Wednesday, 19 February 2020

Where's Larry Silverstein when you need him?

Did you read about that botched high-rise demolition job in Dallas? It was a right mess, with one whole section of the building left standing at an odd angle even after all of the charges had ignited. This lead some wags to describe it as the Leaning Tower Of Dallas. The head of the demolition company explained that the outcome of a controlled demolition is 'never certain'. Which must have had Lucky Larry Silverstein shaking his head in bemusement. Because Larry was the one you'll recall who gave the 'pull it' order for WTC 7 and within minutes the building, nearly five times higher than the Leaning Tower Of Dallas, gently glided to the ground in perfectly symmetrical free-fall.

'What a job the WTC 7 crew would have done on that' he must have observed wistfully. Adding 'or maybe all they had to do was sprinkle some paraffin oil on the top floor and light it. Then sit back and watch the symmetrical fall'. As a successful property developer it must break his heart so see such inefficiency. 

Now let's just hope that America doesn't launch a war of retribution against, well, Putin. Or maybe Iran. Or some other enemy of Israel.

Tuesday, 18 February 2020

Globalism's Baron Of Bullshit

To this day my first real job remains a source of embarrassment. No, I wasn't pimping out my sister to sailors. It was worse. I was an economic forecaster. Yes, my company based its medium and long-term production plans on my predictions for the economy. (The firm has since gone bust - pure coincidence I assume). My predictions were based on diligent research, cogently argued. And invariably wrong. Sometimes spectacularly so. These failures affected me deeply, driving me away from economics and into this new-fangled computer thingy where, unbeknown to me, a glittering career awaited.

I contrast my reaction to those of other economists whose confidence seems to swell proportionally with every disastrously wrong forecast they make. Those who reassured us in the Summer of 2008 that the Irish banks and economy were among the strongest in Europe (within months we ended up with the worst bank crash in our history and years of economic decline) are still there, undaunted by their endless fiascoes, still confidently telling us what's coming next. However they all fade into obscurity compared to that old favourite of mine, the Emperor Of Error himself, Paul Ehrlich. According to him we should by now be frolicking in the tepid seas of Svalbard or basking underneath its whispering palm trees. warming. Or then again maybe not. Because he also warned us back in 1971 of a new Ice Age, an Age so terrible that “by the year 2000 the United Kingdom will be simply a small group of impoverished islands, inhabited by some 70 million hungry people … If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000.”

That's assuming that any of us would actually be here at all. Because in a commentary on the massive bestseller that made him a science rock-star he confidently asserted back in 1971 that “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.” [His English is as lousy as his science]. And that in total some 4 billion people, including 65 million Americans, would perish in the “Great Die-Off.” His 1975 pronouncement that India could not possibly feed two hundred million people will surely come as a surprise to the 1.2 billion now living there. And for good measure he assured us that 'by 1980 all animal life in the sea will be extinct" and that the world's oil would be gone by 2010.
I'm serious when I say that a Mystic Meg or Paul the Octupus would provide more reliable prognostications than would this fraud. Had his handlers asked Paul - the Octupus - (now sadly with his Maker) about the “Great Die-Off” he'd have reached out from his tank and throttled the questioner for wasting his time. You'd imagine then that, given his record, the other Paul would be somewhat circumspect, quietly retiring to spend more time with his family. Or simply come out with his hands up admitting 'ok, I'm a fraud, a charlatan, I've been wrong about everything. I'm the Baron of Bullshit'. But not a bit of it! He's still going strong. Fairly recently his warnings that Australia would become a Third World country due to its mining practices were widely and reverently reported by the media. He has dismissed in very unscientific terms those who disagree with him as  "idiots," "fools," "morons" and "clowns" even though they were right and he was wrong. No lack of confidence there.

But why would anyone with the following awards be modest? Gold Medal from the World Wildlife Fund, The Swedish Academy Of Sciences' highest award, The UN Environmental Prize, the Eminent Ecologist Award of the Ecological Society of America, The Distinguished Scientist Award of the American Institute of Biological Sciences and many, many more. And he's been, wait for it, Professor of Population Studies of the Department of Biology at Stanford University since, well, forever.

So what could account for the seemingly inexplicable success of this globalist supporter of One-World Government, the NWO and immigration 'reform' (White countries only)? 

Whoops, have I answered my own question?

Friday, 14 February 2020

When is violent resistance justified?

Allow me to paint you a scenario and at the end I'll ask if you a question on it.

There's this powerful prosperous country, operating under the rule of Constitutional Law and a highly-representative form of democratic politics. It's 90% mono-racial with the races largely keeping to themselves in relative harmony. It has a strong sense of nationhood, taking pride in its history and accomplishments. But over time a new race begins to appear in ever-greater numbers, Almost indistinguishable from the majority, this race ostensibly 'comes in peace' but secretly plans to destroy this polity with the aid of treacherous, venal and beguiled natives. The plot is all too successful and eventually the country's traditional people find themselves staring into the abyss of minority
status having been manoeuvred into the loss of their political, judicial and currency systems, their borders, media, the right to self-segregate. For all practical purposes they've lost the right of redress through peaceful political means. To crown it all they face a determined attack on their Constitutional right to defend themselves against (increasingly likely) armed attack.

So my question is this: In such a set of circumstances would the traditional population have the right to engage in armed resistance against their Government?

Now we all know what I'm talking about here and some may see my characterisation as exaggerated. They'll say that Americans had the voting power to have blocked this at any time. Well the right to vote in itself conveys little power as we saw with the old Soviet block where the whole adult population was enfranchised. Even 'opposition' candidates and parties were tolerated. But only if they operated within a narrow policy spectrum. Same with America. Just ask Pat Buchanan what happens when you stray off the park. You don't have to send troublesome opponents to Siberia or shoot them in order to neutralise them.

