Monday, 26 August 2013

Psychopaths

Calling on President Obama to launch a cruise missile attack on Syria, Rep. Eliot Engel, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Relations Committee, told Fox "News" that Congress would not be consulted on the move and that lawmakers would have to “assent” to it at a later date.  Not even a token nod towards the Constitution these days once the War Party decides to play.  And yes, Rep. Engel is Jewish, I hardly needed to check it out but I did anyway.  After all, what else is the American military for if not to attack Israel's enemies?

Meanwhile, if you want to know what's behind the Syrian 'rebellion' and the requirement for a chemical weapons casus belli, check this from Wikileaks.  Needless to say the talking head on Faux never raised such awkward issues to the two psychopaths on the show.

God, I hope there's a day of reckoning for criminals such as these, who casually plot the destruction of whole countries and hundreds of thousands of lives before retiring to their country clubs for aperitifs.

Psychopaths indeed.

105 comments:

Glen C. said...

US military units should stand down Savant. They are sworn to uphold our Constitution and this is a flagrant breach of it.

blueboy said...

And they're throwing babies out of their incubators and onto the floor in Kubwait hospitals. Trust me....

Anonymous said...

War Pigs

Sponge Cake said...

What will the Russians and Iranians do?

The next couple of weeks should be very interesting.

NastiestUncle, I'd cancel that holiday to Israel, If I were you.

Dr. Wassell said...

Israel has intercepted 'intelligence' which proves that the Syrian Government done it.

That's good enough for me.

Sponge Cake said...

Afghanistan check

Iraq check

Libya check

Egypt check

Syria pending

Iran pending

Russia pending

sharonski said...

@Dr. Wassell, now that Israel, which is as objective & neutral an observer, with absolutely no parochial interests in how the Syria-Iran-Hezbollah-SunniGulfStates dynamics play out, has so selflessly given the world the smoking gun proof of truth of Assad's guilt, I feel so much better about "Tomahawks over Damscus" in a few days.

Nero said...

.
Another Peace Prize for Obama.

Nero said...

.
The community organiser from Chicago is now on the warpath. Scary.
After a decade of chaos in Iraq, and in Afghanistan, he now thinks this one will be a ‘slam dunk’?
Someone should remind him he is only an affirmative action token black. What were his SATS results again?


William Hague has been dreaming of power all his life – now he finally gets to kill people.
Anyone who wanted to be prime minister at the age of 16 should be excluded from power. What qualified him for power then? And what qualifies him since? Just his ambition...


And then there is Laurent Fabius.
He is not. No wait a minute. Can this be right? Oh yes. Yes it is. He is ... ...err yunno.

Nastiest Uncle said...

"After all, what else is the American military for if not to attack Israel's enemies?"

BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT

Israel and Syria have enjoyed a de facto peace since 1973-ish. It isn't in Israel's interests to have the secular Assad switched out for an Islamist, al Qaeda-run country, armed to the teeth and with chemical weapons.

"Meanwhile, if you want to know what's behind the Syrian 'rebellion' and the requirement for a chemical weapons casus belli, check this from Wikileaks."

BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT

1. Why believe Wikileaks?
2. The reason behind the war there is the pipeline which Qatar and Saudi want to build through Syria to supply Europe with cheap gas. Every other country signed up to it, except Syria, since Syria's major backer (Russia) would lose billions in gas sales to Europe and lose their political blackmailing influence there also.
3. It's the old Sunni vs Shia thing again. Saudi wants to eliminate an enemy to its North.
4. Arab spring. Some Syrians want to fight Assad for democracy, whiskey, sexy.
5. USA wants to weaken Iran. And Russia and China.

"plot the destruction of whole countries"

It's already been destroyed regardless of what happens form now on.

"hundreds of thousands of lives"

The shorter the conflict in Syria, the lower the death toll.

I want Assad to win since he's the lesser of two evils. I'll take higher gas prices over having yet another Islamist terrorist country created.

Here's what probably happened: a faction of the FSA used the chemical weapons in order to draw in the Americans and Europeans to fight Assad for them.

If Assad himself used the chemical weapons, then it's most certainly a trap.

Anonymous said...

Sav. The hope that I will one day see these 'people' face justice is my only reason for living. I don't hold out much hope but think that I (we) will see the beginning of the end. We are waiting for our Archduke Ferdinand moment I feel.

NU
Sounds like a sad, lonely and hate filled existence.

For once NU is right.

Anonymous said...

It does not matter to the chosen how many worthless goyim have to die in the service of Israel and the tribe (ref: the talmud).

My only consolation is that it maybe Darwin just cleaning up the white gene pool - after all to fall for WMDs once may be considered very stupid, but to do it twice in quick succession maybe nature's way of saying goodby.

Rick

Dan said...

The end result of destroying Assad will be the final destruction of Christianity in the Middle East. The Iraq invasion cleansed the Christian community out of Mesopotamia. The Current sponsorship of Sunni Jihadists in Syria in Damascus and the Orontes river area will inevitably lead to the flight and destruction of the remaining Christians in Syria.

