Monday, 4 February 2013

On Nastiest Uncles

I have a number of Jewish friends and colleagues who, during my deluded white liberal (DWL) days  were among the few to warn about non-White immigration. An Israeli work colleague continually got onto me, warning that we'd regret 'leaving all those savages' (he had Muslims in mind, admittedly) enter our countries. One Irish Jewish friend in particular used to rant about 'the fucking monkeys swarming all over the place'.  And, irony of ironies, I used to admonish them for their racism ('you as Jews, of all people.......').

As you know I subsequently, and over time, became aware of the central role Jews played in setting this destructive process in train and how indeed they continue to do so (stand up Alan Shatter). Those friends and colleagues - and this will come as no surprise - absolutely refuse to even contemplate the possibility of this being true. Response is kind of hands over the ears and 'na-na-na-na-na I can't hear you'.  In common with all Jews they refuse to accept any Jewish blame. Which comes with the territory, I guess.

Now: Are those people friends or enemies of our cause? They actively oppose mass immigration. They don't demonstrate any support for the other main planks of White destruction such as feminism, political correctness, moral/cultural relativism, or degenerate art. Surely it's a bad strategy to alienate and antagonise them and drive them out of 'our' camp? Surely every movement encompasses a wide range of views and priorities?  Listen, we're not exactly swamped with supporters, are we?

The argument will be made that they only appear to be with us so as to sow dissension in our ranks. I have no doubt that this applies in many if not most cases. But it certainly does not apply with the people I know. And don't argue with me on this because I've known most of them all my life. They are not dissimulating. So if I call them fucking Jew bastards and tell them to get out of my sight, well, as far as I'm concerned all I've done is lose them as allies, albeit attenuated ones.

Which brings me to Nastiest Uncle. I'll stick my neck out and propose that he's like my friends, with similar objectives. Sure, he'll defend and mislead and so on when the central role of  Jews is pointed out. Just as my friends and colleagues do. Now I've been inundated with complaints to the effect that he brings the Jewish issue into every response and that, as per Occidental Dissent, this immediately lowers the standard of the discussion.

Well I've taken a long look back at the threads and one point has become clear.  UN never brings the JI into his comments unless it's flung in his face or it forms the basis of my main post.  Au contraire, what happens almost all the time is that he makes a general point, and is then immediately inundated with a torrent of abuse predicated on his Jewishness.

So the issue we have to face, ladies and gentlemen, is whether we see Jews who support our main objectives while denying Jewish responsibility as allies or enemies. My view, and it can change, as my pathetic confession in the first paragraph shows, is that they are allies. Allies with whom we disagree on a vital strategic issue, but on which we hope to change their minds by way of reasoned dialogue.

This latter statement will, I know, drive many of you to despair.  To curse my naivety. And you may be right. But I hope you're not.

256 comments:

1 – 200 of 256   Newer›   Newest»
Dan said...

I personally know a Jewish person who was involved in the Freedom Ride malarky. She's not close but was sister of one of the murdered riders.

I said before pick on one or another group. Taking on both in one go will not work. Either the Jew or the black. Prioritize.

They are subversive weather they know it or not. The blacks destroy things direct.

Dan said...

Whether...

Uncle Shlomo said...

Drishat shalom Savant!

My dear old khaver you have made Uncle Shlomo very very happy already with your confessions. I love to see white men confess they, I mean we should all be made to confess every day, in a gulag preferably, about how weak, worthless, and just generally fucking pathetic you, I mean, we all are. Then come the firing squad eh? - juz joking my friend!

Now my dear old sav you sound like an ideal candidate for my new elite white nationalist organisation iz called: Shlomos Combat Hardened Militia Utterly & Completely Kosher (SCHMUCK)

After I just read your fine words you sound like a real SCHMUCK, savant, so get your gelt off to me today here in the white aryan enclave of Golders Green and I will shlep your membership card in the post once I've let the rabbi wipe his dick on it for good luck.

At the moment you're just any old Joe Shmoe but when I get your shekel you officially be a right Schmuck and probably even a schlub and maybe even a klutz.

Lozn grizn to your fraynd nastiest uncle ;-)

Mazel tov 1488

Bemused stare said...

So Sav, jews don't like being up to their armpits in africans in the place that they live and work. I suspect the common barnacle would agree on that one. How does this make them our friends, since usually they make every effort to put them on our backs while dodging them with vigor?

The truth will out said...

History has taught us this lesson, it's been in cycle since Babylonian times.

Let me retell the old Liconln Rockwell classic

It really has more resonance when it's read rather than listened to.

The Fable of the Ducks and the Hens
Echoes of the past ripple back to the future

Please read through the most concise easy to understand tale of what happens when you allow the virus to become part of your tribe.


If someone here can help me find a webpage from an old NF article regarding this very issue of allowing juwes into any nationalist movement.
Tried all sorts from memory but my searches come up with owt.

Iron Felix said...

Well Savant, perhaps the best I can offer is Sartre on Jews; "Jews are murderers" saith he "and they are musicians. They are gangsters and physicians, poets and poltroons;.........." he goes on in this vein---I am more or less paraphrasing him---and, well, I have always felt he had a point. My own limited experience of both Jews and Israelis has been almost entirely a fortunate and pleasent one. I incline to the idea that there is a strain within them, right enough, that does match the villainous description, and indeed that said strain may well be utter villains---but, rounding on that nice fellow who makes the great pastries on account of a Mogilevitch or a Parvus? No, it would be unjust as well as unworthy. I think, Savant, your instincts here are right---there are Jews and there are Jews.

The truth will out said...

Oh yeah not forgetting latest Goy toy Tommy 'Oy Vey' Robinson.

That's what juwes do to you when you bend your rules to play by their game.

They fuck you over, then fuck you over some more.

You are goy, their eternal enemy.

Forget that, and you may as well forget everything you've ever learnt and read to date.

Then vote Shatter back in next term...

Anonymous said...

Iron Felix said

"the best I can offer is Sartre on Jews.....snip......-there are Jews and there are Jews"

If the best you can offer is quoting a Jew (Sartre) on Jews then your best is hardly good enough, is it?

kulak said...

They actively oppose mass immigration.

So Shatter is doing almost everything right. The only thing he's doing wrong is granting too many Nigerians Irish citizenship at one time. En masse.

It should be one thousand Nigerians at a time that are granted Irish citizenship, not ten thousand Nigerians.

Yer gonna fall for this?

Mass immigration is not the problem Savant. Agreement on it does not matter.

Celt said...

the truth will out

the publisher of that fine poem was banged up for five years on 'race hate charges' and is now back inside for some trumped up breach of his parole conditions.

Here he pins the blame for his persecution firmly on the usual suspects:

http://www.heretical.com/imprisonment-by-jewish-lobbies.html

Savant could do with reading that.

Anonymous said...

The Mother Hive

Iron Felix said...

Anon. 22.16.
Hardly good enough, you say---hardly good enough for what exactly?
Sartre not Jewish, by the by.

Dame Edith said...

Seems like a generous and appropriate offer from good old Uncle Shlomo. Take it up, man!

white rose said...

I think the central issue to be resolved is the proportion of jews who are like the ones Savant refers to. I have no idea. But if the proportion is high it seems sensible not to make total enemies out of them.

I'm confused, to be honest, as almost everyone here seems to think that once inside the hive they'll destroy it, like Kipling's fable linked above.

Anonymous said...

Savant you are not thinking right.
Forget any guilt over betraying your Jew friends, your loyalties should be to YOUR tribe, not to other tribes. If you keep this in your head
you can't get it wrong and guilt won't come into it.

Anonymous said...

Sartre was Jewish, not a religious Jew (until the last stage of his life) but an ethnic Jew and a committed cultural and revolutionary Marxist.

http://www.clal.org/e84.html

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Dan said...

I personally know a Jewish person who was involved in the Freedom Ride malarky. She's not close but was sister of one of the murdered riders.

I said before pick on one or another group. Taking on both in one go will not work. Either the Jew or the black. Prioritize.

They are subversive weather they know it or not. The blacks destroy things direct.


Dan has it right. I often feel that the most complex questions can be distilled to their essence.

Blacks or jews? Who to target?

Did blacks play an enormous part in the enslavement, importation, dissemination and elevation to power and influence of jews?

Do blacks own and control all the means of propaganda?

Do blacks own and control world finance?

There's your answer.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
The truth will out said...

If someone here can help me find a webpage from an old NF article regarding this very issue of allowing juwes into any nationalist movement.
Tried all sorts from memory but my searches come up with owt.


I did a search TTWO, and came up with this, hope it helps.

http://nz.yhs4.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?p=jews+infiltrate+nationalist+movements&fr=altavista&fr2=sfp&iscqry=

71 000 results ... happy hunting.

UN
.

Franz said...

Sayan is the trouble (sometimes spelt different).

Some Jews might be on your side but they won't stop the ones who aren't. Here in my neck of the woods they're in immigration law, which is to say, replacing us whites with duskier and (for Jews) more compliant models.

They all hate us, Sav. Sorry. Some express it differently because they have a different role to play.

Anonymous said...

Declare what you're for and let your enemies declare themselves.

I am for white survival. I am for whites having their own countries.

Lots of jews oppose that AND oppose "mass immigration."

If I am for white survival, what should I be against?

White genocide.

Energy and time spent opposing mass immigration, as such, is energy and time not spent on white survival.

It is implicit white.

Such a movement is fine with white genocide as long there's a longer phase-in period.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
white rose said...

I'm confused, to be honest, as almost everyone here seems to think that once inside the hive they'll destroy it, like Kipling's fable linked above.

... and they have an excellent reason for thinking that. I got this from a jewish site.

http://www.yivoencyclopedia.org/article.aspx/Antisemitic_Parties_and_Movements

A history of jewish activism in Europe an the nineteenth century alone ... written by a jew. Read it and grind your teeth.

Then think of that rodent -- Barbara Lerner Specter.

They are truly a virus.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Further to my last.

What can finally be said about a race that are loathed, shunned, vilified, repressed, confined to ghettoes, finally expelled and eternally banned ... only to come creeping back ... to start the whole cycle all over again ... and again and again.

If I am not wanted somewhere ... I take the hint, and go.

This is the behavior of cockroaches.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Anonymous said...

Energy and time spent opposing mass immigration, as such, is energy and time not spent on white survival.

Crap.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

I've never been bothered by Nastiest Uncle's presence on here. Personally it would be very boring if we all agreed on all issues. He can also be quite funny, too.

I agree with you 100% about the JI, btw.

Richard said...

Not all Jooz are political, or openly hostile to gentiles - but one thing is certain and constant: they will always act in the best interests of their own people (a shame whites don't have the same racial loyalty) - over the interests of their adopted country. A seemingly harmless tribal member will often be deployed as a 'Sayanim'. An old friend or acquaintance - could be an accountant - if he is called upon to reveal confidential information about a goyim's business affairs for the greater good of the tribe, he will not hesitate. This is the same throughout all the professions. This gives the tribe a massive financial and political advantage over the normally honest host population.
A country without this racial identity and unity offers the least resistance to these people - hence the massive effort by all the professions they influence to embrace multiculturalism.

Anonymous said...

So the issue we have to face, ladies and gentlemen, is whether we see Jews who support our main objectives while denying Jewish responsibility as allies or enemies. My view, and it can change, as my pathetic confession in the first paragraph shows, is that they are allies. Allies with whom we disagree on a vital strategic issue, but on which we hope to change their minds by way of reasoned dialogue.

I have lately come to the conclusion that I am not using my time productively when I post on forums and rarely now do so but your comment caught my eye and I do have a few minutes!

The only objectives Jews support are;

1. Themselves

2. Other Jews

That is all.

Ethnically homogenous States are a threat to embedded Jewry so mass migration and encouraged miscegenation is "good for the Jews" - irrespective of whether individual (little) Jews may be worried about their personal safety on the streets from Negro muggers or Muslim terrorists. "Fellow travellers" such as the young(er) Savant are their useful idiots with their twisted altruism and alarming (and ,frankly, mind boggling) inability to discern the difference between a European and a Homo Erectus.

Jews, unfortunately, exist but as I have said before, to little effect, our collective weakness over the centuries has allowed them to grow stronger.

Schaublin

Anonymous said...

@Uncle Nasty

What can finally be said about a race that are loathed, shunned, vilified, repressed, confined to ghettoes, finally expelled and eternally banned ... only to come creeping back ... to start the whole cycle all over again ... and again and again.

Yes, the cycle goes on but the parasite needs the host - and the host is division and weakness in Europeans. How many posters or readers here borrow or lend money to banks? - the single most important thing that enables the system to continue. Vote in the sham democratic system that gives legitimacy to the State?

You see where I am going.

Schaublin

Keiser said...

