Friday, 9 August 2013

Britain's (sic) most wanted tax dodgers

I see that HM Revenue and Customs have issued a list, complete with photos, of the 20 most wanted tax offenders. Now we all know the untold benefits that Britain gets from diversity and mass immigration.  Why PM Cameron never misses an opportunity to remind us.

I was astounded therefore to see that of the twenty specimens not one, not a single one, was British. They were from the usual Turd World hell holes and two were from Ireland. Well done lads, you make us all sooooooo proud. It seems most were given bail, allowed keep their passports, and, lo and behold, they skipped the country.  Another resounding triumph for the British legal system.

One disappointing aspect of the report related to the comments, almost none of which referred to the astounding fact that all of 'Britain's' most wanted tax cheats are non British.  Hopefully this reflects the activities of zealous moderators rather than the actual views of the readers.

176 comments:

St Nilus said...

And of course these tax dodgers are small fry compared to some..

I was goimg over to the Telegraph blogs , havent commented there for a couple of months , turns out there's nowt worth commenting on. But this from Daniel Hannan is worth a look:

"...It’s a fascinating phenomenon, this determination to infer odium. It has always been there – George Orwell and Karl Popper, among others, wrote about it – but the Internet in general, and Twitter in particular, have made it more palpable and more immediate. If you aver that the deficit is too high, you ‘hate’ the poor. If you opine that the international aid budget is ineffective, you ‘hate’ people with dark skins. If you argue that Twitter should not be browbeaten by Labour politicians, you ‘hate’ women.

What is interesting here is not the wildly false nature of what is being claimed: that, I hope, does not need stating. No, the really interesting thing is the element of projection. The merest glance at Twitter profiles reveals an asymmetry of hatred. Look at how many people happily declare ‘hates Tories’, ‘hates capitalism’ and the like. Sure, you can find one or two ‘hates socialism’, but it’s much, much rarer.
I’m not for a moment suggesting that all Lefties think this way: I have Labour friends who are motivated by a more or less uncomplicated desire to help the disadvantaged.

Indeed, many of these fair-minded Lefties have written intriguingly about the asymmetry of hatred: LEFTY JEW Nick Cohen wrote a whole book about it, in which he recalled the shock he felt, as a 14-year old, on learning that his teacher, whom he knew to be a decent and fair-minded man, voted Conservative.
On one level, the logic is hilarious: ‘I’m a nice person who doesn’t hate anyone, you think the opposite of me, therefore I hate you.’ It leads to extraordinary forms of doublethink. ‘I refuse to read the Daily Mail because it’s so prejudiced!’ ‘There should be ZERO TOLERANCE for intolerant bigots’. You get this kind of thing, not just from angry students, but from otherwise intelligent writers.

Toby Young gives the example of Caitlin Moran, whom I find rather brilliant, campaigning against Twitter trolls despite having Tweeted ‘Please end this brilliant monologue by running a sword through Toby Young’s face’. Similarly, I remember Charlie Brooker writing a pompous Guardian column ticking people off for Internet nastiness shortly after declaring ‘James Delingpole is a w*nk-writing f*ck-of-a-sh*t’.
You can just about see the reasoning. ‘Ah, but Toby Young and James Delingpole are evil Right-wingers. When I said we should stop being unpleasant, I didn’t mean about them.’ Fair enough, but makes the whole Rightists-are-nasty-Leftists-are-nice shtick all the harder to understand."

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100229359/now-right-wingers-are-supposed-to-hate-the-entire-planet/

St Nilus said...

Speaking of Telegraph bloggers :


Tim Stanley, Heretic or Kafir?

http://biasedbbc.org/blog/2013/08/08/tim-stanley-heretic-or-kafir/

St Nilus said...

How the Jews Won the West

The key to Jewish power rests principally on two things: control of banking and finance, and control of mass media. One is used as a tool to enslave us physically, the other mentally. Over the past hundred years they have gained almost a complete monopoly on them both throughout the world, especially in the West. In order to grasp the full extent of Jewish power today and understand how they have acquired it, one needs to look briefly at the history of banking, beginning with the Bank of England...

http://www.dailystormer.com/how-the-jews-won-the-west/

St Nilus said...

An interesting call to Mike Sledge here from a guy in Illinois

"Tonight on Reconstructions Live I will be discussing affirmative action and the economic apartheid that has been put in place to keep the white man out of the new communist/corporate zio control grid. Plus your phone calls. "

@ 63 min 44 sec :

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/renegadebroadcasting/2013/08/09/reconstructions-live-w-mike-sledge

St Nilus said...

Seems Im the only one around tonight- o yeah , just remembered, Im a "Nazi Hater" with no friends or girlfriend and it's Friday night!

Great little comment here:

johnslattery

" Don't be 'sad.' Don't be nice. Don't try and "justify" rightwing views. Many--not all, but a very significant hard core--far lefties are vicious, stupid, hate-filled traitors, who have never owned a business, employed anybody or in many cases done a useful job of any kind. They would quite literally hand over our nation to a semi-literate horde of Third World scroungers, to further their own aim, which is to get power over all of us. So many on the right still seems to treat this struggle as a kind of sixth-form debating contest, and everybody will go out and have a few pints together afterwards. It isn't. It's a war. The hard left are the enemies of inherent human decency, common sense and the natural order. They are as malevolent and dangerous to us as the Soviet Politburo was in the 1970s. For all our sakes, let us treat them as such."

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100229359/now-right-wingers-are-supposed-to-hate-the-entire-planet/#comment-985589264

St Nilus said...

What a CUNT. Comments , of course, are closed:

Islam is way more English than the EDL
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100230090/islam-is-way-more-english-than-the-edl/


Thoughts on "Tim Stanley" here:

http://biasedbbc.org/blog/2013/08/08/tim-stanley-heretic-or-kafir/#comment-303884

Anonymous said...

Britain's guilt over its evil colonial past, and its obsession with diversity and multiculturalism, spelled its doom decades ago. It has truly lost its way. The UK is pathetic.
A walk around the UK's major cities and towns is indeed sobering. How can Britain's native Anglo-Saxons and Celts not see what is happening? If something's not done NOW,their country will be gone, forever. It is the people who make a nation and a culture. And given the birthrates of the Turd World residents of Britain, the UK will soon no longer be recognizable.

St Nilus said...

Can you imagine any brown tribe being ASHAMED that it was the BEST at sailing , exploring , fighting , strategy , organisation ,logistics , engineering , invention , bravery ,conquering , etc etc etc?

So I say:

What's that ominous creaking sound , jewboy?

That's a HUGE pendulum swinging back towards you ...

Essex boy said...

Stick around Nilus. Your comments are always a joy! Except when you point out how everyone appearing on TV is either a jew or black or gay or disabled - anything but white like us.

St Nilus said...

They DO see what is happening: But they have been shown scapegoats like Emma West as an example to STFU !

Those soaps that the women love , are NOT JUST DUMB ENTERTAINMENT!

NOTHING IS !

The WORST thing anyone can be called in PC World is a "rayciss" , then a "homophobe" , then a "sexiss" , and so on.

Pretty soon , dumb women will be coddling paedos like they coddle and worship queers now.

" Leave him alone ! He cant help how he was born! YOU HORRIBLE PAEDOPHOBE!"

Just a matter of time and engineering.
And they are fucking good at that.

St Nilus said...

Thanks , Essex. Ive literally got nothing better to do. My realisation of all this has surely cohen-cided with a time when jews have come out of the shadows and into the presenters seat , as it were. Was it like this in the 70's when I was a kid?

Esther Rantzen...Lionel Blair ..that Freud wanker that did the dog-food ads ..Mike and Bernie Winters..

You know , I didnt like jews even as a kid , even before I knew what a jew was. My mum's the same..built-in jewdar. I always hated that "American" shit: Happy Days , Laverne and Shirley , Mork and Mindy , etc .

Turns out it was all KIKE SHITE.

At least our 70's queers seemed like they might be nice people , like Larry Grayson , John Inman , even Frankie Howard...not like these despicable fuckers such as Graham Norton ( nasty queen) or Micheal Barrymore , etc..

James said...

Personally I don't care if someone stops the govt stealing money off them.

Note that they use darkies in these lists so that the public will hate "tax cheats" more. Therefore they will love paying tax more.

This is pure propaganda to make us love our servitude, and to think that paying tax is somehow patriotic. Giving money to these govts is what is destroying the white race. We should all follow their example. Tax protest is a legitimate right when expressing a grievance against a tyranny, is it not?

Also, think of all the money these people saved brits who bought cheap booze and cigarettes.

St Nilus said...

Mathew Norman is a gluttonous kike who gets paid to complain about the Michelin-starred food he gets to eat for free.

He also writes for the Guardiograph:

"..
It needs no spelling out that the Muslim world is dramatically less wealthy and academically well served than the West as a whole, and the Oxbridge candidate pool in particular. Whether he was being casually racist is another question, and not a particularly relevant or intriguing one. As he pointed out in his own defence, while scurrying away from the original tweet in a craven and effete version of Knock Down Ginger, Islam is a religion, not a race. So is Judaism, of course, and one doubts he would have the courage to make any such incendiary remark about “the Jews”.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10233530/Come-in-Agent-Dawkins-your-job-is-done.html

St Nilus said...

"This is pure propaganda to make us love our servitude, and to think that paying tax is somehow patriotic. Giving money to these govts is what is destroying the white race. We should all follow their example. Tax protest is a legitimate right when expressing a grievance against a tyranny, is it not?"

Good point James. And who came up with that " Protestant Work Ethic" crap?

Seems like a mantra for happy servitude.

However , it's not. Its just been perverted. I for one am happiest when building or creating something WORTHWHILE and meaningful.

Even clearing out some messy fucker's shed or garage or attic , I LOVE it!

Better still , making your own home / whatever. One thing that the more "primative" people have got right , (and it ties in with ALL OF NATURE) : Dont waste energy. Look at your cat.

