Sunday, 13 October 2019

Sweden's busy sexual assault police

Something very strange going on in Sweden, the Land Where Women Rule. According to their crime statistics institute (appropriately named Bra "Almost a quarter of the population chooses a different route or another mode of transportation as a result of anxiety about crime... Among women aged 20-24, 42 percent state that they often opted for another route or another mode of transportation, because they felt insecure and worried about being subjected to crime. Young women in the 16-24 age category have seen a massive increase in sexual harassment. The number of sexual offences against this group has seen a surge from 7.1 percent in 2006 to 34.4 percent in 2017."  [Side note: In Scandinavia virtually all rapes are committed by Africans and/or Muslims.]

But the sexual assault police are working on it. Look how this go grrrrlll all-female unit takes down an Afghan criminal with brutal and ruthless efficiency (start about one minute in). And there's more! The cops have issued a Three-Step Rape Prevention Process (it's on the web somewhere, I've seen it) which demonstrates a keen understanding of the African and Muslim mindset. So when the would-be rapist lunges the woman's first response is to put one hand straight out (palm outward-facing) while saying 'No!'. In the unlikely event that this fails to deter the tumescent attacker she's then to put out both hands while saying 'No!' even more emphatically. If he still persists - and it's hard to believe he would after all that - the woman is instructed to hit him with her handbag! 

So why are they still they're afraid of being raped?

Well maybe Mikaela Blixt can explain. After a man attacked her in the street and tried to rape her, the police did nothing, even though she knew where her attacker lived and could easily have identified him. The Swedish mainstream media outlet, Expressen, wanted to interview her, but only on condition that she not mention that her attacker was an Afghan migrant.  Surprisingly this attack took place in a remote farming community.  Surprising because diversity is, for now anyway, largely confined to Sweden's urban areas and also you'd imagine there'd be enough sheep and goats around there to satiate even the most romantic Afghan. In any event "the police refused to send a patrol because the crime was not ongoing. She was referred instead to 114 14 where she ended up in hour-long telephone queues".  Unless my Google Translate is way off, then you read that right. So while you're getting raped in Sweden you must, if you want the police to help, manage to extract your phone, ring the help line and provide an approximate estimation of when the attack will finish. If the police can't get there within that time frame then, well, you'll be in Mikaela Blixt's position.

Why are the sexual assault police so slow to respond, especially when their numbers have almost doubled in the last ten years? Well maybe they're all busy stitching up Julian Assange. Vague accusations of sexual assault lead to an explosion of police and prosecution activity and man woman-years of background work, as prosecutors took his case up to the highest levels of Government in order to get an extradition order from Britain. Contrast that with the handing of the Mikaela Blixt case where nothing was done even though she (Blixt)  knew where the rapist lived!

I've said it before: We're living in The Matrix.

Thursday, 10 October 2019

The threat of judicial overreach

The relentless rise of judicial overreach has been one of the most remarkable and dangerous developments in recent decades. Judges now routinely re-define the law based on their political and social views rather than judge on the basis of constitutionally enacted legislation. In the USA the President and/or Congress are routinely thwarted nation-wide by obscure politically-appointed Federal judges in remote judicial outposts. The enforcement of immigration law has in effect been abandoned by the courts who base judgements on what they think is best rather than on duly-enacted legislation. And given that such  judges usually have names like Conchita, Shan'uikwa or Wang the verdict invariably blocks enforcement. In one truly bizarre example a judge determined that a law was invalid because the legislators 'had not spent adequate time in framing it'. So judges now decide the legislative agenda as well?

