps.

Anonymous said...

Give commentators a maximum of five comments per post.

PLEASE DO THIS !!!

Anonymous said...

I'd say it's up to you Savant. I really enjoy Uncle Nasty, Analogman, Californian and Frank Galton's comments. If it's off topic they let you know and as a bonus they'll let you know if something is disturbing (any image of a nig-nog for example).

You definitely have some trolls. As a rule, if a commenter starts off without anything related to your post then (((it))) is a troll. Some trolls don't even read your post, they just post a link and comment about their link. Also, any commenter that constantly post negative agitprop is a (((Yossi))) or one of their lackeys.

Scot Irish

calculus said...

-should we publish only on-topic comments?
No, everything is inter-related and an apparently off-topic comment could be on topic, or at least relevant, on a bigger scale

- should the length of comments be restricted?
Ins't it already ? at 4096 characters, but yeah we should be encouraged to make short comments

- how do we identify trolling?
easy : Anonymous and strongly repetitive

- should certain commentators be banned?
Not IMO but it is YOUR blog, not mine.

- should anonymous commentators be banned?
Yes 'Anonymous said' aka 'who said what ?' why not using an avatar. By the way, can we have an explanation of the pros and cons of using the different options for posting ? I use Name/Url but i honestly don't know why and perhaps OpenId is better ?

- should we become more restrictive still and not publish comments deemed to add little value?
People should exert self-restrain. If one want to make a point, there is no point to redo it unless somebody else comments on it. Redundant posts indeed add little extra value. But Even here i would not implement a new restriction. If we are not capable of self-restrain then we are not who we pretend we are. Freedom comes with self restrain that's why only white countries are free, i mean, were free. So let this blog be free. You cannot prevent some level of trolling anyways, it is inherent to internet.

AKAEW said...

The Back and forth bickering for the sake of it. Ripostes that add value no problems but the squabbling just drowns the blog.

Anonymous said...

Let her fly. Censorship in any form is repulsive. We can learn from trolls, I think.

Anonymous said...

- should we publish only on-topic comments?

Yes.

After a dozen or so off-topic comments, I find myself skipping the comments section altogether.

buhund said...

Keep it as is. It is refreshing, not politically correct and there are a lot of us out there that need this type of format. Usually , we can figure out the trolls.

WHATIS TRUTH said...

The first question is what you want to do. Is it really fair of us to ask you to act as writer, reporter, commentator, and editor? My answer to that is a firm 'NO'. You write an article and we comment and support or refute.

Should we publish only on-topic comments?
The main problem I see with this is deciding what is on topic. Is Frank Galton showing Jewish representation in the media on topic about an article of Jewish representation in the US Senate?

Should the length of comments be restricted?
Cut and pasted vast tracts should be cut when a simple link to an article would do.

How do we identify trolling?
Simple. Don't bother. We must have commenters that we look for. What I do is skim read most comments then read in depth or ignore.

Should certain commentators be banned?
Don't bother. If someone wants to troll they could make life hell for you if they were that sort of person. Let the reader decide who is trolling.

Should anonymous commentators be banned?
Yes.

The very fact that you ask these questions shows how valuable this blog is. The best form of government is a benevolent dictatorship. That's how you should run this blog.
Hope this helps.

Lemmthead

Anonymous said...

Hi Savant
Does this not open you up to the danger of having only the sycophants commenting?
It's nice and important to read contrary comments, different takes and opinions on the subject matter.
In my opinion that's how one learns and evolves.
Also, you get to see how the other 95% think, and maybe begin to understand them, so to better argue and put your point across.
Having said that, there has been quite a bit of brain dead comments, especially lately.
It's like there are people who feign agreement just to take the piss.
It's a hard call, and I for one don't envy you.
it must be a hell of a job doing this at the level and with the frequency with which you do it, without having to go through each comment and vetting it.
I have seen many who could not take the punch, and threw in the towel.
I've been reading your blog for many years, and even though I don't comment, I appreciate your efforts and enjoy most of your commenters.
Whatever you decide, I'll still be here.
Lots of luck to you

José

Anonymous said...

Dear Savant,

The comments section on your blog can be a real gold mine of information.

As many of the 'nuggets' are strictly-speaking off-topic, I would advise against restricting comments to on-topic comments only. I think that people are fully capable of skipping excessively long comments or off-topic comments.

Trolls are usually obvious. Tolerating their presence has its advantages: it reminds us of their existence and reveals their state of mind.

I would not ban anonymous commentators. If you do, the comments section will become an overly 'internal' group. Many anonymous commentators contribute interesting information and links. Being allowed to comment anonymously can often be a first step in the 'red-pilling' of a hopefully soon-to-be former muggle.

Any Jew-style comments should be deleted mercilessly.

Cheers, P

heuristic said...

how do we identify trolling?
easy : Anonymous and strongly repetitive


Not really. Whatever about the repetition it is absolutely simple to set up multiple accounts.

SAVANT said...

Some response already guys to suggestions so far.

First thanks to those of you thanking me (Jose in particular... first time hearing from you!). But understand that it's a labour of love and at the risk of sounding grandiose I want to work towards a better world for my grandkids. Also as I'm retired the workload isn't onerous.

Again, thanks to those who pointed out that it's my blog and I can do what I want. True, but I really do want your input as well so as to make it a better blog.

A few other observations on comments so far:

+ I have no problem with, indeed I welcome, contrarian opinions unless they threaten to run the thread off the rails

+ Anonymous comments are distracting and there's no need for them. Selecting an avatar could not be simpler. Having said that, if you need to address an anonymous comment identification can be made by referring to the time of the comment (e.g. @Anon 11.34)

+ 'The Back and forth bickering for the sake of it.' Yes, that's an area that needs attention. Views appreciated.

+ Other input duly noted and I'll coalesce them all in a day or two.

calculus said...

heuristic : "Whatever about the repetition it is absolutely simple to set up multiple accounts"
Yes, perhaps there is no solution against trolling. A bit of it is OK i guess, only if there is too much of it, is a problem. In my opinion, Savant's blog has never suffered from an excessive amount of trolling.

ChumLee's brother said...



Savant, ...I agree with Anon @ 13:28. Let her fly.

And if it's already good enough for Jose, then it's good enough for me.

Your problem, Sav, is the overbearing clucking Queen Trolls,..with handles like "AnalogMann" and "Uncle Nasty" & "Johnny CupCake"...that think that they can run YOUR blog better than you can. Bung in that slapper "Searcher", and you've got a little cabal of back slappers and 'backer-uppers"...that, frankly bully the other posters.
I wouldn't ban anonymous, as the nastiness from the Queen Trolls above, would deter a lot of good posters, if they couldn't hide behind the "anonymous" tag.
Looking back, I must say, that when I very first posted on this site, I couldn't believe the level of outright nastiness that came spewing forth at me.

Good luck with it, SAV.

ChumLee's brother said...



Oh, and one more thing SAV. Could you get your fat arse out of bed earlier, and update your blog on a more frequent basis. That is all.

Anonymous said...

Sav
keep things more or less as the are:
One qualification...................If any poster slips in the terms nazi/far right .
Reject and do not respond.
These references are burnt into folks psych. They have a bad very effect regard less. Redirect thoughts .............years upon year of bombardment/stroebing on TV at work.
I notice they are used at every opportunity by the BBC and the mass media they are like a plague of poison blankets.
The first times my Email was buggered was when ever I mentioned.......
Cnt Ovenlove Kalergi !
I tick the anom box...but I do sign off as.
dofornow

Anonymous said...

Could you not have a regular open thread/reader tips that would suck up a lot of the off-topic comments?

dr. joseph btfsplk said...

>>>Anonymous ChumLee's brother said...


Oh, and one more thing SAV. Could you [redacted] update your blog on a more frequent basis. That is all.

8 February 2018 at 16:44

...Personal attacks could be handled this way. . .

Anonymous said...

Chum Lee et al I think Uncle Nasty had a similar experience a long while back but he's "celeb" now. I think you're in that league too at this stage. Loved your black bear comments...

I think it's great as it is. There will always be a spat of trolls which can be identified and blown out/ignored.

Anonymous said...

Incog cracked me up with this !

http://incogman.net/2018/02/white-haters-now-saying-first-britons-were-black/

Hans Frank said...

I read your comments for news. Some of the off topic postings and links have been excellent. Morgoth is the only other English site I have found in the EU quite like this. Banning might be the way to go here.

Anonymous said...

The comments will often go off-topic after people have run out of things to say about the subject of the post. But that's a good thing. It's what keeps me wanting to come back and it can't only be me who thinks this way.
(I'm a long-time lurker who enjoys comment threads).

Anonymous said...

Oh no chumlee you are wrong
Sav hasn’t got a fat arse
I’ve got £10 says he is more like oreilly the builder from fawlty towers
Gerry

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O4X_bdJox8w

James said...

Sav the only problem I have is guys like Johnny CNN conducting smear campaigns against me. I credit many of my links so you know where they come from. This is sometimes interpreted as "promoting" the source but really I do it for full disclosure and to avoid plagiarism.

Instead of disagreeing with an article some stupid people just say "Jew".

Also there is nothing worse than a youtube URL followed by "Must see". Nobody's going to click on that. Provide a summary. Tell us what we will learn by watching the video. You won't spoil the surprise.

Chumlee's Bro is calling Uncle Nasty a troll. He's not a troll. He's just one of those old muppets up in the corner grumbling about diversity. He's always been here. He's known and trusted and part of the furniture - 100% legit.

I would not ban anonymous commentators. If you do, the comments section will become an overly 'internal' group.

I don't know why we have so many anons since all people have to do is click the "Name/URL" option and type in a fake name. You don't need to create an account. You don't even need to enter a URL. It's not hard to add a name to a post. If people use the same fake name each time then we can follow who's saying what.

Anonymous said...

The answer to all your questions is NO. With so much censorship going on across so many online websites, blogs and social media platforms, you must support free speech! Most major news outlets don't allow any comments at all now. The number of websites where people can freely express are becoming slim, indeed. Unless it's clearly spam such as, "I made $10,000 last month working from home...", all comments should be welcome and free of being deleted, hidden, edited, shadow banned or other forms of censorship.

Signifier said...

I agree largely with calculus's views except that I do think comments should be on topic. And Anonymous is not necessary.

Fionn McCool said...

Jesus lads even the comments about comments are degenerating into personal attacks!!!

FOD said...

Agree 100% James.

James said...

Freemasons moaning that nobody likes them. They even put full page ads in the paper asking for tolerance of their secrecy (which they call "privacy").

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42986319

James said...

Anonymous FOD said...
Agree 100% James.


Thank you FOD.


Anon said: all comments should be welcome and free of being deleted, hidden, edited, shadow banned or other forms of censorship.

Sav can't do anything about shadow banning since that's a kosher activity. I notice that on some wordpress blogs if I comment about (((certain things))) my comment just disappears after I hit the button. It's only happened a few times with mentions of jimstone.is and a couple of other sensitive topics but it is consistent with those topics. You have to scramble the URLs. There is definitely some things they don't want said.

For an example here, I have tried to post a link to a certain Romanian site twice so far and it didn't make it. I think there is something on that site (((they))) do NOT want people to read. (Sav is there something in your spam area?)

Anonymous said...

Off topic
But on my topic
Not pushing Tommy Robinson as a hero or anything
But he does more than us. He puts his face out there
And this clip shows the media for what it is
I loved it
Gerry

https://m.youtube.com/watch?sns=tw&v=lTZZ_lcV1kY

Kevin Rafferty said...

Your stuff is generally very good James. Maybe a little too much at times but otherwise to hell with the begrudgers!

Franz said...

