Sunday, 18 November 2012

I have an Excel spreadsheet.......

I have an Excel file on my computer. The filename is a bit of a give-away. It's called goodjews.xlsx. In it I record, for future reference, the names and various other data of Jews who have - publicly - questioned significant aspects of the prevailing anti-White narrative. I keep this file as I believe, or want to believe, that all  prominent Jews should not be seen as our mortal enemies. That we have friends out there among them. Despite the rather undemanding qualification for inclusion, the file (opened I just note on March 18 last) remains small. Very small.

And it shows no sign of getting much bigger.  Au contraire, as Delboy might say.

You see, it appears to me that whenever anything really outrageously anti-White comes to my attention, Jewish people are deeply in the mix, despite representing just about about 3% of most Western nations. I'll give you just two very recent examples.....and there are many more, believe me. In the penultimate issue of Newsweek's print edition (before it goes to its richly merited demise) David Frum wrote a gloating article celebrating, rejoicing in the demise of Whites....whom he equates with the Republican Party.

Jonah Goldberg and Harold Meyerson have adjoining pieces in the LA Times betraying similar sentiments, despite a veneer of concern.

Then there's this from the Daily Mail: "An official inquiry into child sex gangs will fail to highlight the targeting of white girls by Pakistani men. Instead the year-long Government-backed investigation will say that child sex abuse is a problem caused by men of all backgrounds in towns and cities across the country. The findings of the inquiry by Sue Berelowitz, the Deputy Children's Commissioner for England......."

Sue Berelowitz. Oh dear, I don't like the sound of this.  Can it be? Yes it can and yes it is.  Sue is Jewish and we've been fucked over once again. It's not like this is an exception. It's the norm.  And it's clear that Berelowitz and all the others like her would accept greater Islamic degradation of White societies, or what's left of them, even though Jews themselves will be prime targets for the Religion Of Peace once they gain sufficient power.

This lends further credence to the distressing theory that Jews use their power to do down White gentiles, irrespective of the collateral damage.  Even if it's themselves. For example Rabbi Baruch Efrati believes Jews should ‘rejoice at the fact that Europe is paying for what it did to us for hundreds of years by losing its identity.’  That's great rabbi, thanks a mill.

That Excel file doesn't look like growing too much in the future.

154 comments:

beppo said...

Would you like to give some of the names on your list?
Some of your readers might be able to suggest additions and it would avoid endless replication: I would, off the top of my head,suggest Norman Finkelstein ( author of The Holocaust Industry) for a start.

Porter said...

Savant,

The heft of your dossier isn’t important. Just because one has a friend who is a jew does not mean jews are his friends. I actually had a black roommate for two years in my youth. He was an intelligent enjoyable guy; I liked him. And blacks are a plague on white society. And there is not one molecule of conflict in these positions.

Jews and gentiles have been in conflict for a very long time. They have neither forgotten the struggle nor sheathed their knives from it. That we have done both has been no shield to their aggression. Look, a millennium plus is sufficient duration to know the score. It profits our children nothing to keep pretending…hoping that what looks like a war against us is not. It is. I know you seek a détente. I used to myself. It is not coming. They will attack until we fight or fall. And if our civilization regains its will to live and chooses the former, the jews will recede to Israel or their ghettos where they will catalogue for posterity the latest predations visited upon them by the evil, despised gentiles.

And when memory has faded, do you know what will happen on some distant morning in a confident prosperous and very white Europe?

Knock, Knock, Knock…Mr. Gentile, hello! How have you been? I’ve missed you so much, may I please come in?

…And the sun will ruefully chuckle at the knowledge that nothing new exists beneath it.

Uncel Nasty said...

.
A joke from the sixties pops into the head, Savant. What were the three thinnest books?

The Australian Book of Culture, The roll of Italian War Heroes and the jewish businessman's book of ethics.

Congrats. Looks like you've been inducted into the Hall of Fame.
Right alongside the Encyclopaedia of African Accomplishment.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

Virtually the same conclusion that some northern female muslim MP came to. It was purely a coincidence that all the victims were white, and the perps were all....wait for it......
"men". And to say any different would play into the hands of the "far right".
They must think we're totally and utterly stupid to put up with crap like this. And they're probably right.
Paris Claims

Anonymous said...

Are Peter Schiff and Mark Levin in there?

JP

nastiestuncle said...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2234702/Rupert-Murdoch-takes-Twitter-question-U-S-media-organizations-bias-Middle-East-conflict-White-House-defends-Israels-right-defend-itself.html

----"Why is Jewish-owned press so consistently anti-Israel in every crisis?"----

Anyone's head just explode?

Iron Felix said...

Well, Savant, slim as the file may be, it is not empty; from way back, I give you Oscar Levy, translator of Nietzsche. Jews of Aryan cast of mind do exist.

eah said...

It's the norm.

Oh dear oh dear...I do fear that nastiestuncle will soon be here to set you straight Savant.

OT

Daily Mail: £500-a-week household benefits cap 'is immoral and demonises the jobless' claims former minister

A foto caption at the end: Sarah Teather says that many families may be forced to leave London as they will be unable to afford to live there under the proposed benefit cap

Per her foto I would say Ms Teather looks rather fat and chav-ish. Yet here she is preaching to the British that unless they subsidize on-the-dolers who want to live in London, they are "immoral". But this is what can -- and too often does -- happen when you give women responsibility: you have to put up with the ensuing stupidity. And note the foto of the nice happy white couple. Question: Aren't those on-the-dolers who need a subsidy to live in London disproportionately not very British? Perhaps even vastly so? I would guess so, from my experience.

Heraclitus said...

Porter, you are a brilliant, compelling writer and analyst. You should have a weekly column syndicated in hundreds of MSM outlets. That's how good you are. And that's why you'd be trampled into the ground if you ever tried.

barry said...

@nastiest. Just because Murdoch, hardly an impartial observer, says the madia is anti-Israel hardly makes it so. And he owns half the news outlets so go figure.

nastiestuncle said...

@barry 11:24

"@nastiest. Just because Murdoch, hardly an impartial observer, says the madia is anti-Israel hardly makes it so. And he owns half the news outlets so go figure."

The media isn't anti-Israel because Rupert Murdoch says it is, it is because that's just the reality. Left-wingers (ie. the vast majority of media luvvies) hate Israel because they see it is a right wing manifestation. Both the war against Hizballah and Operation Cast Lead were cut short before their objectives had had a chance to be achieved because of pressure from the left wing media and from Western governments who were previously pro-Israel but are now anti-Israel due to the courting of the sizeable Muslim vote (the Muslim vote is enough to be a swing vote now in several European countries).

It just re-inforces my point that it is not Jews who are fucking us over, it's left wingers. That many Jews are left wingers is neither here nor there, but that brings me onto my second point.

Our problems are blamed on Zionists but it is actually the anti-Zionist left wing Jews who are the ones who are pro-immigration.

Yes, some Jews are a problem but no, it is not a Jewish plot against us. If we can manage to understand that, then we can make some progress as to the resolution of our problems regarding the third world invasion. Until then, we are stumped.

nastiestuncle said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Ekeroth

Kent Ekeroth the Swedish MP is usually ignored as a Jew against multi-culturalism. I would imagine that the fragment of Levantine mitochondrial DNA which you guise think cause humans to automatically become pro-immigration must have malfunctioned.

The owner of the anti-immigration Daily Express/ Daily Star in the UK, Richard Desmond, is a Jew. Funny, because he's the only Jewish owner of a major UK newspaper and he's not pro-immigration. He makes heads explode.

Chief British rabbi, Jonathan Sachs, isn't particularly pro-multiculturalism: http://isteve.blogspot.co.uk/2007/10/britains-top-rabbi-warns-against.html

All the Jews I know are against immigration, but then I'm more likely to know people who are also anti-immigration.

Anonymous said...

Lawrence Auster is pretty good.

Kevin Rafferty said...

@nastiest uncle, I agree that left-wing jews are the biggest threat against us. The Zionists have no love for us, god knows, but they have their own objectives. However I fear you're being over-optimistic in your take. I've more or less followed Savant's trajectory over the years from philo-semitism to one of deep suspicion. And many of the jewish anti-white activits are by no means 'left wing'.

nastiestuncle said...

@Kevin Rafferty 13:49

"@nastiest uncle, I agree that left-wing jews are the biggest threat against us. The Zionists have no love for us, god knows, but they have their own objectives. However I fear you're being over-optimistic in your take. I've more or less followed Savant's trajectory over the years from philo-semitism to one of deep suspicion. And many of the jewish anti-white activits are by no means 'left wing'."

1. Why is the obsession on the blogs with "Zionists" when the problem is mostly coming from non-Zionists?

2. It is our interpretation that some Jewish leftist activists are anti-white, but what is their interpretation of what they are doing? Do they think they are being anti-white? Do they see races or just 'people'?