The recent Brexit Parliamentary prorogation ruling from Britain's Supreme Court illustrated how judicial 
overreach can have real practical implications at the highest strategic levels. In admitting that 'this was a once-off case' Justice Hale virtually admitted that the law was being selectively interpreted to arrive at a pre-ordained verdict. The almost contemptuous dismissal of the prior Divisional Court judgement makes you wonder how two sets of senior judges could arrive at diametrically opposite verdicts. And while the judgement takes pains to assure that it was not passing judgement of Boris' motivations - which would be ultra vires (see how I'm getting into the swing of this legal thingy?) - they let the cat out of the bag later by admitting that he had 'no good reason' to prorogue Parliament. Blatant judicial overreach.

True to form Tony Bliar and New Labour had a major hand in these developments by establishing the British Supreme Court and by incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights into British law. As we know, so-called human rights and 'hate' legislation is framed in such vague and loose terms that its enactment ineluctably transferred power from Parliament to the Courts. And facilitates politically convenient verdicts.  In doing so Bliar also set up a lucrative 'human rights' practice for his ghastly wife Cherie.

All of this has major ramifications.  As Saul Alinsky, the Frankfurt School, Gramsci and even the Protocols Of Zion all recognised, regulatory capture is the key to power.  We've seen the extent to which free speech has already been curtailed in Britain and it's only going to get worse. In an article in The Spectator some time ago a would-be judge discovered that to be successful he'd not only have to commit to supporting 'diversity' but would have to demonstrate the practical measures he had already undertaken to support it. This is judicial capture, pure and simple. The scary thing is that any counter-measures undertaken by elected representatives can be deemed 'unconstitutional' by the courts and thus rendered void.

Either George Bernard Shaw or Oscar Wilde accurately observed that all professions are conspiracies against the public. Yet any questioning of the courts is described as ‘undermining the rule of law’. The rule of  lawyers would be more like it. Shakespeare had it right: 'First kill all the lawyers'. The Bard saw the dangers hundreds of years ago.

Monday, 7 October 2019

Darker forces at work

Boy, things must be bad in Ireland when the Government is withdrawing a measly €30 per week allowance from disabled workers.  The Minister for Health has defended the axing of a grant paid to people with disabilities on some training programmes. The move to cease the €31.80 per five-day week payment from September 1st has been criticised by social workers and Opposition TDs. Describing the move as a “callous act affecting those most vulnerable and most in need of disability supports”, Donegal Independent TD Thomas Pringle claimed it was motivated by the need to save money.  But the measure, estimated to affect about 400 people, will yield less than €1 million in savings annually.

This represents just one of a wide range of Government support cuts spanning health, education, home support for the elderly and much more. Even the supposedly ring-fenced contribution to the Rainy Day Fund has been abandoned due to fiscal constraints. But the politicians were nonetheless able to conjure up nearly €11 million to fund a range of "Gender Equality and Migrant Integration" projects. The migrant integration projects will provide a range of practical supports directly to migrants, including English language classes and workplace training. Anti-racism and cultural diversity initiatives will also receive funding. The gender equality projects will support women’s entrepreneurship and participation in the workforce through a range of training and mentoring initiatives. In other words get mothers out of the home, the stated primary objective of this freak to whom we've handed over responsibility for children and the family.

In that referenced post I asked whether I was paranoid in thinking greater forces were at work influencing Irish Ministers to make such decisions. In it I described Irish politicians as nonentities, without convictions, whose only interest lies in ensuring their continued place on the gravy train through re-election. Taking training money off the disabled and giving it instead to migrants assuredly does not help with this. So why do they go along with it? Stronger and darker influences are at work here,

Friday, 4 October 2019

Another Misunderstander Of Islam strikes

Where's Inspector Clouseau when you need him? Because the famous bumbling French detective could hardly do worse than the Paris police investigating the recent mass killing at their HQ. They're totally baffled as to the killer's motive.

INVESTIGATORS ARE COMBING an IT staffer’s computer today for clues as to why he stabbed four colleagues to death at police headquarters in Paris. The 45-year-old man killed three men and a woman in a frenzied 30-minute attack that ended when he was shot in the head. A search of the couple’s house found no evidence that the man, who converted to Islam about 18 months ago, had been driven to his criminal deed by radical religious ideology. Shortly after the killings, Paris prosecutor Remy Heitz said anti-terror investigators were not involved in the murder probe. All possible motives were being examined, sources have said, including the scenario of a personal conflict at work.

