Thursday, 27 April 2017

Trump's biggest betrayal yet

Most people have now literally lost track of Trump's betrayed election promises. But his appointment of a corrupt Indian coolie (but I repeat myself) to withdraw existing net neutrality (NN) provisions represents probably the worst betrayal yet. The move is not just about more loot for the ISPs, it could - will - have critical implications for White nationalists and the alt-right generally. Because despite what Trump has said, this is not about paying according to the volume of data you access. It's about what you access. 

We all know there's a multi-faceted war being waged against us under the pretext of 'fake news' and 'hate'. Withdrawing NN provides our nation-wrecking globo-homo overlords with a priceless weapon in this war, more powerful than any legislation. Its power lies in the ability to apply discriminatory pricing and 'performance throttling' to offending web sites.  So ISPs, highly dependent on Government good will, can throttle the performance of web sites to the point where readers will just give up using them. They can supplement this attack by charging users more for access to such sites. It's no exaggeration to say that the very existence of the alt-right is threatened. (On a less sinister note they could decide what film channel you can use or at what stores you can electronically shop.) You don't have to be paranoid to realise where this is going. It sets the foundations for a level of internet control far in excess of anything we've known to date. 

But, hey, let's look on the bright side - at least Hillary didn't win. Had she done so America would be bombing Syria and provoking war with Russia, endorsing NATO and NAFTA rather than withdrawing from them, Yellen would be reinstated at the FED, Assange would still be a target, Obamacare would be place for the foreseeable future.

Yeah, think how bad that would be....

Sunday, 23 April 2017

Solutions to the black undertow

Lady Savant posed an interesting question to me last night. She had been watching a documentary featuring 'fearless investigative journalist Ross Kemp as he travels to Memphis, one of the most segregated cities in the US, to find out why so many African-Americans are worse off today than they were 50 years ago'.Well Ross soon discovered the answer to that: The legacy of segregation. This meant that black Memphis still "suffers from" stratospheric levels of crime and low education achievement and for which it seems African-Americans bear no responsibility. Kemp added that blacks are imprisoned at six times the rate of Whites, the link between crime and punishment apparently too subtle for this investigative journalist to grasp.

Lady Savant's question was direct and interesting: Say Whites finally rebelled against the black plague of crime and dependence what could they actually do in practice? 

My proposals:

First you could offer a substantial 'return' to Africa financial inducement. This is not a glib or facile suggestion. I worked out here the average lifetime costs of a black family to White taxpayers to be in the region of €2 million. Given their impulsive short-term gibs- me-dat-now mentality I'd say the majority would jump at the offer of a tax-free 200k cheque. Then there's payment for voluntary sterilisation, which of course would have to be accompanied by changes in welfare, reversing the current system which encourages indiscriminate breeding. What would blacks lose? Could still muh dick to their hearts' content - and their chilluns aren't exactly the centre of their lives anyway.

My final proposal is a return to the kind of rigid race-based authoritarianism that applied in the Post Reconstruction American South up to about 1950 and under apartheid South Africa. Such a regimen was predicated on the correct assumptions that blacks in general were of low intelligence, impulsive and criminally-oriented, rendering them unsuited for White society. The regimen was supported by a range of segregation laws and a no-nonsense police force aided by other less formal enforcement mechanisms. And woe betide any black committing a crime of violence against Whites, especially against White women. (This is a horrific example of what could happen). Miscegenation even where legal (and it often was not) incurred severe social sanctions.

Th net effect was that blacks and Whites developed a modus vivendi, each knowing his place and the rules of engagement. Not ideal or fair, but then what society is? The fact is that black criminality and the welfare drag on productive law-abiding citizens were but a fraction of what they are today. Whites were able to enjoy the civilisation they and their forebears had hewn from the wilderness. Indeed blacks may have been more content than they are now - crazy as that might sound in today's bizarro world - with stable family structures the norm and nobody stoking their grievances.

That these sensible solutions not alone would never be considered but could possible land their author in jail underlines the depth of our civilisational decay.

Wednesday, 19 April 2017


'No other south American country has succeeded so successfully to integrate [sic] so many different races of people: whites, blacks, Asians, American Indians, and the indigenous population which have together formed today’s “Brazilian” people with their warm, sincere, and creative characteristics. This population of mixed cultures adore their country, support their national football team and passionately share their lives with their co-nationals, without giving importance to the colour of the skin.' 

This panegyric to Brazil is not untypical. There's always a carnival featuring beautiful scantily-clad racial hybrids happily cavorting in the streets. Always presented as a colourful, vibrant, post-racial success story. The reality could hardly be more different because Brazil is a poster child for poverty, violence, crime and corruption - corruption which permeates every aspect of life and reaches from the lowest favela dweller to the Presidential Palace. Now Ireland has its faults and our society is far more enriched (and hence atomised) than it used to be. But when our police went on strike some time ago nobody really noticed. Life went on the same way with no uptick in crime.

Compare this to Brazil where a police strike resulted in apocalyptic scenes of criminality. "Bloodthirsty mob takes over city's streets leaving trail of death and rape after police go on strike" blared the Mirror's headline. The report went on: Dead bodies are being left in pools of blood in the streets as gangs wielding guns and machetes launch a relentless rampage. lawless gangs wielding guns and machetes appear to be running riot - while dead bodies line the streets. "There are people running around with guns in pretty populated areas, dozens of people stealing from malls, even dead bodies on streets."

Such a society is totally screwed up. Screwed up beyond redemption. But they get by with a kind of pigmentocracy which sees a tiny elite pf wealthy Whites living charmed lives in gated communities while at the bottom, scrabbling to survive, swarms a gigantic hostile dark-hued helotry. Ordinary Whites are somewhere in between, unmoored, destined to a demi-monde existence like South Africa's Whites farmers.

Here's the point, my friends. If current trends persist it's what the United States and many other Western countries will look like in 2050. 

Saturday, 15 April 2017

Frightening times indeed

For the first time since the mid-sixties I believe nuclear war to be terrifyingly close. The Trump regime seems hell (sic) bent on provoking a major conflict with Russia. And anyone else that likes to join in, the more the merrier.  That Russia poses no threat to America or Europe is beside the point. The US Administration is like that bellicose drunk who wants a fight and will not be dissuaded by logic or appeasement. Eventually you have to deck the fucker because there's no alternative. That's the way I'd feel if I were in Putin's shoes.

