Friday, 15 June 2018

Support Israel!

The previous post elicited more than 200 comments and a spirited debate about Tommy Robinson's support for Israel and Zionism. Such support was in itself deemed by many as grounds for his expulsion from the WN fold. But should it? There's an argument, in fact many arguments, for WN to actually support Israel.

It's openly and unapologetically an ethnic homeland, to the point that the qualification for citizenship requires DNA testing to prove ethnic purity

Israeli legislation provides no option for civil or interfaith marriage, only those who are recognised as Jews according to Orthodox Jewish law can get married in Israel, and members of other religions can only marry spouses of the same religion.

Roads are segregated by race and ethnicity and there are other restrictions on movements by non-ethnics.

Illegal immigrants are given short shrift, corralled into ghettos or concentration camps before being unceremoniously dumped in Uganda.

Israeli attitudes to Africans can be judged by the secret administration of birth control chemicals to prevent Ethiopian Jews from breeding.

Many restaurants operate a no Muslims/Arabs policy in full compliance with the law while non-Jews have restricted property and residential rights.

And the piece de resistance, the Israelis want all Jews to migrate there!

Seriously, what do we lose by supporting Israel, specifically the ethnic and religious basis for its existence? Whites can only dream of such a dispensation. And by supporting Israel we automatically circumvent the Holocau$t™ protective force field.

Think about it with an open mind.


PS: When I say support Israel I mean support their approach and methods in establishing and maintaining an ethnically pure homeland for their own people and WNs using this to further our own objectives. I certainly don't mean any form of material support or indeed support for their land-grabbing and trouble-making among its 'neighbours'. Regular and esteemed commentator What Is Truth? suggests the following examples for WNs to deploy the 'support Israel' meme:

Your a racist'.
'No. I only want the same as Israel'.

'You want to stop people who are in a desperate condition from becoming refugees'
'No. I want to adopt the same policy as Israel (and the Moslem Arab countries)'.

'You think people from other races are inferior'.
'No. I want us to be just like Israel'.

'You want an apartheid state'.
'No. I only want to be like Israel'."

Monday, 11 June 2018

Tommy Robinson and 'controlled opposition'

The comments on this and just about every White identitarian blog are awash with criticism of Tommy Robinson. He's apparently 'controlled opposition', he's weak on racial issues and in particular the JQ. As such he's not truly one of us and does not merit our support. This hostility - unfortunately - has become routine against those deemed not to fully and unconditionally meet all the requirements demanded of a perfect WN. But remember perfection is the enemy of good enough. Litmus tests for ideological purity will result in permanent marginalisation and ineffectiveness. There will always be disagreements about facts, priorities, interpretations, measures to take etc. That's the nature of any movement. The criterion should be 'is he (or the site) helping or damaging the WN cause?'.

I said this some time ago about Alex Jones, another target of the purists.  Despite carefully avoiding the Third Rail he has worked wonders in waking White people up. He has induced Whites to question and doubt the narrative they've been fed by schools, Government, MSM and Hollywood. Look, time and again he talks about “the elite”, “the global elites”, “globalists”, “international bankers”, “global conspiracy”, “the NWO” and the like. He says that every path leads to the House of Rothschild. Now I ask you, how much more explicit do you expect him to be? 

Tommy Robinson has done something similar, building massive awareness of the treachery perpetrating by Britain's leaders against their own people, the corrupt judicial system, the biased media and Muslim pathologies. He's forced these issues onto the public square, risking everything to do so. Who else has done more? Were he to be ideologically pure and 'safe' on all the key issues he'd be marginalised and ignored while the globalist nation-wreckers continued their work away from the spotlight.

Our biggest problem is that the overwhelming majority of Whites have no understanding - whatsoever - of the war being waged against them. They believe in what they see on TV and the movies, in what they learn in school and university and as such are like lemmings heading unknowingly towards the cliff.

Why would any 'controller' support such messages of awakening from the likes of Tommy? Remember, and I'm living testimony to this fact, once you start pulling at the Narrative string the whole thing comes apart like a cheap suit. Any 'controller' worth his salt knows that and would avoid it like the plague. So please, be glad and appreciative for what Tommy is doing and put aside our differences with him - for now anyway. We are still a small minority and desperately need any help we can get in rousing Whites from their potentially fatal slumber. 

Friday, 8 June 2018

Some reflections on Ireland's abortion referendum

The victory of 'progressive' forces in the recent referendum has been hailed by the chattering classes, media whores and Good Whites everywhere as a decisive victory for democracy. And indeed it was, no arguments about that. Odd then that the very people eulogising the voice of the people in the Irish Republic, and warning against any backsliding by the Government in fulfilling their democratically-expressed wishes, recommend an entirely different approach in the other part of Ireland. You see abortion legislation in Northern Ireland is much more restrictive than on the British mainland, and polls show consistently that this is what its people want.

So one quick somersault later and the luvvies are demanding that 'the tyranny of the majority' be ended. By legislation from Westminster if necessary. Shadow Attorney General Shami Charkrabarty (are there any actual British people left at the top levels of law enforcement?) says “You can’t have democracy without fundamental human rights, and the women of Northern Ireland have suffered for long enough", adding that Labour is “looking at legislative options” in Westminster to force a more liberal abortion regime on the Ulster knuckle-draggers.


Yes, as we knew all along, the democratic will of the people is paramount ..... until it comes up with the wrong result. Just ask Viktor Orban.

Our Prime Minister Leo Varadker took personal credit for the success of the referendum declaring it 'the day we came of age as a country, the day we took our place among the nations of the world'.  Well now Leo, what exactly do you mean by 'we'? Like, I can't imagine that Ireland has too many more Indian Hindu homosexuals on whose behalf you can speak. And fuck your impertinence in dismissing the Ireland prior to your coronation in such derogatory terms. For  many years Ireland has been in the very highest cohort of nations when it comes to life expectancy, standard of living, education, freedom, democracy and general human rights. 

