Luvvies squabble for the spoils

'Multicultural society' is an oxymoron. If it's a society it cannot be multicultural and vice versa. Because under multiculturalism each race/culture (excluding of course Whites of Christian stock) fights for its own, having little or no concern for the welfare of broader 'society'. Take the current contest for Mayor of London. It's between a Muslim and a Jew, who growl and snarl at one another like hyenas feasting on the mangy carcass of what had once been the world's greatest city and the embodiment of the British people. A people who can now but look on helplessly as the spoils of office wait to be dished out by one of the tribalists representing two very different forms of parasite - the brown/black welfare parasites (Sadiq Khan) and the financial parasites of the City (Zac Goldsmith).

Into this maelstrom stumbles ex-Mayor Ken Livingstone, saying two things. First that Israel is an apartheid state and second that, rather than exterminating them, Hitler originally had intended to deport Germany's Jews to Palestine. Cue an explosion of outrage excessive even by the usual Holocau$t™ standards. Leading the attack were the Blairites of his own party. In a stunt that further burnished his record as an opponent of  "anti-Semitism" (and a lucrative career after politics) John Mann called Kenny 'a disgusting Nazi apologist'. Even Sadiq Khan, after carefully weighing up the political pros and cons, treacherously turned on his ex-mentor and called for Livingstone's expulsion from the Party.

In the fusillade of abuse and condemnation one factor was (carefully) omitted: What KL said was true. Indisputably true. There's a mountain of evidence to show that the Nazis co-operated with Zionist leaders throughout the 1930's in working out a way to transfer Europe's Jews to Palestine. Even Benny Netenyahoo himself has ruefully acknowledged this. And yes, Israel is indeed an apartheid state, one whose laws and practices reflect to a remarkable degree those of the despised White regime in South Africa. (Don't get me wrong here. I support the Israelis, just a I did the White South Africans, in trying to separate themselves from the orcs.)

Anyway, major takeaway: Where Political Correctness reigns truth is no defense.

One final observation: Am I imagining it or has a subtle reappraisal of Hitler as 'the most evil man who ever lived' crept into public discourse? I detect nuances emerging everywhere. And were more people to take John Mann's advice  to read Mein Kampf  (the most evil book ever written) they would discover to their amazement that it says nothing about exterminating the Jews. Just as more than two years of Hitler's Table Talks fail to mention this dastardly plan.

Brings to mind Thomas Pynchon's line 'if they can get you asking the wrong questions they don't have to worry about the answers'.

The value of a vignette

Sometimes a brief vignette can provide a more profound insight than dozens of weighty tomes. Just as a great novel can explore the the human condition better than any psychiatrist (which isn't saying a lot admittedly).  As such this report encapsulates in its chilling simplicity the British polity's catastrophic decline over the last few decades.

Teenager Joe Taylor was flagged for political extremism by his school's deputy head after he used a school computer to click on the UKIP website. (Note that UKIP is a perfectly legitimate political party (for now anyway) that enjoys the support of about a quarter of the electorate). Joe had been researching immigration following a classroom discussion on the subject. Teachers called in the police on the basis that the kid had raised 'welfare concerns' by visiting a 'politically incorrect' (sic) website. And get this, he was referred to the police unit that specialises in preventing jihadi grooming of "vulnerable" youngsters (you know, the kind who go on to become enthusiastic beheaders).

I suppose we shouldn't be surprised when the English have put someone like this in charge of their law enforcement.

The Britain of yesteryear has been destroyed.  A peaceable, polite and reserved people once enjoyed probably the least oppressive society on earth, one policed by the friendly local bobby and where political freedom of expression was almost absolute. Like when HRH Queen Elizabeth II took over. This has by now degenerated into an Orwellian dystopia where a schoolboy gets hauled in by the police for what's essentially Thought Crime.

Meanwhile the orc invaders breed like streptococci.....

Hopeful signs in Britain?

Have we been too fast in dismissing the British General Election results as just more of the same? Probably not. But there have been a number of promising initiatives already from the new Government. For instance new laws to combat 'poisonous Islamist ideaology' (which infers there's also a non-poisonous version) are set to be included in the Queen's speech to Parliament.

And Britain has strongly rejected the EU's 'open the floodgates' initiative which forces European countries to accept quotas for the swarm of human locusts churning up the Med even as we speak. Writing for the London Times Home Secretary Theresa May in rejecting the proposals put her finger on the nub of the problem: That allowing the locusts in will only encourage the others waiting in Africa. All one billion of them. She added that 'some' of the migrants should be sent back. This should be stating the obvious but the Overton Window has now moved to the point whereby rejecting illegal immigrants is seen as outrageous.

Is all of this just posturing by oily Dave now that he's safely installed for another five years? Will he backtrack as is his wont?  Maybe. But the very fact that he is safe for another five years means that should he do that he's politically untouchable. And word is being leaked that the Lib Dems had spiked such moves during the previous Government's tenure. So maybe things might be looking up just a little bit. Also worth reading the interview with banished Ukip Parliamentary candidate Jack Sen. He confirms our worst fears, making clear that the Ukip leadership would unhesitatingly sell itself out to Jewish interests were critical mass to be achieved.

