Tuesday, 7 April 2015

The elephant gets ignored again

Have you been following the Rolling Stone "A Rape On Campus"  story?  I have and from early days suspected it to be another media-induced frenzy, another sortie against the White Male Enemy. Just like all those hoax nooses and swastika daubings. And of course not forgetting po' little Trayvon and all the gentle giants -future neurosurgeons one and all -  mercilessly gunned down by racist White cops.


And what a terrible story Rolling Stone told us.  When yet another hand clamped over her mouth, Jackie bit it, and the hand became a fist that punched her in the face. "Grab its motherfucking leg," she heard a voice say. And that's when Jackie knew she was going to be raped. She remembers every moment of the next three hours of agony, during which, she says, seven men took turns raping her, while two more – her date, Drew, and another man – gave instruction and encouragement. As the last man sank onto her, Jackie was startled to recognize him: He attended her tiny anthropology discussion group. He looked like he was going to cry or puke as he told the crowd he couldn't get it up. "Pussy!" the other men jeered. "What, she's not hot enough for you?" Then they egged him on: "Don't you want to be a brother?" "We all had to do it, so you do, too."

And the evidence in support of Jackie's story? Er, none actually.  Yes, Rolling Stone actually published a major story, slandering a whole university and in particular the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity without a shred of supporting evidence. Eventually the story unravelled (and Steve Sailer deserves a hat tip here) leading to a damning report by the Columbia School of Journalism. The report goes into excoriating detail on the 'failures' at multiple levels which lead to the story appearing. But of course the elephant in the room is studiously avoided. By this report and all the others.

Because this particular elephant is pure blood Jewish. The owner and published of RS, its Managing Editor, the "journalist" who concocted the story and the internal legal counsel who gave it the go-ahead  -  in fact all the decision-makers in the process - are Jewish. As is the co-author of the RS retraction article cited above.  Yet this crucial fact gets the Nelson's Eye treatment in just about every report.

Now let me tell you how this debacle unfolded, seeing as you won't come across it anywhere else. The decision-makers saw the opportunity to stick the knife into a venerable symbol of the Old South (a university founded by Tom Jefferson himself no less) and the all-white frat boys. The "journalist" herself gives the game away by describing UV's  'aura of preppy success, where throngs of toned,tanned and overwhelmingly blond students fanned across a landscape of neoclassical brick buildings.'

Boy, can you just imagine the eagerness with which that group of nation-wreckers at the RS took up Jackie's story? All sense and discretion went out the window at the thought of inflicting a mortal blow to the hated goyim. The frog and the scorpion fable redux.

And by the way, despite being described by the Colombia School Of Journalism as the  worst piece of journalism in 2014 none of the culprits got fired. Oy vey, have they not suffered enough?

PS: Good post on this subject over at the Occidental Observer.

75 comments:

Ku Klux Dan said...

See good post on this over at the Occidental Observer.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/04/the-seething-ethnic-hostility-behind-the-rolling-stone-scandal/

Anonymous said...

Check her archive.

6 stories that prove she is so good a concocter they cannot afford to let her go.

Rob said...

Fabricating rapes may be the only American manufacturing industry they won't outsource.

Anonymous said...

Perhaps they should investigate the rape and abuse of white girls in Europe. They wouldn't have to make up details that are far more horrific than their furtive imaginations.
If you want to know the true horror and extent of our grooming problem here's an in-depth investigation.

http://lawandfreedomfoundation.org/2014/03/04/comprehensive-report-on-the-grooming-gangs/

Lemmyhead

Dr. Wassel said...

I see that RS went to two jewish 'journalism professors' who told them that the lack of evidence for the story was ok, go ahead and publish. Who cares about standards in journalism when the objective is to get the enemy?

Iron Felix said...

Running parallel to this sort of thing we have the feminazis and their filthy rape-fantasies, all focussed upon WHITE males. I suggest that no nun, no whole order of nuns even, has ever poisoned the impressionable minds of young adolescent girls on all matters of men and sexuality the way these murderous dykes do every day.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Look on the bright side. Eight down.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/67643395/carbon-monoxide-from-generator-blamed-in-death-of-father-and-7-children

Darwin wins again. Funny thing about niggers -- especially in South Africa. They work on the principle that if you can't actually see it, it has to be free ... to them, anyway.

... A divorced kitchen worker and his 7 children were accidentally poisoned in their sleep by carbon monoxide from a gas-powered generator after the utility disconnected a stolen meter at their rental home, authorities said Tuesday.

