A new series of posts

I'm planning to write  a number of posts on this whole  Holocau$t™  thing.  In each post I'll take some element of the fable, examine it, and demonstrate that the Canonical Narrative comes apart like a cheap suit once subjected to any form of rational inquiry. The label will be The Holocau$t™ and I've already re-labelled some of my existing posts with this tag.

So let's start at the beginning with a review of the Grand Extermination Plan itself.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
That's right. There was no plan. Those silly Germans, who normally document everything to the nth degree, somehow decided to undertake the largest genocide in history without writing anything down.

WW 1's Pearl Harbor

Next Thursday the Co. Cork town where I live will commemorate the centenary of the Lusitania sinking. Everyone knows the story: In flagrant contravention of established maritime warfare principles the fiendish Germans, cackling with glee as only Germans can,  torpedoed and sank a huge defenceless passenger ship with the loss of over 1,200 men, women and children. Contrary to established precedent the attack took place without warning.  (Hitherto submariners allowed those on board non-military craft the opportunity to launch lifeboats before firing their torpedoes.) But not this time.

I can imagine the high-level German representatives at the ceremony shifting uncomfortably under the accusatory glares of the other attendees. But as with this case the blame lies not with the Germans but with their enemies.

The case must be seen in the broader context of  the World War into which Britain desperately sought to embroil America. What better way to outrage the general public than murder over 1,000 innocent civilians? Just days before the sinking Woodrow Wilson's eminence grise, rumoured Rothschild agent 'Colonel' Edward House, met the British Foreign Minister Edward Grey.  House later wrote: "We spoke of the probability of an ocean liner being sunk, and I told him that if this were done a flame of indignation would sweep across America, which would in itself probably carry us into the war." The pair then met King George V who also raised the subject, asking 'suppose they sink the Lusitania, with American passengers on board?"

At all times following the sinking German claims that the Lusitania carried military ordnance (making it a legitimate target) were indignantly denied by the British Government and its shills. But the Germans had sent warnings throughout the USA prior to the Lusitania's departure. Their agents had identified various forms of munitions being loaded under the guise of ordinary cargo.

TRAVELLERS intending to embark on the Atlantic voyage are reminded that a state of war exists between Germany and her allies and Great Britain and her allies; that the zone of war includes the waters adjacent to the British Isles; that, in accordance with formal notice given by the Imperial German Government, vessels flying the flag of Great Britain, or any of her allies, are liable to destruction in those waters and that travellers sailing in the war zone on the ships of Great Britain or her allies do so at their own risk."

IMPERIAL GERMAN EMBASSY

Washington, D.C. 22nd April 1915

Were they right? Of course they were. Because, thanks to advanced diving technology the truth eventually emerged about thirty years ago with vast quantities of lethal ordnance found on the wreck and scattered about the adjacent ocean floor.

And what about the no-warning attack? More despicable lies. At the beginning of the U Boat campaign the Germans has adhered strictly to maritime convention, surfacing and allowing disembarkation to lifeboats. Even on occasion providing directions and sustenance. So what changed?   Enter war-mongering psychopath Churchill who, in flagrant contravention of every legal  and ethical norm had had commercial vessels secretly armed, the guns hidden under innocuous decking and/or cargo. This resulted in numerous U Boats being sunk with considerable loss of life. Naturally enough the warnings stopped after this.

In any event a very large boat like the Lusitania would under normal circumstances have taken about two hours to sink after being hit by a single torpedo.  But the Lusitania sank within 18 minutes.  Why? Because a massive second explosion - obviously caused by the on-board ordnance - blew away a large part of the hull, rendering any hope of rescue impossible. Several other deeply suspicious events are associated with the tragedy.  The British battle-cruiser Juno, patrolling the area for submarines, was inexplicably withdrawn shortly before the attack. Bear in mind that the Admiralty had cracked German codes and knew that subs were in the area. And to crown it all some of the rescue craft were recalled to Queenstown even when within sight of the struggling victims. After all, the more fatalities the better the propaganda.

One of the most disgusting aspects of the whole case was the deliberate scapegoating of the ship's Master, Captain William Turner.  The Admiralty's Richard Webb wrote to Lord Mersey, who oversaw the 'inquiry' "I am directed by the Board of Admiralty to inform you that it is considered politically expedient  that Captain Turner be prominently blamed for the disaster." How sick and cynical is that? And Churchill enthusiastically partook in the persecution of the unfortunate mariner who, though formally exonerated, never recovered and died a broken man.

We can thus say with confidence that the Lusitania can take its place with Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin and 9/11 as false flags enabled by evil men to widen and prolong vicious wars. And have no doubt there are more on the way.

So on Thursday next the standard pantomime (here's another one) will take place. Even through the truth has been forced out it has not really permeated the public consciousness. So  expect another bash the evil Germans scenario. And maybe even some hitherto undiscovered survivors, of the kind who keep miraculously popping up for Holocau$t™ reparations, will be wheeled out for the occasion.

I need your help again

Just like with the previous post I'm confused and in need of your help. Allow me to explain.

My confusion relates to the widely acclaimed, indeed legendary,  Death Camp testimony by Elie Wiesel called Night. And few writers have been the recipients of so much admiration - and money - as Elie. 'Fearless', 'searing truth', 'unsparing'...how could any self-respecting student of the Holocau$t™ (the Word's Greatest Tragedy) not read this canonical testament? But you see I kept putting it off. Not being a ghoul, how could I bear to read about:

Screaming babies hurled into gas chambers by Dr. Mengele himself

Fountains of blood exploding from the heaving mass of  decomposing bodies buried in mass graves

Prisoners forced to take acid baths 

Pumping prisoners full of water until they exploded. Christ, how lousy is that?

Injections directly into the brown eyes of untermencher to change them to a Teutonic blue

Camp Kommandant Laak tossing babies in the air and shooting them like clay pigeons while his cackling ten year-old daughter wildly applauds.  As only a Germans kid would.