What's behind this insanity? A commentator on Zero Hedge says this: 'You, like many Americans, still believe that people make a difference in American politics - elect the right bloke and things will change for the better. 

The undeniable fact is that your government has been taken over by others who don't even recognise the people of America as anything other than enemies of the state. No one in America will reach the presidency who has not been vetted deeply by these folks. And if by some VERY remote chance someone did get through the screen, they would be instantly marginalised or assassinated - as was Trump.

You have lost your country. Face it

Reminds me of what Alexander Solzhenitzyn wrote in '200 Years Together'.

'You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the ‘Russian Revolution.’ It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people.'

To better understand what's going on read The Monomorium Analogy.

Tuesday, 11 April 2017

Fergal Keane: SJW extraordinaire

What a difference 22 years make. When I first interviewed Aung San Suu Kyi she was a humble Nobel Peace Prize winner while I was the BBC's star foreign correspondent. Now she's Burma's President while I....well I still work for the Beeb ('The Most Trusted Name In Fake News') but as a marginalised figure. While I've devoted my life to equality, anti-racism and the cause of the oppressed I must admit I feel a little hard done by. You see the BBC don't really want you if you're White, male, straight and non-Jewish. The only thing I have going for me is that I'm not English but that's not enough any more.

In my interview Aung San Suu Kyi disappointed me. Clearly success has gone to her head. That happens to a lot of people you know. She refused to take my point that the unfortunate Rohinga are being ethnically cleansed even when I explained to her that I had just been to that part of the country. 'I've lived here all my life so maybe I know something as well' she waspishly shot back. So unlike Nelson Mandela, who maintained his humility up to the end of his magnificent life. I remember his generosity even after becoming President. "Had it not been for your fearless reporting Fergal our country would still not be free".  "Madiba, you are too kind" I blushingly responded.

What a man.

In case you're wondering Rwanda is the reason I'm so worked up about the Rohinga gig. You see I got there too late to save the situation. That thought haunts me to this day. I saw the slaughter first hand. From the penthouse suite at the Kigali Hilton. I looked in horror as the locals (clearly suffering from the legacy of colonialism) hacked and gouged one another in an orgy of slaughter. A knock on the door distracted me from the grisly spectacle. It was room service. Eating dinner I mused that at €95 my simple bottle of Chateau d’Yquem Sauternes 55 cost half a year's salary for the average Rwandan. Life is so unfair. But I've suffered as well. Like at that restaurant in Kiev where they served red wine with my fish. You don't forget things like that.

No, it's not easy being a virtue-signalling anti-racist. But I soldier on, serving my shyster globohomo overlords by repackaging inconvenient facts in support of the Official Narrative. You must understand that the Truth is a rare and precious commodity ... we must be economical with it.


Friday, 7 April 2017

Hope dies...

Whatever lingering hopes I had for Trump are dying fast. One retreat/betrayal after another. Using the farcical pretext of civilian casualties Trump has ordered missile strikes on Syrian forces while the Administration daily ramps up the anti-Russian rhetoric. A farcical pretext, and seeing Nikki Haley (known to her Indian parents as Nimrata Randhawa) holding up pictures of disfigured children at the UN brought back chilling memories of  Colin Powell brandishing similar fabrications to get the Iraq war started. What happened to the campaign promises to work with Putin in solving the Syrian crisis and eliminate ISIS? 

Well one thing that's happened is the elevation of Jared Kushner and the sidelining of Steve Bannon. Bannon is an American patriot and Kushner a Chabad Jew. Understand that even most Israelis hate the Chabad-Lubovich sect and fear their rapidly growing power. They see them as insane and dangerous. For example after the death of their erstwhile leader Rabbi Mendel Schneerson a few years ago his followers hung around for days expecting him to rise from the dead!  

Jewish Middle East expert Alan Brownfield tells us.  “Rabbi Schneerson always supported Israeli wars and opposed any retreat. In 1974 he strongly opposed the Israeli withdrawal from the Suez area. He promised Israel divine favors if it persisted in occupying the land. Among the religious settlers in the occupied territories, the Chabad Hassids constitute one of the most extreme groups. Baruch Goldstein, the mass murderer of Palestinians, was one of them.”

Another one of them is Rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburg who heads up a major Chabad institution in the West Bank. Ginsburg praised Goldstein and considers all non-Jews to be subhuman. According to author Motti Inbari, Ginsburg “gives prominence to Halachic and Kabbalistic approaches that emphasize the distinction between Jew and non-Jew (Gentile), imposing a clear separation and hierarchy in this respect. He claims that while the Jews are the Chosen People and were created in God’s image, the Gentiles do not have this status and are effectively considered subhuman.”

Nice people, those Chabads, aren't they? 

And the Co-President of the United States (who recently visited Schneerson's grave)  is one of them. 

Let that fact sink in. 

Given that Kushner spends most of his time working for "peace" in the Middle East should the renewed war on Syria (and possibly Russia as well) come as any surprise? As an aside Kushner is also working hard on financial services "reform". Bear in mind that his father is a convicted felon in the Bernie Madoff mode, serving time in a Federal penitentiary for racketeering, tax evasion and witness tampering. Talk about having monkeys look after the bananas. Meanwhile Kushner packs key positions in the Administration with his Jewish cronies. ZOG was never this good even under Obama or Bush.

Now maybe, just maybe, Trump is playing a long game. Maybe the crushing power of the MIC-Ziocon-Wall Street nexus has dawned on him and he's retrenching. But I'm not optimistic. As the great Enoch Powell once observed "History is littered with wars which everybody knew would never happen."

Trump is not the saviour and the future has seldom looked more dangerous.

Monday, 3 April 2017

News flash: Fight outside London pub!!!

A drunken mob leaves a Croydon pub (ironically named The Goat) and beats up three passers-by. Now maybe I was reared hard but this does not seem like a story to make headline news. And make headline news it did, front-paging The Guardian, The Sun, The Telegraph and was briefly the lead on the BBC and Sky "news" channels. In fact, believe it or not, Britain's Prime Minister got involved, describing the attack as "utterly despicable". Which indeed it was. But in enriched areas of London (and today that means most of the city) shootings, stabbings and mass brawls are par for the course. According to Wikipedia in 2008–09 (latest available figures quoted) there were no fewer than 70,962 assault with injury offences in London.

