The Strange Myopia of Douglas Murray

From Amazon: "The Strange Death of Europe is a highly personal account of a continent and culture caught in the act of suicide. Declining birth-rates, mass immigration and cultivated self-distrust and self-hatred have come together to make Europeans unable to argue for themselves and incapable of resisting their own comprehensive change as a society. This book is not only an analysis of demographic and political realities, but also an eyewitness account of a continent in self-destruct mode. It includes reporting from across the entire continent, from the places where migrants land to the places they end up, from the people who appear to welcome them in to the places which cannot accept them."

I just finished reading it and that summary is, for Amazon, pretty fair.

The author traces in great detail and with increasing horror the stunning scale and speed of the demographic and social transformation besetting Europe. He rips into politicians and the media for their duplicitous role in this transformation. He challenges 'liberals' and feminists on their inherently nonsensical and hypocritical support for immigrants who bring their illiberal and anti-feminine practises with them. He devotes a full chapter to demolishing political correctness, its bogus rationalisations, intolerance and falsification of history, and cleverly shows how these pathologies lead to authorities turning a blind eye to multiple instances of Muslim child-abuse. He traces PC corruption from the highest levels of national Government to local government, the police, courts and social services agencies. I particularly like the way he demolishes, first, the fallacy that Britain 'has always been a nation of immigrants' and second the idea that we need immigrants because European women aren't having enough children, identifying more child-friendly social and economic policies and not more Muslim head-choppers as the solution.

All of this is powerful stuff, deeply researched and written with style. However there are two areas in which the book disappoints: First, explanations for how Europe's death came about and second his unqualified despair about the future. For this particular coroner 'cause of death' was suicide. Not murder.  “More than any other continent or culture in the world today, Europe is now deeply weighed down with guilt for its past.” And why is Europe deeply weighed down with guilt? Because.....well... Christianity. And the Holocau$t™.  The Jewish role, which was and remains central, is ignored apart from his shock at the part payed by European Jewish organisations in supporting the invasion. Shock because the invaders will not be pro-Jewish! (I took Fred Reed to task for a similar evasion some time ago.)

Does Douglas really not 'get it' about the Jews or is he just being cute? I suspect the latter. First because anybody taking even a cursory analysis of the subject couldn't fail to see it and second because Murray himself was pretty explicit in an article with the Jewish Chronicle. While taking care to proclaim his philo-semitism (and in a this-hurts-me-more-than-you tone) he nonetheless makes some hard points. Points which indicate that he does in fact 'get it'. He notes - sadly, he conveys - how phrases like ''one law for the Jews, another for the rest of us'', ''It's all very well for the Jews. They have Israel where only Jews can go and all the time they're destroying our own religious and racial identity in Europe'' and 'rootless cosmopolitans' are coming back into vogue. If nothing else this might give the nation-wreckers a few sleepless nights.

The only other complaint I have lies in his lack of hope, or any form of program to counter the 'strange death'. But I suppose his stated role has been to catalogue that death and he's done a hell of a good job on that. Will it make much difference? Well the book has sold and continues to sell in huge numbers on both sides of the Atlantic. Any non-awake reader will surely be jolted by its analysis and conclusions. Which is good. But bear in mind that Thilo Sarrazin did the same thing for Germany in books avidly read by millions of Germans. Who then went on to give Angela Merkel an even bigger share of their vote.

Maybe Murray's pessimism is justified after all.....

Ode To Joy

What's that creaking sound I hear? Why it's the Gates Of Hell opening up to receive a prized new entry. Yes, John McCain has been diagnosed with inoperable brain cancer and, all going well, will die in agony some time over the next few months. Now they say you shouldn't wish serious illness on anybody. Karma and all that. But why not wish the very worst on the very worst of psychopaths? And that's what McCain is. A depraved, malevolent, degenerate, lying sack of shit.
 

Far from being a war hero he met the legal definition of a traitor through having betrayed military secrets to Vietnam, America's enemy du jour. According to documents secured by Counter Punch, he divulged specific military information such as the aircraft carrier on which he was based, pilot casualties and morale, and information about rescue ships’ locations.

