Friday, 18 February 2011

Worth another look

You've probably read both of the following quotations from two of the 20th century's most notable luminaries - nothing really new. Nonetheless it's worthwhile reflecting on them, as they show how and why we are where we are, and how our rulers control us.

First up Lavrenti Beria, the head of the NKVD, to a group of US communist students at Lenin University in 1953.

“Degradation and conquest are companions. To be conquered, a nation must be degraded … degradation can be accomplished insidiously … and effectively by consistent and continual defamation … continued and constant degradation of national leaders, national institutions, national practices and national heroes must be systematically carries out.

“By attacking the character and morals … by bringing about, through contamination of youth, a general degraded feeling, command of the populace is facilitated to a very marked degree. The attack on the mind of a nation involves changing loyalties, we must have a command of their values. In the animal, the first loyalty is to himself. This is destroyed by demonstrating to him … showing that he does not remember, cannot act or does not trust himself.

“The second loyalty is to his family unit … this is destroyed by lessening the value of marriage, by making and easiness of divorce. The next loyalty is to his friends and local environment … this is destroyed by lowering his trust. The next is to the state …and this is the only loyalty once the State is founded as a Communist State …

“By perverting the institutions of a nation and bringing about a general degradation … a population can be brought psychologically to heel…”

This of course is 100% in alignment with the Frankfurt School and their mutant spawn.

The second is from one Josef Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for the Third Reich.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."


PS: See also this post - How To Brainwash A Nation


Franz said...

Lavrenti Beria and Jo Goebbels were in charge of propagandic pyramid structures, with themselves on the top.

While our situation today is not enviable, it is different. Rather than having one or two guys in command, our societies are covered by the fungus of a dysfunctional ruling class, appointed as much by their arrogance and lust for power as our own apathy.

They will be toppled one way or the other. It has been done before. A great man once said to the luminaries of high finance:

"You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout you out and, by the Eternal, I will rout you out."

The man was Andrew Jackson and indeed he managed to rout ou the "elite" in his time.

I do not worry about the elite crashing down in flames. For they will. Either by revolution, their own ineptitude or a leader with a popular mandate to clean house.

I worry about the new leaders. Will the multicultural West produce Lenins and Pol Pots? Or does the white race still have the greatness to produce another Thomas Jefferson, a Charles Martel or a Frederick William?

I sincerely hope so.

Henry IX said...

Yes, it all looks so obvious once you see the sources (Marxism) diesn't it?

Rob said...

The degraded masses of today - and they include the majority of people in the West - are more complacent and less easily roused to revolt than their counterparts in times gone by.
I think there are two reasons for this. Firstly, there is no real poverty in the old sense: no one is short of food or medical care, thanks to the welfare and health care systems that are in place. Secondly, there is more entertainment to occupy people, thanks to TV and the Internet. It would be interesting to know what indignities would have to be inflicted on people to make them wake up, e.g. how many more millions of Third Worlders can the ruling elites unload on Europe?

awakened said...

Rob - I agree with you. I'd add one more. The sheeple THINK that there's a free press. They think that they're basically getting the real story. Unlike say in China. Difference is, the Chinese KNOW they're not getting either the true or full story.

Anonymous said...

Further to this ... we are all familiar with Hollywood's take on boogs in movies.

The black computer genius (Miles Dyson in Terminator 2 -- Samuel Jackson in Jurassic Park) ... The black kick-ass hero (Will Smith in I,Robot; Men in Black) The black president, black God, black scientific whiz, black father figure and general black nice guy (Morgan Freeman in pretty much anything). I'll never understand the thinking behind Jeff Goldblum's sullen, bubble-lipped negrita of a daughter in Jurassic Park II. Even Spielberg avoids discussion of this.

Well, it appears that the Year of 2010 was a bit too pale and non-diverse for those at the New York Times.

"The New York Times' film critics Manohla Dargis and A.O. Scott alert us to today's burning problem: Hollywood's Whiteout Year: Few Blacks on Silver Screen.

