A simple answer

To any of you wondering whether the various Middle Eastern 'wars for democracy' were actually driven by Israeli strategic objectives there's a simple answer.

Yes.

A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties(1982)

"Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. 

Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization."

A dangeous and worrying legal precedent

Sandra, a 29-year-old Sumatran orangutan at the Buenos Aires zoo can be freed and transferred to a sanctuary after a court recognized the ape as a "non-human person" unlawfully deprived of its freedom.  In a landmark ruling that could pave the way for more lawsuits, the Association of Officials and Lawyers for Animal Rights (AFADA) argued the ape had sufficient cognitive functions and should not be treated as an object.

The court agreed Sandra deserved the basic rights of a "non-human person."   "This opens the way not only for other Great Apes, but also for other sentient beings which are unfairly and arbitrarily deprived of their liberty in zoos, circuses, water parks and scientific laboratories" the daily La Nacion newspaper quoted AFADA lawyer Paul Buompadre as saying.

Now as a life-long and devoted animal lover I rejoice at this news. It is literally criminal to cage up such a gentle creature who has never harmed anyone.  But therein lies the rub. Look again at Sandra's picture.  Ask yourself how many other "non or partly-human persons" bearing an uncanny resemblance to her have you also seen peering through bars.  Difference being that these would most definitely be neither innocent nor harmless.  Au contraire. What if their lawyers used the Argentinian precedent as a ruse to release them back to their own particular reservations or jungles?

A worrying prospect.

Happy CHRISTMAS one and all!

THAT DAY approaches again

Over at the Occidental Observer Francis Carr Begbie reflects morosely on the impending arrival of That Day. 

"It’s that time of the year again. The big day is nearly upon us and every year it seems to come round earlier and drag on longer. It has all become so overblown. The original spirit seems to have been forgotten and it has become such a commercialised affair. Frankly I’m sick of it already — it’s all about the money these days."

He could have added that many elements of the story which That Day commemorates have been shown to be untrue. Indeed some suggest that the whole rationale for the Commemoration is bogus.

He goes on: "Yes Holocaust Memorial Day is nearly upon us again  and the Prime Minister has kicked off proceedings seven weeks early with a visit to Auschwitz concentration camp. It was a private visit — just him, his press corps, a huge security detail, TV crews, and about a dozen reporters and photographers."

Great stuff.  Read the rest of it here.

A tale of two Royalties

Contrast the two sets of national Royalties. On the one hand the British couple, so presentable, never putting a foot wrong, impeccable backgrounds. (And no, Kate is not Jewish, despite the dodgy surnames on the maternal side).  And the other from the world of 'entertainment', what has become Royalty in America, especially since the Obongos became President. The 'King' as a black, buck-toothed, semi-literate ex-drug dealer from the ghetto. And the 'Queen'?  Black father with mother boasting every conceivable source of genetic inheritance, catapulted into astral stardom for reasons unfathomable. Unfathomable to me at least.

The Long March Through The Institutions

'If you got tears, prepare to shed 'em....'

Nothing opens the tear ducts for me like a good Holocau$t story. Like that of Herman Rosenblatt and his dear wife Roma (the eponymous 'Angel At The Fence'). And not just me. Oprah Whinfrey herself was reduced to a gibbering wreck at the poignancy of it all, describing it as 'the single greatest love story in 22 years doing this show'.  Now that  is some accolade. Mind  you a few minor discrepancies in the story did subsequently emerge, but look, after all that poor guy suffered what do you expect?  Total recall?

But there are no discrepancies in the story of old 'Uncle' Schlomo, a long-standing friend of our family. His story is equally heart-rending...and with a similarly joyful conclusion. Imprisoned in Auschwitz as a young boy he was saved from the gas chamber by......

But here, let Schlomo tell you himself in his own inimitable style.

"Oy vey, the sufferink!  I was a tiny boy, me and all my family being lead to the gas chamber.  As my crying parents looked on Hitler himself, up to his knees in blood and gore, face twisted with hatred, flung me into the chamber with such vicious force that I shot straight out the other side and through the camp fence!

Being but a small child, I would still have been doomed had not a courageous and intelligent wolf, realising what was going on, rushed out from the forest and, notwithstanding a hail of bullets from the guard posts, dragged me to safety among the trees. There Romelus (I named him this after the founder of Rome who was himself suckled by a wolf) and his pack looked after me until war's end.

It was a miracle I tell you!  A miracle!

And here is the truly wonderful part. After the war, while visiting Europe to pick up some more reparations cheques, including one for my son, I decided on another visit to Auschwitz. Something told me that Romelus would be there, with that gentle "smile" of his, waiting for me. And believe it or not there he was. In the very same spot where he had rescued me all those years before! 


It was a miracle I tell you!  A miracle!

I took his picture and I'm selling copies  - a limited number only - for the bargain price of $20 each, or packs of ten for $150.  Buy now and get your own living proof of this miracle"

Admit it...you're holding back a tear right now, aren't you?

An extraordinary and wonderful story of human courage and endurance, enabled by an astonishing relationship with the animal kingdom, and one which underlines that in the most terrible of all circumstances hope can still survive.

Oz celebrates diversity

Every dog in the road by now knows about the siege at the Sydney restaurant, which ended with one ventilated terrorist and one dead captive. The terrorist/murderer was "an Iranian-born self-proclaimed Muslim cleric with a lengthy criminal record who is currently free on bail'. The Australian authorities, in their infinite wisdom, granted him political asylum in 1996. Good move lads.  And the Australian courts let him out on bail last Thursday despite his being up on a charge of murdering his wife. More good work guys.

So how come such a charmer got asylum in formerly all-White Australia?  How come he gets treated with kid gloves despite 'his lengthy criminal record'?  Ladies and gentlemen of the jury as Exhibit 1 I offer you the same Tribe that has done the same thing in every White country, with each country ending up like the ants' nest invaded by this guy. Yes, they have toiled, year after year, decade after decade to ensure that the First World gets flooded by the Third World. You can read about some of their star performers here and also about their mysterious inconsistency when it comes to Israel.....the country that attracts their primary loyalty.

