Sunday, 10 April 2016

On a point of order....

There's an interesting five-part review by Andrew Joyce of David Cesarani's Final Solution: The Fate of the Jews 1933-49  currently being published on the Occidental Observer.  Yes, believe it or not, a book on the Holocau$t at long last. 

While strongly recommending his article I must take issue with the following:

"I am not a “Holocaust denier” in the traditional understanding of the term. To wit, I am not preoccupied with quantities of coke, the mechanics of cremation, or the residual properties of prussic acid. I belong to a younger generation of European-descended people who weren’t born before, during, or immediately after World War Two. Like many members of the movement from my generation, while I can clearly see the disastrous effects of “Holocaust education” on young people (and the whole of Germany in particular), I never felt the same urgency to dispel propaganda, specific narratives, or accusations that older movement members seemed desperate to over-turn.

My generation grew up with news of large-scale ethnic conflicts in Rwanda and Cambodia..... Efforts to inform my generation that mass killings had taken place in this or that corner of an East European forest (and four decades before their birth) lacked the power to shock or injure than it might otherwise have done.  We interacted with [the Holocaust], but we found it lacking."

Judging by that I assume Andrew is Generation Y. And while I'm more like generation A or B my experience of younger folk tells me that actually they have fully bought into the wheeze. In fact I know several who've made the Auschwitz Pilgrimage where they gladly underwent the prescribed programming, returning infused with an even deeper sense of White Guilt. Be that as it may, my main concern relates to his dismissing the significance of the Holocau$t and the importance of exposing the fraud for what it is.

I say this because the Holocau$t has in many ways become the embodiment of the 20th Century. It has been wielded with uncanny skill to silence (and incarcerate) critics of Jews or Israel, to extract billions from unfortunate guilt-ridden German taxpayers, and to transform the status of an aggressive and acquisitive people into that of  Ultimate Victim.**

As with the 9/11 attacks, should the general public become aware of the breathtaking scale of the fraud, and the tsunami of lies and obfuscation with which it has been maintained, the consequences would fundamentally transform political and economic life in the West.  And without such exposure things will pretty much go on as they are until we Whites become marginalised and dispossessed in the countries our ancestors built.


** A subsequent comment to this post by B7Scorpio powerfully expands on  this thesis.

"The official version of WWII with the Holocaust as it's centrepiece has become the founding myth of the contemporary West.

What is a founding myth and what does it do? It is a universally known story featuring fundamental archetypes that (1) explains the origin and structure of the world, (2) defines ultimate Good and Evil (from which are then derived the values used to justify the possession of power) and (3) defines what is held sacred in that society. 

The WWII myth fulfils all three functions.

1) We live in the 'post-war world'. The institutions (the UN, the IMF, the World Bank, the World Trade Organisation etc.) all have their ultimate origins coming out of WWII. The borders of key European states were settled after the war. Even the assumption that liberal democracy is the default model for all states follows WWII. (The Cold War froze things for a while but WWII is the key origin point). To repeat: we live in the 'post-war world'.

2) Ultimate Evil is Nazis. Good is simply that which opposes Nazis. The values of our society (anti-racism, tolerance, diversity etc.) follow from these definitions. 

3) The only thing that is held sacred in the contemporary West is the Holocaust.

Seeing WWII and the Holocaust as a founding myth (and a myth that almost all White people believe in!) explains why it has so much power over our people. It also explains why White identity has been so neutered. A society's founding myth sets both the boundaries of allowable political thought as well as the determining centre around which all thought is orientated. White identity politics is powerless as long as the myth holds because the myth says White identity = Nazis = evil so any attempt at White advocacy is disprivileged before it even begins. As long as the Holocaust remains 'holy' the anti-White power holds the ultimate meta-political trump card.

"The Holocaust myth really is a poison wellspring that is psychologically and consequently physically killing our people. The problem is that all three functions of the myth are negative for White people instead of positive. Everything is backwards.

Instead of the origin of the world being something creative and bountiful it is an event of horrific death and destruction.

Instead of ultimate Good being at the centre of the myth, ultimate Evil (Nazis) is placed at the centre. Ultimate Good (Americans dying on Omaha beach for example) is merely reactive. The 'evil' of white racialism, with Adolf Hitler as the devil, occupies the centre-point of the story.

And instead of that which society holds sacred being something beautiful and sublime it is something shameful and obscene (the Holocaust).

The myth really is an anti-myth for White people which means it is spiritual poison.

Unless we break the spell this myth has over our people it's hard to see how we will recover. At the moment our enemies determine the mental frame in which our people think. 

Deprogramming White people out of the kosher WWII myth is vital. Does that mean we have to defend Hitler's National Socialist Germany? Do we need to somehow turn the myth inside out? Transmutate the myth from negative to positive with the Third Reich as heroes and the anti-German powers as forces serving evil? I don't know. But I'm pretty sure being 'red-pilled' about the Holocaust and WWII is transformational. Because once their psychological weapon of calling you 'Nazi' no longer works what else have they got?"



PS: Uncle Nasty...a compatriot of your wants to contact you. If interested would you email me at irishsavant@yahoo.com

121 comments:

Nero said...

Maybe some retired grandee politicians can be roped into our cause.

That's how the zionists got Balfour. Infiltrate ideas from someone high in the cabals of power. Someone everyone knows, who is no longer a threat, to allow the concepts to percolate, ever so slowly, into the hindminds of the newly powerful.

Eamon Bejayzuz said...

Yes; there may be something here in the way of as-symmetry of blame and guilt. I have noticed that mention of Auschwitz will often evoke a powerful reaction of furious condemnation, yet across town so to speak when Stalin bumped off an estimated 7,000,000 by the slow and agonising method of starvation, one finds it impossible upon presenting the details of the ghastly matter in any discourse to get much more than an indifferent shrug from one's listeners. One can somehow get the impression that by emphasis upon the Holocaust, it's affirmation indeed, all other holocausts are de facto denied. Hmmm.

Dan said...

Yup, these nihilists BELEIVE one thing. The super aggressive people that dominate the banks, media, industry, politics...went like sheep to the ovens. Those people who could destroy you professionally in a day subjected themselves to extermination with no more than a wimper.

Anonymous said...

This is where the author falls down:

"I belong to a younger generation of European-descended people who weren’t born before, during, or immediately after World War Two."

Two which all of the rest of us should say:

"I belong to a younger generation of European-descended people who weren't born before, during, or immediately after the Hard Bondage in Egypt under the Pharoah of Oppression"

Because these are equivalent lies and they were both created to make victim claims on the whole world. Either reject them all, or live on your knees. QED.

---MISTER

David said...

Yes but the new counter-culture right is where all the sharpest kids are now hanging out: have a look at these short youtube videos and bear in mind it isn't necessary the long draw out films like Schlinders list that convinced people immediately to discard traditional norms, it was a constant drip of lies over decades that convinced us blacks are clever and ideal marriage partners - an idea so preposterous if one looks at any Black run society or the abandonment and assault issues when co-habituating. A three minute advertisement perhaps having more power than a long drawn out documentary.

Hitler and the Second World War:

https://youtu.be/pDLyKSYRqXM

https://youtu.be/8ymEKiY1UR8

Cartoon: The Last Son of the West: https://youtu.be/7lwypeJzAkE

Bernie Saunders Prep the Bull: https://youtu.be/jPh-1bsye-0

All of these commendable videos are produced with intelligence and verve and go against the official narrative, contrast this with the RTE 1916 commemoration propaganda that anonymous posted here last week and ask yourselves which is on the winning side
https://youtu.be/YoOSGweEzNs

Anonymous said...

The Victim Hierarchy is an important paradigm of the political correctoids and gatekeeper Jews working the strategies of the Culture Wars. The Ultimate Victim winner of the sufferring sweepstakes will sit at the apex of this hierarchy.

The Jews as an ethnopolitical global syndicate had an outsized role in the genocides of the twentieth century in terms of numbers, cruelties, atrocities and Judaic racial supremacism.

The Jewish Cabals machinated WW II through their Gentile Masonry on all sides of WW II. I think they did kill off non-Zionist fellow Jews at the hands of their Nazi project they bankrolled in Germany. People can acknowledge the evidence for that and argue against the Jewish Victim Hierarchy discourse.

William Gates III said...

BotTAY smarter than history professors!

Micro-Soft's (Olde spelling) venture into AI smarter than History professors!

Anonymous said...

How does this help with the impending civil war against isam

Anonymous said...

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/08/video-pro-migrant-activists-throw-sea-front-deportation-boat/

So blacks in America are attacking or harrasing whites with dreadlocks whites with dreadlocks are jumping in front of boats returning migrants. So effing right on

Searcher said...

That RTE production; the Black Celts BS; the Airtricity ad that Granville Thorndyke pasted; the news sheet that Clogheen linked to recently showing "Irish" men.

It angers me. It's so false. I feel dreadful after seeing it.

I see it like this.

Your parents take in a wayward homeless teen. Your parents want to provide the best environment for the teen to thrive but their resources are limited. They set you up outside to live in a caravan and give the teen your bedroom. You feel resentful of the teen. You have been demoted for no wrongdoing on your part. Your parents reason with you and guilt you into feeling selfish for wanting to stay in your bedroom. The teen has never had his own room and needs a lot of support and help to make a real go of adult life. You have no choice but to move out. It's not too bad in the caravan but the longer the situation drags on the more alienated you feel.

You are resentful of the teen but your real hurt would be at your parents' dismissal of you from the inside of the family to the periphery. Your parents have always maintained that they value your input into family decisions and you get to choose whether your mother or your father is in charge of the family budget every year. They make a big song and dance trying to persuade you which one to select each year. Now that the teen is living with you, your parents reason that it is only fair to let him also have a say. Your mum and dad seem to focus a lot of their song and dance routine on the teen instead of you. You get increasingly disenchanted.

The teen is encouraged to treat the family home as his own and is introduced to all the family friends. He is told that he is one of the family and your parents even start pretending that the teen is in fact related to the family. They claim that he has the same grandparents as you. You can't believe it. You think your parents are bonkers. Why are they falsifying family history?

The caravan, you can deal with. You can always upgrade to a better dwelling yourself later in life. The preferential treatment you can sort of understand because the teen has had no real opportunities prior to arriving in your house. But to rewrite the family history to include this teen, thereby nullifying your special bond, hurts the most.

Cognitive Dissonance said...

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Real truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

Searcher said...

You can only really deal with that hurt if you are strong enough. Otherwise you can take the easier yet less productive option: set yourself up in competition with the teen (you grow to dislike him and see all his shortcomings - he's uglier than you; he's stupid; he speaks in an arrogant manner as if he is now lord of the manner; he preens about in the best of threads your parents buy for him). You sometimes hear your parents refer to you as being inferior to the teen and you are furious. You also see that your parents have encouraged his gormless entitlement themselves. They have not disciplined him or impressed upon him the need to know his place and act in a courteous manner.