Syria is strictly speaking the birthplace of Pauline Christianity. It's an extraordinary moment for western civilization. A Black Liberation Theologist with pro Jihad sympathies bombards a secular Dictator on behalf of Israel and Wahabists and the result?

The Eclipse of Christianity in the Levant. God damn them all!

Dan said...

The Israelis are quite happy to see Assad go. My god, they just gave the Cassus Belli-- Assad used Nerve Gas.

Nastiest, in the name of god, fuck off!

Dan said...

How does a gas pipeline to Syria affect the price of natural gas? Unless it goes to Greece and Italy under the Med, what difference does it make if the container ships are coming from Aquaba in the Red Sea or Syrian ports?

What is the legitimate purpose of furthering the weaknesses of the Russian Republic? I cannot think of one. It's already weak enough.

Dan said...

There is going to be a pipeline in either Turkey or Syria for natural gas. Or one in Oman. There was going to be one in Afghanistan. One in Pakistan. Whatever. Really, whatever. There are natural gas pipelines in Poland, Wales, Ireland, Canada.

What is actually going on here is that the Sunni tribes moved enmasse to cities (an internal colonization) and they are butchering Christians and Alawites. Different tribes essentially. Islam has this tendency to retribalize settled city dwellers.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 00:06

"How does a gas pipeline to Syria affect the price of natural gas?"

It is cheaper to ship gas via pipeline than to ship it as LNG via carrier.
The pipeline would go from Qatar, through Saudi, Jordan and Syria to Turkey, then it links to existing infrastructure.

At the moment, Europe is held over a barrel by Russia, who is the main supplier of gas. Look at Poland for example - paying 40% above the current market price for gas due to contracts they signed with Russia. The world currently has (and will continue to have) lots of cheap gas but here in Europe we can't get any because we are supplied mainly by Russia, who like to do things like turning off the tap when people vote in leaders who are pro-West. Gas, for Russia, is a weapon to use against Europe.

"What is the legitimate purpose of furthering the weaknesses of the Russian Republic? I cannot think of one. It's already weak enough."

You're joking, presumably. Russia's revenues from oil and gas have made it resurgent. Unfortunately, they are not our friend.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 00:18

"There is going to be a pipeline in either Turkey or Syria for natural gas. Or one in Oman. There was going to be one in Afghanistan. One in Pakistan. Whatever. Really, whatever. There are natural gas pipelines in Poland, Wales, Ireland, Canada."

There isn't one from Qatar to Europe.
Qatar and Saudi are paying the wages of the FSA in Syria, and buying their weapons for them.

"What is actually going on here is that the Sunni tribes moved enmasse to cities (an internal colonization) and they are butchering Christians and Alawites. Different tribes essentially. Islam has this tendency to retribalize settled city dwellers."

The Sunni-Shia eternal conflict is also a factor in what's going on in Syria.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 23:58

The Israelis would be quite happy to see Assad go, if his replacement was going to be peaceful.
However, if the FSA win in Syria, then Assad's replacement will not be peaceful. Islamists are never peaceful.

So, Israel does not want to change one for the other.

In your world, you'd like to remove your relatively harmless neighbour for one who will certainly try to kill you and your kids.

Cuckoo.

Dan said...

Nastiest,

You are extremely full of yourself. Your Superficial analysis of the pipeline question is wrong. A pipeline can be laid via Turkey. It can also cross over Suez. We do not need to depose Assad to have a competing spigot for Russian natural gas.

Here, I also suspect that Putin is actually the guy. All that western policy in the Middle East has accomplished for decades is to accelerate Muslim migration to the West.

Dan said...

...our policy has also consistently devastated Christian denominations in the Middle East. Siding against Assad at this point assures that we are party to the final destruction of the oldest Christian communities on earth. Our governments (France this time as well) are collectively insane.

Dan said...

Why do you think I'm actually against removing Assad btw?

Where are you getting the idea I'm lobbying for the removal of Assad?

Anyway back to the topic. The British French and American and Israeli governments are acting in a way that undermines their own culture in the long term. Although perhaps they are actually fulfilling their own erasure from history.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 01:25

"A pipeline can be laid via Turkey."

Well that's the plan. But to get to Turkey you need to go through Syria.

"It can also cross over Suez."

Maybe you should inform the Qataris of these possibility because it seems that they have not considered it.

"We do not need to depose Assad to have a competing spigot for Russian natural gas."

You do if you want the pipeline to go through Syria.

"Here, I also suspect that Putin is actually the guy."

I don't understand this.

"All that western policy in the Middle East has accomplished for decades is to accelerate Muslim migration to the West."

Solving the demographic problem which the politicians think exists, and showing how tolerant we are to boot!

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 01:42

"Why do you think I'm actually against removing Assad btw?"

I don't know what you are for or against.

"The British French and American and Israeli governments are acting in a way that undermines their own culture in the long term."

I doubt that anyone would argue with that.

Dan said...

Putin is considerably easier to understand from a cultural perspective than Cameron, Hollande, Obama at this point. Pat Buchanan had a great article about Putin vis a vis Obama up on his site right now. "Culture War Goes Global". I'd link but I cannot copy and paste from an iPhone. Pat Buchanan makes the prescient point that the West is no longer a civilization, it's just a decaying corpse.