Now in comparison take a country like, well, India, a billion people shitting on the ground, turds everywhere you step, rivers filled with shit and bathing humans, millions dying of starvation and treatable disease every year, eye-watering corruption, dead bodies floating in rivers while mangy dogs feast on their corpse, where brides with insufficient dowries are burnt alive. Whereas Ireland currently ranks 8th in the UN's Human Development Index India languishes at a 131, along side such human rights luminaries as Tajikistan and the Congo.

So Leo, if you really want to help a country take its place among the nations of the world head back to the land of your fathers and get to work.

Monday, 4 June 2018

Project Androgeny

Testosterone is what makes men men, And makes women with a surfeit of it into men as well. Just ask Serena Williams. It makes men brave, adventurous, assertive, sexually active and impulsive. Low T results in those characteristics weakening while obesity and depression increase and cognitive ability declines. And men look less masculine. I understand that relatively small reductions in T levels result in significant changes. What then to make of the fact that in the USA male T levels have been falling at 1% per year since 1987? Which leads to the staggering conclusion that 40-60 year-old American men have about 30% less T than they had 30 years ago.

I don't claim to understand what's given rise to this. I can offer some possible explanations like excreted hormones from the contraceptive pill in the public water supply, the use of soy throughout the food chain (hence 'soy boys'), growth hormones in chickens, pigs and cattle, GMO crops. Evidence supporting this T drop is staring us in the face. Women are pushing ahead of men everywhere (I acknowledge AA to be a big factor but it doesn't explain things like changing relative SAT scores), male White suicide rates have skyrocketed, men are fatter and more feminine looking. Just compare a class photo from 30 years ago with one from today and you'll notice the differences.


Now you'd imagine that these developments would ring alarm bells in academia, the medical profession and Government health services. But according to research undertaken by Fox News the subject has been virtually ignored. The National Institute of Health (which has lavished funds on subjects like how canoes can foster cultural identity and the impact of taxes on tobacco sales in Thailand) has done absolutely nothing on this catastrophic development for American men's health.

Now why would that be? Again, I don't know. But look again at the high T characteristics that I listed above. Are they not the very things that make our globalist nation-wrecking overlords tremble? How much better for them were men to become fat, docile, dumbed-down and compliant? Bear in mind that prisons successfully developed a food pyramid diet specifically to reduce aggression among inmates. Why not extend something similar to the general population? This would be fully consistent with Project Androgeny which tries to break down the differences between the sexes.

Crazy speculation? 

Saturday, 2 June 2018

Faces (faeces??) of the new and vibrant London

White British, i.e. British, are now a minority in London, the capital of an empire that once ruled a quarter of the world. Those remaining are ruled over by a Muslim Mayor. There was a time when it was one of the safest metropolises in the world, bobbys on bicycles two by two and all that. But its new vibrancy has lead to its now overtaking New York in the murder stakes.If you're puzzled by this development maybe the following pictures will help your understanding.
"THIS is the moment a cyclist armed with an enormous 'zombie knife' tries to smash the window of a car in an apparent road rage row. The driver was forced to run for his life as the cyclist battered his car with the foot-long blade in the confrontation in Croydon, South London."

Here's my guess at the police description of the assailant. "The attacker was described as male, approximately five feet nine inches, wearing a grey jacket and dark jeans' 

Am I right?

And what about these two beauties?


"Grenfell Tower fire frauds admit posing as victims and claiming more than £125,000 in relief. The pair, both Jamaican nationals aged 51, also tried to take advantage of a scheme granting all tower residents leave to remain in the UK for at least five years."

Welcome to the new and vibrant London of 2018.

Tuesday, 29 May 2018

War has been declared on the British people.

The Soviet Union is commonly perceived to have been an absolute tyranny where opponents of the regime ended up with a bullet in the head. That form of coercion may have ended shortly after the death of Stalin but there never was real political freedom. All political activities had to conform to Party orthodoxy, potentially troublesome foreigners were excluded, no meaningful opposition media were allowed and rather than facing a bullet to the head dissidents could expect to lose their jobs, or if they got too stroppy sentenced to jail by one of the Party's kangaroo courts.

How different is that to what applies today in Britain? Not a lot really. Just a few days ago Tommy Robinson, in his role as a citizen journalist, was filming outside the court where Muslim child rapists were on trial. Police pulled him off the street, dragged him in front of a judge who immediately, without his legal representative being present, sentenced him to thirteen months in prison. After which he was immediately whisked off to start his sentence while the judge imposed a media blackout. How different is that case (and many others like it) to Soviet practice? 

In Britain, and in many other Western countries, the media is controlled, unorthodox political views will lose you your job or land you in jail, laws are so vague as to guarantee convictions, non-conforming foreigners are routinely excluded, education has been replaced by indoctrination, in effect there's just one political party, political hacks get promoted to top positions....and now we have a political activist tried and jailed in secret. I ask again, how is that different to the USSR?

War has been declared on the British people. The Government and its agencies are with the enemy, if not actually the enemy. Why else would they appoint the likes of this clown to head the Crown Prosecution Service and make the likes of these people responsible for the safety of White children? There's a reason for such appointments and British (i.e. White) candidates understand that they either get on message or get nowhere. Just like the Soviet Union. That in turn explains the traitorous behaviour of the police, courts and all Government agencies.

The question is...where's it going to end? Will the British people (and Western Europeans generally) keep retreating, heads down, paying the mortgage while ameliorating the pain of their dispossession with sport and entertainment mind-rot? Or will the traitors and their invader foot soldiers finally push them to outright rebellion?

I have no idea how this will turn out.

Sunday, 27 May 2018

Royal negrolatry

How many of you remember Sarah Ferguson, the erstwhile Duchess of York, ex-wife of Prince Andrew? More specifically the endless hounding she suffered from the MSM almost from the beginning? She was excoriated for being a promiscuous spendthrift from an 'ordinary' family whose father was a mere Army Major. Despite being basically a decent girl married to a guy with very dodgy sexual predilections she was always the Bad One. And of course she had ginger hair and a freckly face.

Contrast that with the unalloyed reverence and veneration which Meghan Markle has enjoyed from the very beginning. Yet compared to her Fergie has been a model of chastity, good breeding and dignity. Albeit with ginger hair and freckly skin. In saner times Markel would have seen as the Bad Princess straight from central casting, would have been hard to imagine anyone less worthy of becoming part of the Royal House of Windsor. 