Was watching a bit of Modern Family (bored-days off) as much as I hate the premise which I mentioned before... multicultural family, white guy with Mestizo second wife, blonde with non typical (for Westerners) looking husband and kids, except son who is western looking but is portrayed as morally deficient and the two easily identifiable white guys are gay with an adopted Vietnamese child.

Modern Family's
Jewish Producer Steven Levitan

Just watched Season 4 Episode 8 "Mistery Date"

A few minutes in an extra, a young girl talks about being invited to a Bar Mitzvah to her friends and says "the gift bags have mobile phones" and then exclaims "Jewish people are great!" So out of place it just stuck out as a real message. They are a tribe... to hell with everyone else. So I say fight fire with water, be our own people and true to our identity. Put our Nationalism first and the rest will fall into place but we have to at least be cognisant of the real problem all the same.

Dan said...

Sartre really laid into Camus in this exchange they made.

Sartre was a thug against Camus.

Keiser said...

opps bear with me

Steven Levitan

Dan said...

Anyone ever read their exchanges?

Camus was a pleasant conservative and in their discussions Sartre mugged him repeatedly by goading him with anti colonial, anti white supremacist diatribes.

Dan said...

Ed ONeill, that's the actors name right? From married with children? He's a bastard.

Anonymous said...

Savant,

Always remember that it is the Jew that has created the black problem and not the black that has created the Jew problem. I am willing to bet that your friendships with these Jews would be non-existent if the shoe were on the other foot. Very few Jews are genuine all the time. And, even fewer believe friendship with a loyal but stupid goy is more valuable than defending destructive and criminal Jews who are destroying the very nations they all inhabit..... as guests.

Pick your poison but I believe the black, although a savage, is more trustworthy than the Jew.

Uncle Nasty said...

Much as I do not trust the mainstream press (MSM) when I see articles like this ...

http://www.examiner.com/article/saudi-arabia-islamic-cleric-rapes-tortures-kills-daughter-pays-fine

Saudi Arabia: Islamic cleric rapes, tortures, kills daughter, pays fine

February 3, 2013
By: Michael Stone

In Saudi Arabia an Islamic cleric who admits to raping, torturing and killing his daughter received a fine but no jail time for his heinous crime. Saudi media reports that the father paid 200,000 riyals ($50,000 US) in “blood money” for his crime, but will not be required to serve any time in prison.

In response to the heinous crime, and lack of justice for five-year old victim Lama al-Ghamdi, the women's rights activist Manal al-Sharif and others issued a press release on Feb 2, and launched a Twitter campaign using the hashtags #AnaLama (Arabic for "I am Lama") and #IamLama, demanding legislation criminalizing violence against women and children.

Fayhan al-Ghamdi, the victims father and a popular Islamic preacher who has made numerous television appearances promoting Islam, confessed to the heinous crime. Ghamdi told Saudi officials he used cables and a cane on his five-year-old daughter, leaving her with multiple injuries, including a crushed skull, broken ribs and left arm, extensive bruising and burns. In addition, one of Lama’s fingernails had been torn off. Hospital staff reports the child’s rectum had been torn open and the abuser had attempted to burn it closed.


... I am reminded of the old truism:- Niggers are living proof that arabs fuck camels.

Or is it the other way round? Your choice. Either way, the semite is not your friend.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

The problem isn't the Jews, I know many Jewish moderates and conservatives who are very pro-christian and pro-european, and say how destructive interracial dating/marriage is. The problem is the white man's psyche: We were biologically programmed through millenia of micro-evolution to be cooperative and altruistic, and to think reciprocally. We will take the sides of our adversaries over and over to the point of becoming doormats for those ungrateful tree-climbing ghetto-monkeys...... I mean niggers. But here in the U.S., things are about to change: Black mob-riots, some as large as 500-1,000 niggers big are occurring with greater frequency and intensity. Even the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center (which is the KKK of the left) has an article on its website decrying it, and says that this phenomenon will ultimately undo the "civil rights" movement. When the U.S. and or one of the European nations undergoes their civil war, the rest of the dominoes will fall, and the white man will become wiser.

AnalogMan said...

UN: Either way, the semite is not your friend.

The irony is, according to the article I linked a couple of days ago, the Jews are not Semites.

Anonymous said...

Pick your poison but I believe the black, although a savage, is more trustworthy than the Jew.

I'm not sure blacks are more trustworthy, but there remains a big moral difference in my opinion.

On average, blacks are sincere but impulsive.

Jews are just the opposite.

Uncle Nasty said...

AnalogMan said...

UN: Either way, the semite is not your friend.

The irony is, according to the article I linked a couple of days ago, the Jews are not Semites.


I take your point, AnalogMan, those that purport to be the chosen ones are Khazars, but they think like semites and behave like them ... so I am prepared to offer them the status of honorary camelscrewers** ... rather the same way that Hendrik gave the Chinese and Japanese "honorary white" status.

Thin end of the wedge ... even then.

UN

PS ** It's only fair.
.

kulak said...

I know many Jewish moderates and conservatives who are very pro-christian and pro-european, and say how destructive interracial dating/marriage is.

But do they know what you think?

The problem is the white man's psyche: We were biologically programmed through millenia of micro-evolution to be cooperative and altruistic, and to think reciprocally. We will take the sides of our adversaries over and over to the point of becoming doormats for those ungrateful tree-climbing ghetto-monkeys...

Jesus H. Christ. Micro-evolution did not stop whites from fiercely warring with each other, nor stop them from having big kick-ass empires.

Your explanation is learned, unactionable, and flat-out wrong:

A doormat is doing the OPPOSITE of thinking reciprocally.

American born said...

Just when I thought Savant was on firm moral ground he goes juden friendly.
Very disappointing indeed.
Oh well....

Anonymous said...

I just cannot get my head around this. How is it beneficial to any group of people to import huge numbers of low intelligence, violent, welfare dependent savages into thier midst? We have enough scum of our own without trawling the sewers of the world to import more.
To me the main facilitators of this lunacy are socialists, who include a disproportunate number of Jews, who, in turn, seem to suffer the most when muslims increase in number.
Paris Claims
P.S. Great news about Huhne!

kulak said...

My view, and it can change, as my pathetic confession in the first paragraph shows, is that they are allies.

O.K. Savant. Name one.

(No pun intended.)

American born said...

No middle ground with juden.

Shaunantijihad said...

"Allies with whom we disagree on a vital strategic issue, but on which we hope to change their minds by way of reasoned dialogue."

You think you're the first? These good Jews will try and stop that aspect of discussion with, if possible, laws against Holocaust "denial", Hate Speech and eventually the total loss of freedom of speech. Jews with political objectives always oppose freedom of speech because this is ultimately bad for Jews by exposing Jewish lies such the the Holohoax, USS Liberty, 911, and the fact that Jewish political pressure groups are primarily responsible for pushing legislation for mass non-European immigration.

So, to mollify these "allies", you will eventually have to silence your own thoughts, not put them on paper as it were, and start banning anyone who mentions the role Jews have played in the colonisation, like the BNP website, for e.g. And thus, by retreating on core principles like Freedom of Expression, you have already begun to fall into the slippery slope of totalitarianism. And what will you do then if the "bad" Jews support laws to mass immigrate Muslims and Negroes? Protest? Uh oh, that's racist Hate Speech isn't it. Ask Emma West and her kidnapped children if this isn't fucking real.

Or, prove me wrong and bring these Jewish friends here and have a full and honest discussion about the Holohoax. Or will they simply use it to have me, and you, ruined and imprisoned? And if you suspect just one little bit that even one amongst them might try to do that to you, are they really friends in any sense of the word?

American born said...

jew friends. That's almost funny.

You need to really trust your instincts, IS. Or not?

Anonymous said...

It's a cop-out to blame Jews for our own failings. It'a the mark of a slave-minded, welfare-addicted nigger. BE A MAN, WHITE MAN!

JP

Dr White said...

Savant just can't get over his love affair with the Jews.

It's like a battered wife (or husband) going back to her (or his) abuser.

Even though Savant knows they are trying to destroy his country (and the rest of the white nations) with mass third world immigration enforced with 'hate speech' laws, he still keeps crawling back to the 'good Jews' who humour him now and again by coming out with a few carefully chosen 'right wing' statements which Savant likes to imagine makes them potential allies.

Savant needs to get over his psychological need for Jewish approval and comradeship. Some of these guys will pander to him and butter him up now and again but they are not going to join white nationalists in a fight to the death against their own tribe and its' sociopathic lust for power and domination.

Roem said...

Blacks are only the symptoms.

Anonymous said...

The brilliant Jewish Canadian writer Dr Henry Makow struggles with the same issue.

The author of Judaism Discovered, Michael Hoffman struggles with this issue.

You are in good company Savant.

Hoffman tends to use the term Judaic for Jews who are jewced and in line with the 'is it good for the Jews' agenda and its orgs. This includes the ethno-political Party Line of the Lobby and its Network. The term embraces a lot of vomit inducing shabbos goy douche bags.

For this Elite - the term is Judaic and Shabbos Goys.

This leaves the collective noun 'Jewish' free to roam and individuals latitude to find good paths.

Anonymous said...

ot
Savant.... news from your favourite part of Ye Olde Englande:

Chipping Norton mosque is approved

5:43pm Monday 4th February 2013 in News
PLANS to build a mosque in Chipping Norton have been approved by councillors today.

http://www.cotswoldjournal.co.uk/news/10205372.Mosque_will_be_built_in_Chipping_Norton_after_plans_approved/

The rot is spreading far and wide!

euroserf said...

This is the same throughout all the professions. This gives the tribe a massive financial and political advantage over the normally honest host population.

Richard, I have personal experience of this, the fucking bastard, even though obviously I can't prove it in a court of law.

Interestingly the guy in question meets the qualities that Savant referred to.

It's for such reasons I believe jews have been driven out throughout history.

Seneca said...

Dan, the irony is that Camus was Algerian. He even played in goal for the national team.

nastiestuncle said...

There appear to be two definitions for Jewishness used on the white nationalist blogs:
1. Those who follow Judaism
2. Those who have an ancestor who followed Judaism or who had an ancestor themselves who...... and so on.

The followers of Judaism do not appear to be in positions in which they are calling for immigration into white lands, so it would appear to be the genetic-but-not-religious Jews who are the problem.

However, there are only a few hundred or at most a few thousand of these genetic Jews who are in positions of influence AND who are calling for immigration to white lands.
Therefore it would not appear proper or even accurate to label Jews as being the enemies of white people if only a small proportion of them are. There are many enemies of white people from amongst white people ourselves. Should we hate ourselves and call for our deaths because some of us support immigration?

From Savant's and my own, and others' experiences with the genetic Jews, they are as outraged with the immigration as white people are. In my case, the Jews I know are taking their families away to the New World to escape what they can see coming (the Muslim conquest of Europe). They are not going to Israel because they do not want to live as Jews (they wear their Jewish badge with pride just as I wear my English/ British badge with pride because that is my ancestry, but they do not identify as Jews primarily); they are going to Canada and Australia because they want to live amongst white people away from blacks and Muslims. Are these Jews a threat to white people? No they are not. They ARE white people, just like us. The fact that their grandmother tied her hair in a scarf and was married to someone called Schneidermann is neither here nor there.

However, Jews are over-represented in the international left which is the entity which is most strongly pushing for immigration into white lands, so I would suggest that the best way to deal with them is to engage them in dialogue. Speak to Jewish organisations about the concerns caused regarding immigration and see what they say.

__________

Does is suit Jews and Israel to have multi-cultural white societies?
The answer is no, because firstly the Jews in these societies will become targets of more attacks due to the blacks and Muslims. Secondly, it does Israel no favours to have previously friendly white governments like the UK become hostile because of having to chase the increasing Muslim vote. The last two Israeli campaigns were cut short because of pressure from Europe/ US.

__________

nastiestuncle said...

On the good old national socialists.

Were the Nazis white nationalists? Did they have the wellbeing of white people at heart?
No, they didn't. They went around killing other white people and they destroyed the nationalist movements in the white countries they invaded.

The Nazis were German nationalists, so why on earth would British whites, or any other whites, support them? There is no valid answer of course, but we all know the real reason - it's because the Nazis wanted to kill the Jews and this is what the whole white nationalism thing is unfortunately about.

What I've learned over the last year or so of visiting the "white nationalist" blogs is that although everyone claims that they care about the future for white children, in reality very few of them do.
The number one overriding reason which trumps every other reason for being a "white nationalist" is hatred of Jews and that's why this whole industry has sprung up, this industry of creating historical lies, denying facts, claiming that everything not in agreement must come from Jews, that everyone who disagrees if a Jew and so on and so on.

