Monday, 18 February 2013

Chutzpah on steroids

In a visit to Turkey some time ago Israeli foreign minister Shimon Peres announced that "We reject attempts to create a similarity between the Holocaust and the Armenian allegations. Nothing similar to the Holocaust occurred. What the Armenians went through is a tragedy, but not genocide." Armenians were understandably outraged.  "We protest this assertive stance by the top diplomat of a nation whose sons and daughters themselves lived through the Holocaust."
Peres' sentiments were then reiterated by Israel's ambassador to Armenia Georgia Rivka Cohen, who said the Genocide could not be compared with the Holocaust™. This resulted in further public outrage and a diplomatic row between Armenia and Israel. The Israeli Government not only validated Cohen's remarks, but went on to suggest that 'this issue requires extensive research and an academic dialogue based on testimonials and proof'.

At which point I collapsed. Awakened by the thud, Lady Savant found me on the floor, quivering uncontrollably, my finely chiseled lips flecked with foam, my eyes staring wildly into space. Only after the administration of copious quantities of Ritalin could I could finally be induced to approach my computer again. And there it was. It had not been a bad dream.

Yes, the Israelis are saying that claims of a genocide, before being accepted, must be supported by 'extensive research and an academic dialogue based on testimonials and proof'. OK, one more time: The Israelis are saying that claims of a genocide, before being accepted, must be supported by 'extensive research and an academic dialogue based on testimonials and proof'.

Meanwhile, as every schoolboy knows, for most European countries and in the Anglosphere generally, not only does the Holocaust™ claim not require 'extensive research and an academic dialogue based on testimonials and proof', but anyone looking for such a thing will find himself up before the courts in double quick time, probably jailed, and certainly have his career ruined.

I leave you with this from the judge at a recent Denial Trial in Germany.  Judge Meinerzhagen summing up, said it was "completely irrelevant whether the holocaust really did happen or did not happen. It is illegal to deny it in Germany, and that is all that counts in court."

Remind me again, what language gives us the word chutzpah?


Dan said...

A cheeky Arnenian should say:

Well yes, the Turks actually led my people out into the desert and let them die. Millions. Yours? Half imagined.

Anonymous said...

Good find, Savant. Nicely observed.

I can imagine little nasty conferring with his handlers right this moment - weather it's better to take the reasonable line of attack (good cop) or the aggresive, you a Nazi? outraged attack (bad cop).

Dan said...

The Armenian show is generally considered to be the first genocide of the 20th century. Indeed my understanding is that 1-1.5 million were verifiably killed. Church records, bodies, ruined villages. Everything that establishing a murder scene requires.

What is the psychology behind denying the Armenians their slice of the victimology cake?

Dan said...

What might be motivating the Israelis in this?

Evidence of a Muslim majority killing a million Christians? Muzzies committing Gendercide? Quick Schlomo cover it up. Except it can't be hidden, too bad.

Were the Triumvirate of the Young Turks Donmei?

Kruger said...

Pity the Turks didn't get the Kardashians' forbears!

The truth will out said...

"What is the psychology behind denying the Armenians their slice of the victimology cake?"

"What might be motivating the Israelis in this?"

Two good questions, with just as good an answer though predictable.
Jews Plotted The Armenian Holocaust (written by A Jew -Brother Nathanael

You see when you first start to see through the hazy illusion that is the world as seen on TV or news media, almost everything stuns you.
It seems everywhere you looked, through all history, when anything horrific and evil occurred the narrative was to place the blame firmly at the feet of British, Christians or white people in general always some grouping of individuals who in truth were the actual victims of the affair..
After some careful review it appears that all historical points that we are made to remember or especially note actually had a completely different cause and result to what we are told.

Which is why people like to tar the notion of blaming it on the jews as the reply of the ignorant anti-semite looking for an easy scapegoat.
Truth be told, the juwes are a wicked mendacious strain of the hominid species.

There are no depths they wouldn't plumb, yet somehow it all gets blamed on their enemy.

The eternal jew cries out in pain as they genocide you.
Can you imagine how evil the extinct white European will appear in future history e-books/books/scrolls/wood carvings* if ever this period in time falls precisely to their plan?

here's some more

The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians (By Chrisopher Jon Bjerknes in PDF)

Jews, Zionists Behind
Armenian Genocide Holocaust

* Depends on how their world war 3 planned for the goyim goes I s'pose

Dan said...

Don't believe what you read in the papers. I wonder who wrote the first article in the The Times in 1917 that claimed the Germans were rendering soap from human bodies? It was such a good propaganda piece that it was revived in the next war!

Dan said...

The thing is the Armenians tell one story that hasn't changed much over the decades. It's consistent.

Otoh the holocaust narrative keeps shifting. It's a red flag. Depending on the decade it's the Germans doing it with Einsatzgruppen alone. Then it's the Wehrmacht, then it's IBM and Deomag, then it's the Swiss ferreting away cash, then it's the Vichy French, then it's Russian peasants and Ukrainian hard arses... Then it's pols in the UK who don't want to accept refugees. Then the cycle of blame rolls to the Vatican... It's an endless merry go round! Show me the frigging bodies already.

Dan said...

Somewhere Eamon Devalera must be at fault in his black nationalist heart.

Anonymous said...

For all the "good" that the nastiest hasbara thinks he accomplishes on this blog, perhaps he should consider heading over to Hungary to lecture those Hungarians, instead:,7340,L-4341151,00.html

Rob said...

...for most European countries and in the Anglosphere generally, not only does the Holocaust™ claim not require 'extensive research and an academic dialogue based on testimonials and proof', but anyone looking for such a thing will find himself up before the courts in double quick time, probably jailed, and certainly have his career ruined.

Actually, the Anglosphere seems unique in not having totally caved in - yet - to the Holocaust enforcement racket. Of course, any questioning of the approved narrative will still ruin your career, and being deprived of your livelihood is almost as bad as going to prison.

Off topic: Bet you thought Britain lets in just about anybody - not if they're White, it doesn't.

Dr. Wassell said...

Generally the “lesson” of the Holocaust boils down to: Jewish racism, nationalism, and self-assertion are good; White racism, nationalism, and self-assertion are evil. The flaw in this position has nothing to do with historical facts. It is simply the glaring moral double standard, which is the essence of Jewish tribal morality. The position is perfectly consistent with Jewish live and let die morals, since both sides of the double standard benefit the Jews.

Roem said...

Dan, They want a monopoly on the Holocau$t™ because it has given the following to benefits to ‘Jews’ and to Israel:

(1) Carte blanche to kill Palestinians and expropriate land east of Jordan;
(2) Ignore and/or flaunt numerous internationally agreed protocols;
(3) Take possession of 4 advanced submarines from German shipyards that each have the capacity to launch nuclear tipped cruise missiles;
(4) Plan and execute the 9-11 atrocity;
(5) Flagrantly attack the USS Liberty, and mercilessly strafe the surviving crew in the water;
(6) Infiltrate European politics by forming countless Jewish or Zionist lobby organizations;
(7) Infiltrate US politics by forming countless Jewish or Zionist lobby organizations;
(8) Pervert the law making processes of the entire Western world;
(9) Destroy the lives of those individuals who challenge their edicts;
(10) Obtain vast transfers of wealth from the United States by defrauding the American citizen;
(11) Engage massively in illegal international criminal trades: prostitution, slavery, narcotics, human organs, body-parts, and armaments;
(12) Repeatedly incite wars, death, and destruction in sovereign foreign nations who posed no threat (either militarily or economically);

Anonymous said...

Que , Neckiest untermensch with kosher howls of "but but but ...The yids are the nicest people in the world butt fucking gay niggers" ...or something.

Dan said...

Poor old Kardashian. All that way to just to nig up with his daughters. They are good bakers those Armenians.

nastiestuncle said...

Peres was wrong to say that what happened to the Armenians was not genocide because it clearly was, but then again he made the statement in Turkey, which was an ally of Israel until Turkey elected an Islamist government, and Peres is a political realist. Imagine if he had said that he considered it a genocide. Bang goes the strategic alliance.

The similarity between both genocides is that shit loads of people were killed in both.

Lots of Jews consider what happened to the Armenians to be genocide and have pushed the USA to declare it a genocide.

Anonymous said...

That fucking Shimon Peres.... I'd like to smear pork grease all over his head. Anyone who demeans the Armenian Holocaust needs a good kick up the ass, and a shot in the balls as well.

Anonymous said...

O/T- I saw Cameron on the evening news."There's no limit to the number of Indians that can come to the UK". They want us gone Sav.Their not even hiding it anymore.

Dan said...

One can always simply claim ignorance.

Tragedy is a Shakespeare play not a march out into the desert after a Gendercide.

fitz fitzgerald said...

