The Alt-Right comes of age

For as long as I can remember we on the Alt-Right have been dismissed as keyboard warriors, wasting our time as we did our thing from the safety of our mothers' basements. Note that this dismissal came not just from the usual suspects but also from the more red-blooded of our own kind. Obviously I've never subscribed to this perception and have been validated by the gradual widening of the Overton Window, exemplified mainly by reader comments in mainstream outlets and the exploding of Donald Trump onto the political scene.

And now we have that vile murdering lesbian Hillary Rodent Clinton (may the Lord grant that reports of her ill health are true) devoting a full 30 minutes speech to attacking the Alt-Right. I can just imagine the dilemma facing the bitch and her enablers, the political, media and financial establishments, all non-Whites (capital 'W' - meaning Jews are in this cohort) and mega-wealthy nation-wreckers like Gates and Soros. On the one hand they knew that any mention (no matter how negative) by the Hildebeast of the Alt-Right would provide it with a massive publicity boost. But they also had come to believe that it - we - had become too influential to ignore. How I'd love to have been a fly on the wall as the reptiles fretted over this dilemma.

The fact that they chose the attack option underlines how far we've come. Our greatest weapon, nothing else even comes close, lies in opening the minds of a critical mass of White people to the existential attack our civilisation is undergoing. How it's taking place, the identity of those waging the attack, why they're waging it, and what defeat would ultimately mean for Whites. Remember the words of Sam Adams "It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”.

The pivotal issue is whether these developments are too late. Demography is destiny with the USA and several European countries now close to the tipping point. Then again as Lenin observed - and he should know - “There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.”

What's the problem with Caster Semenya?

Why all the fuss about Caster Semenya and her stunning success at the Olympics? Some disgruntled opponents say she's more male than female. I don't know. Sometime (as in the top photo) she appears svelte and feminine. A latter-day Audrey Hepburn in fact. Other times, like in the lower photo, not so much.  

Read what this guy in the London Independent has to say about her.  "For anyone outside of the hetero-hegemonic norm that sport likes to stay firmly entrenched within, the Olympics have been a tough place". In English this means that there have always been separate Olympic contests for men and women, none for the in-betweens. 

What the writer doesn't make clear is why hybrids such as Caster should compete in women's events and not men's. He probably believes that they'd lose if they chose the latter. But would they? After all, we now know that men and women are equal in all respects.  Everybody knows that and that disparities in outcomes are due entirely to our patriarchal society and the tyranny of low expectations.

So logically there should be just gender-neutral Olympics. What's not to love? Women competing on an equal footing at last. And not just the Olympics. I'd love to see Rory Best packing down for the upcoming match against the All Blacks flanked by props named Alice and Wendy. And what about Katy Taylor going 12 rounds with Tyson Fury? Fairness for women athletes at last. Competing on an even footing. It's only fair, isn't it?

The Freude of Schadenfreude

They say schadenfreude is an ignoble emotion. After all in the original German it means 'harmful joy'. But I must admit to relishing the feeling when the victim deserves it. Thus, on reading of Ireland's Olympic Committee President Pat Hickey ('the most hated man in Irish sport') being arrested and banged up in one of Brazil's toughest prisons a warm glow of inner peace and contentment settled over me while I savoured every lip-smacking detail of his arrest (naked and on-camera) and subsequent imprisonment.

Why? Because Hickey is the exemplar par excellence of the 'blazer'. That loathed parasitic carbuncle on the backside of every sport. Invariably having been useless at the sport themselves the blazers contrive, through a combination of rat-like cunning, shameless careerism, sycophancy and a total absence of any semblance of decency, to ascent to the highest organising levels of the sport they feed off. Preening, arrogant and unaccountable, these leeches seemingly go on for ever while the sportsmen, the source of their privilege, disappear into obscurity once their brief moment in the sun ends.

