Loud laughter at Norway's Parasite Central

Loud guffaws reverberated throughout Parasite Central in Oslo recently when the Norwegian Government offered "asylum seekers" Kr. 10,000 (€1,000 or $1200) to bugger off home. They split their sides laughing because, inbred morons though they are, they're capable of sniffing out a lousy deal when they see one. And that offer is one lousy deal. Because in Norway the lifetime benefits accruing to an "asylum" family are close to €3 million.

Here are my back of the envelope calculations.

Unemployment benefit:

€40,000 for 30 years at an assumed rate of 70% (Example: the Nigerian unemployment rate in Ireland = 66%)  we have 40x30x2x0.7

Lifetime cost per two-parent family = €1,680,000 

Child benefit: Breeding like rabbits they'll have at least five mini parasites. Based on Irish rates of about €1800 per annum payable for 18 years (Norway's likely to be higher) we have  2000x18x5

Lifetime cost per family = €180,000

Incarceration costs:

I'm being charitable here extrapolating from these figures in suggesting that one in two Muslim/African families will on average have one member incarcerated for a period of five years at some stage in their worthless lives. In Ireland total costs for incarcerating a prisoner run to just short of €100,000 annually. (Norway's luxury condo prisons cost probably twice that but let's be conservative). 5x100,000 /2

Lifetime cost per family = €250,000

So a family of parasites extracts from the Norwegian taxpayers over their lifetimes a total of €2,110,000.

Now you can add to that a lifetime of free medicine, free education and generous housing allowances and the total must be pushing €3 million.

No wonder they're laughing at Parasite Central. And telling the Government where to stick their €1000.

Some people in Ireland really do benefit from diversity

As you've probably discerned, I'm not a great fan of diversity despite being constantly assured of its endless benefits. Mind you for some strange reason those benefits are never actually spelled out in any detail. Which is leading an increasing number of people to wonder whether anyone actually does benefit. In fact I can assure the doubters that many indeed do. Specifically those engaged in the law, prison and immigration industries.

This from the Irish Independent:

"A man who took part in imprisoning, stripping and beating Innocent Wilson because he wanted to teach him a moral lesson for entering his girlfriend's bedroom has been jailed for six months. In Dublin Circuit Criminal Court Judge Sarah Berkeley sentenced Lucky Shaka (24) to two years' imprisonment, but suspended the final 18 months."

I can just imagine the scene in court

State Prosecutor: 'Mr. Shaka, you are facing serious charges. Are you innocent or not?'

Shaka 'No, I not Innocent, I Lucky'. Pointing at Wilson 'He Innocent'

State Prosecutor: 'So you are not innocent?'

Shaka: 'No, I not Innocent'

State Prosecutor: 'Judge, I rest my case'

And then there's the case of the Nigerian employed by an Irish hotel as a Food and Beverage Manager - 'in effect the second most senior management position in the hotel'. The owners must have seen him as quite a catch, possessing as he did a degree in Catering from Lagos University (his Shank Of Missionary being a mouth-watering speciality). Unfortunately - and totally unexpectedly - some problems arose shortly after recruitment. Like spending months at a time out on 'sick leave', having a difficult time with biased and racist colleagues, threatening to strangle the hotel manager. And showering fellow employees, diners and their food with a virulent strain of the TB bacterium.

His lengthy appeal was of course funded in full by the Irish taxpayer. 

So yes, the law and immigration industry do benefit from diversity.  And who does not benefit?  Well just about everyone else really.

Bliss it was that dawn to be alive

Oh! I have slipped the surly bonds of earth

And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings

Forgive me if I wax lyrical this fine morning but some rare good fortune brightens my day and lightens my step. Because the just completed General Election in Ireland has seen two of the most malevolent, treacherous nation-polluting scumbags tossed onto the scrapheap of Irish politics. Both Alan ('Shat the Rat') Shatter and Aodhagin O'Riordain (known to his parents as Aiden O'Riordan) have been given the shaft. From Government Ministers to not even a seat on the back benches.

But not before the traitorous scum had used their period in power to supercharge the population replacement program for Ireland, the success of which can be measured by the sight in every city and town of a rapidly growing dark underclass living on our largesse.  Strange, was it not, that during the formation of the Government both were rewarded with Ministries giving them power over this very issue?  A bit like appointing Casey Anthony as Minister For Childcare.  O'Riordain took his defeat with a faggoty outburst of tears, a far cry from the vindictive power-crazed bully who persecuted a town mayor for pointing out that Africans were rude and aggressive. Watching him blubbering into the camera provided me with a deep inner glow of contentment.

Nothing to the joy evinced by Shatter's erstwhile colleagues who barely concealed their glee at his humiliation.  Even his friends hate him! Scouring media comments I was unable to detect a single one offering sympathy.  In one sense he's shot himself in the foot because he's done the image of Jewishness immense harm, at least in this country.And you'll be staggered at this - wait for it - but what did he put his defeat down to? Bingo! Anti-Semitism. Oy vey, the sufferink! A claim which attracted almost universal derision and further underlined its already declining power to whip the goyim into silence.

So Shatter, 'deformed, unfinished, sent before my time' will soon fade into obscurity, brooding on the words of Browning:

There's nobody on the rooftops now

Just a palsied few at the window set

Thus I entered and thus I go

Yes, go, ye bastards. And at the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember you. For the damage you've inflicted on our country.

Malice or incompetence?

Even while acknowledging the tsunami of malice directed at White countries through the Third World immivasion project I nonetheless wonder if Napoleon's 'never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence' could have some relevance. Because how else can this be explained?