LIGHT RELIEF: Alec Baldwin : the horror of it ... :

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 18:53

Armenian Genohoax?
Never happened.
They all went on holiday and didn't take enough sunscreen.
They declared war on Turkey.
Where is the video footage of the death marches?
The mass graves were just full of stuffed dummies.
Can't even question it in some countries without being arrested.

See what I did thar?

Anonymous said...


rebel said...

Alec Baldwin has gone up in my estimation.

Anonymous said...

Well, the guy Alec Baldwin addressed is a coon. Let's just see if he was right about the crackhead comment.

Uncle Nasty said...

fitz fitzgerald said...

LIGHT RELIEF: Alec Baldwin : the horror of it ...

Baldwin also made “disparaging remarks’’ about Miller’s mother, the photographer said.

As oblivious pedestrians walked by, Baldwin told him to “suck my d--k,” Miller said.

Baldwin also walked up to random people — including a dad pushing his child in a stroller — and told them Miller was an ex-con and drug dealer, Miller said.

“He was saying some serious racist stuff,” Miller said. “He said some choice words about my mother, and he was telling people in the street that I’m a drug dealer.

“He could have said a lot of other stuff. But he used all of the stereotypes associated with black people.”

Miller worked for the NYPD for nearly 15 years, spending most of his time in narcotics.

Let me see if I've got this right.

A. Miller is a nigger.
B. Miller is a retired NYPD cop.
C. Miller was in narcotics.
D. Miller retired after 15 years?

Any guesses that Baldwin (cunt he may be) got it right for once ... and that the phrase this reporter so desperately seeks is "dismissed for corruption and addiction"??

There. Fixed it.


Uncle Nasty said...

Dan said...

The Armenian show is generally considered to be the first genocide of the 20th century. Indeed my understanding is that 1-1.5 million were verifiably killed. Church records, bodies, ruined villages. Everything that establishing a murder scene requires.

What is the psychology behind denying the Armenians their slice of the victimology cake?

Quite simple. There is only a finite amount of money in the world. Admit to another slaughter and the yid's share may plummet to only 99.99%


Anonymous said...

You nailed it Savant, oh the jweish hypocrisy.

Dan said...

This is a link/URL to a telegram sent by Willam Jennings Bryan to the Turks:

The text is here:

Mind you this is in real time. Written as the massacres were happening. One is a PDF of a telegram the other the text.

Dan said...

Where are your patents of nobility Nastiest? When your forefather charged with the conqueror in the war of the roses June 6th DDay 1944 and liberated Bergen Belsen?

Seneca said...

This is hypocrisy off the Richter Scale.

The story also demonstrates breathtaking cynicism on the part of those Israelis.

Really, such cynics are the lowest form of humanity.

Dan said...

There''s more contemporary accounts.

The numbers seem quite reasonable. The reporting is level headed and even seems to spare the Germans the blame for instigation.

No soap legends or whatnot to spice up a perfectly reasonable tally of dead and how it was done. The story was never inflated and boosted to absurd legendary levels of collusion. This my niggers is what is in store for us if the blacks and Muslims take our homelands.

Uncle Nasty said...

And another ...

A really good site. Low key, non-hysterical, level-headed and with lots and lots of references.

I am surprised that it has lasted as long as it has.


Uncle Nasty said...

Oh, and another ...

Feds Buy 2 Billion Rounds of Ammunition

by William Bigelow

18 Feb 2013, 9:11 AM PDT

Something strange is going on. Federal non-military agencies have bought two billion rounds of ammunition in the last 10 months. The Obama Administration says that federal law enforcement agents need the ammunition for “mandatory quarterly firearms qualifications and other training sessions.”

Radio show host Mark Levin is suspicious. He commented:

To provide some perspective, experts estimate that at the peak of the Iraq war American troops were firing around 5.5 million rounds per month. At that rate, the [Department of Homeland Security] is armed now for a 24-year Iraq war. A 24-year Iraq war! I’m going to tell you what I think is going on. I don’t think domestic insurrection. Law enforcement and national security agencies, they play out multiple scenarios. … I’ll tell you what I think they’re simulating: the collapse of our financial system, the collapse of our society and the potential for widespread violence, looting, killing in the streets, because that’s what happens when an economy collapses. I suspect that just in case our fiscal situation, our monetary situation, collapses, and following it the civil society collapses, that is the rule of law, they want to be prepared. I know why the government’s arming up: It’s not because there’s going to be an insurrection; it’s because our society is unraveling.

Now if I was working as a wage slave in an ammo factory ... and was a keen shooter .. and was aware of the plans of the feds ... I would be sorely tempted to double load a few rounds out of every thousand and underload a few more.
Reduce reliability to Pakistani and Indian levels.

Interesting trivia: A decade or three back, the MOD in Britain decided to order a few hundred million rounds of 5.56mm NATO to replenish military stocks.
Someone suggested they source the ammo from South Africa, whose reliability rates at that time, were stratospheric. Failures were rated at parts per million rounds produced. Even today shooters squeal with delight when flat packs of ZA-manufactured 7.62mm pop up at gun shows and swops.

A lefty, however (probably Peter Hain) scuttled that immediately. It would not do to be seen supporting those South African racist fucks. So, what to do?
Simples. They ordered their ammo from India and Pakistan where failure rates could hit as high as three percent.

That may not seem like much -- until you're being shot at. then the chance of one failure in thirty gets a little disturbing.

Hey, but what the fuck, say the pols. It's not me being shot at.

On the same topic, I heard a rumour that the Obama admin is cancelling or reducing military pensions and widow's payouts. Can anyone confirm?

If so, great way to inspire loyalty.


nastiestuncle said...

@Uncle Nasty 22:02

"Radio show host Mark Levin is suspicious."

Mark Levin is a Jew, so therefore the Federal Government did not just buy 2 billion rounds and Mark Levin is not suspicious. Instead, his talk about ammo was just a smokescreen to brainwash white women into shagging black men.

Shame on you for reposting his propaganda here.

Anonymous said...

You bastards! You merciless bastards!

Importing Africans and given them stuff then borrowing 600 000 000 eurines and sending them to Africa as aid when that money could have been spent buying Rolls Royces for the Mccarthys and Daimlers for the Mcdonaghs so that they could send their children to school but no you have failed traveler children,

Vincent Browne tonight.

Dan said...

Lord Triesman, Bernard Lewis, Norman Stone et al plus Shimon Peres have denied the Armenians their holocaust.

Brilliant. Connect the dots.

Franz said...

The rabbi said it long time ago.

"Hitler didn't kill 6 million Jews.

He killed God six million times."

Europeans need to wake up and understand what this MEANS or they'll continue to pay for their own destruction till they're gone.

Uncle Nasty said...

A correction to a previous post.

Phoned a friend of mine who pointed out that Pakistani ammunition is actually rated pretty highly on the reliability scale ... as are their weapons. Apparently they make a pretty mean MG42 clone and manufacture the Heckler and Koch machine pistols (sub-machine guns for our American compadres) under license ... some components exceeding the original German for reliability and finish, although cosmetically they are finished (as said friend stated) by a blind curry muncher with a can of paint.

The Indians, however, more than made up for it ...

A quote:

One of Many
February 29, 2004, 03:56 PM

I made the mistake of buying 500 rounds of the Indian "NATO 7.62 " ammo. This stuff is junk. Out of 8 packages (10 rounds) I opened, there were 5 with case defects that prevented chambering or firing pin strike. The rest were dud primers. I managed to fire 69 out of 80 rounds, and then my rifle had to go to the gunsmith for repairs. That was 7 weeks ago, and I still do not have it back yet.

A ten percent failure rate? if ever the two go to war again, my money's on the Paki's.


Anonymous said...

Holoco$t realists in Germany and other oppressive countries in Europe need to get smart and, instead of questioning the holoco$t directly, they should be questioning the law which states that the holoco$t cannot be questioned whilst constantly asserting that they are not challenging the holoco$t per se. Nonetheless, it's a damnable lie anyway.


Dan said...

That's a good point. I don't doubt that Hitler killed millions of his blood enemy, but why is it illegal to say he didn't? Why indeed?

nastiestuncle said...

I think it's because the people who make a point of denying aspects of the Holocaust which are true are national socialists and national socialism worked out so well the last time it was tried that it's better to put such people in prison where they can do no harm.

I wish we could put communists in prison too but we can't.

Anonymous said...

The Jews (inc. probably our own Nastiest Hasbara) were big time Armenian genocide deniers. ever hear about the ADL official who got fired in 2007 for calling it a "genocide"?

That was until the Jews fell-out with the Turks. After the Jews had to killed 8 Turks aboard the Gaza Peace Flotilla in May 2010.

