Thursday, 15 January 2015

An unusual endorsement

The more I research the subject the clearer it becomes that sinister 'Western' forces were intent on fomenting a war with Hitler's Germany. It also becomes clearer that those forces were personified by  international central banking interests, which is another way of saying the Rothschilds. The Reichsbank, despite its name, was actually a privately-owned central bank (like almost all the other CBs) and it vigorously opposed the economic program with which Hitler transformed Germany.

This program resulted, within a couple of years, in the country having a solid, stable currency, no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries were still out of work and living on welfare. Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, although it was denied foreign credit and was faced with an economic boycott abroad. It did this by using a barter system: equipment and commodities were exchanged directly with other countries, circumventing the international banks. This system of direct exchange occurred without debt and without trade deficits.  

Here's what Richard Tedor (in Hitler's Revolution) said about it.

"Despite objections from Schmidt, president of the Reich’s Bank, Hitler withdrew Germany’s money system from the gold standard…. Hitler substituted a direct barter system in foreign dealings. German currency became defined units of human productivity.


In January 1938, the Soviet diplomat Kristyan Rakovsky commented on the German money system. Rakovsky had held posts in London and in Paris and was acquainted with Wall Street financiers. He explained, “Hitler, this uneducated ordinary man, has out of natural intuition and even despite the opposition of the technician Schacht, created an especially dangerous economic system. An illiterate in every theory of economics driven only by necessity, he has cut out international as well as private high finance. Hitler possesses almost no gold, and so he can’t endeavor to make it a basis for currency. Since the only available collateral for his money is the technical aptitude and great industriousness of the German people, technology and labor became his ‘gold’…. As you know, like magic it’s eliminated all the unemployment for more than six million skilled employees and laborers. “
Germany’s withdrawal from the gold-based, internationally linked monetary system in favor of a medium of exchange founded on domestic productivity corresponded to Hitler’s belief in maintaining the sovereignty of nations. This was an unwelcome development in London, Paris and New York, where cosmopolitan investment and banking institutions profited from loaning money to foreign countries. Germany no longer had to borrow in order to trade on the world market. Foreign demand for German goods correspondingly created more jobs within the Reich.

Rakovsky was wrong in attributing the genesis of the plan to the 'economically illiterate' Hitler rather than to Gottfried Feder but still it's some testament, is it not?

75 comments:

Rob said...

The race replacement/genocide program now underway means no country will have any "defined units of human productivity" to speak of. All the former nations of Europe will become interchangeable, mongrelised zones of economic activity at the mercy of the banks.

john7 said...

Some statement indeed, and why g
Germany, Germans and h
Hitler are demonised and oppressed to this day... cant let an idea like that take hold.

Cassius said...

Rob, and those mongrelised zones of economic activity will be without any racial, ethnic or religious group memory and so will find any kind of organized resistance extraordinarily difficult.

Anonymous said...

Bring Back Borstal on ITV - all the young thugs are White with one Paki. We all know that is representative of reality. Blacks - who are they?

Anonymous said...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/14/george-soros-funds-ferguson-protests-hopes-to-spur/#ixzz3Ovfpyi5h

KP said...

This is worth looking at for those who haven't seen it before:

"The Jewish Declaration of War
on Nazi Germany

Long before the Hitler government began restricting the rights of the German Jews, the leaders of the worldwide Jewish community formally declared war on the "New Germany" at a time when the U.S. government and even the Jewish leaders in Germany were urging caution in dealing with the new Hitler regime..... cont

http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html

Anonymous said...


What iconic musicians like Bowie and Clapton really thought and still do.

Saunders - yid without doubt

Bragg mongrel white trash advocate for wogs yet lives in 'whites only' Dorset ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_Against_Racism

Wolfhound said...

What happened to Germany after the Weimar Republic fell has at times been described as an economic miracle, I always believed it's just the natural progression of a great people (coupled with great leadership) as soon as they can shake the jew parasite weighing them down like a giant anchor.

Debt stifles everything, it's an absolute killer when it comes to creativity, productivity, welfare and evolution.

There's a long, but interesting doc called the rise & fall of the third Reich and obviously they try their best to demonise the Germans anyway they can, but it's absolutely clear to any intelligent viewer what is going on. The Rise is here on youtube.


By the way, Golden Dawn has released a new inspirational campaign ad for their upcoming elections. It's short but great.

James said...

This book has some insights.


www.iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War.pdf

It's author, an MP in the House of Commons, spent WW2 in prison because he spoke out.


CONTENTS

The British Revolution
The French Revolution
The Russian Revolution
Development of Revolutionary Technique
Germany Bells The Cat
1933: Jewry Declares War
"Phoney War" Ended by Civilian Bombing
Dunkirk and After
The Shape of Things to Come
President Roosevelt's Role
Regulation 18b
Who Dares?
Epilogue
Capt. Ramsay's Statement From Prison to Parliament
Particulars - Reasons Given For Arrest

Ivan said...

How can there be a so called Soviet diplomat, with the pucca sahib name of Kristyan Rakovsky, during the height of the Great Purge?

Anonymous said...

"German currency became defined units of human productivity."

Yep, that's the way to do it.

There's absolutely no need for the central bank system. It's all a scam.

Rogue said...

but still it's some testament, is it not?

Savant, it certainly is.

However, fast-forward to mid-June 1941.

Germany consisted of the Greater German Reich, having absorbed Austria, what nowadays would be the Czech Republic, territories ceded to Poland after WW1 (up to and including East Prussia, of course) and, in the West, once more Alsace Lorraine from the French.

Germany occupied Norway, Denmark, Belgium, Holland, the northern half of France (with the southern half entirely placid), the western half of Poland, Yugoslavia and, with the Italians, Greece.

Germany was also allied to Spain, Italy, Hungary and Romania, in an obvious "big brother" relationship.

So Germany was at war with Britain. And it's Empire. But for all practical purposes - Britain.

Britain's war effort at this stage consisted of some desultory bombing raids, and the Battle of the Atlantic, which was not being successfully prosecuted (activity in north Africa was considered mostly an Italian irritant by the Germans).

The point is, Germany stood tall and strong in mid-June '41.

However, 6 months later Germany was at war with the USSR and the USA, plus still being at war with Britain.

For anyone with even half a brain, it must have been obvious that Germany would now lose the war.

Courtesy of Hitler. I don't think there's any dispute on that.

So whether or not he was an economic illiterate (or genius) is somewhat of a moot point, considering that for a fact he was most certainly a strategic military, or geopolitical, illiterate.

katana said...

James said... 16 January 2015 at 00:29
This book has some insights.

www.iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War.pdf
This book has some insights.

------------------

I’ve serialized the book at my blog and recommend it to all.

