Contrasting tales of tails wagging dogs

Like many others on this blog (and hopefully many more to come) I'm reading The Myth Of German Villainy by Benton Bradberry. As an aside the book reminded me again of the contrasting reactions in Russia and Hungary to their respective Bolshevik takeovers at the end of the Great War. In both countries the Bolshevik leaders were almost entirely Jewish and/or foreign, proportionally their numbers were minuscule, yet they still managed to forcefully subdue the native populations.

Soon after seizing power they unleashed the Red Terror in both countries and worked to destroy everything about their culture and heritage. Not exactly a popularity winning programme! In Russia they were entirely successful while in Hungary their rule lasted only about 100 days. Admittedly the Hungarian people  received significant military assistance from Roumania but it's almost certain that they would have done the job themselves in quick measure anyway.  Germans did an even faster job of liquidating their own Soviets in Bavaria and Berlin.

So how could the Russian people allow a minuscule band of non-Russians take over their enormous country which then suffered hitherto unimaginable levels of bloodshed and destruction? Part of the explanation lies in the Bolsheviks initially stabilising their power by meeting populist demands such as land distribution, worker ownership and of course ending Russia's role in the Great War. While it might be argued that for instance the British and Spanish Empires also took control of vast regions with relatively tiny resources there is a fundamental difference: In their cases the fighting was done by the British and Spanish themselves, albeit with the aid of some natives hostile to the dominant tribes. The natives were directly conquered after military defeat by militarily superior invaders.

But had the Russian people united against their Bolshevik oppressors the latter's end would surely have been swift. Instead there was "a weary capitulation without any spirit, helplessly, with a sense of doom” as Solzhenitsyn described it. Even the powerful Red Army stood by as its office corps was systematically wiped out over a period of a few years. 

Are the Russians of today a different breed? I sure hope so as it could be that they're the White race's only hope.

Coda: A majority of the Bolshevik nomenklatura changed their Jewish names to Russian-sounding alternatives. This surely had a significant impact on the public perception of their project, disguising its essentially Jewish nature. It still goes on to this day, as Jon Liebowitz Stewart knows.

Seeking war with Russia

Have you given much thought to the non-stop tide of aggression by 'the West' against Russia in general and in particular Vladimir Putin? If not then you should be, because there is a real danger of WW III breaking out. History, especially that in the 20th century, is replete with examples of countries and alliances stumbling into catastrophic conflict, or assuming that a war of choice lasting many years would have been over within a few weeks. Here's Putin himself directly sounding the alarm. My friend Oleg, who's very well clued in there, tells me that he himself has never been more worried about an outbreak of global hostilities.

Here's a brief recap on recent Western aggression against Russia. First there was NATO expansion into the former Warsaw Pact countries, started almost before the ink was dry in the agreement between Gorbachev and Bush.  This was followed by the spectacular looting of Russia's resources by Western 'advisors' during the Yeltsin era, and since then there's been a non-stop barrage of invective, lies, threats, insults and provocations of every kind. And of course there was the ZioCon coup in Ukraine, which brought Russia's traditional enemies right into the heartland.

Factors I see contributing to these developments: 

NATO careerists and the MIC desperately seeking new enemies, or reviving old ones.

Russia's key role in the international trend towards breaking the petro dollar hegemony, non-dollar trade pacts and selling Russian and Iranian oil to Europe for Euros.

A distraction is needed for the impending collapse of the bankers' financial ponzi scheme

Putin is leading the 'traditional values' fightback against the (((Western))) nation-wrecking tide of degeneracy. (Check this article from Foreign Policy, aka ZioCon Central.)

Post-war anarchy would lead to public support for a NWO (Hegelian dialectic).

Finally and least likely, the green and global warming fanatics who long for a major depopulation event.

(Of course there are major links and overlaps between the interests cited above)

But.......if you read this earlier post of mine on Putin you might agree with me that the explanation is far from clear. But the danger is real.

The Incredible Disappearing Man

Of course you all know of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. Who doesn't?  Legendary Russian dissident during the Soviet era, prisoner in the gulags, starved, tortured, ostracised.  But never broken. He spoke truth to power like few have ever done. His novels such as The Gulag Archipelago, The First Circle and Cancer Ward were not only brilliant literature but offered the rarest of insights into the life of a dissident in the USSR.  He came to be regarded as one of the most eminent writers and philosophers of his age.  Which contributed to his being awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1970 "for the ethical force with which he has pursued the indispensable traditions of Russian literature".

Feted wherever he went, his books became international best sellers, translated into dozens of languages, the world was at his feet.  Then almost overnight it all stopped. He became a non-person. The transformation was virtually unprecedented in the field of literature. Why did this happen? Because Alex stepped on the Third Rail.  Well he didn't so much step on it, rather dived on it full length. You see he wrote a book called 200 Years Together that traced the Jews' colourful relationship with the Russian people and especially their role in the Bolshevik Revolution and its ensuing murderous tyranny.

He didn't pull his punches.  He placed Soviet Jews centre place in perpetrating the worst mass murders of the 20th century. While acknowledging that some Jews also suffered under this tyranny he clarified that it was not as Jews per se, rather that they were in the wrong faction at the wrong time. Solzhenitsyn's own estimate for the number of Christians (his word) who died was 60 million.

He documented all of this in meticulous detail.... names, dates, times. But he did something else, something more insidious and dangerous. Something that had strategic international consequences for the Tribe. For a start he shone a light on the extraordinary Jewish capacity to magic themselves into the position of victimhood irrespective of their actual accountability. This in turn depended on - as he pointedly noted - their uncanny ability to seize control of media outlets.  "There are pages of this history which one does not open without trembling. And these are the pages that are systematically and purposefully eradicated from the consciousness of the Jews."

