Thursday, 8 August 2019

Gun massacres - who benefits?

I'm not strongly into the 'false flag' theory to explain all and every violent event that occurs. I think many on our side are too quick to apply the FF label in the absence of convincing evidence. However it's always correct to ask cui bono? (who benefits?) from such massacres. You don't need to be of a conspiratorial mind-set to be highly sceptical of the explosive growth of such incidents in recent times. Because every such incident elicits a barrage of outraged demands for gun-ownership "reform". Every time. This despite overwhelming evidence that such "reform" would prove worthless in terms of countering such attacks.****
Now the manipulators have successfully seized on the latest massacres to win over Trump and Congressional Republicans, hitherto the only meaningful defenders of the Second Amendment in the political arena.  'We must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms, and that if they do, those firearms can be taken through rapid due process,” Trump said. “That is why I have called for red-flag laws, also known as extreme-risk protection orders.” Well done Donald, you've just lost about half his base while gaining not a single Dem convert. Not one. "Congressional Republicans, under pressure to respond to this weekend’s massacres, appear to be coalescing around legislation to help law enforcement to take guns from those who pose an imminent danger — a measure that, if signed into law, would be the most significant gun safety legislation enacted in 20 years."

It would indeed be the most significant gun safety legislation enacted in 20 years. Because it would provide a mechanism to progressively chip away at gun ownership rights the same way so-called hate speech laws are used to progressively smother almost everything not consistent with The Narrative. Countries like Britain and Sweden, historically bastions of free speech and discourse, have been transformed into USSR-lite. And increasingly less lite as time goes on. Had Western peoples been aware of the eventual impact of seemingly innocent initial restrictions on "hate" - I mean, how could you not oppose hate? - The legislation would have been overwhelmingly rejected. But bit by bit the range and depth of what qualified as "hate" was extended until we are where we are today. Unless White Americans (because - 
be in no doubt - they're the target) act now gun rights, like free speech, will go the way of the dodo.

Bad guys can always acquire a gun. Would-be murderers or terrorists can always get hold a gun or if not a weapon equally lethal. This applies especially in the USA where existing circumstances (hundreds of millions of guns in existence and Latin America lying across a porous border) render it impossible to disarm gang-bangers or terrorists.

Bad guys will ignore gun-free zone warnings. In the name of Jesus it should not be necessary to point this out but many otherwise normal people profess to think that sticking up a sign will stop would-be mass murderers. It'd be comical were not lives as stake.

The ownership/murder ratio does not hold up. The ratio of gun ownership does not correlate at all with the ratio of murders. For instance Norway, Canada and Switzerland lag only slightly behind the USA in the gun ownership ratio but the gun death ratio (especially in Norway and Switzerland) is but a fraction of America's. Same within the USA, States and cities with rigid gun control laws have the highest ratios of gun crime.

The 80/20 rule applies: Analysis of race-delineated gun deaths shows that approximately 80% of White killers kill themselves while the ratio is reversed for black killers. 

Gun deaths are actually declining: Despite the opportunistic hysteria that accompanies every mass killing in the USA the number of gun deaths there has actually declined since the nineties. (Last year 12 per 100,000, 15 for most of the nineties...a 20% decline). 

Legally-owned gun-holders can deter or foil attacks. Think of the football coach who valiantly threw himself in front of his students when Cruz started firing. What if he had had a powerful gun? We know what would have happened. Cruz would have been offed and the death toll drastically reduced. Note that American politicians strangely enough have no problem with guns when its their own asses being protected. The takeaway: Guns don't murder, the people who use them do. 

The nigger in the woodpile: An appropriate metaphor here because the mystery ingredient underpinning all of the anomalies above is race. As FBI statistics show, year after year, blacks murder at about six times the rate of Whites, Hispanics three to four times the White rate. If you normalise the figures, i.e. isolate the ratio of gun murders committed by Whites, you'll see that America is little different from most European countries. 


Matt said...

When(I think never), will they learn the GUN FREE ZONES are murdering 98% of these people?.Who doesn't want GUNS deserve to GET clubbed.Self Defense is as old as MANKIND.The worst part, is they are ALLOWING, INVITING shooters to MURDER THEIR OWN CHILDREN!!!!!!!!.They blame guns, no it's the OPEN INVITATION you DINGLE BERRIES POST all over.

Walmart a GREAT example in EL Paso.Someone could have had him before he got 3 shots off.

Ivanna Humpalot said...

yeah you can't stop mass shooters from trying

BUT if you outlaw automatic/semi-automatic weapons you severely limit their capacity for mass killing

THAT is why gun control is good. It prevents them killing a large number of people quickly

and there is NO reason civilians need autos/semi autos

you can have rifles/pistols for hunting/self-defence, satisfying your 2nd amendment without having high-powered ar-15s or ak-47s

The US is insane and should have started the ban/buyback long ago

Boomer said...

I don't like Morgan but he puts this British reared coolie bitch in her place.

Look at the fizog on Susanah Reid .. lol toadying bitch

Henry IX said...

My God that street shitter on the Boomer video was totally irritating. The fucking cheek, fleeing from some poverty-stricken shithole country and telling Brits that singing THEIR National Anthem is embarrassing. Makes me fucking livid.

English Tom said...

Sav, an interesting point. There were 2 mass shootings within hours of each other. One allegedly carried out by a right winger and the other allegedly by a left/antifa type.
Unless this is the universe just balancing itself out (!) Do we really believe these events were coincidental?
I recently watched a,6 part series on YouTube about the Spanish Civil War. Their society was highly polarised and the 2 sides hated each other (Just Like present day USA). However,what really got the ball rolling was 2 assassinations which took place within hours of each other. The victims were well known person's from opposite sides of the political divide.
The recent mass shootings reminded me of this. Oh, and just by the by, generalisimmo Franco was flown into Spanish mainland to start it all. His pilot just happened to be working for British Intelligence.

Nothing is ever what it seems.

Chumlee's Brother said...