And Oz is no exception. The Occidental Observer has published a five-part analysis entitled The War On White Australia. Excerpt: "The history of multiculturalism in Australia (and indeed throughout the West) is in large part an object lesson in how a small but highly organised and motivated group of activists can successfully hijack the demographic destiny of a nation for its own ends. Acknowledging that Australian multiculturalism is first and foremost a manifestation of Jewish ethno-politics, Jewish historian William Rubinstein observed that: “Thus far, any serious questioning of multiculturalism has not resulted in an anti-Semitic backlash; nevertheless, the Jewish community would certainly be exceedingly disturbed by any basic reversal of the commitment to multiculturalism by successive governments.”[i] 

In addition to opening the floodgates to mass non-White immigration, a key part of this Jewish campaign to radically reengineer Australian society in their own interests has been to shut down speech critical of this immigration and multiculturalism — and particularly of the role of Jews in foisting these disastrous policies on a resentful White Australian population."

If the anti-Semitic backlash that Rubinstein fears does indeed occur it will be richly deserved.

Addendum: And right on cue the "Australian" Muslims come out, after a perfunctory nod in the direction of the victims, wailing about the 'potential' for an anti-Islamic backlash. If only!  And again, right on cue, reacting like performing seals to their stimulus, local 'celebrities' rush in to offer their support. "Celebrities and tens of thousands of everyday Twitter users take to social media to show support for Muslim community Australians have flocked to social media to show solidarity with the Muslim community in the wake of the Martin Place hostage crisis ...

Jesus grant me patience.

Lessons from Ireland's homeless crisis

Homelessness is the subject du jour in Ireland following the death of a homeless man which occurred within a hundred yards of our Parliament building. Homelessness is terrible but as usual with today's media what they omit is more important than that which they report.

For a start it emerged that the man found dead came from wealthy parents. They had bought not one but two houses for him. However he had sold them both, purchased drugs with the proceeds and ended up penniless and on the streets. A fate not helped by his objection to living in shelters. A terribly sad case and maybe the state could have done better.  But you'd imagine listening to the  commentariat that he'd been flung out on the street to die by an uncaring society.

Then the numbers. We're told that there are about 2,500 in the country. Given our population of 4.5 million that figure doesn't seem enormous. We're also warned that this figure is 'exploding upwards' - that we face a 'tsunami' of homelessness. In fact figures from the CSO show the trend to be downwards and that only about 200 are actually sleeping rough. The rest of the 'homeless' are those living in emergency accommodation and in 'informal settlements', usually meaning travellers and Roma who often want to live that way,

Quite a different picture emerging, isn't there?  But it gets better. The Irish taxpayer hands over €120 million annually to the homeless industry...the quangos and various other charities operating under this rubric. As this doesn't include the vast sums they raise in charitable donations there's a minimum €40,000 for each homeless person and realistically it must be nearer to double that. That is -  quite literally - enough to put them up full-time in a four star hotel with no additional costs incurred.

So where's all the money going?

Which brings me to Social Justice Warriors in general. Have you ever noticed how, despite their rejection of materialism, their demands for the rest of us to eschew selfishness (cf. Bob Geldof) and their constant appeals for funds for 'the most vulnerable' they're bloody good at getting their own snouts in the trough? Who are they?  'Academics', invariably with useless degrees like Sociology or English, or else opportunists swimming in our endless sea of quangos. We have seen that, before the needs of the 'most vulnerable' are ever met  these SJWs make sure they trouser salaries of €100k (often more) and luxuriate in massive contributions to pension funds when not entitled to taxpayer-funded index-linked public sector pensions. And they always seem to have plenty funds for exotic vacations fact-finding missions and conferences. No wonder that a whole industry has grown up around the plight of the homeless.

And finally we have lodgements to African dictators' Swiss bank accounts 'foreign aid' of about €700 million annually. That could have all of our homeless living the life of Reilly. But the funds cannot be touched. They are sacrosanct, irrespective of the impact on politicians' careers.  And let's not forget our own cultural enrichers. The now retired Kevin Myers wrote this article about five years ago which graphically illustrates the insanity of our current situation whereby the vast majority of Nigerians, despite having no right to be here, are provided with taxpayer-funded accommodation. And a lot more besides.

But as Kevin points out, we cannot speak of those facts. The West gets more like the USSR or East Germany every day.

Oh happy day.

It tickles me pink when the various stakeholders in the Victimhood Hierarchy turn on one another. Surprising it doesn't occur more frequently given such diverse and potentially incompatible victims as the Religion of Peace, feminists, gays, blacks, transgenders - and any combination of same - all vying for the victimhood spoils.

One such joyous occasion occurred recently in Paris (or Paris France, as they'd say in Texas). It was a 'performance art' exhibition about....the "Horrors of Apartheid, Colonialism and Extreme Racism". (Here's what apartheid was really like). Showing real live Africans as, well, real live Africans. And we all know what that's going to look like, don't we, children?

Included in the Exhibition was a representation of the Hottentot Venus. This lady created quite a stir well over a hundred years ago when scientists were able to be scientists. As such they brought her to Europe and marvelled at what they deemed to be a cross between a human and a.......well, let me quote one of the contemporary observers. 'She had a peculiar jaw structure, low brow, labia boldly protruding, enormous almost horizontal buttocks'.

Not surprisingly the HV became a touchy subject and in due course became unmentionable in polite circles. Until now.  Given that the Exhibition also included 'actors' in native 'dress' caged like animals, you can imagine it impinging on the finely-tuned sensitivities of the Africans who now swarm all over the French capital. And it did, on cue.  "I felt I was looking at a zoo, not a living art exhibition"  according to one attendee.

An observation on which I'll wisely decline to comment.

Anyway, their artistic reservations were expressed in the only way blacks know how with the premises being Fergusoned  and the show cancelled.  According to RT   "It is not the first time the show has run into trouble. In September it was forced to cancel a performance at the Barbican in London, when the opening night was stormed by protesters ..."  

Oh happy day!  Long may the Victimhood Civil War continue.

And here's a sweet addendum.  Deluded White fool wearing shirt pleading 'STOP KILLING BLACKS' gets whacked with a hammer - by a black yoof -  when trying to stop looting.

The dam creakes ominously

I spend a considerable amount of time perusing the comment section of MSM outlets and other prominent blogs.  As I've noted before, the tone and content of the comments increasingly demonstrate a huge awakening of White consciousness. Awareness of how Whites, especially men, are discriminated against at every turn, annoyance at the depredations of 'minorities' and their obfuscation by the MSM, and most significantly, the recognition of Jewish culpability for these problems.

