Happy parasites, willing hosts

Irish readers will be aware that our current Government faces the risk of collapse as various stakeholders squabble for their share of taxpayer loot. In fairness in most cases there's not a lot of money involved, a few million here, a few million there. Right now teams of eagle-eyed analysts forensically examine every Departmental budget and, to the accompaniment of squeals of anguish, try to squeeze out a few bob from somewhere. Anywhere. Nobody escapes.

Actually I'm wrong there because one budget is sacrosanct - that of foreign aid. Yes indeed, disabled kids must go without special needs assistants, elderly citizens spend years in agony as they wait for joint replacements, vital infrastructure projects are deferred but bicycles for Uganda's police (all stolen within weeks), $1500 flag-poles and swimming-pool maintenance for African despots get lavishly and unquestioningly funded. Not surprising really given that tiny Ireland forks out nearly €700 million annually for such necessities so there's plenty to go around.

Why do politicians, the people whom we assume value nothing other than their own careers, not spend on their own voters  instead of foreigners who'll never vote for them? A good question. And Ireland is not unique - most Western countries waste donate a similar proportion of their precious resources.

Meanwhile across the pond another massive giveaway has been agreed. In this case bankrupt America is donating no less than $38 billion to Israel in a ten year deal to be signed over the next few days. That's about $5,000 to every Israeli citizen, each of whom I'm sure is deeply appreciative. I'm also sure the deal requires the Israelis to discontinue stealing and selling on American technology. Congressmen are elected to look after American interests after all....

Overplaying his hand? Probably not.

Arranging a political meeting with the President of the United States, even if he is a just a Kenyan-born ex-community organiser, must be extraordinarily difficult. Details on date, duration, objectives and outcomes must be negotiated months in advance by specialised teams. If you're lucky enough to get offered a slot you jump at the opportunity. And you never cancel, especially at short notice. And, if perchance circumstances demand that you must, you arrange an agreed statement through formal diplomatic channels. What you do not do, under any circumstances, is make the announcement to your own media before you've worked through the formal Presidential channels.

Unless you're Bibi Netenyahu. Bibi is special. Although leader of just a small country in the Eastern  Med which has a parasitical relationship with America, indeed which depends on America for its continued survival, he has no need to worry about openly insulting America's First Citizen. Because he's not really dealing with him but with those who control him and control the Congresscritters holding the purse strings.  I'm talking about ZOG.  And when ZOG has your back you don't need to worry.

Just look at this obscenity if you don't believe me.

And why did Bibi give Barry the finger, humiliating not just him but indirectly the whole American people? Well he's known to be pissed off that the goyim didn't go to war for him against Iran like they did in Iraq, Libya and Syria. And rubbing salt in the wounds by actually signing agreement with Iran. That's the Iran that's been weeks away from making a nuclear bomb for the last five years. According to Beni.

Undeterred by his country's humiliation VP Joe Biden nonetheless headed off to Tel Aviv, checkbook in hand, to present Bibi with an increased aid package for the next ten years.

Strange old world we live in.....

Why the big deal with Pollard?

What's the big deal with Jonathan Pollard passing secret military intelligence to America's Closest Ally? Admittedly it seems there was some really serious stuff in there, including the deployment positions of American nuclear subs in the event of a war with the USSR. Details which the Israelis immediately traded with the Russkies in exchange for allowing more Jews emigrate to Israel. And at a stroke nullifying the whole American submarine-based ICBM capability. The Israelis also sold the most advanced AWACS system to Red China, thereby almost eliminating American first strike capabilities.

But hey, that's what friends are for.

What I don't understand is why such a fuss was made about Pollard given that the American Defense and Intelligence establishments are virtually run by Jewish-Israeli dual citizens (formal or informal), and have been for decades. Right off the top of my head I can name Michael Chertoff who headed Homeland "Security", Diane Feinstein who heads the Senate Select Committee On Intelligence, Joe Lieberman who heads the Senate Select Committee On Homeland Security, Carl Levin heading the Senate Armed Services Committee.  And as Victor Ostrovsky showed in copious detail in The Other Side Of Deception Jewish sayanim operate at every level of the American Defense and Intelligence establishments. So there are hundreds of Jonathan Pollards, and they're in every nook and cranny. And even if there's not one in the required position, well if the Senator in charge of Homeland Security wants information - no matter how classified - he gets it.

I'm not saying that all Jews working in intelligence would be complicit but in all honesty can you just imagine anything of significance being kept hidden from the Israelis under such circumstances? And that's my point. Maybe therefore there's some kind of crazed logic to the Israelis and his vociferous support groups in claiming that Pollard has actually been scapegoated. And that's maybe why they'll give him a hero's welcome in Israeli in due course .

It's clear where we stand

"Wife Of Jogger Killed In Texas Machete Attack Dies Of Likely Suicide"

The headline said it all. Well it didn't actually. Not by a long shot. The story is one in which a White jogger was hacked to death with a machete by a black thug, following which his grief-stricken wife committed suicide. So what? you ask. This is the USA where - in common with all of 'the West' - Whites are under unremitting attack by the orcs. Nothing to see here, move along now.

The TV report on the incident is the reason I post. Check it out. The victims are given mere cursory mention with almost all of the report (despite the headline) taken up with the murderer's football talent, speculation on the reasons why he hasn't fully capitalised on this talent and on the reporter's interview with the murderer's "grief-stricken" mother. The usual 'he a good boy. Dindu nuffins'.

And this in the Great State of Texas. Where gun-totin' real men don't put up with this kind of thing.

Tech industry: Reality dawns

Nothing elicits within me such a deep sense of joy as seeing SJWs become hoist to their own petard as their Victimhood Hierarchy founders on its inherent insane contradictions. Like this lady, the story of whose cultural enlightenment had me rolling on the floor for days on end. Thank you madam for the free entertainment.

