Saturday, 9 January 2010

9/11: The stench gets worse

A reader has sent me details about an Israeli-owned security company called ICTS (International Consultants on Targeted Security). ICTS's senior management are all ex-Israeli security officials, many of whom worked for El Al security.

Now get this. It seems that ICTS was in charge of security........

* at Schiphol Amsterdam Airport where the "Underwear Bomber" boarded flight 253 to Detroit without proper documentation.

* for each of the 4 airports when the 9/11hijackers boarded

* for the London Underground System during the "Muslims bombings" of 7/7

* for the London Buses system during 7/7 London Bombings attacks

* at the Paris Charles De Gaulle Airport when Richard Reid, the 'shoe-bomber' boarded American Airlines flight 63

Now let’s reflect on the last item. Not long before his shoe bomb trick Reid attempted to board an El Al flight from Schiphol to Tel Aviv. He contravened all the security alert guidelines. For example he paid for a one-way ticket with cash and would not reveal what he planned to do in Israel. Normally the ultra-efficient El Al security people wouldn’t have let him near their plane. Yet they allowed him to fly to Israel and several sources say he apparently had some explosive in his shoe at the time (I don't know if this is correct). Anyway, it beggars belief that he could have conned his way on board (he was bordering in mentally retarded). So what was the reason?

We also need to know (the story naturally was dropped by the MSM shortly after it surfaced) why some employees of Odigo Systems, another Israeli owned company with offices near the World Trade Center, received warnings of the attackes before the hijacked planes had even left the ground.

And then there’s the unexplainable issue of the ‘Arabs’ celebrating on Brooklyn Bridge as the planes crashed into the buildings. Of course, as I showed in this post, the ‘Arabs’ were found, after their capture, to be Israeli agents who had been tracking the hijackers. They were quickly released and sent back to Israel.

I'm most certainly not a conspiracy freak, but I tell you, the whole 9/11 thing smells to high heaven.

45 comments:

Anonymous said...

You don't have to be a conspiracy freak to know that the 9/11 thing was an insde job. The bombers were lead along by the nose.

Anonymous said...

"ITCS - International Consultants on Targeted Security - has long been a name synonymous with Aviation Security. The world leader in its field, ICTS - founded in 1982 - has been at the forefront of the global Aviation Sector for over two decades, building an unrivalled reputation for professional integrity, service quality, innovation and commercial ethos."

"Important Notice, 28 December 2009

Following the terrorist attack on DL/NW Flight 253 on 25 December 2009 , there have been incorrect reports linking ICTS Europe to the event.

We would like to make it clear that ICTS Europe Holdings B.V. is not connected in any way to the mentioned events. ICTS Europe does not provide any security services, nor any other services, whether directly or indirectly, at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport and is not connected in any way to any of the companies that provide security services at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport.

Operating in many other airports across Europe and worldwide, ICTS Europe Holding B.V. continues to work tirelessly with our clients and the authorities to ensure that the new, enhanced security measures are implemented efficiently and with the utmost regard to customer service."



ICTS probably heads the security at many if not most major airports. They provide training which doesnt mean they are the actual staff on the ground.

3 or 4 banks are robbed. They all use the same security firm, which happens to be the biggest in its field. That fact doesnt prove the security firm are masterminding the robberies.

Israelieejit said...

There seem to be many conspiracy theories being thrown around.


"Detroit jet terrorist attack was staged

The recent failed attack on a US passenger jet traveling from Amsterdam to Detroit was a set-up provocation controlled by US intelligence, author and journalist Webster Tarpley stated to RT.



http://rt.com/Best_Videos/2009-12-29/detroit-terror-act-fake.html#

Anonymous said...

HEY 00;16 9 JAN. WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU, I LOST FAMILY MEMBERS IN THERE, I BET YOUR THE NEW RICH IRISH LIBERAL CLASS THAT WANT TO BE ENGLISH ARISTROCRATS, PATHETIC AND OH YES YOUR ALL FROM DUBLIN AND ENGINEERS OF SOME SORT. PATHETIC AGAIN.

Anonymous said...

Dear Savant,

Its one thing having a crack Israeli security company guarding these areas but quite another to actually let them do their jobs.

Your politically correct societies have enabled this. Here is an interesting link for you to have a look at. http://www.torontosun.com/news/columnists/peter_worthington/2010/01/05/12349711-sun.html

Anonymous said...

Well at least for the tube and london buses there is *no* security system stopping people with rucksacks getting on. And Reid was knocked back for the AF flight and tried again the next day, no doubt with a check-in attendant that was more of a sap.

With hindsight most things look like a complete fuck-up.

As for the Israeli's, assuming they were celebrating Mossad agents, they no doubt had been trying to warn the americans for decades that the arabs/muslims were murdering scumbags and perhaps they thought that eventually it might sink into their thick skulls that Israel was embattled. Immature and stupid perhaps, but not necessarily evidence of complicity.