Ah well, plus ca change, plus c'est le meme chose and all that..

The more things change the more they really do seem to stay the same.|

The people have spoken. The bastards

So we now know the complete outcome of the British General Election which has given Cameron's Tories an absolute majority in Parliament, contrary to all expectations and poll predictions. The one bit of good news is the annihilation of Ed Millipede's Labour Party. Where will they find another Jew to replace him?  Much gloating in the MSM about the poor performance of Ukip and the fact that Leader Nigel Farage failed to get elected to Parliament where Ukip have but a single seat.

No question that the performance was a disappointment but it was nowhere as bad as the Parliamentary arithmetic suggests. Britain's first-past-the-post system provides a huge advantage to regional parties and the larger ones generally. To get a sense of this realise that Ukip got more votes than the Scottish National Party (SNP) yet got but a single member elected to Parliament whereas the SNP got no fewer than 56.  Grossly unfair...but the British were offered the alternative system in a referendum a few years back and rejected it.  So it's not all bad for Ukip given that in five years the party has gone from 3% to nearly 12% of the Parliamentary vote, from less  than a million votes to 3 million and - tellingly - second place in no fewer than 118 constituencies.

Many nationalists are now wondering whether Cameron ('there is no contradiction between being a proud Jew, a committed Zionist and a loyal British citizen') will honour his pledge to have an In/Out referendum on EU membership.  Personally I think he'll hold one as even as slimy a hypocrite as he wouldn't have the brass neck to renege on all his public promises.  But be assured that Britain will not be leaving the EU. Either the referendum options will be vague and non-binding and/or a No vote will be followed -  as we've seen in several other countries - by repeated referendums until the right answer is given.

One interesting result was that of George Galloway, head of the Respect Party, losing his seat  to Labour's Naz Shah (daughter of a murderess) in heavily Muslim West Bradford. In case you're wondering, the 'respect' that George's party has in mind is for the Religion Of Peace and its violent inbred adherents, and for the millions of African welfare parasites that plague the country. In the light of this you'd have expected George to romp home, given the demographic profile of his constituency.  Especially given that Labour were decimated in the rest of the country. But no. Defeated by an embarrassingly wide margin.

George is said to be devastated and humiliated and unable to understand why the Pakis and Bangladeshis rejected him, given all he's done for them. But I can explain.  You see George, in the multicultural society that you espouse, people come to vote for their own ethnic interests. This has been well established over many years. And no matter what you've done you're still a White kuffar. So they'll reject you and vote for their own. An expensive and devastating lesson.  Let us hope you, and any other would-be useful idiots, learn from it.

WW 1's Pearl Harbor

Next Thursday the Co. Cork town where I live will commemorate the centenary of the Lusitania sinking. Everyone knows the story: In flagrant contravention of established maritime warfare principles the fiendish Germans, cackling with glee as only Germans can,  torpedoed and sank a huge defenceless passenger ship with the loss of over 1,200 men, women and children. Contrary to established precedent the attack took place without warning.  (Hitherto submariners allowed those on board non-military craft the opportunity to launch lifeboats before firing their torpedoes.) But not this time.

I can imagine the high-level German representatives at the ceremony shifting uncomfortably under the accusatory glares of the other attendees. But as with this case the blame lies not with the Germans but with their enemies.

The case must be seen in the broader context of  the World War into which Britain desperately sought to embroil America. What better way to outrage the general public than murder over 1,000 innocent civilians? Just days before the sinking Woodrow Wilson's eminence grise, rumoured Rothschild agent 'Colonel' Edward House, met the British Foreign Minister Edward Grey.  House later wrote: "We spoke of the probability of an ocean liner being sunk, and I told him that if this were done a flame of indignation would sweep across America, which would in itself probably carry us into the war." The pair then met King George V who also raised the subject, asking 'suppose they sink the Lusitania, with American passengers on board?"

At all times following the sinking German claims that the Lusitania carried military ordnance (making it a legitimate target) were indignantly denied by the British Government and its shills. But the Germans had sent warnings throughout the USA prior to the Lusitania's departure. Their agents had identified various forms of munitions being loaded under the guise of ordinary cargo.

TRAVELLERS intending to embark on the Atlantic voyage are reminded that a state of war exists between Germany and her allies and Great Britain and her allies; that the zone of war includes the waters adjacent to the British Isles; that, in accordance with formal notice given by the Imperial German Government, vessels flying the flag of Great Britain, or any of her allies, are liable to destruction in those waters and that travellers sailing in the war zone on the ships of Great Britain or her allies do so at their own risk."

IMPERIAL GERMAN EMBASSY

Washington, D.C. 22nd April 1915

Were they right? Of course they were. Because, thanks to advanced diving technology the truth eventually emerged about thirty years ago with vast quantities of lethal ordnance found on the wreck and scattered about the adjacent ocean floor.

And what about the no-warning attack? More despicable lies. At the beginning of the U Boat campaign the Germans has adhered strictly to maritime convention, surfacing and allowing disembarkation to lifeboats. Even on occasion providing directions and sustenance. So what changed?   Enter war-mongering psychopath Churchill who, in flagrant contravention of every legal  and ethical norm had had commercial vessels secretly armed, the guns hidden under innocuous decking and/or cargo. This resulted in numerous U Boats being sunk with considerable loss of life. Naturally enough the warnings stopped after this.