[https://katana17.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/the-nameless-war-chapters-1-and-2/]

Here’s the intro text:


THE NAMELESS WAR


Here is the story that people have said would never be written in our time — the true history of events leading up to the Second World War, told by one who enjoyed the friendship and confidence of Mr. Neville Chamberlain during the critical months between Munich and September, 1939.

There has long been an unofficial ban on books dealing with what Captain Ramsay calls The Nameless War, the conflict which has been waged from behind the political scene for centuries, which is still being waged and of which very few are aware. The publishers of The Nameless War believe this latest exposure will do more than any previous attempt to break the conspiracy of silence. The present work, with much additional evidence and a fuller historical background, is the outcome of the personal experiences of a public figure who in the course of duty has discovered at first-hand the existence of a centuries old conspiracy against Britain, Europe, and the whole of Christendom.

The Nameless War reveals an unsuspected link between all the major revolutions in Europe — from King Charles I’s time to the abortive attempt against Spain in 1936. One source of inspiration, design and supply is shown to be common to all of them. These revolutions and the World War of 1939 are seen to be integral parts of one and the same master plan.

After a brief review of the forces behind the declaration of war and the world wide arrests of many who endeavoured to oppose them, the author describes the anatomy of the Revolutionary International machine — the machine which today continues the plan for supranational world power, the age- old Messianic dream of International Jewry.

It is the author’s belief that the machine would break down without the support of its unwilling Jews and unsuspecting Gentiles and he puts forward suggestions for detaching these elements.


------------------

My latest blog post, Jews Must Live - Part 7 is here >>> KATANA

Anonymous said...

Here's more info on Rakowsky from Henry Makow (2003).

http://savethemales.ca/000275.html

Anonymous said...

Stalin was simply waiting for the right moment to stab Hitler in the back. Hitler stabbed first.

As for the USA, the USA was supplying Britain (and later the USSR) with weapons and keeping them in the war. Germany was literally fighting against war material coming out of US factories, paid for by the US taxpayer. The US Navy was escorting British shipping, and attacking German u-boats, long before Hitler declared war. FDR had been waging a diplomatic war and economic embargo campaign against Germany for years. Hitler was simply acknowledging facts: when he declared war on the USA, he was simply acknowledging that the USA had been waging an undeclared war on Germany for years.

FDR was the one responsible for goading Britain and France into turning the German-Polish border dispute into a world war (this little tidbit about FDR's role in fomenting WWII came out in post-war memoirs and has been steadfastly ignored by mainstream "scholars" ie court historians, ever since). Without British and French backing of Poland, Poland would have come to some kind of arrangement with Germany (note: Hitler was not asking for Polish territory, only rail rights to connect Germany with Danzig/East Prussia, just like the USA has rail rights to take a short cut through parts of Canada).

You cannot realistically appraise Hitler's decision making ability in regards to his decisions to invade the USSR or declare war on the USA, if you accept Allied war propaganda at face value and ignore Hitler's stated and openly declared justifications for his actions. If you do that, you will have a very one-sided and childish point of view about the matter, which is precisely what the people who crafted the Allied war propaganda intended.

AngloAmerikan said...

...he was most certainly a strategic military, or geopolitical, illiterate. -Rogue

Perhaps they were privy to intelligence that we know little about. Maybe they tried to destroy the threat from the east while they still thought they had a slim chance.

Joshua Sinistar said...

Hitler didn't lose, you did. Hitler is a great man and hero in the future. The jew is an exhibit in the national museum next to the nigger and the dodo of extinct stupid creatures.
The jew will lose, because it cannot win. It has not the brains or the brawn to conquer anything. If the jew could stand up to its wife maybe it might be an inferior man, but it cannot even do that.

Anonymous said...

PS to Savant:

By 1937, boilermen and other essential workers had to be locked into their jobs. A REAL and acute worker shortage ensued all over Germany.

Nowhere anywhere else in the 20th century have I heard of a case of emergency provisions effected because there were too many job opportunities for white guys to get ahead.

Whatever & however, the bankers had to stop the Germans. A few more years and all of Europe would have been unrecognizable. Only it would have been in our favor.

--MISTER

Shaunantijihad said...

The USA has been at war with the Caucasian people since the Jews began their progressive takeover starting in 1913 when, in an act of treason against the Constitution, they created a fiat currency owned by 11? Jewish banking families and the Rockerfellas. Income tax was created later that year to pay the interest to these families. Everyone in America became enslaved into that system, just like in Europe.

Today, the so called US dollar remains the plaything of the same families - the Federal Reserve dollar, with all it's masonic and star of David symbols.

It's value has gone down about 99% despite the military enforcement of the petrodollar. This is another way of saying that 99% of the wealth created by the American people (mostly of European descent) has been delivered into the hands of these 12 families.

Since WW2 finished, they have been promoting the genocide by all means of Caucasian people, and breeding Negroes by means of foreign aid.

The plan - the Kalergi Plan - is to despoil for all time the high IQ Caucasian genome with low IQ Negroes and mixed breed Muslims to create a "New Man". A lower IQ human slave over who they will rule forever.

A primitive attempt was made at this when this same tribe ran the USSR by murdering all Rus who had an education. It didn't work because although the peasants were illiterate, they had the same mean IQ as other Caucasians.

Race mixing with lower IQ hominids, however, will work and it will be for all time. If they are successful.

It makes no difference to them if it done by rape or consent. Hence the sudden concern for the safety of Jews in the UK, despite decades of literally hundreds of thousand of White girls being raped by Pakis and Niggers.

"There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states."

US General Wesley Clarke

Anonymous said...

"it must have been obvious that Germany would now lose the war. Courtesy of Hitler. I don't think there's any dispute on that."

Maybe there is. Check out the following title-

The Chief Culprit: Stalin's Grand Design to Start World War II -Suvorov

SAVANT said...

@MISTER. Thanks for that fascinating piece of information. The German economic miracle of the 1930's really was that.

Anonymous said...

Rogue- Your comments about Hitler and Germany being 'at war' with Britain is, after reading both Tedor's book (looking at Germany during this time) and Diana West's fascinating book'American Betrayal; The Secret Assault on our Nations' Character,' is nothing less than a TOTAL LIE.

According to Tedor, (and the now declassified documents prove it) It was Britain, under both Chamberlain and Churchill, that was EGGING for War, primarily because they couldn't STAND it that Hitler was threatening the hegemony of the Empire, and nothing less!

One quote should suffice: " Denouncing Hitler for pushing tward war and lauding Chamberalin's supposed endeavors to salvage peace, the British hoped to drive a wedge between the German people and their leadership. "England's proven policy toward Germany," a Berlin journalist wrote, "shuns no means to bring the Reich again into a state of impotence and international bondage This is what England regards today as ideal for diffusing power in Europe."