And lots more.  So you can imagine my reluctant to subject myself to such horrors. I wouldn't sleep for a week. But a guy's gotta do what a guy's gotta do.

So with trembling hands I took up 'Night'. And it was every bit as harrowing as I had feared. Mind you there were some puzzling aspects. For instance we learn that Elie was treated in the Auschwitz camp hospital (where incidentally he tells us the quality of food was good) after which the doctor recommended 'a few days rest to recuperate'. And thus my first question. Was not Auschwitz a Death Camp, where mass extermination was the only game in town?  And in case you're wondering, Elie was not some valuable specialist, merely a humble sorting clerk.

Then right at the end of the war we had more strange hospital goings-on.  The Auschwitz medicos were treating Elie's dad in the Death Camp's hospital (even at a time of horrendous German casualties) when word came down that the camp was to be evacuated.  Prisoners were given the choice: Undertake an arduous journey to a new Death Camp......or relax and wait for liberation at the hands of the Red Army  Seems like the ultimate no-brainer. But wait for this...Elie dragged his infirm father out of the hospital and the two of them headed off with the fiendish Germans!

Mind you the Germans were under strict instructions to bludgeon any stragglers to death. I'm sure there's an explanation but, like, if they had given prisoners the option of remaining in Auschwitz why would they then want to kill stragglers?  Anyway, you'll be glad to know that when they arrived at the new Death Camp they were all treated to a hot shower and a 'cauldron of thick soup'. In due course this camp was also liberated, and "early the next day Jewish boys ran off to Wiemar to steal clothing and potatoes. And to rape German shiksas."  Ah well, boys will be boys.  Meanwhile Elie went on to fame and - most definitely - fortune. It could be said he actually created a whole new industry which thrives to this day.

So this is where I need your help. How do we reconcile all of those horrendous Death Camp incidents mentioned at the beginning with Elie's account of the incidents I referred to?  It's not easily explained. I have to confess to an ignoble thought crossing my mind...was he lying? But then I reminded myself that he was, just like Henry Kissinger, Menachim Begin and indeed Barak Obama,  a Nobel Peace Prize laureate.  And could you imagine any of these guys lying?  So I quickly - and shamefully - dismissed that thought.

But that only brings me back to square one. I'm at a loss to explain this conundrum.

Are there any wise readers out there who can clear my mind?

A German Jihad is born

Happy days, a cause for celebration. We sup yet again from the chalice of diversity because a 34 stone (240 kilo) Turkish land-whale in Germany has given birth to a 13 pound (6 kilo) monster which she has suitably named Jihad (Holy War). Can't you just see it in a few years time, mother sticking bloated head of the window and calling 'Holy War, your dinner is ready'. So very Germanic. He'll fit right into the multicultural paradise of the New Germany.

The land-whale reminds me of this creature who I described as "just following the dictates of her Darwinian script and at taxpayer expense eats, drinks, breeds and defecates, wallowing in the putrescence of her chosen state."

But there is an upside to this development as the case has - surprisingly - been afforded extensive coverage in the German media. And what could better exemplify the catastrophe that is multiculturalism than  seeing their taxes showered on a bloated, semi-literate free-loader and her 13 other children, a free-loader so culturally deaf as to name one of her turdlers after the people blowing up the taxpayers' country?

Andreas, a German reader of this blog tells me that reader comments in the local media are almost universally hostile while the number of deleted comments bears mute testimony to the public's feelings.

I close with one question: Did the father of Jihad inseminate the birthing unit by using a fire hose? If not, how?

The Nemtsov killing: Cui bono?

In the normal course of events I'd have assumed that Putin had been involved in the murder of  his opponent Boris Nemtsov either directly or indirectly.  But times are certainly not normal given the constant provocation of Russia by the 'West' - primarily the USA and its lapdog Britain.

Having  applied punitive sanctions, conspired to crash the price of oil.  provoked civil war and bankruptcy in Ukraine  (whose gold has been whipped out to America for 'safe-keeping'), we now learn that oily Dave Cameron plans to send 250 'military advisers' to that unfortunate country. As if they needed more soldiers.

Even Mikhail Gorbachev himself has warned of  the danger of nuclear war if the provocations continue.

On cue the Western MSM, just like they did with flight MH-17 (notice how that story suddenly disappeared once the black box was analysed?) and, without a shred of evidence, assigned responsibility to Putin. And Nemtsov became a fearless national martyr, the Man Who Dared Challenge The Great Dictator. So here's a little offsetting background on our hero Nemtzov. Prominent in Yeltsin's Jewish Mafia, after the fall of Communism he organised the  handing over of numerous multi-billion dollar publicly owned enterprises and resources to the appointed ones for a pittance . Thus he midwifed the birth of the Russian Oligarchs.

Before getting his hands on the loot at national level he had had a dry run as Governor of the Nizhny Novgorod region, a position he reached at the remarkably tender age of 29. Purely on ability, I have no doubt. Yeltsin then catapulted him and another top Jewish Mafioso Anatoly Chubais into "direct unsupervised control" of the state asset disposal. Having duly enriched himself and The Family he then, like Khodorovsky, sought elective political power. This attempt became legend as he made his election appeal - on behalf of the 'common man' - from the lounge of his luxurious private jet.  As you can imagine this didn't go down too well with the newly impoverished nation. His appeal was as a consequence limited and he was nowhere close to being an electoral threat to Putin.

On any occasion such as this one must ask cui bono?  Putin has gained nothing apart from getting rid of an irritating gadfly. But the downside for him is major, providing a propaganda bonanza for his enemies, turning up the volume of the war drums in the West, opening the possibility of a "Maidan Moment" of destabilisation in Moscow, and undermining the chances of a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian and Syrian crises. So if Putin was indeed behind this he's made a very bad and stupid move. And we don't associate him with bad and stupid moves.

