Saturday, 14 July 2018

Conclusive proof of global warming


French soccer team 1958

French soccer team 2018



Irish women's relay team 2012

Irish women's relay team 2018

Wednesday, 11 July 2018

Ungrateful bipeds

The Congo languishes at the very bottom of just about every comparative international metric. Apart from one. You see the Congo holds the coveted prize of The Worst Country In The World For Women. Even the Guardian concedes it to be "the rape capital of the world where women are raped while going go to the fields or on their way to market to trade, or also on the road to the stream while going to fetch water". Far from protecting the women, the forces of law and order are in fact the worst offenders.

A recent Oxfam report denounced the shocking scale of domestic sexual violence. 'Women ... are treated as second-class citizens with few opportunities to enter politics and make a difference in gender relations. Forced marriages of girls under 18 remain a severe obstacle to education." Over vast areas of the country the Congolese live in mud or grass huts without sanitation, power or medical services (apart from witch doctors who'll prescribe albino body parts as a remedy for most ailments). Malnutrition and even starvation are endemic.

You'd imagine then (well actually you wouldn't if you were paying attention) that a woman who managed to escape that country and get United States citizenship would be eternally grateful to her new country and its institutions. Enter stage left Patricia Okoumou, the woman who blocked the Statue Of Liberty to protest at Trump's immigration policies.  "Trump has wrecked this country apart [sic]. I can say a lot of things about this monster, but I will stop at this: His draconian zero-tolerance policy on immigration has to go."

Can you just imagine what life would be like for us if and when primitive ingrates like her achieve numerical dominance in our countries? To get such a sense cross the Atlantic to Sheffield, one of England's largest cities. Once the centre of a proud engineering and steel manufacturing tradition, Sheffield has seen its fortunes decline as traitorous globohomo leaders outsourced the work to foreign shores. As the White working class goes into sharp decline its place is being taken by a motley mob of Third World bottom feeders. One of whom, a Somali asylum seeker with the good old English name of Majid Majid, has been elected by these citizens as the city's Mayor.

Is he grateful to his new country for such an extraordinary development? Not a bit of it. He openly despises Britain and its institutions, including the Mayoral office that he holds, dressing in ghetto gear and threatening to remove the portrait of the Queen in his office and replace it by that of his (presumably burka-clad) mother. And now on behalf of the British people he has banned President
Trump, whom he labelled a “wasteman”, from Sheffield during his forthcoming visit. Citing the “Muslim ban” and the detention of children at the border as the reason behind it he tweeted: "I Magid Magid, Lord Mayor & first citizen of this city hereby declare that not only is Donald J Trump a WASTEMAN, but he is also henceforth banned from the great city of Sheffield! I further declare July 13th to be Mexico Solidarity Day!" 

Doesn't that reek of Third World demagoguery. The kind you'd find in, well, the Congo or Somalia. Pint-sized Idi Amin in the making. But such people are infesting the corridors of power throughout Britain and it gets worse every day. When will the Saxon begin to hate?

Monday, 9 July 2018

It’s a woman’s world. Or is it?

On the face of it, feminism has been an unalloyed success for women. They enjoy freedoms inconceivable in earlier times, discriminatory preferences over men (well White men anyway) in college admissions and promotions at work, they earn more and the law is massively biased in their favour. They’re ‘empowered’ baby! And nowhere more so than in sex and mating.

Social convention (or lack of same), contraception and abortion rights mean she no longer needs to remain chaste and virginal, hoping to be chosen by Mr. Right, marrying and having children while young, consigned to a life of drudgery and housework. Now the liberated young woman plays the field, hooks up, makes out. She has countless temporary relationships that won't interfere with education or career. Then, when she comes to her early thirties she’ll look to settle down and have her 1.5 children with a suitably emasculated husband.

Boy, it’s a woman’s world.

Or is it?

Look at it this way. When it comes to mating, what does your average raging hormone young man want? Am I projecting when I say plenty of sex with plenty of girls…..with little or no commitment? Or the real dream, have chicks come up to them and ask if they want to hook up, followed by casual sex, and then on to the next conquest? This is fairly common following the triumph of feminism.

But is that what most women really want? Somehow I doubt it. Maybe I’m wrong, but, just as the male is biologically programmed to spread his seed far and wide before eventually settling down with his love mate, the female is programmed to treat her reproductive capabilities with great discretion. (The young black man is a bit different in that he likes to play the field a bit, and see which babies come out the prettiest, before he settles down with just three or four of his favourite wummins). Both genders are programmed to have children and most, especially women, are likely to feel unfulfilled in their absence. Glamorous career or not.


Now go back to the having it all young woman. Empowered by an active sex life from her late teens onwards, and having established a glittering career in HR or Marketing (only dykes are of use in any other jobs) she’s now, having moved into her thirties, ready for phase two of her plan: To choose an appropriate mate and start a family. Aha! But theirein lies the rub. Because the years of maximum sexual attractiveness and fertility are now rapidly disappearing in her slipstream. Those years, characterised by casual relationships in which she probably held the whip hand (metaphorically speaking) have not prepared her well for long-term commitment. And another big shock: She’ll find that a very very high proportion of desirable men have already made their choices and settled down.

It happens all the time. Even here in this remote corner of Ireland I know lots and lots of attractive clever young women who realised late - too late - that they really did want a normal family. But by that time they are unprepared for it. Their skills revolve around being sexy career women, and when they lose the “sexy” part they’re left with nothing but a career — usually not a particularly impressive one in a cubicle farm. Within a few short years, years that fly by with horrifying speed, they are, to use the cruel colloquialism, 'past it'. Embittered, barren, hollowed-out husks, asking themselves where it all went wrong.

Meanwhile her male counterparts, having enjoyed her body while it was at its most sexually desirable, are now settled down with someone else. Someone who’s not as liberated as our heroine. And to crown it all the reality of innate capabilities and commercial pressures have meant that he’s now overtaken her.....she who thrived initially on AA but who just couldn’t cut it as the going got tougher and tougher and as her enthusiasm dropped on realising that career was a poor substitute for a family.