Other observations that cut to the bone included their practice of manipulating the legal framework to reflect Jewish interests.  (Think "hate" legislation.) “Russian people are now confronted by a Jew both as their judge and hangman. Why was it that anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka could count with high probability on standing before a Jewish investigator or being shot by a Jew?" He meticulously debunked Jewish writers who sought to portray Soviet Jews as having no choice in what they did. 'Just following orders'  How ironic is that? He carefully traces the ways in which Jews, both within the USSR and internationally, favoured and supported Jewish interests under the cloak of universalistic altruism.

Sound familiar?

I haven't even begun to describe what he wrote in '200 Years Together' not least because I haven't read it, only certain chapters.  So why have I not read it? Aha, therein lies a tale!  You see, Solzhenitsyn's legendary status and guarantee of vast sales would in normal circumstances have had international publishers slavering at the prospect of getting their hands on the rights. But none did. None wanted it. It was never published in the West. In fact, incredible as it seems it has never been formally translated into English! Given that English translations exist for almost every half-assed writing in the most obscure of languages the disappearance of 200 Years Together is mind-blowing. The author himself became a non-person just as he had in the USSR.

Think about it. It is, as I said, mind-blowing. What sort of pressure could have resulted in every Western publishing house, every Western TV company, every Western magazine being intimidated into passing up such a unique and hugely profitable publishing coup?  How exactly was this Jewish power exercised?  Was it overt, subtle, physical, financial....or what?

It truly is frightening.

Is it any wonder that the American armed forces were afraid of commemorating the attack on the USS Liberty? Or that the country's so-called legislators should prostrate themselves before their true rulers in the sight of all?

The Nemtsov killing: Cui bono?

In the normal course of events I'd have assumed that Putin had been involved in the murder of  his opponent Boris Nemtsov either directly or indirectly.  But times are certainly not normal given the constant provocation of Russia by the 'West' - primarily the USA and its lapdog Britain.

Having  applied punitive sanctions, conspired to crash the price of oil.  provoked civil war and bankruptcy in Ukraine  (whose gold has been whipped out to America for 'safe-keeping'), we now learn that oily Dave Cameron plans to send 250 'military advisers' to that unfortunate country. As if they needed more soldiers.

Even Mikhail Gorbachev himself has warned of  the danger of nuclear war if the provocations continue.

On cue the Western MSM, just like they did with flight MH-17 (notice how that story suddenly disappeared once the black box was analysed?) and, without a shred of evidence, assigned responsibility to Putin. And Nemtsov became a fearless national martyr, the Man Who Dared Challenge The Great Dictator. So here's a little offsetting background on our hero Nemtzov. Prominent in Yeltsin's Jewish Mafia, after the fall of Communism he organised the  handing over of numerous multi-billion dollar publicly owned enterprises and resources to the appointed ones for a pittance . Thus he midwifed the birth of the Russian Oligarchs.

Before getting his hands on the loot at national level he had had a dry run as Governor of the Nizhny Novgorod region, a position he reached at the remarkably tender age of 29. Purely on ability, I have no doubt. Yeltsin then catapulted him and another top Jewish Mafioso Anatoly Chubais into "direct unsupervised control" of the state asset disposal. Having duly enriched himself and The Family he then, like Khodorovsky, sought elective political power. This attempt became legend as he made his election appeal - on behalf of the 'common man' - from the lounge of his luxurious private jet.  As you can imagine this didn't go down too well with the newly impoverished nation. His appeal was as a consequence limited and he was nowhere close to being an electoral threat to Putin.

On any occasion such as this one must ask cui bono?  Putin has gained nothing apart from getting rid of an irritating gadfly. But the downside for him is major, providing a propaganda bonanza for his enemies, turning up the volume of the war drums in the West, opening the possibility of a "Maidan Moment" of destabilisation in Moscow, and undermining the chances of a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian and Syrian crises. So if Putin was indeed behind this he's made a very bad and stupid move. And we don't associate him with bad and stupid moves.

I don't for one minute claim to know what happened or who's responsible. But it looks all too like another dangerous escalation of hostilities by Russia's enemies. I truly believe that the world is in serious danger of a major war, a war without doubt provoked by the ZioCons in America and their British satrap.

Our best hope of avoiding it lies in the European nations showing a bit of backbone for once and telling the ZioCon War Party in America to take a flying fuck.

But I'm not holding my breath.

Malice or incompetence?

It's surely the most over-used and hackneyed cliché, one which sees the speaker inevitably settle back with a smug smile having demonstrated, at least in his own feeble mind, erudition and insight.  But, reluctant  as I am to use it I believe in this instance nothing else suffices. It's this: Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first drive mad.

Because what else could possibly explain the blowback from the Nulanding of Ukraine?  In the context of America's strategic goals it has been a succession of cataclysmic disasters, each one worse than the previous and the process continues apace. 

() Instead of Ukraine becoming an EU/NATO/American armed satellite right on Russia's border  it's now a dismembered and impoverished failed state with a highly uncertain future in which total absortion into a Greater Russia has become a live possibility.

() Far from being weakened Russia has emerged hugely strengthened while America looks old and feeble, numerous 'red lines' being crossed with impunity.

() These developments have revealed that flouting sanction policies ordained by the West is now a far less risky enterprise. Expect to see a lot more.

() Russia and China have drawn closer together, Saudi Arabia faces east

() Non dollar-denominated deals for oil are growing at an explosive rate, hastening the end of the petrodollar. Such trends are self-reinforcing and the net result will be - inter alia -  a drop of approximately 30% in the average American's standard of living.  (I see this as being of profound importance and will be posting very soon on the broader impact on White countries)

Let me say the foregoing in no way represents the full extent of the Nulandian blowback, but will suffice for the purposes of this post.

