Some people in Ireland really do benefit from diversity

As you've probably discerned, I'm not a great fan of diversity despite being constantly assured of its endless benefits. Mind you for some strange reason those benefits are never actually spelled out in any detail. Which is leading an increasing number of people to wonder whether anyone actually does benefit. In fact I can assure the doubters that many indeed do. Specifically those engaged in the law, prison and immigration industries.

This from the Irish Independent:

"A man who took part in imprisoning, stripping and beating Innocent Wilson because he wanted to teach him a moral lesson for entering his girlfriend's bedroom has been jailed for six months. In Dublin Circuit Criminal Court Judge Sarah Berkeley sentenced Lucky Shaka (24) to two years' imprisonment, but suspended the final 18 months."

I can just imagine the scene in court

State Prosecutor: 'Mr. Shaka, you are facing serious charges. Are you innocent or not?'

Shaka 'No, I not Innocent, I Lucky'. Pointing at Wilson 'He Innocent'

State Prosecutor: 'So you are not innocent?'

Shaka: 'No, I not Innocent'

State Prosecutor: 'Judge, I rest my case'

And then there's the case of the Nigerian employed by an Irish hotel as a Food and Beverage Manager - 'in effect the second most senior management position in the hotel'. The owners must have seen him as quite a catch, possessing as he did a degree in Catering from Lagos University (his Shank Of Missionary being a mouth-watering speciality). Unfortunately - and totally unexpectedly - some problems arose shortly after recruitment. Like spending months at a time out on 'sick leave', having a difficult time with biased and racist colleagues, threatening to strangle the hotel manager. And showering fellow employees, diners and their food with a virulent strain of the TB bacterium.

His lengthy appeal was of course funded in full by the Irish taxpayer. 

So yes, the law and immigration industry do benefit from diversity.  And who does not benefit?  Well just about everyone else really.

Bliss it was that dawn to be alive

Oh! I have slipped the surly bonds of earth

And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings

Forgive me if I wax lyrical this fine morning but some rare good fortune brightens my day and lightens my step. Because the just completed General Election in Ireland has seen two of the most malevolent, treacherous nation-polluting scumbags tossed onto the scrapheap of Irish politics. Both Alan ('Shat the Rat') Shatter and Aodhagin O'Riordain (known to his parents as Aiden O'Riordan) have been given the shaft. From Government Ministers to not even a seat on the back benches.

But not before the traitorous scum had used their period in power to supercharge the population replacement program for Ireland, the success of which can be measured by the sight in every city and town of a rapidly growing dark underclass living on our largesse.  Strange, was it not, that during the formation of the Government both were rewarded with Ministries giving them power over this very issue?  A bit like appointing Casey Anthony as Minister For Childcare.  O'Riordain took his defeat with a faggoty outburst of tears, a far cry from the vindictive power-crazed bully who persecuted a town mayor for pointing out that Africans were rude and aggressive. Watching him blubbering into the camera provided me with a deep inner glow of contentment.

Nothing to the joy evinced by Shatter's erstwhile colleagues who barely concealed their glee at his humiliation.  Even his friends hate him! Scouring media comments I was unable to detect a single one offering sympathy.  In one sense he's shot himself in the foot because he's done the image of Jewishness immense harm, at least in this country.And you'll be staggered at this - wait for it - but what did he put his defeat down to? Bingo! Anti-Semitism. Oy vey, the sufferink! A claim which attracted almost universal derision and further underlined its already declining power to whip the goyim into silence.

So Shatter, 'deformed, unfinished, sent before my time' will soon fade into obscurity, brooding on the words of Browning:

There's nobody on the rooftops now

Just a palsied few at the window set

Thus I entered and thus I go

Yes, go, ye bastards. And at the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember you. For the damage you've inflicted on our country.

The IBC/05 scam that's transforming Ireland

Drive through Dublin today - in fact drive through any Irish town on any day - and you'll be staggered at the sheer scale of the non-White invasion. How Ireland has been racially transformed in less than a single generation. The genesis of this problem goes back to the time when Ireland - like the USA today - granted birthright citizenship.  Arrive here, give birth, and the offspring automatically gets Irish citizenship. An event which in turn entitled the mother and her extended family to the fruits of the Irish taxpayer for life.

And that's exactly what thousands of Africans, mainly Nigerians, did. Arrive here several months pregnant, claim asylum, and produce a new little welfare bum while the claim is being processed. Simple as that.  It got so bad that around the turn of the century more Nigerians were claiming asylum in Ireland than in Britain, which has a population fifteen times larger. Eventually in 2002 the Master of the Coombe Maternity Hospital declared the situation to be unsustainable with fully one third of births at the hospital being to non-nationals.

This, and the attendant national dissatisfaction with health services lead the Government to hold a Referendum on birthright citizenship. The one and only time the people of Ireland - or as far as I know those of any other White country - had a chance to vote on the demographic warfare being waged against them. The result was predictable: An overwhelming rejection of the birthright citizenship scam, a result which was enacted in legislation shortly afterwards.

But then a strange thing happened. Something that completely negated the will of the people as expressed in the Referendum. Something that was done in virtual secrecy. I'm talking of a scheme called IBC/05 which was tacked onto the Referendum legislation, allowing the Irish born child and its parents 'leave to remain'. And with complete access to the full range of social services, free health and education etc. The scheme did contain a facile requirement for renewal every two years. Which meant for all practical purposes everybody got to stay indefinitely. It still goes on in that leave to remain means that while waiting for your bogus asylum application to be processed you breed with some local mudshark and ergo, you and yours become 'Irish' citizens.

