Sunday, 18 January 2015

The freedom-loving West

Presumably you've all see this photograph. You know, the one where a select group of brave Western politicians lead a one million-strong march of freedom-loving democrats through the streets of Paris. Of course we now know that this was just - yet another - photo op facilitated by the supine mainstream media. Levels of distrust and cynicism are now so bad you could be forgiven for thinking that many of the leaders may have attended only in the digital sense

And just like the editors at Charlie Hebdo the countries those leaders represent have the same approach to free speech.  All for it as long as it adheres to our doctrines. I know it's like shooting fish in a barrel but consider the following examples from the freedom-loving West.

Canada seizes Ernst Zundel from the USA, jails him and then extradites him to Germany where he's jailed again for the same offence. And for good measure they threw his lawyer Sylvia Stoltz in jail as well.  Their offence?  Disagreeing with some aspects of the way the Holocau$t story was presented. Canada also heavily fined Christian pastors who quoted Biblical verses against homosexuality.

Australian authorities jailed Brendan O'Connell for three years for a video he made which was critical of Israeli actions against Palestinians and currently two Christians are under prosecution for articles critical of the Religion Of Peace.  Note that neither O'Connell nor the Christians had promoted violence, let alone engaged in it. Sanctioned for exercising their imagined right to free speech.

Meanwhile Sweden increasingly resembles the post-Stalin Soviet Union. You speak your mind at your peril, anything running contrary to the Prescribed Narrative costing you your job or worse. For instance artist Dan Park incurred a six month prison sentence as he had 'depicted gypsies in a racist way'. Meanwhile in Britain Simon Shepherd has been jailed no fewer than four times.  To assess his offence let's go to the ultra politically correct Wiki: 'His main website contains many articles about women, the multiracial society and Jews, stating that these have negative effects on Western society and White males in particular'.  Meanwhile student Liam Stacey was jailed for unsympathetic tweets after a black footballer got a heart attack.

Still think my analogy to the Soviet Union is over-egged?

Look, I could keep reeling out more examples for another hundred pages. But suffice to say that under 'hate crime' legislation throughout the West you can and will face jail time for merely upsetting the delicate feelings of some 'protected' group.  Crucially the only criterion is whether the snowflake in question has been offended. Which means that the 'offender' must be able to second-guess what will offend the 'offendee'.  How crazy is that? Well actually it's not crazy at all because the whole purpose is to close down non-conformist views.  And truth is no defence. At the end of the Zundel trial in Germany, having effectively proven their case, the judge told the defence team that - in effect - the truth didn't matter as it was against German law to deny any aspect of of the Holocau$t.

And one last thing: Access.  All of us on this site know that it's virtually impossible to get anything onto the MSM that runs contrary to the Prescribed Narrative. Even a letter to the editor. Or to get a book published or a film produced. Just like in the USSR. Or Saudi Arabia.  You know, the people who 'hate us for our freedoms'.

But there is one big difference between the West and countries like the USSR and Saudi Arabia. They know (or knew) that there was/is no freedom of expression, that the media are  utterly biased and truth is revealed only by filtering and reconfiguring the propaganda dished out to you. But in the West the general public has widely bought into the fantasy of a free press and thus are a lot more vulnerable to manipulation.

Happily there are strong indications of this pathology's weakening. Thank you Internet. So may I suggest we all use everything at our disposal in using this medium to awaken the sleeping orcs before we've been bred  out of existence.

114 comments:

Anonymous said...

http://mikesmithspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/2015/01/zuma-lights-fuse-on-zeldas-tampon.html?m=1

Matrix-buster said...

Take heart. Every day sees more and more people awakening. As you have pointed out Mr. Savant,the comments even on the mainstream blogs are becoming unrecognizable from what they used to be and I see it myself even at my workplace.

Nero said...

Elected government is :-
When you discriminate against those who hold opinions you do not like ... better known as voting.

Obviously, the mediocre conformists chosen by such a system presume to apply this to all around them - under them. Us.

Anonymous said...

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

I see comments exposing Jews absolutely everywhere even on the most liberal websites and they are usually the most liked comments too.

The cyber war at least is in full swing and the hasbara can no longer fight the truth.
The Jews are still trying to control the narrative but it is no longer working.

Here is an example, make sure to read the comments.


Anonymous said...

Savant,

"Awaken the sleeping orcs"? I thought the orcs were already wide awake and among us, pillaging!

JP

Uncle Nasty said...

.
The yids themselves have a copyright on endless, irritating mosquito or gnat-like whining.

It's called "kvetching" and in the words of Terry Pratchett, bring to mind a person whose mouth was continually moving and muttering ... almost as if they were trying to dislodge a troublesome pip from between the teeth

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5118/je-suis-charlie-juif

Europe: "Je Suis Charlie"? Maybe. "Je Suis Juif"? Not Really.

by Abigail R. Esman
January 18, 2015 at 5:00 am

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5118/je-suis-charlie-juif

To call for an end to Israel, or to its sovereignty, is now, more glaringly than ever, to call for an end to the Jews.

The four people gunned down in Paris on January 9 had not even been buried yet -- four men murdered by a Muslim terrorist just for being Jews -- when Amsterdam's pro-Palestinian student group demanded an academic boycott against Israel.

Not that they are anti-Semitic -- not a bit, insists Studenten for Rechtvaardig Palestina [SRP], which models itself on the American Students for Justice in Palestine, an organization that accuses Israel of genocide. A leader of the group, Sarah (who would not give her last name to reporters, she said, for fear of reprisals), declared, rather, "I find anti-Semitism terrible. We are against it, and we said so from our first informational meeting. I find Israel as bad as IS," she continued, "and I am Muslim myself."

Comparing Israel, the sole democracy in the Middle East and a country regularly subjected to terrorist attacks, to the Islamic State would be surreal under any circumstances; but even more so when four European Jews have just been killed by Muslims, and when IS has not only applauded their murders but called on Muslims everywhere to commit more.

But it is not, it turns out, inexplicable.

The SRP's outburst was set off by the decision last week by Amsterdam's Vrij Universiteit [VU] (Free University), to cancel a previously planned "debate," called for by SRP, on encouraging the school to join the international academic boycott against Israel. This debate, to which not a single pro-Israel speaker had been invited, was to have taken place the following day at VU. The debate was to be led by former Dutch Socialist Party member Anja Meulenbelt, wife of convicted former Fatah terrorist Khaled Abu Zaid. Abu Zaid, by his own description, once trained fellow Palestinians in the use of explosives against Israeli targets.


... and on, and on and fucking on ...

Someone once told me that endlessly explaining your motives pretty much means that you have lost the debate.

Could it be that the Hoffschnozzen have seen the way the wind is beginning to blow, and are desperately creating non-stop pre-emptive legislation?

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Further to my last ...

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5118/je-suis-charlie-juif

Nevertheless, Sarah and her fellow SRP members quickly found an alternative site: the peaceful-sounding Nelson Mandela Center in Amsterdam.

The Nelson Mandela Center, however, is merely the name of a building. It houses the offices of (among others) Holland's Euro-Mediterranean Center for Migration and Development [EMCEMO], a Dutch-Moroccan organization that has been accused of urging Dutch Moroccans to resist efforts to crack down on welfare fraud by Moroccan immigrants. More pointedly, last August, as Dutch-Moroccan extremists chanted "death to Jews" during pro-ISIS demonstrations in The Hague, EMCEMO called on Holland's Jews to distance themselves from Israel. In the end, by all accounts, the evening passed relatively peacefully, other than the arrest of one attendee who allegedly issued threats against another.


I'll repeat that.

" ... peaceful sounding ... The Nelson Mandela Center, however, is merely the name of a building."

What? What? What? The fiction begins to wear a bit thin.

Bit of a bugger when your feral pets turn around and bite you on the arse, isn't it?

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
I think you'll like this. A German newspaper apologises for running a fake Hebdo image.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/german-paper-apologizes-for-fake-charlie-hebdo-anti-semitic-cover/

German paper apologizes for fake Charlie Hebdo anti-Semitic cover

Berliner Zeitung publishes cartoon showing rabbi making Holocaust joke

The daily Berliner Zeitung featured four real Charlie Hebdo covers on its front page January 8, along with a fake one depicting what appears to be an Orthodox Jew making a quip about the Holocaust. The cover carried the name “Charlo Hebdo” — one of the clues it was a fake.

The Berliner Zeitung said Thursday it “failed to recognize that one of the cartoons was a fake” and offered its “profoundest personal apologies for this highly regrettable mistake.”

It said it had posted a correction in Friday’s paper acknowledging that it mistakenly printed an anti-Semitic cartoon.

Read more: German paper apologizes for fake Charlie Hebdo anti-Semitic cover

The Times of Israel http://www.timesofisrael.com/german-paper-apologizes-for-fake-charlie-hebdo-anti-semitic-cover/#ixzz3PDZXcgMz
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook


Apologises? Well, more of an embarrassing grovel, actually.

Too late boys ... you've stepped on the third rail, and you will be grovelling, cringeing, rending your raiment and covering yourself with sackcloth and ashes, yea, unto the tenth generation ...

