Saturday, 31 August 2019

This is not the West

A reader sent me this insightful comment a few months back which I think deserves its own full post.

This culture we live in isn’t the West. Its looks like the west . It talks like the west. But it isn’t the West. It’s something that has grown in the corpse of the old West and wears its flesh. It is a parasitic zombie that stands in opposition to the old west, feeding on its flesh to fuel its own growth. It is the Anti-West .The old West was Christian, masculine, white and monogamous. The Anti-West is gnostic and effeminate. It is openly hostile to the children of Europe and sexually degenerate. The old West was creative and vigorous. The Anti-West is imitative and stagnant. The old West was fertile and brave. The anti-west is barren and cowardly.

The real West is dead. It died on the battlefields of Europe in the twentieth century. Everything after that has been the twitching of its corpse. It is only when you realize this that you can see things as they truly are. And once you can see clearly, you can begin understand the magnitude of our defeat and its consequences.

Our ancestors, informed by the ideals of the old west, would never have tolerated this state of affairs. They would have barred the colonist from arriving and driven the globalists into the sea. The response to Pakistani rape gangs or desert savages screaming to impose their collection of tribal superstitions would not have been government studies and handwringing, but riots and violence. The streets would have run red. But the parasite is sapping our will to stand up for our culture. This makes us weak and contemptible in eyes of our foes and in the eyes of a growing cohort of our own peoples. Seeing our passivity in the face of their provocations, our would be conquerors grow bolder.

We in the West are proceeding into a new dark age. We got here through our own cowardice and stupidity. We are going to face a century of turmoil and subjugation at the hands of the colonists and the white political catamites who are their enablers. It will be an age of humiliation and defeat. Our generation will live to feel the boot of oppression and conquest on our necks.

It is not we who will throw down the Anti-west and liberate ourselves from the technocrats, globalists and colonists. But we can dream and work towards something better. We must bear what is to come in bitter strength and prepare the way for those who will have the courage we lacked. Then they will throw down the enemy, reconquer what is theirs and build a new west.

Wednesday, 28 August 2019

What the Jimmy Savile case proves

Had someone said to me just a few years back that a global Satanic paedophile ring existed at the very highest levels of power I'd have laughed. Well as they say, I'm not laughing now. Once you start researching the issue in depth this fact becomes glaringly obvious. In fact it's hiding in plain sight. Just take the Jimmy Savile case. This guy went, in less than a decade, from being an uneducated miner to disc jockey to confidante of the British Government and Royal Family.

His child molesting proclivities were known for decades yet he still went from strength to strength. He hobnobbed with paedophile Lord Mountbatten, spent weekends with Margaret Thatcher, was a confidante of Prime Minister Ted Heath, and most incredible of all, according to Princess Diana, Prince Charles suggesting that he (Savile) advise on their marriage problems. Can you believe that? An uneducated miner turned disc jockey with no specialised knowledge or talents is magicked into mediating between the Heir-apparent and his wife. All while mired in allegations of paedophilia and necrophilia. By the way Charles also gave convicted paedophile Bishop Peter Ball a free house on his estate after his conviction.

(((Edwina Currie))) gave him effective control of Broadmoor prison hospital, in which role he invited a paedophile Who's Who to visit, stay over, and 'interact' with the patients. (((Danny Cohen))) and (((Esther Rantzen))) - Rancid? - gave him free rein to run, wait for it, the ChildLine TV programme, a programme according to the BBC which 'ensures an adult is at the end of a phone to help children cope with all kinds of serious issues'. That adult was Jimmy Savile, just waiting to put a friendly arm around the unfortunate children. Rancid herself admitted that at this very time rumours were swirling among BBC staff about Savile's sickening vices. And to round it off the station (thank you Mr. Cohen) pulled a planned exposure of Savile, instead broadcasting a hagiographiucal tribute to his life. 