Delmarva Power said it did not cut off the family's electricity because they were behind on their bills, but rather for their own good. After discovering the illegal connection on March 25, they disconnected it for safety reasons, the utility said.


Tough shit, Delmarva. If the nigger grievance industry (NGI) take this to their bosom and start screaming "Racissss" and De Fus' Nog and his silverback take up the cudgels, it will be free "lectrick to all niggers within the year ... just like in South Africa.

And we all know how well that turned out.

http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21637396-rolling-power-cuts-are-fraying-tempers-unplugged

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/05/safrica-renewables-idUSL5N0W61SY20150305

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/69aa4a9e-7f89-11e4-b4f5-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3WfGSMw7A

and so on ...

UN
.

UNcle Nasty said...

.
Sorry Savant. Your Occidental Observer link is deader than disco.

Didn't waste time, did they?

UN
.

Odin's revenge said...

katana is a HER?

Did not know that.

SAVANT said...

Thanks for the heads-up UN. Link fixed now.

Anonymous said...

The vast VAST majority of rapes in the US are committed by negroes. The victims are overwelmingly white women. Is there a story there, perhaps?


Bill Sturka

katana said...

Odin's revenge said... 8 April 2015 at 00:07
katana is a HER?

Did not know that.

-----------------

Neither did I!

I wrote this in the previous post:

----
AnalogMan said...

Katana is a lady? I never suspected. No insult intended.
------------------

AnalogMan, your intuition is correct, I’m not a lady (or even a female for that matter), although I do like the ladies.

Ivan must have got his wires crossed somehow, possibly because my name sounds like that of a flower. But it also has another meaning, which is also “disarming” ...

------------------

For my latest blog post, The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies click here >>> KATANA

[http://katana17.wordpress.com]

Shaunantijihad said...

Minority elephants are a protected species when it comes to the bleeding obvious, don't ya know?

That Bradford Uni went from 95% White to 80% Paki in a decade, is the particular brown elephant not named in this particular report. One of very real rape.

"COMPLAINTS of rape from students are up by almost 300 per cent in the space of just five years in West Yorkshire, new police figures show, rising at a faster pace than overall allegations of that crime."

http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/12873918.Sharp_increase_in_reports_of_rape_from_students_in_West_Yorkshire__new_police_figures_show/

SAVANT said...

@Shaun. I knew Bradford Uni pretty well in the old days. It was quite a good one (Sir Tony O'Reilly donated a building there) but a former colleague has told me it's gone way down since becoming enriched.

James said...

‘Newspapers have to sell in order to live; so does commercial TV. That leaves the BBC as the only truly public service medium in this country disseminating information, entertainment and, in the case of race relations, propaganda. We are unashamed to admit it is what we are doing.’


Gerry Hines, BBC Programme Organizer quoted in Race Today

From The language of Propaganda

The unmentionable one must be reading this and trying to figure out how to sound normal enough so be can say "Well, no. He didn't say that".

Every liberal does the same.

The BBC is unashamed to push white genocide.
Good for them.

James said...

Fabricating rapes may be the only American manufacturing industry they won't outsource.


But they have recently set up a subsidiary in India.

Anonymous said...

Viewing photos of Ireland's newly imposed NEGRO class always turns a knot in my stomach. To what benefit has it been to Ireland's White people to import such a lower-calibre of people, and then force-feed Irish youngsters into accepting their "medicine" because "it's good for them"?? (I'm not talking to the choir here, just to those unawakened peecee lib/leftists)

But, I do question the writer's need to conflate Slavic with 3rd world immigrants, unless the purpose was to mitigate any perceived notions of "racism" aimed exclusively at Negroes.

These photos could easily depict South Carolina, USA ... but Ireland??

https://ulstersunwheel.wordpress.com/2015/03/28/the-new-irish-demographic-reality/

Anonymous said...

The real rape in America is the more than 36,000 White females that are raped by blacks each year in this country. Since hispanics are counted as White for criminal purposes there is no count for them, but any slight notice you may have of hispanic rapes would lend credibility to a high number of rapes there also.
Ah yes, but here again though the lowly White man is the prolific rapist according to the jew and his White female associates.

Clogheen said...

These photos could easily depict South Carolina, USA ... but Ireland??