And that my friends is why Ireland gets more diverse by the day. The experience reinforces the realisation that the NWO globalists won't let a little matter like the will of the people stand in their way of blending us out of existence.

An open letter to Ronit Lentin

Hello Ronit. You don't know me because we abide in different ethical universes. You on the gender-neutral Moral High Ground of brotherhood, equality and diversity while I prowl the murky depths of the Valley Of Hate. Then again maybe you do know of me. Because your army of Thought Police never sleeps while tracking down Enemies Of The People such as I.

Anyway I notice that you - an Israeli - and some Iranian lady gatecrashed and disrupted the launch of a political party whose goal is to defend the right of the Irish People to their own country.....in other words "a neo-Nazi extreme right wing party". Now there are some who might say it's a bit rich having Iranian and Israeli women preventing Irish men forming a legal political party here in Ireland. But not me. Because I know your sole objective lies in defending the unfortunate Third Worlders who, as the saying goes 'found themselves in Ireland'. And I'm the first to acknowledge your diligent work over many years (financed by the Irish taxpayer) to bring hundreds of thousands of these treasures to our shores. And to prevent ineligible ones from being deported.

But Ronit, you've been so successful you remind me of the Lone Ranger as he and Tonto used to ride off into the sunset after another successful mission: 'Our work here is done'.  Because you see according to Eurostat Ireland now awards citizenship at levels higher than any other European state. And what's more the number of foreign-born residents here is three times the EU average.  Despite the fact that so many of them are on welfare and/or in jail you must nevertheless be so proud at the diversity wherever you now look. Nigerians, Congolese, Somalis, Afghans, Pakistanis......all with huge numbers of children in tow. Every street in every town in Ireland.

So we're getting kinda full here and that poses something of a dilemma because your unquenchable thirst for justice still needs to be assuaged.

But I got good news for you! I know the very place you can do that. Unlike in Ireland, where anyone who flops onto our shores is given free accommodation, upkeep, education and health (before finally gaining citizenship) this country's Prime Minister cruelly described such people as 'infiltrators' and 'parasites' whose presence undermined the ethnic cohesion of the country. Can you believe that?

And it gets worse. His Government rounds up such "parasitical infiltrators" (shudder) and locks them up in concentration camps before shipping them off to the tender mercies of some Third World tyrant who'd been bought off with a generous lodgement to his private Swiss bank account a 'foreign aid' donation. I bet you'd just love to get your teeth into this scandal!  Do what you did in Ireland. Fight the good fight and flood that country with the detritus of the Third World while campaigning hard against any attempt to remove them.  And now the really good news: You'd have no difficulty getting into that country. Because it's none other than your own homeland, Israel.

How about that!

So off with you, Ronit. Because if you don't jump at this gilt-edged opportunity some cynics might say that your real objective lies in destroying the ethnic cohesion of White Christian countries and not in defending the rights of down-trodden Third Worlders. 

Bring forth the cleansing hellfire

Many of you will have seen the viral Youtube whingefest from Irish coal-burner Emma Murphy. She suffered the fate of most coal-burners, to wit, domestic violence and then abandonment after her sperm donor became a.......'father' once again. This time with another local woman. RamseyPaul has done a great video on it in his own inimitable style.

He cites the example of a guy who got eaten by alligators in  Texas. Despite prominent signs and a local woman warning of the dangers he nonetheless decided to swim with the alligators, ending up as their main course for that day. RamseyPaul points out to Emma how utterly predictable this was, adding that as a White women partnering and having children with a black man she incurred an equally predictable risk. (Of violence and abandonment, not being eaten. Although given Africans' culinary preferences one never knows).

There is one difference however.  The dangers to this man of swimming with alligators was made absolutely clear, and he should have known anyway. I don't have much sympathy for Emma Murphy (as with this mudshark) but in partial vindication I ask how she could have known of the dangers inherent in mudsharking. Everything she'd have learned from school, TV, cinema, newspapers, politicians and possibly her sixties-era guilt-ridden parents would have conditioned her to see black men as wondrous, intelligent and cool, sensitive loyal lovers and devoted family men.

A day of reckoning beckons for those  foisting this poison on our people.

"Here Comes The Groom"

Ireland goes to the polls this week to decide on what a former Labour Party Leader declared to be 'the most important civil rights issue of the generation'. Wow!  And what would the most important  civil rights issue of the generation be? Why it's same-sex marriage. Bet you didn't know that. Yes, the appeal of marital bliss has suddenly dawned on the notoriously promiscuous homosexual community. So be prepared for emotional renditions of Here Comes The Groom as Bruce and Selwyn vow till death (or the appearance of the first good-looking young man) do we part.

Many see the issue as a harmless extension of civil rights to another 'marginalised and vulnerable' grouping. Which doesn't explain the explosion of financial, media, political and even judicial support for the Yes side, whose campaign has been marked by a degree of viciousness and intolerance arguably unseen since the Civil War nearly 100 years ago. These "liberals" can be strange people.

But beyond the simple and 'harmless' extension of human rights, the rubric under which the vote is peddled, lies an altogether more sinister piece of legislation railroaded through Parliament without opposition or even debate. The Children and Family Relationships (C&FR) Bill will fundamentally alter the nature of the family. It will for example enable a same-sex couple to adopt. And this, according to Fintan O'Toole, the High Priest of Irish "liberalism", has been the main driver for the Yes campaign. Thanks for your honesty Fintan, if for nothing else.The Bill will also sharply shift the balance from biological to 'psychological' parenting, and from first marriages to second and third relationships. With the state - as in the kind of people who did such a stellar job in the Rotherham sex abuse scandal - deciding which option is 'in the best interests of the child'. Yeah, right.

