The Pope gets his 'riding' instructions

Don’t you just love those Catholics who deride the Church for ‘not keeping up with the times’?  In other words not changing its teachings in line with the current zeitgeist.  The Pope and Cardinals must have been dizzy after the latest Synod, such was the clamour for 'progressive change'.  

Here’s one typical comment:

“There is resistance to Christian doctrine with regard to birth control, divorce, new forms of marriage, homosexuality, cohabitation, fidelity, pre-marital sex.”  Why not  add in pornography, full-term abortion and bestiality as you’re at it. Because, you know, these things are becoming much more acceptable nowadays, aren't they? Former Irish President and ‘staunch Catholic’ Mary McAleese demands ‘a new theology of women’.  Whatever the hell that’s supposed to mean.  But these days anything with  ‘women’ in it automatically elicits serious and thoughtful nods of approval.

The logic, if I may use that term, underpinning such demands seems to be that once an action becomes generally acceptable then the Church must alter its teachings accordingly.  But this misses the whole point of Catholicism which rests on the foundation of Papal Infallibility which in turn is based on the Pope’s status as God’s Representative On Earth. Now I don’t go along with this concept for one minute and it underpinned my abandonment of the religion  -  all religion – in my late youth. But that’s what being a Catholic is all about. You sign up or ship out.  I mean, who can argue with God, right?

It should also be noted that the list of demands outlined above is very much an expression of late 20^th Century lifestyles.  Every single one would have been considered outrageous and unacceptable at any earlier stage of history. And they might become unacceptable again. So you can understand the proceed-with-caution approach the Church is adopting.  And here’s another thing  of which the Vatican, ever alert to the bottom line, will be well aware.  Those religions that swing with the popular mood, that have become 'progressive and liberal' are sinking into irrelevance, an irrelevance characterised by empty churches.  And empty coffers.The Anglican Church and its American equivalent (Episcopalians) are prime examples. 

Meanwhile those that are red in tooth and claw, and that cling to the most outlandish beliefs - think the Religion Of Peace and the mega churches in America run by degenerate hucksters - are thriving. Speaking of which, when I look at the destruction being wrought on White societies I sometimes wistfully imagine a rebirth of the (for me, hated) Church Militant. That organisation wouldn't pussy-foot around with ragheads swarming all over us and with Jews, under the ruse of secularism, systematically destroying every vestige of Christian influence and tradition. No they'd smite and thrust and set them fleeing for their lives. But the CM is gone, never to return.

'Multicultural society' is an oxymoron

The term 'multicultural society' is an oxymoron for the simple reason that being multicultural prevents its being a society as commonly understood. Instead what you get is a range of 'cultures' incompatible with one another to a greater or lesser degree. The resultant societal pathologies, which should have been apparent to anyone with a functioning brain cell, have been identified in a number of research studies like this one.

One of the basic requirement of any functioning society, and one crippled by multiculturalism, is the impartial administration of justice under a system of laws. This system inevitably degenerates into an ethnic and/or religious zero sum game geared towards ensuring that 'our guy' gets, not justice, but the benefit of any verdicts. Things got so bad in the USA that the Supreme Court felt compelled to create special rules for jury selection (the Batson Challenge). This in turn was driven by the repeated failures of blacks to convict a brudda even when the prosecution's evidence was overwhelming. Think O.J. Simpson and Curtis Vance.

In Wales we had the extraordinary case in which two footballers had sex with an inebriated waitress. They said it was consensual, she said it was not. Whatever. The extraordinary thing was that both admitted doing exactly the same thing to/with the girl yet the White guy was convicted (got five years jail) and the black one acquitted.  You see all it takes is a couple of jurors to vote against conviction for the defendant to go free.

And it's going to get worse in Britain as the pathology extends from juries to the Crown Prosecution Service itself which is getting taken over by immigrants from Third World cultures.......where Traditional Justice rules. For example in Pakistan, where many top CPS executives originated, a religious or tribal leader can, completely on his own initiative, order a woman to be punished by means of gang rape or have a Christian killed for 'insulting the Prophet'.  And now this guy's sons and cousins have taken over huge swathes of Britain's justice system.

Yes, The Long March Through The Institutions is proceeding at a brisk pace.

Ian Paisley departs

Well it had to happen. Ian Paisley has finally gone to the great Orange Lodge in the sky.

Norman Tebbit says that 'although many accused him of sacrificing principles for office, I think that it was a genuine acceptance on his part that unless sacrifices were made on both sides, there could be no settlement and only enduring strife in Northern Ireland.'  Well Norman I think you're plain wrong. Paisley went back on everything he professed to believe in and only after he had spent his whole career setting both communities against one another and undermining any attempt at reconciliation.

The last minute conversion came about only because the British deployed the one decisive weapon they had hitherto carefully avoided: The money spigot.  The leadership of both communities could have and would have continued their endless and sterile arguments ad infinitum had not the British Government threatened to close down the Stormont Assembly, and of far greater importance, terminate the pay cheques of all its members.