So let us rejoice then, and breathe a silent prayer of gratitude as we savour the thought of Hickey getting his arsehole enlarged by the seven sex-starved vibrants with whom he currently shares a cell in Rio. Give it all you got guys, you're doing the Lord's work.

Coda: Have you noticed how the Olympic Battle Of The Pharmacists Games have been exploited to promote the anti-White agenda? Michael Phelps, the greatest swimmer of all time, completes another board-sweeping masterclass but all the attention focuses on some black woman who managed to swim the length of the pool without drowning. 

Meanwhile Ryan Lochte and his buddies (all typical White college boy types) get dragged through the media with finger-wagging relish for little more than a youthful prank. And British media celebrate as the "British" Mohammed Farah (pictured) - born and reared in Somalia - wins gold. Congratulations Britain. You've managed somehow to break the mysterious stranglehold that East Africans have held on long-distance running for decades. Well done. Hope nobody discovers your secret.

Could Jews catch the flak if Trump loses?

Over at the Occidental Observer Prof. Kevin MacDonald has written a series of interesting article on the reasons for the extraordinary level of Jewish  antipathy to Donald Trump. Like any sane person Kevin dismisses ostensible Jewish concerns about Trump's character, in particular his alleged sexual and financial improprieties (kettles and pots spring instantly to mind) and exposes the real reason: His blowing open the Overton Window to the point where White ethnic concerns, especially those on immigration, have become mainline topics. For instance he cites (((Jonathan Greenblatt))) of the Anti-Defamation League whining that [Trump] has "allowed some of the worst ideas into the public conversation in ways we haven’t seen anything like in recent memory.” And that's what it's mainly about.

The whole series of articles is well worth a read, but here I want to focus on an issue raised in the fifth (and final?) one: Will Whites blame Jews should Trump lose in November?  I believe this to be a strong and fully deserved possibility.  The White resentment, often expressed by way of the much-deplored 'dog whistles', is palpable. (Explanatory note: A 'dog whistle' is simply an oblique expression of White interests. Obliqueness is required  to forestall subsequent loss of employment or even - as in Europe - a jail term. Jews are notoriously thin-skinned regarding anti-Semitic dog whistles such as 'Hollywood degenerates', 'corporate media' and 'international financiers'.)

The frantic whack-a-mole efforts of online moderators seem unable to keep pace with this growing torrent of White ethnic awakening. In my own case, using a variety of online personas I have acted as agent provocateur on many 'respectable' (i.e. cosy consensus parrots) publications and watched with amusement as my comment first gets overwhelmingly supported before eventually the whole thread gets consigned to the ether by despairing censors. I can assure you that the number of such comments has been dramatically increasing over recent years, going into overdrive since the onset of the Trumpening.

So what happens if Trump loses to the Hildebeast? Well his supporters have already witnessed the unprecedented efforts used by the Republican establishment and their cronies in the media to overturn the legitimate selection of the primary voters. They, with considerable justification, harbour deep suspicions regarding the Presidential election process. Whenever they turn on their screens or open a newspaper they witness the unprecedented degree of bile and vitriol flung at their choice. They know who (((the controllers))) of those outlets are. There's also a growing awareness that Whites are at the Last Chance Saloon when it comes to forestalling their own demographic displacement.

Time will tell. Hopefully a Trump victory will render the question moot.

Seeking war with Russia

Have you given much thought to the non-stop tide of aggression by 'the West' against Russia in general and in particular Vladimir Putin? If not then you should be, because there is a real danger of WW III breaking out. History, especially that in the 20th century, is replete with examples of countries and alliances stumbling into catastrophic conflict, or assuming that a war of choice lasting many years would have been over within a few weeks. Here's Putin himself directly sounding the alarm. My friend Oleg, who's very well clued in there, tells me that he himself has never been more worried about an outbreak of global hostilities.

