Sunday, 5 July 2015

The war on the Confederate Flag

Have you  ever seen anything like the sudden war on the Confederate Flag? Just like the gay marriage issue it's appeared like a thunderbolt out of nowhere.  Right now it's the most urgent item on the agenda. All manifestations must be eradicated. Immediately. And why? Well the ostensible reason is the hurt it be causin' dose po' black folk. The Legacy of Slavery, you know. Now it could be argued that dem po' black folk - none of whom ever experienced slavery -  be living high on the hog for the last fifty years on reparations from those who never owned a slave.  But as Ronald Reagan used to say, let's not talk about that.

So let's talk instead about who actually owned those slaves. Here's some information derived from the peer-reviewed research project entitled Black Masters: A Free Family of Color in the Old South, by Michael P. Johnson and James L. Roak 

By the early 1700's the huge number of free blacks prompted fears of a “Negro insurrection” leading to Virginia Colonial ordering the repatriation of freed blacks back to Africa. But many if not most blacks sold themselves to white masters so they would not have to go to Africa. Clever boys!

By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. In 1830, a fourth of the free Negro slave masters in South Carolina owned 10 or more slaves; eight owning 30 or more. 
Black Duke University professor John Hope Franklin recorded that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city. In 1860 there were at least six blacks in Louisiana who owned 65 or more slaves. The largest number, 152 slaves, were owned by the widow C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards. Another black slave magnate in Louisiana, with over 100 slaves, was Antoine Dubuclet, the owner of a huge sugar plantation.

In Charleston, South Carolina in 1860, 125 free Negroes owned slaves; six of them owning 10 or more. Of the $1.5 million in taxable property owned by free Negroes in Charleston, more than $300,000 (20%) represented slave holdings. In North Carolina 69 free Negroes were slave owners.

There are many other examples of black slave owners cited. Some of them even employed white overseers to manage their black slaves. Now we also know that the proportion of slave-owning White in the Confederacy was probably as low as 3%.  Soooo.......the reality is that many blacks, like sated ticks from a lifetime feasting on White-provided "reparations", may themselves be the descendants of slave owners. While the antecedents of the unfortunate White mugs picking up the reparations tab were almost certainly not slave owners.

Isn't that something else?

See also my post on The Great Slavery Wheeze.


rambaloosa said...

As everyone here knows by now,slaves were often easily procured by offering payment in desired goods to the African chiefs,who would gladly sell off their own subjects. I think something similar is happening RIGHT NOW. I call it The Grand Bargain. Its simple.

The black leadership knows immigration is a disaster for blacks.Yet they happily-even slavishly,heh heh-- go along. Obama is crazy for immigration. He knows damn well that a huge segment of the black populace is literally finished. Their is no place for them. NONE. They will live in EBT depravity forever, devolving into a nation of Shitaviouses. Yet blacks go along and say NOTHING, as long as they get theirs.

Chicago Polack said...

I have a hard time believing that these slaveowners were high tones. The high tones would rebel against another high tone, seeing him as an equal. The aforementioned slaveowners must have been mulattoes, quadroons, octroons, etc., likely for the most part inheriting their estates from their white fathers. I would bet that, if you could have gotten all these "black" slaveowners together for a group photo, the photo would resemble a group shot of today's leadership of the NAACP, Urban League, CORE, etc.

Iron Felix said...

Very interesting stuff there Savant; I am somewhat surprised---but not entirely so. I believe something of the sort obtained in South Africa prior to it's destruction. Apparently there was a significant population of very wealthy Blacks thriving under apartheid. Anyone got any info on that?

Malcolm Excrement said...

Chicago Polack. I beat old john retired copper to it but I see there have been 44 shootings over your weekend in the Windy City with 8 DOA's including a 7 year old niglet. Celebrate diversity!

Dan said...

Django unchained carefully ignored this reality.

The Stepnfetchit played by High Nig Jackson would have most likely been a Halfcaste who had a gang of his own slaves.

The slaves were mostly operated as gangs. That's a social unit of bondsman that would have operated among blacks as it does today among the crips and bloods. Black gang culture most likely resembles the way nig slave owners owned their own darkies.

progressive-slayer said...

Felix. The only thing stopping blacks owning more slaves was their inability to build up farms, plantations etc. It most certainly was NOT any sense of morality or altruism.

Uncle Nasty said...

Could this have some bearing on the matter?

Getting back to off-topic, I see the Greeks have told the rest of Europe to piss off and everyone is running around screaming that the sky is going to fall.

Who feels that it would be a good thing to bring the whole rotten edifice down around the ears of the jews ... and then string them up?

Check these guys out ...

Especially, I recommend the list of those who wish to dump the EU. Scroll to "Other parties which advocate for withdrawal from the EU"


Uncle Nasty said...

Further to my last, I was reading that poor man's history of the EU and EEC, when I saw this little gem buried three quarters down ..

In other words, Greece wasn't allowed to default, even though it needed to, because doing so threatened to set off a series of self-fulfilling prophecies that could have ripped the common currency apart.

Will Greece and Puerto Rico hurt your wallet?(1:27)
Greece and Puerto Rico face economic disasters. Here's what you need to know about the defaults and how it will affect the U.S. (Jason Aldag/The Washington Post)

So Greece got bailed out to the extent that it was given money to then give to the people to whom it owed money. That was good news for the aforementioned French and German banks that got their money back, but it wasn't for Greece. It still had as much debt as before, only now it owed official creditors such as the IMF instead of private ones like the banks. Now, it's true that two years later, its official-sector debts were given lower interest rates and longer maturities at the same time that its private-sector debts were actually written down. But it wasn't nearly enough, especially given that it was getting harder for them to pay anything back with their economy collapsing under the combined weight of budget cuts and a too-strong currency. Indeed, since 2008, Greece's debt burden has shot up mostly because of its economy getting smaller rather than its debts getting bigger.

My emphasis ...

Who was it who said:- "This year, they own the crop ... next year they own the farm"?


Uncle Nasty said...

Tell me that this does not have a familiar ring to it ...


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The "Dragonnades" were a French government policy instituted by Louis XIV in 1681 to intimidate Huguenot families into either leaving France or re-converting to Catholicism. This involved the billeting of ill-disciplined dragoons in Protestant households with implied permission to abuse the inhabitants and destroy or steal their possessions. The soldiers employed in this role were satirized as "missionary dragoons".

With the revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685, Louis XIV withdrew the privileges and toleration that Protestant Huguenots in France had been guaranteed under the edict for nearly 87 years, and ordered the destruction of Huguenot churches and the closure of Huguenot schools.

Following the revocation of religious toleration, Louis XIV combined legal persecution with a policy of terrorizing recalcitrant Huguenots who refused to convert to Catholicism by billeting both dragoons and ordinary infantrymen in their homes. The soldiers were instructed to harass and intimidate the occupants to persuade them to either convert to the state religion or to emigrate. As mobile mounted infantry, the 14 regiments of dragoons in the French Army of the period were sometimes used for what would now be called internal security duties and were an effective instrument for persecuting the Huguenots.[1]

Like so many of these draconian schemes, however, the consequences were not fully realised.

The campaign ultimately proved detrimental to France's economy because the Huguenots who chose to flee possessed skills such as silkweaving, clock-making, silversmithing, and optometry, and became a valuable addition to the economies of the countries to which they fled, including Louis's sworn enemies in the United Netherlands and the nascent Great Britain.

A great amount of these Huguenots, it should be mentioned, made their way to South Africa, hence the preponderance of French origin surnames among Afrikaners ... DuPree, DuPlessis, Duvenage, Roussouw, etc.

They founded the wine industry in ZA.


Anonymous said...

Here, here Savant! Once again you have provided facts which the Leftie PC crowd would to forever stay suppressed. I am, in fact, an American Southerner, and have over the course of my 55 years seen Southern heritage and culture stripped away. From the banning of the song "Dixie" to the removal of memorials to the Confederate dead, all things associated with the Old South have "Gone With The Wind." (Sorry... I couldn't resist the movie reference...

I suppose the ultimate goal of this country's Left is to turn the South, and America for that matter, into a mongrel soceity like Brazil's.

Anonymous said...

Farrakhan's scholarship on Jews and black slavery is worthwhile, too.

john7 said...