Real democratic politics can operate only in the context of balanced access by competing interests to the organs of information. Or propaganda if you will. These include education and the full spectrum of news and entertainment. If these become dominated by one faction democratic decisions get based on partial and tendentious information, which in turn leads to tainted voting outcomes. I'm only speculating here but if completely free and open elections were held today in North Korea Dear Leader would probably get elected despite the unimaginable suffering he's imposed on his unfortunate subjects. And if I'm right they'd have done it because they've been marinated in a propaganda fantasy from the day they were born. How different is that from America today? Remember in even in the most advanced democracies most people get their news and opinion from mainstream media. Those that dig deeper in a sceptical way account for but a small minority.

So what about Constitutional safeguards? Well they're only as good as the courts that administer them. And if the courts rule that the framers of the American Constitution deemed same-sex marriage a fundamental right then you know you've lost the game. In fact in most White countries today courts legislate from the bench in flagrant violation of Constitutional separation of powers. And in America the courts are almost uniformly hostile to the interests of straight, White Christian males and the traditional family. Although there has been some push-back under Trump the court system today remains Occupied Territory.

Consider the three most important pieces of legislation supporting the project to dispossess American Whites. The stated objective of Brown v. Board of Education was to end segregated education - despite the fact that this clearly was not prohibited by the Constitution. Nonetheless, in the most flagrant violation of legal ethics the 'renowned' Justice Felix Frankfurter and fellow Jew Philip Elman, who was presenting the case to the SCOTUS!, worked together and connived to get the legislation passed. As Paul Craig Roberts and Lawrence Stratton show in The New Color Line: How Quotas and Privilege Destroy Democracy the decision had no basis in Constitutional Law. Even the New York Slimes admitted it was “A Sociological Decision: Court Founded Its Segregation Ruling on Hearts and Minds Rather Than Laws.”

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited racial discrimination in public accommodation and private employment but only in under very specific conditions. However over time the law was transformed by bureaucrats and judges into a hiring quotas and racial preferences regime. Alfred Blumrosen, the Jewish compliance chief of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), almost single-handedly banned employment testing and turned workforce imbalances into proof of discrimination to the point where the U.S. Forest Service now posts employment notices that say “only applicants who do not meet standards [i.e. non-Whites] will be considered.”

The real dagger to the heart of traditional America though was the 1965 Immigration Act, which was a Jewish project from start to finish. The cabal's goyishe front-man Ted Kennedy reassured Americans as follows: "What the bill will not do: First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same.... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset.... Contrary to the charges in some quarters, the Act will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia." The Bill's chief drafter (the Jew Norbert Schlei) knew better, gloating 'now let the floodgates open' after the legislation was passed. There can be no doubt whatsoever that had the American people understood the real purpose of the measure and its future impact it would have been overwhelmingly rejected.

Not least because those same American people would know that it'd involve replacing them with a new electorate brought in from abroad. An electorate for the most part hostile to them. Throughout history such transformations have lead to violent confrontations. But it gets worse in that whole swathes of the country have brazenly flouted duly-constituted Federal law by refusing to deport those in the country illegally. And now, redolent of the Mad Hatter's Teas Party, green-lighting laws will permit illegals to vote. Even arch cuckservative Dan Crenshaw fumed: “It sounds like I’m making it up. What kind of government would cancel the vote of its own citizens, and replace it with non-citizens?” Well Dan you should know them better than most. But seriously, what kind of a democracy allows illegal immigrants to vote? Especially a democracy which has lost control of its borders?

So is violence on the part of White Americans now justified? I'm not advocating it if for no other reason that God alone knows how it would pan out. But to give some perspective consider the revered American Revolutionary War which was driven mainly by fiscal issues and was supported only by a small minority of the population. The Irish 1916 Rebellion initially had little popular support but now forms part of the national psyche. In both cases the citizenry of the time had voting rights which were arguably more meaningful than those 'enjoyed' by Whites in America today. And unlike their compatriots of today they didn't face a hostile replacement population and have their taxes sequestered for their welfare. Neither were their rulers seeking to disarm them in the face of such a hostile invasion.

Look, this is not a simple case of Jews invading and taking the country over. Only too many 'Americans' are happy to carry water for them and very many Jews are unhappy with what's happening. Having said that, it's true that the experience of Yonkers has been replicated, and continues to be replicated, across the length and breath of the country.

As a final thought I'll leave you with a warning from JFK: 

"Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent revolution inevitable"

Wednesday, 12 February 2020

Accidental accelerationists?

Most of you will be aware of the informal debate between those who on the one hand want to take the fight to the enemies of White society and on the other hand the 'accelerationists', those who believe that the sooner things come to a head the better. This belief is in part based on the demographic time-bomb ticking in most White countries which accelerationists claim will render any future opposition moot once critical mass is reached. I admit to seeing a lot of merit in this position.

It has the added merit that our enemies - and I use that word advisedly - are doing the job for the accelerationists by regularly inciting a furious reaction  from hitherto cucked and disinterested Whites. It seems they just can't stop themselves rubbing our noses in our dispossession. Take this ad for Scandinavian Air Services (SAS). It starts off badly ("What is truly Scandinavian? Absolutely nothing. Everything is copied") and gets steadily worse to the point where an African gentleman says.....well here's the clip.
Yes, after spending two minutes telling Scandinavians how worthless they are they get a black guy to round it off with a lecture to the effect that "we" are no better than "our" Viking ancestors. What in Christ's name could they have been thinking? But I'll get back to that. Suffice to say that Scandinavians, the most cucked, pussy-whipped emasculated society on the planet, reacted with  explosive outrage.  The SAS web-site, FB page and Twitter feeds were deluged with abuse, as were the Youtube channels that showed the ad (at one stage there were 250 up votes as against 16,000 downs). Item: "What made a Scandinavian airline think pissing and spitting on Scandinavia and all Scandinavians was a good idea,"  Item: "If this doesn’t prove to people that they’re trying to destroy the very essence of what it means to be a European, I don’t know what will." Many of the comments referred to the 'hook-nosed' tribe orchestrating White destruction while several more identified the Wallenberg family as (((the Wallenberg family))) and that the top guy in SAS has a deeply suspicious non-Scandinavian surname. 
Little wonder that the ad was pulled within hours of going public. So to repeat my question: What the hell were SAS and the ad agency thinking?  Could they really have believed that their globohomo agenda (let alone ticket sales) was furthered by such a counter-productive monstrosity? Well maybe they could. You see, the gerontocracies of the former Communist block were secure in their power. Right up to the time they were swept aside by their disaffected subjects. That's what happens when you close off political and media expressions of dissent. You get out of touch, tone deaf. You live in a bubble. And when that happens you make bad decisions.

