Those damn Swedes are at it again!

I see that a woman having an epileptic fit in the trendy and  'vibrant' Sodermalm area of Stockholm had her purse robbed as she lay helplessly twitching on the ground. Lovely.  According to the report the local police chief didn't hesitate to 'take one more jab at the heartless perpetrator.'  Boy, listen to this. 

"Woman had an epileptic seizure on the street. Then someone came and stole her wallet. Description: lacking in compassion and morals. Otherwise unknown"

"Otherwise unknown"?  Well now that's not quite correct, Chief.  You see the comments to the article revealed that bystanders had identified the perp as - are you holding onto something solid? - an immigrant, variously described as Arab or African.  Those revealing comments were of course deleted as fast as possible by The Local's thought police, rendering, by the way, the remaining comment thread hilariously incomprehensible.

The same edition announced that Swedes could vote online by 2018.  And illustrated it with this typical high-tech Swedish voter, shown here.

I ask again, does such madness mean they believe they've won or that they're getting desperate?

In the same issue the rag had a piece by someone with a name like Makarandasavatabanakamustan entitled 'What Can Sweden Learn From India In Advanced Medicine?' I could have given them a quick answer to that: 'Nothing'.  But that wasn't the point you see. The point being that so-called advanced Western/White science (patronising chuckles) wasn't really that advanced after all.

They never give it a break, do they?  

Testosterone and violent crime

In a comment to an earlier post, Ben017 provided us with this interesting piece of research from the University of Western Ontario:


"For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, [East] Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data).


One neurohormonal contributor to crime and reproductive behavior is testosterone. Studies show that black college students and military veterans have 3% to 19% more testosterone than their white counterparts. The Japanese have even lower amounts than whites. Sex hormones are circulated throughout the body and are known to activate many brain-behavior systems involving aggression and reproduction."


This is a perfect fit (as the bishop said to the altar boy) with what I've been saying all along (see tags 'race' and 'crime') and has - or should have - major implications for European immigration policy. But it won't.

A stunning breakthrough

Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick (not Patrick Deval), the first black Governor of that state, has proclaimed Obama's ascension as offering the solution to the notorious rates of black imprisonment. In an impassioned appeal, he calls for Obama to 'redress the last great legacy of slavery' - the ratio of blacks jailed compared to other races. He sees this as an update on Martin Luther King's 'I have a dream' speech.

I found myself fired by this as well. What a vision! If only it could be achieved! But how?

I set about finding out. I devoted myself day and night. Chateau Savant was declared off limits to Lady Savant and the savantettes as I confined myself to my research. Weighty legal tomes littered the floor, interspersed with mounds of research papers on criminology. The Internet hummed with an avalanche of queries and responses from around the world.

But the answer wouldn't come. I lay wake at night, sweated, thrashed about, tortured by images of incarcerated blacks. 'Help me Bono' I cried out 'in my hour of need'.

And He must have intervened, because suddenly, in a blinding flash it came to me. The history-changing solution to black incarceration rates. And it was as simple as it was brilliant:

'Reduce your crime levels to those of whites and you'll go to jail at the same rate as whites'.

Isn't that something? Like all breakthrough discoveries, it was there in front of us all the time.

Now, must be off, have to put in a call to the Pres-Elect to give him an update. I think a Nobel Prize could well be on the way.

A suitable boy

Have you ever noticed how the recently deceased take on virtues that were largely unrecognised when they were alive? Nowhere is this more evident than when referring to the victims of black-on-black gang crime in the UK. It often seemed to me that the murderers sought out the most good-living and innocent as their victims.

Take as an example the shooting of 16 year-old Congolese immigrant Jonathan Matondo in Sheffield about a year ago. The BBC had it “much loved by his friends, family and the community." The teenager was "such a good boy, so funny" (quoting his uncle), and they quoted the ‘Reverend’ Jack Kinsiona to the effect that the murdered teenager had even planned to become a preacher!

Mr. Kinsiona, apparently, cried as he spoke about the youngster. "Jonathan was a great person, he had been to our church. . . I am crying now . . . because Jonathan was very popular in the church." The vicar added: "I want you to know that Jonathan was not bad. He was a very, very, very great person."

Now we know that the Beeb has drunk so liberally of the multi-culti Kool-Aid that anything they say is suspect. But even the Daily Mail, that staple of fuming, purple-faced colonels in their clubs, lets us know, in a blaring headline, that “Teenager who wanted to be a priest murdered in 'Wild West' shootout between feuding gangs”.