And how do you explain Gregor Gysy, Leader of Germany's Left Party. His surname does not sound German (even though it originates in Switzerland) and he looks quintessentially Jewish. Which is explained by his father being Jewish. Now you'd imagine as Germany descends into a virtual civil war - due to a Third World invasion sponsored in large part by his fellow Jews - Gysi would keep his head down and discreetly rejoice at the destruction of (cough) 'his' country.

But no. Instead, for whatever reason, he goes on German TV and openly celebrates the impending disappearance of the German people. Beaming with delight he tells the viewers that 'every year more Germans die than are born. That is very fortunate because the Nazis are not very good at having children'.  He goes on then to claim that Germany needs more refugees to offset this decline.

How perverse and counter-productive is this? Your average German citizen, reeling under an onslaught from an army of lawless barbarian parasites, turns on his TV and sees a 'German' Jew celebrating this army's replacement of the viewer's fading people. Can you imagine his reaction?

Beats me. Maybe Napoleon was right after all....

Germany stops the rapefugees

Well that's a  relief. After all those rapes and assaults over the New Year in Germany we were worried about their unfortunate women. But those efficient Germans have developed a stunningly effective solution. Henceforth a scantily clad Fraulein can on her own walk down any side street in any city at any time in complete safety.

Why? Because the rapefugees have been provided with the following compelling and decisive illustrated instructions.

Whereas I personally expect this initiative to be a roaring success there are always cynics and begrudgers. Those who say most of the illustrations are incomprehensible. Others ask why the explanatory text is in German, a language in which the rapefugees have little or no proficiency while one curmudgeon snidely suggested the recommendations resembled something for preschoolers or even the severely handicapped.

While I dismiss such negativity the initiative does bring to mind that of Sheffield Council of a few years ago as they prepared for enrichment by an army of Eastern European gypsies. You can tell the Council didn't exactly have high hopes given their following behavioural pointers:

'Don't defecate or urinate on the street'
'Don't have sex on the street'
'Don't dump your rubbish in your neighbour's yard'
'Don't try to sell your babies'
'Don't shoplift'
'Don't rip out and sell the plumbing and other utilities from your taxpayer-provided housing'

A bit similar in Germany with the enrichers apparently being enjoined not to rape women, nor to dive on top of swimmers and to help someone who's drowning. Maybe all this multicultural thing isn't all it's cracked up to be? If so I offer the following sign, one worth more than all the others combined.

Swede's open their doors. Literally

Inviting non-assimilating foreign hordes into one's country is analogous to giving some street beggar the spare room in one's house. Now the Swedes, always at the bleeding leading edge of pathological altruism, are about to confirm the validity of this analogy because lots of families there are literally giving their spare rooms over to the Turd World.

Just look at this picture. Doesn't it chill the blood? How could parents allow their attractive young daughters sit on strangers' laps, let alone the laps of muh-dicking Africans?  Now project forward a few nights. Sipho is lying in bed, loins tumescent, scrotum swollen to bursting point from enforced celibacy, tortured by his inability to assuage his impulses. Then he hears pretty little Aneka in the next room, sighing and moaning in her sleep. Can you imagine what's going through his mind?

If you don't, just look at the international rape statistics graph below (in full size here).  Shows Sweden sitting proudly at the top of the table, orders of magnitude ahead of  Jamaica, its nearest challenger. Note that fifty years ago instances of rape were so low in Sweden that they used to get bulked in with other crimes such as domestic violence.

Now one in four Swedish women can expect to be raped during the lifetime.

Celebrate diversity Sweden.

Poland revolts

A few weeks back I celebrated what I felt might be the unanticipated consequences (unanticipated that is by its globalist NWO progenitors) of the African and Muslim invasion of Europe. "That people's eyes have been opened to the true nature of the invaders can be seen in blog and forum comments everywhere, and in talking to the man in the street. But not in the MSM or in any Official Organs.  EU institutions, governance and solidarity are in disarray (I mean, how good is that?), the MSM's remaining credibility further undermined and the true nature of the Religion Of Peace graphically exposed". 

And since then these developments have acquired even greater speed, breadth and depth. Poland for instance is now in open revolt. Following on the heels of the landslide election victory of the anti-immigrant PiS up to 50,000 demonstrators marched in Warsaw chanting slogans and carrying banners like "Great Catholic Poland", "Stop Islamisation of Europe", "God, Honour and Homeland" and "Yesterday it was Moscow, today it's Brussels which takes away our freedom". Best of all the demonstrators shredded, stamped on and burned the EU flag. 

The public airing of such slogans would have been inconceivable even a year ago. Now they're commonplace all over "eastern" Europe and increasingly in Germany itself. It now comes down to a test of will as our overlords bring the full weight of their security and legislative apparatus down on the heads of the rebels. There's no certainty that good will triumph over the globalist evil. It hasn't up to now. And there's the risk that such expressions of nationalism and religion could spill over into intra-European animosities, even the stoking of old revanchist claims. But look, we can't be choosy while our demographic destruction looms over us like a thundercloud.

And the invasion raises a question I've asked a number of times as each new anti-White outrage surpasses the prior ones: Are the NWO globalists getting over-confident or desperate?

Have the globalists got the dirt on Frau Merkel?

While travelling to Scotland recently my wife - despite carefully divesting herself of potential terrorist weapons (you know, things like nail-clippers) activated the airport scanner. In her sixties, blond and blue-eyed a less likely terrorist would be hard to imagine. Yet she was forced repeatedly to pass through the device before finally being undergoing a humiliating body search. Which predictably revealed nothing.