After all she's mixed-race, comes from a ghetto in LA,  her deeply embarrassing family (her father selling personal photos, a cousin wedding guest stopped entry to a nightclub for trying to smuggle in a knife) all seem to hate her despite using her new status to make money for themselves. Thomas Markle Jr describes his sister in an open letter to the Prince as a "jaded, shallow, conceited woman that will make a joke of you and the royal family heritage. As more time passes to your royal wedding, it became very clear that this is the biggest mistake in royal wedding history. Meghan Markle is obviously not the right woman for you." 

Shortly after this the Royal in-law was arrested for allegedly holding a gun to a woman's head during a drunken argument


And the 'Princess' herself? Rode the cock carousel so hard that its bearings must have flamed out at some stage. Was a soft-porn actress (see her Royal Highness above thrusting her naked butt into the air for all to see), and in an inspired piece of casting, played a prostitute in Beverly Hills, 90210 in which she 'performed an intimate act' on screen in broad daylight. One of her countless 'boyfriends' was porn-star Simon Rex (lower picture). Sheer class.

Yet the gushing feelgood fantasy story continues unabated. Another institution bites the dust in the Long March Through The Institutions.

Thursday, 24 May 2018

Ireland's culture wars

Boy, has Ireland progressed since the days when the Church had its well-tailored heel on our necks. The Culture War here is less a war and more a headlong retreat for the forces of tradition as 'progressives'  sweep them off the battlefield on issue after issue. We've just approved gay marriage by a landslide majority, have appointed Katherine Zappon (Strapon), an American of indeterminate gender (and negligible voter support) who fetched up some time ago in Ireland with her/his/its 'wife' and became Minister responsible for.......Children And Youth Affairs. And best of all have elected a homosexual Pakistani Hindu as our Prime Minister.

See how Ireland had progressed everyone!

But there's one arena in which the traditionalists have held sway: Abortion. At least up to now. Because tomorrow the country holds a Referendum which proposes to remove the Constitutional restrictions that currently apply. The issue is both complex and simple and there's no point in going through all the issues here other than take issue with the canard that 'it's the woman's right to choose. My body, my choice'. It is up to a point but if we take it to its logical conclusion it means that the woman can choose to abort the unborn baby any time right up to the point of birth. In other words she can choose infanticide. This is not hyperbole because late-term terminations of viable foetuses are taking place in Britain and many other places this very day.

Naturally enough the Referendum's proponents are not running on this platform. It's twelve weeks and that's it. And we'll never look to increase that time limit. We swear!  The exact same progression took place in Britain and Ireland's craven politicians, with no Constitutional prohibition to hide behind, will gradually extend the time limit in response to the shrieking feminist mob and their air-headed dupes in the general population. According to the opinion polls the Yes side will easily carry the day. Not surprising given the state of the zeitgeist with the Catholic Church relegated to the status of helpless onlooker. In fact I wouldn't be surprised were the current Pope to proclaim abortion as a virtuous act.  But I have a feeling that the result might a lot closer than the consensus indicates. Ireland might yet see an awakening of the forces that gave us Trump and give the nation-wreckers a closer run than they expect.

Monday, 21 May 2018

New business proposal

How about this for a mouth-watering business plan? You sell crap coffee for twice the normal price in a place that doubles as a homeless shelter where 'all are welcome' whether or not they buy anything. While they join a long queue waiting for their order to be fulfilled customers can take in gangs of black teenagers chimping out, junkies shooting up at the tables and savour the juicy aroma wafting from the bathroom as a homeless man, whose earlier meal came from a nearby dumpster, relieves himself on the floor. This kind of thing.

Not exactly calculated to set the pulses of a would-be investor racing, is it? Yet that represents Starbucks' new business strategy, developed following the Rittenhouse Square Massacre where two black non-customers were, in line with company policy, asked to leave unless they made a purchase. When they refused they were subsequently removed - with no use of force - by local police. An everyday occurrence in this type of business you'd imagine. But in this instance it became an overnight national scandal.

To the extent that Starbucks have now fundamentally revised their customer policies, declaring their dining and bathroom facilities 'open to all' whether they're paying customers or not. Now for sure I have nothing but contempt for corporations that virtue signal about equality while paying their 'partners' subsistence wages (exemplar: Amazon) or tech companies that trumpet their commitment to diversity while employing virtually no blacks (exemplar: Google). But in this instance it does seem as if Starbucks have literally put their money where their mouth is. This move - if followed through - will inevitably have a major, and possibly irrecoverable, impact on their bottom line. If they don't follow through a storm of negative publicity is sure to follow so they lose either way. 

I don't get it.

Thursday, 17 May 2018

It's worse than you think....

Most of us associate Jewish power with their dominance of banking, "news" media and the entertainment industry. More recently this has extended to the digital world with the main social media and search engine platforms being under Jewish control and ownership. This is a chillingly wide and deep span of power. In fact in terms of controlling the information flow I'd say it approaches that wielded by the medieval Christian Church.

And this isn't the worst of it because Israeli companies are now to be found in powerful and sometimes dominant positions at critical points throughout the underlying layers of the technology universe like:
  • Microprocessors 
  • Cyber security
  • Systems integration
  • Electronic payment systems
  • Database technology and analytics
  • Aircraft transponder control systems - ask Dov Zakheim
  • The Internet Of Things

The implications are dramatic as the Israelis now have the power to literally bring the Western world - and most of the rest of it - grinding to a halt by sabotaging utilities like electricity, water and telecommunications, banking transactions and airport operations. Add in the capacity to hack into critical corporate and government systems and databases and the circle is complete. Bear in mind that unlike earlier technologies, which could (with difficulty) be reverse engineered to discover malware, the millions of modern microprocessors are closed impenetrable black boxes. Would the Israelis have built in trojan horses or trapdoors into these chips? What do you think??