[From Counter Punch] McCain is often called a “war hero”, a title adorning an unlovely resume starting with a father who was an admiral and graduation fifth from the bottom at the US Naval Academy, where he earned the nickname “McNasty”. McCain flew 23 bombing missions over North Vietnam, each averaging about half an hour, total time ten hours and thirty minutes. For these brief excursions the admiral’s son was awarded two Silver Stars, two Legions of Merit, two Distinguished Flying Crosses, three Bronze Stars, the Vietnamese Legion of Honor and three Purple Hearts. US Veteran Dispatch calculates our hero earned a medal an hour, which is pretty good going.

Mired in corruption throughout his political life (Boeing, Jack Abrahamson, the Keating Five), he divorced the faithful wife who waited all the years he was in captivity and within a month married a billionaire's daughter. As a returned POW he made a mini career out of championing the rights of the missing in action (MIA). Until Big Business decided they wanted friendly relations with Vietnam, at which pointed he rounded on his erstwhile colleagues, using his influence to bring the initiative to a sudden close.

He was directly responsible for the deaths of 134 sailors and serious injuries (blown off arms, legs, blindness and burns) to another 161 sailors on the USS Forrestal after his bravado stunt went wrong. As the crew frantically tended to the dead and dying McCain, in direct contravention of Navy regulations, took himself off to the hospital area for treatment to his trivial injuries. And he got away with it, as he did with everything else, because his father (the guy who master-minded the USS Liberty cover-up) and grandfather were Navy 'royalty'. He fought tooth and nail, probably at the behest of his good pal Larry Silverstein, against any attempt to investigate the 9/11 false flag.

But McCain's worst sin of all has been his war-mongering. Libya, Kosovo, Serbia, Iraq, Syria, Ukraine, Georgia..... McCain was knee deep in the slaughter, cheering on aggression, doing everything in his power to prevent peaceful solutions. He has spent the last few years of his life trying to goad Russia into a war with NATO and America into war with Iran. Both instances capable of precipitating WW III. He literally has the blood of millions on his hands.

But you'd never know that from his fawning treatment in the MSM. Why? Well its's now quite clear to me that the Real Government organised candidates over whom they held the power of swift and total destruction. They know all their dirty secrets. The deal being, you do as we say, vote as we say, or we'll unleash our lapdog MSM on you.

So let's rejoice as this rancid little shit suffers a slow and agonising death awaiting his appointment with Lucifer. 

Your new All-American law enforcement officer

Take a sub-70 IQ black Muslim from Planet Of The Apes Somalia, give him a gun and tell him to go out and control the kuffars. What could possibly go wrong? Well quite a lot actually.  Mohammed Noor hardly had his sandals under the patrol car dash before the complaints - all from terrified White women - began to pour in. From false imprisonment to battery, assault, negligence, violating civil rights and violently transporting an innocent woman her against her will......the new All-American LEO (pictured here with his All-American family) let it all hang out. 

But the police force, headed up by an AA mystery meat lesbian straight from central casting, kept him on duty. An even more serious incident was inevitable and it duly arrived a few days ago. Taking exception to a kuffarette who had dialled 911  (because she was wearing pyjamas in public?) he blazed away at her from the passenger seat of the patrol car, killing her instantly. According to the Mail Online "Noor, 31, has offered his condolences but demanded people respect his privacy".  

Did you get that? He's demanding that people respect his privacy! For a retard he's learning fast. So yes folks, America has now reached the stage where Stone Age Somali Muslim cops are shooting unarmed and innocent White women. Which raises the question: When will patriotic Americans meaningfully begin to fight back?

Andy goes to charm school

Andy Murray is an immensely talented tennis player but in terms of charm...well he's been described as ‘duller than a weekend in Worthing’ - the notoriously boring British seaside town. However he's become an overnight hero with the chattering classes after what's been described as a 'courageous' (sic) intervention during a post-match interview. Here's the (so-called) Independent on it:  "Andy Murray wins praise for taking on 'casual sexism' in press conference following Wimbledon defeat.  Murray corrected a reporter who overlooked the success of female American players. A journalist began asking Murray a question, saying: “Sam is the first US player to reach a major semi-final since 2009”, only to be interrupted by the player. “Male player,” Murray reminded him.

Naturally enough this had the luvvies clucking their approval and the 'correction' (more accurately pedantic point-scoring as everyone knew what the reporter meant) was given banner headlines in the MSM. But while he might have burnished his feminist credentials he fell down badly on two other vital virtue-signalling arenas.