Meanwhile a few hundred miles to the south hundreds of thousand of swarthy and angry young men with names like Mohammed and Khaled with enough baggage to accommodate a small arsenal swarm across the EU borders without so much as a cursory check from the authorities. This of course is just an extreme example to highlight the inexplicable nature of European politicians' support for the brown tsunami engulfing their countries. Because for the average politician such an influx represents unrelieved bad news. Pressure on social services, further limiting access to already crowded schools and hospitals, more taxes to pay for the parasites etc. And not least the inevitable ethnic strife to come.

The spider at the centre of the current web is of course Frau Merkel. Which in one sense is surprising in that five years ago she publicly admitted that multicultural 'had utterly failed', and that the whole concept whereby 'different cultures live side-by-side simply does not work'. The invasion has lead to most other European leaders realising the same thing. (Or admitting it openly anyway as the realisation must have dawned on them years ago.) So now she's battling bitter opposition on all fronts yet persists in her support.

Why?

My own belief - and that's all it is, a belief - is that the NWO globalists, especially those at the heart of the American Deep State, have the dirt on her. This would also explain her otherwise inexplicable support for America's deranged policies on Eastern Europe and Russia even in the face of outraged reaction from virtually the entire German business sector and much of the public. And she also allowed the country's Federal Intelligence Service collaborate with the N.S.A. in spying on and passing industrial secrets from German advanced technology companies such as EADS and Eurocopter.

Don't forget that Merkel was a staunch Party member under the former Communist regime in East Germany before magically somersaulting into the united country's Chancellorship. Who knows what kind of dirt lies under this particular stone? In support of my theory the New York Times has reported that "the N.S.A., in a practice that dates back to the depths of the Cold War and that has never ended, was recording her conversations and those of other top German leaders. It continued to track Ms. Merkel as she ascended to the top of Germany's political apparatus."

Maybe I'm wrong but I fail to see any other logical reason for Merkel to enforce a policy that she herself admitted doesn't work.

Out of evil cometh good

Well now, the ongoing Turd World invasion of Europe has certainly got people's attention, has it not? Of course it's just the latest ramped-up element of a project that's been underway for more than half a century. And if it continues unabated Europe is certainly doomed, destined to morph into a dystopian fusion of the Middle East and Africa. But out of evil cometh good, and much good has cometh from this particular evil.

To wit:

EU institutions are in disarray, in particular Schengen.  Member states at one another's throats, old animosities reactivated (mixed benefit, admittedly), borders closed, closures reinforced by armed police and military, several countries talk of leaving the EU. For instance Croatia has in effect committed acts of war against Hungary by dumping its invaders across its borders while Hungary responds by mobilising its military and introducing emergency legislation. Germany, the most active open-border state, became the first to jettison long-established EU rules in pursuit of its multicultural agenda, only to be shortly followed by a 180 turn. Being the first country to unilaterally close its borders it dealt a body blow to the whole painfully-erected structure of EU governance. In the public mind mass immigration is now strongly associated with the EU.

Lovely!

And, despite the frantic efforts of the traitorous MSM to portray the invaders as primarily doe-eyed children, weeping gentle mothers, hard-working doctors and engineers, their true nature could not be hidden. Three out of four are obviously young able-bodied men, violently and contemptuously ignoring Europe's people and laws, leaving a filthy mess wherever they go, demanding, demanding, demanding, offering nothing in return other than threats. That people's eyes have been opened to the true nature of the invaders can be seen in blog and forum comments everywhere, and in talking to the man in the street. But not in the MSM or in any Official Organs.  The  disparity between the people and the elite, rulers and ruled (and the supporting edifice of lies and evasions) has never been delineated in such sharp focus.

Lovely!

Any of you notice how often Hitler has been brought into the mix, and invariably in a favourable light?  It's amazing. Equally amazing how open and unrestrained the way Africans, Arabs and Muslims are being referred to. PC strictures and constraints are under serious attack.  And I love the growing realisation of the selfishness and hypocrisy of the bloated Gulf Arabs and their two-faced hectoring. Exemplified by the Saudis taking in no refugees despite having tent accommodation for up to a million but offering $200 million for mosques in Dar-al-Harb to accommodate the invaders.

Don't underestimate the value of these joyful developments. EU institutions, governance and solidarity are disarray (I mean, how good is that?), the MSM's remaining credibility further undermined while the true nature of the Religion Of Peace has been graphically exposed. 

Now if only we could magic the invaders back to the hell-holes of origin over the next few months......

Oh Lord, the irony.

I thought we'd be inured by now to the sight of children's bodies what with the various Charities raiding our pockets and the media deploying disaster porn to boost circulation. But I admit the sight of that little boy on the beach in Turkey struck me like a blow to the solar plexus. My instinctive reaction was to throw open the gates of Europe to such people and to hell with the consequences. And I wasn't alone. It transformed the debate overnight, to such an extent that you'd imagine it to be the product of some Satanic .....PR .... agency .....

Perish the thought.

Abdullah Kurdi, the father, has duly become an overnight sensation. A fact underlined by conniving creep Simon Cowell, always on the lookout for the next passing bandwagon, wanting to meet his new 'hero'. Kurdi has been offered accommodation by thousands of trendies in the West, while the Canadian Government reels under accusations of  'inhumanity' for rejecting his asylum application. Although the boy's aunt, currently roosting in Canada, with laser-like accuracy focuses in on the real culprits.  "The whole world is to blame".  Thank you madam, that's very helpful.

Even if we accept Kurdi's story (which, as Uncle Nasty has shown,  is coming apart at the seams like a cheap suit) the inherent absurdity of the Cathedral's Narrative quickly becomes obvious.  First he was living safely in Turkey, had a flat provided by the Government, was employed and had several thousand Euro in cash.  But "I was hoping to provide a better life for my children". And not for himself, we're left to infer. So what did he do? Hired a rickety boat, packed his family onto it without life-jackets, and when it capsized saved himself while his family drowned.