You may well ask how the West finds itself in this catastrophic predicament. You might also ask how a small country like Israel has achieved this level of dominance. A number of factors account for it. First their military and intelligence services recruited large numbers of top researchers and developers  and got them working on key technologies in a structured programme going back more than thirty years. Stolen technology from the West also helped as did the ready availability of VC funding and a fifth column of sayanim smoothing the way in enemy territory (that's us, you understand). 

In any event - in my view - they now have the West by the balls.

Monday, 14 May 2018

The Anti-Christ?

Although having abandoned Christianity as a teenager and subsequently dismissed all religion as mumbo I've begun to reassess my views in recent times as developments increasingly suggest the Bible prophesy stuff might not have been so daft after all. One of the most remarkable has been the self-destruction of the Catholic Church which has gone into overdrive under the present Pope who, in his short reign to date, has come out with more heresies than all the other Popes combined.

Watching the antics of this one man wrecking-ball brings to mind the testimony of former United States Communist Party member, Bella Dodd before the House on Un-American Activities in 1952.  The Communist Party in the 1930s "put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within. Right now they are in the highest places, and they are working to bring about change in order that the Catholic Church will no longer be effective against Communism. The change would be so drastic that you will not recognize the Catholic Church." And we all know with whom the American Communist Party was synonymous, don't we?

Now consider the words of the brilliant Jesuit theologian Malachi Martin from the mid-nineties. "Roman Catholics will then have the spectacle of a Pope validly elected who cuts the entire visible body of the Church loose from the traditional unity and the papacy-oriented apostolic structure that the Church has hitherto always believed and taught was divinely established. The shudder that will shake the Roman Catholic body in that day will be the shudder of its death agony. … Many will accept the new regime. Many will resist. All will be fragmented. There will be no one on earth to hold the fractionating members of the visible Roman Catholic body together as a living compact organization. [This will] transform the Papacy itself into a complaisant, even a cooperative, handmaiden in the service of a new creation. A new earthly habitat. A truly New World Order.”

Friday, 11 May 2018

'Nice movement you got there goyim. Mind if we join?'

It seems that a sinister new alt-right force is emerging on the Web. In fact it's so secretive that they call themselves the Intellectual Dark Web. Now you must understand that the Dark Web is not something vague where naughty people post bad stuff. It has specific technical characteristics (you need TOR to access it) while its content does not get indexed by search engines so will never be found by the casual user. On the Dark Web you can buy military-grade weapons, child porn...all payable in untraceable Bitcoin. Its primary differentiator is to hide the identity of both users and content providers.

In view of this I expected the Intellectual Dark Web to lie well to the right of Andrew Anglin who himself has been forced onto the Dark Web on occasions. But in this instance? Well, not exactly. And we know this because the New York Slimes was able to reveal the identities of the main stakeholders even though they'd described 'people like them who dare venture into this  are in “There Be Dragons” territory'
. So why the 'Dark Web' in the first place. Was this a form of doxxing? No. "The core members have little in common. Bret and Eric Weinstein and Ms. Heying were Bernie Sanders supporters. Mr. Harris was an outspoken Hillary voter. Ben Shapiro is an anti-Trump conservative."

Well I can be of assistance to the author (((Bari Weiss))) here because in fact they have a number of crucial things in common. For a start they all hate Trump and second they're all Jewish. And here's a a third: No self-respecting alt-right/White advocacy movement would or should touch them with a barge pole. Because they're straight from the Jewish Infiltrate And Subvert playbook. Textbook examples, down even to the point where a few neutered goys like Douglas ('anti-Semitism is a mental disease') Murray are allowed to play with them. Under careful supervision.

If we're to believe the New York Slimes (stop laughing at the back!) the movement is "a collection of iconoclastic thinkers, academic renegades and media personalities who are having a rolling conversation.... that sound unlike anything else happening, at least publicly, in the culture right now." Er, no. It's a reflection of the fact that Jews and their shabbos goy allies realise that they're losing control of The Narrative, that coercion, lawfare and violence are no longer in themselves enough to prevent Whites awakening to their impending dispossession and that more subtle measures are required.

'Nice movement you got there goyim. Mind if we join?'

Sunday, 6 May 2018

Elevator Pitch 4: The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan

Virtually everyone on this blog will be familiar with the objectives of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. It's knowledge that we can put to good use in the right circumstances. To do so we need to be able to demonstrate three things. First the broad outlines of the plan itself. Second the fact that the Plan attracted major financial and political support - it wasn't just someone's plan. Third that implementation of  the Plan's recommendations started shortly after WW II and continues to this day. All three components are essential in making our case.

The plan proposes to miscegenate Europeans out of existence and replace them with European/African/Asian hybrids. 'The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.' Can't be much clearer than that! 

Kalergi* makes one exception to this mixed-race fate: Jews. 'Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It's not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats.' Kalergi makes clear that this 'new elite' will rule over the dumbed-down mixed-race helots in a supposedly benign but fundamentally undemocratic system. (Count Coudenhove-Kalergi himself was not Jewish but his main benefactors and two of his wives were). A good summary of his plan be read here and is strongly recommended.

From the very outset Kalergi attracted support from massively wealthy and powerful Jews. Baron Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild became his personal friend and introduced him to mega-bankers Max Warburg who in turn introduced him to extravagantly wealthy Jewish financiers Paul Warburg (Max's brother), Bernard Baruch, and Baruch’s brother Felix. These connections provided lavish funding and political support to Kalergi on an ongoing basis.

Such support inevitably lead to  practical results and, capitalising on the carnage of WW II the plan's sponsors began to change the face of Europe and other White countries. The Charlemange Prize, often referred to as the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize (although as the goyim awaken this association is being downplayed) became Europe's most prestigious, and, straight from the Orwellian playbook was awarded ostensibly to the person who did most to 'promote European cohesion'. Not surprisingly the Count himself was the recipient of the first Award in 1950. Subsequent winners represent a rogues' gallery of nation-wrecking traitors including Churchill (presumably for his efforts in destroying Europe during the war), Kissinger, Blair, Clinton, Merkel, Trichet and the current Pope. Since that first Award tens of millions of brown and black invaders have flooded all over the White world, rendering vast swathes of it unrecognisable from what they'd been less than fifty years earlier. And, spurred by an endless barrage of propaganda, the miscegenation project is in full sway, with Kalergi's mystery meat everywhere we look. Meanwhile our Jewish puppet masters pull the strings from behind the curtain.