Now Napoleon reportedly claimed that one should never impute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence. But can such a catastrophic series of setbacks really be attributed to mere incompetence?  I mean Nuland, and hubby Robert Kagan, you know they're supposed to be The Brightest Of The Bright.  They're usually ten moves ahead of the rest of us.  Or so we're told.

And maybe they are. After all it seems that Ukraine's gold has been shipped to (cough) safety in the US and the oligarchs have been installed to have another go at what's left of that unfortunate country's remaining wealth. That's a plus, but otherwise it's been an unmitigated strategic disaster.

Which begs the question: Can this be explained by mere incompetence?  Or is there a deeper and more strategic plan in place in which robbing the country's remaining wealth is just a side benefit?  There are persistent reports of plans to crash the dollar thus hastening the introduction of a World Currency, one of the most important remaining pieces on the NWO chessboard. Even without using the oil weapon it's no secret that Russia could, if sufficiently provoked, easily crash the dollar simply by cashing in its US Treasury Bills.

I guess time will tell.

Confirmation

As I suggested in this post, the 'neo-Nazis' gathering all the attention in Ukraine were merely shock troop cannon fodder to be disposed of  once the real rulers regained power.  And sure enough it begins. According to the Gruaniad Oleksander Muzychko – known as Sashko Bily, or Sasha the White – has been killed in a shootout in the western city of Rivne.  In classic totalitarian style he was 'shot while resisting arrest'.  

It seems the 'far right' had not intended returning to obscurity, having visions of actually gaining some political control.  Bad move.  Especially for Bily The Adult. Meanwhile as the Jewish oligarchs reinforce their grip on the country half-Jewish former Prime Minister Julia Timochenko gets caught saying she'd like to nuke the 10 million of her own citizens who happen to be of Russian origin.

This baby is set to run and run, IMHO.

Ukraine: The mist begins to clear

With the appointment by the new 'government' of oligarchs to key positions throughout the country, the motivation for the coup becomes a lot clearer. The oligarchs in Ukraine got their paws on the loot just like their comrades in Russia. With funds provided by 'international bankers' (nudge, wink), these vultures bought for buttons all major enterprises previously owned by the state. In fact they acquired entire sectors of the newly "privatised" national economy.

When reading the following bear in mind that, according to the 2001 Ukrainian census, there are only 103,000 Jews in Ukraine, which is 0.2% of the total population.

Now who are these "Ukrainian" oligarchs?

Ihor Kolomoyskyi, just appointed the new governor of Dnepropetrovsk  is a dual Ukrainian-Israeli citizen who controls his business empire from Switzerland. He's the third richest person in Ukraine and according to Forbes  the 377th richest in the world. His main assets are in banking and aviation, and, inevitably, he owns  a high profile football club....presumably to gain some street cred with the hoi polloi.  Interestingly, since 2010 rumors where circulating that Kolomoiskyi assets were coming under pressure from the authorities.

The new governor of Donetsk Region is Sergey Taruta, who is estimated to be worth around $2 billion, putting him among the top-10 wealthiest people in Ukraine. He heads ISD, one of the biggest mining and smelting companies in the world, and also own Donetsk-based Metallurg Football Club.   I'm unable to definitively determine his ethnicity but based on his looks, the way he got his money and the company he keeps I can make a reasonable guess.

Victor Pinchuk is the son-of-law of former President Leonid Kuchma (Kuchma gained office through the prodigious efforts of one George Soros.) Pinchuk is the owner of several oil, gas and energy import/export companies. He also owns the nation's largest steel mill and a chain of banks. His group has very strong ties with other Jewish organisations in Ukraine, as well as in the U.S. and Israel. He is a member of the Ukrainian Parliament and one of the leaders of the Ukrainian Labour Party (sic).

Vadim Rabinovich is a citizen of Israel. In 1980 he was charged in Ukraine with stealing state property and spent 9 months in a jail. In 1984 he was arrested again and sentenced to 14 years in prison for his black market activities . He was released in 1990. In 1993 he became a representative of the Austrian company "Nordex" in Ukraine. The company somehow received exclusive rights to sell Russian oil from president Kuchma. In 1997 Rabinovich became president of the All-Ukrainian Jewish Congress, and in 1999 he was elected head of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine. That same year the Associated Press estimated his wealth as $1 billion. Rabinovich owns Central Europe Media Enterprises, which controls television stations in seven East European countries.

Victor Medvedchuk was formerly Leonid Kuchma's Chief of Staff. The Medvedchuk-Surkis cabal controls Ukraine's energy sector (8 regional energy companies), oil and gas market, alcohol and sugar production, shipbuilding, and athletic organizations. He is a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, and a leader in the Social Democratic party of Ukraine (SDPU). I'm assuming he's Jewish based on his background and this hagiography in Jewish World Review.  

Gregory Surkis, also Jewish, is CEO of Slavutich, a company that controls several huge energy companies (KirovogradEnergo, PoltavEnergo, etc).  He also owns a soccer team, the prestigious Dynamo-Kiev, and is a president of the Professional Soccer League. He too is a member of the Ukrainian Parliament.

These appointments are hardly surprising given that the new Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk is also one of the tribe.  Earlier Uzhgorod Mayor Sergey Ratushniak described him as the “Impudent Jew Yatsenyuk who was successfully serving thieves, who are at power in Ukraine, and using criminal money to plow ahead towards Ukraine’s presidency."

No wonder Victoria Nuland and hubby Robert Kagan were such enthusiastic supporters of the coup.