I don't know. But I do know that the accelerationists will be happy with these developments.

Tuesday, 11 February 2020

A hero for our times





"You have always been an absolute legend but never, never ever more so than this week my friend,"

Who is this paragon attracting such acclaim? Had this latter-day Spartacus single-handedly taken out an enemy machine-gun nest? or dived into a freezing lake to rescue a drowning toddler? or maybe parachuted into Idlib to take ISIS to task over their intolerance for homosexuals? None of these things. The only thing Philip Schofield did to attract such acclaim was to announce on Daytime TV that he was gay. Gay in the sense that he likes to have his ass pounded by other men.

With that announcement he's become a messianic cultural figure whose coming out is ‘a day to celebrate and a massive moment for society in general’. But this isn't really about Schofield, it's more about the gay agenda. As Brendan O'Neill put it "Sensitivity, authenticity, bravery, good fashion sense, and a sacred place in popular culture, where every gay character is an unusually wise possessor of the secrets to life and happiness – this is the story of gayness now. "

But actually it's more than gayness as well. It's about creating a degraded and degenerate society. Listen to Lavrenti Beria, the former head of the NKVD, addressing a group of US communist students at Lenin University in 1953. “Degradation and conquest are companions. By attacking the character and morals … by bringing about, through contamination of youth, a general degraded feeling, command of the populace is facilitated to a very marked degree. By perverting the institutions of a nation and bringing about a general degradation … a population can be brought psychologically to heel…”

Ultimately that's what this is all about.

But going back to Schofield, one admirer solemnly proclaimed that "Everyone should be proud to live their own truth". In which case Schofield has been a total fraud because he hid that truth for 27 years. And why come out now? Well for a start it's obviously been a great career move. But it also seems that he's been in a sexual relationship with Mathew McGreevy, a young assistant on his show, since McGreevy was 18 and Schofield 51. But they've had a lovers' tiff and McGreevy was threatening to blow the whistle. Now you know.

Sunday, 9 February 2020

A picture tells a thousand words

Just look at the interactions in this scene (and the one below it). Girl turned toward man, face upwards, anxious to gain his attention, to please him in any way. He arrogantly indifferent, facing away, self-obsessed to the point of taking a selfie. Textbook stuff of the kind the sadly departed Chateau Heartiste would have made hay. We learn that this girl had posted derogatory and contemptuous tweets about her country's men, the seriously cucked Nordics of Finland. She had also sung the praises of Third World invaders and been photographed carrying a sign proclaiming "We Welcome Migrants".

Annoying to those of us seeking to save our civilisation but this silly girl was just playing out her Darwinian script. She undoubtedly didn't understand what was going on but the deepest recesses of her reptilian brain were prompting her to seek out a strong mate with whom to reproduce. Having emasculated her own menfolk, transforming them into quivering apologetic manginas, this swaggering macho Muslim asylum-seeker must have seemed ideal.

So she took him into her apartment, and we can be sure, provided him with all the material comforts she could afford. And he treated her with contempt. He saw her (and I know this from my own extensive experience of the Middle East) as a whore, a kuffar whore, albeit a beautiful one. How she must have impressed her friends, preening on the moral high ground as Hassan gave her a good rogering every night. He was the ideal prop for her woke status. Together they represented the apogee of successful multiculturalism.

But while emancipated grrrrls like a bit of domination they also want to retain their freedoms, including the freedom to move on to another partner when the mood takes them. Unfortunately - and Sanni wasn't to know this of course - you don't just walk out on a Muslim man. He'd see it as the ultimate belittling of his pride and masculinity. And when she duly tired of her toy he reacted by......well just look at the picture below. 
Neighbours 'felt something was wrong'. When they saw blood pouring out from under the door! On the ball, those Finns.

Yes, in Hassan she got the full diversity package, beheading and all. And another beautiful, blue-eyed alabaster-skinned childless blonde gets sacrificed on the altar of diversity. While we're all ultimately responsible for the results of our own decisions how much was she really to blame? After all from her first breath she'd been programmed by the indoctrination education system and media to see Third World detritus as virtuous and desirable, her own people, especially men, as the polar opposite. She had no ready access to alternative perspectives.  And in a sense the same could be said of the murderer. He grew up under the same degree of programming although obviously of a completely different kind. 

No, the blame for this tragedy lies squarely with those who engineered such a combustible and lethal brew. A special place in hell awaits them.

Friday, 7 February 2020

The productivity paradox

The productivity gains over the last fifty years from information technology, robotics and the 'free' internet have been staggering. It costs today but a fraction of what it used to to produce goods and services. The time and manpower (sorry, personpower) costs of processing an ordinary business transaction, be it bank loan, insurance quotation or invoice payment have been reduced by at least 80% since the fifties. The declines have been even greater in factory production, with many facilities reduced to people-free zones operating 24x7x365 through the use of robotics. Simulation technologies have achieved similar reductions in the time and cost of design and testing.  Farm automation and the Green Revolution have transformed the production of food. And to round off the cost of borrowing has shown a dramatic decline in recent years.

So why aren't we living like stereotypical Frenchmen working 3-hour days and taking four months holidays annually while women luxuriate at home painting their nails with dirt-cheap modern conveniences doing all the work? Au contraire, we're working harder than ever while the stay-at-home mother has now become a derided rarity. And on balance for less reward. Zero Hedge say that "A new report sheds light on [the fact that] 53 million Americans, or about 44% of all US workers, aged 18 to 64, are considered low-wage and low-skilled. Many of these folks are stuck in the gig economy, making approximately $10.22 per hour, and they bring home less than $20,000 per year. An overwhelmingly large percentage of these folks have insurmountable debts. Their wages don't cover their debt servicing payments as their lives will be left in financial ruin after the next recession."