But you also realize that they are actually demonstrating that they don't feel he is one of the family. If he really was one of the family, they wouldn't put up with his shitty attitude. You don't really mind if he acts the maggot when he gets the bus into the city. He doesn't really reflect upon your family. People who know the family, know that he is not really one of you even though he was granted the family surname in some official ceremony. Your parents didn't even bother asking for your input and didn't invite you to the farce of a ceremony.

You realize your uncle and aunt, in the next town are at the same thing. Your poor cousin is in a similar predicament to you. You start communicating and spend a lot of time giving out about the teens, eventually realizing that when they arrived that first evening you were not that bothered by them and you felt quite sorry for them. You grew to hate them as the entire family became dysfunctional, yet you know deep down, the lion's share of the blame rests on your parents. You affirm to your cousin that this guest with your uncle and aunt is not one of the family and there is no way they are related to the grandparents. Your cousin has been dealing with this a lot longer than you and had been told he had to go to the caravan because he was a problem child. You laugh as you realize that the exact same things are happening in each other's families except that you have been given different reasoning behind it with your parents. You also find out that a lot of the other aunts and uncles are engaging in the same nonsense. You reckon it's time for the cousins to really start comparing notes to understand how this actually happened because on the face of it, it makes no sense. Your parents are deliberately making life more difficult for their own offspring than they are some annoying houseguest.

Your parents have recently decided that the family home is now a "safe space" for the teen and no-one can say anything that might upset him. The cousins become each other's the "safe space" for real talk, before you're ready to bring the real-talk into the designated "safe space" and destroy that fiction. In the meantime you keep each other's spirits up and you dig further into the past to see why all the extended family are behaving like this (even with the same crazy ideas like "safe spaces"). It's almost like they have been given a script.

David said...

@ Searcher ..thanks excellent analogy.

B7Scorpio said...

The official version of WWII with the Holocaust as it's centrepiece has become the founding myth of the contemporary West.

What is a founding myth and what does it do? It is a universally known story featuring fundamental archetypes that (1) explains the origin and structure of the world, (2) defines ultimate Good and Evil (from which are then derived the values used to justify the possession of power) and (3) defines what is held sacred in that society.

The WWII myth fulfils all three functions.

1) We live in the 'post-war world'. The institutions (the UN, the IMF, the World Bank, the World Trade Organisation etc.) all have their ultimate origins coming out of WWII. The borders of key European states were settled after the war. Even the assumption that liberal democracy is the default model for all states follows WWII. (The Cold War froze things for a while but WWII is the key origin point). To repeat: we live in the 'post-war world'.

2) Ultimate Evil is Nazis. Good is simply that which opposes Nazis. The values of our society (anti-racism, tolerance, diversity etc.) follow from these definitions.

3) The only thing that is held sacred in the contemporary West is the Holocaust.

Seeing WWII and the Holocaust as a founding myth (and a myth that almost all White people believe in!) explains why it has so much power over our people. It also explains why White identity has been so neutered. A society's founding myth sets both the boundaries of allowable political thought as well as the determining centre around which all thought is orientated. White identity politics is powerless as long as the myth holds because the myth says White identity = Nazis = evil so any attempt at White advocacy is disprivileged before it even begins. As long as the Holocaust remains 'holy' the anti-White power holds the ultimate meta-political trump card.

The Holocaust myth really is a poison wellspring that is psychologically and consequently physically killing our people. The problem is that all three functions of the myth are negative for White people instead of positive. Everything is backwards.

Instead of the origin of the world being something creative and bountiful it is an event of horrific death and destruction.

Instead of ultimate Good being at the centre of the myth, ultimate Evil (Nazis) is placed at the centre. Ultimate Good (Americans dying on Omaha beach for example) is merely reactive. The 'evil' of white racialism, with Adolf Hitler as the devil, occupies the centre-point of the story.

And instead of that which society holds sacred being something beautiful and sublime it is something shameful and obscene (the Holocaust).

The myth really is an anti-myth for White people which means it is spiritual poison.

Unless we break the spell this myth has over our people it's hard to see how we will recover. At the moment our enemies determine the mental frame in which our people think.

Deprogramming White people out of the kosher WWII myth is vital. Does that mean we have to defend Hitler's National Socialist Germany? Do we need to somehow turn the myth inside out? Transmutate the myth from negative to positive with the Third Reich as heroes and the anti-German powers as forces serving evil? I don't know. But I'm pretty sure being 'red-pilled' about the Holocaust and WWII is transformational. Because once their psychological weapon of calling you 'Nazi' no longer works what else have they got?


CanSpeccy said...

I have never researched the Holocaust, perhaps because I feared that merely by making an inquiry I might be accused of denial. But is it not the case that many Jews were sent to camps where many died for one reason or another, while others were shipped to the Eastern front where they were shot, and while yet more were killed by their compatriots, as in the case of the 30 odd thousand in Kiev murdered in a single day in Kiev (the Babi Yar Massacre), and many more by Nazi sympathizers in the Baltic states, etc.?

And if it is the case that, while not exactly six million Jews died directly or indirectly as a result of the malice of the Nazi regime, nevertheless many (i.e., million) did so die, is that in any way surprising or difficult to believe, when apparently the Nazis intended, under Generalplan-Ost to wipe out 85% of the Polish people and tens of million of other citizens of the occupied nations?

So if my reasoning is correct, it seems that the question about the Jewish Holocaust is not so much whether it occurred but whether (a) it was uniquely dreadful (as viewed by the World rather than the victims), and (b) there is any justification for greater consideration for Jews as a consequence of the Holocaust, than say the Ukrainians, Poles, Tatars, Estonians, etc., who died at the hands of the 20th Century's greatest killers, Mao, Stalin and Hitler, probably in that descending order of brutality.

Anonymous said...

I'd have to disagree with the premise of generation Y people being more gullible to the holocaust fraud.

Let's not forget the baby boomers that allowed the inception of both Jewish power and the absolute narrative of Jewish victimhood (an oxymoron).

I'd say my generation is far more open minded than the average 60 something that is still mired in the whole 1960's garbage mentality that created this bizaro world.

The baby boomer generation is quite possibly the dumbest and most destructive in history, and generations to come will wonder just what was wrong with them and why they allowed the invasion, not just allowed it, but actually encouraged it.

Searcher said...

O/T sorry Sav but timely

Trump - RamZPaul - Women

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExgCfyZTYow

Trump turns off a lot of female voters. But why? RamZPaul goes through a few points but I wanted to share a few thoughts I have had recently on this.

(a) He is hilarious but he is also pretty mean. It's not especially creative humor. It's on the spot takedowns with perfect delivery which is also the usual humor of a bully. It's only really funny when you are onboard with him already on the Trump Train or you don't like the person he is ribbing on. If you didn't like him to start with and only engaged with MSM coverage of him then you'd possibly just write him off as a crass and insulting.

(b) He is on his third marriage to a much younger trophy wife. This is coolio in the manosphere and I don't personally care, but I can recognize that it doesn't look good. No man is an island and Donald Trump is no exception. He is a part of society and there are checks and balances in that interplay. The unwritten rules are more important than the written rules. He can and did get legally divorced twice (written rules) yet he loses respect as a result (unwritten rules).

He loses respect of women in particular by divorcing the first two mothers of his children and marrying a much younger third wife at one year shy of his sixtieth birthday. This is a polygamous set-up which may theoretically work out well for all concerned but it is not the standard aimed for in Western society and it could be interpreted as a disposable/interchangeable attitude to women in general.

(c) It seems pretty obvious that Melania is the junior partner in the relationship to a greater extent than "most" marriages. She studied architecture, designed watches and is perfectly groomed and styled in public. It is no great leap of imagination to conclude that she has strong aesthetic sensitivities. A woman such as Melania, could probably create a really stunning domestic space with flair and imagination. Yet when you look at their apartment, it's embarrassingly gauche/vulgar/derivative/faux nobility. There is no way that this is Melania's style. This is traditionalist Donald, red tie, thumbs up, "The Greatest President of the United States EVER".

Searcher said...

(d) The attack ad. Meh. Modelling is known as a sleazy business. Whether it was released by Cruz's people or not is largely irrelevant imho. It was publicly available information as the photo had been published already in GQ Magazine so it was going to surface at some stage. Better get it out and dealt with earlier rather than later. Would women be jealous/disgusted or would they feel sympathy for her? Jealous? For sure. Disgust in the sense that their potential First Lady looks "available"? For sure. I thought the lads at CH had cracked that insultometer recently where sluttiness was the top insult to a woman (because it alienates her from other women and decreases her perceived value by men).

Any sympathy for her vanishes though when Donald tweeted some bad photo of Cruz's wife contrasted with a picture perfect, media ready photo of Melania. It was a bitchy move. This is the kind of shit women play on each other. An unflattering photo of a "friend" posted on FaceBook but only photoshopped, full face of make-up selfies of themselves. It comes across as weak/unmanly for a man to be engaging in such bitchy behavior. Millenials are very attuned to bullying behavior and they are also very conscious of their looks and aware of the tricks that people use with photography. They are probably going to see this as a grandad aged man behaving like a "mean girl".

Furthermore, Ted Cruz's wife looks like a nice above-average looking wife and mom. Belittling her by posting some unflattering photograph, he might as well just tell most American women that they are ugly and are put in the shade by his wife. They WISH they could be in GQ, but they are pedestrian, LOSERS! Somebody posted on CH recently about some man did a "social experiment' whereby he walked towards a group of girls and pointed to the hottest one and said 'you win" and gave her a small token of some sort. The other girls were visibly put out/jealous as he sauntered away. This is the kind of "social experiment" done by the likes of Sacha Baron-Cohen. It's the same mentality: "In my country, good price for you. This one not so much." If he wants to piss off "not so much"; continue with the "my wife is hotter than all you beeyotches" theme and wave bye bye to the female voters.

(e) Pro-Trump media articles seem to refer to Melania as a supermodel. Supermodel is a specific term and implies massive pull within the fashion industry. Janice Dickenson annoys women by claiming to be the first supermodel when she wasn't. Tyra Banks' "America's Next Top Model" show was a massive hit and spin off versions were made abroad. Women are into that kind of thing and they know that there are many run of the mill model careers and very, very few make it to supermodel status. To see someone being touted as having achieved a level of success that they have not, seems in keeping with the hyperbole of the "Best President of the United States EVER". Overrating someone publicly is a usual MSM tactic, creating a need for a takedown. If Trump PR refer to her as a supermodel, then it will irritate female voters.

