Wednesday, 18 October 2017


Several readers have already asked me to comment on the Las Vegas shooting but I declined for the simple reason that I didn't have anything to add. I could have speculated of course but speculation based on sparse knowledge isn't much use. But now take the case of Kymberley Suchomel who had survived the shooting unscathed. Subsequent to the attack she had posted a vivid and detailed description of the events, much of which were at variance with the official version, most notably her claim that there were multiple shooters. Now we learn that she has died 'from natural causes'! She had also written this about when she was escaping with her group after the attack. A  ‘dark-colored SUV’ slowed and a ‘small Hispanic woman’ emerged from the window to “taunt” her group. “[She] leans out the window, and she yells something we couldn’t understand in a clearly taunting manner. It really freaked us out, because again, we didn’t know who we could and could not trust”. Could this have been the same 'short Hispanic women' who other concert-goers claim threatened them before the shooting?

Significantly in my view her FB postings have been wiped from the Internet with her death. And here's another one that was disappeared from the Web. Nabarro's story concerned the valet named Chad Nishimura who parked Paddock’s car and told Nabarro that he chatted with Paddock briefly before parking his vehicle. He said that Paddock “seemed normal”and that he “didn’t have any bags with him upon arrival”. Well, that story has been completely scrubbed from the Internet as well as have Nishimura's social media accounts. Even his Linkedin profile.

It's hard to envisage an innocent explanation for these developments. Which in turn suggests that there's a conspiracy afoot. If so what's it all about? As of now we don't know despite many confident assertions to the contrary. And on the subject of conspiracies, what's the deal with Harvey Weinstein? One of the most powerful men in Hollywood, Jewish, strong supporter of Democratic and "liberal" causes, gets thrown to the wolves for.....casting couch antics? And it wasn't just the fact that he was 'exposed' so to speak. The whole thing seemed to be carefully orchestrated, everybody coming out of the woodwork at the same time, obliterating him within a matter of days. And the people who turned on him were the very ones you'd expect to support him.

All very odd. Will explanations emerge in due course?

Monday, 16 October 2017

Unanswered questions on foreign aid

Take up the White Man's burden,The savage wars of peace--
Fill full the mouth of Famine And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest The end for others sought,
Watch sloth and heathen Folly Bring all your hopes to nought.

The over-riding and all-consuming priority for every politician in a parliamentary democracy is to hold onto his seat. (I derive intense satisfaction from not saying ‘his or her’ seat). Irish politicians, due to the multi-seat proportional representation system, are more sensitive than most, as there's only a handful of really safe seats in the whole country. To keep his seat the pol must keep his constituents happy. This involves diverting as much government largess as possible to his constituency, and above all in avoiding closure of police stations, hospitals, schools quangos or any other publicly funded institution.

Naturally, the pols do everything in their power to prevent such cash-saving actions. They cajole every Minister, threaten to leave the party, to vote against it, to join the opposition or whatever. The pressure on those around the Cabinet table is immense. Small wonder that the battles are so fierce and prolonged despite the figures involved often being quite small, say €10 million annually. They scour every item of expenditure to save a million here, a million there. Always with an eye to the political impact (i.e. their careers). Awful, painful, career-ending cost-based decisions must be made.

As they tear at each other around the Cabinet table why doesn’t someone say, no, scream, ‘why the fuck are we talking about closing a hospital here when we could keep it open, and a dozen others like it, by keeping what we toss away on foreign aid?’  Would not €100 million be better spent on reducing health service waiting lists than on buying jet fighters for the Ugandan Air Force?  Yes, lying on the table, in all its glory, lies an annualised pot of about €700 million which the pols could redeploy overnight with zero impact on the voting public. Yet it remains sacrosanct.

But help might be coming from an unlikely source: Zimbabwe.  Dambisa Moyo in her Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working shows that  systematic aid increases corruption, destroys accountability and inhibits entrepreneurship, fosters laziness in governments and citizens, encourages “reckless consumption” instead of investment in the domestic infrastructure, and foments conflict — even civil wars — because warring factions are intoxicated by the prospect of gaining access to all that free cash. A position Bill Gates described as 'promoting evil' no less. And in fairness Bill is more than familiar with the concept of promoting evil.

So why does the West continue to pour money into international aid? As with most other weighty issues the answer will be found if you 'follow the money'. And in this instance the money keeps a massive aid industry (estimated to employ in the region of 500,000 world-wide with the World Bank octopus-like at its centre) in continuous operation. And here I'm in agreement with the many African nationalists who claim that the aid industry actually doesn't want to cure the economic ills of Africa for the simple reason that were such ills to be miraculously cured they all be out of their comfortable well-paid jobs. In this they're like big pharma which would be out of  business if cures  for  major illnesses were discovered. I experienced this myself directly when heading up the design team for a national telecommunications infrastructure project in Ghana about twenty years ago. Within two weeks it became clear that the project's resources would be plundered by the local bigwigs while designated local staff lacked the necessary skills and experience. I recommended to the WB Project Director that the initiative be abandoned before serious money was flushed down the drain.His reaction was astonishing. He nearly freaked out and came close to admitting that his criterion for success was more about the ability to spend the money rather than achieve the stated objectives.

But that still leaves the question hanging as to why national politicians are so reluctant to tuck into this trough of goodies. After all the numbers directly working in aid industry are comparatively small (although any number is too big) and while the SJWs and their media shills would have a collective fit of the vapours the general voting pubic would be far more grounded. Or based as they say now. 

So..... are there other  forces at work?

Monday, 9 October 2017

The perils of blending

This from Nilus, popular commentator and ace jewdar sleuth in the comment section of the previous post: "Tell me there's not an Irishman that could watch this and not get furious". Well nilus here's one Irishman who got seriously furious, suffused with a cold anger. He was referring to a series of ads running for Tullamore Dew blended Irish whiskey (here and here). No surprise that they're straight out of the Great Book Of Diversity Cliches.