Professor Vasyl Yaremenko, director of the Institute of Culturological and Ethnopolitical research at Kiev State University reviewed the ownership of the country's TV and other media outlets and warned:

"Ukrainians need to know that the mass media is completely in the hands of Jews, and everything that we watch or read is the product of Jewish ideology…"

Comprehensive details of this ownership are provided here.

Professor Yaremenko points out that out of the 400+ members of the Ukrainian Parliament, 136 (possibly 158) are Jews. That is more than in the Israeli Knesset. Who voted for them, asks professor Yaremenko. Who paid for costly election campaigns? — 90% of Ukrainian banks, according to him, are owned by Jews.

The newspaper that published these findings was closed down for, you've guessed it, 'hate speech'.

I'm sure all of this brings back fond memories of the 1930s to older Ukrainians. 

The apotheosis of the Project For The New American Century (PNAC)

You all know about the Project For The New American Century (PNAC). This was developed by 'conservative' (ha!) thinkers with the proclaimed objective of having America dominate the world for the duration of the 21st century. In fact given that the document's progenitors were mostly dual citizen Israeli-Firsters it was always obvious that the interests of Israel and the MIC were paramount, not those of America itself.

American global dominance was to be achieved by turbocharging "defence" expenditure and going to war with any country the Israelis didn't like that didn't embrace democracy and a Rothschild central bank with sufficient enthusiasm.  The plan's authors, realising that the American public was getting increasingly disillusioned with such wars of choice, foresaw the need for 'a new Pearl Harbour' to galvanise them into unthinking flag waving 'patriots'.  And thus the 9/11 false flag operation was born. (I note in passing that PNAC's official website has been taken down.)

Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan duly followed, together with the stimulation of several  'movements for democracy', i.e. funding and training mercenaries and local war lords to wage war on the enemy du jour, Libya and Syria being prime examples. PNAC also took great delight in prodding the Russian bear, nostalgic for the good old days of the Cold War. A notable adventure here occurred in Georgia, where what was in effect a joint Georgian/Israeli government had their ass handed to them when they provoked the bear once too often.

And in fact that's been the trend with all PNAC's adventures.  Far from achieving American global hegemony their initiatives have bankrupted America's standing in the world, in moral, military and financial terms.  Apart from the dubious success in Libya (that country being torn apart by internecine warfare and set back a generation probably qualifies as success for these pyschos) all the adventures have been unmitigated disasters. America's standing has fallen so much that various 'Red Lines' and final warnings have been blithely ignored by, inter alia, Iran, Syria and Russia with the US reduced to bleating helplessly about 'serious consequences'.   Ukraine is the latest locus for their machinations and it's certain they'll get their ass handed to them again here. But at the risk of potentially provoking WW III.  Meanwhile the reserve currency status of the dollar is on life support and when that finally goes - and it will - the economic consequences will be just horrendous.

So well done PNAC.  You have weakened America beyond recovery, placed it on a trajectory towards Third World status, and strengthened the very 'enemies' you sought to weaken.  Meanwhile those unfortunate countries who attracted your attention have suffered massive civilian casualties and ruinous infrastructural and economic damage.

If there's such a thing as karma these monsters would be hog-tied and fed to a drift of starving swine. 

What's the deal with Ukraine?

I admit it, I don't understand what's going down in Ukraine.

A few observations:

First, this was not a 'democratic' revolution.  The previous government, irretrievably corrupt as it was, nonetheless was legally elected.  It was overthrown by violence.

Who are the good guys?  Well they're not going to be the ones supported by the EUSSR, the Neocons, McStain (but I repeat myself) and George Soros. And the chief agent provocateur Assistant Sec. of State Victoria Nuland .....who's married to war-mongering chicken hawk Robert Kagan, founding member of PNAC, you know, the people who dreamt up the 9/11 false flag.  You couldn't make this shit up.  Are these people in every fucking nook and cranny?

But wait. The new guys number among their ranks militants who agree with those who sided with the Germans in WW II, who wave dodgy flags and who've frightened the shit out of the local Jewish community. The whole ethos of the new government is ultra-nationalistic, anti-Russian, pro-EUSSR and anti-Jewish. 

A heady brew indeed.

My own belief is that the insurrection is being driven and financed by western interests with the aim of weakening Russia and surrounding that country even more effectively.  A Ukraine, even a truncated one that was heavily anti-Russian, would fit that particular bill very nicely.  My guess - and it's only a guess -  is that they feel they can control the  street rowdies once they've fulfilled their role as cannon fodder for the regime change project.

Maybe.  But what I do know though is that this Western mischief and meddling could result in an international crisis and/or civil war that would make events in Syria look like a walk in the park. The level of irresponsibility displayed, given the potentially catastrophic outcome, is simply criminal. Criminal.  The cost to Ukraine, a country with the Holodomor still a living memory for some people, could be absolutely catastrophic.

But hey, who gives a damn about that. eh?

Putin

Much comment on the previous post about the possibility of Vladimir Putin and  Russia as the last best hope for White Nationalists. Are those hopes realistic? I've put my thinking cap on and here's my position.

Ok, first the positives.  For a start I love the way he refuses to be intimidated by ‘public opinion’ or warnings from his putative moral superiors in the West. Without messing he’s awarded Pussy Riot and the Greenpeace people hefty jail sentences and he’s banned the proselytising of homosexuality and same-sex marriage, outraging Western degenerates such as the ubiquitous Stephen Fry (who, you’ll never guess, equated it to the Holocau$st ‘where most of my family were exterminated’).

He’s also restored much of the power and wealth of the Russian Orthodox Church (it’s only with difficulty I see this as a positive, and only on the basis of my enemy’s enemy being my friend.)  And there’s no doubt that he has made some powerful observations on the moral and demographic decline of the White race (“The white race is dying out.  Do you understand what I am saying?”) and has acknowledged that this destruction has been driven from the top by ‘powerful forces’.  The clear inference being that such a thing won’t happen in Russia under his watch.