Not only were several 'free persons of colour' slave owners, but far from all slaves were africans. Thousands of whites were chattel, and there were more in the north than in the South before the war of northern aggression began. They always sorta forget that...

Flanders said...

Let no one be deluded that the war is against a flag or political or philosophical opinions. The war is against race - The White peoples of the world. This is an axiom which we should never forget.

"Yet, few have heard of these horrors perpetrated by the mongrel Jews against the White Race. Their hatred for Christianity and Jesus Christ has compelled the Jews to institute policies of genocide, which are in force at all times."

What is plain in the war against the flag of the Confederacy, and in forcing Sodomistic behavior into ascendency over normality, is that it is merely the visible part of a larger plan, and that these are merely steps forward on a master plan, a plan to eliminate all Whites - and that is EVERYWHERE there are White men, in Europe, Great Britian, or Australia. It is as much a war against negro-loving whites, Southern or Northern, and whites who merely surf from the front of their TV sets as it is against White and Nationalist people.

Flanders said...

"ON DECEMBER 24, 1971, the New York Times ran one of the first of many articles on a new holiday designed to foster unity among African Americans. The holiday, called Kwanzaa, was applauded by a certain sixteen-year-old minister who explained that the feast would perform the valuable service of "de-whitizing" Christmas."

"It was in newspaper articles like that, repeated in papers all over the country, that the tradition of Kwanzaa began. It is a tradition not out of Africa but out of Orwell. Both history and language have been bent to serve a political goal. When that New York Times article appeared, Ron Karenga's crimes were still recent events. If the reporter had bothered to do any research into the background of the Kwanzaa founder, he might have learned about Karenga's trial earlier that year on charges of torturing two women who were members of US (United Slaves), a black nationalist cult he had founded."

Flanders said...

Jews and black slavery in Dutch and English colonies - info from a Rabbi Raphael

"During the sixteenth century, exiled from their Spanish homeland and hard-pressed to escape the clutches of the Inquisition, Spanish and Portuguese Jews fled to the Netherlands; the Dutch enthusiastically welcomed these talented, skilled businessmen."

"They began in the 1500's and 1600's to establish themselves in the Dutch and English colonies in the New World. These included Curacao, Surinam, Recife, and New Amsterdam (Dutch) as well as Barbados, Jamaica, Newport, and Savannah (English)."

"Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tax) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jew purchased from the West Indies Company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.

"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the 'triangular trade' that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760's, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760's and early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."

"Groups of Jews began to arrive in Surinam in the middle of the sevententh century, after the Portuguese regained control of northern Brazil. By 1694, twenty-seven years after the British had surrendered Surinam to the Dutch, there were about 100 Jewish families and fifty single Jews there, or about 570 persons. They possessed more than forty estates and 9,000 slaves, contributed 25,905 pounds of sugar as a gift for the building of a hospital, and carried on an active trade with Newport and other colonial ports. By 1730, Jews owned 115 plantations and were a large part of a sugar export business which sent out 21,680,000 pounds of sugar to European and New World markets in 1730 alone.

Slave trading was a major feature of Jewish economic life in Surinam which as a major stopping-off point in the triangular trade. Both North American and Caribbean Jews played a key role in this commerce: records of a slave sale in 1707 reveal that the ten largest Jewish purchasers (10,400 guilders) spent more than 25 percent of the total funds (38,605 guilders) exchanged."
Excerpts are from:
"Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History", By Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael, New York: Behrman House, Inc., (1983), pp. 14, 23-25.

Frank Galton said...

Daily Telegraph, 03 March 2013

On the eve of the American civil war, there were 3,000 black slave-owners in the United States.

Note that Daniel Hannan mentions Christian and Muslim slave traders, but neglects to mention Jewish slave traders.

i24 News, 31 December 2013

Dutch rabbi: Jews were deeply involved in slave trade

Jewish Virtual Library

[Sephardic Jew] Aaron Lopez owned or had interests in over 80 [EIGHTY!] sailing vessels. Lopez was also one of the original founders and contributors of Touro Synagogue and by the end of his life was recognized as one of the "Merchant Princes" of early America. His merchant trading interests included rum, molasses, dry goods and AFRICAN SLAVES.

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

New York Times, 02 September 2001 slave owners...were far more common than many people like to admit. Black masters in South Carolina, for example, were confined to the margins of society but held many of the same attitudes about race as whites. Black masters continued to hold slaves even as the Union Army prepared for its terrible march through South Carolina.

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

The Root, 04 March 2013

Did Black People Own Slaves?

By Henry Louis Gates, Jr.

One of the most vexing questions in African-American history is whether free African Americans themselves owned slaves. The short answer to this question, as you might suspect, is yes, of course; some free black people in this country bought and sold other black people, and did so at least since 1654, continuing to do so right through the Civil War. For me, the really fascinating questions about black slave-owning are how many black "masters" were involved, how many slaves did they own and why did they own slaves?

The answers to these questions are complex, and historians have been arguing for some time over whether free blacks purchased family members as slaves in order to protect them -- motivated, on the one hand, by benevolence and philanthropy, as historian Carter G. Woodson put it, or whether, on the other hand, they purchased other black people "as an act of exploitation," primarily to exploit their free labor for profit, just as white slave owners did. The evidence shows that, unfortunately, both things are true. The great African-American historian, John Hope Franklin, states this clearly: "The majority of Negro owners of slaves had some personal interest in their property." But, he admits, "There were instances, however, in which free Negroes had a real economic interest in the institution of slavery and held slaves in order to improve their economic status."

In a fascinating essay reviewing this controversy, R. Halliburton shows that free black people have owned slaves "in each of the thirteen original states and later in every state that countenanced slavery," at least since Anthony Johnson and his wife Mary went to court in Virginia in 1654 to obtain the services of their indentured servant, a black man, John Castor, for life.

And for a time, free black people could even "own" the services of WHITE INDENTURED SERVANTS in Virginia as well.

Read more:

Henry Louis Gates, Jr. is the Alphonse Fletcher University Professor and Director of the Hutchins Center for African and African American Research at Harvard University.

Frank Galton

Flanders said...

"Nine out of ten Africans were shipped to Brazil. Jewish scholar Dr. Arnold Wiznitzer described the early Jewish presence:

Besides their important position in the sugar industry and in tax farming, they dominated the slave trade....The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices.

•According to Jewish scholar Dr. Harold Brackman, during the 1600s “slave trading in Brazil became a ‘Jewish’ mercantile specialty in much the same way it had been in early medieval Europe.” In fact, wrote scholar Jonathan Schorsch, “Jewish merchants routinely possessed enormous numbers of slaves temporarily before selling them off.” The Jewish Encyclopedia adds that “Jewish commercial activity” in this time included a “monopoly of the slave trade.”

Frank Galton said...

Daily Mail, 26 March 2007

Many slave-traders were in fact black and some of the slaves were white. The Arab slave trade, which stretched from Saharan Africa across the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea, pre-dated and was more longstanding than the European trade across the Atlantic.

There were also African slave traders, particularly in East Africa, which was a fertile market for slaves sold to the Middle East and elsewhere.

Yet for decades, British schoolchildren have been taught that black people were only ever victims and white people only ever oppressors.

Such distortion has bred division and resentment and given rise to an unending clamour for apology - and even for financial compensation.

Across the world, the demand by black lobby groups for reparations for the slave trade amounts to an eyewatering $777trillion.

...David Pott, one of those who walked to London in chains and who has taken it upon himself to apologise to Africa for Britain's part in slavery, acknowledged on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze that he was aware he had thus apologised to the descendants of African slave-traders as well as slaves.

But this was only right and proper, he said, because unlike the colonial British, the black slave-traders had no option but to buy and sell slaves.

This attitude, which utterly demeans black people by stripping them of equal RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR OWN ACTIONS, fuels the wider culture of victimhood which ludicrously blames slavery for ABSENT BLACK FATHERS, BLACK GANG CULTURE or even BLACK-ON-BLACK CRIME.

BBC, 20 August 1999

Trillions demanded in slavery reparations

The West is being asked to pay Africa $777 thousand billion within five years in reparation for enslaving Africans while colonising the continent.