There are now in fact two separate worlds, that of the "journalists" who provide the PC-approved bilge content, and the reality-based one of the readership. Things are said today on mainstream outlets that would have been unthinkable even a few short years ago. To what extent this is due to more tolerant moderation and/or readers' attitudinal change is open to speculation. But the change - the big change - is there. The Thought Police must be tearing their ponytails out in frustration but their options are limited.  In the case of the Daily Telegraph blog the owners have obviously decided to let it die of neglect but of course this results in a sharp loss of readership and is hardly a practical course for most outlets.  The BBC is more cunning in that they publish what they call, in classical Orwellian terminology, 'representative' comments. Yeah, representative.  Got it.

So what's an intolerant PC-infected hypocrite to do?  Well Ann Applebaum has an idea. "Born to a very Reformed Jewish family", when not egging on the goyim to fight Israel's wars she keeps her eye on Russia, recoiling from its lack of freedom and the increasing control of the media by Putinistas.  The horror!  The horror!  In fact she even wrote a book about it - the title  of which says it all: Gulag.  Surprisingly she's an enthusiastic proponent of censorship of Internet comments as revealed in a Washington Post article recently. Now of course she doesn't call it censorship. You see it's only for 'utterly unacceptable and cowardly comments'.  And it's all for the Greater Good.  And who exactly will decide what's for the Greater Good and what's not?  Well I think we can all hazard a guess at that.

Will comment censorship work? It might but I don't think so because the Internet is like a will-of-the-wisp, difficult (but by no means impossible) to control.  And it's recognised that increasingly - and unsurprisingly - readers are drawn to the comments more than the so-called journalists' material. It's all to play for but sure as hell this is a positive development.

"Fair Play For Israel"

In this post I showed that Jews, despite masterminding the Affirmative Action agenda, never sought to avail of its provisions for themselves, especially those relating to racial quotas.  Such selflessness! But that's no surprise. And you know, the same thing is going on with the share out of the coveted Third Worlders that so enrich Western society.

Week after week, month after month, year after year prominent Jews and Jewish organisations work assiduously to ensure that we in the West get more than our share of Third World enrichment.  Like this guy in Norway, this lady in Sweden, this one in Germany. And of course "our own" Alan Shatter, el supremo.  They explain in great detail, how we benefit.  You know, colour, different foods and.......and......well, can't think of anything else off-hand just now. Yet, in a stunning example of selfless altruism, they never seek any for their own homeland, Israel.  Have you noticed that?

In fact so selfless are they that in some instances they even try to steal Israel's existing enrichment and bring it back to their "own" countries.  Yes indeed. "Australian" MP Michael Danby proposed to the Canberra Parliament that Australia should absorb all of Israel's African enrichers which would then enable Oz to celebrate even more diversity. What a rosy picture he painted! And only in the last few days the Israeli Government reluctantly agreed to hand over for resettlemnt in Sweden a large number of Eritrean enrichers (including 54 birthing units women) to a jubilant Swedish delegation.

So, seeing as they won't help themselves then I'm going to do it for them. I now propose that every Western country present Israel with a generous proportion of its own refugees. I know it's hard giving up so many of our Nigerians, Somalis and Afghans but it's only fair. Share and share alike is my motto. If successful my project will lead to a new more vibrant Israel which can celebrate diversity as if there was no tomorrow.  Which of course there might not be......

A child speaks from beyond the grave

I see that Oscar-nominated film makers Amy Berg and Nate Parker are going to do a film on the Ferguson tragedy, you know, the one where a gentle giant got ventilated by a local cop. Here's what they plan to do.

“In response to the growing problem of racial disparity due to the ongoing dehumanization of black men, actor and activist Nate Parker [with Amy Berg] are setting out on a journey of investigation. They will venture into black communities to speak to various stakeholders about the crisis facing these men.”

Here's one response to the idea:

Hello Ms Berg, Mr. Parker. . Don’t recognize me? That’s OK; I understand. My name was Antonio West. I was the 13-month old child who was shot in the face at point blank range by two black teens, who were attempting to rob my mother, who was also shot. I think my murder and my mommy’s wounding made the news for maybe a day, and then disappeared. 

A Grand Jury of my mommy’s peers from Brunswick , Georgia ruled the black teens who murdered me will not face the death penalty. Too bad it was I who got the death sentence from my killers instead, because Mommy didn’t have the money they demanded. See, my family made the mistake of being white in a 73% non-white neighborhood, but my murder wasn’t ruled a ‘hate crime’. Oh, and President Obama didn’t take a single moment to acknowledge my murder. He couldn’t have any children who could possibly look like me – so why should he care?

I’m one of the youngest murder victims in our great Nation’s history, but the media didn’t care to cover the story of my being killed in cold blood. There isn’t a white equivalent of Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson because if there were he'd be branded a ‘racist’. So no one’s rushing to Brunswick to demonstrate and demand ‘justice’ for me, or do a documentary about me. There’s no ‘White Panther’ party, either, to put a bounty on the lives of the two black teens who murdered me. I have no voice, I have no strident representation, and unlike those who shot me in the face while I sat innocently in my stroller – I no longer have my life.  Isn’t this a great country?

So while you’re out seeking ‘justice'  for Michael Brown, please remember to seek ‘justice’ for me as well.  Tell your friends about me, tell your families, get tee-shirts with my face on them, and make the world pay attention, just like you’re doing for Michael Brown.."

The worm turns

The town of Kalispell is capital of  Flathead County Montana, a county that is possibly the nearest thing on this earth to paradise. Quite apart from the stunning scenery, the social life is excellent, the people warm and friendly and it's almost crime-free. If you've deduced that this happy state of affairs reflects, indeed requires, an almost total absence of diversity you would of course be correct.

The region has been mooted for some time by White Nationalists as a possible White Homeland, somewhere that Whites could live with just themselves as company. The threat of which probably explains the arrival of one Rabbi Allen Secher a few years back.  The Rabbi has form going back to his time as a 'freedom rider' down South in the sixties. And since then he's been spreading freedom and diversity in New York, LA and Chicago . And now he's worried that Flathead might miss out on their share of enrichment. Not only that, he's horrified, terrified, that a dreadful White Hate Group (the ADL called them that so it must be true) are setting up shop in the region.

