Wednesday, 11 November 2009
Now riddle me this.......
Thanks to Elaine for this link. If you read it you’ll see that on an Italian TV show debate an MP, Daniela Santanche (isn't she hot?)claimed "Mohammed was a polygamist and a pedophile because he had nine wives, one of whom was only nine years old, that is a historical fact"
According to the report, “her remark incensed Muslims in the audience. Studio ushers were seen physically restraining an irate, bearded member of the audience from lunging at her.”
Needless to say, the presenter immediately and subsequently went into dhimmi mode. "I and my staff dissociate ourselves from these comments, which are offensive to Islam".
Now what’s the riddle here, you might ask? After all, this is how the Religion of Peace always reacts to this charge.
Let me first, to maintain intellectual rigour, quote the following definitions from Encarta:
Polygamist: having multiple spouses: the custom of having more than one spouse at the same time
Pedophile: adult with sexual desire for children: an adult who has sexual desire for children or who has committed the crime of sex with a child
Now Mo qualifies eminently on both counts. He had innumerable wives and married Aisha when she was six, and consummated the ‘marriage’ (i.e., raped the child) when she was nine.
How do we know this? Why, from the ‘sacred’ books themselves. From the very texts that Muslims are shoving down our throats at every opportunity.
So, the obvious riddle is, if someone uses direct evidence that Muslims themselves accept as true, why do Muslims go ballistic?
Now the facile answer is that it doesn’t take much to get them to go ballistic. But surely even they must see the utter illogicality of their position?
Or is that asking a bit much of them?