Flanders said...

The excerpt below is from the third article from the top at this site. Several other good articles are encountered there. Another of the earlier articles has a quote, which I think is from a jewish writer and which is the correct attitude towards jews and jew falsehoods. That author states, "I find it unacceptable that a person will be considered a member of the Jewish people when he does great things, but not considered part of our people when he does amazingly despicable things."

"The crowning achievement of Ehrenburg's career came on December 22, 1944, when this hate-crazed fiend became the first person to mention the kabbalistic figure of Six Million alleged Jewish victims of National Socialism, and then proceeded to introduce that figure into Soviet propaganda. After the war he joined with co-racial and fellow propagandist Vasily (Iosif Solomonovich) Grossman to produce a fictitious "Black Book" and lay the foundation for what has come to be known as "The Holocaust."** The rest is history. Ehrenburg never forgot his Jewish roots, and before his death he arranged for the transfer of his private archives to the tribal cult center at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem. And so, it is altogether fitting that the birthday of this psychopathic lie-master should have been chosen as a day on which to remember the hoax which he concocted and of which he was the original inventor.
-------------
He was a prolific writer, celebrated author of various novels and other works of fiction. He was the top Soviet propagandist during the Second World War. He was a notorious liar and a pathological monster. He was a Jew. As a a leading member of the Soviet-sponsored Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee, Ilya Ehrenburg appeared at fund-raising rallies in the United States, raising support for the Communist cause while displaying fake bars of soap allegedly manufactured by the Germans from the corpses of dead Jews. But Ehrenburg was perhaps most notorious for his viciously anti-German hate propaganda in World War II. In it, he exhorted Soviet troops to kill all Germans they encountered without pity.*
In one leaflet entitled "Kill," Ehrenburg incited the simple Russian soldier to treat the Germans as subhuman. The final paragraph concludes: "The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word 'German' is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word 'German' strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day ... If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime ... If you have already killed a German, then kill another one - there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don't count the days, don't count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! ... - Kill the Germans! Kill!"
And in another leaflet: "The Germans must be killed. One must kill them ... Do you feel sick? Do you feel a nightmare in your breast? ... Kill a German! If you are a righteous an conscientious man - kill a German! ... Kill!"

This is typical of the steady diet of pathological hate fed to millions of Soviet troops by this Jew, safely ensconced far from the front. But it wasn't only the ordinary German soldier Ehrenburg was talking about, whom he accused of the very atrocities the Communists were themselves committing."

Scroll down to - Ilya Ehrenberg - The Man Who Invented The 'Six Million'
http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/2010/11/im-glad-that-gruesome-story-of-katyn.html


Flanders said...

The British capabilities during the war at deciphering and providing weight to messages intercepted from Germany are now well known. That fact was not so well known while the war was going on. During the war, statements made by people were often given significance while these were not supportable by facts. There were many who engaged in agendas which were later discredited by facts, but the media, whether by agenda or by factual ignorance, was not so eager to publish the facts as they were in spreading the sensationalist stories.

"[T]he British Intelligence Service was able to eavesdrop on almost all German military radio communications from a very early date, shortly after the outbreak of World War II."
--------
"To sum up, the following facts may be considered established: The messages deciphered at Bletchley Park undoubtedly constitute one of the most reliable sources on the course of events during the Second World War. They provide information on undertakings of the German army, navy, and air force. They provide an insight into the events occurring behind the Russian front and the conditions in the concentration camps. Since the reports from Auschwitz contain no information on mass killings, the question of whether the British Intelligence Service "knew about the Holocaust," can be answered with a single word: "No!"

In view of the fact that the messages from Auschwitz contain no mention of gas chambers or mass murders, the real question is: what was there really for anybody to "know" about? In other words: was there any Holocaust at all? Regardless of the general belief that hardly any historical event has ever been so thoroughly "proven," one must, once again, expressly point out that, until the present, not one single material or documentary proof for the reality of any mass killings in gas chambers has ever been found. The only thing that exists, at most, is mutually contradictory "eyewitness testimonies" and "confessions," which can, at least in the latter case, easily be shown to have been given under duress."

“The Enemy Is Listening!”
What Did the British Intelligence Service Know about the Holocaust?
http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2016/volume_8/number_1/the_enemy_is_listening.php

SAVANT said...

B7Scorpio - great comment and in fact I've now included it in the main post.

SAVANT said...

CanSpecy. Not disagreeing with your basic thesis. My point is that the official story of the Holocau$t is an utter fraud, unprecedented in its scope. As B7Scorpio shows above, the fraud has been used to fundamentally transform in a negative way the basis of our civilisation. Hence the need to rebut it.

Of course huge numbers of Jews suffered and died but so did even larger numbers of Poles, Russians, Germans, Yugoslavs etc.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
How does this help with the impending civil war against isam (Islam?).

I think you're right. We do have a war to fight and it will be civil war against Islam. We have to ask why this has come to be. We will be weakened but we will win. Then we should go straight into the next war to bring down all those who have brought about the situation. This has been a deliberate policy to destroy white people. We must ensure that we never get into this situation again. We must ensure that our people can live in safety and security. We will have a European Union. It won't be like the current one. We must forget old hostilities. We must strengthen our bonds. It's our united strength that our enimies fear the most. Why else would they want to destroy us?

Lemmyhead

Say NO! to islamization said...

Trevor Phillips

He thought European muslims would integrate. What a maroon.

George W Bush was right they hate our freedom. Belguim, France, Germany, The Netherlands and the UK have no go areas because third world people wnat to live in the third world.

Anonymous said...

@ Anon 04:24 --

"Let's not forget the baby boomers that allowed the inception of both Jewish power and the absolute narrative of Jewish victimhood"

Let me make this as polite as I can:

Start to finish, you are full of shit.

In 1961-2, give or take, when I was 10, the Eichmann kidnap/trial baloney was going full rip. The whole shot was out there: Jewish skin making lampshades, shrunken heads, the whole nine yards. The only fools who bought it were college-educated WWII vet with pink leanings. Why? Because in working class areas, all vets knew it was only Russian agitprop.

Since none of us voted till '68 or held high rank till much later, how in hell could we have "bought" a lie when we had no voice (and as noted, did not buy it)?

The Greatest Generation was paid off for that crap and some of the honest ones, now gone, said as much (Gore Vidal, US Army veteran, Pacific Theatre, for one).

The Greatest Generation Saved Europe... for Bolshevik colonization, and to that end used what were known to be Soviet propaganda tropes about Jewish suffering in the camps to boot their reps even higher.

Boomers did NOT buy the lie. It was set in concrete when we came in.

---MISTER

white rose said...

Searcher and Flanders. Thank you for the fascinating research you keep coming up with.

Glen C said...

"Boomers did NOT buy the lie. It was set in concrete when we came in."

Amen brother!

Daily Maily Hacky said...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3533561/Muslim-contestant-walks-Island-Bear-Grylls-not-handle-women-wearing-bikinis.html

Bear Grylls - some row - free publicity for Channel 4

Same as the last time.

Same as the next time.

Anonymous said...

http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/watch-appalling-gang-attack-man-11168478

Looks like a race attack on white British by non white British. Poor ad I hope he is okay and hey bring back the rope if he isnt

Eff the villa

Anonymous said...

Fukkwitz Watch

I suppose Rizla would rather have them trussed up in the back of a Rotherham kebab shop. BTW has anyone got to the bottom of why all the burgers got shifted out of the freezers mega pronto in UK a few years back and then the story dropped down the memory hole? Eh?

Caliph Kebabs now with added something.

Searcher said...

Cheers David and White Rose.

PS There was an ending to Trump and female voters which I deleted by mistake. Cobbled it back together as best I could:

(a) RamZPaul said that when Trump made a period joke aimed at Megyn Kelly (she was antagonistic because it she was having her period) that women loved it because they hate her blonde media friendly/telegenic looks. I disagree. I think the vast majority of women hate when men use the period jibe when they find a women objectionable, regardless of the target. It's different if a woman says it, but when a man says it is demeaning to all women. (As RamZPaul says, women do tend to personalize a man's perspective towards themselves). There are also women who look up to Megyn Kelly and don't hate her for her looks. He pissed off her fan club. He also pissed off the women who are are jealous of her (would like to be doing the job she is doing and have her public profile), as they think that he is just saying she is a pain in the ass because she is a woman, not because she is not particularly good at her job.

His "average in every way, why would anyone want to woo her" is a personalized insult that would please the jealous women cohort. She isn't all that - make way for the new and improved Megyns. However, to people who are neutral on Megyn, his comment comes across as thin-skinned. Every woman has seen it happen before - a man gets pushed back/rejected and then starts trying to slate the woman, to bring his own esteem back up. The form of the attack/insult is equally (if not more) important than the target. She started it first etc but that is a kiddy-stlye argument.

(b) The biggest selling Athena poster of the 1980s was the B&W of the man holding the baby. Affection beneath. Donald is extremely likable when you see him with young children. He lights up. There is footage of him holding a mini-me with a Donald Hairdo. Super cute. His grandad persona is more endearing (young children) than his dad persona (Ivanka and the two sons). The grandad persona is best observed when they are not his own grandchildren (Donald can be fair/nice to every child). Women sense that his affection beneath for them is based solely on where they rate on his Miss World Judge sheet (which is off the table for the vast majority of women). They know that he would hire them if they were capable but so what? That's not affection. That's just business. He is anti-affirmative action so he is not going to "carry" people in his organization. But women still want/need to see affection beneath from him. He demonstrates that very naturally with young children.

(c) Every clued in grandad would be concerned about Common Core. Common Core has not yet been massively counter-attacked in a media friendly format. Serious dismantling of Common Core needs to be done - as in explaining to the public WHY it is so wrong. Trump can be unequivocal about it and that is good communication for a public rally: "We're going to get rid of Common Core". A serious, detailed counter-attack to Common Core needs to emerge in tandem. This can be done completely independently of the Trump campaign and is better off done independently of the Trump campaign. Similarly TTIP needs to be seriously counter-attacked in a media friendly format. I like all the Trump videos for their sheer entertainment value, but I think there is ALSO a need to get the public interested in and conversant with Common Core and TTIP. Helping to build a discussion and bolster expert opinion on key policy proposals is very important.

Searcher said...

(d) Trump apparently hires a lot of women at senior executive positions in his company. Bernie and Hilary - haven't hired ANYONE! That is only good as a counter-argument to being labelled sexist. It's not particularly winning on its own merits.

(e) I wouldn't even try to defend his narcissistic side - all politicians have a huge ego. Most try to hide it and some like Donald are out in front with it: "The best president of the United States EVER!" I find it refreshing and hilarious. But I know that not everyone does and they worry about the demagogue aspect to his campaign. This means that people who want to vote Trump need to fill in the blanks/cracks and do their bit.