That bondage was both the Rothschild money power, as well as the hubris-laden racial supremacy of Britain and France, lording it over their brethren, after the opporessive terms of Versailles.

As an American, I've come to loathe the PTB in both the US, as well as in Europe- but primarily in England, for their totally unchristian and presumptive nature in ruling us (their subjects/ citizens) as if we were chattel, over the years. Also, it becomes patently clear as well, than the current 'transfer of ownership' to the Jew/Khazar overlords, has been due largely to the Judaization of the upper classes, via the Bolsheviks, as well as the Frankfurt school. Diana West's impeccable chronicling of the Sovietization/subversion of the USA, starting around this same time, is nothing short of a cri de coeur for what America once was, to what she has become today- the shiksa whore of the Deicides.


- Fr. John+
Orthodox Priest

Anonymous said...

It also would appear that others are carefully, cautiously, edging toward the potential (just possibly?) that the Jewish narrative may be.... (gasp!) 'wrong.'

Yet, while they are starting to look more honestly at AH and the whole 'Fascism v. Stalinism' thing, they don't 'quite' yet want to go the 'full monty.'

http://souloftheeast.org/2013/12/27/ivan-ilyin-on-fascism/

Here's a comment I posted a few days ago there, that has yet to see the light of day over at that website. Funny... I wonder why???

“Fascism did not at all have to fall into “political megalomania”, despise other races and nationalities, and proceed with their conquest and extermination.” (post's statement)

(My response)
I thank you for this honest analysis, which is light-years away from the vituperative, rabid ‘H8′ most of the Left, and the duped American common man thinks of, when he thinks of National Socialism.

But (and, as I am reading sources of this era for the first time, and am a new student of Germany from the period 1920-1950) to which people are you alluding to here, in your above statement? To the Jews?

If so, why? Every nation in Western Europe expelled the Jews, some more than once, and the Rus created the ‘Pale of Settlement’ to effectively ostracize and contain this menace. Indeed, the Jewish convert monk novice, Nathanael Kapner, has written than the clear viability of the Justinian Law Code on his website, is a necessary option for a revived Third Rome- http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=824

So, to whom are you referring, if such is the case. If any or all of these actions were to be made law in Russia, it would be that which would be the exact same approach to isolation, de-fusing an ethnic/religious menace, and everything the [supposed] ‘Final Solution’ was supposed to be. So, how is this wrong, or counter to an Orthodox Weltanschauung?

Unless you hold to the fallacy of a ‘Holocaust’ (that never happened) - whose figures of Jewish Dead, decrease in the Official Red Cross Archives each decade, and whose never-ending stories of hyperbole, have made what camp survivor Norman Finkelstein (himself a Jew) calls, ‘The Holocaust Industry’?

Please clarify this point for a dedicated reader. Thanks."

- Fr. John+

Chris said...

Rogue

Hitler threw himself on the fire to protect Europe.

Remember FDR, Churchill and Stalin, all 3 Jewish, were colluding behind the scenes.

Stalin had positioned 35 000 tanks ready to bring talmudic jewish communism/Bolshevism/Marxism to Europe.

Hitler Speaking Normally (Subtitles)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClR9tcpKZec

Adolf Hitler, the Man who fought the Bank
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSUGqj-7dYE

Hitler on Zionists/Jews and The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion (Mein Kampf in English)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAzPQoUlUQE

A truly great man.
mk.christogenea.org/

katana said...

posted by SAVANT at 20:28 on 15-Jan-2015

The more I research the subject the clearer it becomes that sinister 'Western' forces were intent on fomenting a war with Hitler's Germany. It also becomes clearer that those forces were personified by international central banking interests, which is another way of saying the Rothschilds.

--------------------------

Which is another way of saying, … jews.

Your studied subtlety and understatement has its own charm, Savant.

To cut to the chase, my study of that period leads me to conclude that WWII, like WWI was a set up, engineered by jews, to create the conditions we now face today. Namely the slow but sure, if we do nothing, destruction of the White race and its replacement by some kind of jew tyranny.

WWII was a war forced on Germany by the jewish psychopaths that controlled the allied powers (UK, USA, France and the USSR), through their money power. If Poland didn't succeed as the bait then some other pretext would have been created to destroy the Germans and its highly successful creation, the National Socialist ideology, aka, the dreaded "Nazis".

Jews have long controlled our "money" which has resulted in them being able to accumulate untold "money power".

Churchill, for example, was a stooge of jew money power that financed his hedonistic lifestyle. He was the jewish controlled public face of a belligerent British war mongering cabal, that led Britain into a fratricidal war against Germany.

National Socialism contains many worthwhile guidelines on how to organize our societies to its betterment. Something that will become very obvious once you study what National Socialism actually did.

But today, much more than ever, organised jewry remains, as Henry Ford said in the 1920s, the world's foremost problem.

------------------

For my latest blog post, Jews must Live - Part 7, click here >>> KATANA

[http://katana17.wordpress.com]

Anonymous said...

Sometimes when I'm talking to someone about World War II they announce that 'Ireland, instead of being neutral,should have declared war on Germany' because 'World War II was a Good War' because 'it was a war against Evil', you know, unlike all other wars.

So my response is to laugh, disagree, and then tell them that 'everything you know about World War II is wrong!'

So this is how the conversation usually goes:

ME: So, how did World War II start?

THEM: Well, Hitler invaded Poland of course!

ME: Well that's wrong for a start!

THEM: What do you mean?

ME: Poland was invaded by Hitler, and also by Stalin who actually occupied more territory during 1939-41 than Hitler did.

(Now it's really amazing, seriously, how many people don't know Stalin invaded Poland along with Hitler.)

ME: So Britain and France declared war on Hitler because he invaded Poland. But why didn't they also declare war on the USSR also? Stalin also invaded Poland!

THEM: Em...em...er...because it wouldn't be practical. The USSR was too big to take on!

ME: But that's cynical realpolitik! I thought you said World War II was unlike other wars! You know, a clash of Good Vs Evil?

(They then usually try to say that Germany was the the bigger threat because, unlike the USSR it was 'expansionist'.)

THEM: But, you see, Britain and France had to declare war on Hitler! Germany was ruled by a megalomaniac who wanted to take over the whole world!

ME: Well Stalin was also expansionist! Between 1939-40 the USSR invaded and took over Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania, which had been independent for 20
years, invaded Poland and took over 60% of its territory, invaded Finland and took two parts of it, and threatened Romania with invasion and got them to hand over the eastern part of the country which they
renamed the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic. They also had agents in every European country to liaise between Communist parties and Moscow, because Moscow wanted a world revolution. So do you not think that invading five countries, grabbing large chunks of territory, and claiming the whole world could be described as 'expansionist?'