But if feminism has worked to men’s advantage in this way in reality it's a Pyrrhic victory for all of us. Because feminism has still achieved its primary goal of turning our men and women against one another and thereby precipitate the inevitable social degradation we now see around us.

Friday, 6 July 2018

World Cup - some interim observations

Well the first one is that this has been an absolutely brilliant competition. Despite the anti-Russian hysteria that prevailed in the build-up and lachrymose claims by black players that their very lives were at risk in the xenophobic racist dystopia that is Putin's Russia nothing's happened. Same with terrorism. Western supporters were warned by their Governments against travelling due to the supposedly high risk of terrorism. Again, nothing. So the War Party's hopes have, at least so far, been dashed.

And as usually happens not a single one of the supposedly under-represented Third World teams emerged from the Group stages. The reality, as the results show, and reflecting the world we live in, is that such countries are drastically over-represented. Soccer powerhouses such as Italy and Holland failed to make it out of the gruelling European qualifying rounds while makeweights such as Saudi Arabia and Panama qualified and duly got their asses handed to them. This has been much lamented by the commentariat. 'As an African I'm obviously saddened that no African team has gone through' observed one affirmative action 'journalist' in Ireland while his colleagues and commentators clucked in sympathy. Can you just imagine the reaction if someone had said 'as a European I'm glad no African teams got  through in our place'?

And speaking of Italy I introduce you hear to the new 'Italian' captain, Mario Bolletelli. I'm sure he knows exactly how to rouse and motivate his subjects by appealing to their proud history and cultural traditions, the glories of Rome and all that. Actually though it seems to me that  European teams are much less cultural enriched than in earlier World Cups. Even France, which if memory serves me correctly had only one actual Frenchman on their 2014 team now have several. And the Swedish first team was made up almost entirely of, well, Swedes. Maybe it's just coincidence but just maybe it's a sign of some positive trend.

Anyway, mostly good so far. Now if only Russia were to win it and rub their enemies' faces further in the mud!

Monday, 2 July 2018

A beguiling prospect

The previous post was about how anti-white alliances in Western countries are inherently unstable and are beginning to fracture as parasite numbers grow and YT's spoils get thinner. I also predicted that, as a byproduct, Jews will come a cropper under this new dispensation as non-Whites are immune to Holocau$t™ guilt-tripping. And now another intriguing face-off is underway. I refer to the lawsuit against Harvard by Asians who uncovered data showing that if grades and standardised test scores alone determined admissions, the percentage of Asians in an incoming class would more than double, from 19% to 43%.

Now I don't give a damn whether the suit succeeds or not. My view is that huge numbers of Asians should not be in America in the first place. Let them develop their own universities in their own countries instead of forcing out the people whose ancestors conceived of and built their own institutions. But if all goes well it could shine a light on the real admissions scandal. 

Even as things stand 'Whites' are under-represented as the following enrolment figures from 2014 show:

Asian 16%
Black non-Hispanic 7%
Hispanic 8%
International 10%
Mixed 3%
Unknown 12%
Whites 43%



When SAT scores (the only neutral criterion) are taken into account both Whites and Asians are drastically under-represented. But the really significant statistic lies in the "White" breakdown. You see of that 43% Jews make up no less than 24% while gentile Whites make up a mere 19%. The respective proportions of the population are 2% and 68%. So Jews are over-represented compared to Whites - the people who founded and built the institution to its current preeminent position - by a staggering 1200%! This would be slightly reduced when corrected to reflect higher Jewish SAT scores but only slightly. I read research quoted by David Duke which shows that this margin has diminished to insignificant levels in recent years for reasons as yet unexplained.

So that's the beguiling prospect held out by this lawsuit. And being taken by a non-White minority means it'll get favourable media treatment. So will the ten-ton elephant in the room finally be dragged out, trumpeting indignantly, into the cold light of day? Well we should never underestimate Jews' staggeringly effective shape-shifting abilities whereby they can transform from White ('greeting fellow white people') to unique persecuted minority depending on circumstantial exigencies.

But for sure we'll watch this space.

Thursday, 28 June 2018

A heartening development

"Rep. Joe Crowley, one of the top Democrats in the House of Representatives, lost his New York primary in a shocking upset on Tuesday night to community organizer Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Crowley..... fell easily to a first-time candidate with a Democratic Socialists of America membership card and a proudly leftist agenda. She ran on Medicare-for-all, a federal jobs guarantee, and getting tough on Wall Street."

Why would I celebrate the victory of an open-borders female Hispanic 'community organiser' (where have we heard that before?) over a straight White Irish-American male with a platform like hers? Well let me say it's impossible to avoid a pang of sympathy seeing the stricken expression on Crowley's face when the full horror of the result became apparent. But such sympathy would be misplaced. Because he's been a strident and unrelenting critic of President Trump and especially his efforts to control immigration.

And now Crowley's brown pets have turned on him and selected one of their own despite all his efforts on their behalf. The gods of karma surely permitted themselves a grim smile. Crowley would have understood this and possibly avoided his fate had he listened to the wise words of legendary Singaporean leader Lee Kwan Yew. "In multicultural societies you don't vote according to your economic interests. You vote in accordance with race and religion". (In another interview he warned that 'multiculturalism will destroy America'.) But why is this a good thing apart? 

It's good because it accelerates White awakening to the reality of what's happening to them. Such developments - and they're occurring everywhere - will polarise politics to the point where Republicans become (implicitly, not explicitly) the White party, with Democrats, like the "British" Labour Party, an unsavoury and fissiparous rabble of browns, blacks, welfare parasites (but I repeat myself), various shades of sexual freaks and a residue of self-hating Whites. Patriotic Whites will take over the Republican party and oust the RINOs. If that happens before Whites reach minority status then Whites will recover their country.

Gratifyingly should such developments come to pass Jews are likely to feel the chill. Despite their treachery towards White Americans in the form of open borders, anti-White 'hate' and affirmative active legislation, blacks and Hispanics will still see them as White and will be utterly unmoved by the Holocau$t™ guilt-tripping which worked so well against altruistic and trusting Whites. Despite their legendary ability to flee dying hosts onto healthy ones I believe that Whites will no longer be so altruistic and trusting as the scale of  (((their))) treachery becomes more apparent every day. "Greeting fellow White people" might well be met with jeers rather than cheers.