Ivanna Humpalot said...
yeah you can't stop mass shooters from trying

BUT if you outlaw automatic/semi-automatic weapons you severely limit their capacity for mass killing

............Bump stocks are still legal in most US states. Knob end.

Boomer said...

Blackmailing Turkish wog ... and they will soon if not already, while the Yids rub their sweaty palms with glee

Matrick said...

Ivanna Humpalot,
If you think that a single shot weapon would be adequate for home defense then it's quite obvious that you have never shot a gun, and should therefore keep your mouth closed.
Four policemen fired 65 times at the shooter in Ohio. Even highly trained people miss.
Now go away.

Matrick said...

Also, the average hunting rifle fires a more powerful round than an AR15 or AK47, so yet another sign you don't know what you're talking about.

Uncle Nasty said...

Ivanna Humpalot said...
yeah you can't stop mass shooters from trying

BUT if you outlaw automatic/semi-automatic weapons you severely limit their capacity for mass killing

Of course. After all, declaring opioid drugs illegal sure put paid to addiction, manufacture and smuggling ... didn't it?

Stopped them in their tracks.



Uncle Nasty said...

Now the manipulators have successfully seized on the latest massacres to win over Trump and Congressional Republicans, hitherto the only meaningful defenders of the Second Amendment in the political arena.

If I may, Savant:-

Wallace's campaign rhetoric became infamous, such as when he pledged "If any anarchists lie down in front of my automobile, it will be the last automobile they ever lie down in front of" and asserted that the only four letter words that hippies did not know were w-o-r-k and s-o-a-p. He accused Humphrey and Nixon of wanting to desegregate the South. Wallace proclaimed, "There's not a dime's worth of difference between the Democrat and Republican parties," a line that he had first used in 1966, when his first wife, Lurleen Burns Wallace, ran successfully for governor against the Republican James D. Martin. The Wallace campaign in California and other states attracted the "Radical Right", including the John Birch Society.
George Wallace (running for President) 1968

With the benefit of hindsight, there's not too much that Wallace got wrong ... is there?


Captain John Charity Spring MA said...

2nd Amendment is literally designed to give civilians parity with a potentially tyrannical state.

It’s not about self defense or hunting. It’s about giving the population a fighting chance against the central government. Americans have real political power. No one surrenders power without fighting. Power very few in Europe have ever really enjoyed. Power is power.

Scot Irish said...

Humperdink says...

"and there is NO reason civilians need autos/semi autos"

Until they do...

Anonymous said...

Why do jews have nukes?

This is why no nukes is good, it prevents jews from killing a large number of people quickly.

ianrob said...

Ivanna etc above, Sav pointed out the futility of banning weapons, people with no regard for the law will still acquire whatever they want. Bans only affect law abiding people. The fact that most people don't want to spend the rest of their lives in jail, or be shot dead by eager to shoot cop marksmen. (only the eager to shoot apply for these jobs), is usually sufficient to deter the vast majority.
Chumlee's brother raised another excellent point about bump stocks. Incidentally in the UK self loading centre fire rifles are banned, and as far as I know, only .22 rimfire semi auto's are allowed. Amber Rudd when addressing knife crime in London, called for or implemented a ban on bump stocks. .22 rimfires are practically recoilless, and as bumpstocks rely on recoil to operate, surely would not operate efficiently if at all. Totally pointless.
Regarding gun free zones, Sav pointed out the totally ridiculous idea that they would deter criminals. "However", MSM used it's logic in my area following 9/11. Border news on TV reassured watchers who might be concerned that terrorists might fly a plane into Chapel Cross, or Sellafield Nuclear power stations, that the area around these power stations is a designated no-fly zone. They said that without a hint of humour at the totally ridiculous statement they had just made.

ianrob said...

Also Ivanna etc look at this article as well as the pic posted by Sav'. It will be the ordinary white person, of course now a white supremacist who will be targeted for disarmament, while the Jews and the elite will no doubt be spared.

Chumlee's Brother said...

I don't think that the 2nd ammendment will be repealed, ever.

It will just be circumvented, as we are seeing at the moment.

Jew to gulag commandant....."Shoot 2000 inmates by months end".
commandant to Jew ....."Sorry we can't execute anyone. Capital punishment has just been
Jew to commandant....." I didn't say execute them, I said 'SHOOT' them!"

Chumlee's Brother said...

Shooting someone is so not like in the movies.

Especially from a pistol even at point blank range.

A person take a whole mag and still be a serious threat if armed with a knife. Unless the shooter is super cool and can 'mosambique drill' ( 2 to the body, one to the head )
his assailant, he could be in danger himself.

Heraclitus said...

'2nd Amendment is literally designed to give civilians parity with a potentially tyrannical state. '

And that is the very reason TPTB want to take it away, de facto or de jure.

Ottify said...

Hang on to your hats, folks, this ride is going to get little bumpy…

Never, ever forget, my Christian brothers and sisters, that we should not fear the trials and tribulations ahead. Fear not those who can destroy the flesh.

Christ specifically warned us we would be imprisoned and killed for His sake. Sure, pain hurts, but only for a short while. And remember, if the world hates you, it hated Christ first.

Uncle Nasty said...

Just popped over to STUFF NZ ... the site that calls itself "Breaking News". A lot of us here call it "breaking wind".

It is now 9:55 PM on Friday night 9th of August. And here are the headlines of the day:-

9:28 PM
Will All Blacks target Latu?
9:20 PM
Abbey Rd cover recreated
9:11 PM
Capital trains suspended

Here's one they sort of ... missed:

Firearms Licence Owners Launch Class Action Against Government

This week the Fair and Reasonable campaign appointed one of New Zealand’s foremost litigators, Jack Hodder QC, to lead their class action against the government on behalf of responsible firearms licence holders. Along with their solicitors, Jack Hodder QC has identified several potential class actions.

The Bill for the government’s second round of amendments to the Arms Act is due to be published this month. More potential actions may arise from the Bill.

