Sunday, 12 May 2013

Why?

It seems inescapable to me that the Obama administration is doing everything in its power to bankrupt the USA.  Obamacare in itself would do the job, as well as crippling small and medium enterprises in the process.  And it seems, unbelievably, that illegal immigrants may qualify for this boondoggle.  But there's a lot more.

Even with rapidly escalating food prices several states are actually seeking out food stamp recipients. Seems insane but it's true. “Three states in the Midwest throw food-stamp parties where new recipients sign up en masse” says the Washington Post.  Even illegal immigrants get them. “Illegals would come in by the vanload and we were told to give them their stuff. When people protest at being signed up for food stamps, the recruiters in Florida encourage them to get over their shame."

In fact every possible effort is being made to have illegals qualify for a whole host of 'entitlements' while at the same time border protection is being emasculated. And there's an overall general policy - anyone can see this - to increase the numbers drawing welfare and the level of their entitlements.

What can the reason be? Obama himself need never stand for election again so he has no need to propitiate the welfarists. He has to know, detached and all as he is, that these developments will rapidly bring forward the inevitable economic collapse.

Beats me......

158 comments:

Anonymous said...

The destruction of capitalism is the goal of socialists. But they fail to realise that the private sector pays for the public sector,
Wankstains.
Paris Claims

Bemused stare said...

My advice if you are an American? Take the foodstamps, and everything else you can grab. Stock up like there is no tomorrow on foodstuffs, ammo and other essentials with the money you save. Move to the North West with all your stuff.

Dan said...

Obama is doing all of this because deep down he is just like Trayvon Martin, Robel Phillipos and Mark Duggan. He's a black. It's what they do.

Dan said...

If it is coming from a rational place? The only reason that I can think of is that the baby boomers need cash to retire. 30 million new tax payers, and you get to retire.

Is that it?

St Nilus said...

British Academy Television Awards , BBC1 ,

presented by faggot Graham Norton .

Best Entertainment award goes to..Graham Norton !

"Special Award" goes to...lesbian Clare Balding !

Franz said...

@ Dan 12 May 2013 21:30:

"30 million new tax payers, and you get to retire.

Is that it?"


No Dan, it's a really old delusion and it's not even close.

We crunched the numbers almost 30 years ago and what they said then and what they remain saying is that the immigrant cost to the native-born can never be repaid by immigrant productivity, it's too low.

By native-born I absolutely include boomers. Those of us boomers in industry have been downsized on average twice (thrice in my case), quite often starting over from rock-bottom in middle age when work is hard to come by.

The argument needs to be stepped on whenever it comes up. It's stupid. It's false. And it's easy to prove that it's false.

Dan said...

I don't believe that rationale either.

Anonymous said...

The left want as many people as possible to become "clients" of the state.
It's what they have done here in the UK as well.
It's to get people familiar with and welcoming of the government.

Tony in VA said...

Here's your answer. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/11/rand-paul-obama-is-working-with-anti-american-globalists-plotting-against-our-constitution/

And the fact that EZRA KLEIN rubbishes it makes it all the more relevant.

barncat said...

But assuming more and more people become 'clients of the state', who's going to pay? They must realize that this cannot go on.

Or Jeez, do they?

Anonymous said...

Obama is a placeman for the globalist
banksters just like Cameron is. All the EU and American countries are led by politicians who are totally bought. Obama's task is to take down the entire country, by destroying the economy and taking the guns off citizens.His target is the huge White Christian middle class.It's not a conspiracy theory, it is REAL.

Anonymous said...

Cloward-Piven

Anonymous said...

In many respects Obama is the messiah of Marxism..... or is perceived by his useful idiots. However, every Marxist revolution and "utopia" ends in shambles, and destroys its very proponents ( Look at every communist takeover, the revolutionaries always kill their supporters and sympathizers off first--- poetic justice).



As an American, I can tell you that something is definitely afoot: The federal government has been purchasing heavy ammunition, while trying to take away all of our guns..... but not the guns of nonwhite thugs. They're ramping up their "investigations" and schemes against "white nationalist conservative Christian" movements.... whilst ignoring muslim terrorists like the Boston bombers.

Something big will happen soon, but I believe the antiwhite thugs are jumping the gun; there are still more than enough whites left to fight back and prevail..... this shows how desperate and veangeful the antiwhites are.... they want to kill us so badly that they can barely wait.