We live in hope.

Monday, 25 June 2018

Have I got news for you


Have you heard about the Marrakech Declaration? Of course you haven’t, even though it will have greater ramifications for Europe than most wheezes the EUSSR apparatchiks have come up with. It’s the latest in a series of initiatives to – allegedly – stop Europe being flooded by Africans by focusing even more European taxpayers money on ‘developing’ Africa.... so that Africans would flourish there rather than in Europe. Even accepting the sincerity of these motives (which I don’t) that objective has gradually morphed into a straightforward ‘easing the path to legal migration’.

And reading the Declaration you can understand why. Apparently the Dark Continent is swarming with doctors, scientists, engineers and technology specialists, all anxious to join us in Europe. Which prompts the blindingly obvious suggestion, but one studiously ignored in the document, that such geniuses would be better employed in developing their benighted homelands. But no, according to Dimitris Avramopoulos, EU Commissar for Flooding Europe With Non-Whites  Migration, Home Affairs and Citizenship "We cannot and will never be able to stop migration. At the end of the day, we all need to be ready to accept migration, mobility and diversity as the new norm and tailor our policies accordingly", adding that their “restless, inventive minds” will be a boon to Europe. Ephialtes of Trachis, another Greek traitor, springs to mind. 


You have to wonder why these “restless, inventive minds” never got around to developing cities, wheeled vehicles, mechanical contrivances with moving parts such as scissors or hinges, a means of joining pieces of wood together, coins or money, a single written language in the entire region, law codes, literature, philosophy, or any form of mathematics. No, what we’ll get with this initiative is a useless and dangerous rabble of parasites pillaging an inheritance/ civilisation to which they are not entitled.

Taking blacks out of Africa was one of the greatest disasters in human history. Think of all the wonderful places like Brazil and Haiti that they’ve utterly destroyed. If such places were exclusively White they'd be earthly paradises. And they’re doing it still, to once-lovely cities like Baltimore and Detroit with London, Paris and many others pearls of Western civilisation well on the way to a similar fate. 


Many commentators, even on WN forums, refer to the ‘stupidity’ of European leaders .... ‘never ascribe to malice what can be explained by stupidity’. Which I regard as a saying that was cooked up by the malicious and embraced by the stupid. Fact is, if Africa cannot look after its own, which it manifestly cannot come even close to doing, it means that something is wrong with Africans. Which in turn means, or should mean, that they should not be allowed to settle in non-African lands.

Friday, 22 June 2018

Prioritising police resources

When it emerged that "British" jihadis were returning from Syria by the hundred and that police were unable to track them a shocked Piers Morgan asked Sadiq Khan, the Pakistani Muslim Mayor of London “why can’t you instruct the police, why can’t you call [Metropolitan Police Chief] Cressida Dick right now, and say every one of those people that’s come back from a war zone, who’s in London, I want them followed?” Khan replied “Let me tell you why. Because the Met Police budget, roughly speaking, 15 percent, 20 percent is funded by me, the mayor. The rest comes from central government. If the Met Police is being shrunk and reduced, they’ve got to prioritise and use their resources in a sensible, savvy way.”

Morgan, incredulous, shot back, “What could be a bigger priority than people coming back from a Syrian battlefield with intent to harm British citizens? Why is it not the number one priority?


Well I can tell you what can be a bigger priority. In fact let the Met tell you themselves. 
So there you have it. The rozzers might not have the resources to track head-chopping tube-bombing terrorists but the resources are nonetheless there to track down, arrest and prosecute British people for saying rude things about Muslims.

Understand this: The British State and its agents no longer serve the British people, instead they actively work against their interests, operating as an administrative and enforcement arm of the NWO globalist oligarchy. It's abundantly clear that their role and objective is to dispossess and ultimately marginalise the native people while corrupting and debasing the institutions that made Britain Great. They asset-strip the country and expend blood and treasure in foreign wars of no relevance to the people, all at the behest of their NWO globalist overlords.  

There was a time, not so long ago, that such people would have been hanged for High Treason.

Tuesday, 19 June 2018

A Manchurian Candidate

The World Council of Churches (WCC) - a quintessential globalist NWO organisation that the Catholic Church used avoid like the plague -  has announced a joint venture with the Vatican to co-host a meeting on “migration, xenophobia, and politically motivated populism” as part of its work toward “peace-building and migration.” The Director General of the WCC, Rev. Olav Fykse Tveit, said it would be a "dig a bit deeper” into the problems [my emphasis] of xenophobia as an expression of populism, as well as its links to racism, conflict, and violence in countries around the world. No surprise here really as last September the Vatican launched a two-year campaign to change people’s minds about migrants and to encourage a more welcoming attitude toward them worldwide. And sent a Cardinal to hobnob with the NWO globalists at the latest Bilderberg meeting.

The current Pope is turning the Church upside down, transforming it into a SJW organisation like the Church Of England, which has now virtually disappeared as a religious force. Unlike blood-and-guts Islam which continues to grow like a virus. The Church is now fully aligned with the globalist/NWO agenda, a development which Pope Benedict had very much feared. Which raises the question of his resignation, the first by a Pope in 600 years. Was he forced out, and if so by whom?


Evidence from Wikileaks suggests he was, with the usual suspects up to their necks in it.  John Podesta of pizzagate fame and other progressives discussed regime change to remove what they described as the “middle ages dictatorship” in the Catholic Church, to effect a “Catholic Spring” revolution in it. The leaked emails show that Soros, Obama and Clinton used the United States’ diplomatic machinery, political muscle, and financial power to coerce, bribe and blackmail “regime change” in the Church in order to replace Benedict XVI with Pope Francis – who has since become an unlikely mouthpiece for the international left, stunning Catholics around the world. The Podesta e-mail is a response to another Soros-funded radical — Sandy Newman, founder of the “progressive” Voices for Progress. Newman had written to Podesta seeking advice on the best way to “plant the seeds of the revolution” in the Catholic Church.

