Monday, 15 July 2013

A picture paints 1000 words

There are many Americans that I know who genuinely attribute benign motives to the Real Government's clamping down on private guns.  It's to reduce all those killings. See?

Well no, I don't see at all.   It would make some sense were the number of murders increasing at an alarming rate. On the contrary, the numbers are decreasing at a dramatic pace, down by almost one third in less than twenty years. According to FBI statistics the downward trend continued since 2004 albeit at a much lower trajectory.  There were only 8,000 gun murders in 2011.  And of course, thankfully, the vast majority of such crimes involve blacks and Hispanics.

So why the dramatic, unprecedented project to seize the guns now?

I think all readers of this blog fully understand why.

151 comments:

TBone said...

The Regime is preparing for Martial Law.

Simple as that.

Nastiest Uncle said...

"I think all readers of this blog fully understand why."

Unlikely.

But anyway, it's so that the government will find it easier to chip away at the rights of the people. There isn't going to be some sudden take over; it'll be gradual. The US military won't turn their guns on their own families and people.

Anonymous said...

The regime wants as few guns as possible in the hands of whites.

Every little bit helps white genocide.

Uncle James said...

Haha.

As soon as I read "I think all readers of this blog fully understand why." I straight away decided to post:

No, they don't - nastiestuncle.

Looks like he beat me to it! But he is paid by the hour to work this blog so why not.

Anonymous said...

Personally I'd love to buy and use (recreationally) an AR15, the famous Armalite, so well known here in Ireland. But I wouldn't like to live in a society where I felt I constantly needed one for my protection. I saw enough of that shit in Central America...every gas station, shop and restaurant had armed protection patrolling outside. I'd rather a society where no-one "needed" to have guns, but felt safe because of living amongst a racially homogenous law abiding population. Still I don't see the great benefit of banning guns when you choose not to discourage violence caused in the first place by mixing unassimilable numbers of jigs and sand niggers and other genetic riff-raff into an otherwise peaceful community.

The Colt 45 was not for nothing known as "the great leveler" when it came out first as it made - for the first time in history - all men equally potent at inflicting violence on others, which before was directly linked to one's physical strength and honed skills with edged weapons. So banning guns just gives the edge to those with the "traditional" skills...as practiced in every favela and slum on Earth.

So one way or the other, but not both.

Masurian

Confused said...

Confused indeed I be. In the US Constitution it is said that a militia is essential for the good of public order and that accordingly the "right of the citizens to bear and keep arms shall not be abridged". Do you get it? The Constitution is here vesting in the sovereign people the right to resist their own government, and by force of arms if need be, should that government attempt to take the sovereign people in a direction in which they do not want to go, specifically towards dictatorship or totalitarianism. I may say parenthetically that I know of no regime before or since to have vested, in it's foundation document, that level of faith and trust in the essential goodness of humankind. THAT is what the abolitionists and gun controllers wish to vitiate. Almost all the argumenta bruited about in support of gun control are peripheral, where they make sense at all.

James said...

But anyway, it's so that the government will find it easier to chip away at the rights of the people. There isn't going to be some sudden take over; it'll be gradual. The US military won't turn their guns on their own families and people.

Is this an opinion, facts, or a joke?

James said...

The regime wants as few guns as possible in the hands of whites.

Then why is Obama called gun salesman of the year?

Maybe they want all the Goyim shooting at each other? Could that be a possibility?

A race war only benefits Whites if they win it.

James said...

So banning guns just gives the edge to those with the "traditional" skills

No banning guns gives the edge to those who ignore the ban, such as criminals and police.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Uncle James 22:10

My nigger.

Anonymous said...

This is a picture of Trayvon Martin on the night he was killed.

http://media2.wptv.com//photo/2013/05/22/TM711_4_20130522123142_640_480.PNG

Big lad.

The media have been using the picture of him as a little kid. By doing that they undermined Zimmerman's plea of self-defense.

The whole trial was an attempted assault on the right to self-defense.

Same as wanting to ban guns.

Also connected is the clip from "Nat Turner" linked in the previous thread where black people are being incited to murder white babies.

So
- assault on self-defense
- assault on gun ownership
- incitement to violence against whites

USG and media turning more gulag 2.0 every day.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 23:01

"Is this an opinion, facts, or a joke?"

Well, since the future is not something which has happened yet, then any talk of it is opinion.

However, some people's guesses are going to be more educated than others.
Take your usual people who think that Rothschilds own $500 trillion, Anne Frank's diary was written in Biro, intense fires cannot bring down steel-framed buildings, Protocols were real, and so on, and their opinion of what will happen in the future is probably going to be not very accurate because their understanding of the past and present is not grounded in reality, so it's reasonable to expect that they understanding of the future will not be grounded in reality either.

So with that said, any plan to subjugate the American people is something which will happen gradually rather than quickly. This has already been proven, since efforts to subjugate them up until now have been gradual and have not been opposed by armed Americans. Sudden efforts, such as imposition of martial law, moving people into camps, deploying troops on streets, etc, across the country, would be likely to be met by the mobilisation of several dozen million white Americans (many of them veterans) armed to the teeth, a force which would be more than a match for the entire American military, and that's assuming that the US military plus law enforcement, were it to be deployed against the US population, would not suffer significant desertions, which I think it would. The US government could probably rely on law enforcement to suppress the people, but the military would be more likely to be loyal to the American people and not the government.

Anonymous said...

Key word: "...thankfully..."

James said...

So with that said, any plan to subjugate the American people is something which will happen gradually rather than quickly. This has already been proven, since efforts to subjugate them up until now have been gradual and have not been opposed by armed Americans. Sudden efforts, such as imposition of martial law, moving people into camps, deploying troops on streets, etc, across the country, would be likely to be met by the mobilisation of several dozen million white Americans (many of them veterans) armed to the teeth, a force which would be more than a match for the entire American military, and that's assuming that the US military plus law enforcement, were it to be deployed against the US population, would not suffer significant desertions, which I think it would. The US government could probably rely on law enforcement to suppress the people, but the military would be more likely to be loyal to the American people and not the government.

Nup. You seem to be sailing off to lala land buddy.

James said...

Take your usual people who think that Rothschilds own $500 trillion, Anne Frank's diary was written in Biro, intense fires cannot bring down steel-framed buildings, Protocols were real, and so on, and their opinion of what will happen in the future is probably going to be not very accurate because their understanding of the past and present is not grounded in reality, so it's reasonable to expect that they understanding of the future will not be grounded in reality either.

What? Biros? Diaries? What's that got to do with anything?
Why do you keep going on about Anne Frank's pen?

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 00:24

You know perfectly well what I mean. It's explained in the post.

Anonymous said...

If Barack Obama isn't 'white' then George Zimmerman isn't 'white' either. So what's the fuss about whites in the black community in this case?

St Nilus said...

"The US military won't turn their guns on their own families and people."

Massive LOL.

Just like the cops wont tase people or shoot their dogs or drag old ladies out of their cars by their hair and kick them in the head.

LOLLOPALOOZA!

St Nilus said...

Its the jews , stupid.

That's all you need to know.

Nastiest Uncle said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nastiest Uncle said...

@St Nilus 01:07

"Massive LOL."

What do you have to back that shit up?

"Just like the cops wont tase people or shoot their dogs or drag old ladies out of their cars by their hair and kick them in the head."

Who said that? Certainly not me, because I said, "The US government could probably rely on law enforcement to suppress the people".

Anonymous said...

Here's another 1,000 words for you:

Black guys beat up white guy over Zimmerman verdict

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8umZhhKR0c

Hurry and watch before the yootoob flaggers take it down

St Nilus said...

Army folks are trained to obey orders.

Hence the training.

Theyll firebomb a village in Vietnam , rape a few saucy 15 year old Iraqi girls , but will miraculously discover their morals in Wisconsin!

Just like the National Guard in Ohio that shot...students!

Or those nice policemen that gleefully maced those seated "Occupy" protestors.

No , the glorious US Army would NEVER shoot at Americans!

The most stupid fucking thing you have ever said. They are trained to shoot and kill. They will shoot and kill anyone and anything they are ordered to.

Hence the "training" .

St Nilus said...

Sorry Nastiest , maybe I got the wrong end of the stick. I thought you said that American troops would never fire upon Americans. It's late.


Truth Militia Podcast:

http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-124608/TS-765990.mp3

http://truthmilitia.com/

St Nilus said...

Very touching:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=63v4HlOCYvY

James said...

Ruby Ridge and Waco are famous examples.

James said...

Who said that? Certainly not me, because I said, "The US government could probably rely on law enforcement to suppress the people".

The cops are so miltitarized now there's not much difference.

Sherriff John Brown in his APC having himself some fun.

James said...

You know perfectly well what I mean. It's explained in the post.

I actually quoted the post, so don't tell me I didn't read it.

It still makes no sense. Its garbage bullshit that is designed to be impossible to argue against so Mr Right can feel good about himself again.

Seek counselling dude. There's definitely something wrong in there somewhere.

James said...

You know perfectly well what I mean. It's explained in the post.

Not really, its just a few farcical and not-even-falsifiable-even-if-they-are-wrong statements that constitute your usual BS.

Anonymous said...

I suppose the Ohio National Guardsmen at Kent State University in 1970 didn't fire upon their own family members and people, so they're off the hook...right NU?

N-word-lover said...

