Questions, questions....

In this blog we’re not afraid to ask – and answer – the tough questions.  And today’s question is - 'should a clinically certified lunatic whom the Council of Lawyers deem legally 'unqualified' be appointed a Circuit Court judge?'

A tricky one, you'll agree.  Let me help with some background.

Judge Cynthia Brim of the Chicago Circuit Court  (mugshot on the left) has 'form', which culminated in a spectacular courtroom chimpout earlier this year in which she descended from the bench and waded into the crown, scattering all before her and finally assaulting a sheriff. Prior to this she had gone on a 45 minute rant in which she berated police for prosecuting so many blacks, shrieking to the blacks in the courtroom that the white law enforcement officers had 'raped our ancestors'. She then ran around with her hands to her head reciting various phone numbers and addresses, again and again.

By this time, having whipped up the black criminals into a frenzy, the men in white coats stepped in whereupon she was subdued and lead from the court. Following an examination by a court-appointed psychiatrist she was diagnosed as 'legally insane' (although many of you might think that this was perfectly normal behaviour for a black 'judge') and temporarily removed from duty. But she continues to draw her $180,000 salary....and worth every penny too.

The good news is that it looks like this latter-day Oliver Wendell Holmes is going to be re-elected to the Chicago Circuit Court on November 7. Her District is 80% black and   they don't worry too much about incidentals like being unqualified and insane. Hey, nobody's perfect, right? And you know what, they could be right.  Just check out these lunatics here, here and here on this side of the pond.

Ireland's Ghetto Lottery: The gift that just keeps giving

We might have been driven to the edge of ruination by our crooked bankers and incompetent politicians, but some things go on as if nothing at all has changed. In particular our Ghetto Lottery and the various 'human rights' quangos that disperse the shrinking reservoir of taxpayers' funds to offended cultural enrichers.

This week we learn of a Zimbabwean man who claimed he had not been promoted and had been made work unpleasant shifts. So what? You may well ask. We don't all get promoted and don't all get to work our preferred shifts. But the Equality Tribunal (yugh!) deemed that dat be racis' and awarded the 'victim' €25,000. Nice one. How did the tribunal, comprised of lawyers, trade unionists, human rights 'activists' and other useless parasites, none of whom ever had even come close to running a business, how did they judge that the company's decision was based on race?

Well, they just did, that's all.

.

An interesting point: The company did not even bother to attend. Why? Because they knew that with the stacked deck, and the bizarre cost assignment rules (the complainant gets his fees even if he loses, but the company does not get their fees even if they win) meant they just saved time by not attending.

Then a black South African was awarded €15,000 for 'discrimination regarding access to promotion.' How did the tribunal know if the lack of promotion was not justified? See above. Although the fact that a white (shudder) South African was in a management position could have had something to do with it.

And the final bunch of winners in this week's exciting event were a group of taxi drivers in Galway. They picked up nearly €50,000 between them because they were 'discriminated on the grounds of race'. How? They wanted to become shareholders in a company but were refused.

Now isn't that interesting? In fact it's a ground-breaking ruling. It says that a private company must accept every black who wants to become a shareholder. Now isn't that something? What about a company that strikes oil? Must they open their shareholders' register to any black who comes along? Now that should prove to be interesting.

My only hope is that, if things get bad enough here, that this insanity will be brought to a halt, simply because there won't be any more fools' money to pay for it.

Please watch this video clip

Thanks to Robert for sending us in this link. It shows Austrian MP Ewald Stadler ripping into the Turkish Ambassador, and into Islam, in a breathtaking way. It was so good I must have played it half a dozen times. And even better was the reaction from his fellow parliamentarians. Most of them cheered and clapped loudly. Things are really changing.

Play and enjoy.


But my joy was tempered with other news from Austria. Here a local man was fined €800 because his yodelling offended his next-door Muslim neighbours. The mad judges ruled he “could have tried to offend them and ridicule their belief.”
.
I swear – I'm not making this up.