The latest heartening development comes from an unlikely source: The tech industry, an industry which overwhelmingly financed and voted for Obama.  They took great pride in it. Their status whoring on the High Moral Ground was legendary and endless. But if you got tears prepare to shed 'em because now  it's all gone horribly wrong.  Deluded White guys who voted en masse for Bathhouse Barry are now tearing their ponytails to shreds as his measures destroy their livelihoods.

Here's the harrowing story from one White guy testifying (anonymously, due to fear of reprisal from his "liberal" Obama-financing ex-employers) to the Senate Judiciary Committee on his demise. A demise that afflicts millions more like him.   “I’ve paid my taxes, obeyed the laws and have been a good citizen supporting the community with donations,” the former SCE worker wrote. “I voted for President Obama and was appalled that he implemented a rule change, which allows work permits to H-1B spouses. My future votes will only go to candidates that support reforms to the H-1B visa program that preserve the American worker.”

Well buddy, you voted for Hope 'n' Change. You've got the change, but would I be right if I said you're a bit short on the hopey bit? Thought so. Am I sorry for you?  Not one little bit. Because had you been honest this is what you'd have told the Committee. "Hey, when I voted for The Redeemer I thought he'd screw over the racist White bigots in the South and Mid-West. He was not supposed to cost me my job! Oh Jeez, I hate that fucking nigger."

But take heart. Because the Community Organizer will do one thing for you: He'll protect your EBT card to the bitter end. But sadly this bitter end's not too far off as the financial Ponzi on which it's based will soon come crashing down.

Indeed we live in interesting times.....

A longish post but bear with me as I'm going somewhere with it. To make my point I'll focus on the USA but the ramifications can be extended to all White countries.

First take a look at the current international stock market melt-down. Is this the Big One, where the spinning plates of the financial ponzi finally spiral to earth, or will mass money printing by the world's central banks stave off the evil day for a little longer? I don't know, but for sure this baby will blow sometime soon.  And the ensuing destruction will be epic. Add into the mix the ongoing hollowing out of America's real economy (a process to be rapidly accelerated by the introduction of the secretive Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)), the displacement of  skilled Americans by H1B visa holders, and the general war against Whites, White males in particular.

Despite the Fed's dollar-printing ponzi these developments have pushed the economic position of Americans, especially Whites, into long-term decline. This decline will become precipitous over the coming years. First it looks like the dollar will lose the preeminent reserve currency status (RCS) that has provided America with a standard of living vastly higher than its productive capacity entitles it. Not only would a sharp diminution of RCS reduce purchasing power it would lead to foreigners presenting a flood of IOUs for redemption. Assuming they no longer accept the Fed's confetti money the redemption will take the form of physical asset purchases. Typically real estate. This in turn will precipitate an inflationary spiral in the domestic economy in the context of stagnant salaries and wages.

Now let us turn to immigration. Europe and the USA have virtually given up control of their borders. Whole regions of the USA are being over-run with the dregs of the Third World, depriving Americans of jobs, driving up welfare and housing costs while atomising society. More fundamentally they're  changing the very make-up of the American population. The economic significance being the fatal weakening of the legendary American can-do attitude. There will be no traditional come-back from adversity this time simply because the traditional people have been substantially replaced.

The net effect is a drastic decline in the economic fortunes of Whites, arguably greater than that experienced during the Great Depression. But the malaise goes well beyond economic. Every aspect of traditional White Christian culture has been under relentless attack with White males in particular the subject of ritual humiliation in the courts, academia, media, 'entertainment' and employment. Hollywood and the likes of MTV disgorge an endless stream of degenerate filth, featuring every form of depravity and never miss an opportunity to extol the negro and demean Whites.

Despite all of this Whites have remained passive and accepting. So far. But the spring of resentment is being coiled to breaking point. Will the forthcoming squabble for rapidly reduced resources be the trigger that uncoils that spring? As Fred Reed has speculated 'it could explode. It really could. You might be surprised how many people out there think 'bring it on'. Not a good idea, but we go that way.'

And if it does blow the people will be looking for explanations. If not scapegoats. Now what does the following Cast Of Villains bring to mind? International financiers, speculators, globalists, the Federal Reserve, open border advocates, Hollywood moguls, the owners of  the newspapers and TV stations that celebrate White dispossession, and the agents of government subservience to the Israeli Lobby?

Get my drift?

And believe me, already that genie has one leg out of the bottle. People are making the connection. How do I know? Largely through a comprehensive analysis of reader comments on mainstream outlets, outlets that cross the political spectrum. As I said here, I spend long hours evaluating such comments because they represent the only reliable source of the ordinary person's views. And that's allowing for the frantic efforts of moderators to weed out unsanctified opinion.

Those views have undergone a seismic paradigm shift over the last five years or so. The numbers who have become wise to Jewish manipulations have increased by many orders of magnitude. Hitherto an 'anti-Semite' comment that managed to make it onto a mainstream outlet would have been buried in an avalanche of rebuke. Now such comments are commonplace and it seems that the hasbaras have actually given up the fight on many leading forums. What a turnaround! Now couple this rapidly growing awareness with the impending catastrophe I referred to and the Jewish position becomes seriously uncomfortable.