I know that I'm always talking about the Anne Frank Diaries being written in Biro (they weren't), that Eisenhower killed 1.7 million unarmed German PoWs after WW2 (he didn't), that the Rothschilds bought great Britain after the Battle of Waterloo (they didn't) and that Jews control 96% of media (they don't). The reason for this is to show that the hatred which "white nationalists" have for Jews is so strong that it has stopped mattering whether they are believing in facts.

Ignoring the hostility of the PC media towards nationalist groups anyway, if these ridiculous and obviously incorrect "facts" are taken to the people then the entire movement is going to be deligitimised before it's barely started.

"White nationalists" must know how much damage they are doing to the anti-immigration movement (and it moves at the pace of a snail at the best of times) but they don't care because their number one priority and the thing which keeps them doped up is the hatred of Jews. "White nationalists" do not care about white children because if they did then they would not be so obsessed with telling lies about Jews because doing so makes the movement toxic for Joe Public to join.

I've never met such a bunch of thickies, lol. Shame they aren't on the other side.

Esther said...

I think most commentators miss a fundamental point in Savant's post. Namely that not all Jews are the same or hold the same views. His question then is whether we can make allies of the 'good' Jews.

But so many comments here start off again about 'the Jews', thereby missing the central point of the post.

At least that's the way it seems to me.

nastiestuncle said...

@Esther 11:07

Jews, and non-Muslim, non-Jews share a destiny,and that destiny is to avoid being conquered by Muslims, and working together for the betterment of mankind.

If Israel goes down, then Europe is next. The Muslim Brotherhood have already told us this.

Iron Felix said...

The two postings from NU both of 10.45, supplemented by Esthers immediately after, are well worth pondering.There is undoubtedly a strain among the Jewish people motivated by vengeance (masquerading as Morality, if you please!)which positions them in a very destructive posture as regards Gentile society, but froth-mouthed mindless pathological hatred of all Jews simply by virtue of their Jewishness is no answer to anything, nor, be it said, is it in any way worthy of true Aryan thinking. Churchill, Nietzsche, Mildenstein and Tuchler, Oscar Levy and many others were able to see the distinction, and with all due prudence so should we.
Oh; Sartre was NOT jewish, and Camus was a pied-noir.

Anonymous said...

"that destiny is to avoid being conquered by Muslims"
There is strictly no chance for Muslims to conquer Europe by themselves. They live on welfare, free housing &c. They come over in Western planes, they use "white" weapons, and so on. Their only fortune is the money we give them for all the gas they are sitting on.
Stop welfare, don't accept them on airlines or ships... Let them alone, building skyscrapers (with the help of White architects) in their deserts. Muslims are in no position to conquer the West. We are inviting them. Who is "we" ?

nastiestuncle said...

@Iron Felix 11:31

I see the pinnacle of national socialist intellect is at work again.

Iron Felix said...

Anon. 11.36 touches upon a point I should have included in my earlier postings. "Who is we"? asks he. That is a good question, and I suggest that there is a seeking out of similar mindsets as between a certain malevolent Jewish line of thought and a reservoir of ambitious discontented Gentiles who are my great namesakes' "useful idiots". It is the enablers in our own ranks who form the petri dish wherein is incubated the poison which is intended to destroy us. These are the ones to go after.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 11:36

"There is strictly no chance for Muslims to conquer Europe by themselves."

Absolutely bang wrong. Their plan is for a hundreds years conquest. With immigration, shariah creep and threats of violence and terrorism they are quite capable of conquering us. The white European mindset is of "if we fight them it will make them more likely to attack us". As long as we think like that we are doomed.

"Who is "we" ?"

White people who hate themselves of course. Leftie types. The shit coming out of Oxford and Cambridge.

Iron Felix said...

NU 11.50 you lost me there.

nastiestuncle said...

@Iron Felix 11:56

"NU 11.50 you lost me there."

Well of course I did.

Anonymous said...

"With immigration"
That is the core of the question. As I said, they cannot immigrate if we don't let them in and help them for a living. They are useless crap, unable to create any form of civilization, even less to participate in a civilization far above their mental and social level.
If all Muslims are barred from entering a plane, there will be no immigration. If they walk in instead of flying, they'll still have to eat and find housing. If they are not helped, they can do nothing.
I'm not "absolutely bang wrong"...

Iron Felix said...

NU, I went on record as being in agreement with your views, which seem well thought out and sensible. Any reason for the ad hominem spite of your response?

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Not sure if this is on-topic ... but it sure is interesting.

This is from the Slog. A blogger who is leaving England. He writes financially, and pretty conservatively, and never, ever mentions the hosenosed elephant in the room.

http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/

In otter worts, he subscribes to the history that is taught in schools and is reinforced by watching such paragons of truth, veracity and accuracy as Schindler's List, Roots, Red Tails and any amount of recent films depicting pianos, violins, barbed wire, Black-clad Waffen SS and happy little skippetty-poo girls in red coats.

For him to say something like this is ... not usual.

Lines on the morality of killing psychopaths

There is a saying in advertising that aperture and environment are everything. It means, basically, that where and when your ad appears can make or break its effectiveness. I have always believed in this – and when those factors are wrong, advertising can look spectacularly inept. This is an excellent thing, as it warns the public of what goggle-eyed sociopaths may well be behind the ads.

A good example occurred this morning in the early hours, as I was reading a piece about Greek death threats against Yannis Stournaras. This is how the passage at Reuters read in my browser:

‘The [bullet in the mail + threat] was sent by a little-known group called “Cretan Revolution”, which warned the minister against any efforts to seize homes and evict homeowners, police sources said. The group sent similar letters to tax offices in Crete last week.

Yannis Stournaras, a respected economist who became finance minister in June, has angered many Greeks by championing austerity policies demanded by the European Union and International Monetary Fund as the price for bailout aid.


Now, (A) this is an unusual sentiment for the slog to profess, and ...

(B) When did you hear or read in the press about threats to politicians and tax-gatherers?

I sure haven't. Maybe I am simply cut off, but this sort of thing is not big news here. the big stuff is that that fat fuck Ron Jeremy is staying in hospital.

UN
.

nastiestuncle said...

@Iron Felix 12:14

"NU, I went on record as being in agreement with your views, which seem well thought out and sensible. Any reason for the ad hominem spite of your response?"

I misread your post so you have my apologies and I withdraw my comments at 11:50 and 11:56.

If you were here I would let you spank my bottom.

Anonymous said...


Re the mosque at Chipping Ongar

The guilty parties

http://www.westoxon.gov.uk/files/download/9076-2360.pdf

and their addresses

http://www.westoxon.gov.uk/files/download/9079-2355.pdf

Anonymous said...

Sorry Chipping Norton

Iron Felix said...

NU, I rather thought so. If you don't mind I will pass on that last bit; promise you won't be offended.

an innocent abroad said...

If Israel goes down, then Europe is next.

I have often heard this said but for the life of me I could never see the logic in it. Are we supposed to see a wave of Muslim armies sweep across from the Levant? Chances are between none and zero, and were it to happen by some miracle they wouldn't get beyond the Boshporus.

I wish Israel no harm but it seems far more likely to me that Israel serves to inflame Muslim hatred of the West.

Dan said...

See the role of prominent jews in the unravelling of South Africa. Then see what these cats did when they migrated to Australia to repeat the same process of liberalizing immigration laws.

You couldn't enter Australia unless you were northern european in the 1970s. Now? It's filling up with Asians and Africans. Who made those laws? The answer is stunning.

Look into the laws that changed US immigration from exclusively European to 1/3 Africa 1/3 Asia. Jacob Javits.

Heraclitus said...

NU, I went on record as being in agreement with your views, which seem well thought out and sensible. Any reason for the ad hominem spite of your response?

I was thinking exactly the same thing. You make a reasoned and balanced case, largely supporting his position and he turns on you like a viper. Maybe his response represents a far more realistic interpretation of his character, and by extension his broader community, than anything else he has contributed.

Kind of in vino veritas

nastiestuncle said...

@an innocent abroad 13:14

"I wish Israel no harm but it seems far more likely to me that Israel serves to inflame Muslim hatred of the West."

There is no such thing as inflaming Muslim hatred since Muslims hate non-Muslims anyway. Whatever non-Muslims do they will still be hated.

Israel has acted as a distraction for 70 years. The secular dictators of the Muslim lands always needed a reason to keep their Muslim populations in check since they better than anyone knew the dangers of Islamic mobs. Israel was perfect for these leaders because they could blame all of the countries' ills on Israel. Israel has kept the Muslims pre-occupied for 70 years thinking of a way to destroy it, and they have tried many times.

Were it not for Israel, the attention of the Muslims would have been turned much sooner to Europe. The Islamic scripts foretell the Islamic conquer of Europe. There has never been no threat to Europe from Islam. They are playing a waiting game, tick tock. Once Israel is gone, then that clocks speeds up for Europe.

Dan said...

The editor of Jewish Austalia News bragged about how Jews ended the discriminatory white only immigration policy of the Australians.

Look up Dan Goldberg and his op Ed on his people destroying white supremacy in Australia. Goldberg rubbed this role in the face of the goy and then poured salt in the wound.

Now philosemites deny it? Jesus Sav. White supremacy and the logical result white out in Europe, we're methodically attacked by egalitarian minded jewish activists in these counties. There's no denying it because these cunts were bragging about it in real time.

nastiestuncle said...

@Heraclitus 13:25

I thought he was one of the rabid ones and I totally misread his post and thought he was saying that my and Esther's posts were being organised like some sort of Jewish conspiracy.

Once I'd re-read it, I realised my mistake and apologised.

Contrast that with all the people who I have owned over the months with facts and logic who have never issued the slightest apology for their niggerbabble.

wolfietoad said...

02.58 Uncle Nasty said...

http://www.examiner.com/article/saudi-arabia-islamic-cleric-rapes-tortures-kills-daughter-pays-fine

Saudi Arabia: Islamic cleric rapes, tortures, kills daughter, pays fine"

Don't worry UN, some big brave Irish boy will be along in a minute to tell us that 'the word on the street' is that the girl was asking for it.

Mary said...

The argument will be made that they only appear to be with us so as to sow dissension in our ranks. I have no doubt that this applies in many if not most cases. But it certainly does not apply with the people I know. And don't argue with me on this because I've known most of them all my life.

lol, are you for real? You know a few "good jews" and this negates their anti-White actions as a Tribe worldwide, how exactly?

You had your "awakening", and now months down the road, this is where you are at?
Come on.

As for your weak defense of His Nastiness, one who right in this very thread spreads the worst lie of all : " Jews are White" (when so many jews themselves make it crystal clear they most certainly do not consider themselves White, except when it suits their interests to do so, wink wink)....well, my giving you the benefit of the doubt has ended. In my estimation, having read you for years now, it is impossible for a man at your level of intelligence, having read the materials I know you have, could still be this "confused" over the Jewish Question.

If you are worried about what may happen to you legally down that road, that is perfectly understandable given what is happening to so many others under the sickening 'Hate Speech' laws in Europe----but don't insult us by pleading confusion on the issue whilst giving shelter to a cretinous slug whose main job on here is to mock any honest talk of the Jewish role in White genocide. A genocide he claims doesn't exist.....remember? I noticed you never pressed him on that, nor on his constant avoidance of jew's role in Media/Finance/ Holocaust-founded attacks on Free Speech, etc. You note it, but you never make him account for his daily avoiding/minimizing it.
You say basically that "he never starts it" in terms of the JQ being brought up, that it is supposedly "flung in his face", lol.....and yet any honest observer can see it is the tone and incessant mocking of the issue by him that gets people so angry and prone to abusive style postings.
And that is just how he likes it, for as he said only yesterday " I enjoy it" ;)

So: You want to ride the fence? Then do it with pride Savant! But frankly, I don't believe you. I think things are just getting a little too uncomfortable , and you want to get back to simpler times when posting funny nigger stories and making clever commentary on them was an enjoyable pastime.

Good luck with that ;)

Dan said...

The problem with your site Sav, is that it is impossible to cut n paste links to sources to support an argument.

Nastiest, talks about lacrimose Anglo-jewery sadly departing these shores for Canada and Australia. Well what of Australia? These places ceased to be bastions of Britishness under the onslaught of multiculturalists. Various Australian jewish authors brag about a Jewish role in the destruction of the white supremacist immigration policies of the nations in question. They brag about it to this day if you'd care to look. See Brenton Sanderson's series on Occidental Observer about white Australia how Jewish activists changed an explicitely white supremacist state into a multicult.
The weight of evidence, the mocking tone of Jewish Australians and their ideological support of the multicult Australia of today tells you what you need to know.

Jews are not white. They cannot abide white supremacy. They seek Jewish supremacy.

Sorry cant provide a sodding link though as you formatting doesn't allow it to happen with ease.

Dan said...

And like you Mary, I smell a rat with this last post.

I've yet to meet a Jewish white supremacist outside of Israel.