I don't for one minute claim to know what happened or who's responsible. But it looks all too like another dangerous escalation of hostilities by Russia's enemies. I truly believe that the world is in serious danger of a major war, a war without doubt provoked by the ZioCons in America and their British satrap.

Our best hope of avoiding it lies in the European nations showing a bit of backbone for once and telling the ZioCon War Party in America to take a flying fuck.

But I'm not holding my breath.

The silent holocaust

Now that the Auschwitz Show(™) is winding to a close and the exhausted participants return to normality another holocaust from the same time passes off almost unnoticed. Over three days beginning February 13 1945 the beautiful historical city of Dresden  ('The Florence On The Elbe') packed with civilians, refugees from the East and Allied prisoners-of-war was systematically pulverised into rubble. Kurt Vonnegut, a well-treated POW incarcerated there during the fire-bombing, provides a chilling personal account of the atrocity in his novel Slaughterhouse 5, pointing out that "more people died there in the firestorm, in that one big flame, than died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined."

This atrocity ticked all the war crime boxes.  David Irving described Dresden as being "not endowed with any one great capital industry like those of Essen and Hamburg, even though Dresden was of comparable size, the city's economy had been sustained in peacetime by its theaters, museums, cultural institutions and home industries."  

So the city had no strategic value, was known to be packed with civilian refugees (it was called der Fleuchtlingsstadt, the 'refugee city'), the war was virtually over and there were no air defences.  It lay utterly prostrate and defenseless before the onslaught. Yet for three days and nights waves of bombers dropped thousands of tons of high explosive, incendiaries and (illegal) phosphorous bombs.  The bombers were followed by fighter planes who strafed the survivors and rescue crews. Wave after wave.

I don't blame the Allied bomber crews who had little choice when carrying out their grisly task.  The true criminals were Churchill and his 'scientific advisor' Frederick Alexander Lindeman, This German-born psychopath seemed obsessed, like so many of his Jewish co-ethnics, with the literal extermination of the German people. He also demonstrated that extraordinary Jewish capacity to appear from nowhere and miraculously land at the right hand side of the seat of power. And Lindeman had a cunning plan. He had calculated that that every 40 tons of bombs dropped on built-up areas would "make 4,000 to 8,000 people homeless." And, as historian Max Hastings drily observed "[h]oped to create a nation of refugees, and no doubt also a good many corpses under the rubble, although he was too genteel to say so."

At a lower level there was at least one other war criminal. Air Marshall Arthur "Bomber" Harris. He expressed his objectives for Dresden thus: "What we wanted to do in addition to the horrors of fire was to bring masonry crashing down on the Boche (Germans), to kill and terrify Boche".  Nice chap. And he never regretted the mass murder he unleashed. In an interview given thirty years after war's end he proudly admitted that he'd 'destroy Dresden all over again' in the same circumstances. You may well ask whether this monster was put on trial like the other war criminals and suffered the same fate. Well no. On the contrary they erected a statue to him, unveiled by no less a personage than HRH the Queen herself.

Now I'm not 100% correct in claiming the Dresden holocaust goes unrecorded. Over the last few years at this time the city has begun to quietly mark the occasion. But it does so within the severe constraints ordained by the Official Narrative. This in effect means that Germans can discreetly mourn their dead but only in the context of the ritual self-abasement that has been inculcated into their psyche over the last half century. Namely that any such mourning be contextualised by the acknowledgement of exclusive German guilt for the whole disaster and that German suffering was in no way comparable to the Official Holocau$t.

Oy vey, only Jews can suffer.

It's the Auschwitz® Show!

Wow, what a show it's been.  Brand Auschwitz in all its gory glory. The great and the good dragged from all over the world to witness the scene of the greatest crime in  the history of humanity. Or so we're lead to believe.

I'd just love if all the orgiastic ones would take some time out from the TV appearances and reparations processing to address these questions. But I'm not holding my breath.

() Why would the Germans utilise costly and scarce fuel, transportation and military resources to bring millions of Jews to Auschwitz from all over Europe only to kill them?  Why not do it in the nearest disused quarry?

() Why did the resident Red Cross unit at Auschwitz fail to notice that little matter of millions being exterminated under their noses?

() Why was there a special court in the camp to try guards accused of ill-treatment of prisoners?

() Why were no "gas chamber" extractor fans visible on the photos taken by Allied planes towards the end of the war?  The chambers could not have been used for cyanide-based gassing (Zyklon B) in their absence.

() Even with the modest cost-effective modern technology it takes about three hours to fully cremate a human body. This would result in the Auschwitz furnaces cremating about 40,000 corpses during its span of operation, assuming a 24x7x365 operation (which isn't technically possible anyway). Now factor in deaths from natural causes and the fact that at least 50% of deaths in the camp were of non-Jews and you get a realistic figure of about 15,000 Jews incinerated there.

() Why did American gas chamber specialist Fred Leuchter find no evidence of lethal-level cyanide residue in the "gas chamber" walls?

() Why kill prisoners when there was there a constant stream of documents from SS HQ demanding higher output from the camp?

() Why did Allied spies in the camp - acknowledged as such after the war - not highlight the supposed mass killings?

() Why did Eisenhower, Churchill and De Gaulle not mention the Auschwitz 'death camp' in their war memoirs?

The answer to the above questions can be found, at least in part, in this post.

An unusual endorsement

The more I research the subject the clearer it becomes that sinister 'Western' forces were intent on fomenting a war with Hitler's Germany. It also becomes clearer that those forces were personified by  international central banking interests, which is another way of saying the Rothschilds. The Reichsbank, despite its name, was actually a privately-owned central bank (like almost all the other CBs) and it vigorously opposed the economic program with which Hitler transformed Germany.