But will it?

There’s cause for great concern.  First it’s clear that his style is more USSR Release 2, or that of a Czar, rather than that of a Russian nationalist.  Accordingly he’s set great store by accepting, nay, welcoming, huge numbers of Asiatics and north Caucasians…..overwhelmingly Muslim.  On my last visit to Moscow I was staggered at the demographic change, from about 95% White ten years ago to about 70% now. There is no doubt that, despite his fine words, Putin has facilitated this, directly and indirectly, (e.g. employment and welfare bias) and almost exactly a year ago introduced an Amnesty for millions of such illegal immigrants.  Does not all of this sound eerily familiar?

As in the West, a heavy clampdown on nationalism is a corollary of mass immigration. And have no doubt, Putin has come down very hard on Russian nationalists. Despite perceptions to the contrary, Russia has its own panoply of ‘hate’ laws and has applied them almost exclusively against nationalists.  Just like in the West, attacks by enrichers get ignored, attacks by Russians on enrichers attracts the full force of the law and media. Putin’s antagonism to nationalists stems at least in part from the fact that they represent his strongest opposition by far.  The embodiment of that opposition, the Rodina (Homeland) party, has all but been destroyed.  But the persecution still goes on.

Worth noting here that (reflecting his nostalgia for the old USSR) Putin has established a youth organisation which is the old Komsomol in all but name. Any ambitious youth just has to join. And the new Konsomol is into multiculturalism in a way that would put an American university to shame. Every photo of the happy kids must feature a predefined (or so it seems) selection of black and brown faces (faeces?) and owners of said faces are promoted way out of line with their numbers and capabilities.

Bad as all of this undoubtedly is, it’s Putin’s relations with Jews that causes me the most concern. Now my main source of information here is my friend Oleg, whose view of Jews…….well, let’s just say that were our own esteemed Uncle Nasty to fall into his company he (UN) would soon be nervously edging towards the door.  (Here's my earlier post on Oleg).  Yet Oleg is not a liar and everything that I could check has stacked up.  Essentially “Putin is surrounded, supported, mentored and befriended by Jews and anti-Whites in his administration and, in fact, has been throughout his whole career.”  Indeed he has.  Don’t be fooled by the Khodorovsky affair. Apparently Russia’s Jews had little time for him, and vice versa, and his jailing resulted from a power struggle with Putin, having nothing to do with his being an oligarch or Jewish. The oligarchs who have bent the knee to Putin have been allowed get away with their ill-gotten gains.

Wikileaks has provided extensive information on this subject (worth checking out for yourself).  We get the unexpurgated views of the stakeholders, and they are indeed revealing.  Here’s one example from the American Ambassador to Russia:  “Lazar [Berel Lazar, Chabad Lubavitch Shliach to Moscow and Chief Rabbi of Russia] called Putin the most pro-Jewish leader in Russian history, referring to his deep admiration for Israel and the Mossad, his trip to a kibbutz, and his cooperation with the Jewish community. Lazar noted the increase in Russian reverse immigration from Israel, estimating 100,000 Jews had returned in the past four years. He cited Putin's tolerance as a principal reason for the uptick”.

Oleg swears that Jews are at the levers of power in every state institution, and as elsewhere, work assiduously at recruiting and promoting their own. Anatoly Chubais, one of the architects of the looting of Russia under Yeltsin as well as a whole catalogue of other atrocious criminal actions, far from being jailed or, more justifiably executed, is, and has been for over a decade, one of Putin’s most powerful allies. He’s free to continue robbing the country blind, empowering his own Jewish mafia as he does so.  Oleg tells me that ordinary Russians are fully aware of this but feel powerless to do anything. As under the early USSR, there are severe penalties for ‘anti-Semitism’ which in practice means criticising anything or anyone that’s Jewish. By the way Oleg is emphatic that Putin’s mother was actually Jewish and it seems great efforts have been made to sanitise the official records, especially the spelling of her name. I’m unable to verify this, accounts are conflicting.

And we know, to our cost, what Jews do when they take over a country. No need to go over that again, isn’t that right, Mr. Shatter?  Now some people argue that Putin is merely working with Jews, that they don’t control him. Maybe, but if so, good luck to him with that. So going back to my original question, does Russia under Putin offer hope for Whites?  Based on the foregoing it would appear as if he’s as bad as any of the western traitors guilty of selling out their own countries.  But there is one strange and contradictory coda: Almost all the ‘bad guys’ in the west, the Neocons, the libtards, the BBC, the New York Times etc. they all hate him. What’s not to love….  inimicus inimici mei amicus meus est (my enemy’s enemy) and all that?

My view?  I think Putin sees himself as a modern Czar of the Russian Empire, a kind of a cross between Peter The Great and Stalin. He demonstrates strength, intelligence and persistence and could go on to be one of the most famous of Russian leaders. But a friend of White Nationalists?  I don’t think so.

Hey Bandar, get fitted for that bullet-proof vest!

The explosions in Russia in the lead-up to the Winter Olympics in Sochi bring to mind the famous/notorious meeting between Putin and Saudi Prince Bandar in Moscow last August. Bandar, among other things, is head of Saudi Intelligence.  He also (I know this from my many visits to that country) has a reputation for being totally corrupt, debased and degenerate, even by Saudi standards.

Anyway it seems that at that meeting Bandar made the Russians a generous offer in return for the Russians abandoning Bashar Assad.  "As an example, I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics in the city of Sochi on the Black Sea next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us."