So yes, genetics are pretty much out of date and what matters now is the quality and quantity of the 'love' the child receives. Experts tell us so. So it must be right. They tell us that we're 'obsessed' with biological parenting and must be open to other forms. This way we'll be liberal, progressive, tolerant and enlightened as distinct from being HATERS!!! "Everyone Is Equal" the posters proclaim. Really?  So a child-murdering paedophile is equal to a brain surgeon? Ok, got it.  Glad we cleared that up.

Normally I'm not one for the 'slippery slope' argument but this extension of 'equal rights' to same-sex unions really does open up an appalling vista. Once the principle of marriage not necessarily being a biological heterosexual union is conceded why then should the definition not be extended in due course to cover various other forms? Why not  'marriage' between three or more partners, between brother and sister, between father and daughter? Well, why not? They're all equal, are they not? Incestuous unions would of course result in a proliferation of the retarded inbred mutants of Pakistani origins who now prowl the streets of  Britain. But the Project Team have an answer to that as well. "What, are you suggesting that such people don't have the right to life?  That they're (shudder) inferior?' You're a HATER!!

End of argument.

You can see how it goes. And have no doubt that in due course it will.  Because this project, financed massively from wealthy external sources (Soros, Chuck Feeney and other shadowy groups) is not about gay rights, and still less - Heaven forfend - about the rights of the unfortunate children caught up in the ensuing maelstrom. No, it's another step - and a major one - in the Long March Through The Institutions. The war against nature, the project to corrupt, subvert, debase and ultimately destroy the White Christian-derived social order and the unequalled civilisation that accompanied it.

So what's the likely outcome of the Referendum? As of now the polls suggest an overwhelmingly Yes vote. But the lead, though still huge, is rapidly narrowing as more and more voters realise, despite No campaigners not lifting their heads above the parapet, that maybe tinkering with nature and with an institution that has formed the basis of society for thousands of years may not be as great as it's been proclaimed.

WW 1's Pearl Harbor

Next Thursday the Co. Cork town where I live will commemorate the centenary of the Lusitania sinking. Everyone knows the story: In flagrant contravention of established maritime warfare principles the fiendish Germans, cackling with glee as only Germans can,  torpedoed and sank a huge defenceless passenger ship with the loss of over 1,200 men, women and children. Contrary to established precedent the attack took place without warning.  (Hitherto submariners allowed those on board non-military craft the opportunity to launch lifeboats before firing their torpedoes.) But not this time.

I can imagine the high-level German representatives at the ceremony shifting uncomfortably under the accusatory glares of the other attendees. But as with this case the blame lies not with the Germans but with their enemies.

The case must be seen in the broader context of  the World War into which Britain desperately sought to embroil America. What better way to outrage the general public than murder over 1,000 innocent civilians? Just days before the sinking Woodrow Wilson's eminence grise, rumoured Rothschild agent 'Colonel' Edward House, met the British Foreign Minister Edward Grey.  House later wrote: "We spoke of the probability of an ocean liner being sunk, and I told him that if this were done a flame of indignation would sweep across America, which would in itself probably carry us into the war." The pair then met King George V who also raised the subject, asking 'suppose they sink the Lusitania, with American passengers on board?"

At all times following the sinking German claims that the Lusitania carried military ordnance (making it a legitimate target) were indignantly denied by the British Government and its shills. But the Germans had sent warnings throughout the USA prior to the Lusitania's departure. Their agents had identified various forms of munitions being loaded under the guise of ordinary cargo.

TRAVELLERS intending to embark on the Atlantic voyage are reminded that a state of war exists between Germany and her allies and Great Britain and her allies; that the zone of war includes the waters adjacent to the British Isles; that, in accordance with formal notice given by the Imperial German Government, vessels flying the flag of Great Britain, or any of her allies, are liable to destruction in those waters and that travellers sailing in the war zone on the ships of Great Britain or her allies do so at their own risk."

IMPERIAL GERMAN EMBASSY

Washington, D.C. 22nd April 1915

Were they right? Of course they were. Because, thanks to advanced diving technology the truth eventually emerged about thirty years ago with vast quantities of lethal ordnance found on the wreck and scattered about the adjacent ocean floor.

And what about the no-warning attack? More despicable lies. At the beginning of the U Boat campaign the Germans has adhered strictly to maritime convention, surfacing and allowing disembarkation to lifeboats. Even on occasion providing directions and sustenance. So what changed?   Enter war-mongering psychopath Churchill who, in flagrant contravention of every legal  and ethical norm had had commercial vessels secretly armed, the guns hidden under innocuous decking and/or cargo. This resulted in numerous U Boats being sunk with considerable loss of life. Naturally enough the warnings stopped after this.

In any event a very large boat like the Lusitania would under normal circumstances have taken about two hours to sink after being hit by a single torpedo.  But the Lusitania sank within 18 minutes.  Why? Because a massive second explosion - obviously caused by the on-board ordnance - blew away a large part of the hull, rendering any hope of rescue impossible. Several other deeply suspicious events are associated with the tragedy.  The British battle-cruiser Juno, patrolling the area for submarines, was inexplicably withdrawn shortly before the attack. Bear in mind that the Admiralty had cracked German codes and knew that subs were in the area. And to crown it all some of the rescue craft were recalled to Queenstown even when within sight of the struggling victims. After all, the more fatalities the better the propaganda.