3. I've never heard of a Jew being anti-white; rather I have heard of anti-white-privilege which is a different thing entirely.

4. It is apparently obvious that Jews hate non-Jewish white people. If so, then why is so much of the 'evidence' simply made-up? Why the lies about Anne Frank diaries, about quotes being attributed to Jews who never said them, to the Rothschilds doing things they never did, to pretending that The Protocols are real, to pretending that Jews caused the world wars, that 6 million or so Jews (plus another five to eleven million non-Jews) weren't killed due to a state program to eliminate them, that people who are not Jews are really Jews, and so on ad infinitum. Surely something so obvious would not need fabrications to convince people.

5. Why would Jews want to flood western lands with immigrants when the first thing those immigrants do is assault Jews, then cause the host country to be hostile to Israel because the politicians then have to chase the Muslim vote?

6. Why do people think that secular, non-religious Jews are automatically anti-white when these people identify as being white?

^^Some of the problems I can think of off the top of my head as to why I don't fall for the line that the Jews control our destiny. No-one has yet been able to answer any of these points. The only half-efforts have been ones which quote some discredited national socialist website as 'proof' or a video made by someone with the name i-speak-the-truth-911.

I accept that Jews are over-represented in the whole left wing multi-culti industry, but then they are over-represented in all the fields which they gravitate to. Lots of Jews become 'academics' or 'intellectuals' and most academics or intellectuals are left wing anyway.

Anonymous said...

Kent Ekeroth the Swedish MP is usually ignored as a Jew against multi-culturalism.

Swedish Democrats now have a zero tolerance policy against racism.

Their finance guy was just recently made to resign because of a racist clip filmed by Ekeroth.

Ekeroth himself remains.

This all happened in October.

Sweden Democrats launch party 'clean out'

Sweden Democrat leader Jimmie Åkesson has announced that there is a need to "clean up" the party rank and file after a slew of controversial comments by members, stating that there is no place for racism in the party.

...

"We have to put our foot down and state that enough is enough. We need a major clear out," Åkesson told the TT news agency.

"We have a problem and we are not afraid to admit it," he added.

In a letter to the party's elected officials, Åkesson declared that "from now on there is zero tolerance and the work to clean up in the ranks is given the highest priority".

Åkesson has decided to act to law down the law in the party after a continuous stream of controversial comments by local politicians within the party since the 2008 election.

Among the comments which have gained attention include racism and homophobia, and that there should be a "bounty" placed on the head of the prime minister.

In his letter, Åkesson calls on all those who feel targeted to resign their posts and leave the party without delay.

"This would save us a great deal of work. Those who decide to stay on anyway will soon be subject to disciplinary proceedings and expulsion," he wrote.

Jimmie Åkesson explained the timing of the letter in that something had to be done to curb the stream of controversy, saying that the number of incidents "are quite simply too many".

He explained that the problem has arisen because the party has experienced such rapid growth and has thus attracted unsuitable people and caused problems for the party's progress.


Well I guess that problem's fixed.

Anonymous said...

And now, Ekeroth is 'taking a break'

Mission accomplished.

Anonymous said...

What amazes me is that so few Jews have considered the consequences of White GENOCIDE for their own race. As so many of them enthusiastically support the extinction of whitey how many of them wonder what kind of world will be left for Jews?

Are they so blinded by hatred of the White goyim that they can't see they will be next on the genocide list? That the brown and black races have no love for Jews or just plain hate them? That they will be well less than 1% in a churning sea of non White discontent?

What's that saying about revenge? If you seek it don't dig one grave. Dig two.

The truth will out said...

Please goys and goyls, the nastiest jew is as ever playing games.

You understand that today our 'left wing' construct is Bolshevist (i.e. Obama/Ed Miliband) the 'right wing' construct Zionist (i.e. Romney/Dave Cameron).


That is our 'democracy', you get to choose one of these two ways juwes will dictate your future.

Anonymous said...

I may have asked this question before and it's not been answered.
Let's suppose the Jews are behind all this. How do they then plan to reverese the inevitable take over by Muslims? Why would they allow the Muslims to gain the power they have now? Why have they allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to take control in Arab countries?

nemesis said...

NU. I've been going through the itmes you list out under point (4) above, about which you ask Surely something so obvious would not need fabrications to convince people.


Well you see maybe it's because they're not obviously fabricated at all. For instance do you actually believe the 'Six Million' figure, the one that has appeared in numerous jewish texts long before the Holocaust? Or that the Protocols are patently false?

If so you might be interested in this wonderful gold mine I have in Zambia.

Porter said...

Thanks for the kind words Heraclitus.

In regard to the original post, and the touchingly naïve belief that only liberal jews are problematic, Savant gives us David Frum: conservative jew.

Here is an exchange I had some time ago on that topic with another conservative jew. Some here may find it illuminating.

Anonymous said...

http://israelamerica.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-left-jews-and-israel.html

Just like Whites, Blacks, Arabs and any other race/tribe you could name, Jews are their own worst enemies. Remember that Israel and White Apartheid South Africa were allies.

JP

brian boru said...

I wouldn't suggest any additions. I suspect that most of those hebes are what I call 'damage control' jews. They realise that some day their vile tribe might have to pay for their vast crimes and they are trying to buy a little insurance. Oh look, here are jews who disapprove of the crimes of their tribe! It goes to prove that they can't all be bad. An example that comes to mind is in the US. The jew is so heavily involved in the effort to disarm white Americans that it is almost a joke. However, there is a group called 'Jews for Guns' in case any of the stupid goyim get the wrong idea. Look, not all jews are trying to disarm us! You can be sure that this group will disappear like morning mist once the Second Amendment is outlawed, sniggering up their sleeves.

The truth will out said...

Plenty of questions, perhaps even one or two being sincere, asking why would the eternal victim cause his own destruction...

Haven't you been paying attention, haven't the last 109 expulsions of juwes been taught to you clearly enough in the evil Nazi Goyim media and Universities?

How the mighty Empires have fallen, not presented to you in the evil Nazi Goyim media for reasons unknown...

http://christogenea.org/
"Why did ancient Egypt, once the greatest of all nations, crumble into oblivion, where it has remained for 3,000 years? What happened to the glory of ancient Babylonia, or to Assyria? Where is the splendour of the ancient Persians, or the Medes, or Parthia? How have the Greeks, the pinnacle of ancient civilization, not produced anything of note as a culture since the fall of Byzantium nearly 600 years ago? What happened to the might and the majesty that was Rome, once far greater than them all? How, or why, have all of these once magnificent cultures for so long been little more than quarries for museum relics? America, and all of Christian Civilization, is now following in the footsteps of these ancient empires. It's absolutely true. The evidence is all around you. History does indeed repeat itself, again and again because people refuse to learn from it. But there is a solution.

You can deny it. You can rant and rave. You can scream. You can cry "hate" and utter blasphemies. You can make railing accusations. But you can't change the truth. A shining city on a hill cannot be hid. A lamp when lit is not placed under a couch. There is indeed a God of all creation. And there is indeed a race anointed by that God. Here it is identified. Whenever that race allows itself to amalgamate with others, it falls into permanent decay. Understanding this is one of the keys to all history, and it is the understanding of the rise and fall of all great cultures. You can go away mad, even spouting profanities, or you can face the reality, and consider the implications while investigating the assertions being made.

nastiestuncle said...

@nemesis 17:05

"Well you see maybe it's because they're not obviously fabricated at all. For instance do you actually believe the 'Six Million' figure, the one that has appeared in numerous jewish texts long before the Holocaust?"

Well, it isn't Jews who are saying that 6 million of them were killed - it is historians who are saying this. The actual figure doesn't matter though, because whether it was 6 million or 5 million or 4 million, there was still a state campaign by the Nazis to exterminate the European Jewish population. That's what makes the Holocaust so different. It was not like the Rwandan genocide in which mobs ran around with machetes. In the case of the Holocaust every arm of the German government was involved in exterminating other people on an industrial scale. People became cattle to be slaughtered in specially made factories.
Not a lot can be done to stop spontaneous pogroms or violent mobs but it's essential that the conditions which led to industrial slaughter of 11-17 million people (non-Jews and Jews) should never be allowed to exist again.

"Or that the Protocols are patently false?"

Again, research has shown the Protocols to be a forgery. It even contains plagiarised text from earlier works.

You want and need for the Holocaust to have been made up and for the Protocols to be real because it supports your prejudice. Why let inconvenient facts get in the way when you can simply dismiss anything you don't like as being Jewish propaganda.

I'm not Jewish and I believe that the 6 million figure is the most accurate figure arrived at as of this moment. If proof were to emerge that the figure was actually 4 million then I would believe that, but it wouldn't alter the fact that there was a state organised campaign to exterminate Jews, gypsies, Poles, Slavs and other 'undesirable' groups.

eah said...