Bingo!  A solution was found within weeks, angels supped with devils while Martin McGuinness and Ian Paisley became known as the Chuckle Brothers. It seems that they did become genuine friends given that McGuinness  privately visited Big Ian right up till a few days before his death but my verdict on Ian Paisley is that he arguably did more than any single person to prolong Northern Ireland's inter-communal violence and that his late life turnaround was down to personal ambitions rather than any commitment to peace.

Ishag to shag no more

More from the Religion Of Peace. 

In In Sudan a pregnant 27-year-old Christian has been convicted of apostasy and sentenced to death for refusing to renounce her faith.  The court also sentenced her to 100 lashes for marrying a Christian man. Mariam Yehya Ibrahim Ishag says she was born to a Sudanese Muslim father, who was absent, and raised by an Ethiopian Christian mother. But the judge' maintained she was a Muslim raised in an Islamic environment and said that her brother, who is also a Muslim, had filed the charges.

 

Gotta love a religion like that.

 

Naturally enough the paid mouthpieces in the West and various Islamic 'scholars' have designated the ruling an outrageous distortion of Islam.  But it's not. The judge's verdict is the authentic Islamic one. The Paedophile Prophet made the penalty for apostasy very clear. Death, same as it advocates for a whole host of other offences like adultery, mocking the Paedophile, blasphemy, piracy, homosexual behaviour...might be easier to list what offences do not attract the ultimate punishment..  Probably reflecting its barbaric desert origins the Religion of Peace seems to recognise only death and various forms of physical mutilation as appropriate forms of punishment.

 

But Allah, as the man said, can be merciful little devil too, although his mercy is strictly confined to 'good Muslims'.  Like this guy.  A Saudi Arabian cleric ('a popular Islamic preacher') told Saudi officials he used cables and a cane on his five-year-old daughter, leaving her with multiple ultimately fatal injuries, including a crushed skull, broken ribs and left arm, extensive bruising and burns. "In addition, one of Lama’s fingernails had been torn off. Hospital staff reports the child’s rectum had been torn open and the abuser had attempted to burn it closed. Reports indicate the father had doubted his five-year old daughter's virginity."

 

Well if she'd lost her virginity at that age I can understand her father being annoyed.  Had she held her passions in check and waited another year she'd have been the same age as the youngest of The Paedophile's many wives. And if that was ok by him, it must be all right. Presumably. And this isn't out of line with Islam's attitude to youthful crime seeing that in Pakistan recently a nine-month-old baby was charged with attempted murder.

 

So what penalty was inflicted on this doting father?  Saudi media reports that the father paid 200,000 riyals ($50,000 US) in “blood money” for his crime, but will not be required to serve any time in prison.

 

Seriously, this 'religion' is truly Satanic.

Religion Of Peace: Baby charged with attempted murder

I remember reading a story from the Napoleonic Wars about a monkey who'd been captured on a ship in the port of Grimsby.  The locals were much puzzled by such a creature and, in the absence of any other explanation, put him on trial for spying. After a fair trial in which due process was fully observed the unfortunate creature was found guilty (I guess he didn't offer a very effective defence) and in accordance with the law duly hanged.

One would imagine that we'd moved on a lot since the 18th century but when it comes to the Religion Of Peace we haven't moved on even from the 8th Century. Hence you may not be surprised by this particular story from that magic land, that land wherein the angels sing, that home of the blessed where each morning gentle people wake to love another day.

Pakistan.

"While many children his age are still learning how to crawl, a nine-month-old boy in Pakistan has been accused of attempted murder in a case observers say highlights endemic flaws in the country's legal system."  

I think we could all agree with that last bit. 

Sadly, knowing the Religion Of Peace I wouldn't rule out seeing said baby face the gallows in due course.  Having first provided amorous outlets for some of that ghastly country's 'spiritual' leaders.

Jews and Parsis, contrast and compare

It’s interesting to compare Jews with the Parsis (Parsees) of India.  In fact I’m quite familiar with both groups, although with the latter it’s mainly, but not exclusively, by way of my dealings with other Indians.

§  They’re both cognitive elites in their host countries,  demonstrating vastly disproportionate success in business, politics and academia.  Jews we all know about, but Parsis, especially in India, have been stunningly successful and prominent especially given their relatively tiny numbers

§  Generally speaking they both came to their high status gradually and without the use of force

§  Both have been ‘exiled’ from their ancient traditional homelands (Iran for Parsis, Israel for Jews) and have been living in their host countries for many hundreds of years

§  They are two of the oldest continuing religions

§  Both demonstrate strong in-group mentality especially in terms of  endogamy (marrying within the group). This is strong enough to  engender various diseases unique to their groups

§  They have little or no interest in gaining converts to their religion

A lot of similarities, aren’t there?  So are there differences in how they’re perceived by their host populations?

