Thursday, 28 May 2020

BLM: The Bereavement process

To the roving bands of joggers, doctors and scientists currently mourning the loss of another innocent black man I outline below a simple bereavement process, one inspired by the former Baltimore Mayor's 'space to destroy' proposal.


On the news of such a death heart-broken mourners should:

1. Blame President Trump

2. Head to the nearest strip mall

3. Loot all shops and liquor stores apart from those identified as 'minority owned'

4. Burn down the buildings

5. Proclaim the subsequent absence of retail outlets to be structural racism

6. Demand the police be stood down

7. Attribute the subsequent spike in criminal activity to be the result of law enforcement abandoning black neighbourhoods

8. Flee en masse to White suburb


Tuesday, 26 May 2020

Unprecedented decline?

Not exactly an original topic on this blog but.....is the speed of the United States's decline from world supremacy to impending Third World status unprecedented in history? Seems so to me at least. Argentina - once with one of the world's highest per capita income - has certainly become Third World. But that took nearly a century and it never came even close to the preeminence achieved by the US. Believe me when I say that the US - assuming it stays United - is headed the same was as Argentina.

Consider:

() It's had a black President who kept all the loot for his own tribe and cronies

() A country that fights over the spoils on an ethnic basis

() A  country in which a President can order the killing of anyone he chooses without legal constraint

() A country whose Constitution is ignored as a matter of course

() A country with an increasingly militarised domestic police force

() A  country in which emails, phone calls and text messages can be intercepted without a warrant

() A country whose judges rule not on the basis of the law rather on their political and social preferences

() A  country with legislation (NDAA) that allows its military to arrest, imprison and torture without due process

() A country in which a bankrupt treasury debases the currency


What's so special about the USA's decline? To my mind it's resulted from marginalising the people who built the country to its former preeminence. In the younger age cohorts such people are now a minority. A minority whose traditions, achievements and culture are mocked and denied. Where so-called White privilege has been turned on its head. Whites, especially White males are now discriminated against at every stage of their lives. This is not just outrageously unfair but it also hastens national decline. Due to quotas, AA, and legal rulings on disparate impact, pivotal business and government agencies have become swamped with barely literate unqualified, corrupt, unhelpful and incompetent 'minorities', right up to the top levels. Meanwhile capable Whites, the kind of people who'd have produced world-class performance at those agencies have been downgraded and marginalised. 

As Plato said, 'this City is what it is because our citizens are what they are'. And America is what it is because its citizens are what they are. And what they are is increasingly Third World. Standards everywhere have been debased to the lowest common denominator to accommodate lazy and incompetent 'minorities'.

May I end with a quote from the great John Adams: Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

Friday, 22 May 2020

Ye hearte of Merrie England

In the hallowed traditions of never letting a good crisis go to waste the Covid scamdemic has inter alia been used to highlight the allegedly priceless contribution to Britain's health service by foreign-born staff. The message has been none too subtle: Only for us dusky folk you'd be in big trouble. Which is of course debatable. But even if only partly true it raises the question of how Britain came to be dependent on the kind of people who fled the hell-hole countries the same people made. Are we to believe the British to be incapable of operating their own health system? Obviously not, especially when almost all of those dragged before the Fitness To Practice Tribunal have names like Khan, Javid or Obasanjo.  No, Britain has become dependent due to the traitors who introduced open door immigration and affirmative action in both admission to medical training and then subsequent appointments.

But you'll be surprised to learn that Britain's ethnic minorities are not all single-mindedly devoted to the care and well-being of the country's ill. For instance for Birmingham's Holbrook Road The Birmingham Mail reports 'murders, stabbings, a fatal hit and run and -multiple muggings' in one year alone. Naturally the report discreetly avoids the ethnic dimension given that almost all Brits were driven out that street long ago. The Sun reports on 'death threats, arson, giant rats and animals slaughtered in the gardens' for the same street. They quote one resident, Jamil (what else?) "Once we saw people from our window - they slaughtered a full live sheep on our street and were having a BBQ with it in the back garden. 
Last time the fire was that bad that me and my neighbour's gates caught alight and we had to call the fire services. There's flies everywhere, dead mice, rats the size of cats running around - it's only since we got a cat ourselves that they stopped coming in our house. Even my daughter doesn't like to go into the garden, they throw out of date cans into our gardens like missiles and the local park is like a cannabis cafe. We're scared to leave the house, if you come down in the night, and see what goes on you will be horrified."