@Porter

Thanks for the link. Your observation about Jewish hypocrisy was spot on and well expressed. If not well received...

But I note this comment:

I object to the concern about race here. The issue should be values.

Oy vey!

More bullshit follows.

I used to read that blog now and then. As I recall I soon decided it was fucking useless and stopped.

Kenneth said...

Note to newcomers: if you have ever encountered Whiskey, the "Scots-Irish" (lol!) commenter over at Steve Sailer's site, then you might like to know that nastiestuncle is this blog's version of him. In other words, he's someone who continues to spam the threads with the same old crap long after it's become obvious to 99% of commenters what his agenda is.

Anonymous said...

I haven't looked at this blog in a few weeks. I see nastiest jew still corrals the discussion.

I actually know jews in NRA heirarchy. they're jews first. I heard one complain all southerners are racist jew haters based on a comment his dad got in the 70s LOL. of course his dad was probably trying some pretty theft and got caught.

Let them in, and they'll behave as termites, like always.

Just like the Talmud has throwaway sections to show dumb goy that see? not all of us believe that! they're put in there to trick us.

No matter what, jews believe they're acting in the best interest of jews.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
I'm not Jewish and I believe that the 6 million figure is the most accurate figure arrived at as of this moment. If proof were to emerge that the figure was actually 4 million then I would believe that, but it wouldn't alter the fact that there was a state organised campaign to exterminate Jews, gypsies, Poles, Slavs and other 'undesirable' groups.

It must be true ... I saw it in Schwindler's List. I think I'll watch it again, tonight. The Big Bang Theory isn't on, and I could use a laugh.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

for those of you not blessed with jews

buddy of mines wife had a miscarriage at 3 mos and took a few days off work. the jew at work didn't get it, thought he'd be relieved the kid died. Said it without a shred of conscience or hesitation. He slipped and let his goy mask down for a second forgetting we value life.

They're wolves in sheep's clothing. Even the good ones still hate Christ and other values whites hold dear. Don't believe their lies.

nastiestuncle said...

@Kenneth 20:09

"Note to newcomers: if you have ever encountered Whiskey, the "Scots-Irish" (lol!) commenter over at Steve Sailer's site, then you might like to know that nastiestuncle is this blog's version of him. In other words, he's someone who continues to spam the threads with the same old crap long after it's become obvious to 99% of commenters what his agenda is."

My brother in ringlets, dredels and hook noses.

I've never hidden my agenda and have stated it several times, so assuming that 99% of commenters can read, the last ten words of your post are quite correct.

Let's get together for a bagel sometime. Shoot the breeze. Shoot some Palestinians.




Anonymous said...

Ah Edward Gibbon.

Why did't I understand when reading him the first time round?.
Anyway.

"From the reign of Nero to that of Antonius Pius,the Jews discovered a fierce impatience of the dominion of Rome,which repeatedly broke out in the most furious massacres and insurrections.Humanity is shocked at the horrible cruelties they committed in Egypt,in Cyprus and in Cyrene.where they dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives,and we are tempted to applaud the severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of the legions against a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of Roman government,but also of all humankind".

mr.a

Anonymous said...

NU is very confused, she'll pretend she's down with the 'cattle' and say derogatory generalisations about blacks when Savant has an article on something exclusive to blacks, however, when there's an article on something where jews are mentioned, she's fanatically refuting other posters comments with platitudes, incl. such gems as:

"It is our interpretation that some Jewish leftist activists are anti-white, but what is their interpretation of what they are doing? Do they think they are being anti-white? Do they see races or just 'people'?"

Note the "Do they see races or just 'people'?" Strange comment from someone who in many other posts has been quite scathing of blacks.

Yet another: "I have heard of anti-white-privilege which is a different thing entirely."

Again, not consistent with someone who's inclined to derogatory statements, re blacks if anything, an odd thing to say, unless either she's bipolar, incredibly stupid, or, being told what to write.

Anonymous said...

it is historians who are saying this.

Useless mathematically challenged tards.

15 million minus 6 million = 15 million.

These guys are well worth ignoring when they talk about something they do not understand.

eah said...

I'm not Jewish and I believe that the 6 million figure is the most accurate figure arrived at as of this moment.

At Nürnberg, during the IMT trial of the major war criminals, it was claimed there were 4m victims at Auschwitz alone, and this number was part of what was used to convict the major war criminals, many of whom were then executed. If you visit the site today, you will see a plaque saying that 700k died there. In the future this number will very likely also be reduced.

The 6m number has long been discredited.

Anonymous said...

"The 6m number has long been discredited"

jewish accountants came up with that number ;-)

Anonymous said...

These guys are well worth ignoring when they talk about something they do not understand.

Oh now! They understand it all too well. Their fear is that we'll understand it as well!

Mary said...

Heraclitus said...
Porter, you are a brilliant, compelling writer and analyst. You should have a weekly column syndicated in hundreds of MSM outlets. That's how good you are. And that's why you'd be trampled into the ground if you ever tried.


I am a big Porter fan too! Well said Herc!

Ps: I really love the people who comment here, so refreshing to be in a 'jew-wise' zone :)

Martinus said...

I've never really supported the idea of a worldwide Jewish conspiracy, but I do know how devious and similarly destructive those in powerful places are. But I'm still not convinced its a co-ordinated attack, mainly because of the amazingly anti-Israel European press. Aside from that, I do not believe at all in the 6 million number.

My reasons? I've been to Auschwitz, I lived in Munich near Dachau and have been many times. I've visited Treblinka camp and been to Buchenwald as well, macabre I know. Yes, Jews were killed, as were gypsies, Catholics and most of all disabled people. But the number six million, even if I consider that this number may be everyone including Jews killed, I still don't believe it. The absolute insurmountable logistics of destroying that number of bodies...most of which they claim were cremated - I've seen the coal fired crematoria, its just not realistic. Especially as turning a body to ash, takes about 20 hours depending on the size of the body with a coal fired crematory. And then the bones don't turn to ash either, they have to be powdered by a ball bearing blender. How the hell did they manage to kill and dispose of so many millions of people with the few ovens they had? I'm not a 'Holocaust Denier' mainly cause I just don't care for people who insist on having a victim mentality and don't entertain it. Either way you look at it, be it through the newspeak goggles of some people commenting here or from the polar opposite who believe that every rock has a Jew under it, the reality just doesn't support the story.

Anonymous said...

"The actual figure [of the Holocaust] doesn't matter"

Really? Then why are there laws all over Europe which provide for anyone disagreeing with the Six Million figure, a.k.a. as Holocaust "deniers", to be thrown into prison?

Do you agree with this latter day version of burning at the stake for Holocaust "heretics"?

More to the point, WHO provided the impetus for laws which criminalize any questioning of the "offical" Holocaust version? Was it your "historians" or Jews?

Anonymous said...

more enriching. im in a white area. street blacks that don't belong here walked in to the subway I was eating slave food at a table. trayvon the teen had a fistfull of CDs, I think they were his rapping he wanted me to buy. this has happened to me numerous times over the years, a black swindler tries to run game and get me to buy a CD. no.

anyway then the sow dressed like a cartoon got a bunch of napkins and straws(free stuff!) and the teen got a water cup and immediately stole soda with it. they call that getting over, aka trusting someone or giving them something for nothing.

they left without saying thank you and acted like the low class people they are.

if you don't experience this, do what you can to make sure it never happens

kulak said...

termites

Kent Ekeroth is a case-in-point.

First they make themselves very useful, then they sabotage the whole thing.

And where in the party did he nest? Justice. Very original.

On the bright side, the Sweden Democrats are now officially anti-white.

It's their hubris that does them in, right?

The other party in the taped incident said that Kent said "I can do anything."

If their hubris is ultimately a danger to them, then it is a danger to you if you partner with them.

That's half the reason they want to partner.

Teaming up with them is volunteering to be the Great Satan to whoever they're screwing that day.

Wolfhound said...

@ Anonymous 21.14.

Just a selfish queer. He only has the worst venom for any group associated with being anti-gay like Nationalists, Muslims and blacks. Everyone else gets a pass.

Kevin Rafferty said...

Martinus, you have it right. Indeed there was a Holocaust and vast numbers of jews were indeed killed. But the number, for the reasons you give and many others too, is nowhere even close to 6 million.

But there were also huge numbers of gypsies and various other undesirables disposed of also. And of course the really touchy subject, the Ukrainian Holomador where proportionally even more people died. And we know who had a major hand in that.

BJKahn said...

Hang on a minute. It's really stretching the point to say that Kent Ekeroth was a plant and his actions were all set up to discredit the SDs. You really must have a major conspiratorial mind to come up with that interpretation based on what the reports say.

kulak said...

say that Kent Ekeroth was a plant and his actions were all set up to discredit the SDs.

But I didn't say they were set up to discredit the SDs.