One of the most disgusting aspects of the whole case was the deliberate scapegoating of the ship's Master, Captain William Turner.  The Admiralty's Richard Webb wrote to Lord Mersey, who oversaw the 'inquiry' "I am directed by the Board of Admiralty to inform you that it is considered politically expedient  that Captain Turner be prominently blamed for the disaster." How sick and cynical is that? And Churchill enthusiastically partook in the persecution of the unfortunate mariner who, though formally exonerated, never recovered and died a broken man.

We can thus say with confidence that the Lusitania can take its place with Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin and 9/11 as false flags enabled by evil men to widen and prolong vicious wars. And have no doubt there are more on the way.

So on Thursday next the standard pantomime (here's another one) will take place. Even through the truth has been forced out it has not really permeated the public consciousness. So  expect another bash the evil Germans scenario. And maybe even some hitherto undiscovered survivors, of the kind who keep miraculously popping up for Holocau$t™ reparations, will be wheeled out for the occasion.

Optimising face-time

The Irish Immigration Control Platform (ICP) has been getting some good airtime recently, including an appearance before a Parliamentary Committee and on a popular TV program (the Vincent Browne Show). Browne being Ireland's Jeremy Paxman equivalent. On that show their spokeswoman Aine Ni Chonaill (Ann O'Connell) came across as intelligent and with a masterful command of the facts. The problem though is that while a masterful command of the facts works great in a book or academic paper it does not really cut it on TV or indeed on any forum where participants are constrained by time and subject to interruptions. Therefore In the spirit of constructive criticism and as guidance for any reader with the same opportunity I offer the following free of charge.

First, in a short TV interview with only minutes of talk-time do not get bogged down in detailed facts. On such a forum nobody is interested in 'according to United Nations Statute 46.2.14 as amended by Statute 56.3.66  on 25/10/201 and subsequently incorporated into the ECHR requirements etc.etc.......'. That's ok for a book or an academic article, not for a short sound bite.  Just say 'international law requires..'

Keep the message simple and embodied in a small number of key concepts. It should be possible to deploy one or more of them to almost any question asked. Here are a few:

• In Ireland all asylum seekers are bogus, i.e. asylum tourists. This derives from the simple fact that genuine asylum seekers are obliged by 'international law' to lodge their application in the country they first "escape" to.  Ireland has no direct linkages to any of the hell holes concerned, ipso facto we cannot be the 'first country' for anyone.

• Every foreign adult in Ireland is either taking the job of an Irish person or alternatively drawing unemployment benefit. (In reality of course lots of them are doing both!)

• The state spends hundreds of millions annually is support of the immigration industry.  Cite this in the context  of the multiple problems faced by Irish citizens due to Government austerity. 'Little Johnny can't get that heart operation due to lack of resources.  I'd sooner spend the money on him rather than on asylum tourists'. Keep plugging the lack of school places, long hospital waiting lists etc.

• The so-called regularising of illegals is Orwellian NewSpeak. Regularising would mean sending the asylum tourists/illegal immigrants back while prioritising those following the legal route.

• The impact of Third World immigration on Western countries has been disastrous. Be able to recite a range of chilling examples. 'Why are we not learning from the mistakes of others?'.

• Cite Aristotle to the effect that impractical morality is no morality. So when some craw-thumper like the Pope appeals for all immigrants to be welcomed to our shores ask how such vast numbers can be housed, schooled, their health looked after etc.

• Cite international examples, most notably that of America, to show that amnesties, far from drawing a line under the problem, result in massive additional waves of immigrants.

• When challenged about the drownings in the Med cite the Australian example which shows that the certain knowledge of being towed back to where they embarked will stop the trafficking instantly.  End of tragedies on the high seas. Real practical morality would therefore call for this solution.

• When your humanity is challenged you must exude empathy baby! Aine was asked something like 'don't you think migrant woman and children drowning in the Med should be rescued?' Her response was along the lines of  'ICP don't have a position on that'. NOT GOOD!  While technically correct it makes dreadful television. Or radio. Or any forum really.  Say 'my heart goes out to those unfortunate people. However if we operated a rigorous repatriation policy they wouldn't undertake the journey in the first place'.  

As I said, one or more of these snappy factlets can be woven in to any answer to almost any question. They can and should be adapted for other countries.  The outcome will be positive, minds changed.

Try it.

Our futures depend on it.

What's Shat The Rat up to now?

The calls and texts came thick and fast last night. "Turn on the TV. That bastard Shatter is on helping the Muslim terrorist who's in jail in Egypt". And similar. Some background. There's this "Irish"... "teen", a lovely kind innocent dindonufins moderate Muslim who's in jail in Egypt. It seems the poor lad just went over there for a holiday, and when there - you know kids - publicly burned his Irish passport and renounced Irish citizenship, and then by sheer coincidence dropped into a mosque where - again by sheer coincidence - the local Muslim Brotherhood were planning a terrorist attack.

You know yourself.  That kind of thing happens to all of us all of the time.  Anyway his capture by the Egyptian security services rapidly reignited his enthusiasm for Irish citizenship and he's now demanding that the Irish Government - you know, the one whose passport he burned -  use every means possible to spring him from the slammer. Indignant are his family that "we" are not doing more to help "a fellow Irishman".  But that's not really the point of this post. You can if you want get more background on the would-be ISIS beheader here. Suffice to say that he and his family, who have been given sanctuary and citizenship here, are up to their necks in extremist activities.

No, the issue is why Shat the Rat would leap to the defense of extremist Muslims, his sworn enemies. As I pointed out at the beginning, this has caused consternation in many quarters, not least among this blog's readers. And it's even garnered Shatter some brownie points (so to speak) on the deluded MSM for his 'magnanimous gesture' in supporting the ragheads. Given, as we all know but dare not say, their ambition to slit the throat of any Jew they can lay their hands on.