I may have a unique perspective... three weeks of blue screen left me incapable of commenting ANYWHERE but I was able to read plenty. Bye-bye Windows real soon...

My vote is with Sav and most of the posters so far.

As for "on topic" -- mostly it would be yes indeed, stay on topic, but there are times when the OP opens up thoughts in a tangenital area and digression props the original point up better than just saying "Great post, Sav" so in that case... Yeah, because it's fairly self-evident when it works.

But do as thou wilt must remain the whole of Savant law.

ChumLee's brother said...

Anon @ 19:21

Thanks Anon. Bears are kind of de rigueur on this site at the moment.

( Although, I do have a feeling that squirrels are on the cusp of greatness, too! )

James said...

Kevin Rafferty said...
Your stuff is generally very good James. Maybe a little too much at times but otherwise to hell with the begrudgers!


Thanks Kevin. Have you read Jacques Ellul's book Propaganda yet?

That's the #1 book we should all be reading IMO. No bitching, no Hitler, no Jews, no white genocide, just 100% facts about how propaganda works and how to use it.

http://www.balderexlibris.com/index.php?category/English/E/Ellul-Jacques


Gustav Le Bon's short book The Crowd makes a good companion text. So much WN stuff out there doesn't catch on because so many of it's proponents don't understand how propaganda works. It's a big problem.

AnalogMan said...

Savant, I echo the expressions of thanks and appreciation. For years now, this blog has been my first port of call daily, right after checking my Facebook page for messages (access strictly limited to immediate family only). But it goes through ups and downs, driven entirely by the quality of the comments section. At one point, during the NU debacle, I decided the comments section was not worth visiting at all, which of course was the troll's intent.

To your questions,

- should we publish only on-topic comments?

No. Some of the most interesting and informative comments are off-topic. Some introduce new information that forms the topic of a separate post. Keep it open.

- should the length of comments be restricted?

I don't see a problem with this. Not many comments exceed the character count and go into two comments. When they do, it's generally good information, though sometimes repetitive. One can skip to the next comment anytime one gets bored.

- how do we identify trolling?

Personal abuse, gratuitous obscenity, persistently picking fights, "conduct unbecoming". We're not all twelve-year-old schoolboys, we've heard those words before. You want to attract ladies to this blog? Mind your manners.

Jew apologists, flat-earthers - let them have their say, as long as they keep it civil.

- should certain commentators be banned?

Depends. Nastiestuncle definitely needed it, but in general, no. I'm happy to see that nobody has thus far called for banning James on this thread. He can be infuriating, especially with his silly "dialogues" with himself, but he's generally civil, and anyway, his comments are clearly labeled and optional. There are one or two johnny-come-latelies who are trying to take over the comments, and whom we could live without (see trolling), but as long as their comments are clearly labelled, I don't have to read them, and I don't. Question is, do you want new readers to get their first impression of the blog from these misfits?

- should anonymous commentators be banned?

Not a bad idea. Requiring a handle is in no sense censorship, and a very reasonable request. It's not as if you're requiring registration, or a Google or Facebook account, or even OpenID. Does OpenID even exist any more? I used to have an account, but got a message saying it (OpenID) was being discontinued.
You don't even have to use Name/URL. Just sign your work, as Scot Irish, José and P have done here.

Anonymous said...

Give commentators a maximum of five comments per post.

PLEASE DO THIS !!!


Think about it, Anon. How many comments have you made on this thread? At what point should we cut you off?

- should we become more restrictive still and not publish comments deemed to add little value?

That's a bit of overkill. It requires you to make a judgment call, which I would enthusiastically support. It would be a pity, though, if people made comments in good faith, and were disappointed to find they were deemed not good enough. But where a comment deliberately detracts value (see "trolls"), you need to protect your property.

My two cents' worth. Thanks for asking, Savant, and, as always, it's your blog, you're the boss.

Rapparee O'Hogan said...

Bit of a shame that you have to resort to this posting after having on numerous occasions
asked for some restraint by certain commentators. Seems like the obsessive compulsives
just can't take the hint, pity.

Take heart Sav, all successful blogs with open unrestricted comments section suffer the same malaise. Just consider them as flotsam & jetsam on an otherwise deep stable flow.
Keep up the good fight. Cheers!

dr. joseph btfsplk said...

re James @ 20:07

". . .I don't know why we have so many anons since all people have to do is click the "Name/URL" option and type in a fake name. You don't need to create an account. You don't even need to enter a URL. It's not hard to add a name to a post. If people use the same fake name each time then we can follow who's saying what. . ."

I read/post from bottom up and don't know what has been written before. So I was scrolling up and saw this and thought- "Oh good, my stuff has been posted." Reading more, no, that's not mine. . .how can this be. . .did someone copy my stuff?. . .No, mine was not posted. So possibly Sav thought I was plagiarizing from James- no, I hadn't seen it. I was taught that plagiarism was a severe sin.

What James wrote is so similar to what I submitted. . .we may have been typing at the same time. . .with a mental connection. . .yes, esp.

I meditate most mornings, with guided thought about bringing Whites together.

I have had one too many "coincidences."

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Some fascinating responses here. The only ones that I disagree with are those (usually trolls themselves) who shriek about the eeeevils of (gasp) censorship. A particularly yiddish response which invariably boils down to (and ends in) censorship for thee -- but not for me.

Your blog. Your house. Tour rules.

I look at it this way.

If you have the common courtesy to invite someone to your home, and they abuse the privilege by shouting at the neighbours, insulting your wife, making suggestive comments to your daughter (or worse, your son), kicking the dog and drinking your fridge dry as well as cooking themselves a meal, then calling you a selfish prick when you lose patience and eject them ...

Congrats. You've just caught a troll.

But, more about chumlee's brother, later. When I have a moment to spare.

UN
.

Nero said...

Is it possible to have two separate comments section? One for suspected bad apples and another for the rest.

If so, the good guys could say whether to repermit the bad apples to the party.

This site is the most influential site in Europe alongside Morgoth.

p.s. Savant, Uncle Nasty and Frank Galton: Many converts have been made by reposting your material. Gold stars all round (six pointed obviously.)

Denise said...

I find a lot of O/T comments to be of excellent value. I invariably learn all kinds of thing from sincere posters. Don't publish obvious Anti Fa comments though, because these types distract, derail, and demoralize us. Unless there is an exceptionally retarded or demented comments, that be used as an occasional "example". If you regularly publish White Hating sicko comments, then White Hating sickos will keep it up. This will also drive away any Normies that wander in. This makes us look weak and stupid. If we don't take our own side - who will?

We must be confident, because we are the ones on the side of sanity, health, and Truth.

Californian said...

Savant, here's one thing to consider:

There are a lot of normies who are interested in nationalism, race realism and the alternative right. But when such people come to these websites, they are often overwhelmed with invective, backbiting and conspiracy mongering. And this turns them off.

What is needed is more comments with realistic analysis, online activism and dare I say humor. Your front page articles are pretty good for this. But too often, comments diverge into the aforementioned invective, etc.

There needs to be some guidance when it comes to comments such that new ideas and tactics are developed, and newcomers encouraged to take that Red Pill.

Tadeusz Korzeniewski said...

Your blogs are good. Publish only 10 best comments under each blog. Or less, if there aren't that many good ones.

Anonymous said...

In my opinion there is nothing wrong with this forum.

There is a very small percentage of comments per view and when repeat commentators are taken into account it is even smaller.

The people complaining about comments are most likely people who do not wish opinions contrary to their own to be expressed publicly.

I would like to request that all posters use their full real name, government id number, home address, phone number, place of employment, credit card number, next of kin and a government picture id as their identity.

Plus two current utility bills in your name to your current address.

I want to know the identity of the person making a post and you can't be too sure about these things.

BigNoniePhil said...

This is an excellent blog, but for me the very best blogs have had a moderated comment section. Lawrence Auster's View From The Right and Steve Sailer being the best examples. Both this blog and Heartiste's blog suffers from the huge and daunting quantity of comments, many of which are just trading unnecessary insults. I get really bored of people here accusing others of being Jews or 'Hasbara', just as on Heartiste's blog the most cutting insult is to dismiss someone as 'beta male'. As far as I'm concerned you should just engage with the arguments whoever they are, and to indulge in these wild speculations about people being part of a Jewish spy network makes the accuser and the blog look cranky and paranoid, as well as being an admission that you have nothing else to come back with.

It may take up a lot of your time, but light pruning of the worthless comments would add to this blog hugely. Many of your posts are thought provoking and don't deserve to be dragged down by such nonsense, Savant.

I don't agree about off-topic comments though. Both here and at other blogs you come to learn who is worth listening to, and whose links are worth following. Sometimes you have something interesting to share, but there will never be the right topic thread to share it and it just has to be shared somewhere. I always take a look at Uncle Nasty's links, for example.

Jeff Mullins said...

I would only suggest a character limit to the comments (a generous limit but one none the less).

James said...

Cosmopolitan

In 1952, the Rockefellers controlled $250 million dollars of media advertising annually. They hyped Helen Gurley Brown's 1962 book, "Sex and the Single Girl" and the movie. Single women were told they should have career and sex instead of family. At the same time, the Rockefellers were also funding and lobbying for population control and eugenics.

How much damage did this one screwed up woman do as editor of Cosmopolitan for over 30 years? How many lives ruined? How many cats treated like kings? How can one woman be so destructive?

In her autobiography, "I'm Wild Again" (2000) she tells us right away that in 1941, at age 19 she joined an "escort service" and made out with a 50-year-old man for $5 ($80 today.)

Lots of young woman look to that magazine for advice but it's full of very bad advice.

"...she recommended that her readers take advantage of the situation, milking a guilty and grateful married lover for gifts, money and workplace advancement, which Brown regarded as fair recompense for the fact that men got paid more than women and kept the best jobs for themselves."

And years later they can join the #metoo movement for another slice of the action.

https://www.henrymakow.com/130103.html

Maple Curtain said...

I've never read a blog that has such an eccentric cast of regular commenters. I'm glad to see that you are getting feedback on this subject.

A few seem to believe that it is their blog, not yours.

It gets so that it is not worthwhile to read the comments because most are self-promoting.

If, for instance, James wants to posit every crackpot conspiracy theory that ever occurred to man, why not tell him to do so and then just post a link to his website when he comments?

So many comments are off-topic.

Others do have interesting links to related information and that is helpful.

Overall, your commenters should remember that I am right and they either agree or are wrong...sorry, where was I? :)

A little humility and respect for others, particularly the one who has created the blog, would go a long way.

For instance, believe it or not, I don't feel the need to comment on every post I read. I will occasionally comment on here but not every time that I read a post. I don't always have great nuggets of wisdom available on every topic, and that is OK. We can learn from others.

Thanks.

True Faith said...

Hi Savant

I stumbled across your blog a year ago when I started doing serious research on WTF is the matter with the Church, the World and Everything. I sent a link of one of your posts to a friend concerning something horrible they are teaching five year olds at school in Germany. Got back an email telling me off for reading an Anti-S site! That friendship went down the toilet just like all the others. It's shocking how no one wants to know the truth. I can only thank God for yanking me out of the fog because I'm certainly no smarter than anyone else and was pretty much unaware until 18 months ago. I was so overwhelmed I even forgot about your excellent blog and to be honest didn't start regularly checking your page until a few weeks ago and I agree - give us more posts!

As for your musings regarding discipline in the Comments: I think it is great as is. I ignore what I don't care for but what I have gained you would probably not believe. I think it must be easy for you and others who obviously have been observing this morass of lies and obfuscation for years to forget that there are a lot of us who are very new to having the scales fall from our eyes and thirsting as we are for knowledge we can only find it by sifting through a mass of new information. Please keep it coming!