Crammed into this year’s field of 10 best picture Oscar nominees are British aristocrats, Volvo-driving Los Angeles lesbians, a flock of swans, a gaggle of Harvard computer geeks, clans of Massachusetts fighters and Missouri meth dealers, as well as 19th-century bounty hunters, dream detectives and animated toys. It’s a fairly diverse selection in terms of genre, topic, sensibility, style and ambition. But it’s also more racially homogenous — more white — than the 10 films that were up for best picture in 1940, when Hattie McDaniel became the first black American to win an Oscar for her role as Mammy in “Gone With the Wind.” In view of recent history the whiteness of the 2011 Academy Awards is a little blinding.

Go to the link above and check out Steve Sailor's response.

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

@ Savant I hope the quote of Goebbels will be seen in context.
No doubt uncle nasty will provide some.
I dont think the nazi's were great at all but I am getting the feeling that they were the last defenders of the west.

SAVANT said...

anon 9.47. I'm not suggesting an equivalence at all between the two. My point really is to emphasise the techniques being used to undermine us.

Anonymous said...

Hollywood's Whiteout Year: Few Blacks on Silver Screen.

This argument was on the Daily Mail yesterday in an article which I forget because it was on something else and they were arguing why the second african american woman to win an oscar finds it hard to get movie deals.
It is because she is not as good as the first african american to win an oscar.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

@ Savant I hope the quote of Goebbels will be seen in context.
No doubt uncle nasty will provide some.

Your wish is my command. Please go here:-

A few quotes ...

Daybreaker and the like: You can condemn Hitler till you are blue in the face, and that will still not alter your status as goyim slated for extinction. Do you really imagine that the only thing standing in our way is abominable Adolf? You remind me of the people who promote the spurious Ben Franklin quote to the effect that America would be perfect, were it not for the one small problem of the Jews, when the truth is that the system Ben Franklin helped create was systematically flawed, hence the rise of the Jews. These sorts of attitudes are appealing, because they spare us the need to reflect on broader, deeper, systemic problems that might implicate us as well.

Why do 99.99% of Whites in the post-war era reject explicit White Nationalism? Because they in no way want to be associated with the mass-murder carried out by the Nazis.

Do you really think that if we changed just one little thing—if Hitler had decided to stay a painter, for instance—that White Nationalism would be enjoying a good press today? Once whites allowed a Jewish take-over of the press, academia, etc., our days were numbered, no matter who became Chancellor of Germany in 1933.

We are thus obliged, like it or not, to live under Hitler’s shadow. Our enemies have ensured that any expression of White racial consciousness, however innocuous, will be officially pronounced hatefully Hitlerian and “Nazi,” whether we admire Hitler or despise him. It is therefore incumbent on us, as a simple matter of self-defense, to arrive at a balanced view of Hitler and the movement he founded.

The phrase I have emphasized in bold should be tattooed on everyone's forehead, I feel.

This site is rather like red wine. Do not drink two bottles of it in one go. Just have a small glass now and then.

As Kulak said once, you will, eventually, have a "Lightning-bolt moment".

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

You asked for it. Let that be a lesson.

We are thus obliged, like it or not, to live under Hitler’s shadow. Our enemies have ensured that any expression of White racial consciousness, however innocuous, will be officially pronounced hatefully Hitlerian and “Nazi,” whether we admire Hitler or despise him. It is therefore incumbent on us, as a simple matter of self-defense, to arrive at a balanced view of Hitler and the movement he founded.

Anyone who doubts all this should recall the abuse that Pat Buchanan received at the hands of the controlled media and the organized Jewish community during his campaigns for the Republican nomination. Buchanan is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a national socialist, nor even a conscious racialist. He is, instead, a traditional Christian conservative, with all the virtues and liabilities that entails. But he was persistently labeled a “Nazi” nevertheless. [After] his 1992 speech at the Republican National Convention, Jewish columnist Molly Ivins opined, “probably sounded better in the original German.” Her meaning was clear: She was identifying Buchanan as a “Nazi,” delegitimizing his nationalism and social conservatism with the most potent weapon in the Left’s rhetorical arsenal.

How true. Never forget that the weapons of the left are words. Deeds are utterly beyond them.

Your armour is indifference to them.

Try it sometime. Really. When some eye-rolling lefty accuses you of racism/nazism/bigotry, simply say:- "Yes? And your point ...?

Sticks and stones ...