So allow me to explain. Shatter is doing the same as HochJuden in every White country: Turning formerly ethnically and culturally homogeneous societies into fissiparous, balkanised, miscegenated multicultural hell-holes. That's 'good for the Jews' you see.  And to hell with the rest of us. Muslims aren't good for much but as agents of this nefarious agenda they're a Godsend. Will a few lower-level Jews get whacked by way of this? Undoubtedly.  Will a few synagogues get burned down? Of course. But it's a small price to pay for the destruction of the hated White Christian societies.

And that my friends is why Shatter, the reptilian Fifth Columnist, was on that TV show last night.

Leo's lovin' it.

Every so often I like to add a bit of class to this blog.  Hence the occasional rhetorical flourish and pithy axioms in Latin or French. But today I'm degenerating to the level of a Limerick bar-room....but all in a good cause.

Those of you living in the Emerald Isle will by now know that Leo Varadkar (Pakistani father....vibrant Ireland, you know) our Minister for Health, has 'come out' as gay. Cue a tsunami of phone-ins, texts, emails, tweets, all of which seemed to revolve around two words: 'Courageous' and 'admiration'.

Now why is it that every homo who comes out is considered 'courageous' when the disclosure is met with a chorus of acclamation?  Were it fifty years ago or more I'd agree.  But today it's a much-admired lifestyle choice. It would take more courage to keep it under cover actually.

Then what exactly is there to admire?  It's not as if he'd discovered the cure for cancer or some such. Here I come to the rudey Limerick bar bit. What's to admire about a man who takes it up the ass from other men, or administers oral sex to other men? Even leaving all other considerations aside it's no more admirable than say young Darren giving his girlfriend one in the back seat of his Skoda.

But we all know what's going on here. don't we, children? These people here, the Apostles of Degradation, will explain it all.

Lessons from Ireland's homeless crisis

Homelessness is the subject du jour in Ireland following the death of a homeless man which occurred within a hundred yards of our Parliament building. Homelessness is terrible but as usual with today's media what they omit is more important than that which they report.

For a start it emerged that the man found dead came from wealthy parents. They had bought not one but two houses for him. However he had sold them both, purchased drugs with the proceeds and ended up penniless and on the streets. A fate not helped by his objection to living in shelters. A terribly sad case and maybe the state could have done better.  But you'd imagine listening to the  commentariat that he'd been flung out on the street to die by an uncaring society.

Then the numbers. We're told that there are about 2,500 in the country. Given our population of 4.5 million that figure doesn't seem enormous. We're also warned that this figure is 'exploding upwards' - that we face a 'tsunami' of homelessness. In fact figures from the CSO show the trend to be downwards and that only about 200 are actually sleeping rough. The rest of the 'homeless' are those living in emergency accommodation and in 'informal settlements', usually meaning travellers and Roma who often want to live that way,

Quite a different picture emerging, isn't there?  But it gets better. The Irish taxpayer hands over €120 million annually to the homeless industry...the quangos and various other charities operating under this rubric. As this doesn't include the vast sums they raise in charitable donations there's a minimum €40,000 for each homeless person and realistically it must be nearer to double that. That is -  quite literally - enough to put them up full-time in a four star hotel with no additional costs incurred.

So where's all the money going?

Which brings me to Social Justice Warriors in general. Have you ever noticed how, despite their rejection of materialism, their demands for the rest of us to eschew selfishness (cf. Bob Geldof) and their constant appeals for funds for 'the most vulnerable' they're bloody good at getting their own snouts in the trough? Who are they?  'Academics', invariably with useless degrees like Sociology or English, or else opportunists swimming in our endless sea of quangos. We have seen that, before the needs of the 'most vulnerable' are ever met  these SJWs make sure they trouser salaries of €100k (often more) and luxuriate in massive contributions to pension funds when not entitled to taxpayer-funded index-linked public sector pensions. And they always seem to have plenty funds for exotic vacations fact-finding missions and conferences. No wonder that a whole industry has grown up around the plight of the homeless.

And finally we have lodgements to African dictators' Swiss bank accounts 'foreign aid' of about €700 million annually. That could have all of our homeless living the life of Reilly. But the funds cannot be touched. They are sacrosanct, irrespective of the impact on politicians' careers.  And let's not forget our own cultural enrichers. The now retired Kevin Myers wrote this article about five years ago which graphically illustrates the insanity of our current situation whereby the vast majority of Nigerians, despite having no right to be here, are provided with taxpayer-funded accommodation. And a lot more besides.

But as Kevin points out, we cannot speak of those facts. The West gets more like the USSR or East Germany every day.

Celebrating diversity in the Emerald Isle

Ireland's Prime Minister Enda Kenny is the politician straight from central casting. Winking, back-slapping, promising anything, all things to all men, never took a brave or original decision, never did a productive days work in his life.  But he's still the democratically elected leader of our country, and by a huge majority at that.

Yesterday he visited Galway where he was met by a group of protesters angry at having to pay for the water they used. He could have asked who then should pay for extracting, treating and piping the water as well as the €600 million annual infrastructure costs. And he'd have learned that somebody else, not the protesters, should pick up the tab.  Now Galway adjoins the constituency which both Enda and his father represented for well over half a century between them while his broader family has extremely deep roots in the region.

What were his thoughts then when he had a sign shoved in his face which blared 'ENDA  YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE'? Especially as the sign was held by two coal black free-loaders recently arrived from the Dark Continent. One can only imagine.