A stretch here , a quick lick of the armpits and ZAP: another lovely snooze .

In my utopia there is a 3 day working week with flexitime: Let the earlybirds get up at 5am , and the rest of us can roll in at lunch.

James said...

St Nilus said:
An interesting call to Mike Sledge here from a guy in Illinois

"Tonight on Reconstructions Live I will be discussing affirmative action and the economic apartheid that has been put in place to keep the white man out of the new communist/corporate zio control grid. Plus your phone calls. "

@ 63 min 44 sec :

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/renegadebroadcasting/2013/08/09/reconstructions-live-w-mike-sledge


Thanks for that like St Nilus.

Renegade Radio was started by Kyle Hunt too, and he is very good.

http://www.startheoryradio.com/

He makes a good point of the fact that the older generation has left the younger white generation (what little of it exists) out in the cold.

Unfortunately, his game plan won't work. He's already told them.

Mike Sledge is honest and truthful. He said he doesn't know what to do about it all.

James said...

I'm listening to Mike Sledge and that caller St Nilus recommended. We all feel the same.

Nastiestuncle is like some extreme version of Socrates. He might think that's a compliment- but it's not.

Socrates was sentenced to death basically because he was annoying. He admitted it too. He likened himself to the gadfly annoying a lazy horse. He could have easily escaped his fate but he gladly drunk the poison.

His mission was to make people examine the meaning of common concepts like bravery, cowardice, virtue, shame, holiness, unholiness, etc. He got people to realise that they didn't know as much as they thought they did. Unfortunately, Socrates didn't have any answers either. He failed.

Nastiestuncle follows the program of Socrates, but in a corrupted and foul model of it. He doesn't appear to doubt his own ideas, but ridicules everyone else. That's all he does.

Socrates was wrong. Wittgenstein proved that there are two types of thinking, fast (instinctual, emotional, physical) and slow (analytical, logical). How does a tennis player know where the ball is? Does he work it out? No, of course not. Does he need physics? No.

How many books do you need to read to realise what our racial enemies are doing to us. It's plain as day. Every focus of their being is towards getting something from the White race.

Its the same with our struggle. Figuring out that the white race has enemies is like receiving serve in tennis. It's obvious. It's almost axiomatic.

Figuring out how to fix the problem is going to take both types of thinking, for sure.

Nastiestuncle thinks reason and logic prevail over all. He is completely mistaken in that regard.

St Nilus said...

James: Im a big fan of audios and podcasts ( you can get shit done while listening) its a shame that there arent more British ones I can listen to ( but there are some "green shoots" as they say.

Mamis shit was/ is a great aggregator , but I find myself less and less interested in the stuff they post. For example , David Duke talking to Don Black?

(scroll down less than half way)

http://grizzom.blogspot.co.uk/

Nowadays I cant listen to Darryl Bradford Smith ( he seems to have quit anyway) or Mark muzzie-luvvin Glen or David Duke or , loads of things. I dont care whose "real " or not , I hate mainstream radio and I want to listen to people talking about jews and niggers , so I listen to the Guido Bodybuilders at Truth Militia , and Scott Roberts/ Andrew Anglin and co ( yeah I already said I dont care !) and sometimes nutty Tim Rifat for a laugh. The longer you have been in this strange world , the less BS you can tolerate , I find.

It's the only way I can get a magnificent Weiner-sized hard-on that I can text to NU .

As far as I am concerned , it's the fuckin joos and the blacks on TV are not like the ones who rape your granny.

Mike Delaney's Prothink Radio Show 8-5-2013
http://grizzom.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/mike-delaneys-prothink-radio-show-8-5.html

Scott Roberts and Andrew Anglin debate the "jew conspiracy" vs " the biological jew imperative" :

"Last night, I stepped into the octagon to debate the nature of the Jewish problem with Scott Roberts.

Basically, Scott believes in a massive, all-encompassing global Jewish conspiracy which entails a secret plan, and I don’t. The conversation got a little bit circular, but all things considered, I think it was a productive discussion.

Let us know your thoughts on the matter.

Here is the mp3."

http://www.totalfascism.com/in-the-octagon-scott-roberts-vs-andrew-anglin/

St Nilus said...

Great stuff , James. Quite the brain you have got!

James said...

I dont care whose "real " or not , I hate mainstream radio and I want to listen to people talking about jews and niggers

Dude, I can hardly type I'm laughing so much..

James said...

It's the only way I can get a magnificent Weiner-sized hard-on that I can text to NU .

You're killing me.

St Nilus said...

The answer , my friend , is blowing in the...."

My family knows what's happening. They are NOT happy.

My neighbour , likewise.

The people she works with : Ditto.

If I CAN CHANGE ( long haired pot-head groovy one-world I-want-to-have-kids-with-a-black-woman-Nazi-Hating lefty TWAT ) then anyone can.

And social changes tend to happen rapidly , not gradually. 2 years ago the Daily Mohel would have been all over Godfrey Bloom , but instead , they stuck up for him. A BILLION POUNDS a MONTH to foreign NIGGERS?

IN A RECESSION ?

AND WE ARE SUPPOSED TO APPLAUD ? ( most do , unfortunately)

Anyway , I used to be a pot-head that shuddered at the bit in the movie of "The Wall" where the skinheads pull a nigger out of a car off a White girl ...to paraphrase Zimmerman once more :

" Oh I was so much stupider then , I'm wiser than that now .."

James said...

At the moment the pressure is just building towards saturation.

We are in a cloud chamber waiting for the condensation nuclei to form.

Then something will happen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_chamber

[Please forgive the Wikipedia link, but I don't think the Jews have changed this page. It looks legit.]

James said...

We must all read more history books.

Those ignorant of History are doomed to repeat it.

We must understand that our enemies know their own history very well, and re-use their tried and true methods on their ignorant victims time after time.

St Nilus said...

Looks like the " Biased BBC " site are pussies :

" The problem , as ever, with Jew hating conspiracy theories is that all the ‘culprits’ named are secular Jews (as where the Jewish intellectuals in the Bolshevik party and later the Frankfurt school) and are neither informed by or seek to promote their erstwhile ‘faith’.
Plus of course the obvious paradox that ,if the international cabal of Jews is so powerful, how have they achieve so little for the well being of their co-religionists?
But you are entitled to your view and will, to some extent, have the support of the bourgeois liberal left that seek to defend the BBC on here, as attested to by their predictable response to your posts"

MEH

ME : " Well , there is zero response to my posts , presumably because it’s 3 am on a Friday night: Im sure most people have better things to do. Anyway “secular” jews are still jews , so , what is your point?

If this is just another “ITS THE MUSLIMS” blog then I will gladly leave you all to it. And Im no fan of muslims.

Maybe you are the “BBC hating” branch of the EDL?

Is Danny Cohen ( BBC Boss) a muslim? A secular jew ? An observant jew ?

Is Jonathan Levi (ITV) a muslim ?

Is David Abraham ( Channel 4 ) a muslim?

Is Richard Desmond (Channel 5) a muslim pornographer or a jewish one ?

Are these questions irrelevant?

Here’s a debate about the “totally unfounded and nonsensical idea that jews are anything but der little haberdashers who survived the Naaazis” . If you can be bothered:

“Last night, I stepped into the octagon to debate the nature of the Jewish problem with Scott Roberts.

Basically, Scott believes in a massive, all-encompassing global Jewish conspiracy which entails a secret plan, and I don’t. The conversation got a little bit circular, but all things considered, I think it was a productive discussion.”

http://www.totalfascism.com/in-the-octagon-scott-roberts-vs-andrew-anglin/

Here is an article that you probably wont read :

How the Jews Won the West
http://www.dailystormer.com/how-the-jews-won-the-west/

anyway , I politely bid you all adieu , good luck in bashing the “biased bbc” with a wet feather.

Shalom , pussies."

http://biasedbbc.org/blog/2013/08/08/tim-stanley-heretic-or-kafir/comment-page-1/#comment-303930

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Some advice for those who have their savings in an EU or Brit bank.

Be afraid.

http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2013/08/09/global-looting-the-new-eu-bailin-law-was-passed-8-days-ago-did-you-notice/

Revealed: official details on how the EU will steal from us

Are you a citizen with rights, or just a helpless crustacean?

Three beaming eurocrats – Barroso, Van Rompuy and Lithuanian Dalia Grybauskaite – emerged triumphant from a session two days ago, in which they mapped out the biggest bank heist in world history. This is to put flesh on the eurozone law hastily passed on August 1st (while EU citizens were on holiday) to deal with the (inevitability) event of a bank collapse. Under this draft proposal – which many expect to be applied to the entire EU – no depositor big or small will in future be able to feel safe with money deposited in a bank.

The Slog now calls for those who represent us, across the entire cultural spectrum of European society – to do something.

In a barely read piece a month ago, the International Business Times reported on the rapidly drafted new EU law for “overhauling its policy on how banks receive bumper bailouts”. Be aware: this is an EU move, not a eurozone move: it is already law (it passed on August 1st) and although for now it applies only to the eurozone, it is an EU law. Hardly anyone has commented on this, but the approach being taken matches word for word the 3-card trick George Osborne used six weeks ago when he said:

“In future, taxpayers will not be called upon to bail banks out. It will be down to the creditors and the owners”.

The most remarkable example of double-speak to date, at the time I pointed out that creditors are taxpayers (they’re account holders, simple as that) and so as the Establishments daren’t ask us for higher taxes to bail out their mates in the banking system, they will take it via, if you like, Direct Debit. It is exactly the same principle of stealing the Troika wishes to apply to Greek private pension funds.


On second thoughts, don't be afraid.
Be fucking terrified.

UN
.

St Nilus said...