I've spent a considerable part of my retirement trying to understand why Jews have been so unpopular throughout history. My going in explanation was envy at their intelligence and hard-won success compounded by the Christ-killer myth. But research showed in fact that Jews always over-reached themselves via ethnic favouritism, becoming increasingly arrogant until ultimately, immune to any sense of responsibility and blinded to others' perception of them they provoked an explosive backlash. My own exemplar for this was the appointment of Stanley Fischer, former Governor of the Central Bank Of Israel as Deputy Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. This appointment was so grotesque, arrogant and insensitive that for the first time I began to think that Jews really might not be that clever after all. Talk about hostages to fortune! Here's part of what I wrote about the appointment in this post:

"I'm just staggered at the chutzpah here, which borders on the reckless.  The Federal Reserve (of course it's not 'Federal' at all. It's privately owned by the major American banks and has been a Jewish preserve since God was a boy) has, over the last few decades, roundly screwed up the US economy and further enriched the infamous 1%.  Now were I a member of the tribe in question, especially when you consider that tribe's existing stranglehold on the MSM, Hollywierd, the law, politics and academia I'd be saying - I really would -  Jesus lads, take it easy will yez? We'll have everyone else down on top of us like a ton of bricks. This is totally over the top. Stop it, for the love of God or we're all fucked.

Who knows how things will play out?  But indeed we live in interesting times.....

More guidance for The Donald

On this forum (and on most other on the Alt Right) we regularly take Israelis and their dual citizens to task for their breathless hypocrisy on immigration and race mixing. We flail them for imposing these abominations on White civilisation while jealously guarding their own ethnic and religious purity. But now I think there's a way of turning it to our advantage via the candidacy of Donald Trump.

Here's my proposed pitch for him on immigration.

"My admiration and affection for the great state of Israel is well known [here he itemises his various pilgrimages to ZOG HQ in that country].  Because for millennia Jews have suffered persecution, scattered to the four corners of the earth but still (in the face of seemingly impossible odds) fought to retain their unique ethnic and religious heritage, culminating in the establishment of Israel in 1948. At last Jews had their own homeland, a homeland which they were forced to defend militarily on at least three occasions.

But Israel now faces another threat, one of a more insidious variety. My friend PM Netanyahu has referred to the vast numbers of 'illegal infiltrators flooding the country which threaten the very identity of the Jewish state'. He declared that 'this phenomenon is very grave and threatens the social fabric of society, our national security and national identity'. And in this he is absolutely correct. Because were all the so-called asylum seekers and other illegal immigrants allowed to remain Israel would cease to be either Jewish or democratic. My position on immigration to America reflects and is guided by the clear vision of PM Netanyahu.  Like him I want my country for my own people, for the descendants of those who built our country."

Isn't that neat?  What better way to silence the MSM and his political opponents than to link his immigration policy to that of the sacrosanct Jewish homeland?  'Don't hit me with Israel the baby in my arms'. And it will also highlight to the Americanpeople the grotesque double standards that Jews apply to immigration.

I'm expecting a call from The Donald any day now.

How to magic 3% into 60%

In practical terms the US Constitution is whatever the Supreme Court du jour says it is. Not surprising then that the claimed Constitutional basis for many of its decisions has been simply derisory.  Like when the Court stopped the counting of votes during the Bush-Gore Presidential Election. The SCOTUS is essentially a political body charged with conjuring up a Constitutional veneer for what are generally political rulings. And that's the reason why places on the Court are fought over so strenuously.

Recently this Court remarkably established that - somehow -  the original Framers had gay marriage in mind when they drew up that sacred document. I'm sure many SCOTUS law clerks have burnt the midnight oil trying to retrofit some legalistic gobbledygook onto this piece of nation-wrecking legislation which was passed by the smallest possible margin, 5-4.

And  it really gets interesting when we analyse the makeup of the winning team because no fewer that three of the five are Jewish. Yes Justices Breyer, Ginsburg and Kagan are all of the Tribe. In other words 3% of the American population provided 60% of the voting block that forced through a ruling that now becomes binding on all of those States that don't want it.  Meanwhile White Protestants, the descendants of the people who built the country and currently make up about 40% of the population, provide not a single member of the SCOTUS.

Say it loud, say it clear. The USA and indeed all of the Anglosphere operate under a JOG: Jewish Occupation Government.

WW 1's Pearl Harbor

Next Thursday the Co. Cork town where I live will commemorate the centenary of the Lusitania sinking. Everyone knows the story: In flagrant contravention of established maritime warfare principles the fiendish Germans, cackling with glee as only Germans can,  torpedoed and sank a huge defenceless passenger ship with the loss of over 1,200 men, women and children. Contrary to established precedent the attack took place without warning.  (Hitherto submariners allowed those on board non-military craft the opportunity to launch lifeboats before firing their torpedoes.) But not this time.

I can imagine the high-level German representatives at the ceremony shifting uncomfortably under the accusatory glares of the other attendees. But as with this case the blame lies not with the Germans but with their enemies.

The case must be seen in the broader context of  the World War into which Britain desperately sought to embroil America. What better way to outrage the general public than murder over 1,000 innocent civilians? Just days before the sinking Woodrow Wilson's eminence grise, rumoured Rothschild agent 'Colonel' Edward House, met the British Foreign Minister Edward Grey.  House later wrote: "We spoke of the probability of an ocean liner being sunk, and I told him that if this were done a flame of indignation would sweep across America, which would in itself probably carry us into the war." The pair then met King George V who also raised the subject, asking 'suppose they sink the Lusitania, with American passengers on board?"

At all times following the sinking German claims that the Lusitania carried military ordnance (making it a legitimate target) were indignantly denied by the British Government and its shills. But the Germans had sent warnings throughout the USA prior to the Lusitania's departure. Their agents had identified various forms of munitions being loaded under the guise of ordinary cargo.

TRAVELLERS intending to embark on the Atlantic voyage are reminded that a state of war exists between Germany and her allies and Great Britain and her allies; that the zone of war includes the waters adjacent to the British Isles; that, in accordance with formal notice given by the Imperial German Government, vessels flying the flag of Great Britain, or any of her allies, are liable to destruction in those waters and that travellers sailing in the war zone on the ships of Great Britain or her allies do so at their own risk."