So....enquiring minds want to know what made this particular assault if not one in a million at least one in 70,962. The explanation lies with the victims who in this case represented the most protected species on the planet, on a par with the lesser spotted barn owl and leatherback sea turtle: Muslim 'asylum' seekers. It's not too much of a stretch to suggest that the attackers were primarily native British -  what Tom Wolfe called The Great White Defendants. Glittering careers beckon for the law officers who track them down and for the judges who put them away for a long long time.

Then again the Great White Defendants might be lucky. Like the Somali girl gang who kicked an English girl in the head while yelling 'kill the white slag'. They got off with a warning.

Friday, 31 March 2017

The strange case of Max Eichholtz and the SS man

Unless you're a deranged libtard (but I repeat  myself) you despair at today's Western legal systems criminalising what once would have been regarded as merely rude or insulting. The younger among us must wonder what things were like in the old days (prior to the 1960s) or, Heaven forfend, in Nazi Germany.  Well children prepare to be gobsmacked because what follows in an extract from The Jews and Germans of Hamburg: The Destruction of a Civilization 1790-1945 by (((JAS Grenville))). Grenville was born Hans Guhrauer and fled Germany in 1939.

"Max Eichholtz took pride in being a Jew.  A lawyer by profession, a brilliant speaker and a prominent politician of the Weimar era representing the German Democratic Party in Hamburg's Parliament, he was a thorn in the side of the Nazis. He was also a decorated veteran and possessed courage. Not many would have dared take an SS man to court in November 1934 for calling them 'a dirty Jew'. He reminded the judge that, as a lawyer, he was part of the administration of justice and so could call on the special protection of the public prosecutor's office which 'made no distinction between Aryan and non-Aryan'. It tells us something about the ambiguities of Nazi control in the mid-1930s that he won his case. The SS man was required to pay a fine or serve a token two days in prison." (pp 110-111).

Yes, you read that right. In Hitler's Germany a Jew successfully prosecuted an SS man for calling him a filthy Jew.  In conclusion note that as this incident was playing out a major campaign was underway in the West to rescue "Germany's six million Jews" (ten times the actual number) who were apparently at risk of immediate annihilation.

Tuesday, 28 March 2017

Divine comedy

Sport is looked at with a jaundiced eye by many on the alt-right, being correctly seen as a component of the panem et circenses deployed by the NWO globalists to distract and neutralise the White masses. They've also found it a boon (whoops!) in that it showcases the only activities where blacks can equal Whites. (See shiksas, dark meat good for breeding!). But there was a time when sport embodied blood and soil, nationalism and local pride. The local football team was made up of local men and this form of rootedness spread up to regional and national level. Which was why it had to be destroyed.  In those days the very idea of a black on a European national team would have been sacrilegious. Now various forms of mystery meat predominate in the "national" teams of England, France, Holland and Belgium (others are headed the same way) while club sides have lost all connection with their localities.

The money and effort expended on this project by the globalists have been astounding. But they're not satisfied with displacing White men with coloured men. No, they want da wimminz in the game as well. We're all equal after all. Hence the relentless propagandising of women's sports and the shoehorning of women into every last male sporting preserve. Even rugby, that most manly of sports is now infested with a plethora of airheads spouting their vacuous nonsense while useless women's competitions are forced down the TV audience's throat. This particular development is making me incandescent with rage I have to tell you.

But out of evil sometimes cometh good. Because now that transgenders have been allowed in women's bathrooms you can hardly keep them out of women's competitions. And given that your sex is now what you proclaim it to be we find that many second-rate male athletes are transforming themselves into first-class women athletes by the simple expedient of declaring themselves women. What prizes and money beckon as even the Olympic Committee have arrangements to cater for trasngenders. So expect a lot more Caster Semenyas. And there's also the little matter of athletic scholarships, approximately 60% of which currently go to women.  Sorry Carol, that free place in college your were hoping for has gone instead to Willamina (known to his parents as Bill).

Libtard lunacy has come full circle to bite them in their smug asses. They're in an exquisite bind. If they side with transgenders, they discriminate against women who were born women. If they side with women who were born women the discriminate against transgenders. Meanwhile as sexual dimorphism becomes the crime du jour the number of gender identities increases daily as every freak imaginable makes its claim for unique identity. Sort that lot out, ladies!  If they don't (and they won't) the trannies will destroy women's sports.

Pass the popcorn!

Sunday, 26 March 2017

The Fake News Galacticos

Have you read about the horrific civilian death toll from a US air strike on Mosul? It seems that at least 240 have been dragged from the rubble so far. If you have not heard about don't be surprised. Because it received little or no attention from the MSM - at least until RT gave it the prominence it merited. And if they did report on it? Well you'll learn that "dozens" were killed by "Coalition forces". Well, twenty dozen to be precise. You'll note that it's always "American forces" when the results are good, "Coalition forces" when it goes horribly wrong. Must keep the Great American Public behind the Greater Israel project you see.

I hardly need point out that the media now playing down this catastrophe are the same ones who freaked out at the supposed brutality of Syrian and Russian forces when retaking Aleppo. Hardly a day went by without banner headlines, emotional news anchors and a plethora of so-called experts urging 'humanitarian assistance to the civilian population'. I.e. war with Russia. Remember that dying girl reporting from a bombed-out shelter, nonetheless providing detailed casualty figures with professional-level production facilities? Day after day miraculously surviving even as evil Putin and his murderous troops indiscriminately slaughtered the civilians? Whatever happened to her?

And according to RIA Novosti, Americans and Saudis have agreed to transfer 9,000 ISIS jihadis to Syria in order to prolong the conflict there. All we're short now is that vile Blair creature interjecting himself to capitalise on the misery that he had such a major part in causing.

We can be thankful for that much I suppose.

Wednesday, 22 March 2017

London attacks: Your Mayor speaks

A statement from Sadiq Khan, the Right Honourable Mayor of London .

"We sympathise with the kuffars who got whacked today but the important thing now is to avoid Islamophobia. This is necessary because many bigoted Little Englanders will blame Islam for the attacks. In fact most Muslims see them as unnecessary, believing as I do that we can take over the country the same way we took over its capital - by out-breeding the native population.

In any event the attackers are Misunderstanders of Islam, which as we all know is the Religion Of Peace. Perhaps they misunderstood Qur’an 2:191 which says "Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.”  However eminent Islamic scholars have concluded that what the Prophet (pbuh) really meant here was " Do not slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.” Same with Qur’an 9:123 “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood”. This should be understood to mean “Do not make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood”.