An oldie but a goodie :

“Still run by queers and jews?” Chegwin

“I beg your pardon , what?” Gervais

” The BBC. Still run by yer queers and jews is it?” Chegwin

” Well , there..are..some ..er ..homosexuals and some jewish people here , yes. Why ? ” Gervais

( Gervais’s character eventually gets browbeaten by his gay and jewish bosses into dumbing down his comedy show)

Ho ho . Ironic , self aware / double irony. Win win .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=klXUOM4wtT8

James said...

www.imdb.com

Isla Lang Fisher was born on February 3, 1976 to Scottish parents in the Middle Eastern country of Oman. Her family moved to Australia in the early 1980s. From a young age, Isla showed an interest in both acting and writing. At nine years old, she was appearing in Australian TV commercials. She landed some small parts in the Australian television...

So Borat married a scot? That's anti-Semitic of him.

It isn't.--nastiesuncle

You're right. She's not Scottish.

Crazy.--nastiestuncle

St Nilus said...

Isla Fisher converted to jism to marry her chosen one.

Speaking of jism , I bet youve all seen this, right?

Harmless fun and hi-jinks in the sun, hey , you square , it's just willies and bums..:

Brighton Pride in 5 years:

http://www.zombietime.com/folsom_sf_2007_part_1/

St Nilus said...

Has anyone noticed how the BBC starts it's news reports about Oombongo with statement like " President Obama has announced..."

They never say , " The President of the USA , Barak Obama , today said.."

They dont do this with Putin. They didnt do this with G W Bush.

I guess he's a President for ALL of us ...

James said...

Isla Fisher converted to jism to marry her chosen one.

She looks a bit like Carrie Fisher to me. Whatever. Doesn't matter.

James said...

President Obama has announced

You are just jealous because he's got a higher IQ than you have. He must have because his status is higher, he makes more money, and he gets more shit done.

He's got a Nobel Prize too, so he's better than you. He's the Tiger Woods of politics, and there aint gonna be no body's gonna do politicking better than he is right now unnastanwahahtibesayin?.

James said...


Harmless fun and hi-jinks in the sun, hey , you square , it's just willies and bums..:

Brighton Pride in 5 years:

http://www.zombietime.com/folsom_sf_2007_part_1/


Yeah first saw it on Henry Makow's site.

It's good information for kids.--nastiestuncle

But Uncle Nastiest, that man's diddle is all blurry, is that because of AIDs?--some poor kid

No, my little congloloid nephew - that is because of Vladimir Putin restricting information.--nastiestuncle

Vladimir Putin sounds like a very bad man, Uncle NastiestUncle--same poor dumb kid

He is.--nastiestuncle

St Nilus said...

"All the whites in the movie are grasping, evil, and venal."

http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/07/the-lone-ranger/

Uncle Nasty said...

Here's a politician who really gets it:-

http://ozziesaffa.blogspot.co.nz/2013/08/usa-rep-keith-ellison-theres-plenty-of.html

07 August 2013
USA: Rep. Keith Ellison - There's Plenty of Money and 'Government Has a Right' To It


Keith Ellison is a Democrat House of Representative politician and the first Muslim to be elected to Congress.

He also thinks that government has a right to people's money:

“The bottom line is we’re not broke,” Ellison said. “There’s plenty of money, it’s just the government doesn’t have it.”
“The government has a right, the government and the people of the United States have a right to run the programs of the United States,” he continued “Health, welfare, housing – all these things.”


So, there's lots of money, it's just that the government doesn't have it yet.

... and there you have it. Straight from the horse's ... mouth. Watch the vid.

UN
.

James said...

This Keith Ellison guy is prez-eeeeeee-dent-shill mat-ear-eee-al!
unnastanwadimasayin?

James said...

Yeah Matt Damon is all class. His mother must be proud.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dn6de5o16w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSfoF6MhgLA

Anonymous said...

My jew-dar is working full-time as well and, as I've written and now had excellent back-up on the matter, there is a biological aspect that enables jews to do what jews do. It is impossible for me and for people whom I know to tell the BIG LIE. We all tell lies as it's part of our defence system but jews use it as offence to attack us from within. The biological imperative is to destroy the host as a race and as a culture which is why they engineer mass immigration of negroids - fatal for IQ and identity - and of unassimilable cultures like islam. I have no problem with the muslim world as long as it is left where it is, but the jews import it into every western country. They do this because they control money and have bought all media of influence, all corporations of importance, and the entire political body known as the Establishment. Jews who cannot do this simply are no longer jews so they leave and either live near-normal lives (but offering no more resistance than a useless TV-lobotomised white) or they spill the beans - Aaron Russo, Gilad Atzmo, Nathaniel Kapner et al. We know that these are not 'dis-info' by the fact of their revelations being verifiably true.
So it's thanks to St Nilus et al here that I can build-up my database to counter anybody in my circle who doubts the reality.

Allan@Aberdeen

Marcion said...

@ Anonymous 00:03

How can Britain's native Anglo-Saxons and Celts not see what is happening?

Of course they can see what is happening. They just can't do a bloody thing about it, or, at least, that is what they are being trained to believe.

I got on a bus yesterday and there was a white guy, evidently drunk, having a loud conversation, mostly with himself, about the fact that if you try to talk about immigration in England, people call you a racist. I thought: I wonder what's going to happen when a black gets on the bus. So a black gets on the bus, and what do you think happens? The drunk white guy greets him cheerfully like a long-lost buddy.

We're fucked.

Marcion said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Marcion said...

@ Anonymous 10:13

We all tell lies as it's part of our defence system

So it is. We take in the idea that honesty is the best policy with mother's milk. That is as it should be, because mothers raising their young to be honest is part of what it means to be a Christian culture. Otherwise you might as well be a gypsy. But of course there are several hard truths that mitigate against this soppy idea:

Honesty is the commonest virtue because it is the easiest. Tact is harder. Solicitousness harder still. We all understand this as we get older.

We lie to protect our autonomy and others' dignity.

It is frequently wrong to be honest. My last (Jewish) boss once asked me if I trusted him, and I said no. He looked genuinely hurt, but he didn't fire me on the spot, so that's a credit to him.

J Bull said...

Anon 00.03. Yes, demographics is the issue here. Turd Worlders breeding like rabbits + massive immigration = population replacement. Simple as that.

Jeremy said...

St. Nilus. I agree with your take on Biased BBC. But I would echo Savant's recommendation of a few posts back. Take issue with them in a constructive way. Remember it's not the site owners we're necessarily trying to get to, more the general readership.

Keiser said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Keiser said...

Upon glancing at the photos yesterday when I saw that article on the mail first thing I noticed was all the brown faces (faeces) that made up the bulk of the pictures.

I saw one comment on the Mail, I think, where the writer said "well you know where Starbucks and Google are, don't you?"
Fair point

Now having said that I can't exactly be behind taxes and the paying of them.

I don't believe in the debt based money system.

I could tolerate taxes if the government was issuing currency by paying for public works and services with it and then "destroying" its own currency with those taxes in order to manage inflation but in the current system money is issued as debt and P + I*P = f**k you banker in my book since the interest payment is re-loaned and re-loaned.

In a debt based system "Interest" = "money" which never entered circulation in the first place. Therefore interest after being re-loaned (secondary loans made with that interest) can never be extinguished.

The end result is debt to people who never had money to lend in the first place always grows.

see for yourself...

Under the current debt based system we have two choices continual economic growth (for example finding massive gas reserves offshore) or default.

Debt based money and fractional reserve banking is the biggest scam the world has ever know.

Time for a change!

Marcion said...

James 01:21

Note that they use darkies in these lists so that the public will hate "tax cheats" more. Therefore they will love paying tax more.

Let me see if I've got this right. If they use lots of white faces, they're concealing the fact that tax dodgers are disproportionately non-white.

But if they show the reality (for a change), it's a clever ruse to make whites proud of being tax donkeys.

Sponge Cake said...

Ever wondered why your car insurance is so high?

http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.ie/2011/05/britain-now-whiplash-capital-of-europe.html

Jerry said...

The harsh reality is , is that Britain is no longer our country anymore , it belongs to the colonisers and immigrant gangs , many who are in receipt of taxpayers money. Of course we can thank our spineless politicians and our traitorous media who told us that this was a good thing etc etc. However the blame also lies with the British people themselves who time and again voted for the same political parties who allowed this to happen. The same British sheeple who moaned but did nothing.

Robert in Arabia said...

Britain's last hope died in a bunker in Berlin.

Anonymous said...

Although this thread relates to photos of foreign tax-cheats in Britain, these photos reveal faces of those "others".

http://jewishfaces.com/

Anonymous said...

Here's another perk of diversity. If you want more whites to wake up..... just let them know what eating out will be like when more schwoogies come to nest in their hamlets. Enjoy!


http://topconservativenews.com/2013/08/thugs-trash-restaurant-then-cry-racism-when-they-are-banned-from-returning/

Anonymous said...

Here's another perk of diversity. If you want more whites to wake up..... just let them know what eating out will be like when more schwoogies come to nest in their hamlets. Enjoy!


http://topconservativenews.com/2013/08/thugs-trash-restaurant-then-cry-racism-when-they-are-banned-from-returning/

Sponge Cake said...

I was watching the World athletics Championship on tell-lie-vision earlier. The BBC commentators fawning over English" Mo", and "Christine" made me want to vomit.


fawn 1 (fôn)
intr.v. fawned, fawn·ing, fawns
1. To exhibit affection or attempt to please, as a dog does by wagging its tail, whining, or cringing.

2. To seek favor or attention by flattery and obsequious behavior
















Sponge Cake said...

Only 18, and already slapping his bitch around.

At least she wasn't a coal burner.

http://www.herald.ie/news/liverpool-star-faces-girlfriend-attack-claim-29488673.html

kulak said...

http://jewishfaces.com/

Thanks for that.

My folks, former hippies, still have a soft spot for Bob Dylan.

Me? I see his rat face and want to smash it.

As much as I've been complaining about blacks since I got home from vacation, kikes are worse.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Robert in Arabia 16:01

"Britain's last hope died in a bunker in Berlin."

Britain's last hope of having 90% of the males shipped to Europe to work as slave labour and the women being used as breeding stock, yes.