Authoritative-Black-Female walks out on Mewling-White-Beta boyfriend contemptuously dismissing the 'Irish' on her way. This of course is most certainly not racist, just cute. Cut to panel of typical Irish bar-flies, White-guy, Black-guy, Asian-guy to whom Mewling-White-Beta spouts stage Oirish 'poetry' (the Oirish are all poets you know) as he mourns the loss of his magic negress. Then, in a stunning demonstration of their Irishness the mystery meat barflies break into a heartfelt rendition of 'Danny Boy'. See, they're just as Irish as any of us!

Which leads me to my first question. If blacks and Asians (and by inference anybody else roosting here) can be authentically Irish then what does being Irish mean?  Prior to the very recent immivasion the Irish gene pool was made up virtually 100% of Celts, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Normans. This blending over a thousand years and more gave us the characteristics that today define Irishness, the memes the company deploys to hype its products while portraying typical Irish barflies as multiracial hybrids. Inconsistency?

Then we come to the central dilemma of diversity: We're bombarded day and night with the manifold (though never explained) benefits and joys of diversity. Yet the race-mixing that they promote with equal enthusiasm will logically lead to the elimination of diversity as we all become coffee-coloured mongrels. Indeed Tullamore Dew lay great emphasis on the subtle blending that's gone into the development of their products. So they'd be the first to admit that should some naughty employee drop a juicy turd into the whiskey vat the blend might suffer somewhat.  Indeed. Point being, blending can make something worse or better whether you're making whiskey or making a nation. As one commentator put it "a successful blend needs to be poured slowly, be well thought out, with ingredients that complement it and improve it, whilst staying true to it's natural character. "

In conclusion I reiterate my cold bitterness towards those who develop and publish the traitorous bilge that these ads represent. 
Frank Galton reveals that the ad campaign was developed by NY agency (((Opperman Weiss))).


Friday, 6 October 2017

Slobodan Milosovic - what we can learn

When writing on the Rohingya (self-induced) crisis a few weeks back I observed that when the USA, all of its Western lapdogs, the UN, NATO, the mainstream media, all the 'independent' think fact when every official source speaks with one voice you can be sure of but one thing: A major mind-fuck is underway. Hark back now to Slobodan Milosovic and the breakup of Yugoslavia, the Bosnian Civil War and its subsequent bastard child in Kosovo.

Milosovic we were told was a war criminal of the worst kind, in fact the greatest mass murderer since WW II, on a par with Hitler, responsible for the massive ethnic cleansing, mass graves and death camps of Bosnia. He was the master-mind directing Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadžić whose militias carried out the atrocities on the ground. The whole sorry mess was brought to an end only by the eventual and reluctant involvement of NATO whose relentless bombing campaign forced Serbia and Milsoveic to surrender.

And then justice was served as he was brought to trial in a blaze of publicity at the Hague for his 'war crimes'. His death during the trial was presented by the media and the Western political establishment - but I repeat myself - as justice denied to his countless victims. However the subsequent verdict of the court painted a very different picture. Here's an excerpt of the Tribunal's General Conclusion (full report here)

"With regard to the evidence presented in this case in relation to Slobodan Milošević and his membership in the JCE, the Chamber recalls that he shared and endorsed the political objective of the Accused and the Bosnian Serb leadership to preserve Yugoslavia and to prevent the separation or independence of BiH and co-operated closely with the Accused during this time. The Chamber also recalls that Milošević provided assistance in the form of personnel, provisions, and arms to the Bosnian Serbs during the conflict.

However, based on the evidence before the Chamber regarding the diverging interests that emerged between the Bosnian Serb and Serbian leaderships during the conflict and in particular, Milošević’s repeated criticism and disapproval of the policies and decisions made by the Accused and the Bosnian Serb leadership,the Chamber is not satisfied that there was sufficient evidence presented in this case to find that Slobodan Milošević agreed with the common plan."

Naturally these findings were buried by the whores in the Western media who'd have been forced to admit that the whole pantomime was a ploy by our globalist overlords to achieve multiple goals by using its economic power and NATO's military might to destroy a friend of Russia, an opponent of NATO, a strong nationalist and an Orthodox Christian. They succeeded. And they're still at it in the same region by stoking Albanian resistance in Macedonia just like they did in Kosovo. All in the name of freedom and democracy of course.

The sad part for me personally is that I fell for the whole charade at the time. But I've learned from that mistake. Hopefully we'll all recognise it the next time they try it on.

Monday, 2 October 2017

Every little bit helps!

Stefan Molyneux has built up an enormous Youtube following with a platform  that should on the face of it make him a hero to us on the at-right (I'll use that expression as a catch-all to cover those defending White interests). He exposes the devastating impact of feminism on society, calls out 'liberals' for their hypocrisy and double-standards, traces the spread of the Cultural Marxism infection through our institutions, exposes the insanities of the equalist and globalist agendas, isn't afraid to highlight black criminality and low achievement.

So what's the problem? The problem is that Molyneux, himself being Jewish, fails to identify the central Jewish role in the pathologies he rails against. In fact it'd be fairer to say that he carefully redirects his listeners' attention away from the centrality of the Jewish role. That's bad of course and as a consequence his standing is pretty low on the alt-right. And it is true that a failure to identify the war on Whites for what it is - a Jewish project - means we'll never win it.

But I'd still argue that Molyneux and others like him (e.g. Jordan Peterson) that avoid the JQ provide a valuable service. First by the very fact of identifying and refuting the pathologies that beset us. At a minimum this leads to large numbers of people questioning The Narrative of our globo-homo overlords. The biggest obstacle we face is ignorance and the apathy that follows from it. SM is waking such people up. Crucially, many of the awoken then begin to go further and ask how things have come to this and who is responsible. That's where it gets interesting because, as can be seen from the comments section, many of his fans are putting two and two together and coming up with a total which undoubtedly makes him uncomfortable. Even were the editorial scalpel to be wielded ruthlessly what has been seen cannot be unseen.

And essentially that's my point. Molyneux and others like him are doing the Lord's work even if part of their objective is misdirection. They're waking Whites up and that is the first step and an essential one. So cut him some slack and capitalise on his work by using his comments section. Every little bit helps!

