Wednesday, 13 November 2019

How goeth diversity in the Belly Of The Beast?

As capital of the EUSSR Brussels represents the fountainhead of evil, the belly of the beast, the heart of darkness. It is here that unaccountable globalist apparatchiks hatch their plots to destroy our nations, atomise our peoples and flood the continent with primitive Third World savages. As such they must derive a grim satisfaction, cackling malevolently as they survey their handiwork at close quarters. Because the once-enchanting city has become the poster child for diversity.

Within a stone's throw of Le Berlaymont vibrant crime-infested no-go ethnic enclaves proliferate. Here mainly Moroccan drug dealers freely ply their trade safe from the forces of law and order. From such enclaves they issue forth on an odyssey of crime. Which explains why one quarter of the city's residents carry some sort of self-defence object. An incredible figure for Europe.

There's also a pandemic of child kidnapping - no fewer than seven in the first three months of October. This makes sense when you consider that 25% of the city's population has Muslim roots. Or to put it another way, about 50% of the under-15 population is Muslim. 

Bye bye Brussels. Bye bye Belgium. Bye bye Europe?

Saturday, 9 November 2019

The full diversity package

They were the ideal modern couple. White wife, black African husband, biracial child. Their friends and neighbours could see it. Spectrum News NY reported that "neighbors described the couple and their young daughter as ‘the perfect family’. They were lovely. Just a normal, every-day family. They were part of the community, they were involved with the block association'". According to ABC 7 NY he was described as "a friendly and kind man who adored his wife and daughter". Yes, anthropologist Jennifer Schlecht and her devoted husband Yonathan Tedla were living the woke American dream. Poster children for the new polyglot family.

They nonetheless - like all families I suppose - had their problems. To wit: "Schlecht was found decapitated, with her severed head resting in her lap. Her daughter suffered a cut so deep to her neck that she was partially beheaded. The five-year-old’s father was found hanging from a rope tied to a bedroom door". Who could have imagined? Certainly not Schlecht given that she majored in anthropology, which is the scientific study of human behavior and society. This should have provided her with the ideal tool-set to evaluate inter-racial marriages. Especially those between blacks and Whites. You'd expect the very first semester to highlight that a White woman marrying a black man is eight times more likely to be killed by him than by a White husband. Not twice as likely, eight times.

But today universities are not about factual inquiry and learning. They're about propaganda and indoctrination. So the highly-educated Schlecht would have had less meaningful understanding of black pathologies than would the trailer-park White women whom she secretly despised. Same reason that a White progressive ex-colleague of hers lamented "that she should die under such brutal circumstances is beyond understanding." Well someone said that when you lie to others it can work. When you lie to pay. Nature has a way of dealing with such people.

The fantasy black men 
Schlecht saw in the media - cool, clever, masterful, wise, top jobs, devoted fathers and husbands - were just that. Fantasy figures. I can  imagine how she preened and virtue-signalled in front of her equally woke friends. As Pompidor Quixote (not his real name!) observed over at the Daily Stormer "Even her daughter’s name was diverse. She got to experience the full diversity package, beheading and all."

Wednesday, 6 November 2019

If a tree falls in the forest....

"If a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it did it still make a sound?". This is an apparently subtle question from philosopher George Berkeley. To my mind it's bullshit because.......of course it made a sound, you dipstick. But actually he might have been onto something in that if an event takes place and nobody is ever made aware of it did it really take place? The same question arises with a planetary time warp (you can see my superior mind at work here).  So here's my point: If nobody hears of  the depredations of a country's black/brown invaders have those depredations - from a practical perspective - really occurred?

I ask because there's been a truly embarrassing faux pas by Ireland's Minister For Population Replacement, the pathetically useless Charlie Flanagan. Charlie made a big fuss of 'new Irish' athlete Cameroon-born Brandon Arrey as he recently introduced a new raft of Orwellian 'hate' legislation. He wished him well as a symbol of the New Ireland. He didn't know how right he was. Because within days Arraey was shown up to be a misogynistic racist of  the worst kind. Earlier tweets recorded him in conversation with a Hispanic associate - "Well you are just a Mexican bastard and your mother is going to have a miscarriage and die with the unborn baby still inside her". Lovely. And his new countrymen didn't escape his wrath. "Went to the Burren [County Clare] today and the tour guide kept calling me Brendan. I was like my name is Brandon you fucking whore, I was ready to kill the Bitch". "Shut the fuck up you white wigger!!!" and "Ireland will be multicultural in 10 years and your kids will have [no more than] the same rights as mine. I can only laugh writing this" summarised the esteem in which he holds his new benefactors.

Oh deary deary me Brendan. I mean Brandon. You landed the Minister with a PR disaster. Well you would have had it been reported in the media. But it was not. In contrast to the blaze of publicity surrounding the launch, the exposure of Arrey for what he is was met with a wall of silence from the Irish MSM. So special thanks to The Tricolour, a patriotic site trying to ensure that trees falling in the forest do get to be heard.

Sunday, 3 November 2019

The "Honourable" Member takes his leave

Consider the wisdom of appointing Casey Anthony to oversee childcare policy. Or George Soros to reform campaign financing. Or Madonna to develop modesty standards for teenage girls. Trust me on this, such appointments would be prudent and far-sighted compared to appointing coolie Keith Vaz, the "Honourable" (stop laughing at the back!) Member for Bangladesh Leicester East, to oversee justice in the Mother Of Parliaments.

Because Vaz must surely be one of the most corrupt, venal, unscrupulous frauds ever to ooze into Parliament. And treacherous. Having assured fellow bindi Salman Rushdie of his 'unstinting support' during the Satanic Verses furore he performed an instantaneous volte-face once his 'Asian' constituents' views became clear. At which point he lead a mob of several thousand outraged Muslims (are there any other kind?) demanding the book's burning.