This article from the Jewish Forward has the unequivocal title 'Converts Who Changed The Church'. Interestingly, the 'converts' in question were all Jewish, and most of their activities appeared to be directed towards making the Church 'modern' and Jew-friendly. It's well accepted that Jewish 'converts' Von Hildebrand, Oestrreicher, Gurian and Thieme (there were others) played a central role in driving the revolutionary agenda of Vatican II. Bella Dodd, a Catholic-turned-Communist who later recanted said "in the thirties, we put 1,100 men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church." We can see the results today whereby the humanitarian weaknesses built into Christianity have been turned against its followers, rendering the Church into just another globalist humanitarian agency, UNESCO with prayers.

All part of what I call The Quickening. Everything is speeding up. A denouement of some sort is at hand.

Friday, 15 June 2018

Support Israel!

The previous post elicited more than 200 comments and a spirited debate about Tommy Robinson's support for Israel and Zionism. Such support was in itself deemed by many as grounds for his expulsion from the WN fold. But should it? There's an argument, in fact many arguments, for WN to actually support Israel.

It's openly and unapologetically an ethnic homeland, to the point that the qualification for citizenship requires DNA testing to prove ethnic purity

Israeli legislation provides no option for civil or interfaith marriage, only those who are recognised as Jews according to Orthodox Jewish law can get married in Israel, and members of other religions can only marry spouses of the same religion.

Roads are segregated by race and ethnicity and there are other restrictions on movements by non-ethnics.

Illegal immigrants are given short shrift, corralled into ghettos or concentration camps before being unceremoniously dumped in Uganda.

Israeli attitudes to Africans can be judged by the secret administration of birth control chemicals to prevent Ethiopian Jews from breeding.

Many restaurants operate a no Muslims/Arabs policy in full compliance with the law while non-Jews have restricted property and residential rights.

And the piece de resistance, the Israelis want all Jews to migrate there!

Seriously, what do we lose by supporting Israel, specifically the ethnic and religious basis for its existence? Whites can only dream of such a dispensation. And by supporting Israel we automatically circumvent the Holocau$t™ protective force field.

Think about it with an open mind.


PS: When I say support Israel I mean support their approach and methods in establishing and maintaining an ethnically pure homeland for their own people and WNs using this to further our own objectives. I certainly don't mean any form of material support or indeed support for their land-grabbing and trouble-making among its 'neighbours'. Regular and esteemed commentator What Is Truth? suggests the following examples for WNs to deploy the 'support Israel' meme:

Your a racist'.
'No. I only want the same as Israel'.

'You want to stop people who are in a desperate condition from becoming refugees'
'No. I want to adopt the same policy as Israel (and the Moslem Arab countries)'.

'You think people from other races are inferior'.
'No. I want us to be just like Israel'.

'You want an apartheid state'.
'No. I only want to be like Israel'."

Monday, 11 June 2018

Tommy Robinson and 'controlled opposition'

The comments on this and just about every White identitarian blog are awash with criticism of Tommy Robinson. He's apparently 'controlled opposition', he's weak on racial issues and in particular the JQ. As such he's not truly one of us and does not merit our support. This hostility - unfortunately - has become routine against those deemed not to fully and unconditionally meet all the requirements demanded of a perfect WN. But remember perfection is the enemy of good enough. Litmus tests for ideological purity will result in permanent marginalisation and ineffectiveness. There will always be disagreements about facts, priorities, interpretations, measures to take etc. That's the nature of any movement. The criterion should be 'is he (or the site) helping or damaging the WN cause?'.

I said this some time ago about Alex Jones, another target of the purists.  Despite carefully avoiding the Third Rail he has worked wonders in waking White people up. He has induced Whites to question and doubt the narrative they've been fed by schools, Government, MSM and Hollywood. Look, time and again he talks about “the elite”, “the global elites”, “globalists”, “international bankers”, “global conspiracy”, “the NWO” and the like. He says that every path leads to the House of Rothschild. Now I ask you, how much more explicit do you expect him to be? 

Tommy Robinson has done something similar, building massive awareness of the treachery perpetrating by Britain's leaders against their own people, the corrupt judicial system, the biased media and Muslim pathologies. He's forced these issues onto the public square, risking everything to do so. Who else has done more? Were he to be ideologically pure and 'safe' on all the key issues he'd be marginalised and ignored while the globalist nation-wreckers continued their work away from the spotlight.

Our biggest problem is that the overwhelming majority of Whites have no understanding - whatsoever - of the war being waged against them. They believe in what they see on TV and the movies, in what they learn in school and university and as such are like lemmings heading unknowingly towards the cliff.

Why would any 'controller' support such messages of awakening from the likes of Tommy? Remember, and I'm living testimony to this fact, once you start pulling at the Narrative string the whole thing comes apart like a cheap suit. Any 'controller' worth his salt knows that and would avoid it like the plague. So please, be glad and appreciative for what Tommy is doing and put aside our differences with him - for now anyway. We are still a small minority and desperately need any help we can get in rousing Whites from their potentially fatal slumber. 

Friday, 8 June 2018

Some reflections on Ireland's abortion referendum

The victory of 'progressive' forces in the recent referendum has been hailed by the chattering classes, media whores and Good Whites everywhere as a decisive victory for democracy. And indeed it was, no arguments about that. Odd then that the very people eulogising the voice of the people in the Irish Republic, and warning against any backsliding by the Government in fulfilling their democratically-expressed wishes, recommend an entirely different approach in the other part of Ireland. You see abortion legislation in Northern Ireland is much more restrictive than on the British mainland, and polls show consistently that this is what its people want.

So one quick somersault later and the luvvies are demanding that 'the tyranny of the majority' be ended. By legislation from Westminster if necessary. Shadow Attorney General Shami Charkrabarty (are there any actual British people left at the top levels of law enforcement?) says “You can’t have democracy without fundamental human rights, and the women of Northern Ireland have suffered for long enough", adding that Labour is “looking at legislative options” in Westminster to force a more liberal abortion regime on the Ulster knuckle-draggers.


Yes, as we knew all along, the democratic will of the people is paramount ..... until it comes up with the wrong result. Just ask Viktor Orban.