Since then, the Israelis, Jews, and our own Nastiest Hasbara, have no problem whatsoever calling the massacre of Armenians "a genocide."

Anonymous said...

@ Nastiest Hasbara

If you are—as you claim—more English than anyone you know, having traced your family back as far as you can, finding not even any Taffs, Jocks or Paddies in your lineage.

Why are you posting at 02:30 (GMT) on a Tuesday morning?

Uncle Nasty said...

Perhaps off-topic ... perhaps not. You decide.

By Lt.Col “Bud” Farrell, USAF, ret.

When I was a young officer and a jet fighter pilot flying missions in the Korean Conflict (unknowingly under the command of a Soviet General of the United Nations Security Council), I could never understand HOW THE ENEMY KNEW SO MUCH ABOUT US, as broadcast almost daily over the communist Pyongyang radio station in North Korea.

Our wives’ names, children’s names, Squadron Commander names, flight numbers, etc.! The North Koreans knew when we were coming, how many of us there were, what type of aircraft we were flying and even the targets we were to hit. Later I realized that the naval and ground forces suffered the same fate that we did, especially our Army and Marine infantry troops.

All of our military operations had to be forwarded by radio to the Soviet Commander of the United Nations Security Council at the United Nations Building, New York City, for approval before our forces went into action against the North Koreans and Red Chinese.

The Soviet Commander of the United Nations Security Council delayed the battle plans until he used the radios in the United Nations Building in New York to relay all our “battle planning information” to Moscow, North Korea and Red China.

The enemy then contacted and relayed these battle plans to their communist forces in the field. The enemy knew when to move from an area and when to attack our smaller fighting forces. They knew beforehand when we were coming and how many of us there were. They knew everything about us all the time – 24 hours a day!!!

Do I detect the fine hebraic hand .... again?

Once again, you decide.


Dan said...

A real National Socialist would probably say, "it's a pity we didn't kill more, we failed mankind."

kulak said...

A real National Socialist would probably say, "it's a pity we didn't kill more, we failed mankind."

That's essentially what the old Puerto Rican lady I know once said to some Jew she got into a fight with in a parking lot in Florida.

White hubby couldn't believe it. He left her and her sister alone outside for five minutes while he checked into the hotel, came back out to hear her say "... it's too bad Hitler didn't get all of you!"

And no, it doesn't make her "national socialist".

Like most normal human beings, she's just sick of kikes.

nastiestuncle said...

@Uncle Nasty 03:30

I definitely believe that that happened.

Reminds me of the computer geek from The Office.
"You know Bruce Lee's not really dead, don't you? Yeah, it's in a book. What he did was he faked his own death so that he could work undercover for the Hong Kong police, infiltrating drugs gangs and the Triads."

Franz said...

@ Uncle Nasty 19 February 2013 03:30

Not off-topic. Forty years ago I was in the service and heard talk about the high-level cooperation going on during both the Korean War and the one I was stuck in.

The irascable J.B. Campbell mentions specifically the collaboration between Korean brainwashers & their US counterparts in the middle of his essay below:

For anybody new to JB (he was the Militia Man) I still recommend this one:

Uncle Nasty said...

Nice sites, Franz, and thank you. Our resident hasbarat girlie should go there.

She will curry her little frillies.


saighdur said...

UN, as an ex-soldier I remember the high estimation which South African ammo was held in. SO sad to see that country collapse into anarchy when they used to be a leading civilisation.

Essex boy said...

Hi Allan@Aberdeen. That is a really great suggestion. It typifies how we must use those bastard's methods against themselves! Protest loudly that you personally don't question a single thing about the Holocau$t but that banning discussion is undemocratic and dictatorial - which it is.

Bill said...

Could Britain have an Indian Prime Minister? asks a Telegraph hack.

He or she would have to jump the queue of Jews (Miliband), Africans (Umunna and Afriye) and Muslims (Khan) first. That's how bad things are in Britain these days when there's not a white native Prime Ministerial candidate in sight

Anonymous said...

Here's the latest one cashing in on the burgeoning holocaust industry....

Hector G. said...

Anon 13.19. Here is a good comment of the DT on the Terezin camp.

We are constantly reminded of the evils of National Socialism only. The countless millions killed in the name of socialism are more conveniently forgotten, because everyone has succumbed to the onward march of global socialism, and though the collateral damage is regrettable, it was a price that just had to be paid, it is a mere footnote in history. However constantly remembering the evils of National Socialism is necessary to undermine the concept of Nationalism and love of country, that most evil of xenophobic crimes. In the new, borderless, multi-culti world, we must all learn that love of one's own country and culture is a thing of the past.

FOD said...

Most likely this is how most jews behave. Utilizing a dual code of morality to hypocritically justify the nurture of their own collective interests while simultaneously harming the interests of the goyische majority is the foundation of jewish self-delusion and probably a prime motivator of the undying passion to which they devote themselves to those interests and activities.

Which probably explains why judaism is the most successful and enduring crime syndicate in history. With a pocket full of gold, a gun in one hand and a bible in the other, the jewish mafia, among a myriad of other breathtaking crimes, pulled off the greatest theft in history – right in front of the world’s nose – they literally stole an entire country!

beppo said...


I think that, on reflection or further in depth reading, you will agree that you meant to say 'a Talmud in the other'.

Uncle Nasty said...

FOD Said:-

Which probably explains why judaism is the most successful and enduring crime syndicate in history. With a pocket full of gold, a gun in one hand and a bible in the other, the jewish mafia, among a myriad of other breathtaking crimes, pulled off the greatest theft in history – right in front of the world’s nose – they literally stole an entire country!

Beautifully put. I am stealing this to go into my file of hasbarat history.

Speaking of which ... I think I've found our resident rat .

Tell me it ain't so.


Anonymous said...

What are these '' both genocides''
you talk about NaZi Uncle ? The
Turkish genocide of Armenians 1915,
the Holodomor circa 1933, Pol Pot's
effort or the Rwanda genocide of
tons of Tutsis? You don't think I've
missed any do you Moeshe?

Roem said...

FOD. One disagreement. They did not 'steal a country'. They stole dozens of them. Every English-speaking one and several more in Europe.

Dave C said...

The time has never been more ripe for a new Irish political party of the right. We are alone in Europe in not having a nationalist party worthy of the name. I've not voted in years as I've simply nobody to vote for. Might as well just remove myself from the electoral register.

Uncle Nasty said...

Further to my last post, I have been overtaken by events. Please scroll down to the section decribed:-

Blakeney's Blood Libel Against Germany


AnalogMan said...

saighdur said...

UN, as an ex-soldier I remember the high estimation which South African ammo was held in.

It's ironic that SA only started to manufacture ammunition in response to sanctions. Also notable that the main support in setting up its armaments industry came from Israel.

Uncle Nasty said...

AnalogMan said...

It's ironic that SA only started to manufacture ammunition in response to sanctions. Also notable that the main support in setting up its armaments industry came from Israel.

I do not think that I shall ever understand the strange partnership/adversary/assist/betray relationship between ZA and Israel.

History dictates, however, that it was ultimately beneficial to the tribe and detrimental to all others.

Israel ... for what it's worth, still exists and South Africa does not.


Uncle Nasty said...

Dave C said...

The time has never been more ripe for a new Irish political party of the right.

I would disagree. The time is ripe for a bloody revolution. Political parties are a quaint notion and the concept is deader than disco.
Another political party will be infiltrated within a week -- and thoroughly subverted within a year.
The only solution is two, maybe three common goals.

The utter destruction of the current misinformation system -- the MSM.

The destruction of the so-called current "justice" industry ... courts, lawyers, judges, legislation, etc.

The destruction of the current banking and finance system.

.... and when I say "destruction". I do not refer to arrest, trial, etc. Rather, I refer you to that rather unsettling movie that sends a very non-hollywood message -- The Dark Knight.

From the revelation of the Joker, onwards.
Steal the DVD, and watch it carefully. It states (in images) what Covington declares in the books.

An interesting example of leaderless resistance. Really. Please feel free to disagree.


AnalogMan said...

UN: At the time, like many others, I think, I thought that SA was lucky to have a friend like Israel. Israel was skilled in sanctions-busting, and a staunch ally. It was only afterwards, when the dust had settled, that I learned that Israel had voted for those sanctions in the (other) UN.

Lots of money to be made in sanctions-busting.

Manc said...

"Why have the white British left London?" asks the BBC.

Something quite remarkable happened in London in the first decade of the new millennium. The number of white British people in the capital fell by 620,000 - equivalent to the entire population of Glasgow moving out.

The consequence, as revealed by the latest census, is that white Brits are now in a minority in London, making up just 45% of its residents.

