Leo's lovin' it.

Every so often I like to add a bit of class to this blog.  Hence the occasional rhetorical flourish and pithy axioms in Latin or French. But today I'm degenerating to the level of a Limerick bar-room....but all in a good cause.

Those of you living in the Emerald Isle will by now know that Leo Varadkar (Pakistani father....vibrant Ireland, you know) our Minister for Health, has 'come out' as gay. Cue a tsunami of phone-ins, texts, emails, tweets, all of which seemed to revolve around two words: 'Courageous' and 'admiration'.

Now why is it that every homo who comes out is considered 'courageous' when the disclosure is met with a chorus of acclamation?  Were it fifty years ago or more I'd agree.  But today it's a much-admired lifestyle choice. It would take more courage to keep it under cover actually.

Then what exactly is there to admire?  It's not as if he'd discovered the cure for cancer or some such. Here I come to the rudey Limerick bar bit. What's to admire about a man who takes it up the ass from other men, or administers oral sex to other men? Even leaving all other considerations aside it's no more admirable than say young Darren giving his girlfriend one in the back seat of his Skoda.

But we all know what's going on here. don't we, children? These people here, the Apostles of Degradation, will explain it all.

It's the Auschwitz® Show!

Wow, what a show it's been.  Brand Auschwitz in all its gory glory. The great and the good dragged from all over the world to witness the scene of the greatest crime in  the history of humanity. Or so we're lead to believe.

I'd just love if all the orgiastic ones would take some time out from the TV appearances and reparations processing to address these questions. But I'm not holding my breath.

() Why would the Germans utilise costly and scarce fuel, transportation and military resources to bring millions of Jews to Auschwitz from all over Europe only to kill them?  Why not do it in the nearest disused quarry?

() Why did the resident Red Cross unit at Auschwitz fail to notice that little matter of millions being exterminated under their noses?

() Why was there a special court in the camp to try guards accused of ill-treatment of prisoners?

() Why were no "gas chamber" extractor fans visible on the photos taken by Allied planes towards the end of the war?  The chambers could not have been used for cyanide-based gassing (Zyklon B) in their absence.

() Even with the modest cost-effective modern technology it takes about three hours to fully cremate a human body. This would result in the Auschwitz furnaces cremating about 40,000 corpses during its span of operation, assuming a 24x7x365 operation (which isn't technically possible anyway). Now factor in deaths from natural causes and the fact that at least 50% of deaths in the camp were of non-Jews and you get a realistic figure of about 15,000 Jews incinerated there.

() Why did American gas chamber specialist Fred Leuchter find no evidence of lethal-level cyanide residue in the "gas chamber" walls?

() Why kill prisoners when there was there a constant stream of documents from SS HQ demanding higher output from the camp?

() Why did Allied spies in the camp - acknowledged as such after the war - not highlight the supposed mass killings?

() Why did Eisenhower, Churchill and De Gaulle not mention the Auschwitz 'death camp' in their war memoirs?

The answer to the above questions can be found, at least in part, in this post.

Gender equality and cognitive dissonance

So that ugly dyke Billie Jean King is at it again about That Match.  You know, the one that showed women to be the tennis equals of men.  'It wasn't about the money' s/he brayed, 'it was about equality'.  So what exactly did this match prove?  In case you don't know, back in 1973 BJK beat former World No. 1 Bobby Riggs. At the time King was at the top of the women's game while Riggs was a small, bespectacled, bow-legged 55 year-old bon vivant and notorious gambler.  And this apparently proves men and women are tennis equals.

Reminds me of the legendary Liverpool Manager Bill Shankly.  He was asked whether budding star Tony Currie was as good as Tom Finney. 'Oh aye, he's every bit as good.  But you must remember, Tom Finney is 59 years old'.  You'll never hear from the grrrrls about Riggs's match a few months previously against the giant Margaret Court, then the prevailing Women's World No.1. Bobby won that with embarrassing ease. No, that's been erased from the record. Then a few years back we had the Williams brothers sisters both blown away by a German player with a world men's ranking of about 200.

The cognitive dissonance relating to gender has to be worse than any other kind. Ok, it's a bit of a strain believing race to be a social construct when looking at Cameron Diaz and Whoopi Goldberg side by side. But trying to deny the fundamental differences between genders borders on the psychotic, utterly delusional. First there's the little matter of being able to give birth. I've never come across a man yet who managed it. (Thought: what about the First Ho'?  Must check that out)..