Thursday, 28 September 2017

End world poverty now!

In a recent issue of the Rothschild-owned Economist Professor Bryan Caplan argued that labour is the world’s most valuable commodity and its value depends on location. Apparently if borders were open, a world of free movement would be $78 trillion richer than it is now. Mexican labourers would earn 150% more in the West while an unskilled Nigerian worker in Europe could make 1000 times (sic) as much in Germany as he would back home, adding 100 times more to global GDP than he would by the same work in Nigeria. 

Wouldn't that be wonderful? Well, no, as most readers quickly pointed out, and for a number of reasons. For a start where would we accommodate them, how would we build and staff the thousands of new welfare offices such enrichers would require and treat the explosion of tropical disease accompanying their arrival?

Caplan (changing the 'K' to a 'C' doesn't fool us Prof.) coyly avoids being too specific on such issues, not least because he isn't interested in the goyims' economic welfare. What he wants is to render White nations into atomised and dumbed-down abstractions with no unifying racial, moral, cultural or historical identity. Because in such a miasma an intelligent endogamous tribe will triumph and prosper without fear of exposure. Isn't that right Bryan?

Such a programme is underpinned by the following syllogism:

Free movement of produce = Good (more choice at cheaper prices)

Free movement of produce = free movement of people

Therefore free movement of people = Good

But people and goods are not the same, a fact so self-evident that even an economist or sociology professor could see it. Your Chinese fridge does not yearn for its factory of origin in Shanghai, it works productively from the time it arrives and you won't see it followed into your house by an assortment of cookers and fridges from the same factory. And crucially, you can throw it out when it gives trouble.

Then the most basic question: Why are the Nigerians 1000 times more productive in Germany than they are in Nigeria? Caplan has an answer for that: The infrastructure in White countries. Which in turn makes one ask why our infrastructure is so superior. We know the answer. But we won't hear it from Caplan any more than we did from (((Jared Diamond))) in Guns, Germs and Steel.

To bolster my point I now cite a few recent media reports.

Mother, 27, arrested after charred remains of her daughter found on a barbecue. Neighbours called police in Zemst, Belgium, on Sunday after seeing smoke. She is reported to have told officers 'we had to burn together to get into heaven' . The woman, believed to be of African descent, had reportedly been depressed for some time after going through a divorce.

Witch doctors are sacrificing children in drought-stricken Uganda. Jackline Mukisa sobbed as she described how her 8-year-old son was found in a nearby swamp in February without teeth, lips, ears and genitals. His remains suggest he was slowly killed as part of a human sacrifice ritual performed by witch doctors, apparently to appease the spirits.

A Bronx student stabbed a classmate to death with a switchblade and seriously injured another in front of more than a dozen classmates inside their high school Wednesday morning after being accidentally hit by a flying pencil. 

And this bastion of learning's name? The Urban Assembly School for Wildlife Conservation.

Truly fact is stranger than fiction!

Sunday, 24 September 2017

What would you do?

Douglas Murray is coming under increasing odium in WN circles for his repeated failure to finger the Jewish role in Europe's ongoing destruction.  In this interview he actually deemed anti-Semites (i.e. those who refuse to buy into The Narrative) as mentally ill.

Having studied the destruction of Europe, the strange death of Europe in fact, he knows the deal. He understand the Jewish role as well as anyone does. Yet he resolutely refuses to identify it. What does that make him? Well before we become too judgemental put yourself in his position for a moment. At present he enjoys fame and fortune and the future is roses all the way. But should he do a David Irving or an Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn that would change. Change utterly and immediately. 

Irving and Solzhenitsyn went from being celebrated wealthy writers to oblivion almost overnight. Now ask yourself honestly what you'd do in his position. Especially if, unlike him, you had a family to provide for. I'll disappoint you by admitting I'd be unlikely to bite the bullet. Not sure that I'd consign myself and my family to the impoverishment and persecution that would inevitably follow.

However biting your tongue or a little bit of dissimulation is one thing, actively obscuring the source of the problem is something else entirely. And that's what Douglas Murray's been doing. So he's a fair-weather friend at best.

The key issue is not his personal bravely or integrity, it's how we Whites can regain control of our own destiny from the hostile minority which has seized it.

Thursday, 21 September 2017

In God we trust. Not

If you want to understand the deep and complex issues of the day your first port of call should always be a Hollywood actor, some bubble-dwelling coke-head who makes his living dressing up and playing make-believe. And obviously Hollywood director Rob Reiner feels the same way because he's commissioned God himself - Morgan Freeman - to explain how Russia (a foreign country, he helpfully informs us) is undermining the American democratic process with potentially disastrous consequences. But Freeman is again just being an actor here, reading out his lines. Because a cursory examination reveals that this whole anti-Trump project, from Reiner himself to most of the talking heads on the video are Israeli-supporting Jews.

And that's really ironic because Russia's impact on the American democratic process is minuscule compared to that of Israel and its dual-citizen sayanim in America. For a start this whole Russian interference charge has been characterised from the beginning by a complete lack of supporting evidence. There's virtually nothing. Now compare that to the role of the dual-loyalty.....let me stop right there: Most of the sayanim, especially the Neocons, are single-loyalty. And it's not to America which they see as just a tool to advance Israeli interests. (In passing note that an avid supporter of Israeli settler interests has been appointed "American" Ambassador to that country where I'm sure he holds America's interests uppermost at all times.)

For a start nobody gets elected to public office unless they profess undying and unalloyed loyalty to Israel. And deliver on that profession of loyalty. Organised Jewish groups like AIPAC (there are dozens more) and wealthy individuals wield almost total control over the so-called people's representatives. This is enforced by Jewish dominance in banking, media, the courts, entertainment, think tanks and the universities. Anyone who doesn't unequivocally toe the line is consigned to obscurity. Or worse.