Yes indeed. But in one way they work in our favour. Two people I know, both normally very PC, have reacted adversely to the constant portraying of Africans in any and every scene of Ireland. One observed, 'Jesus, looking at RTE you'd think we live in Africa instead of Ireland'.

Tony in VA said...

I’m beginning to wonder if Erdely didn’t pay “Jackie” for her story, telling her the juicier the story the more she’d get.

It seems Erdley was simply applying that old liberal adage … “the ends justify the means”.

James Lord said...

Analogman. What you say is true. But the bright hope derives from the general public becoming increasingly aware of such trickery.

Just read the comments on any major news outlet and you will not recognise them from those even 5 years ago.

Sponge Cake said...


Here we go again....

A white police officer who gunned down a fleeing, unarmed black man appeared to plant his service-issue Taser gun at the side of the victim's lifeless body, according to shocking videotape which emerged in the wake of the senseless killing.
Patrolman Michael Slager, 33, opened fire on father-of-four Walter Scott, 50, in North Charleston, South Carolina, on Saturday morning after reportedly stopping him over a broken tail light.
Slager was charged with murder on Tuesday and could face the death penalty after the incendiary footage emerged. The officer had previously defended his actions, saying he feared for his life after Scott wrestled his Taser gun from him during a scuffle.
However, cellphone footage from the scene showed Scott getting around 15-20 feet away before Slager opened fire with seven shots in quick succession followed by an eighth. The 50-year-old U.S. Coast Guard veteran was hit five times.
The officer then slowly walked toward him and ordered Scott to put his hands behind his back, but the man didn't move.
Slager then handcuffed his lifeless body before jogging back to where he had fired the shots to pick up an object from the ground - possibly the Taser.
The officer then returned to Scott where a second officer was on the scene. Slager can be seen on video tape appearing to drop an object next to the victim's body.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3029597/Cop-charged-black-man-s-murder-opening-fire-eight-times-shooting-ran-away-saying-did-felt-threatened.html

Sponge Cake said...


Green party(UK) 2015 election broadcast
Noble Black woman telling white men how to run a first world, European country.



https://youtu.be/PPgS7p40ERg

Anonymous said...

Whether or not the Republican leadership is foolish enough to support multicultural mass immigration into Ireland is hardly the issue as they were not the power that made it happen. Likewise, the Ulster Scots don't get a pass because they are allegedly more uncomfortable with it.

Ulster Dawn is just whistling past the graveyard if they think this is the case. The Republicans, like any revolutionary movement, looked for support where ever they could find it. Fenians traditionally, including here in the States, have been nationalists instead of internationalists. Which is why the original Official IRA had less popular support than the Provisionals. If the IRA is now trapped by ideology into mongrelizing the country, then they are fools and knaves. But it hardly wraps the pig-eyed Orangeman in glory, as he supported an empire with much the same globalist goals. He can simply be happy to have had the last word. That will be a noble legacy to pass on to his nigger grandchildren.

rambaloosa said...

Sponge, in fairness the black dude WAS running away and the cop shot him 8 times in the back. Perforated coons are normally fine by me but this was downright murder. If they can get away with it with the jigs what's to protect the rest of us?

Anonymous said...

The South Carolina cop shooting the unarmed (was he an amputee?), fleeing black man is already an issue that we are never going to hear the end of. There is already an understood policy that the police should not shoot a fleeing suspect. I think the misunderstanding might be that you cannot give your best shot at beating up the cop and then run. Once you lay a hand on a cop, the cop believes he is fighting for his life and therefore can use whatever force is necessary to subdue the suspect, even if he is in retreat. Maybe the brother missed that distinction. We may never know as the video I saw only shows him running.

Of course, the blacks want affirmative action policing. Unlike in Europe apparently, blacks do not yet get a pass on rape, murder and robbery. Which is why we have so many locked up. They do seem to get a pass on raping black women and kids, however. That having to do with the sort of debased culture that they want to foist on the rest of us.

eah said...

Perforated coons are normally fine by me but this was downright murder.

Of course I don't know exactly what happened and I imagine neither do you. Presumably an investigation will tell. So what I will now say is not necessarily meant to defend this cop in this particular incident.