Grovel, grovel, squirm, squirm, fawn, fawn, cringe, cringe, truckle, truckle, bow and scrape -- for ever and fucking ever, amen.

Unless you merely grow a pair and tell them to suck on it.

Oh, I long for the day.

UN

Andreas said...

Oh, I long for the day.

UN you may get your wish sooner than you think. Many people in Germany get fed up with this grovelling and I have this report in mind also.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Oddly enough ... on topic.

http://takimag.com/article/hate_speech_derby_mohammed_vs_auschwitz_david_cole/#axzz3PDp2tFes

Hate Speech Derby: Mohammed vs. Auschwitz

by David Cole

January 14, 2015

In June 1949, LIFE magazine ran a piece about the forced confession of Nazi propagandist Hans Fritzsche at the hands of Soviet interrogators. Written by anti-Nazi author Konrad Heiden, “Why They Confess” compared Fritzsche’s treatment by his Soviet captors to his treatment by the Western Allies. Whereas the Soviets used a complex system of rewards and punishments in order to turn their prisoners into grateful converts, the West used only brutality. Heiden wrote:

Fritzsche says he could count on the fingers of one hand the Soviet guards who ever overstepped their limits, and on the fingers of one hand the Western guards in the Nürnberg jail who did not. ...

No “Gestapo methods” had been applied (by the Soviets), no hypnotism, no drugs. This is one of the several explanations Fritzsche later gave for his collapse: “Western psychologists don’t see the simple fact that hope is stronger than fear. Therefore hope is more willing to make concessions.”

I was reflecting on Heiden’s piece last week, after the Charlie Hebdo massacre, when Taki’s contributor Daniel Acheampong asked me a good question: “From your experience, which would you deem more dangerous: Holocaust revisionism, or slagging off the Prophet?”

Acheampong knows my backstory: From 1989 through 1995, I was public enemy number one to Jewish organizations like the ADL and the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Branded the “Jewish Holocaust denier,” I was called “powerful and dangerous” by Hebrew University’s Yehuda Bauer, and “the Antichrist” by the always-subtle Phil Donahue.

Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, told the Jerusalem Report in 1993, “I can’t think of any other Jew who has gone so far in aiding and abetting the enemies of the Jewish people.” The editor of the Detroit Jewish News prepared a list of the top threats to the Jewish people, which read: “Hitler, Hussein, Arafat, and Cole.”

Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an article, Taki's Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don't get paid for their work. Email

editors@takimag.com to buy additional rights. http://takimag.com/article/hate_speech_derby_mohammed_vs_auschwitz_david_cole/print#ixzz3PDpd3Evn


Enemies to the right of me ... enemies to the left.

Enjoy,
UN
.

Anonymous said...

More kvetching diatribes from the Holohoax 'survivors' who seem to be getting younger with more vivid recollections and greater in numbers every year ? LOL!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2915658/I-faced-bullet-kissing-Mengele-s-boots-Survivors-remember-horror-Auschwitz-70-years-liberation.html#comments

Patrick Cleburne said...

Nicely done, Savant
http://www.vdare.com/posts/the-irish-savant-on-the-publics-free-press-fantasy
best,
PC

Anonymous said...

I'm surprised this magistrate has not been criminalised LOL!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2914951/Suspended-sent-equality-training-Christian-magistrate-said-Adopted-child-needs-mum-dad-not-gay-parents.html

Anonymous said...

we need more judges like Roland Fleisher he knew how to deal with the rabble....

Anonymous said...

Freedom of speech?

The internet Stasi are getting people sacked from their jobs:

'Gettingracistssacked'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-30854477

Anonymous said...

Keep fighting the good fight people!

Interesting article on European slaves sold in Crimea in the middle ages. The numbers traded were much larger than the Africans sold into slavery in the 1700'sand 1800's.

https://allkindsofhistory.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/blonde-cargoes-finnish-children-in-the-slave-markets-of-medieval-crimea/

Anonymous said...

Good God they all met Mengele in person. When did the guy eat ? All he did was scare jews all day long.

Rob said...

The Soviet tyranny was openly brutal, while the one we live under is soft and subtle, but at least as effective. It would have to be, from the point of view of the perpetrators. You can't work the same trick twice, and anyway there are more effective ways of destroying a civilisation than a Bolshevik revolution. In fact, it may be that communism served mostly as a diversion. For over fifty years, conservatives in the West were obsessed with what they saw as the threat from Russia, while their enemies were destroying their countries from within, under their very noses.

The next threat to our race will be different again, assuming the present system isn't sufficient to destroy us. Most likely, it will come from people pretending to be on our side, such as those in the anti-Islam movement.

Anonymous said...

@ Andreas.

Indeed. My youngest daughter, once a committed liberal (just to annoy her mother I often suspected), has been out marching since the protests started. It's quite brave on her part because, as a teacher, she is expected to toe the line.

mr.a

Anonymous said...

Wicael Whoore apologies for saying that Bill Cosby raped Lena Dunham during the holocaust at Oberlin College. Well done! Truly you are worthy of the Oscar you got for your mockumentary.

SAVANT said...

Thanks Patrick C. for the kind words.

Mentioning Irwin Steltzer you might also be interested in this post. http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/2014/02/my-righteous-jews-spreadsheet.html

Keep up the good fight.

Anonymous said...

The Irish potato famine was a hoax

Anonymous said...


Last week, channel 4 had a documentary about the EDL, far right. Last night, ITV had a documentary about a family of jewish midgets who ended up in Auschwitz.

Anonymous said...

http://m.mg.co.za/article/2012-04-13-reserve-banks-holocaust-denier/

theunrecordedman said...

Savant,

I am presently having an argument with a multi-culti one-worlder. He thinks mass immigration is great and the only problem is people like me who insist on claiming that it isn't a great idea for Britain. It isn't arguments against mass immigration that I'm lacking. I have those already: loss of trust and erosion of social capital; no longer the unskilled jobs that there once were; drain on the welfare system and undermining of any shared sense of belonging. What I need is an argument for why I favour my group over others. I need a justification for favouring my tribe over others. That such ingroup preference is natural - like cancer and rape are natural - is not a good enough argument. Please point me in the right direction.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Anonymous said...

Good God they all met Mengele in person. When did the guy eat ? All he did was scare jews all day long.

19 January 2015 at 12:14


Not only that; they all shook his hand while looking him directly in the eye.

Soooo .... by that logic, finding him in Argentina should have been a breeze.

Depending on his original constitution, all they had to do was seek a one-armed, one-eyed man mit ze Sherman Accent, Ja?, or a fellow with a right arm like the incredible Hulk and an eyball that could benchpress thirty Kilograms.

Even Mossad should manage that.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

andreas: with all due respect to your daughters "committment" tell her to watch out for the nigger marchers,as soon as they see a white girl marching with their groups they presume that said white girl is in love with him,them or HER and will be all over her like a cheap suit.saw it here in Chicago yrs back when the mis guided liberal white girls from various and all white Catholic colleges went marching through all white neighborhoods in the open housing bullshit which they ultimately destroyed,these girls at end of march or during had dicks openly rubbed againsttheir asses,were asked if they could be pimped out.had their young nubile titties squeezed,this is no racist fairy tale,you and daughter dont know what the nigger is capable of and as a dad i would most forcibly forbid her to get involved with these creatures,John old rtd chicago copper.

SAVANT said...

@unrecorded. An interesting question and I'm sure some of the others would have suggestions.

For a start I'd suggest your interlocutor ask a few enrichers why the risk everything to get to White societies and never want to back to theirs. It's self-evident that Whites have reached a degree of civilisation unmatched anywhere, even in north east Asia. By way of contrast look at the unlivable hell holes that Africans and Muslim societies represent.

But I'd also point out that multiculturalism hasn't worked anywhere and even when it appears to, like on Tito's Yugoslavia, it depended on a brutally repressive government. With this no longer there the country dissolved into dreadful civil war.

rhain said...

theunrecordedman said...

What I need is an argument for why I favour my group over others. I need a justification for favouring my tribe over others. That such ingroup preference is natural - like cancer and rape are natural - is not a good enough argument.


It took me a long time to realize this myself, but the fact is you don't need an argument for why you care about your group's self-interest any more than you need an argument for why you care about your individual self-interest, or any more than you need an argument for why it is better to live than to die.

I believe the BUGsters have it at least half-right. We need to stop acting as if anti-whites have a viewpoint that deserves respect, and that we need to justify ourselves to them with "intellectual arguments". They are the ones who should be trying to justify themselves to us. When "debating" with an anti-white, the point is not to get the anti-white to congratulate us on our cleverness; the point is to show the onlookers that anti-whites masquerading as "globalists" and "liberals" are nothing but anti-whites.

If your opponent is really so mystified by the concept of self-interest, you could ask him why he cares about prolonging his own existence, or why he doesn't give all his possessions away. You could also ask him what other forms of self-interest or group loyalty he objects to. Does he object to people caring about their families or about the human species? Does he object to people pledging allegiance to thought tribes like "liberals", "conservatives" or "Catholics"? While you're could also ask him if there are any hypothetical real-world events that would get him to admit to the legitimacy of white group interests: would 100 more Rotherham scandals / Ferguson riots / Paris attacks do it? If he still won't budge, many of the onlookers will see him for the anti-white he is.