New York Times, 02 September 2001

...the recent debate about reparations for slavery has introduced a different narrative in which black people are cast as a victim class seeking compensation for the suffering of ancestors.

...the sweeping notion that individual black Americans are owed a ''debt'' for slavery is a bridge too far. Black families have made and lost fortunes just as white families have. There is in addition no provable connection between 19th-century bondage and specific cases of 21st-century destitution. For these reasons, a publicly financed reparations program based on ancestry is not sustainable politically.

Such a program would logically be open to MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE LIVED AS ''WHITE'' FOR GENERATIONS but are descended from enslaved black people. The program would also be available to the descendants of BLACK SLAVE OWNERS, who were far more common than many people like to admit. Black masters in South Carolina, for example, were confined to the margins of society but held many of the same attitudes about race as whites. Black masters continued to hold slaves even as the Union Army prepared for its terrible march through South Carolina.

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

chicago pollack you did beat me to it,and for your punishment i will find you and steal your kilbsa sandwich that mom made for your lunch,cheers my friend .diversity indeed ,john .

Flanders said...

Off-Topic - But worth it!

JEWS: Celebrating Centuries of Control

"Jews have accomplished so much. And for these final years of jewish dominance, they are going to soak it all in! Trigger warning: this video is like another Shoah.

PS – This video was pulled from jewtube after getting 2,000 views in one day. It was then pulled from liveleak within an hour. That’s why it is self-hosted here, and may load a little slowly. Be patient, it’s worth it!

PPS – This is a satire of SNL’s “Whites” skit."
Link is to the page which has the video:

Iron Felix said...

An oddity; slavery existed for much longer under the Stars and Stripes than it did under the Stars and Bars.

Flanders said...

"A black female, Professor Charshee McIntyre, tells about the jews who near-monopolized, almost fully, the slave trade.

“The case of the Newport merchant-shippers is instructive because these Jewish merchants not only engaged in the actual trade of capturing, buying and selling Africans but also profited from other industries ancillary to it. The shipbuilding industry in Newport, partially financed by Jewish moneylenders and owned by many Jewish shipbuilders, profited handsomely from the transporting of enslaved Africans. These Jews also gained from insuring the slave ships and their cargoes.

Newport was not the only seat of Jewish activity in the buying and selling of humans to make them slaves. One Samuel Jacobs, a troubled son of a well-to-do Jewish merchant in Quebec, also journeyed in 1785 to Jamaica to become “a man” by taking up the life of a merchant. Bertram Wallace Korn, in Jews and Negro Slavery, claims that “Jewish Settlers in the West Indies Colonies were at least as influential as those on the North American mainland.” Benjamin Monsanto from the Hague and his wife, Clara, from Curacao were Marranos (Christianized Jews). They lived in Natchez, Miss., and engaged in the international and domestic slave trade.

Writers who discuss Jews and slavery and/or the slave trade tend to give the impression that no Southern Jews engaged in the practice. But Korn dispels this myth and documents the Southern involvement, particularly after the American Revolution. He picked the 18th and 19th centuries because “the colonial period was the heyday of slave importation from Africa, and Northern Jews were far more active in this aspect of the slave trade than Southern Jews.”

Korn used figures from “An Estimate and Analysis of the Jewish Population of the United States in 1790.” Georgia and Virginia census analyses were destroyed, but he compiled the following:

When we reconcile the numbers in the tables to find how many enslaved Africans each family was likely to hold, we arrived at Jewish slave-owning families averaging 2.5 enslaved Africans in the North and 5 enslaved Africans in the South, with an overall total for both North and South of +4.5 enslaved Africans per family. If we average the percentage of the entire Jewish community holding enslaved people (particularly Africans) in this table, we find 40 percent, a figure much higher than the percentage of slave-owners in the rest of the country.

However, if we check that ±40 percent against 129 wills of Southern Jews, 33 disposed or discussed slaves, giving up a 25-percent ownership among the Jews, equaling the rest of the U.S. census in 1860, which cites 75 percent of Whites not owning slaves at all.”

From about 3/4ths down at the link.

Iron Felix said...

Progressive-slayer, not quite clear how your posting relates to mine of 21.48--------

brian boru said...

How is it that the white race, supposedly the smartest on the planet, gets taken for a ride for so long by such filthy creatures as niggers and jews? I believe that in the early 18th century there were even cases of freed nigger slaves owning white indentured servants. Apparently, they passed a law forbidding such practices so it must have been occurring at some point. There were still white slaves in the Ottoman Empire in the late 19th century when all the niggers in the US had been freed. Of course, today there are still tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of white slaves in the jew-run sex slave trade. However, for most whites only niggers were the victims of slavery and only whites were slave owners. The millions of white slaves in the jew-run GULAG of the Soviet Union, who lived and died in conditions unimaginable to the nigger slaves of the Old South have been erased from history, as have the million or so white slaves, including Irish, taken by the North Africans between the 15th and 18th centuries. As Henry Ford stated, 'history is bunk', especially when written by jews.

Rob said...

The flag you're talking about isn't the Stars and Bars, Savant. It's the Confederate Battle Flag. Here's the Stars and Bars.

Celtic Morning said...

Just had this from an American friend re the Confederate Flag. "When I was a small boy my great grandfather once told us about the flag.'it was the battle flag' he said 'the only time you saw it was when the Confederate Army went into a major attack. In such times you could look to your right and to your left and see long lines of ten to twenty thousand men moving steadily across the fields. Following those blood red flags into the smoke,sound and smell of battle. There was power in it and you got caught up in it. That was when you would hear that wild hunting cry of the rebel yell.Like thousands of wolves howling when their quarry was in sight. Nobody ever practiced it. It was just there. Something in our heritage I think. Coming down to us from the blood soaked battlefields of Scotland and England.'" My reply to him was that we now see it about to be replaced by the rainbow flag of the degenerates and perverts and it appears that the only hope for the western man is from Putin and his Russia. Who would have thought as much even just twenty years ago? We have to make a stand somewhere, someday; for all our flags and for our honour and our childrens children.

IGnolde said...

The Confederate Battle Flag WAS the Stars and Bars. One and the same.

Sentient said...

Who was it who said:- "This year, they own the crop ... next year they own the farm"?

I don't know who said that. But have a fair idea who they were talking about!

The Mad Hater said...

"Note that Daniel Hannan mentions Christian and Muslim slave traders, but neglects to mention Jewish slave traders."

Daniel knows what side his bread is buttered. 'To know who rules over you, ask who cannot be criticised'.

Dan said...

No. The Stars n Bars is the CSA flag.

The Confederate Battle Flag is the red field with the Andrews cross with intersecting lines of stars.

The CBF was designed for the Army of Northern Virginia first and became increasingly used by other Confederate units and states.

Most people wouldn't recognize the stars n bars.

white_rose said...

Great research again from Flanders and Frank Galton.

Anonymous said...

Some accounts from former slaves interviewed during the late 1930's:

Adeline Johnson, age 93:

"That was a happy time, with happy days...I'll be satisfied to see my Savior that my old marster worshiped and my husband preach about. I wants to be in heaven with all my white folks, just to wait on them and love them, and serve them, sorta like I did in slavery time. That will be enough heaven for Adeline."

Mary Anderson, age 86:

"I think slavery was a mighty good thing for Mother, Father, me and the other members of the family, and I cannot say anything but good for my old marster and missus, but I can only speak for those whose conditions I have known during slavery and since. For myself and them I will say again, slavery was a mighty good thing."

Anonymous said...

Reading the comments here makes one understand that Whites are not as stupid as they seem to be. I don't get it.

Flanders said...

Part 1 of 2:

As a commenter said regarding the posting linked below, "Yes. The military and police depts are being groomed and prepped to murder us. Even west point has issued a ‘training scenario’ in their latest text books outlining a ‘right wing white supremacists rebellion’ slated for the summer of 2016. Get ready folks – it aint gonna be pleasant…".

The following is from Part 2 of a 3 Part series, and the LINK IS MARKED AS BEING UNSAFE for certain reasons, WHICH I HAVE ALWAYS IGNORED for this SITE and I have never observed adverse behavior from my visits. There is other good info there, too. Anyway, you will be deciding whether to visit it or not, and I'm just relaying my own experience.