Edward Vidgen said...

darkmoon site had it right for so many years ...
cultivating an elevated commentariat may be even more important than the quality of editorial stuff, the articles, and so on, because whereas the blog management may run out of inspiration at times, there are always commenters able and willing to provide creative input.

a few features i'd like to see in order to provide increased visibility and vibrancy to comments exchange board, as follows:
• prominent (immediately observable) sidebar listing poster, time, topic commented on,
• enable a cascading linkage of posts and replies,
• list simple rules regarding maximum post size, repetition control, ad hominem,
• open display of whitelist/blacklist of trusted/distrusted posters/suspected trolls,
• individual, reader-enabled "ignore" option re. any particular poster,
• publicly distance yourself from any particular views or claims not specifically made by yourself, in order to have an alibi in case of persecution by powers that be, saves you the hassle of monitoring and approving every post (see for example xymphora.blogspot.ba, he couldn't care less who says what and has been sailing smoothly for over 10 years),
• do not ban commenters holding contrarian positions, e.g., if some jew wants to promote talmud, 6m dead jew shoah or kabbalah, let them do so freely, no point preaching solely to the converted,
• don't lose your shirt if criticized, trust the commentariat and readership to form their own opinions and judgement, every troll eventually outs himself, every liar caught in his own inconsistencies,
• don't worry overmuch about posts being on-topic or off-topic, what does it even mean, and sometimes the best threads issue from the wildest tangents.

can't think of much else at the moment.

oh yeah, enable a few more html tags, like blockquotes and embedded links

James said...

German woman told by job center that unless she takes job as prostitute then her benefits could be cut.

Muslim women won't have this problem of course, even if they looked for a job.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/1482371/If-you-dont-take-a-job-as-a-prostitute-we-can-stop-your-benefits.html

This anti-white world is trying to drive us crazy with bullshit.

Tatiana Ulyanova, who owns a brothel in central Berlin, has been searching the online database of her local job centre for recruits.

Ulyanov? Where have we heard that name before?

http://www.historyguide.org/europe/lenin.html

Well that figures doesn't it?

Lenin and his buddies said women should be communal property.

Anonymous said...

Have throughly enjoyed your blog for over a year but have never commented. My two cents:
- Encourage / convert (plugin?) posting of URLs to anchor tags. So many commenters add great links but on my iPad they will not select easily to copy. Extremely hard to visit the link.
- lgnore the trolls, they are 'not people but soul-less husks'.
- Limit comments size to 1000 chars. There has been some comments that are longer than the article itself. Interrupts the discussion. Anything more than that should be a link or the name of the book/publication.
- I am agnostic on avatars - what is said is important not the handle of who said it.
- Nothing is off topic when discussing the 'angel who rides the whirlwind directing this storm'.

Petr Prague said...

Savant, RamZPaul gets hundreds of comments. But they go to his Youtube videos rather than to his blog posts.

SAVANT said...

@Petr Prague. I wonder why they don't appear on his blog?

SAVANT said...

Dr. Joe. No, your suspicions are incorrect in this instance as I have never deleted a comment because it looked too similar to another one. Remember that comments often just disappear into the Joogle ether.

SAVANT said...

Sav is there something in your spam area?

Yes indeed. I have to do a trawl of the spam filter virtually every day. And as I said in the previous comments some other offending comments never reach this blog.

Heraclitus said...

" to indulge in these wild speculations about people being part of a Jewish spy network makes the accuser and the blog look cranky and paranoid, as well as being an admission that you have nothing else to come back with."

Very true. Unless there is evidence for it (sometimes there is) I just sigh and move on.

I feel the same way about posters seeking to attribute Jewishness to all the bad guys, current and past. The 'rationale' seems to be that he was a bad man therefore he must have been a Jew. Please stop this nonsense.

John C said...


There are a lot of normies who are interested in nationalism, race realism and the alternative right. But when such people come to these websites, they are often overwhelmed with invective, backbiting and conspiracy mongering. And this turns them off. 

And that's the point of hasbarats
They are known by the language they use: depraved sexual insults, bile, bigotry, threats, disinformation and character assassination. That’s right: I’m talking about “hasbarats,” zionist trolls who infect the Internet .

http://www.gregfelton.com/media/2009_09_30.htm

Most working class people have no idea about politics, they have no idea how subtle the propaganda is from our enemy. Hence the endless promotion in our lives of stuff that doesn't matter ie tv soap operas game shows sports... some will seek out the internet for information. Thus enter the mass of hasbaras with their endless dis-mis- information to keep confused us Whites.
This blog is a learning curve for all of us and long may it continue. Cheers

Your blog Savant, do what you think is best.

ChumLee's brother said...

Anon 02:14

I would like to request that all posters use their full real name, government id number, home address, phone number, place of employment, credit card number, next of kin and a government picture id as their identity.

Plus two current utility bills in your name to your current address.

I want to know the identity of the person making a post and you can't be too sure about these things.

......May I ask, why do you want to know the identity of the poster?

ChumLee's brother said...

Uncle Nasty said...

I look at it this way.

If you have the common courtesy to invite someone to your home, and they abuse the privilege by shouting at the neighbours, insulting your wife, making suggestive comments to your daughter (or worse, your son), kicking the dog and drinking your fridge dry as well as cooking themselves a meal, then calling you a selfish prick when you lose patience and eject them ...

Congrats. You've just caught a troll.

But, more about chumlee's brother, later. When I have a moment to spare.

UN

....Ha,Ha...very amusing Mr Nasty.

Funny that....when I used to'terrorise' the Highways and Byways of the UK on my Green Kawasaki....one of my insults to drivers...after I'VE cut them up...AND..then given them the finger AND every obscene hand gesture I can muster...would be to occasionally put my head up against their window and tell them that "I'll come around your house...fuck your dog..beat your wife and molest your children."
.

WHATIS TRUTH said...

FFS I'm doing it now. THIS IS OFF TOPIC. I'M SORRY!!!!
Gerry said...

'But he does more than us. He puts his face out there.'

He gets paid. For the vast majority of us to 'put our faces out there' the result would be the exact opposite.
Not only that, look who (((pays)))) him.

Lemmyhead

Anonymous said...

UN. You had me going with this.....

If you have the common courtesy to invite someone to your home, and they abuse the privilege by shouting at the neighbours, insulting your wife, making suggestive comments to your daughter (or worse, your son), kicking the dog and drinking your fridge dry as well as cooking themselves a meal, then calling you a selfish prick when you lose patience and eject them ...

Congrats. You've just caught a troll.

Right up to the word troll. I thought you were describing a group who have been kicked of countries not comments.

Lemmyhead

Anonymous said...

James said...

'How many cats treated like kings?'

I had not given that a thought. So, now when asked what good has come from feminism I have an answer. Cheers mate.

Lemmyhead

Renegade iBot said...

Identifying Bots And Paid Trolls

Know Them by Their Agenda

The purpose of these bots and/or shills is to demoralize real, proactive people. Their comments will be idiot-level, meant to sow doubt, infuriate, depress.

https://nationalvanguard.org/2016/10/identifying-bots-and-paid-trolls/

I've gotten to love you White people and your caring sharing ways. So I'm here to help you win the day... Let's Do This!!!

Californian said...

Most working class people have no idea about politics, they have no idea how subtle the propaganda is from our enemy. Hence the endless promotion in our lives of stuff that doesn't matter ie tv soap operas game shows sports... some will seek out the internet for information.

This is so. Most people buy into the System because there is no credible alternative. That is why websites like Irish Savant are vital. But once a normie arrives at a race realist/nationalist/alt right website...how do you get them to go full Red Pill?

Part of the answer is as the following post indicates:

cultivating an elevated commentariat may be even more important than the quality of editorial stuff, the articles, and so on, because whereas the blog management may run out of inspiration at times, there are always commenters able and willing to provide creative input.

You want to get newcomers involved by posting intelligently. And by developing their skills in seeing through the matrix of television, academic indoctrination, and so forth.

Really, there are two general audiences here:
* One is the old timers who understand the nature of the anti-White system, and thus can discuss more complex ideas.
* The other is the newcomers who are looking to have their eyes opened a little wider.

You may have to tailor the website articles and blog comments to each group separately. This means a little discipline, a lot of thinking about what you are posting, but still giving some room for the people with crazy ideas. It also means studying up a bit on the tactics of information ops and psychological warfare. The idea is to develop ideas and turn them into realworld activism.

Because websites such as this one are a very real front in the ongoing online infowar insurgency.

Anonymous said...

Off topic ffs but lemmyhead started it🤔
Yeah I know rebel media give him a brown bag of cash now and again
But he does pay most of his own way by being a buy to let landlord
Which he did before the EDL

But did you watch his video where he had words with the German press
He accused them of labelling every body a Nazi.
One woman reporter got so upset when he called her a facist she ran off looking for a policeman to get him arrested
He then stuck a camera on all the rest of the left press telling them people were fed up of their lies
They didn’t like it

There are 2 more videos to come from the day out in Germany
Gerry

Geoffrey said...

Anon said
Let her fly. Censorship in any form is repulsive. We can learn from trolls, I think.
8 February 2018 at 13:28
Chum Lee’s brother said...


Savant, ...I agree with Anon @ 13:28. Let her fly.

8 February 2018 at 16:43

So that proves that Anonymous is bad and should be ended. It is nonsense that little cupcakes are “afraid”. They can call themselves “Dr Mengele” and nobody knows their real name. Why should not all have to stand up personally for what they have posted? Anons are cowards, and several are trolls.

My own experience with comments here was initially negative. My very first comment posted a while back was viciously attacked. So I withdrew for 6 or 12 months. When I came back I was girded up for battle and immediately launched an attack on the Anons and the trolls. For this I was attacked by several and called a jew and a HasbaRat and a troll. I once even posted a list of "how to spot a troll" with the source. I doubled down and my posts got more negative about the jews. What jew troll would do that? So the attacks on me seem to have almost ceased for this reason. I will not back down and may be one of the truth tellers who have asked out loud for Savant to come to this crossroads and make a decision.

I add that Chumless Bother gives quite a bit of illegal and criminal advice which could get this site banned. In the previous Sav Post to this one he advocated taking pot-shots at tinted people or those we do not like, and he did not mean by typewriter. He also advocates blocking toilets, to make Ireland and England a little bit more like India. I think he also says to lift paving stones just a tad to cause injuries and overload the compensation system. Naturally it will be tinted people “victims” who “pretend” to fall over these slabs and get big bucks, irony. Fallen whites will just limp home damaged and “take it on the chin” unaware that a fellow white man sabotaged the street paving or blocked the toilet they wanted to use.

There is a human tendency to gang up on the weak, or those being stoned. So, ban insulting other posters. It is one thing to argue, but what about calling me a “jigaboo taxi driver”? Why should any site allow an insult which is unrelated to anything posted? Also “geoffers” and nonsense about the Normans – as though my chosen name meant that all Normans should get a bashing, and I must be a living Norman. The Normans are people who lost power over 700 years ago. Anon Bill (William) got no such abuse despite his Norman name.

Number one, ban all Anonymous posting. Anon Gerry who signs off as Gerry, to post as “Gerry”.

Number two, ban personal insults which naturally cause the victim to respond in kind, lowering him to the level of a slime dweller. This idea is not on Savants list.

Number three; ban some commenters but not many. Chumlee has the guts to take ownership of what he writes. He needs to tone down his attacks on others; I think he is not quite stable (understatement). This may not be trolling, which is knowingly trying to harm or wreck a good site.