(f) His weak point is Melania. He knows that people do snigger/eye-roll at trophy wives in general. Stephen and Mrs Fry are good for a skit in a way that a similarly aged homosexual couple are not. Ashton Kutcher's step-dad, Bruce Willis anyone? It was hilarious when Ricky Gervais made that joke. Mail order brides. Sex tourism in Asia. You can go to Asia looking for much younger sex partners (totally legal) but society's unwritten rules means you lose respect (unwritten rules). Therefore, best off just keeping schtum. Retaliating is a no-win move. Amy Schumer handled her plus size media buzz in a thin skinned manner. She lost any initial sympathy people may have had for her. Rolling with those kinds of punches and letting the audience/public correct the harshness or insult with sympathy is probably the best thing to do.

David said...

"In 1933 a genocide took place in the Ukraine, a genocide that murdered as many as ten million people, what was the name of the man who orchestrated this? Well here is a clue..there are some pictures of him with a Charlie Chaplin moustache. Go on have a guess...let me tell you his name..Lazar Kaganovich and he died in the 1990s in his own bed, one of the greatest mass murderers in history and yet he is forgotten, he also worked half a million slaves to death, because that's what these people were slaves, some of were throw alive into cracks in the wall, building the White Sea canal and may have been the power behind the throne seeing as Stalin married his sister.
Now reflect on that will you..two men with Charlie Chaplin type moustaches, in around the same time frame and geographical area, give or take a few years and a few hundred kilometers, both responsible for a genocide which strangely enough begins with the letter H. One of which the Holodomor, you never heard of, the other has had over a hundred films, countless documentaries, an International day named after it and in many countries a prison sentence if you dispute any facts about it..now ask yourself why if something is so obvious laws are needed to protect it..surely truth should stand on its own."

I find this or a variant is quite good at opening eyes, as usual let people come to their own conclusions.

There was an image of this monster online with the above mentioned moustache, it appears to have been scrubbed.

You don't have to deny the holocaust, you just need people to understand that what happened in the Soviet Union was the biggest crime in history, so much so that the German response was a rational understandable reaction. Understand that and who was responsible and suddenly even the six million figure does nt look so daunting anymore.

Lucas George said...

There is a Chinese guy with dreadlocks in Star Wars Rogue One. #BoycottStarWars in sympathy with Bonita Tindel. Only 6 000 people have signed the petition.

Anonymous said...

https://www.rt.com/news/339226-syrian-refugee-arson-germany/#.VwveeWQUA4M.twitter

They learn the blame game very quickly those Syrians

Flanders said...

B7Scorpio, Excellent comment. As to, "Because once their psychological weapon of calling you 'Nazi' no longer works what else have they got?".

The jews have the same weapon which they have always had to use against us, with further enhanced versions, and that is a near-absolute control over our media and communications. This was the weapon which the jews used to smear holoschmuck all over people's faces and to infiltrate their minds. It was a weapon which had been perfected while tearing down White society during the Crypto-jew Johnson era, and which has been used against us ever since. The Boomer "Silent Majority" were not so much "silent" as they were SILENCED by the overpowering "informational" voices of jew media. The jew-media Jihad is the MOST destructive war in the history of the world.

Flanders said...

Eustace Mullins reveals, "The Secret Holocaust". Anyone who doubts that the holohoax hides true, and worse holocausts of White people, or that the holohoax is an essential weapon for the jews control should read it in full.


"We are asked to weep only for the Jews, and to ignore the many millions of actual victims of world terrorism in the past one hundred and fifty years, a chronicle of such horror that one scarcely can bear to put down this bloodstained record, not merely in fear that the world might put away its business in order to mourn these countless victims of international Communist terrorism, but that the tragic fate of these innocents, most of them women and children, is one of such pathos that one's heart could break from the full impact of its terrifying implications for everyone alive today.

One of the first victims of the international financiers, shortly after publication of the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx in 1848, was the Southern civilization of the United States. White immigrants had wrested from a hostile territory the means to create a gracious culture, one which the ruder and more unlettered sections of the new Republic could only gape at in admiration, an admiration, however, which soon turned to envy and then hatred. This hatred brought armies into the American South, bearing the terrorists who, unknown at that time, were the first Communist totalitarians determined to wreak their hatred and policies of annihilation on all civilized people. The Southerners were unfortunate enough to be the first victims. Military governments were set up in the conquered South, operating solely on the totalitarian concepts of Godless Communism, with courts functioning under martial law. The Southerners had been robbed of their Constitution, and of their rights to property and even to existence. Their homes were burned and looted, and savage hordes were unleashed to rape and pillage the properties which were occupied only by women and children. To deny the inherited rights of these Southerners, which were still their due under the laws of this nation, a brutal reign of terror, featuring Federal Judges, Federal Courts, and Federal Prisons, which were set up for the first time in any state of these United States. For those Southern patriots who dared to protest these outrages, Federal insane asylums were set up for those who were not executed on the spot.

From New York, Jewish carpetbaggers, the Lehmans, the Baruchs, and other special emissaries of the Rothschilds, came to seize from the widows and orphans of the Confederate dead their last savings, their last possessions, and their devastated lands.
---
In Europe, too, the civilized nations were beset throughout the nineteenth century by successive wars and revolutions, which resulted in millions of Christian refugees. Modern history begins with the Congress of Vienna in 1815, when the Jews, unleashed from their ghettoes and bearing a tide of gold amassed by the Rothschilds through their instigation and financing of wars from 1775 to 1812, used their newly acquired wealth to subvert the established governments of Europe and to start them on their terrifying slide into oblivion. Their victims were helpless before their Jewish onslaught because they were Christians who believed that love for one's fellow man guides the affairs of the earth. And so it does, until Satan intervenes through his people. It was impossible for any Christian to believe that such bloodthirsty savages could exist among any civilized people. Nor could the Christians, believing in their religion of Christ's love for humanity, understand the virulent hatred which the Jew bore towards all of God's creatures and which is beyond the ken of any civilized human being."

http://mk.christogenea.org/articles/secret-holocaust-anonmously-annotated

Anonymous said...

Feminist state in Norway pays rape accusers! But don't worry, this doesn't lead to false rape complaints at all and men still run the place. Smash the glass ceiling!


Today I'm suing the Norwegian state. My lawyers work pro bono and this should be another indicator of the sort of hoax we are dealing with. Despite all my losses, Norway refuses to acknowledge any wrongdoing, denying me due damages. They just gave me the 10.000 kroner (about 1.000 US dollars) a man falsely accused of rape has claim to, whereas the false accusers cashed in 150.000 kroner each, which is the set amount any woman reporting rape is entitled to. They paid them for the job.


http://henrymakow.com/2016/04/false-rape-horror-dtory.html

It's bad enough that false rape complaints aren't punished, but in Norway they are rewarded!

James said...

Speaking of woman wrecking the white race...

Surely not. They are defending it! Look at the staunch pro-white super women defending Europe. About half way down the page. God give us strength...

http://www.unz.com/tsaker/the-eus-suicide-by-reality-denial/

Anonymous said...

Sorry blood boiling alert.

Muslims in England saying "get out of our country"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W56BBtaWvFs

Flanders said...

From the second article at the link, the threat against White people, and it's anti-White agenda, is recognized as coming from the holohoax propaganda:

"The third decent piece I found on the holocaust/holohoax was Richard Harwood’s book “Did 6 Million Really Die?” People have been imprisoned round the World for simply owning this book, so we decided to post it in full on here."
-----

"One could scarcely miss the object of this diatribe, with its insiduous hint about “multi-racial partnership.” Thus the accusation of the Six Million is not only used to undermine the principle of nationhood and national pride, but it threatens the survival of the Race itself. It is wielded over the heads of the populace, rather as the threat of hellfire and damnation was in the Middle Ages. Many countries of the Anglo-Saxon world, notably Britain and America, are today facing the gravest danger in their history, the danger posed by the alien races in their midst. Unless something is done in Britain to halt the immigration and assimilation of Africans and Asians into our country, we are faced in the near future, quite apart from the bloodshed of racial conflict, with the biological alteration and destruction of the British people as they have existed here since the coming of the Saxons. In short, we are threatened with the irrecoverable loss of our European culture and racial heritage. But what happens if a man dares to speak of the race problem, of its biological and political implications? He is branded as that most heinous of creatures, a “racialist”. And what is racialism:,of course, but the very hallmark of the Nazi!"

2nd article - Holocaust or Holohoax 03 : Richard E. Harwood : Did Six Million Really Die?
https://holohoax.wordpress.com/2013/07/

Anonymous said...

Comment on youtube.


I've heard it said by blacks and Arabs before that whites are scary, because we hide our anger until we start acting on it. As in we don't get loud or offensive, we just start shooting.

To me that sounds like they as races haven't learned how to not be offensive or civil in the first place.



Exactly. These brown turds better watch out. They should leave Europe. The Illuminati plan is for them all to die at hour X.

It's coming....


THE WRATH OF THE AWAKENED SAXON

by Rudyard Kipling


It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy -- willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate.

Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not suddently bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.

Anonymous said...

I believe one hundred fifty five million gentiles have been killed over time because of this jew myth now at six million.

Anonymous said...

Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk announced his resignation on April 10 and mentioned parliament speaker Volodymyr Groysman as his potential successor.
That's 2 jews named from the 2014 coup, I've got a list somewhere, the amount of them that were behind what happened is shocking.
What surprises me is how some of the Ukrainian Nationalists have fallen for it. Many are sadly on the payroll though to intimidate, torture and kill whoever opposes the new regime. Thousands have 'gone missing ' on top of the thousands killed.

Eff it

Anonymous said...

Anti goys.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/04/10/sanders-event-ends-with-disruption-from-anti-semetic-attendee/

James said...

F the vax. Ever wondered why so many people believe the Holocaust?


"Every child who receives the MMR [measles, mumps, rubella] vaccine gets at least a 10 point IQ reduction for life, and the worst develop full blown autism." - Jim Stone


http://henrymakow.com/2016/04/why-vaccine-industry.html


James said...

I believe one hundred fifty five million gentiles have been killed over time because of this jew myth now at six million.

One of the top Rabbis in Europe at a conference in 1850 said that their "harvest" was thus far 160 million in Europe. That was all before WW1, WW2, and communism.

He might have been an anti-semitic self hater, but that's what he said. He didn't provide references to back it up either so maybe its just an old canard.

James said...


You don't have to deny the holocaust, you just need people to understand that what happened in the Soviet Union was the biggest crime in history, so much so that the German response was a rational understandable reaction. Understand that and who was responsible and suddenly even the six million figure does nt look so daunting anymore.


good point

Searcher said...