So where have they gone to - and why did they leave?"

The BBC/Common Purpose Useful Idiot then goes on to tell us how 'positive' this all is but the best rated comments tell us different. White flight is ethnic cleansing of whites from their capital city, alongside increasing numbers of other towns and cities across Britain, and, soon to be, Ireland.

Some interesting stats there.

Manc said...

AnalogMan 08.48

While the Jews in Israel were raking in the shekels through sanction busting, the Jews in South Africa (Slovo and Co), were busy in the SA Communist Party (allied to the ANC), or in anti-apartheid white liberal parties (Suzman and co)working against the interests of the beleaguered white minority.

Wherever there's an 'enemy within' there you find Jews and wherever there's someone making shady money there you find Jews also.

Anonymous said...

"I think it's because the people who make a point of denying aspects of the Holocaust which are true" ..Which parts

The geysers of blood?
The gas Chambers?

The 4 million dead at Auschwitz, , that made up part of the total 6 million or 11 million including the goys ( a figure puled out of a weasels kosher arse) that was reduced by 3 million leaving the total unchanged?

Electric jew killing cremating machines?

Which part is true? Which parts are denied?

Hows your leafleting campaign coming on?

Corkonian said...

Analogman. Israel does NOTHING FOR ANYONE unles it's in her own interests. Period. She'll turn on a sixpence without a second thought.

J Bull said...

What a traitorous cnut that Mark Easton is. This is propaganda straight out of the Pravda mould. How can this cnut look himself in the mirror?

I see the fucker lives in LOndon with his family. Wud deeply like to see him or them at the working end of some cultural enrichment at some stage.

tokyo paddy said...

UN, I agree about the uselessness of political parties, and of their being infiltrated and undermined. But surely any other form of mass movement would suffer from the same risks.

I guess you'll opt for Covington's leaderless resistance, and I guess you would be correct.

Anonymous said...

I see the highly kosher BBC are busy removing loads of posts on that white flight from London article. Only the ones critical of mass immigration are being pulled of course.
You can have free speech so long as you toe the party line even if the party line means your own destruction.

Iron Felix said...

The reason Dan that Ireland has never had a party of the Right is that it is not capable of so doing.
The "Right" means, generally speaking, Fascism. Though now a word of mindless abuse, it is actually descriptive of a theory of governance derived by guys like Mussolini from the old Roman Republic. Considered symbolically, (the rods bound together around an ax) it means the uniting in harmonious purpose of the several classes in society in the exercise of authority;
considered ethically it ranks well above Socialism and far above marxism since both of these work towards the sundering of society rather than its strengthening, although it falls somewhat below monarchy. And it always presupposes the concept of "Nation" and there you have it Dan, because there is no such thing as an Irish nation, never has been, never will be. Wherever anything smacking of such, even in larval form, might manifest itself it is swiftly suppressed by the Irish themselves. There is nothing in Ireland that could therefore give rise to a right wing party or grouping of any worthwhile kind.If your Paddy decides he is to be a Fascist he will join the BNP, and will sense no contradiction in so doing.He knows, you see, that the so-called "Irish Nation" we see today is simply an accident of history, existing for the time being without meaning or purpose.

Iron Felix said...

Dammit, I am losing my grip. Looking back, it is a chap called Dave C. to whom my earlier post was intended.

katana said...

FOD said...
Which probably explains why judaism is the most successful and enduring crime syndicate in history. With a pocket full of gold, a gun in one hand and a bible in the other, the jewish mafia, among a myriad of other breathtaking crimes, pulled off the greatest theft in history – right in front of the world’s nose – they literally stole an entire country!

19 February 2013 13:32


Well said FOD.

Jews are gangsters in all manner of ways, from the street up and all the way to the top, controlling our societies. Our politicians are pimps and whores for them.

Here's a 'book review' from the Jewish Post about a particular aspect of their role in organized crime in the US.


The Jewish Gangsters in America
By Gad Nahshon

"These are the conclusions from Rich Cohen's exciting to read book:
'Tough Jews' is a fascinating read back into the history of organized
crime," wrote Martin Scorcese. And Mario Cuomo defined this book as
"unusually entertaining". Larry King, a friend of the family, said, "WOW.
What a book. . . You do not have to be Jewish to love Tough Jews."

Arnold Rothstein was the founding father of American organized crime. He was murdered in 1928. He left a legend and a myth and also a tribe of notorious "boys": Louis Lepke Buchalter, the first builder of an empire of crimes which produced in 1940 around $2 million a year, Meyer Lansky, Bugsy Siegal, Dutch Schultz, Abraham Twist Kid Reles, Pep Strauss, Mendy Weiss, Gurrah Shapiro, Red Levine and many others.

They were Jews, criminals and murderers. They also did not hesitate to murder other Jews who dared to challenge them in the underworld. They left a "legacy" to be followed by the Italian "disciples" of Rothstein: Lucky Luciano, Joe Adonis, Louis Capone, Albert Anastasia and many others.

A young writer, Rich Cohen, decided to expose the role of these Jews in the history of organized crime in America. But he also illuminated these Jews in a sort of romantic-nostalgic light.

Cohen is an excellent writer and a superb story teller. He conducted research of his own and produced a fascinating account of the life of these criminal Jews. His book: "Tough Jews, Fathers, Sons and Gangsters" (Simon and Schuster, 1998, New York) will stir debate about the "contribution" of Jews to America.

First: Jews do not tend to be only white collar kind of criminals. They can be cruel murderers.


katana said...


Second, Jews invented organized crime.

Third, Jews were the first ones to describe themselves as businessmen. They turned the crime into business and they built a network of crimes: gambling, prostitution, smuggling, extortion and protection money.

Fourth, sad to say they were the first drug dealers in America!!

Fifth, they were often "good Jews". They went to synagogue and they defended Jews against American Nazis and anti-Semites.

These are the conclusions from Rich Cohen's exciting to read book: "Tough Jews is a fascinating read back into the history of organized crime," wrote Martin Scorcese. And Mario Cuomo defined this book as "unusually entertaining". Larry King, a friend of the family, said, "WOW. What a book. . . You do not have to be Jewish to love Tough Jews."

He is right. The book is rich with engrossing, vivid, violent anecdotes. Cohen covered the era from 1918 to 1950.

These Jews grew up in the Jewish ghettos of America and especially in Brooklyn or Brownsville. As a special tribe, Cohen illuminated, they disappear. Why? Because they sent their children to the colleges, rather than to the streets. The Italians were the ones to develop families or dynasties of organized crime.

But it looks as if the Jews taught them the secret art of organized crime. Cohen does not have a background in criminal justice and he ignored the famous book by Jenna Weismann Joselit: "Our Gang" (1900-1940). So we need more material to understand the unique characteristics of "Jewish crime". Also, he did not mention the film "Lepke" (Buchalter) with Tony Curtis in the major role.

Cohen also compared the "toughness" of the Jewish gangsters with the art of the Israeli commando in Entebbe (give me a break).

Cohen tried to revise our attitude to these Jews. Well they were criminals, period. Many Jews today are sensitive to these kind of stories about crimes. Well we should be more mature. We are not always perfect or a "Light to the Nations". But we should not give medals to Jews such as Abe Reles, for example.

Cohen also tried to present these Jews as an example of "Pride Jews" but the criminals did not go to fight against Hitler in World War II.

Rich Cohen grew up in Glencoe, Illinois. He attended Tulane University in New Orleans and spent his junior year at Oxford University in England. His first job after college was with The New Yorker where he wrote a number of stories, mostly humorous pieces, that ran in "Notes and Comment" and "Talk of the Town." After two years at The New Yorker he became a staff writer at The New York Observer, writing "mostly funny stories about mostly serious people." Less than a year later, he was offered a contract by Rolling Stone magazine where he's now a contributing editor.

At Rolling Stone, he has written stories on the Rolling Stones, Alicia Silverstone, Tom Clancy, Pat Buchanan, and Howard Stern, among other notable subjects. He continues to write articles and humor pieces for The New York Times, The New Yorker, New York magazine, Spy, and Details. He lives in New York City.

'Tough Jews, Fathers, Sons and Gangsters' By Rich Cohen Simon and Schuster, 1998, New York

James Lord said...

I noticed that about BBC as well. The highest ranked comments were all hugely critical of the article, of mass immigration generally.

The bastards are now pulling them down as fast as they can but at least we know what people are thinking.

Shaunantijihad said...

The BBC are not as invulnerable as they might think. In 5 days some of the 911 'truthers' will challenge the BBC in a court of law regarding their biased coverage of 911, supported by the Architects and Engineers for 911 truth.