In any event a very large boat like the Lusitania would under normal circumstances have taken about two hours to sink after being hit by a single torpedo.  But the Lusitania sank within 18 minutes.  Why? Because a massive second explosion - obviously caused by the on-board ordnance - blew away a large part of the hull, rendering any hope of rescue impossible. Several other deeply suspicious events are associated with the tragedy.  The British battle-cruiser Juno, patrolling the area for submarines, was inexplicably withdrawn shortly before the attack. Bear in mind that the Admiralty had cracked German codes and knew that subs were in the area. And to crown it all some of the rescue craft were recalled to Queenstown even when within sight of the struggling victims. After all, the more fatalities the better the propaganda.

One of the most disgusting aspects of the whole case was the deliberate scapegoating of the ship's Master, Captain William Turner.  The Admiralty's Richard Webb wrote to Lord Mersey, who oversaw the 'inquiry' "I am directed by the Board of Admiralty to inform you that it is considered politically expedient  that Captain Turner be prominently blamed for the disaster." How sick and cynical is that? And Churchill enthusiastically partook in the persecution of the unfortunate mariner who, though formally exonerated, never recovered and died a broken man.

We can thus say with confidence that the Lusitania can take its place with Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin and 9/11 as false flags enabled by evil men to widen and prolong vicious wars. And have no doubt there are more on the way.

So on Thursday next the standard pantomime (here's another one) will take place. Even through the truth has been forced out it has not really permeated the public consciousness. So  expect another bash the evil Germans scenario. And maybe even some hitherto undiscovered survivors, of the kind who keep miraculously popping up for Holocau$t™ reparations, will be wheeled out for the occasion.

The HebeBC anyone?

Today I have a quiz for you. Take a look at the guy on the left and try to work out whether he's more likely to be a descendant of  (a) legendary BBC founder Lord Reith, or (b) a pickpocket from the Baghdad Bazaar. Well done if you chose the latter. For Alan Yentob's parents were Jews who fled Baghdad - possibly with a furious horde of recently-bilked Muslims in hot pursuit - choosing England as their new host. Fast-forward a few decades and he's been magicked into what the London Independent describes as 'the guy who decides what you'll see on the BBC'.  You may well ask what accounts for his achieving this unique position at the apogee of British society.

We can all agree he didn't get it on his looks.('Would you buy a used car from this man?'). Nor on his journalistic integrity. You see he was caught faking interviews, possibly the gravest offence open to a TV producer. But far from ending his career, as it would had he been for example Lord Reith's grandson, he amazed everyone and actually got promoted instead. Really. This remarkable escape seems to have inculcated - with justification - a sense of invincibility as he subsequently awarded himself, on top of his salary as full-time BBC Creative Director, an additional £183,000 a year for presenting the Imagine programme. He also - somehow - has managed to acquire a pension pot worth £6 million. Not bad for a humble public servant, is it? And by the way it's apparently anti-Semitic, potentially leading to another Holocau$t(™)  to question any of this.

Maybe Danny Cohen can explain Yentob's otherwise inexplicable rise. Because Danny's own rise has been even more spectacular....to the very top position, Director Of Television. And at the tender and unprecedented age of 38. Everyone was astounded at this extraordinary appointment. Well almost everyone. What explains this meteoric rise? Well, earlier he had enhanced the Beeb's legendary international status with such artistic gems as Snog, Marry, Avoid (Objective: Improve 'slap addicts' by stripping them of their makeup and skimpy clothes), Hotter Than My Daughter (which I'll leave to your imagination) and best of all, Skins. This artistic tour de force followed the lives of Sixth Form (12th Grade) students and celebrated with them and their dysfunctional families as they drank, fornicated and vomited their way through the show. He also aired a tribute to the notorious paedophile Jimmy Saville even after his child-molesting became public knowledge.

All in the finest traditions of Lord Reith.

Danny also ordained - in response to an accusation of partiality - the BBC to be  'not neutral when it comes to multiculturalism and diversity'.  We'd never have guessed that, Danny. Strangely enough he doesn't do diversity and multiculturalism in his own life at all, going to Jewish schools and marrying a balabatish.  Maybe this is explained by the legendary Jewish trait of selfless altruism whereby he forgoes the benefits of diversity so that we goys can have even more of it. Or it could have something to do with the fact that Cohens are severely restricted in whom they can marry.

In fact Yentob and Cohen are by now the norm, not the exception as Jews predominate at the commanding heights of the "British" Broadcasting Corporation. We have or had at Controller level Janice Hadlow, Zai Bennett,  Richard Klein and Mark  ('I should have done more to make the BBC less white') Damazer;  executive board Member Marcus Paul (married to the daughter of Edmund de Rothschild), Tony Cohen, Alan Bookbinder (Head of Religion and Ethics, no less) Jenny Abramsky and former Director General the crypto Greg Dyke who on his appointment in 2001 described the Beeb as 'hideously White'. Check out Anthony Rueben as well, chosen without competition for the specially-created and very powerful post of Head Of Statistics. To ensure balanced reporting statistics. ROTFL!.