IMPERIAL GERMAN EMBASSY

Washington, D.C. 22nd April 1915

Were they right? Of course they were. Because, thanks to advanced diving technology the truth eventually emerged about thirty years ago with vast quantities of lethal ordnance found on the wreck and scattered about the adjacent ocean floor.

And what about the no-warning attack? More despicable lies. At the beginning of the U Boat campaign the Germans has adhered strictly to maritime convention, surfacing and allowing disembarkation to lifeboats. Even on occasion providing directions and sustenance. So what changed?   Enter war-mongering psychopath Churchill who, in flagrant contravention of every legal  and ethical norm had had commercial vessels secretly armed, the guns hidden under innocuous decking and/or cargo. This resulted in numerous U Boats being sunk with considerable loss of life. Naturally enough the warnings stopped after this.

In any event a very large boat like the Lusitania would under normal circumstances have taken about two hours to sink after being hit by a single torpedo.  But the Lusitania sank within 18 minutes.  Why? Because a massive second explosion - obviously caused by the on-board ordnance - blew away a large part of the hull, rendering any hope of rescue impossible. Several other deeply suspicious events are associated with the tragedy.  The British battle-cruiser Juno, patrolling the area for submarines, was inexplicably withdrawn shortly before the attack. Bear in mind that the Admiralty had cracked German codes and knew that subs were in the area. And to crown it all some of the rescue craft were recalled to Queenstown even when within sight of the struggling victims. After all, the more fatalities the better the propaganda.

One of the most disgusting aspects of the whole case was the deliberate scapegoating of the ship's Master, Captain William Turner.  The Admiralty's Richard Webb wrote to Lord Mersey, who oversaw the 'inquiry' "I am directed by the Board of Admiralty to inform you that it is considered politically expedient  that Captain Turner be prominently blamed for the disaster." How sick and cynical is that? And Churchill enthusiastically partook in the persecution of the unfortunate mariner who, though formally exonerated, never recovered and died a broken man.

We can thus say with confidence that the Lusitania can take its place with Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin and 9/11 as false flags enabled by evil men to widen and prolong vicious wars. And have no doubt there are more on the way.

So on Thursday next the standard pantomime (here's another one) will take place. Even through the truth has been forced out it has not really permeated the public consciousness. So  expect another bash the evil Germans scenario. And maybe even some hitherto undiscovered survivors, of the kind who keep miraculously popping up for Holocau$t™ reparations, will be wheeled out for the occasion.

The Nemtsov killing: Cui bono?

In the normal course of events I'd have assumed that Putin had been involved in the murder of  his opponent Boris Nemtsov either directly or indirectly.  But times are certainly not normal given the constant provocation of Russia by the 'West' - primarily the USA and its lapdog Britain.

Having  applied punitive sanctions, conspired to crash the price of oil.  provoked civil war and bankruptcy in Ukraine  (whose gold has been whipped out to America for 'safe-keeping'), we now learn that oily Dave Cameron plans to send 250 'military advisers' to that unfortunate country. As if they needed more soldiers.

Even Mikhail Gorbachev himself has warned of  the danger of nuclear war if the provocations continue.

On cue the Western MSM, just like they did with flight MH-17 (notice how that story suddenly disappeared once the black box was analysed?) and, without a shred of evidence, assigned responsibility to Putin. And Nemtsov became a fearless national martyr, the Man Who Dared Challenge The Great Dictator. So here's a little offsetting background on our hero Nemtzov. Prominent in Yeltsin's Jewish Mafia, after the fall of Communism he organised the  handing over of numerous multi-billion dollar publicly owned enterprises and resources to the appointed ones for a pittance . Thus he midwifed the birth of the Russian Oligarchs.

Before getting his hands on the loot at national level he had had a dry run as Governor of the Nizhny Novgorod region, a position he reached at the remarkably tender age of 29. Purely on ability, I have no doubt. Yeltsin then catapulted him and another top Jewish Mafioso Anatoly Chubais into "direct unsupervised control" of the state asset disposal. Having duly enriched himself and The Family he then, like Khodorovsky, sought elective political power. This attempt became legend as he made his election appeal - on behalf of the 'common man' - from the lounge of his luxurious private jet.  As you can imagine this didn't go down too well with the newly impoverished nation. His appeal was as a consequence limited and he was nowhere close to being an electoral threat to Putin.

On any occasion such as this one must ask cui bono?  Putin has gained nothing apart from getting rid of an irritating gadfly. But the downside for him is major, providing a propaganda bonanza for his enemies, turning up the volume of the war drums in the West, opening the possibility of a "Maidan Moment" of destabilisation in Moscow, and undermining the chances of a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian and Syrian crises. So if Putin was indeed behind this he's made a very bad and stupid move. And we don't associate him with bad and stupid moves.

I don't for one minute claim to know what happened or who's responsible. But it looks all too like another dangerous escalation of hostilities by Russia's enemies. I truly believe that the world is in serious danger of a major war, a war without doubt provoked by the ZioCons in America and their British satrap.

Our best hope of avoiding it lies in the European nations showing a bit of backbone for once and telling the ZioCon War Party in America to take a flying fuck.

But I'm not holding my breath.

"And the loudest cheer of the evening was reserved for........."

"And the loudest cheer of the evening was reserved for Dr. Ben Carson...."  Thus began RTE's description of the audience reaction to the candidates' names at a recent Republican Presidential candidate beauty contest. And the reason for such enthusiasm?  Because he black. That's it.  Just like the current occupant of the White House, and just like this guy, who claims to be Britain's Obama.

In White countries today the world is your oyster if you be black, wear a suit, don't speak in ghetto jive and haven't killed anyone. Admittedly those requirements rule out most of the black make population.  But not Dr. Ben, hence the adulation. But wait!  Just glancing through his autobiography I read the following:  "I happened to have a large camping knife. And you know, one of my friends angered me.  And I just lunged at his abdomen with the knife.  Probably would have seriously injured or killed him but he happened to have on a large metal belt buckle under his clothing upon which the blade broke."