But think about it more abstractly: When a suspect flees, what are the cop's options and what are his responsibilities? Should he just let the guy run off? I think no police department would condone that -- a cop cannot allow a suspect to just run away. He has to prevent that or pursue. Suppose he pursues and somehow a physical confrontation ensues, and the guy wrests the gun from the cop. Or suppose it turns out the suspect ran because he was wanted for more serious stuff, and was armed. He runs, is pursued, gets away for the moment, encounters another person, takes a hostage. Later he kills the hostage and then himself. Or the hostage is killed in a later standoff. And then it emerges the cop could have prevented all of that by using deadly force — his weapon — to stop the suspect from fleeing. Oops, sorry about that family of the unlucky dead bystander.

I have to believe a cop is authorized to use force to stop a suspect — any suspect (yes, especially a black male) — from fleeing. Including deadly force. (Again, I'm not saying it is always right or necessary to do so.) And when you run from a cop, you are opening yourself to the use of force, including deadly force. This must be understood.

In the aftermath of Ferguson they immediately charge him with murder. Which after a little thought does not seem to make a lot of sense. But we'll see.

eah said...

The vast VAST majority of rapes in the US are committed by negroes.

Sorry, but I seriously SERIOUSLY doubt that.

Taken together -- kids, women and men of all ages -- Blacks are only approx 15% of the population (this is an overestimate). Given the (relatively) high mortality among young black men, and the fact black women outlive black men, it is certain that there are significantly more black females than males. So black males are probably somewhere between 6% and 7% of the population. Let's say 7%, and half of them are of an age where they can or would commit a rape -- say, 16 to 50 y/o. So that's 3.5%. So you are saying that 3.5% of the population commits the "vast VAST majority of rapes". No way.

What is true is that interracial rape is grossly disproportionate -- while I do not recall the exact numbers, I think a white woman is something like at least 20x more likely to be raped by a black man than vice versa. In fact, white on black rape is so rare that it is statistically insignificant.

Elaine said...

eah. Please do not be dishonest. The video makes it completely clear. The man was RUNNING AWAY and the policeman kept firing at him from behind. Do not say you don't know what happened.

Rambaloosa is correct. This was clearly murder.

Anonymous said...

I see that our Minister for Education, Jan O'Sullivan, is attempting to get rid of the tradition of schools giving admission preference to the children and siblings of past or current pupils.

This would appear to be at the behest of The Immigrant Council of Irelnd, who claim that this policy is preventing the integration of immigrant children.

mr.a

Dan said...

If it brings on the shiwdown between YT and the blacks, I say "bring it on"

eah said...

Dear Elaine,

You apparently did not read or understand anything I said. And also seem to have little idea of what police work entails.

You say he was running away. Yes, it looks like he was -- it is pretty clear, you are right. Now note carefully: a cop cannot allow a suspect to just run away. What is so difficult to understand about that?

So he has to 1) pursue, or 2) stop the suspect from fleeing. And re 2), there are not many ways to do that where the cop is not in danger of having his weapon taken from him. Which he also can never allow to happen (for obvious reasons).

By your logic, the cop in Ferguson could well have been indicted. Because once the initial confrontation ended, he could have just stayed in his vehicle, rolled up the window, and driven away. Right? Michael Brown was leaving the scene, so to speak. But the cop could not do that -- it is not his job to leave the scene, or to let a suspect leave the scene/run away. He has to try to apprehend the suspect. So he exited his vehicle -- to use pejorative language, one could say that by doing so he provoked the final confrontation that resulted in the death of Michael Brown.

But Darren Wilson was not indicted. Because it was deemed he acted properly in performing his duty as a police officer.

Here the suspect was shot in the back (apparently) -- that is indeed heinous, and enough by itself to raise a red flag.

But shooting a fleeing suspect is not -- it is not, by itself, enough to raise a red flag (of course all shootings must be investigated). Because it could fall within the 'reasonable scope' of a cop's responsibilities. Which include not allowing suspects to flee. I hope that is clear.

Rogue said...

With regards to allegations of police brutality, in the USA or elsewhere, I believe these cases should all be examined on an individual basis.

I'm not prepared to believe official versions, simply because they're official versions, but neither am I going to automatically jump to hysterical conclusions that the police were criminally trigger-happy, simply because the mob and media say so.

I don't hate Blacks (or cops, for that matter) - but am contemptuous of peddlers of lies and false-testimony.

Case by case, with this kind of thing. I don't think ideology fits here.

eah said...

Elaine, here is a point in your favor -- a US Supreme Court decision from the 1980s:

Tennessee v. Garner (1985):

Specified the conditions under which deadly force could be used in the apprehension of suspected felons. Police shot Garner as he was attempting to escape, ruled that deadly force by the police to prevent the escape of a fleeing felon could be justified only where the suspect could reasonably be thought to represent a significant threat of serious injury or death to the public. "the use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony subjects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable."