Which probably means that the sleuths failed to find a statement from the killer (a black immigrant from Martinique) explicitly stating 'in the Name of the all-merciful Allah I will go in to work in the morning and and stab everyone I can find'. Therefore nothing to do with the Religion Of Peace. Just another Misunderstander Of Islam. He must have thought that when the Koran enjoined him to 'Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them' (Qur’an 2:191) 
the 'sacred' text meant, well, kill the unbelievers wherever you find them. And like most misunderstanders he seemed, apart from the mass murdering bit, to have been a swell guy. According to a fellow worshipper “he was a very quiet person. I used to see him going to the mosque but he practised (his religion) in a normal way” . Well he sure did, didn't he? And remember Jihadi John, the notorious 'English' head-chopper for ISIS? He'd been described by his imam as 'a gentle, spiritual boy'. Indeed.

So what's to be done? Well I believe I have a solution. Reinterpret the sacred texts in the light of latest thinking and research. You know the way Pope Francis reinterpreted the Bible to mean that homosexuality and all kinds of degeneracy are fully in accord with that book's teachings. I've been working hard and this is the result to date. I seriously believe that when complete it has the potential to eliminate mass murders stemming from misunderstanding the Religion Of Peace.

My initial attempt.

Quotation: "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.” Qur’an 9:123
Scholastic reinterpretation: "Make friends with your infidel neighbours". 

Quotation: Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam” Qur’an 5:33
Scholastic reinterpretation: "All discussion on religion should be open and tolerant."

Quotation: “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water;melt their skin and bellies.” Qur’an22:19
Scholastic reinterpretation: We're working on that one. But meanwhile lads lay off the hooks and rods and melting bellies and all that stuff.

So gentle reader, do you think it'll work?

Wednesday, 2 October 2019


Pointing out the fallacies of feminism is as easy as shooting fish in a barrel. But it's worth examining the implications of today's movies and advertisements which feature a powerful kick-ass women juxtaposed against a dopey (and invariably White) male. In effect what they're promoting is masculinity. Except that women are the vehicle. The 'virtues' of the New Feminine Lead are essentially masculine. Tough, strong, unsentimental, capable of extreme violence as and when necessary. 

They're conceding that masculine qualities are superior. Which is why the female lead is in practice a man. But without the male appendages. Even more paradoxical is the fact that the heroine (are we allowed to use that word any more?) is invariably represented as scantily-clad and sexy: The very things feminists are supposed to be against. You know, objectifying the female body and all that. And by portraying the men as weak and incompetent you'd have to ask whether they can see women as superior only when set against such men.

To what extent are the feminist war-boars being used by a greater power? I'm no expert on the subject but a lot of the agenda strikes me as Satanic Inversion which includes inverted symbols such as crosses and pentagrams and of course the broader inversion of good and evil. Just look at what's seen as good today (every kind of sexual perversion, transgenderism, full-term abortion) and what's evil (motherhood, national, cultural and ethnic pride....). Baphomet, an important Satanic deity is a man with the breasts of a woman. (In 2014 The Satanic Temple commissioned a statue of Baphomet in Oklahoma). The Black Mass is of course the ultimate expression of Satanic Inversion.

In any event something is happening. The process of societal degeneration is progressive at breakneck speed. It's like as if the world is approaching the edge of a cataract. 

Could this be the explanation?