Here's the Flathead Beacon's breathless report

"Local residents turned out in droves Monday night at the Whitefish City Council meeting to decry a white separatist think-tank’s local residency and voice support for an anti-hate ordinance barring such groups from assembling in the community. The grassroots demonstration was organized by Love Lives Here [is that Orwellian,or what?] and comes on the heels of renewed publicity for the National Policy Institute, whose president, Richard B. Spencer, set up headquarters in Whitefish several years ago after moving from Washington, D.C.  The meeting was organized by civil rights activist and local Rabbi Allen Secher and his wife Ina Albert. Many in attendance spoke of their Jewish faith, including Hilary Shaw whose grandfather is [roll of drums] a Holocaust survivor.''

“I love this town. I adore it and I want to keep adoring it. Let’s not even open the door to this guy”  implored Secher. " Or else how can we enrich this place to the point of being minority White?" He professes to believe race to be a social construct yet amazingly his own site proclaims itself to be is dedicated to "the continuity of the Jewish people."

Talk about chutzpah.  But listen, the worm is turning. You see the comments to the report are running at least 20:1 against the the Thought Police and, even better, show a really clear understanding of Secher's hypocrisy and the central Jewish role in the White Genocide Project.  I

Read them yourself at the end of the article.  

And enjoy!

Our black friends and neighbours: A tribute

"I think this would be a wonderful opportunity to pause for a moment and give thanks for the great contributions that the black community has made to American society. Their peaceful and generous nature make them ideal neighbors, lending testimony to their exceptional family values and parenting skills unrivaled by any other culture. 

Their quiet and calm behavior in restaurants as to not disturb other diners and the generous gratuity they leave after dining is an example that all diners should strive to achieve.   Their commitment to academic excellence enriches our schools and serves as an example to all who hope to achieve prominence as a people. 

Real estate values are fueled by the influx of African Americans into a neighborhood due to their caring and respectful nature for their own property as well as their community,an example of all that they have achieved through their enthusiasm for self improvement by their unmatched work ethic. 

Their hands on, hard work and a self-reliant can-do attitude nurtures a culture of integrity and honor.Without their industrious and creative drive, we truly would be lesser of a nation."

Kory Smith

Was this man the greatest war criminal of WW 2?

Dwight D. Eisenhower enjoyed a miraculously successful military and political career despite (like John McCain) finishing close to the bottom of his graduation class at West Point, where he was known as 'that terrible Swedish Jew'. (His father was said to be Jewish but if so was of the crypto variety). But neither that nor repeated subsequent examples of incompetence (MacArthur wanted rid of him) held him back, as some mysterious(?) force at the highest levels in Washington kept the promotions rolling in.  As one of his biographers pointed out 'in only five years he had risen from a lowly lieutenant colonel in the Philippines to commander of the greatest invasion force in history'.

Amazing!

He ended WW 2 as a hero, loved and lionised by the American people, a reaction which he parlayed into becoming a two term President, one of the most admired of the twentieth century.

While he always professed himself appalled at German 'war crimes' and wanted to exterminate the whole German High Command after the war it seems he wasn't beyond a bit of war criminality himself. In fact, and this is not an exaggeration, he could justifiably be described as the greatest war criminal of the twentieth century.  Because there's compelling evidence to suggest that he deliberately and with malice aforethought consigned over one million German prisoners-of-war to their deaths in 1945.

Rense writes about it with great eloquence and passion here, but in essence Eisenhower had German POWs reclassified as Disarmed Enemy Combatants (DECs) the impact of which was to remove the need to provide sustenance and to put them outside the purview of the International Red Cross. Under normal circumstances this mechanism is understandable, the idea being that with the end of hostilities defeated soldiers can be let to their own devices rather than be a burden on their jailers.  However Eisenhower gave explicit instructions for the German soldiers to be imprisoned in camps and to be denied shelter and sustenance. The inevitable result of such a policy was death through starvation, disease or exposure.

Konrad Adenauer, the pro-Western Chancellor of West Germany during the fifties commissioned a report which found that 1.5 million German prisoners in Allied POW camps never came home alive nor were their deaths recorded. The report attributes this to their being 'penned up for weeks without protection from the weather, water or medical care'.  These events were detailed in the book Other Losses by Canadian writer James Bacque (1989) and picked up by journalist Peter Worthington who wrote 'it is hard to escape the conclusion that Eisenhower was a war criminal of epic proportions.'

Naturally enough, once the crime was exposed a team of  house-trained court historians under the leadership of Stephen Edward Ambrose sprang into action. And  dismissed the book as....... (roll of drums)  a conspiracy theory. While there's undoubtedly room for discussion regarding the total figure there's none in relation to Eisenhower's DEC reclassification, his orders to deprive the captives of care and sustenance and the exclusion of the Red Cross from the camps.  Shortage of food cannot be sustained as an excuse as Bacque cites several documents from Allied logistics officers in the region to the effect that plenty of food was available should they have wanted to feed the prisoners and that American soldiers and German civilians were actually prohibited from doing so.

Interestingly, when I was a student in Germany in 1966 I had a drinking friend called Franz.  He had been in the war towards the latter end as a very young man.  He told me one night while in his cups that he and vast numbers of other soldiers had been imprisoned near Cologne with neither food nor shelter and that huge numbers had perished. He admitted that many had got away as security at some of the camps was weak and that many localised camp commanders, disgusted at what was taking place, simply left the DECs escape.

So it seems that Ike got away with mass murder.  Not just that but thrived and prospered and lived into old age, wealthy and admired. Meanwhile the German people have become synonymous with genocide even as the Holocau$t fairytale unravels and the knowledge of detailed plans to literally wipe the German people from the face of the earth  have emerged.  While the winners write the history, that covering the first half of the last century is surely unsurpassed in terms of grotesque misrepresentation.  Never has a people been so unjustifiably traduced as have the Germans.

Let us all in our own way continue our efforts to get the truth out there.

Norway's education by rape

Even by Scandinavian standards Norwegians have been the most deluded and naive when it comes to multiculturalism. I've read that per capita they import the highest number of 'refugees' in Europe,almost exclusively African and/or Muslim.  With predictable results. Crime - especially rape -  and welfarism have ballooned, and ominously, second generation parasites are worse than their parents. This post introduces you to a witch while providing more details on the country's travails.