Still, I believe the balance from these two stories to be highly positive. First that a parliamentarian can say what he did and, far from being shouted down (the usual response) was actually applauded by his fellow legislators. As for the yodeling incident, exasperating in itself but I believe that in the long term this kind of thing will translate into a popular democratic revolt.

Relief....

Well, what a relief that the murdering bastard Joe O’Reilly has had his appeal turned down. Now those of you familiar with the case may say that he was so blatantly guilty of his wife’s killing that no other outcome was possible.

But those of you familiar with Ireland’s mad judges know that such an outcome was very possible indeed. I can think of many potential reasons for an acquittal. The police weren’t wearing their caps when they arrested him, the didn’t fill out the arrest warrant in triplicate, or it should have been done with blue not black ink. The possibilities for letting this psychopath loose on the general public were limitless.

Thankfully we’ve had a rare demonstration of good sense. Now he’ll spend the rest of his life behind bars. Well, make that the next eight to ten years, because that’s what a ‘life sentence’ means in Ireland. Still, we should be thankful for small mercies.

Enter: The Johnny Cochrane defence

The insanity which has come to characterise anything race-related is neatly underlined by the case of Theodore Ricks. This treasure, had no license when cops say he slammed into a livery car early Saturday, killing the driver and his wife before speeding away.

He was very bad to do that, you’d think.

But no – it wasn’t really his fault.

Why not?

Well, because he was being chased by cops at the time. And what the fuck has that got to do with anything, you may well ask. Ah well, here comes the rub. Ricks (who callously told cops the couple should have been wearing their seat belts, and was on the road despite his license having been suspended or revoked nearly two dozen times since 2005), is black.

Getting the picture?

Over to his attorney for the Johnny Cochrane defence. He was “not a reckless motorist but rather the victim of racial profiling. They were doing nothing wrong. They were just driving on the road. It raises a serious question why two black men in a Mercedes were stopped,” he argued.

I kid you not.

Police deny any chase and instead say Ricks saw cops along Cebra Ave. and floored his 1993 Mercedes-Benz, possibly because he was driving without a license and his passenger was carrying marijuana.

In the Johnnie Cochran defense you don’t argue reason, facts, logic, or law. You argue that the man (that’s you white people for the unenlightened) was keeping these fine black gentlemen down. You argue police misconduct caused these law-abiding men to panic. You argue to the black jury, the only way to stop police misconduct in the future is to stop police misconduct now.

Now, unbelievably, the cops are on the defensive!

Hang on, it’s not unbelievable at all. It’s what this PC/AA monster has lead us to.

God help us all.

Mad judge strikes again

There’s general acceptance, because it’s self-evident, that violence, public disorder and general lawlessness have increased dramatically over the last few decades. As has the ‘compo culture’, whereby everything that happens to you is someone else’s fault, and for which you ere entitled to substantial financial recompense, irrespective of your own responsibility.

In many ways the two are linked, in that, insidiously, personal responsibility is undermined, and with it standards of personal behaviour.

As with so many other problems in Ireland, our mad judges are in the thick of it, stirring the shit. Take the following case and ask yourself, have we all gone mad?

Niall Condon (30), an unemployed former construction and carwash worker from Corrandulla Co Galway, claimed that his wrist was broken and that he had suffered shoulder and head injuries during an incident after he was 'thrown out' of the Supermac's premises at Eyre Square.

In evidence heard last week, he said he had gone to the restaurant after drinking four or five pints at a city centre pub with fellow construction workers. He arrived at Supermac's after midnight but got into an argument with two other men. He was removed by bouncers with his arm behind his back and put outside the door. "I was told to f*** off and go home," he said.

After he made a number of attempts to get back into the premises the bouncers then made a "dive" for him and put him face down on the floor, before lifting him and taking him to a staff room at the rear of the restaurant. He was pinned to the floor there until a garda arrived. "My wrist was broken and the pain was unbearable -- I begged the garda to arrest me, just for my safety," he said.