(Reader nilus has profiled correspondents and presenters in the last comment on this thread).

Maybe they should rename it the HebeBC.

So now this venerable British institution has been transformed into a Jewish-controlled propaganda outlet, a cesspool of  anti-White, anti-British, anti-Christian, anti-family and anti-male subversion. And all paid for by the subversion target - the British taxpayer. Bad enough in itself but, due in part to incompetent vibrants being shoehorned into every possible role, the standard of programming has also plummeted with endless re-runs of evil Nazi (shudder) 'documentaries' and copies of bottom-of-the-barrel American style dross. No surprise then that its viewers and listeners continue to desert it in droves.

Mark another one down in the Long March Through The Institutions.

Lord Reith must be turning in his grave.

A case of rats and sinking ships?

Hark!  What's that squeaking and splashing I hear in the background? Can it be the sound of rats deserting sinking ships?

Perhaps.

I ask because Trevor Phillips, one of the most astute and perceptive rats on board seems to be restless. For those of you who haven't heard of Trevor, well he is - or was - Britain's "Equality Czar". (And look, I'm not referring to the Trevor Phillips in Grand Theft Auto, FFS!). Arriving in Britain as a penniless teenager from the jungle swamps of Guyana it took him no time at all to identify the endless stream of White Man's goodies available to any black brandishing a Race Card. After getting the British taxpayer to fund his education he went from one lucrative public "service" sinecure to the next.  Never did a productive day's work in his life but in due course was appointed Chairman of the super-quango the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Here he (cough) 'earned' £130,000 per annum for three days a week 'service' and exercised control over a £70 million taxpayer funded budget.

Given his tribal origins this was like letting a fox into the hen house and Trev didn't take long to introduce Guyana-style governance to the Commission (whose staff is 70% minority - so much for equality) which became mired in corruption from the outset. A notable example was his awarding a contract to his buddy Samir for the sum of £300,000. This raised eyebrows. Unsurprisingly, as the estimated cost was £30,000 while the lowest bid was £12,000! But Trev brazened it out. Didn't bat an eyelid.  And then he came up with a really cracking wheeze. He directed the EHRC to harry and persecute any organisation deemed to be insensitive or insufficiently diligent when it came to equality. Especially racial equality.

But although persecuting them he also offered them a solution to their problem, a la Rev'unds Jesse and Al. He formed a private company (the Equate Organisation) that would - for a generous fee - provide equality and sensitivity training for the offenders. So as head of the publicly-funded EHRC he issued proceeding against an organisation. Then after a quick visit to the cloakroom he was back, this time wearing his Equate Organisation cap to make an offer they couldn't refuse. The conflict of interest was so blatant that even the pusillanimous Board of Directors rebelled and mass resignations followed. Despite this and the ensuing public furore he was nonetheless reappointed by that wicked witch Harriet Harman. (His initial success also enabled him to acquire a light-skinned Indian wife. But following his rise to the dizzy heights of the EHRC - and the plunder that came with it - he was able to trade her  in for an upmarket fully White one. The de rigueur status symbol for ambitious blacks.)

But this is just background and you can read in detail about his colourful commercial exploits here. And his explanation for the tsunami of corruption?  "I may have been 'naive'." Now there's one thing Phillips is not and that is naive.  In fact he's an unscrupulous conniving opportunist ready to leap onto whatever successful bandwagon emerges on the scene. And hence my earlier reference to rats and sinking ships . Because this guy has come out in the most trenchant way against multiculturalism and mass immigration.  Really gone in heavy on it. So I ask, does he sense an impending epochal shift? As he sniffs the social and political winds do his delicate quivering nostrils sense a dangerous restlessness growing among the natives? And is he positioning himself as the noble selfless black immigrant whose integrity forced him to ask the Questions-That-Cannot-Be-Asked?

Now admittedly he has raised similar views in the past....but still.

Watch this space.

'Multicultural society' is an oxymoron

The term 'multicultural society' is an oxymoron for the simple reason that being multicultural prevents its being a society as commonly understood. Instead what you get is a range of 'cultures' incompatible with one another to a greater or lesser degree. The resultant societal pathologies, which should have been apparent to anyone with a functioning brain cell, have been identified in a number of research studies like this one.

One of the basic requirement of any functioning society, and one crippled by multiculturalism, is the impartial administration of justice under a system of laws. This system inevitably degenerates into an ethnic and/or religious zero sum game geared towards ensuring that 'our guy' gets, not justice, but the benefit of any verdicts. Things got so bad in the USA that the Supreme Court felt compelled to create special rules for jury selection (the Batson Challenge). This in turn was driven by the repeated failures of blacks to convict a brudda even when the prosecution's evidence was overwhelming. Think O.J. Simpson and Curtis Vance.

In Wales we had the extraordinary case in which two footballers had sex with an inebriated waitress. They said it was consensual, she said it was not. Whatever. The extraordinary thing was that both admitted doing exactly the same thing to/with the girl yet the White guy was convicted (got five years jail) and the black one acquitted.  You see all it takes is a couple of jurors to vote against conviction for the defendant to go free.

