Bad strategy?

"Jews always tell you about what was done to them. They never tell you why". This old Russian proverb came to mind as I read about the recent San Diego t Chabad Lubovich synagogue shooting. As did another aphorism which goes along the lines of 'you might get away with lying to others but not with lying to yourself'.  John Earnest in his manifesto said the attack was driven by the pivotal role Jews have played in the ongoing destruction of the White race. He cited their promotion of race-mixing, mass immigration to White lands, feminism, Cultural Marxism, weaponising the courts against Whites, denigrating White history and culture and family-destructive sexual degeneracy in media and academia. Each and every one of these charges is demonstrably true. By which I mean an honest and impartial analysis of the evidence would demonstrate their truth.

Earnest added "But the Jew—with his genocidal instincts—is insistent on poking the bear until it tears his head off. The Jew has forced our hand, and our response is completely justified." You'd imagine (well you wouldn't really) that this would prompt the target people to assess and seek to counter these potentially fatal charges in detail, if only to preempt future attacks. But no, not in the slightest. Their publication has elicited the usual knee-jerk response of a 'mentally-disturbed' attacker spewing 'hate-filled discredited and unfounded anti-Semitic conspiracy theories'. I'm sure Sun Tsu (the master of repackaging the blindingly obvious as profound insight) would take a dim view of such a strategy, seeing within it the seeds of its won destruction.

In addition the staggeringly successful Jewish campaign to control The Narrative and filter out criticism of Jews might turn out to be a double-edged sword. Because by occluding criticism you run the risk of losing touch with what's really happening on the ground and encouraging resentment to build up like with a pressure cooker. For instance Nicolae Ceaușescu believed the people loved him right up to the time they rose up and executed him. Indeed we live in interesting times

PS: Just in case you're worried about the attack victims (!) here's what Chabad Lubovich profess.

Sri Lanka and Christchurch: Contrast and compare the reactions

Well we got over that pretty quickly, didn't we? I'm referring to the slaughter of 300 Christians in Sri Lanka at Easter. A nine-day wonder. Well actually a two-day wonder would be more like it as coverage had pretty much disappeared by mid-week. Well at least it got some exposure, unlike the slaughter of 150 Christians by Muslims a few months back in Nigeria. Contrast that reaction to that of the Christchurch mosque killings in which 'only' 50 were killed. They're still on about that. Did you see Sajid Javid or Sadiq take to wearing a cross? In fact did you hear any condemnation from these two 'Britons'? Probably too busy arranging for the return of their 400 ISIS head-choppers from Syria.  I wonder will Prince William, who's flown all the way to Christchurch to pay his respects, stop off in Sri Lanka on his way home?

And what gives with the 'Easter worshippers' meme? Are they some strange cultists who gather at sunrise and wait for giant chocolate eggs to burst forth from the soil, or stones to spontaneously roll away from caves?  Given that this neologism has been used by several politicians (including Hillary, Obummer, mad-eyed Adam Schiff and Pocahontas Warren) as well as many in the media we must assume that it was coined centrally by Those Who Define The Narrative. "I’m praying for everyone affected by today’s horrific attacks on Easter worshippers and travelers in Sri Lanka” tweeted Clinton. No, this witch preys. She does not pray. Unless it's to her master Lucifer. Contrast this with what she has said about Christchurch: 'My heart breaks for New Zealand & the global Muslim community. We must continue to fight the perpetuation and normalization of Islamophobia and racism in all its forms. White supremacist terrorists must be condemned by leaders everywhere. Their murderous hatred must be stopped'.  Some difference, isn't there? Note how she didn't refer to the Christchurch victims as paedophile worshippers.

And here's another strange thing. There were two synagogues in Columbo but neither was attacked by the ISIS misunderstanders of Islam. And ISIS has yet to attack Israel. You'd imagine if they were looking to avenge Muslim casualties their primary targets would be Jews. If we didn't know better we might think that the tribe has been helping ISIS.

Architecture as virus

If you try to point out to normies how Whites are being programmed by the media, colleges etc. and you get a response along the lines of 'are you seriously suggesting that all of those editors, teachers, courts, ad agency executives etc. are waiting for their daily instructions from some secretive cabal of masterminds?'