And the miner/disc jockey came to be a firm friend of of former Prime Minister Edward Heath who was accused by David Icke - while Heath was alive - of being a Satanic child molester and child murderer. Yet he never sued for defamation. Multiple police forces investigated but he was never even charged. Big surprise.  Heath also regularly met in Westminster with the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange, an organisation which advocated for the decriminalisation of paedophilia. Why didn't Heath sue for defamation? Obviously because he feared a trial. Step in again the BBC which interviewed David Icke and tried to show him to be a deranged fantasist. Great journalism there lads. The in-your-face Westminster paedophile ring was thoroughly investigated by MP Geoffrey Dickens who then handed the incriminating files - all 114 of them - to Home Secretary (((Leon Brittan))). Who unfortunately lost them. Not surprising given that Brittan was himself one of the main suspects.


What's notable about all of these scandals is that few were held accountable. It was all 'lessons have been learned' and we're now 'moving forward'. Well actually one person really got it in the neck. Poor old Carl Beech who tried to expose the ring. This seriously damaged individual admittedly made a poor witness but could have, like the various false rape accusers, been given a slap on the wrist and told to go away. Instead the Establishment sent a very strong message to would-be exposers of powerful paedophile rings by sentencing this unfortunate and badly-damaged man to eighteen years in prison

That'll show 'em.

Look, I've only scratched the surface here and highlighted some of the more bizarre elements of the Savile case to underline my thesis. That Savile, just like Epstein, Marc Dutroux and God knows how many others, was a procurer of vulnerable children for the so-called elites, those at the top of the international wealth and power pyramid. How many? An estimated 8 million children are reported missing each year around the world. Of that number, according to the latest U.S. Department of Justice research, an estimated 800,000 children will go missing in the United States this year.

So just let your mind play on these facts and let the unimaginable scale of the horror wash over you.


Did you know? ....."Dr. Antony Kidman  [Nicole's father] died shortly after fleeing Australia when accused of the sexual abuse and murder of children in an elite Sydney pedophile ring. A month prior Fiona Barnett had filed a complaint with the Australian NSW police and ChildAbuse Royal Commission alleging Kidman’s sexual and physical assaults on her throughout childhood. When the Commission opened an investigation the clinical psychologist suddenly left his 43 years with the Sydney University of Technology and Royal North Shore Hospital to stay in Singapore until he died. The family has refused to comment and Singapore police opened an investigation on what they termed as an unnatural death. The ICLCJ Court has been looking into Barnett’s allegations against Kidman in relation to their investigation of the global elite Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult. Over sixty eyewitnesses such as Barnett have testified of Ninth Circle childsacrifice and pedophile activities that spanned the globe, including criminal activities against children in the Americas, Netherlands and UK commonwealth countries such as Australia."

Monday, 26 August 2019

Will taboos become taboo?

These days most taboos are regarded as barbarous relics by the chattering classes. But generally they're based on practical experience, often spanning thousands of years. Even the most bizarre. For instance in some parts of rural China a newly-married husband must carry his wife over burning coals while in his bare feet before the marriage can be consummated. Presumably the thinking is that it helps prepare him for the life of marital torment to come. The Arab practice of not eating or shaking hands with the left hand stems from their tradition of using it to perform excretory ablutions in the desert. The same people's banning of pork is based on the prevalence of swine fever back when the "Prophet" was whooping it up in Arabia and again makes sense, at least for that time. As does the taboo against consanguinity although it's not adopted in some cultures. Which explains why Britain's jails and mental asylums are bursting at the seams with demented criminals of Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnicity.

By and large the globalist nation-wrecking vermin who rule over us don't like taboos because taboos reinforce community cohesion. Which is one reason for Project Paedophilia. And cannibalism could be next. I've noticed a number of articles asking for 'tolerance and understanding'. No surprise that the Washington Post and especially Slate are active in this space. It'll be interesting to see how the project progresses and on the face of it it's a hard sell. I mean imagine being invited over to your friends for dinner only to discover that you're the main course! But remember these are the people who convinced us to fling open our borders to ungrateful Third World parasites and allow degenerate trans-gendered freaks to sexually propagandise our children.