"The Psychology of The Domesticated, Middle-Class White

The other half of the asymmetrical FRC victimization equation is the psychology of the typical victim. I’ll try to keep this section as short as possible, which is one of my overall missions in writing this.

I’ll start by saying that, as many on the left insist, White people are privileged. By this I mean that they have the “privilege” to grow up usually safely assuming that people who look like them:
◾Will provide for them in regards to the “family contract” (housing, food, supervision)
◾Won’t behave violently towards them aside from occasional spankings, possibly
◾Won’t appear and disappear in varying states of intoxication
◾Will provide the services and goods they advertise without bold deception
◾Won’t behave in loud, boisterous, provocative and obnoxious ways

Once again, this is the NORM. We’ve all read A Child Called ‘It’ and we know Whites can be daughter-raping drunks. But I’m generalizing like mad here.

As a result of the relative social security of White society, Whites get in the “habit” of trusting. They talk to strangers. They roll down their windows when strangers approach. They answer honestly when asked where they live. They open the front door when strangers knock. In sum, Whites have low levels of racial “in-group” suspicion, on average.

At the same time, White people are targeted from preschool onwards to be aware of the racial and social sensitivities of minorities, especially blacks. Blacks are also presented in the media in a manner wholly inconsistent with what statistics tell us about them. I call this the “Denzel Washington Effect.” Blacks are quite deliberately portrayed as being less criminal, less violent and more intelligent than they truly are, ON AVERAGE. As a result, they are increasingly granted honorary and troubling “in-group” status by Whites, often to deadly effect. You can be sure that black criminals use the “polite” acculturation of the White middle class to their benefit.

Flanders said...

[Part 2 of 2]

"Also, middle-class Whites assume that authority figures, especially in the public safety sector, will respond to their needs and protect them effectively. New Orleans natives snicker at times when tourists learn the hard way that not all police are polite, tow-headed farm boys.

Another important consideration is that Whites don’t generally settle disputes with interpersonal violence past the age of about 15 and are thus untrained to spot the clues that precede it and, often, will say after they have been assaulted that they simply can’t believe that another adult hit them. White females are even less likely to be “violence-literate” than White males. But blacks grow up in a culture in which sneak assaults, fights, mob violence and other forms of violence are not a surprise and, in fact, are entertainment. World Star Hip Hop is an example of this. Outside of high school football, wrestling tournaments or karate class, White people don’t generally behave this way and don’t generally perform well in the situations in which others do.

In summary, Whites are generally:
◾Socialized to be careful of the feelings of minorities
◾Not interpersonally violent
◾Seeking to “talk it out” or “be reasonable”
◾Deferential towards authority figures
◾From backgrounds in which they been well cared for

In other words, sitting ducks.

If two groups were ever less suited for peaceable coexistence, it is the descendants of European settlers and the descendants of African slaves.

Back to Part One

Part Three

Heraclitus said...

"Let no one be deluded that the war is against a flag or political or philosophical opinions. The war is against race - The White peoples of the world. "

I think Flanders that many if not most of us on this site realise that by now. Well said though.

Amateur Brain Surgeon said...

The 1860 census showed more slaves in the north than in the south but the real problem then, and now, was not slavery. The real problem was the Yankee. He had both whites and blacks working as slaves (Slavs is root of slaves) in his northern factories and he had no intention of liberating them.

Honest Abe (He got there nickname for the same reason a 400 lb mobster gets the nickname, Tiny) began a war of northern aggression against the south solely owing to the Morrill Tariff - see his 1st inaugural speech.

The Yankee is the descendant of the judaised protestants who created America and to this damn day they think they are God's chosen people meant to bring the "blessings" of American liberty to every damn place on earth - they just started in the south.

America is the new evil empire and it has no intention of letting THE secular symbol of liberty - The Confederate Flag - exist anymore.

In America, the Southern man is the only regional man expected to revile his kith and kin, blood and soil and the Yankee continues to hate his liberty-loving guts and, not only that, the Yankee tells the Southern man that what he thinks the Confederate Flag signifies, liberty, courage, honor, - HIS FLAG - does not mean that.

The question of slavery is essentially recondite; it mainly serves as an the engine of guilt processing the wheat of liberty in to the chaff of collectivism.

Amateur Brain Surgeon said...

Why the continued nonsense about race? Who'n'hell do you think is doing this?

Do you even know what percentage of the population in America is black, Jewish?

The has all been accomplished by WHITE MEN'

Lord have mercy

AB_SP said...

What you say about the Yankees might be true brain surgeon but we have enough enemies without turning on one another.

Flanders said...

An important article which should not be missed, and it might be a wise move to copy it to your files for the abundance of straight information it contains, is from Texe Marrs.

"Standing on a hillside before a motley assemblage of 500 sea robbers and cut-throats, the Jewish creole dandy [The jew - Jean Lafitte] dispatched 60 ships throughout the Caribbean to find Spanish slave ships, and he held weekly slave auctions at his retreat on the Louisiana coast.

Amsterdam armed his ships. Auction houses preferred his slaves, who were sturdy and healthy, since only the hardiest survived in his ships from the disease and brutal treatment of their journey. 400 blacks would be sold in a single day and smuggled into Louisiana, and LaFitte monopolized the commerce of the Mississippi Valley, became known as the “greatest trader in all the West” in 1814.

Remember the War of 1812? Remember when the British burned Washington, DC? The Rothschilds have never given up their plan to own America.

Judah P. Benjamin
Judah P. Benjamin, 1811-1884

Judah Benjamin was a Jewish plantation owner, owned 140-150 slaves, and was a fanatical proponent of slavery. When he was elected to the Senate he spoke out passionately in favor of slavery and secession.

He was so close/inspeparable to Jefferson Davis that Davis’ wife was very concerned. He ran the South before and during the War, and fled to England after the War where he became the head barrister lawyer for the Rothchilds and the Royals.

Judah Benjamin was also Secretary of War and Attorney General during the Confederacy. He pretty much ran the South. Yikes! I don’t think I’d like to be a slave owned by this guy! Creepy!"

"Texe says: “Jews own the casinos today—all the great casinos of today.” Lafitte bred women for sex. BRED THEM. They were gung-ho for the south and for slavery. The Talmud says that we well all be their slaves, per the rabbis, when they get their antichrist world government. Either slaves or die.

“Why did they change in the ’60s and take up civil rights? To drive a wedge between blacks and whites? Yes, of course. Many rabbis admit to that. Whatever land they find themselves, the Jew says “I’m not a citizen here, but of Israel.” In the US today with 7.5 million Jews, the majority say we are not Americans, we are of Israel. Israel will accept them no matter what, even if criminals, and many criminals are in Israel from US.
"Since Judaism is based on hatred of Jesus and humanity, and a determination to own the world and kill and enslave every non-Jew, in my opinion the only good Jew is an ex-Jew. Just like the only good Satanist is an ex-Satanist. Their religion, their cause, their core beliefs, what drives them, makes them evil."

Flanders said...

A biography on Judah P Benjamin, which I suspect to have been written by another jew, treats him as another jew would. If I'm not mistaken Benjimin had earlier escaped to Belize, living an opulent life, prior to returning to England."

"While Judah Benjamin preferred such obscurity, his prominence as a Jew assured that he would come under harsh scrutiny, both during and after his life. For example, on the floor of the Senate Ben Wade of Ohio charged Benjamin with being an "Israelite in Egyptian clothing." With characteristic eloquence, Benjamin replied, "It is true that I am a Jew, and when my ancestors were receiving their Ten Commandments from the immediate Deity, amidst the thundering and lightnings of Mt. Sinai, the ancestors of my opponent were herding swine in the forests of Great Britain."
I consider the article below to be a credible account showing heavy Rothschild involvement on the Southern side, at least initially. Regardless, it is a good recounting about the Rothschild clan.

"History reveals that the Rothschilds were heavily involved in financing both sides in the Civil War. Lincoln put a damper on their activities when, in 1862 and 1863, he refused to pay the exorbitant rates of interest demanded by the Rothschilds and issued constitutionally-authorized, interest free United States notes. For this and other acts of patriotism Lincoln was shot down in cold-blood by John Wilkes Booth on April 14, 1865, just five days after Lee surrendered to Grant at Appomattox Court House, Virginia.