"It's just like Pakistan or Bangladesh" he added. Well no, he didn't actually.

In conclusion I ask you to look at the picture of the street below, presumably taken before enrichment. It is, or was, a quintessentially lower middle class residential area. I'm certain that when it was occupied by Brits it was neat, clean, quiet and lawful. Now it's been taken over by primitive ingrates whose sense of entitlement is matched only by their lack of entitlement. Import the Third World and you get the Third World. Those responsible should be tried for treason.

Wednesday, 20 May 2020

Judicial corruption - the canary in the coal mine

In a post last year I wrote that the relentless rise of judicial overreach has been one of the most remarkable and dangerous developments in recent decades. Judges now routinely re-define the law based on their political and social views rather than on constitutionally enacted legislation. In the USA the President and/or Congress are routinely thwarted nation-wide by obscure politically-appointed Federal judges in remote judicial outposts. The enforcement of immigration law has in effect been abandoned by the courts who base judgements on their personal preferences rather than on duly-enacted legislation. And given that such judges usually have names like Conchita, Shan'uikwa, Saul or Wang the verdict invariably blocks enforcement.

In the trail of wreckage left behind by the traitorous Tony Blair the introduction of the British Supreme Court might well represent a low point. This body has decided - and this was probably the intention ab initio - to arrogate to itself the running of the country. We saw that with the Brexit vote when the Supreme Court ruled that Boris Johnson 'had no good reason' to prorogue Parliament. Just like that, reversing 180 degrees the ruling of a lower court. And the great thing about being a judge is that you're never accountable for your actions. Release a criminal lunatic who immediately goes on to murder again? Not our problem. In one case the Court ruled that a paedophile refugee could not be deported to his native Zimbabwe despite being in no danger there because it would “not be fair”.  


Well in that case why not get rid of  Parliament altogether and let the courts decide everything? Because if judges can decide to overrule Parliament because they personally think a law is unfair then there's no point in having a legislative assembly, is there? Another Zimbabwean criminal (or is it the same one? - No shortage of black jail-bait in Britain) successfully argued for the right to remain in Britain so long as his home country could not provide him with the same expensive, taxpayer-funded HIV medication as the British National Health Service (NHS). The potentially catastrophic impact on the country's immigration and health services? Not our problem say the judges. Power without responsibility, the prerogative of the harlot since time immemorial.

And I wonder what will happen with Creepy Joe Biden in the light of his Ukrainian corruption? In essence he's heard on a recorded phone conversation with the then Ukrainian President requesting the firing of that country's Chief Prosecutor in return for $1 billion of American aid. This would be the same Prosecutor who was investigating Biden's coke head son for corruption at the time. The Prosecutor was fired. And Ukraine shortly afterwards got their money. Some people claim that you can't be sure that such a recording was genuine. Maybe so but as most of us know Biden has already admitted to doing exactly what the recording suggests he did. So will the Feds break down his door and haul him away for interrogation like they did with for instance Roger Stone? What do you think? In the unlikely event that he gets his collar felt I'll bet he'd hope to face that affirmative action negro presiding over the General Flynn  scandal. Da' judge be sayin' dat he tink Joe be ok, case dismissed.

Corrupt courts invariably reflect a polity in terminal decline. On reflection, maybe that's not a bad thing.

Sunday, 17 May 2020

The new Red Guards

Just finished Wild Swans, over 700 pages of densely-packed print but a real page-turner nonetheless. It traces the experiences of a Chinese family spanning three generations up to the late nineties. The author's description of life during Mao's Cultural Revolution was particularly harrowing. And instructive because of the similarities between what happened then under the Red Guards and is happening now under the Woke Generation.

