Prioritising police resources

When it emerged that "British" jihadis were returning from Syria by the hundred and that police were unable to track them a shocked Piers Morgan asked Sadiq Khan, the Pakistani Muslim Mayor of London “why can’t you instruct the police, why can’t you call [Metropolitan Police Chief] Cressida Dick right now, and say every one of those people that’s come back from a war zone, who’s in London, I want them followed?” Khan replied “Let me tell you why. Because the Met Police budget, roughly speaking, 15 percent, 20 percent is funded by me, the mayor. The rest comes from central government. If the Met Police is being shrunk and reduced, they’ve got to prioritise and use their resources in a sensible, savvy way.”

Morgan, incredulous, shot back, “What could be a bigger priority than people coming back from a Syrian battlefield with intent to harm British citizens? Why is it not the number one priority?”

Well I can tell you what can be a bigger priority. In fact let the Met tell you themselves. 

So there you have it. The rozzers might not have the resources to track head-chopping tube-bombing terrorists but the resources are nonetheless there to track down, arrest and prosecute British people for saying rude things about Muslims.

Understand this: The British State and its agents no longer serve the British people, instead they actively work against their interests, operating as an administrative and enforcement arm of the NWO globalist oligarchy. It's abundantly clear that their role and objective is to dispossess and ultimately marginalise the native people while corrupting and debasing the institutions that made Britain Great. They asset-strip the country and expend blood and treasure in foreign wars of no relevance to the people, all at the behest of their NWO globalist overlords.  

There was a time, not so long ago, that such people would have been hanged for High Treason.

A Manchurian Candidate

The World Council of Churches (WCC) - a quintessential globalist NWO organisation that the Catholic Church used avoid like the plague -  has announced a joint venture with the Vatican to co-host a meeting on “migration, xenophobia, and politically motivated populism” as part of its work toward “peace-building and migration.” The Director General of the WCC, Rev. Olav Fykse Tveit, said it would be a "dig a bit deeper” into the problems [my emphasis] of xenophobia as an expression of populism, as well as its links to racism, conflict, and violence in countries around the world. No surprise here really as last September the Vatican launched a two-year campaign to change people’s minds about migrants and to encourage a more welcoming attitude toward them worldwide. And sent a Cardinal to hobnob with the NWO globalists at the latest Bilderberg meeting.

The current Pope is turning the Church upside down, transforming it into a SJW organisation like the Church Of England, which has now virtually disappeared as a religious force. Unlike blood-and-guts Islam which continues to grow like a virus. The Church is now fully aligned with the globalist/NWO agenda, a development which Pope Benedict had very much feared. Which raises the question of his resignation, the first by a Pope in 600 years. Was he forced out, and if so by whom?

Evidence from Wikileaks suggests he was, with the usual suspects up to their necks in it.  John Podesta of pizzagate fame and other progressives discussed regime change to remove what they described as the “middle ages dictatorship” in the Catholic Church, to effect a “Catholic Spring” revolution in it. The leaked emails show that Soros, Obama and Clinton used the United States’ diplomatic machinery, political muscle, and financial power to coerce, bribe and blackmail “regime change” in the Church in order to replace Benedict XVI with Pope Francis – who has since become an unlikely mouthpiece for the international left, stunning Catholics around the world. The Podesta e-mail is a response to another Soros-funded radical — Sandy Newman, founder of the “progressive” Voices for Progress. Newman had written to Podesta seeking advice on the best way to “plant the seeds of the revolution” in the Catholic Church.

This article from the Jewish Forward has the unequivocal title 'Converts Who Changed The Church'. Interestingly, the 'converts' in question were all Jewish, and most of their activities appeared to be directed towards making the Church 'modern' and Jew-friendly. It's well accepted that Jewish 'converts' Von Hildebrand, Oestrreicher, Gurian and Thieme (there were others) played a central role in driving the revolutionary agenda of Vatican II. Bella Dodd, a Catholic-turned-Communist who later recanted said "in the thirties, we put 1,100 men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church." We can see the results today whereby the humanitarian weaknesses built into Christianity have been turned against its followers, rendering the Church into just another globalist humanitarian agency, UNESCO with prayers.

All part of what I call The Quickening. Everything is speeding up. A denouement of some sort is at hand.

Support Israel!

The previous post elicited more than 200 comments and a spirited debate about Tommy Robinson's support for Israel and Zionism. Such support was in itself deemed by many as grounds for his expulsion from the WN fold. But should it? There's an argument, in fact many arguments, for WN to actually support Israel.