They have faked atrocity photos too.

http://www.heretical.com/walendy/fakes.html

Even the amazing Simon Wiesenthal is guilty of this.

James said...

nastiestuncle, do you believe that "Anne Frank's Diary" was an actual diary?

kulak said...

Then why is Obama called gun salesman of the year?

Huh?

Because people sense the threat and think confiscation might happen under him, and the state moves more slowly than they do.

When they're -- ahem -- spooked.

Buying lots of guns feels like doing something, but most whites will turn them over when ordered, just like they "sheltered in place" when ordered in Boston after the bombing.

Just about the only people SERIOUS about the right to keep and bear arms are the criminals.

They have no permits and have unregistered weapons not on a state list.

katana said...

Fred Reeds' take on the usefulness of guns.

-----------------

Roll Over, Bark, and Beg - Fertilizer for the Pansy Bed

July 8, 2008

Oh god. There is no hope.

The other day I glanced at the web site of the Lake Chapala Society, a social club of sorts for expats around Mexico’s Lake Chapala, an hour south of Guadalajara (where I live). Clicking on “Safety,” I found a long list of reasons why you should never, ever use a firearm to protect your home and family. No. See, you might miss, or be scared, or the intruders might take it away and shoot you, and they might be all mad and hurt you when all they wanted was your television. No, the best thing is to let them do what they want, and then maybe they won’t do anything bad to you.

This supposedly was written by a retired cop but, if so, he (or quite possible she, judging by the tone) doesn’t sound like any cop I have known, which is whole lots. Anyway, his, her, or its advice, is “Leave the guns to people who are trained and prepared to use them.” Which he says he is.

Nuts. To begin with, cops usually know little about guns. They get a bit of training in the police academy, and then once or twice a year go to the range to fire a couple of magazines. Being actually good with a pistol requires putting tens of thousands of rounds downrange. Street shooting, which is what cops do in the unlikely event that they do any shooting at all, requires training of the sort offered by IPSC or, years back, Jeff Cooper and Chuck Taylor.

A few cops will learn on their own. When I went to shoot at the NRA range on Waples Mill Road in northern Virginia, I saw an occasional dedicated cop. But police departments don’t engage in real training because it costs a lot, takes a lot of time, and just isn’t worth it. The average cop never fires his weapon in line of duty. It serves chiefly as a badge of authority.

Smith (I’ll call him or her) implies further that no one who isn’t a cop knows how to use a pistol. He needs to get out more. In the small-town South of my boyhood, everybody had guns. We used them for hunting, for shooting varmints, and for plinking. My father gave me my first rifle when I was eleven in Athens, Alabama. In high school in Virginia, the first day of deer season was a school holiday because the teachers knew the boys would all be in the woods. When I was fifteen, friends and I often went to the dump in Colonial Beach at night to snap-shoot rats.

I later went to a federal fire-arms school at Parris Island in South Carolina. You may have heard of it. So did hundreds of thousands of other kids. The emphasis was on deadly force. At Camp Lejeune we did fire-and-maneuver with live ammo. (Also flamethrowers and 3.5" rocket launchers, though I do not recommend these for home defense.) If Smith were to check the number of men who have gone through the Army or Marines, he would find that very large numbers of people have had training in the use of firearms.

But what I dislike most about Smith’s advice is his advocacy of helpless passivity. It embodies a profound change in American attitudes, which once favored self-reliance. Now it’s reliance on the group. Don’t take primary responsibility for your defense. No, that would be violent, or scary, or macho, and all. No, let the criminals do whatever they want with you, rely on their merciful natures, and call 911 if you survive.

This is exactly what Smith advocates. If I were a criminal, I would love this guy.

His advice is bad. He says, correctly enough, that most intruders want chiefly to steal things. Think a little. At two a.m., you hear a noise and turn on the lights. You find two guys with knives. You can now identify them. They have knives. Focus on this point. Knives, and you can identify them. Do you see where this leads?

Continued here ...

katana said...

More from Fred Reed on guns.

--------------------

Gun Control - It Doesn't Have Much To Do With Guns


If you were to trust the media, truly never a wise thing to do, you might believe the controversy over gun-control to be a Manichean dispute between shadowy fascists and an angelic horde. (Journalism is ever the dark night of the mind.) Talk to the contending forces and you get an equally silly view: The pro-gun folk think that the other side wants to make the nation into a communist dictatorship. The anti-gun crowd believe that the other side consists of heartless Bull Conner clones who want shoot orphans, widows, and people in wheel chairs.

Actually, good and evil have little to do with it. The debate over guns is a clash of cultures, a confrontation of different kinds of character, a disagreement over social philosophy, and even--though few notice this--over free will and determinism. The contending factions don't need guns to detest each other. They would anyway.

Those who favor free ownership of firearms tend to be rural, from the South or west, tough-minded, self-reliant, and disposed to believe in personal responsibility--i.e., free will. Those opposed are usually urban or suburban, more northerly and easterly, unacquainted with self-reliance, tender-minded, and inclined to believe in determinism--i.e., that society determines our behavior. Exception can be found in droves, yes. Western megalopolitans may oppose ownership of guns, while New Yorkers from small towns may not. But the foregoing dichotomies establish the poles of the debate.

The two sides have entirely different views of the world. In their approach to guns, both are expressing their experience. They hate each other.

Let's start with the outlook of the pro-gun folk. I know them well, having grown up in rural Virginia. Everybody had guns, certainly including me. (A lovely Marlin lever-action .22.) Kids of fifteen bought ammunition at any country store, and no one thought anything of it. The first day of deer season was a high-school holiday, since the teachers knew that the boys weren't going to be there anyway.

Guns were several things to us. To people who often lived at the low end of lower middle class, the shooting of ninety pounds of dressed venison was not trivial. Farmers used guns to kill whistle pigs that ate crops. Shooting was sport, guns and dogs a source of protection in lonely homes. For a boy, getting a first gun was a rite of passage to adulthood, or toward it, like a driver's license or a girl's first bra. Though few recognized it, guns symbolized the independence that rural people prize.

There was almost no crime, and no gun crime at all. We shot rats, deer, beer cans, frogs, and golf balls. (Well, I did.) We didn't shoot each other. We didn't think about it. There were things you just didn't do. When two kids settled a dispute in the boy's room, bloody noses and puffy eyes abounded. Nobody--ever--kicked the other guy in the head, picked up a piece of pipe, or went for a gun.

Continued here ...

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 03:02

Firing at lefty students is the same as being asked to help enslave your own granny is it?

parisclaims said...

Not wishing to be argumentative, but one reason for the decline in deaths by handguns could be improvements in medical practices.
That said, if I lived there I'd own a gun.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@St Nilus 01:19

Police and army attract a different type of person. The police can be counted on by the state to do whatever they are told because law enforcement tends to attract authoritarian types. The army is a different matter as it's mostly "regular guys" who join up.

In Syria, when government troops were ordered to fire on civilians some of them refused and were forced to shoot by security agents (ie. police types) holding guns to their backs.

Are American troops, who are better people surely than the Syrians, expected to behave less honourably? Are American troops expected to disarm the US population knowing full well that when they retire they will be entering the ranks of the unarmed, enslaved? Yeah, right. Units would rebel left right and centre.

"Theyll firebomb a village in Vietnam , rape a few saucy 15 year old Iraqi girls , but will miraculously discover their morals in Wisconsin!"

Yeah because they have the same ties to the Vietnamese as they have to their own people, and the entire US army was responsible for raping Iraqi girls, not just isolated units. Tsk.

Just imagine if you were an American soldier holding a gun over a family you didn't know, knowing that whilst you were doing that, some other soldier was holding a gun over your wife and kids. Would you shoot? Would you try and find out how your own family was doing? Would you want to tell your colleague with his gun over your family not to shoot? Might you shoot your own officer rather than shoot civilians?

The army doesn't churn out robots who will obey orders without question.

And, the oath of enlistment puts protecting the constitution and defending against foreign and DOMESTIC enemies before obeying the POTUS and superior officers. For the national guard, the oath is to defend the state first. Each oath is subject to law and regulations. The president cannot just order the army to do whatever he likes, because if he does, they have the right to refuse if the order is unlawful or against the constitution.

I know that you guise want to believe that the army is evil and Jew-controlled and so on but your guise' need to satisfy your feelings, and in some cases sexual needs, doesn't trump probable future reality I'm afraid.

Hector G. said...

Don't often agree with you Nastiest but I think you're correct when saying it will be gradual. If of course we can call the speed of what happened already gradual.

But yes, it will not happen over night. A solid chipping away at whites' strengths and resources and a gradual increasing powers of the State.

Dame Edith said...

Not wishing to be argumentative, but one reason for the decline in deaths by handguns could be improvements in medical practices

Not in the space of 20 years, surely?

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Hector G. 08:36

Of course it will be gradual. It's been gradual so far.
The reason why it is a gradual process is that people are less likely to notice.

The older a person is, the more they will notice the difference between how things were when they were young and how things are now, but the older a person is, the less likely they will be to pick up and gun and use it. The government will know this too.

We can forget about any fantasies of people being rounded up and put in camps like is stated on the conspiracy masturbation blogs. There's more than enough for the usual suspects to wank over without having to fabricate this particular line of doom and gloom.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Dame Edith 08:49

Lots of reasons have been put forward:
Demographic change - aging baby boomers.
No more lead in the atmosphere from petrol.
More jobs in the 90s for the potentially unemployed.
A declined cocaine/ crack industry.
There are others.