I repeat, this represents his (unvarnished) version of what happened. So rather than being lionised as a hero and victim he should be charged with reckless endangerment, even manslaughter. And all for the want of 'a better life'. Look buddy, everyone wants a better life. The guy who marries a rich woman wants a better life as does the guy who robs a bank. Wanting a better life entitles you to absolutely nothing.

But all of this is irrelevant. There's a Programme in place, a Narrative to be spun.

And it's working.

Iceland dies

The Icelanders are an amazing and admirable people. With a language and culture going back over a millennium, they have survived in one of the world’s most inhospitable environments. Frozen over for half the year, and at any time liable to be engulfed by an earthquake, smothered by a volcano or swamped by a tsunami , they have not alone survived, but prospered. You should note that this capacity to prosper in adverse conditions is the polar opposite of Africa, where, even with abundant natural wealth and resources, the population is mired in poverty and ignorance.

I wrote that paragraph in this post, lamenting the impending slow destruction of this unique people's identity: 60% Nordic, 40% Celtic (Irish/Scottish). But the impact of the African breeding pair I referred to pales into insignificance compared to what now looms on the horizon for this tiny nation of fewer than 300,000 people. "More than 11,000 families in Iceland have offered to open their homes to Syrian refugees" proclaimed the headline in the London Independent.  Bryndis Bjorgvinsdottir (pictured) the architect of this monstrous scheme, is almost a caricature of the modern female, adherent of a masochistic self-annihilating ideology exacerbated by toxic status whoring, she's single, has but one child, and no commitment to any man.  She'll end up of course alone in a room of hungry cats. But meanwhile she and her ilk will have destroyed  the country that nurtured them. 

By way of a Facebook campaign she's succeeded in convincing 11,000 Icelanders to open their homes to an army of 'Syrian refugees'.  Which as we know in practice means anyone claiming to be a Syrian refugee. Read Africans, Afghans, Pakistanis etc.  People like those in the bottom picture. 

Imagine the impact tens of thousands of these primitive humanoids will have on the unique Icelandic gene pool. Within a few generations the country will be destroyed, no more. Because the invaders, unable to create  or sustain a civilisation in their own more hospitable environments will abandon Iceland once that country's native inhabitants have been bred out of existence. Another sumptuous achievement of the White race will then slowly revert to its natural state, an abandoned land of snow, ice, earthquakes and volcanoes. 

Indeed we live in interesting times.....

A longish post but bear with me as I'm going somewhere with it. To make my point I'll focus on the USA but the ramifications can be extended to all White countries.

First take a look at the current international stock market melt-down. Is this the Big One, where the spinning plates of the financial ponzi finally spiral to earth, or will mass money printing by the world's central banks stave off the evil day for a little longer? I don't know, but for sure this baby will blow sometime soon.  And the ensuing destruction will be epic. Add into the mix the ongoing hollowing out of America's real economy (a process to be rapidly accelerated by the introduction of the secretive Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)), the displacement of  skilled Americans by H1B visa holders, and the general war against Whites, White males in particular.

Despite the Fed's dollar-printing ponzi these developments have pushed the economic position of Americans, especially Whites, into long-term decline. This decline will become precipitous over the coming years. First it looks like the dollar will lose the preeminent reserve currency status (RCS) that has provided America with a standard of living vastly higher than its productive capacity entitles it. Not only would a sharp diminution of RCS reduce purchasing power it would lead to foreigners presenting a flood of IOUs for redemption. Assuming they no longer accept the Fed's confetti money the redemption will take the form of physical asset purchases. Typically real estate. This in turn will precipitate an inflationary spiral in the domestic economy in the context of stagnant salaries and wages.

Now let us turn to immigration. Europe and the USA have virtually given up control of their borders. Whole regions of the USA are being over-run with the dregs of the Third World, depriving Americans of jobs, driving up welfare and housing costs while atomising society. More fundamentally they're  changing the very make-up of the American population. The economic significance being the fatal weakening of the legendary American can-do attitude. There will be no traditional come-back from adversity this time simply because the traditional people have been substantially replaced.

The net effect is a drastic decline in the economic fortunes of Whites, arguably greater than that experienced during the Great Depression. But the malaise goes well beyond economic. Every aspect of traditional White Christian culture has been under relentless attack with White males in particular the subject of ritual humiliation in the courts, academia, media, 'entertainment' and employment. Hollywood and the likes of MTV disgorge an endless stream of degenerate filth, featuring every form of depravity and never miss an opportunity to extol the negro and demean Whites.

Despite all of this Whites have remained passive and accepting. So far. But the spring of resentment is being coiled to breaking point. Will the forthcoming squabble for rapidly reduced resources be the trigger that uncoils that spring? As Fred Reed has speculated 'it could explode. It really could. You might be surprised how many people out there think 'bring it on'. Not a good idea, but we go that way.'

And if it does blow the people will be looking for explanations. If not scapegoats. Now what does the following Cast Of Villains bring to mind? International financiers, speculators, globalists, the Federal Reserve, open border advocates, Hollywood moguls, the owners of  the newspapers and TV stations that celebrate White dispossession, and the agents of government subservience to the Israeli Lobby?

Get my drift?

And believe me, already that genie has one leg out of the bottle. People are making the connection. How do I know? Largely through a comprehensive analysis of reader comments on mainstream outlets, outlets that cross the political spectrum. As I said here, I spend long hours evaluating such comments because they represent the only reliable source of the ordinary person's views. And that's allowing for the frantic efforts of moderators to weed out unsanctified opinion.

