"You beez appropriatin' muh culcha"

By now you're all familiar with the story of Corey Lewandowski, the Trump aide who restrained a female "reporter" lunging at the candidate. Instead of prosecuting her the authorities instead hit Corey with an assault and battery charge. And for good measure assigned a former member of the Hildebeast's Florida Leadership Team (one who had earlier described Donald's rhetoric as 'divisive and inflammatory') to prosecute the case. The wheels of justice grind fine indeed.

Now consider this case (report and video here). In summary a black SFSU 'student' threatened to cut off a White student's hair because his dreadlocks 'appropriated black culture'. While Cultural Appropriation is all the rage these days it of course goes only one way. Because if the sheboon had thought about it she'd have realised that the language she spoke, the clothes she wore, the institution of the university....even the scissors brandished by the goon assisting her, were all products of White Civilisation.

In fact she'd have been justified in the cultural appropriation claim only if the White guy had been wearing a loin cloth and a bone through his nose.

She clearly wasn't a very learned student in that (as far as I can discern from the video) she's never even heard of Egypt. But she most certainly is learned to post-doctoral level in the dark arts of Victimhood. Because as the guy tried to get past her she roughly grabbed him by the arm while shrieking 'take your hands off me'. Then she physically obstructs someone filming the incident. Her arrogance is not surprising as we've now reached the stage whereby high-ranking Victims perceive themselves - correctly - as virtually unaccountable for their actions.

Is this an outrage? Of course it is. Is it another nail in the White Coffin? Well, not necessarily.

You see, every such incident further highlights the glaring injustices and double-standards faced by Whites, especially White males. These have become so egregious that even the most credulous and brainwashed White 'liberal' senses that something is badly askew.  I am absolutely convinced of this. The big question is whether it's all too late. I don't think so. But as time is short it's essential that all of us spread the word of every such development.

Obama droning on

Obama's luvvies have proven to be extraordinarily persistent in their devotion, despite his betrayal of countless pre-election commitments and boundless enthusiasm for foreign wars. Yes, Bush and Cheney can only look on in envy as the Nobel Peace Prize winner not only continued their projects but added a few of his own (Libya, Syria).....while reneging on a key pre-election promise to close Guantanamo. Still his supporters' puppy love remains undimmed.

Apart from one thing:"Targeted" assassinations (as distinct from those whereby you assassinate the first person you meet). Yes, bath-houses in Chicago and HR Departments all across the USA reverberated to cries of anguish and despair, climaxing at Obama's now notorious observation that 'I'm good at killing people'.  Drones are unique in warfare in that the attacker himself is under no personal risk as he delivers his lethal payload (allegedly encouraging a cavalier attitude to killing) and this could explain at least part of the widespread revulsion.

But is it justified? Drones in fact cause much fewer casualties and less damage than conventional bombing or artillery fire. In fact they're particularly suited to today's asymmetrical warfare against irregular combatants who blend into the local population. Their use contrasts sharply with the Allies' WW 2 policy of carpet bombing Germany and particularly Japan in which civilians and their property were deliberately targeted with horrendous results. It seems clear enough that Obama personally selected selected assassination targets because of concern at the alternative prospect of such indiscriminate bombing and a distrust of the intelligence communities' selection criteria. As such the number of those killed by drones (including bystanders) amounts to no more than a few hundred as distinct from the hundreds of thousands slaughtered by conventional weaponry in Iraq and Syria.

Could this small number partly explain the adverse reaction, bringing to mind as it does Stalin's dictum that 'one death is a tragedy, a million a statistic'?

In any event - luvvies please note - I think Obama has got a bum (whoops) rap on this one.

If whites disappeared from America...

Day 1, Morning: The bIacks wake up, but sense that something is wrong. There is no radio and no T.V. Electrical power is partially gone. Venturing out into the world, they notice almost no traffic, no police, no airplanes... almost total silence. Realizing this, they immediately begin to loot. Gun stores and liquor stores are among the first to be emptied out. It’s a free for all. Windows are broken, cars are stolen from garages and parking lots. By the afternoon, most valuables in stores and private homes have been stolen.

By the end of the First Week: Electrical power is all but gone. Phone service is sporadic. Working bIacks are beginning to understand the nightmare. But no one listens to them; they are "Uncle Tom's", who have always appreciated life in America. Black gangs are beginning to rob, rape and murder at an even higher rate than before. There is no government, no order. There is nothing to stop them. It is a great big party. Look, we always said life would be great once YT gone.

By the end of the First Month: Looting and anarchy continue. Law abiding blacks have to defend their houses from looters. War begins among black gangs as they battle for territory and vanishing resources. There is no longer any electricity, and most fresh food has spoiled. Fires are widespread from looting, and very few know how to put them out. There is no more tap water.