I said they DID discredit the SDs.

With friends like that who needs enemies?

Who knows or cares what was going on his mind? Good liars are also very good at lying to themselves.

Take one into your organzation like that, and you put it in jeopardy. Period.

David said...

Comrades
let us take this moment to salute a people under a military occupation like no other, a forgotten people, a people who have been despised for over 60 years a disposable people whose slow genocide means nothing to the chattering classes and its so called intelligentsia, a people burnt out of their native land through a form of terrorism that would make Arkan and his Tigers blush, let us remember the land stolen off the Palestinians, let us remember Deir Yassin. The King David Bombing, the slaughter at Sabra and Shatila, the mosque at Hebron, Operation Cast Lead, the assault against the slave population at Gaza using white phosphorus in violation of every international protocols. Tonight let us salute the brave warriors of Hamas, Islamic jihad or whatever the fuck you wish to call the men and I mean men who are out tonight fighting the fascist national socialist regime of Herr Benny Netanyahu. Regardless of the idiocy of Islam as a political/religious/social system I tonight will toast with alcohol the freedom fighters of a Nation that has been shat upon for over 60 years and forced what most observers will agree, that are the most moderate of Muslims into extremist ideologue. btw nastiest uncle fuck off: I am not interested.

former liberal said...

kulak, you're right when you say Take one into your organzation like that, and you put it in jeopardy. I've seen it time and again. Nationlist movements have been fucked up by jews, the BNP and EDL are just two good examples. It's very hard not to conclude that the MO was infiltrate and destroy.

I have nothing against jews at all assuming they leave me alone. But I would not have one into any organisation that I ran.

Anonymous said...

Their avarice knows no bounds

Anonymous said...

when whites don't like an organization, they leave it

when jews dont like one, they join it

nuff said

Anonymous said...

A phrase, moral holo$$$x survivor(kike), is an oxymoron.Even those of them who seem to be anti Israhell are shills. Norman Filkenstain wrote Holo$$$x Industry ,but this book endorse Holo$$$x lie after all.He has been going around the globe, promoting his book and views ,and at the same time hammering holo$$$x meme into empty goym`s heads (intentionally or not, I don’t know) The same story can be said about Noam Chomsky,he criticizes IsraHell, fine, yet he describes holo$$$x as “the most fantastic outburst of collective insanity in human history” I can name much more fantastic outbursts of human insanity off top of my head: Holodomor, Bolshevik Revolution, Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, Armenian Genocide the list goes on. All examples I have just given, have two common features. Firstly,to some extent they were inspired and executed by holo$$$x survivors, secondly, they actually HAPPENED !!! And who gives a fuck ,about not being allowed entry to IsraHell anyway?

nastiestuncle said...

@eah 21:42

"At Nürnberg, during the IMT trial of the major war criminals, it was claimed there were 4m victims at Auschwitz alone, and this number was part of what was used to convict the major war criminals, many of whom were then executed. If you visit the site today, you will see a plaque saying that 700k died there. In the future this number will very likely also be reduced."

When the Russians 'liberated' the Auschwitz complex, it was they (not the Jews themselves) who overestimated the number of people killed there by 2.5 million, a figure which was revised down once historians had a chance to do their research. That 2.5 million number applied to the number of non-Jews killed there.
Adolf Eichmann had claimed that 2.5 million Jews were killed there, a claim which even the Jews themselves did not believe. Again, research showed this figure to be far too high and the death toll was revised downwards.

A generally agreed upon figure is that between 950,000 and 1,100,000 Jews died at Auschwitz with a few hundred thousand deaths from non-Jewish groups.

"The 6m number has long been discredited."

No, it hasn't. Jew-haters are desperate for this figure not to be true, for some reason which escapes me since as I've already said, even if the 6 million figure is not true, there was still a state program of genocide against Jews, Slavs, homosexuals, Gypsies, communists, etc.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 21:14

"NU is very confused, she'll pretend she's down with the 'cattle' and say derogatory generalisations about blacks when Savant has an article on something exclusive to blacks, however, when there's an article on something where jews are mentioned, she's fanatically refuting other posters comments with platitudes, incl. such gems as:"

It's confusing for you isn't it, but stick with it as one day you might 'get it'.

"Note the "Do they see races or just 'people'?" Strange comment from someone who in many other posts has been quite scathing of blacks."

Not strange at all. Not everyone thinks like us, in terms of races of different humans. Some people do not believe that there are races at all, that races are a 'social construct', and in this context, if they do not believe that there are races, then how can they consciously be pro- or anti- any particular race? Surely this concept is not difficult to understand.

"Yet another: "I have heard of anti-white-privilege which is a different thing entirely.""

Of course, the concept of 'white privilege' is different to 'white race'. Again, you just do not understand anything outside of your personal little bubble in which you live.

"Again, not consistent with someone who's inclined to derogatory statements, re blacks if anything, an odd thing to say, unless either she's bipolar, incredibly stupid, or, being told what to write."

Your lack of understanding is troubling young padawan. Try and move away from the idiocy of the national socialist mindset that everything is either black or white, and try and understand that there are a variety of opinions and motivations which other people hold. I'll start you off: if someone doesn't think that the white race exists, then how can that person be consciously anti- the white race if they don't believe that the white race exists.
It's like this: I do not believe that god exists, so if I were to spill my seed upon the ground then am I responsible for meaning to offend god?

nastiestuncle said...

@Wolfhound 23:48

"Just a selfish queer. He only has the worst venom for any group associated with being anti-gay like Nationalists, Muslims and blacks. Everyone else gets a pass."

Life's all very simple for you isn't it :)

Nationalists are not anti-gay. National socialists are. National socialists are not nationalists, because they are one of the greatest forces promoting immigration.

And I don't hate Muslims because of their hatred of homos, but of course it is a contributing factor. I'm more concerned with the Muslims' hatred of all things non-Muslim.

Blacks are more anti-gay than whites, but the idea that their skin colour causes them to be anti-gay is laughable.

So it's back to school for you.

In the meantime, you will dream about the tip of my penis slipping into your anus and releasing gushes of hot jizz right into your shitbox. Your wife will wake up and ask why you are purring like a cat.

Shaunantijihad said...

Wicked, wicked Savant. The reporting of facts is Hate Speech. No, really.

Anyway, Jews have an escape route to their country. Unless, some bright spark in MI6 would, for example, lose a nuke and get it into the hands of Hamas, then Jews would have no country left to escape to. Then their tune might change and the idea of living under Sharia Law just might have more impact upon their collective consciousness. I'm sure that under such circumstances that excel list would grow, rapidly.

Anonymous said...

eah said... (18 November 2012 09:50): “And note the foto of the nice happy white couple. Question: Aren't those on-the-dolers who need a subsidy to live in London disproportionately not very British?”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2234676/500-week-household-benefits-cap-immoral-demonises-jobless-claims-minister.html

Take a closer look at the Daily Mail’s “stock photo” of the nice happy “white couple”. You’ll notice that the woman in the photo is none other than Gaby Roslin and the man in the photo is her husband, Colin Peel.

Check out the photo of Gaby and her husband Colin Peel. Compare the photo (below) to the one published in the Daily Mail (husband: same shape eyes/cheekbones).
http://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/news-photo/british-television-presenter-gaby-roslin-and-her-husband-news-photo/2109797

Gaby Roslin (born July 12, 1964) is an English television presenter and actress... Her family is Jewish, originating from Zimbabwe (then Rhodesia).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaby_Roslin
Gaby Roslin
http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/london/hi/tv_and_radio/newsid_8435000/8435156.stm


There’s not a day go by when the Daily Mail don’t publish images of that Negro beast, Rihanna, or publish a story about the “Nazis” in their campaign to propagandise the “goyim”.

Wonder what the Zionist-controlled Daily Mail are up to this time i.e. the subtle propaganda attempting to pass a Jewish family off as Gentiles?

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

"And where in the party did he nest? Justice. "

Exactly. Just like Shatter, Straw and many more.

Anonymous said...

To anyone who says jews arent in control of immigration or else they'd never let muzzies in, they're supposed to be in Israel. if western countries get ruined to get jews to emigrate, so what. The ends justify the means.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
To quote the poof:-

"The 6m number has long been discredited."

No, it hasn't. Jew-haters are desperate for this figure not to be true, for some reason which escapes me since as I've already said, even if the 6 million figure is not true, there was still a state program of genocide against Jews, Slavs, homosexuals, Gypsies, communists, etc.


Quite the opposite, actually.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

"if someone doesn't think that the white race exists, then how can that person be consciously anti- the white race if they don't believe that the white race exists."

What student handbook was this little nugget plagiarised from?

Was it the 'Useful Idiots Marxist Guide to Disowning Reality?'

I hope the sociology course isn't too demanding.