Despite pre-fabricated robot-produced building components and architectural design automation tools house costs today represent a vastly higher proportion of take-home pay than they used to. In Britain this ratio 
has doubled in just twenty years from four to eight. Little surprise then that the proportion of 25-34 year-old who own their own house has collapsed from 67% in 1991 to 38% in 2016. Despite this more people are working, for longer hours and with less job security. The inflation-adjusted wages of working class Americans is lower today than it was 40 years ago.

Back in the fifties it seemed that most people lived reasonably comfortable lives, the husband worked in a steady usually-unionised job while the wife was a stay-at-home mother. For sure very few people lived in luxury but most owned their home, had one modest car, owned a phone and TV and went on a modest holiday once a year. And this was an economic environment where the norm was to have large families dependent on a single bread-winner. Still, people lived ok.

So why hasn't the spectacular increase in production resulted in everyone rolling in wealth and indolence instead of struggling even to own a house? I don't know but I offer the following as contributory causes:

Wealth is trickling up. A report in Bloomberg claims that the wealth of the top 1% now exceeds that of everyone else combined. The financialisation of the economy must play a major role in this with the extra wealth created by increased productivity and the money magicked up by the central banks being siphoned off by financial speculators. While vast fortunes can be made little or nothing is added to the wealth or lifestyles of ordinary citizens.

Then there's the black/brown/Muslim undertow as White numbers decline in relative terms. These minorities are less productive, commit more crime, have bigger families and are more dependent on welfare. Their rapidly-increasing numbers add to the pressure on housing and healthcare provision. And the affirmative action racket results in a vast army of incompetent leeches draining wealth from productive Whites.

That's my tuppence-worth, but I'm probably biased.

Any other ideas?

Tuesday, 4 February 2020

What do Conservatives actually conserve?

The Conservative Party in Britain has been returned to power with a massive majority. But how much of a victory does this represent for British, or more relevantly English nationalism? Well here's a clue. Look at those who occupy the three most powerful Cabinet positions, those controlling home affairs, foreign affairs and the Treasury. The rest of the Cabinet positions are in reality second-tier, all subject to the whims of one or more of the Big Three. (Maybe the Big Four if you include the Chief Secretary to the Treasury.)

So who are these patriots charged with leading Britain into the dangerous and unpredictable post-Brexit world? Presumably their every waking hour is taken up with furthering the interests of British factory workers, farmers and pensioners with whom they share a visceral love of country? Presumably they chill with a frisson of patriotism every time they hear God Save The Queen? Presumably they share a vicarious pride in Britain's glorious history, a history shaped by their ancestors over many centuries?

It's possible. But I doubt it. Because here are Britain's new de facto rulers:

Home Secretary: 
Name:  Priti Patel 
Ethnicity: Ugandan-Indian 
Religion: Hindu

Chancellor of the Exchequer: 
Name:  Sajid Javid 
Ethnicity: Pakistani - although he looks like he's from another galaxy
Religion: Muslim

Chief Secretary to the Treasury
Name:  Rishi Sunak
Ethnicity: Indian
Religion: Hindu

Foreign Secretary
Name:  Dominic Raab
Ethnicity: Jewish/English 
Religion: Unknown

Now Patel and Raab seem to be sounder on the 'national question' and other conservative touch-points than many of their Cabinet colleagues and were unwavering in their support for Brexit. At the same time you'd have to wonder when an Indian Hindu whose parents fled Uganda and a Jew whose father fled Czechoslovakia control, inter alia, the immigration spigot that threatens to irretrievably destroy Traditional Britain. And God alone knows what the two Punjabis in the Treasury will do when they get their hands on the loot. Javid had an undistinguished banking career before he was miraculously magicked to the top of the Tory pyramid while Sunak worked for Goldman Sachs in their notorious scandal-wracked Investment Banking arm. 

So here's a closing thought: The British ruled over and transformed what's now India, Pakistan and Bangladesh (current combined population 1.8 billion) for two centuries with a tiny number of administrators and soldiers. Surely this speaks volumes for the governance capabilities of the respective peoples? Is it not truly bizarre then that just a few decades after relinquishing this control the British have recruited their former subjects to rule over them?

Well it's not if you believe that a Greater Power is orchestrating the nation's affairs.

Sunday, 2 February 2020

Fighting fire - with fire

Never let a good crisis go to waste. Thus the Green Movement has attributed the recent devastating Australian bush fires to, you guessed it, climate change. Experts, including that renowned meteorologist Jennifer Anniston, have sternly warned us  “Make no mistake, the tragedy unfolding in Australia is climate change-based.”  Thanks Jen but no, it isn't. In fact, believe it or not, the Green fundamentalists have themselves been largely responsible for the scale of the current disaster.

The affected region features eucalyptus trees growing in the midst of bushy ground cover. At the best of times this is a combustible mix which is obviously exacerbated by hot and dry weather.  But every fire needs fuel and the amount of fuel in the Australian case has a particularly significant impact. Research has found that doubling the fuel in the forest will double the rate of spread and quadruple the fire intensity. While low intensity fires will tend to burn dead fuels below six millimetres in diameter, medium to high intensity fires will burn young trees, thick twigs and branches, bark and deep litter. That's what we've been seeing for the last few weeks. Fuel reduction also reduces the deadly hazard of spotting from eucalyptus bark, in some cases for up to seven to ten years.

So is there any way to reduce the fuel then? Well yes. Multiple ways. Aussies used to do it all the time. Some still do. Men like Liam Sheehan (good Cork name that) who cleared around his house by controlled burning, cutting down trees and bulldozing the scrub. His house was the only one in his region to survive the recent fires. So why doesn't everyone do that then? They don't because environmental fundamentalist mullahs have taken control of the asylum. Sheehan was fined $100,000 for his foresight because it was adjudged to have caused 'significant damage' to the environment. That's serious money for an ordinary householder and Australians soon got the message.

As a consequence a powder keg in every meaning of the term began to grow. Despite which the mullahs literally added fuel to the fire through even more draconian restrictions. Not happy with preventing tree cutting and brush clearing they then deemed that collecting fallen timber for firewood also contravened sacred dogma. As Wildlife Services spokeswoman  Fiona Buchanan said last year 'removing firewood, including deadwood and fallen trees, is not permitted in national parks. On-the-spot fines apply but also very large fines can be handed out by the courts'. 