It seems Putin was enraged by this and responded  “We know that you have supported the Chechen terrorist groups for a decade. And that support, which you have frankly talked about just now, is completely incompatible with the common objectives of fighting global terrorism that you mentioned.”

You don't have to have a suspicious mind to draw the conclusion that the current bombings are payback for that rejection. After all, as Bandar said,  "the Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us."

So here I have a bit of advice for Bandar, worthless degenerate monster as he may be.  Get fitted for a Kevlar bullet-proof vest. You're not dealing with Obama, Cameron, Hollande or any of the other spineless drones who head western governments.  You're dealing with one tough cookie, former head of the KGB, one who has utterly defeated you and your allies in the war that you started in Syria. He will not react well to having his country and its citizens blown up.

I await his reaction with eager anticipation.  I'd happily accept a trebling of the oil price if it resulted from Bandar and his sick, vile kingdom being blown to, well, kingdom come.

"You're a Holocaust denier!"

Such was the charge levelled against me in a conversation with friends and acquaintances last Tuesday evening.  Am I?  Well, you be the judge as I lay out my position.

1. The Jews in Europe did indeed suffer a Holocaust in which vast numbers of them were killed and otherwise lost their lives during WW II.

2.  The numbers come nowhere near the mythical (and it is mythical) figure of six million. I don't know what the number was, maybe nobody does but I suspect it was closer to a tenth of that figure.

3. Other peoples suffered a Holocaust as well during this time, at least as bad as that suffered by the Jews. I have in mind the Poles, Russians, Ukrainians and of course the Germans themselves. The ratio of Tutsis slaughtered in Rwanda dwarfs the ratio of Jews killed in their Holocaust. Yet Jews have cornered the genocide market.

4. There was no plan to exterminate Europe's Jews.  The plan was to get them into work camps, slave labour camps if you will, and at the end of the war expel them to Israel, Uganda, Madagascar or the steppes of Russia.

5. The majority of Jewish deaths resulted from the actions of the Einsatzgruppen and their local allies.  These forces operated behind German lines after Operation Barbarossa to suppress local resistance.  Such resistance was strongly associated with Jews who were in any event an easily identifiable target. Vast numbers were murdered and buried in mass graves. The local forces allied to the Einsatzgruppen undoubtedly took the opportunity to settle many an old score as part of the process. Typhus outbreaks in the camps were also a major contributor...possibly the largest.

6. The idea of the gas chambers as a form of mass slaughter is a complete fabrication.

7. The piles of skeletal bodies as seen in the iconic photos from Belsen and elsewhere represented the victims of typhus and starvation, the latter brought on by the bombing of German supply lines.

I have not arrived at these conclusions casually or quickly. I truly believe that they represent what really occurred.

General knowledge test

(1) What would be the reaction from the MSM were a British punk band to invade a mosque, defile it with obscene lyrics and insult the 'prophet' in the most scatological terms imaginable?

a) Stoutly leap to their defence in the interest of free speech and expression
b) Call for their arrest and imprisonment for such 'offensive' behaviour

(2)What would be the reaction from the MSM were an American neo-Nazi heavy metal band to invade a synagogue, ridicule the Jewish religion and make jokes about the Holocaust?

a) Stoutly leap to their defence in the interest of free speech and expression
b) Call for their arrest and imprisonment for such vile offensive behaviour

(3)What would be the reaction from the MSM were an obscure Russian 'pop group' to invade an Orthodox Cathedral where they defile and mock the alter, the Orthodox faith, Jesus, and the Russian President.

a) Totally ignore it as who gives a damn about an obscure Russian group in a far-away church
b) Stoutly leap to their defence in the interest of free speech and expression
b) Explode into frothing indignation and provide 24x7 coverage of calls for their arrest and imprisonment for such a vile offence

You can obviously see where I'm headed here. Have you ever come across anything like the reaction of the MSM to the Pussy Riot incident?  You know the MSM that warmly applauded the jailing of the 'tram lady' and the young student for the 'offence' they caused with their 'racist' comments. The MSM that walks in dread of saying anything that might offend the Religion of Peace. The same MSM now wallowing in paroxysms of rage and indignation at the jailing of these degenerate sluts from Pussy Riot.

Yes, they are degenerate sluts, not brave 'anti-establishment rockers' as Madonna, that pox-ridden clapped out old hag, refers to them. For a start they have never made any recordings as far as I can see. What they have done is to have a full penetrative sex orgy in public, and in front of onlooking children, and stuffing a frozen chicken  up one of their vaginas' (don't ask me how) again in full public view, as well as a whole host of similar such artistic accomplishments. One more disgusting than the next.

Such is the focus of the West's indignation.  Needless to say it's not what it seems. It's quite obviously part of the Anti-Russian and anti-Putin agenda being pursued for some time in powerful quarters. (Romney: 'Russia is our greatest strategic threat'. Yeah, right). But who specifically is pulling the strings?  Well, as you know, I've gone from seeing Jews as 'the light unto the nations' to being the men behind the curtain, manipulating White ethnic destruction at every opportunity. Maybe I am becoming paranoid  But a little probing indeed reveals some interesting facts.

Oleg, a Russian friend of long standing tells me that the group's manager is Jewish. Mmmm......And Oksana Chelysheva - board member of the Finnish-Russian Civic Forum and a steering committee member of the NED, convicted criminal George Soros Open Society-funded FIDH, Open Society, Ford Foundation, Sigrid Rausing Trust-funded Front Line Defenders, and US State Department-run Amnesty International-affiliated EU-Russia Civil Society Forum - all the usual suspects, in fact - is heading Pussy Riot's support campaign. Which is more interested in damning Russia and Putin than in anyting that really helps the group.  In fact there's no doubt that their so-called supporters would welcome a really harsh sentence.....it'd play nicely into the narrative of the monstrous Putin and the dictatorial undemocratic nature of Russia.