Dr. Wassel said...

John retired copper. Saw the same thing in Madison. Came back with their assholes widened.

Anonymous said...

Irish potato famine not so much a hoax as a mis-direction. Check out the eviction statistics for the famine years. People who died during famine decade closely mirror the evictions year by year. In other words, people who were abruptly and violently evicted from their homes tended to die of exposure and disease, not starvation. Just like what would happen to you if the cops kicked in your door and forced you out on the street tonight.
BTW - how are the loyalist paramilitaries doing with your chimp problem? Even without the government help one might think they'd be a match for the chimps. Primitive drive-by assassination and the like. I wouldn't expect target identification would be a problem.

theunrecordedman said...

Thanks Savant, that's a start. I guess my question is really this: Why do I feel the need to split the world into those who belong to my tribe and those who don't? Can I justify this partitioning philosophically?

rhain said...

SAVANT said

For a start I'd suggest your interlocutor ask a few enrichers why the risk everything to get to White societies and never want to back to theirs. It's self-evident that Whites have reached a degree of civilisation unmatched anywhere, even in north east Asia. By way of contrast look at the unlivable hell holes that Africans and Muslim societies represent.


Exactly. When anti-whites whine about white advocates being "supremacists", I think there are two approaches you can use (or you could use both at the same time). Approach one is to make the general point I made in my first post: self-preservation is its own justification, as even the most primitive of tribes understands. Approach two is to make the point you, Savant, have made above.

I remember hearing Alex Linder discuss this idea that our side needs "arguments". He said "that's like a supermodel saying she needs an argument to prove she's beautiful ... no, it's self-evident, everyone can see it ... nobody wants to live around niggers, even other niggers".

Brutal, but true.

theunrecordedman said...

Thanks rhain, that was just the answer I wanted and I'm sure you are right. I just needed someone to articulate it for me. Even so, I have one more question. These 'anti-white whites', as you call them, are only anti-white when it comes to white people like me. They are fine with white people who share their one-world views. Whether they would come over all anti-black if a black person started pushing his own black agenda, I can't say. What do you think? And is it possible - while still remaining human - to be so much like Jesus that you barely differentiate between your own good from that of others? Are they suffering from some kind of messianic complex or are they truly messianic and on a higher moral plane than UKIP voters like me?

Anonymous said...

Mr. Nigger says...

Proportional to the incidence of violent crimes, and in real numbers, you have a better chance of getting shot by cops here in the US if you are white. Last year about 500 cop shootings and only about 125 involving blacks.

Violent crime by blacks far exceeeds 50%.

Some recent research implies that cops now are more likely to hesitate in a confrontion with gentlemen of color.

You can have "the talk" with your kids about the dangers and differences within the black and white communities in regard to violence. It might be good prep work to clarify what they will see when it actually happens. We are all so propagandized about how everyone is the same. Turning point this way for my daughter was a friendly acquaintance she had with a young black woman at school. One day she showed up at school with her face cut to ribbons with a razor knife. A "misunderstanding."
That kind of shock plus hearing from women at work, who she treats as equals, the their significant other is "getting out" (of jail) soon is enough to make her racially aware. That and that she wants kids that look like her.

Anonymous said...

Martin Luther Coon day...

Danger on the street from feral chimps started in mid-sixties.

Before that, as a young teen I could go downtown by myself and hang out. It's as if the civil rights movement gave them the excuse to be violent and obnoxious. That, and outlawing capital punishment which quadrupled the murder rate in a couple years. Of course, the result is that we are socially enriched. If it wasn't for the shitholing of the downtown areas, we wouldn't have malls.

Anonymous said...

Okay, the US started this globalization crap and we have hate crimes and such which seem only to apply to whites. But at least we have some protection in our First Amendment. You can be hounded and shunned for your opinion but, unless you're are directly calling for immediate and specific violence, you can't be put in jail. Thank you Bill Of Rights.

Questioning said...

Sometimes the ONLY way that your libtarded DWL relatives will learn is when they are in the thick of TNB or TKB. You just have to pray they aren't Amy Beihl'd and make it out alive, intact and free of permanent STDs.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Brilliant link from Anonny of 19 January 2015 at 20:01 on Stephen Goodson.

http://m.mg.co.za/article/2012-04-13-reserve-banks-holocaust-denier/

Obviously written by a non-schnozz, one can tell by the fullness of the information supplied and not -- as we are used to getting from the MSM -- just the barest minimum of fact larded with a healthy walloping dose of lockstep editorial bullshit.

The writer, a Miss Lisa Steyn, does not reel back in simulated horror, Politically Correct dismay or engage in loud, theatrical condemnation; she merely reports. You know ... that thing that reporters used to do before they became "journalists".

There is obviously no future for her in journalism. The jews, in their endless spite and vindictiveness will see to that.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

Brilliant insight. Brilliant.

James said...

To call for an end to Israel, or to its sovereignty, is now, more glaringly than ever, to call for an end to the Jews.

To promote "Diversity", is now, more glaringly than ever, to call for an end to the White race.

James said...

The Irish potato famine was a hoax

You won't lose your job for saying that, so maybe it really is a hoax.

Or maybe it isn't.

Anonymous said...

I believe the BUGsters have it at least half-right. We need to stop acting as if anti-whites have a viewpoint that deserves respect, and that we need to justify ourselves to them with "intellectual arguments". They are the ones who should be trying to justify themselves to us. When "debating" with an anti-white, the point is not to get the anti-white to congratulate us on our cleverness; the point is to show the onlookers that anti-whites masquerading as "globalists" and "liberals" are nothing but anti-whites.

They have the only truly effective real-world pro-white propaganda vehicle there is.

Get out there and write the mantra on something the public can see.

"DIVERSITY" is just a code-word for White GENOCIDE

Anonymous said...

"Interesting article on European slaves sold in Crimea in the middle ages. The numbers traded were much larger than the Africans sold into slavery in the 1700'sand 1800's."

Jews ran the Crimean slave trade hence the Khazars (the Turkic tribes that did the actual raiding) converting to Judaism.

Anonymous said...

They ran the White slave trade in Moorish Spain also.

Anonymous said...

@unrecordedman

"What I need is an argument for why I favour my group over others. I need a justification for favouring my tribe over others."

Well the actual reason is genetic. You share more genes with your ethnic group than with others i.e. for each gene you carry there are far more copies of that gene in your ethnic group than elsewhere. Most human (in fact most animal) behavior revolves around that simple fact.

.

"Are they suffering from some kind of messianic complex or are they truly messianic and on a higher moral plane than UKIP voters like me?"

They are biologically wired up to have less kin-group feeling than normal people. They see this as being more moral so you want to attack them morally by pointing out examples of how their ideology is responsible for getting a lot of other people hurt.

For example pointing out that it is people like them who are responsible for thousands of children being raped by grooming gangs.

Questioning said...

Uncle Nasty,

I agree, that lady reporter does seem to be a "just the facts Sam" type gal. Yep, no future whatsoever.

Flanders said...


The FIRST law passed after the Communists seized power in Russia made anti-semitism a crime punishable by death. (Izvestia, July 27, 1918).
---

After the bloody jewish takeover in Russia, the jewish communists continued their campaign against remarks critical of jewry.

"Trotsky [aka Bronstein, who was formerly a jewish tailor fom New York] in a 1937 interview in the New York Jewish newspaper, Daily Forward stated: "The longer the rotten bourgeoisie society lives, the more and more barbaric will anti-Semitism become everywhere."

Flanders said...

An excellent speech regarding this same subject, which has been censored by the abnormal media, is available at Age of Treason:

http://age-of-treason.com/2015/01/17/george-lincoln-rockwell-speaking-at-ucla-5161967/#comment-13306

Unrecorded Man, You and many others can learn much from this specific Rockwell speech.


By the way, let's not forget (belately by Irish time) the January 19 birthday of a Truly honored and honorable American, Gen. Robert E. Lee.

Mrs. Heraclitus said...

Absolutely fascinating article about that Goodman chappie on the SA central bank. How in God's name has he got away with it, in the banking world of all places?

And yes, much credit to the journalist who did her job in accurately reporting the facts. I note comments are closed, would love to have seen what the readers thought.

This has lifted me immensely, a spring in my step this morning!

Anonymous said...

Savant said: “Canada seizes Ernst Zundel from the USA, jails him and then extradites him to Germany where he's jailed again for the same offence.”

The Guardian, 02 October 2008

Alleged Holocaust denier held at Heathrow

• Teacher detained under German arrest warrant
• Court to consider extradition request

An Australian teacher accused of denying the Holocaust was arrested in transit through Heathrow yesterday and held facing extradition to Germany.

Gerald Frederick Töben, 64, who was en route from the US to Dubai when he was seized, was sentenced to nine months in prison in 1999 by a German court...