Fred Reed has a column at the moment about equality in the US Marines.  Must get an equal number of grrrrrls into the ranks it seems. Problem is they can't cut the tests. A few examples:

"Women's aerobic capacity is significantly lower, meaning they cannot carry as much as far as fast as men, and they are more susceptible to fatigue.

"In terms of physical capability, the upper five percent of women are at the level of the male median.

"The average 20-to-30 year-old woman has the same aerobic capacity as a 50 year-old man."

"Only 21 women out of the initial 623 (3.4%) achieved a score equal to the male mean score of 260.

"Adopting a male standard of fitness at West Point would mean 70 percent of the women studied would be separated as failures at the end of their junior year, only three percent would be eligible for the Recondo badge, and not one would receive the Army Physical Fitness badge…."

Yet they want equality.  And quotas to enforce it. Which probably means they'll keep lowering the standards until the quotas are achieved. Can you imagine the fighting force that will emerge from that?

How in God's name have we descended into such a frothing cauldron of madness?  How did the proponents of such insanity not be immediately strapped into straitjackets and incarcerated in high-security padded cells? Instead of this we've actually implemented their madness, making it national policy in fact, and in the process fundamentally and possibly irrevocably destroying many of our basic societal institutions.

Aha!  But that's really what all this is about, is it not?  Certainly not all the braying hairy-assed monsters like Rosie O'Donnell proclaiming this bogus equality have that as their agenda. But the progenitors, people like these, most certainly have.

See this post also.

The horror! The horror!

The Anti-Defamation League, that bastion of fair-minded and judicious opinion has just published its latest Global 100 Index of Anti-Semitism.  Apparently (roll of drums) it's getting worse. A lot worse, which incidentally is good news for the ADL as every surge in anti-Semitism generates a concomitant surge in donations to them.  But I'm absolutely sure there's no connection whatsoever.

With trembling hand I flicked down through the ADL's criteria, fearfully expecting that the world wants to see Jews gassed by the million or at a minimum be forced to wear the yellow star.  Instead, this is what I got.

Anti-Semites are people who think that:

1) Jews are more loyal to Israel than to the countries they live in 

2) Jews have too much power in the business world. 

3) Jews have too much power in international financial markets. 

4) Jews don’t care about what happens to anyone but their own kind.

5) Jews have too much control over global affairs.

6) People hate Jews because of the way Jews behave.

7) Jews think they are better than other people.

8) Jews have too much control over the United States government.

9) Jews have too much control over the global media.

10) Jews still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust.

11) Jews are responsible for most of the world’s wars.

Well dang me, if that's what qualifies you then colour me an anti-Semite. This is like saying you're a racist if you think there are too many blacks in the NBA, or anti-Irish if you say we drink too much or anti-Chinese if you say they have slitty eyes. Because the eleven propositions are all true to a greater or lesser degree. 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 and 10 being so obvious that anyone responding in the negative clearly doesn't get out much.

They're Hate Facts.

Goes back to a question I raised in this post.  Do Jews really believe this shite? Is it just a cynical ploy to garner funds and preempt negative comment from the goyim - which I could understand - or is their sense of proportion so warped that they actually subscribe to this insanity? If this is so I repeat  - it's literally and in the clinical sense psychotic.

The freedom-loving West

Presumably you've all see this photograph. You know, the one where a select group of brave Western politicians lead a one million-strong march of freedom-loving democrats through the streets of Paris. Of course we now know that this was just - yet another - photo op facilitated by the supine mainstream media. Levels of distrust and cynicism are now so bad you could be forgiven for thinking that many of the leaders may have attended only in the digital sense

And just like the editors at Charlie Hebdo the countries those leaders represent have the same approach to free speech.  All for it as long as it adheres to our doctrines. I know it's like shooting fish in a barrel but consider the following examples from the freedom-loving West.

Canada seizes Ernst Zundel from the USA, jails him and then extradites him to Germany where he's jailed again for the same offence. And for good measure they threw his lawyer Sylvia Stoltz in jail as well.  Their offence?  Disagreeing with some aspects of the way the Holocau$t story was presented. Canada also heavily fined Christian pastors who quoted Biblical verses against homosexuality.

Australian authorities jailed Brendan O'Connell for three years for a video he made which was critical of Israeli actions against Palestinians and currently two Christians are under prosecution for articles critical of the Religion Of Peace.  Note that neither O'Connell nor the Christians had promoted violence, let alone engaged in it. Sanctioned for exercising their imagined right to free speech.