If you think that Hitler was for Britain and the British people then think again; he proved adept at killing white people and condemning Europe to decades of guilt.

Hitler was very much pro-himself and the German people aaaaaaaand that's it.

Anonymous said...

"If you think that Hitler was for Britain and the British people then think again; he proved adept at killing white people and condemning Europe to decades of guilt.

Hitler was very much pro-himself and the German people aaaaaaaand that's it."

Really ?!? - Anglo Saxons, Normans AND Celts and are German by default

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080803150913AAfH0xe

Franz said...

Forget the bunker already.

Redheads are on the march. Europe is saved!

Ginger Pride March

Anonymous said...

"As much as I've been complaining about blacks since I got home from vacation, kikes are worse."

For me its SOUTH Asians... i.e. the shit native to the Indian Sub continent. The kike is hand in glove with this Hindu/Muslim/Sikh dalit mix in UK / Europe especially the Hindu. Hindooos like Jews worship snakes. They're as despicable as muslim pakis and all the same in my eyes - can't stand the sight of any of 'em.

Fucking brown RATS.. Yids are paler with the same shifty eyes and slimey features.

Jews - the "highest order" like them are Asiatic vermin!

Ragnarok said...

Savant,
Just found your blog a few weeks ago. Has opened up a whole new line of thinking for me on present events here in Eire. Was not paying attention to the genocidal aspect in all this. Not surprising really, considering the conditioning we have been subjected to. So, thanks for that.

Don't know if this book has appeared here before, but i'll post it anyway.

http://www.archive.org/details/TheBabylonianWoe

Some seriously interesting perspectives on the historical role of one of the most effective tools at the enemy's disposal, the private creation of a state's money. And it apparently goes back much, much further than shabbas goys such as Ferguson would have us believe.

UN
Downloaded the books last weekend....read them back to back...What can i say.....
:)

Ragnarok

Seneca said...

St. Nilus, did you base your name on Professor Sergei Alexandrovich Nilus, of Protocols fame?

Marcion said...

@ Anonymous 22:10

Is that where you get your information on history? Yahoo!?

Oh well, I suppose that isn't such a terrible crime, because I get my history from YouTube.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Seemingly off topic but ...

http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.co.nz/2013/08/riots-in-belfast.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2388702/Belfast-riots-Violence-leaves-56-police-officers-injured-parts-city-wrecked-night-mindless-anarchy.html

Savant, can you shed any light on this?

UN
.

James said...

@Marcion.
Let me see if I've got this right. If they use lots of white faces, they're concealing the fact that tax dodgers are disproportionately non-white.

But if they show the reality (for a change), it's a clever ruse to make whites proud of being tax donkeys.


It was just my attempt at explaining why they are so keen to identify the races of this particular class of criminal, but not other types of criminal.

Have you got any other theory why this should be so? You don't get the media informing everyone that rapists are disproportionately non-white do you, or murderers. So why tax cheats.

I don't think you have demolished my theory quite yet.

James said...

I don't know if this will give nastiestuncle a hard-on because of the message or a soft-off because of the speaker, but here it is:

On February 4th, 2013, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, addressed the Duma, (Russian Parliament), and gave a speech about the tensions with minorities in Russia:



"In Russia live Russians. Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to live in Russia, to work and eat in Russia, should speak Russian, and should respect the Russian laws. If they prefer Sharia Law, then we advise them to go to those places where that's the state law. Russia does not need minorities. Minorities need Russia, and we will not grant them special privileges, or try to change our laws to fit their desires, no matter how loud they yell 'discrimination'. We better learn from the suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive as a nation. The Russian customs and traditions are not compatible with the lack of culture or the primitive ways of most minorities. When this honorable legislative body thinks of creating new laws, it should have in mind the national interest first, observing that the minorities are not Russians."

The politicians in the Duma gave Putin a five minute standing ovation.


Poor nastiestuncle, maybe he'll get both and this little wiener will curl up into a pretzel.

James said...

http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.co.nz/2013/08/riots-in-belfast.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2388702/Belfast-riots-Violence-leaves-56-police-officers-injured-parts-city-wrecked-night-mindless-anarchy.html

Savant, can you shed any light on this?


Didn't you read all the comments? It was just sheer madness. Nothing more to it. Anybody who questions that needs to be investigated for thinking.

Next topic please.

James said...

Infinitely more important:

Simple but sexy in stripes: Diane Kruger is effortlessly stylish in eye-catching shorts and a studded T-shirt

James said...

From Henry Makow:

Finally some good news - Western intelligensia is not having children -
Be patient- they will die out.


Many will now say that he hates white people and wants them to die out. We'll I agree with him. Liberals and intellectuals need to go. They suck.

James said...

This is amazing.

Look at what these people will sign!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjEh0QfM-WE&feature=player_embedded

Marcion said...

@ James 00:48

Well, it is striking that there suddenly appears in defiance of political correctness a pic of mostly black perps. It is a countersign, because the rule, as you know, is to crowbar blacks into every ad and sitcom. The social engineering goal is enforced togetherness, not "us and them."

So it is tempting to see in this anomaly some kind of meta-signal.

I don't think your theory is implausible, but since most Britons are already obliging taxpayers it seems surplus to requirements to try to manipulate them into feeling chuffed about it.

Of late there have been a couple of strange signals of distress emerging from the power centre. There is an air of desperation in HMRC's decision to release the pics of the tax dodgers. Many have already fled the country. Then there are those absurd and vaguely surreal "Go Home or Face Arrest" billboards in London.

The media can't finesse these signals because they come straight from government. They are aberrations, and they perhaps demonstrate that the UK government is under extreme pressure, crippled as it is with billions of pounds of debt and unfunded liabilities.

Of is it just a cynical ploy by the Tories to preempt UKIP?

James said...

@Marcion,

It's hard not to be cynical about all this.

I'm sure there's an angle to is somewhere.

James said...

Back to the nastiestuncle-is-an-idiot file.

In history, Jews were able to move freely among muslims, while muslims and Christians were butchering each other.

Maybe he can tell us why Jews are scared of Muslims today?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdsVGoGbbqI

Or maybe he could find the strength within to admit that they are not.

Marcion said...

@ James 01:26

Look at what these people will sign!

It's fun to buttonhole people on the street and make them look stupid. Mark Dice is a bit of a wally, though. His Jay-Z: Illuminati Musical Satanism shows he's completely out of his depth. He falls for the idea that Crowley sacrificed children:

"For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim."

Since Crowley was not a murderer, it is generally agreed that when Crowley refers to "sacrifice" he means a wank.

Crowley had such a high opinion of himself that he at one time sold tablets said to be able to restore a man to full vigour whose main ingredient was his own sperm.

James said...

It's fun to buttonhole people on the street and make them look stupid.

You'll notice however that a few smarter (white) people caught on and said no when asked if they wanted to sign it.

Others, when asked if they supported "releasing rapists, murderers, burglars" signed it anyway. I didn't notice too many lights on upstairs in some of those people, did you?

I don't think he tricked anyone, he simply asked them to sign a petition to give amnesty to all illegal alien prisoners no matter what they did. He was very clear on exactly what he wanted them to sign. He even mentioned the words rapist, murderer, burglar, to make sure there was no mistake or misleading of people.

They signed it anyway. This isn't like the famous interviews asking Americans the boiling point of water, this is pure and simply a demonstration that people will sign anything that seems to be PC or aligns with rights for their in-group.

James said...

You may be completely right about Mark Dice. I'm not really interested in him. The point is people signed a petition to let rapists and murderers out of jail. Were they even thinking at all? And if so, what were they thinking?

Maybe they just heard the word "amnesty", thought Mark was some liberal nitwit and thought "OK I'll sign that", and didn't think or hear anything else? Well, that is still a major indictment on how democracy "works", isn't it?

Leaving Crowley out of the picture, in my view it is still stunning that anyone signed it at all. They didn't seem like La Voz de Aztlan hombres either, just normal Mexican Americans or whatever.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
James said...

It's fun to buttonhole people on the street and make them look stupid.

It's even more fun when they do it for themselves without any prompting.

Here we have Carlos Danger ... oops, sorry, that would be Anthony the weener showing a level of class that makes Matt Damon look good.

Good? Hell, he makes Damon look absolutely amazing.
Please watch the video in sheer disbelief and, halfway through, you will ask yourself if Weiner's mother slapped him once too often during his formative years.

By the end of the segment you'll be convinced that she didn't slap him enough .... no matter how often and how hard she actually did.

http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2013/08/weiner-the-us-equivalent-nasty-bastard-of-rudd/

The thing that amazes me, is that it's jews like this little putz who wonder why anti-semitism is a growth industry.

Can you imagine just how irritating this scrawny little cunt must be when he's dealing with what he thinks are his inferiors?
The urge to throw him to the ground and stomp that prodigious proboscis must be overwhelming.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Speaking of public arseholes ... why is is that so many lefty politicians -- when they hit a certain period in their lives -- look like ageing lesbians?

http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2013/08/kevin-rudd-doesnt-like-being-upstaged-hurts-kid-to-prove-point-video/

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Back to reality ...

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/08/ultra-orthodox-jewish-ethics-gaming-the-system/#more-20118

Connelly describes

... the arrest of 44 people, including several rabbis, in a money laundering and influence peddling scheme involving payoffs to public officials in New Jersey. Rather than marginal figures, the rabbis involved were highly respected pillars of the Syrian Jewish community — a traditionalist Jewish group that remains largely separate even from other Jewish groups. What’s fascinating is that Rabbi Israel Dwek, a founder of the New Jersey synagogue at the center of the scandal, renounced his own son, Solomon Dwek, because the son had cooperated with the FBI after being indicted on bank fraud charges. The father’s actions were entirely within the Talmudic Law of Moser — the prohibition of a Jew informing on another Jew.