Anonymous said...

George Soros and a Hollywood depicition of him

Really
Annoying
Communist
Inspired
Silencing
Tactic

Trying to think up of a word to describe the above.

Alison Williams said...

Do not forget sexual predators like Lena Dunham!

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Mildly off topic. I mentioned (a few threads ago) Harvey Weinstein -- yes, him of the nose brothers -- who said that yids would have to become more unforgiving of the trespasses against them.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/film/67651851/nicole-kidmans-grace-of-monaco-denied-cinema-release

Nicole Kidman's Grace of Monaco has been denied a cinema release

Grace of Monaco, the much-discussed biopic starring Nicole Kidman as Hollywood actress turned European princess Grace Kelly, has met the cruellest of Hollywood fates.

The film, which ignited a storm of controversy at the Cannes Film Festival, and was publicly panned by the Monegasque royal family and film critics, will bypass cinemas and instead premiere on US cable TV.

... The film had a limited international release in cinemas, but its poor reception is believed to have contributed to the decision to send it straight-to-cable in the US.

Such a move is roughly analogous to being sent "straight to DVD", an outcome usually reserved for low-budget films and umpteenth sequels.

For a film with such a high pedigree - backed by Hollywood heavyweights Bob and Harvey Weinstein, and starring Kidman - it is a particularly brutal fate.

The film's distributor, The Weinstein Company, had planned to release the film in US cinemas in November, 2013, and then March, 2014.

After it was met with shocking reviews at Cannes, the film was pulled from theatrical distribution indefinitely.


Vhoops ...

UN
.

Anonymous said...

A bird doesn’t sing because he has an answer, he sings because he has a song.

Joan Walsh Anglund's quote winds up on Maja Angelou's stamp.

The US Postal Service is 20%+ Black.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Elaine said...

eah. Please do not be dishonest. The video makes it completely clear. The man was RUNNING AWAY and the policeman kept firing at him from behind. Do not say you don't know what happened.

Rambaloosa is correct. This was clearly murder.


Whacking a jigaboo is not strictly murder. I see no reason to elevate them to the state of humans.

It is more correctly called "culling predators" or "pest control" ... and we could use much, much more of it.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

"eah said...
The vast VAST majority of rapes in the US are committed by negroes.

Sorry, but I seriously SERIOUSLY doubt that.

Taken together -- kids, women and men of all ages -- Blacks are only approx 15% of the population (this is an overestimate). Given the (relatively) high mortality among young black men, and the fact black women outlive black men, it is certain that there are significantly more black females than males. So black males are probably somewhere between 6% and 7% of the population. Let's say 7%, and half of them are of an age where they can or would commit a rape -- say, 16 to 50 y/o. So that's 3.5%. So you are saying that 3.5% of the population commits the "vast VAST majority of rapes". No way.

What is true is that interracial rape is grossly disproportionate -- while I do not recall the exact numbers, I think a white woman is something like at least 20x more likely to be raped by a black man than vice versa. In fact, white on black rape is so rare that it is statistically insignificant".

8 April 2015 at 21:02

I'm not sure which race you are but Blacks seem to be unable or unwilling to comprehend basic statistical facts. According to the Dept of Justice stats, in the US there are an average of 36,000 Black-on-White rapes annually in the US the number of White-on-Black rapes is between 0-10. That's not a misprint, it's between zero & ten. I believe Blacks to be 13%-14% of the US population & that of course includes females, children & older Black males. Therefore the number of Black-on White rapes is astronomically high for Blacks who make up a mere 13%-14% of the US population & Black males only 6%.

Other Black-on-White violent crime stats are also very high & instead of attempting to disprove these simple facts which won't change no matter how many times you try why don't people like you stop attempting to continually compare the large % of Black-on-White violent crime with the much lower crime rate of Whites who make up a much larger % of the US population. Instead why don't you encourage Blacks to read these Dept of Justice stats & perhaps Blacks will stop slaughtering & raping Whites in record numbers.

And no, I don't care if Blacks are killing & raping other Blacks in record numbers also because both of them are a problem that is being caused by Black criminals.

salvagesam.

glengarry said...

think a white woman is something like at least 20x more likely to be raped by a black man than vice versa

You mean the number of black men raped by white women? Yup, guess that would indeed be small.