Oh dear.

Now you'd imagine the Repubs might have reservations about such a person's finger on the nuclear button.  But I suppose nobody's perfect. And Ben is a neurosurgeon no less, which he emphasises by publicly appearing in his lab coat whenever possible. (Mind you, when I see a black in a lab coat my mind thinks of crystal meth rather than neurosurgery.) And I wonder is Ben someone you can actually let loose on a patient or is he like most of the other AA blacks rammed through medical school who end up as 'administrators' working for the gub'mint?

Seriously, how insane can the Republicans be to even consider a black nonentity as a candidate? Their motto seems to be "somehow we have found a presentable black man.  Let us make him our leader". And what would that leader achieve for them?  Blacks make up less than 13% of the population and will vote for their interests rather than for a black face. Those interests being plenty of free shit, EBT cards, affirmative action, quotas, Section 8 housing and all the other things that are supposed to be anathema to conservative Americans. So what's the point?  And  remind me again how the Obama  AA Presidency worked out.

Have they considered the millions of  conservative White Americans who'll stay at home on election day rather than voting for another token black placeman? And given Carson's already dodgy background who knows what else is going to emerge from the woodpile as has been the case with so many other vibrants?  Ok, the whores and luvvies in the MSM would like another black candidate but they'l still support the Dems.  No, even from this isolated rain-swept rock on the edge of the Atlantic it's blatantly obvious that the supposed representatives of conservative Americans are shooting themselves in the foot. Soon to be a minority in the new and wondrous multicultural America, their votes and influence will be diffused while the other ethnics ruthlessly pursue their own narrow interests.

In all likelihood Carson won't get the nomination, which will go instead to some verminous bought-and-paid-for careerist like Jeb Bush. But the very fact that a nobody like Carson can evoke such an enthusiastic response is deeply depressing.

McDonald's: I'm lovin' it

A McDonald's dining experience is invariably an occasion to savour. Multi-course menus offering  choice seasonal delicacies, table settings resplendent with porcelain and sparkling crystal, strictly enforced dress codes, wholesome food served by smiling formally-trained staff..........all overseen at a discreet distance by a French-speaking  majordomo. But on occasions such high standards can slip, usually in vibrant neighbourhoods.

As this epic chimpout in New Jersey graphically illustrates.

Here a divergence of opinion among the clientele was resolved by the administration of multiple blows to the head by chair-wielding combatants. Interestingly this incident has now lead to a class-action lawsuit against McDonald's under new legal provisions introduced by AG Eric 'My People'  Holder. Drawn up by the fine legal mind of  his Deputy AG Joshua Feingold, the provisions of quia non potest esse aliquid nigrum populus ('blacks cannot be held accountable for anything') has lead to the following suit being lodged.

The defendant knowingly used, and allowed to be used, sitting devices that could be picked up and used as bludgeons.

Defendant was warned repeatedly that sitting devices not bolted to the floor could be used as battering rams and clubs.

Defendant's defence that sitting devices had to be mobile to accommodate various sizes of people according to the ADA, is not a valid excuse for not having the said sitting devices bolted to the floor.

Therefore, we, the plaintiff, ask for total damages be awarded in the amount of $40,000,000, and (6) iPhones with Beats headphones (carrying-cases too). We also ask that all sitting devices, at all McDonald's, be hereby bolted to the floor, so that we can sue McDonald's again in a year's time for violation(s) of the ADA and discrimination against the medically-obese.

I think the suit has every chance of success, now that the Rev'unds Jesse and Al have thrown their weight behind it and Joshua Feingold's brother Schlomo is leading the legal team.                

In case you were wondering about ZOG....

Everyone on this site must have heard of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty during the Six-Day-War in 1967. Just to recap, the Liberty, which was focused on intelligence-gathering and thus lightly armed, was attacked by Israeli Mystere jets using machine guns and napalm, and by attack boats which hit the ship with several torpedoes. As survivors scrambled for safety the Israelis strafed the lifeboats with machine gun fire. All the evidence to hand makes it clear that the Israelis knew that the Liberty was American although the motives of Moshe Dayan, who ordered the attack, remain unclear to this day.

Nothing illustrated the validity of the ZOG (Zionist Occupation Government) charge than this incident and the American reaction to it. For a start while the two hour attack was in progress "Defense" Secretary Robert McNamara called back a US rescue mission, stating 'President Johnson is not going to war or embarrass a close ally for the sake of a few sailors'.  Leaving the callousness aside, and the fact that the same President used 'an attack on a few sailors' (Tonkin incident) to declare war on North Vietnam, the reluctance to 'embarrass' a country that was in the process of murdering your servicemen beggars belief.

But what really blew my mind was the story of the Grafton Memorial. This relates to the privately-funded memorial library to be established in the city of Grafton near Milwaukee twenty years after the attack. As was and still is required in the Land Of The Free, the Israeli connection was played down with the focus almost exclusively on commemorating those who had served and suffered.

Now you'd imagine that local Jews would have at worst kept their heads down, at best supported the project while apologising for the Israeli 'mistake'.  Not a bit of it!  Instead the attack dogs were unleashed, crying - you've guessed it - 'anti-Semitism'. Rabbi Gideon Goldenholz declared it 'insulting to Jews' while James Fromstein of the Milwaukee Jewish Council proclaimed the Liberty incident(!) to be a 'sensitive subject considered offencive to Jewish people everywhere'

I swear I'm not making this up.

But it gets better. The local press turned on the Outrage Button. An editorial in the Milwaukee Journal thundered  'where is the outrage in Grafton?  Why is there no outcry?' Now let me be clear, because we're talking about an upside down world here. The requested outrage and outcry were against the idea of commemorating American servicemen who had given their lives for their country, because such commemoration might offend the sensitivities of the people who cost them their lives!