It's openly and unapologetically an ethnic homeland, to the point that the qualification for citizenship requires DNA testing to prove ethnic purity

Israeli legislation provides no option for civil or interfaith marriage, only those who are recognised as Jews according to Orthodox Jewish law can get married in Israel, and members of other religions can only marry spouses of the same religion.

Roads are segregated by race and ethnicity and there are other restrictions on movements by non-ethnics.

Illegal immigrants are given short shrift, corralled into ghettos or concentration camps before being unceremoniously dumped in Uganda.

Israeli attitudes to Africans can be judged by the secret administration of birth control chemicals to prevent Ethiopian Jews from breeding.

Many restaurants operate a no Muslims/Arabs policy in full compliance with the law while non-Jews have restricted property and residential rights.

And the piece de resistance, the Israelis want all Jews to migrate there!

Seriously, what do we lose by supporting Israel, specifically the ethnic and religious basis for its existence? Whites can only dream of such a dispensation. And by supporting Israel we automatically circumvent the Holocau$t™ protective force field.

Think about it with an open mind.


PS: When I say support Israel I mean support their approach and methods in establishing and maintaining an ethnically pure homeland for their own people and WNs using this to further our own objectives. I certainly don't mean any form of material support or indeed support for their land-grabbing and trouble-making among its 'neighbours'. Regular and esteemed commentator What Is Truth? suggests the following examples for WNs to deploy the 'support Israel' meme:

Your a racist'.
'No. I only want the same as Israel'.

'You want to stop people who are in a desperate condition from becoming refugees'
'No. I want to adopt the same policy as Israel (and the Moslem Arab countries)'.

'You think people from other races are inferior'.
'No. I want us to be just like Israel'.

'You want an apartheid state'.
'No. I only want to be like Israel'."

Tommy Robinson and 'controlled opposition'

The comments on this and just about every White identitarian blog are awash with criticism of Tommy Robinson. He's apparently 'controlled opposition', he's weak on racial issues and in particular the JQ. As such he's not truly one of us and does not merit our support. This hostility - unfortunately - has become routine against those deemed not to fully and unconditionally meet all the requirements demanded of a perfect WN. But remember perfection is the enemy of good enough. Litmus tests for ideological purity will result in permanent marginalisation and ineffectiveness. There will always be disagreements about facts, priorities, interpretations, measures to take etc. That's the nature of any movement. The criterion should be 'is he (or the site) helping or damaging the WN cause?'.

I said this some time ago about Alex Jones, another target of the purists.  Despite carefully avoiding the Third Rail he has worked wonders in waking White people up. He has induced Whites to question and doubt the narrative they've been fed by schools, Government, MSM and Hollywood. Look, time and again he talks about “the elite”, “the global elites”, “globalists”, “international bankers”, “global conspiracy”, “the NWO” and the like. He says that every path leads to the House of Rothschild. Now I ask you, how much more explicit do you expect him to be? 

Tommy Robinson has done something similar, building massive awareness of the treachery perpetrating by Britain's leaders against their own people, the corrupt judicial system, the biased media and Muslim pathologies. He's forced these issues onto the public square, risking everything to do so. Who else has done more? Were he to be ideologically pure and 'safe' on all the key issues he'd be marginalised and ignored while the globalist nation-wreckers continued their work away from the spotlight.

Our biggest problem is that the overwhelming majority of Whites have no understanding - whatsoever - of the war being waged against them. They believe in what they see on TV and the movies, in what they learn in school and university and as such are like lemmings heading unknowingly towards the cliff.

Why would any 'controller' support such messages of awakening from the likes of Tommy? Remember, and I'm living testimony to this fact, once you start pulling at the Narrative string the whole thing comes apart like a cheap suit. Any 'controller' worth his salt knows that and would avoid it like the plague. So please, be glad and appreciative for what Tommy is doing and put aside our differences with him - for now anyway. We are still a small minority and desperately need any help we can get in rousing Whites from their potentially fatal slumber. 

Some reflections on Ireland's abortion referendum

The victory of 'progressive' forces in the recent referendum has been hailed by the chattering classes, media whores and Good Whites everywhere as a decisive victory for democracy. And indeed it was, no arguments about that. Odd then that the very people eulogising the voice of the people in the Irish Republic, and warning against any backsliding by the Government in fulfilling their democratically-expressed wishes, recommend an entirely different approach in the other part of Ireland. You see abortion legislation in Northern Ireland is much more restrictive than on the British mainland, and polls show consistently that this is what its people want.