Rabbi Dwek was also involved in a tax fraud scheme in which Jews would receive a kickback of 90% of their charitable contributions. Again, this behavior is not from an isolated bad apple, but occurs at the highest level of these communities.

A recent Forward article by Jay Michaelson (“The Creeping Jewish Fundamentalism in our Midst“) compares the ultra-Orthodox to an organized crime syndicate:

In recent months, the Forward has depicted the coercion and ignorance prevalent in American ultra-Orthodox communities: in brilliant essays by Judy Brown and Shulem Deen, in exposés of Hasidic money laundering, and longer ago in its award-winning coverage of the Agriprocessors meat processing plant. And of course, “fervently Orthodox” leaders have defended, justified, covered up and explained away sexual predators in a way that would make a Vatican official blush. What has emerged from all this is a picture of a subculture that looks more like “The Sopranos” than like “Fiddler on the Roof” — a world in which a small elite maintains power at the expense of thousands of serfs.


How surprising ... but they have such a wonderful image ... those nice, gentle, religious jewish men of the cloth ...

UN
.

James said...

Uncle Nasty,

I didn't really understand that Weiner thing.

But my IQ is only 114.88 - the maximum goy IQ. (115 is reserved for nastiestuncle and Yahweh's masterpieces.)

Relating to your other post:
Henry Makow said old lesbians all start looking like Christopher Walken. They do!

James said...

In recent months, the Forward has depicted the coercion and ignorance prevalent in American ultra-Orthodox communities: in brilliant essays by Judy Brown and Shulem Deen, in exposés of Hasidic money laundering, and longer ago in its award-winning coverage of the Agriprocessors meat processing plant. And of course, “fervently Orthodox” leaders have defended, justified, covered up and explained away sexual predators in a way that would make a Vatican official blush. What has emerged from all this is a picture of a subculture that looks more like “The Sopranos” than like “Fiddler on the Roof” — a world in which a small elite maintains power at the expense of thousands of serfs.

Will these types of people end up in the minority tax cheats list in the UK?

Don't bother waiting.

Anonymous said...

Robert in Arabia said...

Britain's last hope died in a bunker in Berlin.

10 August 2013 16:01


--

Yes, Robert. That says it all.

--

Anonymous said...

To James @ 11 August 2013 01:09

Unfortunately Putin did not utter those words though he may intend such things by actual policy:
http://www.hoax-slayer.com/putin-duma-speech-sharia-law.shtml

Allan@Aberdeen

Anonymous said...

James. Diane Kruger is currently 'dating' a Jew.

AngloAmerikan said...

@Nastiest Uncle - 10 August 2013 20:45

Britain's last hope of having 90% of the males shipped to Europe to work as slave labour and the women being used as breeding stock, yes.

I can't believe people still believe this sort of shite. The Germans were the most honourable enemies we ever faced. They treated their British prisoners with great care and respect (just look up the statistics!) and fought honourably and courageously. I can't say the same about us unfortunately.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@AngloAmerikan 10:28

"I can't believe people still believe this sort of shite."

The reason why people believe this "shite" is that there is documentary evidence to support it.

I was however wrong about the 90% figure. In fact, males between the ages of 17 and 45 were to be deported.

"just look up the statistics"

Ok then. The death rate of British PoWs held by the Germans was 3.5%. The death rate of German PoWs held by the British was 0.03%, or 117 times less.

Some Germans fought honourably and others didn't. The Wehrmacht for example, usually held up as an example of German honour in battle, committed regular atrocities just like their SS colleagues. Not surprising really, since the German population had been brainwashed by the non-Jewish media that they were super human and everyone else was sub human.

Idolising World WAr 2 era Germans is a little bit like a religion, isn't it?

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 01:56

"Maybe he can tell us why Jews are scared of Muslims today?"

Jews have always been shit scared of Muslims, since Islam has been deadly to Jews right from the start. You'll have to read the Qur'an and hadiths to see why though. Arabia was a mix of Jews, Christians and pagans before Muhammad's mental illness presented itself.

You'll wonder why Jews were often allowed to live amongst the Muslims. The answer is there for you in the Qur'an and hadiths as well.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 01:09

What gave me a hard on was that he never said those things.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 22:10

"Really ?!? - Anglo Saxons, Normans AND Celts and are German by default"

That's odd, because those ethnic groups in the UK do not speak German, eat Sauerkraut or wear leather shorts. They don't sound very German to me.

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said (5 August 2013): “There were black soldiers there but what were their units?”

The first Allied force to enter Dachau concentration camp and liberate its prisoners was the 3rd Battalion, 157th Infantry Regiment led by Brigadier General Felix Sparks. As stated previously, NO black UNITS/REGIMENTS took part in the liberation of Dachau.

It’s not only Jewish organisations (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum etc) and Jewish propagandists (Steven Spielberg etc) that continue to repeat the lie that a Negro regiment liberated Dachau.

Broken Alliance: The Turbulent Times Between Blacks and Jews in America, by Jew Jonathan Kaufman

Extract from Jew Jonathan Kaufman’s book:

“Paul Parks, a 20-year old sergeant from the poor, black part of Indianapolis was settling down for the night on the outskirts of Munich when he received word that the next morning HE AND HIS TROOPS WOULD BE THE ADVANCE SOLDIERS INTO A CAMP CALLED DACHAU. Parks assumed "Dachau" was a German army camp. He wondered why his unit was to be FIRST IN.”

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VSiaAAAAIAAJ&q=he+received+word+that+the+next+morning+he+and+his+troops+would+be+the+advance+soldiers+into+a+camp+called+Dachau.+Parks+assumed+%22Dachau%22+was+a+German+army+camp#search_anchor

Why do Jewish organisations and Jewish propagandists (film-makers, documentary makers, historians, journalists, authors etc) continue to propagate such obvious lies?

What are their motives?

Perhaps the answer lies in the title of the book by Jew journalist Jonathan Kaufman.

What’s your opinion, nastiestuncle?

Frank Galton

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 13:34

I dunno my nigger. There's no interest for Jewish people to pretend that blacks liberated Dachau. Dachau was one of thousands of camps. Who gives a fuck who happened to get there first.

What I would be interested to know though is who the black soldiers were who were at the liberation of Dachau.

Marcion said...

@ James

You may be completely right about Mark Dice. I'm not really interested in him. The point is people signed a petition to let rapists and murderers out of jail. Were they even thinking at all? And if so, what were they thinking?

You're right. My point was irrelevant. I think the point you're making is that the "liberal reflex" is highly developed, to the point of hypertrophy, while critical faculties are absent. Kind of like a bodybuilder who develops only his deltoids while the rest of his musculature atrophies.

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: “There's no interest for Jewish people to pretend that blacks liberated Dachau.”

If, as you say, there’s no interest for Jewish people to pretend that blacks liberated Dachau, why do YOU, nastiestuncle, believe the Jew journalist Jonathan Kaufman, the Jew newspaper The New York Times, the Jew propagandist Steven Spielberg, and the Jew organisation, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum pretend that a Negro unit/regiment liberated Dachau?

NEW YORK TIMES

“In World War II, Mr. Parks was part of a REGIMENT OF BLACK SOLDIERS THAT LIBERATED DACHAU, the concentration camp.”
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/03/us/black-ex-gi-a-bridge-between-jackson-and-dukakis.html

B’NAI B’RITH TO HONOR WW2 VETERAN DESPITE QUESTIONS

Senior U.S. military historians say NO black soldiers were present when Dachau was liberated.
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=894&dat=20001020&id=UFZIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=GU0DAAAAIBAJ&pg=4814,2686346

Frank Galton

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 14:59

"If, as you say, there’s no interest for Jewish people to pretend that blacks liberated Dachau, why do YOU, nastiestuncle, believe the Jew journalist Jonathan Kaufman, the Jew newspaper The New York Times, the Jew propagandist Steven Spielberg, and the Jew organisation, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum pretend that a Negro unit/regiment liberated Dachau?"

I don't. Why do you think I do?

"Senior U.S. military historians say NO black soldiers were present when Dachau was liberated.
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=894&dat=20001020&id=UFZIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=GU0DAAAAIBAJ&pg=4814,2686346"

And yet camp survivors testified to having seen some black soldiers at the liberation of the camp. So somehow, in the fog of war, some black soldiers found themselves at the liberation of Dachau. I don't believe that Parks was one of them, but some were there. Big deal.

Anonymous said...

nastiestuncle,

Do you believe that Jew Jonathan Kaufman and the Jew-owned New York Times are telling the truth when they categorically state that a Negro regiment liberated Dachau?

Frank Galton

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 15:25

I refer you to my previous answer in which I answered your question.

The New York Times isn't owned by Jews by the way. It's owned by shareholders.

Anonymous said...

So you agree with me then that Jew Jonathan Kaufman and the Jew-controlled New York Times (Arthur Ochs Sulzberger et al) are lying when they categorically state that a Negro regiment liberated Dachau.

Thanks for clearing that one up, nastiestuncle.

Now onto my next question:

Do you believe the camp “survivors” are telling the truth when they testified to having seen black soldiers at the liberation of the camp?

Note: Senior U.S. military historians, along with colonel Hugh F. Foster III and retired brigadier general Felix L. Sparks (who led the liberation of Dachau) say NO black soldiers were present when Dachau was liberated.

Frank Galton

DJF said...

Nastiest Uncle writes""""The New York Times isn't owned by Jews by the way. It's owned by shareholders.""'

And the shareholders who control the NYT’s are the Sulzberger family, they have the unrestricted voting shares.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 16:46

Mein Neger.

If they are aware of the facts of the case and still maintain that Parks' regiment was there, then they are most likely lying. If not, then they are not.

"Do you believe the camp “survivors” are telling the truth when they testified to having seen black soldiers at the liberation of the camp?"

I don't see that they would have any reason to lie. They have nothing to gain. No one has anything to gain by claiming that black soldiers were at the liberation.