It's pretty clear that America is working to destabilise and delegitimise Russia and its leadership by way of NGOs such as those referred to above, and many others, such as the so-called 'independent' election monitors. Who, needless to say, came up with the required verdict that the recent elections were not genuine.  And of course there's a long and deep antipathy between Jews and Russian Orthodoxy.

Why has Russia incurred such animus?  If anything the Russians themselves should be the resentful ones. That unfortunate people had tens of millions killed under Communism and, post-Communism, their industrial and mineral wealth looted, the country bled dry by western 'experts' like Larry Summers and the Jewish oligarchs who fled to the West (mostly Israel) with their ill-gotten gains once the coast was clear. The sacred agreement that NATO would not advance beyond existing 1991 borders was broken almost as soon as the ink was dry, yet another example of western bad faith.

Why has Russia incurred such animus? Is it because, as many readers here suggest, that country and its people will in fact represent the last stand of White ethnicity? I don't know the answer to that.  What I do know is that they must be doing something right if they're attracting such attention from those reprobates now attacking them.

The new Pravda

Almost everyone on this blog will know the time when we in the West took everything that Pravda said with the proverbial grain of salt. Same with all the other Soviet MSM outlets. And justifiably so. They were on message or they were in deep shite. We patronisingly contrasted this with our own lively totally independent media. We relied on the latter for truth in the news, Pravda and their ilk for amusement and some intellectual stimulation. Here I'm referring to the skill of interpreting the company line. So does an announcement to the effect that 'Comrade Brezhnev has a slight cold' mean that he's just died, or in fact been dead for weeks?

My, my, my. How things have changed. Now our media have become totally Sovietised while their Russian counterparts shine a light on the West that reveals it in all its festering corruption and incompetence. If you want a source other than the Internet for what's really going on in the West today, go to Pravda or Russia Today (RT). Mind you, these media are a lot more coy when reporting on internal matters. But that's another story.

So read this excerpt from a Pravda article from 2009. Could you just imagine this kind of truth finding its way into our lamestream bought and paid for outfits?

Throughout the totalitarian West, the Marxist internationalist elites, while busily flooding their countries with tens of millions of third worlders, have introduced specific measures to keep the native populations down and in check.

These measures have come in the form of Hate Crimes Laws. The laws state that a crime is not just a crime if we can find a deeper motive, such as hate of a specific race, sex, religion or sexual orientation. Thus the Lords of Humanity have given themselves the power of God to know what is inside the hearts of men.
In practical terms, what this means is 1. A murder is not just a murder if hate is involved. Say again? This means certain lives are worth more than others, a protected class, another insult to Christ and justice. 2. If the local jury trial is considered to lenient, then those globalist elites of the West can try the person again for "hate" or rather in actuality for the same crime, twice. Again, an insult to justice that Western serfs bow, grin and bare.

But this gets worse, since in practice, the elites decide who is a racist and who is not, they use these laws sparingly to keep the native population down, shackled and paranoid of the knock on the door.

Couldn't have said it better myself, mate. If only I had a platform........

The strange, strange case of Max Täubner

The SS Einsatzgruppen were a para-police unit that ‘cleaned up’ behind main German army lines in eastern Europe and Russia during WW2. Cleaned up, we might add, with merciless brutality. SS-Untersturmführer Max Täubner commanded a workshop detail in the brigade and was tried along with four other Waffen-SS men for unauthorised and sadistic killings of a large number of Jews, and also for taking photos of the killings showing them to his wife and friends. In the verdict the court states "The accused allowed his men to act with such vicious brutality that they conducted themselves under his command like a savage horde". Accordingly the court handed down a substantial jail sentence.

This seems a run-of-the-mill war crimes trial.

Apart from one thing.

The court was not that of the victorious Allies, rather it was an SS court, held in May 1943. That’s right. Now an SS court punishing an SS unit for massacring Jews, even in particularly brutal and sadistic fashion, seems a bit like giving a speeding ticket to a driver at the Indianapolis 500. After all, every schoolboy knows that the raison d’etre of the SS einsatzgruppen was to locate and kill every Jew they could find.

Wasn’t it?

Well hardly, if the case of Max Täubner is anything to go by. If you check out the various sources you’ll frequently see his case referred to as ‘the only known instance of an SS man being tried for killing Jews’.

Was it?

I don’t know.

What I do know is that I don’t know what’s true anymore, especially in relation to the whole Nazi period. What I do know, from this case and from some other that I’ll write about shortly, is that our minds have been, and are being, seriously fucked with. After a lifetime of believing myself to be well-read and well-informed, I now feel more like Truman in The Truman Show.

On account of this I feel angry and almost humiliated.

Oleg, Jews, and the rape of Mother Russia

I like Oleg. Oleg is a spectacularly unsuccessful Russian technology entrepreneur. Like so many unsuccessful entrepreneurs, it seems, he blames ‘the Jews’ for his predicament. His lack of success doesn’t come from lack of brains or education or ability to work - it’s just, well, he’s a lousy businessman. Last week he flew over from Moscow with his latest brainwave. Having dismissed it out of hand (how does he come up with those ideas?) we had several hours to kill. We spoke about Mother Russia. More specifically, we (well he) spoke about Mother Russia and the Jews.

Oleg assures me that ‘The Jews’ have been behind just about everything that has gone wrong with Russia, from the Bolshevik takeover, the running of the NKVD through to the disastrous experiment with ‘free markets’ during the nineties and the robbery of the state’s most valuable assets by the oligarchs.