And there's nothing unusual about this. Recently asylum tourists in Cork blockaded the road in protest at the 'dire conditions' in which they were 'forced' to live.  The media were wholly supportive, banner headlines screaming that the poor creatures had less than €20 per week to live on. True, but the 'journalists', you know, those diligent fact-checking seekers of the whole truth, neglected to mention that in addition to the €20 they also had free accommodation, free food, free medical care, free education and free public transport. All courtesy of the Irish taxpayer.

And what exactly was the latest protest about? The poor suffering creatures had a list of very specific demands. The full range of sports channel (Sky, BT and Eurosport), free university education, free in-house gym, food (free, of course) that reflected their ethnic origins, and, especially for the Religion Of Peace, separate social areas for males and females.

And you know what? Each and every one of their demands was met. 

Ireland's Muslims start to flex their muscles

I'm sure you're all aware of the 'progression' of Muslims' behaviour as their ratio of a country's population increases.  Essentially transitioning from quiet as a mouse, tolerant and respectful of the country's laws and customs - when their numbers are tiny - right across the spectrum to where non-Muslims live in terror of offending the Religion Of Peace. This is no exaggeration. In Pakistan, a ghastly country which I know well, non-Muslims can quite literally be executed on the uncorroborated accusation of  having 'offended the "Prophet"'.

Well Ireland's Muslims are starting to flex their muscles given that there are now 50,000 of them in our tiny country who represent 'the fastest-growing religion in Ireland'.  Their Head Wallah is the angelic-looking peace-loving "Dr." Ali Selim whose PhD apparently resolved the most intractable theological issue facing modern Muslims ....whether aggregate stone compounds can be used in stoning adulterers.  This 'Muslim academic' (surely an oxymoron?) pleads that 'in today's society we need to apply a more pluralistic approach when it comes to school uniforms'.

My prolonged and extensive exposure to Muslims has lead to my having a dim view of their analytical and logical capabilities.  And "Dr." Ali obliges by on the one hand demanding the freedom to send his many children (five....and counting) to school in bin liners as it's 'essential to their religious identity' and on the other that 'in order to provide children with an inclusive education these obstacles (in this case Christian symbol on uniforms) must be removed'.

Ten out of ten for brass neck. Zero out of ten for logic.

But this is far from his only demand. He wants special halal meals served wherever Muslims want them, kosher slaughter allowed, stronger 'hate laws' and schools closed on Islamic feast days.  We can expect this list of demands to grow as Muslim numbers continue to increase, helped by fast breeders like the good "Doctor". Meanwhile over in Saudi Arabia, the world's most Islamic state, religious police, in the finest traditions of Muslim tolerance, burst into a private house where a group of Christians were quietly holding a prayer meeting and hauled the unfortunate occupants off to jail.

There should be one clear and unambiguous message to every Muslim currently residing in the West (Dar-al-Harb....Land of War): 'If conditions here don't suit you please feel free to fuck off back to whatever violent poverty-stricken hell-hole you escaped from'. With the rider 'what the hell are you doing in our countries anyway?'

But "Dr." Sinedi was right about one thing. Explaining to a rapt audience of useful idiot kuffars that the murderous ISIS were un-Islamic he referred to the Prophet ordaining that 'anyone who kills even one soul kills all of mankind'.  And you know, as I thought about this I realised he was right.  I mean, when did you ever hear of a Muslim killing anyone? You haven't? Me neither. Why Dar-al-Islam (Land of Peace!!!!) from Libya to Pakistan, from Nigeria to Bosnia is like one giant Switzerland where everyone gets along in peaceful tolerance and where all disputes are resolved with a genial handshake.

Indeed.

Ian Paisley departs

Well it had to happen. Ian Paisley has finally gone to the great Orange Lodge in the sky.

Norman Tebbit says that 'although many accused him of sacrificing principles for office, I think that it was a genuine acceptance on his part that unless sacrifices were made on both sides, there could be no settlement and only enduring strife in Northern Ireland.'  Well Norman I think you're plain wrong. Paisley went back on everything he professed to believe in and only after he had spent his whole career setting both communities against one another and undermining any attempt at reconciliation.

The last minute conversion came about only because the British deployed the one decisive weapon they had hitherto carefully avoided: The money spigot.  The leadership of both communities could have and would have continued their endless and sterile arguments ad infinitum had not the British Government threatened to close down the Stormont Assembly, and of far greater importance, terminate the pay cheques of all its members.

Bingo!  A solution was found within weeks, angels supped with devils while Martin McGuinness and Ian Paisley became known as the Chuckle Brothers. It seems that they did become genuine friends given that McGuinness  privately visited Big Ian right up till a few days before his death but my verdict on Ian Paisley is that he arguably did more than any single person to prolong Northern Ireland's inter-communal violence and that his late life turnaround was down to personal ambitions rather than any commitment to peace.

No Country For Old Women. Or young ones either

Just been reading a harrowing report from the UN Human Rights Committee on the plight of women in a terrible country whose representative was subjected to ‘a severe grilling’ by the shocked  Committee members. In fact the women’s plight was so bad that the Special Rapporteur cried out in anguish that he was ‘unable to sleep at night’ thinking of it.

And the name of this backward misogynistic dystopian hell-hole?  Somalia? Saudi Arabia?  Iran?  No, it’s none other than the Emerald Isle.

Now let me give you just a few representative facts about the unfortunate Irish woman.   If she decides to never work and instead  live a comfortable life at the taxpayers’ expense the process is simple. Find a willing sperm donor, get pregnant, demand a private house or apartment, fully fitted out, and for the rest of her life never have to incur medical, education or public transport costs while enjoying generous spending money for herself and her kids. Want more kids and thus a bigger house and in a location convenient to ‘me mam’?  No problem. Just let us know the details.