Booth's grand-daughter, Izola Forrester, states in This One Mad Act that Lincoln's assassin had been in close contact with mysterious Europeans prior to the slaying, and had made at least one trip to Europe. Following the killing, Booth was whisked away to safety by members of the Knights of the Golden Circle. According to the author, Booth lived for many years following his disappearance."

Anonymous said...

Off topic. Sorry.
I was thinking about how the MSM like labels. This blog would be called 'The far right' Irish Savant. The 'racist' David Duke, the 'Neo-Nazi' EDL. The 'Fascist' 85 y.o. lady who doesn't like Moslems. You know exactly what I mean because you see it nearly every day.
Why don't we start our own truth campaign? Every time we comment we use a tag. The Anti-British Labour Party. The Far Left Conservative Party. The Anti White Guardian.
The Anti Christian Rotherham Council.
The possibilities are endless. The worst that can happen is the comment is deleted. When allowed and you get called a moron it gives the opportunity to fire off a few facts that will astound and amaze the ignorant.


Flanders said...

From the section: Jewish Slave-Dealing in the United States

Jews were twice as likely to be slave owners as the average Southerner. Rabbi and historian Bertram Korn, the acknowledged expert on 19th-century Jews, wrote: “It would seem to be realistic to conclude that any Jew who could afford to own slaves and had need for their services would do so ... Jews participated in every aspect and process of the exploitation of the defenseless Blacks.”

The very first Jewish communal settlement in the United States was a Florida sugar plantation supported entirely by the labor of dozens of enslaved Africans.

According to documents, when the earliest settlers in New York decided to enter the slave trade, they contacted “the jobbers and the Jews,” who were the recognized international dealers. The largest shipments of Africans arriving in New York in the first half of the 18th century were commissioned by Jewish merchants.

Jews owned slave pens where they warehoused Africans and sold them wholesale. They smuggled slaves to places where slavery was illegal, rented them when they did not want to buy, and bred African women for sexual purposes. Jews ran jails and imprisoned and punished Black slaves; they served as constables, sheriffs, detectives, and bounty hunters. Jewish peddlers traveling the countryside were known to search for and capture runaway slaves and bring them in for the bounty.

The founders of Richmond, Virginia's Jewish community were all slaveholders. When slavery was outlawed in Georgia, Jews left; they returned only when slavery was reinstated.

In Newport, Rhode Island—the center of the rum and slave trade—every Jewish family owned Black slaves. Their synagogue was built by Black slaves “of some skill.” Of the 22 Newport distilleries serving the triangular slave trade, all were owned by Jews. American rabbis owned and rented slaves. The leading abolitionist organization bitterly complained that Jews “have never taken any steps whatever” against slavery.

The nation's highest paid clergyman, Rabbi Morris Raphall of New York, defended slavery and claimed God Himself had sanctioned it. The one rabbi who forcefully attacked slavery, Baltimore's David Einhorn, was thrown out of his own Jewish congregation and forced to flee the city.

Flanders said...

Part 2 of 2

The Jewish writer Mordecai Manuel Noah was such a virulent racist that the very first Black newspaper, Freedom's Journal, was started in 1827 just to combat his racist attacks.

Jews helped to suppress slave uprisings and in 1831, Jews were involved in hunting down the great Nat Turner and his freedom fighters. More than 3,000 Jews fought for the slaveholders in the Civil War, and a Jewish owner of a 140-slave plantation, Judah P. Benjamin, was secretary of state for the Confederacy.

His picture is engraved on Confederate currency. Jewish bankers like the Erlangers financed the Confederacy. Benjamin financed the Ku Klux Klan after the war.

Jews willed Black humans from one Jewish generation to another, and sold Black babies away from their parents. One Jew stipulated in his will that the sale of his slaves should be used for his son's Yale tuition. When their slaves grew elderly and infirm and were unable to work Jews “freed” them, forcing them to fend for themselves in their old age.

The first Jew elected to the U.S. Senate, Florida's David Yulee, was one of the most strident haters of Indians and defenders of slavery in American history. The distressing reality is that nearly all the Jewish slave dealers enjoyed prominent and honored places among their co-religionists. The profits from their slavery-based enterprises helped finance Jewish community development, built synagogues, homes, schools, businesses, and institutions, and in many untold ways enriched their lives and communities. Actually, one is hard-pressed to name a single prominent American Jew in the slavery era who did not own slaves or profit directly from Black African slavery.
"Enough! Is EVERY Black Person AN 'Anti-Semite'?"

Anonymous said...

received my degree in history way back in 1981 from a small public college in a very blue mid-Atlantic state. Even back in those (supposed) less enlightened times the professors cautioned us against "Presentism" or the uncritical adherence to present-day attitudes, especially the tendency to interpret past events in terms of modern values and concepts. Such views were considered as a hallmark of totalitarianism and not something to be found in a free society.

We were taught to first uncover the facts, and only then construct our hypothesis. To begin with a conclusion, and then cherry-pick the data to support your theory/cause/agenda/hypothesis was only something that happened in the old USSR or some other dictatorship.

My oh my how things have turned 180 degrees in only three decades.

Dubh Linn said...

On Facebook be sure to check out "Emma Murphy" from Dublin 2. Her latest video is being shared and she is being called "brave" and "courageous" by bobble headed moron ladies and men alike.

Emma you see is a victim of domestic violence. In the video she points to her nappy haired, shark eyed halfbreed boy and she also has a girl mulatto as well. If that is not disgusting enough this race mixer has received rave reviews from other social justice warrior idiots.

I see no negative comments about her mudsharking at all. The brainwashing and social conditioning has been really effective it seems. What a complete and utter disgrace this blonde girl is and she has pooped out two niglets and will probably do even more harm in future.

Disgusting attention whore traitor bitch.

Flanders said...

More on Judah P Benjamin:

"Benjamin focused his efforts on cultivating diplomatic relations with England and France, including securing the Erlanger Loan, in which a French banking house agreed to market $15 million in Confederate cotton bonds to inject much-needed capital into the Confederacy's economy. Benjamin was still dogged by political enemies, however, who accused him of smuggling and transferring money to personal bank accounts in Europe. The rumors tended to focus on similar misconduct, with accusations that Benjamin had left Yale for thievery and stole money from the treasury when the cabinet had to vacate Richmond (the cabinet did pack up the treasury upon departure, however, and people are still trying to track down that gold).

Though it was advocated by other government and military officials as well, Benjamin came under fire for suggesting that slaves be allowed to fight for the Confederacy in exchange for emancipation. A subsequent vote in the Confederate Congress to find him "not a wise and prudent Secretary of State" failed in a tie. Despite being a controversial figure, Benjamin's likeness was printed on the Confederate two-dollar bill."

There is more mention about Benjamin's involvement in Lincoln's assassination, before fleeing to the Caribbean, then to England. Also, "By that time, he had become involved in covert activities against the United States, including encouraging dissent and funding spy rings operating out of Canada."

Anonymous said...


You never mentioned who owned the slave ships?

Read "The Special Relationship Between Blacks and Jews" - the whole slave blame thing is another deflection of blame from the rightful owners of it (Jews) to the real victims of it (American whites).

Here's a short? version:
noirg dot org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/TSR.HighlightsKeyPoints1 dot pdf (remove the spaces surrounding the "dot")

Courtesy of one of the black chieftains!

SAVANT said...


You never mentioned who owned the slave ships?

All in good time my boy. It will be the Slavery Trilogy!

Anonymous said...

7 shark attacks in recent weeks off North Carolina barrier islands. Officials suspect chumming close in to shore by fishermen. Personally, I blame the Jews. Chugging around in their dirty little boats throwing fish guts close to surfers. Jews never liked surfers anyway because of the whole beach blonde image. And surfers used to wear Iron Crosses.

Anonymous said...

Interesting historical footnote about the battle of Yorktown is that after Hamilton and the French stormed the redoubts, and Cornwallis' position became hopeless, the Brits were allowed to surrender and march out with honors. Not so lucky were the thousand slaves who had fled to the British for protection and the promise of emancipation. Among those rounded up and sent back to the plantations were a dozen each of Washington's and Jefferson's slaves.