Those views have undergone a seismic paradigm shift over the last five years or so. The numbers who have become wise to Jewish manipulations have increased by many orders of magnitude. Hitherto an 'anti-Semite' comment that managed to make it onto a mainstream outlet would have been buried in an avalanche of rebuke. Now such comments are commonplace and it seems that the hasbaras have actually given up the fight on many leading forums. What a turnaround! Now couple this rapidly growing awareness with the impending catastrophe I referred to and the Jewish position becomes seriously uncomfortable.

I've spent a considerable part of my retirement trying to understand why Jews have been so unpopular throughout history. My going in explanation was envy at their intelligence and hard-won success compounded by the Christ-killer myth. But research showed in fact that Jews always over-reached themselves via ethnic favouritism, becoming increasingly arrogant until ultimately, immune to any sense of responsibility and blinded to others' perception of them they provoked an explosive backlash. My own exemplar for this was the appointment of Stanley Fischer, former Governor of the Central Bank Of Israel as Deputy Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. This appointment was so grotesque, arrogant and insensitive that for the first time I began to think that Jews really might not be that clever after all. Talk about hostages to fortune! Here's part of what I wrote about the appointment in this post:

"I'm just staggered at the chutzpah here, which borders on the reckless.  The Federal Reserve (of course it's not 'Federal' at all. It's privately owned by the major American banks and has been a Jewish preserve since God was a boy) has, over the last few decades, roundly screwed up the US economy and further enriched the infamous 1%.  Now were I a member of the tribe in question, especially when you consider that tribe's existing stranglehold on the MSM, Hollywierd, the law, politics and academia I'd be saying - I really would -  Jesus lads, take it easy will yez? We'll have everyone else down on top of us like a ton of bricks. This is totally over the top. Stop it, for the love of God or we're all fucked.

Who knows how things will play out?  But indeed we live in interesting times.....

More guidance for The Donald

On this forum (and on most other on the Alt Right) we regularly take Israelis and their dual citizens to task for their breathless hypocrisy on immigration and race mixing. We flail them for imposing these abominations on White civilisation while jealously guarding their own ethnic and religious purity. But now I think there's a way of turning it to our advantage via the candidacy of Donald Trump.

Here's my proposed pitch for him on immigration.

"My admiration and affection for the great state of Israel is well known [here he itemises his various pilgrimages to ZOG HQ in that country].  Because for millennia Jews have suffered persecution, scattered to the four corners of the earth but still (in the face of seemingly impossible odds) fought to retain their unique ethnic and religious heritage, culminating in the establishment of Israel in 1948. At last Jews had their own homeland, a homeland which they were forced to defend militarily on at least three occasions.

But Israel now faces another threat, one of a more insidious variety. My friend PM Netanyahu has referred to the vast numbers of 'illegal infiltrators flooding the country which threaten the very identity of the Jewish state'. He declared that 'this phenomenon is very grave and threatens the social fabric of society, our national security and national identity'. And in this he is absolutely correct. Because were all the so-called asylum seekers and other illegal immigrants allowed to remain Israel would cease to be either Jewish or democratic. My position on immigration to America reflects and is guided by the clear vision of PM Netanyahu.  Like him I want my country for my own people, for the descendants of those who built our country."

Isn't that neat?  What better way to silence the MSM and his political opponents than to link his immigration policy to that of the sacrosanct Jewish homeland?  'Don't hit me with Israel the baby in my arms'. And it will also highlight to the Americanpeople the grotesque double standards that Jews apply to immigration.

I'm expecting a call from The Donald any day now.

An open letter to Ronit Lentin

Hello Ronit. You don't know me because we abide in different ethical universes. You on the gender-neutral Moral High Ground of brotherhood, equality and diversity while I prowl the murky depths of the Valley Of Hate. Then again maybe you do know of me. Because your army of Thought Police never sleeps while tracking down Enemies Of The People such as I.

Anyway I notice that you - an Israeli - and some Iranian lady gatecrashed and disrupted the launch of a political party whose goal is to defend the right of the Irish People to their own country.....in other words "a neo-Nazi extreme right wing party". Now there are some who might say it's a bit rich having Iranian and Israeli women preventing Irish men forming a legal political party here in Ireland. But not me. Because I know your sole objective lies in defending the unfortunate Third Worlders who, as the saying goes 'found themselves in Ireland'. And I'm the first to acknowledge your diligent work over many years (financed by the Irish taxpayer) to bring hundreds of thousands of these treasures to our shores. And to prevent ineligible ones from being deported.

But Ronit, you've been so successful you remind me of the Lone Ranger as he and Tonto used to ride off into the sunset after another successful mission: 'Our work here is done'.  Because you see according to Eurostat Ireland now awards citizenship at levels higher than any other European state. And what's more the number of foreign-born residents here is three times the EU average.  Despite the fact that so many of them are on welfare and/or in jail you must nevertheless be so proud at the diversity wherever you now look. Nigerians, Congolese, Somalis, Afghans, Pakistanis......all with huge numbers of children in tow. Every street in every town in Ireland.

So we're getting kinda full here and that poses something of a dilemma because your unquenchable thirst for justice still needs to be assuaged.

But I got good news for you! I know the very place you can do that. Unlike in Ireland, where anyone who flops onto our shores is given free accommodation, upkeep, education and health (before finally gaining citizenship) this country's Prime Minister cruelly described such people as 'infiltrators' and 'parasites' whose presence undermined the ethnic cohesion of the country. Can you believe that?