Were she instead to choose a working life she’ll find all kinds of opportunities open to her just because of her gender. Often totally unsuitable ones like the police or fire services. And it doesn’t end there. Diversity quotas ensure that promotions will come thick and fast  (especially if she is in fact thick and fast) largely independent of ability. If by some chance the promotions don’t materialise she can sue the company for  gender discrimination, sexual harassment or bullying. Or whatever. She will never lose.

And what if she were to do the unfashionable thing and actually get married? Well, it’s another win-win. Say the husband is out working his ass off to provide a home for her and her children but she gets bored and decides to leave him for another man.  Irrespective of the merits she’ll get half of his estate and, except in very rare circumstances, gain custody of their children. And if at any time she claimed rape against the new lover she’d win in court 90% of the time. What about the other 10%, like say where there's the presence of exculpatory DNA evidence?  Well ok, the court finds the man not guilty. But behave yourself in future as all this has upset the poor woman. The false accusation that cost the victim a fortune and permanently tarnished his reputation?  Ah well, poor girl must have been upset and confused.  Ask her to take some (free) counselling.

So to what could the Committee have been referring? Apart from some regrettable events that took place generations ago their main issue for Ireland relates to restrictions on abortion, which, the Committee Chairman sternly reminded us, was ‘an unconditional right’.  To which I'd respond ‘says who?   There is no black/white, right/wrong on this subject. Fanatics on both sides want either a zygote to be deemed a fully formed human, or on the other the toleration of what is virtually infanticide.  The Irish people, on two occasions, have been asked to vote on the subject and have adopted  a fairly restrictive framework…abortion on demand it most certainly is not. Although constantly droning on about  ‘democracy’ and ‘democratic rights’ the Committee, in the one instance where there’s been a clear democratic decision, decide that democracy isn’t such a good idea after all.

And where does the head of this Committee come from? Some bastion of women’s rights like Sweden or Norway? No, from Tunisia, that progressive paragon of gurrrrll power. Assisted by his neighbours from Algeria and Egypt.  Other  human rights luminaries who have adorned this committee in the past include Saudi Arabia and Libya. As expected the Irish delegation and media grovelled before these moral titans and promised to improve. If only the voters could be convinced….   What they should have done was tell these posturing hypocrites to stick their human rights where the sun don’t shine. Or better again to return to their own dystopian hell holes and stop women being stoned to death for adultery there.

Be aware of course that this whole exercise is just further evidence of the anti-White agenda in action. More specifically the anti-White male agenda.  Knowing what it is makes is easier to defeat.

A time for celebrations

'Tis the time for celebrating anniversaries, some whose origins go back a long way, others of more recent vintage.  As every schoolboy knows this year is the one thousandth anniversary of Ireland's defeat of the Vikings at the Battle Of Clontarf.  Although victorious, the Munstermen who made up the bulk of the Irish army (and particularly the O'Brien clan amongst them) suffered such enormous casualties that it took them centuries to recover.  If indeed they ever did fully recover.

But it freed us of foreigners, didn't it?

And today you can be damn sure that, whatever about Clontarf, every schoolboy certainly knows that we celebrate the Irish edition of Africa Day. Which I first deliriously celebrated here.....all of six years ago.  Things have moved on.  As the picture here of Dublin football team Insaka shows, our ability to repel foreigners ain't what it used to be.  And unlike the Vikings and Normans, who became 'more Irish than the Irish themselves', this collection of lovelies seem like staying among their own. Which, I suppose, is on balance a good thing.

So let us all head to the nearest Social Welfare office and join with the 'new Irish' in celebrating their......good luck in landing among a nation of gullible fools.

Shatter's battered, clattered, tattered, splattered but still hangs on. For now

Joyous tidings to relate. As everyone in Ireland knows "our" Minister for Justice and Defence (yes, for some reason he got two Ministries) has been gloriously hoisted on his own petard.  This 'brilliant' Minister's purview  has degenerated into a shamble, everyone turning on everyone else, the police outraged and demoralised, even his erstwhile political allies furious as he staggers from scandal to crisis.

Part of his problem is that he's been too smart by far.  Example: He claimed two police whistle-blowers 'did not co-operate' with an official inquiry. True.  Except that they were not given the opportunity to co-operate by the inquiry team. Extend this kind of sophistry to several other areas of his domain and you can see why people are getting roundly pissed of with the slimy little toad. And of course everyone and anyone, colleague, subordinate and friend has been  thrown under the bus as he ducks and weaves to save his political skin.

It was a thing of joy to behold as the super-arrogant slimeball was forced to to apologise, twisting and turning, as he faced a parliamentary vote of No Confidence.  The sneering strutting demeanour is gone as he now, literally and metaphorically slips out the back door to be whisked away in his Ministerial car. All he's short is a blanket over the head. 

Before the confidence vote I said to Lady Savant that an 'anti-Semitic incident' could be expected.  And voila!  -  right on cue it came. A swastika-daubed envelope containing 'a suspicious looking white substance' (it turned out to be baking powder) was delivered to his address.  The horror!  The horror!  But his star has fallen so low that even this failed to elicit any sympathy, and much to his outrage attracted some cynical comments on local blogs. Imagine that.

He's now political poison, has alienated everyone (Oscar Wilde's 'even his friends hate him' comes to mind) and his claim during the vote that 'I'm not afraid to be unpopular' was greeted with howls of derision by the assembled legislators.  His time at 'Justice' is now limited but it seems he's anxious to get the centre-piece of his legislative program implemented before he goes.  Want to guess what that is?   Same sex marriage.   Now that's a surprise, isn't it?