Here’s a personal anecdote about the Parsis.  Several years ago I met a number of  Indians on business. I was surprised that they  seemed to defer to one guy even though he wasn’t the ‘boss’ and was certainly younger than the others.  I raised this later and by way of explanation was simply told ‘he’s a Parsi’.  Inquiring further I  learned that Indians generally hold the Parsis in the highest possible levels of esteem and indeed affection.   The others in his team  agreed when asked individually later.

My own subsequent inquiries revealed that this affection stems from their astonishing levels of philanthropy, honest dealings and a respect for the common good. There is an Indian saying "Parsi thy name is Charity".   In many respects they’re like the Quakers.   “Parsis are incredibly charitable, preferring to spread around their wealth Moreover, no one sees them as doing so without any real care for others -- i.e., just being charitable to gain approval or to keep the would-be rioters content. All observers seem to agree that it's out of a sense of duty and empathy.”

At the time of the Raj the British held similar views, seeing them as uniquely honest, trustworthy, honourable generous with their time and money . I remember when working on a project with the Inland Revenue in England being told by a guy that a Parsi family he knew agonised over claiming some form of social welfare because they felt they had not as yet ‘paid enough into society’. Scandals in Parsi-owned commercial enterprises are as rare as hens’ teeth and, in India’s multi-ethnic and constantly feuding society the only ethnic conflict they were ever involved in was with the Religion Of Peace.  And if the Muslims aren’t fighting you, you must be doing something wrong.

I love and derive great amusement from euphemisms. Take for instance ‘mixed reaction’, as in ‘there was a mixed reaction within the black community to  the Rodney King verdict’.  Another great one is ‘blip’, as in ‘there was a blip in Anglo-German relations during the early 1940s’. And it’s fair to say there have been quite a few mixed reactions to Jews and blips in their relationships with their host countries over the centuries in marked contrast to the Parsis.

Strange, isn’t it?  And they’re like one another in so many ways…..

A lesson in practical morality for Francis

You know, the more I see of Pope Francis the less I like.  He has all the appearances of being trendy and tolerant, in tune with the zeitgeist and not at all comfortable with this sin business. In 'reaching out' to gays he made the astonishing claim that  'it is not possible [for the Church] to interfere spiritually in the life of a person."  Well, if it's not 'interfering spiritually' then what exactly is the Church's purpose?

And if a good press is what you're after you can't beat the Immigration Industry.  And he's been fast off the mark here too. Visiting Lampedusa and demanding that all immigrants be 'given a home in Europe'.  Before Christmas, in another PR coup, he visited immigrants in Rome, handing out gifts and declaring that "a change of attitude towards migrants and refugees is needed on the part of everyone, moving away from attitudes of defensiveness and fear, indifference and marginalisation, all typical of a throwaway culture, towards attitudes based on a culture of encounter, the only culture capable of building a better, more just and fraternal world."

According to Catholic Online he then rounded it all off  by expressing the hope that countries would welcome migrants keeping the values of their culture of origin. So are we to assume then the millions of Muslims rampaging through the West will retain their quaint customs, ones like stoning to death for adultery, death for apostasy and death for insulting the 'prophet'?  And Africans retain  'values and customs' such raping children to cure AIDS, or killing and eating your enemies?

Seems like it.

Look, I have no love for the Catholic Church. Growing up in Ireland when I did I in fact came to detest the narrow-mindedness and rampant hypocrisy in which it wallowed. Gave up Catholicism by my mid-teens.  But now I see it as a possible ally in the fight against the cultural war on the West.  But Pope Francis won't be much of an ally. What he fails to realise is that pandering to contemporary moral standards might win him some grudging brownie point from the chattering classes and the representatives of the various sexual degenerates out there.  But it also leads to oblivion. 

Look at the Church of England which has become the most trendy of all.  Eschewing the taking of moral positions on anything, it instead espoused a vapid New Age feelgood vibe, kumbaya.  They even appointed an incomprehensible African tribesman as their head honcho to demonstrate their bona fides. Yet, far from making it relevant to the new age, the institution is for all practical purposes moribund. Its churches empty, the few believers rapidly ageing and dying off.  You see, for better or worse, it's the old fire and brimstone uncompromising religions that are doing best.  No matter how bizarre their teachings and rituals.

So this Pope is leading his institution down the path of oblivion.

Going back to the immigration issue, Aristotle taught us that impractical morality is no morality at all. (No wonder he's hated by libtards).  There is nothing on this earth more impractical than allowing vast numbers of additional immigrants into Europe. No need for me to elaborate why, of course.  And, were we to take the Pope's suggestion, the inevitable consequence would be to turbocharge the stampede, increasing numbers by orders of magnitude.  Impractical morality of the purest kind.

So here I make a practical moral suggestion for Pope Frankie. Open up the Vatican to the huddled masses on your doorsteps. Giving them call cards at Christmas is all well and good, but Frankie, you said it yourself, we must welcome them into our houses.  You have a very  very big one just up the road, and a lovely - and very large - holiday home at Castelgandolfo. The immigrants would just love them. And you know what?  you would too, Frankie.  You see they're such wonderful people. You said so yourself.

So what about it, Nincompope?