Rob said...

So why the dramatic, unprecedented project to seize the guns now?

To make the world safe again for cherubic, Skittle-buying sons of Obama.

Uncle Nasty said...

kulak said...

Then why is Obama called gun salesman of the year?

Huh?

Because people sense the threat and think confiscation might happen under him, and the state moves more slowly than they do.

When they're -- ahem -- spooked.

Buying lots of guns feels like doing something, but most whites will turn them over when ordered, just like they "sheltered in place" when ordered in Boston after the bombing.


Interestingly enough, Kulak, I recommend you read Guns and Violence: The English Experience by
Joyce Lee Malcolm


http://www.amazon.com/Guns-Violence-The-English-Experience/dp/0674016084/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1373976651&sr=8-1&keywords=the+english+experience

At the end of the book, Ms Malcolm states that regardless of the draconian anti gun laws passed in Britain, there are probably tens -- if not hundreds of thousands of what I like to call free-range firearms. Not everyone falls into line ... and I am not referring to Jamaican "gangstahs"

New Zealand attempted a huge crackdown in the early 90's after the Aramoana massacre but backed off a lot when they were informed (by pro gun advocates) that sales of 6 inch and 8 inch PVC drain pipe had gone through the roof ... not to mention end-caps for the pipe which, when one thinks of the original intended purpose, seemed, in retrospect, a little odd.

This was told to the commissioner of NZ police and Philip Alpers -- a known anti gun loony -- by several people with a "What the fuck are you going to do about that?" grin.

UN
.

Sponge Cake said...

Piers Morgan scraping the bottom of the barrel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdSxdSPn7HM

Sponge Cake said...

Hispanic beaten by knee-grows

Justis fo Traboon

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/crime/blog/bs-md-trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-monday-20130715,0,5135359.story

Anonymous said...

"Why do you keep going on about Anne Frank's pen?"

Exactly. Who gives a flying fuck about Anne Frank.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 13:02

Mein Schwartze.

It's not about Anne Frank's pen, it's about the belief which goes with it. If someone believes that she wrote her diary in Biro, bearing in mind that she didn't, then what does that say about that person's grounding in reality? What does that say about their ability to understand the past or predict the future?

I'm here to make you guise look stupid here so that you can learn from it and not look stupid in real life where it counts.

:)

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Sponge Cake 12:55

It suggests the death of the nation is coming when the likes of Rachel Jeantel are allowed in. To observe her and to hear her speak is to witness some kind of evolutionary throwback.

Anonymous said...

The Zimmerman trial was all about showing whitey that when he rightfully defends himself against the Black Undertow he will be dragged through the courts until he is bankrupt, unemployed, and alienated.

Snowhitey

Anonymous said...

..... not that it will stop us.....

Snowhitey

Anonymous said...

"@Anonymous 13:02

Mein Schwartze.

It's not about Anne Frank's pen, it's about the belief which goes with it. If someone believes that she wrote her diary in Biro, bearing in mind that she didn't, then what does that say about that person's grounding in reality? What does that say about their ability to understand the past or predict the future?

I'm here to make you guise look stupid here so that you can learn from it and not look stupid in real life where it counts.

:)"

Ye, whatever you total prick

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 14:18

Neger, bitte. Stop flirting with me. I don't dig you that way.

Anonymous said...

>>but one reason for the decline >>in deaths by handguns could be >>improvements in medical practices

>Not in the space of 20 years, >surely?

Yes, very dramatic decline in mortality despite *increased* violence.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324712504578131360684277812.html

"The reported number of people treated for gunshot attacks from 2001 to 2011 has grown by nearly half."

"Our experience is we are saving many more people we didn't save even 10 years ago,"

Anonymous said...

Gun grabbing in the states will be as fast or as slow as TPTB can get away with. The more resistance there is the slower. If there was no resistance at all they'd do it the next day if they could.

Sponge Cake said...

@Nastiest Uncle

Here's more stone age people

How's your Ebonics NU

http://topconservativenews.com/2013/07/trayvon-supporters-mass-at-the-scene-of-self-defense-shooting-in-little-rock-ar/

Anonymous said...

'Jeantel also responded to the massive mockery she received in social media for the way she speaks, explaining that she was born with an under-bite that has made it difficult for her to speak clearly.'
But clearly not to eat.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Sponge Cake 16:39

After studying the species for a short time I have a rudimentary understanding of their language, if you can call it that.
I call it "nigger babble".

reveal1914 said...

KTVU News sacked their producer after their news reader read out bogus names of the Asiana flight 214 pilots.

> Captain Sum Ting Wong.

> Wi Tu Lo.

> Ho Lee Fuk.

> Bang Ding Ow.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFA7t1sHxBI

stand your ground said...

Stevie Wonder doesn't think whitey should be able to defend himself from attacks by blacks:

"The singer Stevie Wonder meanwhile announced during a concert in Canada that he will boycott Florida and all other states with “stand your ground” laws that heavily favour self-defence cases in shootings."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10183376/Trayvon-Martin-half-of-jury-thought-George-Zimmerman-was-guilty.html

Sponge Cake said...

Translate English to Ebonics.

http://englishtoghetto.com/

sayanara said...

Here's a very large and very useful list of Jew-aware sites courtesy of The British Resistance....

http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/guest-writers/2474-list-of-jadar-sites

Pass it on!!

James said...


It's not about Anne Frank's pen, it's about the belief which goes with it. If someone believes that she wrote her diary in Biro, bearing in mind that she didn't, then what does that say about that person's grounding in reality?


Dude, she didn't actually right a diary, it was more a collection of stories. They weren't even written on the days they were claimed to be. The stories weren't even all about real events.

A diary is a chronology of "What did I do today" daily recollections. Anne Frank's corpus of stories was not that.

Conclusion: There was no real diary. The whole thing's a hoax to generate money and guilt. Sure the poor girl died of Typhus in a camp, and I feel sorry for her for that, but facts are still facts.

It isn't.--nastiestuncle

James said...

Anonymous 3895 said:

Ye, whatever you total prick

That's Prick, with a capital P mate.

James said...

Everyone thinks Zimmerman is White.

He'd be so proud, he's wanted that his entire life.

enrichment kills said...

Left-wing, multikulti Swedish activist gets too much 'enrichment':

http://birminghamnationalist2.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/afican-immigrant-rapes-kills-idigenous_14.html

WARNING: graphic and gruesome pictures!

James said...

Exactly. Who gives a flying fuck about Anne Frank.

I do. She suffered terribly in a nasty camp. Nobody should go through that.

But lots of people suffered during those terrible times.

Sponge Cake said...

Knee-grows in Crenshaw protesting over Traygone.

It's like a scene from the recent movie World War Z

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx8UCGzx7Fg

James said...

Fred said:

a society of the tender-minded, inclined toward organized compassion instead of toward gutting it out, a land of therapy, support groups, and the detailed study of feelings

The land of nastiestuncle and his boyfriend. Nice.

James said...

Fred also said:

There is, of course, more than the cultural divide behind the dispute. The unspoken subtext of debate over guns, always, is race. Whites are terrified of blacks. When their first kid reaches school age, the parents move to the whiter suburbs--liberals as quickly as conservatives. When whites think about armed robbers, rapists, or burglars coming through the window in the night, they think about blacks. The statistics bear them out. The carnage in the cities, for example, is almost entirely committed by blacks against blacks.

No Whites aren't terrified of backs.

We just know we aren't allowed to do anything about them (yet?).

If it was open season, if being white was adequate defence in court, then Whitey would get massive payback. I'm certain of that.

One day the payback will come. Then the blacks will realise that when they are outnumbered 2 to 1, they have about as much chance as Whitey does now when he's outnumbered 20 to 1. You see, blacks are blow-hard cowards and weaklings for their size really.

Cleaner said...

If Elin Krantz truly was a divershitty hor then that pic made my day.

If she wasn't then I'll be sad.

So far it looks like she was so Ephram Yohannes is my new hero.

Remember the Sewerdish Government's Blending Video? WTF!?

Cleaner said...

More pix if you need them.

http://www.bestgore.com/murder/rape-murder-elin-krantz-nigger-immigrant-multiculturalism-sweden/#

It's hard to actually care. She deserved it.

Cleaner said...

More details:

http://blonde-on-a-mission.tumblr.com/post/31460603540/multicultural-Sweden

Because Sweden is so multicultural now, no Swedish media could publish the fact that the perpetrator was an immigrant or that he was black in their reports on the case. They could not even mention his name by law, so they referred to him merely as a “23 year old”, saying things like “the 23 year old was charged with murder and aggravated rape”.

Makes you sick.

James said...

Guess how Ephrem Yohannes got to Sweden? That's right, he claimed refugee status. From which country? The USA ferchrissakes! What was he running from? They kept putting him in jail because he was BLACK!!


While living in Virginia, USA, Ephrem Tadele Yohannes was sentenced to 13 months and 11 days in prison for drunk driving, hit and run and provision of false testimonies. He whined that he’s being mistreated in the USA because he’s black and was granted refugee status in multiculturalism embracing Sweden. Poor Ephrem was treated like shit which he was in the US prison and used the fact that he’s black to get to Sweden. To thank Sweden for what she’d done for him, he raped and murder one of her natives.