Anonymous said...

The number one overriding reason which trumps every other reason for being a "white nationalist" is hatred of Jews

Not me. I don't even hate muslims, but I hate islam with a white hot intensity. As for Afro-Caribbeans, don't hate them either, but I'd certainly prefer it if they stayed in their own countries.
Jews should be banned from entering politics, they do seem to fuck things up.
Paris Claims

nastiestuncle said...

@Dan 13:55

Wanting a secure future for white children and a homeland for whites should not be about white supremacy anyway. We should wish the other peoples of the world well in their endeavours as long as their actions do not conflict unreasonably with ours. We should even co-operate with them wherever necessary for the greater good.

As for Jews altering Australia then boasting about it, would the mainstream of Jews accept these boasts on behalf of these Jews?
Did these Jews do what they did because they hate white people or because they see humanity as one unit?

Something I meant to bring up earlier was that if someone does something they do not think is wrong, then can they be blamed for their actions? An example being a Jew who promotes multi-culturalism in white lands. Are they being anti-white or just naive and idealistic?

If it turns out that particular people had been ruining Australia for nefarious reasons, then why have they not been warned/ beaten/ assassinated? All it would take would be to pay a terminal cancer sufferer's family £20k surely.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 14:02

There's a world of difference between a national socialist and a white nationalist. National socialists aren't white nationalists. They mistakenly support German nationalism. They are in the business of hating Jews first and wanting to save white people somewhere down their list of priorities. They think they are white nationalists, but they are not.

Iron Felix said...

Yes Heraclitus, it did seem odd didn't it. I thought, well, look at that---a Holden Caulfield so desperate to have an enemy that the nearest friend will do. You don't see that kind of theatre much these days. However he seems to have genuinely misunderstood what I was saying and has apologised, so all's well that ends well.

nastiestuncle said...

@Mary

" Jews are White"

Perhaps I should clarify.

There is no reason to say that a Jew who looks white, acts white, identifies as a white and who is not anti-white is not white.

nastiestuncle said...

@Iron Felix 14:22

I was on the phone whilst I was reading it and fucked it up good and proper. Now I feel bad for having let myself down.

Uncle Moishe's jewish lightening production facility said...

Hey you schleps!

We're on your side you filthy anti-semites, if you don't believe me ask rabbi nastiest, he'll tell you straight.
We're all the same 'neath the skin, Oy!

Now there are good jews and bad jews.
"Say Uncle Moishe, but how can we tell one jew from the other?" I hear you say.

We'll listen up and heed my words.

A good jew is one that tells you that you can trust him not just a bissel, but a lot.
Trust me.

Now at least with blacks we're all on the same page, you goy schmucks go and focus on them as the real problem, we'll watch your backs for any bad jews trying to come in and play khazeray with our white nationalist movement, but you must go and fight, fight the Muslims, fight the blacks, fight the Pakis, we got your backs.
We're good jews remember, we're your friends.

You don't want to be called nazis now, do you?

So that's agreed then, you'll of course have to allow us fine mentsh jews to take the most prominent positions and roles otherwise everybody will call you racists, so we'll be the best fit for that role.
It's for your own good you filthy dirty shmutz goys, Oy!

Of course you can trust us, remember it's not like we killed Jesus or anything is it?

May G_d bless those who are cowed and grovel before Is-Ra-El and curse those who don't bend to our will.
It says it there, in the book our great great great grandfathers wrote.


To all those other schleps that say we aren't white, I say to you a curse be upon you all you filthy goyim nazi!

Mavel tov and goodnight!

XIV

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iSrGQ1cwxM







(Remember when the debts are piling up and the rent is due and you've already sent off your youngest shiksa to prostitute themselves in my brothers brothel, just before your insurance is up for renewal, look to your Uncle Moishe and his jewish Lightening Production Facility as your first port of call, we'll work together and if the police ask any questions I'll just drop you in the shit and move overseas, simple name change is all. That's my guarantee.)

nastiestuncle said...

****INTERMISSION****

*NIGGERS*
*CHINKS*
*WOPS*
*WOGS*
*WETBACKS*
*SPICS*
*UNCLE SALTY*
*CHICKEN SKINS*
*WHITE MOTHER FUCKERS*
*HILLBILLY BOYS*
*REDNECKS*
*PORCH MONKEYS*
*APES*
*SLOPES*
*GOOKS*
*KRAUTS*
*FROGS*
*MICKS*
*THICK IRISH*
*STUPID LEPRECHAUNS*
*ENGLISH SCUM*
*SHEBOONS*
*SHITLETS*
*PAKIS*

Now carry on with the regular programming.


Dan said...

Nastiest is a remarkably disingenuous poster.

Naive? Idealistic...newspaper editors and academics and lawyers, niave?

Pull the other one.

They knew exactly what they were doing.

nastiestuncle said...

@Dan 14:31

I don't doubt that some of them know what they are doing, but it is possible to have a professional job and still be extremely naive.

In fact, naivety would appear to be more prevalent in the professions that it is outside of them.

When it comes to immigration, street smart trumps a 1st from Cambridge every time.

Dan said...

Seeing man as one unit?

Sheesh.

That's precisely the definition of hatred. Tax units, labour units, pigs at a consumerist trough, suckers to fleece, marks, pockets to pick and voters to con.

Anonymous said...

I have asked this question before. If the Jews are behind 'everything' why is it that Islam is on the ascendance? I don't see Jews demanding that more synagogues be built. I don't see Jews trying to make it illegal to criticize Judaism.
(N.B. The Islamists are only trying to get criticism of Islam made illegal ignoring all other religions.)I don't see Jews stopping whites near their places of worship for being inappropriately dressed. I don't see Jews grooming and raping children. I don't see Jews taking to the streets because someone has allegedly offended their religion. I don't see Jews calling for the death of cartoonists.
I do see Jews being attacked on British streets by
Muslims. I do see synagogues defaced with
Moslem anti-Jewish graffiti.
At a stretch there are probably a quarter of a billion Jews. Moslems about three billion and growing rapidly.
Where is the benefit for the Jews? How are they going to suppress Islam?
Call me a Jewish apologist as much as you like. I'm simply stating what is happening. I'm also a revisionist.
Please explain how the Jew is going to gain control from Islam, which seems well on the way to dominating the world?

Dan said...

You do know how vicious faculties get? You do know what paper editors are?


You are remarkably dishonest. The professions are examples of reservoir dog eat dog.

The truth will out said...

I have asked this question before. If the Jews are behind 'everything' why is it that Islam is on the ascendance?


I don't see Jews demanding that more synagogues be built

I don't see Jews trying to make it illegal to criticize Judaism.



!

Dan said...

If you do not see these things it is because you are not looking.

Take the grooming stories.

What is porno? Do you know what women exist in the Israeli brothels? Exactly how Russian is the socalled Russian mafia?

On the question of historical slavery, look up San Tome, it's an island in the Atlantic. The portguese booted out their jews and resettled them there. Within a decade the Jews of San Tome had imported niggers to work their sugar plantations. This is the actual genesis of the Atlantic Slave trade. I wonder what the Sephardi were doing in Iberia? Guess what? They were importing Slavs to work the cane fields in Andalusia, Crete, Sicily. Look up Recife as it relates to sugar slavery and news in the new world.

Nothing much has changed.

Keiser said...

@Dan
The problem with your site Sav, is that it is impossible to cut n paste links to sources to support an argument.

Maybe awkward with an iPhone but not impossible

Cut n' paste links (by adding a bit of code)

I posted this before but for those of you who need a laugh and haven't seen the Barrackalax View here is an

Educational Video from Uncle Shlomo's White Nationalist Media Production Company

Anonymous said...

I suppose it's fairly accurate to say that most Jews, like most of us, keep their heads down and mind their own business.

When it comes to Jews in leadership or influence peddling positions, the kind of people who make things happen, I think the behavior is somewhat different. Is a greater percentage of these Jews pro-White or a greater percentage of them anti-White?

I think we all know the answer.

nemesis said...

Jews appear to hold the opinion that all the bad things that happened to the Jewish people had nothing AT ALL to do with their own behaviour.

Then ask yourself: Why isn't there a 2000 year history of anti-Greek progroms and holocausts? After all, the Greek diaspora is rather numerous. What about the Dutch? You'll find Dutch traders everwhere in the world. For some reason they never manage to make themselves thoroughly hated and despised.

Im certainly not saying that "All joos are bad and deserve to die". Merely remarking that they seemingly lack the capacity to oust bad elements from their communities. Instead they circle the wagons. Every time.

Granted, there are outliers like Breitbart and Michael Savage (whose show I occasionally enjoy).

Still, jews in general (I'd say 90%) are compulsively shooting themselves in the foot by not denouncing the likes of Ben Bernanke, Bloomberg, the merry Millibands, Mike Wise or Maurice Dees from the dreaded SPLC. Thus, Jews give the goyim an impression of semitic complicity.

Be assured: I'd rather have it that they did not. But they do.

In a perfect world, Jews would handle the worst elements amongst them in the same fashion Catholics are dealing with paedophile priests: Publicly point the finger at them and say "Go die in the mud!"

Alas, the world is imperfect and I fear that the gulf between us and them is not shrinking, but in fact widening.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 14:39

Your numbers are wrong.

There are about 13.5 million Jews* and about 1.5 billion Muslims**.

Or 111 to one. And when you look at it like that, you can see why the Muslims are so embarrassed at their backwardsness. It appears that Allah favours the Jews.




*People who would be identified as Jewish, religious or not.
**People with at least some Islamic identity. Not all Muslims are Muslims after all.

Dan said...

Anon,

Do you know anything about the Sugar plantations in Recife? Look up the history of that community in particular the conflict between the "Dutch" and the Portuguese. Recife is a city located in Brazil. In the 1600s it had cornered the sugar market and suck in slaves like a black hole. It was run by a very large population of people who had perfected the Business in Sao Tome. For various reasons they sided with the Dutch in one of the Portuguese Dutch wars and the Portuguese eventually booted them out. This group resettled in the Carribean and brought their Uncle Sugar skills with them setting the stage for industrial scale sugar cultivation. I'm sure these Sugar types saw mankind as one unit. One see less unit of production and consumption.

Richard said...

I have to agree with Dan and Mary. It's very difficult to believe Savant can be this naive, especially with his level of experience and intelligence. Attacking blacks and Muslims is very safe. Attacking the symptoms and not the disease will never get you tagged with the ultimate 'hate' crime - antisemitism.

Dan said...

Not that I have much sympathy for blacks, anyone who is seriously interested in the Jewish role in history ought to look at their seminal role in the Sugar cane industry.

Just take a look at the areas in the Med that had cane fields, trace it back to Mesopotamia and the Nile Valley. The Islamic conquests swept from These eastern areas seeking out land to cultivate sugarcane. Andalusia was the last most western area suitable for cultivation. It largely explains the presence of Jewish traders in Spain. Both Slav dealing, distilling the sugar and loaning to planters. The entire spice trade of old was essentially monopolized by these merchant princes of Sugar. It's a misnomer to call the space trade spice. It was just sugar mostly.

Now why did the Portuguese and Spanish try to find a eastern route to India ? Why did they brave the Cape in SA? They were looking to establish new plantations and circumvent the Arabs and their Jewish lackey/advisers/loan sharks.
All over the med corsairs were kidnapping Europeans to work he plantations in Cyprus, Crete, Sicily, Morrocco, Levant, Nile etc. you only have to look at the evidence for yourself and it's quite clear. The Jews got into the Atlantic slave trade at the beginning. They got into the plantations at the beginning in Sao Tome, Recife then after a further expulsion they landed in Haiti, Jamaica, Guyana, Surinam... Loaning, distilling, shipping slaves. It's a remarkable but not well advertised narrative.

Anonymous said...

Reasoned dialogue with kikes?They are our allies?You cracked me up.Don't sniff glue,it is harmful at your age.No wonder Ireland is in state it is,having savants like yourself,sir.Stick to bashing niggers,it is easier and much,much,much safer.And don't forget to thank your kike friends,when black, rabid muslim will jam his cock up your colon.Your next post should be a tribute to 6.000.000.000.000.000 jewish victims, of evil white Europeans nazi cannibals.

Dan said...

One last point.

Nastiest got into a dispute about banking. Claiming that without banking we would be in the stone age. The spirited defense of banking struck me as peculiar.

Surely we live in material comfort because we have machinery performing the work slaves and servants would otherwise be doing? Surely it's because we have cheap energy in the form of oil and coal? What did loaning at interest to a Jaimsican planter accomplish for the Slave?

Calculus said...