Töben appeared before Westminster magistrates court...
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/oct/02/secondworldwar.australia

EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT

Parliament UK

html version of the file http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN04979.pdf

The EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT in practice

The arrest of Gerald Toben

Dr Gerald Fredrick Toben is an Australian citizen who was born in Germany but has spent
most of his life in Australia. In 1994 he founded “the Adelaide Institute” whose stated goal is
to expose “the Holocaust Myth”. He has served a term of imprisonment in Germany, and has
also been the subject of legal proceedings in Australia in relation to material on the Institute’s
website. In October 2008, he was ARRESTED WHILE IN TRANSIT at HEATHROW AIRPORT, under an EAW [EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT] issued in Germany alleging that he had carried out “world wide internet publication” of material that was anti-Semitic, and denied, approved, or played down the mass murder of Jews perpetrated by the Nazis during the second world war.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:19ef_n9RByEJ:www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN04979.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

BBC, 05 December 2014

The EAW [EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT] operates EU-wide and replaced separate extradition arrangements between the EU member states. The EAW was introduced in January 2004, and was prompted by the international ANTI-TERROR drive after the 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 ATTACKS ON THE US.

A national judicial authority, such as a court, can issue an EAW to get a suspect extradited. For an EAW to be valid, the suspect must be accused of an offence incurring a maximum penalty of at least a year in prison, or must have been already sentenced to at least four months in prison.

The EAW means faster and simpler surrender procedures for suspects. EU states can no longer refuse to extradite one of their citizens on grounds of nationality. Extradition no longer requires a political decision for a suspect to be handed over. The EAW means mutual recognition of criminal justice systems in the EU.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23239493

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

The Guardian, 22 October 2009

The BNP leader Nick Griffin was repeatedly pilloried and criticised on the BBC's Question Time tonight when he was dubbed the "Dr Strangelove" of British politics after attempting to claim the mantle of Winston Churchill and struggling to explain his denial of the Holocaust.

He then struggled as a young Jewish man wearing a skullcap challenged him to explain why he had likened the "orthodox opinion" that six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust to the old "orthodox opinion" that the earth was flat.

The audience member said: "Sir Winston Churchill put everything on the line so that my ancestors wouldn't get slaughtered in the concentration camps. But here sits a man who says that is a myth just like a flat world was a myth."

Griffin was jeered as he struggled to explain his stance on the Holocaust. "I cannot explain why I used to say those things," he said as he blamed his inability to spell out his thinking on the threat of being deported under the EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT to France and Germany where Holocaust denial is illegal.

Jack Straw, the justice secretary, said there was no law preventing Griffin from explaining himself.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/oct/22/bnp-nick-griffin-question-time


VIDEO: Question Time (skip to 07:25)

Jew Jack Straw: “There is no law here that stops you [Nick Griffin] explaining yourself...as a justice minister I PROMISE YOU [LOL!!!] if you want to explain why you don’t believe it...”

David Dimbleby: “...you [Nick Griffin] have the freedom now to explain it.”

LOL!!!

Note: Chris Huhne MP, jailed for 8 months for perverting the course of justice, mentions the Toben case, saying that the Government refused a European Arrest Warrant from a country (Germany) that requires Holocaust denial to be an offence.

Just because the Government refused a European Arrest Warrant from Germany in the Toben case, does not mean that it would refuse a European Arrest Warrant in other cases re Holocaust denial.

Nick Griffin knows this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNVB43xfBRY

Frank Galton

fair-minded-racist said...

Griffin's big mistake that he tried to explain his views in an apologetic way. BIG MISTAKE. IF YOUR EXPLAINING YOUR LOSING!!!!

Ridicule baby! Ridicule all the Elie Wiesel stories that were disproven. Hey we have a multitude of examples which blow the shit out of the whole fairytail,

Julian said...

You might be fair-minded but "YOUR" also fucking illiterate. Learn to write in English and in future we might listen to your TAIL.

Prick.

Shaunantijihad said...

theunrecorded...

Your argument, though you don't need one, can be as simple as:

1. I am of the same opinion as all the Negroes racists desperate to get away from other Negroes and live amongst White people.

Or, a bit more interesting:

2. I want White people to have equal rights with Jews and Black people, don't you?

Jews and Blacks can have Jewish or Black clubs, publications etc, even countries of their own! But Whites are not allowed even a White chess club? Why don't we have the Freedom of Association allowed to everyone else? Don't you think it would be hateful if we told Jews they no longer were allowed Jewish only schools or clubs? Why do you hate Whites so much?

UNcle Nasty said...

.
Fascinating. For the last few months there has been quite a sea-change all over the world.

Read these comments from the Slog -- almost unthinkable a few short months ago ... The Slog, I might add, although I agree with him on many points, dances an incredible fandango to avoid stepping on the third rail.

https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2015/01/19/hebdo-why-we-must-resist-sympathy-for-islamics-about-charlies-true-colours/

Tom
January 19, 2015 at 11:38 am Reply

I’m afraid I think you are mistaken. The quote from Booker is a pure slice of Telegraph agenda.
Ever since the Charlie Hebdo attacks, the Telegraph, in common with most of the rest of the British media has been pushing the points they have been told to push that a) Muslims in general are not to be trusted and are planning attacks here b) There is increasing anti-semitism and Jews are thinking of leaving the UK c) The security services need more power and d) The BBC is pro-Palestinian
The Israeli regime, through their stooges in the UK government and media, have been allowed to hijack the Charlie Hebdo tragedy for their own ends, smearing anyone who questions the improbable narrative of the Paris attacks as anti-semitic or pro-Palestinian.
What has it come to when the on the basis of an isolated atrocity in a foreign capital city we have the Chief Rabbi given the prime slot on the BBC’s Today programme with the simpering Justin Webb allowing him to get away with naked Zionist propaganda unchallenged? Britain is being governed by a client regime, dropping everything at the behest of Netanyahu, Obama and Merkel, while British values and British freedom of speech are being throttled.
The Charlie Hebdo ‘freedom of speech’ issue is a red herring, intended to divert people from the real threat to our freedom of speech, which is from the power-hungry ‘security services’ and the pro-Israeli media pushing its own agenda on behalf of foreign owners.
For the same reason, the attacks in Paris will never be properly investigated because the Israelis and their government placemen will never allow it, as it would expose them as criminals.
I’m afraid Booker is no better than Richard Littlejohn and many other columnists – they pretend to be plain-speaking and on the side of their readers while being shameless propagandists for a bought-and-paid-for government.

Bran1
January 19, 2015 at 12:53 pm Reply

Absolutely right, Tom. I have read somewhere on the web that Charlie Hebdo is owned by a Rothschild. If this is true then it might explain why one of its cartoonists was sacked a few years back for taking the mickey out of Israel. Why is “free speech” for one a “hate crime” for another?

Maxter
January 19, 2015 at 1:50 pm Reply

Bang on the money. We need to revise history starting from the 1st world war onwards. Its all been one big zio bankster lie. The innocent have been demonised and the history writers are just agents of deception.


Are we getting to the influential 10% yet?

UN
.

Anonymous said...

At Howard University in 1965, LBJ declared, “We seek ... not just equality as a right and a theory, but equality as a fact and equality as a result.”

They were given every opportunity to be scientists in real life and not just movies but failed big time.

Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an article, Taki's Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don't get paid for their work. http://takimag.com/article/selma_50_years_on_patrick_buchanan/print#ixzz3PMrnKGSZ

katana said...

Anonymous said... 19 January 2015 at 22:21
andreas: with all due respect to your daughters "committment" tell her to watch out for the nigger marchers,as soon as they see a white girl marching with their groups they presume that said white girl is in love with him,them or HER and will be all over her like a cheap suit.saw it here in Chicago yrs back when the mis guided liberal white girls from various and all white Catholic colleges went marching through all white neighborhoods in the open housing bullshit which they ultimately destroyed,these girls at end of march or during had dicks openly rubbed againsttheir asses,were asked if they could be pimped out.had their young nubile titties squeezed,this is no racist fairy tale,you and daughter dont know what the nigger is capable of and as a dad i would most forcibly forbid her to get involved with these creatures,John old rtd chicago copper.

-----------------------

Thanks John for that.

You do have a knack of providing a unique viewpoint based on real street level life experience as a former cop that dealt with niggers first hand. Some brainwashed PC liberals will accuse you of being a "despicable racist hater" that represents everything they stand against.

I'd say you represent a true realist, a race realist, who has been informed by life experience, at the least, to call a nigger a nigger, while retaining a great, slightly cynical to be sure, sense of humor.

For readers wanting more, I've complied a a three part series of posts of John's comments, entitled, The Wisdom & Musings of John, an Old Retired Chicago Cop – Part 1

[https://katana17.wordpress.com/2014/09/07/the-wisdom-musings-of-john-an-old-retired-chicago-cop-part-1/]

Interesting, humorous and above all educational stuff.
------------------

For my latest blog post, Jews Must Live - Part 8, click here >>> KATANA

[http://katana17.wordpress.com]

Anonymous said...

fair-minded-racist said: “Griffin's big mistake that he tried to explain his views in an apologetic way.”

I think Nick Griffin’s biggest mistake was going on the show. He must have known he was going to be set up.

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

@Julian

Re "YOUR" and “YOU’RE”.