Uncle Nasty

kulak said...

@U.N. RE: Steve

Why wasn't a single black actor even considered for the role of Mark Zuckerberg in The Social Network?

Now that's funny!

Last night I had to watch Despicable Me.

Again, a total lack of melanin.

Pros: The villains are funded by Jewish bankers. The worst villain is the son of the banker. The villains don't actually invent anything; they either just steal stuff or pay goyim to come up with things.

Cons: The music stinks. The worst low-level characters are, of course, southerners. It's just not that funny.

Parental Guidance suggested.

Bemused stare said...

This year, the mood couldn’t be more different. Confounding the hopes of everyone who dared think this might herald a bright future for minority cinema, this year’s Oscars have turned into the whitest in recent history. Not a single black man or woman has been shortlisted for any major award. Neither is black talent represented in any of the myriad technical -categories. The 10 films shortlisted for Best Picture are, as a BBC honcho once put it, “hideously” white.

That's the BBC for you. White is now described as hideous.

Anonymous said...

Franz said...

I worry about the new leaders. Will the multicultural West produce Lenins and Pol Pots? Or does the white race still have the greatness to produce another Thomas Jefferson, a Charles Martel or a Frederick William?

I sincerely hope so.

So do I, Franz. But sometimes I despair ....

or this ... old but startling.

Watch 'em and weep for the future.

Uncle Nasty

Piet said...

Lack of blacks at theOscars: Yes, all the black blogs anf the hff post are going apeshit over it. Lovely!

Piet said...

Excellent post onAH UN. Set me thinking.

Franz said...

Allow me to add my two cents on the topic of Adolf Hitler, his party and the two being the last defenders of the West.

I benefit of course from many conversations with old Germans who remember the days.

One thing I heard (not read in the officially approved history books) over and over is that the Nazi party was a deeply corrupt bunch that didn't defend anything but the purses of its high ranking members. Party fuctionaries were called "gold pheasants" by the people for their colorful uniforms made from the finest fabrics and laced with precious metals. These folks drove around in 12 cylinders Mercedes when there was no petrol to be had on the eastern front.

As for Hitler himself, it is clear that he was no fool in his earlier years. Once in power however he seems to have succumbed to mental disease and illusions of grandeur. His blindness to the corruption of his henchmen is just one of many sins AH committed.

I believe that AH would have made a fine public intelectual a "conscience of the nation" similar to the status of the Russian poets in the 19th century. As a political leader however, he marched my grandfather's generation to the abyss.

To me, the story of AH and the pyramids of skulls he left behind is a cautionary tale. A tale abouth the lows to which one-man-leadership can sink even if that man had good intentions.

For that reason I pray for the emergence of leaders who will rule through the people instead of lording it over the populace. A vital distinction, I believe.

We will see what happens.

When the people are ready, the leader will come.

Franz said...

@ UN

The people of Walmart make me cringe everytime I see them. However, their presence is but a function of the technological and "moral" advances we have made.

Advances in the sense that there is no human evolution anymore.

These days, every child that isn't aborted lives. Even those whose physical and mental feebleness would have condemned them to death by hunger, disease or accident not 200 years ago.

Simple example. My family hails from the countryside. There, just 50 years ago it was considered perfectly normal that children who were stupid enough to provoke guard dogs were bitten.

If a kid was sufficiently dense to pull a Rottweiler's tail, death - instant or through gangrene - was the natural consequence. It was a natural way to root out those who were too dim witted to spot an obvious source of danger.

These days, dogs are muzzled. Kids driving bicycles wear helmets. Cars are forced to drive s-l-o-w-l-y. Medication for all kinds of ailments is available even to those who don't work for a living. You get the picture.

Most mammals loose 40% of their offspring to natural selection. We however have thought it wise to eliminate any form of natural selection. The results of that fateful decision are there to be admired at Walmart 24/7 as you pointed out.

If you want to make the unique experience of simultaniously weeping and laughing like never before in your life, watch the great comedy "Idiocracy".

hector said...

The people of Walmart are ridiculously easy to fool and control. Keep them mindless and just above subsistnce level and they won't cause problems.

Anonymous said...