Meanwhile Sweden increasingly resembles the post-Stalin Soviet Union. You speak your mind at your peril, anything running contrary to the Prescribed Narrative costing you your job or worse. For instance artist Dan Park incurred a six month prison sentence as he had 'depicted gypsies in a racist way'. Meanwhile in Britain Simon Shepherd has been jailed no fewer than four times.  To assess his offence let's go to the ultra politically correct Wiki: 'His main website contains many articles about women, the multiracial society and Jews, stating that these have negative effects on Western society and White males in particular'.  Meanwhile student Liam Stacey was jailed for unsympathetic tweets after a black footballer got a heart attack.

Still think my analogy to the Soviet Union is over-egged?

Look, I could keep reeling out more examples for another hundred pages. But suffice to say that under 'hate crime' legislation throughout the West you can and will face jail time for merely upsetting the delicate feelings of some 'protected' group.  Crucially the only criterion is whether the snowflake in question has been offended. Which means that the 'offender' must be able to second-guess what will offend the 'offendee'.  How crazy is that? Well actually it's not crazy at all because the whole purpose is to close down non-conformist views.  And truth is no defence. At the end of the Zundel trial in Germany, having effectively proven their case, the judge told the defence team that - in effect - the truth didn't matter as it was against German law to deny any aspect of of the Holocau$t.

And one last thing: Access.  All of us on this site know that it's virtually impossible to get anything onto the MSM that runs contrary to the Prescribed Narrative. Even a letter to the editor. Or to get a book published or a film produced. Just like in the USSR. Or Saudi Arabia.  You know, the people who 'hate us for our freedoms'.

But there is one big difference between the West and countries like the USSR and Saudi Arabia. They know (or knew) that there was/is no freedom of expression, that the media are  utterly biased and truth is revealed only by filtering and reconfiguring the propaganda dished out to you. But in the West the general public has widely bought into the fantasy of a free press and thus are a lot more vulnerable to manipulation.

Happily there are strong indications of this pathology's weakening. Thank you Internet. So may I suggest we all use everything at our disposal in using this medium to awaken the sleeping orcs before we've been bred  out of existence.

An unusual endorsement

The more I research the subject the clearer it becomes that sinister 'Western' forces were intent on fomenting a war with Hitler's Germany. It also becomes clearer that those forces were personified by  international central banking interests, which is another way of saying the Rothschilds. The Reichsbank, despite its name, was actually a privately-owned central bank (like almost all the other CBs) and it vigorously opposed the economic program with which Hitler transformed Germany.

This program resulted, within a couple of years, in the country having a solid, stable currency, no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries were still out of work and living on welfare. Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, although it was denied foreign credit and was faced with an economic boycott abroad. It did this by using a barter system: equipment and commodities were exchanged directly with other countries, circumventing the international banks. This system of direct exchange occurred without debt and without trade deficits.  

Here's what Richard Tedor (in Hitler's Revolution) said about it.

"Despite objections from Schmidt, president of the Reich’s Bank, Hitler withdrew Germany’s money system from the gold standard…. Hitler substituted a direct barter system in foreign dealings. German currency became defined units of human productivity.

In January 1938, the Soviet diplomat Kristyan Rakovsky commented on the German money system. Rakovsky had held posts in London and in Paris and was acquainted with Wall Street financiers. He explained, “Hitler, this uneducated ordinary man, has out of natural intuition and even despite the opposition of the technician Schacht, created an especially dangerous economic system. An illiterate in every theory of economics driven only by necessity, he has cut out international as well as private high finance. Hitler possesses almost no gold, and so he can’t endeavor to make it a basis for currency. Since the only available collateral for his money is the technical aptitude and great industriousness of the German people, technology and labor became his ‘gold’…. As you know, like magic it’s eliminated all the unemployment for more than six million skilled employees and laborers. “

Germany’s withdrawal from the gold-based, internationally linked monetary system in favor of a medium of exchange founded on domestic productivity corresponded to Hitler’s belief in maintaining the sovereignty of nations. This was an unwelcome development in London, Paris and New York, where cosmopolitan investment and banking institutions profited from loaning money to foreign countries. Germany no longer had to borrow in order to trade on the world market. Foreign demand for German goods correspondingly created more jobs within the Reich.

Rakovsky was wrong in attributing the genesis of the plan to the 'economically illiterate' Hitler rather than to Gottfried Feder but still it's some testament, is it not?