Number four, Savant should delete all or any posts he feels like without explanation. There are no sycophants here as somebody commented. Sav seems to have a thick skin which is an admirable trait. He just needs to protect good intelligent people who are being cruelly attacked in an attempt to silence their ideas and opinions. The more truthful about the jews the comment is, the more vicious are the personal attacks. Probably many antifa, SJWs and otter leftist scum lurk here. They are real trolls. None admit being lefties or Coons, they pretend to be right wing but their comments give them away.

Number five, the first 50 or so comments should all try to be on topic.

Anonymous said...

The trolls want you to get rid of the anonymous comments even when nicknamed. I'm telling you that the last thing I would want is to comment here through my signed-in gmail account or Facebook or whatever. I doubt it gives me any real security but then I don't need any. But I especially don't need to be hooked in here through services that have a tendency to notify others in their "web." I get telephone notifications when someone I know makes a comment on Facebook. Besides, there's a plausible deniability to being "anonymous." I hesitate to comment in places that require formal sign-ins.

Bill

Anonymous said...

O/T

Magna Carta - Article 61

If you live in the UK you need to be aware of this.
It's effectively saying if Queen and country do not treat the host population justly they are guilty of treason. A treason list already exists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cKcCnOZSWA

There was a very interesting documentary about about this growing movement on Radio 4 this morning. Lots of people 'lawfully' not paying council tax water rates etc and getting away with it. Cops operating OUTSIDE the law, convictions and threats of, under current conditions all illegal.

Very useful information - and all above board

Anonymous said...

The Queens Enemies - earlier today on Radio 4

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09qhsc4

Anonymous said...

Geoffers
I add that Chumless Bother gives quite a bit of illegal and criminal advice which could get this site banned. In the previous Sav Post to this one he advocated taking pot-shots at tinted people or those we do not like, and he did not mean by typewriter. He also advocates blocking toilets, (tbf he pointed out it's hard to get caught blocking the Lavs Of the Hated enemy) to make Ireland and England a little bit more like India. I think he also says to lift paving stones just a tad to cause injuries and overload the compensation system. Naturally it will be tinted people “victims” who “pretend” to fall over these slabs and get big bucks, irony. Fallen whites will just limp home damaged and “take it on the chin” unaware that a fellow white man sabotaged the street paving or blocked the toilet they wanted to use. (geoffers the idea originated in Liverpool in the 70s,80s, the rest of the country cottoned on decades later ffs, it how lots of brits get by nowadays) if you haven't had a claim-up, then you'd better find something to fall over or bump into. Then it's holiD time, init.

Anonymous said...

Gerry 🤗🤗🤗 hows that I have taken note

Anyway a dogooder kind hearted soul
Sees sense
https://vladtepesblog.com/2018/02/07/those-people-who-ate-with-me-drank-danced-laughed-they-talk-about-me-as-stupid-german-whore/

kulak said...

Long time Savant. Glad to see you're still around.

Simply mechanically limiting the number of comments per user per article could be very effective.

I prefer on-topic comments. Commenters flaming each other is a huge turn-off.

Luther Burgsvik said...

You could have an 'open thread' post once or twice a week to allow people to comment about whatever they want.

It could cut down on the number of off-topic remarks in the comments section. They do it over at the Biased BBC blog, and have done for several years. It seems to work okay for them.

Anonymous said...

08:21- "- Encourage / convert (plugin?) posting of URLs to anchor tags. So many commenters add great links but on my iPad they will not select easily to copy. Extremely hard to visit the link."
I disagree with this one. So many links here go directly to (((enemy))) sites (jpost, haaretz, etc) to use their own words against them; and by clicking a conveniently-coded link, your browser will tell the (((enemy))) that you arrived there from here. That will put each visitor (you), and especially this site, on their radar - which will undoubtedly result in increased hasbarite activity. Don't give them any data to work with.
It is still possible for the individual commenter to add href code to his links, if he so desires. Honestly though, seeing the URL is often informative enough (who needs to click into each story on Drudge anymore?). If e.g. Frank posted ten links that read JOO TREACHERY #5, and you had to mouseover each link to see where it was going, you probably wouldn't.

Anonymous said...

Geoffrey: "So that proves that Anonymous is bad and should be ended...Anons are cowards"
Everyone on here is Anonymous. In my browser, your name appears as "Anonymous Geoffrey". There are also, "Anonymous Anonymous, Anonymous Californian, Anonymous AnalogMan, Anonymous James" and everyone else.
Then you have the Nonymous, registered Blogger accounts: "Blogger SAVANT, Blogger AKAEW, Blogger WHATIS TRUTH, Blogger Maple Curtain". Who are they? Nobody knows, so they too are Anonymous.
Tell your therapist where the Anonymous poster touched you on the doll, tie your shoelaces, and get back in the game.

Anonymous said...

are you saying this blog is broke?

if not, don’t fix it

keep up the good work Irish Savant

nilus said...

here's another off-topic and totally irrelevant comment /comments by Nilus:

Friday Night Widdicombe:
This suffocating, oppressive WHITE MALE SUPREMACIST PHALLOCENTRIC HETERO-NORMATIVE PATRIARCHY MUST END !!!

Channel 4 6pm "A jew on every show? Just a cohencidence, goy"
(((The Simpsteins))) 'The Doh-scial Network'
A spoof of the movie about jews ,written, produced and directed by jews, starring jews playing jews who ripped off two WASPS to become gazillionaires, special guest JEW is (((Armand Hammer))) who plays: The GOY Winklevoss twins. What's particularly gutting is that this ep is written and directed by SHABBOS GOYS.

followed by 'Hollyoaks' , which is LGBTQP propaganda for "young people".(children)
( "A faggot on every show? Just a coloncidence, goy")

BBC2 6.30pm "A faggot on every show? Just a coloncidence, goy"
'Poofter Portillo's San-Fran Soy-Goy Gay-Boy Gang-Bang'
EXPERIMENTED AT PUBLIC SCHOOL, IT'S PERFECTLY NATURAL

BBC1 7.30pm "A jew on every show? Just a cohencidence, goy"
' Would I Lie To You?' produced by
JEW Richard Cohen, with
JEW Gaby Roslin (why?) and
EVIL CURRY Romesh Ranganathan and
MOPED STABBSTER Teeny Tiny Stinky Dizzee Rasclat Dozee Bass-Tard

BBC4 8pm 'Sounds Of The Six Million' "A jew on every show? Just a cohencidence, goy" Tonight,
JEW (((Manfred Mann))) aka Manfred Sepse Lubowitz

BBC4 8.10pm 'The Good Old Days' (1981) "A jew on every show? Just a cohencidence, goy" back when jews didn't present every-goddam-thing on telly...? Presented by
JEW Leonard Sachs

BBC1 8.30pm 'Room 101' "A jew and a queer on every show? Just a cohencidence, goy" with
JEW Josh " footy and lager, honest" Widdicombe and
BULLDYKE DWARF Rusty Volvo

BBC4 9pm 'Classic Albums' "A jew on every show? Just a cohencidence, goy" does 'classic' mean 'jewish' ?
JEW Carly Simon's 'No Secrets'

BBC2 9pm 'Nigel Slater's Middle East' "A faggot on every show? Just a coloncidence, goy" He's a mildly camp , wealthy cock-sucking faggot who loves cooking ! But that's not why he's getting a free , paid holiday on license-payers money, no sir. It's cos he's wildly talented and beloved of the Great British Public, just like Graham Norton !! Middle Eastern countries are totally OK with queers!
It's those repressive Christian Fascist regimes like UK and Canada that "still have a long way to go"

cont:

nilus said...

cont: Channel 4 9pm "A jew and a flaming faggot on every show? Just a cohencidence, goy"
'8 Out Of 10 Cats Does Countdown' produced by
JEW Richard Cohen , with
JEW Rachel Riley and flaming mincing faggotty
QUEER Tom Allen (he's GAY you know ! But he doesnt like to go on about it)

ITV2 9pm "A jew starring in every film? Just a cohencidence, goy"
'22 Jump Street' starring the loveable and talented Hollywood
JEW Jonah Hill (Feldstein)

BBC2 10pm "A queer on every show? Just a quimcidence, goy"
'QI' presented by
BULLDYKE Scandi Flatpacks

Channel 4 10pm "A jew and a COMMIE VAGINA on every show? Just a cohencidence, goy"
'The Last Fucking Straw' presented by
JEW Josh watchin footy wiv me mates Widdicombe and
COMEDY POLITICIAN Enema Fivebellies

BBC2 10.30pm "A jew on every show? Just a cohencidence, goy"
'Jewsnight' edited by South African Ex-(((Guardian)))
JEW Ian Katz, presented by Canadian
JEW Emily Maitliss

BBC1 10.35pm "A queer AND a jew on every show? Just a coloncidence, goy" 'The Graham Norton Hollywood Whore Hour' Mincing multi-millionaire
FAGGOT Graham Norton hoists his expensively-moisturised knees behind his ears for:
HOLLYWOOD JEW Deborah Messing and
HOLLYWOOD FAGGOT Eric McCormack as they flog their K-Trash :
"Will and Grace"
(Ironically two characteristics sadly lacking in The Current Year Reality)

ITV 10.45pm "A jew on every show? Just a cohencidence, goy"
'Through The K-Hole' with
JEW Rachel "I'm just a blonde Essex girl" Riley

Channel 5 10.35pm 'Funny Women' , with........err.......hold on I'll get back to you

Luke2236 said...

My humble opinion is that all comments should be allowed, and the off topic and personal attack/flame wars be deleted by our host. After all, its HIS blog to do with as he pleases.
I do NOT wish to see anon posting go away; personally, I dont have a fakebook or wordpress or whatever account and have no plans to get one. I will be glad to tell anyone person to person what I think; however, putting real name and traceable links in a public forum like this is simply INVITING trouble and harassment from [[[TPTB]]]. In England and Canada for example, high courts have openly stated that 'the TRUTH is no defence'!!! If you dont follow and espouse the narrative, you are a criminal in many countries, and in those where legal action is not readily available, you are open to loss of job, ostracisation etc over non popular but TRUTHFUL views. Anon posting must stay imnsho.
I enjoy most of the posts and actually learn from them as well as the main article. Deletion of irrelevant or idiotic comments should obviously be the determination of Mr Savant; I think most of us trust his judgement in those areas.

nilus said...

On topic: I've yet to see ONE site on the net where comments are 100% 'on topic' to the specific article. But if the GENERAL topic is JEW instigated ANTI-WHITE shennanigans, and negro / muzz criminality, then I'd say you're doing OK.

Comment sections are why people remain at a blog as opposed to just reading the Post, which takes usually 2 minutes. If it's the Daily Stormer with its comments on a separate site, that's actually a good thing, cos you are forced to move on and read more articles.
If Savant or Morgoth shut down comments Im sure traffic would drop considerably.

Its a double edged sword.

nilus said...

Also, these places are a bit like clubhouses or favourite pubs : you find one you like and stick there, it's human nature. I pretty much live 100% at Morgoths,(as Tony Hayers)

I like the Disqus system.
I wish Frank Galton, or Uncle Nasty, for instance, would show up over there now and then (as you do , Savant) but it is what it is.

AnalogMan said...

O/T, but speaking about bots and trolls...

Have any of the Kiwis on this board been pestered by these? Yesterday I got two phone calls, one man, one woman, word for word identical:

"Hello, my name is _____, from Customer Service at Windows. This call is about your computer, OK?" (with Indian accent).

Anonymous said...

I visit here often, and get very good info especially on (((who))) is on the TV screen any given time. leave the comments alone except for the reasonably obvious and simply add a 'blocked' at the end of the comment to show that said source of BS is blocked henceforth.