Sooo, Savant, your Jewish friends told you to do something against mass immigration because they worry about your endangered genetic future? I don't think so. Most likely, as it was pointed above, they don't like THEIR kids sitting next to muslims in public (i.e free) schools.
But why don't THEY do something? why do they come to YOU to act, and
they want you to do what, exactly? going on a rampage in a school, immolate yourself in fire, demonstrate violently with a bunch of skinheads running from the tear gas. So what's next? next time they come to you and say 'Ooooo Savant, your wife has an affair with your best friend...', or maybe they'll go see the priest: "Father, Savant is not a good Christian...'. Maybe they'll go see the muzz and ask them to do 'something' if YOU don't do 'something'.
They'll kiss you and sell you for 20 silver coins.

Keiser said...

Dan said...
Surely we live in material comfort because we have machinery performing the work slaves and servants would otherwise be doing? Surely it's because we have cheap energy in the form of oil and coal? What did loaning at interest to a Jaimsican planter accomplish for the Slave?

Correct, there is a group for whom loan capital trumps working capital and for whom usury trumps productive enterprise, i.e. work. Spirited defense indeed.

Dan said...

During the Turkish and Arab incursions, into both the Balkans and particularly Spain (Al Andalus) the cohabitation. Of Jew and Muslim was Quite strong. Whatdkyou think the motivation of the Arab was in Spain? The answer is Christian chattel slaves and good land suitable for Sugar plantations, a product who's secrets the Arabs and their advisors divvied up between themselves.

kulak said...

@JP

It's a cop-out to blame Jews for our own failings.

True. Like Kipling wrote:

"There has been a miscalculation about the New Day, my dears," she began; "one can't expect people to be perfect all at once. That was our mistake."

"No, the mistake was entirely ours," said the Princess.

"Pardon me," said the Wax-moth. "When you think of the enormous upheaval--call it good or bad--which our influence brought about, you will admit that we, and we alone--"

"You?" said the Princess. "Our stock was not strong. So you came--as any other disease might have come. Hang close, all my people."


Note that the Wax Moth wants the blame.

Wolfhound said...

Maybe the time has come to stop talking about the jews ad infinitum as the debate doesn't feel as productive as it once was.

This blog has become an extensive archive of pro and con over the years, more than enough material to allow any newcomers to draw their own conclusions.

We have to do something tangible within the current framework we have to deal with.

Wouldn't our time be better spent laying the groundwork for an Irish National Party along the lines of the Hungarian Jobbik party?

No matter how we twist or turn our thoughts on jews, the mainstream will still find all our other beliefs which we agree upon here distasteful and anti "insert protected species here".

How long are we going to flog a dead horse?

All of us agree that at the very least there is an element of jewish society doing everything within their power to destroy White nations and their compatriots have not been able or willing to put the brakes on them for us or themselves.

Several countries in Europe are leading the way, the hardest step of being the first is not even a hurdle anymore.

Let's make an attempt to be the change we moan about being necessary. (Does that sound too Obama-ish? Sorry!)

Wolfhound said...

@ Nemesis

I listened to Michael Savage for a while or Michael Weiner as he's actually called, understandable that he dropped that surname.

He has some interesting views on topics, but he kept trying to hawk his own books every 5 mins! And the jewishness came flooding out at times too.

Keiser said...

@ Kulak
I tend to agree. Those of use that remain will be stronger while the DWLs will be swept away in the flood of natural selection. We should look at the Jews as agents of evolution on some level but not lie down for them, you do still after all "fight a cold" when you get it in order to develop the antibodies. Pardon the simple analogy.

Dan said...

Ho Ho Ho.

The Wax Moth.

Excellent.


Rumplestiltskin too.

Anonymous said...

Let's be clear: Israelis consider themselves white when the chips are down and their (stolen?) lands are being invaded by the cancer that their fellow ideologues in the west inflict upon all white countries:

http://atlantablackstar.com/2012/06/05/blacks-in-israel-under-sustained-violent-attacks/

- “We don’t need to import more problems from Africa,” Mr Yishai, leader of the religious Shas party, told Maariv.

“Most of those people arriving here are Muslims who think the country doesn’t belong to us, the white man.” -

The number of jews in the west who are willing to come out and repudiate the destructionist imperative of judaism can be counted on one hand. These are:
Gilad Atzmon, Paul Eisen, Henry Makow, David Cole, Nathaniel Kapner - visit their websites and see for yourselves. Any others?

Allan@Aberdeen

Anonymous said...

They can never be allies, they don't want to be allies except to further their agenda.
Remember "irgun" never forget.
We had our chance but blew it in 39' now they have the upperhand only an alliance with moslems might help our peoples plight as much as it is a place we might not wish to go we are running out of options.
Who turned the moslems on us THAT IS THE QUESTION.

kulak said...

Iron Felix writes:

Churchill, Nietzsche, Mildenstein and Tuchler, Oscar Levy and many others were able to see the distinction, and with all due prudence so should we.

O.K., I see the distinction.

Now let them make aliyah or be barred from practicing law or holding public office or working in media.

Anonymous said...

Check this out!!!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jm4v2pRLlFo

kulak said...

Whenever someone SAYS "Jews can be our allies", what they almost always MEAN is "Jews should remain emanicipated and treated as equals."

I think we should have our own countries, as THEY have THEIRS.

Now THAT's reciprocal.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 17:27

"Who turned the moslems on us THAT IS THE QUESTION."

Anyone else here ever read something so stupid, so retarded that they just want to bite their own arm off?

Anonymous said...

THIS HAS BEEN A CLASSIC IN AMERICA, PEOPLE MIGHT DECRY IT, BUT THEY SECRETLY LIKE IT.... INCLUDING MYSELF. /ENJOY!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RiHfEtOy6A

Anonymous said...

Stern showed his true colors when he left his wife and kids.

non-schmuck said...

This blog is in danger of becoming the hasbara show. Let's unite with the tribe who are intent on destroying us!
Irish Savant or Idiot Savant?

rambaloosa said...

Holy shit anon 18.12. Is that really Ted Danson? How the hell did this get out?

Manc said...

Is Savants olive branch to 'good Jews' down to fear of Big Brother Cohen starting to coming down hard on any site breaching ZOGs "hate laws"?

http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/writers/the-editor27/2319-the-british-resistance-is-a-hate-site

PreatorianXVI said...

Savant,

Refer to the age old story of the Scorpion and the Frog crossing the river.

It is in their nature, genetic blue print, as is our traits as an ethnic group.

Eventually the parasite kills the host and moves on, unless the host rids itself of the parasite and terminates it.

Darkies get the message when told to piss-off, they know they are not welcome and leave's one alone, this parasitic lot always needs a host.

Who has been Cajouling the massess up against White Western Europeans, don't see any of the tribe protesting to loudly.

A clear cut choice has to be made no halve arsed measures, all the way or no way.

Planet is big enough with lots of Un-occupied space suitable for life of anykind. Madagaskar was proposed once.

Anonymous said...

I think Michael Savage is a good example of the kind of Jew who poses as our "friend". In reality he is a pro-Israeli propagandist masquerading as a conservative pro-White.

He blew his cover for me by defaming Pat Buchanan for his book, "The Unnecessary War", a non PC version of events surrounding WWII. Buchanan concluded that there would have been no "Holocaust", or a greatly reduced one, had Britain not gone to war after the attack on Poland and thereby starting WWII. Mind you, Buchanan didn't deny a holocaust.

For his conclusion Savage viciously attacked him, insinuating that he was a Nazi. I dare say, with Jewish "friends" like Savage we don't need Jewish enemies.

Anonymous said...

Check out this interview and tell me whether ALL Jews are enemies.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RiHfEtOy6A

Dan said...

It's possible that the holocaust such as it existed was an escalation and reciprocation for the strategic bombing campaign. Jews as hostages.

Anonymous said...

A Jew is just a nigger with a brain.
For us they are just parasites.

Anonymous said...

I have asked this question before. If the Jews are behind 'everything' why is it that Islam is on the ascendance? I don't see Jews demanding that more synagogues be built. (OK I have now seen a video of a few Jews wanting their own separate state in Germany). I don't see Jews trying to make it illegal to criticize Judaism (OK there are a few).
(N.B. The Islamists are only trying to get criticism of Islam made illegal ignoring all other religions.)I don't see Jews stopping whites near their places of worship for being inappropriately dressed. I don't see Jews grooming and raping children.(I haven't been to a brothel or Israel so I bow to your superior knowledge on the subject) I don't see Jews taking to the streets because someone has allegedly offended their religion. I don't see Jews calling for the death of cartoonists.
I do see Jews being attacked on British streets by
Muslims. I do see synagogues defaced with
Moslem anti-Jewish graffiti.
At a stretch there are probably a quarter of a billion Jews. Moslems about three billion and growing rapidly.
WHERE IS THE BENEFIT TO THE JEWS? How are they going to suppress Islam?
Call me a Jewish apologist as much as you like. I'm simply stating what is happening. I'm also a revisionist.
PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE JEW IS GOING TO GAIN CONTROL FROM ISLAM, WHICH SEEMS WELL ON THE WAY TO DOMINATING THE WORLD?

Anonymous said...

What must always be remembered with the Jewish question is they always fail:-

1848 Jewish-inspired revolutions across Europe – all failed.
1860’s Supported German reunification; they got the Nazi’s – failure.
Turn of 20th Century. The Austrian Empire was turned into a one-man-one-vote democracy by them (supposedly). Austrians become just another ethnic group in own ‘empire’. Creates paralysis and aggression, hence World War One in 1914. Austrian Jews were destroyed in 1944.
1905 Russian revolution attempt – failed.
1917 Communist revolution in Russia – catastrophe, failed 1991.
1919 Communist revolution in Germany – failed.
1919 Communist revolution in Hungary - failed
1917 Return to Palestine. Crash! Bang! Bang! Crash! Ouch!. Has failure written all over it.
1880 – present. They go to USA. Try the same as Austrian Empire. Backlash commencing...

We should pity them. They are not impressive.

The truth will out said...

Anonymous 5 February 2013 21:39

"I have asked this question before."

Yes, yes you did and it was answered earlier @14:47.

Anonymous said...

Is Savant in retreat now that ZOG and its EU stooges is cracking down on 'hate sites'?

How can you form an alliance with the very same people who are out to destroy you, your country, its traditions, racial homogeneity and way of life?

Dan said...

No no
No it's only illegal to question historical events that relate to the Jews. That's making critique of the Jews illegal. It's a stacked deck.

If I were to say

"that's a rather large number of holocaust survivors you got there in Germany 1945"

I could be imprisoned in Germany. And perhaps extradited from a variety of other places.

johan said...

Jews get blamed for bad times because a disturbingly high number of them are involved in subversive movements that end up spreading the chaos and mayhem of said bad times.

It was the Jewish elite who engineered the social chaos that led to Germany being forced to accept the humiliating Versailles Treaty, as a result the German people would see all Jews as being back stabbers and traitors which led to the anti-Jewish pogroms during the Nazi Era. While it was unfair to the rank and file Jewish/German citizens who considered themselves German first and Jewish second many of whom fought and sacrificed for the Kaiser as much as any Gentile, it is understandable how such anti-semitic feelings can become so virulent.

The exact same thing has happened in the U.S. as well, these same Marxist Jews were instrumental in the so-called "Civil Rights Movement" which is really an anti-White, anti-Christian movement. Sadly, these traitors will rekindle anti-Semitism in this country as well...and once again regular innocent Jews will be caught up in the backlash as they were in Germany.

Dan said...

Where is the benefit of miscagenation and multiculturalism for the Jews?

Look up the story about Jaboc tending Laban's flock in Genesis.

Jaboc ends up playing Mendelian Geneticist with Laban's flocks for 20 years and steals his entire herd in the process. This is the foundation of Judaism. He also absconds with Laban's daughters, disinherits their brothers and helps make Laban's gods vanish. That's Rachel (Israel)

Anonymous said...

People continue to blame Jews because 99.9% of the time, when you look at a problem's root cause, you find a Jew. You just have to open your eyes and look. It's not antisemitic. It's the truth.

Keiser said...

@ SAVANT

Hey Savant remember that clip Slave! (very informative by the way) from your post

"Anyone spot the irony?" Thursday, 24 January 2013

I'm not an Israeli-basher,but its relationship with America is simply obscene (as this clip testifies).

Well it's been taken down from JewTube.

and instead we get this...


"Slave!" The YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated due to multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement.
Sorry about that.

Sorry about that indeed


If you have a link to another copy I would love to try and download it. I have a youtube/flash video downloader. I suppose I should have done that when I had the chance.

edgar said...

There might be some Jews who opppose the mass immgration of Third Worlders into the nations of the West. Some of these might be genuinely unaware of the role their Jewish co-ethnics have played in the decline of the West and of the White race. Some of these might just be in denial about it rather than being conscious dissimulators. None of this changes the fact that Jews are not White.