Under cross-examination, Mr. Condon admitted he had made a statement to gardai that he had drunk seven or eight pints of beer on the night. He also agreed that his wrist had not been broken and that he had told the garda that he would "do" one of the security men if he could get a bottle. The court was told that Mr. Condon had been prosecuted and convicted at Galway District Court. He was fined €200 with €492 expenses for breaching the Public Order Act.

Which seems entirely reasonable.

But back now to my original point. This being Ireland, where you have no responsibility for your own actions, Condon took the sensible approach of suing the restaurant. For what? Well, kinda, like, well, let’s see. He was ‘hurt and humiliated’. Which is exactly what he should have been.

But, mad judge Mary Leffoy to the rescue. She acknowledged that he had been "a dreadful nuisance" and should have gone home, that he was intoxicated and loitered outside wanting ‘to best the security personnel’. But ‘he had been pulled in by the security men and lifted forcibly off his feet’.

Oh my God! How terrible! So terrible that the ‘learned’ judge awarded him €25,000 in ‘compensation’, plus all his costs. Which being a High Court case, would have been considerable.

Supermac's founder and CEO, Pat McDonagh, said afterwards that, while he had to accept the High Court decision, he found it "amazing". Well, yes and no Pat. Amazing that a gurrier who got thrown out ends up with €25k. but, given our past experience of mad judges, not in the least surprising.

And of course as job losses soar, not least due to the high cost of doing business here, such cases add greatly to this problem. But it’s not a problem for the judges and the rest of the legal system that parasite on productive people like Pat McDonagh.

Again, the Cleansing Hellfire of severe recession might clear out a lot of this stuff.

We deserve all we get. Again.

About a week ago I had a post entitled ‘We deserve all we get’ which highlighted the fact that about 100 Albanian murderers and gangsters were refused extradition from the UK by the UK courts, for reasons that will be apparent only to mad judges. My point was that a people that doesn’t rise up against such outrages ultimately deserves what it gets.

Now I have another splendid example from closer to home. This is the case of Kristoff Alauya, a Nigerian cultural enricher who has been sentenced to life for the brutal murder of a pretty Belfast girl Grace Moore. The judge said it was ‘impossible to comprehend’ the brutality and callousness of the killing and subsequent ransacking of the flat. He added that experienced police officers ‘had been devastated’.

After the murder and robbery (and possible rape – the girl was covered in semen, both internally and externally) the cultural enricher went for a meal ‘because he was hungry’. Obviously he was deeply traumatized by the experience.

As you’d expect, this guy has form. He had applied for asylum in Dublin (can't imagine why they didn’t do the usual, ‘come in, make yourself at home, bring joy and diversity to our dull lives’). He kept busy while waiting for the decision. In this short time he married an Irish woman and fathered children by four different retards women. In between he had attacked and robbed two taxi drivers and began dealing in crack cocaine.

Needless to say, our mad judges let him out on bail, at which point he skipped up to Belfast and within days had robbed and murdered Grace Moore. So mark down another rape/murder to our ‘learned’ judges.

Now you may well ask yourself why I'm writing this. After all, violent thieving African fuck-machines marauding around the country are hardly noteworthy by now. True. But my point is this: haven’t the victims, and by extension the rest of us, brought this on themselves?

Despite the oppressive PC censorship blanket, almost everyone in Ireland now knows what Nigerians are like. Not least their high incidence of HIV. Yet, within a very short time of arriving here he got some Irish girl to marry him. Found three more to impregnate (and God knows how many others he didn’t knock up), unleashing four future criminals onto society. And he got the taxpayer to pick up all their living expenses.

After the violent robberies I referred to, he was let loose on society again

He then meets an attractive girl in a nightclub, who, never having met him before, invited him back to her house. Where he rapes, kills and robs her.