Dan said...

Turkey is an alternative route for that pipe. The pipelines via Syria are and turkey are mutually exclusive routes.

Dan said...

Nastiest,

The Iran-Iraq-Syria route would have given the Western Europeans more providers of natural gas. Toppling Assad and installing Sunni leadership will nix an additional pipe route. I don't see why the Europeans would attempt to have that project stopped. Unless its got nothing to do with "Europeans" at all.
Azerbaijan-Armenia-Turkey-Greece
Russia-Poland-Germany
We have those two now.

The sponsorship of the Sunni terrorists in Syria prevents the
Iran-Iraq-Syria route.

In addition to being obtuse Nastiest you can't read a fucking map!





Either way

James said...

At the moment, Europe is held over a barrel by Russia, who is the main supplier of gas.

Russia is not obliged to sell Europe gas.

Maybe it would be better if they didn't. Only whites can survive in freezing conditions.

James said...

It's not about gas or oil guys.

It's about blood. It always is.

James said...

The Israelis would be quite happy to see Assad go, if his replacement was going to be peaceful.
However, if the FSA win in Syria, then Assad's replacement will not be peaceful. Islamists are never peaceful.

So, Israel does not want to change one for the other.

In your world, you'd like to remove your relatively harmless neighbour for one who will certainly try to kill you and your kids.


Personally, I'd rather live next to an Assad Syria than Israel.

Syrians have never been caught spying on New Zealand or committing state-sponsored crimes here.

Little old NZ. Still not free from Israeli criminals, yet we are so far away, and can never conceivably hurt Israel.

Dan said...

Correct James. It's about blood. Tribe v Tribe...There are resources to fight over everywhere. The rate at which blacks in the US kill white constitutes war according to UN definitions. It's always about blood.

Dan said...

It was commonly said that Saddam had all the oil. What fuvking good is oil if you don't sell it? You can't eat it. You have to sell it to people who have cars and Planes, or you starve while drowning in the gloppy mess. Over a barrell? Why is it that the Aaronovitch's and Nick Cohens drone on about Russia's mineral wealth? The Aussies have us over a barrell with every metal on earth. The Congolese have us over a barrell with the precious metals in the smart phone. One is white the other is niggered out.

Maximum Herzl said...

"A handy rule for arousing hate is, if at first they do not enrage, use an atrocity."
- Propaganda Technique in World War, Harold Dwight Lasswell, 1927, p.81.

"One of the most effective means of frightening a country into unified action is to flood it with atrocity stories. This is an ancient method. Certainly it goes back as far as the Crusades, when atrocity stories from the East were employed to urge Christians to seek out and slay the infidel."
-Controlling Human Behavior: A First Book in Psychology for College Students, Daniel Starch et al., MacMillan, 1936, p.559.

"Modern propaganda is a consistent, enduring policy of creating or shaping events to influence the relations of the public to a given enterprise,"
- Edward Bernays, WW1+2 promoter, Freud's nephew, friend of Henry Morgenthau Junior and Chaim Weizmann

So beginth another bellum Judaicum.

Time for the final heave of the Arab "terrorist threats" in Judea and Samaria over the Jordan, à la the European Judaics and the Bug.

"The Arabs will have to go, but one needs an opportune moment for making it happen, such as a war."
- Ben Gurion letter to his son Amos, 1938

Perhaps we should put out rumours that the deportation stations are actually gas chambers, or steam chambers, or electrocution chambers.

Á la the European Judaics and the Bug.

Anonymous said...

There's some good English atrocity propaganda posted on this blog about the Irish rebellion of 1641.

Oliver "the Jewish messiah" Cromwell stepped up to the task of spreading democracy amongst the Irish barbarians.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
But then there are such things as unintended consequences ...

When you are attempting to juggle six or eight or ten balls at the same time ... one tiny little nudge and things can get away from one.

http://americanfreepress.net/?p=12418

How many read about this in the MSM, Hmmmm?

Hungary Sheds Bankers’ Shackles

August 23, 2013 AFP • International Monetary Fund told to vacate the country; nation now issuing debt-free money

By Ronald L. Ray

Hungary is making history of the first order. Not since the 1930s in Germany has a major European country dared to escape from the clutches of the Rothschild-controlled international banking cartels. This is stupendous news that should encourage nationalist patriots worldwide to increase the fight for freedom from financial tyranny. Already in 2011, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán promised to serve justice on his socialist predecessors, who sold the nation’s people into unending debt slavery under the lash of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the terrorist state of Israel. Those earlier administrations were riddled with Israelis in high places, to the fury of the masses, who finally elected Orbán’s Fidesz party in response. According to a report on the German-language website “National Journal,” Orbán has now moved to unseat the usurers from their throne. The popular, nationalistic prime minister told the IMF that Hungary neither wants nor needs further “assistance” from that proxy of the Rothschild-owned Federal Reserve Bank. No longer will Hungarians be forced to pay usurious interest to private, unaccountable central bankers.