Our Prime Minister Leo Varadker took personal credit for the success of the referendum declaring it 'the day we came of age as a country, the day we took our place among the nations of the world'.  Well now Leo, what exactly do you mean by 'we'? Like, I can't imagine that Ireland has too many more Indian Hindu homosexuals on whose behalf you can speak. And fuck your impertinence in dismissing the Ireland prior to your coronation in such derogatory terms. For  many years Ireland has been in the very highest cohort of nations when it comes to life expectancy, standard of living, education, freedom, democracy and general human rights. 

Now in comparison take a country like, well, India, a billion people shitting on the ground, turds everywhere you step, rivers filled with shit and bathing humans, millions dying of starvation and treatable disease every year, eye-watering corruption, dead bodies floating in rivers while mangy dogs feast on their corpse, where brides with insufficient dowries are burnt alive. Whereas Ireland currently ranks 8th in the UN's Human Development Index India languishes at a 131, along side such human rights luminaries as Tajikistan and the Congo.

So Leo, if you really want to help a country take its place among the nations of the world head back to the land of your fathers and get to work.

Monday, 4 June 2018

Project Androgeny

Testosterone is what makes men men, And makes women with a surfeit of it into men as well. Just ask Serena Williams. It makes men brave, adventurous, assertive, sexually active and impulsive. Low T results in those characteristics weakening while obesity and depression increase and cognitive ability declines. And men look less masculine. I understand that relatively small reductions in T levels result in significant changes. What then to make of the fact that in the USA male T levels have been falling at 1% per year since 1987? Which leads to the staggering conclusion that 40-60 year-old American men have about 30% less T than they had 30 years ago.

I don't claim to understand what's given rise to this. I can offer some possible explanations like excreted hormones from the contraceptive pill in the public water supply, the use of soy throughout the food chain (hence 'soy boys'), growth hormones in chickens, pigs and cattle, GMO crops. Evidence supporting this T drop is staring us in the face. Women are pushing ahead of men everywhere (I acknowledge AA to be a big factor but it doesn't explain things like changing relative SAT scores), male White suicide rates have skyrocketed, men are fatter and more feminine looking. Just compare a class photo from 30 years ago with one from today and you'll notice the differences.


Now you'd imagine that these developments would ring alarm bells in academia, the medical profession and Government health services. But according to research undertaken by Fox News the subject has been virtually ignored. The National Institute of Health (which has lavished funds on subjects like how canoes can foster cultural identity and the impact of taxes on tobacco sales in Thailand) has done absolutely nothing on this catastrophic development for American men's health.

Now why would that be? Again, I don't know. But look again at the high T characteristics that I listed above. Are they not the very things that make our globalist nation-wrecking overlords tremble? How much better for them were men to become fat, docile, dumbed-down and compliant? Bear in mind that prisons successfully developed a food pyramid diet specifically to reduce aggression among inmates. Why not extend something similar to the general population? This would be fully consistent with Project Androgeny which tries to break down the differences between the sexes.

Crazy speculation? 

Saturday, 2 June 2018

Faces (faeces??) of the new and vibrant London

White British, i.e. British, are now a minority in London, the capital of an empire that once ruled a quarter of the world. Those remaining are ruled over by a Muslim Mayor. There was a time when it was one of the safest metropolises in the world, bobbys on bicycles two by two and all that. But its new vibrancy has lead to its now overtaking New York in the murder stakes.If you're puzzled by this development maybe the following pictures will help your understanding.
"THIS is the moment a cyclist armed with an enormous 'zombie knife' tries to smash the window of a car in an apparent road rage row. The driver was forced to run for his life as the cyclist battered his car with the foot-long blade in the confrontation in Croydon, South London."

Here's my guess at the police description of the assailant. "The attacker was described as male, approximately five feet nine inches, wearing a grey jacket and dark jeans' 

Am I right?

And what about these two beauties?


"Grenfell Tower fire frauds admit posing as victims and claiming more than £125,000 in relief. The pair, both Jamaican nationals aged 51, also tried to take advantage of a scheme granting all tower residents leave to remain in the UK for at least five years."

Welcome to the new and vibrant London of 2018.

Tuesday, 29 May 2018

War has been declared on the British people.

The Soviet Union is commonly perceived to have been an absolute tyranny where opponents of the regime ended up with a bullet in the head. That form of coercion may have ended shortly after the death of Stalin but there never was real political freedom. All political activities had to conform to Party orthodoxy, potentially troublesome foreigners were excluded, no meaningful opposition media were allowed and rather than facing a bullet to the head dissidents could expect to lose their jobs, or if they got too stroppy sentenced to jail by one of the Party's kangaroo courts.

How different is that to what applies today in Britain? Not a lot really. Just a few days ago Tommy Robinson, in his role as a citizen journalist, was filming outside the court where Muslim child rapists were on trial. Police pulled him off the street, dragged him in front of a judge who immediately, without his legal representative being present, sentenced him to thirteen months in prison. After which he was immediately whisked off to start his sentence while the judge imposed a media blackout. How different is that case (and many others like it) to Soviet practice? 

In Britain, and in many other Western countries, the media is controlled, unorthodox political views will lose you your job or land you in jail, laws are so vague as to guarantee convictions, non-conforming foreigners are routinely excluded, education has been replaced by indoctrination, in effect there's just one political party, political hacks get promoted to top positions....and now we have a political activist tried and jailed in secret. I ask again, how is that different to the USSR?

War has been declared on the British people. The Government and its agencies are with the enemy, if not actually the enemy. Why else would they appoint the likes of this clown to head the Crown Prosecution Service and make the likes of these people responsible for the safety of White children? There's a reason for such appointments and British (i.e. White) candidates understand that they either get on message or get nowhere. Just like the Soviet Union. That in turn explains the traitorous behaviour of the police, courts and all Government agencies.

The question is...where's it going to end? Will the British people (and Western Europeans generally) keep retreating, heads down, paying the mortgage while ameliorating the pain of their dispossession with sport and entertainment mind-rot? Or will the traitors and their invader foot soldiers finally push them to outright rebellion?

I have no idea how this will turn out.

Sunday, 27 May 2018

Royal negrolatry

How many of you remember Sarah Ferguson, the erstwhile Duchess of York, ex-wife of Prince Andrew? More specifically the endless hounding she suffered from the MSM almost from the beginning? She was excoriated for being a promiscuous spendthrift from an 'ordinary' family whose father was a mere Army Major. Despite being basically a decent girl married to a guy with very dodgy sexual predilections she was always the Bad One. And of course she had ginger hair and a freckly face.