This program resulted, within a couple of years, in the country having a solid, stable currency, no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries were still out of work and living on welfare. Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, although it was denied foreign credit and was faced with an economic boycott abroad. It did this by using a barter system: equipment and commodities were exchanged directly with other countries, circumventing the international banks. This system of direct exchange occurred without debt and without trade deficits.  

Here's what Richard Tedor (in Hitler's Revolution) said about it.

"Despite objections from Schmidt, president of the Reich’s Bank, Hitler withdrew Germany’s money system from the gold standard…. Hitler substituted a direct barter system in foreign dealings. German currency became defined units of human productivity.

In January 1938, the Soviet diplomat Kristyan Rakovsky commented on the German money system. Rakovsky had held posts in London and in Paris and was acquainted with Wall Street financiers. He explained, “Hitler, this uneducated ordinary man, has out of natural intuition and even despite the opposition of the technician Schacht, created an especially dangerous economic system. An illiterate in every theory of economics driven only by necessity, he has cut out international as well as private high finance. Hitler possesses almost no gold, and so he can’t endeavor to make it a basis for currency. Since the only available collateral for his money is the technical aptitude and great industriousness of the German people, technology and labor became his ‘gold’…. As you know, like magic it’s eliminated all the unemployment for more than six million skilled employees and laborers. “

Germany’s withdrawal from the gold-based, internationally linked monetary system in favor of a medium of exchange founded on domestic productivity corresponded to Hitler’s belief in maintaining the sovereignty of nations. This was an unwelcome development in London, Paris and New York, where cosmopolitan investment and banking institutions profited from loaning money to foreign countries. Germany no longer had to borrow in order to trade on the world market. Foreign demand for German goods correspondingly created more jobs within the Reich.

Rakovsky was wrong in attributing the genesis of the plan to the 'economically illiterate' Hitler rather than to Gottfried Feder but still it's some testament, is it not?

Was this man the greatest war criminal of WW 2?

Dwight D. Eisenhower enjoyed a miraculously successful military and political career despite (like John McCain) finishing close to the bottom of his graduation class at West Point, where he was known as 'that terrible Swedish Jew'. (His father was said to be Jewish but if so was of the crypto variety). But neither that nor repeated subsequent examples of incompetence (MacArthur wanted rid of him) held him back, as some mysterious(?) force at the highest levels in Washington kept the promotions rolling in.  As one of his biographers pointed out 'in only five years he had risen from a lowly lieutenant colonel in the Philippines to commander of the greatest invasion force in history'.

Amazing!

He ended WW 2 as a hero, loved and lionised by the American people, a reaction which he parlayed into becoming a two term President, one of the most admired of the twentieth century.

While he always professed himself appalled at German 'war crimes' and wanted to exterminate the whole German High Command after the war it seems he wasn't beyond a bit of war criminality himself. In fact, and this is not an exaggeration, he could justifiably be described as the greatest war criminal of the twentieth century.  Because there's compelling evidence to suggest that he deliberately and with malice aforethought consigned over one million German prisoners-of-war to their deaths in 1945.

Rense writes about it with great eloquence and passion here, but in essence Eisenhower had German POWs reclassified as Disarmed Enemy Combatants (DECs) the impact of which was to remove the need to provide sustenance and to put them outside the purview of the International Red Cross. Under normal circumstances this mechanism is understandable, the idea being that with the end of hostilities defeated soldiers can be let to their own devices rather than be a burden on their jailers.  However Eisenhower gave explicit instructions for the German soldiers to be imprisoned in camps and to be denied shelter and sustenance. The inevitable result of such a policy was death through starvation, disease or exposure.

Konrad Adenauer, the pro-Western Chancellor of West Germany during the fifties commissioned a report which found that 1.5 million German prisoners in Allied POW camps never came home alive nor were their deaths recorded. The report attributes this to their being 'penned up for weeks without protection from the weather, water or medical care'.  These events were detailed in the book Other Losses by Canadian writer James Bacque (1989) and picked up by journalist Peter Worthington who wrote 'it is hard to escape the conclusion that Eisenhower was a war criminal of epic proportions.'

Naturally enough, once the crime was exposed a team of  house-trained court historians under the leadership of Stephen Edward Ambrose sprang into action. And  dismissed the book as....... (roll of drums)  a conspiracy theory. While there's undoubtedly room for discussion regarding the total figure there's none in relation to Eisenhower's DEC reclassification, his orders to deprive the captives of care and sustenance and the exclusion of the Red Cross from the camps.  Shortage of food cannot be sustained as an excuse as Bacque cites several documents from Allied logistics officers in the region to the effect that plenty of food was available should they have wanted to feed the prisoners and that American soldiers and German civilians were actually prohibited from doing so.

Interestingly, when I was a student in Germany in 1966 I had a drinking friend called Franz.  He had been in the war towards the latter end as a very young man.  He told me one night while in his cups that he and vast numbers of other soldiers had been imprisoned near Cologne with neither food nor shelter and that huge numbers had perished. He admitted that many had got away as security at some of the camps was weak and that many localised camp commanders, disgusted at what was taking place, simply left the DECs escape.

So it seems that Ike got away with mass murder.  Not just that but thrived and prospered and lived into old age, wealthy and admired. Meanwhile the German people have become synonymous with genocide even as the Holocau$t fairytale unravels and the knowledge of detailed plans to literally wipe the German people from the face of the earth  have emerged.  While the winners write the history, that covering the first half of the last century is surely unsurpassed in terms of grotesque misrepresentation.  Never has a people been so unjustifiably traduced as have the Germans.

Let us all in our own way continue our efforts to get the truth out there.

Germans as surrogate for Whites

After becoming awakened to what was being done to us, and by 'us' I mean the White race, I totally gave up watching films. But thanks to Lady savant I couldn't avoid watching the opening scene of one such Hollywood production recently called Murphy's War.  This scene, the only bit I could watch, showed a British merchant ship being sunk by a German submarine and the survivors then being machine-gunned while struggling in the water.