(They then usually change track again and say that Germany and Hitler was the biggest threat because they were so 'Evil'. Hitler, you see, was the most evil man in the world and Germany was a mass murdering regime unlike any other. So the conversation usually continues like this...)

THEM: Hitler was an evil mass murdering maniac!

ME: When Hitler invaded Poland there were about 100,000 inmates in German camps and prisons. However, there were about 1,600,000 inmates in Soviet gulags. The German regime had killed around 60,000 people. However, the Soviets had killed millions. The artificial famine created in the 1930s killed four million Ukrainians, the 'Holomodor', and three million other Soviet citizens. This is the official KGB figure revealed in the 1990s! They also shot another approximately 100,000 Ukrainians in leadership positions. In the period 1937-38 Stalin shot 500,000 political prisoners and 450,000 criminals. Death toll for the gulags between 1930 and 1939 can be estimated as 450,000 as the official statistics show that about 1,054,000 died between 1934-53 which works out at about 50,000 per year. So do you not think that millions of people dead from artificial famine, shootings, and hard labor in camps is evil? And do you not agree that in 1939 at least,going by these statistics, Stalin and the USSR was more evil than Hitler?

THEM: Eh..well..I..er...


(...and their brain explodes!!!!)

Nero said...


Your time, efforts and future plans are all squeezed aside in proportion to your debt, if you are a large debtor.

What will you do with your life? Service that debt.

You serve that debt! You are no longer free – just a debt serf.

Anonymous said...

Swimming against the tide of public perception is a most difficult task at best, and look at who we're trying to convince!

See >>>>>>>>> HERE.

I have friends who fit this sad scenario, and trying to engage their minds in this subject matter is like breaking into a heavily-protected Fort Knox only to find the gold bullion was removed long ago.

Anonymous said...


@ - Fr. John+
Orthodox Priest
16 January 2015 at 13:08



Perhaps you should read this link refs Chamberlain

http://fathersmanifesto.net/jewkills48millionchristians.htm

Anonymous said...

as i have stated here before that if one wanted to study the Reds in Hollywood in the 30s and 40s one only has to see a film entitled"Mission to Moscow",in it we have the late actor Walter Huston portraying the American Ambassador having a discussion in English no less with Joe Stalin telling him that "America is astounded at what the Soviet Union achived under its five year plan" and how the American people look to Soviet Russia as a wave of the futher blah blaf blah,when he is called before Congress in the movie and is castigated for his pro Soviet sentiments he is asked about the invasion of Finland and states"Russia was only buying time to defeat the Nazi invasion they knew that was coming"this was the sort of propaganda that was being pumped out of the Jew shit factories in Hollywood for American consumptiom,if anyone can get this movie by all means do so.John old rtd Chicago copper.

Anonymous said...

Currently reading Wyndham Lewis' 'Red Wings Over Europe'. He wrote it in 1936, horrified at what he saw as the financial PTB relentlessly trying to start a war. Fascinating to get a perspective from that time.

Rogue, Hitler was not an illiterate, in any way shape or form. Please see the Soviet order of battle in Europe on June 21 1941. Hitler said that any idiot could see the largest army ever assembled was about to fall upon Europe.

Hitler's biggest mistake by a million miles was failing to understand how corrupted and infected with the YKY disease Britain was. He thought he was dealing with the Britain of Pitt and Wellington, civilised human beings, who would take their beating in 1940 like any reasonable power would.

Hitler thought the anti white Bolshevik capital was Moscow, when the true axis of evil was and is Washington-New York-London.

WR

Anonymous said...

Even Hitler made a couple "What was I thinking about?" comments about his declaration of war on the US. Going after Germany without it would have been a tough sell even after the Pearl Harbor attack. Undoubtedly, it galvanized and united the country which then accepted the necessity of prioritizing Germany as the foremost
enemy.

Dad was in the Coast Guard circa 1942 and various British ships were in New York harbor being refurbished in various ways. One was an older passenger liner being fixed up as a troop carrier. Anyway, he was an electrician and his group was sent to install a communications system. They completed their work and were waiting for transport back to base. As this was an old passenger ship, there were deck chairs around and so they lounged on them while waiting.

All of sudden up comes this central casting British naval officer, red-faced and all, probably mutton chop whiskers, demanding to know what was going on. They explained that they'd finished their job and were waiting for a ride.
"Well, isn't there something else you could be doing?"
"This is enough for me to be doing on a limey ship!" dad said.

He spent the rest of the war in the Pacific.

Iron Felix said...

anon at 19.29 makes an interesting statement about Hitler's anti-Bolshevik crusade against Russia.I have more than once thought that Hitler made a mistake here> He failed to see that bolshevism had already been extirpated in Russia---by Stalin himself! Nobody knows better what a revolutionary can do than a revolutionary who has succeeded to the throne; by the end of the '30's Stalin had destroyed all the old bolsheviks both at home and abroad, but of course his Russia continued to TALK in the idiosyncracy of Marx-speak. How easy it was to thus hoodwink the "useful idiots", the Shaw and the Syd and Beatrice and Guy Burgess and all those idiots who traipsed off to fight against Franco, all the Mencken booboisie. And yet Hitler, among the most perceptive of men somehow seems to have missed it. Fact is when Germany invaded the Soviet Union that June morning they were actually attacking a fascist power. Low grade, ramshackle,
arbitrarily vicious, unendingly brutal and brutish certainly, but a power actually cleansing itself of marxism nonetheless.By June of 1941 it was no more a communist regime in any marxist/bolshevist/jewish sense than was, say, Australia.

Nero said...


By 1939 the Third Reich seemed to be running out of cash.

One of the first things they did after conquering a new territory was high tail it down to the government vaults and steal all the gold.

Could it be that like many grand centrally planned operations, that after initial crude success it was all beginning to fizzle out?

Faced with going cap in hand to the German people and saying, ‘it’s all downhill from here’, ‘The Weimar Republic ended when it was overthrown by superior men’ then becomes ‘The Nazis are just another failure’.

Maybe the Nazis could not resist militaristic gambles. Playing with fire was a Hohenzollern tradition.

Anonymous said...

I remember working in a dept whose hiring policies perplexed me. I chose that company as they had a reputation for not pandering to the diversocrats. Suddenly it became more and more dominated by turd world vermin. I then found out via eavesdropping that one of the women there was a jew. It was a eureka moment. I decided to trace the relations. It turns oit that this kikess had been sucking up to the bosses / intimidating with PC jew-terror like racism (carrot and stick) to recommend darkies, who recommended other darkies, until the dept turned into a turd world ghetto dungheap. I found this kikess's facebook account and she even boasted about encouraging incompetent turd worlders to work there.