This is powerful stuff. Provided we can get it out there among the general public. Which is where the Elevator Pitch comes in. But how can we possibly compress it into a meaningful and convincing pitch that lasts about half a minute? Well here's my first cut.

"Did you know that the whole EU project is based on a plan originally drawn up in the 1920s by a Japanese-European Count? He said that the European man of the future would be of mixed White, African and Asiatic race ruled over by a Jewish elite. The proposals attracted massive financial and political support from powerful Jews and the EU from its beginning directly follows the Plan's proposals'.

In itself this will not convince anyone. But the objective is to lead people to further question the Ordained Narrative. You'll notice that I downplay the Jewish role for the Pitch. Remember that White goyim have been brainwashed to the point of altered brain chemistry when it comes to the JQ. It must be introduced with care.

*I suggest shortening the Count's full name to Kalergi in general conversation. Brevity is the essence of the Elevator Pitch!

Tuesday, 1 May 2018

Britain's in safe hands!

So Amber Rudd has bitten the dust, a victim of the very multiculturalism and diversity she worked so hard to promote. Her civil servants let her down by telling some people illegally in Britain that they were, well, illegally In Britain. Shock, horror - and Rudd's resignation - duly followed. Her replacement was quickly named. He's Sajid Javid, a Pakistani Muslim. He promised that his "first priority" would be to right the wrongs of the Windrush Scandal, that which drove Rudd from office. Maybe someone will suggest to  him that addressing the epidemic of black murders convulsing London might be more urgent. In any event this is the guy with responsibility for enforcing the control of Britain's borders and the overall administration of justice. Don't you feel better already?

And what a support team he's got. Idi Amin lookalike Mike Fuller is now Chief Inspector of the Crown Prosecution Service. His main claim to fame, apart from being the first black to hold this position, is to have used a personal chauffeur to clock up more than 150,000 miles in six years travelling from his home in London to his office in Kent.

Javid presumably will have his hands full dealing with the mass rape of White children by members of his Muslim community. Then again he might have other things on his mind. Like punishing the civil servants who told the Windrush illegals that they were illegal. If he's too busy he can enlist the aid of this guy who's head of the Crown Prosecution Service's Child Abuse Unit. Yet another Pakistani Muslim, Nazir Asfal has professed himself to be "unruffled by mounting media hysteria (sic) over the ethnicity of abusers in Rotherham".  Instead he suggests "stepping back and taking a wider view of the nationwide picture".

And in taking a wider view of the nationwide picture Asfal can count on the assistance of Bardardo's Homes, "the main provider of child sexual exploitation services in the UK". And who heads up Barnardo's? It's Javed Kahn, yet another Pakistani Muslim, one who has been exposed as having turned a blind eye to the abuse of White children by Muslims over many years.

I think every parent in Britain can rest easily with their children under the care of such a team, dedicated 24x7 to the welfare of British citizens.

Meanwhile yet another Pakistani Muslim rules over the kuffars of the nation's capital. Sadiq Khan, a terrorist-sympathising dwarf who can't speak proper English has become the self-appointed spokesman for the British people by declaring President Trump to be unwelcome in his country. Sorry, I mean in Britain. Khan's country is of course Pakistan. 

Maybe a change of Government will see brain-box Diane Abbot as Treasury Secretary. After all if Compton ghetto trash can marry into the Royal Family anything is possible.

Isn't it amazing...the British people who built an Empire that ruled a quarter of the world and inter alia ran the whole Indian sub-continent, from Afghanistan to Burma, with about 200,000 of their own people, now need their former subjects to run their own country?

Is that an evil cackle I hear from behind the curtain?

Sunday, 29 April 2018

Jordan Peterson takes the shekel

Back in January I wrote a post on Jordan Peterson and his hands-off approach to the Jewish Question. I called for forbearance as despite his reticence he nonetheless continues to awaken huge numbers of Whites, especially White men to the war being waged against them. And let's face it, should he stray off the reservation on the JQ he loses his glittering career and celebrity status. His silence on the JQ was consistent with a core recommendation of his to 'tell the truth - or at least don't lie.'

Sad to relate he did exactly that - lie - in a recent article in which he finally addressed the JQ head-on. His position (you can read it here, it's quite short) is essentially that Jews don't conspire to undermine White societies, that their success is explained exclusively by superior intelligence* and not by nepotism or ethnic networking, that Whites who complain about Jewish influence are failures seeking to scapegoat others for their own inadequacies. He excoriates 'the players of identity politics on the far right' but has no issue with non-Whites' identity politics. In fact the whole essay is a no-holds-barred attack on those espousing White identity.

For this I accuse him of lies, cowardice and abandoning young White men, those he claims he most wants to help: He has already clearly identified the sources of their anomie and despair as the evils of feminism, discrimination via affirmative action, ridicule and humiliation in movies and TV, their women encouraged to mate with dusky foreigners, their countries' courts biased against them, their ancestors' stunning achievements denied and/or vilified. Be assured he knows full well the central role played by Jews in bringing these pathologies to fruition.

So the next time Jordan wells up in tears as he describes the unfortunate young men he treats remember that he has wilfully turned attention away from the source of their problems.

To conclude on a positive note the reader comments on his essay (thousands of them) have been largely negative towards JP. It's truly heartening to see the huge numbers of readers fully awakened to the Jewish role in our ongoing destruction. In fact it's possible that JP might have scored an own goal with this one.

*As I've mentioned on a number of previous occasions the much-touted Ashkenazi IQ average of 115 is based on very flimsy evidence. Vox Populi does an excellent dissection on the figure here and plausibly posits an average of 104 as being more accurate. In the process blowing JP's core argument to pieces.