Esther said...

UN, what point are you making about Harvey Weinstein and that Nicole Kidman film?

Uncle Nasty said...

.
No particular point. I just like to give him a well-deserved pasting now and then. He's a jew, you know.

Just like israel. For thee, but not for me.

http://www.iol.co.za/news/world/israel-gives-african-migrants-ultimatum-1.1840164

Israel gives African migrants ultimatum

April 1 2015 at 03:32pm
By AFP Comment on this story

AFP
African asylum seekers, who entered Israel illegally via Egypt, lean at the fence of the Holot detention centre in Israel's southern Negev Desert in 2014 as they join other migrants who came to protest outside the detention facility.

Jerusalem - Israel is set to force illegal African migrants to choose between leaving to a “safe third-party” country in Africa or face imprisonment, the interior ministry said.

A statement from the ministry's population and immigration authority said the measure would apply to migrants currently at the southern Holot detention centre, “who infiltrated Israel and cannot be expelled to their country of origin”.

There are currently around 2 000 African migrants at Holot out of an estimated 42 000 in Israel.

Most of the migrants at Holot hail from Sudan and Eritrea and would face danger were they to return home.

Israel will identify migrants who qualify for the measures, inform them of the proposed destination, and pay for their plane ticket and hotel there.

A spokeswoman for the interior ministry refused to name the third-party countries, but media and some charities named them as Rwanda and Uganda.


We should try that, sometime ... but that would have the whole yidocracy on our backs cring "Racissss".
And that, Dear, is why I enjoy giving them a pasting.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

wanna bet Jakee is a nigger?

eah said...

@salvagesam

Therefore the number of Black-on White rapes is astronomically high for Blacks who make up a mere 13%-14% of the US population & Black males only 6%.

Wow. All I can say is...huh? What the heck are you talking about?

Read again the original claim:

The vast VAST majority of rapes in the US are committed by negroes.

I took that to mean all rapes -- as should you, because that's what it says. And it is just loony to say black males commit the "vast VAST majority of rapes" -- all rapes in the US. Because it isn't true.

What does the "vast VAST majority" mean? I would say, to pick a number, 80+%. So the claim is that black males commit 80+% of all rapes in the US. I can only repeat: no way.

It is no doubt true that black men commit rape at significantly higher rates generally than eg white men. But it is not so astronomically higher that the result is they commit 80+% of all rapes. And as you (just) repeated, their rate of interracial (black on white) rape is hugely higher than white on black rape -- the latter being, as you point out, statistically insignificant. But again here that discrepancy is not enough to mean all rapes by black men make up the "vast VAST majority" of all rapes. Because white men do rape -- they just rape white and Asian women 'far FAR' more often than black women.

There can be no confusion now. So please don't regurgitate info on interracial rape.

And FYI I'm a white guy.

@glengarry

By "vice versa" I meant white (male) on black (female) rape. I think that was clear...right? If not clearly said.

James said...

For years now the liberals called anyone posting pro-white stuff on the net a "Keyboard Kommando".


They do this because they know keyboard activism works and they want to discourage it. That's why they attack people on the Internet.


We need as many keyboard commandos as we can get. Go to www.whitakeronline.org/blog and learn how to do it properly.

White Genocide is real.
Anti-Whites are everywhere. You could be living next to one or working with one. You probably are in fact.

James said...

think a white woman is something like at least 20x more likely to be raped by a black man than vice versa


Some years in the US the numbers are 20,000 vs zero. Since dividing by zero is undefined, I guess 20x is as good an estimate as any.

James said...

Since hispanics are counted as White for criminal purposes there is no count for them, but any slight notice you may have of hispanic rapes would lend credibility to a high number of rapes there also.

They are counted as Whites when perps but Hispanics when victims.

The FBI stats are blatantly anti-white!

glengarry said...

@eah. I knew that. Just having a little chuckle at your expense!

IGnolde said...

Erdely went on PBS last November and claimed- without a shred of proof- that the fraternity had engaged in an annual ritualized rape. And now the coward can't even bring herself to apologize to the fraternity directly? Shame on her..

PS It was also self-serving of Erdely to talk about how much pain this has caused HER in her very first sentence of her "apology." At no time does she talk about the pain she inflicted on the members of the fraternity. That's because men don't count.

Anonymous said...