What could possibly go wrong? Well we've just seen what could go wrong, haven't we?  But instead of learning from their catastrophic interference the mullahs have used it to demand even greater powers to 'reduce global warming'. 

You see the Green bureaucrats care as little about the environment as socialists care about the working class. They want power above all else. And their policies aren't really about controlling global warming. They're about controlling you.

Friday, 31 January 2020

Why has Ireland become so woke so fast?

The self-administered transformation of Ireland in the space of two generations has been staggering in its scope and depth. We've gone from mono-racial nationalistic Catholic conservatism to becoming multicultural and the wokest of the woke. Few nations - if any - have sloughed off their past and embraced globohomo with such enthusiasm. On approving a referendum to extend abortion rights thousands of young women thronged the streets, weeping with emotion. In revulsion at the impending deaths of thousands of additional unborn babies? No, in celebration of the fact. The right to gay marriage was fought for here with an intensity rarely seen elsewhere. And approved in a landslide.

What accounts for this almost unprecedented transformation? Surely the massive scandals that lead to the implosion of the Catholic Church were central. Because the Church was and remains inextricably linked with Old Ireland. In Old Ireland the Church was everywhere, ruling every facet of life with a deeply conservative rod of steel to the extent that an unmarried teacher 'living in sin' with her boyfriend would lose her job. When the dam finally broke and the full breathtaking scale of the corruption and hypocrisy was revealed the moral and spiritual bedrock of the Irish people was removed. This took place just as the sixties Cultural Marxist revolution was sweeping the world. So very quickly anything opposed to traditional Christianity was enthusiastically welcomed. Agitators sneeringly questioned what it really meant to be Irish. Hundreds of thousands of Africans and Pakistanis were happy to broaden the definition.

Why has Ireland's collapse been so abject? Surely much of it can be attributed to our colonial legacy. We always saw Britain, England really, as overwhelmingly bigger as well as stronger and better. Despite the bluster our national pride rested on shaky foundations. But then (for a variety of reasons) within a relatively short time we became wealthy and technologically advanced. On most Human Development Index criteria we now outperform the Brits. As this new standing coincided with our abandonment of Old Ireland (in particular the Church) the association became, or appeared to become, clear. We were the beggars on horseback and we knew who provided us with the horse.  Traditional = bad, progressive = good.

But it's a Faustian Pact and one that we're paying for already in terms of soaring murder and suicide rates and declining social cohesion. Meanwhile the building blocks for future race and religious conflicts have been put  firmly in place. Hopefully this catastrophe can provide 
some lessons for the countries of Eastern Europe, currently under unrelenting attack by globohomo. Because they too have suffered centuries of colonisation and/or occupation and see themselves as backward vis-a-vis 'the West' just as Ireland did with Britain. And just as with Ireland (though by no means as bad) the Church there cowers in the corner or  actually become cheerleaders for globalism.

A final thought. Isn't it deeply ironic how our enemies used the Church's homosexual and paedophile scandals to bring it down yet will now capitalise on its demise to promote those very sins? And by the way, there's another lesson to be learned : That homosexuality is the 'gateway drug' to paedophilia.

Wednesday, 29 January 2020

John Lewis: Get woke, go broke

John Lewis is an employee-owned UK company which operates a chain of department stores appealing strongly to middle and upper-class shoppers. Almost one hundred years in operation and owned by a trust on behalf of all its employees its iconic status has been based on the solid British values of hard work, honesty and lack of flamboyance. The formula has been hugely successful, delivering solid profits and bonus payments to staff year after year after year.

But then some time ago the company decided to get woke. They commissioned diversity consultants who described their brief as follows: "John Lewis had begun to review their talent pipeline and was keen to develop women and ethnic minorities to senior positions. They were also keen to develop understanding and cross-cultural sensitivity to their increasing diverse partner base and to ensure they were fit for purpose as they began their store expansion plans particularly targeting diverse areas."

And the project has been hugely successful. In achieving diversity that is. Women and various other minorities came to dominate senior management ranks. (That's the Executive Board there on the left.) Their advertisements (which, the theologians among us will be interested to learn, were developed by Adam And Eve) became legendary among the chattering classes and invariably featured a wealthy, well-adjusted black family. Like this one. Which is surprising given that blacks would enter their stores only to shoplift. Time hitherto spent developing new products, optimising stocks and building IT infrastructure were instead devoted to joining hands and singing kumbaya or attending sensitivity and White Privilege workshops. This paid off as they continued to win one diversity award after another culminating in the ultimate woke validation last September when they proudly announced the first financial loss in the company's history.

Sales are plummeting, the vital IT infrastructure (you know, the kind of thing that White males look after) has fallen into a parlous state, customer satisfaction has declined sharply, the latest CEO (a woman) has just been fired and the employees are in revolt. So who will replace the departing CEO? 
Surely it will be a titan of the retail trade with an unalloyed record of corporate turnaround and innovation? Well no. The new CEO is a black female civil servant with zero experience of retail or indeed anything outside the sheltered and undemanding microcosm of public 'service'.

What could possibly go wrong?

Sunday, 26 January 2020

Chinese immunity

I have a rule of thumb that serves me well: When a new cause celebre appears out of the blue with the MSM, the UN, the EUSSR, the 'independent' think tanks and all the bien pensants commenting in lock-step. fact when every official source speaks with one voice you can be sure of but one thing: A major mind-fuck is underway. Bin Laden to blame for 9/11, Iraq and its non-existent WMD, Putin and Russia responsible for everything that goes wrong, the Kosovo 'massacres'...I could go on. Remember the viruses that were about to wipe out all human life? Zika, ebola...the latest lethal flu virus. Remember them? Why aren't we all dead by now? Have more than a couple of thousand people died world-wide from the whole lot of them combined?