And this subversion, unlike that of Russia, has been spectacularly successful, to the extent of literally destroying traditional America via mass Third World immigration and Frankfurt School-induced societal degradation. In terms of putting Israel first the billions handed over annually to that country on behalf of American taxpayers is small change. The real payoff comes in terms of using American blood and treasure to fight Israel's wars in the Middle East. The catastrophes of Iraq and Syria have been masterminded by the Israeli-first Neocons and now the very same people, utterly unabashed and bereft of guilt, are trying to embroil America in a war with Iran. They might well succeed.

So Morgan, if you're really interested in the American democratic process forget about Russia and concentrate instead on Israel. Otherwise - God - go back to fucking your granddaughter.

Friday, 15 September 2017

Cry me a paddy-field

Myanmar (formerly Burma) is under severe attack from the "international community" (read NWO Globo-homos) for so-called genocide against the Rohingya Muslims. The United Nations calls them the “most persecuted minority group in the world”. Imagine that. Also amazing to see Muslims not getting on with their neighbours, isn't it? All respectable opinion, every 'international body', all the mainstream media see this conflict as truly Manichean. There are the good guys (Muslims) and the bad guys (Buddhists) and nothing in between. And whenever you encounter such unanimity from such sources you know that a new mind-fuck is underway. And the Rohingya campaign is no exception.
You'll be amazed to learn that the Rohingya Muslims have always had bad relations with their Buddhist neighbours. This was fuelled by not alone traditional Muslim out-group hostility but by massive long-standing growth in their numbers, derived not just from breeding like rabbits but through mass cross-border migration from what's now Bangladesh (previously East Pakistan and India before that). SOP in such circumstances is for Muslims to create their own Dar-al-Islam (even though they fled their previous one) which inevitably leads to clashes with the natives. This does not apply of course in cucked Europe where the locals just roll over.

But the Burmese Buddhists didn't roll over and widespread communal unrest resulted. "The massive rate at which they entered Arakan was a cause of great resentment among the local population, among whom a strong sense of nationalism developed." The problem was somewhat manageable until the onset of WW II when the British got the idea of enlisting the Rohingya in the war against Japan. Armed to the teeth by the Brits they duly went off to war. But against their fellow countrymen, not against the Japs. And with 
more than 20,000 fatalities they weren't holding back. 

Here's one contemporaneous account: "By night fall we could see rolling flames on the Maungdaw side from Taknaff Town across the wide Naff River. Later we heard the depressing news that tens of thousands of Bengali-Muslims had entered Maungdaw after the town was abandoned and burned down the whole town after taking away everything removable from the Yakhine houses including rice, cooking oil, salt, and every single piece of furniture. All the Yakhine villages, there were hundreds of them Buddhist villages, on the extremely fertile strip south of Maungdaw Town between the Naff River and Mayu Ranges were completely wiped out by the rioting Bengali Muslims within few days."

As you can imagine this didn't exactly endear them to the Burmese, especially as the mass cross-border influx continued unabated after the war. In response the Government imposed severe restrictions including a law that gave national citizenship to only those Burmese who could prove having ancestors residing in the country before British colonial rule. Which strikes me as a thoroughly splendid idea. But of course it's the antithesis of everything our NWO Globo-homo overlords stand for. Hence the international hue and cry.

We can now expect the invading army of European-based head-choppers (rested and replenished courtesy of the European taxpayers after their exertions in Syria and Iraq) to head off to Myanmar on their latest jihad. Aided and abetted once again by the peace-loving Gulf states and the freedom-loving Western democracies.

Just watch.

Tuesday, 12 September 2017

Lord Of The Flies in Paradise

Developments in the Caribbean island of St. Martin after hurricane Irma surely substantiate William Golding's pessimistic take on human nature. It was Lord Of The Flies redux. (As an aside, I see there are plans afoot for a remake of the earlier film versions but this time with an all-female cast. This in turn has provided the feminazis with yet another opportunity to display their unfathomable ignorance, hypocrisy and inconsistency. For decades we've been beaten over the head with demands for women to take on the roles traditionally played by men. We're all the same you see. But now we're indignantly told that girls would never turn into little savages like the boys did.)

Even the New York Slimes came perilously close to honest reporting. "In the few, long days since Irma pummeled the northeast Caribbean, killing more than two dozen people..... the social fabric has begun to fray in some of the hardest-hit communities At dawn, people began to gather, quietly planning for survival". To which any normal person would respond "well why the hell did they not quietly plan for survival before the storm hit?" As one local Dutch guy commented 'you can fill a cooler with $20 in rice and beans and eat for 3 weeks'. In any event 'quietly planning' actually meant opportunistically looting (or as the Slimes put it 'ad hoc provisioning'!). "They started with the grocery stores, scavenging what they needed for sustenance: water, crackers, fruit. But by nightfall on Thursday, what had been a search for food took a more menacing turn, as groups of people, some of them armed, swooped in and took whatever of value was left: electronics, appliances and vehicles." “All the food is gone now,” Jacques Charbonnier, a 63-year-old resident of St. Martin, said in an interview on Sunday. “People are fighting in the streets for what is left.” Latest news is that the local zoo is being plundered and the animals eaten.

We all know that blacks cannot sustain a techno-industrial society, let alone create one. In natural disasters blacks loot and pillage, Whites prepare and rescue. Blacks survive only as parasites, which is why they follow - all the time loudly complaining  - their White prey wherever we flee. But here's a question. What happens if and when YT is unable or unwilling to sustain them? What happens if and when White societies get over-run by Third World bottom feeders and become Third World themselves or when and if the financial money-printing ponzi that now artificially sustains us finally collapses?

Well, these events, and those with Katrina, have given us a pretty good idea.

Friday, 8 September 2017

Pessimism? I rest my case

Many on here took me to task a few posts back when I expressed despair at the power of International Jewry. But the approach of a new September 11 anniversary starkly reminds us of that power because 9/11 (arguably the most traumatic event in American history since the Civil War) was a blatant false flag with Israeli hands all over it. The official explanation is so implausible as to be almost laughable. Yet at an official level it has never been subjected to any meaningful examination. Any single one of the following blow open the official case, taken in combination they render it  literally  beyond belief.