The power of music

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVtZPCiOPBk

Can you listen to this without thinking of certain images?

Anonymous said...

http://www.therebel.media/truth_about_reports_of_muslim_refugees_bullying_children

Have a read Muslim new students new arrivals say Muslims rule the world

Anonymous said...

Speaking of woman wrecking the white race... Here's a good rule of thumb. Is she good looking? Then she's pro-white anti-feminist. Not sure if it's a woman? Feminist.

Jezza said...

The thing is, the Nazis did in fact murder millions of Jews. That's something you just have to get to grips with. You can't expose the frauds you rightly rail against by calling the truth of the Nazi extermination programme a fraud as well. Sorry, but history is history. Doesn't mean the extermination hasn't been turned into a religion of extortion etc. But it did happen.

Searcher said...

Mental illness in the modern era

Chapter 1 - Xenophobia

Xenophobia: irrationally afraid of other cultures and foreigners.

Treatment plan includes: NLP therapy; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Isolation. However, caution is advised as the Xenophobe is typically resistant to treatment, and sees themselves as perfectly healthy. The Xenophobe might encourage Xenophobia in others so NeuroTypicals must be protected from the Xenophobe. This is an important public health strategy that centers around the creation of "safe spaces" where Xenophobes may not enter, in case they infect the well-adjusted NeuroTypicals in the population. Signs such as "Racists Out" and helpful twitter tags like #hopenothate, help to remind the Xenophobe that their thinking is not correct for the current year and that they need to work on getting better. Since Xenophobes tend to use similar brainwashing techniques known to infamous magicians such as Hitler, they are very dangerous people.

The Xenophobe's brainwashing magic is especially appealing to people who lack focus in their lives and who also spend time on social networking sites such as Twitter or FaceBook. However instead of pursuing healthy, functional habits such as sharing photos of restaurant menus/food/alcoholic beverages; sharing photos they have taken of themselves in their bathroom mirror; and sharing their kitchen sink drama on Twitter, the Xenophobe instead uses these forums to speed his disease through mind-controlling his associates.

Any signs of Xenophobia manifesting on these platforms is a public health and safety concern. The Xenophobe has no legitimate use for these platforms since the Xenophobe has no food or drink worth photographing and the Xenophobe's life is so boring that they could not possibly maintain a proper Twitter account with "stuck in traffic"; "was at a concert" details.

Such a Xenophobe should be curtailed in their own safe space, commonly known to NeuroTypicals as prison. This is important not only for the treatment and safety of the individual Xenophobe but also as a means of discouraging any other Xenophobes plying their magic and hypnotizing skills on social networks. Xenophobes typically have a low IQ and poor achievement record. Drug and alcohol dependency are common and relationships with the opposite sex are problematic.

Only intelligent people can spell Xenophobia without the use of spellcheck and only intelligent people have a strong, natural immunity to Xenophobia. Intelligent people tend to have mastered techniques to defend against the Xenophobe's hypnotic powers, which include the following (list is not exhaustive):

- Being able to correctly state the current year in any given year
- Competent use of outliers: NAXALT technique. "Not all "X" are like that"
- Tell the Xenophobe to open a book. This is a very simple but effective technique but it can only be used effectively by a VIP (very intelligent person).
- Tell the Xenophobe to kill themselves or more specifically to die in a grease fire. This can be said without fear of actually triggering suicidal feelings in the Xenophobe, because the Xenophobe erroneously believes that they are perfectly healthy and NeuroTypicals are wrong.
- Tell the Xenophobe to "take their meds". This is a particularly good defense strategy against Xenophobia, because it reminds the Xenophobe that NeuroTypicals know that the Xenophobe is ill.
- Being readily able to discern the illness is very important. VIPs can achieve this by simply provoking the suspected Xenophobe. The usual test is to say: "You're a racist" and wait to see the reaction from the Xenophobe. Reaction time is important - a delay in answering the charge is generally indicative that the illness is present. Other telltale signs may manifest in face crimes, hand crimes and other body language crimes. Diagnosis rates increase with practice and observation.

Searcher said...

There was an interesting comment on that Rebel Media article:

GLENN CRAIG commented 1 hour ago
One of the things that has always poisoned the politics of Nova Scotia is that it is legal to run in provincial elections when you are a teacher.


Reminds me of our situation here (article from 2011):
http://www.independent.ie/life/family/learning/teachers-still-top-of-class-for-31st-dail-representation-26709393.html

eleos said...

The thing is, the Nazis did in fact murder millions of Jews. Sorry, but history is history.

No. History is the interpretation of events written by the winning side and/or the side telling the story. History is anything but fact-based and neutral. If 'millions of Jews got killed' how come the World Almanac of 1948 shows the world population of Jews marginally higher than it had been in 1938?

Ignorant twat said...

The thing is, the Nazis did in fact murder millions of Jews. That's something you just have to get to grips with. You can't expose the frauds you rightly rail against by calling the truth of the Nazi extermination programme a fraud as well. Sorry, but history is history. Doesn't mean the extermination hasn't been turned into a religion of extortion etc. But it did happen.


I haven't heard about this before. What happened? How many millions?

Anonymous said...

Jezza, I recommend you to watch this video. It's top notch research and very well made.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMPSt92jZNQ

Flanders said...

eleos said...
Quoting Jezza:
The thing is, the Nazis did in fact murder millions of Jews. Sorry, but history is history.
End Quote.

No. History is the interpretation of events written by the winning side and/or the side telling the story. History is anything but fact-based and neutral. If 'millions of Jews got killed' how come the World Almanac of 1948 shows the world population of Jews marginally higher than it had been in 1938?
-----
Documentation which supports Eleos' statement:

Image - jewish population 1933
http://fathersmanifesto.net/jews1933.htm

Image - jewish population 1948
http://fathersmanifesto.net/jews1948.htm

A more complete explanation
http://fathersmanifesto.net/holocaust.htm

Anonymous said...

The Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland is key to all this. New World Order globalization is either a creature of the Nazi bankers or largely Jewish bankers or maybe some weird cabal of Nazi-Jewish bankers. It's well established that during WWII, the Germans got cash for gold (including dental gold) from the bank, headed all through the war by an American. Were the children of Roth involved also at that time? They are for sure involved since then as the BIS is the central bank of all central banks.

Searcher said...

Bananas are the new Swastika
Watcha doin' Fara?

http://statement-analysis.blogspot.ie/2016/04/faramade-ifaturoti-and-racial-claim.html

#WeStandWithFara

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Short posts at the moment ... I have quite a lot on my plate.

But I think you you may find this interesting, considering that that the EU is testing the waters as far as provoking Russia into some kind of rash military reaction.

http://www.unzcloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Saker-EU-Ukraine.jpg

Maybe you ladies should dump the Hillary Clinton I-Am-Woman ... Hear-Me-Roar self-deception ... and go and make the fucking supper.

Full article here:-

http://www.unz.com/tsaker/the-eus-suicide-by-reality-denial/

The EU's “Suicide by Reality Denial”

What had to happen did happen. The EU, being the chain of weak links it is, did eventually give in, and the Dutch people were the first one to vote against the association with the Ukraine. Of course, the Euroburocrats can now find some reason to declare the vote invalid, they can declare that some law was violated, they can even negotiate some minor change the to association agreement, or they might even decide that they can simply ignore this vote. But none of that will make any difference: the undeniable truth is that the Ukrainians are not welcome in the EU, not as associates and even less so as members. So no EU, no NATO no “European future” for the Ukraine. The entire hot air balloon which has been fueling the naïve and ugly hopes of the Euromaidan has burst and the Euro-Ukrainian project is crash and burning like the Hindenburg.

This disaster did not have to happen, it was entirely man made. In a saner world, the EU, Russia and the Ukraine could have negotiated a tripartite deal which would have given the Ukraine the role which geography and history have given it: to be a bridge between Russia and the EU. But the EU categorically rejected this option, several times, simply declaring that “the Ukraine is a sovereign state and Russia has no say in Ukrainian matters”. This zero sum game was forced on Russia against her will but now it is the EU which has lost it all, even if this is by no a victory for Russia either. The sad reality is that everybody has lost. Now the EU has to accept the total defeat of its Ukrainian policy, Russia is now alone looking at a dying failed state right across her border, while the Ukraine is simply falling apart and dying a painful death. Will the Eurobureaucrats accept this outcome?

Probably not.

They will do what they have always done. They will lie, deny, minimize and, most importantly, pretend like nothing has happened. They will say that 60% of 30% of a small EU nation do not get to make decisions for the entire continent. Or they will declare that instead of just an old fashioned “association” the EU will offer the Ukraine something much better – a “heartfelt friendship” maybe. Or a “love eternal”. Or even a “continental brotherhood”. But that will all be in vain because the people of Europe are clearly weary of the Ukronazis, even their Polish “friends” are now considering building a wall of their own, to keep their “Ukrainian friends” out of Poland;

feel the love!


UN
.

CS said...

@ Anonymous

Boomers did NOT buy the lie. It was set in concrete when we came in.

The Holocaust narrative was certainly firmly established by the time the boomers came along. At the age of 10, in 1953, I was informed by a boy of my own age with whom I had made casual acquaintance, that the Germans had gassed six million Jews.

Searcher said...

O/T again sorry Sav

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNc3_Qf8QiE

This is kinda weird. The Jewish comedian Alex Barnett at the end of this clip says that fraud is the American way:

"...hey if people wanna sell pregnancy tests or SAT scores or diplomas from Harvard and someone else will buy it, y'know hey, that's the American way right...we we''ll buy and sell anything as long as there's a market for it. I think it's fantastic and I don't I don't begrudge her at all".

Believing that your girlfriend is being honest when she shows you a positive pregnancy test is stupidity or naivety according to this header ball. Weird. He also speaks of fraudulent SAT scores and Harvard diplomas when no-one else did. The piece was all about fraudulent pregnancy tests being used to trick a man into proposing marriage.

Flanders said...

Off-Topic: "Supranational society: Masterlist of 1,300 NGOs and the top 400 people in them".

http://www.isgp.nl/global_power_structures

Flanders said...

"After State Department officials and historians assembled in Washington, D.C., last week to discuss the 1967 war in the Middle East, I am compelled to speak out about one of U.S. history's most shocking cover-ups.

On June 8, 1967, Israel attacked our proud naval ship -- the USS Liberty -- killing 34 American servicemen and wounding 172. Those men were then betrayed and left to die by our own government." - ADM. THOMAS MOORER, Betrayal behind Israeli attack on U.S. ship, Houston Chronicle, Sunday, January 11, 2004.

http://www.chron.com/opinion/outlook/article/Betrayal-behind-Israeli-attack-on-U-S-ship-1493153.php
-------
IMPORTANT:

"From the Honor the Liberty Vets face book page:

BILLBOARD COMPANY REFUSES TO HONOR NAVY VETS – We placed this billboard in New Bedford, MA, to honor USS Liberty veterans and to help them and their families get the respect and help they deserve.