Allan@Aberdeen

Anonymous said...

You could have an 'open thread' post once or twice a week to allow people to comment about whatever they want.


I agree. This would allow for the people who want to go off about the "Zionists" to have their space while not hijacking other threads.

Nige said...

Me too on the bots and trolls problem Analogman. Must be a NZ thing so.

James said...

James said...

'How many cats treated like kings?'

I had not given that a thought. So, now when asked what good has come from feminism I have an answer. Cheers mate.

Lemmyhead


LOL. Simon at www.heretical.com had a similar idea. Scroll to the bottom:

http://www.heretical.com/sgs-2016/animals.html

James said...

If, for instance, James wants to posit every crackpot conspiracy theory that ever occurred to man, why not tell him to do so and then just post a link to his website when he comments?

The "MAFIA" conspiracy theory was regarded as insane years ago. Now it's common knowledge. If you know for sure that a conspiracy theory is barking up the wrong tree, then why don't you provide information on it?

Often I post crazy stuff for these reasons:

- So it is in the open and discussed.
- So someone can refute it.
- I believe it is BS but cannot formulate a decent argument why so maybe someone else can.
- I can't find anything wrong with it but can't trust it either. (Miles Mathis stuff is often like this.)


Just saying something is "crazy" without being able to refute it is slightly crazy too isn't it? If the theory is so crazy, then it ought to be easy to debunk, correct?

The only think I know for sure is the White genocide is real. Even the idea that Jews are behind it all is debatable. The fact it exists is not IMO. I can walk down the street and see it every day. I don't see any Jews down the street very often.

The Kalergi Plan is real.

James said...

Here's a crazy conspiracy theory. Iphone source code was leaked by some Aryan saboteur of the (((system))).

NSA backdoors found. Media spins it as people using the code to hack phones. Most of the media deserves jail time.

jimstone.is (I'm posting it all here because some guy in Australia said the site is blocked there. Aussies are supposed to think about rugby, cricket, and beer not their country's survival.)
People within Apple released the most basic code, central to the Iphone's existence, to Github in unencrypted form anyone could read. This is the code the NSA puts their bugs in, and now, no doubt, there are droves of programmers going over the code to reveal exactly how bad it is compromised. The exact operating system the code was for is IOS 9, which is a recent version, but not the latest IOS 11. 9 is probably good enough to tell all.
The media is focusing on how this can be used to jail break phones, but the real issue here (that they would never talk about) is the fact that you can bet foreign governments are combing their way through the Iphone's source code to see exactly where the NSA put their back doors in, and where the back doors might lead to.

This clearly demonstrates the risk companies face when they cooperate with intelligence agencies to produce products that are penetrable for some people, and not others. All it takes is someone who cares about the public more than they care about their job and the deep state to blow the whole thing wide open. Obviously the linked article does not say this will pull the pants off the NSA yet again and instead stays on the sideline talking about jail breaking phones - but who would expect them to tell the public what is really going on with this?

The code that has been released is the exact code that allows them to keep the phone's microphone and camera on when it is turned off. It is the code that will allow the NSA or others to plant "evidence" on your phone, or read everything on it in the background, without you ever noticing. It is the code that will allow them to place specialized software on your phone without you ever knowing or seeing it, in case they want to add features to their spying abilities, such as applications that would cause the phone to continue recording it's location via GPS while you are out of reach of any cell tower, and then, when you are back in reach, send them a map of everywhere you went, what you said, and what you saw. Out of box the phone probably does not have that ability simply because it would be risky when it ate memory space in the phone - astute users might notice, so the NSA would only use such applications in special cases.

Obviously they are not going to tell the public about this in any way that would really allow the public to know what is going on, but they can't stop the Russians, Iranians, and whoever else from getting a boost in their state security.



http://bgr.com/2018/02/08/iphone-iboot-source-code-leak/

Anonymous said...

Gerry
If people don’t want me to put Tommy Robinson videos up then I won’t
Or you don’t have to view them
Love him or hate him
I am in the middle, but I do like his videos
Germany part 2

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc2qfazSgSg

Anonymous said...

Gerry
Sorry me again. I grew up around this area
The tram station wasn’t there it was put there to better lives
A dirty migrant murderer stabs a white father of 4 and gets a lesser charge
That could be any of us stabbed 60 times in a 2 minutes random attack

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5372027/Killer-walks-away-scene-stabbing-man-death.html

Ross Noble said...

USE YOUR READERS AS LABOR. Let them sort the comments. Trust that your readers are not all fools, and majority will be able to ascertain truth.

To do this sorting will require an upgraded comment section. In other words, intelligence will have to be built into website.

If enough people tag a comment as a troll, it will sort into a troll category. On topic comments that are instructional and useful can be flagged, and hence will sort with other like kinds.

This is an important subject, making a quantum leap forward relative to other websites. Let your readers help you rather than doing all the work yourself.

This is not censoring, but instead is sorting.

James said...

Jews upset that Soros's open plots were called "secret" plots.

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2018/2/9/living-in-an-orwellian-tyranny


In hate-speak, "secret plot" doesn't really mean secret. It just means something the goyim aren't supposed to know about. We all know that. Jews need to read more hate.


James said...

I would add the the Kalergi plan is a secret plot to destroy the white race.

It's in the open, and you can even read about it on Wikipedia, but so much of it is hidden.

The intent is hidden.

Merkel's plans are hidden, although they are out in the open. We know what she did, but the why is hidden. The goal is hidden. They pretend she's a mis-guided do-gooder. She isn't.


Searcher said...

Sav

You know when you are shit at something: cooking? gardening? foreign languages etc? What do you do if you are shit at something? You DELEGATE.

You are not good at spotting trolls. You are not good at spotting controlled opposition/gatekeepers. Accept and move on.

What do you do?

You DELEGATE what you are shit at to people who are good at it.

I have seen you posting on Chateau Heartiste. I think it's how I found your blog. Anyhow, who is a good troll spotter there? Not you. Captain Obvious is a good troll spotter. Why? Social IQ. C'est la vie.

You have been told time and time again WHO is ruining your comments section.

So who should you not publish?
Anonymous
James
Chum Lees Brother
Joe Splunge
Geoffrey

Their comments (in the round) add nothing. They add bad feels. Spirit Within. Why did Spirit Within get a tolerance on Chateau Heartiste for so long? Men too dopey (low social IQ) to spot a subversive (my perspective). Spotted straight away but didn't post - very female unfriendly therefore only Jewish females bother - kinda like Jared Taylor met his wife at a Holocaust Denier conference. Only Jewish females welcome. Like RamzPaul snuggling his Jewish female attendee at AmRen. Dipshits. I have zero respect for men who are led by their muh feels (sexy).

Esther and Iron Felix are too dopey to really ruin your comments section.

Move on.

PS Don't publish me - it's your choice. Publish or delete.

You want names:
Anonymous
Chum Lees Brother
Geoffrey
James

Don't publish their comments and see your comments section improve.

Continue to publish their comments for "diversity of thought" LOL. Come on. You know there is one group above all who want to destroy any vision of a future that you have - your grandkids. They are wayyyyy more engaged in that than your nice normie neighbours (who are oblivious btw). They are going to actively seek out your blog and destroy your comments section. And yes, it is being destoyed (serious).

PS I also like the Disqus system because James et al would be like ZooKeepeer... at the bottom...

Tony Hayes is funny. He is near the top. I like Disqus.

Searcher said...

Did you notice how many comments showed up to say to keep the comments section as it is? Pattern recognition!

Did you also notice how NONE OF THESE ARE SINCERE posters like:
AKAEW
shauntantijihad
lemmyhead
dofornow Gerry
Nilus
Analogman
UN
ETC (and apologies - it's late)

You need to keep in mind that you are not talking to SINCERE people when asking for restraint. Don't be a moron and think that everyone who comes across your blog is sincere.

LOL. GOOD TO SEE CHUM LEES BROTHER OUTED HIMSELF. Ask Captain Obvious if you can't figure that one out.

Searcher said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Searcher said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

I do not like to define reality with kike terminology, because when you do you have reduced yourself to the reality where (((they))) want you to exist.

If you wish this to become a (((white racist))) forum, then make this a (((white racist))) forum.

I have faith in God through Jesus Christ. I love my biological identity but the Truth must always come first.

Matthew 8:23 And when he was entered into a ship, his disciples followed him.

24 And, behold, there arose a great tempest in the sea, insomuch that the ship was covered with the waves: but he was asleep.

25 And his disciples came to him, and awoke him, saying, Lord, save us: we perish.

26 And he saith unto them, Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith? Then he arose, and rebuked the winds and the sea; and there was a great calm.

Searcher said...

You have a house.

Someone shits outside your house.

You are like: "meh whatever".

People stop visiting.

You wonder WHY.

People tell you why.

You're like ... but smells bein' good 'n all ... diversity of smells.

Your house, your choice.

OR Git off my lawn, child of SATAN!

Your choice. Allow shit outside your house or practice some housekeeping. And, cop on that not everyone who visits your house means you well.

Searcher said...

LOL

I only spotted Denise's comment and I noticed that she was ALSO interested in SINCERE posters.

Not suprising in the least.

Sav, if you can't spot sincerity, ask Flanders, AKAEW, John C, Denise and Captain Obvious for a dig out.

Sincerity is the OPPOSITE of trolling. It is nothing to do with the number of characters or whether a comment is on topic.

Accept that you are not good at:
Spotting CONTROLLED OPPOSITION
Spotting GATEKEEPERS
Spotting TROLLS

DELEGATE

Denise can spot it.
John C can spot it.
AKAWE can spot it.
Flanders can spot it.

ASK people who can SPOT IT for help. Stop floundering.

I don't mean mean it in a demeaning way. I mean it in a nice but distant way - WTF are you doing allowing trolls shit in front of your house?

Searcher said...

Length of post is important? LOL You have a total tool on here who is insulting you as a "begorrah" "abo" and you publish his comments... because...????

By the way, you are the bogorrah abo that GEOFFREY refers to. You. That's you he's talking about. Do you think Morgoth would publish a gobshite calling him a limey, chinless obededient slavie tier pleb? Nope. Don't think so. Cop on.

James has constantly dominated your comments section with mostly crap. You reckon the odd piece of carb in his rat poison is great? Whatever - your blog.

Shaunantijihad was sincere. Never posts here anymore. Told you directly that your comments section was turning to shit ages ago. Nada. Neener neener. Ears closed shut.

If you can't spot sincerity. You need help. You need to

DELEGATE

Anonymous said...

The first argument of (((racists))) is who is race and who is not.

Once this argument has been decided, the next argument is who is the most race.

This is all pointless relativism, the kike's favorite subject.

Point, line, plane, cube.

There must be a point to your ideology, else anti-Christ.

Anonymous said...

In my opinion, until white people get back to the point that created white people, white people are gone.

There were no white people before Christ, there were only tribes of white flesh.

White flesh became servants of Christ.

Kike converted servants of Christ, to servants of kike.

The point is God, the line is Jesus Christ, the plane is the Holy Spirit, the cube is Christ's Church on earth.

The filthy kikes cannot ever change the Truth, they can only lie.

I respectfully request that all posters on this blog be required to post the point in truth to their post whether it be in fact or faith.

Anonymous said...

55
jew n Gay on show.

why not just all ((( )))?
why add in others?

Anonymous said...

I just read an article from the Occidental Observer, sponsored by the renowned (((white racist))) and (((antisemite))), Kevin Macdonald.

OK, I only read a few paragraphs.

How much blatantly pro-kike propaganda do you have to read before you realize it is propaganda.

Stephen Miller is an unrepentant Christ hating kike.

I can accept that fact.