The Fair and Reasonable Campaign has a number of lawyers supporting the QC in strategy, Arms Act interpretation, researching, and implementation.

Check out the comments. I think it's a good bet that the latte-slurpers at the NZ (((MSM))) are all having a good old weepie.


Glen C. said...

For sure the 2nd Amendment will not be repealed. It will follow the same path as the 1st...death by 1000 cuts, aided and abetted by the Federal Courts.

Unknown said...

Be in no doubt, in an era of female suffrage & turd world voting demographic clout, a gun ban is inevitable. These yards CGAF bout history of the country they are squatting in.

The solution is for White guys to stockpile as many guns as they can, so that it'll be hard for the (((ptb))) to get rid of guns for centuries. Give some to unlicensed White friends.

BuelahMan said...

Ivanna Humpalot has no idea what they are talking about.

ianrob said...

Sorry I meant to post this in my previous comment.

Anonymous said...

Look up who were the despotic rulers (the first secretaries of the politburo) of communist Russia, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria etc...
All of them were non-Jews!
If you still believe they were jews, get an appointment with a psychiatrist!
Russia must still be the world's best country: The babushkas earning a government pension of €100, while the oligarchs own yachts of €500 mio.

Frank Galton said...

ianrob said: "It will be the ordinary white person, of course now a white supremacist who will be targeted for disarmament, while the Jews and the elite will no doubt be spared."

Newsweek, 13 January 2015

A prominent Jewish leader has written to the governments of all the EU countries, calling on them to pass legislation giving special licence for Jewish people to carry guns.

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

HEEB, 17 December 2012

There is a growing chorus of voices speaking out against the unchecked proliferation of firearms. But, channel-hopping through the Sunday morning talk shows, one can’t help but notice the voices heard first, and loudest, belong to [Zionist] Jews (A fact not lost on The Jewish Daily Forward, either.) Yesterday on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” just minutes after outgoing [Zionist-Jew] New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg (I) railed against the President for not doing enough to curb guns, [Zionist-Jew] Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) announced that she would be introducing legislation to “ban the sale, the transfer, the importation and the possession” of assault weapons. Just few channels away, Feinstein’s east coast colleague [Zionist-Jew] Chuck Schumer (D-NY) seemed to echo her sentiment on CBS’ “Face The Nation,” saying “I think we can get something done.” And on “Fox and Friends,” Connecticut’s independent [Zionist-Jew] senator Joe Lieberman called for a reinstatement of the Federal Assault Weapon Ban, which expired in 2004.

It’s no secret that American Jewry is traditionally anti-gun. There exists a broad, though by no means universal, feeling that guns are treyf. Un-kosher. Not Jewish.

There may be no single root cause for this Jewish aversion to firearms in the US [Note: The right to bear arms was originally seen as a check against the potential tyranny of the new Federal government as well as foreign invasion].

Washington Post, 12 October 2015

A resident of Tel Aviv will not be given a [firearms] permit, though residents of a Jewish settlement in the West Bank will be [Note: settlements are illegal under international law as reaffirmed by UN Security Council Resolution 2334]. So will retired army officers, former police officers, firefighters, ambulance technicians, special forces vets, licensed public transportation drivers and residents of militarily strategic buffer zones, as well as those who live or work in Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem — including the Old City — [Note: Israel's occupation of East Jerusalem is considered illegal under international law] and the West Bank.

Population of Jewish Settlements in the West Bank: 449,697
Jewish population, Jerusalem: 536,600
Jewish population, East Jerusalem: 215,000

i24 News, 21 August 2018

Half million Israelis eligible to carry guns in move to improve terror response

Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan announced Monday that over half a million Israelis will now be eligible for firearm permits after the government decided to ease gun restrictions for the country’s hundreds of thousands of infantry veterans.

Under Erdan’s reform, Israelis who served in infantry units are immediately eligible to carry firearms.

Additionally, police officers who have received similar training, military officers ranked first lieutenant or higher, and non-commissioned officers ranked first sergeant or higher will no longer have to relinquish their weapon upon completion of service.


Office of the European Union Representative

Six-Month Report on Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem

Settlements are illegal under international law as reaffirmed by UN Security Council Resolution 2334.


The city's status remains disputed, with Israel's occupation of East Jerusalem considered illegal under international law.

Frank Galton

ianrob said...

Great comments again Frank Galton.

Poupon Marx said...

The Georgia USA town that mandated that every household MUST own a gun and have one in the household:

Mocked by the morons, cowards, and flakes of the world, the implementation of this law coincided (n.b. I did not say cause) with a precipitous decline in crime, especially murder. And has stayed way below the national average. Check it out.

Boomer said...

Street shitters in action - and ((they)) tell us we're all equal

cool aide said...

. . .aided and abetted by the (((Federal Courts))).

Kool-aided and abetted


Frank Galton said...

Cheers ianrob,

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

"residents... in the West Bank [and East Jerusalem given firearm permits]"

"Half million Israelis eligible to carry guns in move to improve terror response"

Al Jazeera, 09 November 2015

Poll: 53% [Jewish] Israelis support extrajudicial killings

Some 53 percent of [Jewish] Israelis have expressed support for the extrajudicial killings of alleged Palestinian attackers on the spot, even after their arrest and when they "no longer pose a threat", according to a new poll.

Since October 1, Israeli troops or settlers have killed at least 77 Palestinians, among them unarmed protesters, bystanders and suspected attackers.

The Guardian, 15 April 2016

Why is Britain silent on the extrajudicial killing of Palestinians?

If the US, the UK and its EU partners are genuine democracies, why do they allow Israel to violate international law so consistently and with such shameless arrogance? They are complicit in Israel’s crimes because of their reluctance to censure it and this raises questions about their own democratic values.

Last month, the UK abstained yet again at the United Nations human rights council in Geneva when it came to a vote to admonish Israel for its continued violations of international law and continued settlement building. The resolutions were carried by the majority of 32 nations. The UK, along with its European partners, refused to vote in favour of the resolutions.