Again I ask, how fucking stupid and irresponsible are these girls/women who went out with him? Do they deserve much sympathy for what happened? I'm not sure that they do. What about the mad judges who let him out, to continue his life of violent crime? Well, they don't need sympathy, as they’re safe and comfortable in their leafy wealthy suburbs.

One final point: The judge noted that Alauya felt more sorry for himself than for the victim and her family. This is classic psychopathic behaviour and supports once again the link between this syndrome and race. If you haven’t read my earlier post on this, read it here.

Jail the judge!

Bartender Martin Prokopec was on is way home in the early hours of November 1, 2004 when he bumped into Bryan McBarron on Arklow's Main Street and fell into conversation with him. The barman gave McBarron a cigarette and went to walk away after declining to give him a second one.

.

But McBarron ran after him with a knife and stabbed him several times in the head and face. As well as the stab wounds, Mr Prokopec was left with fractures near his eye and cheek bone, exposed tendons on his hand and injuries to the abdomen, back and scalp. The brutal attack left the Slovakian man fighting for his life.

The case came to court in December 2005 at which point Irish justice swung into action. Judge Pat McCartan gave McBarron, who also had previous convictions for drink driving, criminal damage and possession of a flick knife, a two-year sentence at Wicklow Circuit Criminal Court.

.

Two years! But it gets better. Because this particular Mad Judge then suspended the sentence, and this violent thug walked free from the court.

.
Well done ‘learned’ judge.

.

Now fast forward to June 2007, where this beauty stabs to death the daughter of an eminent cardiologist. As the Irish Independent delicately put it (musn’t upset the ‘learned’ judges now, and risk contempt of court) “McBarron was only free at the time of the murder because a judge suspended a two-year sentence for a brutal attack which left a Slovakian man fighting for his life.”

In other words Sara Neligan would be alive today if this prick of a judge had done his job and put McBarron away for about 20 years. And we wonder why our murder rate goes up and up.

'we're the boys who fear no noise'

Ex-soldier Victor Murtagh was awarded over €300,000 in the High Court this week to compensate for his experiences in Lebanon. With a name like Victor it's probably not surprising that he apparently 'always wanted to be a soldier', presumably attracted by the cut and thrust of battle and the adrenalin rush of taking it to the enemy. So here's the story.

He joins the Irish Army and gets trained in the skills of combat. Gets posted to Lebanon in due course. But then things start to go wrong. He heard a 'loud explosion' down the road which frightened the shit out of him, and then when he heard that two other soldiers were killed (imagine that, soldiers killed!) he became very upset. Very upset indeed.

So decided to sue the army. And he gets awarded €300k.

That all makes sense I suppose, and there's plenty of precedent. Historical records reveal that both Hitler and Stalin were driven demented during the Battle of Stalingrad with compensation claims from soldiers complaining of the noise. 'Mein Gott, can't they fight more quietly?' fumed Hitler, 'these claims are bankrupting the Reichsbank'.

It's sad that the army's proud claim of 'we're the boys who fear no noise' is now somewhat diminished. Still, looking at the bright side, in these days of growing unemployment, a whole new compensation industry is opening up, catering for every soldier who was ever upset by a loud bang.

Mad judge to the rescue

What a complete crock of shit the Pamela Izevbekhai ‘asylum’ saga is. She’s the one who, with the aid of the Immigration Industry, has secured leave from a deluded judge to challenge her deportation in the High Court. We all know what a High Court case costs, and she has already been bleeding the legal system dry for nearly three years as every angle is pursued. No problem of course, the Irish taxpayer is picking up the bill for the whole thing.
.
According to the Irish Independent, her story is a mass of lies and contradictions. Now isn't that a surprise?
.
Izevbekhai, who bears an uncanny resemblance to one of the savages who bloodied the streets of Cork recently, claimed she arrived in this country from the Netherlands. However, there is no evidence that she was ever granted a visa, according to Dutch officials.
.
She came here at the end of January 2005 and immediately claimed asylum status. Her application was fully processed and having exhausted the appeals mechanisms, she was informed in November 2005 that she was to be deported. Her case has been fought through the courts since she was arrested in early January 2006 although the High Court ruled in favour of the State. Again, what a waste of time, money and other resources for this country.