It's only because of Washington's political genius that the history of the revolution seems so glorious. He understood the importance of an overlay of formal, setpiece battles on what was mostly a vicious, guerrilla civil war. Largely terrorist on both sides to be honest. The US violated the Treaty Of Paris by refusing to pay any reparations to loyalists chased out of the country.

Uncle Nasty said...

Flanders said:-

Booth's grand-daughter, Izola Forrester, states in This One Mad Act that Lincoln's assassin had been in close contact with mysterious Europeans prior to the slaying, and had made at least one trip to Europe. Following the killing, Booth was whisked away to safety by members of the Knights of the Golden Circle. According to the author, Booth lived for many years following his disappearance."
6 July 2015 at 19:08

Interesting concept ... that of Booth being whisked away to his just reward. Hell of a lot better than the Feds, The CIA -- in general Da Gummint -- et al treated Lee Harvey Oswald.

Or am I opening yet another can of worms?


Anonymous said...

When my dad lived in Chicago in the late thirties, blacks weren't allowed to cross to the north side of State Street. He thought it was wrong and if blacks weren't treated with respect, there would only be more trouble in the future.

Unknown said...

I wonder of any of these niggers has any clue that the reason Whites are persecuted in the United States is because they closed the spigot of easy money the jews had by selling their nigger forebears? No. They are completely clueless. When the last White European Government closed up shop in Afreaka, the jews swooped in and opened every old slave market up again. You can buy a nigger for less than the cost of a cheap microwave oven at Wal-Mart anywhere in "black" Afreaka. Suckers, all day suckers. The jew doesn't like niggers, they only love gold. Easy money.

Anonymous said...

Watching a show. Gors to Africa & see loads of White women giving medicine for the future ape criminals. Why? Almost never men or even Asian women. Why o why are those do-gooding bitches always White?

Uncle Nasty said...

Strikes me as interesting that every action and utterance by the Tribe can be encapsulated in two words.

Damage control.

My, but they are a guilty race.


Anonymous said...

Check out "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews" for sale on Amazon: "Drawing almost entirely from Jewish documents, the first volume of this series (1991) revealed the Jewish role in the trans-Atlantic slave trade...Volume Two reveals that as merchants and businessmen, Jews gained much in a repressive Jim Crow society."

Dan said...

Surf Nazis!

A Troma Toxic Avenger Trope.

Flanders said...

I'm enclosing a link page to several Birdman Bryant articles which he had saved, from other sources, some of which are interesting. This article for instance, which seems to be from 2002, cites some information not so known to the public.

"Swedes less well off than poorest Americans -study

Saturday May 4, 10:47 AM EDT

STOCKHOLM, May 4 (Reuters) - Swedes, usually perceived in Europe as a comfortable, middle class lot, are poorer than African Americans, the most economically deprived group in the United States, a Swedish study showed on Saturday." [continues]

Frank Galton said...

Jewish Daily Forward, 17 February 2010

Rabbi [Morris] Raphall Goes to Washington

...on the eve of the Civil War, Rabbi Raphall once again made headlines. Speaking in New York at the request of the American Society for Promoting National Unity, he described slaveholding as “no sin,” and declared that slave property was “expressly placed under the protection of the Ten Commandments.”

Frank Galton

Kevin Rafferty said...

UN, that's because there's a lot of damage to control!

Frank Galton said...

BBC, 27 November 2000

The lost Africans of India

Long before the first slave ships started supplying labour to the cotton plantations of the American south, and MANY CENTURIES before the first Africans were brought ashore to the sugar estates of Brazil and the Caribbean, Africans were being sold as slave-soldiers for India's princely states. in India, almost lost among the mosaic of different cultures and communities in that country, are tens of thousands of people of African descent.

They are known as Sidis.


Although they came at first as slaves, they were so successful as fighters that they at times usurped power from the rulers they were supposed to be serving.

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

BBC, 17 February 2011

British Slaves on the Barbary Coast

The fishermen and coastal dwellers of 17th-century Britain lived in terror of being kidnapped by pirates and sold into slavery in North Africa. Hundreds of thousands [the figure could be as high as 1,250,000] across Europe met wretched deaths on the Barbary Coast in this way.

In the first half of the 1600s, Barbary corsairs - pirates from the Barbary Coast of North Africa, authorised by their governments to attack the shipping of Christian countries - ranged all around Britain's shores. In their lanteen-rigged xebecs (a type of ship) and oared galleys, they grabbed ships and sailors, and sold the sailors into slavery.

Not content with attacking ships and sailors, the corsairs also sometimes raided coastal settlements, generally running their craft onto unguarded beaches, and creeping up on villages in the dark to snatch their victims and retreat before the alarm could be sounded. Almost all the inhabitants of the village of Baltimore, in Ireland, were taken in this way in 1631, and other attacks were launched against coastal villages in Devon and Cornwall.

Britons in later years have boasted that they 'never will be slaves,' but during these years they were enslaved all too often.

Jewish Journal, 14 September 2006

Jewish piracy has been around since well before the Barbary pirates first preyed on ships during the Crusades. In the time of the Second Temple, Jewish historian Flavius Josephus records that Hyrcanus accussed Aristobulus of "acts of piracy at sea."

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

Jewish Encyclopedia

With the dispersion of the nations in Europe, and the conflicts arising from the divergence of creed between the Arians and the Catholics in Spain, opportunity was given to the Jews, who were equally hated and equally licensed, to supply both with slaves.

Pope Gelasius (492) permitted Jews to introduce slaves, if they were heathen, from Gaul into Italy. At the time of Pope Gregory the Great (590-604) Jews had become the CHIEF TRADERS in this class of traffic...

It has been suggested by Jacobs that the British slaves who had been brought to the Roman market, attracting Gregory's attention to the need of Christianizing England, were in the hands of Jewish slave-dealers ("Jews of Angevin England," p. 5).

With the rise of Islam large opportunities were afforded to the Jews to supply Moslem slaves to the Christian world, and Christian slaves to that of Islam...

According to Abraham ibn Ya'ḳub, Byzantine Jews regularly purchased Slavs at Prague to be sold as slaves... Many, indeed, of the Spanish Jews owed their wealth to the trade in Slavonian slaves brought from Andalusia (Grätz, "Gesch." vii.).

Jewish Slave-Trading Opposed

The Church repeatedly protested against the sale of Christians to Jews, the first protest occurring as early as 538. At the third council of Orleans a decree was passed that Jews must not possess Christian servants or slaves, a prohibition which was repeated over and over again at different councils...

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

Re British Slaves on the Barbary Coast

“Hundreds of thousands [the figure could be as high as 1,250,000] across Europe met wretched deaths on the Barbary Coast in this way.”


It is thought that the number of men, women and children ENSLAVED could be as high as 1,250,000.

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

THE TIMES OF ISRAEL, 02 October 2012

“...I consider these [Cushites] as irrational beings, and not as human beings; they are below mankind, but above monkeys, since they have the form and shape of man, and a mental faculty above that of the monkey.” – Moses Maimonides

Cushites are commonly considered Ethiopians, and in the Hebrew vernacular, Blacks.

Moses ben Maimon [known to English speaking audiences as Maimonides and Hebrew speaking as Rambam] (1138–1204) is the GREATEST JEWISH PHILOSOPHER of the medieval period and is still widely read today. The Mishneh Torah, his 14-volume compendium of Jewish law, established him as the leading rabbinic authority of his time and quite possibly of ALL TIME.

Frank Galton

Frank Galton said...

Jewish Telegraphic Agency, 30 July 2013

David Lau, the recently elected CHIEF ASHKENAZI RABBI OF ISRAEL, was broadly condemned for a racist comment about basketball players at the Maccabiah Games.

Exhorting his haredi Orthodox constituents to devote their time to learning Torah rather than watching basketball, Lau said on Tuesday, “Why do you care about whether the ‘kushim’ who get paid in Tel Aviv beat the ‘kushim’ who get paid in Greece?”

Kushim is a derogatory Israeli slang term for blacks.

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

If Dylann Roof lived in a 90% black town then "his" manifesto saying how he came to be racially aware because of various websites and organisations that the SPLC hates is probably a forgery.

Anonymous said...

Fucking vermin .... I hope 'somebody' disembowel's their white/kike mothers and or offspring respectively wherever they are.