Nastiestuncle better do some fact checking because this is so crazy its unreal.
You couldn't make this up could you?

James said...

There is a good politician in Sweden.

Thoralf Alfsson.

http://www.thelocal.se/33136/20110411/

On his blog he wrote:

"With regards to group rape, it almost exclusively refers to offenders with immigrant or foreign origin."

Alfsson's blog post refers to the trial of three men suspected of aggravated rape in Västervik in June 2009.

In his post Alfsson, who is one of 20 Sweden Democrat members of Sweden's Riksdag, continues by way of explanation:

"In order to commit these crimes the perpetrator's view of humanity and attitudes to women must almost constitute an illness. This is found very rarely among ethnic Swedes, but is much more common in men from some other cultures where gender equality does not exist."

Since the election the Sweden Democrats have had to deal with a raft of cases of party bloggers and online forum posters who express personal views that differ from official party policy.

In recent months one party member courted controversy by claiming that "Africans have a 'child rape gene'", while another grabbed headlines for admitting that he is against "race mixing" and describing Islam as "a violent pedophile cult".

The party typically responds to each incident with protestations the comments do not reflect party policy and that they reject accusations of a racism. In the two cases mentioned above the members were removed from their positions of responsibility.

But in the case of Thoralf Alfsson, party secretary Björn Söder has limited his criticism to one point made by his colleague:

"There is a clear majority of foreigners who commit group rapes, but to say that it is exclusively foreign men is taking things a bit far."


Yeah, a bit but not much.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Cleaner 19:45

"It's hard to actually care. She deserved it."

She deserved to be raped and murdered for being naive?

Anonymous said...

She deserved to be raped and murdered for being naive?

Not those things specifically, but it is a good thing she is gone, since she harbored hatred in her heart and actively supported white genocide. She was an immediate danger to all Swedish children and an indirect one to all white children everywhere.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Anonymous 20:18

"actively supported white genocide."

I doubt that very much. I bet she didn't even know what white genocide is. It's most likely that she was just naive. It's not like she was a politician or anything like that.

Anonymous said...

Ag no fuck man is Nastiest foreskin still talking crap on here ?

James said...

nastiestuncle puked:
I doubt that very much. I bet she didn't even know what white genocide is. It's most likely that she was just naive. It's not like she was a politician or anything like that.

Naïve? So she never heard of racism? All that time she must have spent battling racists and she still had no idea how they think? She didn't know that lots of people in Sewerden didn't like immigrants and didn't want them there? She didn't have any idea that racists have a point?

In any case she aint naïve anymore, so at least some good has come out of this. I'm sure Mr Black Man Rapist would have spelled it out very clearly for her: We hate you white bitches that think you can help us. You still think you are better than us don't you? You skinny white chicks think nobody could hate you, because you are helping us? I got news for you. I know you still think you are better than I am. I still hate you, I hate all white people. Take this bitch.

Besides that, nastiestuncle, you don't need to know what something is to support it. Ever heard of a "useful idiot"?

Naiveté is no excuse. Ignorance of the law is no excuse in court, and its even less excuse in the court of nature.

She got exactly what she deserved. People like her are causing untold misery in western lands.

I've got 100x more sympathy for Anne Frank than her. Anne Frank was innocent. Elin Krantz was not.

James said...

nastiestuncle,

How many Elin Krantzs have to die this way before naiveté is no excuse? 100? 1000? A million? 10 million?

I bet if you went to her a week before and told her not to hang out with blacks she would have sneered at you and snogged one (with lots of tongue) right in front of your face. I've had that done to me, and it wasn't even an activist that did it.

ACTIVIST. Does that mean anything to you? She was an ACTIVIST.

A.C.T.I.V.I.S.T.

That means she was ACTIVE.

She wasn't as naïve as you think.

She ACTED.

She didn't ACT in the best interests of Sweden, so to hell with her.

Simon Sheppard says it best, its quite common these days. As with most things, immigration has a sexual element too. Its part-and-parcel with feminism. It gives females power to bring in immigrants that compete with white men and drive them nuts.

Who has low self-esteem in this situation? Certainly not the woman. She is attempting to demonstrate (possibly due to insecurity of the exaggerated esteem she has of herself) that she is superior to you. She is conferring low esteem on you. This is precisely what she is doing by flaunting her relationship with an immigrant in front of you – "I prefer a wog to you." This also explains why, although women like wogs, most don't go to wog-land to indulge their perversion – because one its greatest benefits, of being able to spite their men by this practice, would be unavailable to them there.

http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/in-women.html"

James said...

The black in this case realised that he meant nothing to Elin Krantz, except as a black.

That pissed him off, so he went nuts and did nasty things to her.

He cured her naiveté one hopes (if she was naïve), but even that isn't guaranteed. Brainwashing is rather powerful.

James said...

Firstly, some men claim that only a particular kind of women go with immigrants. This is not true. I actually measured this (sitting at the side of a shopping mall with a clipboard over several weeks) and confirmed that the tendency to race-mix was led by women. Further, the tendency was expressed by women of all ages, ugly and attractive, and across all social classes. (I am excluding from this analysis Unstable Females, who are the first to defy social conventions, and who pave the way for others – when women see that UF's successfully get away with it, they follow suit. UF's in the past would have been burned as witches, or similarly persecuted, in order to prevent their aberrant behaviour reverberating for generations afterwards.) This is evident from the "common slapper" picking up a nigger at a nightclub to Princess Di opening her legs for Dodi al-Fayed.

Unstable Females - used as propaganda all the time on TV.

...the first to defy social conventions, and who pave the way for others – when women see that UF's successfully get away with it, they follow suit.

So propaganda works.

It doesn't.--nastiestuncle

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 21:34

Mein neger.

In the world of the Jew obsessed, either you're a white nationalist or you are anti-white. Reality is not so simple.

Some people don't think that there are any races except one which is the human race.
Some people think that all races should be able to live together in a multi-culural heaven, tra-la-la.
Some people are so turned off by white nationalists, who let's admit have enormously fucked up the public face of anti-immigration for forty years, that they'll believe the exact opposite of what the white nationalists believe.

Just as a person can be declared guilty or innocent for killing another person, so someone can be guilty or innocent for supporting immigration. It depends on their reason for doing so.

So if Elin Kranz supported immigration because she wanted her countrymen to be raped or killed then she is guilty and she got what was coming to her. If she supported immigration because she was basically a dumbass then she deserves some sympathy; not an enormous amount of sympathy like you would give to a child, but still some sympathy. The penalty for being a dumbass regarding immigration isn't to be raped and killed any more than the penalty for being a lion tamer is to be bitten to death.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Dame Edith said...

Not wishing to be argumentative, but one reason for the decline in deaths by handguns could be improvements in medical practices

Not in the space of 20 years, surely?


Interestingly enough, during the nineties in South Africa, when it was well into the process of becoming a Rainbow Nation, South African clinics and hospitals were flooded with requests from overseas doctors to train in treating gunshot trauma.

Several of the European medics pointed out that, back in their home countries, they could go through years without ever seeing a gunshot wound, whereas in the new improved RSA, they could observe and assist in dozens -- in the space of a single week.

Even the lowly paramedics and ambulance drivers (absolutely no insult intended) were far better versed in practical and effective stabilisation tactics than the best that Europe and the US could offer.

See? It's an ill wind ...

UN
.

James said...

So if Elin Kranz supported immigration because she wanted her countrymen to be raped or killed then she is guilty and she got what was coming to her. If she supported immigration because she was basically a dumbass then she deserves some sympathy; not an enormous amount of sympathy like you would give to a child, but still some sympathy. The penalty for being a dumbass regarding immigration isn't to be raped and killed any more than the penalty for being a lion tamer is to be bitten to death.

Damn your thinking is warped.

if Elin Kranz supported immigration because she wanted her countrymen to be raped or killed then she is guilty and she got what was coming to her

Do you actually think I believe that her punishment fitted this crime?

No.

Promoting immigration leads to dozens of small annoyances daily for millions of people.
Also, it leads to millions of aware white people to despair for their people's future. Add all that up, and you can she that she aids and abets an ideology which causes more misery overall than what she experienced on her last night on earth.

Nobody is saying she promoted what she got. Stop being such a shit head.

If she supported immigration because she was basically a dumbass then she deserves some sympathy;

No, she doesn't. If you asked her for some sympathy because you are upset at all the immigration destroying your country, you would have got nothing but hatred and contempt from her. So that is what I have for her, in turn - hatred and contempt. I have no sympathy for her.

Uncle Nasty said...

Further to my last, here's some food for thought.

I used to know a lot of nurses, nursing sisters and even a few matrons**, thanks to a really good friend who had an Ob/Gyn sister for a GF.
He used to call her his "little koeksuster". South Africans will get the point.

Believe me, you got lots and lots of Saturday night dates if you were in with the nurses at the Jo'burg Gen.

Anyhoo, over a date one night, one of the trauma sisters casually mentioned that nigger felons shot during attempted felonies were no longer being admitted to the Gen (Johannesburg General Hospital ... universally known as "the Gen")

Why was this, I asked.

Her reply? Their survival rate was extremely low ... the nurses and sisters made sure of it. It was amazing what ten to fifteen units of insulin slipped into the IV could do.

Nurses are ... naturally conservative. They see too much to entertain liberal fantasies.

A few weeks later, all wounded nigger felons were shipped only to private clinics ... the bill to be footed by the ANC govt. -- i.e., the taxpayer.