How much clearer can it be?

Accordingly I call for an ecumenical ceremony full of meaningless platitudes, to be followed by a candle-lit vigil by an army of deluded hand-holding White liberals. Hopefully the whole thing will then disappear down the memory hole, inshallah.

Meanwhile I'm off to Heathrow to welcome a new constituent from Pakistan, together with his eight wives and sixty children.


Monday, 20 March 2017

Ah, the memories...

Must be close to twenty years since I got my first real exposure to sub-Saharan Africa. I was part of a team visiting Nigeria on a mission from the World Bank. On the way to our hotel in downtown Lagos we encountered the standard African practice of sleeping al fresco, in all kinds of places and in all kinds of positions. But one guy surprised us, resting just off the main highway, limbs in strange positions, head thrown back. 'What a place to sleep' I observed. 'No sah' retorted the driver, 'he dead. Hit by truck'.  And so he was, as we discovered for ourselves as our vehicle edged closer. Nobody took any notice. My introduction to Africa.

I was reminded of this when reading an article in the current London Review Of Books (print edition). It showed things had not changed much since my first visit. "The road into town is lined with ramshackle shops, pedestrians thread through the traffic carrying cheap plastic goods for sale. Everywhere, derelict buildings and half completed bits of infrastructure tell the same story: huge sums of money paid out by oil companies for community and social responsibility are being misused".  Iow disappearing into local politicians' Swiss bank accounts.

Ah, I remember it well.

And the security, that too. "We were picked up at the airport by an in-house security team. Immediately in from and behind of our vehicle two pick-up trucks of heavily-armed police escort us through the chaotic traffic. We are left through our base security barrier by more armed guards."  Before starting my initial visit we were warned to keep our laptops (very valuable in those days) with us at all times. Even when sleeping and going to the bathroom. Yet within a week all four devices had been stolen.

The rest of the LRB article details the all-pervasive corruption and incompetence that overlay every attempt at undertaking normal business. The author (trying to investigate a case of fraud) is eventually told by his local company man that the police would undertake an honest investigation only if offered a substantial bribe. He didn't know whether to laugh or cry and eventually gave up all hope of completing his project.

Poverty, violence, squalor, endemic corruption and distrust at every level of society. A dreadful country by any objective standard. And yet, as one of the world's largest oil producers it could and should be Switzerland on the Equator. It is not so because of the Nigerian people. As somebody said, if you transfer all the Nigerians to Japan and all the Japanese to Nigeria within a generation Nigeria would become today's Japan and vice versa. And as Plato observed over 2,000 years ago 'this City is what it is because our citizens are what they are.'

A large and rapidly growing number of "Irish" "citizens" today are of Nigerian origin. In their own proud way they're making Ireland a little bit more like Nigeria. 

Thanks, (((nation-wreckers))).

Thursday, 16 March 2017


Reading an article by this odious Irish political reject underlined how libtards like to project themselves as brave and anti-establishment when in fact today they are the establishment. There's nothing brave these days in coming out as gay or in savaging the Church's mangy carcass. Fifty years ago it would have been. But back then O'Riordan would have been the head altar-boy ratting out pupils he saw smoking behind the shed.

On reflection the whole libtard (and please use that word - it infuriates them) Weltanschauung is a farrago of lies, hypocrisy and contradictions.

To wit:

They promote diversity yet the 'logic' of their race-mixing agenda means that all races will eventually merge into a coffee-coloured hybrid with all diversity lost.

They promote women's 'rights' (e.g. full-term abortions, no-fault divorce) while advocating mass Muslim immigration and defending misogynistic Islamic practices.

They promote 'free speech' while closing down non-conformist views through legislation and physical oppression.

They claim to stand for the working class but depress wages by promoting immigration of unskilled immigrants.

They claim to support the environment yet regard attempts to limit the Third World's explosive population growth as Western Imperialism.

They claim genetics don’t matter but demand sperm from high IQ donors when their shrivelled ovaries can no longer produce.
They claim to be generous and giving whereas numerous studies (and my personal experience) have shown conservatives contribute more to charity.

They want to remove guns from Whites living in dangerous neighbourhoods but think it's fine for celebrities and wealthy 'liberals' to be protected by armed guards.

They proclaim that everyone should be proud of his or her race, culture and sexual orientation. Unless you're a straight White male. In which case you're guilty of a hate crime.

And that's the whole point: That everything about them can be explained by their hostility to Whites, especially straight White men.

The best of 'liberals' are delusional fantasists, while the worst - the majority - are self-loathing virtue pimps, bullies and hypocrites who will eventually succumb to their self-annihilating ideologies.

Can't happen soon enough.

Sunday, 12 March 2017

Altering our brain chemistry

Since my time working in Muslim countries I've always suspected that endless brainwashing and indoctrination can actually alter the chemistry of the brain. The sensory stimuli (hearing, seeing etc.) generate electrical impulses which find their way to the brain. Here the millions of neural pathways (tracts) transport the data at the speed of light to the appropriate area(s) of the brain for processing. As I understand it these pathways are embedded early in life but can be modified later. For example the fear of dogs can become hard-wired in some people's brains from an early age but can subsequently be overcome.

I mentioned Muslims because it seemed to me that their brains quite literally would not process certain unpalatable inputs. And I'm not just talking about ignorant peasants here I'm thinking specifically about a number of highly qualified technologists with genuine PhDs from top Western universities. These were clever and able guys. But they proved incapable of handling a question such as 'do you really believe that Mohammed got onto his horse and flew up in the sky to negotiate with Allah?' I tell you that they went into melt-down. Not as in slitting my throat, more along the lines of a mental breakdown. It was an extraordinary experience.

What brings this to mind was a recent meeting with three Germans who were visiting my town. We got into discussion and I eventually brought the conversation around to Hitler, WW II and the Holocau$t™. I presented them with overwhelming evidence (if you're interested see The Holocau$t™ tag under 'Topics' on this blog's Home Page) of the mammoth fraud which had been perpetrated on the German people. Yet it was all for nought. Their brains simply could not process the data, the required neural tracts ossified and darkened as the tendentious ones bloomed and blossomed.

Hard to now what they said among themselves when we parted.  But I'm not optimistic.