Now, simple soul that I am, I was duly impressed by all of this, and all the other black paragons of virtue who had met their untimely ends in the course of gang attacks. Well, I was impressed until I spoke to a friend currently doing a research stint in one of Sheffield’s two universities. He revealed that he’d been attracted by its claim to be ‘Britain’s safest city’. (Mind you, that's like claiming to be the world’s tallest dwarf, but no matter).

In fact it seems that, in common with most British cities, whole areas of Sheffield are given over to violent criminal gangs, most of a non-white hue. Needless to say, the Somalis are at the forefront. They control the Broomhall area, and police intruding on their patch will be met by a hail of gunfire, and if they persist, by petrol bombs from the balconies.

These ‘tower blocks’ are of course referred to by the MSM as deprived, isolated, ignored – you know the drill. With this in mind I direct you to the image below where St. Jonathan was killed. This, apparently, is the epicentre of the problem area. Now what do you see?

Well what I see is a nicely laid out block of apartments, with a public park, plenty of greenery and a recreation area right alongside. In fact the kind of setup that most people in the UK, let alone the Congo or Somalia, would pay – and have paid - a lot of money to be part of.

And this brings me back to St. Jonathan. Apparently he wasn’t quite the paragon we were lead to believe. In fact, according to my friend, and there are several sources on the Web to back this up, he was a key figure in the gang warfare and drug dealing that blights the area.

A leading member of the S3 Gang, he was, according to police (admitting it now, as distinct from when he was shot) ‘a feared gunman and drug dealer, and someone who struck fear into other teenagers’. He apparently had a squad of police and youth workers assigned almost full-time to him. He rejoiced in the gang-name Venomous. And venomous he certainly was.

Now why did the MSM provide such a grossly misleading picture? Why do they continue to do so? Is it because the victims (and perpetrators, of course) are invariably black, and hence beyond balme for anything they do? I don't know, but whatever the reason, they’re failing miserably in their prime duty - that of keeping the citizenry informed.

But then, if they did keep us properly informed we might start asking the wrong questions. Like, ‘why the fuck are we leaving these savages into our country in the first place?’ Questions like ‘why don't we ship these bastards back to where they came from without further ado?’

A lot of unanswered questions throughout this post. But of one thing we can be 100% certain: Allowing large numbers of blacks into a country, city, suburb or school will see a commensurate and rapid decline into crime, violence, ignorance, welfare dependency and overall societal breakdown. And a final question: why should we put up with it?

And speaking of the ignorance element, I offer in conclusion some evidence of the skills these cultural enrichers will endow to British society. Here are some of the ‘in memoriams’ left at the scene of the murder.

"Its Eatin Away At Mee Cah I No Im Neva Guna See Mii Big Cuzen Agen..

"All Those Times Yuv Tld Me Yuv Gt Mii Bak Nd If Ne1 Bothers Mee Dat Yur Here Nd Yu Will Sort Em..

"OMDZZ Finkin Ov All Tha Memories Nd Stuff Nd Theres Soo Mani Ov Em..!!..

"Dis Shunt Hav Happend Tu Yu.. Lovin Yuu, Missin Yuu, Hurtin Wifout Yuu Nd NEVA Forgettin Yuu..

And even in the unlikely event of any of these latter-day Shakespeares applying for a job, you couldn’t test them on their writing skills as this would ‘contravene equality legislation’. Think I'm joking? Check out my earlier post here.

Jamaica love song

Jamaicans have been flooding into Britain for the last 50 years, and this gives an example of how they live back home. (By the way, the stabbing epidemic in the UK is almost exclusively an Afro-Carribiean issue). Jamaica is of course, like virtually all black-run countries (or neighbourhoods in Western countries, for that matter) overrun with crime. You can't walk around Kingston without an armed guard - and it's not much better in that tourist paradise, Barbados.

Anyway, the SAS blog showing a link to the Jamaica Sunday Post gives us an insight into the kind of cultural enrichment we can expect to embed itself here over the next few decades - for example the Notting Hill battle field 'carnival'.


Check this link to see how they behave in civilised society.

Crime Triggering Incest!

Walled in by crime and violence in some of Jamaica's violent inner cities, men and women answering nature's call for sex and companionship have turned to blood relatives - in some cases fathers to daughters, brothers to sisters and even mothers to their sons.