.
Officials disclosed last night that she applied for a UK visa in September 2003 and was issued with a multi-visit visa for six months. She and her husband subsequently applied for a further UK visa in mid 2004 and received a two-year permit in June of that year. Although that visa did not expire until the middle of 2006, she arrived in Ireland in January 2005 and claimed she had never used the UK visas.

Her husband was later arrested by detectives from the Garda National Immigration Bureau in Dundalk and was returned to the UK where the authorities sent him to Nigeria.

Her fight against deportation has been fought mainly on the basis that her 18-month old daughter died after undergoing genital mutilation at the insistence of her husband's family and she feared that her other two daughters could face the same fate if the family returned. Immigration officials have argued that this incident took place in 1995 but, by her own account, she did not leave Nigeria until January 2005.

.
As I say, what a crock of shit. A total waste of our facilities, money, manpower and resources for un utterly bogus asylum claim. Despite this being demonstrably clear, the stupid courts have allowed her, at our expense, to dance a jig around us for over three years.

Holland goes completely mad

My friend Oskar - my eyes and ears in Rotterdam - send me this link. As I read it my head lolled and my tongue hung out in disbelief.

Read on:

THE HAGUE, 11/03/08 - A district court in Rotterdam has acquitted a 20 year old Somali of a mugging. Although the police found his loot in his pocket, the judge wanted to see more evidence.
The victim said he was threatened by the Somali, who told him he had a revolver aimed at his back. He received a blow on his head and was forced to surrender his wallet.

When the police arrived they found the wallet in the Somali's jacket pocket. The Public Prosecutor (OM) considered robbery proven, but ran up against the judge, who wanted to see further evidence.

The judge was unmoved by the OM's argument that the victim had given a very detailed statement and the fact that the Somali had been convicted of mugging earlier, Additionally the suspect lied in more than one court case in the past, the OM argued in vain.

"One must certainly have guts to immediately mug someone again after just having served a prison sentence of some months. One must also assume that the defendant has learned something from the sentence and that it has made him wiser," according to the judge, who ordered the man's release!!!

The Somali showed that this was not enough for him. He was kept in custody for two months despite, he claims, being innocent and will demand damages from the man who accused him. If I were the victim I'd start arranging a bank load as soon as possible.

By the way, Oskar tells me that this case never made it to the MSM. Isn't that amazing?

Our wonderful judges

Jaroslav Gotszik is a Pole living in Ireland. The Polish Government tried to get him extradited to face charges related to sexual abuse of children. They submitted two extradition requests to the Irish courts.

All fine and dandy you'd think, get this bastard out of here as fast as possible and back to the fellow EU country that wants to try him. But mad judges don't think like that. The 'learned' Michael Peart decided that, on a technicality (there were two warrants, not one) he refused the application. Well done, you stupid bollocks.

But then I nearly Gotszik when it emerged that the defendant was released on bail. Presumably he'll now 'remove himself from the jurisdiction' and continue his nefarious activities somewhere else.

Don't our judges really inspire you?

Sane judge shock

Judge Sean McBride may not be a shining light in the field of jurisprudence. For example he threatened to ‘blow the head off’ any unwanted intruder, and referred to a defendant as ‘an IRA scumbag’. Some may see these as refreshing directness, and he certainly didn’t fail on that count at a recent court case. This case involved one Gregory Ebhotemen, presumably a Nigerian, and presumably like all other Nigerians, is here on some criminal activity.

Anyway, the judge blew his top when the boys in blue didn’t oppose bail. ‘How can you not oppose bail when they come here without any identification, no passport, driving license, nothing?’ To which your Savant would add, touché. Warming to the subject, he added that Ireland was becoming a ‘laughing stock’ and going ‘to hell in a hand-cart’ in relation to immigration controls. So there are non-mad judges out there.