Mainstream media journalists make the same mistake. I’ve seen it in The Guardian and the Daily Mail.

Frank Galton

Martel said...

Shaun 12.29. Great, great answers, especially your 2nd one.

Anonymous said...

I think this belongs in the "ultra-psychosis" bag more than the "blacks are all fucked up" bag:
The other night in South Jersey a woman stopped her car in the middle of the street and sprayed her baby with an "accelerant" and set it on fire. Witnesses said the woman told them she was burning "dog waste." Baby died after being airlifted to Philadelphia hospital.
Life in the small city.

Anonymous said...

No john ex copper.you're misreading my comment.

My daughter is marching in the anti-Islamic protests in Germany. Not too many niggers involved there

mr.a

Nero said...

These 'anti-white whites' theunrecordedman

These people are levellers.

They implicitly think of whites as establishment and the rest as the underdog. They like to take the side of the underdog, as they see it, against the establishment. Hence they are white, but anti-white.

Their mentality here is instinctive, often emotional, so you can't easily reason with them intellectually.

They are deluded and like the idea of believing they are right without ever analysing what it all means - it does not cost them anything to express these beliefs. This is why they can afford to be against their own kind.

Anonymous said...

"To find out who rules over you simply find out who your not allowed to criticize"..........Voltaire , funny thing he said this hundreds of years ago,How true today!

James said...

I think Nick Griffin’s biggest mistake was going on the show. He must have known he was going to be set up.

Bob Whitaker would have destroyed the Jews and liberals on that show. It's what he does best. Tim Wise and Alan Dershowitz are scared of him.

(But they'd debate David Duke and Nick Griffin any time at all.)

Nick should have just mentioned the fake chimney at Auschwitz and how David Irving went to jail for mentioning that it was fake. That is enough of an excuse to say nothing more on the matter except that you don't believe it and that the powers that be are afraid of open legal debate because their story is so shockingly crapola. For the rest of the interview he can engage in meta hate speech (i.e. speech about speech about the Holocaust, as recommended by the Birdman).

He can say believing in the Holocaust is like believing that "Diversity" isn't white genocide, and that if you believe that you'll believe anything.

James said...

that was anti-Semitic, and denied, approved, or played down the mass murder of Jews perpetrated by the Nazis during the second world war.

Apparently its legal to exaggerate it then.

Unless you're a goy of course.

James said...

They might have to change the Alimony laws because - God forbid- women are suffering.

http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2013/01/16/516822/10018334/en/Photo-Release-Women-Paying-Permanent-Alimony-Proves-Financially-Devastating.html

Tarie MacMillian was married for 13 years and has been paying $84,000 a year in permanent alimony for just as long to a former husband who hasn't worked since 1996. Despite having experienced a 75% decrease in her income, a judge ordered MacMillian to pay her ex-husband 65% percent of what she is currently earning – thereby forcing her to live off of just 35% of what she makes!

What are they really doing? Trying to make White people think twice about getting married and having kids? Of course that's what they are doing.

James said...

Hitler:

“It (Democracy) is, first and foremost, the cause of the incredible inundation of all political life with the most inferior, and I mean the most inferior, characters of our time (psychopaths)” .

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=109920

Anonymous said...

Samuel Adams summed it best: “it is always observable, that those who are combined to destroy the People’s Liberties, practice every Art to poison their Morals.”

Anonymous said...

Daily Telegraph, 20 Jan 2015

The British security services will not be able to prevent terrorism unless they MONITOR THE INTERNET TRAFFIC OF INNOCENT PEOPLE, the former head of MI6 has said.

Sir John Sawers, the chief of the Secret Intelligence Service until November last year, warned a successful terrorist attack on the UK by Islamic militants is all but inevitable as he said there cannot be "no-go areas" on the internet.

"At some point a threat will get through," he said at the central London launch of the EDELMAN [Jew PR firm] Trust Barometer...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11356645/Ex-MI6-chief-Sir-John-Sawers-We-cannot-stop-terrorism-unless-we-spy-on-innocent-people.html

LOL!!!

Edelman.com

Dan was proud to be Jewish... He was one of thousands of men who fought in Europe against the Nazis, but his contribution was to listen overnight to enemy propaganda, then to formulate an effective response on radio or via leaflet drops.
http://www.edelman.com/p/6-a-m/dan-edelman-the-indomitable/

Jewish Daily Forward, 15 January 2013

The Edelman agency has 66 office offices and 4,500 employees around the world, as well as affiliates in more than 30 cities. Edelman’s son, Richard Edelman, has served as the company’s new president and CEO since his father retired in 1996.
http://forward.com/articles/169296/daniel-edelman-pr-pioneer-dies-at-/#ixzz3PORJkaf9

Edelman is the world's largest independently owned public relations firm.
http://www.odwyerpr.com/pr_firm_rankings/independents.htm

Frank Galton

john said...

unrecordedman - one thing to remember...Jesus was 'rayciss'. He stated clearly that 'I came only to the lost sheep of Israel'. Once you understand WHO israel is - and more importantly isnt - then a lot becomes clear. see http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/content/pikes-mistake for info/proof.
Hang in there and remember, some folk are too stupid and deluded to reason with. Comes a point where you just 'shake the dust from your feet'.

Anonymous said...

Daily Telegraph, 17 January 2015

“No doubt those who oppose such legislation will claim that this is merely an excuse for...[the] state to snoop on the harmless activities of ordinary people going about their private business.” – Jonathan Evans, former director-general of MI5
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11352489/The-law-is-lagging-behind-in-the-fight-against-terror.html


REGULATION OF INVESTIGATORY POWERS ACT 2000

Sunday Telegraph, 06 September 2008

ANTI-TERRORISM laws used to spy on noisy children

The RIPA [Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act] was introduced to help fight TERRORISM and crime. But a series of extensions, first authorised by David Blunkett in 2003, mean that Britain's 474 councils can use the law to tackle minor misdemeanours.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2696031/Anti-terrorism-laws-used-to-spy-on-noisy-children.html


Sunday Express, 07 March 2010

Town Halls use TERROR LAW to spy on staff

They are using laws designed to catch TERRORISTS to open private emails, film parking attendants and monitor bin men.

Staff have been spied on at home, videoed at their desks and even in the shower.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/162025/Town-Halls-use-terror-law-to-spy-on-staff


Daily Telegraph, 05 December 2008

ANTI-TERROR powers used to spy on paperboys

A council used ANTI-TERROR powers to spy on paperboys to check whether a village newsagent had not obtained work permits for them.

Cambridgeshire County Council sent undercover officers to monitor whether eight children delivering papers in Melbourn, Cambs, were doing their rounds without the correct paperwork.

Andrew Lansley, the Conservative MP for South Cambridgeshire, said: "These powers should only be used for the scope they were intended, which is to tackle serious crime and TERRORISM."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/3567436/Anti-terror-powers-used-to-spy-on-paperboys.html

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

cont.

Daily Telegraph, 01 Nov 2008

Half of councils use ANTI-TERROR LAWS to spy on 'bin crimes'

The Act allows public bodies – since expanded to include councils – to place residents and businesses under surveillance, trace telephone and email accounts and even send staff on undercover missions.

The Tories condemned the latest figures as further evidence that the law had become a "snooper's charter".

"Under Labour, the rights and liberties of law-abiding citizens are being eroded through plans for ID cards, sinister microchip spies in bins and abuse of anti-terror laws by councils," said Eric Pickles, the party's communities spokesman.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3333366/Half-of-councils-use-anti-terror-laws-to-spy-on-bin-crimes.html


Belfast Telegraph, 16 January 2015

BBC uses RIPA TERRORISM LAWS to catch TV licence fee dodgers in Northern Ireland

Broadcaster is using Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act used for surveillance

The Act, which regulates the powers of public bodies to carry out surveillance and investigation, was introduced in 2000 to safeguard NATIONAL SECURITY.
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/northern-ireland/bbc-uses-ripa-terrorism-laws-to-catch-tv-licence-fee-dodgers-in-northern-ireland-30911647.html


The Guardian, 14 May 2008

Council used TERROR LAW to spy on fishermen
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/may/14/law.humanrights


Huffington Post, 22 August 2012

Local Councils Abusing ANTI-TERRORISM Powers For Lesser Crimes

Powers designed to combat TERRORISM and serious crime have been used to catch dog owners whose pets fouled the streets and to investigate breaches of the smoking ban, according to a report.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/08/21/local-councils-abusing-anti-terrorism-powers_n_1819715.html


Sunday Times, 05 December 2010

TERROR LAW used on carrot thief

Some councils are using surveillance powers supposedly introduced for spying on suspected TERRORISTS and serious criminals
http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/Society/article470304.ece


The Independent, 11 April 2008

ANTI-TERROR LAWS used to spy on family

A family who were wrongly suspected of lying on a school application form have discovered that their local council used ANTI-TERRORISM surveillance powers to spy on them.

The Act, passed in 2000, was supposed to allow SECURITY AGENCIES to combat TERRORISM.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/antiterror-laws-used-to-spy-on-family-807873.html


The Mirror, 18 June 2009

Lancashire Town hall uses ANTI-TERROR LAWS to snoop on cleaners

Laws designed to fight TERRORISTS and gangsters have been used by a council to spy on its cleaners.