I think it was Enoch Powell who claimed that all political careers end in failure. And while he'll definitely go out on a major low, having, inter alia, had a disastrous impact on the public perception of Jews in general, he can proudly look back at a nation far worse off now thanks to his handiwork.  Up to 50,000 new citizens from the dregs of the Third World plus countless others brought in on his farcical 'entrepreneurship' scheme, a Holocau$t memorial installed at Justice HQ (having banned the Army from taking part in Christian festivals) and the traditional family structure further undermined.

So I'd say he, and his handlers back home, will be reasonably happy with the overall outcome.

Aer Lingus, take a bow.

Today my mood is joyous. There's a spring in my step, my fedora tipped at a jaunty angle.  The cause of my joy?  Met a friend of long standing this morning in the little town where we both live.  Told me he had just taken issue with some burka-clad humanoid who had discarded some packaging onto our pristine footpaths (they really are pristine thanks mainly to local volunteer groups). We again shared our views on the catastrophic societal impact wrought by EU immigration policies and implemented by treacherous nation-wrecking scumbags like Alan Shatter.

Which brings me to the cause of my joy.  Told me that while checking in at the Aer Lingus desk in Cork this week he saw two African adults in the queue, surrounded by a swarm of turdlers and a gigantic heap of luggage....enough to bring down a Flying Fortress. The girl at the desk pointed out that their luggage was significantly in excess of the weight limits and they'd have to pay the excess charges or leave some of it behind.

Cue the standard response from the Cultural Enricher Playbook. 'You being racist against me 'cos I'm blaaaaack'.  But here's the good bit.  In a firm no-nonsense voice the girl replied  "no, you are being racist against me because I am white. Now either pay the excess or leave some luggage behind.  Next please!"

Wow!  How about that? 

But it gets better.  When my friend congratulate the girl on her response she told him that they had been instructed by Aer Lingus to respond this way.  It seems they, and other passengers, were having to put up with so much grief from the enrichers that a line had to be drawn.

This folks, is great news.  It shows that people, and more important, enterprises, are getting fed up of the shakedown from the parasites who have flooded into our country.  I've seen other signs myself but this is surely something of a breakthrough.  I feel so elated I'm now going to treat myself to tea and biscuits (at my age that qualifies as living on the edge).

Shatter and Lentin's handiwork

Taking up from the previous post we learn from the first Interim Report of the Child Care Law Reporting Project that African families in Ireland are '20 times more likely' to end up in child care courts. Apparently 'Neglect is the number one reason for children to be taken into care, commonly because a parent is suffering from a mental illness'.

Isn't that wonderful?  Say a nice big thank you to Mr. Shatter and Ms. (or is it also Mr.?) Lentin.

Displaying the customary stunning naivety of the people who draw up such documents the authors paint a picture of a "cohort of children who need protection and nurture if they are to grow and develop and who are not getting this from their parents for various reasons"  So are we to assume then that if they get the requisite protection and nurture the little black ones, when they grow up, will become model and productive citizens?

Like they do everywhere else.  So that's all right then.

The one silver lining was the reader reaction as embodied in the comments. Even on the 'liberal' Journal.ie they were heavily negative. For example this was approved by a 22:1 ratio: 'I have been to Africa and I seen who  [sic] in African culture it is normal for a man to beat his wife and children when he gets pissed off. There was one time a man had his wife on the ground kicking her on a busy street and nobody even looked.  It’s a culture thing.'  Several readers also pointedly mentioned that the Irish taxpayer would be picking up the tab for this societal disaster inflicted on us by YKW.

PS: Lo and behold, when I went to check just now on the Indo comments I found they had disappeared - or rather been disappeared - since the report was published.   Same thing happening everywhere folks, but I think and believe that this is actually a good thing and that the moderators are ultimately fighting a losing battle.

Another treacherous interloper

A reader sent me this link which nearly made me throw up my rasher sandwich in rage. It features one Ronit Lentin who heads up the Race, Ethnicity and Conflict Studies department at Trinity College Dublin.  What's she doing here in Ireland?  After all she was born in Israel to Jewish immigrants from Roumania. Well what she's doing here is the same thing her co-ethnic Alan Shatter is doing. Race replacing the Irish people.  Yes, an Israeli Jew of Romanian parentage is directing our destruction......and berating us for our racism while doing it!

Chutzpah!

She talks about Irelands’ 'long and shameful history in its treatment of migrants since the state's inception'.  Yeah, right.  What she does not talk much about is how her actual homeland - Israel - handles its own racial problems. As in rounding up its Africans and stuffing them into concentration camps before booting them back to Africa. (Which I strongly approve of, by the way). When challenged in another forum she did grudgingly concede that 'Israel was a racial regime but was not based upon colour nor ethnicity.'

Thanks, so that's cleared that up then.

And can I now put to rest a particular canard that's a staple of the anti-racist fever swamps which this lizard frequently brings up to silence Irish race realists: Namely that for many years in America the Irish were deemed to be non-White.  True as far as it goes, but that's not  very far at all. Because the whole issue of classifying people as White at that time had to do with power, voting rights, religion etc. and not with colour or ethnicity. Which explains why Germans, Finns and some  other northern Europeans were also classified as non-White for some time.  Anyone making even a cursory analysis of the subject would readily realise this.  But of course the anti-racist industry has other objectives in mind, namely to keep programming Whites with the meme that race is a social construct.

Like Shatter and other Jewish luminaries in Ireland, Ronit Lentin never misses an opportunity to berate the Irish on the tiny number of Jewish refugees we accepted in the early twentieth century. 

Lady, what ever the number was it was too big.