Thursday, 9 March 2017

"I love myself. So I must be good"

If you read the links on previous posts you'll find  'a lack of self-esteem' adduced as one of the main explanations for low black SAT scores. This is ridiculous on any number of counts, most obviously by avoiding the IQ elephant in the room. But where do they get the idea that blacks have low self-esteem? In fact the contrary is the case, especially for the younger cohort for whom a preening swaggering bravado, totally unrelated to actual capabilities, is standard behaviour. And that's not just my impression.

It's also claimed - insanely - that this low self-esteem derives from 'the negative portrayal of blacks in the media'. Would that be the same media that uses every available ploy to cover up black crime and misbehaviour, that shoehorns admirable and totally unrepresentative blacks into every film and advertisement? You know, those brilliant doctors, judges, scientists and educators, sensitive and caring, driven by family values, an unrelenting thirst for justice and a better society. 

And what happens when their unfounded self-esteem collides with life's realities? When low intelligence, poor self-discipline and lack of application result in a life of failure? Well self-evidently it can't be their fault. So what else can it be other than racism or the legacy of slavery? 

Why have self-esteem and self-love come to be definitively Good Things? Could the concept be another weapon deployed by the (((nation-wreckers)))? I ask because it flies directly in the face of the fundamental Christian message which teaches that happiness derives from loving others and being a good person. And what happens when a young sociopath develops self-esteem and is taught to love himself?  He'll conclude that his disregard for others, his anti-social behaviour and criminal instincts are just fine. That's the way he is and he loves himself.  So why try to change?

Maybe it's a part of The Plan or maybe it's not. Either way the self-esteem program fits beautifully into the nation-wrecking agenda.

Tuesday, 7 March 2017

The 'SAT racial achievement gap'

Has anyone ever tried to calculate the cost of trying to eliminate the 'SAT racial achievement gap' in America? I'm not referring just to the direct financial cost, massive as that undoubtedly is. But the indirect costs are almost unimaginable: Untold man-years trying to turn sows' ears into silk purses, wasted resources from large scale dropping out, denying worthy White students college places, dumbing down of academic standards...and on a more amorphous level the demotivation of non-black students. And having morons like this in positions of vital importance. One direct cost lies in financing an army of research trying to explain away the blindingly obvious.

The racial scoring gap on the SAT test has now become wider than has been the case for the past two decades. Many believe that in the years to come the gap may grow smaller, not because blacks are catching up to whites in educational achievement, but rather because the test makers are adding a writing component to the test that may be manipulated to lessen racial differences and therefore reduce public criticisms of the test.

Yup, despite almost half a century of this nonsense the gap remains as wide as it was at the beginning. And this despite (as the excerpt above coyly indicates) multiple attempts to skew the tests to favour black students. Now if you're in need of a laugh read the part of the report where they try to explain away the reasons for the continued disparities. It's Comedy Gold watching them tiptoe around the gigantic elephant in the room.

Well maybe in one sense. But to see university level researchers, masters of statistics, correlation, regressions and causalities carefully avoid the conclusions to which their research unequivocally points indicates a society with serious problems. It's similar to the way science was conducted under Stalin. I don't for one minute accept the integrity of these researchers and the environment in which they flourish. They know that low black IQ is the major explanation for the gap yet they refuse to even consider it.

There's a word for this: Prostitution. And it's costing us big-time.

Saturday, 4 March 2017

A scandal to die for

Ireland is currently in a fever of outrage at the discovery of nearly 800 children's bodies in Galway. They died at a religiously run foster home there between 1925 and 1960. In case you're wondering this infant mortality rate is not normal, being double that of other mother and baby homes around the country over the same period. The children succumbed to a wide range of infant afflictions, some as simple ear infections. Lack of care and attention hardly describes it.

Make no mistake, this was a real scandal on so many fronts. And having been run by the Catholic Church it was grist to the mill for "Ireland's" Minister For Children, the American bull dyke Catherine 'Strap-on' Zappone (whose stated objective is to get mothers out of the home and into the workplace). With lip-smacking relish Strap-on explained that the scandal arose from a culture of unquestioning deference to the Church, rigid conformity, authorities avoiding and covering up inconvenient signs, a culture which blamed the victims (unmarried mothers) and a legal system in thrall to the prevailing orthodoxies.

And you know what? She/he/it was right. That's exactly what happened. And it's also exactly what happened with the Rotherham child abuse scandal. Except that here the offenders, being Muslim, occupied the position once occupied by the Church. In the West today rigid and legally-enforced conformity to PC multicultural orthodoxies means that Muslims are the ones who cannot be criticised, the ones whose crimes the authorities ignore and which if prosecuted attract slap-on-the-wrist penalties from the legal system

But the luvvies will never tell you that. Because the dead babies are mere weapons in the war on White Christian civilisation. The evil and indifference of the nuns will be paraded before us at every opportunity, their good work in healthcare, poverty alleviation and education studiously ignored. 

Friday, 3 March 2017

Politicus Hibernicus and the lesson for President Trump

Irish politicians must be among the most useless in the world. Their exemplar is our current Maximum Leader Enda Kenny. Having spent a few years teaching ten year-olds he followed his father into politics, spending the next 40 years on the rubber chicken circuit, never displaying an original thought, conviction or principle of any kind, ever poised to leap onto any passing bandwagon -  and dismount as soon as it was opportune. This lifetime of non-achievement eventually won him the highest position in the land. Delicate nostrils quivering as he sniffs the political winds he nudges, winks, glad-hands and quips, ducking every unpopular decision while promoting worthless cronies to key positions. 

Enda is the quintessential Politicus Hibernicus.

An almost polar opposite of the driven super-achieving Donald Trump, Politicus Hibernicus can nonetheless be of tremendous and immediate value to him. You see a Deep State guerrilla war is underway against President Trump. His winning the Presidency was - like BREXIT - never meant nor expected to happen and represented a shocking setback to the NWO globalists. They're regrouping now to emasculate his Administration by taking down key members one by one, distracting Trump and undermining both his credibility and legitimacy.

Having taken out Mike Flynn they're now targeting Jeff Sessions. And there will be many more. Already many Republicans are calling for him to recuse himself while a Special Prosecutor investigates. They think that Sessions won't be found guilty of anything meaningful and that the investigation can be used to highlight the tsunami of Democratic corruption, especially that of the Clinton Crime Family. Big mistake! Because the Deep State has no interest in the truth or justice of this case. They just want to neutralise Sessions and wound Trump. As soon as Sessions stands aside they'll target someone else and then someone else again until Trump is eventually driven from office.