But he was most notable for the industrial-strength corruption in which he was embroiled throughout his career. Fiddling expenses, peddling influence, selling UK citizenship, lying under oath about his numerous conflicts of interest, failure to register sources of extra-Parliamentary income, employing an illegal immigrant at slave labour wages, making slanderous allegations for which he had to pay damages, intervening to prevent the extradition of Iranian mega-crook Nadhmi Auchi to France.....mired in corruption throughout his career. Little wonder fellow MP Patrick Mercer described him as
 "a crook of the first order". An observation that got Mercer suspended for, wait for it, 'bringing Parliament into disrepute'.
Vaz seemed to have run out of road when he was exposed as a carpet-munching drug dealer after being caught having unprotected sex with two male prostitutes at his £500k London apartment, a soiree at which he offered to supply copious quantities of cocaine in return for access to their asses. (I wonder did he use Vaseline for lubrication?). That was in September 2016. Yet the following month he was appointed by Harriet  Harman to the Justice Select Committee! Harman isn't  nicknamed “Hypocrite Hattie” for nothing. She supported for years the Paedophile Information Exchange which worked, inter alia, to legalise sex with ten year-olds. Yet after Jimmy Savile was finally exposed (posthumously) she had this to say in a passionate and tearful Parliamentary speech: “It is impossible to overstate the suffering caused to those whom he abused. No one should be complacent. There are countless young women and men who have been abused but have never complained." 

And like Diane Abbot (the Hackney Hippo) she worked tirelessly against high-priced private schooling which apparently 'propped up society's inequities'. Only to send her own kids to exactly such a school. She was roundly criticised for her hypocrisy by Abbot. Who proceeded to do exactly the same thing once her own mutant spawn were old enough.

But exposing 'woke' hypocrisy is like shooting fish in a barrel so back to Keith who has at long last been suspended from Parliament. Such a suspension normally signals the end of a political career but don't rule out a comeback. Because he still has one priceless weapon in his armoury: He's a brown man. Already he's on record as saying that the copious criticism he has attracted has been driven by (shudder) racism. He's been held to a lower standard of expectations all through his crooked parasitical life because of his race. Which means a Lazarus-like resurrection could yet be on the cards.

The Long March Through The Institutions continues at a brisk pace.

Thursday, 31 October 2019

The Noahide pandemic

The Noahide Laws are, according to Wikipedia, "a set of imperatives which, according to the Talmud, were given by God as a binding set of laws for the "children of Noah" – that is, all of humanity. According to Jewish tradition, non-Jews who adhere to these laws are said to be followers of Noahidism and regarded as righteous gentiles who are assured of a place in the world to come." That seems ok then, especially as the laws themselves are like a slimmed-down Ten Commandments. I mean, even though the penalty for every transgression is decapitation, I can forego the temptations of blasphemy and the worship of graven images. However the views of Rabbi Schneerson, the Noahide Movement's founder, give me pause for thought.
To wit: "We do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather we have a case of . . . a totally different species. . . . The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world . . . The difference of the inner quality [of the body] . . . is so great that the bodies would be considered as completely different species. This is the reason why the Talmud states that there is an halachic difference in attitude about the bodies of non-Jews [as opposed to the bodies of Jews]: “their bodies are in vain”. . . . An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness."

Oh dear. So it looks like our place will equate to that of blacks in the antebellum American South, But why worry?  After all those laws only affect a marginal Jewish cult. Right? Well no. In fact Noahide Centres are sprouting up all over the world. And they're made up almost exclusively of former Christians, overseen by a visiting rabbi. Their proponents make it clear that the laws are for all mankind. Whether mankind wants them or not. To underline their pervasiveness the laws have been formally  introduced into the American legal system via Public Law 102-14 and there's an active campaign to get them approved by the US Supreme Court, even - especially - the capital punishment bits. Make no mistake, the laws are to be applied to the whole world, administered by a rabbinical court in Jerusalem.

I have no special knowledge of the laws but I do know the following:

The plan for their world-wide implementation is real and has powerful support including that of the Israeli Government and Western traitors like Kushner and Von Rumpoy

The laws are incompatible with Christianity (hence the rewriting of the Bible and Koran under the guise of ‘improved translations’)

They are tightly interwoven with Chabad Lubavitch, one-world government, the Third Temple and various other manifestations of Jewish eschatology

They are very bad news for the goyim

If you're interested in pursuing the subject check out the excellent videos by Adam Green over at Know More News which include a fascinating debate with the founder of Jews For Jesus. Here's the Bitchute link, they're also on Youtube.

Tuesday, 29 October 2019

Does Orania have a future?

Just by way of context for this post I have a neighbour who's been visiting South Africa at least once a year going back to 1995. He was a believer in the Rainbow Nation for a long, long time. But over the last few years he's relented. Admits that the country is going to hell in a handcart, that every time he visits he sees further signs of decline. He perceives the impact of BEE to be worse than that of violence or corruption. (BEE is of course a form of legalised corruption). Every visit sees another black nincompoop elevated into a position of crucial importance . He says that unlike in the Middle East such blacks appear blissfully unaware of their crippling limitations and that this is having a catastrophic impact on effectiveness and morale. As an aside he also professes astonishment at the number of Whites who continue to profess belief in the country's future.

Which brings me to Orania, a town which seems to be going from strength to strength. Even The Guardian admits this while expressing 'disquiet' at the uniform Whiteness of the town. Presumably they'd see no problem with the uniform blackness of Soweto.  According to the report 'the school has experienced strong growth particularly in the junior primary phase — the youngest pupils — and many of the classes have for the first time reached such numbers that they have had be to divided into two'. Some estimates see the population rising to 10,000 (it's currently about 2,000) by 2030. No surprise to learn that crime and unemployment are negligible while the industrious people have, as the Afrikaners have always done, carved a good living out of deeply inhospitable terrain. 

So can the Afrikaners really build their own homeland? History is against them. They built their own civilisation after they arrived in the 1600's but in the early 19th century were forced out by the British. In 1834 they upped sticks and trekked into the barren interior of the Cape and into Natal. After much further tribulation they established genuine independent homelands in Transvaal and the Orange Free State between 1854 and 1856. However they had the misfortune to pick an area which happened to have the world's largest diamond reserves which in turn lead to Britain yet again dispossessing them by way of the Boer Wars. The Afrikaners' final attempt took place under the Apartheid system under which Africa's most prosperous and advanced country was created. So desirable that blacks flocked to it in droves from the rest of Africa despite the supposedly hateful apartheid regime. But 'freedom and democracy' were not to be denied and by 1994 the Afrikaners were sold out again, this time by their own leaders.

So yes, history is against them. And today Afrikaners have (almost) no place left. Except maybe for Orania. But Orania can only ever be a peripheral solution because there are literally millions of Afrikaners and they can't all move there. So what are the prospects for the town itself? As things stand it's protected by the South African Constitution which allows some freedoms for tribes to have their own communities. Hence the importance of its remaining an exclusively Afrikaner community. But anyone who believes that the country's Constitution will, if tested, hold back the bantu is on cloud cuckoo land. If you have any doubt jst take one look at the country's top law enforcer (this guy). 