By The End Of The Third Month: Canned food can still be found but fresh water, milk, bread and produce are non-existent. Gasoline becomes scarce. No television or radio. Garbage and sanitation services are gone, and diseases begin to spread. Rats multiply. Some hospitals are still running but with almost no trained staff. A few law-abiding blacks try to restore order and resort to a shoot on sight policy.

By The End Of The First Year: Starvation is rampant. Food becomes the most valuable thing in the "New Black America." Trees are cut down for firewood. Many die from cold. Most infants do not survive, as medical care becomes non-existent. A few blacks hoard all the food for themselves by the use of force (just like Africa today.) There is no light at night, except from wood fires. Blacks begin to reorganize by tribes. Gangs rule the city. Travel is almost impossible, except on horseback, and gangs frequently murder travelers. Youth engage in dueling, to prove their manhood. Nomads now roam from destroyed town-to-town looking for food. All farm animals have been slaughtered.

By The End Of Five Years: Nearly two thirds of the blacks are dead. The life span is down to about 35 years, as it is in many black countries in Africa today. The U.S. has become Africa, only worse, for there are no white men to organize aid and feed them.

Am I right or wrong?

PS: This material sent to me by reader James Lord. I'm told it's been on Stormfront and been around for nearly ten years.

I heartily endorse gender equality in sport

I'm well aware that the majority on this site have little time for professional sport, seeing it - correctly - as the exemplar par excellence of the bread and circuses strategy to keep White proles dumb and quiescent. But if like me you've been a fervid fan all your life this belated realisation isn't enough to switch off the interest. And actually it's not necessarily a bad thing as it enables you to keep a close eye on some of our enemy's activities.

One such activity is the women's equality agenda. An agenda which of course has nothing to do with equality of opportunity, rather that of outcome. The current brouhaha about prize money in women's tennis exemplifies this. For the record I'm all in favour of equality in sport. To the winner the spoils and all that.  In many ways sport represents the one true arbiter of ability. So I enthusiastically endorse the principle of joint male-female competitions.  And you'd imagine that the dykes who run women's tennis would feel the same way. After all, this would finally enable them to validate their endless claims to be as good as their male counterparts.

But strangely they don't want this. Not at all. In fact they scream and holler and flee from the idea like it were the plague. Why? Because they are only too aware - as is anybody with even a passing interest in the sport - that under such a regime not a single woman would make it past the 1st round, obliterated by their male opponents. Over a matter of months even the best of them would percolate down in the joint rankings until they were all out of the top 200 and thus condemned to playing in Challenger events.  The winners of such events might, if lucky, walk away with a cheque for $10,000. The rest, like their male equivalents now, would eke out a subsistence living, dining in cheap burger joints and sharing accommodation.

So you can understand their reluctance.

Same applies to other sports. There have been bitter complaints about women's soccer and rugby getting minimal coverage on TV and lack of corporate endorsements. Again I propose equality. Make all forms of football unisex. What would the sports look like after this revolutionary move? Why, exactly the same as they do now. Women wouldn't get within a donkey's roar of a top football or rugby team. And were the authorities to force "equality" like they do in business? Well, there are no HR Departments on the sports field. No sinecures. No safe zones. Failure to deliver gets cruelly exposed and ruthlessly punished.

So roll on sports equality.  If as you say grrrllls you're as good as the men you'll now have the chance to prove it.

PS: It's worth propagating this meme because it ineluctably links to the broader employment domain 'equality' racket.

That Turkish deal

Whatever illusions we might have harboured regarding EU traitors' leaders' efforts to solve the immivasion crisis have been confirmed by the so-called deal they've just struck with Turkey. The Turks' have promised to 'make all reasonable efforts'  to stem the flow of invaders to Greece.  An arrangement I'm sure Erdogan and his mafiosos will honour to the letter.

The arrangement (such as it is) applies only to Greece. The Turks will continue to usher the rabid hordes across the Bulgarian border in even greater numbers and presumably the more entrepreneurial among them will open up thriving new sea-based routes to Romania. And for each Syrian returned to Turkey the EU will take in one replacement from those already living in Turkey. What a deal! And for this the Turks will collect a €6 billion ransom, have their application for EU membership fast-tracked and visa requirements waived for most of their nearly 80 million inhabitants.

Even the supine and corrupt presstitutes in the media have deemed this a bad deal. But was it?  You see it depends on what the Eurocrats wanted to achieve. If their objective was to temporarily halt the politically embarrassing flood of rapefugees while ensuring the European population replacement project remained on course then in fact it was a very good deal. They appear to have done something about the crisis while reducing the momentum of the "far-right".