Contrast that with the unalloyed reverence and veneration which Meghan Markle has enjoyed from the very beginning. Yet compared to her Fergie has been a model of chastity, good breeding and dignity. Albeit with ginger hair and freckly skin. In saner times Markel would have seen as the Bad Princess straight from central casting, would have been hard to imagine anyone less worthy of becoming part of the Royal House of Windsor. 


After all she's mixed-race, comes from a ghetto in LA,  her deeply embarrassing family (her father selling personal photos, a cousin wedding guest stopped entry to a nightclub for trying to smuggle in a knife) all seem to hate her despite using her new status to make money for themselves. Thomas Markle Jr describes his sister in an open letter to the Prince as a "jaded, shallow, conceited woman that will make a joke of you and the royal family heritage. As more time passes to your royal wedding, it became very clear that this is the biggest mistake in royal wedding history. Meghan Markle is obviously not the right woman for you." 

Shortly after this the Royal in-law was arrested for allegedly holding a gun to a woman's head during a drunken argument


And the 'Princess' herself? Rode the cock carousel so hard that its bearings must have flamed out at some stage. Was a soft-porn actress (see her Royal Highness above thrusting her naked butt into the air for all to see), and in an inspired piece of casting, played a prostitute in Beverly Hills, 90210 in which she 'performed an intimate act' on screen in broad daylight. One of her countless 'boyfriends' was porn-star Simon Rex (lower picture). Sheer class.

Yet the gushing feelgood fantasy story continues unabated. Another institution bites the dust in the Long March Through The Institutions.

Thursday, 24 May 2018

Ireland's culture wars

Boy, has Ireland progressed since the days when the Church had its well-tailored heel on our necks. The Culture War here is less a war and more a headlong retreat for the forces of tradition as 'progressives'  sweep them off the battlefield on issue after issue. We've just approved gay marriage by a landslide majority, have appointed Katherine Zappon (Strapon), an American of indeterminate gender (and negligible voter support) who fetched up some time ago in Ireland with her/his/its 'wife' and became Minister responsible for.......Children And Youth Affairs. And best of all have elected a homosexual Pakistani Hindu as our Prime Minister.

See how Ireland had progressed everyone!

But there's one arena in which the traditionalists have held sway: Abortion. At least up to now. Because tomorrow the country holds a Referendum which proposes to remove the Constitutional restrictions that currently apply. The issue is both complex and simple and there's no point in going through all the issues here other than take issue with the canard that 'it's the woman's right to choose. My body, my choice'. It is up to a point but if we take it to its logical conclusion it means that the woman can choose to abort the unborn baby any time right up to the point of birth. In other words she can choose infanticide. This is not hyperbole because late-term terminations of viable foetuses are taking place in Britain and many other places this very day.

Naturally enough the Referendum's proponents are not running on this platform. It's twelve weeks and that's it. And we'll never look to increase that time limit. We swear!  The exact same progression took place in Britain and Ireland's craven politicians, with no Constitutional prohibition to hide behind, will gradually extend the time limit in response to the shrieking feminist mob and their air-headed dupes in the general population. According to the opinion polls the Yes side will easily carry the day. Not surprising given the state of the zeitgeist with the Catholic Church relegated to the status of helpless onlooker. In fact I wouldn't be surprised were the current Pope to proclaim abortion as a virtuous act.  But I have a feeling that the result might a lot closer than the consensus indicates. Ireland might yet see an awakening of the forces that gave us Trump and give the nation-wreckers a closer run than they expect.

Monday, 21 May 2018

New business proposal

How about this for a mouth-watering business plan? You sell crap coffee for twice the normal price in a place that doubles as a homeless shelter where 'all are welcome' whether or not they buy anything. While they join a long queue waiting for their order to be fulfilled customers can take in gangs of black teenagers chimping out, junkies shooting up at the tables and savour the juicy aroma wafting from the bathroom as a homeless man, whose earlier meal came from a nearby dumpster, relieves himself on the floor. This kind of thing.

Not exactly calculated to set the pulses of a would-be investor racing, is it? Yet that represents Starbucks' new business strategy, developed following the Rittenhouse Square Massacre where two black non-customers were, in line with company policy, asked to leave unless they made a purchase. When they refused they were subsequently removed - with no use of force - by local police. An everyday occurrence in this type of business you'd imagine. But in this instance it became an overnight national scandal.

To the extent that Starbucks have now fundamentally revised their customer policies, declaring their dining and bathroom facilities 'open to all' whether they're paying customers or not. Now for sure I have nothing but contempt for corporations that virtue signal about equality while paying their 'partners' subsistence wages (exemplar: Amazon) or tech companies that trumpet their commitment to diversity while employing virtually no blacks (exemplar: Google). But in this instance it does seem as if Starbucks have literally put their money where their mouth is. This move - if followed through - will inevitably have a major, and possibly irrecoverable, impact on their bottom line. If they don't follow through a storm of negative publicity is sure to follow so they lose either way. 

I don't get it.

Thursday, 17 May 2018

It's worse than you think....

Most of us associate Jewish power with their dominance of banking, "news" media and the entertainment industry. More recently this has extended to the digital world with the main social media and search engine platforms being under Jewish control and ownership. This is a chillingly wide and deep span of power. In fact in terms of controlling the information flow I'd say it approaches that wielded by the medieval Christian Church.

And this isn't the worst of it because Israeli companies are now to be found in powerful and sometimes dominant positions at critical points throughout the underlying layers of the technology universe like:
  • Microprocessors 
  • Cyber security
  • Systems integration
  • Electronic payment systems
  • Database technology and analytics
  • Aircraft transponder control systems - ask Dov Zakheim
  • The Internet Of Things

The implications are dramatic as the Israelis now have the power to literally bring the Western world - and most of the rest of it - grinding to a halt by sabotaging utilities like electricity, water and telecommunications, banking transactions and airport operations. Add in the capacity to hack into critical corporate and government systems and databases and the circle is complete. Bear in mind that unlike earlier technologies, which could (with difficulty) be reverse engineered to discover malware, the millions of modern microprocessors are closed impenetrable black boxes. Would the Israelis have built in trojan horses or trapdoors into these chips? What do you think??