To clarify: the Masai are not East Asian, the Japanese are not Black, Arabs are not Polynesians ... and Jews are not White. Moreover, Jews are a particular subspecies who have been at war with the rest of humanity for about 3,000 years, and whose current war with us Whites might very well lead to our extinction from this planet. The damage done by obscuring these facts (which trying to find Jews to ally with helps to do) far outweighs the benefit of simply finding a few more people to grumble about "the damned Blacks and Muslims". An ethnic Jew who identifies as a Jew and who denies the role his co-ethnics have played in the ruin of the White race is no friend of White Nationalism. That should be a no-brainer.

It seems there is something about the psychology of large numbers of our people (White people) that means that even when they are presented with the facts about the Jewish war against the White race, they devote a large amount of time desperately looking for "good Jews" when they could instead be thinking and acting in ways to protect Whites from the Jewish onslaught. I admit I used to feel this way myself ... but what could possibly explain it?

Is it because some Jews look like us? Is it because we cannot face up to the fact that there is a race of people out there who want us dead and who have 3,000 years of experience behind them in organizing, plotting, swindling and nation-wrecking? Is it because we fear what might happen to the Jews if we Whites stop letting this naturally parasitic race feed off us anymore?

If it is the latter, then you're looking at things the wrong way. Instead of worrying about the damage that telling the truth about the Jews might do to the Jews, you should be thinking about the damage failing to tell the truth about Jews does to Whites.

Keiser said...

Yeah searched a bit more can't find it, definitely taken down. I'm going to try dailymotion and a few others.

Infringement on the account? nonsense, There was just the one clip on that account "Slave!" the clip in question and it was just a guy talking with a generic background. OK, what he was saying was enormously detrimental to Israeli interests in the US as he showed clearly the facts, figures, lies and costs involved in that relationship but that is not infringement????

It was no doubt just too close to the truth and had to be censored. 1984 and Brave New World Eh

Anonymous said...

Axis Rule in Occupied Europe by Raphael Lemkin.

It's in this book that the term and idea of 'Genocide' was introduced.

Lemkin, a Polish Jew and lawyer, wrote the book in 1943 and it was published in 1944 the second edition was published in 1988.
This book is 674 pages long, yet it's remembered today only for the 16 pages that are Chapter IX, titled, Genocide - A New Term and New Conception for Destruction of Nations.

The opening paragraph reads as follows:

New conceptions require new terms. By "genocide" we mean the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group. This new word, coined by the author to denote an old practice in its modern development, is made from the ancient Greek word genos (race, tribe) and the Latin cide (killing), thus corresponding in its formation to such words as tyrannicide, homocide, infanticide, etc.Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.

Cliff said...

Anonymous said

"I don't see Jews trying to make it illegal to criticize Judaism (OK there are a few).
(N.B. The Islamists are only trying to get criticism of Islam made illegal ignoring all other religions.)I don't see Jews stopping whites near their places of worship for being inappropriately dressed. I don't see Jews grooming and raping children.(I haven't been to a brothel or Israel so I bow to your superior knowledge on the subject) I don't see Jews taking to the streets because someone has allegedly offended their religion.
Call me a Jewish apologist as much as you like. I'm simply stating what is happening. I'm also a revisionist.
I have asked this question before. If the Jews are behind 'everything' why is it that Islam is on the ascendance? ... WHERE IS THE BENEFIT TO THE JEWS? How are they going to suppress Islam?"


I have seen these sorts of question asked many times, and I used to ask them myself, so I will assume your questions are genuine. I won't sugar-coat this, since that doesn't seem to be the done thing around here.

1. The issue is not religion, it is race. You do realise that it is the continued existence of the White race (not our liberal values or whatever) that is being threatened by mass immigration and assimilation.

2. The Jews are a race. Judaism the religion is just a proxy (like Zionism) that helps them maintain their racial cohesion. The Jewish strategy is a parasitic strategy whereby they live off the backs other peoples (the "hosts") instead of living off the land. When the Jews have found a host population to live off, the Jews then set about undermining that host population's racial cohesion. If you look at any movement that undermines the racial cohesion of White people - e.g., race denying Boasian "science", "left wing" Marxism (playing the classes off against each other), "right wing" libertarian individualism, Feminism (creating conflict between Men and Women) etc etc etc - and you will find they are overrun with Jews who have been pushing all of this nation-wrecking filth for decades.

3. Jews generally see Muslims (Arabs, Pakistanis, Somalis, whoever) as tools for undermining the homogeneity of Western nations. It could be that their empowering of Islam will blow up in their faces, just as Soviet Communism did. But their desire (or instinct) to destroy the White Western nations is stronger than any fear they might have of Islam. To them, White racial consciousness is always "Nazism". Plus, you should be aware that Jews still speak of the 700yr long Islamic occupation of Spain as the Jewish Golden Age in Europe. Also note that Islam did not prove strong enough to stop the USA and Britain invading Iraq for Israel's benefit.

4. You say you are a revisionist. Do you mean a holocaust revisionist? It's not Muslims who are responsible for getting holocaust "deniers" locked up, that's for sure.

Dan said...

This doesn't even address the relationship with Esau...

Richard said...

Cliff @ 23:43

Excellent post.

Anonymous said...

Jews and Moslems are closer to each other than to Whites. Each of the first two think they can handle the other. Both are just vultures from the desert, good only for target practice.

Keiser said...

That damn "Slave!" clip has vanished off the internet.

from my last comment

Yeah searched a bit more can't find it
and
Infringement on the account? nonsense

were rhetoricals just in case anyone was thinking I was having a conversation with myself (I'm not far off the more I read :-) )

Anyhow

AIPAC collapsing democracy one dollar at a time

Dan said...

The Caliphate in Andalusia is mythologized by Jews today.

The Jews did not get on well with the Germanic Vandals. They did not get on with Catholic Spain.

There's a clue there...

katana said...

Savant wrote at 20:47 on 04-Feb-2013:

> As you know I subsequently, and over time, became aware of the central role Jews played in setting this destructive process in train and how indeed they continue to do so (stand up Alan Shatter). Those friends and colleagues - and this will come as no surprise - absolutely refuse to even contemplate the possibility of this being true. ...

> Now: Are those people friends or enemies of our cause?

Enemies.
Their tribe is behind it all and for them to deny it means they are willfully covering up the very cause of our problems. They are happy to join in complaining about all the symptoms of jewish poisoning, but of course not willing to admit who the poisoners are.


>So the issue we have to face, ladies and gentlemen, is whether we see Jews who support our main objectives while denying Jewish responsibility as allies or enemies. My view, and it can change, as my pathetic confession in the first paragraph shows, is that they are allies. Allies with whom we disagree on a vital strategic issue, but on which we hope to change their minds by way of reasoned dialogue.

I think you are grasping at straws here, Savant. It's like being at war and suggesting that some members of the enemy tribe might be potential allies because they also decry the destructive effects of the war.

Another thing, these 'friendly' jews, by denying the central role of their tribe have the effect of sapping your resolve and creating fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD). Your post itself reflects this.

BTW, some excellent comments by:

@ Dr White - 5 February 2013 09:26

@ Mary - 5 February 2013 13:45

@ Cliff - 5 February 2013 23:43

Count O Ben Stauffenberstein said...

OI vEy! He so right dis Oirish Saban 'ere. Yes der are many good Jews. I'm a member of the IDF and beleive you me that we are gonna turn on our own leadership soon. We are sick off kicking the Pals off their patch. We are sick off bringing in the USUk fodder to fight our war. The Knesset is to meet at the Wolfcanslerie at the Adlersnest in Tel Aviv. I Count Olohondro Ben Stauffenberstein been selected to end the war with the goyim in one act. It's gonna be good. Make Aliyah when its all over meshuggas.

Heraclitus said...

Edgar..excellent contribution.

It very much reflects my own progression, if I may be so bold as to call it that, which has lead me to the point where my views largely coincide with yours.

Heraclitus said...

Keiser. I refer to your 'missing clip' and the spurious reasons adduced for its removal. I have seem multiple such instances and it confirms the existance of a dedicated team which crawls the Web seeking out - and removing - non-kosher facts.

Wikipedia is the example par excellence. It seems every jewish villain has had his history airbrushed and sanitised beyond recognition. Or where the infamy is too great to fully accomplish this we find that their jewishness is played down or airbushed out altogether.

These people represent formidable opposition.

Chucky said...

Racist jibes prompt Saga to scrap its social network ‘Facebook for the over 50s’

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100022685/racist-jibes-prompt-saga-to-scrap-its-social-network-facebook-for-the-over-50s/

Larry Davids said...

In my honest opinion the wise Savant is absolutely correct. As white nationalists we have failed completely and now we must seek out all those good Jews, like Savants friends, who agree with us on some things and will give us their approval and guidance.

Without the help of good Jews white people amount to nothing and are doomed to constant failure. We must gain the approval of good Jews and be guided by them in order to avoid the taint of anti-semitism, which is the worst thing in the world that a white person can be labelled with.

We must form groups like "White nationalist friends of Israel" like all the mainstream parties have done. That way we may get the approval of even more Jews and, possibly even their funding. Then we can go to the Jewish Lobby to seek their backing.

As committed white nationalists we must do everything we can to avoid any accusations of "Nazis" from our Jewish friends. We must not rock the boat and should keep on the right side of them at all times.

Take care.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Larry Davids said ...

... quite a lot of things, actually. Infiltration -- or one of the subtler satires to appear in the blog?

I'll go with the latter. Welcome aboard, Larry.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

The Jews wanted Israel , they got it , it time they all moved there and ill support their nationalism for their homeland , why is this even a question that if they live in white countries we ask what their role should be , they have Israel they should go live there and stop fucking up other peoples countries. Jews living in Israel are allies Jews intruding in white countries doing everything in their power to fuck it up (intenionally or not ) should move to the land you wanted for 2000 years

Jerry said...

Chucky. The one thing that disappointed me about the Saga report was the comments. They seemed very PC for the DT. Of course they were probably heavily moderated by a PC 'journalist'.

PhilW. said...

I gave Zionism up as a bad lot long ago, and the excruciating details of how my religion (as anemic as my connection to it is) is being used as a front for theft, and to mislead Jews, really doesn’t interest me. I think Jews are pretty much the same as other people, and will do political minipulation, colonialism, land theft, expropriation and oppression just like anybody else, with local variations. And anybody who says different is an anti-Semite, in my opinion!

Uncle Nasty said...

Okay ... in for a penny -- in for a pound.

Those that peruse this site over the years will recall that I posted once that I had several really excellent jewish friends. Hard to believe, I know.

It was true then, and it is just as true now.

Now ... let me tell you another story. An equally true one.

I once worked in a company where one the employees did a very, I feel, civilized thing.

This girl had a pet rat -- your standard white rat, and circumstances at home had changed drastically enough that she felt she had to either give her rat away, or, throw herself on the mercy of the employers and get permission to bring the rat into work for about three weeks -- until all came right.

The bosses said okay ... but ask the others -- your co-workers how they feel.

Which she did. One or two people (out of a total of nine) had pretty grave reservations ... hey, this is a fucking rat we're talking about, but all agreed that the girl was quite a sweetie at heart and was genuinely concerned about the rodent, so yes -- bring it in -- but in a cage, please.

Long story short. Within about three days, everyone loved the fucking rat.

No kidding. It was naturally clean and odorless. Housetrained, highly intelligent and genuinely affectionate. It had a habit of attracting your attention by very gently grasping one of your fingers in a little pink paw and (equally gently) shaking it until you noticed it. By now it was out of its cage more often than in -- not, I might add, the fault of the owner. All the others kept cooing over the rat and letting her out.

The greatest problem the rat caused was when it sometimes (unthinkingly) walked over a keyboard, but that's why God gave us CTRL-Z, I guess.

Well, the rat went home and all were sad. The point of the story? One rat was cute as a button, but you don't want to live in a New York tenement.

Where the rats run the show.

UN
.

Heraclitus said...

Great allegory, UN. So apposite.

jewamongyou said...

The truth is that Jews are far from monolithic. As a matter of fact, there are serious questions surrounding the very definition of "Jews." So it should be no surprise that some Jews are allies of whites while other are enemies. Some Jews, far too many, are even enemies of their own people.

Dan said...

Far from monolithic? These categories are meaningless. So what I'd three rabbis in a room argue over a point? So fucking what? It's another joke.

Dan said...

I'd should be if.

So what if the learned argue over a few points? They are foreign.

Wolfhound said...

Jewish gratitude is encapsulated by the King David hotel bombing.

The Brits and allies go to war for the jews.

The Brits and allies win the war and carve out a homeland for the jews.

The jews take exception to the Brits confiscating documents detailing criminality within the jewish government so they bomb the King David hotel killing 91 and injuring 46 (by the way, a far greater toll than anything the IRA has ever managed)

And to top it off, none of the jews involved have ever apologised or even expressed doubt about their actions of that day.