1. The collapse of WTC7, the only steel framed building in history for which fire - and a very small fire at that - was allegedly the sole cause of its collapse. This preposterous explanation, taken to its logical conclusion would result in all such buildings throughout the country being closed down. None were. (And the collapse was described in graphic detail by the BBC twenty minutes before it happened!).

2. That Larry Silverstein, despite his "pull it" (a common term for a demolition) admission live on TV has never been called on to even explain his remark, let alone been charged with mass murder.

3. That the 'dancing Israelis', subsequently revealed to be Mossad operatives, openly admitted they were present on the day 'to record the event'. Self-evidently they knew it was going to take place yet they were released by US authorities while the Israeli Government were never called on to explain their role.

4. And one of my own favorites, the 'terrorist passport', miraculously surviving the plane explosion and subsequently found in perfect condition in the midst of thousands of tons of smoldering rubble.

There's a ton of additional evidence to show that 911 was a false flag and that Israel together with the mainly Jewish Neocons were behind it. Yet not only did they get clean away with it they used the event to embroil America in a disastrous war to take out one of Israel's most dangerous enemies. How bizarre is that? Yet to this day nobody in any official position questions it. If that doesn't demonstrate their almost supernatural power then what does?

Actually there was one attempt. And here's what happened. 'A revealing, four-part investigative series was aired by Fox News in December, 2001, dealing with the arrests of several hundred Israeli nationals as well as some of the incriminating circumstances surrounding their activities in the United States. In response, every major media outlet in America received a visit from Abraham Foxman, the head of the Anti-Defamation League. A phrase he used was, “What are you doing putting this stuff out there? You’re killing us!” Executives at the highest levels of the various networks were inundated with phone calls, letters and emails. Members of the most powerful Jewish groups in the country – ADL, AIPAC with its 60,000 members, and the misnamed Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America CAMERA – visited the White House and petitioned officials at the highest levels to close down investigations of the Israeli spies.'

The series was cancelled and removed from the Fox archives. Nobody else touched the subject.

I rest my case!

Sunday, 3 September 2017

Conservative journals

Are there any conservative English-language journals left? The Spectator had held on longer than most but has been careering over the "liberal" cliff in recent times. Take Carola Binney (please do!) who taught English in China for a year and who was absolutely horrified by the race realism racism there. This 'conservative' journalist, when seeking a pictorial exemplar for the word 'wife' chose......Michelle Obama!  Yes, a six-foot tall black American who looks like (and possibly is) a man was chosen rather than, well, a Chinese wife. Poor Carola was devastated by the eruption of revulsion that followed. 'Oh, so ugly!' 'Looks like a monkey'. 'So black!'

She was also astonished to learn that the Chinese believed Africans belonged in Africa. What a crazy thought! Shaking her head she writes that their 'ideas about racial hierarchies are not outdated pseudo-science but unquestioned belief'. (Note: 'pseudo-science' is libtard-speak for...'science'). This reached its logical conclusion when a prominent national politician asked rhetorically whether pressure to allow in Africans would 'change China from a yellow country to a yellow and black country'. In case there was any doubt about his own views he explained that Africans brought 'poverty, drugs, sexual assault and infectious diseases'. Which of course had the writer clutching her pearls in horror.

She ends up (after reciting a further series of shocking racist incidents) sternly warning the Chinese of a grim future unless 'they sort out their race problem'. No, you idiot, China does not have a race problem for the simple reason that 99% of them are of the same race. However they would have one in the unlikely event that they listened to you, you preening, sanctimonious, virtue-signalling, close-minded, non-thinking drone, comfortably enveloped in your personal cloud of invincible ignorance.

Anyway it doesn't matter because the Chinese are pouring huge resources into eugenics based on gene editing. They're about to produce a new Master Race of, I guess, highly intelligent, tall, blond blue-eyed, merciless sperg-like automatons....... while formerly White nations turn into Brazil.

An afterthought: That journalist doesn't do irony, does she? Because the article is just loaded with cultural imperialism. It hasn't dawned on her that, just like Cecil Rhodes, she's lecturing the natives on what's good and bad about their culture and prescribing remedies which reflect the latest Western fads. How ironic is that?

Wednesday, 30 August 2017

Never felt so pessimistic...

Not been posting much over the last week and it's mainly because I've been reading The Balfour Declaration by  American academic (((Jonathan Schneer)). It claims to be the most comprehensive study yet of that subject, the author having had access to newly-released documents and other hitherto unavailable sources. And indeed it is comprehensive, with footnotes and references taking up almost half of the text. 

Purporting to 'unravel the bewildering labyrinth that was British Middle East policy' leading to the eponymous Declaration, it does nothing of the sort. It is instead an exercise in obfuscation designed to minimise Zionist manipulation of Western democracies, diverting the blame for the problems that beset the region today onto Perfidious Albion. In fact it's borderline comical that the 'most comprehensive analysis ever' could totally ignore the Jewish machinations that induced the United States to enter WW1, Jewish agitation at the Paris Peace Conference following the war and the notorious 'stab in the back' on Germany (payoff for British support for the Zionist state).

Nothing new here of course but I'm writing to explain how the book has rendered me more pessimistic about the future than I've ever been. Despite the author's methodical obfuscations and gas-lighting the book nonetheless reveals the terrifying power of Organised Jewry and its ability to manipulate the dumb goyim. Tenacious, indefatigable, cohesive (despite disagreements on tactics), ruthless, intelligent, cunning and in possession of an awe-inspiring ability to marshal a dizzying array of resources and deploy them through inducement, blackmail, bribery, appeals to moral sentiment or whatever is deemed necessary.

Malynski, referring to the United States, wrote in La Démocratie Victorieuse 'The power to stir up a whole nation of solid, egotistical and utilitarian individuals, and to persuade them that their greatest privilege is to set out and get themselves killed at the uttermost ends of the earth, with no hope of gain for themselves or their children and almost without their understanding against or for whom they are fighting, or why, is a simply incredible phenomenon which makes one afraid when one comes to think about it.’ 