Thanks UN and Franz
I have had the peasure of speaking to many old Germans myself and it is clear that the history we are taught does not reflect reality.
There can be no doubt that Hitler is now the whip against white nationalism, odly enough he is now the whip used by Palestinians against Israel.

The elite jews now have their people beaten by the whip they produced through media control.

White nationalism will have to find a way to deal with Hitler without throwing the baby away with the bathwater.

And strangely enough the jews will have to deal with it too sometime.
Many right thinking jews are starting to see this and see their future tied to the survival of white nationalism.
I hope for a German revival , not in the nazi sense but just as an antidote to white guilt.

white4ever said...

@Franz. I also think AH lost the war through his disastrous decisions, especially on the eastern front.

Anonymous said...

Bemused stare said...

"... The 10 films shortlisted for Best Picture are, as a BBC honcho once put it, “hideously” white.

That's the BBC for you. White is now described as hideous."

Quite. Now imagine how far you'd get in describing Hollywood as "Hideously jewish"; Birmingham as "Hideously black" or France as (gasp) "Hideously muslim ..."

Hear that bubbling sound?

Uncle Nasty

aviatrix said...

Beria and the Frankfurt School were readinf off the same him-sheet. And boy havent they been successful?

Anonymous said...


Demoralized people are separated in their minds, doubters that are transfixed by someone who will assuredly give them unconflicted peace with Hope in Change.

Love has a completeness in loyalty. Cheapen love to sex, mocking those who hold affection, then there is no loyalty to man, only a lust for creature comforts provided for by the State in return for a little assasination. Communism. Love is purchased.

Truth has a completeness in fidelity. Cheapen truth to faith in judging the less able to pretend, then there is no fidelity to man, just God and His Fuhrer to cull the non believers. Islam. Truth is belief.

To make this a Black and White IQ/skin color issue misses the mark of all human conditionings and hypnosis at your peril.

SAVANT said...

Point taken Kinderling, a very astute comment.

white rose said...

I think this is a great post Savant. Surely anyone looking at what's happened to western societies can see these imperatives at work? What surprises me is how the general public is so blissgully unaware. I suppose that's part of the syndrome.

Anonymous said...

You may wonder why I am posting this, but it is an excellent example of the power of focused propaganda and the lost opportunities that accrue therefrom.

... and for those of you with the unspoken question trembling on your lips; no, I don't.

Uncle Nasty

Rob said...

How often do the left/liberals get beaten with the communist stick the way anyone who shows the slightest concern for the white race gets called a Nazi? Just about every left-wing government in Europe contains people who are or were Marxists, e.g. Blair's and Brown's. And the "conservative" parties are falling over themselves to adopt the policies of the left/liberals.

Heraclitus said...

Rob, I'd say part of the reason the 'communist' tag isn't used is that it became a debased coinage, especially in the United States, where anyone to the left of Ronald Reagan incurred its assignation.

Perhaps in due course the 'Nazi' epithet will fall into the same level of debasement. However, your point is correct - assign them an unpleasant, whether justified or not.

Kiwiguy said...

***Beria and the Frankfurt School were readinf off the same him-sheet. And boy havent they been successful?***

How much of their success is thanks to the Nazis? By completely killing the brand for nationalism, race realism, genetic differences in ability etc, they inadvertently helped the Frankfurt school types achieve their aims for them.

Anonymous said...

I got this off the comments section of Old Holborn. Can anyone confirm or deny?

"OH, have you been following whats been going on in Toronto during the G20?

It has had to be the most heavily defended G20 in it's own history. $1.5 Billion canadian dollars.

There are some pretty brutal videos emerging of police repression. i.e threats of rape and forcible strip searches of women. An entire film studio turned into a makeshift guantanamo-esque prison. Journalists beaten, press cards thrown away and footage deleted.

This is Canada? Land of the free and the terminally civilized and the superior?

Not some sandbagged saudi shithole? Say it isn't so.

Has anybody anything to add?

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Heraclitus said...

Perhaps in due course the 'Nazi' epithet will fall into the same level of debasement. However, your point is correct - assign them an unpleasant, whether justified or not.

For me, "Moonbats", the "Righteous" and "Swivel-eyed Lefties" work pretty well.

Uncle Nasty

Heraclitus said...