And it's going to get worse in Britain as the pathology extends from juries to the Crown Prosecution Service itself which is getting taken over by immigrants from Third World cultures.......where Traditional Justice rules. For example in Pakistan, where many top CPS executives originated, a religious or tribal leader can, completely on his own initiative, order a woman to be punished by means of gang rape or have a Christian killed for 'insulting the Prophet'.  And now this guy's sons and cousins have taken over huge swathes of Britain's justice system.

Yes, The Long March Through The Institutions is proceeding at a brisk pace.

Bottom feeders take over

Does the increasingly brazen encroachment on and displacement of Whites in our own countries and the ever-diminishing range of dissent tolerated mean our destroyers have become supremely confident in victory..... or is it a sign of desperation?  This latest salvo tends to support the former explanation. It seems Third World bottom feeders now take it as a sacred right to not only usurp the commanding heights of our societies but to lecture us on how they now intend to impose their world-view on us.

In a scene unthinkable even a few decades ago we see someone who rejoices in the name of Faisal Islam proudly announcing his appointment as Chief Political Editor of media giant Sky News.  That in itself is bad enough. But as part of his pitch he takes it on himself to deface the national flag and redraw it to his own liking. That's right. A guy named Islam from a backward, medieval poverty-stricken hell-hole where children are sold into marriage and apostates from Islam executed...this guy has become the political filter for what may be the nation's largest news channel.

And as I pointed out here and here, the control of institution after institution in Britain is being handed over to Pakistani Muslims. You know, those people who are running the paedophile sex gangs all over the country.  If you go to the above links you'll probably think it's just as well for paedophiles that their fellow ethnics and co-religionists have their hands on judicial, administrative and now political power.

All of which tends to support my contention that our enemies are confident that we are in fact defeated. The only compensating factor is the thought of all those White right-on lefty libtard journalists (but I repeat myself) who keep losing out to the enrichers in all the juicy appointments. Suck it up, bitchez!

By the way, you've seen the Union Jack that Mr. Islam has redrawn.  Maybe he'd actually prefer this one?

A gripping tale of good and evil

Oft, when on my couch I lie, in vacant or in pensive mood I ponder how PC indoctrination can stray into the realm of self-parody. The cognitive dissonance so blatant that it can elicit only derision from anyone other than the most deluded.  Take for instance this advertisement from England's Crown Prosecution Service, an institution we spoke about quite recently and which England has in effect  handed over to Third World refugees.. Here they bring to us a gripping narrative which begins when Jerome, a dreadlocked half-breed 'yoof' witnesses a White man robbing a shop. Filled with the insatiable thirst for justice and righteousness which pulsates through the veins of every Nigerian he takes off in pursuit of the evil White man.

We don't get to find out whether he caught him or not but either way, in the one and only indication that relations between black yoofs and the law may not be one of unqualified harmony we see Jerome faced with a dilemma: Should he rat out a fellow criminal to the Old Bill testify in the imperial Courts of Justice or not?  His White (of course) girlfriend is unable to help, which we can impute to Whites' moral underdeveloped and all that.

Fortunately for the cause of justice he has a Nigerian mother who - of course - knows the right thing to do. Here's the pulsating narrative.

"I don't know what is going to happen, mum. I'm worried about what will happen to me if I tell what I saw."

But still, Mum took Jerome to the police station to report the robbery.

"Let's see what they can do to help."

"OK, I'll tell the police what I saw."

Don't know about you but I breathed a huge sigh of relief when I read that. And it made me realise once again what a blessing those intelligent and law-abiding Nigerians are to our countries. Surprisingly the CPS missed the opportunity to introduce your stereotypical African sperm donor father, you know, intelligent, monogamous, well-dressed and bespectacled, sporting a gentle and winning smile. But then that would have meant a same-race marriage, so I suppose they faced a bit of a quandary with that.

The rip-roaring tale continues with the appearance of  the prosecutor, female and of indeterminate ethnic origin. But look, I'm spoiling the story for you.  Read it yourself all the way through to its thrilling and unpredictable climax.

Meet England's top law enforcement executives

English Common Law and Statute Law, whose origins date back nearly 1,000 years, underpin the legal systems of the whole English-speaking world and indeed many other countries as well.  You'd imagine that the people who accomplished this, and who built an Empire on which the sun never set, would be capable of actually administering the system.

Apparently not, given that its top administrators derive from such exemplars of equitable jurisprudence as Nigeria and Pakistan. In this post I highlighted the bizarre situation whereby proud Pakistani Muslims had been appointed to the key positions in the battle against child sexual abuse while the main perpetrators came from  that very same community.


Here's Michael Fuller, the guy who heads up the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for England, who in his previous job insisted on being chauffeur-driven to work at taxpayer expense.  Isn't it amazing that there wasn't a single candidate from the people who actually developed the system........not a single one better suited than he for this vital position?

Maybe the explanation lies with his predecessor, 'Baroness' Scotland.  In effect she put him in the top law enforcement job, her selection rubber-stamped by a supine Parliamentary Committee.  Just as Obummer did with Eric 'My People' Holder.