First he refused to acknowledge the achievement of American veterans players, including the venerable John McEnroe, in reaching Wimbledon Seniors semi-finals and indeed finals. On the charge of ageism therefore I find Andrew Murray Guilty.

Second he refused to acknowledge the magnificent achievement of America's Bryan brothers in winning the Wimbledon doubles tournaments on a number of occasions recently. Therefore on the charge of quantityism I find Andrew Murray Guilty.

Not looking so good now, is he?

Trump's call to arms against the enemy within

I didn't comment on Trump's amazing Warsaw speech until I checked out the reaction of the Usual Suspects whose hysterical pearl-clutching confirmed its significance. And so much was significant. First the location in Poland and the frequent references to that country's glorious Christian history. You must understand that Poland is arguably the most anti-Semitic (read: Jew-aware) country in the world. “As the Polish experience reminds us, the defence of the west ultimately rests not only on means but also on the will of its people to prevail” Now that hurt. What a hater. (And by the way he didn't get around to visiting the Holocau$t™ Memorial due to 'scheduling difficulties'. Right.)

Then he rubbed salt in the wound. “Americans, Poles, and the nations of Europe value individual freedom and sovereignty. We must work together to counter forces, whether they come from inside or out, ... that threaten over time to undermine these values and to erase the bonds of culture, faith and tradition that make us who we are. Do we have enough respect for our citizens to protect our borders? Do we have the desire and the courage to preserve our civilization in the face of those who would subvert and destroy it?”

Oh dear. 

But it gets even better. "We write symphonies. We pursue innovation. We celebrate our ancient heroes, embrace our timeless traditions and customs, and always seek to explore and discover brand-new frontiers. We reward brilliance. We strive for excellence, and cherish inspiring works of art that honor God. We treasure the rule of law and protect the right to free speech and free expression. We put faith and family, not government and bureaucracy, at the center of our lives. And we debate everything. We challenge everything. Our own fight for the West does not begin on the battlefield. It begins with our minds, our wills and our souls. We can have the largest economies and the most lethal weapons anywhere on Earth, but if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive."

Gentle reader, this was a call to arms against the enemy within. And the enemy within recognised it as such. Immediately. The reaction ranged from head-shaking disappointment to outright hysteria. For instance one snowflake at the (((Daily Kos))) referred to "fourteen words from-Trump's speech that are truly terrifying". I'm serious. Here's the link. And the fourteen words? "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children." Now I recognise that these words have been associated with White patriots supremacists. (Shudder). But why should anyone object to them? Why should we not secure the existence of our people and a future for white children? Why the fuck should we grovel and apologise for that? Substitute blacks, Jews or any of the mud people and the sentiments would be loudly acclaimed from the mountain tops.

Listen, Trump gets it. Trump knows. He has indeed given us reason to doubt him up to now. But remember this. On all sides enemies surround him. And I'm sure he's been shown the Zapruder film. In fact his only power lies in the mandate from the people and his ability to directly communicate with them. That is why we, especially Americans, must offer him our wholehearted continued support.

Feminism fails. And it's men's fault

A new study by Yale University has discovered that a "dearth of marriagable men has left an oversupply of 'amazing, attractive intelligent women' taking desperate steps to preserve their fertility. The first global study into egg freezing found that shortages of eligible men were the prime reason why women had attempted to take matters into their own hands. "Terrifying” (sic) demographic shifts had created a “deficit” of educated men and a growing problem of “leftover” professional women, with female graduates vastly outnumbering males in in many countries."

And as ever, men are to blame. Apparently we men 'feel threatened by their success and so are unwilling to commit to starting a family together'.

Errr.....no. It's more that men are not attracted to 'successful' women in their late thirties, preferring a girl who will put his family ahead of her career, someone young, good-looking and loyal. No man, not even a a house-broken mangina, wants to come home to some ball-breaking work-focused jargon-spouting feminist. He doesn't want to compete with his wife. Especially a wife who's spent the best part of twenty years riding the cock carousel and whose 'success' is based on her 'Masters' in Gender Studies and a six-figure government Diversity Manager job.