Yes kiwiguy, it's one of the great ironies of history. The Nazis ended up promoting everything they detested.

ironman said...

Uncle Nasty: This is very strange w/r/t Canada. They're possibly the most supine of all western nations.... Didn't even realise that they HAD forces such as this. I'd say - watch this space.

Anonymous said...

On the topic of Toronto's G20 meeting-fiasco that happened last summer, here's a brief summary, including videos of the infamous "officer bubbles" (dusky type, of course!) demonstrating the usual ineptitude of affirmative-action hires.

The cost of holding this G20 summit meeting, and unnecessarily held in a large city, was estimated to be about $900 million. (US, Cdn, Australian dollars are all at par)

Makeshift holding cells "accommodated" about 1000 innocent people who were scooped off the streets, held for 24 hrs, and released without charges.

Yes, a sad day for civil liberties here in Canada.

Anonymous said...

yes, a sad day for civil liberties. yet the same poeple bend over backwards to accommopdate every kind of uselessx tereacherous mud people. the kind who cause all the trouible at G20!!!

Anonymous said...

Tell me the MSM are not getting desperate?

In which FOX news are caught red-handed.

Fox News under fire over switched videotape

Fox News is under fire following Republican Ron Paul’s victory in a 2011 straw poll which has nominally made him the front-runner for his party’s nomination for the 2012 presidential election.

Fox News interviewed Paul after he won the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) poll but played a video clip of the announcement of his win which showed crowds overwhelmingly, and loudly, booing the result.

Uncle Nasty

Motoboy said...

Even tho they reflect my views more than any other of the main networks, I think there's something actually evil about Fox, their owners (Murdoch, Ailes) and presenters. Apart from Megan Kelly. OMG!!!

Anonymous said...

Google Chris Brand and Edinburgh Looniversity.
He was removed because of hte comments made by the "London school" of psychology practioner was unacceptable to whatever the other school is.
As Lawrence Summers? proved academic freedom is only there for those approved by the "right on" types.

Anonymous said...

I am a keen reader of Chris Brand's blog. Highly recommended.

Interesting thing about Edinburgh Looniversity is something that happened a few years ago, back in the good Ol' RSA of the mid-nineties.

A friend phoned me to check out a girl who had graduated with honours, etc. from Edinburgh in animation, art and motion graphics, and was in South Africa looking for work. he wanted my opinion of her work.

After all, we had seen graduates from former USSR, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, the works ... many of whom flooded into South Africa in the nineties.
All looking for "A chance to begin again in a land of opportunity and adventure ..." ***

... and, I might add, a lot of those people made me feel very old and very useless. Oozing with talent, most of them.

My first thought was "Wow! Edinburgh Uni! Top honours! This chick must be something. This, I have to see ..."

Long story short. The girl's work was so relentlessly mediocre, so immature and basically sloppy -- and so little of it -- that I really thought I had been the subject of a childish practical joke. I was rather pissed off with my friend.

As it turns out -- no. The girl had a genuine degree and genuine honours from Edinburgh.

I feel she had a genuine case for a lawsuit against them.

If anyone else can with experience of Edinburgh can comment, I would be grateful.

I honestly want to know if this was an unusual case.

Uncle Nasty

*** Thank you, Ridley.

Dr. Wassell said...

Ridley - i know well a person from Qatar who got a PhD in business applications from Edinburgh. He showed me his thesis. It was so badly written, superised, referenced, and without a shred of original findings, that I felt it had zero chance of neing awarded. He was offended. And stuck it to me when the award was made - WITHOUT REVISIONS - immediate after the viva voce! I could hadrly believe it and alienated this guy for good measure.

Anonymous said...

Further to Chris Brand ... I thought I had posted this, this, but obviously not.

Please go here:-

Scroll down to :-


In which is said:-

Let me tell you what we Whites are made of:

Over 97% of the most important scientists and 74% of the most important artists and authors were white, almost all males, and most from only four countries, Great Britain, Germany, France, and Italy with borders defined by Naples, Marseilles, the western border of Dorset County in England, a point a few miles above Glasgow, the northern tip of Denmark, and a point a few miles east of the city that used to be Breslau in German Silesia (now Wroclaw in Poland).