P.s As students tend not to get up early and this retard is posting at 4AM, or earlier, I would suggest it's either up all night or it's based somewhere in the Levant.



nemesis said...

Can NU or any of the others explain why the 'Six Million' figure has been floating around jewish literature for centuries? And then it just so happens that the Nazis killed that figure. What a coincidence.

Boer said...

It's worth bearing in mind, whilst looking for jews worthy of being called human, that they like to control both sides of every debate rather than leave the outcome up to chance. It's called "controlled opposition" and there are many examples - even Hamas was a creature of MOSSAD so as to give a name & face to the inchoate Palestine resistance movement.
I mention this because many seemingly anti-(jewish)-establishment commentators are revealed to be, upon deeper investigation, to be part of this controlled opposition.
How can you tell? I think the best measure is some sort of litmus test - just where do they stand on seminal topics such as whodunit in the case of 9/11; or the Holocau$t. Devise your own set of criteria.
An example: Noam Chomsky supported the official 9/11 narrative for years. This makes one ask: if he is "controlled opposition" then what can one make of his anti-imperialist diatribe aimed largely at the USA? One exaplanation would be that he is part of the decades-long agenda of dragging the USA off the moral high ground, and demoralising its citizens to boot.
Another good measure of a jewish commentator is the level of exposure s/he enjoys in the jew-controlled media. By definition, anybody who is given a lot of airtime - no matter how much you'd like to resonate with his message - is serving the zio-protocols. This would scratch Peter Schiff off your list quick-sharp.

katana said...

Sunday, 18 November 2012
I have an Excel spreadsheet.......
I have an Excel file on my computer. The filename is a bit of a give-away. It's called goodjews.xlsx. In it I record, for future reference, the names and various other data of Jews who have - publicly - questioned significant aspects of the prevailing anti-White narrative. I keep this file as I believe, or want to believe, that all prominent Jews should not be seen as our mortal enemies. That we have friends out there among them. Despite the rather undemanding qualification for inclusion, the file (opened I just note on March 18 last) remains small. Very small.
-------------------------------

The number of 'good jews' will remain small, just like the list of vegetarian wolves. Or non-parasitic parasites.

Jews have changed our immigration policies, our 'hate' laws, and so on. All leading to our destruction as a society.

Our 'salvation' is not in looking for 'good' jews, but rather in facing organized jewery and defeating it.

nastiestuncle said...

@nemesis 12:38

"Can NU or any of the others explain why the 'Six Million' figure has been floating around jewish literature for centuries? And then it just so happens that the Nazis killed that figure. What a coincidence."

I didn't find anything to do with that figure floating around for centuries. What I did find was a Martin Glynn who had written in The American Hebrew, October 31st, 1919 that 6.8 million Jews in Europe were living in poor conditions. Perhaps that is the source of your confusion.

nastiestuncle said...

@Uncle Nasty 12:20

"Quite the opposite, actually."

Skillyant. That's one of you who has come over to believing the 6 million figure. Anyone else?

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 11:51

"To anyone who says jews arent in control of immigration or else they'd never let muzzies in, they're supposed to be in Israel. if western countries get ruined to get jews to emigrate, so what. The ends justify the means."

But then there will be no Jews outside of Israel to control the gentiles in their own countries. So, back to the drawing board with that idea.

Anonymous said...

http://mypostingcareer.com/forums/topic/426-the-shtetl-of-mettle

Anonymous said...

Savant -- what is NU contributing, in your opinion?

SAVANT said...

"Savant -- what is NU contributing, in your opinion?"

Opinion!

Wolfhound said...

"Blacks are more anti-gay than whites, but the idea that their skin colour causes them to be anti-gay is laughable.

So it's back to school for you."


I never said their skin colour had anything to do with their views on the world you disingenuous cocksucking kike bitch.

Not only are you a dishonest traitorous anti-Nationalist, you're a repulsive subhuman long overdue a dose of AIDS.

The truth will out said...

The Six Million Myth, Six Million Times / beginning in 1869


http://i1117.photobucket.com/albums/k598/WhiteWolf722/TheSixMillionMyth.jpg

kudzo bob said...

you disingenuous cocksucking kike bitch. Not only are you a dishonest traitorous anti-Nationalist, you're a repulsive subhuman long overdue a dose of AIDS.

If I read it correctly, wolfhound does not like Nastiest Uncle. Am I right, wolfie?

kulak said...

Our 'salvation' is not in looking for 'good' jews

Correct katana.

It's not whites' job to find them or nominate them.

Let them declare themselves to be against white genocide.

Anonymous said...

Savant, are you NU?

nastiestuncle said...

@Wolfhound 17:54

"I never said their skin colour had anything to do with their views on the world"

You said that blacks were associated with being anti-gay, and I pointed out that it is not their skin colour which makes them anti-gay, which is true. You should have said "people who come from primitive, low-IQ, macho cultures are anti-gay", in which case you would have been correct.

"you disingenuous"

Naaa.

"cocksucking"

Never tried it. But you go ahead and fantasize.

"kike"

Wrong again.

"bitch."

Nope.

0/4. PLEASE SEE ME.

"Not only are you a dishonest"

Wrong again.

"traitorous"

And again.

"anti-Nationalist"

Since it's the national socialists who are anti-nationalist and I am not a national socialist then I can't be anti-nationalist can I. So wrong again.

"you're a repulsive"

I dunno. I scrub up pretty well. My milkshake brings all the girls to the yard.

"subhuman"

Pretty sure you're wrong about that too.

"long overdue a dose of AIDS."

A person cannot really get a dose of AIDS since AIDS describes the condition brought on by getting a dose of HIV.

So that's 0/10 so far. I think I'm going to have to have a word with your parents at the next parents evening. We might have to consider special school.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
To quote the poof:-

"Jew-haters are desperate for this figure not to be true ..."

Quite the opposite, actually.

UN

***********************************

nastiestuncle said...

@Uncle Nasty 12:20

"Quite the opposite, actually."

Skillyant. That's one of you who has come over to believing the 6 million figure. Anyone else?


You missed the point of my post entirely ... pretty much as I expected.
Read it again ... the simplified version (far above). I am confident that on the fourth or fifth take, you'll get it

UN

PS> Told you ... they're not that smart.
.

SAVANT said...

"Savant, are you NU?"


NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!

Anonymous said...

NastiestUncle=Iron Dome

Anonymous said...

NU stated, with a Jewish sourced detail, a detail which might impress the unwary:

"I didn't find anything to do with that figure floating around for centuries. What I did find was a Martin Glynn who had written in The American Hebrew, October 31st, 1919 that 6.8 million Jews in Europe were living in poor conditions."

And then The Truth Will Out gave a link with 40 scans from historical sources where from 1869 to 1945 Jews had claimed that white people had murdered/starved/endangered etc 6 million Jews. (There is an uninteresting reason for this based on Talmudic hocus pocus prophesy).

NU. Comment on precisely the answer to your assertion, if you are able to without resorting to ad hominem argument or misdirection.

Or, refuse to answer, so that you can make the same claim again and again and again in the future, pretending you have not been refuted.

SAJ

ER said...

I agree with kudzo bob. Wolfhound, would you stop beating about the bush and let us know what you really think of NU?

Uncle Nasty said...

.
SAVANT said...

"Savant -- what is NU contributing, in your opinion?"

Opinion!


In my humble opinion, Savant, and I quote from the judenpoof's previous post:--

" ... In the meantime, you will dream about the tip of my penis slipping into your anus and releasing gushes of hot jizz right into your shitbox. Your wife will wake up and ask why you are purring like a cat."

... that is not opinion.

I feel that the judenfag merely lowers the tone of the blog ... and, coming from me, that is quite a statement.

But ... as I say, That is merely my opinion.

UN
.

katana said...

Here's what a 'bad' jew turned 'good' jew had to say about organized Jewry.

Text: http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-freedman.html
Audio: http://archive.org/details/AJewishDefectorWarnsAmericaByBenjaminH.Freedman

A Jewish Defector Warns America
by Benjamin H. Freedman

Introductory Note: Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States. Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation.

Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S.

BENJAMIN FREEDMAN....

Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co- religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

1/9

katana said...

2/9

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it - - the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.

katana said...

3/9

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."

katana said...

4/9

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema' Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.

katana said...

5/9

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?

katana said...

6/9

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

katana said...

7/9

Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

katana said...

8/9

Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.) The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."

katana said...

9/9

But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.

That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.

Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.

--------------

Dave C said...

Q. What causes antisemitism?

A. Semitism.



Savant, could you do a piece on Greece's Golden Dawn? Looking beyond all the hate talk about them?

Anonymous said...

Talk of secession is in the air. The White House this week confirmed that residents in all fifty states had submitted petitions asking to leave the union. Will the last one left please turn out the lights?

Residents in seven states, all in the former Confederacy, submitted more than 30,000 signatures each — enough that some hapless bureaucrat or intern will now have to take a look at their petitions.