It's a seductive enough argument and you need to be prepared with the answer. The one I use is that of 'The Architecture'. By this I mean the destructive edifice erected by Cultural Marxist/Jewish interests which acts as a self-perpetuating virus to destroy the White host. The components of The Architecture include feminism, multiculturalism, racial and other 'equality' theories, the systematic undermining of nationalism, Christianity and most other traditional Western institutions.

It's perfectly analogous to a parasitic virus in that it feeds on and damages the host (sometimes fatally) yet can still perpetuate and propagate itself automatically as part of its life-cycle. The long march through the institutions has been ongoing for a very long time, but the Frankfurt School made it manifest. By infecting every Western institution, especially academia and media (and thereby politics and law) it incubated its own genetically modified larvae. These then dispersed into the wider community where, pre-programmed, they automatically infect society at large.

Therefore there's no need for a secret cabal to issue ongoing instructions, at least to the infected drones who will automatically do their work, blind to the origins of their world view.

Bye bye Britain

The New French mourn the loss of a cultural icon

With a bang or a whimper?

How much more can White Americans take? How much more will they take? Will they go down with a bang or a whimper? The proverbial visitor from Mars would surely scratch his green head and ask himself how the most powerful race in history in the most powerful country in history could allow itself be invaded, denigrated and ultimately replaced by primitive and hostile outsiders without  firing a shot in defence of their heritage.

Right now in the House Of Representatives (sic) a rabble of blacks, browns, Jews and Muslims denounce the 'threat' of White nationalism. This in a country that was 90% White fifty years ago. The mob is lead by (((Jerry Nadler))) who looks like the NKVD interrogator straight from central casting and who's an enthusiastic supporter of Jewish nationalism as represented by Israel. On the sidelines Ilhan Omar purses her purple lips and also denounces 'White nationalism'. This from a creature who grew up in a Somali dystopia, but was allowed move to America (where she married her brother) and who now 'represents' Americans in the House. Expect many many more of her ilk as the demographic mudslide rolls on. Meanwhile black-on-White the assaults grow in number and malevolence by the day. As does the brazenness. Here we see a Nigerian who looks like he just dropped out of a coconut tree given a platform by CBS to justify attacks up to and including physical assault on 'Nazis' (i.e. Whites). 

It makes my blood boil to witness these developments and I have no connection to America. How must Heritage Americans feel? What will they do? What can they do? For a start I don't buy the CW 2 scenario. Ain't gonna happen. Already street-by-street vast swathes of their towns and cities have succumbed to the toxic black/brown sludge. And Whites retreat. Again and again. How long can this go on? Well, long enough for it to become irreversible once they decline to minority status.

Before that happens the real nature of multiculturalism will of course have become clear. But this is where a mind control programme, carefully-constructed to deter effective opposition, comes into effect. The War For Your Mind. Because as Orwell foresaw, when you constrain what can be said you eventually constrain what can be thought. Fyodor Dostoyevsky wrote “Above all, don’t lie to yourself. The man who lies to himself and listens to his own lie comes to a point that he cannot distinguish the truth within him, or around him, and so loses all respect for himself and for others." I became aware of this in the old Communist countries, especially Roumania. The lies and cognitive dissonance were so outrageous it seemed to me the authorities were not trying to convince but to humiliate, to break the people's spirit and will to resist. Being forced to acquiesce to the lies and to remain silent - or even worse to regurgitate them - rots people's moral fibre, rendering them easily controllable and malleable.

As (((Tim Wise))) said 'tick, tock, tick, tock, your time is ebbing away White man'

"This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper."
T S Elliot

What's the problem with Ukrainians?

It's said that people get the Government they deserve. This could be true of Ukrainians, who have elected one corrupt incompetent gang of rogues after another into the highest offices of the land. Or as a local sitcom asked 'why are all the honest people fools and all the clever ones crooks?', going on to ponder 'what kind of people are we that we keep voting mother-fucking liars knowing full well that they're all crooks?. Well they might ask because by any reasonable standard Ukraine is now a failed state. I've been there several times and you just see and sense it. Poor, everything badly organised, listless and apathetic people, all-pervasive corruption.