Why can’t the UK bring itself to approve any resolution that would undermine Israel’s impunity?

Aipac, the organisation which lobbies on behalf of Israel in the US, demands that American politicians don’t dare challenge US political, financial and military support for Israel. But few understand just how much Israel’s voice counts in Britain too.

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

In America The Council of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations is composed of the 50 largest Jewish organizations.

With over a billion dollars of wealth they are dedicated to Israel and Jewish interests nationally and globally. They support clear domestic policies in Western nations. They all support Israel, but the policies they support for every other nation are the VERY OPPOSITE of that of Israel.

1) They support Israel which bans same sex marriage in defense of the Jewish family.


2) They support Israel where it is illegal for a Jew to marry a non-Jew. Most of the largest Jewish organizations in Western nations have programs to prevent intermarriage of Jews and non-Jews.


3) They support Israel which has the strictest immigration policies in the world, based on Jewish DNA and accept almost no refugees.


4) They support Israel which is overwhelmingly segregated in schools, apartments, neighborhoods, whole cities and towns and even in the settlements they stole from Palestinians. Israel even segregates public transport and has "Jews only" roads in the occupied territories.


5) They support Israel where Israel citizens can publicly carry around machine guns if they wish.


6) They Support Israel which honors Jews who spout hate and even genocide against Gentiles (such as the late Rabbi Yosef).


7) They support Israel where massive casino gambling such as in Las Vegas is not permitted.


8) They support Israel which a Jewish State that celebrates and honors its Jewish religion and culture.


9) They support Israel which is the very opposite of "diversity." In fact they demand that Israel be a "Jewish State" openly dedicated to the Jewish People.


Read more:

Frank Galton

Saoirse Ban said...

Naturally Frank as eternal victims they need to be protected against the evil white racists especially those who are caught with a lighter in their pockets.

Saoirse Ban said...

Hi sav, I don't know if you saw the photo in the paper last week at the Galway races where the best dressed woman on ladies day was a black from 'Galway' beside her were two better dressed and far prettier Irish women.
A friend of mine, a Garda sent me a video of of the black from 'Galway' reverting to type later on that night.
She was naked in Eyre Square screaming
cursing and spitting and dancing like
the baboon that she is. I can send you the video if you on Whatsap if you want

Frank Galton said...

"Look up who were the despotic rulers (the first secretaries of the politburo) of communist Russia... All of them were non-Jews!"

Jews comprised 71 percent of the first Politburo.

World Socialist Web Site

Published by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI)

October 23 (October 10, O.S.): Bolshevik Central Committee votes for armed insurrection

No specific date for the insurrection is set yet. However, the Committee resolves to form a Political Bureau (Politburo), consisting of [Jew] Lenin, [Jew] Trotsky, [Jew] Zinoviev, [Jew] Kamenev, Stalin, Bubnov and [Jew] Sokolnikov, which is specifically tasked with directing the insurrection.

The Central Committee

There were 21 members and 10 candidate members of the Central Committee at the time of the Revolution in 1917, including [Jew] Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, [Jew] Leon Trotsky, [Jew] Grigory Zinoviev, [Jew] Lev Kamenev, Josef Stalin, [Jew] Grigory Sokolnikov, Andrey Bubnov (the seven members of the first Political Bureau)



Ynet News, 24 May 2011

Lenin's Jewish roots confirmed,7340,L-4073133,00.html


The New Yorker, 30 November 2009

Trotsky “revelled in terror”; at times “it seemed that Trotsky and Stalin were competing for the status of the most brutal commissar.” Their difference was one of style and background (Trotsky was Jewish)...


Jerusalem Post, 11 November 2017

Lenin’s deputies Lev Kamenev (originally Rozenfeld) and Grigory Zinoviev (born Hirsch Apfelbaum) and his treasurer Grigori Sokolnikov (Girsh Yankelevich Brilliant) were all Jews...

Frank Galton

Uncle Nasty said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Look up who were the despotic rulers (the first secretaries of the politburo) of communist Russia, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria etc...
All of them were Jews!
If you still believe they were not jews, get an appointment with a psychiatrist!
Russia must still be the world's best country: The babushkas earning a government pension of €100, while the (((oligarchs))) own yachts of €500 mio.

9 August 2019 at 14:40

There. Fixed it for you. You're welcome.

Oldest jew trick in the world:-

(1) Make a statement that is an out-and-out lie ... the bigger, the blacker, the better.
(2) Accuse anyone who disagrees of mental or emotional issues.
(3) Have incontrovertible proof waved in your face that you are, indeed, a liar.

(4) Feign sudden amnesia over the whole subject. Gaze vacantly into distance -- go home.
(5) Wait one day.
(6) Make a statement that is an out-and-out lie ... the bigger, the better.

Seriously Schlomo ... did you not notice the tone of this blog before you shot your mouth off?


Uncle Nasty said...

The (((MSM))) are definitely turning up the wick.

I Posted last night (my time around 9:30 PM) about the shooters of New Zealand starting a class action suit against Jacinda Ardern and the socialists**

As at this writing (Saturday Afternoon 1:05 PM, not a fucking peep from the (((NZ MSM))) ... they must still be in shock.

latest news headlines
1:01 PM
White visitors pan slave plantation tours
1:00 PM
Teen robber released
12:46 PM
Bridesmaid? Thanks, but no video
12:43 PM
Bank robber at large in Christchurch
12:42 PM
All Blacks in confused state
12:40 PM
Shamir: I'll get Hampton NBA ready
12:32 PM
Live: Wild weather hits
12:26 PM
Wellington train power supply 'tripped'

Quelle Surfuckingprise,


**Sounds rather like a cheesy eighties pop group, no? Like Katrina and the Waves.

Uncle Nasty said...

Anonymous Ivanna Humpalot said...

BUT if you outlaw automatic/semi-automatic weapons you severely limit their capacity for mass killing

and there is NO reason civilians need autos/semi autos

Heard a lovely response to this sort of question a few months back in which a woman asked a guy why he even needed (note: NEEDED) a rifle that could fire more than a single shot at a time.