But change is in the air!  It seems that education by rape is working and Norway is deporting the parasites by the thousand.  "The National Police Immigration Service.... deported 824 people in October, which is a new record. PU believe some of the reasons for the rise in figures are more resources, more staff and a change of “portfolio priorities”. It has also become easier to deport people back to Afghanistan and Nigeria."   Could anything sound sweeter than that?  Maybe if you added in Somalis and Pakis.  No wonder this guy is gearing up for emergency action.

The overall target for this year is over 7,000 but all is still far from well.  You see "a percentage of those deported in 2014 were asylum seekers who had their application for continued asylum rejected. They were then deported along with their families. The majority of deportees however had committed crimes or had returned illegally to Norway" Would have been a lot better had the expulsions been more broad-ranging but still, be thankful for any progress. I like it too that the families are also being deported.

Check out the comments on the report.  Remember The Local is just about the most close-minded intolerant PC medium out there. Their censorial comments policy is well known - for example I'm totally banned even under my own name.  Yet almost without exception the comments jubilantly welcome this move by the authorities.  Things are indeed looking up.

In conclusion I simply have to provide you with a picture from another report from The Local. This one is of - I kid you not - the top two 'Norwegian' fashion designers for this year. Even without being told I knew that the guy on the left of the pic was Norwegian,  Obvious really.

Celebrating diversity in the Emerald Isle

Ireland's Prime Minister Enda Kenny is the politician straight from central casting. Winking, back-slapping, promising anything, all things to all men, never took a brave or original decision, never did a productive days work in his life.  But he's still the democratically elected leader of our country, and by a huge majority at that.

Yesterday he visited Galway where he was met by a group of protesters angry at having to pay for the water they used. He could have asked who then should pay for extracting, treating and piping the water as well as the €600 million annual infrastructure costs. And he'd have learned that somebody else, not the protesters, should pick up the tab.  Now Galway adjoins the constituency which both Enda and his father represented for well over half a century between them while his broader family has extremely deep roots in the region.

What were his thoughts then when he had a sign shoved in his face which blared 'ENDA  YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE'? Especially as the sign was held by two coal black free-loaders recently arrived from the Dark Continent. One can only imagine.

And there's nothing unusual about this. Recently asylum tourists in Cork blockaded the road in protest at the 'dire conditions' in which they were 'forced' to live.  The media were wholly supportive, banner headlines screaming that the poor creatures had less than €20 per week to live on. True, but the 'journalists', you know, those diligent fact-checking seekers of the whole truth, neglected to mention that in addition to the €20 they also had free accommodation, free food, free medical care, free education and free public transport. All courtesy of the Irish taxpayer.

And what exactly was the latest protest about? The poor suffering creatures had a list of very specific demands. The full range of sports channel (Sky, BT and Eurosport), free university education, free in-house gym, food (free, of course) that reflected their ethnic origins, and, especially for the Religion Of Peace, separate social areas for males and females.

And you know what? Each and every one of their demands was met. 

With enemies like this, who needs friends?

Sometimes I wonder about Jewish intelligence because some of them - lots of them - do such utterly stupid things.  Take this guy, (yeah, do take him. As far away from Europe as possible).  He's Erwin Kohn, Deputy Director at the Norwegian Center Against...(roll of drums) Racism and here he gives an interview about demographics in Norway.  And why do I question his intelligence?

Well if you listen to the interview - at which he's accompanied by a dumb blonde shiksa parroting PC platitudes to deflect from the Jewish agency -  you'll understand.

First he says that Norway has always been ethnically homogeneous 'so we have a big job of work on our hands'.  Now apart from the most deluded brainwashed 'liberal' out there, what's any Norwegian to make of that given that in effect he's saying it's too Norwegian?  I know they're dumb goyim, and being Nordics they've drunk even more deeply of the PC KoolAid. But really, any normal Norwegian would have to take this as a personal insult.

Then, turning things on their head, he goes on to warn of the major challenges that lie ahead in integrating the various enrichers. He compounds this error by specifically mentioning Muslims and gypsies, the worst and most troublesome Turd World detritus imaginable.  How dumb is this guy? He even admits that they are behind the rise in (roll of drums) anti-Semitism in Norway.  Now you imagine, having admitted the need for a flood of enrichers that he'd offer some of the (entirely imaginary) benefits they might bring. Not a word. But he does acknowledge the generous funding he's been awarded by the dopey goyim...a Jew saying he has enough money!

With enemies like this, who needs friends?

I solve a mystery for Fred Reed

I'm sure that many of you read Fred Reed. Understandably, as Fred is a fine writer, experienced and highly intelligent. Having spent many years as a police reporter his take on the black undertow is searing and unsparing. Which explains why in this article he despairs at the degree of power wielded by such an undeserving and small minority.


"It is curious that blacks, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity, should dominate national politics. Yet they do. Virtually everything revolves around what blacks want, demand, do, or can’t do.  Blacks control what you can say to your own children in your own home."

"Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress, rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as must be examinations for promotion in fire departments, the military, and police forces. Blacks must be admitted to universities for which they are not remotely qualified, where departments of Black Studies must be established to please them. Corporate work forces, federal departments, and elite high-schools must be judged not on whether they perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of blacks. Obama was elected because he was black: an equally unqualified and negligible white pol would have had no chance. He is now fiercely pushing the most profound transformation of America ever attempted, by opening the floodgates to immigration from the south."

Isn't that powerful stuff?

He ends despairingly with "things that ought to be unbelievable, and once were, have become routine."

And my God, that is the truth.

But the article, excellent though it is, suffers from an extraordinary omission. You see Fred metaphorically throws his hands in the air in complete bafflement at the fundamental question of how 'the unbelievable has become routine'. In fact the explanation is there as plain as a pikestaff .......for anyone who wants to see it.   You see Fred, all of this unbelievable stuff becoming routine didn't just happen, or happen overnight. The situation that had prevailed in the former Confederacy States (and in reality most of the others as well) until about the middle of the last century was the natural order whereby a low intelligence, violent and largely indolent racial minority were kept at arms length from Whites, miscegenation carried punitive social repercussions and indulgence of their lawless and violent nature guaranteed swift and severe retribution.