You may well ask how the West finds itself in this catastrophic predicament. You might also ask how a small country like Israel has achieved this level of dominance. A number of factors account for it. First their military and intelligence services recruited large numbers of top researchers and developers  and got them working on key technologies in a structured programme going back more than thirty years. Stolen technology from the West also helped as did the ready availability of VC funding and a fifth column of sayanim smoothing the way in enemy territory (that's us, you understand). 

In any event - in my view - they now have the West by the balls.

Monday, 14 May 2018

The Anti-Christ?

Although having abandoned Christianity as a teenager and subsequently dismissed all religion as mumbo I've begun to reassess my views in recent times as developments increasingly suggest the Bible prophesy stuff might not have been so daft after all. One of the most remarkable has been the self-destruction of the Catholic Church which has gone into overdrive under the present Pope who, in his short reign to date, has come out with more heresies than all the other Popes combined.

Watching the antics of this one man wrecking-ball brings to mind the testimony of former United States Communist Party member, Bella Dodd before the House on Un-American Activities in 1952.  The Communist Party in the 1930s "put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within. Right now they are in the highest places, and they are working to bring about change in order that the Catholic Church will no longer be effective against Communism. The change would be so drastic that you will not recognize the Catholic Church." And we all know with whom the American Communist Party was synonymous, don't we?

Now consider the words of the brilliant Jesuit theologian Malachi Martin from the mid-nineties. "Roman Catholics will then have the spectacle of a Pope validly elected who cuts the entire visible body of the Church loose from the traditional unity and the papacy-oriented apostolic structure that the Church has hitherto always believed and taught was divinely established. The shudder that will shake the Roman Catholic body in that day will be the shudder of its death agony. … Many will accept the new regime. Many will resist. All will be fragmented. There will be no one on earth to hold the fractionating members of the visible Roman Catholic body together as a living compact organization. [This will] transform the Papacy itself into a complaisant, even a cooperative, handmaiden in the service of a new creation. A new earthly habitat. A truly New World Order.”

Friday, 11 May 2018

'Nice movement you got there goyim. Mind if we join?'

It seems that a sinister new alt-right force is emerging on the Web. In fact it's so secretive that they call themselves the Intellectual Dark Web. Now you must understand that the Dark Web is not something vague where naughty people post bad stuff. It has specific technical characteristics (you need TOR to access it) while its content does not get indexed by search engines so will never be found by the casual user. On the Dark Web you can buy military-grade weapons, child porn...all payable in untraceable Bitcoin. Its primary differentiator is to hide the identity of both users and content providers.

In view of this I expected the Intellectual Dark Web to lie well to the right of Andrew Anglin who himself has been forced onto the Dark Web on occasions. But in this instance? Well, not exactly. And we know this because the New York Slimes was able to reveal the identities of the main stakeholders even though they'd described 'people like them who dare venture into this  are in “There Be Dragons” territory'
. So why the 'Dark Web' in the first place. Was this a form of doxxing? No. "The core members have little in common. Bret and Eric Weinstein and Ms. Heying were Bernie Sanders supporters. Mr. Harris was an outspoken Hillary voter. Ben Shapiro is an anti-Trump conservative."

Well I can be of assistance to the author (((Bari Weiss))) here because in fact they have a number of crucial things in common. For a start they all hate Trump and second they're all Jewish. And here's a a third: No self-respecting alt-right/White advocacy movement would or should touch them with a barge pole. Because they're straight from the Jewish Infiltrate And Subvert playbook. Textbook examples, down even to the point where a few neutered goys like Douglas ('anti-Semitism is a mental disease') Murray are allowed to play with them. Under careful supervision.

If we're to believe the New York Slimes (stop laughing at the back!) the movement is "a collection of iconoclastic thinkers, academic renegades and media personalities who are having a rolling conversation.... that sound unlike anything else happening, at least publicly, in the culture right now." Er, no. It's a reflection of the fact that Jews and their shabbos goy allies realise that they're losing control of The Narrative, that coercion, lawfare and violence are no longer in themselves enough to prevent Whites awakening to their impending dispossession and that more subtle measures are required.

'Nice movement you got there goyim. Mind if we join?'

Sunday, 6 May 2018

Elevator Pitch 4: The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan

Virtually everyone on this blog will be familiar with the objectives of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. It's knowledge that we can put to good use in the right circumstances. To do so we need to be able to demonstrate three things. First the broad outlines of the plan itself. Second the fact that the Plan attracted major financial and political support - it wasn't just someone's plan. Third that implementation of  the Plan's recommendations started shortly after WW II and continues to this day. All three components are essential in making our case.

The plan proposes to miscegenate Europeans out of existence and replace them with European/African/Asian hybrids. 'The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.' Can't be much clearer than that! 

Kalergi* makes one exception to this mixed-race fate: Jews. 'Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It's not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats.' Kalergi makes clear that this 'new elite' will rule over the dumbed-down mixed-race helots in a supposedly benign but fundamentally undemocratic system. (Count Coudenhove-Kalergi himself was not Jewish but his main benefactors and two of his wives were). A good summary of his plan be read here and is strongly recommended.

From the very outset Kalergi attracted support from massively wealthy and powerful Jews. Baron Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild became his personal friend and introduced him to mega-bankers Max Warburg who in turn introduced him to extravagantly wealthy Jewish financiers Paul Warburg (Max's brother), Bernard Baruch, and Baruch’s brother Felix. These connections provided lavish funding and political support to Kalergi on an ongoing basis.