In my post on Project Paedophilia I cited a general modus operandi to condition us into accepting the unacceptable. A similar approach can be used for cannibalism. 
Scientific papers and domain 'experts' will tentatively emerge suggesting cannibalism might be 'more complex' than had heretofore been believed.  Appeals for 'understanding' will follow, reinforced with a new lexicon of euphemisms. New organisations supporting 'dietary freedom'  will emerge. We'll learn that would-be cannibals (or whatever the new term is) are much more numerous than we think. Openness to discussing cannibalism will be promoted as sophisticated, progressive and tolerant. They'll produce 'research' on the nutritional benefits of the practice, material which will be eagerly published by the fake news media.

So don't rule it out. Having your in-laws for lunch might yet come to take on a whole new meaning.

Saturday, 24 August 2019

Irish "teens" doing their thing


Drogheda (a town near Dublin) and its police force experienced diversity up close and personal last week. According to the Irish Independent "FIVE teenagers were arrested and a garda (policeman) was viciously assaulted after a party in a Drogheda pub descended into violence. Shocking video footage of the incident shows teens kicking a garda multiple times as he lies on the ground on Friday night. Sickeningly the person who circulated the video mocked the garda being attacked. “I f**king love my young drillers. Good enough for em f**ing pigs. Feckkkkk these guys are dumb. They done skiddy bop on the pigs head””. (Video).

An eye witness who saw the carnage said, “One poor cop was rushed by a load of them who kind of bowled him over by weight of numbers. When he hit the floor they started kicking him around the place, some of them were actually dancing on his head and there was blood everywhere. They were scumbags acting like animals hunting in a pack, I doubt any one of them would have been brave enough to take the cop, who was a big bloke, on in a one to one scrap, but they were brave boys when they outnumbered him.”

Needless to say the report neglected to mention that the teens were, well, "teens". At least the (not very) Independent did report on the incident unlike our 'national' broadcaster RTE which completely blanked it. Or blacked it out. Yet RTE found time for a lengthy report on the plight of asylum seekers having to make do with inadequate pocket money despite having all their meals, accommodation, health, education and transportation costs picked up by the Irish taxpayer.

The 'teens' in question apparently come over from Balbriggan which is Ireland's answer to Detroit or Gary Indiana. But new Balbriggans are evolving all over the country* while our homosexual Indian Prime Minister (a Justin Trudeau cut-and-paste) posturing and preening, lectures us endlessly on the latest trendy issues and our duties to the '
 international community'. And now, to thunderous applause, he has landed Ireland with 100 of the 350 economic migrants stranded off the coast of Italy. Why should Ireland, with 1% of the EU's population take nearly one third of these parasites? Why indeed, especially when Libya, whence they departed, is willing to take them back.

The answer of course is that the strategy is not about saving the migrants. It's about diluting and replacing Europe's ethnic population.

*Reader comment on Political Ireland blog: I spoke with a local garda, off duty, about an hour ago. I showed him the video and he said they are causing mayhem on the Southside of Cork City. They come in from Ballincollig on the bus directly to Carrigaline. his words "you can't do anything about it".

Wednesday, 21 August 2019

The end of God?

The issue of transhumanism, and by extension immortality, came into prominence recently with Jeffrey Epstein's reported activities in that field. I'm no theologian but it seems to me that the Satanic/Luciferian end-game is  everlasting life whereby men (but of course only a very small number of men) in effect become God. For instance Genesis indicates that Eve was offered immortal Godhood by the serpent as part of his temptation while the books of Daniel and Revelation tell us that the Antichrist will take human form (Kushner?). Maybe this is why pride has always been defined as the deadliest of sins.

Billions have been poured into the "anti-ageing" project by the likes of Sergey Brin and Larry Page whose Calico project aims no less than to “solve death”. Jeff Bezos, 
Larry Ellison and Peter Thiel have massively backed similar projects. Ray Kurzweil, Google’s director of engineering believes we’ll reach a point where “the world will change more in a decade than in a thousand centuries, and as the acceleration continues and we reach the singularity, the world will change more in a year than in all pre-singularity history.When that happens, humans will achieve immortality. As they gain traction in the 2030s, nanobots in the bloodstream will destroy pathogens, remove debris, rid our bodies of clots, clogs and tumors, correct DNA errors and actually reverse the aging process".