But it gets better still. The full machinery of the national and local government was brought to bear on the memorial organisers.  An $83,000 federal donation was withdrawn, an invitation to the White House to send a representative was ignored (as was a personal invitation to GHW Bush), the local high school refused to provide a band for the opening ceremony, denouncing the organisers as Nazis, while the Commander of a nearby Naval Training Centre was ordered not to attend by Naval brass.

Remind me of ZOG again....

Reverse evolution?

In my post LBJ And The Destruction Of Black America I hypothesised that the Great Society initiative had precisely the reverse impact to that intended.  Far from elevating blacks to equality with Whites it has instead dumbed them down into useless welfarists increasingly unable to compete in today's techno-industrial environment. Welfare dependency has been compounded - paradoxically - by the battery of legislation to enforce Affirmative Action, job quotas and the dumbing down of job entry qualifications.

I say paradoxically because such measures have further reduced the incentive for blacks to better themselves to the point where they can compete on a level playing field with Whites and other races. Why? Because they can now either live on welfare or sit back and let quotas and AA do the work for them.  The latter option may have given us the much celebrated black middle class but this is a mere Potemkin Village, artificially sustained by AA, quotas and make-up jobs in Government agencies which will not survive the impending economic Armageddon.

Were this not bad enough two new forces have now coalesced to destroy blacks' already limited linguistic abilities.  Civilisation and language are symbiotic. The more advanced a language, the more advanced the civilisation, and vice versa. Language underpins everything even, actually especially, maths and science. This is why attempts to develop cross-reference dictionaries for African languages have floundered. African languages would typically have only a couple of hundred words and only the most primitive system of measurement.  So you'd get 'one', maybe 'two' but after that it'd just be 'many'.

The evolutionary impact of such a limited vocabulary can only be guessed at and undoubtedly  contributed to the comical failure of attempts to formalise Ebonics as a language. Efforts to agree on syntax, semantics or indeed any kind of canonical structures were dismissed as 'White man sheet' and differences resolved amid a hail of bullets and upturned tables as the snap below (taken at a recent academic forum) illustrates. But no matter how they dress it up Ebonics doesn't even come close to being a language or even a dialect in any meaningful sense.

This barbaric Wild West of Ebonics is bad enough but it's got worse...a lot worse. Partially driven by the linguistic degradation deriving from Twitter and phone texting ('you're' becoming 'your' for example) in the 'hood communications increasingly deploy postures, facial expressions, grunts, hand signs and other kinesthetic cues as replacement forms of communication. (The Special Olympics of Debating provides us with a mild example and in fact initially whetted my appetite for the subject). Not putting too fine a point on it but this is the way animals communicate. 

So in effect what we're seeing here is a form of reverse evolution.  It really is. The fun will start when the American economy begins to seriously nosedive (it will) and the money for EBT cards and make-believe gubmint jobs will have gone.  It's going to be epic. 

A simple answer

To any of you wondering whether the various Middle Eastern 'wars for democracy' were actually driven by Israeli strategic objectives there's a simple answer.

Yes.

A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties(1982)

"Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. 

Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization."

A child speaks from beyond the grave

I see that Oscar-nominated film makers Amy Berg and Nate Parker are going to do a film on the Ferguson tragedy, you know, the one where a gentle giant got ventilated by a local cop. Here's what they plan to do.

“In response to the growing problem of racial disparity due to the ongoing dehumanization of black men, actor and activist Nate Parker [with Amy Berg] are setting out on a journey of investigation. They will venture into black communities to speak to various stakeholders about the crisis facing these men.”

Here's one response to the idea:

Hello Ms Berg, Mr. Parker. . Don’t recognize me? That’s OK; I understand. My name was Antonio West. I was the 13-month old child who was shot in the face at point blank range by two black teens, who were attempting to rob my mother, who was also shot. I think my murder and my mommy’s wounding made the news for maybe a day, and then disappeared. 

A Grand Jury of my mommy’s peers from Brunswick , Georgia ruled the black teens who murdered me will not face the death penalty. Too bad it was I who got the death sentence from my killers instead, because Mommy didn’t have the money they demanded. See, my family made the mistake of being white in a 73% non-white neighborhood, but my murder wasn’t ruled a ‘hate crime’. Oh, and President Obama didn’t take a single moment to acknowledge my murder. He couldn’t have any children who could possibly look like me – so why should he care?

I’m one of the youngest murder victims in our great Nation’s history, but the media didn’t care to cover the story of my being killed in cold blood. There isn’t a white equivalent of Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson because if there were he'd be branded a ‘racist’. So no one’s rushing to Brunswick to demonstrate and demand ‘justice’ for me, or do a documentary about me. There’s no ‘White Panther’ party, either, to put a bounty on the lives of the two black teens who murdered me. I have no voice, I have no strident representation, and unlike those who shot me in the face while I sat innocently in my stroller – I no longer have my life.  Isn’t this a great country?

So while you’re out seeking ‘justice'  for Michael Brown, please remember to seek ‘justice’ for me as well.  Tell your friends about me, tell your families, get tee-shirts with my face on them, and make the world pay attention, just like you’re doing for Michael Brown.."

The worm turns

The town of Kalispell is capital of  Flathead County Montana, a county that is possibly the nearest thing on this earth to paradise. Quite apart from the stunning scenery, the social life is excellent, the people warm and friendly and it's almost crime-free. If you've deduced that this happy state of affairs reflects, indeed requires, an almost total absence of diversity you would of course be correct.