" eah said...
@salvagesam "

The whole point of my comment was that the Black % of all violent crimes in the US, including rape was much higher than the White %. And it is true that Blacks do have a very much higher rate of rapes than Whites. I never mentioned anything about 80% of all rapes being committed by Blacks but do believe that the % of all rapes committed by Blacks is very much higher than that of Whites. If this wasn't the case then why are US prisons so full of Blacks who have committed violent crimes (including rape).

salvagesam

Anonymous said...

Humouruos of Irish times not caring about what they print

They do nor care about what they put in so why should we?

The UVA hoax got more interesting when some other chick turned up who had been raped exactly the same way and sustained the exact same injuries when pushed through a glass table in the same frat house possibly by the same non-existing guys.

The Rolling Stone magazine does not care what unbelievable nonsense they put in their magazine so why should you?

Dan said...

The nog had just beaten the cop in a fight.

If the cop caught up with this nog he'd have had to shoot him most likely anyway.

The cop has a fairly good argument in his defence. He ought to have waited for said nigger to turn though. Pursue 15 ft behind if the nig turns make him good.

Anonymous said...

Rambaloosa is correct. This was clearly murder.

He's running away. Why? What has happened before? Why run if you're stopped for a light out? Why doesn't the officer shoot for his legs instead of for a kill?

Lemmyhead

Anonymous said...

O/T
Is it just me or is this disgusting?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-32037397

Interesting that it's called 'NHS Tavistock Gender Identity Service.'
I wonder if it's based in Tavistock Square?

Lemmyhead

Kevin Rafferty said...

Got a belly laugh at RTE News last night. This Paki jeweller in London was the victim of a huge robbery. The hilarious thing was his complaint to the effect that he came to London because it was supposed to be such a safe place to do business. 'What has this place come to?'

Look in the mirror for the answer, sand boy.

Sponge Cake said...


Slager pulls over Scott for a broken tail light.

Scott has a warrant out for him, so he takes off running.

Slager gives chase on foot and catches up with him.

A struggle ensues and Slager uses his taser gun.

Scott takes off running again and Slager shoots him.

Who's at fault?

Sponge Cake said...



5 images about being black in America shared after Walter Scott shooting

http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-32222454

Anonymous said...

If this sperm story has any validity, I hardly believe it was an "accident".

https://murderbymedia2.wordpress.com/2015/04/06/autistic-surinamese-sperm-donor-impregnated-up-to-500-dutch-women/

great white said...

That is a fucking appalling story about that Surinamese retard impregnating that Dutch woman. Question is how did the clinic take sperm from this fucker?

Anonymous said...

Bono’s family struggled under religious segregation in Ireland.

Reply to above nonsense

There was a video of his neighbours Fiachra and Oisin wandering around Ballymun pointing out where they grew up.

Here in Pierce tower.

This is Heuston love.

Canadian TV took it down due to copyright reasons.

Copyright reasons and nothing else.

(bonio is not a northsider is he and I think that he is really from Templeofmorons Tipperary. You can see it in the way he balances on his knuckles when he tries to walk upright!)

Anonymous said...

A book about the Charlie Hebdo hoax was recently published.

The publisher, who had a page on Wikipedia for many years, suddenly disappears from Wikipedia.


The Jews admit in the Talmud that they re-wrote the bible and other sacred texts for the express purpose of "ensuring the survival of the Jewish people". They re-write everything they can get their hands on. They are the people operating the memory hole.


http://smoloko.com/?p=5489

Anonymous said...

Why doesn't the officer shoot for his legs instead of for a kill?

How do you get 8 bullets into his legs? The back is a bigger target.

Anonymous said...

The Wikipedia page on rape in the USA should be helpful, but it isn't. (No surprise there).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_the_United_States#Demographics

All it says on the matter is:

Rape is usually intraracial.[citation needed]


They have a special page for every imaginable white crime e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching but cover up anything else.


http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=26368

This article is from 2007 so the stats are from 2005.

In Table 42, entitled "Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender," we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.


Anonymous said...

Hate jews while you still can

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJkQb0nuUGA

Anonymous said...

Things become a bit clearer.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/walter-scott-killing-dashcam-video-released-223803800.html?vp=1#mrwuJzK

Anonymous said...

BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS

In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man.

Table 42. Personal crimes of violence, 2005 [page 55]:

In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus05.pdf

What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.