So one quick somersault later and the luvvies are demanding that 'the tyranny of the majority' be ended. By legislation from Westminster if necessary. Shadow Attorney General Shami Charkrabarty (are there any actual British people left at the top levels of law enforcement?) says “You can’t have democracy without fundamental human rights, and the women of Northern Ireland have suffered for long enough", adding that Labour is “looking at legislative options” in Westminster to force a more liberal abortion regime on the Ulster knuckle-draggers.

Yes, as we knew all along, the democratic will of the people is paramount ..... until it comes up with the wrong result. Just ask Viktor Orban.

Our Prime Minister Leo Varadker took personal credit for the success of the referendum declaring it 'the day we came of age as a country, the day we took our place among the nations of the world'.  Well now Leo, what exactly do you mean by 'we'? Like, I can't imagine that Ireland has too many more Indian Hindu homosexuals on whose behalf you can speak. And fuck your impertinence in dismissing the Ireland prior to your coronation in such derogatory terms. For  many years Ireland has been in the very highest cohort of nations when it comes to life expectancy, standard of living, education, freedom, democracy and general human rights. 

Now in comparison take a country like, well, India, a billion people shitting on the ground, turds everywhere you step, rivers filled with shit and bathing humans, millions dying of starvation and treatable disease every year, eye-watering corruption, dead bodies floating in rivers while mangy dogs feast on their corpse, where brides with insufficient dowries are burnt alive. Whereas Ireland currently ranks 8th in the UN's Human Development Index India languishes at a 131, along side such human rights luminaries as Tajikistan and the Congo.

So Leo, if you really want to help a country take its place among the nations of the world head back to the land of your fathers and get to work.

Project Androgeny

Testosterone is what makes men men, And makes women with a surfeit of it into men as well. Just ask Serena Williams. It makes men brave, adventurous, assertive, sexually active and impulsive. Low T results in those characteristics weakening while obesity and depression increase and cognitive ability declines. And men look less masculine. I understand that relatively small reductions in T levels result in significant changes. What then to make of the fact that in the USA male T levels have been falling at 1% per year since 1987? Which leads to the staggering conclusion that 40-60 year-old American men have about 30% less T than they had 30 years ago.

I don't claim to understand what's given rise to this. I can offer some possible explanations like excreted hormones from the contraceptive pill in the public water supply, the use of soy throughout the food chain (hence 'soy boys'), growth hormones in chickens, pigs and cattle, GMO crops. Evidence supporting this T drop is staring us in the face. Women are pushing ahead of men everywhere (I acknowledge AA to be a big factor but it doesn't explain things like changing relative SAT scores), male White suicide rates have skyrocketed, men are fatter and more feminine looking. Just compare a class photo from 30 years ago with one from today and you'll notice the differences.

Now you'd imagine that these developments would ring alarm bells in academia, the medical profession and Government health services. But according to research undertaken by Fox News the subject has been virtually ignored. The National Institute of Health (which has lavished funds on subjects like how canoes can foster cultural identity and the impact of taxes on tobacco sales in Thailand) has done absolutely nothing on this catastrophic development for American men's health.

Now why would that be? Again, I don't know. But look again at the high T characteristics that I listed above. Are they not the very things that make our globalist nation-wrecking overlords tremble? How much better for them were men to become fat, docile, dumbed-down and compliant? Bear in mind that prisons successfully developed a food pyramid diet specifically to reduce aggression among inmates. Why not extend something similar to the general population? This would be fully consistent with Project Androgeny which tries to break down the differences between the sexes.

Crazy speculation? 

Faces (faeces??) of the new and vibrant London

White British, i.e. British, are now a minority in London, the capital of an empire that once ruled a quarter of the world. Those remaining are ruled over by a Muslim Mayor. There was a time when it was one of the safest metropolises in the world, bobbys on bicycles two by two and all that. But its new vibrancy has lead to its now overtaking New York in the murder stakes.If you're puzzled by this development maybe the following pictures will help your understanding.

"THIS is the moment a cyclist armed with an enormous 'zombie knife' tries to smash the window of a car in an apparent road rage row. The driver was forced to run for his life as the cyclist battered his car with the foot-long blade in the confrontation in Croydon, South London."

Here's my guess at the police description of the assailant. "The attacker was described as male, approximately five feet nine inches, wearing a grey jacket and dark jeans' 

Am I right?

And what about these two beauties?

"Grenfell Tower fire frauds admit posing as victims and claiming more than £125,000 in relief. The pair, both Jamaican nationals aged 51, also tried to take advantage of a scheme granting all tower residents leave to remain in the UK for at least five years."

Welcome to the new and vibrant London of 2018.