Such support inevitably lead to  practical results and, capitalising on the carnage of WW II the plan's sponsors began to change the face of Europe and other White countries. The Charlemange Prize, often referred to as the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize (although as the goyim awaken this association is being downplayed) became Europe's most prestigious, and, straight from the Orwellian playbook was awarded ostensibly to the person who did most to 'promote European cohesion'. Not surprisingly the Count himself was the recipient of the first Award in 1950. Subsequent winners represent a rogues' gallery of nation-wrecking traitors including Churchill (presumably for his efforts in destroying Europe during the war), Kissinger, Blair, Clinton, Merkel, Trichet and the current Pope. Since that first Award tens of millions of brown and black invaders have flooded all over the White world, rendering vast swathes of it unrecognisable from what they'd been less than fifty years earlier. And, spurred by an endless barrage of propaganda, the miscegenation project is in full sway, with Kalergi's mystery meat everywhere we look. Meanwhile our Jewish puppet masters pull the strings from behind the curtain.

This is powerful stuff. Provided we can get it out there among the general public. Which is where the Elevator Pitch comes in. But how can we possibly compress it into a meaningful and convincing pitch that lasts about half a minute? Well here's my first cut.

"Did you know that the whole EU project is based on a plan originally drawn up in the 1920s by a Japanese-European Count? He said that the European man of the future would be of mixed White, African and Asiatic race ruled over by a Jewish elite. The proposals attracted massive financial and political support from powerful Jews and the EU from its beginning directly follows the Plan's proposals'.

In itself this will not convince anyone. But the objective is to lead people to further question the Ordained Narrative. You'll notice that I downplay the Jewish role for the Pitch. Remember that White goyim have been brainwashed to the point of altered brain chemistry when it comes to the JQ. It must be introduced with care.

*I suggest shortening the Count's full name to Kalergi in general conversation. Brevity is the essence of the Elevator Pitch!

Tuesday, 1 May 2018

Britain's in safe hands!

So Amber Rudd has bitten the dust, a victim of the very multiculturalism and diversity she worked so hard to promote. Her civil servants let her down by telling some people illegally in Britain that they were, well, illegally In Britain. Shock, horror - and Rudd's resignation - duly followed. Her replacement was quickly named. He's Sajid Javid, a Pakistani Muslim. He promised that his "first priority" would be to right the wrongs of the Windrush Scandal, that which drove Rudd from office. Maybe someone will suggest to  him that addressing the epidemic of black murders convulsing London might be more urgent. In any event this is the guy with responsibility for enforcing the control of Britain's borders and the overall administration of justice. Don't you feel better already?

And what a support team he's got. Idi Amin lookalike Mike Fuller is now Chief Inspector of the Crown Prosecution Service. His main claim to fame, apart from being the first black to hold this position, is to have used a personal chauffeur to clock up more than 150,000 miles in six years travelling from his home in London to his office in Kent.

Javid presumably will have his hands full dealing with the mass rape of White children by members of his Muslim community. Then again he might have other things on his mind. Like punishing the civil servants who told the Windrush illegals that they were illegal. If he's too busy he can enlist the aid of this guy who's head of the Crown Prosecution Service's Child Abuse Unit. Yet another Pakistani Muslim, Nazir Asfal has professed himself to be "unruffled by mounting media hysteria (sic) over the ethnicity of abusers in Rotherham".  Instead he suggests "stepping back and taking a wider view of the nationwide picture".

And in taking a wider view of the nationwide picture Asfal can count on the assistance of Bardardo's Homes, "the main provider of child sexual exploitation services in the UK". And who heads up Barnardo's? It's Javed Kahn, yet another Pakistani Muslim, one who has been exposed as having turned a blind eye to the abuse of White children by Muslims over many years.

I think every parent in Britain can rest easily with their children under the care of such a team, dedicated 24x7 to the welfare of British citizens.

Meanwhile yet another Pakistani Muslim rules over the kuffars of the nation's capital. Sadiq Khan, a terrorist-sympathising dwarf who can't speak proper English has become the self-appointed spokesman for the British people by declaring President Trump to be unwelcome in his country. Sorry, I mean in Britain. Khan's country is of course Pakistan. 

Maybe a change of Government will see brain-box Diane Abbot as Treasury Secretary. After all if Compton ghetto trash can marry into the Royal Family anything is possible.

Isn't it amazing...the British people who built an Empire that ruled a quarter of the world and inter alia ran the whole Indian sub-continent, from Afghanistan to Burma, with about 200,000 of their own people, now need their former subjects to run their own country?

Is that an evil cackle I hear from behind the curtain?

Sunday, 29 April 2018

Jordan Peterson takes the shekel

Back in January I wrote a post on Jordan Peterson and his hands-off approach to the Jewish Question. I called for forbearance as despite his reticence he nonetheless continues to awaken huge numbers of Whites, especially White men to the war being waged against them. And let's face it, should he stray off the reservation on the JQ he loses his glittering career and celebrity status. His silence on the JQ was consistent with a core recommendation of his to 'tell the truth - or at least don't lie.'

Sad to relate he did exactly that - lie - in a recent article in which he finally addressed the JQ head-on. His position (you can read it here, it's quite short) is essentially that Jews don't conspire to undermine White societies, that their success is explained exclusively by superior intelligence* and not by nepotism or ethnic networking, that Whites who complain about Jewish influence are failures seeking to scapegoat others for their own inadequacies. He excoriates 'the players of identity politics on the far right' but has no issue with non-Whites' identity politics. In fact the whole essay is a no-holds-barred attack on those espousing White identity.

For this I accuse him of lies, cowardice and abandoning young White men, those he claims he most wants to help: He has already clearly identified the sources of their anomie and despair as the evils of feminism, discrimination via affirmative action, ridicule and humiliation in movies and TV, their women encouraged to mate with dusky foreigners, their countries' courts biased against them, their ancestors' stunning achievements denied and/or vilified. Be assured he knows full well the central role played by Jews in bringing these pathologies to fruition.

So the next time Jordan wells up in tears as he describes the unfortunate young men he treats remember that he has wilfully turned attention away from the source of their problems.

To conclude on a positive note the reader comments on his essay (thousands of them) have been largely negative towards JP. It's truly heartening to see the huge numbers of readers fully awakened to the Jewish role in our ongoing destruction. In fact it's possible that JP might have scored an own goal with this one.

*As I've mentioned on a number of previous occasions the much-touted Ashkenazi IQ average of 115 is based on very flimsy evidence. Vox Populi does an excellent dissection on the figure here and plausibly posits an average of 104 as being more accurate. In the process blowing JP's core argument to pieces.