Charlie Hebdo voice of tolerance? Not really

Developing on the previous post I decided to dig a bit into the now world-famous Charlie Ebdo. You know, 'we are all Charlie Ebdo'....that one. You see my suspicions were aroused by the fact that its scurrilous attacks on religion were largely focused on Christianity and more recently the Religion Of Peace. And here let me acknowledge that their printing of the cartoons of the "Prophet" was indeed a brave act.

But still, how committed to free speech were they? Well, as it turns out they were - like most "liberal" publications, passionately committed to free speech. Provided it adhered to their doctrines.  In other words they were not, in fact committed to free speech in any meaningful sense. This is from a Daily Telegraph report five years ago.

"Maurice Sinet, 80, who works under the pen name Sine, faces charges of "inciting racial hatred" for a column he wrote last July in the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo. The piece sparked a summer slanging match among the Parisian intelligentsia and ended in his dismissal from the magazine. 

"L'affaire Sine" followed the engagement of Mr Sarkozy, 22, to Jessica Sebaoun-Darty, the Jewish heiress of an electronic goods chain.  Charlie Hebdo's editor, Philippe Val, asked Sinet to apologise but he refused, exclaiming: "I'd rather cut my balls off." Mr Val's decision to fire Sine was backed by a group of eminent intellectuals, including the philosopher Bernard-Henry Lévy."

So there you have it. The freedom-loving editors fired him and the 'Parisian Intelligentsia' helped bring him before the courts on charges of anti-Semitism.  And who might those 'Parisian Intelligentsia' be? Well you'll note that prominent among those mentioned by the DT is the execrable Bernard-Henry Levy to whom I referred in the previous post.

And on September 12 1996 Liberation reported that three stalwarts of the Charlie Hebdo had campaigned to collect more than 170,000 signatures for a petition calling for a ban on the National Front.  They did this in the name of the 'Rights of Man'. 

So much for CH being paragons of free speech.

Frankenstein's Monster turns on its creator

Occasionally you see something that's so mind-blowing, so bizarre, so inherently counter-intuitive that you're left dazed, stupefied, holding your head in your hands, immobilised with bewilderment.  I remember the last time it happened to me.  I had just heard that one Nigerian family in my town were neither in jail nor on social welfare. I can tell you I wasn't right for a week.

And now it's happened again. Over on Politico I encountered this headline: "France's Multiculturalist Agenda Makes Jews Pack Their Bags".  How could you better that?  I mean Jews were the ones who developed and enforced 'France's Fucking Multicultural Agenda', harassing and demonising anyone who opposed it.

First the so-called intellectuals, most notably that boring and corrupt plagiarist Bernard-Henri Levy. He and his colleagues have been standard bearers for multiculturalism and denigrators of everything European and Christian. They provided the ammunition for the Socialist Party (the upper echelons of which have been a Jewish fiefdom going back to Leon Blum and continuing right up to Dominique Strauss Kahn) to implement a whole raft of nation-wrecking multicultural legislation.  They have provided (bogus) intellectual justification for internationalism, anti-nationalism, mass immigration from Africa, 'hate' legislation and every form of anti-family sexual depravity. They worked endlessly to demonise and marginalise the National Front and indeed anyone who opposed their multicultural agenda.

Numerous Jewish or crypto-Jewish 'charities' maintained the same agenda.  The best known is probably 'SOS Racisme'. Founded by Julien Dray (Jewish) its organisational engine (just like those of the ACLU and NAACP in America)  has been Jewish.....although the occasional goyishe dupe gets trotted out for the cameras when required. Again like the ACLU and NAACP SOS Racisme was active for decades in organising undesirable immigrants like Africans and Muslims to claim their 'rights'  including those in the key area of family reunion, which predictably resulted in a tsunami of 'relations' flooding the country. They also financed endless 'lawfare', opposing deportations, prosecuting - and often bankrupting - nationalists for 'hate' crime. There are several other such organisations, probably the best known being LICRA (International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism). In another stunning example of chutzpah this outfit remains monochrome Jewish while poised to explode in righteous outrage at a lack of diversity anywhere else.

Admittedly a few Jews such as Alain Finkielkraut have begun in recent years to question the benefits of mass immigration. But exactly like this guy in America the only criterion they apply is the self-serving one of  'is it good for the Jews?'  Thus their opposition is not to nation-wrecking mass immigration per se, rather towards Muslims, who have been increasingly making their presence felt - to the shock and alarm of France's Jews. And to my amusement.