This is of course a gross calumny.  Survivors of such attacks were unanimous in crediting the Germans with not just saving their lives by allowing them to disembark into lifeboats but also providing them with directions to the nearest safe haven.  There are countless individual testimonies to this effect. In fact if we get into the issue of breaking wartime maritime law the main transgressors were the Allies. The British and Americans deployed Q Ships, which, though flying the merchant flag and appearing like merchantmen were actually disguised warships which blew the unsuspecting sub to pieces when it surfaced.

But all of this is by the way. The incident really made me wonder whether this endless demonisation of Germans could actually represent an attack on Whites with the Germans acting as a kind of surrogate or proxy. Think about it. The Germans are always shown or portrayed as blonde with merciless steely blue eyes as they bayonet babies and or undertake some other such favourite German pastime. The reverse psychology and subliminal programming are obvious: Blonde hair and blue eyes equal merciless ruthless killers or at its most basic very bad people.  And they don't have to come straight out and say it, just let the message sink in.

It's at least a strong possibility.

Germany celebrates

I was thrilled to see Germany win the World Cup.  Not just that they were IMHO the best team in the competition but that the victory reinforces the nation's growing national pride.  Never has a nation needed it more. For none has been so unjustly vilified, traduced, maligned, denigrated and slandered. We've been brought up to believe that this fine people represented some unique manifestation of evil. As I sought to demonstrate in this post, nothing could be further from the truth.

For decades Germans have kept their heads down, ashamed of their identity and afraid to demonstrate any semblance of national pride. Their job was to shut up and pay up. The rapidly declining population (I don't include Third World colonisers in this) is one manifestation of this syndrome. Now, national flags proudly wave among massive enthusiastic crowds in the traditional capital of a reunited country as the team brings home the trophy.

Well done lads and let us all hope it leads your country onto even greater achievements and more important, results in hiving off your albatross of unjustified guilt.

"You're a Holocaust denier!"

Such was the charge levelled against me in a conversation with friends and acquaintances last Tuesday evening.  Am I?  Well, you be the judge as I lay out my position.

1. The Jews in Europe did indeed suffer a Holocaust in which vast numbers of them were killed and otherwise lost their lives during WW II.

2.  The numbers come nowhere near the mythical (and it is mythical) figure of six million. I don't know what the number was, maybe nobody does but I suspect it was closer to a tenth of that figure.

3. Other peoples suffered a Holocaust as well during this time, at least as bad as that suffered by the Jews. I have in mind the Poles, Russians, Ukrainians and of course the Germans themselves. The ratio of Tutsis slaughtered in Rwanda dwarfs the ratio of Jews killed in their Holocaust. Yet Jews have cornered the genocide market.

4. There was no plan to exterminate Europe's Jews.  The plan was to get them into work camps, slave labour camps if you will, and at the end of the war expel them to Israel, Uganda, Madagascar or the steppes of Russia.

5. The majority of Jewish deaths resulted from the actions of the Einsatzgruppen and their local allies.  These forces operated behind German lines after Operation Barbarossa to suppress local resistance.  Such resistance was strongly associated with Jews who were in any event an easily identifiable target. Vast numbers were murdered and buried in mass graves. The local forces allied to the Einsatzgruppen undoubtedly took the opportunity to settle many an old score as part of the process. Typhus outbreaks in the camps were also a major contributor...possibly the largest.

6. The idea of the gas chambers as a form of mass slaughter is a complete fabrication.

7. The piles of skeletal bodies as seen in the iconic photos from Belsen and elsewhere represented the victims of typhus and starvation, the latter brought on by the bombing of German supply lines.

I have not arrived at these conclusions casually or quickly. I truly believe that they represent what really occurred.

Explaining the hysteria

I know that Mandela is a special hate figure for many if not most on this blog, especially South Africans.  But I don't see it that way.  You see he fought diligently, relentlessly and highly successfully for his own people.  That was very bad for Whites there and it gets worse by the day.  Yet if Whites had had a Mandela on their side who knows how things might stand today? And sure he was involved in violence where innocent people got killed, but that happens in every rebellion or civil war.  (Why, we  have another black man in the White House who does it daily on a much bigger scale and he has the Nobel Peace Prize on his cupboard.) Mandela was also a man of principle,  enduring many additional years in prison for refusing to renounce his policies.  And finally, in a way unknown in the rest of Africa, he did seek to embrace the country's Whites, albeit being too old ultimately to make much difference.

Having said all of that he was, or should be, a minor world figure. Yes, he 'inspired' his movement from prison, was ultimately successful and held the position of President for a few years. In terms of global importance his country would realistically be ranked mid-range, about the same as say Algeria or Roumania.  Now can you imagine the global reaction to the death of one of their Presidents? A few lines on the back page.   Or let's take Presidents with colossal geopolitical achievements, such as Michael Gorbachev, who oversaw the collapse of the Second World, or Helmut Kohl who rammed through German reunification.  Compare those achievements to that of Mandela who, in effect, lead the majority in a sometimes violent rebellion against a tiny and ultimately doomed minority in a country of little global importance.

Realistically he didn't achieve a lot more than did ben Bella in Algeria or even Mugabe in Southern Rhodesia . But you'd never think that from the MSM in the west.  I don't need to rub your noses in it anymore. But to take just a single example, the front page of the Irish Times yesterday had the paper's logo at the top, while every other single pixel went to make up a giant picture of Mandela (whom many of the cringing and slobbering madia have now taken to calling -excruciatingly -  Madeba.)  Suffice to say I have never - ever -  seen such blanket hagiographical coverage, not even for JFK.

All for the leader of a rebellion in a faraway country of modest importance.