Similar dispensations have applied throughout the world since the dawn of man, simply reflecting the natural order. And you defy the natural order at your peril..... as most White Americans of the time understood at the deepest visceral level.  So how then did blacks come to rule over us and the unbelievable become routine? It was one hell of a project and arguably one that had never been successfully undertaken before. It was multi-faceted and required a carefully co-ordinated set of self-reinforcing measures developed by a specialised Project Team

First item on the plan was 'Civil Rights' for blacks which set out with a number of seemingly reasonable proposals (who could object to nice Mrs. Parks moving up the bus?) but had as its ultimate objective the rendering of blacks impervious to criticism and judged on different criteria. Towards this end the Project Team set up a number of key implementation bodies such as the NAACP and ACLU, fronted by a few token blacks for the optics. So now blacks could go anywhere and any time.  Problem was of course that the closer blacks got to Whites the less Whites came to like them.  Which then gave rise to the most audacious element of all: The creation, a la Orwell, of a parallel universe, one where fact was fiction, war was peace. And black was white.

Thus academia developed bogus 'equality' theories of race, gender and culture, rewrote history to downplay the civilisational role of Whites and to overplay their alleged genocide and exploitation of the noble savages. Full spectrum media output reinforced these theories.  Thus blacks had to be presented as intelligent, kind, honest....and horribly done down by Evil Whitey.  The ultimate target was the White Male, the embodiment of The Enemy. He had to be traduced, belittled, discriminated against through Affirmative Action, impoverished in marriage, emasculated by feminism, ultimately reduced to a hollowed-out husk ashamed of what he was and what his ancestors had been. But that still wasn't enough. The screaming cognitive dissonance needed legislative enforcement to repel reality.  Hence the introduction of a battery of 'hate' and 'anti-discrimination' laws aimed exclusively at Whites and enforced by politicised activist Federal judges.

So Fred, that's really how the blacks came to power. The achievement of inducing the greatest civilisation the world has seen to destroy itself may appear magical (just like this guy).  But when the Project Team control the media, 'entertainment' industry, finance and academia and have had centuries, nay milennia, to hone their repertoire of destruction maybe it's not so amazing.  Anyway Fred, that's the mystery solved for you. But it wasn't really a mystery, was it?  I mean, you're really smart, well read and have vast on-the-ground experience, and yet you avoid identifying The Project and the tribe who ran it. Which kind of defeats the whole purpose of your article, doesn't it?  A bit like describing the voyage of the Titanic without mentioning the incident with the iceberg. 

No Fred, the shades, leather jackets, cigars and constant reminders of your 'fearless' and 'scurrilous' writings don't cut it as long as you step away from the Third Rail. 

Got to hand it to the Israelis

Israel and the Israelis clearly aren't everyone's cup of tea, and not only on this site.  But they sure know how to pursue their own national and ethnic interests without giving two hoots about 'international opinion' and in a way that's truly inspirational.

Here are a few of those things I admire.

They don't fall for the bull about illegal African  immigrants, calling them 'infiltrators'.  Which is what they are.  Not only that they then round them up, incarcerating them in concentration camps before shipping them back to Africa.  Their clear-headed recognition of how the world works is manifest in the problem associated with the infiltrators' countries of origin...you know of course how they dump their passports once they land in the the welfare state of choice.   In the West we agonise about this, poor dhimmified castrated dummies that we are. Usually for years at a time,  Meanwhile providing the infiltrators with free accommodation, food, healthcare, education and living expenses. The Israelis on the other hand simply provide a modest lodgement to some dictators Swiss bank account sum in "development aid" and hey presto, issues of national origin disappear and the welfare tourists are on their way back to the Dark Continent.

And presumably you've heard about the 'black Jews' from Ethiopia?  Having given them sanctuary the Israelis quickly realised that while they might call themselves Jews in reality they were African, Dumb, largely unemployable and prolific breeders. But again, being admirably clear-sighted they solved the problem by administering copious doses of Depo Provera to the unwitting birthing units.

Israelis also understand at the deepest level how to deal with the Religion Of Peace. They realise that the worst of all approaches is that of appeasement, that any concession will merely whet the appetite and lead to more and more demands until we kuffars begin to live as dhimmis. Their 'minorities' start blowing its citizens up?  Put up a wall and make them travel on special roads. Could you just see us in the West doing that? And they don't just react to provocations.....they take the fight to the enemy ,,,,,, the Mayor of Jerusalem plans to ban the ear-splitting howling of their muezzin  and now they've even blocked access to the Al-Aqsa mosque.

How cool is that?

Now of course everyone will jump in and point out that Jews in the West would fiercely oppose those very same measures being applied here while turning a Nelson eye towards Israel,  And that is true. But any Israelis I know, and I know a lot, think that we in the West are insane and suicidal in allowing our lands to be colonised.  They also believe that if we're stupid enough to behave as we do - and that includes letting Jews decide our destiny - then maybe we deserve to fade away into the night.

And maybe they're right.

The Pope gets his 'riding' instructions

Don’t you just love those Catholics who deride the Church for ‘not keeping up with the times’?  In other words not changing its teachings in line with the current zeitgeist.  The Pope and Cardinals must have been dizzy after the latest Synod, such was the clamour for 'progressive change'.  

Here’s one typical comment:

“There is resistance to Christian doctrine with regard to birth control, divorce, new forms of marriage, homosexuality, cohabitation, fidelity, pre-marital sex.”  Why not  add in pornography, full-term abortion and bestiality as you’re at it. Because, you know, these things are becoming much more acceptable nowadays, aren't they? Former Irish President and ‘staunch Catholic’ Mary McAleese demands ‘a new theology of women’.  Whatever the hell that’s supposed to mean.  But these days anything with  ‘women’ in it automatically elicits serious and thoughtful nods of approval.

The logic, if I may use that term, underpinning such demands seems to be that once an action becomes generally acceptable then the Church must alter its teachings accordingly.  But this misses the whole point of Catholicism which rests on the foundation of Papal Infallibility which in turn is based on the Pope’s status as God’s Representative On Earth. Now I don’t go along with this concept for one minute and it underpinned my abandonment of the religion  -  all religion – in my late youth. But that’s what being a Catholic is all about. You sign up or ship out.  I mean, who can argue with God, right?