Interestingly one of the plaintiffs has refused to pay his BBC license fee on the basis of anti-terrorism legislation. That's a new twist.

I am sure Nastiest Aunty will be there to tell them that questioning the official version of events means they believe David Icke is cool and alien reptilians run the world.

Here again is the film 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out

nastiestuncle said...

@Shaunantijihad 14:44

Questioning the 'official line' is always good (and in fact, necessary) but so is questioning what the revisionists have to say, because just as governments have their agendas, so do revisionists.

The purpose of questioning anything is to find out the facts to as high a degree as is possible. Well, that's how it is supposed to be, but from reading some of the *ahem* 'less reality-based' blogs, it's clear that the purpose of questioning the official line is not to find out the truth, but to feed their own addiction to their particular brand of bullshit. That's why we find people believing in the following gems, all untrue of course:
Steel doesn't lose its strength as it gets hotter,
Rothschilds bought the United Kingdom after the Battle of Waterloo,
Anne Frank diary was written in biro,
Eisenhower killed 1.7 million unarmed German troops,
Rothschilds own more gold than has ever been mined on Earth.

If truth is what is sought, then it has to be accepted however unpalatable. For example, in the space of a year I have gone from thinking that Jews have nothing in particular to do with multi-culturalism to knowing that they are over-represented in this. I have not noticed the same level of intellectual honesty from people here though, but that is because you guise are infected with a religious way of thinking and I am not.

There's no point in questioning the official line of events if you are a religious-style thinker, because 'what really happened' is going to be nowhere near what you end up believing in.

Anonymous said...

Combat Liberalism

Anonymous said...

Questioning the 'official line' is always good (and in fact, necessary) but so is questioning what the revisionists have to say, because just as governments have their agendas, so do revisionists.

There's nothing wrong with having an agenda.

There's everything wrong with having white genocide as your agenda.

Rob said...

Off topic:

Are Malmo cops afraid to arrest enrichers, even when they turn themselves in?

Shaunantijihad said...

Thank you Nastiest. Now I know that the following people are religiously insane! Please go to the court and tell them that their phd's and other areas of expertise in counter-terrorism and such means nothing because they put "911" and "truth" in their url - which is proof positive they believe in a hollow moon and that metal warmed by burning fuel and office paper should not vaporise! It will certainly be an interesting case, which if upheld, will mean paying the BBC license fee is supporting terrorism!!

From the website:

Professor Niels Harrit
Professor Niels Harrit, Ph.D, led the team of scientists that discovered thermitic material in the WTC dust

Dr. Niels Harrit is a Professor of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen and is one of the world’s leading experts on the scientific evidence that contradicts the official story of 9/11. Professor Harrit's team of scientists in Copenhagen proved that there was nano-engineered thermitic residue, both ignited and unignited, throughout the dust of the three WTC towers. He led the team and published the peer-reviewed study in an official scientific journal. He is also an expert on the other aspects of scientific evidence indicating controlled demolition of the three towers.

Professor Harrit was interviewed for a major documentary with BBC in 2011 where BBC clearly attempted to harass and discredit him rather than look at the scientific evidence, which was devastating to the official story of the destruction of the Twin Towers. Professor Harrit's team took the precautionary step of recording this interview, as well as the interaction before and after the interview, which clearly shows the harassment and highly inappropriate conduct by BBC

Tony Farrell
Former UK intelligence official Tony Farrell has publicly questioned the official 9/11 story, and has been granted 3 hours to present the 9/11 evidence in a UK court of law.

Tony Farrell is a former Intelligence Analyst for the South Yorkshire Police Department. He was fired in 2010 because he felt compelled by his conscience to tell the truth in his official report and state that, due to his extensive analysis of the events of 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings, he considered that the greatest terrorist threat to the public did not come from Islamic extremists but from internal sources within the US and British establishment. He is now dedicating his life to helping to expose the evidence and he is challenging his dismissal through international court.
Other members of Rooke’s presentation team include:

Ian Henshall: Leading UK author on 9/11 and founder of the UK group ‘Re-investigate 9/11’
Ray Savage: Former counterterrorism officer who demonstrates the official 9/11 story is not true
Peter Drew: UK AE911Truth Action Group Facilitator
In addition to these presenters, there are detailed written testimonies of evidence and support from four other 9/11 researchers which will be deployed to bolster to Tony’s defence:

Richard Gage, AIA: Founder/CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Dwain Deets: Former NASA Director of Aerospace Projects
Erik Lawyer: Founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
Jake Jacobs: Veteran US airline pilot and member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth

The evidence about 9/11 that will be presented by the various individuals above has rarely, if ever, been seen in any court of law in the United Kingdom, so this court case represents a unique and valuable opportunity for the 9/11 Truth movement.

Baloo said...

This reminds me of "All animals are equal...." So much so, that I've reposted it all here with an intro. Hope that's okay:
All Genocides are Equal, but....

Anonymous said...

Finally ... a decent RIVAL uploader to youtube.

And to begin with ... a young guy who doesn't mince his words.


Anonymous said...

“He struck me as sincere, and you know, you have to be sitting there at the meeting obviously, but I also told him when he used the word Jewish lobby what it meant to Jewish people,” he added.

“And I told him what a double standard is. That Jewish people throughout the centuries have suffered a double standard. Everyone could be a farmer except Jewish people. Everyone could live in Moscow except Jewish people. I said when everyone else can lobby but all of a sudden when those of us who are pro-Israel lobby, it’s a negative, that’s a double standard. And I’m sure you didn’t mean it, but it harkens to the old days.

“And he really, you know, he almost had tears in his eyes when he understood. So I believe he will be good.”

-- Chuckie Schumer on Chuck Hagel

Dan said...

Couldn't live in Moscow or own a farm?

Monsanto is essentially a Jewish Lawyer Cartel that OWNS the farms indirectly. No deeds no liability. Just own the seed. This is a variation of the Jewish strategy in the Pale (four times the size of Texas). They were grain factors and they were brewers and distillers.

Why would you live in Moscow if you owned Odessa? What more do these fuckers want.

Uncle Nasty said...

Dan said...

What more do these fuckers want.

In a word, everything.

The words "Avarice" and "Greed" are synonymous with the pedestrians -- and has been so since the dawn of history.


Anonymous said...

The Story was broken by Veterans Today in the USA, that the Pope was stepping down because the Vatican was to release Archives from the Holocaust/Hoax, and it would discredit the mainstream as it exists today as a total fraud.

ie 6 million killed in a 3 car, Garage sized Vented room by use of bug spray.

It also showed war crimes committed against the Germans, who defended their nation from Communist Jews hell bent on bringing a Marxist Revolution To Germany.

Anonymous said...

What he really did to Hagel was empathize with him:

"I worry about my grandchildren. My position as Senator places them in danger. You have grandchildren too, yes? You too have been nominated for a dangerous position. It would be a tragedy if something happened to any of them."

David said...

@ Shaunantijihad this paper says it all, the man is a professor and publishes his work in a peer reviewed journal, but some people would have you think he believes in shape shifting lizards, the following extract sums its up nicely:

Professor Niels Harrit and colleagues in a scientific paper in a peer-reviewed journal re discovery of unexploded nanothermite in all World Trade Center (WTC) dust samples studied (2009): “We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic… having observed unignited thermitic material in the WTC residue, we suggest that other energetic materials suitable for cutter charges or explosives should also be looked for in the WTC dust. NIST [National Institute of Standards and Technology] has admitted that they have not yet looked for such residues… Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnolgy, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.” (Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, The Open Chemical Physics Journals, vol.2, pp.7-31 (25), 2009:

Uncle Nasty said...

Anonymous said...

“He struck me as sincere, and you know, you have to be sitting there at the meeting obviously, but I also told him when he used the word Jewish lobby what it meant to Jewish people,” he added.

“And I told him what a double standard is ..."

And I told him this ... and I told him that ...

Back in the mists of time, when Tarentino almost made films and George Clooney almost acted, there was a piece of dialogue in "Dusk 'till Dawn", in which Harvey Keitel admonished Clooney:-

"Are you such a fucking loser, that you don't know when you've won?"

The urge to crow and the utter incapacity to simply shut the fuck up when you are winning is a trait that has got more pedestrians strung up than any other.

They are very much like niggers in that respect. They simply do not know when to shut up.


Uncle Nasty said...

Anonymous said...

What he really did to Hagel was empathize with him:

20 February 2013 20:45

Ohhhhh ... nice one.


potgieter said...

The irony of it all is that the South African Jews, who were central in the dismantling of the Apartheid system in their own country ( and thus its subsequent destruction), have fled in droves to Australia. There their ethnic brethern ( or perhaps even they themselves) are engaged in the same anti-White policies that destroyed their own country in the first place. By destroying others the Jews ultimately destroy themselves, but try to explain that to compulsively destructive parasites!