He looked her up and down, then asked: "You buy your toilet paper one sheet at a time, do you?"

The rabbit-in-the-headlights look must have been wonderful to behold.


Flanders said...

"NRA takes aim at three Jewish billionaires pushing ‘elitist agenda’ [JTA, 1 November 2018]

"Tweet from National Rifle Association accuses George Soros, Michael Bloomberg and Tom Steyer of paying to push anti-gun measures on Americans

The National Rifle Association tweeted that three prominent liberal Jewish billionaires are pushing “their elitist agenda on Americans.”

The tweet came three days after a shooter killed 11 Jews at a Pittsburgh synagogue.

In response, a number of readers charged that the tweet accusing George Soros, Tom Steyer and Michael Bloomberg fed into far-right notions of a Jewish conspiracy.

“Another billionaire is pumping unlimited money into electing anti-gun lawmakers,” Tuesday’s tweet read. “Notorious anti-gunner George Soros joins anti-gun billionaires Steyer and Bloomberg. There is no end to how much they’ll pay to push their elitist agenda on Americans.”
The tweet linked to a CNBC article about Soros donating to liberal candidates ahead of the midterm elections.

Soros, a Holocaust survivor and philanthropist who funds liberal and pro-democracy causes, has been a frequent target of the far right in the United States and abroad who often invoke anti-Semitic tropes to exaggerate his influence in politics and economic affairs.

Republicans, including President Donald Trump, have also criticized Soros for funding left-wing causes.

Michael Bloomberg, a former New York mayor, has funded a variety of liberal causes, and Steyer is a prominent liberal donor from California.
Steyer, whose father was Jewish, called McCarthy’s tweet a “a straight-up anti-Semitic move.”

In February NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre was criticized after a speech accusing Soros, Steyer and Bloomberg of promoting “socialism” and “social engineering.”

“Every time in every nation in which this political disease rises to power,” LaPierre told a CPAC conference, describing socialism, “its citizens are repressed, their freedoms are destroyed, and their firearms are banned and confiscated, and it’s all backed in this country by the social engineering and the billions of people like George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Tom Steyer and more.”

Flanders said...

"GOP State Senate Candidate Mails Out Flyers of Jewish Opponent Clutching $100 Bills" [JTA Oct 31, 2018]

"A State Senate candidate in Connecticut sent out a flyer that featured his Jewish opponent holding $100 bills.

The mailer distributed by the campaign of Ed Charamut, a Republican, features a manipulated image of Democrat Matt Lesser under text saying that he opposes lowering some taxes.

Lesser, 35, told the Hartford Courant that people told him on Monday that they had received “an anti-Semitic flyer.”
Charamut, 60, dismissed claims that the flyer invoked anti-Semitic stereotypes.

“I reject hate speech in all its forms,” he told the Courant. “The mailer draws a stark contrast between myself and Matt Lesser. Do you want to protect your wallets, or do you want to make Matt Lesser your new state senator?”

The director of the Anti-Defamation League’s Connecticut office, Steve Ginsburg, said the flyer suggested anti-Jewish imagery.

“We do know, though, the feelings that the flyer is evoking – the juxtaposition of a Jewish candidate for office and money in this manner suggests an age-old anti-Semitic trope,” Ginsburg told the Courant. “We can’t and don’t know the motivation of the producer of the flyer, but we do know its impact and they should clarify what they meant.”

Flanders said...

"President Hate, Leave Our State' [Haaretz Oct 30, 2018]

"Pittsburgh Jews Give Trump a Furious Reception

Hundreds of protesters rallied outside the Tree of Life synagogue to demonstrate against Trump's rhetoric, holding signs reading 'Trump will lie about this too' and 'Ban assault rifles, be a leader'

"Protesters held signs that read, "President Hate, Leave our state," "Words matter," "Ban assault rifles, Be a leader" and "Trump will lie about this too."

" open letter from a group of local Jewish leaders who told Trump: "You are not welcome in Pittsburgh until you fully denounce white nationalism."

More than 43,000 people have signed the letter, organized and posted online by the Pittsburgh chapter of Bend the Arc ***, a Jewish organization opposed to what it calls "the immoral agenda of the Trump administration and the Republican Party."

Scroll down at the link to find out just how many of Jewry's front organizations these jew's use in order to peddle to all of their perverted philosophies throughout the Jew's extensive networks, whose activities are conducted against good countries and their people.

Flanders said...

Wayne LaPierre had identified Jews as being the enemies of America who are led by European-style Socialists, and referred to them as being a "political disease" whose goal is “Absolute control".

A speech which the jews have managed to keep off public television stations and from news reports in America, hoping to keep knowledge about it away from the general American public, is a February 22, 2018 speech, given at the Conservative Political Action Conference. Flanders found the speech covered on the Israeli jewish site, Haaretz soon after. That article is now censored from public viewing and is suppressed by condensing it to a short blurb on the site.

I had edited the article, which had seemed to be fairly presented, to present most of what Wayne LaPierre had to say in the original report at Haaretz.

“Wayne LaPierre identified the enemies of the NRA, and of America, as Jews – from Karl Marx to Bernie Sanders, from Hungarian-born Holocaust survivor George Soros to former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg. LaPierre singled out Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer of New York as one of the Democrats who are “liars to the core.”

“History proves it. Every time, in every nation in which this political disease rises to power, its citizens are repressed, their freedoms are destroyed, and their firearms are banned and confiscated. It is all backed in this country by the social engineering, and the billions, of people like ["philanthropists of Jewish lineage" - Hareetz description] George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Tom Steyer, and more.”

LaPierre, who has led the NRA for three decades, outlined a vision of a vast conspiracy led by “European-style Socialists” who, he said, have turned the Democrats into a “party which is now infested with saboteurs” and which has infiltrated and taken over such bodies as the FBI, the U.S. intelligence community, the Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service.