It was revealed yesterday that town hall bosses employed the draconian measures over 500 times, including one occasion to snoop on bus drivers.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/lancashire-town-hall-uses-anti-terror-400640

Frank Galton

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Edelman.com

Dan was proud to be Jewish... He was one of thousands of men who fought in Europe against the Nazis, but his contribution was to listen overnight to enemy propaganda, then to formulate an effective response on radio or via leaflet drops.
http://www.edelman.com/p/6-a-m/dan-edelman-the-indomitable/


Indomitable all right, no question about that. The stress must have been terrible

but amazing how few of them found themselves on Omaha beach, getting shot at by real Germans with real bullets.

Patton wrote of his general staff suddenly being flooded by jews (commissioned officers only, in brand new uniforms) ... but only safely at the very, very end of the war.

How unfortunate for us that Patton's awakening to reality came so little, so late.

He, McArthur (and possibly Smedley Butler) and a few other disaffected -- and aware -- generals could have led a coup against the traitorous jew-riddled administration -- and military -- of the time.

Imagine Eisenhower, Roosevelt (in wheelchair of course) Morgenthau, Alger Hiss and a few other of the usual suspects blinking in the dawn light as they waited for the trap to drop from beneath them.

Robert Oppenheimer would be there too.

The very thought brings a smile to my lips.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
I remember hearing a few years back that Mark Steyn had sold out.
But I never dreamed it would be to this extent.

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0115/steyn011915.php3#W7H9QqJ0ZxXyjWmH.99

If the flow of information is really controlled by Jews, as the Reverend Jeremiah Wright assured his students at the Chicago Theological Seminary a year or two back, you'd think they'd be a little better at making their media minions aware of one of the bleakest stories of the early 21st century: the extinguishing of what's left of Jewish life in Europe. It would seem to me that the first reaction, upon hearing of a Jewish school shooting, would be to put it in the context of the other targeted schools, synagogues, community centers, and cemeteries. And yet liberal American Jews seem barely aware of this grim roll call. Even if you put to one side the public school in Denmark that says it can no longer take Jewish children because of the security situation, and the five children of the chief rabbi of Amsterdam who've decided to emigrate, and the Swedish Jews fleeing the most famously tolerant nation in Europe because of its pervasive anti-Semitism; even if you put all that to the side and consider only the situation in France... No, wait, forget the Villiers-le-Bel schoolgirl brutally beaten by a gang jeering, "Jews must die"; and the Paris disc-jockey who had his throat slit, his eyes gouged out, and his face ripped off by a neighbor who crowed, "I have killed my Jew";

Read more at http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0115/steyn011915.php3#2DcTbmfTt4Cc3e0m.99

It's what's known as "getting your kvetch in first ..."

Needless to say, it completely ignores the toll (death, economic and otherwise) on White people who have fallen in the two-century-long open war waged upon us

UN
.

James said...

Frank, an extension of your post is that laws designed to "combat anti-Semitism" are actually used to combat the WHITE RACE!

Uncle Nasty said...

.
The eternal kvetchers are scraping the bottom of the barrel, now.

http://www.imdb.com/news/ni58182826?ref_=hm_nw_au_tp1

In 1945, British Allied Forces commissioned director Alfred Hitchcock (circa "Spellbound" era) to supervise a documentary on the liberation of Nazi concentration camps. Titled "German Concentration Camps: Factual Survey," the project foundered under political and artistic pressures. Thus, enter producer Brett Ratner and director André Singer, whose "Night Will Fall" plays HBO on Monday, January 26 at 9pm Est. Watch trailers and clips below. The presentation combines restored, hardly seen archival footage (including pieces of an elusive sixth reel thought to be lost) and eyewitness testimony to offer an exclusive, behind-the-scenes look at a film that was never finished. (An incomplete version played the Berlin Film Festival in 1984, and PBS in 1985, under the title "Memory of the Camps.") Newsweek has a fascinating, in-depth look at what went wrong and what this footage looks like: "Two women drag an emaciated female corpse ...»

and on and on and fucking onnnnnnnn .....

Are the noses so surprised when even the thickest, brain-dead libtards wail: "Enough, already ..."

UN

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Funny how things work out. Just a few days ago, my thoughts turned to the infamous Dreyfuss and whether or not he was indeed guilty of treason.

Silly me. He was a jew, so ...

http://carolynyeager.net/heretics-hour-dreyfus-affair-guilty

The Heretics' Hour: The Dreyfus Affair - Guilty!

Published by carolyn on Sun, 2015-01-18 13:53
2:04:20

Jan. 19, 2015

Margaret Huffstickler brings us a detailed examination of the Dreyfus Affair in turn-of-the-century France, including new information coming forth suggesting that Jewish Army Officer Alfred Dreyfus was indeed guilty as charged.

The evidence against Dreyfus was very strong, yet a certain element in society insisted on his innocence;
The head rabbi of France tells the Paris Police Chief that if Dreyfus is prosecuted it will create a war that will split France in two;

35 million francs pour into France for Dreyfus' defense, mainly from England and Germany, and many new newspapers spring up for the same purpose;
After Dreyfus goes to prison, a long campaign begins to appeal the verdict, which is not above carrying out bribery, perjury, forgery and even murder;

Even after Dreyfus is pardoned, his supporters continue on to get him declared legally innocent of all charges;

The whole affair was characterized as antisemitism, pure and simple, and even today that is universally presented as the one and only lesson of the Dreyfus Affair;

From it the League of the Rights of Man was launched in France, the counterpart of the ADL in the U.S.


The French said it well. How very apt.

plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

That sort of campaign didn't work out quite so well for Leo Frank, did it?

As the modern kids would say: "Bummer ..."

UN
.

Anonymous said...

The real interesting question is where did the "lost" money go and who got a warning ahead of time.


http://www.usagold.com/cpmforum/2015/01/18/swiss-franc-trade-wipes-out-830-million-hedge-fund/

katana said...

Uncle Nasty said... 20 January 2015 at 21:06

Imagine Eisenhower, Roosevelt (in wheelchair of course) Morgenthau, Alger Hiss and a few other of the usual suspects blinking in the dawn light as they waited for the trap to drop from beneath them.

Robert Oppenheimer would be there too.

The very thought brings a smile to my lips.

UN
-------------

My God UN, you really are stern and without mercy!

Surely, somewhere in your heart you could find some leniency, some compassion for Roosevelt’s wheelchair? The poor thing suffered the indignity of having spent years of being sat upon, and no doubt shat upon, by one of America’s greatest traitors!

------------------

Shaunantijihad said...

Let's see how long this comment stays up at the Express:

"...Paris attacks..."

Those Parisians eh? Muslims attacks is what they were and it will get worse. Jews are canaries in the coal mine. Jews should be absolutely against Islam and Muslims. Multiculti dreams of a One World State are not merely wrongheaded, they are suicidal and will hand Western civilisation to the Muslims if we permit them to breed themselves into the majority. The corollary of which is that we must deal firmly with the Muslim birthrate and without a shred of doubt as to our right to a White homeland. It means a sober recognition that Muslims must be dealt with one way or another - or we become yet another nation conquered by 3rd world genetics and ideology.

Multiculturalism has become a death spiral for White countries and White countries only. We cannot have any kind of adult solution unless - absolutely unless - the rights of Whites as Whites is addressed. And our right to White homelands free from third world immigration and re-population is the first priority. For if we lose our homelands then all else is moot. Jews should know this above all other people.

If we lose to the insane liberal fanatics who try and stifle discussion with "racism" and threats of imprisonment for thought crime then in 40 years Britain and France - and our over 1,000 intercontinental nuclear missiles - will be in the hands of the Mullahs. Israel will be smoking ruin and Sharia law will ensure the death of all Jews and the slavery of women for all time.

That's what's at stake. So stop calling us racists and try and find out why we are so concerned about the future."

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/553186/Jewish-community-quit-UK-safety-threat-Paris-attacks-terrorism-anti-Semitism

Anonymous said...

I wonder what the answer was?

Anti-Muslim cartoons: Satire or Waycis'?

Seneca said...

Sean. That is an excellent and highly relevant comment on the Express. In any normal society it would not alone be allowed but debated intensively.

But we are not living in a normal society, are we?

Anonymous said...

James said: “Frank, an extension of your post is that laws designed to "combat anti-Semitism" are actually used to combat the WHITE RACE!”

RACE RELATIONS BILL (RACE RELATIONS ACT 1965)

House of Commons debate, 03 May 1965

The [Jewish] Secretary of State for the Home Department (Sir Frank Soskice) I beg to move, that the Bill be now read a Second time.

Sir B. Janner [Sir Barnett Janner, Jewish MP for Leicester North West]: We must not give a person who is a scurrilous abuser the right to get free from the net by claiming that he did not mean to attack Jews as a race, but was talking about the Jewish religion. The Home Secretary has stated categorically that the Bill fully covers "Jewish", in such a sense as to come fully within the provisions of the Bill.