The region has been mooted for some time by White Nationalists as a possible White Homeland, somewhere that Whites could live with just themselves as company. The threat of which probably explains the arrival of one Rabbi Allen Secher a few years back.  The Rabbi has form going back to his time as a 'freedom rider' down South in the sixties. And since then he's been spreading freedom and diversity in New York, LA and Chicago . And now he's worried that Flathead might miss out on their share of enrichment. Not only that, he's horrified, terrified, that a dreadful White Hate Group (the ADL called them that so it must be true) are setting up shop in the region.

Here's the Flathead Beacon's breathless report

"Local residents turned out in droves Monday night at the Whitefish City Council meeting to decry a white separatist think-tank’s local residency and voice support for an anti-hate ordinance barring such groups from assembling in the community. The grassroots demonstration was organized by Love Lives Here [is that Orwellian,or what?] and comes on the heels of renewed publicity for the National Policy Institute, whose president, Richard B. Spencer, set up headquarters in Whitefish several years ago after moving from Washington, D.C.  The meeting was organized by civil rights activist and local Rabbi Allen Secher and his wife Ina Albert. Many in attendance spoke of their Jewish faith, including Hilary Shaw whose grandfather is [roll of drums] a Holocaust survivor.''

“I love this town. I adore it and I want to keep adoring it. Let’s not even open the door to this guy”  implored Secher. " Or else how can we enrich this place to the point of being minority White?" He professes to believe race to be a social construct yet amazingly his own site proclaims itself to be is dedicated to "the continuity of the Jewish people."

Talk about chutzpah.  But listen, the worm is turning. You see the comments to the report are running at least 20:1 against the the Thought Police and, even better, show a really clear understanding of Secher's hypocrisy and the central Jewish role in the White Genocide Project.  I

Read them yourself at the end of the article.  

And enjoy!

Was this man the greatest war criminal of WW 2?

Dwight D. Eisenhower enjoyed a miraculously successful military and political career despite (like John McCain) finishing close to the bottom of his graduation class at West Point, where he was known as 'that terrible Swedish Jew'. (His father was said to be Jewish but if so was of the crypto variety). But neither that nor repeated subsequent examples of incompetence (MacArthur wanted rid of him) held him back, as some mysterious(?) force at the highest levels in Washington kept the promotions rolling in.  As one of his biographers pointed out 'in only five years he had risen from a lowly lieutenant colonel in the Philippines to commander of the greatest invasion force in history'.

Amazing!

He ended WW 2 as a hero, loved and lionised by the American people, a reaction which he parlayed into becoming a two term President, one of the most admired of the twentieth century.

While he always professed himself appalled at German 'war crimes' and wanted to exterminate the whole German High Command after the war it seems he wasn't beyond a bit of war criminality himself. In fact, and this is not an exaggeration, he could justifiably be described as the greatest war criminal of the twentieth century.  Because there's compelling evidence to suggest that he deliberately and with malice aforethought consigned over one million German prisoners-of-war to their deaths in 1945.

Rense writes about it with great eloquence and passion here, but in essence Eisenhower had German POWs reclassified as Disarmed Enemy Combatants (DECs) the impact of which was to remove the need to provide sustenance and to put them outside the purview of the International Red Cross. Under normal circumstances this mechanism is understandable, the idea being that with the end of hostilities defeated soldiers can be let to their own devices rather than be a burden on their jailers.  However Eisenhower gave explicit instructions for the German soldiers to be imprisoned in camps and to be denied shelter and sustenance. The inevitable result of such a policy was death through starvation, disease or exposure.

Konrad Adenauer, the pro-Western Chancellor of West Germany during the fifties commissioned a report which found that 1.5 million German prisoners in Allied POW camps never came home alive nor were their deaths recorded. The report attributes this to their being 'penned up for weeks without protection from the weather, water or medical care'.  These events were detailed in the book Other Losses by Canadian writer James Bacque (1989) and picked up by journalist Peter Worthington who wrote 'it is hard to escape the conclusion that Eisenhower was a war criminal of epic proportions.'

Naturally enough, once the crime was exposed a team of  house-trained court historians under the leadership of Stephen Edward Ambrose sprang into action. And  dismissed the book as....... (roll of drums)  a conspiracy theory. While there's undoubtedly room for discussion regarding the total figure there's none in relation to Eisenhower's DEC reclassification, his orders to deprive the captives of care and sustenance and the exclusion of the Red Cross from the camps.  Shortage of food cannot be sustained as an excuse as Bacque cites several documents from Allied logistics officers in the region to the effect that plenty of food was available should they have wanted to feed the prisoners and that American soldiers and German civilians were actually prohibited from doing so.

Interestingly, when I was a student in Germany in 1966 I had a drinking friend called Franz.  He had been in the war towards the latter end as a very young man.  He told me one night while in his cups that he and vast numbers of other soldiers had been imprisoned near Cologne with neither food nor shelter and that huge numbers had perished. He admitted that many had got away as security at some of the camps was weak and that many localised camp commanders, disgusted at what was taking place, simply left the DECs escape.

So it seems that Ike got away with mass murder.  Not just that but thrived and prospered and lived into old age, wealthy and admired. Meanwhile the German people have become synonymous with genocide even as the Holocau$t fairytale unravels and the knowledge of detailed plans to literally wipe the German people from the face of the earth  have emerged.  While the winners write the history, that covering the first half of the last century is surely unsurpassed in terms of grotesque misrepresentation.  Never has a people been so unjustifiably traduced as have the Germans.

Let us all in our own way continue our efforts to get the truth out there.

I solve a mystery for Fred Reed

I'm sure that many of you read Fred Reed. Understandably, as Fred is a fine writer, experienced and highly intelligent. Having spent many years as a police reporter his take on the black undertow is searing and unsparing. Which explains why in this article he despairs at the degree of power wielded by such an undeserving and small minority.


"It is curious that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity, should dominate national politics. Yet they do. Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or can’t do.  Blacks control what you can say to your own children in your own home."

"Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress, rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as must be examinations for promotion in fire departments, the military, and police forces. Blacks must be admitted to universities for which they are not remotely qualified, where departments of Black Studies must be established to please them. Corporate work forces, federal departments, and elite high-schools must be judged not on whether they perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of blacks. Obama was elected because he was black: an equally unqualified and negligible white pol would have had no chance. He is now fiercely pushing the most profound transformation of America ever attempted, by opening the floodgates to immigration from the south."

Isn't that powerful stuff?

He ends despairingly with "things that ought to be unbelievable, and once were, have become routine."

And my God, that is the truth.

But the article, excellent though it is, suffers from an extraordinary omission. You see Fred metaphorically throws his hands in the air in complete bafflement at the fundamental question of how 'the unbelievable has become routine'. In fact the explanation is there as plain as a pikestaff .......for anyone who wants to see it.   You see Fred, all of this unbelievable stuff becoming routine didn't just happen, or happen overnight. The situation that had prevailed in the former Confederacy States (and in reality most of the others as well) until about the middle of the last century was the natural order whereby a low intelligence, violent and largely indolent racial minority were kept at arms length from Whites, miscegenation carried punitive social repercussions and indulgence of their lawless and violent nature guaranteed swift and severe retribution.

Similar dispensations have applied throughout the world since the dawn of man, simply reflecting the natural order. And you defy the natural order at your peril..... as most White Americans of the time understood at the deepest visceral level.  So how then did blacks come to rule over us and the unbelievable become routine? It was one hell of a project and arguably one that had never been successfully undertaken before. It was multi-faceted and required a carefully co-ordinated set of self-reinforcing measures developed by a specialised Project Team

First item on the plan was 'Civil Rights' for blacks which set out with a number of seemingly reasonable proposals (who could object to nice Mrs. Parks moving up the bus?) but had as its ultimate objective the rendering of blacks impervious to criticism and judged on different criteria. Towards this end the Project Team set up a number of key implementation bodies such as the NAACP and ACLU, fronted by a few token blacks for the optics. So now blacks could go anywhere and any time.  Problem was of course that the closer blacks got to Whites the less Whites came to like them.  Which then gave rise to the most audacious element of all: The creation, a la Orwell, of a parallel universe, one where fact was fiction, war was peace. And black was white.

Thus academia developed bogus 'equality' theories of race, gender and culture, rewrote history to downplay the civilisational role of Whites and to overplay their alleged genocide and exploitation of the noble savages. Full spectrum media output reinforced these theories.  Thus blacks had to be presented as intelligent, kind, honest....and horribly done down by Evil Whitey.  The ultimate target was the White Male, the embodiment of The Enemy. He had to be traduced, belittled, discriminated against through Affirmative Action, impoverished in marriage, emasculated by feminism, ultimately reduced to a hollowed-out husk ashamed of what he was and what his ancestors had been. But that still wasn't enough. The screaming cognitive dissonance needed legislative enforcement to repel reality.  Hence the introduction of a battery of 'hate' and 'anti-discrimination' laws aimed exclusively at Whites and enforced by politicised activist Federal judges.

So Fred, that's really how the blacks came to power. The achievement of inducing the greatest civilisation the world has seen to destroy itself may appear magical (just like this guy).  But when the Project Team control the media, 'entertainment' industry, finance and academia and have had centuries, nay milennia, to hone their repertoire of destruction maybe it's not so amazing.  Anyway Fred, that's the mystery solved for you. But it wasn't really a mystery, was it?  I mean, you're really smart, well read and have vast on-the-ground experience, and yet you avoid identifying The Project and the tribe who ran it. Which kind of defeats the whole purpose of your article, doesn't it?  A bit like describing the voyage of the Titanic without mentioning the incident with the iceberg. 

No Fred, the shades, leather jackets, cigars and constant reminders of your 'fearless' and 'scurrilous' writings don't cut it as long as you give the Third Rail - the fountainhead of the destruction you deplore - such a wide berth. Come on, you'd do a superb job if you chose to do so.  What's stopping you? 

America cracks down on corruption. In Hungary

The world reeled in shock yesterday as the Wall St. Journal reported a crackdown by America on corruption.  However panic was avoided and order restored when it emerged that the moral crusade applied only to Hungary, And presumably any other country without a Rothschild Central Bank, Or which objects to a takeover by the Tribe as apparently 'old scapegoats have come back to life in a nation that was flattened by globalization: foreigners, bankers, and Jews.'  Oh dear.

This from the WSJ.    "The State Department refused entry to the U.S. to several Hungarians because it said they had been involved in corruption, once more highlighting tensions between the U.S. administration and the feisty government of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. In a statement issued by Charge’d affairs M. Andre Goodfriend the embassy said the US canceled the visas on the basis of “credible information that those persons are either engaging in or benefiting from corruption.”

Some more observations by TPTB.

President Obola. 'I've never heard of Hungary before but must ask myself why they cannot conduct their business affairs honestly. Like Jon Corzine, Jamie Diamond and LLoyd Blankfein.'

AG Eric Holder: 'If there's one thing I cannot stand it's corruption and accordingly strongly endorse this fearless and even-handed application of the law. If we let this kind of thing go unpunished you could find the Hungarians doing something like......supplying weapons to gangsters in neighbouring countries,'

Abe Foxman: 'An excellent move. Godammit what would happen if these goys, I mean guys get into financial racketeering as well? And those Magyars, will we ever forget the Arrow Cross in WW 2? Oy vey, the sufferink...the sufferink. Just as well we have one of our own in Amos Goodfreund, whoops I mean Andre Goodfriend fighting our corner.'

We'll have to keep an eye on this anti-corruption thingy from the Americans. Humanitarian bombing might be replaced by anti-corruption bombing.  We live in interesting times.