If anyone should know an expat ZA medical person, ask them yourselves.

BTW, for John (Old retired Chicago Cop) read Joseph Wambaugh's cop novels. His extremely practical attitude to niggers was hilarious.

UN

** Not all matrons are 50 year old battleaxes, BTW.
.

Anonymous said...

People need to breath to live.

Yo my nigga. If you had my superior intellect you would KNOW that is not true. Check the facts.

But...

Don't expect me to do everything for you. Research and you will find that F.L. Finkestein PROVED that we don't.

But....

Look scumbag. Here I am brain the size of a planet and you CAN'T think for yourself. Check the facts.

But.....

Typical Nazi, Believes everything he reads on the internet.

But.....

Are you so Jew obsessed that you cannot see anything else? You Nazi Fascists are never going to get anywhere. Check the facts like I do and you will be right. I'm always right. Without exception. Ever. That's right I'm always right. Get used to it. Right, right right. If I say it's right it will be fact. Your small mind cannot grasp the enormity of my in intellect.
She puts the lotion on the skin or she gets the hose again.

But......

Oy vey my little goyim. Finkelstein PROVED beyond doubt by proper science and stuff, done in a laboratory with Bunsen burners and test tubes and shit you don't need to breathe. Let me put it simply so your puny mind can understand. If you light a match and hold it against a 5cm diameter steel rod the rod will bend (malleable stage) then melt (the melty stage).

But....

You will witness my Becoming.
Look at my intellect.
Do you see?
Look at my brainpower.
Do you see?
Look how clever I think I am.
Do you see?
Look at my superior smugness.
Do you see?

But....

Before Me you are a slug in the sun. You are privy to a great Becoming and you recognize nothing. You are an ant in the after-birth.
It is in your nature to do nothing correctly: before Me you rightly tremble. Fear is not what you owe Me, you and the other pismires. You owe Me awe.

Fuck off you loony.

Lemmyhead

Nastiest Uncle said...

@Lemmyhead 22:47

You got sunstroke there chief?

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 22:22

Is there a heatwave over in New Zealand as well?

James said...

I think Lemmyhead is better than you.

The penalty for being a dumbass regarding immigration isn't to be raped and killed any more than the penalty for being a lion tamer is to be bitten to death.

Sorry mate, that's too complicated. Can you make it simpler. It looks suspiciously like bullshit the way you put it.

James said...


Is there a heatwave over in New Zealand as well?


It is the middle of winter here.

No, it isn't.--nastiestinchle

Its close enough, its cold anyway.

No, it isn't.--nastiestuncle

Its hot in the UK though.

No, it isn't.--nastiestuncle

You're right. Got just heard you and changed the weather. Silly god not keeping up with the latest pronouncements from on high.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Holy smokes, Lemmyhead.

The only one you omitted was "Look upon my works, ye mighty ... and despair."

Nice pwn.

UN
.

James said...

Back to the topic at hand.

Does anyone here really care?

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 00:26

I think Lemmyhead is better than me as well, but I'm a Jew and must be wrong so that means he can't be better than me. I think that's how it works.

That Red Dragon shit was insightful though. I'm the dude with the fake gnashers and you guise are all tied up, shitting yourselves before I rip your lips off and use you to frighten a parking attendant. And it takes a whole bunch of bullets to bring me down whereas you all die with one shot. In this version, I'm not queer though. You all are. It reflects the pwnage which goes on here on a daily basis.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
stand your ground said...

Stevie Wonder doesn't think whitey should be able to defend himself from attacks by blacks:

"The singer Stevie Wonder meanwhile announced during a concert in Canada that he will boycott Florida and all other states with “stand your ground” laws that heavily favour self-defence cases in shootings."


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10183376/Trayvon-Martin-half-of-jury-thought-George-Zimmerman-was-guilty.html
16 July 2013 19:00

How the fuck would he know, anyway?

You could plonk him down in any reeking humid nigger-infested swamp (Harlem comes to mind) and it wouldn't smell any different.

UN
.

James said...

Benjamin Levin, Ontario's former Deputy Minister of Education, has been charged with seven counts of child exploitation[No, just spreading information--NU], including child pornography [Information--NU].He hasn't just been charged with possessing images of children being sexually abused [Given information.--NU].He's been charged with arranging for sexual offences against a child[Giving them too much information--NU], making child porn [Information--NU] and distributing it to others [Distributing information.--NU].Levin's bail conditions include a ban on his using the Internet except at work -- he's a professor at the University of Toronto.And he's not allowed to use a cellphone that connects to the Internet or has a camera in it.There are tens of thousands of civil servants in Ontario and, as a matter of statistical probability, a number will be charged with crimes every year.But this is different.

It isn't.--nastiestuncle

As you'll note he's Japanese as usual.

He isn't.--nastiestuncle

I was only joking.
"Grade 6 kids will be taught masturbation; Grade 7 kids about anal sex, as opposed to vaginal intercourse..."


That's all useful information.--nastiestuncle


"He had a hand in drafting sex lessons for children that will destroy the innocence of thousands of Ontario children."


Information doesn't destroy anything. It's just information.--nastiestuncle

But what if some sleaze is pushing that information towards you and its all slimy?

Information can't be slimy. Its just information.--nastiestuncle

OK, what if you don't like the information?

What's not to like? Information is just information.--nastiestuncle

But kids don't need that sort of information from that sort of person telling them how great all these different things are.

People like you are harming kids by withholding information that might help them find out if they are hardwired or not.--nastiestuncle

It sounds like you had too much of this information when you were 3.

Now you are all crazy again.--nastiestuncle

That's your standard response when you are proven to be an idiot.

It isn't.--nastiestuncle

Well, I don't care about you. Other (more normal) people can check this link for details.

http://henrymakow.com/2013/07/child-pornographer-drafted-sex.html


There's definitely some sort of agenda going on here.

No, there isn't.--nastiestuncle

Well, there is a trend at least.

No, there isn't.--nastiestuncle

OK, you must at least admit there is one isolate case.

No, there isn't. An "isolated case" of what?--nastiestuncle

Of something a bit sick here.

Define "a bit sick".--nastiestuncle

Pervs trying to teach kids this stuff.

It's just information. Why do you think kids having access to information is so bad? Its people like you that harm kids.--nastiestuncle

No, I think kids are better off without this sort of stuff.

What sort of stuff?--nastiestuncle

God help us.

God? There is no evidence for the existence of God. Religious people like you cause harm to children.--nastiestuncle

It was just an expression of exasperation that's all!

Exasperation is illogical. It merely shows that the person lacks the information to proceed with processes in life which will enable that person to achieve what they want. You are being pwned, therefore you are exasperated because you can't pwn me back.--nastiestuncle

WTF!

James said...

There is an elite agenda.

There isn't.--nastiestuncle

http://intellihub.com/2013/07/16/22-quotes-that-lay-out-the-elites-agenda/

The elites seem to think there is.

(some shit nobody would read anyway)--nastiestuncle

For example:
7. “The New Deal is plainly an attempt to achieve a working socialism and avert a social collapse in America; it is extraordinarily parallel to the successive ‘policies’ and ‘Plans’ of the Russian experiment. Americans shirk the word ‘socialism’, but what else can one call it?”
H.G. Wells The New World Order 1939


(some more shit nobody would read anyway)--nastiestuncle


10. “We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.”
Mikhail Gorbachev 1987


(some nonsense about soviet union collapsing or something)--nastiestuncle

11. “National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order.”
Adolph Hitler during World War II


(some crap about nazis)--nastiestuncle

13. “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”
– Henry Ford


(something about loony antisemites)--nastiestuncle

14. “The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”
– Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets


(something about fact checking probably)--nastiestuncle

Nastiestuncle, do you ever give up?

(something about saving the world by fact-checking Nazi posts on blogs)--nastiestuncle

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Got this from Ozzie Saffa.

http://ozziesaffa.blogspot.co.nz/2013/07/muslim-advantage.html

The big advantage to being a muslim ... When you change wives, you can still keep the same photo on your desk!

Enjoy,
UN
.

James said...

Slut.

She should cover herself up a bit more.

James said...

When you change wives, you can still keep the same photo on your desk!

Other advantages:

You can get 4 wives and you still only need 1 photo.

You can imagine whoever you like under that dress.

You can send it to your mate and tell him his mother is under the dress.

Your chick could be a ten under there, who knows?

The possibilities are endless.

Uncle Nasty said...

Perhaps this is O/T, perhaps not.

This may seem like a redundant question, but has the United States gone completely mad?

The Trayvomit Martin number is getting clean out of hand, with everyone, the churches, the politicians, the media all going absolutely gaga over a nigger who was pretty useless in life and was not improved by his untimely passing.

Don't get me wrong. When I say "untimely" I mean that an early abortion would have been his finest hour.

The last time I saw such hysteria was over that other oxygen thief .. Steve Biko ... even leading to trendy dipshits like the yelping Peter Gabriel attempting to deify the cunt. I lost a girlfriend over that prick. Biko, not Gabriel, that is.

Back in the day, I got a panicky phone call at work from this chick who breathlessly informed me that "Biko's dead!"

My response: "Who's he?"

When she told me my response was ... "So he got killed? That's the function of kaffirs. To die badly."

Coming home the next day I found all my possessions in a cardboard box outside my back door.

C'est la vie

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

Canada is also heading for the abyss ...