But Israel partisans complained, one threatening to take his business elsewhere, so the billboard company reneged on their contract and took the billboard down two weeks early.

Now we’re asking others to SHARE THIS IMAGE to honor these men and their 34 shipmates who never returned. The Liberty is the most decorated crew since WWII."

http://ww3zionism.blogspot.com/2016/04/uss-liberty-vets-call-for-help-as.html

Flanders said...

In the 3rd part of "On the Book of Frank" by Simon Shepperd, the matriarchial and feminist uses to which the holohoax has been placed is given good discussion, along with why and how it is used against White males.

"A rational and consistent argument exists that in the Holocaust legend we are dealing with recycled wartime propaganda which certain factions find very advantageous to sustain. Indeed the list of those factions is so multifarious that it is easier simply to specify the single group to whose benefit it is not: decent, White, heterosexual males. In the long term however by destroying Occidental civilization with such dishonesty – which it is quite capable of doing – it will benefit no-one. By relentlessly extending the boundaries of taboo, by suppressing open discussion of plain facts about the differences between men and women and the different traits of races, these factions have succeeded in instituting what is effectively a new religion. We find Roosevelt in the unlikely role of prophet: at Teheran on 30 November 1943 (the day after Stalin had proposed shooting 50,000 German Officers after the war: Taylor p. 125),

The President finished up by returning to the tint theme and said that the effect of this war would be to blend all those multitudinous tints, shades and colours into a rainbow where their individuality would be lost in the whole, and that this whole rainbow represented the emblem of hope... (Bryant p. 99).

Three essential components of a religion are hope, faith and the resolution of guilt. Christianity has been in decline for several decades in Western society, but humans are still religious creatures and the distortions arising from the Holocaust legend have satisfied the human need for something to believe in. Faith is vested in the Utopia on Earth which is to arrive when we achieve the ideal of a multiracial, ‘rainbow’ society in which racism has been eradicated and everyone, regardless of their colour or creed, will live together in harmony.

Guilt is placed squarely onto the shoulders of males; every perceived misdemeanour is used as ammunition against him. Paramount among these, of course, is the Holocaust. Occidental males are incapacitated by false guilt and self-doubt: ‘Look what happened last time White males followed their instincts.’ Every race is encouraged to be proud of its culture except Whites, and one can talk about thoroughbreed dogs but never humans. Every kind of pollution is bad except, it seems, the genetic variety.

In Holland the creed is explicit and thus readily perceived: the trick of redefinition is used, and it is unselfconsciously stated, particularly by females, that “there’ll be no racism when everyone’s the same colour.” Presumably crime will also disappear when all the laws are repealed. It cannot work and it will never work, because any system based on dishonesty will ultimately fail."

http://www.heretical.com/sgs-1996/bof3.html

The other two parts are at the section, Sheppard: Other, All about Women - BOF, on the left at this link.
http://www.heretical.com/main.html#directory

Flanders said...

It can easily be argued that the "holocaust" was found to be extremely useful for it's part in this type of power play described in, "Catechism By Gramsci" and the derived result, “The long march through the institutions.”.

"Thus, in order to destroy their power [i.e., the power of the ruling classes in Christian countries], it followed that one had to undermine the so-called cultural hegemony of Christianity itself.

Different Marxist factions had different ideas about how best to go about this. The Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci drew a distinction between what he called a “war of manoeuvre” and a “war of position.” The war of manoeuvre was the Stalinist model. One simply used political violence to achieve one’s ends. But Gramsci thought this would not work in the more highly developed Western countries. For these countries, he recommended a war of position. A war of position is one in which one first identifies “switch-points of social power” and then one seeks to peacefully take control of those switch-points. The switch-points all relate to the field of cultural values – in particular, the arts and education. The most important switch-points of power are positions like school principal, university professor, government policy maker, education department bureaucrat and journalist."

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/villanova-catholic-katie-grimes-gramsci-racism/

Shaunantijihad said...

The Holocaust happened in exactly the same way that World Trade Centre Tower 7 did not happen, goy! In other words, if we say it happened then it happened, and if we say a skyscraper did not fall down then it didn't. Did it, Winston?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mi4WGEXctmo

Anonymous said...

http://order-order.com/2016/04/11/corbyns-thousands-in-offshore-income/

He who casts the first stone

Anonymous said...

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/11/bombshell-report-berlin-lost-to-arab-clans-now-recruiting-physically-strong-young-migrants/

Hitlers Berlin lost to Arab gangs

And still they import more

Eff the villa

Anonymous said...

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/04/11/german-intelligence-chief-makes-surprising-admission-analysts-didnt-expect-terrorists-to-sneak-into-europe-with-migrants/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=ShareButtons

No shit sherlock even a paddy like me brought up on a bham council estate who left school at 14 . I effing well knew they would do it

You prat

Anonymous said...

http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.com/2016/04/analysis-of-feminists-migrant-fairy-tale.html

That bitch red penny or penny red gets a right bashing over her feminist wishy washy views
this is the person who has put people who have different views to hers addresses on the internet asking people to visit and bash them

Eff the villa

Joe Btfsplk said...

I presume you folks know that ron unz is a jew. . .

red pill said...

Ron Unz is one of the good ones Joe. And he certainly is good.

Searcher said...

News just in

They thought he was dead. Well, he is now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97pEKGNT0Xw#t=225

Anonymous said...

6 million lies

2 hours+ of Holocaust facts - best video I've found on the topic.

Must see!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMPSt92jZNQ

Anonymous said...

According to Searcher's Xenophobia diagnosis manual, these Israeli kids must be all completely nuts.

https://youtu.be/QJIDdYY6fzA

Anonymous said...

Germans aren't proper Germans, immigrants are.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/02/you-are-not-the-people-you-are-the-past-critics-of-mass-immigration/

Henry Makow is posting some proper hate lately. Good stuff.

Anonymous said...

WTF it this shit? Leftist propaganda of some kind, but hard to classify.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMQkV5cTuoY

Flanders said...

"The Christians love blood so much, we will give them all they can handle, as we cut the throats of their children and drag them over the altar rails of their churches. May the parents drown in the blood of their own children." - Gus Hall (Hallberg), the perennial head of the American Communist Party, a jew born as Arvo Kusta Halberg on October 8, 1910. Hall was a candidate for the CPUSA for the presidential elections in 1972, 1976, 1980 and 1984.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/08/when-did-the-soviet-socialist-republic-of-america-begin/vote-communist-gus-hall-for-president-jarvis-tyner-for-painting-artwork-print/

"During WWII the number of Jews in Europe remained flat, but according to Britannica Book of the Year, the number of Jews in the world increased by 600,000, or 4% . How could 6 million Jews (40% of all Jews and 64% of those in Europe) have died in the Holocaust if their worldwide population increased by 4%?

A likely explanation is that the extra 600,000 Jews appeared, and then disappeared AFTER the "holocaust", because of war reparations received by Jews. In other words, Jews who didn't admit to being Jews during the war suddenly did admit to being Jews when the money was being handed out.

Why don't we STOP SUBSIDIZING THE HOLOCAUST INDUSTRY?
-------
WWII reduced the total population of all of Europe by 12.5% or 48 million, from 440 million in 1940 to only 392 million in 1950. If the Jewish population in Europe alone had decreased by a similar 12.5%, there would have been only 14 million Jews worldwide in 1946. If the 1946 almanac is correct, then there were 1.8 million more Jews than that in 1946 and even more in 1950. This would mean that the Jewish population increased at the same time that the European and Christian populations decreased considerably. And that suggests that the Nazis did a better job of protecting Jews than of protecting Christians. There were undoubtedly Jews who were treated unfairly during WWII, because war is that way. But if this data doesn't at least suggest that Nazis treated Jews much more fairly than they treated Christians and other Europeans, it definitely proves that Jews died at a much lower rate than Christians did. If fewer than 1.2 million Jews died during WWII, then they died at a rate lower than all Europeans died."

http://holywar.org/S35.htm

Larry said...

So many jealous people want to blame other people's success on religious affiliation and racial connections. It's called working hard and studying. Don't hate on people for being successful.

You're just making excuses for your own laziness. Jews in power worked very hard as hard work and economics education is ingrained in their upbringing. It's a cultural thing.

Don't hate on others for being successful, no matter how hard you try, it won't make yourself successful.

Hard work and financial competence is highly ingrained in jewish upbringing which is why so many are financially successful. Blaming "family connections" is just an excuse to hate on successful people. 

I had the foresight to be well insured and I had the business acumen to try for a double payout. G-d loves a trier. You are just jealous that I am such a hard little worker and more intelligent than the rest of humanity. Jews have statistically won more Nobel Prizes than anyone else. This makes lazier, stupid people envious.

Shalom Haters

Searcher said...

In this episode we look at how easily people believe lies:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixguz5J2VhY&nohtml5=False

Searcher said...

UN

Hilary does not only appeal to women who supposedly need to get in to the kitchen. She also appeals to some White men (not all obviously):

"Clinton will have the support of tens of millions of white men."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/03/18/hillary-clinton-doesnt-need-white-men/

This is a man making his eejity comment (again, confirming my own view, that sometimes men are the worst "useful idiots" going).

ferobson
3/20/2016 3:40 AM GMT
They voted for Hillary when she was running against a black man showing their racial bias but running against a white man they vote against her showing their gender bias. Makes a white male ashamed of his group.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
JOHN, OLD RETIRED CHICAGO COP saw this coming for years.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/04/01/murders-shootings-soar-chicago-through-first-three-months-2016/82507210/

Chicago's murder rate soars 72% in 2016; shootings up more than 88%
Aamer Madhani, USA TODAY

5:15 p.m. EDT April 1, 2016

CHICAGO — Murders in the nation's third-largest city are up about 72%, while shootings have surged more than 88% in the first three months of 2016 compared with the same period last year, according to data released Friday by the Chicago Police Department.

Police said the disturbing rise in violence is driven by gangs and mostly contained to a handful of pockets on the city's South and West sides.

“While CPD will remain tireless in its efforts to hold criminals accountable for their actions, we all have a part to play in creating a safer Chicago,” newly appointed interim Superintendent Eddie Johnson said in a statement. “In the coming weeks and months, I plan on meeting with and listening to a range of Chicagoans — from activists and elected officials to ministers and parents — to find ways that we can come together to build mutual trust and lasting partnerships that will make our streets safer for everyone.”