Instead, the Hungarian government has assumed sovereignty over its own currency and now issues money debt free, as it is needed. The results have been nothing short of remarkable. The nation’s economy, formerly staggering under deep indebtedness, has recovered rapidly and by means not seen since National Socialist Germany. -

See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=12418#sthash.FpnlwnMN.dpuf


Oops.

I like the Hungarians. They know the jew. They've had a good industrial-strength, weapons grade hate on for the hooknose since 1956.

UN
.

Andreas said...

UN, a jewish guy I knew from Germany always said that the Hungarians were the most anti-Semitic people in Europe. And this guy's wider family were from all over the continent, so he should know.

SAVANT said...

The community organiser from Chicago is now on the warpath.

You know, I honestly don't believe so. I believe that he's totally captive to the Real Government and is doing this largely against his will.

Keiser said...

Look at me Mr. On Topic :-)

Maybe these might be useful for some insight.

Leaked Documents: U.S. Framed Syria in Chemical Weapons Attack

The REAL Reason Israel Attacked Syria

Defacto Peace indeed. Israel dissimulates peace, that is all.

Keiser said...

James said
"Syrians have never been caught spying on New Zealand or committing state-sponsored crimes here.

Little old NZ. Still not free from Israeli criminals, yet we are so far away, and can never conceivably hurt Israel."


Mossad even stole Irish passports and used them for their whacky spy adventures.

Mossad and the Irish connection - Irish Independent News Article


Keiser said...

*whacky spy adventures.

and the kind of adventures where people inevitably get killed.

Anonymous said...

http://www.snouts-in-the-trough.com/

Cameron is itching to get involved. Look what a bloody fool he made of himself when in opposition
Paris Claims

Keiser said...

Download for Leaked Britam Defence Documents Showing Plans to Frame Syria with Chemical Weapons

These are the actual documents from Britam Defence acquired by hackers in January of 2013.

Britam Defence Document Archive

Mirror 1

Voice of Russia Article

Britam Defence Security Contractors

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 10:21

To be fair though, the Georgians were tricked into launching the military action. So in actual fact, it was the Russians who started it, albeit by hoodwinking the world into seeing the Georgians as the aggressors.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 01:56

"Turkey is an alternative route for that pipe. The pipelines via Syria are and Turkey are mutually exclusive routes."

Turkey isn't next to Saudi. The pipeline must go through Jordan then Syria to get to Turkey.

L2Mapread

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 04:15

"Russia is not obliged to sell Europe gas."

Absolutely my point, my man.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 02:11

"The Iran-Iraq-Syria route"

You think that Sunni Saudi and Qatar will ship their gas via Iran? Are you stoopid or what.

"In addition to being obtuse Nastiest you can't read a fucking map!"

Says the man who thinks that Turkey shares a border with Saudi.

Dan said...

Where did I say that Saudi shares a border with Turkey?

Nastiest's geography is the question here. His reading comprehension is also suspect.


Savant,

I think Obama seems to have a vested Interest in the ethnic cleaning of the Middle East's Christian populations. Blair appears to have the same motivation if his recent comments are anything to go by. The remarkable tho g about Assad's Syria is that it was functioning as a haven for Chritstians fleeing egypt, Iraq and Lebanon and Turkey. If I were at all religiously minded and a partisan Christian I'd say it's deliberate extermination.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 14:44

"Where did I say that Saudi shares a border with Turkey?"

You said: "A pipeline can be laid via Turkey." Which it can't, because Turkey isn't next to Saudi. To get to turkey you must go through Syria.

"Nastiest's geography is the question here."

I got 100% in my Geography GCSE.

"His reading comprehension is also suspect."

Says the man who is well known here for barely being able to string a sentence together without fucking it up.

"I think Obama seems to have a vested Interest in the ethnic cleaning of the Middle East's Christian populations."

To be fair though, you are a bit of a thicko.

Dan said...

Why are you talking about Saudi Arabia Nastiest? There is an existing pipeline from
The Caucasus to Turkey

There is a a proposed pipeline from Iran via Iraq to Syria. This war will prevent that pipeline from being built.

What does Saudi Arabia have to do with this? They would be foolish indeed to build a pipeline via Jordan and Syria to the sea. That would place their resources at the mercy of both Israeli Jets in wholly novel ways and also at the mercy of sullen Shiite populations all over the area. A spigot in Aqaba that crosses to the Sinai that shadows the Suez would be much safer for them. The Saudis also have a multiplicity of ports. They are not landlocked and can ship resources by container ship.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 14:53

"Why are you talking about Saudi Arabia Nastiest?"

Because the entire point of the Syria pipeline war thing is that Saudi wants to construct a gas pipeline through Syria.

"There is an existing pipeline from The Caucasus to Turkey"

But Saudi Arabia and Qatar (the ones who want to send gas via Jordan and Syria to Turkey) are not in the Caucasus.

"What does Saudi Arabia have to do with this? They would be foolish indeed to build a pipeline via Jordan and Syria to the sea."

They don't plan to build the pipeline to the sea. They plan to build the pipeline to Turkey, overland.