It needn't mean that they got themselves ringside seats in advance to watch the planes crash. There are probably 100's of Mossad agents in NYC at any one time, and they physically have to be somewhere.

However one thing is certain - thousands of muslims worldwide celebrated openly at 9/11.

Thin gruel.

Rohypnol Nights

Suomi said...

Savant, I didn't have you down as a conspiracy nutcase. If there are enough dots you can join them up to make any picture you want.

Get back onto your normal logical track.

Anonymous said...

I agree with the last comment. In a major event like 9/11 you can - if you want to - start drawing up all sorts of imaginative associations and conclusions. Have you ever seen Glen Beck on Faux News?

Anonymous said...

I remember watching 9/11 as it happened and the first thought to go through my head, was that there was definitely a lot more to this than just Terrorists hijacking aeroplanes. I am of the opinion an attack like that could only ever succeed with a lot more inside planning than just a bunch of suicidal Arabs with Stanley knives. As to who, what or why, there would have been so many red herrings left to follow, no-one will ever know the whole picture, so let's just stick to worrying about what will happen to us, as the future unfolds. We all have a front row seat. Whoopee!!!!!

Israelieejit said...

Reading the above comments, I say Thank God there are sane people participating in this blog.

BTW the 03:29 comment about ITCS was mine. The information was taken from their web page.

Israelieejit said...

To Anon at 09:29

Yes, the conspiracy accusation makes it sound as though Uzi-toting Mossad agents are present on every bus and tube-train compartment across London.

We need to get Mulder and Scully onto this X-File quickly.

Anonymous said...

I'm always suspicious of commentators who tell bloggers what they should do on their own blogs especially 10:01, who then agrees with himself at 10:52... all without offering any reasoning rebuttal, I might add.

Just what part of ..."free speech", or right to "free opinions"... don't you get?

Anybody who still believes 9-11 was not an inside (CIA-Mossad-NWO) job at this late date has not been doing their homework with due diligence.

I watched a youtube video a couple of years ago that has always remained with me. One amateur video actor played several roles that brilliantly connected the dots outlining the inconsistencies of this historical event. I couldn't find it on youtube.com ; perhaps other readers may have better luck.

P.S.
One must always question why one little desert country populated with only 4 or 5 million people can capture so much of the world's attention on a daily basis, 365 days of every year....year after year after year?!

Ireland or New Zealand have about the same population as Israel, but how often are those countries mentioned in the western news media?

stella said...

The role of ICTS - and I'm in a position to know this - is largely an advisory/training one. They don't literally man the machines and frisk the passengers. As such they would have been in a weak position to facilitate such an attack.

Also you have to ask if their record is so questionable, why are they in so much demand?

Answers please.

Anonymous said...

chek out this new post on VDare
http://www.vdare.com/roberts/100107_truth.htm

Anonymous said...

For all you history buffs taking time to carefully read this congressional record from 1940 , you may be rewarded by finding some fascinating gems of knowledge that aren't widely dispersed today....and for good reasons (theirs!).

SAVANT said...

OK - a lot of posting on this in less than 24 hours.

Just to put my views straight.

I don't believe the STATE of Israel organised or facilitated the 9/11 attackes. However, apart from what I wrote on this post I see two things as utterly incapable of an innicent explanation.

First, the employees of that Isreali-owned company that were given advanced warning. Second, the celebrating 'Arabs'. Both defy an innocent explanation.

My own belief, for what it's worth, is that the Israeli security services, or elements within them, knew about the attacks and while they may have warned the Americans in general terms, were not specific enough to stop them.

Anonymous said...

I guess I should declare my interests in stating that I find no government on the planet trustworthy ... none whatsoever.

This being the case, you can imagine my feelings a day or two after 9/11 being regaled with images in the South African press of -- wait for it -- a pristine middle east passport (Iranian or Iraqi or whatever) sitting conveniently on top of a heap of rubble alongside the statement that it belonged to one of the pilots.

Not to mention the report a few days later, that a rental car in an airport parking lot had been traced back to one of the conspirators, complete with a sort of "Piloting a Boeing for Dummies" book still on the passenger seat (presumably still open at the chapter headed:- "How to avoid pursuit while navigating to the WTC ...").

The final straw was the collapse of the infamous (third?) building several blocks away, that was struck by absolutely nothing, but somehow, in a spirit of architectural sympathy (in context, I hesitate to use the word "Solidarity"), managed to implode in a fashion identical to the Twin Towers.

It was at this point that I began to feel that someone was taking the piss ...

One almost can imagine a scenario in some smoke-filled room where spook "A" says: "I know ... let's plant an Iraqi passport on some rubble for the press to photograph ... and we can ... let me see, now ... Yeah! We can plant a Boeing flight manual in a parked rental in one of the airports"

And Spook "B" replying:- "They'll never buy that. It's too ... Hollywood."