Anonymous said...

Alex Jones predicts the end of the world by October.

I've done some of the links so you don't have to.

I hadn't heard of Jade Helm :-


eah said...


Exclusively for the enjoyment of Savant and his readers, I post a link to a foto from the DailyMail web site, which had this caption:

Love all! On Centre Court, Stephen Fry and his husband Elliott Spencer watched Maria Sharapova defeat Coco Vandeweghe

No need to thank me!

You know, I have to say I'm getting pretty fucking disgusted with the way the media constantly pushes the most disgusting images of faggotry right in my face.

Flanders said...

What is behind "racism" - as it is now being pushed in the public arenas?

Flanders said...

"This kard shall expire upon kompletion of the the "fundamental transformation" of Amerika. At that time, kard holders shall be subject to penalties, inkluding, but not limited to: discrimination, persekution, imprisonment, torture, forced labor, and death under the laws and direktives enakted and upheld by the Peoples Kongress, the Supreme Soviet, and Komrade Glorious Leader. Do not use this kard while kriticizing Komrade Glorious Leader and other high party officials, as this may decrease your life expectancy. Use at your own risk."

Flanders said...

Gettysburg 152nd Anniversary complete with Confederate re-enactors:

"The event turned violent when irate activists, seeing that their yelling and spitting did not achieve results, began physically to attack the actors by pushing and hitting them. The faux Confederate soldiers in turn defended themselves, which only provoked the crowd of about 280 protestors to retaliate even more severely. Police attempted to contain the riot, but without the appropriate riot gear the small-town police force failed to qualm the civil unrest.

Police had to stand by as protesters turned their anger from the reenactors to the town itself, destroying historical monuments and breaking windows of businesses and private homes. The memorial dedicated to the 20th Maine, who valiantly defended Little Round Top against Confederate forces and saved the Union Army during the second day of fighting, was destroyed by a group of about 50 hammer-wielding protesters who mistook it for a Confederate memorial.

Among the monuments dedicated to the men of the 20th Maine were 18 other statues and plaques that have been forever lost to blind anger and senseless destruction in a riot sparked by the presence of a historical flag during a historical demonstration.

[And - Who gets the blame and is penalized for the actions of the jewish-Marxists inspired crowd? Everyone constituting the public, of course,]

The city of Gettysburg is now debating whether it would be prudent ever again to allow Confederate reenactors in Civil-War-era uniforms to perform historical demonstrations on national park grounds, since their presence is apparently causing the destruction of property and civil unrest among the increasingly vocal progressive community."

Flanders said...

About the only benefit accruing to the general public from the mollifying of negroes consists of viewing the stimulating the negroids' public performances.

Anonymous said...

Izola Forrester -- This One Mad Act

Strange book if you can find a copy. Read it when I was a kid.

Lincoln was a very weird progenitor of Mussolini and even distrusted "wage" work; believing it to be not much more than a slightly more clever version of slavery.

The last official act of the Abraham Lincoln presidency, before his assassination, was sending congratulations and well-wishes to Louisiana for passing an early version of what were later called the Jim Crow laws.

Lincoln mistrusted capitalism and opposed race-mixing till he died. He only gave the vote to negro soldiers who agreed that they must live apart from white men or the system would not work.

Why Lincoln just didn't say the hell with it and move to Canada is the true mystery. He hated American capitalism and American race-mixing, why did he ever imagine he could change either?


eah said...

Well the ostensible reason is the hurt it be causin' dose po' black folk.

Not exactly. It's being generally condemned as a symbol of racism, 'white supremacism', etc etc, something that might motivate the next Dylan Storm Roof or whatever that guy's name is.

Of course there is no evidence that it motivated him, and of course none that it would ever motivate anyone else in the future. But why take chances? Anyway, these frenzies don't need evidence to grow.

In the meantime, 22 people were murdered in St Louis in the month of June alone. And while I will make no attempt to verify it, likely 100% of the victims were black, and it's also likely that 100% of the perpetrators were black.

But facts like that, and a reality like that, are apparently not important -- all of that, not only in St Louis, but in numerous other black-infested cities in America, will be ignored by the national media. Instead they will focus on some fantasy like the Confederate Flag.

Flanders said...

While jews are quick to encourage and to protect "minorities", and encourage them toward uncivil behavior, in the name of "constitutional freedoms", they have a different opinion when it comes to those who are not advancers of the jew's interests.

"Absolute free speech is stupid. It’s an excuse for abuse. It’s an excuse to bully and destroy others. It’s a manipulative way to wrest control of a conversation.

And anyone who argues for it is either an enabler of abuse or an actual abuser.

No more."

This jew reminds us that not all jews are alike [in the physical sense].

eah said...

Well the ostensible reason is the hurt it be causin' dose po' black folk.

Not exactly. It's being generally condemned as a symbol of racism, 'white supremacism', etc etc, something that might motivate the next Dylan Storm Roof or whatever that guy's name is.

Of course there is no evidence that it motivated him, and of course none that it would ever motivate anyone else in the future. But why take chances? Anyway, these frenzies don't need evidence to grow.

In the meantime, 22 people were murdered in St Louis in the month of June alone. And while I will make no attempt to verify it, likely 100% of the victims were black, and it's also likely that 100% of the perpetrators were black.

But facts like that, and a reality like that, are apparently not important -- all of that, not only in St Louis, but in numerous other black-infested cities in America, will be ignored by the national media. Instead they will focus on some fantasy like the Confederate Flag.

Flanders said...

The Real Danger behind the suppression of the Confederate Flag is this:

"Their fellow tribalists around the world financed and their shock troops executed the brutal takeover of the Russian government. Upon achieving total power, their deep, psychopathic, racist hatred became manifest in the greatest human slaughter of all time."

Anonymous said...

The surf Nazi culture had it's heyday in the mid-sixties. Being tall and blonde being a very important part of the scene. The Iron Crosses were borrowed from the Hell's Angels. Bikers had an incredible influence on culture in those days and going forward. They were central to California hippie culture and decades later urban gangs aped biker colors at the start of rap and hip-hop. You can see the outlaw biker influence today in European and Russian motorcycle gangs.
In hindsight, one can see how stupid it was to expect to be an outlaw anything when you drive around loud and obnoxious advertising that you're an outlaw.

Anonymous said...

The good thing about homosexuals, unless they're dangerous drug addict prostitute criminals like those the cops took down during the Stonewall riots (the putative start of the gay rights movement although fags were marching in DC back in the early sixties), is that they're usually not dangerous and women feel comfortable around them. Plus they help real estate values by gentrifying areas that no white family with kids would touch.

Anonymous said...

"Alex Jones predicts the end of the world by October"

There's rumors China will float their currency in October.

It may not be true and not exactly the end of the world but it would likely mean instant Weimar in the West - especially the US and UK.

Possibly quite biblical in scale like the plagues of Ancient Egypt, coincidence huh.

Pretty grim but better than WWIII which is what the YKW banks are pushing the world towards so - Go China!

Flanders said...

Uncle Nasty said...

We seem to be moving towards very very interesting times ...

The Greek Debt Is a Swindle — So Is the Entire Transatlantic Financial System, Sink It to Stop WWIII

Lyndon LaRouche today launched an international initiative, centered in Manhattan, to expose the utter fraud of the debt which is being attributed to Greece by the European Union and the British Empire's banks. That debt is being used as blackmail to try to bludgeon Greece—and after them, all of Europe—into committing suicide by imposing genocidal bankers' austerity, yet again.

"The Greek debt, as such, is mostly not Greek debt," LaRouche stated. "The debt which Germany and other nations are demanding that they pay for, is money that the Greeks never got! So the Greeks don't owe that money. This was a swindle, because the Greeks didn't incur that debt."

The whole thing was foisted on Greece by a series of frauds, LaRouche said, but in fact it only went to pay Greece's international banking creditors, to cover up a Ponzi scheme run by Goldman Sachs and other predatory financiers, and to grease the skids of corrupt arms deals negotiated by previous Greek governments—as members of the current Greek government have documented.

But the Greek case is not an anomaly on the world scene. It is a classic example of what LaRouche and EIR have long described as "bankers' arithmetic," a fraud under which the majority of the nations of the planet have been saddled with debts they never actually incurred, built up by a pyramid of derivatives speculation and related financial swindles. That is how we got $2 quadrillion in derivatives and other financial assets on the books today, with no conceivable way of paying that debt.