So how can the worthless time servers in Ireland's parliament possibly be of assistance here? Well they instinctively possess one priceless weapon. A brass neck. Or more colloquially, a neck like a jockey's balls. Irish politicians and senior public administrators just do not resign. No matter how incompetent or conflicted, no matter the hue and cry throughout the land, they will not resign unless they're legally forced to. And that hardly ever happens*. Their hind brains inform them that the public attention span is shorter than that of a goldfish, that within a little while attention will drift off to some other distraction as demands for resignation fade away.

And that's what Trump should do. Tell everyone that his Administration is under existential attack by the Deep State, corrupt Democrats (a tautology) and the Fake News media and that they won't succeed in preventing him implement the programme for which he was elected. Jeff Sessions is going back to his job in the morning and you can stick your investigation. Sure there'll be a hullabaloo but that will pass. As any Irish public figure would explain. Of course he'll need the Republican Congresscritters to back him up. If they don't he should go over their heads to the people.

There's a real war on. President Trump should learn from the masters.

*The only resignation (forced of course) in recent times has been that of Chief Nation-Wrecker Alan Shatter. In a glorious and exquisite twist of fate he was done in by unfair procedure. Thank you God!

Monday, 27 February 2017

What gives with Trump's 'defence' build-up

I rejoiced at Trump's election and at so much of what he's been doing since then. Most of all the way he continues taking a flame-thrower to the lying media. But what the hell is he playing at in proposing a few days ago to implement “the greatest military build-up in American history"?  After all America spends, according to some estimates, more on "defence" than the rest of the world combined. Apparently huge additional numbers of military personnel, aircraft carriers, missiles and bombers are urgently needed.

For what?  Maybe Secretary Of State Tillerson is offering us a clue. "We’re going to have to send China a clear signal that, first, the island-building stops and, second, your access to those islands also is not going to be allowed.”  Now Mr. Secretary that is stupid and dangerous talk. You don't threaten a major power unless you have the means to enforce that threat. Otherwise you risk humiliation (think Obama's red lines in Syria) - or a conflagration.

So how would America force China to abandon those islands? Station a major naval task force in situ? If so they'd be sitting ducks. The Chinese have developed advanced ship-killer missiles that would devastate such a fleet resulting in thousands of US servicemen returning in body bags. What then? A land invasion? Obviously preposterous. A nuclear war? Equally preposterous - at least I hope so!  In short no matter how much more is spent on "defence" the threat from Tillerson is hollow. And highly dangerous.

And it's not just China. American "defence" forces are great for destroying infrastructure and large detachments of concentrated combatants (and all too often non-combatants!) while their Navy would easily defeat any other nation's fleet in all-out combat. But the war game has changed, as Iraq and Afghanistan, inter alia, have shown. If Trump doubled spending the American military would still not be able to hold down these relatively small and powerless countries. And what of the enemy du jour, "Terror"?  Maybe lots more aircraft carriers, tanks and intercontinental ballistic missiles can forestall a jihadi planting a bomb in a train or driving a lorry into a crowd of kuffars. But how exactly is unclear to me.

This is not to criticise American fighting men (I exclude the non-fighting women and transgender freaks). Problem is that they're structured to fight WW II all over again - a common failing throughout history, re-fighting the last war. Another and more ominous lesson from history is that the pressure to use huge armies and flashy new weapons is hard to resist.

So again, why the gargantuan budget-busting military budget in the first place and now putting it on steroids with the greatest military build-up in American history"? And how will this be financed? Remember that the reign of HRH Obama The First saw the national debt double, to an eye-watering $20 trillion. Which brings me back to China and the transformation of international competition. Because if China chooses it can bring down the dollar (and with it the proposed military build-up) by flooding the markets with US Treasuries. Sure, the Chinese public would suffer from this as well but they - like Russians and unlike Americans - are well used to suffering.

We can only hope that Trump is playing some kind of game here, messing with his internal enemies' minds as he's done so well up to now.  Hope.

Sunday, 26 February 2017

Oh ma' achin' sides!!!

You know, these days it's almost possible to feel a little sorry for the legacy media, die Lugenpresse. Take the Guardian (yes, please do). Its obese shrieking lesbians and their wispy-bearded virtue-signalling "male" counterparts can feel power slipping from the oily grasp. Already reeling from Trump and Brexit, their readership and credibility plummet while financial losses soar. Reality smacks them in the face every day and watching them pull their own teeth out is such fun. Take this Gruaniad report from South Africa where that country's African population riot against illegal immigration from other parts of Africa.

South African police have used stun grenades, rubber bullets and water cannon to try to disperse anti-immigration protesters in the capital, Pretoria, and keep them from foreign nationals who had gathered to express alarm about recent attacks.
A police official said 136 people had been arrested in the past 24 hours.

Resentment against foreign nationals has sometimes turned deadly amid accusations that they take jobs from locals in a country where unemployment is more than 25%. Others are blamed for drug-dealing and other crimes.

In 2015, anti-immigrant riots in and around the city of Durban left at least six people dead. About 60 people were killed in similar violence seven years earlier.

On Friday protesters in Pretoria marched towards the foreign ministry, some carrying sticks or pipes. A petition was handed to the ministry in which they suggested the government teach immigrants to “speak properly”. The petition added: “They are arrogant and they don’t know how to talk to people, especially Nigerians.

Oh deary deary me. How can this be? Our favourite pets saying the very same things as White fascists.  It's enough to make a GoodWhite journalist choke on his/her/its tofu. Snowflakes melting in the African sun! As they stagger around, stupified, is there any chance that they'll stumble on and report the real genocide taking place in the Rainbow Nation?

Simple answer: No.

Thursday, 23 February 2017

The new leader of Ireland?

Very soon Ireland will have a new Prime Minister, the current one having been forced to quit by his own party. And like all Irish public figures he went kicking and screaming, in the process shedding any residual vestige of dignity.  Given that his party's founders were also the founders of the Irish State it's understandable that its policies have always been of the traditional, conservative, law-and-order kind while it draws its support mainly from middle class Catholics. Its name, Fine Gael, means Irish People or Irish Tribe.