A handy little map is included. You would never dream that so much -- pretty much everything, in fact -- came from such a small area.

The multi-culti's certainly don't want you to think so.

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Pinched from here:-

[I]n Europe it is now all but impossible to have a debate about the nature of Islam, or about the effects of immigration of Islam’s adherents.

—Geert Wilders

Interesting, No?

For the last forty years it has been impossible to have a debate about the nature of jews, or about the effects of immigration of the tribes’s adherents, apologists and propagandists.

The biter, once again, bit.

You bought it, Boys. You paid for it, with our money, and now I am going to sit here and watch you eat it.

Every bitter mouthful.

A plague on all your fucking houses.

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Stolen from here:-

"Wisconsin Dems still fighting; are the Republicans?

James P. writes:

Sage McLaughlin wonders why the Wisconsin Republicans don’t generate intolerable legislation in order to bring the Democrats back to the legislature. This question is even more baffling in view of today’s news that the Democrats in the Wisconsin Assembly are feverishly generating unacceptable amendments to the anti-union bill in an effort to derail it. Thus, in a legislature that is ostensibly totally Republican controlled, both Senate and Assembly, it appears that the Republicans are dozing while the Democrats are furiously active. I simply don’t know how to explain this!

If you are an American reader -- and a Republican -- I feel that you have been utterly betrayed by your party.

In a previous post I recall quoting McGovern's comment about there being not a dimes worth of difference between the parties ... but this is out-and-out, backstabbing treachery.

The one-party system has officially arrived in Amerika. We have it in South Africa, and believe me, it doesn't work.

Good fucking luck, Lads.

Uncle Nasty

Tony in Va said...

Take it from me as an American and a Republican, there's almost no difference between the Reps and Dems. They've all been bought and paid for.

Anonymous said...

Looks like somebody finally asked the questions ... "Why?" and "Why NOW?"

Rothschilds Stage Revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt To Kill Islamic Banks In Emerging North African Markets

A quote:-


Islamic banks have been eating into Rothschild profits in the Middle East because: they don’t charge interest (Shariah Law), they are growing very rapidly among the world’s exploding Muslim populations, and (in these catastrophic economic times) they are more stable than western banks.

and another:-

“Clearly Islamic banks in the Gulf are already anticipating the day when their home markets are saturated. And it appears that Egypt will be on the next front-line in the development of regional Islamic banking and finance.”

“African countries such as Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia and Sudan are keen on future sukuk exercises (issuing Islamic bonds). Gambia debuted with a US$166m sukuk deal, privately sold in the US in 2006.” [International Finance Review (Reuters), 2008]

Let's just list the countries in the previous paragraph, again and note the date of the finance review above.

Don't the names ring a bell? Haven't those countries been in the news very recently?

Hands up all those who still doubt the dead hand of the internationalist hoffjuden in this little spree?

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

You know, the world seems to be getting stranger and stranger every day. The behaviour of many people -- usually on the far left -- is showing an even greater disconnect from reality than usual.

The left have always been strangers to the real world as they live in a wonderful fluffy pink country where anything is permissible as long your intentions are good ... and, of course, as long as the fallout doesn't effect you or yours ...

This is a particularly alarming turn of events:-

"CIA agent gave Al Qaeda Nuclear and Biological material?"

A quote:-

"Wait, what?

Here's the news story, and an exclusive DT analysis below:
Double murder-accused US official Raymond Davis has been found in possession of top-secret CIA documents, which point to him or the feared American Task Force 373 (TF373) operating in the region, providing Al-Qaeda terrorists with "nuclear fissile material" and "biological agents," according to a report.

Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) is warning that the situation on the sub-continent has turned "grave" as it appears that open warfare is about to break out between Pakistan and the United States, The European Union Times reports.

The SVR warned in its report that the apprehension of 36-year-old Davis, who shot dead two Pakistani men in Lahore last month, had fuelled this crisis.

The Link:-

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

I'd put nothing past these stupid bastards.

Anonymous said...

Don't know about you, but I could use a laugh ...

Scroll down to "Ghaddaffi's last speech From Tripoli ..."

... and watch the video, but clingwrap your keyboard first.

Uncle Nasty