So a few humble suggestions.

Keep it Afrikaner. If you dilute the ethnic, cultural and religious homogeneity you're doomed. I always believed that the unwillingness of pre 'democracy' Whites to do all of their own work, including low-level labour, fatally undermined the Homeland policy. 

Don't be too successful, or if you are don't flaunt it. Ostentatious wealth will act like a magnet to both the impoverished black masses and their wealthy overlords. And in turn they'll be repelled by a frugal, honest and hard-working lifestyle.

Train to be as military proficient as circumstances allow. This includes small arms training, survival skills, emergency and contingency planning etc.

Learn from history in that under certain circumstances you might be sold down the river by everyone, even your own leaders. Prepare accordingly.

And finally consider the possibility that corruption could actually be your friend. A relatively modest bribe to key political and media figures might, just might, go a long way in deflecting unwanted attention from your success.

I offer these suggestions with a sense of deep humility (having as I do only an outsider's understanding). Humility because I'm offering survivalist advice to a doughty people who have overcome impossible odds throughout their history. But I offer it as a friend and well-wisher. I hope and, literally, pray that things work out for you.

Saturday, 26 October 2019

Where the job opportunities lie

Many of us tear (what's left of) our hair out at the tumescence of university 'degrees' in useless counter-productive subjects like women's studies, lesbian dance theory, sociology, feminist theory, peace studies and the like. We argue that such 'qualifications' do not provide students with the means to earn a living in the workplace. Instead, we proclaim, they should study engineering, technology, medicine and science. But maybe we're wrong. Because in fact there are plenty of positions waiting for graduate of Woke.

Google alone employees literally thousands of 'hate speech' sleuths whose only objective is to detect and eliminate anything that conflicts with the Approved Narrative. The police in Britain and all over the Western world have branches of the force dedicated solely to sniffing out 'hate'. In fact the Victim Class is actually encouraged to take offence and report it to one of the woke police officers. There are endless opportunities for diversity managers, even in for-profit enterprises. Jared Taylor a few weeks back quoted some grovelling CEO proclaim 'nothing is more important to his company' than diversity. Nothing. Boundless opportunity for Disabled Lesbian Theory alumni there. And the demand for race hustlers was never better, a profession greatly enabled by a degree in Reparation Studies.

Meanwhile White STEM graduates are getting replaced by low cost Asian immigrants. Maybe I was wrong all along...

Tuesday, 22 October 2019

The Kansas City schools "experiment"

In 1985, after finding that the city and the state had maintained a racially segregated system, Federal District Judge Russell Clark ordered an ambitious overhaul of Kansas City's schools. As he put it, he "allowed the district planners to dream" and "provided the mechanism for those dreams to be realized."  All on the White taxpayer's dime of course, $1.5 billion in all.  Annual spending per pupil grew to twice that of nearby White suburbs. Rotted buildings were replaced with state-of-the-art facilities. Greenhouses, laboratories, a 25-acre farm, a planetarium, schools that offered  "total immersion" in foreign languages, an Olympic-sized swimming pool with an underwater viewing room, television and animation studios, a robotics lab, lavish athletic arenas, radio and TV studios, computers in every classroom field trips to Mexico and Senegal.  You name it, they were given it. Teacher salaries were substantially increased and the student:teacher ratio was reduced to the lowest in the country.  

And the results were spectacular. SAT scores and attendance rates soared for black students while dropout rates declined dramatically. Many of them went on to found leading-edge companies and develop brilliant careers in science and technology. Well no, actually. In fact the experiment failed so badly that after ten years the Supreme Court stepped in to bring it to a halt.  The dropout rate actually increased while daily attendance rates, despite the magnificent facilities, actually declined and 60% of the 'students' who started high school never finished. Performance on standardised tests showed "no measurable improvement" (PC-Speak for 'no improvement'). Worst of all the black/White achievement gap, the bridging of which was the program's centrepiece, remained as wide as ever. By some measurements it had actually widened. The forecast rebalancing of student demographics (70% black) not alone failed to emerge but actually got worse, rising to 80% in 1995.  Even the Washington Post admitted that 'compared to students in the rest of the state, Kansas City pupils are worse off today than when Judge Clark began underwriting the school district's dreams'. 

Heckuva job there Judgie, well done.

White taxpayers (but I repeat myself) naturally enough objected to Clark's social engineering. Not only had they to fork over more tax money for black kids but now also tens of thousands of after-tax dollars to send their own kids to safe schools. (At a given bus stop it was common to find ten local kids going to ten different schools.) This revolt prompted Clark to take over fiscal policy as well, inflicting massive tax increases on the unfortunate citizenry. So not alone was he making the law up as he went along he then ruled that citizens weren't taxing themselves enough. 

The whole experiment was an unmitigated disaster, with ultimately no winners, not even the "teachers" (almost all black and described by one educator as "not focused, vacuous, totally devoid of intellectual capacity, ill suited for the mission at hand") feeding at the Gub'mint trough, most of whom eventually lost their sinecures. In fact it wasn't an experiment at all because the results of a real experiment are, ipso facto, unknown beforehand. Whereas the results of Clark's folly were utterly predictable. I mean, all it took was a couple of weeks in Nigeria and another few weeks in Rochester NY for me to understand the truth about blacks. How can people grow up in America and not realise the same thing?

I ask because not a single analysis of the Kansas 'experiment' even hinted at the real explanation. Even the "right wing" Cato Institute. The failure was attributed to lack of incentives, training, self-esteem, money and time. Or the legacy of name it. We all know that the leading nation-wreckers were fully aware, rubbing their hands in glee as society disintegrated before their eyes. But what about Judge Clark and the army of White libtards who volunteered to implement the scheme? Apparently Clark went to his grave believing that with just a little more time and money the achievement gap would have been eliminated. And the madness continues to this day.

'They don't know enough to care or don't care enough to know'.

Friday, 18 October 2019

The greatest meme of all?

Read the reactions below and watch libtard heads explode as they struggle to explain their problem with the slogan. Their problem is that the lies they tell themselves have come home to roost. Spiked explains their dilemma: ‘I thought we had all agreed to pretend not to have any negative opinions about Islam. But this statement forces me either to agree with it, which I don’t, or disagree with it, which I’m not allowed to.’ The result is utter confusion on the part of the interviewees about how to signal their obedience to the unspoken lie. One woman, who struggles to explain why she found the posters ‘upsetting’, nevertheless, ‘ripped them down, took them to the police, and alerted social media’.