These developments underline the fatuousness of our ‘Integration Minister’ Conor Lenihan. Conor says ‘it’d be a total disaster if we mismanaged immigration like some other European countries’.

Conor, listen to me – and to the judge. That's exactly what we’re doing, me oul’ mate. There’s only one solution and that's to avoid altogether the need for an Integration Minister. Don’t allow any high-risk categories to come in here at all, irrespective of the excuse. Deport anyone – everyone – who fails to meet what should be rigid criteria. Those here legally (i.e. we bought the crock of shit they sold us as so-called asylum seekers) should be paid to leave. Do it now Conor, and if the immigration industry kicks up, withdraw their generous grants.

Conor – future generations are depending on you. Are you going to let the country to ‘to hell in a hand-cart’ as per the eminent judge, or will you actually do something about it? Remember, the people would be behind you on this.

Our wonderful judges

Our judges continue to be a source of reassurance with their solid, sensible, commonsense approach to key issues.

First take this family from Nigeria (yes, please take them). This wonderful addition to our country are all AIDS infected. But Justice Geoghegan allows them challenge a deportation order because of a risk of the family not obtaining proper AIDS treatment in Nigeria.

Now, unlike our head-in-the-cloud judges, let's think sensibly about this. Does this mean that any illegal AIDS-infected immigrant can stay here if he or she can't obtain proper treatment in their home country? Seems to me fairly clear. Would it be any surprise then if, based on this judgement, we get flooded with such people? Quite apart from the impact on our tottering health services, given Africans' attitudes to sexuality, we can be sure that their affliction would in due course be defused more widely here.

Another Nigerian, a women this time, has been served with a deportation order. She claims her son is autistic, but this was not accepted in the deportation procedings. However, mad judge to the rescue again, this time in the form of Justice Feeney. He based the case on the possibility that the child might in fact be autistic. So again, can any illegal immigrant with an autistic child come here and stay for treatment? Seems like it. This when Irish citizens with autistic children are travelling to Canada because our health services cannot provide adequate support. With judges like this, it'll be a long time before that changes.

By the way, a post-script to this. The lady in question has 'fled' from Italy, where she had already been granted asylum. Why? Well, because, like, it's better in Ireland. With the number of mad judges we have, she's dead right. Precedents arising from these rulings will come back to haunt us in double-quick time.

Mad judge disease

Your Savant was long of the view that Ireland held the proud record for having the most mad judges. Who can forget the case of the Nigerian witch-doctor who killed a child trying to 'circumcise' him? The child bled to death. How did the fuckwit judge instruct the jury? 'You must not judge him by our culture, but by his. Was this legal in his culture?"

With instructions like that, the jury had no option but to acquit the butcher. But reflect. It's not the law of the land that applies, it's the so-called 'culture' of the offender. Do these judges know even the most basic facts of the law? Taking his 'logic' to its conclusion, if the same Nigerian were to have murdered one of his wives for adultery, would that also be judged according to his culture or religion? It seems so, and that means that a cannibal immigrant from New Borneo who consumes his neighbour, would also get acquitted, and be free to dine again on his remaining neighbours.

I really hadn't realised that there were people this stupid still alive in modern Ireland, let alone in positions of responsibility. But the same bacillus has now spread to Germany. This woman, of Moroccan descent, as the saying goes, was being beaten by her Moroccan husband. She appealed to the court for protection. The case was thrown out on the basis, not on the law of the land, but on the Koran, which allows a husband beat the shite out of his wife if she's 'unchaste'.

Unchaste in this instance meant leading a normal German lifestyle. But the 'learned' judge, that's really got to make you laugh, decided that 'according to the Koran, man has dominance over women [true] - so there is no need for you to get a divorce'. You couldn't make this kind of thing up.