Likes a Larf said...

Hey, where's Uncle Shlomo - he seriously cracked me up.

Please Uncle Shlomo, do your friggin' funny stuff!

Hunsdon said...

Hey, Uncle Nasty! (Or anyone else.)

Got a question. What's with the six million to the Jews? Not just the "Nazi six million" but the constant earlier repetitions? Something cabalistic?

It was, umm, eye opening to see how that number kept floating around.

Thanks in advance.

Uncle Nasty said...

Hey there, Hunsdon, for what it's worth ...

The article is a bit old, but ...


Uncle Nasty said...

David said...

@ Shaunantijihad this paper says it all, the man is a professor and publishes his work in a peer reviewed journal, but some people would have you think he believes in shape shifting lizards, the following extract sums its up nicely: ...

David, there is one thing you can be absolutely sure of -- and that is basic Yid trick #3a

Your post, no matter how many eminent scientists, engineers, chemists are quoted, and even with an endorsement by God, Himself, will simply be ignored ... and in about two weeks the same lamebrained comments about heat-softened steel will be trotted out as though it never appeared.

The memory hole is so convenient, and has been used so often, that the average yehudi goes into some sort of fugue state when confronted by someone who does not swallow the B.S.


Uncle Nasty said...

Hunsdon ... something a bit newer ...

.... They meet no obstacles in aspiring to the highest positions which the profession offers, except it be that the Government uses caution so as not to place too many Jewish Judges in any particular district in order to obviate the prejudice and ill feeling which jealousy would thus excite. So, too, their influence is being felt in the medical profession, and in the field of science their position is prominent. At the universities they figure prominently and in great numbers in the professorial chairs. At the Universities there is a great deal of feeling against the Jews. While no doubt there are many Jews employed on the German press occupying prominent positions in the editorial staffs of leading journals, yet their numbers and influence have been much overrated. They certainly do not control the press to as large an extent as in Austria."

The above quote is from The American Hebrew ... published in the New York Times -- in the 1880's.

I'll say it again. The first target is the MSM. Read the books.


kulak said...

heat-softened steel

As an engineer by training I think there's something to that UN, and I think that the issue sets up a false dichotomy.

They made sure. They had insurance. (!)

Shaunantijihad said...

I don't really hold out much hope for the court case. I reckon the Judge will say something along the lines of, "Well, the BBC is far more than just the reporting or lack of reporting about 911. So you can't really refuse to pay the license fee based on one area you say is wrong or omitted" etc etc

On the other hand, I don't know the specific anti-terrorism legislation he us using to justify his case.

Perhaps just having the evidence read in a court is useful as precedent.

It will be interesting to see anyway.

Heraclitus said...

Hunsdon, if I may be so bold as to answer on behalf of Nastiest Uncle. The six million is a mythical jewish figure going back eons. Various tragic events have been retrofitted around this figure, the most recent being the Holocau$t.

Setanta said...

'The first target is the MSM'

Yes. The more I read, the more I think about it, the more I realise that this is absolutely true.

It's a major ask, unfortunately.

Dan said...

One moment in Soviet history is quite instructive.

The Troika of Zinoviev, Kamenev and Stalin.

AKA Apfelbaum, Rosenfeld and Djugashvili.

And how the squeezed out Their partner Bronstein (Trotsky)

It's amazing in retrospect that Stalin outmanouvred theese three Jews. Obviously Stalin was a brilliant pol.

SAVANT said...

Dan, I've often thought about that too. But there's anotehr way of looking at it. That these Jews did not stick together and support one another on a 'what's good for the Jews' basis, as most on this blog would have assumed.

I'm sure Nastiest would have a view on this.

For Hunsdon said...

The holocaust 'truths' of the kabbalah are so fragile that none is able to think about them. Laws are required to protect holocaust 'truth' from goyishce questions.

Uncle Nasty said...

Read this article and tell me what you think it's all about.
Published in New Zealand Business Day 22/02/2013

Woman wins 'Nazi' firing case

Last updated 12:59 22/02/2013

A company that fired a woman from its Nelson office for being a Nazi sympathiser has been ordered to pay her over $35,000.
The Employment Relations Authority (ERA) said in a decision released today that it did not believe the employee, Mia Nelson, had neo-Nazi views, or was trying to bring Nazi ideas into the office.
United States-born Mia Nelson was employed as a writer and researcher for a company called Haldeman LLC in May 2011.

She was quickly promoted to a management position by the owner of the company, Tony Katavitch.
As part of the promotion, Katavitch said she should move from the Invercargill office to the Nelson office, to benefit her financially, and to help run the company smoothly.

She was given a $10,000 "encouragement payment" to relocate.
Nelson said one of her main tasks at work was to create false blogs using search terms that would trick Google's search engine, bringing the company's website to prominence on the Google search page.

But in May 2012, she attended a former staff member's barbecue, an employee Katavich said left on bad terms.
When Nelson arrived to her office the next week, all the furniture had been removed and her desk and chair were pushed into the corner of the room.

Nelson told the ERA it was "basically turned into a cell and positioned so as to put me in the 'dunce hat corner'."
She said she felt humiliated because everyone was talking about it and did not know what it was about or why it was in that state at the time.

Katavitch then asked Nelson to drive out to a cabin in Brightwater, known as the "remote office" or "the cottage", to find out if people had spoken ill of him at the gathering.
She said they had not.

But Katavitch later sent an email saying she had failed to tell him about the event, saying it was a "major error of judgment".

"I am aware a company event of sorts transpired on Friday evening to which some knucklehead(s) omitted to invite me," he emailed.

"A repeat will see the culprit(s) Christmas bonus withdrawn, and a declaration of elephant mouth."

Tell me this doesn't smell like a mossad operation that got it's little circumcised arse blown out of the water.

New Zealand Intelligence (yes, there is a such a thing ...) has gone on record more than once that they do not trust israel or israelis.

I wonder why. Could it be that israelis have been caught on more than one occasion using NZ passorts?

This bears watching. And I'm pretty damn sure the NZ intel guys are doing just that.


Dan said...

The Troika is a really interesting subject.

For those who think Stalin evil, one can at least recognize that he manipulated Jews to his own ends for a long time, right as they were poised to wield absolute power. . He could have very easily ended up a victim of them like Hitler. He's worth studying. Perhaps his Jewish wives were part of this. Maybe they expected he would have successor as a son and thus spared him in the struggles of the 1930s. He was both their Golem and poster boy and played on those prejudices to keep alive.

Dan said...

Correction he wasn't married to a jewess.

nastiestuncle said...

@SAVANT 17:47

Well there's no point in saying this of course but what the hell.

As far as I am aware, Jews were over-represented in the early days of Soviet communism, but then Jews are over-represented in the world of intellectuals so of course this was going to be the case. I would imagine also that getting rid of the Tsar was an attractive prospect since the Tsar had persecuted Jews.

I don't remember his name but didn't the main Jew involved in the early days also try to rid the Russian Jews of their Jewish identity (he himself saw himself as Soviet and not Jewish regardless of his ancestors) and also tried to get rid of Zionism?

Then later on along came Stalin (the most dreadful Soviet leader of all) who persecuted Jews and purged them from the Communist Party.

But like I said, there's no point even talking about it. People just believe what they want to believe. 95% or more of the world's population thinks in a religious-type way and it's no different here. Why do you think that the world is in such a pickle?

nastiestuncle said...

@Dan 02:46

Hitler was a victim of Jews?

No, Hitler was a victim of Hitler. Ever since he started his insane ranting he put in motion a chain of events which would always lead to his death.

The man may have possessed the gift of making boys and girls wet their pants at his rallies but his decision making skills left a lot to be desired and he was clearly utterly insane.

But he did smile at children which proves he had a good heart :)

Dan said...

The Czar didn't do the Jews any damage. Certainly Not this one. Russia was steadily liberalizing.

Indeed Nicholas II was a fairly liberal ruler. If the Czar was as bad as they claimed he'd have killed Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Kaminev, etc. he was also a steady ally for the British. Commited to fighting the Reich. At least 6 of the dozen scumbags the Germans sent to Russian to create the October revolution were Jewish. It's astounding that this is downplayed to the extent that it is. All the apparent ravings of the Nazis suddenly make sense. Especially when Bela Kun and Luxemberg are factored in as Reds even closer to Germany who came within an ace of absolute power. There's also Leon Blum in France.

I find it very hard to find anything convincing about your case for the moment of Jewish coup d'etat in the Russias. Why are you posting so late? By my calculation you must be an insomniac or posting from California.

Dan said...