Guilt was no longer determined by the rule of law, the presumption of innocence (such as it was) abandoned. Replaced by mob denunciation arising from a perceived lack of ideological purity, or something you said a long time ago, or being once seen in the company of somebody now out of favour. Just like today in the West ritual denunciation was followed by grovelling confessions - which were never enough. In fact as we see with today's "liberals" such grovelling - for some reason - seems only to elicit even greater fury, fuelling demands for re-education but with no guarantee of rehabilitation. Humiliation was a powerful weapon, breaking the spirit of even the most resilient. And the more truthful and accurate the defence the more frenzied became the torment, reminding us of Orwell's "The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it".


Mao's stated objective was to destroy The Four Olds:  Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas.  Add in the systematic undermining of the family unit, religion and personal loyalty, the lack of privacy and an absolute adherence to the Party Line and his programme takes on chilling similarities to what we see now in our own countries. And worse is headed our way.  Unless meaningful opposition arises. [To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.” - Dr George Brock Chisholm, who served as the first Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) from 1948 to 1953]

I'll leave you with a final thought: Mao's main instrument of tyranny was not the police, the army or the intelligence services. He controlled the most powerful enforcer of all: The people themselves. The Cultural Revolution turned the Chinese people into the enforcers of their own repression. Neighbour ratted-out neighbour, even family members ratted one another out. Do I hear you say something about pandemic lock-down? The 17th Century English philosopher Thomas Hobbes saw even back then that absolute power comes less from an imposition from above and more through people willingly giving up their own freedom in the face of some real or imagined threat.

Saturday, 16 May 2020

Which group leads in the Victimhood Olympics?

I’ve been thinking lately about the hierarchy of victims. As every university undergraduate learns within weeks of arriving, everyone is a victim – apart of course from straight, white Christian males. But who are the top victims? 

Up to a few decades ago Jews almost had the title to themselves, but even they don’t have the chutzpah to claim they’re downtrodden victims today. In any event they’ve cornered the genocide/holocaust market and can trot this out any time a new genocide/holocaust is imminent (e.g. if there’s talk of reducing US aid to Israel or Palestinians getting their own state).

Women have had a great run, most definitely displacing blacks from the top rung for a while. But again, who can seriously claim victimhood status for them? Polar opposite, they’ll clean out men in a divorce, any complaint of sexual harassment will be accepted and the unfortunate able-bodied straight white Christian male gets the book thrown at him. They’re promoted way beyond their capabilities in every organisation, and have been forced into those where they have no business whatsoever (military, police, fire fighters).

Despite having hairy-chested foul-smelling dykes like Andrea Dworkin leading their cause, Perverts United (gays, lesbians, trans-sexuals) have been climbing the table strongly in recent years. They’ve surpassed females for sure. Attacks by blacks on Whites will be ignored or explained away by the chattering classes. Unless it emerges that the victim is part of the sexual freak alphabet soup. Then all hell breaks loose. Straight women have been passed by Perverts United and also by blacks. Just notice the reaction, or rather lack of same, when a White woman gets attacked by blacks.

So who takes the top spot, the kings of victimhood? It’s got to be Muslims. Look, most of the groups I've mentioned do have some claim to victimhood - they’ve all been kept down to one degree or another at some time. But it’s hard to imagine a less likely collection of victims than violent, intolerant, misogynistic, undemocratic, homophobic, genital mutilating, head and hand cutting, polygamous, child bride-fucking Muslims.

Yet they get a free pass on everything. They’re constantly ‘offended’ by everything and anything in Western Civilisation, and we bend over backwards to remove even the perception of such offence. When they hang homosexuals in Iran, or cut the heads off adulterers in Saudi Arabia, or when a young girl becomes an honour killing victim in the west, the chattering classes and the other victim groups are silent.

So for those reasons Muzzies get my coveted Top Victim award.

Do you agree?