Some experts forecast that you won’t even need a body or a brain to exist because one day human consciousness will live on a computer. When such a mind is enhanced by artificial intelligence the world may encounter within the foreseeable future transhumanist beings of almost inconceivable knowledge and power. Imagine a cadre of George Soros replicants ruling over an increasingly dumbed-down miscegenated world. God help us all. Because nobody else could.

Speaking of dumbed-down, new research suggests that fluoridated water consumed by pregnant women might reduce children's intelligence. Obviously I'm not in a position to judge the validity of the research but I've always been deeply suspicious of the campaign to fluoridate our water. The only benefit claimed is a reduction in dental cavities and for this governments have gone to extraordinary lengths, including protracted court cases, to enforce adoption. This makes no sense at all. Unless of course the goal is a dumbed-down populace. Bertrand Russell,
in his book 'The Impact of Science on Society' (1953) gave a clear indication of the long term goals of the Satanic 'elite': "Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton."

Again, God help us all.

Monday, 19 August 2019

Reparations for slavery

Has there ever been anything more preposterous than American blacks’ demands for slavery reparations? Well there is actually: Their protests at Whites expropriating their “culture”. Future historians will scratch their heads, baffled that an advanced people gave serious consideration to the proposal that those who never had slaves hand over money to those who never were slaves in compensation for slavery. Those future historians would surely think that descendants of slaves, far from deserving reparations, have actually struck the jackpot. Because they now enjoy the advantages of an advanced affluent culture in which they enjoy favourable treatment through a plethora of affirmative action measures. Had their antecedents been smarter or fleeter of foot they’d have avoided capture and their descendants would be now subsisting on grubs and bush meat in the West African jungles.

In an non-insane world it’d be the other way around - America’s Whites would be seeking reparations from blacks. Considering the trillions, yes, trillions of dollars they’ve spent on the futile attempt to ‘bridge the achievement gap’ between the races and to keeping black criminals off the streets, the disruption suffered by having to flee neighbourhoods invaded by blacks and seeing their kids dragged down academically and physically endangered through forced school integration. The potential claims list is endless.

The cultural appropriation wheeze is upside-down as well. Tell me, what “culture” do Whites appropriate? I’m pressed to think of anything beyond fuzzy hairstyles and primitive jungle rap “music”. Can you think of anything else?  The black contribution to building America was equivalent to that of the carthorse yet they benefit from advanced infrastructure, telecommunications, health care, democratic institutions, organised sport, complex musical instruments, writing (actually scrub the last two). In other words White civilisation. The thing that thousands of Africans risk their lives to gain entry to. Yet America’s blacks benefit from it free of charge. How about charging them a license fee for its use?

But I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for Tyrone to cut a cheque.  

I long for the day when someone - anyone - will tell them to take a jump. All the way back to Africa if possible.

Friday, 16 August 2019

Sorry for lack of posting.  Internet down and working through my phone.  Not easy!

Monday, 12 August 2019

More sufferink. This time in Lithuania

Unlike many on this blog I believe Jews are in general smarter than Whites. I know it pains but it's true. If not how is it that they, despite their minuscule numbers, rule over us just as thoroughly as White colonists ruled over the Africans? What's more they get us to pay for the privilege. The colonists never managed that. But Jews also possess a sperg-like quality whereby they can be tone deaf to the goyim they oversee, which can lead to surprising outcomes. Take this case from Lithuania.

First a brief history of that country in the twentieth century. It enjoyed a brief period of independence between 1919 and 1940, despite being constantly undermined by the heavily Jewish Communist Party of Lithuania, lead by Antanas Gintautas Sniečkus who was married to a 'sophisticated' Jewish woman.  Independence of all the Baltic countries ended after the USSR invaded in 1940 at which point Sniečkus and the local Communists, working with the largely Jewish NKVD, began a reign of terror against local nationalists, vast numbers of whom were murdered or deported to die in Siberia. Naturally this didn't go down too well with the remaining Lithuanians who began a campaign of partisan resistance, in an uneasy alliance with the Germans for some of the time, in which Jonas Noreika and Kazys Skirpa played important roles. Roles which, understandably, lead to their being regarded as heroes by Lithuanians who erected plaques to them after the collapse of the USSR.