"That would place their resources"

No. When the gas is in the pipeline it becomes a European resource.

"at the mercy of both Israeli Jets in wholly novel ways"

Why on earth would Israel want to bomb gas pipelines serving Europe? Are you insane?

"and also at the mercy of sullen Shiite populations all over the area."

Why would Shi-ites wish to incur the wrath of their government by attacking Europe's gas pipeline?

"A spigot in Aqaba that crosses to the Sinai that shadows the Suez would be much safer for them."

But they don't want to build a pipeline to Egypt. They want to build it to Turkey. Are you being stoopid on purpose?

"The Saudis also have a multiplicity of ports. They are not landlocked and can ship resources by container ship."

They don't want to ship their gas by container ship. They want to ship it via pipeline overland to Turkey. You're as thick as hell.

Actually fuck it, ring up the Saudi king and point out to him that his country has container ships because he has obviously forgotten. LOL.

Nastiest Uncle said...

Lord have friggin' mercy.

Dan said...

The idea that this war is the result of pipeline routes is a conspiracy theory par excellence.

I should know I've done risk management for Shell. Countries do not rip themselves apart because new infrastructure is proposed.

The war on Assad is a war fought to remove a Secular (vaguely socialist but now neoliberal) leader and to replace him with a theocratic Sunni. Turkey, Qatar, Israel, UK, US are all in on it. This is the subtext of all these Arab Spring events.

Sav, ban this Nastiest Plonker.

Dan said...

The Sunni rebels in Syria have been blasting pipelines for years. The first attacks started in 2011.

The Shiites have targeted at various times spigots all over Arabia. The Arab Spring as it manifested itself in Algeria was also an attempt by Sunnis to remove a Shiite led pro Iran government. It had fuck all to do with pipelines and looked a lot like the current fight in Syria.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 15:13

"The idea that this war is the result of pipeline routes is a conspiracy theory par excellence."

Mmmhmmm. Syria's agreement needed to build pipeline - not given - lo and behold, thousands of paid mercenaries turn up to try and oust the regime which said no. Oh, and then Saudi contacts Russia to offer them guarantees about oil and gas prices if only they'll let this one slide. How odd.

"I should know I've done risk management for Shell."

You haven't done shit for anyone. You can barely string a sentence together.

"Countries do not rip themselves apart because new infrastructure is proposed."

Do you think that's why Assad is defending himself against an onslaught by jihadis, because of a pipeline? LOL. He's fighting for his life.

"The war on Assad is a war fought to remove a Secular (vaguely socialist but now neoliberal) leader and to replace him with a theocratic Sunni."

Well done, but it isn't the only reason.

"Turkey, Qatar, UK, US are all in on it."

Well done again. Good boy. Except the US and UK do not want another theocracy. So only half points there.

"Israel"

BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT

The last thing Israel wants is a chemical weapons armed suicidal Islamic state on its border.

"This is the subtext of all these Arab Spring events."

BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT

The people rose up because of democracy, whiskey, sexy. Then the Islamists hijacked the movements and everyone got screwed.

"ban this Nastiest Plonker."

Ban me for making Dan look like a prick over and over again.

Dan said...

You have repeatedly made incorrect statements. Your idea that this war is about a pipeline route is conspiracy theory bullshit. There is an article in the guardian by a dr Nazeem Summatorother. He's been peddling the the idea for a year or so.

The Muslims take their Fitna seriously. They want to dispose of irreligious leaders like Assad and replace them with Fundamentaist theocrats and in the process exterminate the last remaining Christians from their midst.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 15:18

"The Sunni rebels in Syria have been blasting pipelines for years. The first attacks started in 2011."

Which is when the war started. Note how they were not doing it before then.

"The Shiites have targeted at various times spigots all over Arabia."

With the result that the Government cracks down on them, which is why they almost never attack the pipelines.

"The Arab Spring as it manifested itself in Algeria was also an attempt by Sunnis to remove a Shiite led pro Iran government. It had fuck all to do with pipelines and looked a lot like the current fight in Syria."

Who said the Arab Spring had anything to do with pipelines?

I'm not sure if you're trying to be a parody of someone who has been hit on the head repeatedly with a claw hammer or not.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 15:29

"You have repeatedly made incorrect statements."

Except I haven't.

"Your idea that this war is about a pipeline route is conspiracy theory bullshit."

At least my conspiracy theories make sense, unlike the absolutely fucking shit you guise come up with.

"There is an article in the guardian by a dr Nazeem Summatorother. He's been peddling the the idea for a year or so."

I'm not interested in reading a Guardian article by someone called Nazeem Summatorother. And nor should you. Jews own the media, right? (except when it suits you).

"The Muslims take their Fitna seriously. They want to dispose of irreligious leaders like Assad and replace them with Fundamentaist theocrats and in the process exterminate the last remaining Christians from their midst."

Especially when there are billions to be made from a gas pipeline.

Dan said...