The city has seen 141 murders this year, compared with 82 murders at the same point last year. Police reported 677 shootings this year compared with 359 at the same point last year.

The grim rise in violence comes after the Chicago Police Department reported 468 murders in 2015, a 12.5% increase from the year before. There were 2,900 shootings in 2015, 13% more than the year before, according to Police Department records.


Now here's an interesting thing ...

http://www.diplomacy.edu/resources/books/reviews/wisdom-crowds-why-many-are-smarter-few

In which we learn that the crowd is actually a hell of a lot smarter than the so-called elite would like you to think ... and here we have the BBC (of course) trying desperately to prove that this is not the case.

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20140708-when-crowd-wisdom-goes-wrong.

It appears, that pretty much anyone with more than a dozen brain cells to rub together ... and the capacity to see what stands in plain sight before him can make a pretty damn good educated guess about what's in store for them. Getting the timing right, of course is a different kettle of fish entirely. That's a whole other story.

It's the fellow who overthinks the situation ("I wonder what would happen if I reached up and touched that cannon ball?") -- rather than prudently ducking out of the way -- who seems to live to fight another day.

UN
.

Flanders said...

I don't know where, or if, this ever ran, but it's the filthiest garbage I've seen.

http://www.podblanc.guru/jews-their-gop-like-shabbos-underlings-waste-white-german-minds-sprite-dirty-commercial-2013_b7573a4a3.html

http://www.coca-colacompany.com/brands/sprite/

Joe Btfsplk said...

Warning- Eustace Mullins may be a mystic. Lack of precision, getting names and facts wrong- a real space cadet. He referred to Ernst Zundel as "Ernest Zunn-del." He called Ayn Rand "Ann Rand." Now he gives etymology of cannibalism as-

Not only did Nimrod kill and eat the fair-skinned descendants of Shem, in his fury and hatred he often burned them alive. The type of human sacrifice involving the eating of the slaughtered human victims derived its name from the combined names of his uncle, Canaan, and the demon god Baal, the two names being combined to form the word "cannibal." [from his book Curse of Canaan] >>>I think either mental illness or deliberate lying.

cannibal (n.) Look up cannibal at Dictionary.com
"human that eats human flesh," 1550s, from Spanish canibal, caribal "a savage, cannibal," from Caniba, Christopher Columbus' rendition of the Caribs' name for themselves (see Caribbean). The natives were believed to be anthropophagites. Columbus, seeking evidence that he was in Asia, thought the name meant the natives were subjects of the Great Khan. Shakespeare's Caliban (in "The Tempest") is from a version of this word, with -n- and -l- interchanged, found in Hakluyt's "Voyages" (1599). The Spanish word had reached French by 1515. Used of animals from 1796. An Old English word for "cannibal" was selfæta.

Cassius said...

JoeB. Very good point about Eustace Mullins. Don't know about the mystic bit but he has got quite a number of facts wrong in his writings. Definitely undermined my confidence in him. Pity, as otherwise his material is excellent.

Joe Btfsplk said...

Cassius- a mystic is one not knowing the difference between the inner world and the outer world. Or, a subjectivist.

It's more than getting facts wrong- it's that made-up neologism canaan-baal.
Problem is, way too many readers let errors slide, assuming if an authority said it, it must be true.

Joe Btfsplk said...

". . .it's the filthiest garbage I've seen. . ."

The filthiest garbage I've ever seen is the filthy jewish "money" in my wallet.

James said...

Chicago's murder rate soars 72% in 2016; shootings up more than 88%

Be aware that many media article with the number 88 in them are propaganda aimed at White nationalists. Many are faked.

Articles with the number 6 in the headline are most often Jewish scams of some kind.

James said...

How could 6 million Jews (40% of all Jews and 64% of those in Europe)

I've heard it said that Hitler only got his hands on 3.5 million of them. Anyone know the facts on this?

James said...

Anonymous Joe Btfsplk said...


Something about Cannibals.

I think Mullins' source of the word is more believable that that story about Caribbeans.


Here's the tell:
Columbus, seeking evidence that he was in Asia,

I think Columbus knew exactly where he was. Next the dictionary will say he was there because he bumped into it trying to prove the world wasn't flat.

James said...

JoeB. Very good point about Eustace Mullins. Don't know about the mystic bit but he has got quite a number of facts wrong in his writings

Do you have any examples? You are increasing the frustration levels on the Internet by alluding and not delivering. That is sub-optimal hate delivery.

Flanders said...

"Madonna's Malawian Son, David Banda Gets Gold Grills Just like His Mama"

http://www.malawiheat.com/2014/02/madonnas-malawian-son-david-banda-gets.html

Searcher said...

Agenda driven people are prone to a need for moral superiority over others:

http://statement-analysis.blogspot.ie/2016/04/human-resources-self-awareness-in.html

Flanders said...

Joe, Mullins works were presented often more in a conversational manner, intended to relay the basis for ideas. I don't agree with everything he wrote, and I know he has made factual errors, but I'm convinced that he not only believed what he wrote, but had a more solid basis for his expressed beliefs than does Dictionary.com. I think you are treating Mullins unfairly, and that some of that is likely because you don't understand the biblical basis for what he states, or disbelieve in it yourself. Personally, I will overlook a few factual errors from someone who is trying hard to awaken people to facts about the problems we face, and I abhor those who rely on "documentable sources" which are known to be "documentable" only by reason of their strict adherence to the "party lines". Those latter sources will continue to keep people in the dark.

Flanders said...

I have just come across this and haven't read the other parts, so I don't know what to think of it other than it is not the type of thing I normally devote much attention to because of it's laborious examinations of esoteric points, but it seems interesting enough in this part that I think will interest most people, and the author recites an agreement with Mullins. I'll read it in full when I get the chance, but don't have time now.

"Here's a biblical account of the practice that is attributed to Canaanites.

32) So they gave out to the sons of Israel a bad report of the land which they had spied out, saying, "The land through which we have gone, in spying it out, is a land that devours its inhabitants; and all the people whom we saw in it are men of great size.
33) There also we saw the Nephilim (the sons of Anak are part of the Nephilim); and we became like grasshoppers in our own sight, and so we were in their sight.

Numbers 13:32-33

This report that was given to Moses and Israel by the spies on their return from the promised land reveals that they witnessed cannibalism. A figure of speech is used (specifically known as metonymy of the subject) where the land is put for the people of the land. The land that devours its inhabitants is where cannibalism is practiced. These "bad tree" Canaanites ate human flesh. And, no, this is not the whitewashed version most of us have become familiar with. This is the adult version.

While most versions of etymology point to Christopher Columbus' reference to the Carib people as the source of the word, "cannibal," it seems to me far more plausible that Eustace Mullins is correct. He wrote in The Curse of Canaan (p. 12) that the word "cannibal" is a combination of "Canaan" and "Baal."

Are we to think such behavior as this comes without some legitimate basis, something to which we can point as its origin? Just as I had presented the Sodom and Flood scenarios as echoes of Eden with realities that reverberate forward even unto the present time, this matter of cannibalism has a root in the Garden. Adam is dust and the serpent eats dust. If we can perceive such a theme as a long thread woven into the fabric of history, our perception of this and the continuity of similar essential themes really does foster our understanding of the peculiar realities of our present time and provide a reliable framework for the unfolding of Bible prophecy."

http://www.theopenscroll.com/cainsPaternity3.htm

Anonymous said...

Before the days of PC as kids in school, we would cruelly and gruesomely mock the extermination of the Jews in the camps. I later felt sorry about this as we were too rough on the pretty much little, gentle Jews. Weird that nowadays victimhood and weakness is considered a positive asset for any group. Similarly, you can't brag about being descended from slaves. But now you can although it is obviously counterintuitive to the point where it will not hold up as truth in the long run.

And if you really hate the Jews, why deny the holocaust? Five million they can prove but maybe a couple million more that they can't document. But that's against 50 million for the whole European mess. Any way you look at it, they got tagged pretty well.

Anonymous said...

If cannibalism is a combination of Canaan and Baal, shouldn't we Brits and Yanks be a little concerned that 40 foot reconstructions of the arches of the temple of Baal from Palmyra are going to be constructed in London and Times Square?

Anonymous said...

Oh wait...no Baal arch for Times Square or London. But London does get a Roman triumphal arch in Trafalgar.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
It's the fellow who overthinks the situation ("I wonder what would happen if I reached up and touched that cannon ball?") -- rather than prudently ducking out of the way -- who seems to live to fight another day.

UN
.
13 April 2016 at 06:40


Sorry ... I seem to have gotten that, when one stops to think about it, exactly wrong.

Secondly please let me use this short post to say, Savant, thank you for the heads-up on the person who wishes to make contact, but now would not be a very good time for me to do that. Life, as John Lennon is purported to have said, is getting in the way.

I will make contact as soon as ...

UN
.

Flanders said...

"Israel's Friends Against the First Amendment
Criticism of Israel becomes a crime", Philip Giraldi - does a good job.

"...I try to keep my critique on a rational and proportionate basis. While I have sometimes suggested that those who are over the top in love with Israel should consider moving there and have also not hesitated to describe the behavior of certain congressmen like Senators Cardin, Menendez and Schumer as something akin to treason, I have never called for confiscation and destruction of property, denial of citizenship, or exiling the miscreants that I identify. I will leave those sorts of things to the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which is very good at it.

But sometimes the actions of the friends of Israel in the United States are so truly outrageous that they seem to invite a reaction that is more explosive, like petitioning the Strategic Air Command to nuke AIPAC when it next gathers here in Washington. A couple of recent Israel first initiatives that are aimed at denying first Amendment rights to anyone but those who are supporters of Israel fall into the category that seems to demand a really strong response. Like, what the hell is going on here? Is anyone in Congress and the Judiciary awake?"

http://www.unz.com/article/israels-friends-against-the-first-amendment/

Flanders said...

"My students are terrified of Donald Trump," one teacher from a middle school with a big black Muslim population said in the online survey, the SPLC says in a release.

"They think that if he’s elected, all black people will get sent back to Africa."

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/splc-survey-donald-trump-immigration/2016/04/13/id/723824/

Anonymous said...

James please believe the figures, my old friends that are still on the job tell me its probably higher then that,Mayor Emanuel the guy nobody voted for has judged the stats to try to keep the llid on things and to keep the niggers happy and content, I'm,possible i know, just wait until this summer at the conventions, should be hilarious.TRUMP 2016,John old rtf chicago copper.

Anonymous said...

find out who this LARRY person is and see if he has any relatives living in Germany....

James said...

Panama Papers. Whatever. Who cares?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-12/swiss-bank-whistleblower-claims-panama-papers-was-cia-operation


Everyone's getting so bored of all the false flags, even the people that believe them. The Illuminati need something really big to get everyone's attention.