And it gets worse. His Government rounds up such "parasitical infiltrators" (shudder) and locks them up in concentration camps before shipping them off to the tender mercies of some Third World tyrant who'd been bought off with a generous lodgement to his private Swiss bank account a 'foreign aid' donation. I bet you'd just love to get your teeth into this scandal!  Do what you did in Ireland. Fight the good fight and flood that country with the detritus of the Third World while campaigning hard against any attempt to remove them.  And now the really good news: You'd have no difficulty getting into that country. Because it's none other than your own homeland, Israel.

How about that!

So off with you, Ronit. Because if you don't jump at this gilt-edged opportunity some cynics might say that your real objective lies in destroying the ethnic cohesion of White Christian countries and not in defending the rights of down-trodden Third Worlders. 

Maybe mudsharking is good

Spent a couple of enjoyable hours outside my favourite coffee shop yesterday as Ireland basked in uncharacteristic sunny weather.  The one fly in the ointment (I hesitate to say nigger in the woodpile) being the regular appearance of mudsharks, their mutant spawn swarming all around them. Did they with their uncontrolled - nay, actively encouraged - reproduction represent the future, the replacement of the White race and its unprecedented civilisation? Would some traveller, eons from now wonder, like Shelley 'What powerful but unrecorded race once dwelt in this annihilated place'?

But this bleak prospect was overtaken by something altogether more benign. Rather than debasing the White gene pool and devolving our genetic heritage into the Planet Of The Apes could mudsharking in fact result in its enhancement by eliminating the least desirable elements?  Because without exception the mudsharks I witnessed represented the lowest form of White female. Beastly, mountainous tattooed freaks, waddling towards the Welfare Office, shrieking obscenities at their unruly spawn as they went.

And such spawn, based on the One Drop Rule, will always be regarded as black or mixed, not White. Surely our gene pool has been enhanced by their elimination? I agree that not all mudsharks conform to this profile. You have the arty-farty, Age Of Aquarius hippies (often with Daddy Issues) whose selection of a black mate represents a fashion statement and/or an attempt to gain street cred with their contemporaries. But they represent a Darwinian cul-de-sac, usually ending up childless, barren husks, long abandoned by their exotic pets.

The third type is the high calibre White whore prostituting herself for fame and fortune by marrying a black entertainer or sportsman. For instance does anyone believe that Elin Nordegren would have given Tiger Woods a second glance had he been the caddy rather than the golfer? However the numbers involved here are minuscule, so again there's little impact on the gene pool.

Finally we have those females whose mudsharking is driven by pathological altruism.  And they too challenge the Darwinian Imperative.  As with a cheetah too kind to polish off the gazelle it catches, the genetic future of White females smitten by pathological altruism is also doomed. And maybe, as it fights existential threats on many fronts, the White gene pool is better off without them.

Whether my benign scenario is valid or not Western societies, if not their gene pools, have been seriously impaired by the presence of non-Whites and the ensuing race mixing. Because all suffer from the presence of  a newly created and rapidly growing parasitical, violent and hostile underclass that - apart from in the United States - was non-existent fifty years ago.

Hopeful signs in Britain?

Have we been too fast in dismissing the British General Election results as just more of the same? Probably not. But there have been a number of promising initiatives already from the new Government. For instance new laws to combat 'poisonous Islamist ideaology' (which infers there's also a non-poisonous version) are set to be included in the Queen's speech to Parliament.

And Britain has strongly rejected the EU's 'open the floodgates' initiative which forces European countries to accept quotas for the swarm of human locusts churning up the Med even as we speak. Writing for the London Times Home Secretary Theresa May in rejecting the proposals put her finger on the nub of the problem: That allowing the locusts in will only encourage the others waiting in Africa. All one billion of them. She added that 'some' of the migrants should be sent back. This should be stating the obvious but the Overton Window has now moved to the point whereby rejecting illegal immigrants is seen as outrageous.

Is all of this just posturing by oily Dave now that he's safely installed for another five years? Will he backtrack as is his wont?  Maybe. But the very fact that he is safe for another five years means that should he do that he's politically untouchable. And word is being leaked that the Lib Dems had spiked such moves during the previous Government's tenure. So maybe things might be looking up just a little bit. Also worth reading the interview with banished Ukip Parliamentary candidate Jack Sen. He confirms our worst fears, making clear that the Ukip leadership would unhesitatingly sell itself out to Jewish interests were critical mass to be achieved.

Ah well, plus ca change, plus c'est le meme chose and all that..

The more things change the more they really do seem to stay the same.|

A lesson in practical morality

As a keen student of philosophy Pope Francis will be aware of the Socratic precept which defines impractical morality as no morality. And a very fine precept it is too, one that should be emblazoned over the front door of every SJW's* trendy house in the leafy suburbs. The current brouhaha over migrant drownings in the Med brings this to mind. "Fury At Europe As Hundreds Perish" thundered the Guardian, while the Irish Slimes, never one to miss out on an opportunity for self-flagellation, declares the drownings "A Challenge To Fortress Europe".

Don't you just love that?  Fortress Europe.  Good God, if Europe's a fortress I'd hate to see what an open border would look like.  Oh wait, I can!  The Southern border of the USA.

Anyway, back to Pope Francis.  He's been getting into the act big time, arriving at the remarkable conclusion that migrants are 'fellow human beings'.  And that we should 'open our hearts' (and by inference our borders and wallets) to accommodate these 'unfortunate victims'.  Fine Your Holiness. So here's a suggestion.  I know Vatican City (a sovereign State) is small, but there's plenty of room to accommodate a hundred or so of those victims you worry so much about.  A few prefabs in the corner of St. Peter's Square would do nicely. And every morning you could look out and savour the vibrant diversity that you're so keen to foist on the rest of us.