The whole treatment bears an uncanny resonance with that of the Peace Prize Laureate himself, you know the one who starts undeclared wars and makes a list of people to be killed at the beginning of each week.  I remember when he burst on the scene on the basis of his speech to the Democratic National Convention. Now I'm not looking at this with hindsight but I really did think at the time 'ok the guy made a good speech. So what?'  I say the same about any speech from any politician. Because they have highly paid speech writers to create the words while the pol just reads them out. The words are analysed and parsed and run across focus groups interminably before they're finally loaded up onto the speaker's autocue. The 'soaring rhetoric' is someone else's creation

So really we're just seeing another example of the attempt to transmogrify elemental and localised black accomplishments into something profound and global.  And that in turn is part of the broader strategy to make blacks appear good, successful, intelligent and thus attractive brood stock for naïve and credulous White females. Probably 95% of those creaming themselves over 'Madeba' don't realise why they're doing it. But the elite few currently implementing the long-standing programme of White destruction know exactly what's going on. And why. As the following quotation from Mein Kampf underlines, the author was ahead of his time in so very many ways.

“The Jews were responsible for bringing negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate.”

Couldn't put it better myself.

Food for thought.........

Here's Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the “Jewish Question”)

Jews were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their ‘race’. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.

Arthur Koestler in The God that Failed, writing on pre-War Germany,  in referring to the Ullstein group said it 'was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein – they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.'

Hugh Wilson, the (very anti-German) American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938 commented in his book Diplomat Between The Wars wrote "the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews."

According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory): “even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination. “

Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, and a noted anti-German wrote in a tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back  “In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state. No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests, throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. "  [my note: Pre-War Berlin was also a thriving centre for the dissemination of Modern ‘Art’, an important factor in the debasing of Western Civilisation]

In Disgrace Abounding the same author wrote "In the Berlin of pre-Hitler years most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish."  

Edwin Black who wrote The Transfer Agreement, said "For example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of the doctors were Jewish."

Isn't it uncanny how this picture resembles the West today?....... plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose and all of that. But that’s not what really set me thinking. As you’re probably aware, I'm pessimistic about the future. It seems to me that the demographics of mass immigration have set a trend that cannot be reversed short of taking what current thinking would deem inconceivable measures. But also that Jewish control, aided by their shabbos goys, is so entrenched in banking, media, entertainment, politics and law that any meaningful opposition would be strangled at birth without too much difficulty. That seems to have been happening for decades by now.

But the German story suggests my pessimism might be misjudged.  Because, within a few short years this whole battery of controls, and the Jews themselves, had been swept away. And we know how that turned out.  In fact more amazing than the degree of wealth and power acquired by a group representing only about 1% of the  population was the speed and seeming ease with which it was all demolished. Maybe their power isn’t impregnable now either.

Food for thought.........

Germania delenda est

A classical Jewish response to accusations of German hatred (and I’ve personally heard this) goes ‘they tried to exterminate my people, literally wipe us off the face of the earth, every last man, woman and child.’ Except that they did not. The Germans wanted all Jews out of their sphere of influence even if it took banishment to the wilds of Russia where their ultimate survival would be a matter of indifference.

Callous yes, a policy of extermination, no.  In the fog of war vast numbers of Jews were murdered, starved or worked to death. But nowhere, not even in the minutes of the famous/notorious Wannsee Conference, where the details of the alleged extermination were supposedly worked out, has such a plan been found.  And trust me, they’d find it if it were there.

Now if it’s a detailed carefully worked out plan for racial extermination that you’re looking for, well I can help. Exhibit 1 Julius Rosenberg lookalike Theodore N. Kaufman, a New York based Jewish businessman who  in 1941 wrote a book with the cheery and unambiguous title Germany Must Perish. Here the author made clear that Germans as a race must be wiped out.  He ruefully acknowledged that the direct murder of upwards of fifty million people was ‘impractical’ and instead proposed a neater but equally effective solution: Sterilisation for every German male (not sure if he had females in mind as well).  In one fell swoop the extermination of the German race would be accomplished within a generation. You might imagine that such malevolence would have resulted in his being committed to jail or a lunatic asylum, but far from it.  The press gave it respectful attention and he earned handsome money by lecturing on his plan throughout the country.

Doubtless inspired by Kaufman’s foresight Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau (Jewish) came up with the eponymous Plan which would have resulted in ten million Germans being killed by starvation within two years of war’s end and which would have totally destroyed Germany’s industrial base, coal mines, colleges and universities. 'I realize this would put 18 or 20 million people out of work,' he modestly  acknowledged, adding reassuringly ‘but able- bodied Germans could be transported to Central Africa as slave labour on some big project like the TVA’ (the Tennessee Valley hydroelectric project). 

Be aware that this was a real plan, detailed, costed, with milestones and accountabilities.  It was not just something drawn up on the back of an envelope.  The detailed work on the plan was undertaken by another Julius Rosenberg lookalike Assistant Treasury Secretary Harry Dexter White (Jewish) who was revealed after the war to have been a Soviet spy. These two worked assiduously behind the scenes to convince Roosevelt to accept it. The President, in near terminal failing health, acceded to it, monstrous and all as it was, in fact suggesting that ‘the Germans in future should  live off just soup-kitchens.’  Secretary of War Henry Stimson was appalled: ‘It is Semitism gone wild for vengeance and, if it is ultimately carried out (I can't believe that it will be) it as sure as fate will lay the seeds for another war in the next generation.’ He added that Morgenthau was ‘so biased (sic) by his Semitic grievances that he is really a very dangerous adviser to the President.’

Neocons, anyone?  Plus sa change, plus c'est la meme chose. (The more things change........)