It should also be noted that the list of demands outlined above is very much an expression of late 20^th Century lifestyles.  Every single one would have been considered outrageous and unacceptable at any earlier stage of history. And they might become unacceptable again. So you can understand the proceed-with-caution approach the Church is adopting.  And here’s another thing  of which the Vatican, ever alert to the bottom line, will be well aware.  Those religions that swing with the popular mood, that have become 'progressive and liberal' are sinking into irrelevance, an irrelevance characterised by empty churches.  And empty coffers.The Anglican Church and its American equivalent (Episcopalians) are prime examples. 

Meanwhile those that are red in tooth and claw, and that cling to the most outlandish beliefs - think the Religion Of Peace and the mega churches in America run by degenerate hucksters - are thriving. Speaking of which, when I look at the destruction being wrought on White societies I sometimes wistfully imagine a rebirth of the (for me, hated) Church Militant. That organisation wouldn't pussy-foot around with ragheads swarming all over us and with Jews, under the ruse of secularism, systematically destroying every vestige of Christian influence and tradition. No they'd smite and thrust and set them fleeing for their lives. But the CM is gone, never to return.

What drives the reptiles?

Let me cite a few facts and then ask a question: If you're a football fan you must have noticed the degree  of insanity associated with the issue of race. Serious drugs and match-fixing offenders, which strike at the sport's fundamentals - get off with the proverbial slap on the wrist. Yet should a player be accused - note accused - of a racist insult his world will collapse. Luis Suarez, then of Liverpool incurred a colossal and unprecedented eight match ban for the offence of addressing a little black guy as 'negrito', which in Spanish means........well,  'little black guy', There are simply scores of similar incidents,

All over Europe clubs have incurred devastating financial losses and had on-field performances impacted by the partial, or as in the case of CSKA Moscow, total closure of their grounds. Why? Because some fans hurled racist insults at opposing players. In fact there's a proposal in whereby a referee can abandon a game in the event of racial insults being heard. Can you just imagine the scope for corruption associated with that?

Then there's the horrendously costly PR measures. Vastly expensive advertising time at every top event is given over to 1984-style exhortations such as 'Say No To Racism'.  Major brands like Coke or Mercedes would kill for such exposure.  Then we see grown men, highly paid professionals, forced to shuffle around with pennants emblazoned with the 'RESPECT' rubric. The respect in question being reserved solely for players of the dusky variety. Of course.

In short, the foul anti-racist (i.e. anti-White) agenda has spread its slimy tentacles all over the sport, creating an atmosphere akin to that in Stalin's USSR. In trying to explain why, we must understand the nature of those who achieve high office in sport. If you're familiar with the scene you'll understand that they - for whatever reason - are among the worst of human beings. Just like politicians. Citing the heads of the two main football bodies, Platini  of UEFA and Blatter of FIFA I rest my case. It would be hard to find, especially in Blatter's case, a more corrupt, venal, unpincipled bagmen this side of a jail wall....Ok, maybe in Wall Street. And note, neither is Jewish!

So my question is this: Why do such men and their equally corrupt and unprincipled organisations do what they do on the racism issue?  Remember that in a sense there's nothing in it for them. It's costing the crooks a lot of money, disruption, disputes and law suits, outrage from most players and fans. And what do they get in return? It's not obvious to me I must say.  Remember again the guys at the top of these organisations are bereft of a moral compass and will, as we saw with the awarding of the World Cup to Qatar, sell out to the highest bidder. Which of course raises the question as to whether there is some 'higher bidder' bank-rolling the Racism/Anti-White project.  Or is there something else?

It could just be that understanding what's going on here might shed some useful light on our broader struggle.

America cracks down on corruption. In Hungary

The world reeled in shock yesterday as the Wall St. Journal reported a crackdown by America on corruption.  However panic was avoided and order restored when it emerged that the moral crusade applied only to Hungary, And presumably any other country without a Rothschild Central Bank, Or which objects to a takeover by the Tribe as apparently 'old scapegoats have come back to life in a nation that was flattened by globalization: foreigners, bankers, and Jews.'  Oh dear.

This from the WSJ.    "The State Department refused entry to the U.S. to several Hungarians because it said they had been involved in corruption, once more highlighting tensions between the U.S. administration and the feisty government of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. In a statement issued by Charge’d affairs M. Andre Goodfriend the embassy said the US canceled the visas on the basis of “credible information that those persons are either engaging in or benefiting from corruption.”

Some more observations by TPTB.

President Obola. 'I've never heard of Hungary before but must ask myself why they cannot conduct their business affairs honestly. Like Jon Corzine, Jamie Diamond and LLoyd Blankfein.'

AG Eric Holder: 'If there's one thing I cannot stand it's corruption and accordingly strongly endorse this fearless and even-handed application of the law. If we let this kind of thing go unpunished you could find the Hungarians doing something like......supplying weapons to gangsters in neighbouring countries,'

Abe Foxman: 'An excellent move. Godammit what would happen if these goys, I mean guys get into financial racketeering as well? And those Magyars, will we ever forget the Arrow Cross in WW 2? Oy vey, the sufferink...the sufferink. Just as well we have one of our own in Amos Goodfreund, whoops I mean Andre Goodfriend fighting our corner.'

We'll have to keep an eye on this anti-corruption thingy from the Americans. Humanitarian bombing might be replaced by anti-corruption bombing.  We live in interesting times.

American Renaissance's 'Savage' rejection

The members of that  fine organisation American Renaissance (Amren) have been described by Fred Reed as follows:  "As I remember they ran to middle-aged or older and, though certainly with exceptions, middle class, civil, and leaning toward dweebish. They seemed more worried than hostile. A society they valued was, at least as they saw it, being overrun by alien peoples." Indeed.  They are determined to reflect Amren's founder Jared Taylor in being reserved and gentlemanly. Most notably they go to extraordinary lengths to avoiding any negative mention of the Tribe. Articles, links (the primary Amren activity) and even comments are - or at least were - vigorously policed to avoid any hint of offence.