Their goal? “Absolute control, in every corner of our government, is their ultimate dream. These intellectual elites, they think they’re smarter than we are. They think they’re smarter than the rest of us. And they think they’re better than we are. They truly believe it, and you know it, the privileged and the powerful. They think they deserve to be in charge of every lever of power.

“This growing Socialist state dreams of manipulating schoolchildren to squeeze and squeeze information about their parents. They’ll be asking your kids if mommy or daddy spanked them, or what mommy and daddy feed them for dinner, they’ll want to know what TV shows you watch, what magazines or newspapers you read – and, oh yes, do mommy and daddy own a gun.

“And all that private information will be entered into that ultimate list, that cloud of data storage, that couldn’t care less about due process and constitutional freedom, and your privacy as an American citizen – and then it’s just a short hop to the systematic destruction of our most basic freedoms in this country.

“On college campuses, the Communist Manifesto is one of the most frequently assigned texts. Karl Marx is the most assigned economist.”

“Anyone who attempts to resist is smeared into submission…Yep, you know it. Ah, yes, the Art of the Smear – we do live in the Socialistic age of the Art of the Smear. It doesn’t have to be true. It just has to stick somewhere, anywhere. It’s designed to degrade, to destroy, and it’s all over the national media to serve their agenda, and is a movement that loves a smear – ‘Racist,’ ‘Mysogynist,’ ‘Sexist,’ ‘xenophobe’ and more.”

“You name a group, and they’ll find a way to turn them into victims. They keep their movement growing by finding someone to be offended by something, every minute of every day.”

Flanders said...

According to a 2018 Capital Research article, Hogg's “March for Our Lives”, had a lot of leftist sponsors and donors, many or even most of them named in the report seemed to be jews, or organizations and networks which were run or influenced by jews.

"Early funding for March for Our Lives came from a number of celebrity donors. Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, George Clooney, Oprah Winfrey, and the fashion company Gucci reportedly donated $500,000 each to the group. Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff pledged another $1 million. The ride-sharing company Lyft offered free rides to the march. Americans for Responsible Solutions, a gun control group founded by former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, also supported the march."

In yet another article from 2018, TIME, had reported about a Republican with a typically jewish name, and I would assume that he is until I've found differently, "...Ambassador Al Hoffman Jr., a Florida estate real developer and GOP donor, who served as Ambassador to Portugal under George W. Bush.", who had launched a similar group for "comprehensive gun control", called Americans for Gun Safety Now", in order to coincide with that Hogg group.

Other supporters names mentioned in the Time report were, Fred Guttenberg, Republican Congressmen Carlos Curbelo and Brian Mast, and Dennis Blair, "Director of National Intelligence...[from 2009 to 2010]". Along with Hoffman, other Republican donors and supporters named were Cathy Bailey, Mel Sembler, and Howard Leach, "all of whom, like Hoffman, served as Ambassadors under George W. Bush", and a billionaire named, Norman Braman, as well as the retired renouned golf ball hitter, Jack Nicklaus.

Boomer said...


Great posts! I hope it's all being absorbed and educating those of us who matter.
Unfortunately the great unwashed - the goy don't care!

As Savant says it will take a cataclysmic recession to see any significant change in the targeted cattle - in particular, the (coveted by all) white wimmins who worship feminazis, fags, Jews and ethnics. All these ignorant fuck-ups care about is their soap operas, chiwldraan, 'olidaaays... and the state benefits they demand (and get) to rear them and make themselves feel important...

Have you noticed how the press report these people's 'significance' by labelling them as mother (or father) or 1 or 3 or 10 etc when doing columns or reports on them? Even if the kid is a retard the parent(s) becomes 'significant' for giving birth to and owning it. The sacred institution of marriage doesn't figure or come into it.

Some of these illegitimates do 'make it' i.e they go on to become 'successful' or financially comfortable with the substance and attitude to match or compliment the state puppetry if they're favoured, but the majority will end up by the wayside, or nobodys, working and SLAVING for yids and/or other Asiatic/ethnic shit. They will also be competing with niggers on their own soil as they do already for whatever jobs they can get - all the while believing with strong conviction we're all eqwoool!

I believe all we can do is wait for the storm or else for those who feel they have nothing to lose, do something major.

Being concerned about Palestinians is pointless - they hate us as much (in some cases more) as they hate settler yids on their land and understandably so if you delve deeper into the history.

Armageddon is coming regardless - it's natures way.

John 14:6 said...

I am assuming that Trump will win the next election by default.

The democrats simply won't put up anyone capable of defeating the Trump.

It was the same with his initial election. Who in the hell voted for the wicked witch of the west? German americans I guess.

It was the same with Obama. Obama's big selling point was antiwar. Sound familiar.

Antiwar Obama vs John Mccrazy and then moneybags mormon.

It would seem that Tulsi retard is the most likely candidate to challenge Trump.

While she is antiwar she is also a converted antichrist hindu.

It is ok to be antichrist in America, just not officially. Yet. Unless you are an antichrist kike and then it's ok because nobody has the nerve to simply ask, "hey, aren't you antichrist?".

Democracy is a joke.

Print money, buy media, buy politicians, make promises to the ignorant.

Become a cult of personality through attacks from the opposition and then break all of your promises.

I was thinking that democracy could be workable if one had the ability to either vote in the affirmative or the negative.

For example, I could vote yes for either Trump or Clinton or I could vote no for both of them. Only one yes vote but as many no votes as there are candidates as long as you have not voted yes for any of them.

ianrob said...

The David Duke article says it all Frank. Extreme double standards. I notice however, that most people don't know or care, and seem to somehow trust their conservative friends of Israel politician to care for them. Surely TV would tell them if all was not well. It can get pretty frustrating, competing with years of social conditioning. Of course, those who carry out the conditioning know this, and only silence those capable of breaking though the barrier, like Robin Cook, David Kelly, and many more, I'd even go so far as to say that John Lennon was viewed as a potential threat. Indeed anyone with the potential to move large numbers in the direction that is not desired by the control system. Any of us who can see, is considered an extremist or white supremacist, and with these terms being now linked to terrorism in their never never land reality, it is becoming more authoritarian and dystopian by the day. This site thanks to Savant is one of the best outlets there is, and the standard of comment on here, is generally very good. Long may it last.