Here is but a single example of dozens which litter the book. Towards the end of the war the Allies were - with the utmost secrecy - exploring the possibility of a separate peace with Turkey. Towards this end the Americans sent a delegation to meet with the Turks. President Wilson's right-hand man (((Louis Brandeis))), fearing that the initiative could damage Zionist aspirations, secretly informed British Zionists who quickly intercepted the delegation in Gibraltar. And the rest as they say is history. There's a word for this: Treason. But as Sir John Harrington observed nearly 400 years ago 'Treason never prospers. What's the reason? For should it prosper none dare call it treason'. And indeed Brandeis subsequently prospered mightily, twenty years on the Supreme Court, even had a prominent university named after him. 

Why in a work of obfuscation would Schneer describe this incident and many more of a similar nature, incidents which in effect show Jews committing treason against their host countries? I can only assume that he sees nothing wrong with it and is unable to empathise with goyim who'd take a less charitable view. Right now the same Power is busily at work flooding our lands with Third World barbarians and encouraging our people to mate with them, debasing our culture and financial systems while step-by-step delegitimising and marginalising those few of us trying to fight back. (I note that Stormfront is the latest White site to be closed down). With the minds of our people so deformed by a century of non-stop brainwashing we now lie almost helpless before them.

I leave the final words to the great Revilo P Oliver. "But that seemingly despicable tribe, by arduous, intelligent, and indefatigable work for more than twenty-five centuries, has, through its own efforts, made itself the major world power today and is not far from its great objective, total ownership of the entire globe. History provides no parallel for that stupendous accomplishment. It must be regarded with respect, even awe."

To say I'm not optimistic would be an understatement.

Friday, 25 August 2017

Controlled opposition?

The charge of  'controlled opposition' is regularly hurled at a variety of sites and individuals on the Alt-Right, usually because of a disagreement over something inconsequential. Alex Jones is the exemplar.  Funded by Jews, he seeks to deflect attention away from Jewish involvement in 9/11 and his wife is, or was, Jewish. Anyway, it seems he's controlled opposition. Even the Daily Stormer's Andrew Anglin has been thus designated by several commentators on this site. 

It seems to me that those charges are laid if the target doesn't fully and unconditionally meet all the requirements demanded of a perfect WN. But remember perfect is the enemy of good enough. There will always be disagreements about facts, priorities, interpretations, measures to take etc. That's the nature of any movement. The criterion should be 'is he (or the site) helping or damaging the WN cause?'.

When assessed this way almost all charges of controlled opposition dissolve. Even in the case of Alex Jones. Despite carefully avoiding the Third Rail he has worked wonders in waking White people up. He has induced Whites to question and doubt the narrative they've been fed by schools, Government, MSM and Hollywood. Look, time and again he talks about “the elite”, “the global elites”, “globalists”, “international bankers”, “global conspiracy”, “the NWO” and the like. He says that every path leads to the House of Rothschild. Now I ask you, how much more explicit do you expect him to be? It doesn’t take a great leap of the imagination to establish the connection here. 

Or take someone like Stefan Molyneux. His mother was Jewish and he too tries to downplay the Jewish role in the war on Whites. But he has done, and continues to do, tremendous valuable work in waking Whites up to the terrible dangers posed by feminism, mass immigration, so-called liberalism and the White Privilege meme among others. I repeat, he (and other so-called controlled opposition sites like his) contributes greatly to waking White people up. And that is the main challenge facing WNs. Our biggest problem is that the overwhelming majority of Whites have no understanding - whatsoever - of the war being waged against them. They believe in what they see on TV and the movies, in what they learn in school and university and as such are like lemmings heading unknowingly towards the cliff.

Why would any 'controller' support such messages of awakening? Remember, and I'm living testimony to this fact, once you start pulling at the Narrative string the whole thing comes apart like a cheap suit. Any 'controller' worth his salt knows that and would avoid it like the plague. That's why Kevin Myers and James Damore were summarily fired.

So please, be judicious in deploying the charge of controlled opposition simply because the target's position doesn't conform exactly with yours. We are still a small minority and desperately need any help we can get in rousing Whites from their potentially fatal slumber. 

In similar vein it does not help our cause by categorising in scatter-gun fashion everyone who is against us as Jewish. To paraphrase one comment on the previous post on this blog: Hitler could have been partly Jewish because his grandfather was illegitimate and his biological father could therefore have been Jewish. Ipso facto Hitler was 'controlled opposition'. Can you see how ridiculous this stuff can get?

So please, welcome any help we can get. If you disagree with people like AJ or SM take the issue up with them in a constructive way in their blogs. And there are more than enough people of real Jewish heritage trying to take us down without assigning non-Jews to that category.


Monday, 21 August 2017

The quickening

The gun-control lobby is in full swing as gang-land and terrorist gun crime continues to increase. Yet its position is inherently and fundamentally flawed. Seizing legally held (read White-owned) guns and/or imposing more restrictive licensing requirements will have almost zero impact on gun deaths because terrorists, gangsters and ghetto thugs can always get their hands on guns. Neither Khaled the Camel Humper nor Quantavius in the ghetto will be deterred by the need for a gun license. ("By the Beard Of Allah my gun license has expired. Cancel the attack!"). Surely even the most deluded, febrile SJW can see that? But of course the gun control agenda has nothing to do with reducing murders. It's about disarming law-abiding Whites.

Am I alone in thinking that this is another sign of a general quickening? Not just gun control but all elements of the anti-White project seem to have suddenly gone into overdrive. Third World immigration, the spread of "hate" (read anti-White) legislation, the blocking of pro-White websites, White displacement in the workplace, antifa aggression and provocations, depravity and degeneration in the public sphere, the rewriting of history.

It's like the way the flow of a river speeds up as it approaches a cataract waterfall. It's a good analogy because it seems we are headed towards some precipitous event, the nature and outcome of which, to me at least, are unknown.