(Incidentally, one of the reasons Stimson failed to  get involved in the Morgenthau Plan was, by his own admission, his work on rewriting the historical documents relating to Pearl Harbor ‘to save the President’s place in history.’)  He also marvelled at the gay abandon with which civilians (Roosevelt and his circle) blithely discussed the potential slaughter of hundreds of thousands of war prisoners and civilians.  (I’ve read many such reports and in my opinion the callous indifferent psychopathy displayed is little different to that of Stalin and his Court.)

Churchill initially, and to his credit, was bitterly opposed to the plan. He asserted that it flew in the face of civilised norms and, glaring at Morgenthau, added that it was ‘deeply unChristian’. Ouch! But Morgenthau had an ace up his sleeve in the form of Frederick Alexander Lindemann, 1st Viscount Cherwell. Despite the fancy title he in fact was a Jew from Germany who had moved  to England. Despite being described by Sir Anthony Eden as ‘evil, and quite possibly mad’ he astounded everyone by becoming a close advisor to Churchill. Amazing, isn’t it? Here he became the inspiration for the notorious Bomber Harris with his enthusiasm for carpet-bombing the cities of his native country. Unsurprisingly he was also a keen supporter of Mogenthau’s plan to wipe his ex-countrymen off the face of the earth. In any event Churchill was eventually induced to signed up to The Plan, which largely due to the outraged reaction of the American public when it was leaked, was never fully implemented.

Meanwhile on the Eastern Front we have Ilya Ehrenberg, another Germanic Jew calling, nay, begging, for the total destruction of his ancestral stock.  A prolific writer and one of Stalin’s main propagandists, he had this helpful suggestion for the common Russian soldiers entering German lands: 'The Germans  are not human beings. From now on, the word 'German' is the most horrible curse……We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day ... If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime ... If you have already killed a German, then kill another one - there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don't count the days, don't count the kilometres. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! ... - Kill the Germans! Kill!"

Sadly, the soldiers took him at his word and did him proud. And you’ll be glad to know that this splendid chap lived to be a ripe old age and died in his bed. Like Lazar Kaganovich (Jewish), the butcher of millions of Ukrainians.

Their views were possibly influenced by those of Jew Walther Rathenau, Foreign Minister of Germany in 1922: "Today France is politically very strong: thanks to a large and victorious army and to powerful alliances. But even if the alliances with Italy, England and America hold fast for five hundred years without faltering even for a moment, no far-sighted person will be able to give France any advice but this: do not rely on it! Destroy Germany in the truest sense, kill her people, settle the land with other races..." "Letter to France", February 6, 1920. Quoted in: Nachgelassene Schriften vol. 1, pp. 113-116. 

You should of course be aware that while all of this was going on 'The' Holocaust™ had yet to be discovered. Or invented, if you prefer.  And you doubtless will have noted that the people I’ve cited in this post were, almost without exception, Jews of Germanic origin. You’ve seen what they said, did, and tried to do. As Sir Anthony Eden bitterly observed at the time ‘these ex-Germans seem to wish to wash away their ancestry in a bath of  blood’. 

So I’ll leave you with this question: Who were the real exterminationists?

Grab those Daimler shares

If you hold shares in Daimler, the company that produces Mercedes and other engineering miracles, then you're a lucky investor. Because, almost alone among car manufacturers they continue to pile up the profits, year after year. And they're about to get a lot better. They're going to be enriched!

'Daimler, the German auto-giant behind luxury car brand Mercedes, has decided that its management personnel is just too German. The firm has vowed to fill half of its top jobs with international applicants.' Yes, too efficient German for its own good. I wholeheartedly agree. And with that in mind I've perused my copious personnel files and come up with a number of top-range candidates. The usual fee of 50% of the first year's salary will apply.

 For Power Train Operations I propose Mohammed bin Suleiman al Thani bin Mubarak Mustafa el Krim. Mr. Krim exploded onto the scene in the Pakistan/Afghanistan border region where he developed innovative vehicular security testing techniques. The usage of live testers rather than crash test dummies has greatly enriched the value of his experiments.

But my piece de resistance is a candidate who meets every requirement for a top business executive these days: A woman, black, disabled and a lesbian. Dr. Manfred Bischoff, I present you with the delectable Chlamydia LeToya Ali, who has spent a lifetime living on welfare. Who better to advise and guide Daimler's entry into this previously untouched market?

Yes, things are set to get only better for Daimler.  Grab those shares before news of these appointments leaks out.

 

German workers suffer stress

According to English language The Local, nearly half of Germany's workers feel more stressed than two years ago.  They even provide us with a picture of a typical worker.

This typical German worker is shown here (top).

Also, on the same page, they have the lower picture to illustrate 'Going out in Germany'

These images, especially the 'German worker' are so perverse, so crass, so obviously tendentious, so laughingly unrealistic, that I ponder this question: Are those propagandists over-confident, (we're more or less home and dry)  ..... or are they running scared?

I feel it must be one or the other. They must believe The Matrix has been sealed. Or else that we're onto their game....

Can somebody please help me? I seem to be going insane.

We know what happened to the Jews in Germany during WWII.  They were mercilessly hunted down, to the last man woman and child, and, after a Death March, were killed in the gas chambers of Auschwitz or Belsen or wherever. In fact wherever the Germans went the same thing happened, from Paris to Moscow, from Vilnius to Belgrade.

How do we know this?  Well everybody knows it, from hundreds of films, thousands of books, dozens of Holocaust museums, millions of church sermons, from every approved history of the period.  So that seems clear enough.

But then I come across this, an excerpt from the history of the Rykestrasse Synagogue in Berlin, written by a former Head Rabbi at that institution. (Hermann Simon (Die Synagoge Rykestraße (1904–2004), Berlin: Hentrich & Hentrich and Stiftung Neue Synagoge Berlin / Centrum Judaicum, 2004, (Jüdische Miniaturen; vol. 17)).