It's the only country of the former Soviet Communist block that has actually regressed economically since the USSR's collapse in 1991. Yet at that time it seemed poised to be a success story. In fact its people saw themselves as analogous to the Catalans, believing they were contributing more to the centralised USSR Government than they were getting back and independence would mean improved living standards. After all they had some of the world's the richest soil (black gold), iron, coal, its own motor, truck and aircraft manufacturing industries. So what went wrong?

“Ukraine, which parted from Russia in 1991, has never achieved a true independent state. Just like in Russia, or even 80 years earlier in the Weimar Republic, a tribe of vultures descended upon the body of the nation.” The Russian playbook again. Backed by 'international financiers' Jewish oligarchs seized ownership of the state's richest assets. And they did so at a tiny fraction of their real value. The oligarchs then played a largely predatory role, dismantling much of the production for scrap metal, and shipping their profits offshore as opposed to re-investing. 

And of course they own the media as well. Professor Vasyl Yaremenko, director of the Institute of Culturological and Ethnopolitical research at Kiev State University, released an article in 2003 entitled Jews In Ukraine Today: Reality Without Myths which stated "Ukrainians need to know that the mass media is completely in the hands of Jews, and everything that we watch or read is the product of Jewish ideology…". Their control has become even stronger since then. And of course Ukraine's gold, like that of every country 'liberated' by the West, has duly disappeared.

So how have the 99.3% of Ukrainians who are not Jews responded to this? Well by voting Jews into power time and again. Sometimes you'd wonder where they get them all. Professor Yaremenko points out that of the 400+ members of the Ukrainian Parliament, 136 (possibly 158) are Jews. In the few short years since 'independence' there have been Ministers, Prime Ministers and even a President from this minuscule minority. And now they're set to elect another one as their latest President.

Why in God's name would Ukrainians do this? It's not as if their relationship with Jews has been untroubled. Quite the contrary. Less than a century ago up to six million (!!) of them were driven to starvation by the campaign of (((Lazar Kaganovich))) to destroy the kulaks. Ukrainians know this. They also know that the largely Jewish Soviet secret police murdered unimaginable numbers of  their intellectuals, clergymen, academics and successful businessmen. Kill The Best Of The Gentiles ?

So could it be that today's Ukrainians, deprived of the genetic endowment of the intellectual elites exterminated in the thirties, have become dysgenically mutilated unthinking serfs, hewers of wood and drawers of water, easily manipulated by their (((overlords)))?  After all, 'why are all the honest people fools and all the clever ones crooks?' in that country?

An important question for all of us

It's now clear to everyone that globalism has declared open war on the right. Censorship has reached levels that quite literally match those of the Soviet Union. And this is understandable as their house-of-cards fantasy is certain to collapse in the face of open debate. As Chateau Heartiste put it in his inimitable way 'This is happening in China, but the censorship factories are fully operational in the land of the free and home of the brave. Hunched-back teams of foreign nerd-mercs and spiteful soylibs at all the Big Tech Bathhouses — Goolag, Fapple, Facecock, Amazog, Gaypal etc — censor reviews and comments, shadowban and delete accounts, tweak algorithms to hide opposing views, deplatform and demonetize heretics, ban users, and stop the payments of thought criminals. The term “corporate conspiracy” doesn’t quite capture the breadth of malice these speech police oligarchs have toward free-thinking Americans who won’t parrot Globohomo orthodoxy.' 

But this project has what appear to me to be some strange anomalies. As we know most of the 'extreme' right-wing/White nationalist voices have been marginalised or shut down. Yet some remain. For instance David Duke (whose name cannot be mentioned in polite circles without referring to him as 'former KKK leader and notorious Holocaust-denier', and who shines a brilliant searchlight on Jewish shenanigans) remains on Jootube, albeit in restricted form, his web site remains operational, he's still on Twitter and Faceborg while his books can be bought on Amazon even after their latest digital book-burning.