But wait, it gets even better.  The research by Frank Galton (comment 9 September 2014 06:33)  reveals in detail that the rot goes much deeper and wider.  The descendants of the people who created the legal system are now an actual minority of its senior enforcement officers, and a rapidly declining one at that.

Monkeys guarding the bananas

The Rotherham sex scandal continues to surprise.  You think the awful facts can't get any worse but they just keep coming.

Peter McLoughlin and Gavin Boby in their report Easy Meat: Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery devoted a whole section of it to Barnardo's.  It  clearly demonstrates that Barnardo's knew for years what was going on. Not surprising given that they are in their own words  "the main provider of child sexual exploitation services in the UK". It will have encountered hundreds, if not thousands, of girls who have fallen victim to Muslim rape gangs. Some of these victims' stories are told in the Barnardo's report. But with one key detail mysteriously excised: the religious or ethnic identity of the perpetrators.
 Now who have Barnardo's, "the main provider of child sexual exploitation services in the UK", with more direct knowledge of child abuse problems than any other institution, who do they appoint as Chief Executive?  A fucking Pakistani Muslim.  A fucking Pakistani Muslim named Javed Kahn who goes out of his way, squirming, ducking, prevaricating and at times downright lying to deflect criticism of Pakistani Muslim child predators in this interview.

But it gets better. Who do you think the Crown Prosecution Service appoints as lead on child sexual abuse?  Another fucking Pakistani Muslim.  You could hardly make this stuff up.   And this guy, Nazir Asfal, who's been charged with prosecuting child abusers also goes out of his way to deflect attention away from the elephant in the room, the ethnic and religious connection. We learn that he is "unruffled by mounting media hysteria (sic) over the ethnicity of abusers in Rotherham.  He suggests stepping back and taking a wider view of the nationwide picture".  Oh, I believe him.  What should he be ruffled?  He'll deflect any questions by screaming 'racism' and 'Islamophobia' and he'll get away with it.  Yes he will.

How the hell have what are arguably the two most important positions for preventing child abuse been awarded to members of the ethno-religious 'community' that specialises in this very crime? (See this also). It goes without saying that there were many native British applicants for these posts.  But in each case they appointed those from a community notorious for its treatment of and attitude to child sex abuse as well as being a byword for corruption, extremism, filth and incompetence.

I wrote very recently here on the subject of vigilante justice.  I truly believe that this case and its broader implications demand exactly that.  The police, child 'protection' agencies, courts..in fact all relevant authorities not only failed to prosecute horrendous crimes but actually colluded in their cover up. In the absence of systemic root and branch reform - and there's no evidence of that - it's time that some of these sociopaths are found floating face down in the river Don.

Pour encourager les autres, you understand.

The truth is no defence

Of course the truth is no defence.  That is the whole basis of 'hate' legislation.  If you look into its origins, as I have done, you'll see that it was heavily driven by Jewish interests.  They may have been worried about blacks, gays and Muslims.   Maybe. But I have this uncanny feeling that, as with so much else, they were using these 'victims' as surrogates to head off criticism of themselves.  Oy vey, the sufferink!

Which leads me to UKIP's Zimbabwean-born decorator Andre Lampitt.  Andre is in deep deep dudu and has been suspended by his party for, well, for telling the truth.  George Orwell said something to the effect that in times of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

He also said that 'at any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas which it is assumed all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to state this or that or the other, but it is "not done"... Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with surprising effectiveness. A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing, either in the popular press or in the highbrow periodicals.

Now nobody will confuse the Daily Mail with a highbrow periodical but it has followed the prescribed point and splutter script to perfection. All the standard excerpts from The Outraged Liberal's Handbook are in evidence.  'Shocking comments', 'vile racist slurs', 'offensive' and so on.

And what did Andre say that provoked such foaming outrage?

'Described the Islam as ‘an evil organisation respecting a prophet who was a pedo’. CHECK.

'Milliband is not a real Brit. He's Polish'.  CHECK

'Most Nigerians are generally bad people'  CHECK

It's deeply reassuring to observe once again the dichotomy between the boilerplate 'journalism' and the reaction of the readers, who are almost entirely on the side of Andre Lampitt. They also clearly recognise this story as yet another crude attempt to blacken UKIP. So it could be that the party will actually benefit from this in that Lampitt resonates with the electorate while the party retains, cough, the moral high ground by officially distancing itself from his 'outburst. Of course it would have been better had they had the courage of their convictions and openly supported him but let us be glad for small mercies.

And if any of you Brits are getting your houses decorated be sure to give Andre a call. 

The dangers of bestiality

To what extent are White women who engage in inter-species sex to be blamed for the inevitable outcome? This question, an important one, has bothered me for some time. Sure, they ultimately make their own decisions, but remember they - and their parents - have been subjected throughout their lives to relentless 24x7 propaganda, rotting their minds and programming them to value those cool, clever, handsome and considerate black doctors, engineers and scientists we see all over the MSM.


But for the mudshark featured here I have little sympathy. Just take one look at the creature she took on as a mate and whose bastard spawn she now takes care of....at taxpayer expense of course. I'm reminded of Gem Junior's brilliant analogy to 'shark's eyes'.  Anyone going within 20 feet of this primitive biped, let alone become a birthing unit for his degenerate seed, must have known what was coming.  And if she was too stupid or self-destructive to realise it, then Darwinian extinction of her genes beckons. 