Unsurprising then that all of its leaders have reflected this history, traditional policies and support demographics. Despite this a different type of candidate for the leadership has now emerged. Not just a candidate, he's the favourite. And no surprise because Leo Varadkar ticks all the boxes. He's gay, brown, foreign and a Hindu. In the Ireland of today - in fact in any White country - this represents an unbeatable combination. The fact that he's accomplished nothing politically is neither here nor there. If he's not given the job it will show that Ireland has failed to outgrow its shameful past and remains a benighted homophobic, racist and xenophobic backwater. 

So yes, all going well The Irish Tribe and the Irish Government will shortly be lead by a homosexual Hindu from Pakistan.

That's what I call progress.

Sunday, 19 February 2017

Quantifying diversity's costs

In an earlier post I computed a lifetime cost to us northern European taxpayers of €3 million for a typical family of African or Muslim parasites roosting in our countries. But the real cost is very much greater as the following examples show. 

1.   Direct cost of the equality agenda which attempts to bridge the Achievement Gap by transforming the accomplishment of low IQ immigrants from clan-based societies into the equal of their Western hosts

2.  Financing the whole enforcement industry which has grown up alongside the equality agenda, the various NGOs, quangos and "charities"....

3.  The catastrophic impact on productivity deriving from the dumbing down of qualification requirement, the promotion of vibrants into make-believe jobs, productive workers (read: Whites) becoming demotivated and less productive as opportunities get closed off to them due to their race. 

4.  The redefining of excellence and success as 'elitist' and 'Eurocentric' in the interests of 'fairness'.

5.  Waste of education resources and lowering of education standards for everyone as vibrants are shoe-horned into academic courses for which they're unsuited 

6.  Culture of corruption. Here I'm thinking mainly of Indians and Chinese who have fundamentally different attitudes towards things like elections, examinations and the law generally. If you can cheat and get away with it in any of those areas well you do it. This Asian culture and the clan-based African and Muslim societal mores are incompatible with Western systems of academic qualifications and the impartiality of judges and juries

7.  The broader lack of societal trust experienced in multicultural countries leads, inter alia, to significant additional expenditure on security, both physical and financial.

So adding these unquantifiable costs onto the €3 million direct lifetime costs leads one to ask what a real repatriation programme would be worth to a Western Government. It also leads us to ask how we ever allowed ourselves to get into this situation in the first place.

Thursday, 16 February 2017

Am I paranoid?

Help me here. Am I paranoid? To answer you first must understand something about the Irish political system. The key point being that our politicians are nonentities, without convictions, whose only interest lies in ensuring their place on the gravy train through re-election. For the longer-standing ones the ultimate prize is a Ministry. The in-fighting to win the Ministerial Mercedes and the concomitant golden pension is ferocious. 

Now with that in mind consider the case of American bull dyke Catherine Zappone who fetched up in Ireland a few years ago, complete with her "wife" and presumably a selection of her favourite dildos. She immediately jumped on the charity bandwagon and in the last general election the trendy constituents of her Dublin constituency helped her squeak into our parliament. As an Independent. Now normally Independents have little chance of being awarded a Ministry, the spoils invariably going to members of the dominant Government Party. 

While this Government relies on a certain amount of Independents the selection of this newbie was mysterious. Unless you consider that she (or he - what do you call those freaks?) is a radical feminist with a stated objective to 'get mothers out of the home and into the workplace'. Where presumably they could meet nice bull dykes like Zappone and be introduced to a whole new world of fun. 

Did the curtain twitch mysteriously as the Ministerial appointments were discussed? Just as it must have when that nation-wrecking poison dwarf Alan Shatter was appointed? The plot thickens when you consider that while Shatter was given charge of the immigration spigot Zappone has responsibility for children and the family (where she/he has become embroiled in probably the greatest scandal in the history of the State).

On reflection, no, I don't think I'm paranoid. 

Monday, 13 February 2017

It's a fine line

Here's an interesting comment to the previous post, followed by my response.

"Dilemma; as a Mishling European, Irish, German, English, Danish heritage born in Australia who doesn't act Aboriginal, what nationality should I call myself?

My response:

"The people who built Australia were of European ancestry, primarily British. They became what we know today as Australians, a distinctive people with their own particular variations on their common European heritage. (I hesitate to say that they have their own, (cough) culture!) As such everybody understands your general lineage and its particular permutations become unimportant. 

You're very unlikely as an Australian to be asked about your ancestry anyway because you look and speak like what people expect of an Australian. If you are asked you can cheerfully and proudly expound as you did above. And it's not just Australians. For example my grandson's grandparents are Irish, Scottish and English. But because we're all from the same basic race, stock and culture nobody pays any attention to it. And if they did we'd all be happy to talk about it.

The case of the black "Irish" woman is totally different. Essentially if she's to be taken as Irish then the word loses all meaning. To be Irish is no different to being any other nationality and that's self-evidently ridiculous. Which of course does not prevent the idea being relentlessly foisted on us."

This interchange raised a further important dilemma. On the one hand we Whites must constantly and fearlessly reaffirm our own unique racial, national, ethnic and cultural heritages. This is required to put ersatz 'Irish' people like that woman in their box and to prevent them appropriating what's ours. And also of course to build resistance to the broader Kalergi-derived invasion of our lands and ultimately blending us out of existence.  But on the other hand great care must be taken to not widen existing fissures within the Europe-derived ethny. And God knows, we're picking our way through a minefield here, mines of the national and religious kinds in particular, laced with high-explosive historical baggage. Primed to explode at the slightest touch.

It's a fine line. And there's no simple solution other than to suggest that at the highest level European-derived peoples should celebrate our common achievement and focus on our common enemies and their dastardly plans.

Thursday, 9 February 2017

"But where are you really from?"

As every schoolboy knows rebellion against English rule has been a regular feature of Irish history for over 500 years. Each insurrection drew substance from our ancient and unique heritage, bloodline, myths, values, language, morals, religion and traditions. Here for example are the opening lines of  the 1916 Declaration Of Independence:  "In the name of God and of the dead generations from which she receives her old tradition of nationhood, Ireland, through us, summons her children to her flag and strikes for her freedom."

I raise this not, Heaven forfend, to stoke anti-English sentiment - happily about 95% of Irish people have a positive and affectionate attitude towards our English cousins. I mention it in response to this women I saw on TV, bitterly complaining that when she tells people she's Irish they answer 'yes, but where are you really from?'. She gets baffled and frustrated by this, while the other geldings on the panel clucked in sympathy. After all she was born and reared in Ireland, spoke with a Dublin accent....