Wednesday, 25 April 2018

A modest proposal

It's standard practice - for obvious reasons - to identify the affiliations of those being interviewed on the media. 'Muslim Brotherhood spokesperson', 'Far-right activist' or whatever. Poor David Duke (on the odd occasion he gets on the MSM) gets tagged to this day with the 'ex-leader of the Ku Klux Klan' appellation even though he left that organisation over forty years ago. So why then should we not identify the ethnicity of Jews appearing on the media? 'Jewish journalist', Jewish Senator' etc.

You can just imagine the squawks and squeals of outrage such a proposal would elicit. Hitler and the Nazis would get yet another airing, another Holocau$t would be in the making. But why should this be? Why would they object to being identified as Jewish? In fact they revolt against the idea for the same reasons I support it. First it would highlight their staggering over-representation at the controlling heights of Western society. Second it would bring into sharp relief the fact that, despite internal disagreements about methods and means and bracing claims of universal moral pieties, they operate under a single criterion: 'Is it good for the Jews?'


At which point the nativists would start getting restless. Very restless.

As Josef Goebbels observed: One may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've been found out."

Saturday, 21 April 2018

Elevator pitch 3: The JQ

This, the JQ, is the big kahuna. Yet paradoxically it probably isn't the most important one in terms of waking normie Whites up, being of now too close to the bone for most of them. The following pitch might strike some of our more muscular readers as rather insipid. But remember the purpose of the elevator pitch. It's to get normies questioning the Official Narrative, and hopefully thereafter to pursue truth to a deeper level.

So here's my suggestion. "I'm not saying it's all or even most Jews but it's become very clear to me that Jews have been at the forefront of everything that ails us Whites today. Open borders, modern feminism and its catastrophic impact on families, anti-White 'hate' and affirmative action  laws, bogus theories on racial and gender equality and White guilt. degradation of our art, literature and music, central banks running our countries, turning our universities into close-minded intolerant propaganda machines. You name it. Jews have been leading the way, And you know it's very easy to demonstrate the truth of what I just said'.

Obviously you'll need to become versed in the material required to back up the pitch should the need arise. It'd be a great shame to achieve first base by eliciting questions only to find you can't answer them.

Good luck!

Wednesday, 18 April 2018

Elevator pitch 2: 'But where are you REALLY from?'

Being asked 'where are you from?' is an exasperating experience for black musician Nura from the band SXTN. The rapper said that when she tells people she’s from Germany, they often press further by asking, “but where are you really from?”. Her experience is common all over the world and it persists despite endless programming to make us believe that holding a German passport makes you German. I'm reminded of that clownish Bishop of Dublin with his fatuous observation on Muslim Brotherhood 'activist' Ibrahim Halawa (this fine young Irishman is pictured here with his lovely sisters) to the effect that 'he's as Irish as any of us'.

It's vital that Whites clamp down on this insidious nonsense and it's possible to do so without being unduly "offencive" to normies. So here's my proposed elevator pitch* for use the next time you hear Mo Farah described as British or other such nonsense. It's important not to let it pass.
"But he's not Irish [or any other White nationality] because the Irish today have evolved over thousands of years, sharing territory, ethnicity, language, culture, religion, history, traditions, myths and legends which have fused to make us what we are today, which is in effect an extended tribe with unique characteristics and a strong sense of national identity. Being born here to African parents affords him none of that. It doesn't mean he's a worse person or anything, it just means he's not Irish. If I had been born in Japan would it not be understandable for people to ask me 'but where are you really from?' If he can be deemed Irish then the word has lost all meaning."

I think that's a powerful pitch. It can of course be modified - if the conversation continues! - to show that European peoples are merely an extended version of White nations. That is, we have more in common with one another than we ever will with those of different races.

*So-called because it represents the duration of a typical elevator ride in which you have to make your point to a prospect.

Saturday, 14 April 2018

Elevator pitch 1: Migrants

Much discussion has taken place here over the last few weeks on the most effective way to address the JQ. A strong majority (including me) recognises a full-frontal assault to be generally counter-productive, that most people have been programmed to tune out and/or rebel if fed too much too fast. Same applies in other areas of interest to White advocates. We must recognise that our opportunities to exert influence on normies in an interpersonal level is limited, particularly in relation to time. What we require therefore is a form of 'elevator pitch'* for each subject, something short and punchy that will, if not open up a deeper interaction, at least introduce an element of doubt in the other's mind. 

Here's my suggested elevator pitch for the migrant issue. (I'll suggest others over the coming weeks).

Normie: 'How can you be so cruel and uncharitable as to turn away those unfortunates 'fleeing war and poverty'?'

You: 'So are you saying that everyone who wants to come here should be accepted? Research from Oxford University shows that hundreds of millions of sub-Saharan Africans would migrate to Europe if they could. Are you suggesting that Europe's population be doubled within a few years?'

'Of course not. Therefore you have to agree that migration controls are necessary in principle. Which means we're talking about how we implement immigration controls rather than immigration controls per se. We're making progress!

'Here's another thing. If migrants seeking illegal entry knew with certainty that they'd be rejected and returned (i.e. the Australian Solution) the mass drownings would stop overnight. If you're sincere about preventing these drownings you'd support the Australian Solution too.'

*So-called because it represents the duration of a typical elevator ride in which you have to make your point to a prospect.

Wednesday, 11 April 2018

Stunning: Or is it?

It's long been my understanding that the Jewish Power over White countries has been applied by relatively subtle means. The Jew-behind-the-curtain stereotype has arisen for a reason. There have been exceptions of course, the early Soviet Union being an obvious example, the Bela Kun regime in Hungary another. But for the most part I would have thought that a juicy combination of financial inducements, favourable (((media))) coverage and blackmail would have done the trick. I remember reading that when Netanyahu first met with President Clinton he's supposed to have pointed out that some damaging material about him (Clinton) had fallen into Mossad hands...but not to worry 'it's safe with us'. 

