Friday, 4 August 2017

Legal justice in today's Britain

For centuries British legal principles have been an inspiration to legislators throughout the world. But along with everything else in that betrayed country they too have been sacrificed to the gods of diversity. Just read the following legal monstrosity as embodied in the College Of Policing's Hate Crime Operational Guidance.
"For recording purposes, the perception of the victim, or any other person .... is the defining factor in determining whether an incident is a hate incident, or in recognising the hostility element of a hate crime. The victim does not have to justify or provide evidence of their belief, and police officers or staff should not directly challenge this perception. Evidence of the hostility is not required for an incident or crime to be recorded as a hate crime or hate incident." [My emphasis]

Could a more outrageous or egregious example of legislative (mis)guidance be imagined? Illegality is determined by the perception of the 'victim' rather than on the legal text and the associated case law. Under such a system a 'victim' could deem any innocuous comment or even a compliment from a White man as 'hateful'.  "I like your outfit" could be deemed as hateful by a 'victim' because....well, just because. And the 'victim' doesn't have  to provide any supporting evidence! How cool is that? 

A ten year-old child wouldn't come up with such nonsense yet in fact it emanated from one of Britain's most decorated judgesAnd it was not nonsensical really. It was another string to the bow of White civilisational destruction wrought by traitors in our midst. It's been successful. As the following illustrates.


«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 205 of 205
Mad Max said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Yes, we landed on the moon several times.

To deny it is a form of solipsism (conspiracy theory would be too respectable).

.....It's all a matter of 'degree'. The 60 IQ African, builds helicopters and stealth bombers in his back garden, out of dustbins and rabbit hutches. The 120 IQ White, builds spaceships in large sheds, out of dustbins, hoover hose, baking foil and duct tape.
Can you see how the two are connected. Both groups of people have the same "cargo cult" mentality, separated purely by IQ.

Mad Max said...

Anonymous James said...
It looks like this blog is being infected by flat Earth moon hoax BS which will unfortunately drown out its real message - White genocide.

....Give it a rest, James. Take five minutes out from your studies. Sit back, relax.
I'll come clean. The earth is indeed flat. Do you know , how I know.
It's easy, I look at the fucking window, and yes, it's flat.
If you cannot see the significance of that statement, in our struggle, then I cannot
explain it to you. You either get it or you don't. I don't wish to patronise you, my
friend, but that's the way it is.

AnalogMan said...

Anonymous said...

Yes, we landed on the moon several times.

To deny it is a form of solipsism (conspiracy theory would be too respectable).

Do you see the irony in your comment? Maybe not. Let me explain.

I have not categorically denied that "we" landed on the moon. You have categorically stated that "we" did. Neither of us has personal knowledge of such an event. Only one of us is pretending to.

I merely asked a question: Can anyone explain why a photograph purporting to show a rocket landing site shows no evidence of the rocket's exhaust? You haven't even tried to answer it.

Anonymous said...

I steer well clear of all 'conspiracy theories' that you cannot weigh up without having a science background. As far as the moon landing goes yes I do find it odd that you can't see any stars in the photos etc but who am I to judge whether the stock answers to these science objections are bs or not.

Nevertheless, I do think that the moon landings could very well be a hoax as (((Stanley Kubrik))) made a video (which he asked to not be released until after his death) in which he admitted that all the film footage we see of the moon landings was shot by himself on Planet Earth and that Neil Armstrong couldn't live with the lies and became a recluse.

The 'Flat Earth' theory has come from nowhere in the last two years, so I am very suspicious of that, just when we the ' alt-right' is gaining traction on white genocide.


AnalogMan said...

Neil Armstrong couldn't live with the lies and became a recluse.


Yes, I suspected that was the reason. John Glenn, on the other hand, milked the fame for a Senate seat.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 205 of 205   Newer› Newest»