But there was a problem. Both Sniečkus and Noreika, despite being imprisoned by the Germans, had 'declared anti-Semitic views'. I wonder why that would be? (shakin' ma haid). But having valiantly fought for their country's interests, and in Noreika's case given his life for it, and given the traitorous role played by the largely Jewish Communist Party, you'd imagine that Jews would have kept their heads down hoping the whole unsavoury episode would quietly fade into history.

But no. They had to launch a bitter and long-lasting campaign to remove the plaques, much of it driven from wealthy Lithuanian exiles in America (take a bow, Sheldon Adelson). Inevitably they were successful. "The move was ordered by Vilnius mayor Remigijus Simasius (yeah, right) who said it was done because of Noreika's approval of the Nazi administration's decision to establish a Jewish ghetto and seize their property. Both decisions were hailed by the Lithuanian Jewish Council."  And Noreika's plaque was not just quietly removed, it was smashed by a hammer in from of an approving crowd of local Jews.

Now you don't have to be a genius to expect an angry reaction from Lithuanians, which duly came about via mass demonstrations (by 'neo-Nazis', you understand) and blood-curdling threats against the local Jewish community.  To the extent that "Jewish leaders in the Lithuanian capital are indefinitely closing the city's sole synagogue and community center following threats sparked by an emotional debate over the country's World War II-era history, Community leader Faina Kukliansky told The Associated Press."  "There is an atmosphere of tension and incitement" he added.

Now in case you're upset and worried about the synagogue closure I have good news for you. It opened again after a few days. But 'community relations' have been badly undermined. The development most certainly has not been good for Lithuanian Jews. So why do they do such things and continue to be surprised at the outcome? 

Saturday, 10 August 2019

Epstein dead. Bill and Hill react

Well now isn't that a surprise? The most watched prisoner on the planet, with one (alleged) suicide attempt already during his current stint in jail, and he somehow manages to hang himself. In most incarceration regimes strict measures are taken to minimise suicide attempts and this perp was supposedly under 24-hour watch. Remember that modern facilities have a plethora of advanced technologies to monitor a prisoner's every move, every heart-beat, and possibly every thought. They remove anything that could conceivably be used for a suicide attempt. Yet Epstein manages to hang himself.

Right. 

My only comment is that the Cabal have given up even pretending. They don't care what ordinary people think. And they're probably right. Because nobody will do anything about this flagrant flouting of the justice system which in America and most of the West has become a sick joke. In fact it's quite possible that they're so contemptuous of the ordinary person's willingness and ability to react that they're sending out a message: Don't even think of stepping out of line.

Thursday, 8 August 2019

Gun massacres - who benefits?

I'm not strongly into the 'false flag' theory to explain all and every violent event that occurs. I think many on our side are too quick to apply the FF label in the absence of convincing evidence. However it's always correct to ask cui bono? (who benefits?) from such massacres. You don't need to be of a conspiratorial mind-set to be highly sceptical of the explosive growth of such incidents in recent times. Because every such incident elicits a barrage of outraged demands for gun-ownership "reform". Every time. This despite overwhelming evidence that such "reform" would prove worthless in terms of countering such attacks.****
Now the manipulators have successfully seized on the latest massacres to win over Trump and Congressional Republicans, hitherto the only meaningful defenders of the Second Amendment in the political arena.  'We must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms, and that if they do, those firearms can be taken through rapid due process,” Trump said. “That is why I have called for red-flag laws, also known as extreme-risk protection orders.” Well done Donald, you've just lost about half his base while gaining not a single Dem convert. Not one. "Congressional Republicans, under pressure to respond to this weekend’s massacres, appear to be coalescing around legislation to help law enforcement to take guns from those who pose an imminent danger — a measure that, if signed into law, would be the most significant gun safety legislation enacted in 20 years."