The behaviour displayed by Obama and McCain in support of Morsi in Egypt is a strong indication that the US/UK want theocrats in power. Erdogan is a fundamentalist too and he keeps getting more and more support from the US. Fundamentalist regimes are the Democratic expression of the will of most Muslim countries. Any fool supporting democracy in Arab lands is simply supporting theocratic takeover.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 15:35

"The behaviour displayed by Obama and McCain in support of Morsi in Egypt is a strong indication that the US/UK want theocrats in power."

Since the Suez Canal is essential to the well being of Europe and hence America, what you're saying is that the Governments of those very countries would want to trade the predictable, purchasable loyalty of a secular dictator who can be trusted to keep the canal open for an Insane Islamist who cannot. LOL.

"Erdogan is a fundamentalist too and he keeps getting more and more support from the US."

Since US support for Turkey hit rock bottom after their failure to allow Allied planes to use their bases for teh invasion of Iraq, the only direction the support can go is upwards.

Calculus said...

I was talking to a mining engineer involved in fracking technology. He said that there are huge reserves of oil under the us soil.
I asked if he was sure, if he could fool himself or be fooled by others for 'any reasons'. Nope, he was pretty sure.
The oil cannot be retrieved without that 'fracking' technology, so I thought the end price at the pump would be prohibitively high, 'not even' he said and added it should be at 'same price or slightly higher than today's price at the pump'.
Of course it could be higher, but that would have nothing to do with the cost of fracking.

So the US knows they could have their own oil if necessary.

Dan said...

The US Government won't exploit energy resources for a variety of reasons.

One critically important factor is the Ecology Movement, which actually does have considerable power. This movement is hostile to capitalism, it's also hostile to the founding population (white) of the US. God forbid some grimy white guys drill a hole and extract a fortune out of the ground. That leads to independence and self reliance. Instead it is much more interesting to flit about in the ME and get embroiled in sectarian disputes and stab Christians there in the back.

Did anyone see Blair's craven call to arms against Assad? What is his problem with Baathists?

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Calculus 16:07

The US has been weening itself off foreign oil for a decade now and will become a Net energy exporter within about six years and will produce more than Saudi. OPEC are, of course, shitting themselves, and if you are wondering why Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds have been buying everything up of late, wonder no more. The days of the Middle Eastern countries deriving their entire income from oil are coming to an end.

I always laugh at the idiots who think that the Iraq war was about oil.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 16:16

"which actually does have considerable power"

So powerful in fact that they have been unable to prevent the fracking industry driving ahead at full speed.

"stab Christians there in the back."

Yeah. The US Green Movement is forcing the US government to spend billions of dollars on getting rid of the Middle East's Christian communities.

LOLOL

This guy's even better than The Truth Will Out who, incidentally, is currently experiencing much butthurt, apparently.

anti viral said...

I like the hungarians too, I just wish their attitude spread thru out europe, the prime minister has balls, the way it should be, its amazing how quickly things change once the virus is expelled.

All symptoms come to griding halt, all the countries in europe should chase out the virus

Sponge Cake said...

O/T

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/over-4-000-to-become-new-irish-citizens-1.1507162

Sponge Cake said...

The Mask slips.

Mr Shatter, who initiated the citizenship ceremonies, said he was considering legislation to establish them on a permanent footing, to ensure they continue after his term in office

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Sponge Cake 17:17

Can he enact this legislation himself, or does it require the Irish parliament?

Anonymous said...

Unfortunately, they [Russia] are not our friend.

Are they anti-white?

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 18:07

Is white all we are, or do we have other traits?

Dan said...

Well, that's what is actually happening. It's irrational but it's actually what the US government has been doing. The left in the US is motivated by one thing. Getting rid of white Christians. In their guise of being socialists, ACLU, SPLC, Greens, Commies, black groups like the NAACP or NOI. This is the modus operandi of the left in the US, which for all intents and purposes runs the US government. They cackle with delight every time a white city turns black or when a new report is published about the demographic demise of the white christian in the US. Why would they approach it any differently when they see an opportunity to sweep away the oldest settled community of relatively white Christians anywhere in the world?

Dan said...

The only concrete result of the deposition of Saddam Hussien is the extinction of Christianity in Iraq. It's one demographic fact that screams out as to the consequences of US policy promoting democracy. The singular result of French, British and AmerIcan intervention in Syria will be the extinction of Syria's Christian population. It's irrational for the west to do this, but you must keep in mind that in the higher reaches of government we are often dealing with zealots. We know that the Sauds are zealots. They think in religious terms.

Anonymous said...

BUDAPEST, Aug 27 (Reuters) - Hungary's Bank Association said on Tuesday it was ready to bear most of the burden of providing relief to foreign currency borrowers with a scheme of its own costing the banks several hundred billion forints.

Bank Association Chairman Mihaly Patai said the plan would be spread over several years and meet the government's requirement for a drastic reduction in borrowers' monthly repayments.

The government, preparing for elections next year, said last month that it wants to get rid of foreign currency mortgages that have turned into a millstone round the necks of many Hungarians with housing and other loans mainly in Swiss francs.

Earlier measures ordered by the government in 2011 caused big losses to banks, but alleviated only partly the plight of many people with foreign currency mortgages caused by heavy depreciation of the forint.