One other thing. At the tail end of ww1 two Jews set up the Bavarian Sofialist Republic.

Kurt Eisner and Eugen Levine.

So most Germans around Munich would have seen up close and personal what the Jews there were up to. It's no surprise that Hitler developed his pathogical distrust of these people.

Dan said...

Also Ernst Toller and Gustav Landauer. A couple more of them who seized
Power in Munich in Hitler's formative years as a military intelligence operative in Munich.

it's not surprising that rightwing authoritarians put 2 and 2 together to make 4. The Jews want to turn the existing order upside down and seize power from the existing aristocracy
And then lord it over the yokels.

AnalogMan said...

UN said: Tell me this doesn't smell like a mossad operation...

No, I don't think so. The guy is just a paranoid jerk. So-called Search Engine Optimisation is a big thing in web design, and the particular technique she describes is called a Google Bomb. It just gives his company greater prominence in web searches. Google tries to detect and discount these spurious links.

The court apparently decided there was no merit to his charges of Nazi sympathies, and not that that would have been insufficient grounds for firing her.

I think Mossad can do better than this guy. Although, it did strike me that he sounds very Jewish. Heaven help me, I think I'm becoming an anti-semite.

Dan said...

One of the juicy moments in Weimar Republic history is the assassination of Walther Rathenau after he signed over territory to the USSR. Was it a coincidence that both he and his Brother-in-law Kark Radek were coreligionists and Communists?

Krokodil said...

Nastiest, I'd pretty much go along with your comment of 06:21.

Hitler's decision making was thoroughly piss-poor, overall, and he was the prime reason for Germany's utter ruin by the end of the War.

Dan said...

Eventually the Germans were going to be liquidated all over Europe... Seems paranoid but they were a target for takeover. Too close in ability to their Jews to be left unmolested by men like Rathenau or men who married Jews like Streseman. The record of the Weimar Republic suggests it would gradually implode under socialism and wild eyed revolutionaries of the left.

You can quibble about contingencies here n there but eventually the Germans were going to end up fighting the USSR in a death match. Hitler was hasty, but on the other hand who knows what sort of pressures (economic) dictated the timetable of conquests?

Andreas said...

krokodil and Nastiest. Yes indeed. Hitler lost Germany the war and made much additional suffering by not accepting the inevitable earlier.

nastiestuncle said...

The idea that Germany had the power to conquer Europe but was at the mercy of a few Jews (or even more than a few Jews) is laughable.

How many times does it need spelling out - Hitler always wanted war, he said as early as the twenties that he wanted war, then when he had the power he had craved he put the German economy on a war footing and did everything he could to produce the war he had always wanted.

In fact he wanted war so much that he waged it without being anywhere near ready. Had he prepared, and listened to his generals, then there would now be no Moscow nor a Stalingrad (Volgograd).

The German people faced two problems. One was the mere existence of Hitler. The second was their support for Hitler. Individual Germans are clever people, but just as with anyone else, if you group people together they are stupid. An individual might have the brains to see that if you allow an obviously mad, ranting lunatic to take control of your country then your fate is destruction; a crowd of people together will become emotional and make stupid choices, they will sell their future for a little temporary prosperity now.

Dan said...

He wasn't elected. Von Papen selected him. In fact their share of the vote was in decline.
Additionally this idea that his generals were giving sage advise is untrue. I can deliver an essay on this subject, but the professional soldiers were NOT all that sharp. If they were they would have assassinated him.

The truth is Hitler was carrying out some well laid plans that the general staff had cooked up for him.

Dan said...

And it's quite clear to me now that Chamberlain was pressured to declare war over Danzig. Which is a pretty fucking insane reason for a war. It was a German city historically. The Germans were just reclaiming it from
League Mandate status. It would have been better to have encouraged the Germans to share a direct border with the USSR. Not impotently stand by whilst the USSR and Germany carved up Poland. Then the Brits could have decided which dictator to side with if hostilities continued to mount in Eastern Europe. The Brits could have turned a profit instead of losing an Empire.

The declaration of war by the UK in retrospect seems absurd given what we know of Danzig's population at the time. Why protect Danzig? We let Stalin have Hungary! We let the Soviets have Czechoslovakia later on. Wake the feck up you soft headed ejit.

Nastiest, your sense of absolute moral superiority is comical and by turns sinister.

AnalogMan said...

Krokodil said...

Hitler's decision making was thoroughly piss-poor, overall, and he was the prime reason for Germany's utter ruin by the end of the War.

My regular barber, who just retired, is a German born during the war. He is a conspiracy theorist, and maintains that Hitler never intended to win the war. He says Germany had jet fighters as early as 1941, which would have given it a decisive advantage; but Hitler refused to order their production.

Hitler, he says, was a tool of the Illuminati conspiracy, and his purpose was to discredit nationalism so thoroughly that is would never again be a legitimate force in politics. For that, Germany had to lose.

His controller was Field Marshal Erhard Milch, a Jewish deputy of Goering who, he says, was the only official who had unrestricted access to Hitler. Milch was the man who oversaw the development of the Luftwaffe.

For what it's worth.

nastiestuncle said...

Dan, you are reading books and filling your head with historical facts without understanding the nuances.

Britain did not declare war over Danzig. Britain* declared war because appeasement had been tried and had failed.

As for Hitler's war policy in Russia, it was at odds with that of his generals. For Hitler it became a personal matter; for his generals it was a job to be done as well as they could do it.

*Well actually, Germany declared war since they had the knowledge of the treaty between Britain/ France and Poland.

Dan said...

Danzig is decidedly complicated. Lloyd George commented in 1919 that to administer the city as independent from Germany was colossal folly. Indeed it was like sticking a chicken bone down a dogs throat. I'm not at all sure why the treaty of Versailles drew up the border of East Prussia as it did. It's as if the allies wanted
an absurd inconvenient factor to later quibble over. Danzig was electing Nasi majorities in the late 30s to its municipal lege. It was German and had been so for centuries.

Dan said...

Trading an entire Empire for a patch of ground in The Baltic that had been an integral part of Prussia for centuries. Because a policy was failing?

Does anyone see the disproportionate foolishness? Very well bask in the moral superiority as a bunch of coons burn London today. If it's any comfort it's cold comfort indeed.

Anonymous said...

It's quite simple - the settlement at Versailles of 1918 was deliberately engineered to create injustice for the Germans and thus ensure another gloriously profitable war, exactly as General Smedley Butler said in 1935 about American naval exercises near Japan. Anyway, here are some of "Hitler's rantings". Make up your own mind especially as of 1.40 noting that.....there's no teleprompter!


Dan said...

If you reconceive of Eastern Europe as the wild west of Europe, as a Jewish playground (it's basically the Pale) a place reserved for them to fill up management and professional jobs and lord it over the yokels ALOT more of the events of 1914-1990 make sense. This was the Jewish century and Eastern Europe was the Jewish gangland. Think about the story of that place in this way and a number of convoluted theories about various events suddenly pop into clear focus. The American midwest is a strangely similar thing, especially when you think about the bullshit surrounding civil rights, the destruction of places like Detroit, St Louis, Birmingham Alabama, Memphis etc same thing happened. Homogenous white groups had to migrate because of a few Jewish legal players and their zombie henchmen. Look at Rahm Emmanuel or Bloomberg, worse that Bela Kun or Zinoviev in their own way. Same multicult play book is used that the counterparts in Europe were reading from in the 1920 and 30s.

It still might be.

ER said...

Dan, the irony is that jews see their time in the Pale as one of great 'sufferink'. It fuels huge resentment towards Russians to this day.

Dan said...

If they suffered they also multiplied like rabbits whilst the Czar ruled over them. The reality is that the Czar was pretty benevolent toward them. He could have evicted them all during a harsh winter and let them turn to icicles.

Uncle Nasty said...

Dan said...

.... Hitler was hasty, but on the other hand who knows what sort of pressures (economic) dictated the timetable of conquests?

Not so sure that he was that hasty, Dan.

Several documents indicate that he beat Russia to the draw by mere weeks ... if not days.


In which we are told:

...Albert Weeks reviews the currently available information on Soviet military preparations in mid-1941 and ends that there is strong evidence that the Soviet Union was not only preparing for an invasion of Germany, but that such an attack could have occurred as early as July 1941. If this is true, then not only was a Russo-German war a certainty, as each side had concluded privately that successful prosecution of such a conflict was necessary if it was to achieve its national goals, but each party intended to begin the fight in 1941 with a surprise attack against the other.

"Most of Stalin's Other War is dedicated to a careful examination of the available evidence on Soviet military preparations and a history of the debate on Soviet intentions
toward Germany, It is an excellent study that thoroughly covers the subject matter Under discussion, and Weeks provides an exceptionally good overview of the current state of the debate among Russian scholars who are
making use of the new evidence that is progressively becoming available as the Soviet archives are opened to scholarly scrutiny.