Will the Coronavirus turn out to be more of the same? Perhaps, as the same story-book is playing out. Already there have been sixty deaths. That would be out of one thousand six hundred million Chinese. But maybe we should be extra careful because if the Chinese immune system can't fight it whose can? I ask because based on what they eat you'd imagine they'd have built immunities to just about anything Mother Nature - or a biological warfare facility - could throw at them. Note: There is such a facility in the city where the Coronavirus broke out.

Anyway, here are some of the dietary techniques the Chinese use to strengthen their immune systems.

Gutter oil actually does comes from gutters including sewer drains, grease traps, slaughterhouse waste depots, disposed of meat, animal fat/ skins/ innards, and restaurant oil dumps. Once collected, this slop is then filtered, mixed together, cooked up, and then sold to unscrupulous restaurants around China. Gutter oil you see is cheaper than new, clean cooking oil.

Other mouth-watering delicacies include bat soup, baby mice, rat-on-a-skewer and insects: Every kind of creepy crawly is available..... grasshoppers, scorpions, tarantulas, locusts and cockroaches.

The Chinese may well be intelligent but in a sperg-like inhuman way. They seem to lack the milk of human kindness. It's not unknown to see drivers reverse over traffic accident victims to finish them off to avoid the potential hospital costs. Or they just drive on leaving the victim on the road. They seem utterly and totally immune to animal suffering. It just doesn't seem to register with them at all. 

Clever or not, hard-working or not, our countries are better off without them.

Friday, 24 January 2020

I'm standing for election!

Desperate times call for desperate measures. And there's nothing more desperate than Irish politics, which will shortly see a General Election. Still, destiny beckons. Some seek greatness, others have greatness thrust upon them. In which spirit I plan to offer myself to the electorate with what I believe to be an irresistible political platform.

Key measures include:

Immediate deportation of all non-Whites and Muslims

Women's right to vote, the fountainhead of almost all that besets us, will be rescinded

Foreign aid will be cancelled

All NGOs will be closed down. Employees of those with the word "Rights" in their title will be hurled through their office windows onto the street, their personal assets seized and their offices burned to the ground.

Every business in the country will be instructed to close their Human Resources departments and to fire without compensation the soy boys and lesbian land-whales employed therein

The current liberal prison regime which sees convicted scumbags roam our streets while prisoners luxuriate in 5-star facilities will be replaced by the acclaimed Honduran model (left) whereby inmates are packed together like sardines, fed on gruel and mowed down by machine-gun fire if they riot

All university courses containing the word "Studies" will be defunded and terminated

Alan Shatter to be deported to Israel.

Well, what do you think? I'm optimistic. I think the last item alone will have voters stampeding to the booths to support me. 

I'll keep you posted.

Wednesday, 22 January 2020

Can Whites and Jews co-exist?

Is it possible for White gentiles to live harmoniously with a Jewish minority? I've come to the view that it's not. First let's get out of the way the standard acknowledgement that there are many good Jews in any community (I've known plenty) and there are even greater numbers who just want to live and let live. Nonetheless a significant Jewish presence in any country seems to have, and has had throughout the centuries, a negative impact on the host communities. In some cases, like that of Russia, this impact has been catastrophic. The maladies that affect Western countries today have been heavily, in some cases overwhelmingly, driven by Jewish Power. I refer, and this is far from an exhaustive list, to mass Third World immigration, debasement of art and literature, transforming courts into enforcers of anti-White 'hate' legislation and every form of sexual degeneracy, turning universities into indoctrination centres, redirecting economies from productive self-sufficiency to speculative finance, destroying the foundations and supports of the traditional family.

That's a fairly serious rap sheet. But it's fair to say that we ourselves allowed them do this through inattentiveness, inaction and a misguided altruism. For the sake of argument let's posit that Whites miraculously became Jew-aware and seized back control of our countries. Could we maintain such control?  I don't think so.  Because over time Jews will gradually recapture The Narrative. Bit by bit they'll transform into the helpless victims of yore, Whites will be reduced to warring ethno-religious camps, laws masquerading as universal principles of justice (think 'hate' crimes) will be implemented to further their agenda, indebtedness will grow, societal cohesion will atrophy. Think how Jews have taken over any - make that every - institution in America.  Using the tried and trusted cuckoo-in-the-nest strategy ('greetings fellow white people') they've edged out the goyim and replace them with their own. It's gradual, surreptitious and symbiotic in that each infiltrated component - media, law, politics and finance - will work together to achieve the broader objective.

Incidentally, this is not necessarily by way of a formal plan or structure. It's more of a shared instinct defending shared interests in a spirit of bitterness. If they lose ground in any arena they'll come back. Again and again. They were pushing for immigration "reform" in America for fifty years before they got the 1965 Immigration Act passed. And now Holocaustrianity  gives them unprecedented latitude.

To cut to the chase I don't think an accommodation possible. Why? A number of reasons. We must consider the Kevin MacDonald theory that they're biologically programmed to act as they do. Which in itself renders an agreed solution impossible. Then as some wise man once said “Jews do not have a history, they have a martyrology”. Jews have a kind of meta-history of martyrdom and persecution that relieves them of any responsibility for their historical travails. This and the Talmud (which in places reads like a psychopath's charter) combine to reinforce in-group support and out-group antipathy. Such ethnocentric people are prone to not seeing how their own ethnocentrism blinds them to rational discussion of anything related to their ethnic interests.  Then there's the insatiability. They can never have enough as we've seen in Wall Street and the Middle East. And there's no gratitude, every concession is quickly followed by further demands. Ad infinitum. They seem to have no sense, or so it seems to me, of the blatant double standards under which they operate.  

Hard to build a lasting accommodation with such people. Which means......what?

Sunday, 19 January 2020

Best of luck to the Virginia 2A campaigners tomorrow

Fingers crossed for the gun rights demonstrators at Richmond Virginia tomorrow. Many of us see the event as risking a repeat of the Charlottsville disaster.  You can be sure that the enemies of the people (lead by enthusiastic baby-killer Ralph Northam) have their plans made, agents provocataire planted, police and maybe even National Guard armed to the teeth. And with the full resources of the Surveillance State at their disposal you can be certain that every text, email, phone call and social media message has been intercepted and analysed. And no matter what happens the MSM will spin it the same way. Violent Nazis and White supremacists were to blame.