The case of Greece is the same fraud that the vulture funds are trying to perpetrate against Argentina. And it is the same swindle run worldwide by the drug-running, tax-evading bankrupt banks that are at the core of the British Empire today. One such case, that of HSBC—formerly Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, aka the central bank of Dope, Inc.—has recently gained notoriety for organizing planet-wide tax-evasion schemes for their wealthy clients. That, on top of the earlier demonstration at U.S. Senate hearings that HSBC was at the heart of laundering tens of billions of dollars of blood money from the Mexican drug cartels.

But HSBC is just one case among dozens. A whistleblower at UBS (Union Bank of Switzerland), former head of protocol Stephanie Gibaud, has just stated that "the information on HSBC is a copy/paste of what I experienced at UBS." She added, with scientific precision:

"We have to understand that we are dealing with a criminal industry."

It sure don't surprise me none ...
- Full Metal Jacket (1987)

“If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're mis-informed.”
― Mark Twain

Invest in metals if you can. Steel, brass, lead ... and sit back for a moment and imagine what would happen if the MSM was taken out of the picture or even merely disabled for a week or two.


R.A.Moore. said...

Regarding Dubh Linn's comment(20:35 6 July 2015)

I watched the videoclip of that Emma Murphy on Facebook. What a benighted, whining, self-pitying, race-traitor slut she is! It took her 5 minutes 40 seconds to say what could have been said in less than a minute. She still referred to her ex simian lover as the "love of my life!" She doesn't seem to grasp that was a one way street on her part, as her ape-lover would have seen her as a white piece of meat, to be used(impregnated with little missing links), abused(witness the fading shiner on her face, courtesy of her silverback ex) & discarded(it was cute how she thought that she had dumped him, when it had already impregnated another woman during their abominable relationship)! I've seen this sort of thing happen with so many times with White people(many of whom are very slow learners on this score), they always look surprised & hurt when some nigger lets them down. That's the folly of treating niggers like they are the exact same as us(except for a different paint job). But, will this little mudshark learn her lesson about the perils interracial bestiality? I very much doubt it, as she will probably repeat her experience with the next smooth talking baboon-coon she encounters! Tragically, there are no shortage of these shit-skinned subhumans in Dublin these days, thanks to that big-nosed,reptilian looking kike, Shatter.... well may he & the rest of his verminous ilk rot in hell!


Eimear said...

R A Moore. In partial mitigation remember her peanut brain has been bombarded with pro-simian propaganda for its entire life.

R.A.Moore. said...


Agreed. A lot of White women like her just never stood a chance against the insidious, relentless barrage of pro-nigger propaganda, that has been a staple of the Jew-controlled, Western news & entertainment media since at least the 1970s. I was born in 1976 & as a child, growing up in the UK & after '86 in NZ, I had a very favourable impression of "black people"(I was still a far cry from the pitiful, drug-loving white-nigger vermin of today) up until 1992, when my political outlook went from liberal to National Socialist in less than a year. Jew-media fantasy of saintly jigaboos lost out to rock hard reality that year with me. Anyway, getting back to the topic of Emma Murphy & her ilk, I can't help but think: what a total fucking waste! I personally would not touch her with a 10 yard barge pole, for as far I'm concerned a White lass who commits interracial bestiality, especially with niggers, is not worth 1% of a lump of dried cat shit! Harsh, but true.


eah said...

Re Emma Murphy of Dublin: The person in the fotos on this link appears to be one and the same -- check them out. She is low-pop-culture-enthralled white trash.

Dear Eimear @ 8 July 2015 at 00:46 -- Sorry, but I cannot agree with you; there are no mitigating factors here relevant enough to deserve the name.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone face up to the reason that Rebs who owned no slaves fought so fiercely and tenaciously? I have often seen it left as an unanswered puzzle, but only a fool can't see the truth. So long as Blacks were slaves, even the lowest White man had millions to look down on, and it was the trash who did the fighting. Lincoln went through a change in his attitude toward emancipation. In the Lincoln-Douglas debates, he was absolutely clear that he considered Blacks inferior to Whites, but that did not justify the extension of slavery to the territories. He thought that sending Blacks home to Africa was the only solution after he accepted emancipation, because he couldn't imagine the races living together. Of course, the primary purpose of the Emancipation Proclamation was to make it impossible for any European country to join the Rebs. That it explicitly excluded the slaves of slave states still in the Union shows it to be political rather than humanitarian. Through most of the war, Lincoln was a supporter of African Colonization. It is alleged that Frederick Douglas changed his mind.

Braveheart said...

Does anyone face up to the reason that Rebs who owned no slaves fought so fiercely and tenaciously?

No mystery there. Because the issue of slavery was an add-on used to justify the Union war of aggression. The ordinary Johnny Rebs knew that their whole lifestyle and culture was under threat.

Interesting point about the strategic move to preclude European support for the Confederacy.

AnalogMan said...

Anon said

only a fool can't see the truth. So long as Blacks were slaves, even the lowest White man had millions to look down on, and it was the trash who did the fighting.

Only a fool would believe that pop psychological crap. As long as there were negroes in the South, slaves or free, even the lowliest White man had millions to look down on. And if the ones who fought were "trash", they gave a good accounting of themselves. They fought bravely and honourably, and all for the satisfaction of feeling superior to kaffirs? Bull shirt.

I don't know you, but I seriously doubt your credentials for calling the likes of Robert E Lee and Nathan Bedford Forrest "trash".

I believe the true motivation was probably better expressed in an anecdote that I read, about a Confederate soldier who was taken prisoner. His captors, noting that his clothes were threadbare, and probably also his lack of education, and in view of how fiercely he had fought, asked him: "I don't understand you rebs. You don't have any slaves, or cotton plantations. What the hell are you fighting for?"

He replied, "I'm fighting because you're down here".

Dan said...


They saw themselves as a distinct population from the Northerners and to whatever degree they understood the constitution of their country recognized that Lincoln was a front for a centralized power grab.

Most southerners knew that they were paying massive tariffs for the importation of industrial machine tools and agricultural impliments from Germany, France and Britain, in order to subsidize northern industrialists.

That's the underlying economic issue.

If you look at the fight between the Brits and Germans for supremacy in Europe you have a mercantilist empire v an industrial powerhouse. The profile of the confederacy wasn't much different. An agricultural territory v an industrial territory.

"Trash" infantry have nothing to do with it. I'd guess most confederates had a plot of land or a workshop. Most of the northern troops by contrast came from factories or were immigrants from Germany and Ireland with no property.

Californian said...

Savant, you make a lot of good points in the article. But for most blacks, it's not about the actual history. It's about their playing the perpetual victim card--and hitting YT up for more cash on the barrelhead. "Reparations" is a racket, and one which will keep going on until white people stand up and put blacks in their places. Or rather, put the hostile elites who use blacks as their front in their place. Regardless, this demonstrates that you can not have large numbers of blacks in a polity and expect civil discourse.

I suspect that blacks migrating to (i.e., invading) Europe these days will come up (or be handed) their version of the racket. You know, European owe blacks "reparations" for generations of imperialism and colonialism.

All the more reason to deport every last African back to the dark continent, then build a wall around it.


Well, now that the world has voiced tons of ignorance about the Battle Flag of The Army of Northern Virginia and seen fit to trash their white Southern neighbors, it's time we re-examine the issue at hand in Charleston, South Carolina.
The Charleston shooter's confessed motive was retaliation for black-on-white murder and rape.
He said he killed them because black thugs kill whites while other blacks show no willingness to turn them in to the police.
Under the guise of the "No Snitch" and "Warn-A-Brutha" themes of looking the other way from crime, blacks have long incubated a criminal underclass no longer content to murder, rape and maim just their own. Firm in the knowledge that no black will report them to the cops and firm in the knowledge no media will report them as black, they spread murder, rape and hate to the white community.
In the mind of the Charleston shooter, this lack of civic responsibility to rat out murderers, rapists and thugs made the black community collective accessories to the murders of innocent whites.
A white lady turned in the white Charleston shooter.
Time for blacks to do the same.