Moral - these kikes are responsible for everything. They hate Aryans with a passion. You can't always see it, this witch didn't have a j-name or even look that j (she'd pass as generic white). They are the foundation to everything. I saw on a personal level what the rat politicians do on a national level - find the weak link in us to let the turd world aliens into our countries for WHIYE GENOCIDE.

Anonymous said...

Bang on iron felix, Stalin was a nationalist. The Soviets were actually the "good" guys in the cold war, if anyone was. It's a major mind fuck, I know. It's the US/UK that's been pushing relentlessly for white genocide for the last 100 years. FP Yockey has been good on this. Also the historian Kerry Bolton an Stalin's purges in 38, which we ought to applaud.

WR

Uncle Nasty said...

.
I love this blog. Grownups discussing grown up issues with other grownups.

The occasional hasbarat pops in like a ferret with diarrhea ... is promptly trashed, the place is disinfected and we get on with it.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
I really do like this fellow ...

https://kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/demonization-takes-a-wide-stance/

For some weird reason, the blog is sub-headed with the phrase: "We take more pleasure from the beans ..."

Don't ask.

Demonization Takes a Wide Stance
The Administration / 27 mins ago

Have you ever noticed that a certain majority group comprising approximately 10% of the Earth’s population is never “demonized” no matter the lurid exertions of its detractors? No, it’s always “demonization” for me but not for thee. It’s quite another example of this group’s legendary “privilege” that it is able to produce “demonization” with such mild effort and language. Other groups, by comparison, spangle the cobweb with calumny, never to receive proper recognition as “demonizers.” Consider it Hell’s glass ceiling.

That was my lament upon reading this piece on Hungary’s Viktor Orban at the Paris Hebdo rally. The headline was just another example of crediting a white man with what others have done so much better: Orban demonises immigrants at Paris march. Let’s take a look at this flaccid example of cultural appropriation.“

Orban told Hungarian state TV in the margins of the rally, held in support of free speech and tolerance in Europe, that the Charlie Hebdo murders should make the EU restrict access to migrants with “different cultural characteristics”.

Referring to the flow of African and Arab migrants to the EU, he said: “Economic immigration is a bad thing in Europe, it should not be seen as having any benefits, because it only brings trouble and danger to the peoples of Europe”.

“Immigration and cultural questions related to that must be discussed in a much more open, honest and straightforward manner than until now. I hope that a composed, calm analysis of the recent events will guide European leaders and Brussels towards a tough policy restricting immigration”, he added.

Have you ever heard such venomous hatred in your life? Actually, yes.

Noel Ignatiev, a founder of a journal called Race Traitor and a fellow at Harvard’s W.E.B. DuBois Institute, a leading black-studies department, argues in the current issue of Harvard Magazine that “abolishing the white race” is “so desirable that some may find it hard to believe” that anyone other than “committed white supremacists” would oppose it.

In excerpts appearing this week in newspapers nationwide, Mr. Ignatiev, who is white, [Whitish] writes that “every group within white America,” including “labor unionists, ethnic groups, college students, schoolteachers, taxpayers and white women” has at one time or another “advanced its particular and narrowly defined interests at the expense of black people as a race.”


Ignatiev, like Adelson, like Soros is a person very high on my list of those who must be defenestrated.

Why defenestration? Because it's so .... cinematic, I guess. And very very public. Even the little ones can view and enjoy it.

Yaaaaaaaaa ... SPLAT.

See, Christina? That's what happens if you don't eat your veggies.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
At first, I thought this was satire ...

http://www.ipolitics.ca/2015/01/09/the-far-right-spreads-its-wings-over-europe/

The far right spreads its wings over Europe

By Jonathan Manthorpe | Jan 9, 2015 4:27 pm | 11 comments | 165544

Europe’s already rampant right-wing, anti-immigration political parties have been swift to seize on the jihadist attacks in France as ammunition for their cause.

In Holland, Geert Wilders, head of the Party for Freedom — currently leading public opinion polls — said Europe is “at war” with the Muslim world. He called for the closing of borders to immigration and the “de-Islamization” of the Netherlands.

In France itself, Marine Le Pen, head of the National Front party and still leading early poll projections for the 2017 presidential elections, called for an end to what she called the “hypocrisy” of government’s refusal to condemn Islamic fundamentalism.

In Britain, the leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), Nigel Farage, blamed the Paris attacks on multiculturalism and said Muslim immigration has spawned cells of “fifth columnists … We’ve got people living in these countries, holding our passports, who hate us.”

As xenophobia grips many in Britain, Farage’s UKIP is expected to make significant gains in national elections in May. UKIP and Le Pen’s National Front (NF) were among four European right-wing parties that topped the polls in European Parliament elections in mid-2014. Le Pen’s NF and Wilders’ Dutch Party of Freedom have even made a formal alliance, which they hope will become a pan-European coalition of right-wing parties.

It’s a realistic aim. Right-wing parties with anti-immigrant and anti-Islamist leanings are on the rise across Europe, notably in Italy — a prime destination for refugees from Africa and the Middle East — Spain and even traditional havens of left-wing liberalism like Sweden and Denmark.

The rise of right-wing, anti-Muslim, anti-immigration sentiments is, predictably, most wrenching in Germany where guilt over the Holocaust has become part of the national DNA. But that feeling isn’t nearly as strong in the old East Germany, where nearly half a century of post-war isolation within the Soviet Bloc insulated people from the soul-searching that consumed the country’s West.


The rise of the Far, far, far extreme NAZI, Let's-Gas-Every-Yid-In-Sight right.

I bootle in my trems at the very thought.

Seriously though, this article(?) is, as far as I can tell, not satire.

Do I detect a note of desperation, here?

UN
.

Iron Felix said...

Yes; revolutions tend to devour themselves, to end in blood, crime, incendiarism. It varies a bit from time to time, place to place, principally according to the degree of marxism or crypto marxism driving it.The American revolution seems to have been an exception, being largely based on reason. Hitler's Night of the Long Knives, Ireland's brief episode of backyard butchery called the Civil War, these are mickeymouse affairs compared to the bloodbath of the French Revolution, the colossal
destruction visited upon Russia, China, Ethiopia, Cambodia, all of which had the marxist toxin as their driving impulse. In every case there had to ensue a counter revolution which would destroy the revolutionaries (purges, show trials, etc). Today it is a source of sardonic humour in Russia that it is now the USA which is the most Bolshevik of countries; today China is in form a communist country, in content anything but. There seems to be a parallel of some sort with the naturopathic theory of disease, which holds that an organism first sickens, then permits infection, which consumes the toxins causing the sickness,(The Revolution) then generates the antibodies to destroy the infection itself lest this proceed to kill the organism as a whole (The Counter-Revolution), after which the organism steadies itself, and convalesces back to health.
Somehow one sees hope springing eternal in this organic view of human society.