I was therefore staggered to read the following in the Occidental Observer. Bear in mind that in political circles even very close associates of senior political figures will use their formal title in front of 'outsiders'. I have had many meetings with Government Ministers in Ireland, South Africa, Pakistan and the Middle East and they were always referred to as 'Minister' in my presence even when it was obvious they all were on personal terms with the others at the meetings. I'm talking about Ministers or even Under-Secretaries here, not Prime Ministers or Presidents. That puts in context the following staggering exchanges.
"Levy was described as “undoubtedly the notional head of British Jewry” by the Jerusalem Post. Two potential donors to New Labour, John and Courtney Coventry, described what happened when they met Levy and Blair:
“We were greeted by Jane Hogarth [a New Labour official] and taken to meet Lord Levy. He was like an animated cartoon, with large gestures and an overbearing personality. He discussed donations and how appreciative the party would be, especially Mr Blair. He said he would introduce us to ‘Tony’ and Jack Straw [the half-Jewish Home Secretary], Alastair Campbell [Blair’s thuggish spin-doctor] and various others. He said we would have plenty of time with Tony.” Then they [John and Courtney Coventry] witnessed an extraordinary exchange. Lord Levy was taking a call when the Prime Minister walked over to him and started to speak. Courtney said: “Lord Levy held up his hand and said, ‘Not now, Tony,’ and went back to his phone call. The Prime Minister turned to walk away and Lord Levy said, ‘Tony, wait, I need to speak to you.’
“I thought, ‘My God, what a way to talk to a Prime Minister.’ But Mr Blair stood there like a puppet on a string while Levy continued his phone call for at least a couple of minutes. Then he turned to the Prime Minister without apology for keeping him waiting and launched into a conversation about the importance of the evening. Here was the leader of your Government being treated like a child. Jane Hogarth, Lord Levy and Tony Blair all acted like this was normal.” (Lord Cashpoint, the bogus count and his porn star wifeThe Daily Mail, 24th March 2007)
But it was normal. Blair knew his place: as gentile frontman for a Judaeocracy, that is, a government funded and controlled by Jews. That’s why, as the Jewish Chronicle has reported, he “was conscious of the need to have very, very good relations” with “the Jewish community.” He knew that if he obeyed orders, he would get to feed first his narcissism in office and then his avarice out of office."

That just blows my mind and maybe puts a question mark over my optimism in the previous post.

Monday, 9 April 2018

Nil desperandum!

It's clear that for whatever reason (fear of White awakening and/or collapse of the financial ponzi?) our globalist overlords are moving in for the kill. Activity on every single battlefront has been ramped up in the War On Whites. Open borders, anti-White affirmative action, 'hate' legislation, anti-White and pro-minority programming in 'entertainment' and media, rewriting of history....the full Orwellian playbook. Of considerable worry is the project to eliminate Bad Thought (i.e. White advocacy) from the internet through an unholy alliance of tech companies, media and traitorous Western governments. This is potentially disastrous as the internet represents easily our most effective communications medium. As always, sometimes behind the curtain, other times in full view, the Tribe has its hands up the asses of their goyim puppets, manipulating them at will. It seems that no matter where we turn our enemies command the reins of power.

But despair not. At least not yet. Because Jews held an almost similar grasp on the commanding heights of society in Weimar Germany. If you're interested in further reading this excellent book provides chapter and verse. Suffice to say that, just like in the West today they dominated politics, banking, media, universities, courts and the medical profession despite comprising little more than 1% of the population..... 'everywhere except agriculture'  as the author notes. 

Their malign impact on popular culture has eerie parallels with today's degenerate West. "The streets are sexually charged, lined with a heady concoction of prostitution, homosexuality, transvestism and drugs. A ferment of artistic and sexual experimentation, the Weimar Republic (1918-1933) privileged an outpouring of cultural creativity in the Bauhaus movement of modern art and the development of the International Style in modern architecture. Against a background of inflation and depression, Berlin drew the talent and energies of the rest of Germany towards its glittering cabaret performances and burgeoning sex tourism industry. From within this hotbed of frenzied immorality, supposedly constitutional sexual equality worked to create the myth of the sexually liberated and financially independent 'New Woman' in Weimar German society. Criminal gangs involved in prostitution, narcotics, gambling, pornography, robbery, and burglary developed and flourished."

Yet within a few years the whole panoply of control had been swept aside with patriotic Germans now in control. Naturally enough this transformation elicited, and does to this day, howls of anguish, much of it focused on how the replacement of Jews (the most talented and industrious of all!) represented an irrecoverable loss for Germany. On the contrary the transformation was accompanied by a (short-lived, admittedly) golden age of economic, cultural and military transformation, all in the face of a ferocious international Jewish boycott.

The lessons being that it is possible to get (((their))) foot off our necks and, far from suffering thereby, Whites will thrive.

Friday, 6 April 2018

The future of American Renaissance

The previous post proposed that a spectrum of opinion in defence of White identity, from the blood and thunder Daily Stormer right over to the tepid and genteel Amren, helps rather than hinders our cause. The Amren case raises a related issue, to what extent - if any - should White identitarians ally with Jews. Amren and Jared Taylor in particular have bent over backwards to accommodate such an alliance. “The role of Jews in a society, the morality of abortion, the influence of Christianity, the appropriate foreign policy, and the place of homosexuals should all be discussed openly in a free society, all in their appropriate places. AR is not that place”.

And that, Jared, is text-book bait and switch. Much like dismissing conspiracy theorists as those who believe 'the earth is flat......and 9/11 was an inside job'. A bit like telling the Titanic story without mentioning that incident with the iceberg.  Because the role of Jews in a society, unlike the other issues he referred to, has been and will be absolutely critical to the success of Amren's objectives. Arguably it's the single most important factor and JT does his cause no service by tiptoeing around this particular elephant. Grovelling before Jewish interests, begging for Jewish Conference speakers (despite often brutal rejection) and banning the likes of David Duke have spectacularly failed so far to generate any payback.

And in my view never will, other than in the form of some short-term tactical alliances. How could anyone think otherwise? Amren's ostensible goal of a White ethnic homeland represents the worst possible nightmare for most Jews. That's why they have been the drivers of the anti-White agenda......open borders, affirmative action, 'hate' legislation, busing, forced integration and a stream of non-stop anti-White propaganda through media and entertainment for close to a hundred years. And if anything have raised the intensity in recent years.  