The Silence Of The Shams

Everywhere I look these days I see 'moderate' Muslim leaders in hysterics over one thing or another. The slightest suggestion of 'Islamophobia', be it some canton in Switzerland deciding they don't want their 'citizens' walking around like post boxes, Christian schools displaying 'offensive' (i.e. Christian) symbols, non-halal food inadvertently being served to Muslims or whatever.  Loud wailing betrays the degree of persecution the unfortunate Religion Of Peace labours under.

In fact it's blindingly obvious that those 'moderate' Muslim leaders, just like the race hucksters in America, actually seem to be on the lookout for any conceivable offence for which retribution - and restitution, don't ever forget that - can be gained. They are busy busy boys (they're always boys, of course).  And as for their counterparts in Dar-al-Islam, well, they have of course a altogether more robust ways of making their hurt feelings known.

I can only assume that the 'moderate' community leaders are so busy hunting down such trivia in the Dar-al-Harb (Region of War, in case you didn't know) that they never get around to protesting, or even condemning, the endless saga of murderous outrages carried out by their coreligionists around the world with monotonous regularity.  You know, setting a giant bomb off in a Christian
n church in Pakistan, killing hundreds, hacking and machine-gunnung scores of churchgoers in Nigeria, or that little matter in Nairobi recently.

I've undertaken a detailed  and pretty meticulous search and have come up blank.  Those 'moderate' leaders, so beloved of our political and media elites, and so sensitive to the slightest hint of anything offensive to their precious feelings, are struck dumb when the kuffar is the victim.

But then, what would you expect from them?  What I would hope - but not expect - from dhimmi Western political and media leaders is a demand for these hypocrites unequivocally to condemn the outrages committed in the name of Islam.

I'm not holding my breath.

Celebrating diversity at Minneapolis South High

Stan Alleyne, the Minneapolis Public Schools chief of communications says that Minneapolis South High is a school that continually makes the district proud. “South is a very diverse high school. It is a microcosm of the city. Students function together at a high level every day. That is the strength of this school. Our students live diversity every day.”

Well the last bit is true, whatever about the rest. Part of this 'living diversity every day' seems to involve regular police storming the dining areas, blazing away with rubber bullets and mace while flailing with truncheons as they try to break up vicious inter-ethnic inter-religious fighting.

One student, Abdi Sheikh, (yes) said he saw hundreds of students fighting in what appeared to be a racial incident. “A big riot,” he said. “It was all types of races.”  Well it wasn't actually.  A close perusal of the comments and reports in other media outlets makes clear that the fighting was primarily between African Muslims (most likely Somalis, with which Minnesota is infested) and local African-Americans.

Isn't that amazing?  I thought they'd all be model students. You see, I read that somewhere......

Here's another student, Symone Glasker, demonstrating an uncanny insight into the ethnic nuances involved: “I know it’s a pride thing between Muslims and black people. They want their pride back or something. I don’t know.” She also said “boys were hitting girls” (what, Muslims doing that????)  and that some people were lying on the floor, with their hands over their heads, in surrender.

Sounds like good multicultural fun to me. Maybe that's the 'vibrancy' they always speak about? I never understood what they meant by that.  Until now.

I wonder will there be calls to ban food that fits the definition of an assault food?

In conclusion I give you the thoughts of one commentator.

You wanted diversity.
Now you got it.

You were tricked into wanting multiculturalism to show you aren't some supremacist racist.
Now you got it.

You wanted to feed the poor and help the sick.
Now you got millions of them.

Home school, if you're not doing it already.

An African Pope?

Well, that's what the bookies say....they're offering short odds on it.  If it happens I believe the successful competitor will have a profile reflecting most if not all of the following:

() Has multiple children

 

() Has multiple mistresses

 

() Has embezzled vast sums of Church money

 

() Luxuriates in an oil sheik lifestyle

 

() Engages in witchcraft

 

() Has performed at least one ritual sacrifice of an albino

 

() Has appointed multiple unqualified members of his own tribe to key ecclesiastical positions (bishop, nun)

 

() Killed at least one competitor to get his current job

 

() Suffers from an STD

 

() Is a Freemason

 

Just you wait........

Pas de Regrets

Several comments to my most recent post to the effect that the Church, being hated by Jews, especially those most focused on destroying Whites, should not be subjected to criticism or ridicule. My awakening has made me well aware of those who seek the destruction of Whites and I do agree that the Catholic Church represents a prime target for them. That does not make me a RC supporter.

Look, I've grown up in Ireland in the fifties and sixties, at a time when the Church held unchallenged control. And I did not like it, not one little bit. You need not just take the more obvious outrages such as child abuse, forced labour scandals, bringing undue influence to bear on bequests and so on. The whole monolithic environment dampened the spirit, inhibited free thought, was deeply suspicious of science and accordingly made Ireland a backward poverty-stricken nation of young people just waiting to emigrate. The whole environment was marinated in a sea of hypocrisy. It suffused everything and could only sicken any fair-minded person.