There are self-evidently huge numbers of French Jews not happy with the destruction of the nation's structure and institutions.  I know one family who've been complaining bitterly about such matters for as long as I can remember. But here I'll repeat what I wrote in an earlier post. I wish ..... that the Jewish-American elite didn’t in fact represent the broader Jewish tribe.   If so, then it is the responsibility of the broader Jewish tribe to rein in their destructive, anti-white Jewish cousins. Will it do this, or would it rather blame those who understand the nature of the game, and have the temerity to point out the prominent Jewish role in it? It should also be said that the Jewish poison being fed to whites (and other races, for that matter) doesn’t become any sweeter just because some Jews are idiotic enough to swallow some themselves.  

This remains equally true for France.The family I referred to would accept no responsibility on behalf of Jews.  Several years ago our esteemed contributor Uncle Nasty told me that whenever Jews appear to have unassailable power they end up shooting themselves in the foot.  They've done it again now.  And this particular fat lady is only gargling in preparation for the forthcoming concert.

Winston nails it.

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia (rabies) in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.

No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”-- 

Sir Winston Spencer Churchill (The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50)

Sometimes the old brute was on the money. Muslims are a curse on Western society.  Which is why they've been foisted on us.

An exciting new business venture

You'll all be pleased to know that I've decided to return to the entrepreneurial world even as I fade into my dotage. Simply because at times an opportunity comes along that's just too good to be missed. I mean, where else could you get a range of quality products guaranteed to cure:

() Impotency and other forms of erectile dysfunction

() AIDS and other venereal diseases

() Baldness

() Unfaithful spouses

() Bad vibrations

I am of course referring to the magical curative properties of our customised range of Albino Remedial Solutions (ARS) from our suppliers in Tanzania, a country which has pioneered this innovative brand of alternative medicines, building on what  the BBC  refers to as 'the tradition of cooking albinos into potions'. Indeed, and I want to assure all potential customers that we buy directly from carefully selected providers who supply only the finest hearts, penises, entrails and scrotums (scroti ??).  We offer comprehensive product traceability for each potion from our specially designed chilling facilities back through the full supply chain ultimately to the source albino.

I'm sure you'll all join in wishing me well for this exciting new venture.

Reverse evolution?

In my post LBJ And The Destruction Of Black America I hypothesised that the Great Society initiative had precisely the reverse impact to that intended.  Far from elevating blacks to equality with Whites it has instead dumbed them down into useless welfarists increasingly unable to compete in today's techno-industrial environment. Welfare dependency has been compounded - paradoxically - by the battery of legislation to enforce Affirmative Action, job quotas and the dumbing down of job entry qualifications.

I say paradoxically because such measures have further reduced the incentive for blacks to better themselves to the point where they can compete on a level playing field with Whites and other races. Why? Because they can now either live on welfare or sit back and let quotas and AA do the work for them.  The latter option may have given us the much celebrated black middle class but this is a mere Potemkin Village, artificially sustained by AA, quotas and make-up jobs in Government agencies which will not survive the impending economic Armageddon.

Were this not bad enough two new forces have now coalesced to destroy blacks' already limited linguistic abilities.  Civilisation and language are symbiotic. The more advanced a language, the more advanced the civilisation, and vice versa. Language underpins everything even, actually especially, maths and science. This is why attempts to develop cross-reference dictionaries for African languages have floundered. African languages would typically have only a couple of hundred words and only the most primitive system of measurement.  So you'd get 'one', maybe 'two' but after that it'd just be 'many'.

The evolutionary impact of such a limited vocabulary can only be guessed at and undoubtedly  contributed to the comical failure of attempts to formalise Ebonics as a language. Efforts to agree on syntax, semantics or indeed any kind of canonical structures were dismissed as 'White man sheet' and differences resolved amid a hail of bullets and upturned tables as the snap below (taken at a recent academic forum) illustrates. But no matter how they dress it up Ebonics doesn't even come close to being a language or even a dialect in any meaningful sense.

This barbaric Wild West of Ebonics is bad enough but it's got worse...a lot worse. Partially driven by the linguistic degradation deriving from Twitter and phone texting ('you're' becoming 'your' for example) in the 'hood communications increasingly deploy postures, facial expressions, grunts, hand signs and other kinesthetic cues as replacement forms of communication. (The Special Olympics of Debating provides us with a mild example and in fact initially whetted my appetite for the subject). Not putting too fine a point on it but this is the way animals communicate. 

So in effect what we're seeing here is a form of reverse evolution.  It really is. The fun will start when the American economy begins to seriously nosedive (it will) and the money for EBT cards and make-believe gubmint jobs will have gone.  It's going to be epic.