' Emma Hunt was gouged in the eyes, punched repeatedly in the face and had  ear almost bitten off by ex-boyfriend in horrific attack outside primary school while dropping off three-year-old daughter'. 

Such an outcome was predictable as day following night.

Our civilisation disappears before our very eyes.

The ideal man

I see that Keith Vaz MP has been to Luton airport to greet Britain's (and Ireland's) first batch of Roma immigrants due to swarm into the country under new immigration laws.  Why would he be the one, I asked myself?  But on reflection realised he was in fact the perfect one.

Consider:

() Like them his people originated in the Indian sub-continent

() He's spent almost  his whole life sucking the government teat

() Extraordinary sums of money pass through his bank accounts

() He's perverted the course of justice

() Made false accusations against law officers

() Fiddled his MP expenses and lied about it in Parliament

() In general has been mired in corruption, influence peddling and scandal all his worthless life

() Yet he survives, nay, thrives, despite all of this. He is often called Britain's most powerful crook Asian.

Now I ask you, could there possibly be a more inspirational figure to greet the new  army of parasites?

Was Quisling a quisling?

Very few people can be said to have had their name become a word in its own right in the English language. Captain Jimmy Boycott, of Co. Mayo, would undoubtedly agree were he still with us.  Vidkun Quisling has also lent his name to the language albeit in an altogether less flattering way. Quisling has come to refer to the lowest form of traitor, the kind who supports the enemy against his own country.

So what did the eponymous Quisling do to merit such a reputation?

Vidkun Quisling was a Norwegian politician (he served as Norwegian Minister of Defence) and quasi philosopher. His family were it seems warm and friendly and stayed close right  up until his death. He was a brilliant student at all levels. In the 1920's he undertook humanitarian work in the USSR to help ameliorate the effects of the notorious famines there and also worked on behalf of the Armenians. By all accounts he was a superb administrator and proved highly effective in offsetting what he came to see as the catastrophic effects of Bolshevism. He also provided diplomatic (and some say spying) services for Britain during this time.  His humanitarian work lead to his later being awarded the Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) by the King of England and similar recognition from the governments of Roumania and Yugoslavia.

Later after serving in a number of Governments his party seized power with the aid of Germany in the turmoil that ensued after WW II broke out.  While leader he worked diligently to broker peace between Germany and the Allies.  Later in the war he broke into tears when it became apparent that Germany had no plans to reinstate Norwegian independence. Towards the end of the war he did everything in his power to minimise Norwegian casualties, refused to sign any execution orders, risking his own life in the process. Once German defeat became inevitable he ordered forces under his command not to offer resistance to either the Allies or the internal resistance movement.

I've read a lot about his trial and, absolutely sincerely, believe it to have been an outrageous miscarriage of justice, featuring one trumped-up charge after another.  For example his death sentence was contrived under a law that was enacted half way through the war by the government-in-exile . (On the other hand one Maynard Cohen declared the trial to be a model of probity). All witnesses to his execution concede that he died bravely and fearlessly. His last words were, "I'm convicted unfairly and I die innocent. Within ten years I will be seen as another King Olaf'  (a legendary 11th Century Norwegian patriot)..

Sorry Vidkund, but The Narrative had been well established within that time and you were the designated  'bad guy'. 

So what exactly had he done to merit the ultimate fate, and his name becoming synonymous with treason?  Siding with the enemy?  Well, maybe. But you see Britain had violated Norwegian territory before Germany did. They knew that Germany desperately needed Swedish iron ore and were therefore equally desperate to stop its shipment. Towards this end they mined Norwegian territorial waters - an act of war against Norway - and had drawn up detailed plans for the invasion and occupation of that country.  Towards this end they had planned a false flag operation as a pretext to invade and  'protect' (on behalf of the Scandinavians of course!) the mines and shipping routes from  the Germans.  The Altmark Incident confirmed to Hitler that a British invasion of some kind was imminent and this is what lead to the German action. The Germans just beat the Allies to the punch.

Norway would be invaded by one side or the other no matter what the Norwegians wanted or did.

Had the British had got there first they would for certain have done exactly what the Germans did....i.e. install a puppet government to help them achieve their war objectives. What would have happened to their Quisling - the Good Quisling -  at war's end?  Well, we all know the answer to that, don't we children?  Compare and contrast Quisling with King Victor Emmanuel of Italy. This guy had worked with Mussolini and had earlier instigated invasions of numerous countries, which ultimately lead to tens of thousand of deaths. But - in the finest Italian tradition - yon king had the good sense to change sides when the WW II tide was turning. He ended his life in peace and luxury as did countless other mass murdering villains from that war.

As Talleyrand so well stated, treason is only a matter of timing. A couple of centuries earlier Sir John Harrington put the same concept to verse.

"Treason doth never prosper; what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

Note: Most of my material came from Hans Fredrik Dahl's Quisling: A Study in Treachery, which, as the title makes abundantly clear, was not sympathetic to its subject.  Other sources were also used. 

Don't know whether to laugh or cry...........