Now maybe I'm jumping to conclusions here but just maybe the fact that she's black as the ace of spades has something to do with it. Yes, you see this Irish woman's parents had left Africa and, as the saying goes, 'found themselves in Ireland'. At which point they got down to reproducing lots of Irish boys and girls, who now presumably share their sister's frustration. Assume for a minute that my parents had left Ireland and gone to Japan just after they'd been married and that I'd been born and reared there. Would anyone anywhere refer to me as 'the Japanese guy'? Had I introduced myself as such the inevitable question would have been 'but where are you originally from?'. Of course it would.

What this issue highlights is the old Proposition Nation canard, coined by (((rootless cosmopolitans))) in relation to the USA but now being extended to all White countries. In essence the canard claims that a nation is defined by its values and ideals, not by bloodline. Thus anyone can become an American or Englishman or whatever. But this assumes that such a Proposition can arise independently of ethnic heritage....our DNA.  It does not because otherwise Africa and the Arab world would be flourishing liberal democracies. 

So what happens when a large enough number of people either don’t care about or actively oppose the Proposition? (Think African and Muslim hordes now weeping across our lands). You don't have a nation anymore. You have a monstrosity whose future is deeply problematical. To sustain it you must force everybody to think the same. That of course is what the Political Correctness project is all about. They tried something similar in the Soviet Union (the ultimate Proposition Nation) with predictable results.

The late great Sam Francis wrote "We need not only to understand the role of race in creating our civilization but also to incorporate that understanding in our defense of our civilization. Until we do so, we can expect only to keep on losing the war we are in. As long as whites continue to avoid and deny their own racial identity, at a time when almost every other racial and ethnic category is rediscovering and asserting its own, whites will have no chance to resist their dispossession and their eventual possible physical destruction.

He could have added: "And that is the plan".

Sunday, 5 February 2017

Courts lose the run of themselves

What sort of a crazy situation applies in the USA when an obscure judge, whose job involves Federal cases only in the western half of Washington state can rescind a Presidential Executive Order and extend his ruling to the whole country? Seems insane to me. But it reflects a trend in all White countries whereby courts increasingly usurp the power of elected representatives, in effect making the law as well as adjudicating on it. Just say a law or Executive Order is 'unconstitutional' and everybody must go back to base.

Being largely unaccountable they seldom hesitate to intervene and make rulings that are both unpopular and illogical. The execrable European Court Of Human Rights is probably the worst with every Third World criminal due for expulsion guaranteed a right-to-remain verdict. And what about Brexit, where the (((judges))) decided to do away with all this democratic voting nonsense? There's an admiring quote ascribed to US Chief Justice Earl Warren (arguably the guy who started the rot) as he assessed potential rulings: 'Is it fair?' he asked. Might sound nice but that criterion has nothing to do with the US Supreme Court or any court for that matter. Their job lies exclusively in interpreting the law as laid down by the relevant legislature. If they start making the law, which in effect they're doing, the whole system of checks and balances collapses.

Interestingly, but not surprisingly, capture of the judicial system ranks high on the nation-wreckers' agenda with Saul Alinsky, the Frankfurt School, Grampsci and even the Protocols Of Zion all recognising its importance. Combining this power with the broader nexus of Jewish interests is capable of achieving extraordinary results, as my case study on Yonkers shows.

Incidentally I find it interesting that when a Federal court in Texas issued an injunction halting Obama’s executive amnesty order, the administration simply ignored it and continued as before. Which raises the question of what Mr. Trump should do now. In fact I think the nation-wreckers might, just might, have shot themselves in the foot. If the President conducted a media blitz, asking 'who runs the country, elected officials or judges?' it might not reverse the decision but it would highlight the extraordinary power wielded by unelected judges. 

He could also of course simply issue a new similarly-worded Executive Order and recommence enforcing the immigration law while the DoJ appeals the current Federal ruling.

In any event my bones tell me that if this gets played right the ruling could end up like the 'fake news' meme as a major own-goal.

Thursday, 2 February 2017

Satan lives and his spawn stalk the land

Destroy the family" observed Vladimir Lenin, "and you destroy the country.” And that psychopath was nothing if not a perceptive student of societal destruction. The nuclear family is the bedrock of a stable society. And that's why Lenin's 'spiritual' heirs have focused their demonic attention on destroying it. No-fault divorce, mothers in the workplace, pornography, degenerate art, undermining parental authority, and the glamorising of miscegenation, extra-marital sex and homosexuality....the list goes on.

But there were depths to which even the nation-wreckers were unwilling to descend. Or so I though until I checked a link supplied by regular commentator 'James'. This related to an article in a German magazine called Baby And Family, a publication which purports to help parents prepare kids for the real world by making them smart, healthy and 'responsible citizens'. Really.

The title of the piece was Danger from the Right. Here's how Vertigopolitix describes it.  "It depicted an artist’s renderings of solely blonde mothers with their blonde children in various settings such as playgrounds or day care centers. However, the accompanying text was thinly veiled, deliberately anti-German doublespeak. The writer warned of a rise in “right-wing” extremism amongst middle class native Germans, especially in the eastern rural areas. Parents, the writer cautioned, should be vigilant at all times, but that the warning signs were easily detected if one knew what to look for. And what are these indicators, she asked?"

And this is where things become surreal....

1. If the children are “inconspicuous, cute, and engaged.”

2. The family is generally nice and dedicated to one another.

3. If the children are cleanly clothed, obedient, and not overly loud.

4. The parents and children do not have American logos on their clothing.

5. If the children exhibit attentiveness beyond their years.

6. Young girls who often exhibit “accurately braided hair and wear long skirts.”

7. If the parents try to build personal relationships with other parents.

8. Parents who want to build a “better community.”

9. If the family seems “too normal.”

Can you credit that? Seriously, c
an you credit that? That the purveyors of this malevolence feel confident enough to publish it in a leading 'family' journal eloquently reveals the extent of German self-destruction. That they have not been strung up from lamp-posts but (as the Vertigopolitex article reveals) are actually subsidised by the German Government suggests that Germany has gone beyond the point of no return. Thus the plans hatched by (((the tribe))) for the destruction of the German people are coming to fruition, albeit in a less gory fashion than originally hoped for.

Speaking of which I note that our old friend (((Anetta Kahane))), ex-Stasi crony of Frau Merkel, has been a key player in providing intellectual input to the Danger From The Right article. 

Truly Satan lives and his spawn stalk the land. It's open warfare. This time we must win.