I make this suggestion because an iron-clad alternative solution is readily available to them if they want it. I'm referring to an adaptation of Australia's approach, an approach which has almost eliminated their illegal immigration problem. The EU could finance large detainment facilities in a number of key countries (e.g. Turkey, Egypt, Libya) to which all would-be illegal invaders would be sent. While there their applications could be processed with those rejected either returning to the countries of origin or else face indefinite detention at the centres.

Would the  human rights industry (and especially the Saudi Arabian chaired UN Human Rights Commission) object? Of course it would. They'd squeal and stamp their Gucci-clad feet and be joined by their lackeys in the media. But Australia faced the same challenges and just drove ahead.

No, my friends, I'm cynical about Eurocrats' motives and those of their political masters. For sure some of them will be genuine but the overall system is geared towards destroying European civilisation by blending out White people.

I remain to be convinced of a more benign interpretation.

Consolidating America's Jewdiciary

I notice that Obama has nominated yet another Jew to the US Supreme Court. The Guardian's extensive report  contrived to avoid mentioning this highly relevant fact. Highly relevant because Merrick Garland's appointment would result in the SCOTUS being comprised of four Jews and five goyim. And of that five there's not a single Protestant. In other words the descendants of the pioneers who built the country, and who still make up that country's largest religious cohort, don't have a single member on that land's highest court. Jews, who comprise less than 3% of the population will be just one short of a majority.

(As an aside, Garland has been widely praised for his "liberal" views on gun control. Liberal in this case meaning he's in favour of police seizing Constitutionally guaranteed and legally owned firearms from American citizens - 90% of them White.)

We need be in no doubt as to how a Supreme Kosher Court will perform. Think lower kosher courts' decisions that for example handed Lucky Larry Silverstein the WTC complex for a song, that instructed the insurance companies to pay out to him for the 'terrorist' attack and supported the Zuckerberg Facebook rip-off. And now we have this....a Federal Reserve Board employee caught passing sensitive information to Goldman Sachs (the Squid), an offence normally meriting time behind bars. But Judge Gabriel Gorenstein instead fined Jason Gross (and look at him, he's well named) a derisory $2,000 fine. Approximately the amount he'd normally pay for lunch, I imagine.

(As another aside, why the hell would GS need anyone to pass them FRB secrets? After all they control that institution, with their respective employees being almost interchangeable.)

All of which reminds me of what I wrote in this post.  "Jews always over-reached themselves via ethnic favouritism, becoming increasingly arrogant until ultimately, immune to any sense of responsibility and blinded to others' perception of them they provoked an explosive backlash. My own exemplar for this was the appointment of Stanley Fischer, former Governor of the Central Bank Of Israel as Deputy Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. This appointment was so grotesque, arrogant and insensitive that for the first time I began to think that Jews really might not be that clever after all. 

Now were I a member of the tribe in question, especially when you consider that tribe's existing stranglehold on the MSM, Hollywierd, the law, politics and academia I'd be saying - I really would -  Jesus lads, take it easy will yez? We'll have everyone else down on top of us like a ton of bricks. This is totally over the top. Stop it, for the love of God or we're all fucked."

Interesting times indeed......

Overplaying his hand? Probably not.

Arranging a political meeting with the President of the United States, even if he is a just a Kenyan-born ex-community organiser, must be extraordinarily difficult. Details on date, duration, objectives and outcomes must be negotiated months in advance by specialised teams. If you're lucky enough to get offered a slot you jump at the opportunity. And you never cancel, especially at short notice. And, if perchance circumstances demand that you must, you arrange an agreed statement through formal diplomatic channels. What you do not do, under any circumstances, is make the announcement to your own media before you've worked through the formal Presidential channels.

Unless you're Bibi Netenyahu. Bibi is special. Although leader of just a small country in the Eastern  Med which has a parasitical relationship with America, indeed which depends on America for its continued survival, he has no need to worry about openly insulting America's First Citizen. Because he's not really dealing with him but with those who control him and control the Congresscritters holding the purse strings.  I'm talking about ZOG.  And when ZOG has your back you don't need to worry.

Just look at this obscenity if you don't believe me.

And why did Bibi give Barry the finger, humiliating not just him but indirectly the whole American people? Well he's known to be pissed off that the goyim didn't go to war for him against Iran like they did in Iraq, Libya and Syria. And rubbing salt in the wounds by actually signing agreement with Iran. That's the Iran that's been weeks away from making a nuclear bomb for the last five years. According to Beni.

Undeterred by his country's humiliation VP Joe Biden nonetheless headed off to Tel Aviv, checkbook in hand, to present Bibi with an increased aid package for the next ten years.

Strange old world we live in.....

By their enemies shall you know them.....