"Note: Senior U.S. military historians, along with colonel Hugh F. Foster III and retired brigadier general Felix L. Sparks (who led the liberation of Dachau) say NO black soldiers were present when Dachau was liberated."

The inmates are more likely to have come into contact with black soldiers than the top army leaders, since it's likely that the black soldiers would have been involved in handing out food and water and sheeit.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@DJF 16:47

If that is the case then I stand corrected. They must be a kind of Israel-hating Jewish family though because the New York Times loves those Palestinians and hates those right wingers.

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: “If they are aware of the facts of the case and still maintain that Parks' regiment was there, then they are most likely lying. If not, then they are not.”

In 1998 Paul Parks stated that HE, along with his REGIMENT (365th Infantry Regiment) LIBERATED Dachau. We know this from watching the documentary ‘Spielberg's Hoax - The Last Days of The Big Lie’ (skip to 43:23 mins in the video).

Yet in October 2000, Paul Parks changed his story, quote: “`My outfit was NEVER at Dachau, but I was”.

Seymour G. Saideman, president of B'nai B'rith Europe said in October 2000: We’ve made our inquiries, and we’re satisfied that there's no reason not to give (Parks) the award (Raoul Wallenberg Award).”

Andras Kain, president of B'nai B'rith in Berlin, said (October 2000) his chapter relied in part on Steven Spielberg's 1998 Holocaust documentary, “The Last Days,'' and its companion book as evidence that Parks was a Dachau liberator.”

If Andras Kain had relied in part on Steven Spielberg's 1998 Holocaust documentary, “The Last Days,'' then he would have been aware of Paul Parks’ lies that HE, along with his REGIMENT (365th Infantry Regiment) LIBERATED Dachau. Yet in October 2000 (the same year that B'nai B'rith was to honour Parks), Paul Parks changed his story, quote: “`My outfit was NEVER at Dachau, but I was”.

Jew journalists, Jew propagandists and Jew organisations must have been aware of the facts.

‘Spielberg's Hoax - The Last Days of The Big Lie’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80GgRWuXcO8

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: “I don't see that they (the “survivors”) would have any reason to lie. They have nothing to gain.”

Do you believe the “survivors” are telling the truth when they talk of restaurants, libraries, movie theatres, orchestras, plays, crèches, sports events, camp currency, beer, books, newspapers etc etc etc in Auschwitz?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVmIaBW-HjI

Frank Galton

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 17:58

So if Paul Parks thinks he was there without his regiment, and it is known that some black soldiers were there, then maybe he was one of them.

I couldn't care less if he was there or not but you seem to be really into it.

Chuck Hammer said...

James

"In Russia live Russians. Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to live in Russia, to work and eat in Russia, should speak Russian, and should respect the Russian laws....."
Poor nastiestuncle, maybe he'll get both and this little wiener will curl up into a pretzel.


As far as I can determine Vladimir Putin did not make that speech. It's an internet hoax. Oh well.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 18:04

"Do you believe the “survivors” are telling the truth when they talk of restaurants, libraries, movie theatres, orchestras, plays, crèches, sports events, camp currency, beer, books, newspapers etc etc etc in Auschwitz?"

It's not clear from the video that they are talking about Auschwitz. At 2:40 for instance they are talking about Westerbork camp in the Netherlands in which there was an orchestra.

However, it makes sense that all those things were there, if not all at Auschwitz then at other camps, depending on their function. If I was running a transit or labour or death camp, I'd want those things to exist. It'd make the running of the camp a lot easier.

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: “So if Paul Parks thinks he was there without his regiment, and it is known that some black soldiers were there, then maybe he was one of them.”

We’ve already established that NO black soldiers were present when Dachau was liberated.

“then maybe he was one of them”

But you’ve already stated that quote: “I think Paul Parks was LYING.”

Now you’re saying that “maybe he was one of them”.

pwned!

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: “I couldn't care less if he was there or not but you seem to be really into it.”

If you “couldn’t care less if he was there or not”, why do you keep responding, you NUMPTY?

ROTFLOL!!!!

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: However, it makes sense that all those things were there (restaurants, libraries, movie theatres, orchestras, plays, crèches, sports events, camp currency, beer, books, newspapers etc etc etc), if not all at Auschwitz then at other camps, depending on their function.

Strange how Jew propagandist, Steven Spielberg, managed to include the fraud Paul Parks in his propaganda film ‘The Last Days’ yet chose to edit out the “survivor” testimonies that mentioned the restaurants, libraries, movie theatres, orchestras, plays, crèches, sports events, camp currency, beer, books, newspapers etc?

Strange?

Frank Galton

Chuck Hammer said...

Nastiest Uncle
However, it makes sense that all those things were there, if not all at Auschwitz then at other camps, depending on their function. If I was running a transit or labour or death camp, I'd want those things to exist. It'd make the running of the camp a lot easier.


So did these things exist at Auschwitz or not? The sticking point for me is no-one is allowed to ask the questions, including actual historians. There's only one officially-approved version of the Holocaust and it's the one starring Elie Wiesel, the apparently tattoo-less Auschwitz survivor.

If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear. I know that's true because Joseph Goebbels apparently said so before it was adopted as the motto of the TSA.

So let's have a full and complete investgation of the Holocaust by actual historians. Was it 6,000,000 or was it 282,000 which the Red Cross at one point appeared to believe?

And while we're at it let's have a thorough independent investigation of 9/11 as the co-chairs of the original 9/11 Commission, Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton, have both effectively admitted their report was a whitewash.

Neither of these things will happen of course as there are powerful vested interests who have no interest in discovering the truth.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Robert in Arabia said...

Britain's last hope died in a bunker in Berlin.

10 August 2013 16:01


--

Yes, Robert. That says it all.

--

11 August 2013 08:52


I would amend it to this, Robert:

The West's last hope died in a bunker in Berlin.

--

This year marks 80 YEARS of continuous parasite propaganda against Germany, starting in 1933 when International Jewry openly declared war on Germany.

They REALLY don't want whites waking up to just how Germany financed itself after booting the parasite bankers out.

--

Anonymous said...

Jewish boycott of German boxer Max Schmeling.

1937!

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1144&dat=19370215&id=seQdAAAAIBAJ&sjid=-0sEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4507,1110323

Marcion said...

@ Anonymous 19:55

This year marks 80 YEARS of continuous parasite propaganda against Germany […]

The Germans are doing fine despite it. They have prevailed despite how shattered they were after the war, despite the threatened Morganthau Plan, despite the dismemberment of the country into two, despite the Marshall Plan repayments, despite the fact that Germany's share of the Marshall Plan was not the largest as is commonly believed (Britain's was larger), and despite, of course, the onerous reparations to organised Jewry.

In his latest column, Peter Hitchens says this about the Germans:

Germany has schools that teach people the skills of work. It has real apprenticeships.

It has family-owned manufacturing industries in every town, which export around the world on quality as well as price.

Work itself remains hard and disciplined, but it is well-paid […].

If you have children, you are subsidised and mothers are not pressured to go out to work – rather the reverse.

Debt is feared and despised. Thrift is encouraged.


The British could learn a lot from the Germans.

AngloAmerikan said...

Ok then. The death rate of British PoWs held by the Germans was 3.5%. The death rate of German PoWs held by the British was 0.03%, or 117 times less. - Nastiest Uncle

These figures don't count those that perished in the camps after the war ended (the most dangerous time for a German PoW)and those that perished after being transported from Allied held areas to the Soviet Union (up to 90% casualties in some cases). Nor does it subtract those that perished due to Allied war atrocities and disease. And lets not talk about the number of German civilians murdered by the Allies bombing campaigns eh?

That's odd, because those ethnic groups in the UK do not speak German, eat Sauerkraut or wear leather shorts. They don't sound very German to me. Nastiest Uncle

English is a Germanic language. The ignorance is simply apalling.

Anyway the comment "Britain's last hope died in a bunker in Berlin" is implying an alternative history where WW2 does not occur and Europe is "Aryanized" willingly. Thus no need for slaves and breeding stock. No Holocaust. All the little kids that were aborted since the war would have been looked after in the new civilization. Everyone driving around in nice BMWs, Ferraris, Porsche, Mercedes and Jaguars from London to the Urals and a colony on Mars already. I think that's what Robert in Arabia means.

James said...


What gave me a hard on was that he never said those things.


As I said, the message gave you a hardon.

Pwned.

Still it's good to have our resident Socrates wannabe back on board.

James said...

Ok then. The death rate of British PoWs held by the Germans was 3.5%. The death rate of German PoWs held by the British was 0.03%, or 117 times less. - Nastiest Uncle

Another attempt at philosophical grandeur has failed.

Germany was a war zone. Britain was not. They had how many more prisoners to look after than the British? How many British POWs died in the Dresden bombing etc? Are you counting that? It's easier to look after prisoners when you are winning that when you are losing.

The British enslaved 100,000 German POWs and took them to England to work, many of them for years. The Britsh public did raise some protests, as did British veterans. They even grabbed ethnic Germans from Argentina and enslaved them in Europe - ethnic Germans who didn't even fight in the war or had ever been to Europe. The aftermath of WW2 was the most shameful thing in British history. The British as a race DESERVE what's coming to them. Suck it up genius. Only 20 years before your glorious plan to deport all the niggers expires. What are you gonna do then mate? Start your own blog?

www.nastiestuncle.il

You are so full of shit you're making this entire blog stink.

James said...

If that is the case then I stand corrected. They must be a kind of Israel-hating Jewish family though because the New York Times loves those Palestinians and hates those right wingers.

Oh my god. Major softon for NU.

But you would still pwn Miko Peled?

Maybe in you're own mind. Did you like my comparison between you and Socrates? Quite accurate wasn't it?

James said...

As far as I can determine Vladimir Putin did not make that speech. It's an internet hoax. Oh well.

I didn't really believe it anyway. Jutin seems as NWO as they come.

Still people believe in Jutin. Just like nastiestuncle thinks people will believe in him when he finally crushes the White Nationalists and unveils his big plan to STWR (and Israel of course).