So no, I don't regret its passing. I don't regret that its clergy is at last being held to account for its sins and omissions. I don't regret that a girl who gets pregnant is no longer driven from polite society and her child forcibly taken from her. I don't regret that a couple whose marriage breaks down have a chance to start anew. I don't regret that Catholics are no longer banned from attending a friend's funeral in a Protestant Church. I don't regret the end of brutal physical punishment in schools by sadists who delighted in their abuse, which seemed to have as its ultimate aim the destruction of the child's self-respect and capacity for independent thought.

Good riddance to those times and the institution that brought them on to us.

Does that mean I like what we have now? Well, every reader of this blog knows my views. Systematic and planned population replacement, denigration and mixing out of Whites, cringing in terror before the Gods of Political Correctness, the undermining of the family, the tolerance, nay, the celebration of degeneracy, systematic and deliberate dumbing down of culture.

I detest these developments and yes, they would not have occurred had the Church remained ascendant.  The Church Militant, as it were. Well, I don't want either of them. And I don't see why we should have to choose one over the other. Maybe we do.  But I don't think we have to submit to one tyranny or the other.  I believe that, in say the thirties, forties and fifties most Northern European countries, The United States, Australia, Canada and New Zealand had achieved a good balance.

That's what we should try to regain.

I also did a series of posts on the subject Do We Need Christianity? a few years back (final one here).

Pope Ben resigns

I've never been a fan of him, the Vatican, or the Catholic Church in general, but with my awakening comes a realisation that his being a white Christian calls for a little solidarity on my part. But this post is an opportunity to explore, with your kind help, something that has intrigued me for years. Not exactly of profound or strategic importance I know, but I must ask: What happens when he urgently needs to take a dump?

Think about it.  Look at those layers of clothing, from the top hat on down. Surely no self-respecting Pope would perform his ablutions with that on?  Then there are layers of cloaks and vesty things of every kind, none of which look to be easily discarded.  All underpinned by the papish underwear which we can reasonably assume to be not of the Speedo variety.

The problem is compounded by the urgent and unpredictable nature of bowel movements in the elderly.  Remember also that his sphincter, the controller of last resort, will have come in for a lot of attention during all those years in the monastery, so must be in rag order.

Maybe sometime we'll see future Popes decked out in a fetching  shade of Papal Brown?

A useful principle

Read an interesting piece in the National Review recently which underlined a most important principle when dealing with Muslims.  Here's Andrew McCarthy:

An Egyptian court recently upheld the blasphemy conviction of Makarem Diab a Coptic Christian. Diab had gotten into a discussion with a Muslim acquaintance, Abd al-Hameed, who, in the course of mocking Diab’s faith, insisted that Jesus was a serial fornicator. Diab countered Hameed’s baseless taunt with an assertion most Islamic scholars regard as accurate: namely, that Mohammed had more than four wives. Yet, because the context of Diab’s assertion evinced an intention to cast Islam’s prophet in an unfavorable light, Diab was prosecuted for “insulting the prophet” and “provoking students.” He was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment.

The principle is this: Muslims can not discuss their religion rationally. Even those highly educated and seemingly open-minded and modern, even when they're friends. Even when the discussion is laced with joshing and laughter I've found this out personally, and ironically, it was a Coptic Christian who warned me. (I ignored his warning). I didn't end up in jail but was frozen out of a particular country for all time.

Be warned. .

I see that Egyptians have voted in favour of a new Constitution based on Islamic law and principles. President Morsi says it will 'guarantee freedom of religion to all'.  And I have no doubt he means it.  But his ideas here may not be quite what your average deluded western liberal might have in mind. For example about three years ago Pew Research conducted a major poll there. It found that 92% of Egyptians supported 'freedom of religion'.  And that 84% supported applying the death penalty to anyone leaving Islam.

Living in the Matrix

Take a small island in the Adriatic where 4,000 people - equivalent to nearly half the regular population of the island - were brutally and sadistically massacred over about five days.  Many people alive today remember it.  You'd imagine, would you not, that this would kinda get a mention somewhere when you check out that island? Like Wikipedia. Well you'd be wrong. Because the 'wrong' people were slaughtered, in this case German soldiers who had surrendered to Tito's guerrillas in 1945 on the island of Rab.

Check it out yourself. I guarantee you'll find it very hard to dig up anything.  Oh sure, you'll find all you want about the concentration camp on Rab - an Italian one, I might add - mainly for recalcitrant Slovenes and Croatians, but also gypsies and Jews.  You'll learn plenty about how over 200 Jews, 'the elderly or sick who were sent to Auschwitz by the Germans for extermination' [Wiki].  Now as an aside, a concept about Death Marches that always fascinated me. Why would the super-efficient and super-evil Germans go to all the time trouble, expense and risk of sending them through four countries in order to kill them in Poland?  Why not just shoot them where they were?  I'm not holding my breath for an answer. Nor for anything about the massacred Germans appearing in Approved Outlets.