Sadly this respect is not reciprocated.  All the main Jewish organisations, ACLU, $PLC etc. never miss an opportunity to denounce Amren in the most vigorous terms. But news depths were plumbed in a recent piece in Salon colourfully entitled America's Virulent Racists: The Sick Ideas And Perverted  "Science" Of The American Renaissance Foundation. It is an excerpt from a book published by no less an institution than Harvard University. The piece itself was a scandalous libellous attack on Amren and JT himself, his work, and associates as “shockingly ugly”, “hateful, dangerous, ancient, and outdated,” “virulently racist”, “neo-Nazi” and “white supremacist.”  As 'liberals would say "Wow!  Just....wow!".

The piece, and thus presumably the full book is shockingly un-academic in the strict meaning of the term. It's characterised by a  pantheon of  misstatements so grotesque that one can only conclude that the author either never read any Amren material or else set out to write a defamatory propaganda piece where truth has no role.  If you want to understand proper academic work read where JT demolishes it on a point-by-point basis.

As Fred Reed said, were a cub reporter to present such a badly-researched fact-free diatribe to his editor he'd  probably be fired.   But the author of this monstrosity is one Robert Wald Sussman Professor of Physical Anthropology at Washington University in St. Louis and as I said earlier the full abomination was published by Harvard. Which bears out my frequently expressed view that social 'sciences' are not science at all.  Here's what renowned theoretical physicist Richard Feynman had to say on the subject. "Social science is an example of a science which is not a science. They follow the forms. You gather data, you do so and so and so forth, but they don’t get any laws, they haven’t found out anything." Adding "and I can’t believe that they know when they haven’t done the work necessary, they haven’t done the checks necessary, they haven’t done the care necessary."

He could have added that these pseudo-scientists demonstrate the most unforgivable of all research offences: Starting with an assumption and manipulating the data to support that assumption. This episode once again underlines the not only bogus nature of social 'science' but its true nature as evidence-free malign propaganda, driven by a  full spectrum hatred of everything White and Christian.  It's coming demise should be welcomed by all of us.

Now Amren also tried to establish a relationship with Michael Savage, the popular and 'conservative' radio jock. Here was the so to speak savage response: “STOP YOUR LIES. OBAMA IS TOO GREEN NOT TOO BLACK. DROP MY NAME FROM YOUR EMAIL LIST OR I WILL TURN YOUR ORGANIZATION’S NAME OVER TO THE FBI FOR HARASSMENT.”

Now is that over the top or what? Bizarro.

The main lesson that should be learned from both incidents is that trying to appeal to the good sense and reason of the Jewish power elite, of which Sussman and Savage are representatives, is futile. The good boys at Amren were attacked with vile propaganda and with an emotive viciousness that borders on pathological and in a way worse than that endured by the likes of David Duke. 

Why would this be? Is it because they see 'respectable' WN groups like Amren as the real threat? Perhaps. And this suggests that Naming The Jew might after all not represent the most effective tactics. It would at least keep, as Uncle Nasty calls them, the Selwyns in the leather goods shop on board,  After all they must have concerns similar to those of espoused by Amren.  And that might just be Amren's objective. But they also need to see that grovelling and appeasing just seem to whet the appetite of the Jewish Commissars for more blood.

So how to manage the competing interests of the Selwyns and the Commissars?  Here I cite a great comment by Trainspotter which I used in an earlier post. I wish ..... that the Jewish-American elite didn’t in fact represent the broader Jewish tribe.   If so, then it is the responsibility of the broader Jewish tribe to rein in their destructive, anti-white Jewish cousins. Will it do this, or would it rather blame those who understand the nature of the game, and have the temerity to point out the prominent Jewish role in it? It should also be said that the Jewish poison being fed to whites (and other races, for that matter) doesn’t become any sweeter just because some Jews are idiotic enough to swallow some themselves.  

In any event, you might as well give up trying to bamboozle those whites who already understand the nature of the Jewish attack on our people. That game is up, the evidence is overwhelming, and awareness is only going to grow from here. The horse is already out of the barn. The Jews had a good thing going, but as usual allowed their hatred and arrogance to get the better of them.
   
However, what you can do, if you are Jewish and if you are actually sincere, is work within the Jewish community to call off the dogs. You can work with them in a way that we can’t. Next time you are tempted to chastise the goyim, chastise your own instead. Persuade THEM, those who are doing harm, as opposed to US, who are simply pointing out the reality of the situation in a bid to salvage what we can out of the increasing wreckage of our own tribe. I don’t think you’re going to get anywhere with them, but I’d love to be proven wrong, and the long term results would be far better for everyone concerned. Doubt they’ll see it that way, though. They are more than happy for us to disappear, and will attempt to block any efforts that we make to reverse our decline. Key word is “attempt.” They will fail, but they will try.

Wise words...wise words.

'Multicultural society' is an oxymoron

The term 'multicultural society' is an oxymoron for the simple reason that being multicultural prevents its being a society as commonly understood. Instead what you get is a range of 'cultures' incompatible with one another to a greater or lesser degree. The resultant societal pathologies, which should have been apparent to anyone with a functioning brain cell, have been identified in a number of research studies like this one.

One of the basic requirement of any functioning society, and one crippled by multiculturalism, is the impartial administration of justice under a system of laws. This system inevitably degenerates into an ethnic and/or religious zero sum game geared towards ensuring that 'our guy' gets, not justice, but the benefit of any verdicts. Things got so bad in the USA that the Supreme Court felt compelled to create special rules for jury selection (the Batson Challenge). This in turn was driven by the repeated failures of blacks to convict a brudda even when the prosecution's evidence was overwhelming. Think O.J. Simpson and Curtis Vance.

In Wales we had the extraordinary case in which two footballers had sex with an inebriated waitress. They said it was consensual, she said it was not. Whatever. The extraordinary thing was that both admitted doing exactly the same thing to/with the girl yet the White guy was convicted (got five years jail) and the black one acquitted.  You see all it takes is a couple of jurors to vote against conviction for the defendant to go free.

And it's going to get worse in Britain as the pathology extends from juries to the Crown Prosecution Service itself which is getting taken over by immigrants from Third World cultures.......where Traditional Justice rules. For example in Pakistan, where many top CPS executives originated, a religious or tribal leader can, completely on his own initiative, order a woman to be punished by means of gang rape or have a Christian killed for 'insulting the Prophet'.  And now this guy's sons and cousins have taken over huge swathes of Britain's justice system.

Yes, The Long March Through The Institutions is proceeding at a brisk pace.