Anyway, read and enjoy!

"For women, the message is insulting and unnerving."

"It was short-sighted and you didn't gain anything from it"

"It's unclear who they target, women or Islam."

"Its either targeting Islam or women or both I don't know"

“I’m not really sure what point they were trying to make but either way it was terrible”

"I don't know what this means but it feels illegal."

"It's insulting to someone with an Islamic background"

Now what I'd love to see is a follow up meme saying “Islam is right about homosexuals”. 

Wednesday, 16 October 2019

Diversity: The costs to White Americans

Have you ever wondered how much diversity costs a country in hard financial terms? Well regular commentator Dexter sent me this link which provides some fascinating analysis of the 2014 American Federal Budget. In a nutshell the average White American over his lifetime transfers $384,109 of his wealth to a single black American.  Or at least the Federal Government does it on his behalf. This is based on the following average annual net tax/welfare benefit trade-off:

White: -$2,795
Black: +$10,016

Normalising for the respective population ratios the average black would then be a net lifetime beneficiary to the tune of nearly $800,000. For married couples the figures would approximately double. Kids will widen the differential further. Surprisingly (to me at least, you know, those hard-working Mexican dreamers.....)  Hispanics are barely better than blacks, being net beneficiaries to the tune of $7,298 annually.

Bad and all as these figures are from a White perspective they tell only part of the story. Because they refer only to welfare, and Federal welfare at that. The financial drain on Whites of the black and Hispanic undertow extends much wider and deeper than that. For a start you must factor in State and Municipal welfare payments and subsidies of all sorts for which the tax/welfare benefit trade-offs should be broadly similar to those at the Federal level. Then factor in the likes of incarceration and general law enforcement costs (Hispanics incarcerated at twice, and blacks five times, the rate for Whites). This would add about another $2,000 annually to the individual White's annual tax bill. 

Then, and this is a huge although unquantifiable financial burden on Whites, consider the tens of millions of (mainly public sector) make-work AA 'jobs' occupied by persons of colour. I've read where about 40% of the black so-called middle class occupy such positions. And as everyone who's worked with blacks knows, they're generally useless at anything other than the most basic tasks. So indirectly Whites are paying for this as well. And the cost is stratospheric. The blog author's Conclusion states: The negative fiscal impact of blacks and hispanics is significant. All of this discussion of a “national debt” and “deficit” is primarily of function of blacks and hispanics. Without them, we would be running budget surpluses today, even when keeping the military the same size.

My conclusion is to point out what should be obvious: That this cannot continue. A system based on declining contributor numbers and a soaring population of net beneficiaries will hit the wall sooner or later. When probably depends on how long the Federal Reserve can get away with magicking up their funny money. 

Or when Whites revolt.

Sunday, 13 October 2019

Sweden's busy sexual assault police

Something very strange going on in Sweden, the Land Where Women Rule. According to their crime statistics institute (appropriately named Bra "Almost a quarter of the population chooses a different route or another mode of transportation as a result of anxiety about crime... Among women aged 20-24, 42 percent state that they often opted for another route or another mode of transportation, because they felt insecure and worried about being subjected to crime. Young women in the 16-24 age category have seen a massive increase in sexual harassment. The number of sexual offences against this group has seen a surge from 7.1 percent in 2006 to 34.4 percent in 2017."  [Side note: In Scandinavia virtually all rapes are committed by Africans and/or Muslims.]

But the sexual assault police are working on it. Look how this go grrrrlll all-female unit takes down an Afghan criminal with brutal and ruthless efficiency (start about one minute in). And there's more! The cops have issued a Three-Step Rape Prevention Process (it's on the web somewhere, I've seen it) which demonstrates a keen understanding of the African and Muslim mindset. So when the would-be rapist lunges the woman's first response is to put one hand straight out (palm outward-facing) while saying 'No!'. In the unlikely event that this fails to deter the tumescent attacker she's then to put out both hands while saying 'No!' even more emphatically. If he still persists - and it's hard to believe he would after all that - the woman is instructed to hit him with her handbag! 

So why are they still they're afraid of being raped?

Well maybe Mikaela Blixt can explain. After a man attacked her in the street and tried to rape her, the police did nothing, even though she knew where her attacker lived and could easily have identified him. The Swedish mainstream media outlet, Expressen, wanted to interview her, but only on condition that she not mention that her attacker was an Afghan migrant.  Surprisingly this attack took place in a remote farming community.  Surprising because diversity is, for now anyway, largely confined to Sweden's urban areas and also you'd imagine there'd be enough sheep and goats around there to satiate even the most romantic Afghan. In any event "the police refused to send a patrol because the crime was not ongoing. She was referred instead to 114 14 where she ended up in hour-long telephone queues".  Unless my Google Translate is way off, then you read that right. So while you're getting raped in Sweden you must, if you want the police to help, manage to extract your phone, ring the help line and provide an approximate estimation of when the attack will finish. If the police can't get there within that time frame then, well, you'll be in Mikaela Blixt's position.

Why are the sexual assault police so slow to respond, especially when their numbers have almost doubled in the last ten years? Well maybe they're all busy stitching up Julian Assange. Vague accusations of sexual assault lead to an explosion of police and prosecution activity and man woman-years of background work, as prosecutors took his case up to the highest levels of Government in order to get an extradition order from Britain. Contrast that with the handing of the Mikaela Blixt case where nothing was done even though she (Blixt)  knew where the rapist lived!

I've said it before: We're living in The Matrix.

Thursday, 10 October 2019

The threat of judicial overreach

The relentless rise of judicial overreach has been one of the most remarkable and dangerous developments in recent decades. Judges now routinely re-define the law based on their political and social views rather than judge on the basis of constitutionally enacted legislation. In the USA the President and/or Congress are routinely thwarted nation-wide by obscure politically-appointed Federal judges in remote judicial outposts. The enforcement of immigration law has in effect been abandoned by the courts who base judgements on what they think is best rather than on duly-enacted legislation. And given that such  judges usually have names like Conchita, Shan'uikwa or Wang the verdict invariably blocks enforcement. In one truly bizarre example a judge determined that a law was invalid because the legislators 'had not spent adequate time in framing it'. So judges now decide the legislative agenda as well?