Spook "A": "... and your problem with that? Hell, these people bought Arlen Specter's 'Magic Bullet' theory. They'll buy anything"

Other fascinating pieces of sound-bite legerdemain were the constant references (by Bush) to Saddam Hussein in the same breath as the 9/11 incident even though Hussein in particular nor Iraq in general were ever accused of complicity in 9/11.

A few weeks of this, and Hussein and 9/11 were irrevocably linked together in the so-called mind of the public, therefore it came as absolutely no surprise whan Iraq was invaded, Saddam was hunted down and, ultimately, executed.

Don't get me wrong, here. I have no problem with executed politicians ... but stop assuming that I'm an arsehole.

Just because my friends do, anyway.

Anyway, have a wonderful 2010.

Uncle Nasty

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

For all you history buffs taking time to carefully read this congressional record from 1940 , you may be rewarded by finding some fascinating gems of knowledge that aren't widely dispersed today....and for good reasons (theirs!).

9 January 2010 21:31

Went there, and was most fascinated.

Ahhh...1940. When even congressmen weren't afraid to call a spade a spade.

If you have an hour or two to spare, strongly recommended.

Uncle Nasty

blueskpies said...

Uncle Nasty (or anyone who's read it) could you oblige by giving a precis of the CR piece? I've looked it up but there's about 40 pages of sense print.

Israelieejit said...

To Stella.
This is exactly the point I was making. The company can train staff, bring in equipment, oversee security, but at the end of the day, its ordinary local people who are manning the check-in procedures.
For example, at Ben-Gurion airport, such positions are held by ordinary youngsters in their early twenties, who are willing and able to work shifts and weekends on a regular basis.

Anonymous said...

re: the Odigo "warnings" - it would be nice to see if they were specific or whether they were vague - in the Nostradamus vein (ie complete bollocks). I suspect the latter. If any of you wingnuts can furnish said warnings as being along the lines of - the twin towers are coming down today" then I apologise.

As for the "agents" Savant, the guys might just have been assholes. The suggestion that they knew it was going to happen and got themselves a good view of it (as you are implying) is fucking cobblers and hardly worthy of your otherwise excellent blog.

The tale about the muslim schoolkid knowing in advance seems more credible (which isn't saying much) but then that doesn't target the Joos.

Israelieejit said...

My tuppenceworth on the conspiracy theory.
Such an attack would have taken months if not a year or two to plan. Bush was fresh in his presidency which rules him out. I find it incredible to believe the CIA would carry out such an operation by itself.
If it was an inside job and the main goal had been to invade Iraq and Afghanistan, surely those involved would not have sacrificed so many innocent lives to do so. The WTC had already been attacked, as well as the USS Cole. Why not just blow up a bridge on American soil or something, to add to the rage?
Secondly, two planes attacked the WTC. OK, this was to ensure that if one failed, at least the other would succeed. But why risk all the lives of those at the Pentagon and at the destination of the fourth plane. Surely the WTC attack would have been enough to enrage the public? Why the unneccessary loss of so many lives?
Going onto Iraq, anyone slightly familiar with the Middle East knows that Arabs are divided into sects who hate each other (even more than they hate Jews). The only thing that kept them from each other's throats was their butcher dictator. It was pure folly for the Americans to believe that going in and ousting Saddam Hussein would lead to a happy democracy. They failed to consider the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds with the ill-will between them.
Back to the 9/11 attacks, dont forget these were suicide attacks. How many CIA folk would agree to commit suicide and kill thousands of Americans for their flag? Americans are more prone to being able to discern right from wrong and less "brainwashable". As proved innumerable times, all over the world, Moslems are easily brainwashed into suicidal attacks against innocents due to radical Islamic teaching.
Therefore, I think its far more likely the attacks were carried out by Moslems.

SAVANT said...

Israelieejit - you have a point about the nostradamus-type warning - I just don't know.

However, the 'celebrating Arabs' thing can't be brushed aside. Why would a group of Israeli 'students' be gathered at a key vantage point at the crucial moment, and the start celebrating when the planes hit.

To me there simply isn't an innocent explanation. Your proposed one certainly doesn't fit the bill.

SAVANT said...

There's no doubt whatever in my mind that the attacks were carried out by Muslim extremists. Equally I can't see that the Bush regime would have the capabilities, or the will, I concede reluctantly, to organise them.

But I do think that Israeli agents, perhaps in conjunction wil elements of US intelligence, knew pretty well what was going to happen and 'let it happen'.

A lot of agendas were served by 9/11.

Anonymous said...

I don't see how it was a particularly "key vantage point". As I'm sure you're aware the twin towers were perfectly visible from the whole of NYC - especially from anywhere on the lower shoreline in any direction, so the idea of a "vantage point" is the perfect example of something appearing post hoc as significant, in my opinion natch.