Dr. Wassel said...

Well Robert if the JEWISH oligarchs and the JEWISH Harvard Gang has not cleaned Russia out of its natural resources under Yeltsin then maybe the babushkas' wages would be a lot higher.

Dr. Wassel said...

You have nailed the Jewish hasbara modus operandi perfectly there UN. You can easily tell the graduates of hasbara school. But the goyim are starting to wise up.

Corkonian said...

Always makes me smile when I see Jews jumping up and down at 'anti-semitic stereotyping' when the 'offender' never mentioned Jews. (See Flanders above, 05.08). They really are shooting themselves in the foot. Somebody accuses a Jew of typical Jewish traits - while never saying anything about Jews and he immediately gets accused of anti-semitism. His straight-faced response can justifiable be 'who, me? I never mentioned anything about Jews. Didn't even know my opponent was Jewish'. I love it.

Chumlee's Brother said...


I'd even go so far as to say that John Lennon was viewed as a potential threat.

....He was a commie stooge.

Here is Nancy shevell, Jane Asher and Heather Mills.

Chumlee's Brother said...

In fact, Dick Gregory the one time black presidential candidate, once asked John Lennon how four young men from the slums of Liverpool could have such meteoric stardom.
Lennon replied that " the British Secret service write our music ".

SAVANT said...

@Saoirse Ban. Was that chimpout lady in Eyre Square the same one who won the best dressed lady title? Surely not?

ianrob said...

Chumlee@10:13 Did they then go on to write the music for all the individuals with their characteristic individual styles after they split up?

Glaswegian Megasnake said...

Irish Minstrels have always been in high demand. There’s also a history of British popular culture being consumed with relish in the US.

I’ve alwsys had a soft spot for Lennon. His performance in How I Won The War is underrated. Private Gripweed’s death scene...”you knew it was going to happen didn’t you?” Spooky.

Boomer said...

Paki (Kaseem) in lower vid talks about "our" shared heritage in its white middle class English accent... that is "our shared heritage" between Australia and the UK. Someone needs to kick its arse and it that he is NOT one of "our".... and keep this thing OUT!

Also note there's as many rabid ANaL/Antifa white/kike trash barking in Australia as there are in the UK. I bet half of these screeching hypocritical arseholes are ORIGINALLY from the UK an all.

Boomer said...

UK Taxpayers now PAYING to support the (((famine affected)) Chinese commie, mineral resource satellite;

but then there's this ... ?

Do you get the drift? LOL!

oh and in the meantime Bob Mugarbage is enjoying 'special treatment' in Singapore with his entourage of black offspring, goons, bitches and an array of international commie supporters many from the UK and North America

Frank Galton said...


BBC, 10 August 2019

Jeffrey Epstein 'found dead in cell'

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

UN said:

"(3) Have incontrovertible proof waved in your face that you are, indeed, a liar.
(4) Feign sudden amnesia over the whole subject. Gaze vacantly into distance -- go home.
(5) Wait one day.
(6) Make a statement that is an out-and-out lie ... the bigger, the better."

The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about... The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened. Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck. I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying - Adolf Hitler


Frank Galton

Seneca said...

There it is Frank Galton.

Another “suicide.”

Same sort of thing happened to his supposed madam’s father, Robert Maxwell. Super criminals sure know how to clean up.

Poes and Latte said...

Just look at all these stinking kaffirs in Portugal. The organiser "originates" from the UK

You'd have thought the Poras or sea kaffirs would have taken exception to this after losing Mozambique and Angola? Guess they're just as fucked up with liberals as the rest of the European world bar Poland, Croatia, Czech and Slovakia. Are the Italians and Spanish just as accommodating?

Gerry said...

Is it juncker or drunker

ianrob said...

Israel's a few hours ahead of us, he'll be in the Dog and Duck or Palestinian Bomb Victim's Arms in Tel Aviv by now, enjoying a pint.

Frank Galton said...

Cheers Boomer,

Frank Galton

luke2236 said...

@ Mr Ottify - true..but remember, Jesus told us to be armed for the days ahead. See Luke 22:36... :)

@ Mr ianrob - Either epstein was clintonned this morning or he's on his way to tel aviv - not taking bets either way personally.

Flanders said...

A Great Job you are doing, Frank Galton, as have become customary with your informative comments.

Flanders said...

"NYT Tries to Pat Trump On The Head For Pushing Gun Control, Gets Blocked by Own Readers"

"The New York Times sought to give President Trump a pat on the head for his speech on Monday demanding "red flag" gun control laws, executions for "hate crimes," and social media policing of pre-crime but decided to back off due to outrage by their own idiot liberal readers.
In actuality, Trump called for anti-Second Amendment "red flag" gun seizure laws, swift executions for so-called "hate crimes," "involuntary confinement" for people the state deems "mentally disturbed," and directed the DOJ to work with states, local law enforcement and social media sites to "detect mass shooters before they strike" -- which is exactly what our ruling oligarchs wanted him to do."
"New Jason Blum Movie 'The Hunt' Features Liberal Elites Hunting 'Deplorables'* For Sport"

[ 'Deplorables'* - A jewish/leftist/MSM Code word for patriotic Americans - especially intended as derogatory to America's White people. - Flanders]

"Did anyone see what our ratfucker-in-chief just did?" one character asks early in the screenplay for The Hunt, a Universal Pictures thriller set to open Sept. 27. Another responds: "At least The Hunt's coming up. Nothing better than going out to the Manor and slaughtering a dozen deplorables."

Here's the shorter trailer:"
"AOC Warns 'Perfectly Normal, Good People Are Capable of Aiding Racism & White Supremacy'
"Media's War on Truth Never Ends"

Flanders said...

Other versions of this video have already been removed.