The recent Brexit Parliamentary prorogation ruling from Britain's Supreme Court illustrated how judicial 
overreach can have real practical implications at the highest strategic levels. In admitting that 'this was a once-off case' Justice Hale virtually admitted that the law was being selectively interpreted to arrive at a pre-ordained verdict. The almost contemptuous dismissal of the prior Divisional Court judgement makes you wonder how two sets of senior judges could arrive at diametrically opposite verdicts. And while the judgement takes pains to assure that it was not passing judgement of Boris' motivations - which would be ultra vires (see how I'm getting into the swing of this legal thingy?) - they let the cat out of the bag later by admitting that he had 'no good reason' to prorogue Parliament. Blatant judicial overreach.

True to form Tony Bliar and New Labour had a major hand in these developments by establishing the British Supreme Court and by incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights into British law. As we know, so-called human rights and 'hate' legislation is framed in such vague and loose terms that its enactment ineluctably transferred power from Parliament to the Courts. And facilitates politically convenient verdicts.  In doing so Bliar also set up a lucrative 'human rights' practice for his ghastly wife Cherie.

All of this has major ramifications.  As Saul Alinsky, the Frankfurt School, Gramsci and even the Protocols Of Zion all recognised, regulatory capture is the key to power.  We've seen the extent to which free speech has already been curtailed in Britain and it's only going to get worse. In an article in The Spectator some time ago a would-be judge discovered that to be successful he'd not only have to commit to supporting 'diversity' but would have to demonstrate the practical measures he had already undertaken to support it. This is judicial capture, pure and simple. The scary thing is that any counter-measures undertaken by elected representatives can be deemed 'unconstitutional' by the courts and thus rendered void.

Either George Bernard Shaw or Oscar Wilde accurately observed that all professions are conspiracies against the public. Yet any questioning of the courts is described as ‘undermining the rule of law’. The rule of  lawyers would be more like it. Shakespeare had it right: 'First kill all the lawyers'. The Bard saw the dangers hundreds of years ago.

Monday, 7 October 2019

Darker forces at work

Boy, things must be bad in Ireland when the Government is withdrawing a measly €30 per week allowance from disabled workers.  The Minister for Health has defended the axing of a grant paid to people with disabilities on some training programmes. The move to cease the €31.80 per five-day week payment from September 1st has been criticised by social workers and Opposition TDs. Describing the move as a “callous act affecting those most vulnerable and most in need of disability supports”, Donegal Independent TD Thomas Pringle claimed it was motivated by the need to save money.  But the measure, estimated to affect about 400 people, will yield less than €1 million in savings annually.

This represents just one of a wide range of Government support cuts spanning health, education, home support for the elderly and much more. Even the supposedly ring-fenced contribution to the Rainy Day Fund has been abandoned due to fiscal constraints. But the politicians were nonetheless able to conjure up nearly €11 million to fund a range of "Gender Equality and Migrant Integration" projects. The migrant integration projects will provide a range of practical supports directly to migrants, including English language classes and workplace training. Anti-racism and cultural diversity initiatives will also receive funding. The gender equality projects will support women’s entrepreneurship and participation in the workforce through a range of training and mentoring initiatives. In other words get mothers out of the home, the stated primary objective of this freak to whom we've handed over responsibility for children and the family.

In that referenced post I asked whether I was paranoid in thinking greater forces were at work influencing Irish Ministers to make such decisions. In it I described Irish politicians as nonentities, without convictions, whose only interest lies in ensuring their continued place on the gravy train through re-election. Taking training money off the disabled and giving it instead to migrants assuredly does not help with this. So why do they go along with it? Stronger and darker influences are at work here,

Friday, 4 October 2019

Another Misunderstander Of Islam strikes

Where's Inspector Clouseau when you need him? Because the famous bumbling French detective could hardly do worse than the Paris police investigating the recent mass killing at their HQ. They're totally baffled as to the killer's motive.

INVESTIGATORS ARE COMBING an IT staffer’s computer today for clues as to why he stabbed four colleagues to death at police headquarters in Paris. The 45-year-old man killed three men and a woman in a frenzied 30-minute attack that ended when he was shot in the head. A search of the couple’s house found no evidence that the man, who converted to Islam about 18 months ago, had been driven to his criminal deed by radical religious ideology. Shortly after the killings, Paris prosecutor Remy Heitz said anti-terror investigators were not involved in the murder probe. All possible motives were being examined, sources have said, including the scenario of a personal conflict at work.

Which probably means that the sleuths failed to find a statement from the killer (a black immigrant from Martinique) explicitly stating 'in the Name of the all-merciful Allah I will go in to work in the morning and and stab everyone I can find'. Therefore nothing to do with the Religion Of Peace. Just another Misunderstander Of Islam. He must have thought that when the Koran enjoined him to 'Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them' (Qur’an 2:191) 
the 'sacred' text meant, well, kill the unbelievers wherever you find them. And like most misunderstanders he seemed, apart from the mass murdering bit, to have been a swell guy. According to a fellow worshipper “he was a very quiet person. I used to see him going to the mosque but he practised (his religion) in a normal way” . Well he sure did, didn't he? And remember Jihadi John, the notorious 'English' head-chopper for ISIS? He'd been described by his imam as 'a gentle, spiritual boy'. Indeed.

So what's to be done? Well I believe I have a solution. Reinterpret the sacred texts in the light of latest thinking and research. You know the way Pope Francis reinterpreted the Bible to mean that homosexuality and all kinds of degeneracy are fully in accord with that book's teachings. I've been working hard and this is the result to date. I seriously believe that when complete it has the potential to eliminate mass murders stemming from misunderstanding the Religion Of Peace.

My initial attempt.

Quotation: "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.” Qur’an 9:123
Scholastic reinterpretation: "Make friends with your infidel neighbours". 

Quotation: Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam” Qur’an 5:33
Scholastic reinterpretation: "All discussion on religion should be open and tolerant."

Quotation: “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water;melt their skin and bellies.” Qur’an22:19
Scholastic reinterpretation: We're working on that one. But meanwhile lads lay off the hooks and rods and melting bellies and all that stuff.

So gentle reader, do you think it'll work?