I don't doubt that the Israelis may well have known that there was something about to happen and may well have been tracking Atta and his bumchums, and may well have tried to warn the Americans. But to go from there to suggesting that some young guys (if agents, very probably junior agents) were aware of the date, time and targets and showed up with the proverbial six-pack to watch the festivities is so unlikely that any, any other scenario would be more plausible. Perhaps something as innocent as shorting Airline stocks the previous day...

Rohypnol Nights

ps http://galliawatch.blogspot.com/2010/01/to-them-we-no-longer-exist.html#links

is far more depressing

Anonymous said...

Rohypnol Nights - this doen't seem to be a valid link

Anonymous said...

http://galliawatch.blogspot.com/2010/01/to-them-we-no-longer-exist.html#links

Israelieejit said...

Savant, regarding the "cheering Israelis"
(BTW, the Odigo post wasnt mine)

If they WERE agents, just musing on my part, perhaps Israel had given warnings with specific details, but they were ignored. Then when the attack did take place, the despicable cheering was in the vein of "Look, we were right and you didnt believe us."
One of those Israelis was interviewed here on a chat-show but I dont remember what account and explanation he gave.

teacher.paris said...

If the four planes had taken off at their scheduled times, Washington, D.C. would have been struck first. This would given an excuse for the military failure to intercept the planes.

teacher.paris said...

More on ICTS from Haaretz, an Israeli newspaper.


http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1141434.html

kulak said...

Who cares who did 9/11?

It's too bad all those people died, but I have about as much in common with the people of New York City as the people of Timbuktu.

It's foreign territory, really.
Those small-town boys have no idea what they are dying for. Want to stop the war? Take them on a field trip to NYC before the recruiter gets ahold of them.

A lot of agendas were served by 9/11.

Indeed!

Except for the important one. ;)

Anonymous said...

Too cryptic for me I'm afraid kulak. What is the important agenda?

kulak said...

Anon@22:35 : White survival.

Anonymous said...

Savant,

America WAS warned prior to 9/11 - in particular by the Israelis, the Russians and the French (now THERE'S a motley crowd!) intelligence services. Arrogant, complacent Bush admin. paid no heed, and the fanatics slipped through. Conspiracy theories grant Bush, Cheney, etc. the competence and smarts that they quite clearly don't possess.

Potgieter

SAVANT said...

JP - true they were warned, but clearly they weren't warned on the specifics. It just seems to me that SOME people knew about the specifics.

Anonymous said...

" It just seems to me that SOME people knew about the specifics."

Yeah, Al Queda

kerdasi amaq said...

"Secondly, two planes attacked the WTC...But why risk all the lives of those at the Pentagon and at the destination of the fourth plane...Why the unneccessary loss of so many lives?"

The people who organized the attacks: do not regard other people to be human beings like them, so the loss of the above lives was of no consequence to them. However, the Odigo warnings were mandated by their religious law.

As for the Pentagon, I've seen it said, and I believe it, that it is physically impossible to fly a modern airliner that close to the ground, at that speed, and maintain control. It would have been truly spectacular if Flight 77 had really hit the Pentagon.

The Pentagon was not hit by a Boeing 757.

Anonymous said...

kerdasi amaq - a Boeing 737 pilot (ok, I know it's a smaller plane) told me the same thing. It would be bordering on impossible for even a skilled pilot to do that.

I don't know, just telling you what he said.

Anonymous said...

Anon 11:49 says:

"It just seems to me that SOME people knew about the specifics."

'Yeah, Al Queda'


This is old news, but Al Qaeda is a C-I-A invention, so pls. try to keep up.

kerdasi amaq said...

A 757 would have touched the ground and cartwheeled into the Pentagon. There would have been bits and pieces flying everywhere.

Anonymous said...

I agree with Savant on the celebrating 'Arabs'. I don't buy the explanation from Israelieejit and I hoestly can't for thenlife of me come up with an innocent one.

Anonymous said...

The suspect's father worked for a Mossad front company in Nigeria.
Isn't it curious how many links there is between Israel and Nigeria.

Wasn't the 'anti-racist' industry in Ireland heralded by an Israeli lecturer in TCD?

Anonymous said...

If you check out the sinister charity "common purpose", its links can be traced back to the City of London. One of its prime investigators, former UKIP member Brian Gerrish, claims to have linked them to people smugglers and organized crime as well as promoting (enforcing) multiculturalism.
All roads appear to led to international banking interests.

carla grace said...

If you are traveling and looking for a spot to park your car gatwick meet and greet is a novel service that provides you with the exact services that you require of them.

perry cole said...

Traveling more or less is a part of everyone's life. But when ever you do it, make smart choice and plan well so that nothing can be a problem for you when you are on your trip. gatwick parking south terminal