Just like they spun the events of Greensboro NC exactly forty years ago. Back then a group of Communist Workers Party and 'civil rights' activists sought to provoke a violent reaction from local Whites. Their initial move was to disrupt a screening of D.W Griffiths' The Birth Of A Nation. The same 'liberal' attitude applied back then: You can do anything you want - provided we approve. This fracas was followed by a proposed 'Death To The Klan' march with many of the organisers taunting Whites about being afraid to attend. One of their propaganda posters read that the Klan "should be physically beaten and chased out of town. This is the only language they understand. Armed self-defense is the only defense." Well local Whites took them at their word and showed up armed. A gun battle ensued which left fifteen marchers ventilated, five of them fatally. One of the White counter-demonstrators was slightly wounded.

The agitators had laid down the challenge and that challenge was met. With lethal force. Naturally that wasn't how the media portrayed it, and over time it morphed into what is now known as 'The Greensboro Massacre'. Happily the Whites involved were acquitted by a jury of their peers. But that was then, this is now. There are many reasons to urge caution and hope for the safety of the demonstrators and that the inevitable doxxing won't cause them too much trouble. But what else is there to do if the traitorous Government, undeterred by the Constitution, starts to disarm the citizenry? Court cases? Entryism into the Uniparty? Maybe, but it's probable that this might be too little too late as the demographic clock relentlessly ticks away.

And never forget what gun control is all about.

Saturday, 18 January 2020

Camelot - NOT

As predicted by anyone with a functioning brain the royal union between Prince Harry and Meghan Markle has been a car crash. They have now left/been turfed out of the Royal Family and ended up in Canada. Where it seems they're not wanted either. It's only a matter of time before Markle stiffs the Royals for a few million and heads for the hills. Equally predictable was assigning racism as the cause of the problems. Vox referred to the “wave of abuse and harassment” Markle had already been subjected to. That included “the racial undertones of comment pieces” and “the outright sexism and racism of social media trolls and web article comments.”  Which apparently was all too much for this delicate shrinking violet.

Let me offer an alternative take. 'The Firm' (Royal Family Inc,) viewed Harry's bout of jungle fever with alarm from the outset, an alarm that grew dramatically as they experienced her up close and personal. So they ousted her and him.

Item: She was brought (dragged) up in Compton, one of the worst ghettos in America, to the sound of gunfire and exploding crack dens.

Item: They feared that her friends and relatives from the 'hood would rob the Royal Cutlery or cause Windsor Castle to go up in flames

Item: They saw the risk of her becoming 'nigger-rich' - a well-studied phenomenon which could result in Buckingham Palace being painted a fetching shade of orange or the ordering of a personal fleet of solid gold limousines for the 'Duchess'

Item: Due her despotic behaviour there was a mass exodus of her staff within a short time of her taking over.

Item: She had broken Royal Protocol no fewer than 67 times in just 18 months on the job and showed no sign of stopping

Item: They worried about her stepbrother's letter to Harry imploring him: “Whatever you do, don’t marry her.” 

Item: The Duchess of Sex, sorry, Sussex, had had her ass pounded by an endless array of basketball players, pro footballers, golfers, porn stars, marines and Z-list actors from her early teens up to the time she met the Prince. (They were introduced by a Jewess). She appeared on film simulating oral sex in a car and half-naked pictures of her still circulate on the internet.

Item: Rumours that she drove Kate Middleton to tears with her rudeness and aggression. Such rumours were confirmed by the following simple announcement from the Palace Press Office: "Rumours of disagreements between the two Duchesses are absolutely unfounded."

Item: The changes in Prince Harry: "I haven’t seen him look really happy for a long time. To go from being the most popular member of the Royal Family to where people barely care about you, something has to have gone seriously wrong."

So what do you think? Was it racism....or other things?

Wednesday, 15 January 2020

The fox in the hen-house

Does cyber security worry you? Well it should. As things stand right now 'bad actors' are capable of accessing and corrupting all of your private data,  listen to what you say, know what you buy, read what you write, know what you watch on the internet and TV. Maybe even know what you're thinking. And this doesn't apply just to individuals but to corporations and government as well. Almost everything is reachable. If they get nasty they could bring down power and other utility systems, cause aircraft to plummet from the skies and cripple most commercial activity by disabling the internet. Within weeks cities would become Mad Max dystopias and while rural areas could survive longer they'd soon be targeted by roaming gangs fleeing the cities and would be reduced to subsistence living in due course. I'm absolutely serious about this and I've had direct first hand experience of the subject area over many decades.

This could happen because much of the software, firmware and hardware that runs civilisation as we know it has been hopelessly compromised by, inter alia, pre-installed 
Trojan software just waiting to be activated and back-doors through which malware can be introduced at will. Think of the Stuxnet virus that blew nearly half of the centrifuges at Iran's Natanz nuclear facilities. Taking down a whole regional power grid in America would be child's play by comparison. I'm not exaggerating and I'm deadly serious.

Is there any way of managing the risk? Well actually help is at hand. None other than Bibi Netanyahu has offered to provide an Israeli-lead Cyber Security World Order. He's certainly well positioned to implement it. Off the top of my head I can name companies across the full range of information and communications technologies owned or controlled by Israeli companies and/or their sayanim in the West. Payment gateways and processing, encryption, antivirus and data security products, databases, telecoms billing and mediation technologies, microprocessors, remote flight interception technologies, internet search, instant messaging, artificial intelligence, data mining, social media platforms.... In other words full-spectrum oversight if not control. Trust me on this: These products are riddled with back-doors and Trojans. They're as porous as a sieve. Also trust me when I say that the Israelis and their sayanim now have enough power to bring the West to a standstill.