It would indeed be the most significant gun safety legislation enacted in 20 years. Because it would provide a mechanism to progressively chip away at gun ownership rights the same way so-called hate speech laws are used to progressively smother almost everything not consistent with The Narrative. Countries like Britain and Sweden, historically bastions of free speech and discourse, have been transformed into USSR-lite. And increasingly less lite as time goes on. Had Western peoples been aware of the eventual impact of seemingly innocent initial restrictions on "hate" - I mean, how could you not oppose hate? - The legislation would have been overwhelmingly rejected. But bit by bit the range and depth of what qualified as "hate" was extended until we are where we are today. Unless White Americans (because - 
be in no doubt - they're the target) act now gun rights, like free speech, will go the way of the dodo.

****
Bad guys can always acquire a gun. Would-be murderers or terrorists can always get hold a gun or if not a weapon equally lethal. This applies especially in the USA where existing circumstances (hundreds of millions of guns in existence and Latin America lying across a porous border) render it impossible to disarm gang-bangers or terrorists.

Bad guys will ignore gun-free zone warnings. In the name of Jesus it should not be necessary to point this out but many otherwise normal people profess to think that sticking up a sign will stop would-be mass murderers. It'd be comical were not lives as stake.

The ownership/murder ratio does not hold up. The ratio of gun ownership does not correlate at all with the ratio of murders. For instance Norway, Canada and Switzerland lag only slightly behind the USA in the gun ownership ratio but the gun death ratio (especially in Norway and Switzerland) is but a fraction of America's. Same within the USA, States and cities with rigid gun control laws have the highest ratios of gun crime.

The 80/20 rule applies: Analysis of race-delineated gun deaths shows that approximately 80% of White killers kill themselves while the ratio is reversed for black killers. 


Gun deaths are actually declining: Despite the opportunistic hysteria that accompanies every mass killing in the USA the number of gun deaths there has actually declined since the nineties. (Last year 12 per 100,000, 15 for most of the nineties...a 20% decline). 

Legally-owned gun-holders can deter or foil attacks. Think of the football coach who valiantly threw himself in front of his students when Cruz started firing. What if he had had a powerful gun? We know what would have happened. Cruz would have been offed and the death toll drastically reduced. Note that American politicians strangely enough have no problem with guns when its their own asses being protected. The takeaway: Guns don't murder, the people who use them do. 

The nigger in the woodpile: An appropriate metaphor here because the mystery ingredient underpinning all of the anomalies above is race. As FBI statistics show, year after year, blacks murder at about six times the rate of Whites, Hispanics three to four times the White rate. If you normalise the figures, i.e. isolate the ratio of gun murders committed by Whites, you'll see that America is little different from most European countries. 

Fathers' Day in da' hood


Tuesday, 6 August 2019

Go woke, go broke

On this blog we've often fulminated at the evil genius Edward Bernays, the  advertising and propaganda mastermind whose black arts have had a lasting negative impact throughout Western society. As he roasts in the Seventh Circle of Hell he must be aghast at the extent to which former client Proctor & Gamble has dropped the ball he provided for them. I'm referring to the notorious Gillette advertising campaign  "The Best Men Can Be"  - a series of videos which took on 'toxic masculinity' - make that White toxic masculinity - in a way that bordered on self-parody. I've made this point before: That the media masters have become so isolated in their own bubble, having consigned all heretical opinions to the far reaches of the internet, that they've become a bit like loathed dictators imagining they're still loved by the people.

How much closer to self-parody can you get than having a White guy, about to proposition a girl, held back by a sensitive well-dressed black 'youth' who enjoined him 'that's not cool'. Yeah, I'd say that happens every day of the week. In essence the company takes aim at straight White males - who make up the overwhelming bulk of their customers - making them feel worthless, inadequate, that their needs and desires are wrong under any circumstances, that their instincts are loathsome, that their very existence is a malignancy, and that they're responsible for all the world's ills. After heaping on the abuse they then ask their target to give them their money. That's a winning strategy if I ever saw one.