When I see how readily acceptable (((white people))) are to some kike who whispers nice things, I know for a fact where I am.

Christ vs antichrist.

James said...

Swamp in trouble? Clinton foundation received Russian money in connection with Uranium One deal.

Bill Clinton - guilty of bribery and treason. CIA, FBI, and IRS all knew about this but did nothing.

Greg Hunter (former CNN reporter) explains that many top people in the Obama and Bush Admins might go to jail.
https://usawatchdog.com/bombshell-testimony-of-fbi-informant-implicates-many-for-treason/


Link to original story:
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-08/fbi-informant-testifies-moscow-routed-millions-clinton-foundation-russian-uranium

Geoffrey said...

Anonymous Anonymous Bill said...

The trolls want you to get rid of the anonymous comments even when nicknamed. I'm telling you that the last thing I would want is to comment here through my signed-in gmail account or Facebook or whatever. I doubt it gives me any real security but then I don't need any. But I especially don't need to be hooked in here through services that have a tendency to notify others in their "web." I get telephone notifications when someone I know makes a comment on Facebook. Besides, there's a plausible deniability to being "anonymous." I hesitate to comment in places that require formal sign-ins.

Bill

9 February 2018 at 17:56

Bill, there is no need to choose Google Account. I choose Name then I enter my name, then Post. I do not enter any URL or Gmail account. Have you tried this? Just as easy as choosing Anon, then having to type your name on every post which I do not have to do.

No need to sign in with your real name, Bill. Presumably your name is not Bill. Signing in with Facebook is not even an option here. I agree with you on that, I do not make comments when they insist on such types of sign in. I lost my Youtube account because I refused to link it with a Facebook account.

If Big Sister is following all that you post and all that I post here, they already know our real names, even with your "Anon" identity. Most Anons post opinions only. Nobody goes to jail for an opinion in an English speaking country. It has to be "hate" or advice to use violence etc. Chucking bacon in to a mosque etc. Blocking toilets, slightly prising up paving stones or taking pot shots at people also can lead to jail. Maybe for many years, if the person charged is white.


I agree that people with good jobs who love paying high taxes need to be careful of losing their job due to the Thought Police and SJW Brigades. I am old and do not care about such things. Even my life does not matter very much. So I can say Coon, Nigger, Ikey Mo, Four by Two, Chink, Tinted Folk, Faggots and Shitskins with relative impunity. If ever I am arrested and charged with “hate” I will enjoy defending myself with no shyster (((lawyer))), in a blaze of glory which of course will not be publicised at all by the (((media))).

Most people arrested and jailed in Germany for denialism intended this to happen; they knew they were breaking the law, e.g. David Irving. Staying out of jail is not hard. Brendan O’Connell (note Irish name) in Australia got a whopping 3 years in jail for mildly arguing with a young jew activist to his face in public. You can find this “crime” on youtube. Senior Israeli politicians and diplomats visited the remote city of the trial; Perth W.A. to make sure the court gave the correct decision. So, better not to do an O’Connell or an Irving. Insult jews online and stay out of jail, but your bed or favorite chair might get loaded up with some nuclear material.

PS Nilus I love your media posts about cohencidences in hiring. Fags and jews are lucky, it seems. Being both is ideal, like Miriam Gargoyles.

Anonymous said...

How many kiwis are on here?
That's a conspiracy in its self.

Anonymous said...

I pretty much live 100% at Morgoths,(as Tony Hayers) 

This place seems to attract the split personality types

Anonymous said...

Savant, I have only commented once it at all, but I agree, that comments are so important for the overall affect of the blog. I am not sure how to advise other than it should be at your discretion as to which enhance, add to, or confirm your post. Perhaps you can post 10 of the best comments ( your call) after the article and then have the rest on another page?

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Interestingly enough, I had a crack at downloading this:-

Anonymous said...
The Queens Enemies - earlier today on Radio 4

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09qhsc4
9 February 2018 at 18:20


Only to be met with this message:-

NOTUKERROR

403 notukerror


Which, one has to assume, means that no-one outside the UK may access or download it. Can't be giving the colonials ideas, can we?

UN

Frank Galton said...

James said: "The only think I know for sure is the White genocide is real. Even the idea that Jews are behind it all is debatable. The Kalergi Plan is real."

"The Kalergi Plan is real." - James

THE KALERGI PLAN

Jewish Telegraphic Agency, 02 August 1934

“If we who already are free from the taint of ‘Aryanism’ could entirely forget our natural feeling of revulsion against unions with pure ‘Aryans’ I [Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi] for one am perfectly willing to do exactly that if I can be of service to humanity we would undoubtedly eventually achieve the ultimate ideal of racial admixture.

“That ideal would mean a European-Negroid strain, magnificently impure in make-up, and the ‘Aryan’ taint would be so well diluted that it would evidence itself, I believe, in only occasional traces of insanity.

“But these scattered throwbacks would tend to destroy themselves by their own violence, so that within a few generations all traces of this blemish undoubtedly would be lost.

“In my race Utopia, Jews, of course, would constitute the intellectual aristocracy.”

The above is, of course, pure improvisation. The Graf [Coudenhove-Kalergi], did, however, say some of the things attributed to him. He did declare for a European-Negroid race, with an intellectual aristocracy of Jews...
https://www.jta.org/1934/08/02/archive/the-bulletins-day-book-142

"Even the idea that Jews are behind it all is debatable." - James

The Intermarium: Wilson, Madison, & East Central European Federalism, by Jonathan Levy

Page 392

The WARBURGS were a wealthy and powerful family of JEWISH INTERNATIONAL BANKERS. Max Warburg who fled Germany in 1938 was one of COUDENHOVE-KALERGI'S MOST IMPORTANT BACKERS.
http://tinyurl.com/zuvblac

Page 43

In 1925, FUNDED BY THE WARBURG'S WEALTH, Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Pan Europe movement were imported into the United States.
http://tinyurl.com/j8dsxzf

Page 48

In 1939, Coudenhove-Kalergi found himself shuttling between Paris and London organizing Austrian resistance with WARBURG BANK MONETARY SUPPORT.
http://tinyurl.com/z9gb7cs

Dr. Jonathan Levy, author of The Intermarium: Wilson, Madison, & East Central European Federalism (ISBN: 978-1581123692)
http://web.archive.org/web/20150324082924/http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Author.aspx/1235

REVISION OF THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER, February 1950

Page 494

STATEMENT OF [JEWISH BANKER] JAMES P. WARBURG, GREENWICH, CONN.

"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."
http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b5149812;view=1up;seq=11;size=125
http://www.jta.org/1969/06/05/archive/funeral-services-slated-for-friday-for-james-p-warburg-banker-financier-author

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

Gerry said: "Yeah I know rebel media give him [Tommy Robinson] a brown bag of cash now and again But he does pay most of his own way by being a buy to let landlord"

"a buy to let landlord"

BBC, 23 January 2014

Tommy Robinson, former EDL leader, jailed for fraud

Former English Defence League leader Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, has been jailed for 18 months for mortgage fraud.

The fraud amounted to £160,000 over a period of six months.

Robinson admitted two counts of conspiring with others to obtain a mortgage by misrepresentation from the Abbey and Halifax building societies.

Judge Andrew Bright QC described him as the "instigator, if not the architect" of some of the frauds.

He described Robinson as a "fixer" who had introduced others to fraudulent mortgage broker DEBORAH ROTHSCHILD.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25862838

CPS

Five people were sentenced at St Albans Crown Court yesterday, Thursday, 24 January 2014, in a mortgage fraud case.

The five, including corrupt mortgage broker DEBORAH ROTHSCHILD, were involved in a complicated conspiracy to acquire properties using various fraudulent means.

Stephen Yaxley Lennon, aged 31, from Bedfordshire, pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to commit fraud by misrepresentation and was sentenced to eighteen months in prison.
http://www.cps.gov.uk/thames_chiltern/cps_thames_and_chiltern_news/five_sentenced_for_mortgagae_fraud___herts/

Frank Galton

Damned United said...

James said
So it is in the open and discussed. Lol
- So someone can refute it.
- I believe it is BS but cannot formulate a decent argument why so maybe someone else can. Lol
- I can't find anything wrong with it but can't trust it either. (Miles Mathis stuff is often like this.) Lol

Thus wasting time (everyone's time) on bs riddles.
Can miles investigate the missing 2.4 million jews that Irving(looking to sell books) webber(doesn't do much) and cole(jewish) say are missing from eastern Europe. Or doesn't miles touch the hoaxie?
Roll-Up Roll-Up james got another riddle diddle for us to fiddle with.

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

katana said...

OT

Red Ice TV – Thought Criminal Monika Schaefer Arrested and Imprisoned in Germany – Part 2 — TRANSCRIPT


Henrik of Red Ice Radio interviews Canadian-German activist Alfred Schaefer on the situation surrounding his sister’s arrest on Jan 3 this year, in Germany, for making a video called “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About the Holocaust“.

Part of the subversion of Whites has been achieved through the diabolical lie known as the “Holocaust” that is used by organized jewry as a “shield and sword” to draw attention away from its massive crimes against humanity, such as the instigation of the World Wars, 9/11, etc., while also instilling guilt and shame in Whites for their very existence.

In Part 2 here, Henrik explains his thinking on how Red Ice should present such taboo topics as Revisionist material, and the role of organized jewry in our racial and cultural destruction, that Alfred discusses. Since Red Ice has a large and growing audience on YouTube, Henrik rightly concludes that despite wanting to get the truth out, they must avoid getting banned by YouTube by publishing certain material discussed here in the members section.

Alfred then talks about the use of “control words“, such as “extreme right wing“, “racist“, “anti-semitism“, etc., by our enemies to frame the debate in their favour. Organized jewry through its media domination have been relentless lying to us for the purpose of effectively genociding the White race through mass invasion of non-Whites, miscegenation and other means to drive the Whites into minority status.

He then talks about how the advert of digital technology has enable us to reclaim history and expose the lies that we have been feed. Despite the availability of the true history it is a traumatic process for most people to go through as they rid themselves of the lies that they have been brainwashed with all their lives. Alfred talks about how he overcame his fears to eventually come to conclude that Adolf Hitler was one of the greatest leaders that we have ever produced.

Henrik talks about how he has become “skeptical” about the so-called “Holocaust“, because of the many things that simply don’t add up, and as such is very interested to hear about what “Holocaust deniers” have to say. He goes on to say how the “Holocaust” is always talked about in an emotional way by the main stream media, leading him to conclude there is something “fishy” with the story.

Alfred goes on to explain how the people of the West have been, through psychological manipulation, reduced to the level of spiritual, emotional cripples, that have prevented them from resisting, so far, from being flooded with millions of the Third Word.

Henrik tells how that Red Ice has put everything on the line in talking about migration, the JQ, White genocide, etc., wherever the truth leads them. How jews like Barbara Spectre, Noel Ignatiev, Gregor Gysi, talk about the desirability of White population replacement.


Much more is discussed, with Alfred and Henrik ending by urging listeners to write letters of support to Monika.

I would add that Monika’s imprisonment is a real expression of the war being waged against us and our freedom to exist. Her situation is symbolic of the repression that will only get far worst unless we stand up and fight back in any way we can, however small or large. So start sending cards and letters to Monika, and anything else towards helping her and our cause — KATANA.

Write to Monika now, at:

Monika Schaefer
Stadelheim Prison
Stadelheimer Straße
81549 Munich
Germany

Anonymous said...

@10 February 2018 at 08:19

Gerry you should read that 5,6,8 times and let it sink in.
It's not the first time this information has been put up.


ChumLee's brother said...


SAV...'Stand long' and let the Searcher 'broadside' pass overhead.