Anonymous said...

I don't know about any other posters on here, but Nastiest Uncle has definitely convinced me of the irrevocable TRUTH.

How could you possibly not believe it's a moron?

Anonymous said...

In 1919 Martin Glynn, the then-governor of the State of New York, wrote an article in a Jewish-language newspaper stating that 6 million Jewish men and women in Europe were in danger of starvation, and that if aid weren't forthcoming, there would be a holocaust. Sound familar? In Jewish kabala, 6, the number of points on the Mogen David, is a number with which to conjur. Six million is a made up statistic, intended to give religious cachet to the Zionist movement.

Anonymous said...

David said...( 19 November 2012 00:38): “Comrades, let us take this moment to salute a people under a military occupation like no other...”

Well said David. The Palestinians are the ONLY people fighting back. Seems white Christians have just capitulated.

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

nemesis said...( 19 November 2012 12:38): “Can NU or any of the others explain why the 'Six Million' figure has been floating around jewish literature for centuries? And then it just so happens that the Nazis killed that figure. What a coincidence.”

Ever wondered why the TV series, starring Lee Majors, was called ‘The SIX MILLION Dollar Man’, and not ‘The Million Dollar Man’, ‘Two Million Dollar Man’, Five Million Dollar Man’ etc, etc?

Yet more subtle propaganda directed at the “gullible goyim”.

Frank Galton

occasional said...

More eye-poking. Santa Monica judge, granddaughter of a slave, bans Nativity displays, even though they've been held for over 50 years. Santa Monica's attorney, Barry A. ROSENBAUM, said the city is "very pleased" with the ruling. I fucking bet he is.

Anonymous said...

On the morning after, Jewish Republicans advise the party

gallowglass said...

So Gaby Roslin/Yorath is Jewish?

Well, that explains why she's foisted onto every sports programme we have despite knowing fuck all about it.

Another mystery solved.

mischling said...

Nastiest Uncle. I was impressed initially with your argument that you had checked out all the facts and your opponents had not.

The more I see of the exchanges the more I think the reverse to be the case. A prime example above being the Six Million legend.

The truth will out said...

Anonymous said...19 Nov 2012 02:04
"When whites don't like an organization, they leave it

When jews don't like one, they join it


nuff said"

Amen!

Kiwiguy said...

One of the curious findings was that 52% of jews approved of the tough Arizona laws to clamp down in illegal immigrants. Unfortunately, their representative organisations are stuck in the non-discrimination advocacy against those types of measures.

Anonymous said...

The great thing about Nastiest Uncle is that you can insult him day and night,and he still comes back for more.Reminds me of my ex wife.

Anonymous said...

@gallowglass-She's not as bad as Garth Crooks or Dion Dublin.These A-A hires totally ruined match of the day.BBC should use Hansen and Lawrenceson all the time.They know what their talking about.

Anonymous said...

No, it hasn't. Jew-haters are desperate for this figure not to be true, for some reason which escapes me since as I've already said, even if the 6 million figure is not true, there was still a state program of genocide against Jews, Slavs, homosexuals, Gypsies, communists, etc.

You forgot the 540 freemasons you anti-Enlightenment thug!

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 23:22

"stating that 6 million Jewish men and women in Europe"

Actually, he said 6 million men and women and 800,000 children, which equals 6.8 million. It was tricky I admit. I had to use a calculator.


Uncle Nasty said...

This should actually be next in the "Turd World" post, but I feel that that thread is fading so, I post it here:-

http://www.counter-currents.com/2010/10/lawyers-and-sex-crimes/

The following ended up on the cutting room floor as I prepared “Birth of a Nation,” my review of Harold Covington’s Northwest Quartet, for publication. I decided to cut it for lack of space, and also because I thought that even serious criticisms seemed petty when considered alongside the Quartet’s towering virtues. I came across these words while tidying up my files, and I decided to publish them as a free-standing essay because they echo and reinforce some very wise comments on Occidental Dissent by one of my favorite commentators, who goes by the name Trainspotter.

The most problematic feature of the Northwest Quartet, like The Turner Diaries, is the author’s penchant for genocidal fantasies, directed not just at non-whites, but at white people as well. The most famous such passage in The Turner Diaries tells of the “day of the rope” in which white race-traitors, particularly those who engaged in inter-racial sex, are lynched by the thousands.

Covington makes clear that the creation of a white homeland would not, and indeed could not, require the mass killing of non-whites, even though moral qualms about mass murder of civilians tend to be set aside during warfare. Such killing would be logistically impossible for a small guerrilla army, and it would be unnecessary, since Covington thinks that most non-whites could be induced to flee simply by destroying their employment and social support networks through targeted killings, beatings, and property destruction, mostly aimed at the whites who profit from and facilitate their presence.


Quite.

UN
.

kulak said...

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar.

There were a lot of Germans here too. Sufficient that there was serious talk of making German an official language. For some time they were the single largest white ethnic group.

But never mind them.

Freedman says some good things, but he reminds me of that joke about the Jew who reads the Nazi newspapers because they tell him how well the Jews are doing and it cheers him up.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 20:49

"NU stated, with a Jewish sourced detail, a detail which might impress the unwary:

"I didn't find anything to do with that figure floating around for centuries. What I did find was a Martin Glynn who had written in The American Hebrew, October 31st, 1919 that 6.8 million Jews in Europe were living in poor conditions."

And then The Truth Will Out gave a link with 40 scans from historical sources where from 1869 to 1945 Jews had claimed that white people had murdered/starved/endangered etc 6 million Jews. (There is an uninteresting reason for this based on Talmudic hocus pocus prophesy).

NU. Comment on precisely the answer to your assertion, if you are able to without resorting to ad hominem argument or misdirection.

Or, refuse to answer, so that you can make the same claim again and again and again in the future, pretending you have not been refuted."

Alright then, me darlin.

1. I have no way of knowing if those scans are real.
2. The six million figure actually comes from Adolf Eichmann. I don't think he would be in on a Jewish conspiracy.
3. Could I see all the scans of Jew-related articles throughout history which mention numbers other than "6 million"?
4. There are 1,530,000 results for "ten million Jews" on google: http://tinyurl.com/cn84ce4 and 799,000 results for "1.3 million Jews": http://tinyurl.com/cu4fqsq so maybe we should be pursuing those conspiracies also.
5. Six million isn't the number of Jews who were killed. It might have been 5,375,901 or 7,102,392.
6. Numerology is kookery.
7. If the 6 million figure is made up, does this mean that there wasn't a state program of genocide against the Jews (and others) by the Nazis? Or to apply this logic to a modern genocide: it is claimed that 800,000 people died in the Rwandan genocide, but if the number actually only 500,000, then does this mean that the Hutus weren't actually wandering around with machetes killing any Tutsis they could find?
8. Why the fixation on the 6 million figure? Isn't the point really that there was a program of genocide against various groups of people?

Anonymous said...

michael savage, larry auster,etc,etc,...jews covering all bases...nothing more.

Anonymous said...

I did some research on Golden Dawn. supposedly they're legit. They get money from supporters and people they do favors for. They want to reconquer land in the Mediterranean.

kulak said...

Boer writes

It's worth bearing in mind, whilst looking for jews worthy of being called human, that they like to control both sides of every debate rather than leave the outcome up to chance. It's called "controlled opposition" and there are many examples - even Hamas was a creature of MOSSAD so as to give a name & face to the inchoate Palestine resistance movement.
I mention this because many seemingly anti-(jewish)-establishment commentators are revealed to be, upon deeper investigation, to be part of this controlled opposition.
How can you tell?


The mantra has never failed me. Not once.

Anti-racist is code for anti-white.
Diversity is code for the genocide of white peoples.

I've never personally met a Jew who passed the mantra.

I know there must be some out there, simply on entropy grounds.

Most Jews in times past I'd be tempted to count as allies are at best orthogonal.

All other litmus tests come and go , are disposable, and may mislead.

AnalogMan said...

UN, I wish you hadn't done that.

I don't read that faggot's crap. I collapse them all before I start reading the thread, precisely because, like its fellow perverts, it can't make a point without descending into vile obscenity. Please, people, don't respond to this stain on the blog.

Savant, you must decide whether the contrary opinions are worth the general degradation of your site. I've seen other blogs destroyed by a single troll. I can't imagine that this one's intentions are any different, since it seems to make a full-time job of being obnoxious here. At the very least, please try to enforce some standard of decency.

Anonymous said...

let us remember the land stolen off the Palestinians, let us remember Deir Yassin. The King David Bombing, the slaughter at Sabra and Shatila, the mosque at Hebron, Operation Cast Lead, the assault against the slave population at Gaza using white phosphorus in violation of every international protocols.

Crom does not care. Crom laughs.

the brave warriors of Hamas, Islamic jihad or whatever the fuck you wish to call the men and I mean men who are out tonight fighting

But Crom admires that.