Mr. Henry Brooke (Hampstead): The House must never forget that about SIX MILLION Jews were put to death as a result of Hitler.

Sir B. Janner [Sir Barnett Janner, Jewish MP for Leicester North West]:..Millions of people allowed the gas chambers to be used, participated in their use and did not raise any voice against their use and that the rest of the world stood by when the people of Auschwitz asked to be bombed...
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1965/may/03/race-relations-bill

Jewish Telegraphic Agency, 09 June 1965

British Parliament Discusses Adding ‘religion’ to Bill on Racialism

Sir Frank [Sir Frank Soskice, Jewish Home Secretary], opposing the Rose amendment, told the committee that the drafters of the bill assumed that religion was “something personal to each citizen, and not a distinctive definition applying to a group.” For that reason, he said, “it is better to have JEWS and other religious minorities covered in the definition of RACIAL AND ETHNIC GROUPS.”
http://www.jta.org/1965/06/09/archive/british-parliament-discusses-adding-religion-to-bill-on-racialism

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

RACE RELATIONS BILL (RACE RELATIONS ACT 1965)

AJR [Association of Jewish Refugees] INFORMATION, September 1965

PAGE 5

Fascist Activities

Mr. Reginald Freeson [Jewish MP for Willesden East] suggested that the police be asked for special reports about the growth of illegal acts by members and associates of the Union Movement, the British Nazi Party, and other such organisations. He was particularly concerned about acts of violence, assault, abusive telephone calls, threats of violence, arson and other insulting and threatening conduct against the persons and property of minority groups.

Sir Frank Soskice, the [Jewish] Home Secretary, stated that he was being kept informed of the activities of fascist groups. These activities, he said, remained on a small scale and no general request for special reports was necessary

PAGE 5

Race Bill

The RACE RELATIONS BILL was given an unopposed third reading in the House of Commons. Sir Frank Soskice [Jewish Home Secretary], who moved the third reading, said the Bill was designed to "get in first", to be ready to cope with frictions and difficulties which might arise. The Government would watch the situation as it developed. Should it appear that the provisions were inadequate, it might later be necessary for the Government to extend its scope and to reconsider its effect and operation.

During the debate Mr. Quintin Hogg condemned attacks on Jews and Jewish property. "The Jewish people have suffered enough in our lifetime without having this frightful thing rearing its head again", he declared. Mr. Hogg said he represented a constituency where there were a large number of Jewish people and he had been very much disturbed by the number of attacks on Jewish property. The Board of Deputies had given him a list of 22 outrages against Jewish property since last November, one case involving loss of life.
http://www.ajr.org.uk/journalpdf/1965_september.pdf

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

Bolsheviks and British Jews: The Anglo-Jewish Community, Britain and the Russian Revolution, by Dr Sharman Kadish

PAGE 253

“The MG’s Russian correspondents in 1917, DAVID SOSKICE [Sir Frank Soskice’s father] and Michael Farbman, were assimilated Russian Jewish émigrés with left-of-centre views.”
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=SRSAAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA253&lpg=PA253&dq=russian+jew+%22David+Soskice%22&source=bl&ots=kJ6XfBGLfA&sig=NXPICBADtmw1HSH9qrmaF_XecOI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=PE6_VITxCYbzUKKjhPAH&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=russian%20jew%20%22David%20Soskice%22&f=false

Dr Sharman Kadish is founder of Jewish Heritage UK (2004) and of its predecessor, the Working Party on Jewish Monuments in the UK & Ireland (1991).
http://jewish-heritage-uk.org/about/contact

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

AJR [Association of Jewish Refugees] INFORMATION, September 1952

PAGE 3

GROUP LIBEL was debated in the House of Lords, but Lord Silkin, a Jew, failed to secure a motion in its favour. Viscount Simon opposed the argument, and the Jewish Observer supported him." The fact (it said) that it has not proved possible to frame a legal measure on group libel which would effectively offer protection is, perhaps, an indication that the conception is itself not sound "; the Zionist paper found itself in agreement with Earl Winterton that in Britain "a group libel law might well give the IMPRESSION that certain minorities [Jews] were seeking privileges and protection that singled them out from the rest of the population."
http://www.ajr.org.uk/journalpdf/1952_september.pdf

Frank Galton

Heraclitus said...

Sean as of now the comment is still up. A bit amazed because you explicitly refer to 'White' countries a number of times.

The explanation could lie in the adroit way you rope Jews into our cause, even though as we know the people purporting to represent them were central to the invasion. This makes a lot of sense to me. One job at a time so to speak.

Shaunantijihad said...

Thanks H.

I got so used to being banned in the msm that I forgot just how important it is to get our ideas out there. Bob Whittaker has lots of practical ideas about how to do this.

What is more, if we can show ordinary Jews that they too have no future in a Muslim/Negro Britain then just maybe they can stop supporting their leaders driving them and us to mutual destruction.

Anyway, its best to select battles you have a chance of winning, as Bob would say.

http://www.whitakeronline.org/

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/

awakened said...

Yes, the trend following Sean's Express post confirms my view that we are better off fighting one battle at a time. Let us just suppose that we get, by inferring Jews to be 'just like us' a broad and influential front for a much tougher line on the mud invasion. We could always at our leisure so to speak point out who actually gave the initial inpetus to that invasion. with the implicit threat that we are now watching for similar tricks.

beppo said...

@SHAUN and awakened

Sound, practical suggestions here.

Reminders also of how the Catholic church declined in peoples estimation when it was seen how it dealt with the problems caused by a minority of its leaders by circling the waggons against the rest of the nation.

Anonymous said...

Only under KIKE fucking law in the UK? We truly ARE an emasculated bunch of pussies for accepting it

You cannot make this up

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2919386/Doctor-wanted-raping-child-U-S-allowed-stay-Britain-judge-rules-extradition-breach-human-rights-faces-lengthy-jail-term.html

Anonymous said...

PUBLIC ORDER ACT

House of Commons Debate, 03 November 1983

Mr. Lawrence [Ivan Lawrence, Jewish MP for Burton] asked the [Jewish] Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he has completed his review of the Public Order Act 1936; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. Janner [Greville Janner, Jewish MP for Leicester West]: In view of the patent weakness of the Public Order Act to deal with such evil manifestations as National Front parades, marches and demonstrations at the Cenotaph service during the forthcoming Armistice and Remembrance observances, will the Minister, in considering amendments to the Act, take care to see that such activities can be banned?

Mr. Brittan [Leon Brittan, Jewish Home Secretary]: The concept of public order disturbances should be at the centre of such legislation. I understand and share the anxiety expressed by the hon. and learned Gentleman about the activities of the organisations that he has in mind.
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1983/nov/03/public-order-act-1936

BBC, 14 January 2013

'Insulting words' crime ditched

The crime of "insulting" someone through words or behaviour, which once led to the arrest of a student for asking a police officer whether his horse was gay, is to be dropped.

Section 5 of the 1986 Public Order Act currently means that "threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour" might be deemed a criminal offence.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21020737

RACIAL HARASSMENT BILL

House of Commons debate, 28 March 1994

Mr. Harry Cohen [Jewish MP for Leyton]: In 1985, I introduced the Racial Harassment Bill under the ten-minute rule. It was the first Bill presented to Parliament to make racial attack a criminal offence...

One other reason for such a law is the rise of the British National party. It is a most dangerous organisation, not only to black and Asian communities, but to the whole community. It is a threat to democracy and I would not be opposed to banning it. Neo-Nazi organisations have been banned in Germany, for example. If the Government say that there would be civil liberties problems in banning the BNP, they need to make its activities illegal and make the racist attacks that it carries out illegal. That is why a new law is so important.

Wherever racism rears its ugly head, there is death. Whether the Ku Klux Klan, the apartheid regime, racial attacks in this country or the holocaust of Nazi Germany, racism equals death. It is in MULTICULTURAL, MULTIRACIAL SOCIETIES where people live together that one has HARMONY.
http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199394/cmhansrd/1994-03-28/Debate-19.html

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

We don't have any friends among whoever has power. Look at the flak that Michael Moore is taking for just saying 'snipers are coward'.
Conservatives here play the offended goodygoody american patriot.
Well too bad, during the battle of Brandywine, George Washington, was on horse and in the line of fire of a British sniper. This is a well known episode of Brandywine. Washington could not see the sniper and could not avoid the shot, BUT the sniper decided NOT to shoot George Washington because 'you don't shoot a man in the back' he said later.
Honor on the battlefield saved Washington, and the USA. It is ironic that today's American neocons find honorable to shoot in the back.
Nonetheless, after his statement (that snipers were coward) observe that Moore has to play low profile and he has to 'explain his tweet'.
But at least he is not in jail.

Shaunantijihad said...

Frank, Katana, UN, St Nilus, Savant etc, don't worry.

To get to the numbers we require needs some tlc when it comes to our kinfolk.

This isn't the world we wanted, so we must make of it what we can.

You must keep 100% to the truth. Some must bring them to you. Some cannot be brought. I'm trying to re-balance what I see is unbalanced and is detrimental to "our" cause.