Trust your instincts.

Anonymous said...

Well Searcher, don't hold back. You might well be right about my inability to spot trolls - genuinely - but that in turn raises the question of what constitutes trolling. It seems to me that you equate it with those who disagree with you. You cite James, Chum Lees Brother, Joe Splunge and Geoffrey. Chum Lee ...maybe...but the others, I don't think so.

To my mind it's trolling when you deliberately take people off a promising track, when you engage in pointless abusive interchanges or when you try to set White people against one another (we have a few on here who try to stoke historical Irish grievances against Britain for example) or when you swamp the comment section. I have a problem with such people but not with anyone, including obvious Jews like Esther, joelgp and philip-L who takes a different view.

Btw your deleted comments above were duplicates, not an example of my new keen-eyed anti-trolling regime!

Anonymous said...

Gerry

Mortgage fraud was all they could get him on
After years of trying
Then they put him in a cat A prison for mortgage fraud hoping all the Muslim jihadists would kill him
They even locked him in a room with 2 Muslims and 2 converts who battered him senseless. Knocked most of his teeth out and he had to have reconstructive surgery
The government meant did that
For mortgage fraud
Ps I bet there are a few reading this who have mislead on their mortgage application
And in a booming housing market it happens all the time
If they could of got him for anything else they would of loved to give him ten years

Anyway I won’t put up anymore of his entertaining videos or his anti Muslim rhetoric
As he is a convicted fraudster
Catch yourself on ffs

Anonymous said...

I am old and do not care about such things. Even my life does not matter very much. So I can say Coon, Nigger, Ikey Mo, Four by Two, Chink, Tinted Folk, Faggots and Shitskins with relative impunity. If ever I am arrested and charged with “hate” I will enjoy defending myself with no shyster (((lawyer))), in a blaze of glory which of course will not be publicised at all by the (((media))). 

You see geoffers this in a nutshell is why you as a golden oldie should have a bit more self awareness. (It's good that the good fight has come at just the right time for You) People have jobs, are younger than you (try getting your children to be upfront like you suggest) have bills to pay, they don't want their kids living in abject poverty. Incidentally why did you send your child to a multi school when there must of been other schools to choose from. Just wondering old chap.

Regulation 18B

ChumLee's brother said...


SAV, first time that I've ever seen you rattled. @ 10:21

You did it to yourself.

Searcher and her motley crew are like the Eucharistic ministers at mass.
Whilst a few of them do sterling service out in the community...there is a hard core of middle aged women, with their trousers half way up their asses...who absolutely insist on handing out communion at mass, on the pretence that they are helping out the priest.
And they will go running to the Bishop with every micro-grievance that they have against any Priest that dosen't kow tow to them in their quest for power.
At mass I play the game "Dodge the Eucharistic Minister". It's like space invaders but with people. You have to keep queue jumping, as the Searcher-esque old tarts use spoiling tactics, like switching stations with the Priest at the last moment etc.

Anonymous said...

Will it kick off now ?

https://twitter.com/LTCJonathan/status/962288309203558400/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rt.com%2Fnews%2F418406-israel-iran-syria-fire%2F

Anonymous said...

Uncle Nasty said...
.
Interestingly enough, I had a crack at downloading this:-

Anonymous said...
The Queens Enemies - earlier today on Radio 4

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09qhsc4
9 February 2018 at 18:20

Only to be met with this message:-

NOTUKERROR

403 notukerror

Which, one has to assume, means that no-one outside the UK may access or download it. Can't be giving the colonials ideas, can we?

UN

10 February 2018 at 07:04


Thought BBC iplayer was free for 'foreigners'? if you haven't sign in it's free

Anonymous said...

The Queen's Enemies
Out of the Ordinary, Series 6 (Radio 4)

Across Britain, thousands of people have stopped paying council tax, water rates and speeding fines. They think they have the law on their side, thanks to the 1215 Magna Carta treaty between King John and the Barons. They argue that the present Queen has breached her obligations under the treaty and so has in effect deposed herself and even become a traitor. As a result, all laws passed by parliament are invalid, the courts are shams, and government officials are imposters. Instead, they swear an oath of allegiance to a group of members of the House of Lords.

The rebels meet in a Facebook group with 13,000 members. In truth, few people join the group because of an interest in constitutional history - most arrive there because they are in a desperate financial or legal situation, feel that the system is stacked against them, and are looking for a way out. The group offers a system to deal with the authorities that - if used effectively - will supposedly get them off your back.

For nearly a year, Jolyon Jenkins followed the group's members, even signing an oath himself. But does the system work? Over the months, members of the group become increasingly frustrated at the authorities' refusal to take their arguments seriously. The frustration eventually leads to a secret plan to seize a crown building, as they believe Magna Carta entitles them to.

Presenter/Producer: Jolyon Jenkins.

Anonymous said...

How many Muslims are currently living in Ireland?

According to the 2011 Irish census, there were 49,204 Muslims living in the Republic of Ireland, representing a 51% increase over the figures for the 2006 census. At the time of the 2016 Irish census the number of Muslims had increased from 49,000 to 63,000, an increase of 29%.

(Google)

How long before Ireland, like England is over whelmed?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVXIcJ0XkAAY2yX.jpg

Anonymous said...

It's all here, all brazenly obvious in 'technicolour' from Google itself ?!?
Just copy and past the search below into your browser

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=abarron+haviv&client=opera&hs=HBE&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj2m5fTxpvZAhVQzqQKHchnB4wQsAQIJg&biw=1880&bih=970

Anonymous said...


https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1457/95/1457957887901.jpg

Geoffrey said...

I ask for any Anon to refute this advice I gave to Anon Bill. How to use a name here - it is perhaps easier than being Anon. My name pops up with each new comment and I just have to click it.

"Bill, there is no need to choose Google Account. I choose Name then I enter my name, then Post. I do not enter any URL or Gmail account. Have you tried this? Just as easy as choosing Anon, then having to type your name on every post which I do not have to do."

Wotamuthafarker said...

The Anonymous comments on this thread present strong evidence for the case that Anon posts should not be allowed - if the site host blogger dot com has thought about this option. A chosen name does not require signing in, unless I have missed something. Savant asked for help with administrative questions, and now about 90% of comments are not addressing his questions at all. Including those who use names. "Happens every time".

Comments here are like the game of Chinese Whispers - the end is nothing like the start. On many sites such as Yahoo and The Daily Mail the comments are better than the host "news'. On this site the Savant posts are better than the majority of comments.

There is entertainment in watching an Autistic argue with an Asperger’s. Here is the place.

Watching or listening to a low brow knuckle dragger abusing an intelligent person is a modern version of bear baiting. Get your knuckle draggers here, also.

Anonymous said...

Sav
Off topic?
I watched a clip by chance, from.BBC Horrible Histories prog.(a spoof using Cinderella... in the blitz. series 1 -episode seven .May 2009.)I my opinion is deliberate degrading . Setting up for a repeat are we?
I would accepted this on face value , but I had already watched the London /Hull/Bristol/Clyde Bank series of programmes .
The true level of hard ship experienced and the level of deceit used by the authorities which caused slaughter to occur on a much greater scale.
New to me the level of deceit and treachery in play at that time!
Folk (mostly women and elderly males were stopped from leaving the area of maximum bombardment) .Most fit males rounded and put in holding areas out of range!
I note :Still no instructions regarding action to or not in the case of a stampede by large adults in places of entertainment.
dofornow
I started this post 4 days ago:
Stuff keeps coming too mind
The thespians in the spoof: A cross section of present day London and
how my mother blamed herself fo Eileens’ death!
www.telegraph.co.uk › News
2 days ago - A keen sailor who had competed for Britain in the European Championships, she had been enjoying a night out with members for the Durham University Sailing Club when the tragedy happened. Eyewitnesses described how Miss Burt became trapped under a barrier
which collapsed as students queued ...

Anonymous said...

Wotamotherfarker... You've just identified yourself !
The trolls are starting to bark and knarl like mad dogs lol

Geoffrey said...

Savant, here is a compromise idea. Ban all personal insults made by Anon posters. Those that wish to degrade themselves and others must have a Moniker. Then their victims can have a go back, if they wish. There is nothing sillier than two Anons insulting each other, which happens here. Maybe the two Anons are one Schizo, careless with the Meds.

Anonymous said...

O/T @ 10 February 2018 at 18:24
Another one - see it's dead easy! Pussy mushy is it you ?

Anonymous said...

The little 96 year old man who performed the coin toss at the Superbowl was the great Woody Williams. During the battle of Iwo Jima, he climbed atop a pillbox and put the nozzle of his flamethrower down the chimney. And a bunch of other stuff that day.

Anonymous said...

Overly long comments scratch. Obvious trolls putting in propaganda and fake news.

Frank Galton said...

EDL leader S̶t̶e̶p̶h̶e̶n̶ ̶L̶e̶n̶n̶o̶n̶ ̶ T̶o̶m̶m̶y̶ ̶R̶o̶b̶i̶n̶s̶o̶n̶ Paul Harris jailed for false passport offence

BBC, 07 January 2013

The leader of the English Defence League has been jailed for 10 months for using someone else's passport to travel to the USA.

Stephen Lennon, 30, from Luton, admitted possession of a false identity document with improper intention.

Lennon used a passport in the name of Andrew McMaster to board a Virgin Atlantic flight from Heathrow to New York, Southwark Crown Court was told.

He stayed one night and travelled back to the UK the following day using his own legitimate passport, which bears the name of PAUL HARRIS.

Judge Alistair McCreath told him: "I am going to sentence you under the name of Stephen Lennon although I suspect that is not actually your true name, in the sense that it is not the name that appears on your passport.

Lennon was jailed for assault in 2005 and also has convictions for drugs offences and public order offences, the court heard.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-20935502

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

Watching or listening to a low brow knuckle dragger abusing an intelligent person is a modern version of bear baiting. Get your knuckle draggers here, also.

Well yes, but the way to look at it, is, the person doing the abusing is only showing themselves up and other's can see what's going on. Savant should just delete those offenders after a while. Looking back at the last five years of posts (just a few here and there, Rob was good and a few anons) you can see it was a bit more classy with a good few commentators but you still had the trolls or wind-ups back then. Some commentators leave having said all they have to say, seeing that it's a full circle (maybe their therapy was complete, they got it all out so to speak).
No one should be discouraged from writing a comment just because their grammar isn't up to scratch, by the look of things some here are living the real nightmare with it all about them, so writing to this blog is an outlet for them.But granted People should watch their abuse levels, unless it's directed at james.
Savant should not except any comment within the first 50 that isn't commenting on the actual post in hand.

Anonymous said...

If you think the establishment is upset with Trump now, wait'll he pardons Larry Nassar.

Anonymous said...

NYC is 40% foreign born.

SAVANT said...

Ok folks, that's about it. Thanks a mill for all the input. As with any good forum there was a range of views expressed. After due consideration and reflection I plan to leave things pretty much as they apart from:

Banning Anonymous comments and comments that are just inter-personal insults.

At the start of every comment thread I'll have a standard notice to this effect.

And as Geoffrey and some other posters mentioned it's virtually as easy to choose Name/Url and then enter some kind of identifier as it is to choose Anonymous.

Happy posting!

Anonymous said...

The New World Order and associated Marxists and minority fanatics made the same mistake Hitler did. They went for our throats five years too soon. They started with the serious white male scapegoating in Obama's second term, figuring it was their best shot to wrap everything up. And they decided to swarm the monkeys in everywhere. But nobody misses that stuff and now we have Trump.