Anonymous said...

NU is a Yid cliché..
read The Judas Goats http://www.amazon.com/The-Judas-Goats-Infiltration-Nationalist/dp/B000JKTH6Y

Necky Untermensch could be on every page and his obsessions expose him for what he is.

Anonymous said...

Boer said... (19 November 2012 13:40): “By definition, anybody who is given a lot of airtime - no matter how much you'd like to resonate with his message - is serving the zio-protocols.”

Re Nigel Farage (Ukip). The BBC can’t get enough of this old charlatan. Over the past 3 years, this snake oil salesman’s appeared on Question Time TEN times, along with numerous appearances on the Politics Show etc.

Question Time appearances since 2009: 05/02/09, 28/05/09, 08/10/09, 25/02/10, 22/07/10, 25/11/10, 17/02/11, 27/10/11, 26/04/12 and 15/11/12.

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

The resident kike wrote:

3. I've never heard of a Jew being anti-white; rather I have heard of anti-white-privilege which is a different thing entirely.

How is it that whites acquire this "white privilege"?

They say whites are BORN with it.

So obviously what must be done is to prevent whites from being born.

Iron Felix said...

Well now, that was a most interesting and enlightening exegesis from Katana, with much food for thought provided therein; many thanks, sir, not alone for that but for incidentally raising the entire tone of this whole debate.

Iron Felix said...

Well now, that was a most interesting and enlightening exegesis from Katana, with much food for thought provided therein; many thanks, sir, not alone for that but for incidentally raising the entire tone of this whole debate.

Iron Felix said...

.....good grief; somehow I seem to have sent it twice.....

Dame Edith said...

Katana. Absolutely fascinating. I've heard about this guy but in truth never followed it up. I actually went back and read the whole lot of your posts a seond time.

Kenneth said...

From "The Jewish Strategy" by Revilo P Oliver-

In sharp and terrible contrast to our race's suicidal mania, the Jews could legitimately boast that no Jew has ever knowingly betrayed his race. (They) ... wail about betrayals, but that so corresponds to the standard and inveterate Jewish technique of making themselves seem "persecuted" that one is inclined to question every instance of supposed "betrayal" that they adduce.

...

The Jews speak bitterly of Henry Klein, a Jewish attorney who, during the premature Jewish Terror in the United States in 1944, did not betray his American clients, as a good Jewish lawyer should, but defended them before the Jewish Federal judge who had been appointed by our great War Criminal to destroy them and thus terrorize all American curs who dared not to lick the boots of their masters. The Jews so persecuted Klein that he denounced the Zionists (e.g., in his booklet, Zionism Rules the World, 2 which he had printed at his own expense in 1955) before he was hounded to suicide. But, nota bene, he denounced the Zionists, not his own race, and it is only reasonable to believe that he, however mistakenly, believed that he was protecting his compatriots in the United States, not harming them.


The majority of Jews hate Benjamin Freedman, who quoted a few well-known passages in the Talmud and other Jewish writings that the lowly goyim should not be permitted to see in his books Facts Are Facts and The Hidden Tyranny. Freedman, unlike the many Jews who had themselves sprinkled with holy water and worked themselves up to positions of power in the various Christian churches during the Middle Ages and in the time of the Reformation and Counter-Reformation, incurred the venomous
hatred of many Jews. When I met him many years ago, he told me — I assume truthfully — that when he and his wife were in an elevator of the very expensive apartment building in New York City in which he then lived, and the very rich Jews who lived in the same building entered the same elevator, they would spit all over his and his wife's clothing to show their disapproval by a typical Jewish gesture. Freedman, however, did not intend to betray his race; on the contrary, he was convinced (it seems, mistakenly) that he was racially a real Jew, whereas most Jews were Turko-Mongolians who had disguised themselves as Jews and cunningly come to dominate the Jewish race, which he certainly did not intend to depreciate, much less betray. On the contrary, he imagined that he was, at great self-sacrifice, protecting his own people from the reprisals that might someday fall upon them.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
AnalogMan said...

UN, I wish you hadn't done that.

Analogman ... I have to assume you refer to the rather appalling wet dream mentioned in a previous quote from the judenpoof. (My post of 19 November 2012 22:14) ...

was, in fact lifted -- from the faggot's post of 19 November 2012 04:07

I felt I had to include the actual quote as otherwise my point would have been lost.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

Gallowglass.

Gabby Roslin isn't Gabby Yorath/Logan, but I can see what you mean. She used to do the football til one pundit pointed out she didn't even watch the games.

The truth will out said...

Oy Vey!
Rupert Murdoch arch-zionist whose grandmother was a jewess, whose career the entire past 60 years has contributed in no small way to the destruction of all white lands through his foul media group including choosing Prime Ministers and Presidents says...

Why Is Jewish owned press so consistently anti- Israel in every crisis?

Dave C said...

Anon 4:41 "I did some research on Golden Dawn. supposedly they're legit. They get money from supporters and people they do favors for. They want to reconquer land in the Mediterranean."

Whoever in Golden Dawn is putting out the wild talk about Istanbul being Greek and taking it back needs to be reined in. Major Achilles heel right there. Fomenting war with Turkey is plain mad.

Roem said...

"When whites don't like an organization, they leave it

When jews don't like one, they join it"


Just brilliant. So insightful.

Here's another: Anti-semitism is a disease. You catch it from jews.

Anonymous said...

Neckiest Untermensch said

"The six million figure actually comes from Adolf Eichmann. I don't think he would be in on a Jewish conspiracy." o_0 .. no of course not ..

kulak said...

Mark Steyn is close to totally kick-ass rockin'.

According to the Census, in 1970 the “Non-Hispanic White” population of California was 78 percent. By the 2010 census, it was 40 percent. Over the same period, the 10 percent Hispanic population quadrupled and caught up with whites.

That doesn’t sound terribly “natural” does it? If one were informed that, say, the population of Nigeria had gone from 80 percent black in 1970 to 40 percent black today, one would suspect something rather odd and unnatural had been going on. Twenty years ago, Rwanda was about 14 percent Tutsi. Now it’s just under 10 percent. So it takes a bunch of Hutu butchers getting out their machetes and engaging in seven-figure genocide to lower the Tutsi population by a third. But, when the white population of California falls by half, that’s “natural,” just the way it is, one of those things, could happen to anyone.


Worth watching.

white rose said...

kulak, you do realize that Steyn is Jewish, don't you?

Want to withdraw the comment?

Can't be saying nice things about them now, can we?

kulak said...

kulak, you do realize that Steyn is Jewish, don't you?

Of course.

Want to withdraw the comment?

Nope.

Can't be saying nice things about them now, can we?

O.K. how's this:

If a faction of Jews goes pro-white, they'll claim they invented it. That way they get the money.

Verily I say unto you, for all these and for all this, they may be forgiven.

But they still don't get in.

AnalogMan said...

UN: Yes, that's what I meant. I never doubted that you quoted it accurately, nor the validity of the point you were making. I just wish I hadn't read that. Now I feel dirty. Damn, it's vile.

The truth will out said...

Well, lately in the main stream media, I'm certain you've all noticed a stark shift in dimension toward our lovable juwes, that work so tirelessly to destroy us.
Anyway... here's the latest in an article about Anonymous finally hitting a target that really deserves their contempt.

Hackers declare 'cyber war' on Israel after IDF threatens to cut off internet in Gaza

The following comment from a GIYUS drone/Nastiest kike-alike, had me rolling around laughing.

"So ANONYMOUS has come out in support of the pro-Hitler, Pro-Nazi, holocaust denying hamas? I guess its now obvious that the NWO are pulling the strings of the hackers.
- Andy Salter, Bournemouth, United Kingdom, 20/11/2012 13:31"


Must be nastiest's infinitely more intelligent brother, as that comment is borderline insane/mental retard.

I can't be certain (only a hunch)but this year was the first time in my 25 or so years of studying this virulent juden problem, that I felt a real tangible shift in peoples perception.
From the comments section alone:
The insanely left-wing Grauniad contained a majority of anti-Israeli sentiment and the equal but opposite madly right-wing Daily Mail does too.
As ever the further extreme end of the spectrum you go, it meets itself, for it is all the same thing, with a different angled light shone through the prism.

Anonymous said...

Ever wonder why some particular youtube videos get removed? This audio video may explain why... HERE.

Also included are brief notes on Benjamin Freedman.

On the Mark Steyn issue, this was pulled from the questionable Wikipedia source, so draw your own conclusions.

"Steyn was born in Toronto. He was baptized a Catholic and later confirmed in the Anglican Church;[3] he has stated that 'the last Jewish female in my line was one of my paternal great-grandmothers' and that 'both my grandmothers were Catholic' "

ELN

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrV0g6E3-4g&feature=player_embedded

They really are sub-human. Why do our rulers keep importing these vermin?
Paris Claims

J Bull said...