Here's a brief recap on recent Western aggression against Russia. First there was NATO expansion into the former Warsaw Pact countries, started almost before the ink was dry in the agreement between Gorbachev and Bush.  This was followed by the spectacular looting of Russia's resources by Western 'advisors' during the Yeltsin era, and since then there's been a non-stop barrage of invective, lies, threats, insults and provocations of every kind. And of course there was the ZioCon coup in Ukraine, which brought Russia's traditional enemies right into the heartland.

Factors I see contributing to these developments: 

NATO careerists and the MIC desperately seeking new enemies, or reviving old ones.

Russia's key role in the international trend towards breaking the petro dollar hegemony, non-dollar trade pacts and selling Russian and Iranian oil to Europe for Euros.

A distraction is needed for the impending collapse of the bankers' financial ponzi scheme

Putin is leading the 'traditional values' fightback against the (((Western))) nation-wrecking tide of degeneracy. (Check this article from Foreign Policy, aka ZioCon Central.)

Post-war anarchy would lead to public support for a NWO (Hegelian dialectic).

Finally and least likely, the green and global warming fanatics who long for a major depopulation event.

(Of course there are major links and overlaps between the interests cited above)

But.......if you read this earlier post of mine on Putin you might agree with me that the explanation is far from clear. But the danger is real.

The proof of the pudding....

When Henry Ford 1st published his famous/notorious exposure of the Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion in the Dearborn Independent he adopted a distinctive approach. Declining to offer an opinion as to their authenticity he instead simply reprinted the protocols and invited his readers to assess the extent to which subsequent world events actually conformed to them. (The money men eventually got to Henry through his company, forcing him to don sackcloth and ashes and recant in the finest traditions of Galileo).

The prescriptive power of the Protocols was extraordinary even at that time, and subsequent events (especially regarding central banks' powers) continue to validate their authenticity. But A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties (aka the Yinon Plan) almost blows your mind in the way its recommendations have become reality since its publication in 1982. (In Hebrew for a World Zionist Organization magazine.) In essence the plan suggests fomenting endless war (intra-national and international) among Israel's 'neighbours' with a view to rendering them devastated, divided, impoverished and powerless, and thus easy prey for Israeli expansionism. Incidentally the document provides a chilling insight into the mind of a textbook psychopath, one utterly devoid of morality and empathy, casually proposing the death and impoverishment of millions of innocent civilians.

Here are are a few illustrative excerpts (full text here).

"The Western front, which on the surface appears more problematic, is in fact less complicated than the Eastern front, in which most of the events that make the headlines have been taking place recently. Lebanon's total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel's primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi'ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.

Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible."

Now compare this to what Gen. Wesley Clarke revealed about the lead-up to the Iraq War. Six weeks later, I saw the same officer, and asked: “Are we still going to attack Iraq?”   He said: “Sir, it’s worse than that. He said – he pulled up a piece of paper off his desk – he said: “I just got this memo from the Secretary of Defense’s office. It says we’re going to attack and destroy the governments in 7 countries in five years – we’re going to start with Iraq, and then we’re going to move to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.”

This document, and the events which have followed its publication, should lay to rest once and for all any illusions we might have harboured in relation to the various wars in the Middle East. Clearly the Zionist-Occupied Governments (ZOGs) of the West are using their countries' blood and treasure in pursuit of Israeli expansionism. The depths of the associated treason and treachery are simply breathtaking and will continue in overdrive should Hillary Rodent Clinton be elected President. 

There are none so blind as.....

Wow, that hurt! I'm talking about last night when my jaw dropped so fast it hit hit the table with a thump. You see Lady Savant was watching the indoctrination news on CNN or CNBC when two black "intellectuals" (if you're black, haven't killed anyone and wear a suit you're an intellectual) were discussing the alluring prospect of African-Americans returning to their Mudda Continent.