I understand that a number of Jews are now working at Amren - which is like allowing the fox into the chicken coop. Because infiltrate and subvert is their standard MO as we've seen with the BBC, National Geographic, Ford Foundation and National Review. These legendary White institutions - and dozens of others like them - have over time been taken over by Jews and weaponised against Whites. Amren would be easy meat by comparison. 

Time will tell

Tuesday, 3 April 2018

The spectrum of White Identitarians

Prof. Kevin McDonald is taking quite a bit of flack - Caroline Yeager has a right go - from many White Identitarians (including several on this forum) for failing to call out the Holocau$t™ in a recent interview. Indeed he could have been stronger on it but the question is should he?  Because had he directly called it out for the hoax it is he'd have been instantly reclassified from a simple anti-Semite to a (shudder) Holocaust denier. This in turn would have been used to further marginalise and discredit his valuable and ground-breaking research on Jews and their calamitous impact on their White hosts. KMcD is an academic and his value to the White cause lies in his academic credibility which remains high despite countless attempts to undermine it. 

Point is when it comes to awakening slumbering Whites it's not always essential to directly identify the JQ. In fact due to more than half a century of relentless brainwashing it can actually be counter-productive. It has to be handled carefully, ideally by way of Whites being induced to discover the truth themselves. Here's what I said in an earlier post about Jordan Peterson. Thanks to JP huge numbers of Whites, especially White men, are being awakened to the war being waged against them. Even though he avoids the JQ (and hey, he's one goy who knows) his material inevitably leads many of his White followers to dig deeper into the existential war being waged against them. That's good enough for me. Remember JP reaches a vast audience, most of whom would never go near the more explicitly Jew-wise sites. At least not before he had ignited their curiosity. What's more he's winning huge numbers of converts to his views on, inter alia, feminism, Cultural Marxism and men's rights. Should he stray off the reservation on the JQ he loses all that and becomes a David Irving, even to the possibility of serving time in the slammer under Canada's Orwellian 'human rights' laws.

We can all help in our own way. Obviously this blog directly addresses the JQ and the Holocau$t™ wheeze, the main effect of which is to guilt-trip Whites into self-destruction. But personally I don't have much to lose being retired, financially comfortable and in a position where all my acquaintances (including a few Jews!) know my views. And this is why I admire those like David Duke, Mark Collett, Greg Johnson and many others who have fearlessly taken on the behemoth from more vulnerable positions. And it's why I don't have much respect for the likes of Jared Taylor who not alone turns away from the JQ but actively misrepresents their destructive and subversive role.

Whites are awakening. The question is whether enough will awaken before we get overtaken by events. Our fight back can take many forms but attacking our own is surely not one of them.

Thursday, 29 March 2018

3D chess? Or checkers?

It's becoming increasingly clear that our faith in Donald Trump was misplaced. I'm one of the holdouts (because it's clear that he knows) but the only consolation from last week's disasters is that the Hildebeaste would have been worse. After all Trump stopped the Joos from getting a majority on the Supreme Court and, for now anyway, pulled out of the Paris Climate Hoax Programme and cancelled the TPP. But that pig's ear of a spending bill he signed last week can never become a silk purse. Money for everything, every imaginable pork project, every failed social programme, billions for Israeli 'security', even $500 million for Planned Parenthood, the privately-owned abortion factory. And a fat pay increase for the Congresscritters.

Money available for everything. Except The Wall. And DACA remains in place for the foreseeable future. That's the DACA he was going to cancel on his first day in office. Reneging on the wall and DACA means (unless we buy into the increasingly improbable 3D chess theory) that the two main planks of his election platform have been abandoned. Another major commitment was to extract America from the foreign war imbroglio. And towards that end he appoints war criminal and Israeli-first cheer-leader John Bolton as his National Security Adviser.

Was he, as many suspected, a fraud from the very beginning, tapping into the zeitgeist to win the biggest prize? Or has he (more likely in my opinion) become hostage to forces so pervasive and powerful that he's simply given in? Who knows what they have on him? Whatever the reason he seems to have abandoned his base, compensating with futile appeals to minorities who'll never ever vote for him.

To offset these disappointing developments I'll leave you with a short entertaining video from the legendary British wild-life broadcaster David Attenborough.


Tuesday, 27 March 2018

Is gravity a social construct?

“It's been described with words like: Signature, Innovative, Contemporary, Iconic, Outstanding, Landmark, Event Venue, Linear Park, and a Place to Linger and Gather. Archetypal design principles of blending shapes, creating shadows, selecting textures, choosing pleasing colors, opening new vistas, using native materials, creating feature lighting and that celebrates and is inspired"

Wow!...what's this, a new Sistine Chapel? Well, not exactly. We're talking about Brutalist Architecture at its most, well, brutal. An over-the-top mass concrete foot bridge weighing nearly 1000 tons. Like something from a post-apocalyptic totalitarian dictatorship you could imagine Harrison Ford pursuing replicants across it in Blade RunnerBrutalist architecture might not be pretty, in fact it's invariably hideously ugly, but at least it works. As in bridges stay up. But, as the top picture shows, this one did not.It lasted a mere seven days.

Which is surprising as the project seemed to have everything going for it. An all-female affirmative action team of  engineers, a  Cuban-American construction firm that had been sued numerous times for unsafe practices and 'well connected' in Miami politics (think Tony Soprano's 'environmental' enterprise) ...what could possibly go wrong? And you'd imagine God would have helped out as it was that unique phenomenon, a moral bridge.  "We're trying to build a bridge, not a wall".  Unfortunately, by collapsiing within a week it became a de facto wall.

You may well ask why the contract was awarded to such a firm. The answer lies in its being a Certified Minority-Owned business, a designation that provides major competitive advantage when tendering. Or.....it's another way for White taxpayers to fund their own economic exclusion and dispossession. One Youtube commentator indignantly asked "was the bridge ever stress-tested to see if it could take the weight? Did it go through health and safety checks? This happened in the United States, not some Third World country". But that's the point. Southern Florida is the Third World, a cross between Latin America and Haiti.

Steve Sailer used to have an aphorism regarding the impact of AA and the invasion from the Third World: 'Say goodbye to bridges that don't fall down'.

Goodbye.