Anonymous said...

http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=15020.0

Anonymous said...

@22:13 For a few years, the hasbaRATS had us truth-seeking realists running from one corner to another with their diversionary tactics. Thankfully, Savant now seems to have that issue under reasonable control.

"Teutonic Warrior Chick" is another White person deserving my respect for stating uncomplicated and simple truths. Her website truthisahatecrime.blogspot.com is not updated (possibly due to Google having banned it??). However, her youtube videos are still operating... for now.

>>>>> HERE.

Rogue said...

With regard to the general discussion of Hitler and WW2, I ditched my ideological position some years ago. Like most people, I had it firmly in my head that the Allies were the good guys, the Germans the baddies, Hitler the embodiment of all evil, yadda yadda and so forth.

But, apart from unavoidable bias, which is only natural to have, I no longer have an ideological position about Hitler, WW2, Nazism etc. However, that doesn't mean taking up an ideological position to the opposite extreme either.

There are 2 points I would mention relative to this discussion:

1)Regardless of how mean or otherwise the Poles were being to ethnic Germans, Hitler knew of Britain's war guarantee and that this would mean war with France as well.

2)After the Western allies had firmly established themselves in Normandy, and then launched their swift advance across France, and the Soviets had shredded the German eastern front with operation Bagration, what was the point of continuing the War?

Only the most obtuse could have thought victory was still possible.

Hitler should have at that time thrown in the towel. Think how many German lives, not to mention all the others, that would have been saved by ending this war 8 - 10 months earlier.

@ anon 13:08

Sorry, what are you on about? I made a simple statement of fact that Germany was only at war with Britain and it's empire mid-June '41.

That's hardly a LIE, as you put it.

If you are referring to Britain and France having declared war on Germany, and not the other way round, I'm well aware of that.

Holocaustralian said...

"What does Democracy or Authoritarian state mean for those International hyenas? They don't care at all! They are only interested in one thing."

"Are you willing to be plundered?
Yes or No?"

"Are you stupid enough to keep quiet in the process?
Yes or No?" - AH

The Fuhrers words combined with imagery of our current predicament make for compelling viewing.

Matrix-buster said...

"Regardless of how mean or otherwise the Poles were being to ethnic Germans, Hitler knew of Britain's war guarantee and that this would mean war with France as well. "

Rogue, you mean....you mean politicians would break their word?

OyVeyBaby said...

UN, yes it's always the 'far right' and they're always 'seizing on the opportunity provided by the attacks'.

In reality of course they should be saying the the far right are actually middle of the road nationalists and that THEY were the ones who were right all along about the jihads.

Anonymous said...

This is HEADLINE NEWS in the UK section of Russia Today:

Holocaust memorial POSTERS daubed with anti-Semitic GRAFFITI

Russia Today, 16 January 2015

Anti-Semitic GRAFFITI has been SPRAYED ON POSTERS [LOL!!!] promoting Holocaust Memorial Day in the London borough of Newham.

The graffiti, which is currently being investigated by the capital’s police force, was sprayed on two posters in High Street, Stratford, and on another poster in West Ham Lane, near Stratford Park.
http://rt.com/uk/223399-newham-holocaust-anti-semitism/

Why is a global news network like Russia Today reporting minor criminal acts (you could understand it if this petty criminal offence was reported in the local paper)?

It seems Russia Today is slowly turning into Rothschild Today.

LOL!!!

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

"Anti-Semitism is our government and civic duty." – German Chancellor Angela Merkel

German Chancellor Angela Merkel during an official statement in Berlin on Thursday, January 15, mistakenly stated that anti-Semitism is a civic duty in Germany, reports newspaper Rheinische post.

"Anti-Semitism is our government and civic duty," said Merkel in a speech before the Bundestag, the Federal Assembly of the Federal Republic of Germany. She added that this also applies to "attacks on mosques".

http://newstwenty4seven.com/en/news/merkel-sluchajno-nazvala-antisemitizm-grazhdanskim-dolgom-germanii-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mazfHrr9cOg
http://www.rp-online.de/politik/deutschland/2.159969/angela-merkels-unangenehmer-antisemitismus-versprecher-aid-1.4801599

LOL!!!

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

O/T here, but I need to vent on this short article. However, several sensible commentaries were a welcomed sign of some relief. Also note the last line: "The 'Americans' are here for four days to tour Toronto."

"Why didn't we think of this first?! What a wonderful idea for police forces to recruit straight off the streets of Mogadishu. The capital of modern piracy, the center of a former communist country torn apart by decades of civil war, a haven for Islamic terrorism ..."

Yep, imported 3rd world African REFUGEES are now here to teach us how to enforce our own laws. LOL

Anonymous said...

great video taken and put on Jew Tube,guy delivers pizzas to a used car lot in state of Mass, and so doing receives change which he figures is a 6 or 7 dollar tip,when he leaves Jew girl and daddy who owns lot along with obese nigger at computer call the guy back and belittle the poor bastard and demand the money back and put the poor guy through the shit fat nigger boy say"ise going to call his boss and gets him fired" why these rocket scientists released this taken on there security video beats the shit out of me but they did.copper from Mass got their telephone # and their computer info and has been broadcasting it around the nation.Jew boy argues with any and all if they call the number,will get the # along the line and passs it on to all subscribers here.

a said...

How do you know the guys at the dealership stiffing the pizza boys were Jewish?

I see no evidence of it.

Anonymous said...

Rogue, Hitler rightly predicted in MK that France would be a negro African country within two centuries. Kaufmanns 'Germany must be destroyed' and the genocidal morganthau plan were public knowledge. How can you think Germany should have surrendered? Defeat meant extinction.

Hitler said if Germany lost the war it would be the end of civilisation, he was fucking right. WWII wasn't some medieval dynastic struggle where the protagonists shook hands afterwards and had a drink together. It was a war for white survival, shame, eternal shame on the British and American grunts for not seeing it as such. One would think the yanks would have copped on when they were forced at bayonet point to accept niggers in their schools.

WR

Anonymous said...

Ignatiev is so extreme that he isn't taken seriously even by the commies. A satire. Mentally ill might however and so he is very dangerous. More important is the Soros connection to events in Missouri this fall. Big money to outlaw groups and then all in for a pep talk at white house by the Evil Monkey.