CENSUS.GOV

The Black Population in the United States: March 2002

In March 2002, 36.0 million people in the United States, or 13 percent of the population, were Black.
https://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/p20-541.pdf

CDC.GOV

In 2013, the population of African Americans including those of more than one race was estimated at 45 million, making up 15.2% of the total U.S. population.

Those who identified only as African American made up 13.2% of the U.S. population-over 41.7 million people.
http://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/populations/REMP/black.html

NAACP.ORG

African Americans now constitute nearly 1 million of the total 2.3 million incarcerated population

Nationwide, African-Americans represent 58% of the youth admitted to state prisons (Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice).
http://www.naacp.org/pages/criminal-justice-fact-sheet

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

Daily Telegraph, 05 November 2006

Three in four YOUNG black men on the DNA database

An estimated 135,000 black males aged 15 to 34 will be entered in the crime-fighting- database by April, equivalent to as many as 77 per cent of the young black male population in England and Wales. By contrast, only 22 per cent of young white males, and six per cent of the general population, will be on the database.

Figures for the last census in 2001 showed there were 175,000 black men, aged between 15 and 34, in England and Wales.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1533295/Three-in-four-young-black-men-on-the-DNA-database.html

BBC, 05 September 2007

Figures compiled from Home Office statistics and census data show almost 40% of BLACK MEN have their DNA profile on the database.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6979138.stm

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

The officer could be telling the truth when he says Scott tried to grab his taser.

Check out the video.

At 00:18 an object (taser?) falls to the ground.

At 00:59 after handcuffing Scott, the officer heads back to retrieve the object (taser?).
https://vimeo.com/124336782

CNN

Police said Slager used a Taser against Scott, but Slager would also later tell a dispatcher that Scott at some point had grabbed the Taser.

After Slager shot Scott five times, the officer went back to pick up something.
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/04/09/us/south-carolina-witness-video/

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

FOX NEWS, 16 January 2014

Holder [African-American] Shakes Down 'Racist' Banks for Nearly $1 Billion
http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/01/16/holder-shakes-down-racist-banks-nearly-1-billion


RACIST BANKS STILL OPERATING IN THE UNITED STATES

BBC, 07 April 2015

Battle to stem closures of African-American banks in US

Banks owned by African-Americans which SERVE THE BLACK COMMUNITY in the US have been closing down at a rapid pace.

There are now only 24 such banks left across the country...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-32200358

OneUnited Bank

We are the first BLACK internet bank...
https://www.oneunited.com/about-us/

Frank Galton

eah said...

Re that SC shooting case (and my last OT post on that -- sorry Savant)

From a link previously posted -- 10 April 2015 at 08:31: A fundraising page dedicated to Slager was shut down by GoFundMe on Wednesday.

That tells you something about the political climate in the US at the moment. Why can't people raise funds to help this guy with his defense? If you don't want to contribute, then don't; if you want to discourage others from contributing, that's OK too.

A few points: a murder charge is inappropriate at this stage, and is also politically motivated (both the timing and the charge itself); I personally cannot see how a murder charge could ever be justified in this case -- something like reckless homicide yes, but not murder; dismissal from the police force at this stage, ie before the outcome of a formal investigation, also seems inappropriate, but because of the political climate will probably not be opposed by the cop's union; per previous posts, a cop is allowed to use deadly force to prevent a suspect from fleeing, even shooting the suspect in the back (like it or not) -- but it must be fully justified, and that is the problem here -- to be as kind to the cop as possible, it is far from clear that it was justified.

Basically this is a kind of mob justice, but the US is susceptible to that right now when this kind of thing happens -- again due to the political climate.

Anonymous said...

Mother of one spare jail for sheltering murderers ans lying to police

Hussein Hassan and Hassan James were the names of the murderers.

Nothing to see here folks move along and read Erdely's account of how Lt Blumer discovered she had been raped to try to escape getting a DUI.

Or read Erdely's other falsified accounts of stuff that never happened.

Incompetent journalists drive away readers who wudda thunk that?

Sponge Cake said...


Invasion of the passport snatchers continues.

Young Nigerian mother holds back tears as she touches tricolour after becoming Irish citizen.

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/young-nigerian-mother-holds-back-tears-as-she-touches-tricolour-after-becoming-irish-citizen-31133018.html

Sponge Cake said...


Minister says 15 years of direct provision regrettable.

http://www.rte.ie/news/2015/0410/693233-direct-provision/

0jr said...

the satanic irelaners are the biggest allies of the jews