@Paris. Only possible consolation was that she probably is - was - a coal burner.

kulak said...

OT

Nice piece at altright

OT2

Q: What's the lesson of Thanksgiving for a Southerner?

A: Yankees are commies who change their ways only when they are literally starving.

Roscommoner said...

How many Irish parents are aware that the books of Jewish 'historian' Henry Friedlander, a self-styled 'holocaust survivor', are compulsory reading for 15 and 16 year old Irish schoolchildren, being set texts for all those studying history.

Books such as "Nazi Germany And The Jews: The Years Of Persecution 1933-1939" and "The Origins of Nazi Genocide: From Euthanasia to the Final Solution" are being forced down the throats of thousands of Irish kids every day, until their heads are stuffed full of Jewish victimhood and white oppression.

Shatter and co must be laughing their tits off.

Clogheen said...

Roscommon. Never knew that. A total fucking disgrace.

Anonymous said...

@The truth will out .

Like our well loved Uncle says. They're not that smart ..certainly not as clever as they think they are. It's starting to come apart at the seams, Syria etc..it's now down to us to use our much vaunted , and historically proven, superiority . We need to recreate a sense of "tribalism" among our own , save who we can and push on. Succeed and the juden pays the price it deserves to pay. It has to die for us to live , it knows it we know..it could have been different if it hadn't been so malignant. It has to be cut out. We can see where to make the incision because it's grown to large to hide or miss.

Read The Judas Goats..please

Neckiest Untermensche has been quiet since it kicked off. must be in a Tel Aviv shelter away from his PC and incoming missiles. Lets all hope he at least has access to a shower..oi vey.

true grid said...

it (the jew) knows it we know it.

Love to think you're right.

I dont think you are.

In either case.

nastiestuncle said...

@The truth will out 20:05

"Hackers declare 'cyber war' on Israel after IDF threatens to cut off internet in Gaza"

Anomymous used to be a /b/ thing. Anonymous used to do things for the lulz. If you visit /b/, Anonymous hates Muslims and immigration and niggers.
Over the last year and a half or so, Anonymous has been hijacked by the left. It was obvious from all the propaganda which started being posted on /b/. Anonymous isn't Anonymous any more; it is just another lefty activist group. Boring and not funny.



The NWO are pro-Israel. So, they are right wing.
The NWO is pro-immigration. So, they are left wing.
But the people who are pro-immigration are also anti-Israel even though they are supposed to be pro-Israel.
The people (national socialists) who are anti-immigration and anti-Israel are really pro-immigration by virtue of the damage they do to the anti-immigration nationalists.

Damn those pesky Jews for creating so much confusion.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrV0g6E3-4g&feature=player_embedded

They really are sub-human. Why do our rulers keep importing these vermin?
Paris Claims
20 November 2012 20:34

*********************************

J Bull said...

@Paris. Only possible consolation was that she probably is - was - a coal burner.


Unfortunately the jootube video is now hidden behind a firewall, requiring email addy, sign-on, etc. Tell me how astonished you are about that.

It can, however be seen here, along with framegrabs of the subhuman in question in glorious colour ... if one can call an image of faecal brown glorious.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2235811/CCTV-girl-16-punched-ground-random-attack.html?ICO=most_read_module

Having viewed the video, I feel that assumptions of ligneous combustion are unwarranted.

The girl literally did not know what hit her. Having said that, however, I am now of the opinion that the only solution, is the Waco Solution.

Savant's one of earlier, happier days in the early 1900's ... not the FBI/BATF one of the nineties.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_Siege

A few concerned citizens, a few smouldering wind-chimes, and voila! The problem becomes self-solving.

I'll happily supply the kerosene and light the match.

UN
.

The truth will out said...

Anon 23:37
"Read The Judas Goats...please"

Thanks anon, this looks to be a very good read and tips like that I appreciate greatly mate.
Just downloaded it from here and only read the preamble and preface so far, there's no messing about here great stuff, thanks for the heads up, I'm familiar with Michael Collins Piper from Mami's Shit.

If you're yearning for some open free speech radio that's not afraid to name the eternal enemy of man and poke it squarely in the eye, this guy has the lot updated daily with several radio shows per day from a whole array of presenters, all jew-wise to varying degrees.

If overwhelmed at first grab as many from Mike Sledge as you can, very very funny (though his last 3 or 4 were uncharacteristically serious, but he wanted to be clear about his message, which is spot on), extremely jew-wise he does a great Alex Jones impression too (he could do 3 hours non-stop and never run out of material), he sometimes gets joined by other famous 'troof tellers', seriously worth checking out this website.

http://www.oraclebroadcasting.com/archives.php?stream=/LiveFreeOrDie/LiveFreeOrDie.2012-10-18_16k.mp3
Around the 90 min mark is when they join Lee Rogers' show.
This episode is a good idea of how entertaining they can be, sometimes they stay sober enough to carry on talking coherently, sadly 'Dr Fuchs' could not muster in that in this very episode.

From the sublime to the ridiculous, he's always on the mark.

Esther said...

UN, I've come around, very reluctantly, to the virtue of 'wind chimes'. I now understand how whites in SA and the American Deep South were so 'direct' in their handling of blacks. It is now clear to me that normal civilized democratic law enforcement just does not work with them.

And that's why I think the HAC solution could work as well. Take over street by street, area by area. Cut back drastically on welfare as well and whitopia results.

AnalogMan said...

Thanks for the tip (Anon) and link (truthwillout) to the Judas Goats. Looks interesting. I've just read the dedications - Cynthia McKinney!? Really?

Let's see where this goes.

red arrow said...

Savant..... there's more in the Daily Mail today about that Berelowitz creature and her deliberately misleading report on child sex abuse:

"Anger as sex abuse report 'turns blind eye to Asian gangs' despite admitting that they account for a QUARTER of all cases"

http://tinyurl.com/b5vsgzg

The truth will out said...

Nastiest toerag, must've been put on other assignments after clearly displeasing his handler 'mischling' earlier in on this thread...

Big Dog?
More like big cunt!

Roem said...

Very good response, truthwillout.

(Hope your name turns out to be true!).

Anonymous said...

Did anyone actually read the David Frum article? He doesn't say anything anti-white in it: doesn't even suggest Republicans should pander to minorities. He probably didn't write the "You're Old, You're White, You're History" line on the Newsweek cover. I think that to be honest, he makes some fair points.

JP

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Aaaand, Guess what? We're baaack to the kiddie fiddlers in high places.
And the people who put them there.
As you can see, I'm not going to let it go.

http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/

American bond and hedge fund mogul Jeffrey Epstein went to prison in 2010 – albeit briefly – having been found guilty by a US Court of soliciting prostitution from a minor.

How and why he escaped a more hefty jail sentence – despite overwhelming evidence of sex crimes with dozens of young girls – remains something guaranteed to make the neutral’s blood boil.

The U.S. attorney who led the Epstein prosecution in Florida’s Southern District commented publicly on the case once it was no longer sub judice, even giving Tina Brown’s highly respected Daily Beast exclusive access to his view in the form of a long open letter. The following facts, among others, emerged: three 12-year-old French girls were delivered to him for his twisted pleasure as a birthday present. Epstein had purchased a “Balkan sex slave” from her family when she was just 14. And the FBI identified around 40 young women, most of them underage at the time, who had been coaxed into Epstein’s Palm Beach home on the request for a “massage” for money…..then forced into various sexual tableaux.

The judiciary knew all about this when Epstein was sentenced. In the US, sex crimes of this nature typically carry a term of 10 to 20 years in prison. Indeed, the very fact of serious FBI involvement makes clear that the crimes were considered to be extremely serious, organised, and professionally rewarded.

Yet Jeffrey Epstein was sentenced to just 13 months in jail.


Read on and discover who, in the British establishment was buddies with Epstein.
It would be appalling of me to name names, so I won't even mention them ...

I'll let him do it.

* The convicted paedophile’s addresses included ten entries for Lord Mandelson and his partner Reinaldo da Silva.

* The book had no fewer than 16 numbers for Prince Andrew, including the *home* numbers for politicians Lord Heseltine and former Northern Ireland Secretary Shaun Woodward. The Prince admitted Epstein was a close friend, and refused to disown him even when the guy was found guilty.

* An office address for Tony Blair and a personal number for Bill Clinton were also among the virtual names on record.


As I said in a previous post, no one in a position of influence is allowed to get there without a big, easily-grasped, blackmail handle.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

Went to suggested youtube video, but they "age-restricted" it. Ya, sure, more like censoring this 16 sec. video.

Try it HERE.

"Dirty Harry" should be called to task to track the Black bastard down.

Anonymous said...

Spelling error.

There are four letters too many, "oqes", in the word to describe Osama Boetero.