I mention this case merely to illustrate the parallel universes we live in.  On the one hand there's reality, what is actually happening and what has actually happened. And then, like in The Truman Show or The Matrix we have an imaginary world.  This world, in our case, is one in which Whites, and particularly White males, are inherently evil and the cause of all the world's problems, non-Whites, especially blacks, are wondrous human beings, whose occasional faults and failings can be fully explained by generations of White abuse. It's one where races, religions and genders are equal, (in fact there's a kind of inverse pigmentocracy) where the race-mixing of Whites into oblivion is an unalloyed good, where accepted history, the kind you get in orthodox academies and on Wikipedia, has become a parody of itself. But a parody that brooks no questioning.

Maintaining parallel universes does not come easily or cheaply. It requires the systematic immersion of the public in a particular way of thinking, which in turn calls for overwhelming control of the media, education, politics and finance. And, as Orwell showed, of history also. It also requires the elimination, as far as possible, of any contrarian narrative as even at a low level this can cause disproportionate damage. Internalised conformity to the level of Thought Control is the objective. And it's been achieved.

Now here's my other question. Which is stronger, the almost total control enjoyed by The Empire....or the Trusty Sword Of Truth? This makes me sound like some pretentious philosophy student (if a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it fall, has it really fallen? To which I'd respond 'of course it has, you stupid twat'). But it's a serious question. Maintaining such a parallel universe doesn't come cheaply or easily. Despite the range and depth of control enjoyed by the Thought Police, cognitive dissonance is all around the proles. This is where enstupidation comes in. Dumb them down (race mix with inferiors, debase their culture) and distract them with bread and circuses into semi-conscious servitude.

It's worked phenomenally well so far.  Almost every White person is unwittingly enmeshed in The Matrix, oblivious to The Truth about what governs their lives. Are they open to it?  An oft-cited source of hope is the collapse of the USSR, where another Matrix, although of a different kind, also operated. But I'm not so sure. Because you see, the vast majority of Soviet citizens knew they were living a lie, They saw through the totalitarian contempt for facts and reality and just had to tune into the western media to find all the proof they needed. But in the West, especially in the USA, people genuinely believe that they're getting the real story from the MSM, academia, the churches and the other sources of pollution.

Then again, do they want to know the Truth? It's been pointed out that sooner or later, most everyone stumbles over the truth, but that most then pick themselves up and continue on as if nothing happened. Most people do not want to learn any truth they fear may breach their comfort zone or compromises their plans and preconceptions. That if they ignore it, it may go away. I don't know the answer, but that's our challenge. We must keep shining the light on the cockroaches and our Masters might one day resemble the frozen leaders of the USSR waving from atop Lenin’s Tomb as their world crumbled around them.

So I close on a positive note from Victor Hugo “Mightier than the tread of marching armies is the power of an idea whose time has come.”

What a toxic brew

Wow, what a toxic combination:

A woman. Nay, a brown woman. A brown foreign woman. A brown foreign non-Christian woman. Half a dozen victimhoods rolled into one already. And she has to die because, Ireland being a Catholic country, her viable foetus cannot be aborted. Any one of these factors would be enough to activate the hive of PC fanatics, waiting, delicate nostrils quivering as they scent out any new opportunity for outrage.  But all of them rolled into one? No wonder the country's been engulfed in a tsunami of outraged protest ever since the news got out. The Indian Government itself has got into the act, with the Irish Times' correspondent there solemnly informing us that the incident could lead to 'a diplomatic incident' between the two countries.

Wow again.

OK, so what do we actually know about the case? We do know that the unfortunate woman did die under an operation in Galway's University Hospital, and that she was four months pregnant at the time. And what else do we actually know?

Well, surprisingly, that's about it.

So why the mass international outrage? Well, this stems from what her husband claims happened. He claims that his wife wanted an abortion because she felt there was something wrong with the foetus, but was told that this is a Catholic country and it was against the law. Now personally I'd be very surprised if any senior health official said such a thing in today's PC-whipped Ireland. Very surprised indeed.  If for no other reason that, while it is a grey area, the law here allows a foetus to be aborted if the life of the mother is at risk.   And the whole basis of the husband's case is that her life was in fact at risk. (And by the way if any woman wants an abortion at any time she can hop over the England and get it done.)


So what's going on here?  Look, I quite like Indians and we have a lot of them on this blog.  But guys, let's just put it this way, you're not exactly Scandinavians when it comes to financial probity. In fact, not to put too fine a point on it, financial shenanigans are your stock in trade. Given all the victimhoods tied up in this, and Ireland's pathological need to be nice to the fuzzy wuzzies, the husband stands to pocket an absolutely enormous financial settlement.  If his allegations hold up. To say he has skin in the game would be an understatement. And yes, at this point in time we have only his word for the story that has swept the world.

Now to the Indian Government and their 'outrage' I say FUCK YOU.  Irish tourists have died over there as a result of a particularly deplorable scam whereby restaurants poison their tourist customers and then, when the victim feels ill, direct them to private hospitals in on the scam. Who then proceed to shake down the victim for everything he has. Indian Government please note: Numerous people, including some from Ireland, have died from this. And you do bugger all about it.  Only a few weeks ago an Irish tourist was found  injured somewhere in India. He was left untreated so long (as the hospital checked whether he had insurance cover that they could rip off)  that permanent brain damage ensued.