The country's mostly foreign-owned banks, which had feared the new programme could inflict further hefty losses on them, presented their own proposals to Economy Minister Mihaly Varga on Tuesday.

Anonymous said...

Is white all we are, or do we have other traits?

Does the Russian state promote white genocide?

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 18:29

They appear to be filling their country up with Muslims, so I guess they do.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 18:17

"The left in the US is motivated by one thing. Getting rid of white Christians."

Their primary motivation is getting rid of right wing people. There are plenty of left wing Christians.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 18:23

"It's one demographic fact that screams out as to the consequences of US policy promoting democracy."

The persecution of Christians in Iraq was not a consequence of the invasion. It was a consequence of Muslims hating Christians.

"The singular result of French, British and AmerIcan intervention in Syria will be the extinction of Syria's Christian population."

Nope. If the Christians in Syria re persecuted it will be a consequence of Muslims hating Christians.

"They think in religious terms."

Lime most people here.

Sponge Cake said...


@NU

Can he enact this legislation himself, or does it require the Irish parliament?


"Legislation will generally be initiated in either House by the Government but parliamentary procedures also allow Opposition parties and Independent Members to introduce Bills which are called "Private Members' Bills". In the vast majority of cases Private Members' Bills do not succeed in progressing beyond the Second Stage debate, but a few have in fact become law.

Each House has identical procedures for processing Bills. However, Money Bills which deal with taxation and expenditure and Bills to amend the Constitution can only be initiated in the Dáil. Otherwise, the legislative process can begin in either House. There are five stages in considering a Bill, of which second and third stages are the most important.

The Second stage of a Bill consists of a general debate on the principles of the Bill and Members may refer not only to what is in the Bill but to what could relevantly be put into the Bill. At Third (Committee ) Stage, a Bill is examined section by section and it is open to each House to modify the Bill by way of amendment. However, only a Minister or Minister of State can propose an amendment in either House which could have the effect of imposing or increasing a money charge upon the people or State Boards. Ministers and Ministers of State may attend and be heard in Seanad Éireann where Government amendments to Bills are proposed from the Chair. On the Fourth (Report) Stage further amendments, which arise out of the Third Stage can be made to the Bill and on the Fifth Stage the debate is confined to the contents of the Bill".

Anonymous said...

The U.S., U.K., and Irish governments all promote white genocide.

We all have much worse, and much closer enemies than the Russian state, if indeed enemy it is.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Sponge Cake 18:51

Sweet. So it's up the Irish government to make it law.

potgieter said...

Of course the CIA also helped Saddam Hussein to attack his own civilians with chemical weapons. But that was then, this is now, heh?

Eimear said...

Nastiest, you keep making disparaging responses to Dan's question. But I think it's valid and you have not answered it. The main question being - why would the Saudis want to build a pipeline across that very dodgy territory when there are so many other sensible alternatives?

You may answer 'because they just do'. But do you know that? As far as I can see they have never said that as such. So a bit more respect from you would be in order please.

Dan said...

The extinction of Christianity in Mesopotamia was quite clearly caused by deposing Saddam. Saddam's right hand man was a Christian.

Dan said...

Secular dictatorships or militry juntas are the only institutions the west ought to be promoting in the ME.kingdoms and democracies there enable our temporal and spiritual enemies. It's that simple.

Dan said...

Keep in mind that Obama would like to disarm white Americans (invariably Christians) and arm some brown Arabs in the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda. Keep your eye on that as you watch the Syriac Christians getting butchered.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 18:07

Is white all we are, or do we have other traits?


27 August 2013 18:17

Once again ... who is this "we", jewboy?

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Christ, the amount of hasbarat posts I've had to disable over the last day or two, is alarming.

Obviously the cheque came through yesterday. Amazing how much energy those pot noodles give one, eh?

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Further down from Winston Smith's article on Cromwell, in the comments section, there's this little gem:

http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/oliver-cromwell-king-of-jews.html?zx=b0d93f9f028261a0

Anonymous25 January 2013 06:46

"Strictly speaking it is INCORRECT to call an Ancient Israelite a Jew or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).

"Edom (read that "Kenites", sons of Cain) is in Modern Jewry" ~ The Jewish Encyclopedia 1905 edition

Rabbi Stephen Wise, one of the main Jewish leaders in the United States a few years ago, stated that when the Jews returned to Jerusalem from Babylon (with a small remnant of the True Israelites), about 536 B.C., they brought with them the teachings which became known as the Babylonian Talmud. "THIS WAS THE END OF HEBRAISM AND THE BEGINNING OF JUDAISM", the learned Rabbi stated. (This is when the Jews usurped the identity of the tribe of Judah, one of the twelve tribes of True Israel. The Jews have never been Israelites) !!!

"JEWS BEGAN TO CALL THEMSELVES HEBREWS AND ISRAELITES IN 1860". ~ Encyclopedia Judaica 1971 Vol 10:23 (They were Edomites/Kenites (sons of Cain) before that, hmmm, how did they change their DNA/genes in the 19th century???) !!!!!