If Americans have any reservations about voting for Trump (and I can understand why they might) his enemies should put them to rest because the increasingly desperate anti-Trump army is like an anti-White rogues' gallery. Neocons, the Republican Establishment, the whole Democratic Party, Muslims, the Jewish Establishment, the Pope, the mainstream media (MSM), Hollywood, the banksters, Israeli-Firsters, the 'music' industry, the Israeli Lobby, top military brass, NWO globalists, the ACLU, Amnesty International, the EU, anti-Putinites, dual-citizens of every hue.

The intrepid sleuths of the MSM - who proved themselves unable to discover Obama's phony birth certificate or his academic grades, whether he actually attended Columbia University, or explain evidence showing him to have been born in Kenya and registered in an Indonesian school as a Muslim, or how he came to use a Connecticut SS number even though he never lived  there and numerous other basic questions about a person occupying the highest position in the land - have had no such problem when it comes to DT. A stream of unsavoury revelations has flowed unabated since he began to look like a serious contender, obscure facts from earlier years, unverified recollections of 'friends' and former business associates have been used to blacken his reputation to a degree unparallelled in recent times'

What's the takeaway? If the anti-White nation-wrecking traitors are that worried about him he really must represent to them a mortal threat. And if the sleaze war doesn't take him down we can be assured that some other method will be used.

Ask JFK.

Oh, sorry, he's dead.

Bliss it was that dawn to be alive

Oh! I have slipped the surly bonds of earth

And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings

Forgive me if I wax lyrical this fine morning but some rare good fortune brightens my day and lightens my step. Because the just completed General Election in Ireland has seen two of the most malevolent, treacherous nation-polluting scumbags tossed onto the scrapheap of Irish politics. Both Alan ('Shat the Rat') Shatter and Aodhagin O'Riordain (known to his parents as Aiden O'Riordan) have been given the shaft. From Government Ministers to not even a seat on the back benches.

But not before the traitorous scum had used their period in power to supercharge the population replacement program for Ireland, the success of which can be measured by the sight in every city and town of a rapidly growing dark underclass living on our largesse.  Strange, was it not, that during the formation of the Government both were rewarded with Ministries giving them power over this very issue?  A bit like appointing Casey Anthony as Minister For Childcare.  O'Riordain took his defeat with a faggoty outburst of tears, a far cry from the vindictive power-crazed bully who persecuted a town mayor for pointing out that Africans were rude and aggressive. Watching him blubbering into the camera provided me with a deep inner glow of contentment.

Nothing to the joy evinced by Shatter's erstwhile colleagues who barely concealed their glee at his humiliation.  Even his friends hate him! Scouring media comments I was unable to detect a single one offering sympathy.  In one sense he's shot himself in the foot because he's done the image of Jewishness immense harm, at least in this country.And you'll be staggered at this - wait for it - but what did he put his defeat down to? Bingo! Anti-Semitism. Oy vey, the sufferink! A claim which attracted almost universal derision and further underlined its already declining power to whip the goyim into silence.

So Shatter, 'deformed, unfinished, sent before my time' will soon fade into obscurity, brooding on the words of Browning:

There's nobody on the rooftops now

Just a palsied few at the window set

Thus I entered and thus I go

Yes, go, ye bastards. And at the going down of the sun and in the morning we will remember you. For the damage you've inflicted on our country.

The value of a vignette

Sometimes a brief vignette can provide a more profound insight than dozens of weighty tomes. Just as a great novel can explore the the human condition better than any psychiatrist (which isn't saying a lot admittedly).  As such this report encapsulates in its chilling simplicity the British polity's catastrophic decline over the last few decades.

Teenager Joe Taylor was flagged for political extremism by his school's deputy head after he used a school computer to click on the UKIP website. (Note that UKIP is a perfectly legitimate political party (for now anyway) that enjoys the support of about a quarter of the electorate). Joe had been researching immigration following a classroom discussion on the subject. Teachers called in the police on the basis that the kid had raised 'welfare concerns' by visiting a 'politically incorrect' (sic) website. And get this, he was referred to the police unit that specialises in preventing jihadi grooming of "vulnerable" youngsters (you know, the kind who go on to become enthusiastic beheaders).

I suppose we shouldn't be surprised when the English have put someone like this in charge of their law enforcement.

The Britain of yesteryear has been destroyed.  A peaceable, polite and reserved people once enjoyed probably the least oppressive society on earth, one policed by the friendly local bobby and where political freedom of expression was almost absolute. Like when HRH Queen Elizabeth II took over. This has by now degenerated into an Orwellian dystopia where a schoolboy gets hauled in by the police for what's essentially Thought Crime.

Meanwhile the orc invaders breed like streptococci.....