"It is heart-breaking," chairman of the Trench Town-based Caribbean Applied Technology Centre, Dr Henley Morgan, told the Sunday Observer. "There were areas in the inner cities where violence has forced individuals within a 30 square feet radius to remain there for years". "They cannot go up the lane, down the lane or anywhere else because of violence. The end result is this heart-breaking situation. The males have never left it (their communities) to find a girl. So they prey on each other"

Renowned social anthropologist specialising in social violence, Dr Herbert Gayle said “there are cases where mothers have turned to their sons, because their husbands or spouses are in prison and they go to her sons to fulfil her sexual needs..." One cop said "I have come across situations where during the investigation of a crime, you find everybody with the same surname. In one instance I interviewed 30 persons and they all have the same surnames. They were brothers, sisters, cousins and friends. It got to a point where you say 'wait a minute, what is happening here?' Only to retrace your steps to find that they are all family in the sickest kind of ways... It is just sickening..." he said, clearly uncomfortable discussing the issue.

Then we have crime dons, who, in the absence of police legitimacy, have taken over whole neighbourhoods. These dons initiate young girls, sometimes very young girls, into sex.Gale pointed out that the status and stock of the dons are closely linked to the number of children they sire, irrespective of their contribution to the lives of the children once they are born. [Now where have we seen that before?]

In modern societies, victims are able to access public psychiatric assistance in a bid to heal. According to the veteran cop, "Here (in Jamaica) people suffer in silence, and even more worrying is that the tragedy is repeated over and over again." Now I fully realise that whitey is to blame for all of this. But I can't seem to work out why. Any suggestions?

Now do you think they'll be any different here in ireland as their numbers swell?

The full article can be accessed here.

The solution to our crime wave

“For every complex problem” said the great HL Menken, “there is a solution that is clear, simple – and wrong”. There is one exception however – the crime wave that’s brought New York rates of murder to Dublin. This crime wave can be solved at a stroke. Seriously.

Ireland’s crime, like that in most of the Western world, is driven by the criminalisation of drugs. It’s not in dispute that the bulk of crime either directly, i.e. drug dealers doing their thing, or indirectly, desperate users robbing to feed their habit, is drug-related. The simple solution therefore is to legalise drugs. Or should I say, the drugs currently classed as illegal. For don’t forget that two of the most lethal drugs, nicotine, the most addictive and alcohol, one of the most damaging, are both perfectly legal.

Consider the following:

The current war on drugs is an absolute failure as illegal drugs are now cheaper and more plentiful than ever before. Police interceptions, proudly touted with ‘street values’ of x millions, achieve nothing other than temporarily raise the cost to the user. Which in turn increases his need to mug and rob.

How in any meaningful sense is the current regime any different to the doomed Prohibition in the US all those years ago? If there’s a demand for a ‘product’, people will pay to get it. If they can't get it legally, criminals will fill the gap.

Cocaine, heroin and speed are all hugely damaging, but not significantly more than the legal drugs. Arguably, they’re less damaging to health than nicotine, and less damaging to life and limb than excess use of alcohol.

The law enforcement resources poured into the war on drugs are at the expense of more practical alternatives (e.g. rape, house-breaking, street violence).

Methadone is for all practical purposes a drug like heroin – it occupies the same opiate receptor in the brain. Yet methadone is ‘good’.

The solution is – really is – simple:

Regulate the sale of all drugs in the same way as alcohol is now regulated. This will ensure the quality of the drugs, variances in which are the cause of many problems today. Tax them just like we now tax other drugs. The vast funds saved by eliminating the police and jailing costs, together with the tax revenues, can be applied to a major ongoing educational programme to deter potential users and to wean others off.

As Richard Brunston of the North Wales Police Authority says, "if policy on drugs is in future to be pragmatic not moralistic, driven by ethics not dogma, then the current prohibitionist stance will have to be swept away as both unworkable and immoral, to be replaced with an evidence-based unified system (specifically including tobacco and alcohol) aimed at minimisation of harms to society. “Prohibition has created a crisis in the criminal justice system, destabilised producer countries and undermined human rights worldwide.

By pursuing a policy of legalisation and regulation, the Government will dramatically reduce drug-related criminality and will enable significant funds to be transferred from law enforcement to harm reduction and treatment procedures that are known to work”.

Thanks you Richard, couldn’t have said it better myself