I say "our" because my cause is not merely Britain or Eire but Caucasia. And that is something that has never existed... yet. For unlike any White country until now, Caucasia assumes a racial element in it's very foundation. It could begin with a Caucasian League. (Just as there is an Arab League) And like Jews who pretend to be British, French etc yet are traitors to us, we are bound by being Caucasians like they are bound to being Jews. Do you see? We use their model of success for our own ends.

I believe we must open fronts at every section of the enemy's propaganda efforts.

Some require... delicacy.

Anonymous said...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Crimewatch - a 74 year old white woman sent £150,000 to a lonely heart in Ghana. Coalburner geriatric bitch.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Dan said...

Stalingrad was more or less decided by Russian snipers.

Anonymous said...

Anti-muslim protests. Germans wake up:

"Police in the nearby city of Leipzig are preparing for huge crowds after a local Pegida offshoot claimed they would bring 40,000 people onto the streets on Wednesday night.
With 19 separate counter-protests also taking place in the city, police say they are preparing for crowds of 100,000 people on the streets, and drafting in reinforcements from neighbouring states.
The Leipzig offshoot, which calls itself Legida, is much more radical than the main Pegida movement, and has openly called for an end to Germany's "culture of war guilt" over the crimes of the Nazis...........

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11360138/Pegida-leader-pictured-posing-as-Adolf-Hitler.html

Anonymous said...

That is wonderful wonderful news from Leipzig.

Anonymous said...

Two Finnish men, one a 40 yr. old employee and the other a 74 yr. old man were axed to death by a SOMALI refugee in a public pub one week ago. Yet no international news coverage has surfaced on this blood-curdling story ... only on some alternative-news sites will you read about it.

Now Finnish authorities are more worried over an ANTI-immigrant backlash other then the two slaughtered Finnish citizens and their distraught families.

http://yle.fi/uutiset/police_monitor_social_media_for_anti-immigrant_sentiment_following_oulu_murders/7747356

Andreas said...

Well the Finns are some tough fucking cookies. Interesting to see how they react to this. Assuming they get to hear about it of course.

Anonymous said...

.. and the diatribes continue. It's getting hotter now as we approach January 27th where no doubt there will be a 2 minute silence, shreiking renditions of horror and terror by the "survivors"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2920791/Monster-wished-10-million-Jews-murdered-week-s-TV-drama-Eichmann-s-trial-new-book-reveals-horror-man-claimed-just-small-cog-Nazi-machine.html

Anonymous said...

http://bbc.com/news/uk-politics-18519395


Anonymous said...

"Washington could not see the sniper and could not avoid the shot, BUT the sniper decided NOT to shoot George Washington because 'you don't shoot a man in the back' he said later.
Honor on the battlefield saved Washington, and the USA. It is ironic that today's American neocons find honorable to shoot in the back."

Hmmm...Clear my throat. False equivalent. You are a hopelessly idiotic twit.

I'm not a "con" or "neocon".

Scot Irish

rhain said...

theunrecordedman said..

Thanks rhain, that was just the answer I wanted and I'm sure you are right. I just needed someone to articulate it for me. Even so, I have one more question. These 'anti-white whites', as you call them, are only anti-white when it comes to white people like me. They are fine with white people who share their one-world views. Whether they would come over all anti-black if a black person started pushing his own black agenda, I can't say. What do you think?


Good question. While white "leftists" tend to excuse non-white tribalism on the grounds that non-whites are "oppressed", I have encountered many whites who claim to oppose racial loyalty on behalf of anybody, and I believe some of them are sincere. Even the ideas (or received opinions) of such genuine "egalitarians" are harmful to us, of course.

I don't know what the BUGsters make of such people, but I suppose one might say such people might not be anti-white in terms of beliefs, but they are anti-white in effect (or, to use "leftist" terminology, they help support the anti-white system). Their beliefs (or should I say the memes that have been pumped into their heads) are to me, are anti-human, and still absurd - you can bet such people will usually have no issue with people caring about their family, or their species, or with people self-organizing around social constructs like "liberalism" or even "British values"; it's just "racism" they don't like.

PS - I don't know if the person you are debating is white or not, but perhaps you do.

theunrecordedman said..
And is it possible - while still remaining human - to be so much like Jesus that you barely differentiate between your own good from that of others? Are they suffering from some kind of messianic complex or are they truly messianic and on a higher moral plane than UKIP voters like me?


Another good question. People might post anti-white messages online for a variety of reasons, but the first thing I should point out is that their doing so absolutely does not give them the moral high ground over us. Indeed, the illusion of moral superiority is pretty much all they have. I know it is hard to overcome the social programming that says our natural, healthy feelings are "bad", but we have the moral high ground, not them.

Assuming that anti-white whites you encounter really are white (and not jews or other non-whites pretending to be white), and assuming they do not have familial ties to non-whites, I believe they could have a variety of motivations. I don't claim to fully understand them, but I believe the majority are just what William Pierce called "lemmings". The "authorities" tell them what "every decent person believes" (i.e., what they want everyone to believe) and the lemmings are too scared to go against the herd. I sort of liken modern-day anti-racists to the crowds of old who used to cheer on the drowning of witches - they just "knew" they were the good guys too.

Anyway, if the majority of people are just lemmings following the reigning anti-white narrative, that still leaves the question of where that anti-white narrative comes from, and the only sensible answer to that as far as I can see is that it comes from another competitor race, namely the jews.

Shaunantijihad said...

Might be pushing my luck a bit this time. Let's see how long they last at the Express. You can go and give me some thumbs up if you like:

"You mean just like France arrested the Hebdo cartoonist who said Le President's son made a savvy move converting to Judaism?

There is no Freedom of Speech in the EU. Read the Lisbon Treaty (Constitution). You can be arrested and held without trial for criticising any Eurocrat. Many, many people are imprisoned by the EU for simply quoting the revised figures from the Auschwitz Museum curators who revised down the number of Jews who died there by 2 million.

Was it Voltaire who said you had only to discover whom you cannot criticise to find out who rules over you?"

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/553358/Miss-Turkey-Charlie-Hebdo-shooting-media-crackdown-Merve-Buyuksarac-arrest-police

and...

"We demand equal rights with Black people! Blacks can form clubs, organisations, magazines etc exclusively for Black people. Whites cannot. We demand freedom of association for Whites!

NO TOLERANCE FOR ANTI-WHITES!"

http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/552697/Conservative-Party-Derek-Laud-David-Cameron-racism

Anonymous said...

look at this dumb white bitch from South Africa and her efforts to sit pretty with Yids in the acting world being 'mother' to an 'enricher'. Pathetic!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2921111/Charlize-Theron-shows-sexy-figure-low-cut-leather-trousers-snacks-fruit-shoot.html

Gary Paul said...

Been obvious for a long time that the little yard ape is just a fashion statement from Charlize Theron. She can barely touch her "son" without visibly showing distaste. I have personally seen this.

Anonymous said...

Shaunantijihad said :-

I say "our" because my cause is not merely Britain or Eire but Caucasian.

If we don't take this view all will be lost. In the unlikely event of one white country keeping their ethnic origins they will be surrounded by enemies.
I have said many times that any organisation that holds a pro-white stance should unite with others. Now is the time to put aside differences.
We have, at best, thirty years to reverse the situation. Now is the time for unity not division.

Lemmyhead

white flight said...

No-go zones for whites in Europe?

"Doesn't matter how one cuts it, in the end conflict will ensue in Britain and the rest of Europe and the winners will be the one trying to hold onto to their country, they simply have more to lose! The losers will be the ones clutching at straws, it's as simple as that.

This conflict will begin when the Muslim population reaches a tipping point. That hasn't been reached yet but say in another 20 to 30 years perhaps when their numbers become high enough they will then make their move on trying to force Islamic doctrine into law to such a degree that the eventual reaction will be complete resistance and not the subservience we are currently seeing on behalf of the consensual liberal elite.

This war will be brief, violent and destructive. It will reverse in a matter of months that has taken decades to grow. It will be a war of attrition not seen since the German - Soviet war of WW2 with house to house fighting to match but not so much on the mechanised scale."

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/01/21/did-emerson-mean-bradford-when-he-described-birmingham-as-a-totally-muslim-city/

petard said...

Leftists turn on each other in Britain:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9376232/free-speech-is-so-last-century-todays-students-want-the-right-to-be-comfortable/

LMAO!!

skilpad said...

Savant,
The only requirement for persecution is not simply that the aggrieved party chooses to feel offended - those supposedly aggrieved also have to enjoy preferential status with the money powers and those they own in the media, judiciary, and government.
As a counter-example, take the lot of the Boers/Afrikaners in South Africa. If any group has cause for being aggrieved, it is surely them. They are discriminated against in every way imaginable and being slaughtered at a genocidal rate - yet you will hear nothing about it in the international (or local South African) media. Stunning. Spare a thought.
Disclaimer: I'm one of 'em!

Shaunantijihad said...

Lemmy, WF - I am right here in Bradford and this will be one of the front lines.

Skilpad - I wish you all could be with us, my dear brothers and sisters.

This is the end or the beginning. It's like the old fairytale Ragnarok.

Its happening.

Rise Caucasia.