Wednesday, 2 October 2019


Pointing out the fallacies of feminism is as easy as shooting fish in a barrel. But it's worth examining the implications of today's movies and advertisements which feature a powerful kick-ass women juxtaposed against a dopey (and invariably White) male. In effect what they're promoting is masculinity. Except that women are the vehicle. The 'virtues' of the New Feminine Lead are essentially masculine. Tough, strong, unsentimental, capable of extreme violence as and when necessary. 

They're conceding that masculine qualities are superior. Which is why the female lead is in practice a man. But without the male appendages. Even more paradoxical is the fact that the heroine (are we allowed to use that word any more?) is invariably represented as scantily-clad and sexy: The very things feminists are supposed to be against. You know, objectifying the female body and all that. And by portraying the men as weak and incompetent you'd have to ask whether they can see women as superior only when set against such men.

To what extent are the feminist war-boars being used by a greater power? I'm no expert on the subject but a lot of the agenda strikes me as Satanic Inversion which includes inverted symbols such as crosses and pentagrams and of course the broader inversion of good and evil. Just look at what's seen as good today (every kind of sexual perversion, transgenderism, full-term abortion) and what's evil (motherhood, national, cultural and ethnic pride....). Baphomet, an important Satanic deity is a man with the breasts of a woman. (In 2014 The Satanic Temple commissioned a statue of Baphomet in Oklahoma). The Black Mass is of course the ultimate expression of Satanic Inversion.

In any event something is happening. The process of societal degeneration is progressive at breakneck speed. It's like as if the world is approaching the edge of a cataract. 

Could this be the explanation?

Sunday, 29 September 2019

The mask falls, the gloves are off

It's been perfectly obvious to anyone paying attention with an open mind that war had been declared on the White race, with particular focus on straight White males.  Who has declared this war? The Satanic (and I don't use that word lightly) architects of the globalist NWO. Globohomo. Its goal is the destruction not just of the White male but also of nationalism, tradition, the family, freedom, beauty, truth and personal accountability. Their weapons include feminism, sexual degradation, Third World invasion, negrolatry and Holocaustrianity. Up to fairly recently that war paid at least lip-service to the Geneva Convention as it were. They professed to operate within the confines of democratic discourse and the rule of law. Such restrictions have now been thrown to the winds reflecting desperation or, more likely, confidence that globohomo can now get away with anything. 

There are countless examples to support my thesis but I'll cite what I call The Project To Disarm Law-Abiding Whites. Because that's what it is. The whole gun control campaign is based on lies as I showed in this post. In a nutshell bad guys can always get their hands on guns, gun deaths have been in decline for some time, international and (American intra-national) comparisons prove that there's no correlation between gun ownership and the rate of gun murders (negative correlation if anything), while suicide represents 80% of gun deaths for Whites. 

These facts of course haven't deterred globohomo which continues to whittle away at the Second Amendment, first by restricting certain types of gun, second by restricting gun rights for certain individuals as embodied in the proposed Red Flag legislation.These so-called extreme risk protection orders authorise removing guns and ammunition from individuals deemed as dangerous by some anonymous, unaccountable person or persons.Given that black and Latino gangs cause the vast bulk of gun killings in the USA you'd imagine that restrictionists would see the existing gang databases as manna from Heaven. That is, if their objective really was to restrict gun deaths and not to disarm law-abiding Whites.“The majority of violent crime, including gun violence, in the United States is linked to gangs,” said Rep. Ken Buck. “My amendment is quite simple. It would allow the issuance of a red flag order against anyone whose name appears in a gang database if there was probable cause to include that individual in the database [my italics].” 

Sounds like a no-brainer. But globohomo Democrats vetoed the amendment. And with that rejection went the pretext that the agenda is not just about disarming law-abiding Whites. Whether the legislation goes through or not is secondary. Whites should now realise that they are being not alone discriminated against and displaced in their own lands but that there's an active agenda to render them powerless before certain minorities and militarised law enforcement officers.

Scary stuff.

Thursday, 26 September 2019


The media chattering classes are so insulated from reality, thanks to Stasi-like censorship, that they frequently descend into unwitting self-parody.  Real-life Titania McGraths. Look at this from a Guardian journalist - an oxymoron if there ever was one. Especially when said journalist is an affirmative action female from Nigeria. Logic, consistency and self-awareness are not to be expected from such people. But the following still takes some beating.

Apparently women's magazines have succumbed in reassuring numbers to the 'get woke, go broke' fate. Readership has plummeted and many household names have disappeared down the tube. "Cosmopolitan saw its print circulation drop by a third in the last half of 2018; weeklies Woman and Woman’s Own were down 20% and 19% respectively. Now magazine dropped 43%." Now get this: "The closure of Teen Vogue’s print publication was met with widespread outrage, after we had watched the magazine mature into a politically engaged tome for pubescent readers who cared about fashion, but also wanted to ensure that the climate crisis hadn’t scorched the world in which it could exist." Oh ma' achin' sides!  "Although glossy magazines are the worst affected, online women’s publications have not escaped – the Debrief and the Pool suffered the same fate. The closure of Lena Dunham’s email-based Lenny Letter showed that even a famous CEO and acclaimed writers couldn’t ensure a publication’s longevity."

And this: "The sad thing is that the current purge" - yes, she actually wrote that word - "is happening at a time when women’s magazines are less sexist and more progressive than they ever have been.  Last year’s September issues made history with virtually every one featuring a black cover star." After which it went bust. For the life of me I can't imagine why.

To such people hearing views not conforming to their own would be like the family dog giving his opinion on Brexit. Then again maybe some day they'll get their pin-heads around this whole 2+2=4 thingy. But in the meantime we should rejoice and capitalise on their unfathomable ignorance and blindness. They represent a target-rich environment.

Monday, 23 September 2019

Bury My Heart At........Fort Mims?

The 'massacre' (it used to be called a battle, more anon) of the Lakota Sioux at Wounded Knee has become a staple of American martyrology. The publication of Dee Brown's Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee in 1970 has inspired countless books, poems, movies (most notably Soldier Blue) and songs and a mighty outpouring of White Guilt. The narrative is straightforward: Peaceful eco-friendly Indians communing with their ancestral spirits massacred by inherently evil Whites. A metaphor for the whole world really. Benighted is the man or woman who has not heard of this terrible event.