There has to be some explanation for the latter, because the scale of the theft – there’s no other word for it - has been staggering. Literally trillions of dollars/euros drained from the country with most of it, according to Oleg, shipped to Israel. There’s also the fact that five out of the six oligarchs are Jewish, despite Jews representing less than 1% of the Russian population.

Then there was the catastrophic transition to capitalism under Yeltsin. In case you don't know, a team of ‘experts’ from Harvard and USAID stampeded Russia into ‘freeing the market’. This turned out to be catastrophic, setting the national economy back by a generation. Well, it was catastrophic for the Russians, not for the ‘experts’ who advised them.

Not only was the advice and guidance lousy, but several of the advisers used the opportunity to enrich themselves by speculating in the shares of the very companies whose futures they were deciding! It doesn’t get much more unethical than that. If it had happened in the US the perpetrators would have spent many years in the slammer.

And who were those perpetrators? The main one was Andrei Shleifer, a Russian Jewish émigré, aided by his eminence grise and close personal friend Larry Summers – also Jewish. It was so bad that the US Government sued Harvard and Shleifer, who eventually had to pay back about $32 million and $2 million respectively. Despite this, Summers and Shleifer both remained (the latter still remains) on the Harvard faculty, Summers as President.

I found myself asking (of myself) ‘this has got to be the greatest heist of the 20th century. How come I, and just about everyone else, treated it as a nine-day wonder?’. Oleg has the answer to that too. ‘The Jews’ control the range of discussion. If they want something to disappear from the public arena, it disappears.

He makes the point that this is more pronounced in the West than anywhere else. Questioning the Holocaust will land you in jail, as will a whole range of supposedly ‘hate’ crimes. The legislation to support these measures has been the brainchild of ‘The Jews’, who have, more importantly, through their control of the media, rendered a whole range of subjects and attitudes outside the scope of polite discussion. In effect they’re contrived a situation where criticism of Jews, even individual Jews, exposes the critic to serious sanction. For this reason criticism of Summers and Shleifer was muted, and dismissed as anti-Semitism by many of their defenders.

Oleg believes that an ethnic network will close around and defend ‘their own’ if faced with a serious threat. For this to work, the commanding heights must be controlled. Hence every US President is surrounded by Jews, while Congress is like the Israeli Government in exile.

All of this is true. But does it mean ‘The Jews’ are the master puppeteers jerking the rest of us around on a string? I have two counter arguments. The first is that Jews have very high IQ levels and as we all know, that is the most important determinant of the kind of success we see them achieve. Also the most effective opponents of ‘The Jews’ have time and again been, well, the Jews. For instance the most trenchant critic of the Holocaust Industry has been Norman Finkelstein (‘There’s no business like shoa business’) and Naomi Klein lead the assault on Summers and Shleifer.

This happens all the time and if you don't admit that you’re not being honest.

So do I still think the ‘Jewish Plot’ theory is bogus? Well, yes, in the sense that it does not refer to Jews generally. But just let’s say, I'm not at all as convinced as I used to be. And I'm still pondering why I let so much of this just float past me.

Russia and Georgia: A reality check

The arrogance and tendentiousness of the American MSM continues to take the breath away. The Washington Post, once a great newspaper, and supposedly ‘liberal’, exemplifies this with an insane editorial entitled “The U.S. and its allies must unite against Moscow's war on Georgia”. It contains the usual Bush blather about defending democracy, freedom, blah, blah, blah.

Just consider a few facts:

The Georgians started this conflict. In South Ossetia they attacked Russian peacekeepers (I use that term in its loosest sense) who were there as part of a peace deal signed by Georgia and Russia. Several Russians were killed.

For almost two hundred years Georgia has been part of Greater Russia. Maybe they were entitled to independence, maybe not, but if so, why can't South Ossetia and Abkhazia then be independent of Georgia? Their people are not Georgian and don't want to be part of it.

Back in the late eighties Ronald Reagan promised Gorbachev that if the Soviet Union peacefully granted non-Russian ‘countries’ independence, the US and NATO would reciprocate by not expanding into those countries. These promises were broken with a callousness and cynicism that would have done Hitler proud. Now they want Georgia to become a member of NATO. In case you forget, NATO stands for North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. Georgia is closer to the South Pacific than the North Atlantic. For fuck sake!

Then Bush wags his finger and with a straight face warns against using ‘armed force’ to ‘bully’ a small nation. All he was short of saying was that ‘we could have bullied Iraq and Afghanistan too, but we took the peaceful route’.
And of course if you ever see America doing something stupid in this general region, you can be sure the Israelis are in there somewhere, pouring petrol on the flames. And sure enough, the Israelis are up to their necks in Georgia. They have been selling them massive amounts of armaments and ‘private’ military training and intelligence services. A number of the Georgian cabinet hold Israeli citizenship. A nice little war would boost Israeli coffers (replacement armaments), test the weapons and intelligence in actual war circumstances and hopefully drag America into another conflict in the region. All of this is still on the cards.

The only bright side is that the US is bogged down in the Iraq and Afghanistan fiascos, the economy is going down the tubes, and China and the ‘sovereign funds’ (i.e. Arabs) can pull the financial plug at any time. Thankfully Europe, conscious of its dependence on Russian energy, looks like staying out. Surely, in such circumstance even a buffoon like Bush and the neocon nutcases that surround him wouldn’t do anything so stupid as get directly involved? Let’s just hope so.

But going back to the Washington Post and the American MSM generally. How in God’s name do they continue to purvey such garbage? Have they learned nothing from all the disasters of the last forty years – Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan? How do the American sheeple continue to believe it? Have they been totally lobotomised?

I truly fear for that once great country. How the Chinese and the Arabs must be laughing.

But I'm laughing too, because the Internet and blogs are rapidly putting these useless bastards out of business.