I assumed that they'd be quaking in terror at the prospect of living without YT's free shit. But no - they actually wondered how YT would get on without them! I swear! "We built this country, why should we hand it over?" Yes, they actually said that.  "The myth that Whites want us to go to Africa is just that. A myth". Yes, they said that as well.  And they referred a few times to the one trillion dollar spending power of the black 'community' in America. Watch YT survive without that, they chortled. This figure seemed crazy at first but then if you factor in welfare payments, loot from employer discrimination shakedowns (most of which ends up with Rev'unds Jesse and Al's drug dealers), 'reparations' for slavery and income from makeup AA jobs in Gub'mint they might actually be in the right ballpark. And apparently with black cultural icons such as P Diddy and Snoop Dog back in the Dark Continent White Americans would have 'no culture' left.

They failed to mention that:

The prison population would go down by 37%

Average IQ would go up 7 points

SAT scores would go up by about 100 points

Cases of sexually transmitted diseases would be reduced by more than half

The amount of people in poverty would go down by over 30% and as a result welfare costs would plummet

More than that, millions of police, prison guards, judges and lawyers would be redirected to productive employment, the inefficiencies of affirmative action would be massively reduced, blowing trillions of dollars on the futile attempt to 'bridge the achievement gap' would end while Whites would at last be allowed to settle in Whitopias without fear of Section 8 vibrancy driving them out.

America would lead the world again.

It staggers me that African Americans, especially their 'intellectuals', can be so divorced from reality. I can only assume that they buy into the fantasy world of black wonderfulness presented to them by the media, that they actually think they got and hold their AA jobs on merit, that their manifold failures are genuinely due to racism. Can they really be so deluded?  Have they not learned of the original Return To Africa experiment?  Probably not.

All of which means that when the Fed's funny money Ponzi hits the rocks (it will)  and America's blacks have to fund their own lifestyles the blow-back will be epic.

"Moderate" Muslims: Caution required

Long time members of this blog will know that I've spent many years working in Muslim countries, from Egypt to Pakistan and all stops in between. You will also be aware that I'm not a fan of the Religion Of Peace. Having said that my experience is by no means all negative. I have many pleasant memories of friends and acquaintances from those countries, with Oman holding a special place in my affections.

Now all of us have heard the following, or a variance of it. "We must distinguish between the terrorists and ordinary Muslims. I know plenty of Muslims who take a beer, don't go to a mosque, enjoy discos, are great fun....just like any of us".  All well and good. Apart from the last bit. Because apart from some rare exceptions they are not 'like any of us'. This truth can be established through the simple expedient of making a joke about the "Prophet" or Islam generally. Do that (not advised) and watch the transformation in your fun-loving hedonist. The realisation will dawn that in fact he is different, very different, and not in a reassuring way.

My experience has lead me to believe that an Islamic upbringing actually changes the chemistry of the brain, fossilises the neural pathways so that the brain is literally incapable of processing certain offending thoughts or concepts. I have had highly intelligent Muslims (technology PhD level from good Western universities) argue that the "Prophet" actually did head off into the skies on his horse and subsequently engage in a series tense (and successful!) negotiations with Allah Himself.  Attempting to dissect the inherent nonsense of such a position is not advised as it will quickly - very quickly - lead to a state of open and probably permanent animosity.

Also bear in mind that as a community Muslim behaviour is predicated directly on their proportion of the population. When it's tiny, as it is in Ireland right now, Muslims will generally be enthusiastic supporters of  freedom and tolerance of every kind, especially that of the religious variety. But they become progressively more demanding as they proportionally increases, to the point where they begin to run parallel societies (France, Sweden) and ultimately force their own rules and mores on the host population. "When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam."

Indeed. Nothing but a major prohibition on further Muslim immigration to the West will be sufficient. Those countries in the 10%+ range are doomed short of mass deportations.

All of which justifiably points the spotlight at those nation-wreckers who have foisted this recklessly dangerous social engineering project on the people of the West. In a just world they'd face the most severe form of retribution.