Jewish gratitude.

Wolfhound said...

Anyone interested in reading about that event who hasn't yet heard of it:

King David Hotel Bombing Wiki

Wolfhound said...

Paxman did an interview with one of the people responsible called Sarah Agassi for a BBC series called Empire about a year ago and it boiled my blood listening to this unapologetic bitch.

ZERO sympathy for the victims and ZERO regrets about her actions. And the usually abrasive and confrontational (jew) Paxman just sat there with a smirk unwilling to challenge her on any remark.

Tried to track down the interview on the net, but no dice. It seems almost clinically removed as you can get your hands on almost any fragment of tv you've watched over the last ten years somewhere online.

It was however referenced on this blog

Anonymous said...

if per chance you check out the you tube video of the jews in tel a vi demonstrating against the nigger invasion of their area you will be surprised,

The truth will out said...

wolfhound
Sneaky bastard sneaks only have a 2 min clip on BBC* website, here is the final part of that very episode (split into 4 parts) starting with that interview
Jeremy Paxman – Sarah Agassi interview in ‘Empire’


I've sent this on to the blog you linked also.



Delenda Est Judaica!







*Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation

Anonymous said...

If you find this whole issue confusing, get the book "A Culture of Critique" by Kevin MacDonald.

It will clear up a lot of the fog....

Book: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/kmac_critique.jpg

His Blog: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/

Iron Felix said...

A half-forgotten episode from the '30s; the visit of Kurt Tuchler (Jewish) and General v. Mildenstein (SS) to Palestine. The general was to aver that his stay among the Zionists had shown him the cure "for a centuries-long wound on the body of the world; the Jewish question. It was truly amazing how some good boden under his feet could enliven the Jew. The soil has reformed him and his kind in a decade; this new Jew will be a new people." It was even proposed that an orderly evacuation of the Jews, with their legitimate property,from Germany to their traditional ancient homeland could eventually have lead to the established of normal relations between the Reich and an established Hebraeum in the Levant. This idea even had the support of both Goebbels and the heirarchy of the SS.
I mention this en passant and without comment.

Anonymous said...

Almost ALL Jews resent Christians and see White Europeans as cattle
to be used by Jews in any way they see fit. It is a monumental error to think that because you had a couple of Jew friends at uni,that makes them suitable to inhabit your country. You cannot trust them, they like nothing better than a sneakey
conspiracy/plan to get the better of
us dumb goys.That's the way it is.

Anonymous said...

Nastiest Jew wrote: "I know that I'm always talking about the Anne Frank Diaries being written in Biro (they weren't),"

Know who Raul Hilberg was Nastiest Jew? He had the following exchange with Doug Christie (Zuendel's barrister, during the first Zuendel trial:

DC: "Do you believe, asked Christie, that there is some question about the authenticity of parts and in fact all of Anne Frank's diary?"

RH: "There is some question as to parts of it, yes," said Hilberg."

DC: "Is it correct, asked Christie, that there are some parts that appear to be written in ball-point pen which wasn't invented until 1952?"

RH: "My understanding, which is based on newspaper accounts, is that the Anne Frank diary which, incidentally, I haven't used or cited in my context whatsoever, is an accurate diary except for amendations or corrections made by her father after the war. It may be that, as sometimes happens with a diary of deceased people, that that was his daughter, that he felt they had to make certain changes in it, or corrections in it, which seems to be, from newspaper accounts, it's stated fact."

Nastiest Jew wrote: "that Eisenhower killed 1.7 million unarmed German PoWs after WW2 (he didn't),"

They weren't even permitted POW status, they were labelled 'Disarmed Enemy Forces' to circumvent the Geneva convention on the treatment of POWs. The Germans permitted British POWs held near Auschwitz-Monowitz to received football kits from the ICRC! The exact number of Germans who perished in Eisenhowers' death camps is unknown, but the number certainly exceeds a million.

Nastiest Jew wrote: "that the Rothschilds bought great Britain after the Battle of Waterloo (they didn't)"

No one claimed they "bought great (sic) Britain"

Nastiest Jew wrote: "and that Jews control 96% of media (they don't)."

They control 100% of Hollywood, that's for certain.

Anonymous said...

Watch this! http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=l80MKpp74LE&feature=endscreen

Anonymous said...

Does the "nastiest" hasbarah think he's making any headway in convincing us of his opinions, other than -- what dozens of websites, well-researched books, eg. "Other Losses" by James Bacque, numerous youtube videos, documents, history, and basic common sense are telling us??

Silly question, yes.

But he deludes himself by thinking that he, and he alone, is the supreme authority on the jewish question.

This type of relentless behaviour is rather bizarre, IMO.

Uncle Nasty said...

While we're on the subject ... does the group not wonder at the Damascene conversion of Hagel?

Amazing. We have all watched the descent of this man(?) from Hero to Zero in just one month.

(Apologies to Disney's "Hercules" ... a mediocre piece of celluloid, but with the virtue of being made when Disney was still a white company)

It appears that that Hagel is currently being questioned (bullied? Caponised?) by the senate.

Hagel Wisely Caves in to the Israel Lobby

Kevin MacDonald on February 1, 2013 —

The viciousness of the Hagel hearings is really amazing, especially the questioning of John McCain, Lindsay Graham, and Ted Cruz. Graham and Cruz especially were being good soldiers of the Israel Lobby. The exchange that really revealed the power of the Lobby was when Graham asked Hagel to

“name one person, in your opinion, who’s intimidated by the Israel lobby in the United States Senate.”

“I don’t know,” Hagel ultimately conceded.

Graham continued his interrogation, asking Hagel to, “Name one dumb thing we’ve been goaded into doing because of the pressure from the Israeli or Jewish lobby?”

“I have already stated that I regret the terminology,” Hagel protested.

“But you said back then, it makes us do dumb things,” Graham pressed. “You can’t name one senator intimidated, now give me one example of the dumb things that we’re pressured to do up here.”

“Well, I can’t give you an example,” Hagel admitted.


Once again, amazing. And here I thought public castration went out with the middle ages. There's a lesson here.

Never ever apologise.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Sorry. The link to the above post ...

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/02/hagel-wisely-caves-in-to-the-israel-lobby/

UN
.

Dan said...

Bring me my chariot of fire!

Shaunantijihad said...

You really know how to get your blog fired up Savant! Chuckle...

Anyway, let me throw your own argument at you. As you know, I live in Bradford, and interact with Muslims most days and have employed some in the past.

Now listen carefully. Most of the individual Muslims I have known have been fairly ordinary ordinary folk of no exceptional abilities, and not overt Islamic supremacists.

Not one I have personally been in contact with is like Anjem Choudry, at least to my face. I have no doubt, though, that this "extremist" viewpoint does indeed apply in many if not most cases. But it certainly does not apply with the people I know. And don't argue with me on this because I've known most of them all my life.

But...

None of this refutes the reality that Islam as a system, and Muslims as a group, are a successful conquering ideology and cult that has taken over at least 55 countries worldwide, and is a clear and present danger to us all. And unfortunately, this includes all the "nice" ones I know. Including their wives. And mothers. And children. For colonisation is done with wombs.

Consequently, any group that supports mass Muslim (and Negro) immigration are enemy agents. Jews are right up there, providing the architecture via the Marxist long march through the institutions, along with "liberals", socialists, communists, dickheads, idiots and every single Muslim - even the nice ones.

Now, I have to go and do some work for a Muslim customer, who yesterday brought us plenty of tea and chocolate biscuits and paid cash on the dot.

My friendly enemy. Friendly... for now.

If a Jew supports the expulsion of Muslims? Great. Ally? Sure. My friendly enemy. Friendly... for now.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xCdehrV96U

ps If the link doesn't work search Youtube for What the west needs to know about Islam. Obviously, Nastiest Aunty thinks that watching a Youtube video makes you believe in alien lizards and think that David Icke is great. But perhaps when it is anti-Islam facts then her hypocrisy will shine through.

Seneca said...

I think Hagel took the right approach. I also favout the 'don't apologise' approach but in this instance, had he not grovelled, he would not have got the job. Simple as that. (He still might not).

If he becomes SoD he's in a position to exact a lot of retribution on his persecutors. He can open so many cans of worms that now lie serene and unopened.

My feeling is that they'll come up with other stuff, beats his wife or some such thing.

nastiestuncle said...

@Shaunantijihad 08:29

My brother in niggerdom.

Only if they are made by 911TruthSeeker911 and so on.

The truth will out said...

I would like to demonstrate how it's not just Jesus and Hitler who were anti-semites...


Ask any jew under hypnosis what is behind anti-semitism and the majority would say
"Jesus, Christianity who have used the church's doctrine to foment their 'irrational hatred' toward and persecuted the poor pitiable oppressed jews chosen by God to bring light unto all nation...reparations, money, give" et cetera

What I suppose would help here to demonstrate that Jesus wasn't the world's first anti-semite nazi is the following.

Marcus Tullius Cicero - who died 43 years before Jesus was ever purported to have been born.

Here’s a sample of some choice quotes
“Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills.” (Oration in Defense of Flaccus)

Cicero was serving as defense counsel at the trial of Flaccus, a Roman official who interfered with Jewish gold shipments to their international headquarters (then, as now) in Jerusalem. Cicero himself certainly was not a nobody, and for one of this stature to have to “speak softly” shows that he was in the presence of a dangerously powerful sphere of influence. and on another occasion Cicero wrote:
“The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”

not forgetting...

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

History holds all the clues and the answers, which is why they have made such effort in denying to the average goy the opportunity to know of them in our academic indoctrination centres.

The truth will out said...

One more, seeing as the virus has repeated his same disingenuous statement (forgetting how we've already established how juwes moved in quickly to command then undermine and destroy it)about the jew infested and subverted 'truth movement' [juif movement]


http://grizzom.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/tiu-radio-what-is-truth-movement.html

TIU Radio - What is the Truth Movement 2013.02.04 (40 mins)

Ognir talks about the Sandy Hook mind-game, how we are all getting pitted against one another in the REAL truth-movement using various jewish-inspired divide-and-conquer strategies... Link

Taken from http://grizzom.blogspot.co.uk which hosts various internet radio of variable levels of free speech radio.

Anonymous said...

I guess Savant needed a new angle to keep his blog afloat.

Anonymous said...

For a blog that's difficult to find, it would appear that IS is doing very well.
I think many of you are being far too hard on IS, he just expressed a view that not all jews are the same and that many of them could share our viewpoint about mass 3rd world immigration.
There are only two ways the trend can be reversed, firstly armed revolution, and "they" have all the guns, so that doesn't appear to be an option. The second way is through the ballot box and by educating them. I think IS is doing more than most to put things right. If anyone thinks praising Hitler and blaming the joos for everything is going to win popular support, I expect they're wrong.
Paris Claims

The truth will out said...

@Paris Claims

It will not be through the ballot box.

Democracy is the device set up to maintain the status quo.

Or did the Irish fighting off the English for 400+ years only to shackle themselves to the EU immediately pass you by?

Only places like Hungary, Greece and Ukraine have a true sense of national pride enough to ignore the cries of "anti-semite", "nazi" and "racist".
We have been cowed and brow beaten into accepting the multi-cult, gay marriage, celebrity worship and other nation-wrecking propaganda that the British and Irish now obediently allow.

Our youth hate God, have no morality and only understand selfish personal gain.

We won't be the one's initiating the inevitable troubles heading our way.

There won't be any nationalist movement democratically elected that will break the shackles of the jew world order.

Democracy is designed to prevent that, or at least been subverted enough so that we can never have a true democracy.

Everything that will happen will be as a result of the impending crash, when the benefits are cut and the food is scarce from the shelves, we'll be plunged into it.

The juwes will have fled from the cities by then [nothing focuses the mind on the problem as starvation] and the people will be plunged into the Hell fighting for resources among the 3rd world flotsam we've been invaded by.

There is little kinship among our own, we will have to fight them off as hardily as we will the invaders.

My sole objective personally is to simply inform as many I can as to who, why and how.

So that when the time comes, we know who to purge ourselves of first.

It will come just as it has the previous 109 times our fathers saw sense, only this time we've got records on video and resources stored across the world to keep as record.
So that our children's children will not ever make the same mistakes our forefathers and we have.

Things for the native people to do when it does:

Remove all juwes from your midst.
The rest will fall into place.

We won't start the recessions, the wars or the food shortages.

We just need to be informed for when it does happen and the uncivil behaviour starts, there are enough of us who know what to do.

Engaging and encouraging cunts like nastiest filth to post here, helps distract and derail any sensible discussions or exchanges of ideas between another.

Savant knows all this already, so I really have questions as to the reasons for not only allowing him a platform but almost encouraging his disruptive presence.