Sheffield City Council obviously has high hopes for its new Roma enrichers.

'Don't defecate or urinate on the street'
'Don't have sex on the street'
'Don't dump your rubbish in your neighbour's yard'
'Don't try to sell your babies'
'Don't shoplift'
'Don't rip out and sell the plumbing and other utilities from your taxpayer-provided housing'

Maybe the pictures shown here of a Roma settlement in Slovakia prompted the Council to issue these thoughtful suggestions.  If you think they're of Pakistan or India then it's because that's where these parasitic scumbags originated. And now they'll be swarming over the UK and Ireland in even greater numbers from next January as the already pathetic immigration controls are abandoned entirely.

We really have arrived at the apex of insanity where literally the lunatics run the asylum.

Want another example?

'We want to claim our streets back. Tensions are building here. We need to do something or it will be too late’. 

What's mad about that?  Well, the fact that it was uttered by one Kashmir Malik of Sheffield's Pakistani 'community'.  Yes, according to the Daily Mail 'the local Pakistani community association is running ‘official’ warden patrols between 8pm and 10pm every weekday with the intention of ‘educating’ the Roma population about ‘how to behave in England’.

'Our' streets............'how to behave in England'.

One's head spins. We descend deeper into the raging cauldron of insanity, of mass delusion as a nation self-destructs before our very eyes. We are the rats in the maze of this deranged experiment.  Sheffield in this instance is the petri dish. But listen. There's method to the madness.  It's an old totalitarian technique. Blatant and relentless cognitive dissonance, the absorption of one insane phenomenon after another, all serve to undermine the victim's (that's us) self-confidence, pride, dignity and by extension our capacity to resist. This tactic has been well established.

And what about this....... David Blunkett, a key member of the government that did more than any other to flood the country with the kind of people who build the kind of countries those same people are desperate to escape from........this guy warns that the area 'could explode into the ugly street warfare that broke out more than two decades ago'.  Words fail me.  Personally I'd take childcare advice from Casey Anthony before I'd take social advice from this decrepit horny old hypocrite.

Remember this, just in case the opportunity ever arises to roll out the tumbrels and bring these traitorous scum to justice.  They have waged an unrelenting war against the family, against the community, against tradition, against history, against wisdom and experience, against individuality, against ethics, against common sense, against classical aesthetics, against reason and statesmanship.

Against reality and human nature itself.

In Sheffield we can see at first hand the results of their evil machinations.  How cannot the great mass of people not see how they've had their country taken from them?  Is there any hope?

Confidence? Or fear?

The propaganda for destroying the White race becomes increasingly grotesque and surreal by the day. My question, does this represent 'their' belief that they've won and it's just a matter of putting the last nails in the coffin? Or are they getting desperate as more and more people appear to awaken? The latest advert from the Halifax Building Society is so divorced from reality that it makes Lord Of The Rings seem prosaic. It borders on self-parody.

Here we have a (to me) villainous-looking black man who 'works hard all day as a teacher' (sic) who then devotes his spare time to voluntarily coaching and minding school kids, who ruefully laughs off being deliberately hit on the head by the ball, and who finally, after a long long day teaching and looking after mainly white kids, arrives home to be greeted by his smiling and pregnant White wife/sperm bucket.

Now as anyone who has experience them knows, blacks don't like working very much, especially 'working hard', are most unlikely to work as teachers, and certainly would never volunteer for unpaid additional duties.  He'd have been more likely to be rifling through the kids' pockets in the changing room while a White teacher did the unpaid coaching. And had he deliberately been dissed by having the ball kicked at him, well the offending kid would probably have been lacerated by knife on the spot.  As for the pregnant White woman...........enough said.

So which is it? Confidence or fear?

Britain's (sic) most wanted tax dodgers

I see that HM Revenue and Customs have issued a list, complete with photos, of the 20 most wanted tax offenders. Now we all know the untold benefits that Britain gets from diversity and mass immigration.  Why PM Cameron never misses an opportunity to remind us.

I was astounded therefore to see that of the twenty specimens not one, not a single one, was British. They were from the usual Turd World hell holes and two were from Ireland. Well done lads, you make us all sooooooo proud. It seems most were given bail, allowed keep their passports, and, lo and behold, they skipped the country.  Another resounding triumph for the British legal system.

One disappointing aspect of the report related to the comments, almost none of which referred to the astounding fact that all of 'Britain's' most wanted tax cheats are non British.  Hopefully this reflects the activities of zealous moderators rather than the actual views of the readers.

In passing............

Not much to add to the story of the Woolwich murder apart from this. It seems ITV News has got hold of an email sent to troops which reads: "No uniforms are to be worn by any military personnel whilst walking out of unit/MoD locations in London and Greater London with effect now until further notice."

So here we have the nation that build an empire on which 'the sun never sets' ordering its own soldiers, on its own soil, not to wear their uniforms in public.  How much more degraded can that country become?  Terrorised by political correctness and a gang of knife-wielding thugs.

Meanwhile Cameron and 'Boris' bleat about the attack representing 'a perversion of Islam', yeah, right, while the MSM seeks every opportunity to shift the focus onto patriotic groups like the EDL.

Sad, sad, sad.