Saturday, 19 August 2017

Daily Stormer back

Daily Stormer back (for now anyway until the "liberals" - you know, the free speech people - bring it down again.  (updated Aug 24)

Friday, 18 August 2017

A costly piece of ass

I notice that the team which drove a car into those people in Barcelona came from Morocco. Sorry for the kuffars who got squashed but to me it's still a small price to pay for the joys of diversity. Back home in Morocco a gang of 'youths' occupied their time waiting to join us in Europe by engaging in sexual congress with....a donkey. I must admit that when I saw the Sex With A Donkey headline I thought it might be Katie Price or Lena Dunham but no, it referred to the Sons Of Allah doing their thing. (And they say Muslims don't love animals.) All had a good time including it would seem the donkey itself whose name has not been published to protect its identity.

The only problem was that, like all sluts she was carrying a disease. In this case the deadly rabies. The lovers are now being treated in hospital while local police are, according to the Express "appealing to anyone else who 'approached' or 'admired' the donkey in order to stop the spread of disease".

I hope these fine young men make a full recovery and join us here in Europe as soon as possible. And in the interim hone their driving skills.

Monday, 14 August 2017

Don't feed the bears

If you've ever gone to a wildlife park or nature reserve you're sure to have seen signs instructing you to not feed the wild animals. And there's a good reason for this. Feeding them makes us feel good but longer term the practice has negative ramifications for the animals. Over time they become dependent on humans and neglect survival instincts honed over thousands of years. For instance bears over time will shorten their hibernation period while their hunting and foraging skills deteriorate. With more r-selected species human feeding promotes spectacular population growth.

All of which is ok until something goes wrong and humans can no longer improve nature. This could - and does - happen in the case of bears when the parks are cut off by heavy snow or other adverse natural conditions. In such circumstances large numbers of them starve or freeze to death. In the case of over-population natural calamities such as drought will result in a large die-off of the affected species.

I thought of this when reading an article by some Irish philanthropist who focuses on Ethiopia. ("I have two adopted Ethiopian daughters" he reminds us frequently). Apparently that country is yet again headed for famine.  Insert boilerplate cut-and-paste doom porn here 'worst crisis in living memory, millions will die.....unless you send money NOW'. You know the drill. This guy should have heeded what Charles Darwin wrote many years ago. “One day something brought to my recollection Malthus’s “Principles of Population”. I thought of  his clear exposition of “the positive checks to increase”–disease, accidents, war, and famine–which keep down the population of savage races to so much lower an average than that of civilised peoples."

You see, since the time of the 1985 Ethiopian Crisis (which Bob Geldof exploited to relaunch his failing career) that country's population has tripled! Yes, tripled, from 32 million in 1975 to 101.4 million today. Any chance that this has something to do with the famine? Learning: Don't feed the bears.

And here's another learning: "Liberal" virtue-signallers are the worst hypocrites on the planet. Deep down they know that encouraging Ethiopians to breed at unsustainable levels inevitably leads to vastly greater suffering than had nature been allowed to take its course. But virtue-signalling to their peers trumps all. And now of course the reviled Whitey is being called on to once again rescue the situation. For all the thanks we'll get.

Friday, 11 August 2017

Welcome James to the land of the Red Pill

A few observations on the case of James Damore, the guy fired by ('do no evil') Google for circulating a document full of Hate Facts. And the first observation is that a factually-based, logically-argued proposition will not save you. Because the shrieking libtard/feminazi alliance are not interested in either facts or logic and in all probability won't even have read the material. And, as I noted in the previous post, claiming to be a GoodWhite who loves diversity, multiculturalism, feminism, blacks, gays, Jews and every other victim group will not alone fail to protect you but for some unexplained reason will further inflame the baying mob. Same with apologies and recantations. They won't save you.

All of this must have come as news to poor James, the nerdish GoodWhite. But even in the short time since his firing you can see the change that's coming over him. In his interview with Stefan Molyneux he's baffled by his predicament as the truth almost painfully dawns on him. But since then he's clearly taken the red pill and, as his new tee-shirt illustrates, his former loyalty to Google has disappeared.

And on that point each of us can do our bit by removing this evil company from our lives as far as we can. Possibilities include using Mozilla Firefox, Bing, Yahoo or a meta search-engine (which uses/leverages other search sites including Google and Yahoo) like Searx. When your mobile is due an upgrade choose Apple or Galaxy. I'm actively looking at alternative platforms for this blog, but one that won't mean losing what's on Blogger. (It's for the children, you understand).

Bear in mind that Google is going into overdrive on the anti-White project since that Indian coolie was made CEO. They've gone well beyond relegating sites like this to the bottom of the search queue. For example their new AI 'hate' checker rates "All conservative American Christian males should be put in labor camps" as 10 percent toxic while "All conservative Israeli male Jews should be put in labor camps" is rated as 83 percent toxic. Or, and this is brilliant, Google "happy American family", go to images, scroll down. And realise the extent to which they're fucking with our minds.

Finally a word on that Indian CEO and the army of HB1 visa holders (90% men, by the way) he's using to replace the White American workforce. India, where half the population is starving, turds everywhere you step. Where rivers are filled with shit, human corpses, dead animals..... and bathing humans. Where advanced degrees can be purchased for a few dollars and every single person is out to defraud you. Despite the glossy propaganda it's a corrupt and impoverished failure. You have to wonder how companies like Google will end up as they use such people and AA diversity drones to replace the productive White engineers who built the company.

Monday, 7 August 2017

Grovelling and recantations, all to no avail.

"I am not rescuing anything as it is over for me professionally as far as I can see - I am very, very sorry that I should have offended them. I do offer an apology for no other reason than out of genuine contrition for the hurt I have caused them...I am the author of my own misfortunes, I am the master of my soul and I must answer for what I've done. I must do nothing that will bring ruin or unhappiness to other people."

Kevin Myers, 'disgraced' Irish journalist (His crime? Pointing out that two Jewish women were Jews.)

“I Kamenev, together with Zinoviev and Trotsky, organised and guided this conspiracy. My motives? I had become convinced that the party’s – Stalin’s policy – was successful and victorious. We, the opposition, had banked on a split in the party, but this hope proved groundless. We could no longer count on any serious domestic difficulties to allow us to overthrow Stalin’s leadership. We were actuated by boundless hatred and by lust of power.”