But I can understand the dilemma of the exemplar in the Yale survey. Having focused on career at the expense of settling down she's now horrified at the speed with which her child-bearing years are disappearing, while all those disposable 'good men' whom she confidently put to one side at an earlier time are no longer available. They're married and/or interested only in girls a lot younger than she. The liberated kind of girl who dispenses sexual favours with reckless abandon....like she herself once did. And that career isn't all glamour. Today record numbers of women live alone, childless, on psychiatric medication, facing a life-time of wage slavery in grinding jobs that they can never leave. And now as her eggs atrophy the terrible realisation dawns that she's in a kind of Darwinian cul-de-sac with her cats as a surrogate family.

It's tempting to feel a small tinge of schadenfreude at the fate of such women. But they're also victims. Victims of feminism, the single most evil and destructive movement ever to beset the White race. It utterly corrupts girls, turning them from fresh-faced feminine young women into masculinised harpies. It subverts every value and tradition underpinning the greatest civilisation the world has ever seen. It neither kills outright nor inflicts apparent physical harm, yet the extent of its destructive toll is already greater than that of any war, plague, famine, or natural calamity on record. Its potential damage to the quality of human life and the fabric of civilised society is beyond calculation.

But it's hard to awaken women (generally weak-minded conformists) to this reality given the full spectrum control wielded by the (((nation wreckers))) and their goy quislings. They've drunk so deeply of the feminist Kool-Aid that any change in their diet would probably kill them. But changing men's attitudes just might force that awakening. Because increasingly men are disengaging from formal commitment. Men Go Their Own Way (MGTOW). Why get married and risk impoverishment through divorce rape? Why have children when in the event of a break-up they'll be taken from you while you get stuck with the bill for their upkeep? Certainly not for non-committal sex which, ironically thanks to feminism and the societal rot it engendered, is freely available to any man looking for it. 

What we see here is the bitter harvest of feminism. And for women the fruits will be bitterest of all. Yet if you distill that survey and the related MSM analysis it emerges that the solution is actually more feminism. Well if that's what you feel then go for it ladies. You're culling our race of its decadent stock and as such, and this will really horrify you, you're doing the Lord's work.

'Diversity is (((our))) greatest strength'

All of us on this blog are in no doubt as to the origins and purpose of the 'diversity is strength' meme. It's part and parcel of the globalist agenda to atomise, mongrelise and weaken White society, especially straight White men. It's been spectacularly successful, to the point where its purported merits are now being beyond question. This is astonishing because it's hard to imagine a more difficult proposition to sell than diversity.

Diversity means forcing incompatible people to mix with one another, means the best persons doesn't get the job or college place, requires a panoply of laws and regulations with an army of bureaucrats to enforce them, which in turn leads to endless costly and disruptive disputes, court cases and appeals. Meanwhile billions get spent training people to appreciate that which is supposed to be self-evidently wonderful.

A look at diversity in practice should be enough for it to be rejected out of hand. Just up the road from me Catholics and Protestants have been going at it for centuries. Inter-communal violence always breaks out wherever and whenever Muslims reach sufficient numbers in a 'community'. Tutsis and Hutus, Chinese and Tibetans, Turks and Armenians, blacks and Whites, blacks and Hispanics, Jews and gentiles and so on ad infinitum serve to bear out the Chateau Heartise aphorism 'Diversity + Proximity = War'. 

Even university professors have been forced to swallow their prejudice and concede ground on the issue. Robert Puttnam concedes that "in racially and ethnically mixed communities, not only do people not trust strangers, they do not even trust their own kind. They withdraw into themselves, they support community activity less, they vote less. People living in ethnically diverse settings appear to 'hunker down,' that is, to pull in like a turtle, They tend to "withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, to register to vote less, to agitate for social reform more but have less faith they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television."

After conducting several research projects in the business environment MIT Professor Thomas A. Kochan declared the diversity industry to be "a racket built on foundations of sand.”

Consider it another way. What would the USA have been like without the joys of diversity? For a start there'd have been no Civil War, none of the race riots that beset the country to this day, no KKK, no black ghettos or White flight, the staggering cost in terms of money and effort expended trying to 'bridge the (unbridgeable) achievement gap' would have been saved, welfare and law enforcement costs would be a fraction of what they are now, while American math students would not be languishing in the low thirties of the PISA international rankings. Which incidentally are dominated by diversity-free countries such as Japan, Iceland, Finland and Korea.

But the mantra never ends -  'diversity is our greatest strength'. Or more accurately, 'diversity is (((our))) greatest strength'. (Hat-tip Shaunantijihad)

Malnourished African child

Are you thinking what I'm thinking?