"Jews brag about Muslim invasion of Europe." [4:28 Min]
Martin Luther:

"Learn from this, dear Christian, what you are doing if you permit the blind Jews to mislead you. Then the saying will truly apply, "When a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into the pit" [cf. Luke 6:39]. You cannot learn anything from them except how to misunderstand the divine commandments...
* * *
Therefore be on your guard against the Jews, knowing that wherever they have their synagogues, nothing is found but a den of devils in which sheer self­glory, conceit, lies, blasphemy, and defaming of God and men are practiced most maliciously and veheming his eyes on them."
* * *
“However, they have not acquired a perfect mastery of the art of lying; they lie so clumsily and ineptly that anyone who is just a little observant can easily detect it. But for us Christians they stand as a terrifying example of God’s wrath.“
"Jews are not white. People who try to argue otherwise are not only abrogating history and denying our people’s authentic identity, they are in fact (even if unintentionally) also practicing a form of Western imperialism, as nobody has the right to superimpose an artificial Western identity on a people with an ancient Middle Eastern-tribal identity. Nobody has the right to try and make Jews, or any other Middle Eastern people, feel they “need” to fit into the “neat” Western categories of religion and race. Nobody has the right to force Jews into identifying as white people when they are clearly not. As for Jews who identify as white without being forced to do so – please decolonize your identities and understand that the identity your claim to express is a falsification of who you really are."

Frank Galton said...

ianrob said: "The David Duke article says it all Frank. Extreme double standards. I notice however, that most people don't know or care..."

Boomer said: "Unfortunately the great unwashed - the goy don't care!"

ianrob, Boomer,

People need to keep pointing out the double standards/hypocrisy of Zionist-Jews (I've noticed a lot of people are doing this on social media etc).

Pointing out this hypocrisy to Zionist-Jews is futile; they don't care. They are pursuing an agenda.

One may call Zionist-Jews hypocrites, it runs off them like water off a raincoat. But point out this hypocrisy to the goyim and you will be astonished at how they recoil, how they suddenly shrink back: “We’ve been found out.”

As I said, people need to keep pointing out the double standards/hypocrisy of Zionist-Jews.

Boomer said: "Being concerned about Palestinians is pointless".

Boomer, I'm just pointing the double standards/hypocrisy of Zionist-Jews.

Frank Galton

Flanders said...

I had run across this information below about Epstein, but I guess he's permanently off of probation now, unless he's at Netanyahu's house in Tel Aviv, or with his Mossad handlers. The link would not load for the article image, or to the comment telling about it. No dates were given, only the year.

In 1993 Jeffrey Epstein Was Sentenced for Stealing People's Checks from the Mail.

Epstein pled guilty to stealing US Treasury checks from residential mailboxes - Palm Beach Post - [1993]. Sentenced to probation along with 2 others.

I couldn't locate the Palm Beach archives, but I did locate the FBI archive files [Scroll down past the deleted pages section:

ianrob said...

thanks Frank.

Frank Galton said...

Cheers Flanders,

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

The Kosher Nostra (2019)

Starring Robert Duvall as Yossi Cohen, head of Mossad, and Michael V. Gazzo as Jeffrey Epstein.

Did Epstein have a little party before he died?


Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

I'm not strongly into the 'false flag' theory to explain all and every violent event that occurs. I think many on our side are too quick to apply the FF label in the absence of convincing evidence.

Iron Felix said...

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states: "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".
There you are. It says nothing beyond this.
The Amendment constitutionally prevents Congress from disarming a state militia. That is about the size and scope of it. here is nothing in it that prevents a stat government, or indeed a city government, from implementing such gun control laws as seem best to them. Thus many states/municipalities have such laws, often of varying severity; some indeed are considerably stricter than those in Ireland. Curiously enough those areas with rigorous gun control laws seem often to have higher murder rates than those areas which are liberal.
The "evening herald" is an Irish national paper which some days ago had a piece by one Colette Fitzpatrick, a querulous, resentful cow with angry eyes, banging the drum for confiscatory laws; that every point she made in favour of this has no basis in reality and, if implemented would only render matters a great deal worse, seems to be of no importance to her and her ilk. Nor does she hesitate to lie, with her assertion that the USA has a murder rate far greater than any other country; it doesn't even make the top twenty, in fact.
This is a topic which requires light, not heat and ignorance, in it's discourse.
There is no necessary causative link between gun ownership and the rate of gun murder

Jay Walker/Whiteman said...

study the ninth amendment. a book has been written- The Forgotten Ninth Amendment- by Randy Barnett, whose real name is (((Randy Barnett))). The ninth should be integrated with the second, to help put the second into context.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

>>>In 1939 the U.S. Supreme Court considered the matter in United States v. Miller. 307 U.S. 174. The Court adopted a collective rights approach in this case, determining that Congress could regulate a sawed-off shotgun that had moved in interstate commerce under the National Firearms Act of 1934 because the evidence did not suggest that the shotgun "has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated milita . . . ." The Court then explained that the Framers included the Second Amendment to ensure the effectiveness of the military.

This precedent stood for nearly 70 years when in 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court revisited the issue in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller (07-290). The plaintiff in Heller challenged the constitutionality of the Washington D.C. handgun ban, a statute that had stood for 32 years. Many considered the statute the most stringent in the nation. In a 5-4 decision, the Court, meticulously detailing the history and tradition of the Second Amendment at the time of the Constitutional Convention, proclaimed that the Second Amendment established an individual right for U.S. citizens to possess firearms and struck down the D.C. handgun ban as violative of that right. The majority carved out Miller as an exception to the general rule that Americans may possess firearms, claiming that law-abiding citizens cannot use sawed-off shotguns for any law-abiding purpose. Similarly, the Court in its dicta found regulations of similar weaponry that cannot be used for law-abiding purposes as laws that would not implicate the Second Amendment. Further, the Court suggested that the United States Constitution would not disallow regulations prohibiting criminals and the mentally ill from firearm possession.<<<

Unknown said...

As sure as night follows day Savant.