Sunday, 29 September 2019

The mask falls, the gloves are off

It's been perfectly obvious to anyone paying attention with an open mind that war had been declared on the White race, with particular focus on straight White males.  Who has declared this war? The Satanic (and I don't use that word lightly) architects of the globalist NWO. Globohomo. Its goal is the destruction not just of the White male but also of nationalism, tradition, the family, freedom, beauty, truth and personal accountability. Their weapons include feminism, sexual degradation, Third World invasion, negrolatry and Holocaustrianity. Up to fairly recently that war paid at least lip-service to the Geneva Convention as it were. They professed to operate within the confines of democratic discourse and the rule of law. Such restrictions have now been thrown to the winds reflecting desperation or, more likely, confidence that globohomo can now get away with anything. 

There are countless examples to support my thesis but I'll cite what I call The Project To Disarm Law-Abiding Whites. Because that's what it is. The whole gun control campaign is based on lies as I showed in this post. In a nutshell bad guys can always get their hands on guns, gun deaths have been in decline for some time, international and (American intra-national) comparisons prove that there's no correlation between gun ownership and the rate of gun murders (negative correlation if anything), while suicide represents 80% of gun deaths for Whites. 

These facts of course haven't deterred globohomo which continues to whittle away at the Second Amendment, first by restricting certain types of gun, second by restricting gun rights for certain individuals as embodied in the proposed Red Flag legislation.These so-called extreme risk protection orders authorise removing guns and ammunition from individuals deemed as dangerous by some anonymous, unaccountable person or persons.Given that black and Latino gangs cause the vast bulk of gun killings in the USA you'd imagine that restrictionists would see the existing gang databases as manna from Heaven. That is, if their objective really was to restrict gun deaths and not to disarm law-abiding Whites.“The majority of violent crime, including gun violence, in the United States is linked to gangs,” said Rep. Ken Buck. “My amendment is quite simple. It would allow the issuance of a red flag order against anyone whose name appears in a gang database if there was probable cause to include that individual in the database [my italics].” 

Sounds like a no-brainer. But globohomo Democrats vetoed the amendment. And with that rejection went the pretext that the agenda is not just about disarming law-abiding Whites. Whether the legislation goes through or not is secondary. Whites should now realise that they are being not alone discriminated against and displaced in their own lands but that there's an active agenda to render them powerless before certain minorities and militarised law enforcement officers.

Scary stuff.

Thursday, 26 September 2019


The media chattering classes are so insulated from reality, thanks to Stasi-like censorship, that they frequently descend into unwitting self-parody.  Real-life Titania McGraths. Look at this from a Guardian journalist - an oxymoron if there ever was one. Especially when said journalist is an affirmative action female from Nigeria. Logic, consistency and self-awareness are not to be expected from such people. But the following still takes some beating.

Apparently women's magazines have succumbed in reassuring numbers to the 'get woke, go broke' fate. Readership has plummeted and many household names have disappeared down the tube. "Cosmopolitan saw its print circulation drop by a third in the last half of 2018; weeklies Woman and Woman’s Own were down 20% and 19% respectively. Now magazine dropped 43%." Now get this: "The closure of Teen Vogue’s print publication was met with widespread outrage, after we had watched the magazine mature into a politically engaged tome for pubescent readers who cared about fashion, but also wanted to ensure that the climate crisis hadn’t scorched the world in which it could exist." Oh ma' achin' sides!  "Although glossy magazines are the worst affected, online women’s publications have not escaped – the Debrief and the Pool suffered the same fate. The closure of Lena Dunham’s email-based Lenny Letter showed that even a famous CEO and acclaimed writers couldn’t ensure a publication’s longevity."

And this: "The sad thing is that the current purge" - yes, she actually wrote that word - "is happening at a time when women’s magazines are less sexist and more progressive than they ever have been.  Last year’s September issues made history with virtually every one featuring a black cover star." After which it went bust. For the life of me I can't imagine why.

To such people hearing views not conforming to their own would be like the family dog giving his opinion on Brexit. Then again maybe some day they'll get their pin-heads around this whole 2+2=4 thingy. But in the meantime we should rejoice and capitalise on their unfathomable ignorance and blindness. They represent a target-rich environment.