James said...

Sure, you can find one or two ‘hates socialism’, but it’s much, much rarer.

It's permitted to hate socialism, so long as its either NSDAP socialism or "excessive" socialism which looks like it might be "Marxism".

Normal "good" socialism shouldn't be called "socialism" - you might offend the "good" people implementing the "good" socialism.

James said...


The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

The great nastiestuncle doing his hair

Anonymous said...

Jewish organisations (B'nai B'rith, The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum etc), despite knowing about Paul Parks’ “war record”, continue to promote and honour the old fraud!

B'NAI B'RITH SAYS PARKS CAN KEEP SERVICE AWARD

August 27, 2002

“An international Jewish group (B'nai B'rith International) has decided that Boston civil rights leader Paul Parks can keep his decoration for "distinguished" World War II service, EVEN THOUGH ITS INQUIRY INTO HIS WAR RECORD FOUND NO PROOF THAT PARKS HELPED LIBERATE THE DACHAU CONCENTRATION CAMP, as he often contended.”

Frank Galton

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 21:42

No, no, no. You got that wrong. I have a punk haircut.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 21:42

I suppose the question is then: can every single soldier who claims to have been at a particular place at a particular time in WW2 prove it with documentary evidence?

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 21:24

"Germany was a war zone."

Who says that the Germans had to keep the British PoWs in Germany? They could have kept them somewhere which wasn't a war zone, since they'd conquered loads of territory. But they didn't.

James said...

Same guy reporting at 911 ad Boston Marathon Bombing. Coincidence?

Lets ask the foremost biblical scholar of America about coincidences shall we?

Marcion said...

@ James

About your "Socrates" analysis. It's unusual to condemn Socrates or his emulators. It can't be true that Socrates failed because he didn't have any answers. Who, apart from Principal Skinner, needs answers? The Greeks understood that answers are provisional. Pro tem. Placeholders. The problem of the hypostasis: taking the placeholder as final. Answers turn into convictions. Then you have a model and you are forced to bend all new information to fit that model.

Do you refuse the opportunity to examine your assumptions? Do you believe you are less dogmatic than NU? How important is it to you to be right?

James said...

Nastiestuncle thinks Jews cannot live among Muslims.

I'm not sure where he gets this idea from, since Jews lived in Iraq for 3000 years, until Mossad blew a few hundred of them up to make the rest leave. Zionists like killing Jews to make them go to Israel. That's why they helped the Nazis. Maybe they were the Nazis?

Back to the topic at hand. Nastiestuncle's sticky hand. Rabbi Daniel Lapin thinks Muslims are blessed and that God listens to them. He's one of the foremost biblical scholars in the US. I guess that makes him pretty clever in most people's minds but a complete nutjob in nastiestuncle's mind (since the bible isn't proven on Wikipedia and it talks about stupid things like Gods that every rational person knows are false because the peak of all creation is nastiestuncle - maybe he's a god, the first god ever to be proven wrong because he won't accept that gods exist. But if he's a god then that should be good enough for anyone. This god in infinitely stubborn though, Amen.).

Jewish Rabbi Admits Muslims Are Blessed

Nastiestinchle pwned again.

Waiting for the denial. 3...2...1...

It isn't. I decree that thou must believeth that it isn't.--nastiestuncle

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: “I suppose the question is then: can every single soldier who claims to have been at a particular place at a particular time in WW2 prove it with documentary evidence?”

But we’re not talking about “every single soldier”; we’re talking about Paul Parks. And we know he’s lying when he claims that HE, along with HIS REGIMENT, liberated Dachau. He then subsequently changed his story saying: “My outfit was NEVER at Dachau, but I was”.

Paul Parks is a LIAR!

Frank Galton

Nastiest Uncle said...

@AngloAmerikan 20:28

To suggest that the Germans were somehow honourable in their treatment of PoWs is to have been dropped on the head whilst a baby. Their treatment of Russian PoWs for example was atrocious: 58% died.

"English is a Germanic language."

This does not make the British people German, you fucking imbecile.

"Anyway the comment "Britain's last hope died in a bunker in Berlin" is implying an alternative history where WW2 does not occur and Europe is "Aryanized" willingly."

Entirely meaningless since WW2 did occur.

James said...

It's unusual to condemn Socrates or his emulators.

Actually every Socrates that has ever existed (one of them) was condemned. He died.

It can't be true that Socrates failed because he didn't have any answers.

He did fail. They told him to kill himself and he did. Athens failed in the end too. Greek politics failed.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 22:13

"But we’re not talking about “every single soldier”; we’re talking about Paul Parks."

Why is Paul Parks' location being held to a higher standard than every other soldier in WW2?

James said...

Who says that the Germans had to keep the British PoWs in Germany? They could have kept them somewhere which wasn't a war zone, since they'd conquered loads of territory. But they didn't.

Yes, that's standard practice. You keep your POWs right at the edge of your conquered territory where its really hard to look after them and the enemy can easily come and take them back. I forgot about that.

James said...

This does not make the British people German, you fucking imbecile.

Socrates in action. (sort of)

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: “Why is Paul Parks' location being held to a higher standard than every other soldier in WW2?”

Because Jewish organisations continue to promote and honour the likes of Paul Parks in order to promote harmony between the Negro and Jewish communities, whilst at the same time inciting Negroes to attack “dem ebil” white Christian “debils”.

Da jews beez our frieends in da struggle against “Da Man”.

How can dem ebil wite raycess debils say dem nasty tings bout dem poor lil jews wen evbody knows dat rudolf hitler dun did kilt 600 billion jews?

“Neber Again!”

Frank Galton

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 22:11

"Nastiestuncle thinks Jews cannot live among Muslims."

I didn't say that. You pulled it out of your ass. You haven't read the Qur'an or hadiths which is why you do not understand the relationship between Jews and Muslims and how deadly Muslims are to Jews.

"I'm not sure where he gets this idea from, since Jews lived in Iraq for 3000 years"

Not alongside Muslims, they didn't.

"Jewish Rabbi Admits Muslims Are Blessed"

Which is not proof that Muslims are blessed. All it means that he thinks that Muslims are blessed. Big deal. There is no such thing as "blessed". "Blessed" is something which religious people have pulled out of their ass.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 19:03

"Now you’re saying that “maybe he was one of them”."

Paul Parks said that his regiment was at the liberation of Auschwitz, which is probably a lie.
The claim that he was there without his regiment may or may not be true, since there were black soldiers present at the liberation, but not in regiment strength.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 19:07

"If you “couldn’t care less if he was there or not”, why do you keep responding"

Because you keep asking.

James said...

"Nastiestuncle thinks Jews cannot live among Muslims."

I didn't say that.



I'm sorry I thought Muslims being deadly to Jews meant jews couldn't live among Muslims.

My mistake.

James said...

So Muslims are deadly to Jews, but Jews can live among Muslims?

I'm confused, my 114.88 IQ isn't enough. I can smell smoke.

Marcion said...

@ James

He's one of the foremost biblical scholars in the US. I guess that makes him pretty clever in most people's minds but a complete nutjob in nastiestuncle's mind (since the bible isn't proven

False opposites. Scholarship versus unthinking atheism? Oh please. There are conservative scholars and liberal scholars. Revisionists and apologists. We've had more than a century of Higher Criticism, but you wouldn't know it listening to Hagee or Lapin.

Their fireside chat is a shitfest from start to finish, starting with "El" as the name of God (conveniently forgetting that El was a bull-god) to "the Bible says that Jacob had twelve sons" (they weren't "sons"; they were independent tribes that banded together to form a federation).

You only need to read a page of the Midrashim to know that the good Rabbi Lapin is a pious tosspot.

James said...

"I'm not sure where he gets this idea from, since Jews lived in Iraq for 3000 years"

Not alongside Muslims, they didn't.


OK alongside Muslims for 1500 years or whatever it is.

Then Zionists tried to scare them into migrating to Israel. Most didn't want to go so blew up about 300 jews and asked again.

Now what are you going to say?

- thicko, it was 295 not 300
- thicko, what Zionists?
- thicko, out of your ass
- thicko, whatever else you think is conducive to discussion in your mind

James said...

You only need to read a page of the Midrashim to know that the good Rabbi Lapin is a pious tosspot.

How much power do these guys have to amass before you start to take them seriously?

I suppose you wouldn't run away from a madman with a chainsaw just because he was in a clown suit?

How do you know he's not lying? My point was, I think these guys are intelligent, that's all.

And they might be dangerous.

James said...

I'm not sure where he gets this idea from, since Jews lived in Iraq for 3000 years"

Not alongside Muslims, they didn't.


Nastiestuncle has trouble admitting that many Jews like living in Islamic countries surrounded by Muslims and in fact did not want to leave. The Jews in Iran aren't wanting to leave either.

He goes into contortions trying to avoid that fact.

He must prove that muslims want to kill Jews, even though they don't kill Jews.

Totally nuts.

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: “The claim that he was there without his regiment may or may not be true, since there were black soldiers present at the liberation, but not in regiment strength.”

We’ve already established that NO black soldiers, units or regiments were present when Dachau was liberated.

Frank Galton

Marcion said...

@ James

I see what you're saying. You also seem to be saying that Hagee and Lapin might be dangerous because of their generous ecumenicism, because they include Muslims among those heard by God (because of some divinely ordained nominative determinism involving the word Ishmael) Well, they're only returning the favour, since Muslim countries like the UAE pretend to accept that Britons are not quite wogs because they are notionally People of the Book.

James said...

I see what you're saying. You also seem to be saying that Hagee and Lapin might be dangerous because of their generous ecumenicism, because they include Muslims among those heard by God (because of some divinely ordained nominative determinism involving the word Ishmael) Well, they're only returning the favour, since Muslim countries like the UAE pretend to accept that Britons are not quite wogs because they are notionally People of the Book.

No I think they might be dangerous because Christian Zionism is going to destroy the white race.