But the reality was quite different. Even Wikipedia can't garnish the essential facts. "On the morning of December 29, the U.S. Cavalry troops went into the camp to disarm the Lakota. One version of events claims that during the process of disarming the Lakota, a deaf tribesman named Black Coyote was reluctant to give up his rifle, claiming he had paid a lot for it. Simultaneously, an old man was performing a ritual called the Ghost Dance. Black Coyote's rifle went off at that point, and the U.S. army began shooting at the Native Americans. The Lakota warriors fought back, but many had already been stripped of their guns and disarmed." 25 soldiers and about 250 Indians were killed. That seems like a battle to me more than a massacre. The disparity is casualty ratios can reasonably be attributed to the Americans' superior weapons, training and organisation.

Now there is no doubt whatsoever that ordinary soldiers lost control, slaughtering numerous non-combatants while many of the wounded were finished off where they lay. Not justifying it but that's what happens in the heat of battle. Has since the dawn of man and will continue for as long as we're on this earth. It's admitted that the officers 'lost control of their men', a fact confirmed by the last surviving combatant. and Irishman from Mayo, who admitted 'I don't know what came over us'. What came over them was the red-dimmed blood lust of battle. Always has, always will. 

What cannot be denied is that, once the officers regained control, indiscriminate shooting ceased, the wounded received attention and the remaining Indians taken into custody. Very different to what happened at Fort Mims in what's now Alabama during the Creek wars. What's that, you've never heard of the Fort Mims Massacre? 

Strange, as the number killed was nearly twice that of Wounded Knee. While Wikipedia coyly puts at 500 the number 'killed or taken captive' additional research suggests to me that only the black slaves were taken alive (to be used as slaves for the Indians) while everyone else was killed, most bodies showing signs of horrific mutilation.  After their victory, the Indians "razed the surrounding mestizo and white plantations.... They slaughtered over 5,000 head of cattle, destroyed crops and houses, and murdered or stole slaves."

George Orwell observed that 'he who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past'. Which is why the White settler rallying cry of 'Remember Fort Mims' has been consigned to the dust-bin of history.

Saturday, 21 September 2019

Suffer little children

God love them, those poor students protesting climate change. According to the MSM the kids are 'deeply troubled' and suffering from - wait for it - 'climate grief' and 'eco-anxiety'. One student said she woke at 2 a.m. and then cried for two solid hours about the warming ocean. Which is surprising because based on what I saw they were having a whale of a time. (Maybe a bad analogy!). If these kids are suffering from climate grief then I want some.

But the images they showed of water-borne plastic pollution were both depressing and horrifying. Just look at the pic on the left. The kids' solution?  'Give up your plastic straws. Just say NO!' 'Make reusable cloth bags from old t-shirts. And do it now!' And if everyone in the West were to do just that it would have the impact of a snowflake in hell. Because, as a study from Germany’s Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research discovered, the 10 top-ranked rivers transport 88-95 percent of the global plastic load into the sea. And out of those top ten rivers eight are in Asia and two are in Africa. It's the same all over the Third World. People just dump their plastic wherever they want, often into rivers and the sea. They don't give a flying fuck about pollution. Unless they can use it to extract even more dosh from Whitey.

Plastic, and air pollution so bad you can hardly see the palm of your hand are Third World problems. Even with all its industrial production the West is responsible for only about a quarter of the world's carbon emissions. And that proportion is going down sharply while that of the Third World is rising just as sharply. Even on a per capita basis the West is far below that of the Persian Gulf states. But the towering colossal elephant in the carbon emission room is population. As it is with just about all the world's ecological problems ..... deforestation, water shortages, soil erosion, acidification of the oceans, every form of environmental stress in fact. 

And where is this population explosion to be found? Why, mainly in Africa. So why don't our eco-moralists focus their attention there? Well that would be White paternalism and imperialism. Are you saying their culture is inferior or something? And here's another thing. Big and all as the African carbon footprint is set to become it would be constrained were Africans to remain in Africa. After all building houses of cow dung and eating insects is eco-friendly in relative terms. But the most enthusiastic supporters of mass African migration to Europe are those very same latte-sipping (no straws!) kumbaya-singing hypocrites hectoring Whites about their duty to Gaia.

God grant me patience.

Meanwhile behind the curtain Luciferian Globohomo smiles and pulls the strings.

Wednesday, 18 September 2019

Those damn Californians

 It's exactly ten years, at the dawn of this blog's existence, that I wrote a post entitled California Tumbles Into The Sea. The post traced the transformation of that once great State into a Third World sewer via demographic displacement. I forecast that Whites would become a minority there and that this trend would be replicated across the whole country. These conclusions weren't stunningly prescient. They were, or should have been, obvious to anyone paying attention. Compounding the demographic destruction the State has now become a byword for degeneracy and criminal-coddling.

Californians have been roundly cursed by White Americans for the cancer they introduced and which now metastasises right across the country. They had heaven on earth and blew it. But did they? Understand that White Californians fought bitterly against degeneracy and the impending mudslide. Twenty five years ago they passed Proposition 187 by a massive 60:40 majority. This measure, also known as the Save Our State (SOS) initiative, would have imposed drastic restrictions on illegal immigrants. Had it taken legal effect it's reasonable to claim that the State would still have a White majority today.

In fact Californians in many ways took the lead in fighting the poz. They voted to end bilingual teaching in schools, passed the three-strikes law which would have locked up habitual criminals for good rather than protecting them as is done now now in so-called sanctuary cities. Californians voted to ban affirmative action in the public sector and even voted against gay marriage as recently as 2008.

So what went wrong? The courts went wrong, that's what. These unelected wreckers demonstrated where the power lay by shamelessly overruling the will of the people time and again. And as always the 'unconstitutional' justification was trotted out. For instance Judge (((Marianna Pfaelzer))) placed a permanent injunction on the Initiative claiming that "California is powerless to enact its own legislative scheme to regulate immigration. It is likewise powerless to enact its own legislative scheme to regulate alien access to public benefits." The constraints on CA are now being extended to the whole country. Yes, every single one of the State and ultimately nation-saving measures was gutted by unelected judges, most of them Jewish. The will of the people was stymied by judicial over-reach time and again. Three strikes, same-sex marriage, bilingualism and Government affirmative action, all of them. And that my friends is the real breach of the Constitution: Judicial over-reach, the destruction of the fundamental checks and balances envisioned by the Framers.  But the damage has been done and is now in practical terms irreversible.

In any event, the next time you hear someone blaming 'Californians' for their state's demise remember that they did fight against it. But were defeated by The Enemy Within.