Canada Anxious to Bury "Porn Judge" Inquiry

July 13, 2013

(left. Lori Douglas, Chief Family Court Judge of Manitoba. When she was appointed in 2005, Douglas failed to disclose her husband tried to enlist a client to have sex with her, using images like these, and then she bought the client's silence for $25,000. ) Rather than fire Porn Judge Lori Douglas,Canada's Tory government is trying to sweep this issue under the carpet. Masons protect their own. On Canadian government's failure to defend Canadian Judicial Council Disciplinary Hearing, Federal Court Judge Judith Snider said, "Indeed, I would view such an abdication as irresponsible, totally contrary to the public interest and close to contemptuous of this court."

- See more at: http://henrymakow.com/2013/07/Canada%20Anxious-to-Bury-Lori-Douglas-Inquiry%20.html#sthash.W6mlBgd0.dpuf


Check her out. Imagine standing in court on charges and hauling out blowups of these images.

What would they charge you with? What could they charge you with?

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold


UN
.

Setanta said...

And she's a Family Court judge. Hell in a handcart, as they say.

Clogheen said...

James, about the Swedish Democrats. They face the same problem all WNs do. They have to disown comment that can be used to discredit - and ideally prosecute - them.

They - we -all know what these guys say is true but for now at least it's probably necessary to disown them.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 04:10

You sure there isn't a heatwave over there at the moment?

AnalogMan said...

They - we -all know what these guys say is true but for now at least it's probably necessary to disown them.

Is there a more concise definition of cowardice?

UN: ... a nigger who was pretty useless in life and was not improved by his untimely passing.

I'm sure that's not what you meant to say.

Anonymous said...

UN
You dodged a bullet there with that bitch. Any money on her now being a mudshark?

Uncle Nasty said...

Hi AnalogMan.

You stopped reading too soon ... but that's okay. you've triggered me into writing something off topic.

So what else is new?

I was reading that the latest offering from Disney -- The new "Lone Ranger" has gone over like a lead balloon. Apparently this flick joins the pantheon of flops that have been bedeviling the Mouse House since "Mars Needs Moms"

Only the Gucci-suited goons in the counting house could have pulled the boners that followed. It appears that MNM (above) was such a stinker that when Andrew Stanton wanted to release his "John Carter of Mars", the empty suits decided that he should remove any reference to "Mars", thereby thoroughly confusing the legions of Edgar Rice Burroughs fans who were looking forward to it.

The Great Unwashed had never heard of Edgar Rice Burroughs -- or John Carter for that matter, so they, even more confused, stayed away in droves. What the Hell. The flick was a confused mess, anyway. It may make its budget back on the 35th anniversary Blu-Ray release.

On to strike three -- The Lone Ranger. Costing well over a third of a billion dollars (Yup, that's right) and the same again in marketing -- and the out and out theft rampant in H'wood, the flick opened this weekend and took five days to earn 50 million. It's all downhill from here, so it might break even by, oh, 2068.

UN
.

St Nilus said...

just turned on Radio 5live , Richard "kosher" Bacon's show...first voice I hear is the jew David Baddiel...

So , a quick look at Radio 4..

9am: Midweek.
Libby Purves meets jew Zandra Rhodes and jew James Rhodes.

11am: The Story of The Talmud:

An insight into the ancient texts of the Talmud , which unlock the secrets of Judaism

Episode 1
Episode 1 of 2
Duration: 28 minutes
First broadcast: Wednesday 17 July 2013
In the first of two programmes, Rabbi Naftali Brawer delves into one of the greatest books ever written holding the key to unlocking Jewish thinking and history. Traveling to Jerusalem, he gains rare access to one of the world's leading ultra-orthodox yeshivas - the Mir. Here he finds young men who will study these ancient Hebrew and Aramaic texts, full time, for anything up to 30 or 40 years. They explain how arguing and debate are the ways to understand the ancient wisdom of the rabbis that have contributed to the Talmud though the ages and still telling you everything you need to know to be a Jew today. The Talmud is not about the arrival but the journey and it's less about about finding answers than discovering what the questions are.

Tracing the history of the Talmud, Rabbi Naftali heads to the Galilee to the archaeological site of Beit She'arim, the remains of an ancient city, where shortly after the destruction of the 2nd Temple, the first words of this book were written down. He discovers that the Talmud was an audacious project defying one of the key Jewish laws which forbade writing down the Oral Laws of Moses. Its creation was deemed necessary in order to preserve Jewish culture and practice which, at this time, was facing extinction.

Rabbi Naftali meets some of the greatest Jewish minds and scholars in the world today: Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, described by Time Magazine as a 'one in a millennium scholar', who has published his own edition of the Talmud; Gila Fine - one of the growing number of female orthodox academics working with the Talmud.

The programme ends with a moving story from leading Talmudic scholar and holocaust survivor, David Weiss Halivni, who explains how the Talmud sustained him in the concentration camps."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b036vrsq

2.15pm Afternoon Drama :Volunteer Julie goes to Nigeria to teach sewing in a women's refuge

"When idealistic young volunteer Julie sets off for Nigeria, she's a bundle of nerves. Her project is to teach sewing skills to women in a refuge in Jos; but what if they don't like her - or feel patronised by her attempts to teach them?

Once Julie's in Jos, her anxieties evaporate. Sewing class is a roaring success, and Julie's only problems are the stupid caution and lack of enthusiasm of refuge director Fran, and the incomprehensible tensions surrounding the silent Muslim woman, Mathenneh.

Inspired by a plan to help the women make money from their sewing, ready to really make a difference to their lives, Julie is on a roll ... blithely unaware that there may be consequences, unimaginable and terrible, to her failure to play by Fran's rules."

They dont even know how to SEW , for fuck's sake?

4pm: Thinking Allowed : "The first dedicated UK study of black Caribbean middle-class families, and their strategies and priorities in relation to their children's education. The role of 'extra-curricular' activities in the process by which black middle-class parents seek to raise and develop their children."

Ethnography Award
Thinking Allowed in association with the British Sociological Association announces a new annual award for a study that has made a significant contribution to ethnography: the in-depth analysis of the everyday life of a culture or sub-culture.

Are you involved in social science research and completing or will have completed an ethnography this year? The Award is open to any UK resident currently employed as a teacher or researcher or studying as a postgraduate in a UK institution of higher education.

cont:

St Nilus said...

4.30 The Media Show :

Mishal Husain becomes new Today presenter

Mishal Husain is to join the Today programme as presenter. The BBC's head of news programmes, Ceri Thomas and the Observer's Miranda Sawyer, also of Sound Women, discuss the significance and whether we can expect announcements of further changes."

(yet another posh female muslim fronting a bbc programme)

7.15 pm Front Row

"Directed by Joe Wright and starring Chiwetel Ejiofor, the UK premiere of A Season in the Congo by Aimé Césaire opens on stage this week. Set in the Congo during the country's first year of independence, the play charts the life of Patrice Lumumba from his campaigning against Belgian rule, to becoming Prime Minster, to his assassination. "

8pm The Moral Maze

"The Morality of Place

This week the Moral Maze asks "are mixed communities a moral good?" With the government rolling out its benefits cap and a study claiming that high rents mean a third of Britain is effectively off-limits to lower-income working families, some campaigners are arguing that the less well-off are the victims of social cleansing. It's argued the lack of affordable housing means that large parts of the country, especially London, are being turned in to homogenised gated communities reserved for the well off and where the poor are welcome to work, but not to live. Does that really matter? Should we let the free market solve these problems, or use planning laws to make sure property developers build social housing alongside more expensive homes? Should the tax and benefits system be used not just to make sure that people have a roof over their heads, but also to shape the social make up of our communities and nation? Are pluralist, socially diverse communities inherently better - a sign that we're a healthier, tolerant, more democratic society? Or have we for too long been beguiled by the dream of a melting pot? And not only is it human nature to want to live in a community with people who have the same kind of background, values and aspirations, but those communities also create virtues such as neighbourliness, trust and social solidarity. By trying to create more diverse and integrated communities are we undermining the strong social ties that create truly cohesive communities? "

10.45pm Book At Bedtime

Episode 3
Their Eyes Were Watching God
Written by Zora Neale Hurston (black)

Episode 3
One day Janie is cutting potatoes in the yard when a citified, stylishly dressed man stops by. And, while her husband has stopped talking to her in rhymes, Joe Starks has dreams of being a big voice and Janie is just the sort of woman he would like by his side when he arrives at the first all-black town in Florida.

This African-American classic was first published in the 1930s and is seen as one of the greatest American novels of the twentieth century. The author, Zora Neale Hurston, grew up in Eatonville, Florida, the first incorporated black town in America. Nearly every black female writer of significance - including Maya Angelou, Toni Morrison and Alice Walker - acknowledges Zora Neale Hurston as her literary foremother.

"A rigorous, convincing and dazzling piece of prose, as emotionally satisfying as it is impressive." Zadie Smith

Read by Adjoa Andoh

11pm The Lach Chronicles:

The Night Dylan Came

JEW? Lach was the King of Manhattan's East Village and host of the longest running open mic night in New York.

Many people came to see him in New York and, in this episode, Lach remembers the night JEW Bob Dylan/Zimmerman arrived.

St Nilus said...