Yet Jared Taylor and American Renaissance have been hit with a full high-velocity salvo, banished from all the platforms David still maintains, Jared's books banned on Amazon and he's now prohibited from travelling in the Schengen area. Just about every weapon in the globohomo armoury has been deployed against him and his organisation. Yet they are at the extreme 'respectable' end of the White advocacy spectrum. Never an impolite word, AR staff refer to one another as 'Mister', all their material is from unimpeachable sources, even with hostile interviewers Jared is unfailingly polite and respectful. And, most important of all the JQ is avoided like a grenade with the pin out. Which of course it is. Even wholly Jewish organisations such as the ADL and $PLC are coyly referred to as 'liberal' or 'progressive'.

Yet none of it works. They have been given the full treatment.....treatment much more aggressive than that inflicted on David Duke. Why should this be? (And PULEEZE! Don't anyone start with this 'DD's controlled opposition' nonsense). Could it be that the very 'reasonableness' of JT and Amren are perceived by our globohomo overlords as more insidious and threatening to them than the direct in-your-face approach of DD? If not, what other explanation is there? If it yes we should learn the lessons as we take our fight forward.

Amazonian Indian, Romanian dwarf and Nigerian jail-bird versus the British people

It's by now been nearly three years since the British people voted decisively to leave the EUSSR. The intervening time has seen a determined and ongoing campaign to thwart this clearly-expressed decision.  The vote largely entailed real British people supporting Brexit and a rancid stew of minorities and cosmopolitan blow-ins voting Remain. Little wonder that those working subsequently to thwart the will of the British people come from that cohort.

No sooner had the votes been counted than Amazonian Indian Gina Miller (born Guyana) was out of the traps to launch a high-profile challenge to the legality of the result. Since then she has been harassing and harrying Brexit voters non-stop. I suppose they should be grateful that she hasn't attacked them with curare-tipped darts from her blowpipe.

Poisoned dwarf John Bercow (know to his parents as John Berkowitz), the scion of a family of Romanian Jews, has used, or more accurately abused, his position as Speaker of the House Of Commons to thwart proposed  Brexit legislation in a way that has scandalised even arch-Remainers like the Guardian and the BBC.  'He’s already reached back to the 1600s in his apparent determination to Stop Brexit. And he continues to tear up the rule book and override precedent.' His unpopularity is such it's said that even his friends hate him.

Much has been made of his migration - more of a somersault really - from the political right to the left. He once wanted to have Nelson Mandela hanged - but now a defection to Labour is rumoured. In fact there's nothing surprising about this, which closely mirrors that of the "American" neocons who have migrated in the opposite direction. All have been driven by the perennial question 'what's best for the Jews?'. And as rootless cosmopolitans Jews have been overwhelmingly anti-Brexit.

And finally we come to the Nigerian jail-bird MP. This report from Metro: (WARNING: Report contains hideous close-up images of this monster).

Former Labour MP Fiona Onasanya is facing backlash after she voted against no-deal Brexit which passed by a majority of one yesterday. Brexiteer have slammed Parliament for allowing the MP for Peterborough, who was sentenced to three months in jail for lying to avoid a speeding fine, to vote. Onasanya was 

released with an ankle bracelet in February and her ability to participate in Parliamentary business depends on the terms of her curfew. Brexit supporter Meirion John Thomas said: ‘Last night, tag-wearing convicted criminal Fiona Onasanya helped a bill designed to frustrate the will of 17.4 million people to pass through the Commons by just a single vote. ‘British politics truly is a complete and utter cesspit.’ Martin Daubney said: ‘Last night, the former jailbird, wearing an ankle tag, voted against a No Deal Brexit, which lost by one vote. Her vote.’ He added: ‘A criminal just stopped Brexit.’

So there you have it. The British people vote. A motley crew of foreigners dispenses. Incidentally the next Conservative Leadership contest is likely to be between a Jew and a Pakistani Muslim. Just as was the last Mayoral vote for the capital city of what used to be the British Empire.

Learning from Moygashel

Moygashel is a small village in Co. Tyrone Northern Ireland.  Like most places on this island its people take a dim view of having Third World detritus dumped on them. But unlike most places on this island the locals have been open and unapologetic about their resistance. As these images underline. The opposition has extended to the point of  helpfully pointing out to landlords that 'leasing to foreign nationals will not be tolerated'.  Given that particular area of Norn Iron I'm sure would-be lessors quickly got the message.

So what's not to love? 