One notorious chimp murder around here some years ago was a woman with toddler carjacked at a convenience store. Threw the kid out of the car and then the usual rape and stabbing. Easily caught of course and big-mouthed sister explained that he was upset by the election of Bill Clinton who he thought was in KKK and had said "he was going out to kill a white woman because that's where the white babies come from." Still had capital punishment in theory back then but got off with life as of course he qualified as retarded. Called the victim's husband a "faggot" in court. Media chimp sympathizers pointed out how at least he hadn't killed the child.

se said...

One Irishman to another
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N46mIHEGHN0

Time to bone up on yer Islam lads
Dr. Bill Warner:
Background research: http://www.politicalislam.com/

1 Destruction of Western Civilization by Islam

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y

2 A Taste of Islam (on Jewish Holocaust Survivor channel!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjBDDC4wVxk

3 Good summary of confusion about how Islam is viewed, and proposes how to win the war against the political ideology of Islam

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWUoAgVxXGc

Rogue said...

Regarding language and the use thereof.

The other day on RT I heard the adjective of "extreme" used against the National Front of Le Pen. I remember thinking: Aah, so we've now gone from "far" to "extreme" on the MSM (and, yes, RT is also unfortunately MSM, however much they pretend differently).

I believe that the closer a "right-wing" party gets to the political centre, so the more "extreme" they will be described by the MSM.

A far-right party (to use the terminology of the left) are no threat when all they garner is 1 or 2 percent of the popular vote. But let them become an actual political threat to the establishment - then the gloves of language are off!

So we can expect ever more hysterical use of adjectives to describe the "right" in the months and years to come.

Hopefully.

Anonymous said...

Old concept of "displacement" in
psychology. Who knows what they call it now? But basically you get yelled at at work and go home and kick the cat. I can't help but think there's a lot of that operating here at Savant, a primarily English blog. Everyone here is hell on the Jews but what happened to your WASP establishment that was ruling the earth 100 years ago? That haven't been replaced by the Jews even if the j-words are the principal managers of national destruction. Judiazation (sp?) Judicization (?) is just a rationalization.

You really need to spew some bile on your ruling class who was always ready to sell you out but just put you at the back of the line until they cut every other throat in the world.

Anonymous said...

"So whether or not he was an economic illiterate (or genius) is somewhat of a moot point, considering that for a fact he was most certainly a strategic military, or geopolitical, illiterate."


That's not the point(s).

The main contemporary point and something they want suppressed is the Germans created an alternative to the Rothschild central bank model which is at the heart of the money power - a model we'd all do well to copy.

The historical point is WWII started in 1933 when the banking mafia declared war on Germany and used their wealth and influence to get proxies to fight their war for them.

(Exactly like what's happening now with Putin.)

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Well, well, well. It appears that Hollywood is too "white" for the tastes of some ...

Oscar nominations spark 'too white' firestorm

Responding for the first time to the firestorm of criticism over the lack of diversity in this year's Oscar nominations, film academy president Cheryl Boone Isaacs says the all-white acting slate inspires her to accelerate the academy's push to be more inclusive. She also hopes the film industry as a whole will continue to strive for greater diversity.

The first black president of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences spoke out Friday night about the Oscar nominations and the widespread criticism that followed.


Isaacs, hmmmm. There's a good Welsh name.

Yet Boone Isaacs insisted the academy is "committed to seeking out diversity of voice and opinion" and that outreach to women and artists of color is a major focus.

"In the last two years, we've made greater strides than we ever have in the past toward becoming a more diverse and inclusive organisation through admitting new members and more inclusive classes of members," Boone Isaacs said. "And, personally, I would love to see and look forward to see a greater cultural diversity among all our nominees in all of our categories.
This sums it up perfectly.

Congratulations, @TheAcademy for taking several steps backwards. #OscarsSoWhite pic.twitter.com/SNhDw9TmbL — Nerdy Wonka (@NerdyWonka)

January 17, 2015

A 2012 survey by the Los Angeles Times found the academy was 94 per cent white, overwhelmingly male and with a median age of 62. A more recent survey determined the percentage of older white males had dropped by one point, the Times said. But with nearly 7000 members and no requirement to retire, diversity is going to take some time.

Boone Isaacs declined to address whether she and the academy were embarrassed by the slate of white Oscar nominees, instead insisting that she's proud of the nominees, all of whom deserved recognition.

She explained that while each branch comes up with its own criteria for excellence and each nominates its colleagues, all voting is individual and confidential.


Almost all white ... and here's me under the impression that Hollyweird is 100% jew -- or, if you prefer WWN -- White When Necessary.

What was I thinking?

UN
.

Anonymous said...

17;36 who else has a loud mouth fat yelling daughter and hires niggers to work in the office??

Anonymous said...

RE Hitler
I am sure I read or heard ... that he was locked into drugs by his doctor.
Some diary or other mentioned "how good
he was after docs visit...Regardless of the current circumstances at that time!"

Looks as if 2014 is going to be a "New Renascence",!Watch out for manic false flags.
dofornow

heuristic said...

UN, about the Hollywood 'Academy' always remember that Jews choose to fly under the 'white' flag when they want to disguise their over-representation. They drop the ruse at other times.

awakened said...

Anon,that Rock Against Racism thing. Yes, 'Saunders' just like 'Miller' is regularly used to disguise real names like Finkelkreit, Goldblum or whatever.

And notice how Bowie was made to undergo the ritual abasement and retraction process before his career was allowed proceed.

katana said...

OT

Western Spring has a review of a new book, "The Partisan"

http://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-partisanreview/


A Book Review by Peter Ireland:

White Europeans fighting back – literally – armed resistance on the streets putting traitorous ruling elites and mud hordes to flight, and all led by La P├ętroleuse, a smoking-hot cutie. How does that sound? Interested?

This punchy novel is one of a growing number of similar works opening up the underutilised genre of White resistance and resurgence. These works range across various mediums from video cartoons to novels such as this, and all of them have a crucial role to play in our struggle. They may be fictitious, but we need to recognise that fiction is the most powerful tool available in creating new social paradigms. After all, it’s the weapon of choice for our enemies in peddling their genocidal agenda via the West’s mass media – which of course they own.

---------------------------

I posted a comment that UN is likely to favour.