Richard Bacon's next guest is one Robert M Edsel , who is flogging a book about saving Italy's Renaissance art and treasure frfom, you guessed it , "HITLER AND THE NAZIS" , who probably would have turned it into soap or something..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Edsel

http://www.bing.com/search?q=robert%20edsel%20saving%20italy&pc=conduit&ptag=A976EFAC18EFD4E4BB3F&form=CONOMX&conlogo=CT3210127&ShowAppsUI=1

Anonymous said...

Official Chimpout Advisory Guide

http://stormchan.org/storm/src/1370115514238.jpg

Anonymous said...

Here's a black speaking common sense.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=54f_1370397875

Anonymous said...

More on lucky Larry


http://www.infowars.com/world-trade-center-owner-larry-silverstein-sues-airlines-for-billions-over-911-after-5-billion-insurance-payment/

St Nilus said...

Richard "Alan Partridge" Bacon:

" So why were the NAAAAAZIS interested in art? I wouldnt have thought that they cared about that stuff.."


Bacon: " So what treasures were lost , or recovered?"

Jew-loving guest:" Well , the 'Last Supper' fresco was almost destroyed in a bombing raid by THE ALLIES , it was A MIRACLE that it survived , but we did recover thousands of artifacts from ALLIED TROOPS who had picked them up as MEMENTOS of the war .."

For fucks sake ..

James said...

nastiestuncle oozed:
You sure there isn't a heatwave over there at the moment?

You are mental.

James said...

On to strike three -- The Lone Ranger. Costing well over a third of a billion dollars (Yup, that's right) and the same again in marketing -- and the out and out theft rampant in H'wood, the flick opened this weekend and took five days to earn 50 million. It's all downhill from here, so it might break even by, oh, 2068.

It's moore's law for movies. You can only pack so many transistors in a chip.

You can only pack so much propaganda into a movie before the whole thing starts to fall apart.

James said...

Jew-loving guest:" Well , the 'Last Supper' fresco was almost destroyed in a bombing raid by THE ALLIES , it was A MIRACLE that it survived , but we did recover thousands of artifacts from ALLIED TROOPS who had picked them up as MEMENTOS of the war .."

For fucks sake ..


Was the guest in love with a Jew?--nastiestuncle

James said...

Official Chimpout Advisory Guide

Awesome.

James said...

"The Morality of Place

This week the Moral Maze asks "are mixed communities a moral good?" With the government rolling out its benefits cap and a study claiming that high rents mean a third of Britain is effectively off-limits to lower-income working families, some campaigners are arguing that the less well-off are the victims of social cleansing. It's argued the lack of affordable housing means that large parts of the country, especially London, are being turned in to homogenised gated communities reserved for the well off and where the poor are welcome to work, but not to live. Does that really matter? Should we let the free market solve these problems, or use planning laws to make sure property developers build social housing alongside more expensive homes? Should the tax and benefits system be used not just to make sure that people have a roof over their heads, but also to shape the social make up of our communities and nation? Are pluralist, socially diverse communities inherently better - a sign that we're a healthier, tolerant, more democratic society? Or have we for too long been beguiled by the dream of a melting pot? And not only is it human nature to want to live in a community with people who have the same kind of background, values and aspirations, but those communities also create virtues such as neighbourliness, trust and social solidarity. By trying to create more diverse and integrated communities are we undermining the strong social ties that create truly cohesive communities? "


I suppose the answers are yes, yes, of course, certainly, yes, hell yes, sure, why not, etc?

You don't even have to look at the questions properly.

Yes, you do.--nastiestuncle

(Sigh) No, you don't.

James said...

So nastiestuncle are you going to tell me what Ms. Frank's book was all about? Was it her diary or something else?

No, I'm not. Read it if you want to know what's in it.--nastiestuncle

St Nilus said...

Just heard two niggers rappin at each other in the yard behind me , in full Landan yardie accents. Went upstairs to my neighbours to take a look:

Both of them White.

Aaaaahhhhh...

St Nilus said...

James : The Radio 4skin schedule for today is 100% genuine.

We are WAY BEYOND PARODY at this point, eh ? !!!!

St Nilus said...

"The New Lords"


Friday , Radio 4 , 8pm

"Any Questions?"

Panel of 4 , 2 of them JEWS, just a COHEN-cidence of course:

Lord Baron Sir Nigel Lawson and Baronness Rabbi Julia Neuberger , who is sister-in-law to the highest Judge in the land , who of course is another KIKE:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b036wgjb

Rabbi Julia Babette Sarah Neuberger, Baroness Neuberger, DBE (born 27 February 1950; née Julia Schwab) is a member of the British House of Lords. She formerly took the Liberal Democrat whip, but resigned from the party and joined the Crossbenches in September 2011 upon becoming the full-time Senior Rabbi to the West London Synagogue.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Neuberger,_Baroness_Neuberger



Julia Schwab married Professor Anthony Neuberger.[7] They have two adult children, a son and a daughter. Anthony Neuberger is the son of Professor Albert Neuberger, and the brother of Professors Michael and James Neuberger, as well as Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.

David Edmond Neuberger, Baron Neuberger of Abbotsbury, Kt, PC /ˈnjuːbɜrɡər/ (born 10 January 1948), is an English judge. He is currently President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. He was a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary until the House of Lords' judicial functions were transferred to the new Supreme Court in 2009, at which point he became Master of the Rolls, the second most senior judge in England and Wales. He also serves as a Non-Permanent Judge of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Neuberger,_Baron_Neuberger_of_Abbotsbury

St Nilus said...

The UK was SWARMING with kikery since before even my grandad was born.

He's dead now , he wouldnt hear a bad word about that hero Churchill.

How little we know.

And once you do ? No friends , no girlfriends , no movies , no TV , etc.

Your family agrees with you , but only at arms length.

Oh well , this is the path I have chosen.

St Nilus said...

This is how kikes respect their paper saints:

This is Inappropriate: Anne Frank Porno In The Works

Los Angeles, CA In an effort to wrest dollars away from the ever growing amateur adult market, Vivid Entertainment has announced plans to start a new line of films based on historical events and raising the bar on traditional film elements such as production values and screenwriting. The new division will be called Vivid Classics.
President and founder, Steve Hirsch, announced that label’s first film will be based on the life of Holocaust refugee Anne Frank, though the age of the character will be altered in order to comply with United States law.
The story of Anne Frank is one that I find particularly compelling, continued Hirsch. The script we have going is a really interesting and compelling blend of a young girls desire to survive in the midst of the horror of the Holocaust, and the innermost sexual desires of a young woman. We also plan to film an alt version of the film which will of course involve Nazi’s and lots of leather.
I understand there are a lot of strange fetishes out there, but what audience are they trying to reach with this porno? Who would want to “spank to Anne Frank?” Jews aroused by Nazi defiance? Skinheads beating off to Jew hunting? People that love hide and go seek? This is a terrible, terrible idea all around. I wonder what other themes they have in the works…

http://boozeworthy.com/2009/10/01/this-is-inappropriate-anne-frank-porno-in-the-works/

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 19:55

My nigger.

You got it so right that time. If you want to go and read about her flaps then you may do so.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 19:46

My nigger.

Nastiest Uncle said...

@James 19:46

My nigger.

St Nilus said...

Funny how Akira , one of the most jew-wise of them all , didnt make it to the "chosen" list at British Resistance:


IT'S TOUGH BEING AN INTELLIGENT, FRIENDLY, CONSIDERATE NEGRO SURROUNDED BY MORONIC, INFANTILE, IGNORANT, EFFEMINATE NON-NEGROES WHO BE TRYIN' TO KEEP BLONDE WHITE BIMBO WIMMINZ AWAY FROM YOU

http://whatdoyoubelieve.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-1823.html

St Nilus said...

Anne Franks vagina. Nothing fishy here:

http://www.bing.com/search?q=anne%20franks%20vagina&pc=conduit&ptag=A976EFAC18EFD4E4BB3F&form=CONOMX&conlogo=CT3210127&ShowAppsUI=1

St Nilus said...

Bright dead alien eyes.

Milliband?

The New Unhappy Lords:

http://archive.org/details/TheNewUnhappyLords

St Nilus said...

Ohio Man, Pat Mahaney, Dies After Being Beaten by Six Black Teens ‘Because They were Bored’

http://www.totalfascism.com/ohio-man-pat-mahaney-dies-after-being-beaten-by-six-black-teens/

James said...

Meanwhile on Stormfront.

卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍

卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍

卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍

卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍 卍卍 卍 卍卍卍卍
卍卍卍卍卍

卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍卍

It isn't.--nastiestuncle

Anonymous said...

Anne wrote her final entry...

"I fear ze end is near. Fuck, zat vaz a knock on ze door!!

......I have to.... Scheiß my fucking biro's run out."

Uncle Nasty said...

.
It appears that Amazon.com has quietly (oh, so quietly) removed Orwell's 1984" from the Kindle.

http://io9.com/5317703/amazon-secretly-removes-1984-from-the-kindle

Amazon Secretly Removes “1984" From the Kindle

Thousands of people last week discovered that Amazon had quietly removed electronic copies of George Orwell's 1984 from their Kindle e-book readers. In the process, Amazon revealed how easy censorship will be in the Kindle age.

In this case, the mass e-book removals were motivated by copyright . A company called MobileReference, who did not own the copyrights to the books 1984 and Animal Farm, uploaded both books to the Kindle store and started selling them. When the rights owner heard about this, they contacted Amazon and asked that the e-books be removed. And Amazon decided to erase them not just from the store, but from all the Kindles where they'd been downloaded. Amazon operators used the Kindle wireless network, called WhisperNet, to quietly delete the books from people's devices and refund them the money they'd paid.