But such incidents are passed over and forgotten about within a day or two. You see the victims are male, they're white and from Christian stock. So actually, they're not victims at all, in fact. You see, there's no such thing as a white male Christian victim.

So my take?  We simply do not know what happened in this case other than that a woman died under a procedure at a reputable teaching hospital. An independent investigation has been ordered and I really feel we should wait until this has been completed and the report issued.

Some chance!

No, this opportunity will be milked for  everything it's worth between now and then.

A Day Of Love. Islam style.

I seldom laugh these days, nary a smile plays on my rugged features as I contemplate civilisational doom. But watching the TV news today made me  dissolve into gales of laughter.  I refer to the Religion Of Peace and,  in Pakistan, their 'Day Of Love For The Prophet Mohammed'  (I'm not joking). This was a form of tough love in that nearly twenty of their own Prophet-loving people, including three policemen, were killed.   So far.

But what cracked me up was the way they showed their love.  Bearded fanatic whirling like a dervish, wielding a 4x2" plank and laying into every and any Prophet-lover within reach. A well-dressed lunatic jumping, two feet at a time at the side of a car, trying to smash in the windows. And landing on his arse before picking himself up and repeating the procedure. Then there's the guy who acquired a long pole and, at great personal risk, sought to smash in the headlights of a car. A car which was already ablaze from stem to stern. He carefully poked and prodded, shielding himself from the flames as well as he could, while he earnestly went about his allotted task.

In every gesture, dignity and love, sayeth Milton.  I'd love to know what he'd have thought of these people. These people, who now swarm all over western lands, and who are so different to us that there will eventually have to be a day of reckoning. Because co-existence is not possible once comparative numbers of these fucking nut cases reach a tipping point. 

Are we beaten? Seriously

There's been some great input and ideas in recent threads as to how White Nationalists can fight back and hopefully avoid our destruction. A load of practical, well thought-out measures, and I intend to collate it all and present in a separate post shortly.  But here I raise again the question I did a week or two ago:  Is it too late?

“Just a few decades ago whites were a confident race, proud of their achievements, convinced of their fitness to dominate the globe. Today they are a declining, apologetic people, ashamed of their history and not sure even of their claim to lands they have occupied for centuries. It is very rare for fundamental concepts to be stood on their heads in the course of just a generation or two, as has happened with thinking about race. Such speed suggests there has been something more than natural change.”

Whites have been browbeaten into seeing  'Whiteness’ as inherently wicked. To give you one example, my daughter-in-law mentioned to her friends that she was looking forward to having a lovely blonde baby (both she and my son are blonde/fair).  She was severely castigated by them for her ‘racism’.  Isn't it some achievement when hoping to have kids like yourselves can seem to be unnatural. Any ethnic group who can get another ethnic group to think like that must be almost unstoppable.

A professor friend at a leading American University tells me that Jewish faculty and admin staff now openly admit that they want to minimise the White presence at  the institution. The point is, they’re openly saying this. That’s the level of confidence. It’s some achievement to get the majority ethnic group, the one that created the very institutions from which you’re now driving them, to accept their expulsion and disempowerment almost without demur. Any people who can get another people to think like that must be almost unstoppable.

Quite simply, Jews have succeeded – spectacularly -  in getting Whites to accept their Narrative. That, to my mind, was never the case in the past, when Jews were routinely judged by facts on the ground, aided by the Christ-killer meme. Today they’re almost impervious to criticism (‘don’t hit me with the Holocaust in my arms’).

It’s a truly awesome accomplishment.  They’ve fully capitalised on all their own strengths – and all of White weaknesses. They’ve bamboozled us into being literally our own worst enemies. Again, it’s an awesome accomplishment.  And this brings me to the painful question that’s the basis of this post (and it’s not a rhetorical question): Should we just acknowledge that a superior race has bested us, and will continue to best us, in the same way that Whites will always best Blacks? Jews have significantly higher IQ levels than do we, and they ally that to a level of cohesion, tenacity and ethnic ruthlessness that Whites don’t even come close to matching. Should we just accept it and make the best of it?

You see, 95% of the public exist in the Matrix.  And here’s the big problem. There’s no simple, easy or cheap way to even make them aware that they are in the Matrix. The political system, courts, conventional media are all totally inaccessible to us. And to fully understand the magnitude of the damage done takes many hours of study and research. How many of the stupefied brain-dead zombies will give up their MSM-based prolefeed for that?