Before considering that let us reflect on the Miami Showband massacre. Back in 1975, at the height of The Troubles, the eponymous showband was travelling back to Dublin after a gig in Ulster. They were stopped at a road block by rogue elements of the Ulster Defence Regiment who planned to place a powerful time bomb in the group's van and set it to explode as they reached Dublin. Unfortunately for them the bomb went off as they planted it, killing the two bombers. At which point the remaining gang members opened fire on the band killing all but the two who were blown by the explosion into wooded land beside the road.

What's this got to do with Moygashel and its resistance to the foreign invasion? Well you see Wesley Sommerville, one of the bombers who got blown up, was from that village. That being so you'd imagine that the villagers would disown him and be embarrassed by any mention of his name. But far from it. Wesley is celebrated there as a hero, a 'fallen volunteer'. They even have a permanent monument erected to him! (That's Wes on the right below).

This reaction is explained by the fact that Moygashel is virtually 100% a Protestant / Loyalist village. And to its inhabitants the horror of seeing blacks or Muslims moving in would be exceeded only by the arrival of their fellow countrymen of the Catholic / Fenian persuasion from down the road. Which illustrates a very serious fault line running through any attempt at White unity in Europe. Because attempts to repel the Third World invasion by appealing to ethnic and nationalist traditions carry within them the seeds of intra-White conflagration. As the upstanding citizens of Moygashel show us. All over Europe similar passions slumber, their ashes waiting to be ignited by some as yet undetermined spark. But we need those passions because facts and logic will not in themselves counter the invasion. The White Soul must first be stirred.

So there's our dilemma. What can we learn from Moygashel?

Load, aim, shoot self in foot

The second previous post centred around the concept of Jewish intelligence, with many readers denying any particular Jewish capabilities in that sphere. Their case is given substance when you consider the way Jews have, in my opinion, walked into aligning themselves with some of today's most unpopular, even reviled, people and causes.

Banksters: Did you ever hear anyone speak fondly of these parasites? The sensible appraoch would be to put as much distance as possible between them and you. At least for public consumption. But Jews react with outrage at the word. When Trump said “Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors” The Forward and many others disinterred Hitler and the Holocau$t™ and gave them another good airing. Similar reaction to anti-Zionism which Jews resolutely refuse to differentiate from anti-Semitism despite the near-pariah status of Israel today. 'Anti-Zionism is a dangerous form of anti-Semitism' (Times Of Israel) and in vain does poor old Jeremy Corbyn seek to elucidate the distinction. He (and Labour overall) has an 'anti-Semitism problem'.

The disastrous implications of globalism are dawning on rapidly growing numbers of goyim, day by day. Jews would be well advised to discreetly look the other way but instead vigorously equate anti-globalism with anti-Semitism. According to The Times Of Israel 'The connection between globalists and Jews is, in part, the old anti-Semitic smear that Jews are not truly loyal citizens of any nation. Use of globalist as a negative term can be a dog whistle for the far right: those who recognize its roots in Hitler’s philosophy recognize that it’s an encoded way of denigrating Jews.' And finally there's Soros, the most hated person on the planet, of whom it could be said that even his friends hate him. Even though I have never seen a mainstream politician or media outlet highlight his Jewishness Jews themselves rush in to fill the void. 'Dripping with poison of antisemitism: the demonization of George Soros' blared a headline in the Guardian, while the ADL warns ominously of  'The Anti-Semitism Lurking Behind George Soros Conspiracy Theories'. And recently they've decreed Cultural Marxism, whose malevolent impact is becoming increasingly clear to even the man-in-the-street to be an 'anti-Semitic slur'.

Surely Jews are shooting themselves in the foot here, in the process making themselves hostages to fortune. Why would they do that? My own belief is that it arises from a toxic and conflicted combination of paranoia and arrogance. Jewish paranoia is a given, they feel everyone is out to get them, which in turn leads to perceiving the innocuous as the threatening. The arrogance derives from the unprecedented levels of power they currently enjoy and which they ruthlessly deploy to stifle any criticism or restlessness among the goyim.  Were paranoia to dominate they'd keep their heads down and distance themselves from their unpopular Tribesmen. When power dominates they'll use it to stamp out any perceived recrudescence of anti-Semitism.

Power dominates these days. And I think it will work out badly for them.