 “The Jewish school in the front building was forced to close in 1941. However, the Jewish community formally remained proprietor of the site. In May 1942 the borough of Prenzlauer Berg declared its will to acquire the site paying the ridiculous sum of reichsmark 191,860 and with effect of 1 September 1944 the site was conveyanced to the borough. When on 6 May 1943 the Jewish community applied at the Gestapo for a sale permission, since all its property was under custodianship as were any sales proceeds, it named the Heeresstandortverwaltung I Berlin (German Army garrison administration no. I) as the tenant of all the site, except of two little apartments in the front building still rented out to residential tenants.”

So here we have, according to the Rabbi of the synagogue in question:

in the middle of World War II,

the Jewish community,

negotiating,

with the Gestapo,

for the sale of their synagogue,

which happens to be down the road from Hitler’s HQ.

Now tell, am I going insane, or have I momentarily stepped outside The Matrix? And what's that green man with the TV aerial ears doing looking in my window?

"All that glisters is not gold...."

A very small humble cargo ship could do it, all in one go. As could about 100 trucks. Assuming the appropriate level of militarised security.  I'm talking here about the 1,500 tons of German gold stored, or allegedly stored, at the Fed in New York. As every schoolboy knows, the Germans now want it back.

And they'll get it.

But over a period of seven years!

What the hell's going on here?  Give any self-respecting gang of criminals the keys and they'd have the place cleaned out over a weekend. But this exercise will take seven years?  I've been reading all about it everywhere I can for the last few weeks and I can tell you this: I have found nothing that even approaches a logical explanation for the delay.

Unless of course the gold isn't there!  But what about the annual inventory audits conducted by the Budesbank?, you cry. Oh dear. There hasn't been one for a long long time. Well actually, reading between the lines it seems there never was a physical audit or stock check by the efficient Germans.

Here's the knee-slapping, eye-watering funny bit: They trusted the Fed!  Hilarious, isn't it?

So now yet another lunatic theory - that there's no gold in Fort Knox - has been lent respectability.

Interesting times indeed.

Living in the Matrix

Take a small island in the Adriatic where 4,000 people - equivalent to nearly half the regular population of the island - were brutally and sadistically massacred over about five days.  Many people alive today remember it.  You'd imagine, would you not, that this would kinda get a mention somewhere when you check out that island? Like Wikipedia. Well you'd be wrong. Because the 'wrong' people were slaughtered, in this case German soldiers who had surrendered to Tito's guerrillas in 1945 on the island of Rab.

Check it out yourself. I guarantee you'll find it very hard to dig up anything.  Oh sure, you'll find all you want about the concentration camp on Rab - an Italian one, I might add - mainly for recalcitrant Slovenes and Croatians, but also gypsies and Jews.  You'll learn plenty about how over 200 Jews, 'the elderly or sick who were sent to Auschwitz by the Germans for extermination' [Wiki].  Now as an aside, a concept about Death Marches that always fascinated me. Why would the super-efficient and super-evil Germans go to all the time trouble, expense and risk of sending them through four countries in order to kill them in Poland?  Why not just shoot them where they were?  I'm not holding my breath for an answer. Nor for anything about the massacred Germans appearing in Approved Outlets.

I mention this case merely to illustrate the parallel universes we live in.  On the one hand there's reality, what is actually happening and what has actually happened. And then, like in The Truman Show or The Matrix we have an imaginary world.  This world, in our case, is one in which Whites, and particularly White males, are inherently evil and the cause of all the world's problems, non-Whites, especially blacks, are wondrous human beings, whose occasional faults and failings can be fully explained by generations of White abuse. It's one where races, religions and genders are equal, (in fact there's a kind of inverse pigmentocracy) where the race-mixing of Whites into oblivion is an unalloyed good, where accepted history, the kind you get in orthodox academies and on Wikipedia, has become a parody of itself. But a parody that brooks no questioning.

Maintaining parallel universes does not come easily or cheaply. It requires the systematic immersion of the public in a particular way of thinking, which in turn calls for overwhelming control of the media, education, politics and finance. And, as Orwell showed, of history also. It also requires the elimination, as far as possible, of any contrarian narrative as even at a low level this can cause disproportionate damage. Internalised conformity to the level of Thought Control is the objective. And it's been achieved.

Now here's my other question. Which is stronger, the almost total control enjoyed by The Empire....or the Trusty Sword Of Truth? This makes me sound like some pretentious philosophy student (if a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it fall, has it really fallen? To which I'd respond 'of course it has, you stupid twat'). But it's a serious question. Maintaining such a parallel universe doesn't come cheaply or easily. Despite the range and depth of control enjoyed by the Thought Police, cognitive dissonance is all around the proles. This is where enstupidation comes in. Dumb them down (race mix with inferiors, debase their culture) and distract them with bread and circuses into semi-conscious servitude.

It's worked phenomenally well so far.  Almost every White person is unwittingly enmeshed in The Matrix, oblivious to The Truth about what governs their lives. Are they open to it?  An oft-cited source of hope is the collapse of the USSR, where another Matrix, although of a different kind, also operated. But I'm not so sure. Because you see, the vast majority of Soviet citizens knew they were living a lie, They saw through the totalitarian contempt for facts and reality and just had to tune into the western media to find all the proof they needed. But in the West, especially in the USA, people genuinely believe that they're getting the real story from the MSM, academia, the churches and the other sources of pollution.

Then again, do they want to know the Truth? It's been pointed out that sooner or later, most everyone stumbles over the truth, but that most then pick themselves up and continue on as if nothing happened. Most people do not want to learn any truth they fear may breach their comfort zone or compromises their plans and preconceptions. That if they ignore it, it may go away. I don't know the answer, but that's our challenge. We must keep shining the light on the cockroaches and our Masters might one day resemble the frozen leaders of the USSR waving from atop Lenin’s Tomb as their world crumbled around them.

So I close on a positive note from Victor Hugo “Mightier than the tread of marching armies is the power of an idea whose time has come.”