Hope this helps ...


Uncle Nasty said...

Another interesting point was the attitude of the other eternal victim ... Poland.

Contemporary accounts indicate that Poland, Czechoslovakia and France were ... and had been the bully boys in the neighborhood for most of the 1920's and 30's

This is worth a watch.


Dan said...

Poland certainly was a belligerent menace. France certainly wasn't much better. A very ungracious victor was France.

Dan said...

Nasty makes a good Point here. The USSR was massing it's army in the Russo-German border for some reason. That is why they were so badly cut to shreds in the opening fortnight. Had they lightly garrisoned the new border from Bassarabia to Poland and retained their position on the older frontier they would have been able to search and destroy German spearheads. What happened is the Soviet army was caught half deployed for its own invasion of Germany and Romania. The sort of wreckage that Germany made of them so quickly suggests the Germans caught them out whilst they were themselves attempting to land a right hook.

Uncle Nasty said...

One thing I always find fascinating is the so-called current ruling wisdom and morality -- and perception of reality ... compared to the wisdom and morality of a hundred or even a mere fifty or even twenty years ago.

And where does this disparity make itself most known? In the writings of the average person and the average press or magazine article of the time.

There are many examples still available in which public figures -- and the ordinary person could enunciate truths (or perceived truths) that are the exact opposite of today.

An interesting one -- growing up in South Africa in the fifties and sixties -- was everyone's perception of the jews. Blacks, whites, Indians, coloureds all agreed that they were clannish, avaricious, and above all, never, ever to be trusted.

I still have fond memories of our head messenger (a Zulu named Richard) who, when speaking of the tribe, would only refer to them as the Faakingjooze.

But I digress.

In the early to mid thirties, most of the western world regarded a certain nation as a collective loose cannon, so to speak. A nation that was not only regarded as volatile and unstable, but sufficiently arrogant and aggressive to cause harm ... as well as possessed of the most sophisticated, well armed and disciplined army on the planet.

A nation that many military intelligence agencies regarded as most likely to be the trigger of the next great conflict.

Yup. France. In 1938.


UNcle Nasty said...

As any regular reader of this blog knows, I am a keen moviephile ... not the asswipe that springs eternal from Hollyweird these days, I hasten to add, in which plots and themes are totally interchangeable but with bigger and flashier CGI and louder explosions.

But proper cinema. And one of my favorite director/writers is Terry Gilliam.

An utterly anarchic director whose hits (The Time Bandits (1981); Brazil (1985; 12 Monkeys (1988); The Fisher King (1991); The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus (2009)) were balanced by his colossal misses (The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (1988); Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1991); The Brothers Grimm (2005) and Tideland (2005))

Gilliam stated that one of his favorite reversals was in The Brothers Grimm where gentle innocent German peasant folk were brutalised by the conquering French.

A nice touch, I thought. And one you'll never see out of Hollyvood.


(Favorite Gilliam quote on leaving America) "... I got more and more angry and I just felt, I've got to get out of here — I'm a better cartoonist than I am a bomb maker. That's why so much of the U.S. is still standing."

SAVANT said...

Don't want to foment intra-White feuding here but UN is dead right when he says that 'Contemporary accounts indicate that Poland, Czechoslovakia and France were ... and had been the bully boys in the neighborhood for most of the 1920's and 30's'

Poland in particular had an aggressive military who were very keen to 'have a go.

But of course that's all down the plughole of history now......

Dan said...

See the "Lvov" or "Lwow Pogrom" 1918 as an example. A war rolls through town, soldier act like soldiers throughout history. Jewish observers howl pogrom. These people are a protected class then as now. See how separate British, American and German commissions cry a river over 60 deaths among a war that killed 10s of thousands. The NYT was comically on hand too.

Wolfhound said...

Absolutely, the average person on the street in the West has no knowledge about history whatsoever.

Poland-Lithuania was a powerful empire for centuries, to see Poland as a poor little defenseless country attacked by the evil Nazis is laughable. They were the fourth largest army in Europe in the late 30's and the image of Polish cavalry charging German Panzers to stress their military weakness is a complete myth.

And even if Poland was a victim in all this..why did the Allies decide to betray them after the dust settled? The moral powerhouses of US, Russia, Britain and France show the world why they're the good guys.

Hitler didn't destroy Germany, the ZOG footsoldiers did. I see the same arguments being used here as is used when a girl wearing provocative clothing gets raped (she was asking for it!). There will always be maggots trying to blame Hitler while voting for pathetic shills like Obama, Blair, Clinton, Hollande, Cameron etc.

@ Allen. Really enjoyed that link. Thanks

Dan said...

And then there is the largely suppressed story of Jewish domination in Eastern European politics. They are keen to talk about the Nobel Prizes but point out the wealth that was being vacuumed up by them as they played kingmaker in the east and you get shrugs and blank stares. Name a commodity market in this area and you get a pretty familiar list of trader names, but history books refer to the Jewish merchants as Poles or Russians or Whatnot. When you look at the Americas there are accounts of Jews pretending to be Dutch or Portuguese depending on who they are trying to fool. If they are playing a Dutchman the mark is a Catholic if they are pretending to be Portuguese the mark is a northern european Protestant. Peter Stuyvesant a Dutch governor of New Amsterdam complained about a boatload of Portgugese who showed up in Manhattan from Recife. He figured out they were actually Jews posing as Portguese, wrote his board in Amsterdaanti complain about them. Someone back home told him to shut his fugking pie hole and accept the new arrivals. See Recife and CuraƧao or Suriname for how the game was played. The level of deceit is astounding. I think they were the "Dutch" who lived in Nagasaki the trade networks got that far.

Andreas said...

The other thing about 'pogroms' is that they were very of if not most times just fighting between jewish population and others. But we are shown them as always local people attacking jews for no reason and jews making no defense.

Dan said...

In the account of the Polish-Ukraine war it appears that Jews exempted themselves from taking a side by remaining neutral. Chutzpah again. How do you remain neutral if the war is in your territory? If your city is under siege? In reality the Lwow Jews were skimming off profits from either side, probably smuggling for both sides etc etc. Truly showing themselves to be aliens among the Poles and Ukrainians. Btw this is exempting yourself from conflict on advantageous terms. It's not an example of conscientious objection. When Shatter brings up Devalera's neutrality in ww2 and how this doomed the feckin 6 million point out that Jews in the Pale felt themselves to be too good too distinct from the peasants there to pick a side and stick with it. Why in gods name would Irish Governments support an empire they just separated from to support a conflict that doomed Europe?

Dan said...

How does a distinct minority population claim neutrality like this Polish-Ukrainian tustle? On what legal basis? Or moral? Unless they see themselves as a separate nation it is absurd. Once they are seen as a nation it makes sense. But then of course this means you are a player in the conflict on a whole other level.

spiritus Germaniae said...


Must be that Armenians never show loyalty or vote Democrat; therefore, they aren't deemed a White Exception and can't be a part of the Victimology Club.

James said...

This is the problem. Someone posts this:

“He struck me as sincere, and you know, you have to be sitting there at the meeting obviously, but I also told him when he used the word Jewish lobby what it meant to Jewish people,” he added.

“And I told him what a double standard is. That Jewish people throughout the centuries have suffered a double standard. Everyone could be a farmer except Jewish people. Everyone could live in Moscow except Jewish people. I said when everyone else can lobby but all of a sudden when those of us who are pro-Israel lobby, it’s a negative, that’s a double standard. And I’m sure you didn’t mean it, but it harkens to the old days.

“And he really, you know, he almost had tears in his eyes when he understood. So I believe he will be good.”

-- Chuckie Schumer on Chuck Hagel

Well all go "that scumbag Chuckie Shumer, who is he kidding?"

Well he's kidding the whole world. Have any of you got a decent counter argument? Its harder than it seems when you try to do it in the hot seat. We need politicians that CAN answer such questions, quickly and clearly.

Dan said...

Yeah the Pale was an enormous territory. Many times the size of Texas. It wasn't a ring fence around Dublin. The Pale was probably the actual breadbasket, brewery and mining center of Eastern Europe too. it's like being confined to California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico and Texas but excluded from Denver and St Louis.

James said...

No mention yet of Donmeh crypto jews, otherwise known as the "Young Turks" who were really responsible for the Armenian genocide. So here it is FYI. This guy wrote a whole book on the subject.

James said...

Sorry Dan you did mention them, but spelled it differently.

Denise said...

Dea, dear Irish Savant, there is a reason why Jews are hated everywhere they go.