XIV

Delenda Est judaica!

Keiser said...

I've read the comments and I think right or wrong people have opinions. What annoys me is that Nastiest Uncle demands that everyone else shares his views and resorts to belittling and name calling if they don't. His argument is if you focus on the Jews you are a Nazi (or "National Socialist type" as he says per the semantic games) and this is counter productive.

Anonymous said...
But he deludes himself by thinking that he, and he alone, is the supreme authority on the jewish question.
This is what annoys people I think.

Perhaps half of fixing a problem is defining the problem. Any refusal to do so means you are just curing the symptom. Sure allieviate the symptoms (mass immigration, feminism, cultural marxism, porn, sexual liberalism) Only when you wise up to the disease do you have a long term chance at survival.

What's all this hurry and contrived pressure from Nastiest as well. I have read comments along the lines of "I'd like to have the immigration problem sorted by the time I'm seventy"or something to that effect. This problem has been in the works for 3,000 years. All I'm saying is that... do (A), (B), and (C) and everything is fine but don't mention the Jews won't work. In fact it is distraction at its finest! Awareness is the main thing that needs to be put forward. Nastiest is very much against that as he unreasonable says that people will equate it with Nazism. Why? when all people are doing is reasonably pointing out the truth and drawing connections about the behaviour and especially about the media and the bizarre cultural Marxism that seems to pervade it. Can't hide behind the holocaust forever and where are the movies about the Jewish mass murderers of the Gulags for that matter, tens of millions of Christians dead! Spielberg is quiet on that one.

I defer to Kulak's Wax Moth tale, awareness within the White community followed by choice, followed invariably by natural selection will be the way forward.

katana said...

Paris Claims on 7 February 2013 10:51 wrote:

>I think many of you are being far too hard on IS, he just expressed a view that not all jews are the same and that many of them could share our viewpoint about mass 3rd world immigration.

He qualified that view by saying those jews he knows also flatly denied any involvement in our destruction despite (I presume) his efforts to educate them on their tribe's role. But you are right, we shouldn't be too hard on Sav. We all read, absorb and learn at different speeds.

>There are only two ways the trend can be reversed, firstly armed revolution, and "they" have all the guns, so that doesn't appear to be an option. The second way is through the ballot box and by educating them.

Between the two (and outside) there's a range of outcomes. As you say 'educating them' is crucial. This blog is doing just that. We need to convince the 'Invisible Thinking Class'. (Not to be confused with the jewish paid and bought 'Intellectual Class' that plague our jewmedia).

>I think IS is doing more than most to put things right.

Yes, he's doing a great job with patience and humor! IS does know how to do a good mix of jew, islam, and nigger posts. Family viewing at its best.!

>If anyone thinks praising Hitler and blaming the joos for everything is going to win popular support, I expect they're wrong.

A while ago I would have agreed with that view. Now I don't. Of course 'popular support' for uncle Adolf and his views on jews will be a long time coming. The German people fought to the bitter end against the jew run governments (US, GB, USSR) for very good reasons, something that we need to re-learn.

These 'extremist' views set the pace and in their wake, what was once considered 'extremist', becomes just slightly 'edgy'. And so on.

Mary said...

Published on Jan 27, 2013

Greece's Golden Dawn party has said a visit to Greece by American Jewish Committee leader David Harris is meant to ensure more of what it calls "Jewish influence over Greek political issues" and safeguard the interests of "international loan sharks." Harris, who is executive director of the AJC, is leading a Jewish delegation to the region that is meeting with several Greek leaders, including Prime Minister Antonis Samaras. During the meetings, Harris expressed his "concern and solidarity for Greece during the crisis." But a statement from Golden Dawn posted on its website Thursday slammed the Greek government for giving Harris high-level access. It also derides Harris in what is clearly an example of the party ratcheting up its anti-Semitic rhetoric .


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hd3RyqKK0mM#!


:)

Anonymous said...

With the Jewish Question and all the radical causes they pursued what everyone must realise is, they were acts of opportunism. They surfed a wave and fanned the flames.
Again, these people have no tradition of politics. For a thousand years they were a cosseted middle class caste. They had no foreign policy, no embassies, never made peace with anyone. Suddenly, they find themselves at the centre of events, playing big power politics. They have more collisions than a pinball. And when all this stupidity is going on, what are the rest doing?

Anonymous said...

I do agree with what many posters say on here, but from my point of view, and I'm learning all the time, my country has been fucked up by Wilson, Heath and more lately by Blair & Brown with Cameron continuing from where they left off. One blog, on which I'm no longer welcome, even claims Cameron is a jew ( apparently he's 1/16th) in their desparation to blame everthing on the jews. I merely pointed out if you say things that people think is plain stupid they're not going to take anything you say seriously, even if you mostly talk sense.
Casing point....David Icke. He could solve the world's financial problems in the morning and find the cure for cancer in the afternoon and all most people would think is "change shifting lixards" i.e. a fucking nutter.
Paris Claims

Anonymous said...

One other point. Whenever I get into a discussion re the religion of peace ( my pet hate along with lefty-liberals) if I launch into
"mohammed was a mass murdering warlord paedophile" people think I'm a nutter and stop listening, even though my description was accurate.
Before I found this blog I had no idea that many jews were behind mass 3rd world immigration and multiculturism. But if I'm to believe most of what I read here I'll end up thinking that concentration camps were a bit like butlins and jews were only too happy to go there. It was just a bit of misfortune that a handful died in the process.
Paris Claims

nastiestuncle said...

@Paris Claims 15:37

I witnessed your banning from that blog.
It's funny, because although that blog claims to want to retake our country, it is one of the most pro-immigration blogs around, the reason being that some of the stuff they spout is so damaging to the anti-immigration cause that they couldn't do a better job in favour of immigration if they tried.

Mary said...

Before I found this blog I had no idea that many jews were behind mass 3rd world immigration and multiculturism. But if I'm to believe most of what I read here I'll end up thinking that concentration camps were a bit like butlins and jews were only too happy to go there. It was just a bit of misfortune that a handful died in the process

What is your point? You, like Savant, have discovered the truth about the role of Jews in our planned (and currently in motion) Genocide---but you're asking us to drop it, is that right? How does that help anything?

You'll note The Golden Dawn isn't doing anything of the sort, and their numbers are growing....

nastiestuncle said...

@Paris Claims 15:45

That doesn't really work, my nigger.

Firstly, you're comparing what one person has done to what an entire group of people has supposedly done.
Secondly, you can prove it about Muhammad but not about Jews.

"concentration camps were a bit like butlins and jews were only too happy to go there."

Oh yeah, I always laugh when people say "but there was a childrens' playground at Auschwitz so it must have been a nice place really". HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

The truth will out said...

This little 'discourse' between Paris and nastiest... sweet as it is, is precisely the same concerted effort to demotivate others.

HaHahaHaHaHa!
Wankers.


Interesting links on Rothschild man David Cameron

Who does ‘Agent Cameron’ work for?
http://hardons-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/who-does-agent-cameron-work-for.html


Why they call him ‘Agent’ Cameron
http://hardons-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/why-they-call-him-agent-cameron.html

...and one more fantastic long but detailed article hardly mentions his jewishness but his zionist ties and background.

Cameron’s Closet
http://hardons-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/camerons-closet.html

@Paris claims
I can tell you about a dozen stories of acquaintances of mine who are 1/8 or 1/16 jewish, all to a man only identify with their jewish identity.
All.To.A.Man.
A little how you see openly with half/quarter-caste children only ever see themselves as black despite being brought up by a single white mother and having no black parental influence around.

When they discover they have a single drop of jew blood they suddenly have a strange change, the years of anti-white propaganda perhaps takes an inverted twist and now they see themselves set against us, perhaps, who knows.
Whenever any issue comes up they will vie for whatever position is good for Israel or the juwes.

From past experiences and observations it almost appears that they only have any goyim 'friends' just so they can keep a watchful eye or contain the goyim.
When it looks like uncontrolled goy may start to think or act independently they move in "circling the wagons" controlling the discourse steering it precisely where they can manage it always but always for the sole advantage of their tribe. Often they are undeclared juwes, crypto or whatever you want to call it, their names changed to sound more Saxon, their behaviours always betray them as solely seeing themselves as one of the tribe.

To ignore the jewish question is to not understand the scope of our problem.

The reason every successive leadership of our European countries have betrayed its people and heritage is by the greed and love of money, they have served the zionist agenda totally for the past 100 years.

Whether jew or not, they have all been installed to positions of power by serving jewry.
Thatcher only got into power from the jewish community of Finchley, without them she would never have vbecome MP.

What's good for juwes is only ever bad for white Europeans.

Churchill is feted as our greatest hero, he sunk Europe and all its colonies, the widespread immigration into all our lands was kick started by him.

He tried to recant too late in his career, after sending 66 million white Europeans to their deaths so that the zionist movement can guarantee their boot on all our faces.

It's a pity you utilise the same snarky boiler plate underhanded kiki-alike snide throw-away remarks that nastiest filth does with 'they think Cameron is jewish'HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
He is, his own Jewipedia entry even has it, but he's a proud and devoted zionist [see links above provided] which more to the point is what makes him anti-white and for the tribe 1st, his jewishness makes it a personal unbreakable bond.

Go on say something about lizards you pair of cunts.

The truth will out said...

Snidey pair of cunts say...
"concentration camps were a bit like butlins and jews were only too happy to go there."

Oh yeah, I always laugh when people say "but there was a childrens' playground at Auschwitz so it must have been a nice place really". HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA."


Nazi death camps or hi De hi
I'll let you decide which it more closely resembles, honest answers please... sigh.

Richard said...

Good post, 'The truth will out'

Regarding Churchill. His earlier writing clearly shows he was aware of the Tribe and it's machinations. He even stated in print that the Russian revolution was being financed and organized by the Jews, and that most of the revolutionary leadership was Jewish.
However, in the late 1920's he got caught up in the Wall St. market scams and lost most of his fortune - putting his family estate in severe danger. It was a Jewish financier who kindly came to his rescue thus putting him completely in the hands of the Tribe.... just in time for Churchill to line up against Hitler for the second world war........the rest unfortunately is history

Dan said...

Jack Straw is a case in point. Just look at him, he's clearly Jewish. The matrilineal descent bolsters the case. His sympatico with multiculturalism in England seals it. Don't be surprised if you find him openly practising his actual faith one day.

I recall Helena Bonham Carter as a youthful actress stressing how she wasn't English in interviews when she stared out acting and that she identified herself with her Spanish... Yes Spanish heritage. I thought nothing of it. Well now she's the veritable face of English actress hood. Turns out she really meant Sephardi all along.


Dan said...

Resorting to the holocaust is a bit shop worn.

I'd hazard that Jewsused the sack of Jerusalem for decades as a scam too.

When Edward I expelled them they were probably pissing and moaning about it to Polish princes for centuries.

Enough already, Basta!

johan said...

Let us earnestly that we see a lot more of such things, Mary.

Gem Junior said...

I have Jewish friends too, so I know what you mean Savant. I know them all my life and know that they have no idea that their brethren are involved in destroying white nations. They would side with gentile whites, IMO but I believe those Jews are few and far between. My experience of Jews unknown to me personally is that upon interaction they will presume to immediately assume the role of overlord and to use a verb, their behavior is to demand. Less likely will they look around a busy shop to see if they can spot an item vs. imperiously quizzing an employee already busy with a customer. So I dunno. I think that although my friends are Jews, they were raised among us so behave that way. Then what if we put them with fellow Jews? Well, probably blood would win out and we might see a different side of them. NU I don't know about, but one thing is for sure; he doesn't put any blame on them for mass immigration and destruction of white nations and that is odd because anyone can see that Spectre, Shatter et al are fucking us all over. And he can't see? Hmmmmmmm is all I can say

nastiestuncle said...

@Gem Junior 18:50

"NU I don't know about, but one thing is for sure; he doesn't put any blame on them for mass immigration and destruction of white nations and that is odd because anyone can see that Spectre, Shatter et al are fucking us all over. And he can't see? Hmmmmmmm is all I can say"

Oh lordy, here we go again.

I've gone on record many times to say that Jews are over-represented in the multi-culti movement.

The thing with which I have a problem is blaming it on "the Jews" as if they are a single entity which is out to get us. The reasons are firstly that it isn't true, secondly that when we say it it makes us sound like retards, thirdly it makes people think we are national socialists and therefore they will never side with us, and fourthly it's dangerous as I have no doubt in my mind that most people here would murder every Jew they could find if they could get away with it.

You give an example of a few Jews (genetic Jews) who are pushing multi-culti. What if I gave you a few examples of white people who are doing the same - would that make all white people our enemies? Do you see the problem with using a few examples to smear the whole lot?

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 256   Newer› Newest»