Where I live it's been a shitstorm since the seventies. I like the exotic and wouldn't mind so much but it's just getting so crowded. I was at Walmart today and saw a woman in full veil and her husband waiting outside wearing the white outfit, you know, with the stupid little ice cream vendor hat on his head. And of course the place was filled with sheboons (maybe not quite as black as the British prince's future mother-in-law). No big deal except for the vicious old crone who wouldn't get out of my way in the aisle.

They could have flooded the country with half a billion tribesmen by 2020 but now we have a chance of diminishing it. Of course, Buchanan was the right man at the right time with the right vision in the nineties but he wasn't electable. He couldn't resist calling out the Jews in the late seventies for their takeover of academia.

Bill

ChumLee's brother said...

Anon @ 18:24

The true level of hard ship experienced and the level of deceit used by the authorities which caused slaughter to occur on a much greater scale.
New to me the level of deceit and treachery in play at that time!
Folk (mostly women and elderly males were stopped from leaving the area of maximum bombardment) .Most fit males rounded and put in holding areas out of range!

....The British ((("establishment"))) was waging war on the British public in WWII.
The German V Weapons were used to great effect by the British secret service.
Detonate a bomb near the Admiralty in London, and in all the chaos, embedded agents ran around the corridors and threw out of the windows high up, several senior offices who weren't going along with the (((programme))).Deaths blamed on V2 rocket.
Same with Regimental church full of soldiers wives and children. Blow that sucker up, and blame it on the V2. Throw a metal fin in the debris and the narrative is complete. It's the soldiers fault, obviously they weren't prosecuting the war to their (((masters))) satisfaction.
Then after the war is over...bring in boat loads of blacks to screw our women. This is something that is only done to a country that is beaten.

AnalogMan said...

Savant, I of course respect your decision, and this is not a criticism, but I hope you won't be too dogmatic in your enforcement of the anonymous rule. There are a couple of long-time posters here, e.g. dofornow, john old retd chicago copper, whose perspectives I enjoy, who always identify themselves and whom I would miss, but who may be resistant to change, shall I say? Be gentle with us codgers.

Frank Galton said...

Jewish Telegraphic Agency, 20 July 2016

When the late Austro-Hungarian aristocrat Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi attended church on Good Friday, his father would famously cause a scene, storming out when the liturgy came to the anti-Semitic exhortation “Let us also pray for the faithless Jews.”

Such protest was unusual in 19th-century Austria-Hungary, where anti-Semitism and other forms of racism were de rigueur. But the old count — a personal friend of Zionist legend THEODOR HERZL — abhorred such biases in part because his wife, Richard’s mother, was Japanese.

Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi made the fight against anti-Semitism a cornerstone of the Pan-Europa movement he founded in 1926. It was a major precursor of the European Union...

Little wonder, then, that prominent Jews such as Albert Einstein and Sigmund Freud endorsed the nobleman’s pan-European vision from its inception.

[Is it good for the Jews?] Traditionally, Jews have been very supportive of the incarnation of von Coudenhove-Kalergi’s vision: the European Union, with its strong anti-racist rhetoric and agendas. [Is it good for the Jews?] But the growing influence of homegrown xenophobes, integration failures and Brussels’ perceived singling out of Israel for criticism have disillusioned many Jewish opinion shapers.
https://www.jta.org/2016/07/20/news-opinion/world/can-a-hobbled-eu-live-up-to-its-promise-to-combat-anti-semitism-and-racism

"Jews have been very supportive of the incarnation of von Coudenhove-Kalergi’s vision"

COUDENHOVE-KALERGI’S VISION

"The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.

"Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi

Jewish Telegraphic Agency, 02 August 1934

[Coudenhove-Kalergi] did declare for a European-Negroid race, with an intellectual aristocracy of Jews...
https://www.jta.org/1934/08/02/archive/the-bulletins-day-book-142

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

Gerry
Frankie said
Lennon used a passport in the name of Andrew McMaster to board a Virgin Atlantic flight from Heathrow to New York, Southwark Crown Court was told.

Just to put the record straight
He was invited by Americans to speak
And foolishly because he knew he would be banned
He tried to get there to speak to the American right by deception
Big boo frank
Ffs
To be honest I got up to more than Tommy by the time I was 21 growing up on a council estate in bham
He is just a amateur
But because of his dubious character
And by the way a lot of street lads who went for a row on edl rallies don’t like him because he put a suit on and that quillam thing.
But they all enjoy his videos

And another thing if there is anybody out there doing better videos or reports I will support them.
Even you frank if you want to put a microphone in peoples faces and put your life on the line and your family’s security.
I will come with you and I will film it so the left can’t lie
Ps it needs a special kind of person to do this.with a thick skin or no concentration other than their ideas or thoughts
A friend of mine went to Brussels about 7 years ago . He was Tommy’s personal only back up on the day
He said Tommy was up all night pacing rehearsing his speech
And he got up in Brussels and gave a great speech about the evil of Islamic indoctrination
He then came back to his seat and after a while he became bored with the rest of the chit chat about how Europe should accommodate Islam
He started making finger puppets on the wall

So I know he isn’t the great saviour
And he isn’t my hero
But I think his videos are brave and funny
I couldn’t do it

But don’t worry I won’t be putting anymore up
Because you have proved he is a fraudster and a altogether no good person who shouldn’t have a voice about Islam

Ps I will put up 1 more video
Where were you supporting this action against criminals

AnalogMan said...

Anonymous said...

O/T @ 10 February 2018 at 18:24
Another one - see it's dead easy! Pussy mushy is it you ?


No, that's dofornow, a longtime respected contributor. See? He signed his name, unlike you. Just before the postscript. If you took the time to find your bearings before starting in slinging anonymous insults, you would know that.

SAVANT said...

Thanks Analog and I'm aware of that. In short if a poster identifies in any way I'll post it.

Anonymous said...

Gerry

Why aren’t there crowds outside the courts of grooming gangs
Why are we afraid or does it cost to much to travel there
Or is it because it will interfere with our daily lives
You can bet if this was white English men in court for raping young Muslim girls
There would be mobs outside
Why are we afraid
Only Tommy turned up at numerous grooming court cases
I went to to 2 about 5 years ago in Yorkshire
Cost me a days wages and a £100 pound
Travel plus food
But at least I went. And mostly what happened was the English police took my name a few times filmed me lots of times
And then raided my house a few months later.
But I went
Same as the al quids demonstrations in London
I went for 3 years on the trot
About 50 of us tried to block the Rd on 1 demo and the police got very heavy handed and hit us with batons
Just so that thousands could march with banned Muslim groups banners across London
But hey if thousands had turned up to support us. It might of been different
But they didn’t
No they would rather argue on the internet
Ps I’m 60 this year
And I will still turn up on some rallies
Speakers corner has been lost to Muslim aggression
I would love to go back there
We turned there tables over a few years ago
It’s about time we went back over free speech
But we will be lonely as nobody else will turn up
To busy on the internet

ChumLee's brother said...


Gerry...for what is worth...you're right. And also, a personal thanks for all you've done.

cranky white woman said...

In reference to anonymous and your trip to Walmart-I have just returned from Target=I think I was the only white woman in the place.But the real unbelievable I saw earlier
today,having turned up at the stable for my usual saturday riding lesson.A couple of us were standing about chatting when somebody came along and expressed the opinion that she wondered be if it was a good idea to be riding with all those flowing robes.Turned to look in one of the arenas and there was a bloody muzzie riding a horse.covered from head to toes and a riding helmet over her heeby jeeby. FFS
I realize my little anecdote is off topic.I just wanted to say how much I enjoy this blog,even when commenters go off on tangents.Censoring would be a terrible idea,although I do get tired sometimes of hearing about jews.Mind you, every jew I have every met has been a pain in the ass and I have never met one I liked.

Geoffrey said...

Savant, I am pleased you like my idea (and from some others) to ban insults from Anons. Who would have expected the owner of the site would have taken advice from a jigaboo taxi driver jew HasbaRat troll? Winners are grinners. The losers cannot even have the fun of swearing and abusing me from their keyboards. Well they can, but their abusive comments will mostly not be published.

Although I would have preferred ending the Anons altogether, as using a Name is very easy. I do not know why so many people still think that choosing an invented name, with no sign in or Email address, is less secure than being called Anon. Those Anons that now know their worries were groundless will not admit it.

I think that Anons that question/criticise other posts have no right to expect a reply. The insults were the pointy stick which got the angry response they were looking for.

All commenters that want any type of debate with another poster should choose a name. I do not buy the idea that the time and date stamp is good enough. Those Anons that sign their posts forget that any other Anon can copy them with the same inline sign off with fake opinions. I wonder how often this happens. Not often enough, unfortunately, to wake up Anons from their slumber.

Savant, have you made any decisions as to your other requests for opinions?

Rusty said...

The SQ
All squirrels are merely interchangeable economic units of consumption.

What total Rot

If we don’t do anything all those indigenous to this land will go extinct. Allowing a destructive force entry can never end well, in the end we fight or we die.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9CWXi5q4ARY

Rusty

ChumLee's brother said...

Anonymous said...
The New World Order and associated Marxists and minority fanatics made the same mistake Hitler did. They went for our throats five years too soon. They started with the serious white male scapegoating in Obama's second term, figuring it was their best shot to wrap everything up. And they decided to swarm the monkeys in everywhere. But nobody misses that stuff and now we have Trump.

...The way I see it, Obama's policies were so effective, as they had little or no opposition ( that's a 'wite' thang ), that (((they))) had to put in Trump, to hold the fort for 8 years, and give the demographic time bomb time to explode on (((their))) terms.
Also, if the 'progressives' take too much ground, the USA will cease to be a viable country overnight, so some sanity has to be restored going forward, less the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.
Even (((destroyers of worlds))) have to know when to back up a little...Maybe the (((parasite))) has learned something, over the last several thousand years.

6271530 said...

Geoffrey give it a rest will you, you're just a number at the end of the day from your birth certificate number to your national insurance number to your driving licence number to your passport number to your wedding licence number to you death certificate number. You are just a fucking number. You only have a name coz your mommy liked the name Geoffrey to put to that nice little scrunched up face. And if you think you are free by saying you're not a number you are a free man called Geoffrey, then try going off grid 100% Bear Grylls does it for a week or two for a teevee program but even he can't wait for an instant hot shower and a comfortable bed with clean pressed bedsheets to roll in to.
Ps if the nazis were lucky enough to have had you in ww2 with your clipboard checking and ticking with approval they might have bloody won. I sense your daddy was in the Royal Australian Tick Box Brigade.
Lets just move on now Geoffrey

Anonymous said...

THERE ARE TWO KINDS OF PEOPLE, THOSE WHO STARE AT THE DATA AND LET THIS TRUTH REWARD THEM, AND THEN THERE ARE THOSE WHO, ONCE THEY RECOIL IN HORROR - TOSS THIS DATA AND CHARGE FORWARD, BLINDED BY SOME IDIOTIC NOTION.

AA. EEOC. EBT. WELFARE. SECTION 8. SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAMS. AND WHAT IS THE BEST ALL OF THESE HAVE GENERATED?

"HE WAS AN ASPIRING RAPPER."
/55

nilus said...

"I pretty much live 100% at Morgoths,(as Tony Hayers)

This place seems to attract the split personality types
"

NEWSFLASH: "Tony Hayers" "Nilus" "Morgoth" and yes, even "Irish Savant" are
what are known as nom-de-plumes / pen names /aliases /pseudonyms

FFS

Banger said...

the question is, Savant: could you really be arse-holed trawling through dozens of comments, deleting as you go, according to some pre-ordained, hazy set of parameters?
We all know who the lunatics are, save yerself the time and leave the rest of us to ignore 'em, I say~