What's that you say? Your guests' friends and relatives might decide to move in as well? And  that your new neighbours might include the noble Islamic seafarers who recently consigned their Christian fellow passengers to a watery grave?  In response I'd say welcome to the real world. Nothing like bringing a manifestation of a problem to one's own doorstep to concentrate one's mind on practical solutions. Yes, practical solutions.  As distinct from preening, bleating, sanctimonious nostrums, geared towards flaunting one's superior morality while doing nothing to resolve the underlying problem.

And very often actually exacerbating the underlying problem. Because it's as sure as night following day that should Europe offer free access to anyone who wants it the Med would be black (whoops) with boats, packed to the gunwales, heading for a life of  plenty courtesy of the European taxpayer. Inevitably the casualties would show a commensurate increase, even with beefed-up rescue resources.  The so-called solution would only make things worse.

But, on the by no means certain assumption that the SJWs actually do want a practical solution, there is one readily at hand.  Guaranteed to work, cheap, and easily implemented.  Deaths at sea eliminated at a stroke. An SJW's dream.  The  exquisitely simple Australian Solution involves intercepting all trafficking vessels and towing them back to their embarkation point (almost invariably Indonesia). In that post I quote an Afghan people smuggler who openly conceded the deterrent effect on smugglers and their clients. Asked if he believed the Abbott government's policy of turning back the boats would work he replied: "Of course it will work, it is working." 

And there should be zero surprise at this.  If  asylum seekers know, and know for certain, that they will be turned back, they will not come.  Even a sociology professor should be able to see this. 

Practical morality of the kind Socrates had in mind.

Pope and other SJWs please note.

* Social Justice Warriors

Optimising face-time

The Irish Immigration Control Platform (ICP) has been getting some good airtime recently, including an appearance before a Parliamentary Committee and on a popular TV program (the Vincent Browne Show). Browne being Ireland's Jeremy Paxman equivalent. On that show their spokeswoman Aine Ni Chonaill (Ann O'Connell) came across as intelligent and with a masterful command of the facts. The problem though is that while a masterful command of the facts works great in a book or academic paper it does not really cut it on TV or indeed on any forum where participants are constrained by time and subject to interruptions. Therefore In the spirit of constructive criticism and as guidance for any reader with the same opportunity I offer the following free of charge.

First, in a short TV interview with only minutes of talk-time do not get bogged down in detailed facts. On such a forum nobody is interested in 'according to United Nations Statute 46.2.14 as amended by Statute 56.3.66  on 25/10/201 and subsequently incorporated into the ECHR requirements etc.etc.......'. That's ok for a book or an academic article, not for a short sound bite.  Just say 'international law requires..'

Keep the message simple and embodied in a small number of key concepts. It should be possible to deploy one or more of them to almost any question asked. Here are a few:

• In Ireland all asylum seekers are bogus, i.e. asylum tourists. This derives from the simple fact that genuine asylum seekers are obliged by 'international law' to lodge their application in the country they first "escape" to.  Ireland has no direct linkages to any of the hell holes concerned, ipso facto we cannot be the 'first country' for anyone.

• Every foreign adult in Ireland is either taking the job of an Irish person or alternatively drawing unemployment benefit. (In reality of course lots of them are doing both!)

• The state spends hundreds of millions annually is support of the immigration industry.  Cite this in the context  of the multiple problems faced by Irish citizens due to Government austerity. 'Little Johnny can't get that heart operation due to lack of resources.  I'd sooner spend the money on him rather than on asylum tourists'. Keep plugging the lack of school places, long hospital waiting lists etc.

• The so-called regularising of illegals is Orwellian NewSpeak. Regularising would mean sending the asylum tourists/illegal immigrants back while prioritising those following the legal route.

• The impact of Third World immigration on Western countries has been disastrous. Be able to recite a range of chilling examples. 'Why are we not learning from the mistakes of others?'.

• Cite Aristotle to the effect that impractical morality is no morality. So when some craw-thumper like the Pope appeals for all immigrants to be welcomed to our shores ask how such vast numbers can be housed, schooled, their health looked after etc.

• Cite international examples, most notably that of America, to show that amnesties, far from drawing a line under the problem, result in massive additional waves of immigrants.

• When challenged about the drownings in the Med cite the Australian example which shows that the certain knowledge of being towed back to where they embarked will stop the trafficking instantly.  End of tragedies on the high seas. Real practical morality would therefore call for this solution.

• When your humanity is challenged you must exude empathy baby! Aine was asked something like 'don't you think migrant woman and children drowning in the Med should be rescued?' Her response was along the lines of  'ICP don't have a position on that'. NOT GOOD!  While technically correct it makes dreadful television. Or radio. Or any forum really.  Say 'my heart goes out to those unfortunate people. However if we operated a rigorous repatriation policy they wouldn't undertake the journey in the first place'.  

As I said, one or more of these snappy factlets can be woven in to any answer to almost any question. They can and should be adapted for other countries.  The outcome will be positive, minds changed.

Try it.

Our futures depend on it.

Norway's Alan Shatter

Meet Erwin Kohn, President of the Jewish Community in Norway and also - and you'll be surprised by this - Deputy Director of the Norwegian Centre Against Racism. Erwin is a busy boy. In this interview you can hear him say "Norwegian society is too homogeneous, too white. So there is a job to be done." And we all know the nature of that job, don't we, children?  Erwin shakes his head wearily. But at least money isn't a problem.  "We have generous funding" he assures the interviewer.. And who provides this funding?  Why, it's the Norwegian Government. You know, the ones sworn to represent the very people being blended out by Kohn's project.