Each nation, Rosenzweig argued, knows, even if unconsciously, that some day other peoples will occupy their lands, and their language and culture will be interred in dusty books. Who now remembers the Lusitani, the Illyrians, the Sicani, the Quadians, Sarmatians, Alans, Gepidians, Herulians? Yet the Jews have existed for well over 3,000 years, and Hebrew is the only language West of the Indus that is spoken today more or less as it was spoken 3,000 years ago. A nation of slaves. And yes, they have come back to Israel.  It’s almost enough to make you believe in the Bible! And is it the Bible that says the Devil’s greatest achievement is to convince people that he doesn’t exist?  I go along with that - whoever said it - because it reflects the essence of our problem.

I acknowledge I'm in gloomy form tonight.  Help me feel a bit more optimistic. As Gerry Rafferty sang, "when you wake up it's a new morning, sun is shining, it's a new dawning".

Help me, Bono.......

Shatter Watch: Forgiving ain't easy

Now far be it from me to rise up in defence of religious superstition, least of all that nonsensical Roman Catholic sacrament of Confession.  That’s the one where you confess your sins to a priest and, hey presto, and for a modest donation, all your sins are forgiven!  And if you believe that, as they say…

And that’s why I’m finding myself in the unusual situation of opposing a law I’d hitherto have enthusiastically supported .

Now it’s always been the case that such confessions are secret, God being the only other one who gets to hear about it.  So when a murderer or child rapist confesses, the priest cannot, using this information, assist the law in bringing the offender to justice. I think this is outrageous. Whatever mumbo jumbo goes on internally within a religion is ok once the laws of the land are not contravened. Much as I’d say that the Religion Of Peace cannot be allowed to stone adulterers or kill those they see as blasphemers.

Now we learn that ‘our’ Justice Minister Alan Shatter calls for legislation to make it mandatory to report crimes, regardless of any internal rules of a religion, i.e. end the seal of Confession. Fine, as far as it goes.  But why does it always seem to be Jewish interests who are so keen to make Christians toe the line?  Like in the US, where they have lead the campaigns, for decades, to ban school prayer and the display of the Ten Commandments in public spaces. Or in Britain, where we see one Lynne Choona Featherstone, born and brought up in British Jewish family, arranging to ban the wearing of the crucifix.

This again raises the question:  Does their enthusiasm for secularism and the non-favouring of any religion before the law apply to Israel as well?  I think we all know the answer to that. The usual approach, it’s good for thee but not for me.  Because it’s all part of the overall plan to undermine and marginalise western culture and institutions.


And that’s why I’m finding myself in the unusual situation of opposing a law I’d hitherto have enthusiastically supported .

The Lord moves in mysterious ways.

Even though it’s been a central component of our culture I’ve hated organised Christianity from a very young age.  A major part of the revulsion has been the all-consuming stench of hypocrisy that slimed every level of the organisation. But if you want to encounter an industrial scale example, well, read on.

According to the Irish Times “Michelle Mulherin (FG Mayo) gave the media palpitations during the debate on abortion legislation when she quivered about “fornication” in the course of an ironically impenetrable speech.”  Michelle bemoaned the country’s moral turpitude, it’s proliferation of fornication, and then issued a dire warning. “Fornication leads to births outside of marriage”

Wow!  Who could have imagined?

For her troubles this throwback to a bygone age  became the butt of countless jokes, one of which had a photo of her in a nun’s garb.

But the real Michelle , “who holds strong Christian beliefs” is somewhat different to this picture. Because she has had, as ‘a very  close companion’ a Kenyan cultural enricher. Since 1997!   "But The Irish Mail reveals that  in defending her position she neglected to mention her own first-hand knowledge of the impact sex outside marriage can have.  The Irish Mail on Sunday can reveal that the man she is referring to is Mr Kole, a devout born-again Christian educated in Mombasa, Kenya.

“Kole, who ‘holds very strong born-again Christian beliefs’ (just like Michelle) left Kenya in the mid-Eighties and moved to London, where he worked as a part-time photographer for a number of years before travelling to Ireland for a weekend break in 1989. During his short stay here, he met a wealthy French woman and the pair began a relationship. He moved to Ireland to live with her full time.”

Aw, isn’t that nice?  I love a bit of romance.

According to the Mail however “after three years together, the couple decided to go their separate ways and Mr Kole, who was describing himself as an actor at the time” (well fuck me, that was true anyway) “moved to Calary, Co. Wicklow” where the 35 year-old met an 18-year-old south Dublin girl who "would go on to have his child". No surprise there.  But here comes the really amazing bit.  Are you holding on to something solid? Because Kole left the mother and hightailed it when the baby was just 12 months old!  

Can you credit a black father doing that?

Shortly after abandoning the mother and child this devout Christian met another devout Christian. In this case Michelle Mulherrin, who was and is quite a high flyer. She’s a leading lawyer in the West of Ireland, Mayor of Ballina (a good-sized town on Mayo) and a TD (equivalent to a British MP).  Undeterred by his past indiscretions she brought Kone back to Ballina with her and got him a job in a hotel. And he’s been there since.  Now, given that they’re both devout God-fearing Christians we must assume that the relationship is totally platonic.

Yes. An African going without muh dick for 15 years.

Truly a miracle.  Truly the Lord moves in mysterious ways.