Maybe Bibi's offering is in the finest traditions of Jewish out-group altruism. Or maybe not. Call me cynical but instead I'm minded of Tony Soprano complimenting a celebrity chef 'Nice restaurant. Shame if it burned down'. You may well wonder if those at the apex of America's national security colossus could have been so derelict in their duty to allow such a catastrophe occur. Unfortunately the American alphabet agencies are riddled with sayanim and actual Israelis. The highest strategic level of 'national security' is almost Ziocon Central and a "Chabad Lubavitch Linked Woman Related To One of the Wealthiest Jewish Families in U.S. [has been] Named Cybersecurity Chief For NSA". And I've written on how Lubivichers see us goyim. (Hint: they loathe and despise us). Former CIA analyst Philip Geraldi has exposed how former USAF Chief of Staff James Abrahamson appointed an Israeli named Lani Cass to oversee the Air Force’s most secret cyber capabilities including nuclear codes. Hard to believe but Cass was born, raised, and educated in Israel, is fluent in Russian and reportedly reached the rank of major in the Israeli air force before moving to the United States where she was rapidly magicked into overseeing cyber security on behalf of Israel the United States. You couldn't make this stuff up.

Are things any better in Britain? Well judge for yourself. The new Director General for Cyber Security at GCHQ is ..... Dr Ian Levy. I'm sure this sweet-looking gentleman is dedicating his life to protecting his people. Whoever they might be. I know I now sleep more  peacefully at night knowing that my cyber security is in his hands.

How did the Israel/sayanim nexus come to acquire near omnipotence in this arena? Remember that only a few decades ago Israel was but a niche player and the great technology  inventions were the work of goyim geniuses. I offer a number of explanations. First there was the well-documented outright theft of intellectual property from Government, corporations and universities. Then there was the cuckoo-in-the-nest strategy whereby breakthrough technology companies were gradually taken over by Jewish stakeholders, continually pushing out goyim and replacing them with Jews until the latter had de facto control. I have direct first hand knowledge of Intel, Microsoft and EMC where I was able to witness the process play out. 

Then there's technology lawfare whereby Jews use Jewish judges and other powerful figures to neutralise their criminality.  Facebook is an excellent example. In a nutshell Zuckerberg stole the idea and much of the code from the Winklevoss twins at Harvard. The latter's appeals foundered within Harvard where the two key decision-makers were Jewish.  Their final appeal was held before Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, a Roumanian Jew, who threw the book at them. (Can't you just see his eyes glow with the thirst for justice? Actually this guy
 was subsequently forced to resign in disgrace for doing a Harvey Weinstein with his staff.)  His judgement on the Winklevoss case: "The Winklevosses are not the first parties bested by a competitor who then seek to gain through litigation what they were unable to achieve in the marketplace. And the courts might have obliged, had the Winklevosses not settled their dispute and signed a release of all claims against Facebook." Seeing the writing on the wall the twins settled for a tiny fraction of Facebook's value. Then there's financial engineering whereby cash-strapped innovators are forced to cede ownership to those-with-access to-unlimited-financial-resources.

America and Britain (I'm not in a position to assess other Western countries) have been sold out and hollowed out. It can fairly be said that the new paradigm is 'designed in Israel, manufactured in China'. Whole swathes of America resemble the Third World as formerly thriving cohesive communities based on secure well-paying jobs come to terms with the new reality. This says nothing of the loss of sovereignty and security. The depth and breath of the treachery exhibited by the country's bribed or blackmailed leaders has been nothing short of breathtaking. Has its like ever been seen before, whereby the world's most powerful country allowed itself be taken over by a tiny hostile foreign race (who never hesitated to pass on latest military technology to America's enemies), bled dry and rendered into a hollowed-out husk? A husk that can be sustained for a little longer only by its ability to print money, a power itself dependent on its rapidly declining military might.

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare

The lone and level sands stretch far away

What powerful but unrecorded race

Once dwelt in that annihilated place?

Sorry for the black pill but 'they' have us by the balls.They have every angle covered. We're the chickens in the hen-house.

Some additional reading:


Doomsday Election Simulations

Saturday, 11 January 2020

Boeing, Boeing, gone?

Boeing used to be one of the Great Companies. Legendary. For a century its technical excellence and innovation kept it at the summit of aircraft manufacturing. But now it faces the worst crisis in its history with its commercial business in particular facing a bleak future. The 737 Max scandal that has cost hundreds of lives and billions of dollars isn't its only problem. The flagship 787 Dreamliner is deemed so unreliable that it seems even key Boeing staff won't fly on it.

"If it's not Boeing I'm not going" has mutated into "i
f it's Boeing I'm not going". What happened? Well such a spectacular decline cannot be multi-causal. But I'll wager that the 'shareholder value' concept and a commitment to diversity have been critically important. Shareholder value is shorthand for replacing engineers and designers with accountants. Short-term profit becomes the priority with top executives (usually from marketing or finance  backgrounds) "earning" million-dollar bonuses while speculators use their insider knowledge to make a killing, usually at the expense of R&D and quality.

And then there's diversity. "Boeing has made diversity and inclusion a strategic priority — and external validators have taken notice. On May 7, it was announced that Boeing ranked 32nd out of more than 1,800 companies that participated in DiversityInc’s 2019 Top 50 Companies for Diversity survey — moving up 17 spots from No. 49 last year. Boeing also was ranked No. 2 among the top companies for veterans, No. 9 on the list of top companies for people with disabilities, and No. 10 on the list of top companies for mentoring and sponsorship."  ('Boeing’s 737 Max Software Outsourced to $9-an-Hour Engineers').

Well done Boeing. Now could we get back to the 737 and Dreamliner problems? 

   Your Life In Their Hands
Back in the day I worked closely with HP and IBM, both, like Boeing, legendary companies and both subsequently destroyed at least in part by diversity. (Hi Carly). I was always impressed by the dedication of their software and engineering staff. Literally 100% White, they'd be at their desks late into the night, at no extra pay, just driven by a commitment to quality and reliability. You will seldom get such commitment and diligence from blacks or affirmative-action women while -  trust me on this - bindi programmers will simply try to get away with whatever they can get away with. And with software it's easy enough to fake test results. 

The company has been hollowed out, its standards degraded, its culture corrupted. It will of course struggle on, sustained if nothing else by "defence" expenditure, financed by magic money from the FED. Even so 'financial engineering' and diversity have done their work in emasculating yet another Western institution.