Now I was outraged to the extent of immediately boycotting (sorry, in the Current Year this should be personcotting) all Gillette products. I wondered to what extent others would take the same course. I looked out for the company's financials in a haphazard way in the interim but found nothing  of note. Until now. It has emerged that the company has taken an $8 billion non-cash write-down for the period since the launch of the campaign in January. According to Reuter 'P&G reported a net loss of about $5.24 billion.... for the quarter ended June 30, due to an $8 billion non-cash write-down of Gillette. For the same period last year, P&G’s net income (i.e profit) was $1.89 billion.' Now I know that it's not possible to attribute all of this catastrophic change to the ad campaign but the company offered no other explanation admitting 'it was a mistake to call our customers rapists'.  (All right, I made up that last bit).  

This represents one of the most gratifying and encouraging developments I've heard in a long time. It underlines the latent power of White males, and of all Whites actually, once they become aware of the war being waged against them. And decide to fight back. A marvellous development. Having said that it seems to me that the corporate world, especially big tech and Hollywood, are prepared to be hit in the pocket to further their agenda. Amazing. Who could have imagined such a situation even ten years ago? Major corporations prepared, against all their natural instincts, to suffer severe financial penalties to pursue a social agenda. What can be driving them?

Friday, 2 August 2019

East Kent about to learn Da Lawd's Prayer

Rose Hudson-Wilkin, the delectable creature you see pictured here, is about to make history by becoming the first black female Church of England bishop. Prior to that she'd been the personal choice of John Bercow, or Berkowitz if you want to get fussy, as Chaplain to the House Of Commons. Apparently he had a significant input to her subsequent promotion to the Bishop of Dover gig as well despite the tradition of awarding it to the Rector of Westminster. But the latter is male, pale and stale. And Bercow wasn't having that. Which raises the question as to why a Jew should play such a role in supposedly Christian institutions. And something else is remarkable. How do  universally loathed people like Bercow get elected to high office time and again?

According to an ex-colleague Hudson-Wilkin is 'arrogant, opinionated, would tread on anyone to get her way and has a major chip on her shoulder'. Another ex-colleague claimed that the new Bishop 'knows nothing whatsoever about theology and her administrative skills are non-existent'  even though her new role 'requires a great deal of senior management ability'. So why then would she be considered for such a role? Well we all know. Because she's a woman and black. And boy, does she know how to play the race card. Journalist Ysenda Graham writes that 'she specialises in haranguing her audiences for not being diverse enough'. She complains of St. Paul's Cathedral that 'while the congregation is diverse the clergy is completely different'. She berated Specsavers and Marks & Spencers for not having enough 'models of colour' in their ads. Her sermon to the Rotary Club consisted of endless whingeing at their lack of diversity. 

The astonishing thing about people like her is their sense of entitlement. It might appear school-boyish to point out that had Whites not colonised Africa the natives would now be subsisting on grubs in mud huts in the Dark Continent.  They should be on their knees in gratitude at being afforded the benefits of an advanced and rich society. Anyway it remains to be seen how the sensible down-to-earth parishioners of East Kent will take to her. The appointment was made by the very cool and woke Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby. Justin is so concerned with diversity, inclusion, feminism, climate change and other trendy fads that it seems like he'd be happy to see the end of this God business altogether. 

He seems to think that his approach will arrest the precipitous decline of his Church. It won't. It will accelerate it until it degenerates into one of those Californian New Age spiritual movement that flared briefly before disappearing into the dust bin of history. The religions that thrive today, like Islam, are red in tooth and claw, giving short shrift to the latest transient fashions. And if Welby believes, as he seems to, that Hudson-Wilkin will enrich the CoE with her 'African sense of the spirit' then he's in for a rude awakening. Africans don't do the Christian God of humility, poverty and turn-the-other-cheek. Instead they see God as the the all-powerful Daddy In The Sky who's there to help them achieve the worldy objectives. Like winning the lottery or afflicting a love-rival with ebola.

Another venerable Western institution bites the dust.