Sounds like a good read. I've put it on my list of purchases to make.
.
For a very definite good read I recommend the "The Brigade" by Harold Covington.
.
Available here as a free download: https://archive.org/details/TheBrigade
.
Here's a favorable review:
.
This novel is not for everyone. If you believe that the U.S. should be a multicultural society, where perversion of various kinds is accepted, where pedophiles run rampant, and where the colors of the various races will bleed into one, then this book isn't for you.
.
However, if you are white, male/female, heterosexual and are sick and tired of being blamed for everything wrong in American society - you might get some enjoyment out of the novel. It's fast paced, the characters are believable and the military aspects are real enough. If anyone studies insurgency movements, they soon discover that most start out in much the same way that Covington describes - as a group of friends who band together for a common purpose, in this case, establishing a homeland for whites "where a white child can grow up in the world of Jane Austen, not the world of 'A Clockwork Orange.'"
.
Yes there is racism present in the novel - it's in the reader's face and it's pervasive. What of it? The U.S. has been dominated by the PC-infused nitwits from both parties for the past 20 years or so and 'Brigade' addresses those issues, admittedly in a very violent manner, but the author does address where the U. S. might be headed if certain ideologies prevail, namely the 'let's blame Whitey for all the wrongs in soceity and let's all accept every behavior from any minority because it's their right, blah, blah, blah.'
.
Overall, it's a well written book, with some minor spelling/typographical errors and is very logical in its plot progression. Those reviewers who give this book and others in the saga [now up to 4 books - 6, if you include 'Fire and Rain' and 'A Slow Coming Darkness'], on this site and others, fail to see that there is a significant part of the white population that has had enough of the b.s. that has been shoved down their throats since the 1960s. This book is an important step in reversing some of the more uglier trends of the previous half-century. Having said that, it's definitely not for the faint-hearted or Politically Correct/Corrupt, coffeehouse, postmodernist crowd.
.

.
------------------
.
For my latest blog post, Tales of the Holohoax - A Historian's Assessment - Part 2 (last), click here >>> KATANA
.
[http://katana17.wordpress.com]

Shaunantijihad said...

As anticipated, the increase in Muslim attacks will not bring a logical anti-Muslim reaction from the PC terrorists that are destroying the White homelands, but instead, will crack down even harder on our freedom of speech and thought. Especially upon those who speak about what needs to be done to stop Islam's conquest of the West and of protecting the Caucasian gene pool.

Vocal opposition to Islam will soon be a crime of terrorism in the UK. It is already illegal to have a pro-White anything (even a chess club), though their are almost 30,000 organisations that exclude Whites.

We also anticipate that not only will Jews be the only people allowed to keep their children away from Muslims and Negroes, but that they will be the only ones with a special police force for themselves (Stasi), and they will be the only people allowed to carry firearms.

Their plan to mix the low IQ genes of the 3rd world with Caucaisan genes continues...

Shaunantijihad said...

Sorry, here's the link:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2915032/PETER-HITCHENS-Don-t-like-PC-mob-makes-terror-threat.html

Anonymous said...

WWN..........yup that is a perfect description.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Strangely enough, on topic.

Here is a microcosm of what the jew wants. This one has merely jumped the gun a bit.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/09/garden/09selma.html?_r=1&

An Abandoned Men’s Club Is Now a Home

Robert Rausch for The New York Times

David Hurlbut applied his “neo-Gilded Age steampunk” aesthetic to the abandoned Harmony Club building in Selma, Ala. More Photos »
By REBECCA FLINT MARX
Published: December 8, 2010

Slide Show
A Renovation That Preserves the Decay

Robert Rausch for The New York Times

“For 40 years, this place was a glorious pigeon coop and rat motel,” said Mr. Hurlbut. More Photos »

BY the time David Hurlbut bought the Harmony Club, a 20,000-square-foot building on the waterfront here, it had been abandoned for nearly 40 years. Built in 1909 as a social club by a group of prominent Jewish businessmen, it had been turned into an Elks club in the 1930s; when the Elks disbanded in 1960, the building was boarded up.

Mr. Hurlbut, 47, first saw it more than a decade ago, when he was working as an industrial designer in Atlanta, where he was born and raised. He found it through historicproperties.com, a Web site he compares to an addictive drug. (It’s like “my crack,” he said.)

The building’s sole inhabitants were a flock of pigeons that left behind what he estimates to be about 140 cubic yards of guano. There was no plumbing, and the electrical wiring was “in shambles,” he said.

Still, he knew he’d found his home. “I thought it would be a perfect clubhouse for me,” he said. “It’s probably a guy thing.”

His Jewish ancestry “wasn’t a deciding factor,” said Mr. Hurlbut, who was raised Episcopal by his British mother, but has Jewish cousins. “But it played a part.”

He was also enamored of Selma, a sleepy river town he likens to “an inland Charleston or Savannah.” After a few visits, he bought the Harmony Club for just under $100,000, paid in full, and moved in three months later, on Jan. 1, 2000.

One of his first tasks was hauling out what the pigeons had left behind — which filled a series of Dumpsters — but that didn’t faze him. Mr. Hurlbut’s home in downtown Atlanta had been built in 1884 as a grocery store and was being used as a crack house when he bought it.


They are quite happy to dwell among the ruins ... as long as the price is bargain basement.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

Wasn't 12 years a Massey Ferguson an AA winner last year?
And before that we had Densel Washington rob Morgan Freeman of his rightful award when he won his alongside Halle Berry?
Then again maybe she robbed the great one as well.
Hang around long enough and they give you one for turning up.

Anonymous said...

Britain would not be Britain LOL!
A typical statement from the yid rimming 'pound shop' MP's ordained to erm 'govern'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2915480/Without-Jews-Britain-not-Britain-warns-Theresa-fears-exodus-wake-anti-Semitic-attacks.html

Would these toadying cunts say the same for Anglo Saxons or Celts insulted, raped and murdered by the animals her jews import and then wind up in comic books ?!? The mind boggles

Anonymous said...

"Everyone here is hell on the Jews but what happened to your WASP establishment that was ruling the earth 100 years ago? That haven't been replaced by the Jews"

They've been replaced by hybrids like Cameron / Johnson / Clegg.

"Invasion of the Bodysnatchers" for realz.

Anonymous said...

Frank, if I told you that it was a Jew that had 'defaced' that poster would you be surprised? What better way to promote the Holohax and anti-Semitism?

Lemmyhead

Anonymous said...

German Chancellor Angela Merkel during an official statement in Berlin on Thursday, January 15, mistakenly stated that anti-Semitism is a civic duty in Germany, reports newspaper Rheinische post.

That isn't a mistake.

Anonymous said...

Anon @ 21.41

'a model we'd all do well to copy'.
Savant mentions Gottfried Feder. His view on economics, in particular banking, are extremely illuminating.
He wrote for the common man and is very understandable. He hits the nail on the head when he describes the problem and offers solutions.

Anonymous said...


American sniper: 100 million dollars on opening weekend.

Selma: 20 million after three weeks.

Anonymous said...

American Sniper - inspiring gullible whites to join the US Army (the bankers' enforcement agency) to go to other peoples' countries, and 'bravely' kill them from 1 mile away. That film has an even worse basis than the egregious Selma.

ALlan@Aberdeen