Lev Kamenev, 'disgraced' former USSR Politburo member. (His crime? He offended Stalin)

Is there not an eerie resonance here? And also with their post-recantation treatment with both suffering immediate execution. Literally in Kamenev's case, metaphorically in the case of Myers. It's worth noting that, contrary to popular perception, the Russo-European Communist bloc did not (apart from the period of Stalin's purges) exercise power by way of mass executions. Instead citizens were cowed and controlled by round-the-clock surveillance which tracked every heretical word and thought. Offenders - apart from the more serious ones - were punished by way of losing their jobs and/or humiliated in the media.

Little wonder then that the term Political Correctness originated in that environment. And, in mutated form, still lives on today.

Friday, 4 August 2017

Legal justice in today's Britain

For centuries British legal principles have been an inspiration to legislators throughout the world. But along with everything else in that betrayed country they too have been sacrificed to the gods of diversity. Just read the following legal monstrosity as embodied in the College Of Policing's Hate Crime Operational Guidance.
"For recording purposes, the perception of the victim, or any other person .... is the defining factor in determining whether an incident is a hate incident, or in recognising the hostility element of a hate crime. The victim does not have to justify or provide evidence of their belief, and police officers or staff should not directly challenge this perception. Evidence of the hostility is not required for an incident or crime to be recorded as a hate crime or hate incident." [My emphasis]

Could a more outrageous or egregious example of legislative (mis)guidance be imagined? Illegality is determined by the perception of the 'victim' rather than on the legal text and the associated case law. Under such a system a 'victim' could deem any innocuous comment or even a compliment from a White man as 'hateful'.  "I like your outfit" could be deemed as hateful by a 'victim' because....well, just because. And the 'victim' doesn't have  to provide any supporting evidence! How cool is that? 

A ten year-old child wouldn't come up with such nonsense yet in fact it emanated from one of Britain's most decorated judgesAnd it was not nonsensical really. It was another string to the bow of White civilisational destruction wrought by traitors in our midst. It's been successful. As the following illustrates.

Wednesday, 2 August 2017

Comedy gold coming our way

They say that comedy is dead and it might well be. I'm in no position to judge as I no longer watch TV or movies. No surprise if it is because SJWs recoil from it like vampires before a crucifix.  Humour and political correctness are mortal enemies. But hope is at hand and from the unlikely source of Jeff Bezos' Amazon History Channel. (Incidentally if we're ever invaded by aliens I propose sending Jeff to meet them as they'd think he's one of them).

Reparations traces the history of a three State republic gifted to liberated slaves at the end of the American Civil War. As 'reparations' for slavery.  Constantly attacked by an aggressive White America, the black republic (Colonia - why not just Colon?) nonetheless fights back and with the application of typical black characteristics - technical ingenuity, Teutonic work ethic, integrity and a talent for strategic institution-building - Colonia overcomes all odds and after 150 years become an economic and scientific powerhouse as White America 'struggles to stay afloat'.

Pure Comedy Gold. Tears will roll down our faces, we'll slap our thighs, our sides will ache as we're convulsed with mirth. Thanks Jeff, we need a laugh.  Although it's serious as well. Director Will Packer says the project  involves “bringing on the appropriate historians to make sure we are telling the story in an accurate and responsible way,” Wow!  

Actually Mr. Director I can be of help here. Because you already have the perfect template for the series. A country which was established by and for liberated American slaves after the Civil War, a country that in terms of natural resources was much wealthier than the Mississippi Delta, that got a head start with a major cash infusion from White America. Mr. Packer, I have just saved you a lot of time, money and effort. It's all here for you.

Sunday, 30 July 2017

Ireland of the cucks

As far as I can judge there have been ten fatal accidents in Ireland in the last two weeks. These include six road fatalities, three drownings and one involving a farm tractor. Each of these - with one exception - got just passing reference in the national media. 'Man killed in two-car collision has been named as.....'. That kind of thing.  The exception relates to the drowning of young "Irish" boy Damola Adetosoye in the river Shannon, an event which attracted fevered coverage on national media, coast-to-coast TV and more. Locals were trotted out to deliver encomiums ('A Champion In Heaven': Tributes paid to teenage boy who drowned in River Shannon), the details of the accident were played out at length and the performance was repeated nation-wide when he was planted a few days later.

Clearly this was a nucular fizzizist or brain surjun in the making. Or maybe not. Because despite a plethora of signs warning of dangerous waters he nonetheless jumped in and sank like a stone. Yet Longford County Council were widely blamed. According to one local dog-collar 'the accident could and should have been avoided'. He was right. It would have been avoided had the knuckle-head taken notice of the multiple warning signs.  

How cucked can a country get? What has rotten our souls to the point that we mourn the loss of a Nigerian ahead of our own people? 

And today we learn that veteran gadfly journalist Kevin Myers has been fired from the Irish edition of the London Times (the Oirish Toimes) for an outlandish anti-Semitic attack on two BBC "journalists".  

Sunday Times Ireland columnist Kevin Myers will not write again for the paper, a spokesman said. The newspaper said it abhorred anti-Semitism after Mr Myers noted that two of the best-paid female presenters at the BBC, Claudia Winkleman and Vanessa Feltz, were Jewish in an article on the corporation's gender pay gap. Myers wrote: "Good for them. Jews are not generally noted for their insistence on selling their talent for the lowest possible price, which is the most useful measure there is of inveterate, lost-with-all-hands stupidity."

Sunday Times editor Martin Ivens has apologised personally to the two women for these "unacceptable comments both to Jewish people and to women in the workplace". A spokesperson said: "We can confirm that Kevin Myers will not write again for The Sunday Times Ireland. "A printed apology will appear in next week's paper."

Yup, that's correct. He got fired for noting that the Jewish women were Jews. But the reaction isn't as crazy as it sounds. An old Russian proverb says something to the effect that you can deliver any insult to a Jew. Apart from calling him a Jew.

The Fighting Irish? Gone with the wind. A relic of our past.  If you doubt me read the comments at the link above.