Anonymous said...

Link won't work for me but google
9 questions for antifa and the left Ireland

Some interesting notes

Eff the villa

Anonymous said...

Larry, 22:42,

You're absolutely correct. The Jews deserve everything they get.

Wait...let me dial that back. It's too harsh. But really, don't you think some of the media Jew clusters are a bit too much? If I had a dollar for everyone named Roth on PBS, I could get a pretty good lunch at Outback.

Joshua Sinistar said...

Choke on your own diseased dick monkey boy. Koreans don't believe you are human, deal with it. You aren't going to make them feel bad about their ancestors monkey boy. You insult their ancestors and they will make your foul homeland a smoldering ruin, even worse then now. Why anyone believes something dumber than chimps and bonobos are human is a mystery. With that heavy bone density that makes it impossible to swim, just like apes, I would think that anthropoid is the obvious conclusion from the evidence. Wild animal behavior has already been more than proved hasn't it?

Larry said...

Our high verbal IQ makes us uniquely suited to broadcasting and journalism. That's why you find lots of Jews in media. It's not a big conspiracy, like we all get around a table and decide to take over the media, LOL. We are just better at that profession than most. And this is why everyone notices a massive increase in quality of media output in the past few decades. Ditto for universities. You should be grateful that we're doing such a good job.

Haters gonna hate.

Anonymous said...

James,

I agree with you. If he cannot show where Mullins got his facts wrong, then it is very suspect.

Eustace was an extremely thorough researcher. He did all the work himself. Until he was banned from the Library of Congress, all his work was done there. He is still by far one of the most respected researchers of the 20th century.

Frank Galton said...

Flanders said: "[T]he British Intelligence Service was able to eavesdrop on almost all German military radio communications from a very early date, shortly after the outbreak of World War II."

BLETCHLEY PARK.ORG

The first operational break into Enigma came around the 23 January 1940 [one year prior to the Wannsee Conference]...The ‘Y’ Service, a chain of wireless intercept stations across Britain and in a number of countries overseas, listened in to the enemy's radio messages.
http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/content/hist/worldwartwo/enigma.rhtm
http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/content/hist/worldwartwo/inttoact.rhtm

The Independent, 22 August 1993

“I think we weaken our case against the Germans by publicly giving credence to atrocity stories for which we have NO EVIDENCE. These mass executions in GAS CHAMBERS remind me of the story of the employment of human corpses during the last (1914-18) war for the manufacture of fat, which was a GROTESQUE LIE.” – Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, Chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, 27 August 1944
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/why-the-bbc-ignored-the-holocaust-antisemitism-in-the-top-ranks-of-broadcasting-and-foreign-office-staff-led-to-the-news-being-suppressed-says-stephen-ward-1462664.html

The Times, 06 June 2005

BRITAIN’s intelligence chiefs refused to accept witness reports of the German massacre of Polish Jews in the Second World War and DISCOUNTED THE EXISTENCE OF THE HOLOCAUST, according to an authorised account based on official archives.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article1933797.ece

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

Flanders said: "The crowning achievement of Ehrenburg's career came on December 22, 1944, when this hate-crazed fiend became the first person to mention the kabbalistic figure of Six Million alleged Jewish victims of National Socialism, and then proceeded to introduce that figure into Soviet propaganda. After the war he joined with co-racial and fellow propagandist Vasily (Iosif Solomonovich) Grossman to produce a fictitious "Black Book" and lay the foundation for what has come to be known as "The Holocaust."”

The Pittsburgh Press, 28 November 1944

Six Million Jews Listed Slaughtered

Moscow, Nov 28 (UP) – A five-volume “black book” containing a documentary record of the German massacre of approximately six million European Jews was being prepared today by the State publishing house.

The work was under the general editorship of [Jewish propagandist] ILYA EHRENBOURG [Ilya Ehrenburg]...
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1144&dat=19441128&id=MDcbAAAAIBAJ&sjid=qkwEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5204,263697&hl=en

Six million Jews did not die during the “Holocaust”.

In March 1981 the New York Times stated that as many as THREE MILLION Jews died at AUSCHWITZ and that, in all, SIX MILLION Jews died during the Holocaust.

New York Times, 11 March 1981

...as many as THREE MILLION Jews died at AUSCHWITZ... in all, SIX MILLION people were murdered in a systematic campaign of genocide against Jews.
http://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/11/us/auschwitz-survivor-sues-for-prize-for-proving-germans-gassed-jews.html

Eleven years after stating that THREE MILLION Jews died at AUSCHWITZ”, the New York Times reported, on 17 June 1992, that the AUSCHWITZ death toll had been REVISED DOWNWARDS from FOUR MILLION to 1.5 million.

New York Times, 17 June 1992

It was previously thought that FOUR MILLION [THREE MILLION of which were Jews] died at the camps [AUSCHWITZ]. More recent research has revealed the figure to be closer to 1.5 million.

While thousands of non-Jews were among the estimated 1.5 million killed at Auschwitz, the victims were PREDOMINANTLY JEWISH.
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/06/17/world/poland-agrees-to-change-auschwitz-tablets.html

Yet 17 years after reporting that the Auschwitz death toll had been REVISED DOWNWARDS, the New York Times is still claiming that SIX MILLION Jews died during the Holocaust.

New York Times, 28 January 2009

About SIX MILLION Jews were systematically MURDERED by the Nazis and their collaborators during World War II.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/world/europe/28iht-pope.4.19756219.html?_r=0

NOTE: It has always been reported that the victims at Auschwitz were PREDOMINANTLY JEWISH. The victims were PREDOMINANTLY JEWISH when it was thought that FOUR MILLION people had died at Auschwitz. These PREDOMINANTLY JEWISH victims would have been included in the overall figure of SIX MILLION.

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

The New Yorker, 15 November 1993

Last year, a young revisionist agitator from California, David Cole, who makes much of the fact that he is Jewish, visited AUSCHWITZ to undertake his own site assessment. Amid the barbed-wire fences and watchtowers of the Stammlager, Cole discovered, he says, a camp theatre, where the inmates used to put on productions; a swimming pool with a diving board and starting blocks for races; and delousing chambers, for maintaining camp hygiene.

“These were the real gas chambers,” Cole reported in a videotaped excursion through the camp, “except their victims were clothing and mattresses, and their purpose was to preserve the health of the inmates.”

David Cole also toured a “FAKE” gas Chamber—a reconstruction of the room where RUDOLF HÖSS, by his own account *, witnessed the first mass gassing of camp inmates. Cole noted, ACCURATELY, that the CREMATORIUM CHIMNEY IS A FREESTANDING STRUCTURE, IN NO WAY CONNECTED TO THE OVENS. One entrance to the gas chamber does not have a door, or even any evidence of hinges. Inside the chamber, a tight rectangular space with a low ceiling, there are marks where walls have obviously been removed. To one side, there are pipes where a bathroom once stood. In the center of the room is a manhole with an iron cover.

Museum officials readily ADMIT that the crematorium at the Stammlager is indeed a “RECONSTRUCTION”...

Jerzy Wróblewski, who is the director of the Auschwitz Museum...is painfully aware of the questions about authenticity, but he says that he has neither the time nor the resources to deal with all the issues that the museum confronts both in its day-to-day operation and in its long-term plans.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1993/11/15/evidence-of-evil

* “I commanded AUSCHWITZ until 12/1/1943 and estimate that at least 2.5 MILLION [Jewish] victims were executed and exterminated there by gassing and burning, and at least another half million succumbed to starvation and disease making a total dead of about 3 MILLION.” – Rudolf Höss
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/Hoess.html

AUSCHWITZ DEATH TOLL REVISED

BBC, 27 January 2008

Auschwitz death toll revised

...the report estimated 4,000,000 [FOUR MILLION] people [THREE MILLION of which were Jews] had perished there between 1941 and early 1945. The final death toll was later REVISED DOWNWARDS, by the Auschwitz Museum, to between 1 and 1.5 million...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/27/newsid_3520000/3520986.stm

According to Robert Faurisson, “His [Rudolf Höss’] confessions were false. They had been extorted from Höss by torture, but it took until 1983 to learn the identity of the torturers and the nature of the tortures they inflicted upon him.

The confessions of Rudolf Höss supply the keystone to the theory which maintains that systematic extermination of the Jews, especially by means of homicidal gas chambers, was a historical reality.”
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p389_faurisson.html

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

Daily Mirror, 28 September 2015

Bizarre claims that Auschwitz was a 'summer camp' for Jews in upsetting white supremacy documentary

Filmmaker Dan Murdoch... speaks with one [KKK] member in the BBC Three documentary , named James, who truly believes in something so HISTORICALLY INACCURATE it leaves the filmmaker literally gobsmacked.

The Klan Chaplain claims that Auschwitz was..."manufacturing goods for war...there was a MOVIE THEATRE, THERE WAS A LIBRARY, AND EVEN A SWIMMING POOL IN AUSCHWITZ...
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-previews/bizarre-claims-auschwitz-summer-camp-6516801

Auschwitz movie theatre, day care, soccer league etc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVmIaBW-HjI

Frank Galton

Flanders said...

Excellent work and great links, Frank G. Thanks for your efforts and the results you obtain with some very helpful information and difficult to find links. You and your work are appreciated.

Frank Galton said...

Cheers Flanders.

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

Actually, Larry, the quality of media content has gone down. When the NYTimes became completely Hebrew written in the 80s, it became a joke. And it's not just because of the conscious propaganda either, there is a general lack of knowledge in the media, both historical and cultural. And the same applies to the universities.

What finished the Times for me, in the early 21st century, was a self-involved article about the Wall Street bombing of 1920. The premise was that no one knows this but me but, you know, New York had a 911 before 911. Such self-involved ignorant bullshit. A pseudo-intellect with a tidbit of knowledge preening arrogantly.

Until the mid-sixties, the bombing outside the J.P. Morgan bank was a historical event known to everyone in high school. Now, I'm not saying that this kind of self-aggrandizing, arrogant ignorance is exclusive to the Jews, but one might think they'd be a little more careful about whistling past the graveyard.

brenda90 said...

Oliver J. Flanagan an Irish politician had this to say, this makes them the goyim wet their knickers: Flanagan was a social conservative, who famously claimed that "there was no sex in Ireland before television". A notorious anti-semite early in his career, he used his maiden speech in the Dáil, on 9 July 1943, to urge the government to "rout the Jews out of this country".

Leslie Lim said...

Thank you for posting some kind of information. It was really helpful since I am doing some research now.

www.imarksweb.org

Leslie Lim said...

Thank you for posting some kind of information. It was really helpful since I am doing some research now.

www.imarksweb.org