An uproar followed, with outraged customers pointing out the irony that Amazon was deleting copies of a novel about a fascist media state that constantly alters history by changing digital records of what has happened. Amazon's action flies in the face of what people expect when they purchase a book. Under the "right of first sale" in the U.S., people can do whatever they like with a book after purchasing it, including giving it to a friend or reselling it. There is no option for a bookseller to take that book back once it's sold.


The reason for doing it (copyright, in this instance, apparently) is unimportant. What is important is that it can be done.

Perhaps another good reason to go the old fashioned route ... paper.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Once again, I am not easily gobsmacked but ...

St Nilus's' daily dose of BBC hebe, nigger, hebe, hebe, fag, hebe, hebe, hebe, nigger, fag, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, nigger, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, poof, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, raghead, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, carpet muncher, nigger, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, hebe, ad infinitum; as well as what appears to be combinations and variations of the above must surely get the alarm bells ringing?

Or at least tinkling gently? Is there no comment at all?

UN
.

Anonymous said...

ah the great cameron backed uaf in action

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=S6PNlL4eneQ

James said...

NU,

We are so used to it, if the Jews weren't on TV anymore we'd all be worried that something big was going to happen.

Anonymous said...

Savant,

I just wanted to pass on a link regarding Guiness. Pass this on to your Irish comrades. It disgusted me.

To all the beer drinkers out there (a little eye candy included):

http://foodbabe.com/2013/07/17/the-shocking-ingredients-in-beer/

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Hmmmm.

Heebeecee?

UN
.

St Nilus said...

It is , so it is , sure it is , to be sure , inshallah..


A white Muslim convert who vowed to bring Sharia law to the UK has been jailed for six weeks for beating up a photographer.

Jordan Horner, who changed his name to Jamal Uddin, also laid into a car, causing £3,000 of damage.

Horner, 19, converted after being approached leaving a pub and was later seen putting up posters across East London “banning” alcohol.

Speaking of his previous life and friends he said: “I don’t talk to any of them now.

"I have deleted their numbers from my phone and want nothing to do with them.

“As Muslims you can’t integrate with non-believers because their way of life is completely opposite - I would rather give up my friends and family than give up on Allah.

http://whatdoyoubelieve.blog.fc2.com/?no=1824

St Nilus said...

"Private Eye" the anti-establishment naughty public-schoolboy publication that gets to the , snigger , bottom of things...fearless , on the edge , daring..just like " The Now Show " or "The News Quiz"..

Communism takes many forms. We were shown black and white footage of Russians lining up for a shitty loaf as the government propaganda boasted about the turnip harvest or tractor production.

Now they call it "the economy" , and they tell us that unemployment is down , as is crime.

In Brighton , rape has gone through the roof over the last few years...can anyone think why?

Its a mystery to liberals.

Private Eye:

http://www.big-lies.org/private-eye/index.html

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Now here, we have a nigger with a good idea. A really really good idea.

http://ozziesaffa.blogspot.co.nz/

Trayvon Martin Killing: Akon Tells Black People to Move to Africa

R&B singer Akon, born in Senegal, west Africa, says that African-Americans living in the USA should move back to Africa.

"Every African-American in the United States needs to move their money, family, knowledge back to Africa were you will be treated like the royalty you are. You don't deserve this treatment. This is not your country."

Yeah, he's kind of upset that George Zimmerman got away with murder....

What a brilliant idea! Take your money, family and knowledge to Africa!! You'll fit right in on all levels.

America would be wealthy again overnight. No more food stamps, welfare, and Section 8 housing to pay for these parasites. No more dumbed down schools. Hardly any more crime. No more affirmative-action for the poor poppets. No more listening to slavery tales. No more White guilt. No more lower standards of living, or living in fear. Paradise!


Please read on ....

Unfortunately, those who are history-impaired will not note that shipping boatloads of jungle bunnies back to Africa has been done before.

The lucky recipients are now called Liberia and Sierra Leone.

Anyone remember the memoirs of an inner city school teacher who asked his class what would happen if Whites should suddenly disappear?

One answer was: "We be fucked!" That particular zot had promise.

UN
.

St Nilus said...

Any of you who are serious about kikery and niggerama should check out this site regularly. It does what it says on the tin:

http://whatdoyoubelieve.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-1823.html

St Nilus said...

Uncle Nasty: Yeah , you'd think a few alarm bells would be ringing.

Radio 4 is there to brainwash the older folks , who fancy themselves as "a cut above , intellectual even" , and CBBC is there to get the under 3's worshipping , trusting and looking up to niggers.

Fucking EVIL is what it is.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Back to Canada ... who, still reeling from the female high court judge whose hairy squash is adorning porn sites from Manitoba to Moosejaw, now has another scandal on its hands ...

It appears that the great preschool sex educator Benjamin Levin, a former deputy minister of education has been charged with exploiting children.

For those who don't know it, Mr Levin (a good Scots name, that) is the weirdo who advocated teaching Canadian pre-schoolers the delights of buggery.

"Kevin's two daddies have both bought pet hamsters."

http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/

The former education minister, Kathleen Wynne, is now the provincial premier…..and a close friend of the accused. Levin himself is in turn from a powerful family, and was apprehended as part of an international pornography sting operation.

After he was charged with two more child pornography offences on Wednesday 10th July, University of Toronto professor Benjamin Levin was granted bail set at $100,000. Levin will face seven charges of child exploitation, including possessing and accessing child pornography following a Monday raid on his home. (Bad luck for him that Michael Gove wasn’t there to get him off.)

Toronto Premier Kathleen Wynne, on whose ‘transition’ team Levin served, commented on his arrest for the first time yesterday.

“I was shocked** to hear about these charges through the news,” her statement said. “Insidious crimes like these are absolutely terrifying. The safety and well-being of our children has always been my absolute priority, and at no time did I have any suspicion of criminal behavior. I am confident that the police and judicial system will address these serious allegations.”

Note the quite unfeasibly large amount of arse-covering that went into that statement. Wynne – an aggressively feminist lesbian – stressed her former adviser had no role in formulating the sex-education curriculum; but there appear to be huge doubts about her claim. It was after all her revamp of the sex education guidelines when she held the education portfolio that was dropped in 2010 after some religious groups objected to it as too risque.

And as she brought him onto the transition team, why would he be concerned with everything but sex-education…him being an educator, an’ all.

Levin next appears in court on 8th August.


** "Shocked! Shocked!!! I tell you ..."
She's just kicked him off the sleigh.

Nastiest Uncle, of course, will say that I get off on hating jews.

Not really. What does get me going, however, is when a hypocritical heeb like Levin gets his shriveled little circumcised willy caught in the gears of public opprobrium.

Every time this happens, WN's nod their heads and say:- "Hmmm. Another one of the chosen ..."

People are noticing, you know. I make damn sure of it.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
St Nilus said...

“As Muslims you can’t integrate with non-believers because their way of life is completely opposite - I would rather give up my friends and family than give up on Allah.

And he would rather give up all of them than relinquish his sail foam.

I find it odd that sub-humans all over the world have this almost reverential affection, if not actual worship of mobile or cellphone technology.

What would happen if it all disappeared tomorrow?

UN
.

St Nilus said...

Imagine a middle-aged man gathering together a group of children in a park or at the seaside.

He starts to talk to them about sex , and condoms , and anal sex , and queers , and fisting , and rimming.

Disgusting and wrong , yes?

Now imagine that that person is your child's teacher , he's saying the same stuff to 8 year olds but in a classroom.

That's OK now?

Californian said...

Here's my spin: there ought to be an international front to support the Right to Bear Arms. This is especially true in first world countries where governments are trying to disarm the populace (or have succeeded in some cases).

Pro-gun activists ought to make common cause with nationalists. Demand the rolling back of gun laws. Get guns, practice with them. Form shooters clubs with a pro-freedom and pro-national political line.

Owning a weapon is a basic human right. It's also an issue around which support can be organized. And by doing so internationally, we make common cause with allies around the globe.

Owning a firearm gives one a sense of independence. Even if a gun is never used, it gives one the sense that one is not helpless in the face of criminals, rioters, wild beasts...or tyrannical governments.

Behind this is the attitude of resistance. It amazes me the number of people I know who believe that in the face of the kind of rioting brought about by "youths" in many European cities they would do nothing to defend themselves or their families. They believe that if guns were freely available, then the rioters might also start shooting. Better to hide under the bed and await the "all clear" signal.

Gun owners are more willing to take it to the wall, to stand their ground. Liberty or Death, as one American once put it. Which is one reason the US government has been persecuting Mr Zimmerman over in Florida for blowing away a "youth." Can't have Americans thinking they have a right to defend themselves because the next thing you know, they might stand up for their rights against an increasingly repressive (and anti-white) government.

It may sound cliche, but when the people are afraid of the government there is tyranny. When the government is afraid of the people there is liberty.

We're seeing the rise of a de facto globalized government, and there is a definite trend to authoritarianism as well as the ethnic cleansing of white people. The future just may be a post-apartheid South Africa writ worldwide, with all that entails for collapse of civic order and Western civilization.

It's all the more reason for freedom fighters to organize globally...and get armed.