Whites will commit suicide in large numbers just to make the jews happy eventually.

Watch some vids on the noachides. Watch how they basically WORSHIP jews. A bit like nastiestuncle but more religious.

James said...

Marcion
Do you refuse the opportunity to examine your assumptions? Do you believe you are less dogmatic than NU? How important is it to you to be right?

I don't think I'm dogmatic at all, or at least try not to be. On this blog I've taken the anti-hitler side, the pro-Hitler side, the anti-jew side, the pro-jew side. I've even stuck up for blacks on occasion if I think they're being unfairly treated.

I've got no dogma. I'm totally confused by it all. However, if I see a statement that doesn't help ease the confusion then I'll jump on it, just for fun.

It's not even clear if Hitler was a traitor or not. Anyone who thinks they know anything is mistaken. (Now that's real Socrates action for you right
there.).

As far as the need to be right goes, perhaps I have on occasion been guilty of that, but others have too.

Let's face it. There's very little actual discussion happening here.

James said...

ecumenicism, because they include Muslims among those heard by God (because of some divinely ordained nominative determinism involving the word Ishmael)

Yes, they say there are no such things ad coincidences. I'd agree. Most bad things that happen to the white race don't "just happen".

Anonymous said...

In light of all of the lies in Spielberg’s fraudulent film ‘The Last Days’, should this film be reclassified as fiction?

Also, should Jew journalist Jonathan Kaufman’s book, ‘Broken Alliance: The Turbulent Times Between Blacks and Jews in America’, be reclassified as fiction?

Frank Galton

Marcion said...

Most bad things that happen to the white race don't "just happen".

I expect not. But I agree with NU that whites are bringing displacement and retreat upon themselves. You only have to look at Hagee gleefully participating in the hideous conceit, which you see more and more, that Christianity is still a Jewish artefact even after 2000 years of European history. It wasn't Jewish to begin with, but maintaining that deception means pretending that Judaism was untouched by several hundred years of Hellenism.

You understand the predicament we are in. Our survival depends on having some kind of kernel of faith we can organise our communities around, but our legacy religion, Christianity, can be co-opted by Jewish or Christian Zionists at any time.

James said...

@Marcion,

Yet nastiestuncle thinks that in the space of 20 years that if he can just stop the National Socialist types, then we'll get rid of the immigrants.

The immigrants, jews, liberals, Hollywood, the governments, etc all working in concert haven't been able to "stop the national socialist types" after 100 years of effort, millions of them.

Now why would that be? Could it be that the jews and liberals like the national socialist types, or at least the ones that do discredit white nationalism? Why is it so hard to get this message afloat. A lead balloon has a bigger chance of getting off the ground.

Are NS types that destructive? All on their own? What's really at work here?

I'd believe Henry Makow 100x more than nastiestuncle.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 23:06

"We’ve already established that NO black soldiers, units or regiments were present when Dachau was liberated."

The inmates would disagree with you, since they saw black soldiers present at the liberation. One of them might even have been Parks.

James said...

@Marcion,

We will never be able to agree what Christianity really is, who Hitler really was, or what's really going on.

That knowledge is simply beyond our reach, isn't it?

(Unless you abandon reason and utilise other, more effective modes of thought perhaps?)

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 00:41

Without the National Socialists and their type, the enemy have little or no ammunition to use against us.
Can they call us "Nazis"? No, because we are not Nazis.
Can they call us "racists"? No, because this is not about hating people because of their skin colour.
Can they call us "anti-Semitic"? No, because we do not hate Jews.

What the Left will soon find is that we are bullet-proof.

The argument has now shifted from "it's all the Jews fault" to "the British people deserve their own homeland." Who can argue with that?

If a leftist says that the British do not deserve their own homeland then it is them who are now on the defensive because why do they hate the British, why are they so bigoted against the British, why do they want the British people to cease to exist, why are they being so racist?

We can't win the argument until the National Socialists stop supplying the enemy with so much ammo.

Most British people want to have their country back. Look at the comment sections on the mainstream newspaper sites. We're crying out to get rid of the traitors. If the National Socialists are taken out of the equation there will be room for a surge in new British confidence.

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: “One of them might even have been Parks.”

But B'nai B'rith International found no proof that parks helped liberate the Dachau concentration camp.

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: “If a leftist says that the British do not deserve their own homeland then it is them who are now on the defensive because why do they hate the British, why are they so bigoted against the British, why do they want the British people to cease to exist, why are they being so racist?”

Decades of Jew indoctrination!

Frank Galton

James said...

NU, you underestimate how much they hate the White race.

They will always have "ammo".

James said...

I do agree that the Nazi image is a bad one, but it's not possible to erase it.
They simply won't let you.

According to the mainstream media, you, nastiestuncle, Mr Anti-Nazi, is also a Nazi.

Shake that one off if you can.

I agree we need to get rid of the Nazi image, but I disagree that they will let you forget about it.

Look at America with slavery. No amount of apologising to blacks works. We could give them ALL our money, ALL our jobs, ALL our daughters, they still would come for more? Why? Because every time we give them anything they hate us even more!

It doesn't matter how you put it - a white homeland is simply a Nazi idea and cannot be allowed to happen. They will do ANYTHING to stop that.

If you yourself actually got somewhere with this, someone would kill you.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 22:47

"Then Zionists tried to scare them into migrating to Israel. Most didn't want to go so blew up about 300 jews and asked again."

BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT

James said...

OTOH maybe it would work.

Where do we start?

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 01:11

No accusation of being a "Nazi" is able to stick to me, or anyone like me.

And in practice, none of the accusations of "Nazi" have stuck to UKIP either.

Accusations only stick if the crowd believes they do.

"They will do ANYTHING to stop that."

Good. Let them come.

Peacefully or violently, the UK shall undergo quite a change. There's still time for it to happen peacefully.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 01:06

"Decades of Jew indoctrination!"

No, I don't think we should say that to them.

James said...

"Then Zionists tried to scare them into migrating to Israel. Most didn't want to go so blew up about 300 jews and asked again."

BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT


Wrong? OK, I'll check. Here's a page that is pro-jew.

http://jewishrefugees.blogspot.co.nz/2007/04/seven-myths-about-jews-from-arab.html

Inconclusive. Miko Peled would disagree with 3 & 6. So that page is no help.

Any I just don't care. Zionists destroyed Iraq and we're supposed to worry about a few Jews?

I'm wasting my time arguing with someone who can't see what Jews are doing to the white race. It's like expecting a severely dyslexic kid to help you decipher an ancient language.

Anonymous said...

James said: “Look at America with slavery. No amount of apologising to blacks works.”

Why won’t Jews apologise to Negroes for their role in the Transatlantic Slave Trade?

All we ever hear about in the Jew/Zionist-controlled media is of white Christians and Muslims enslaving Negroes.

Frank Galton

James said...


Peacefully or violently, the UK shall undergo quite a change. There's still time for it to happen peacefully.


You might be right. I hope you are.

Write a letter to the Queen and ask her to endorse your movement. If I'm right and the Queen hates the British, then it will get nowhere. If I'm wrong, then you will have a most powerful ally in your quest.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 01:01

I bet they would find no proof of the exact movements of millions of people in WW2.

So maybe he was there. Maybe not.

We do know that there were some black soldiers there though. Maybe Parks was one of them. Maybe not.

James said...

Why won’t Jews apologise to Negroes for their role in the Transatlantic Slave Trade?

Because they aren't as dumb as white people are, that's why.

Apologise? They gave blacks a chance bringing them to America. They had to come as slaves for one single reason: they wouldn't have been allowed in otherwise. Well, whitey fell for that one hook, line, and sinker didn't he?

James said...

We do know that there were some black soldiers there though. Maybe Parks was one of them. Maybe not.

Blacks saved the world from Hitler. End of story.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 01:23

Yeah, because the first person I'd contact would be someone who hadn't done her job in stopping the UK from being ruled by a foreign power.

Anonymous said...

David Duke: “Amistad carefully portrays the Slave Trade as a Christian enterprise”.

Couldn’t possibly have anything to do with Jew propagandist Steven Spielberg (there’s that name AGAIN!!!), could it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oul-t9weDrY

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

LITTLE PUNKY JEW nastiestuncle said: “I bet they would find no proof of the exact movements of millions of people in WW2.”

We’re not talking about “millions of people in WW2"; we’re talking about Paul Parks.

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

Is the scheming Jew propagandist, Steven Spielberg, deliberately inciting Negroes to attack dem ebil white Christian debils?

Frank Galton

James said...

Yeah, because the first person I'd contact would be someone who hadn't done her job in stopping the UK from being ruled by a foreign power.

Ok, don't contact her then.

What if she actually had done her job, and her job was to make it happen? Is that a possibility?

Anonymous said...

http://topconservativenews.com/2013/07/world-famous-south-african-chef-slaughtered/

Media silence says everything.

nastiestuncle said...

The inmates are more likely to have come into contact with black soldiers than the top army leaders, since it's likely that the black soldiers would have been involved in thieving food and water and sheeit and raping the wimminz.

Major ooopsie on my part.

Anonymous said...

David Duke: “Amistad carefully portrays the Slave Trade as a Christian enterprise”.

Quince one of the freed african dudes went back to africa to partake in typical african trade- selling slaves.

Wonder why spielberg forgot to include that?

Anonymous said...

David Duke: “Amistad carefully portrays the Slave Trade as a Christian enterprise”.

Quince one of the freed african dudes went back to africa to partake in typical african trade- selling slaves.

Wonder why spielberg forgot to include that?

Anonymous said...

Jamaica:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/transgender_teen_killed_high_father_8g97ng8pJlZnWgn1TLwEwL

Haiti :
http://www.france24.com/en/20130812-mob-attacks-gay-couples-engagement-ceremony-haiti

fitz

St Nilus said...

"The....people of Haiti have not yet learned to be...homophilic...and ..they must , this is a big issue , and we queer jews will be at the centre of that...."