Sunday, 15 September 2019

In Ireland the poz runs deep

The story just emerging about Welsh rugby international Gareth Thomas is that he's gay and HIV positive, facts which he's kept secret up till now, even, presumably, from the woman he duped into becoming his wife and thus giving him cover to operate in the macho world of rugby union. He revealed those facts only because a British tabloid was about to do an expose. What would be your opinion of Thomas? I'll bet it's different to those that swamped the reader comments section of Here's the single most popular: "God bless him. Hiding being gay for years hiding the HIV also. The years and years of stress that he put himself under is sad." And the second-most popular "Hats off to him. He’s a hell of a role model for anyone." And "A role model for anyone who has an interest in compassion and humanity."

Yes, the readers acclaim as a role model someone who lied about his sexual orientation, engaged in degenerate homosexual behaviour which predictably resulted in contracting the deadly HIV virus, who may or may not have subsequently put his wife and male partners at risk and who fessed up only because he was going to be outed anyway. How sick in the head do you have to be to acclaim such a person as a role model? Seriously? How deep must run the poz in what in ancient times was known as The Island Of Saints And Scholars....

Then again....The villagers of Oughterard (inexplicably means 'high cream' in Irish) in Co. Galway were recently presented with the opportunity to celebrate diversity up close and personal. And turned it down in the most emphatic fashion. "A silent protest has been held in Oughterard, Co Galway in response to the potential development of a direct provision centre for asylum seekers at a disused hotel in the town. Around 1,500 people [in effect everyone in the village] attended the protest with a number holding placards stating ‘No to Direct Provision for Oughterard’ and ‘Oughterard says No to Inhumane Direct Provision Centres’. 

"Local TD 
[Member of Parliament] Noel Grealish  has come in for criticism for telling a public meeting on the matter earlier this week that the type of people to be accommodated in the centre would be “economic migrants from Africa” whom he described as “spongers”. “I can guarantee you it is not the persecuted Christians and Syrians that are coming here. It is the economic refugees that is coming in from Africa that are trying to get across the Mediterranean and ended up in Europe and ended in up Ireland and ended up in Oughterard,” he said."

Oh dear. Predictably he was ordered to recant by the chattering classes. But, tellingly, he did not. In fact he didn't even dignify the instructions with a response. RTE, the official State propagandist broadcaster felt constrained to help the misguided villagers back to the path of righteousness. They did this by conducting a survey of how Wicklow town was getting used to having had a similar asylum centre installed there a few years back. And indeed the broadcast interviews would suggest that everything was going swimmingly. Yes, those Nigerians, Somalis, gypsies and Pakistanis were proving a boon to the town. No, schools and hospitals were not overwhelmed, and no, there's been no increase in crime rates. Now you bigots in Oughterard - put that in your racist pipes and smoke it! Mind you only three interviewees were featured. From a town with a population of 11,000. Still, as a state-funded broadcaster with a charter to present fair and honest material I'm sure RTE's interviewees accurately reflected the views of the townsfolk. Don't you?

Thursday, 12 September 2019

Farewell to the 'lungs of the world'?

Have you ever come across anything like this 'Amazon is burning away' furore'?  None of the great and good missed the opportunity to warn us of the calamity that would follow should 'the lungs of the world' be destroyed. Posturing and preening, they flew by the dozen in their private jets to swanky resorts where they agonised over the planet's future. Leo DiCaprio, Ronaldo, former ghetto porn star Meghan Markle (a.k.a. the Duchess of Sussex) and  gap-toothed pox-ridden whore Madonna were among those hectoring their moral inferiors. And they made it very clear who the culprit was:  President Jair Bolsonaro, the 'Brazilian Donald Trump'. You could almost picture him speed-boating down the Amazon hurling Molotov Cocktails left and right.

Mind you our saviours had evidence to back up their claims. Problem is all of it was wrong. Where to begin? For a start the fires were almost all on agricultural land being cleared of scrub in the traditional way. And those pictures? Macron's was twenty years old, Ronaldo's five, Madonna's thirty. Yet they tell us that the rate of forest burning is unprecedented. CNN, The Leading Name In Fake News, went so far as to claim that “the current fires are without precedent in the past 20,000 years.”  Er, not exactly. As this graph illustrates, a more accurate figure than 20,000 years would be......three years. Before Bolsinaro was elected.
As for the 'lungs of the world' claim here's what Dan Napsted, one of the world’s leading experts on the Amazon forest, had to say.  “It’s bullshit. There’s no science behind that. The Amazon produces a lot of oxygen but it uses the same amount of oxygen through respiration so it’s a wash.” Thanks Dan. And, according to NASA, forest fires are actually declining globally. But why let facts get in the way of a good story when rich pickings are to be made in the highly competitive (competitive for donors' dough that is) environmental saviour market? And a globalist agenda to be maintained ('an international approach is essential').

Then there's the remarkable fact that the burning forests in Bolivia, Angola and the Congo, in total bigger than Brazil's, hardly got a mention. And the reason is simple: Bolivia has a globalist left-wing leader while Angola and the Congo are 'independent' black-ruled countries. Can't criticise them.

The facts associated with the Amazon fires could be ascertained in less than an hour by anyone with a device connected to the internet. That's what I did. We're therefore left to conclude that this has been a deliberate hoax in pursuit of an agenda.

Tuesday, 10 September 2019

Another 911 anniversary accompanied by the sound of silence

So yet another 911 anniversary is on us and the twenty ton elephant in the room continues to be studiously avoided.  Here are just two items of evidence which prove the official explanation to be utterly false and which shine a laser on the real culprits.

The 'dancing Israelis'. These were self-confessed Mossad agents who, in their own words, were present that day to 'record the event'. Self-evidently this means that they knew it was going to happen. They knew it was going to happen. Yet they warned nobody. 

WTC 7. No serious scientist or engineer believes that a few small fires could have brought this steel-framed building down in free-fall. Be that as it may, Larry Silverstein openly admitted in a TV interview that he gave the order to 'pull it' (a phrase synonymous with 'demolish' in the construction industry).Self-evidently the building had to have already been rigged for demolition.

There's a mountain of additional evidence to fatally undermine the official report on the attacks but the two I cited unequivocally prove it to be false. Yet the 'dancing Israelis' were allowed return to Israel with no attempt ever being made to extradite them while Silverstein was never even pulled in for questioning about his bizarre admission.

What this demonstrates is the staggering and terrifying power of ZOG. The United States doesn't have even the pretence of being an independent country.