But despite the size of the task, much good work has already been undertaken. Most of eastern Oslo has by now been enriched beyond recognition by New Norwegians from Pakistan, Somalia and Nigeria. With generous helpings of Iraqis, Kosovars and Albanians. Why, Mohammed is now the most popular boy's name in Oslo, the nation's capital. Mind you this has not been an unmixed blessing, not least because an epidemic of rape has coincided with the arrival of the New Norwegians. And the police report that every single rape in Oslo over a recent five year period was attributable to an enricher. Every single one. There's more. The armed forces now accepts hijab-clad female warriors for the "prophet" into their ranks

So could Oslo become another Malmo, of which the Jewish Tablet has this to say:

"Today, Rosengård has become the symbol of ghettoization at the heart of the Scandinavian welfare state. Out of Rosengård’s 22,000 inhabitants, 89 percent are immigrants or children of immigrants. Only 39 percent of residents between the ages of 20 and 64 are employed.

In 2008, when a mosque in Rosengård was refused a lease renewal, riots erupted. Cars were burned, and homemade bombs were thrown at police. Fire-fighters, ambulance drivers, and paramedics were welcomed in Rosengård with rocks and spitting. The Fire and Rescue service made the decision that ambulances could no longer enter the housing project without police escort, a policy that lasted for a few months.   Gangs command the street and deal drugs openly. Recently, the Swedish Postal Service decided that it would no longer deliver mail in the area, since its mail carriers were subjected to repeated attacks."

Seems to be what President Kohn has in mind for his adopted country (he's actually Hungarian).

And here's what Judith Popinski a Holocau$t(™) survivor (I know, yet another one)  has to say about Malmo. "I never though I'd see this kind of hatred again in my lifetime. Not in Sweden anyway. This new hatred comes from Muslim immigrants. The Jewish people are afraid now."

Oy vey, the sufferink. The sufferink!

Maybe this lady should have a word with Kohn. And ask him, well, what the fuck he's up to in recreating a new Rosengård in Norway. Actually I can be of help here. I could explain to her that Jewish leaders in White countries really don't give a damn about the Judith Popinskis of this world, whether they suffer personal attacks or their synagogues get bombed.  These little people are unimportant, their travails the collateral damage of a far more strategic project. The objective of which is to to destroy the ethnic, racial and religious cohesion of Western countries. In other words to destroy the very essence of those - our - countries.

As for you Kohn, you despicable back-stabbing nation-wrecking ingrate I hope that one day you roast in the Seventh Circle of Hell along with your fellow-travelling fifth columnists such as Alan Shatter, Barbara Lerner Specter and Anetta Kahane.

A case of rats and sinking ships?

Hark!  What's that squeaking and splashing I hear in the background? Can it be the sound of rats deserting sinking ships?

Perhaps.

I ask because Trevor Phillips, one of the most astute and perceptive rats on board seems to be restless. For those of you who haven't heard of Trevor, well he is - or was - Britain's "Equality Czar". (And look, I'm not referring to the Trevor Phillips in Grand Theft Auto, FFS!). Arriving in Britain as a penniless teenager from the jungle swamps of Guyana it took him no time at all to identify the endless stream of White Man's goodies available to any black brandishing a Race Card. After getting the British taxpayer to fund his education he went from one lucrative public "service" sinecure to the next.  Never did a productive day's work in his life but in due course was appointed Chairman of the super-quango the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Here he (cough) 'earned' £130,000 per annum for three days a week 'service' and exercised control over a £70 million taxpayer funded budget.

Given his tribal origins this was like letting a fox into the hen house and Trev didn't take long to introduce Guyana-style governance to the Commission (whose staff is 70% minority - so much for equality) which became mired in corruption from the outset. A notable example was his awarding a contract to his buddy Samir for the sum of £300,000. This raised eyebrows. Unsurprisingly, as the estimated cost was £30,000 while the lowest bid was £12,000! But Trev brazened it out. Didn't bat an eyelid.  And then he came up with a really cracking wheeze. He directed the EHRC to harry and persecute any organisation deemed to be insensitive or insufficiently diligent when it came to equality. Especially racial equality.

But although persecuting them he also offered them a solution to their problem, a la Rev'unds Jesse and Al. He formed a private company (the Equate Organisation) that would - for a generous fee - provide equality and sensitivity training for the offenders. So as head of the publicly-funded EHRC he issued proceeding against an organisation. Then after a quick visit to the cloakroom he was back, this time wearing his Equate Organisation cap to make an offer they couldn't refuse. The conflict of interest was so blatant that even the pusillanimous Board of Directors rebelled and mass resignations followed. Despite this and the ensuing public furore he was nonetheless reappointed by that wicked witch Harriet Harman. (His initial success also enabled him to acquire a light-skinned Indian wife. But following his rise to the dizzy heights of the EHRC - and the plunder that came with it - he was able to trade her  in for an upmarket fully White one. The de rigueur status symbol for ambitious blacks.)

But this is just background and you can read in detail about his colourful commercial exploits here. And his explanation for the tsunami of corruption?  "I may have been 'naive'." Now there's one thing Phillips is not and that is naive.  In fact he's an unscrupulous conniving opportunist ready to leap onto whatever successful bandwagon emerges on the scene. And hence my earlier reference to rats and sinking ships . Because this guy has come out in the most trenchant way against multiculturalism and mass immigration.  Really gone in heavy on it. So I ask, does he sense an impending epochal shift? As he sniffs the social and political winds do his delicate quivering nostrils sense a dangerous restlessness growing among the natives? And is he positioning himself as the noble selfless black immigrant whose integrity forced him to ask the Questions-That-Cannot-Be-Asked?

Now admittedly he has raised similar views in the past....but still.

Watch this space.