Dr. Abba Hillel Silver, a well known Jew, when writing in the Jewish publication, Liberal Judaism, January, 1949, about the newly created state of (fake) Israel declared: "FOR THE CURSE OF CAIN, the curse of being an outcast and a wanderer over the face of the earth has been removed..." !!! (He just told you ALL JEWS are from their father Cain which was fathered by the Serpent of Genesis 3:14,15) !!!!!

“Zionism is Judaism, and Judaism is unthinkable without Zionism.” (Harper’s Encyclopedia of United States History, Vol. X, “Zionists”).

“Some call it Marxism (Communism), I call it Judaism.” – Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise - The American Bulletin, May 5, 1935. (Judaism is nothing but disguised, camouflaged Communism, therefore, Zionism is nothing but disguised, camouflaged Communism) !!!


UN
.

Anonymous said...

Masters of slight-of-hand and misdirection - the chosen have made excellent stage magicians.....from Houdini to David Blain/Uri Geller.

I have noticed our own hasbarat uses the same racial skill-set on this blog as his brethren are doing from their positions of power. His tireless defense of his own race (OK it also brings in the shekels)is something whites can learn from.

Rick

Anonymous said...

"Psychopaths indeed"

Quite.

Anonymous said...

"The community organiser from Chicago is now on the warpath."

"You know, I honestly don't believe so. I believe that he's totally captive to the Real Government and is doing this largely against his will."

Agree.

Anonymous said...

There are multiple actors in this
- US
- UK
- France
- Israel
- Saudis
- Gulf States
- Turkey
etc

They all have their own reasons and some will have multiple reasons so there's no *single* reason, pipeline or otherwise.

Israel's reason for wanting Assad toppled is Iran. They need to get the Americans to attack Iran before the US loses the will or ability to do so. They can worry about the consequences of a jihadist-controlled Syria later.

Anonymous said...

"You know, I honestly don't believe so. I believe that he's totally captive to the Real Government and is doing this largely against his will."

As an aside I think this means Obama will be the last brown muslim they'll promote for President.

Keiser said...

UN said...
"Once again ... who is this "we", jewboy?

UN"


It seems to be a habit they have UN. For example, a quotation from that article that Sponge Cake linked to about Shatter...

“It is truly remarkable that this tiny island at the edge of Western Europe facing into the Atlantic Ocean which is home to us all has, as its citizens, as members of the national family, people who came to live with us from every country on this planet”

Alan Shatter - Cunt Extraordinaire

"us" indeed

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Uncle Nasty 21:05

"Once again ... who is this "we", jewboy?"

The answer's in the question, my old Alzheimer sufferer: Is white all we are, or do we have other traits?

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dan 19:48

And he's still alive and well.

You still don't understand cause and effect though.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Eimear 19:22

"The main question being - why would the Saudis want to build a pipeline across that very dodgy territory when there are so many other sensible alternatives?"

So many other sensible alternatives? There are no other sensible alternatives. Which I suppose is why they want to build it across Syria.

Anonymous said...

Butthead: So Obama wants to go to war so he can lay some pipe in Syria.

Beavis: HeHenh. Syria released some gas.

Butthead: Hahuh. I think that's how Michelle has to turn him on.

Beavis: HaHenh, HaHehenh. Syria must have eaten those school lunches.

Anonymous said...

Is white all we are, or do we have other traits?

What other traits would whites need before you object to white genocide?

James said...

So many other sensible alternatives? There are no other sensible alternatives. Which I suppose is why they want to build it across Syria.

Mr Pipeline expert.
Did you write the feasibility study?

Dan said...

The Saudis have plenty of ways to get their oil and gas to customers. They sell a great deal of their wares to Israel on the sly. One pipeline mysteriously ends in Jordan according to the maps, but that's not quite the whole story.

Anyway, the best pipeline for the Saudis would be to build it crossing Sinai and have a spigot in Ismaelia or Suez. Even then people do not go to war over the route of pipelines. That's not enough of a motivation to risk losing a war. Name a country anywhere in the world and their you will find resources worth a fortune that could be fought over.

Instead what you are looking at in Syria is the end game for Christianity in the Levant. That is a cause that will get every Sunni properly motivated, especially because it will also mean the Jihadis get to butcher Alawites.

Dan said...

Btw y'all, the Alawites say that they are Shiites. The reality is that they are Crypto-Christian. A lot of them are paleface whites as well. The Sunnis flooding the area are full blooded Arabs.

Anonymous said...

bottom line savant, we will dispose of assad and kiss the rebels ass then we will have to fight the rebels,never ends, john old rtd chicago copper....

Anonymous said...

If Iran is attacked, it will be Israel that does it, not the US. US does not have contingency plans to bomb Iran: they only have plans to deal with any fallout caused by Israel bombing Iran. Israel may do an Osirak on Iran, and word is that they already made a dry run...

JP

Anonymous said...

This:

http://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/africa/4502-sudan-accuses-israel-of-bombing-raid-on-arms-factory-in-khartoum

JP

Shaunantijihad said...

Our enemies are filling our lands with non-White babies.

Therefore...

Have more White babies.