Anonymous said...

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to solve this puzzle, Savant. Come on, you know the globalists are intentionally destroying Western Civilzation in order to enslave us all! We the only thing standing in their way. That's why these social programs are being dangled as carrots, the jobs are shipped overseas, the financial system is filled with corruption, Western nations are being flooded with undesirables, food sources are poisoning the population, educational systems that don't educate, entertainment distractions, loss of morality and ethics, a healthcare system that is an assemblyline for illness and death, propaganda over the airwaves, a police state, etc., etc. This isn't a matter of incompetence, it is a matter of the useful idiots doing a great job for the Rothschilds, everyone's bosses!

First destroy their culture, make them dependent, destroy their wealth, disarm them.

The only solution is r********n! Just remember these people will do anything, ANYTHING, to stay in power. they just may destroy the Earth in the process.

Franz said...

Dan said...
I don't believe that rationale either.

12 May 2013 22:43


I made no "rationale".

Anonymous said...

Obama is doing his best for Wall Street (read recent piece in Takimag) and doing his best to create a Third World model where the brown masses are kept docile with panem et circenses and the super-rich like Penny Pritzker get Washington appointments and fat contracts...and the middle class is suffocated.

JP

AnalogMan said...

Anon @ 00:38 has the answer.

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward (1926–2001) and Frances Fox Piven (b. 1932) that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty" - Wikipedia.

Of course, that's just more magical thinking - standard for "progressives". Others, though, have seen the possibilities, and are working the strategy for their own ends. Read about it here.

Excerpt:

For the central state to assume more authoritarian control, public support will increasingly be based on a perception of a required redistribution of wealth from the rich to the growing number of poor. Redistribution of wealth is the goal, but in reality it is from the poor to the government and to those who feed at the government trough.

Insolvency is not a risk - it's the plan. The Savant has often said "Worse is better". Well, our enemies think so, too. For whom will it be better? I'm afraid to find out. Even more afraid that it will be my children and grandchildren who will have to deal with it.

Franz said...

@ AnalogMan --

The Cloward–Piven strategy

I've read of it, and for as a socialist strategy, it's perfect for... 1933.

Currently "the USA" is not a nation by definition, since an entity without borders is something else.

Properly speaking, the US is not even an empire anymore, but like a Filipino told me 40 years ago in the navy, it was never very good at empire anyway.

"Worse is better" probably will only work in favor of the Loot-And-Leave Coalition. As I'm not quite a billionaire, I won't be needing it much.

Nice idea while it lasted, though.

SAVANT said...

Analog, Franz and others. You may be right. But this implies that there is a deliberate plan for such an outcome.

Think about that. Is it really feasible that the cabinet or whatever will get together and define the plan and then carry it out. You see, this is so fiendish that I can hardly imagine such a thing.

What I certainly CAN imagine is Obama's puppet masters maneuvering such a thing. But that brings me back to the question raised in my post: Can they not see that the whole thing will come crashing down if this continues?

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Further to this thread, you may want to check this out ...

http://captainranty.com/less-than-100-people-run-the-world/

Check out the graphic, open it up to its full size (it's big) and as the villain said in "Meet the Robinsons" ... prepare to be amazed.

This is handy. We have their names.

Now all one needs is their addresses.

UN
.

katana said...

Anonymous13 May 2013 04:22
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to solve this puzzle, Savant.

First destroy their culture, make them dependent, destroy their wealth, disarm them.

The only solution is r********n! Just remember these people will do anything, ANYTHING, to stay in power. they just may destroy the Earth in the process.
---------------------------
I agree with you anon.

A plan to create chaos so our jewish overlords can enslave us. That's the long and short of it, I'm afraid.

Politicians are merely their tools, their frontmen.

I also agree that the solution is revolution!

Franz said...

@ SAVANT --

You may be right. But this implies that there is a deliberate plan for such an outcome...

I'd try it like this: In the century since the Protocols and Nesta Webster's work, not to mention the massive distribution efforts on the part of Henry Ford, the real question is, what will it take to get whites to accept the possibility there MIGHT BE a plan?

I'd be willing to accept the history of Zionist subversion of NATO since it was formed as a pattern of behavior that screams PLAN to me. Not only did jacking into NATO give them immense power, it gives them insane mobility. And you bet, skipping out while the wheels come off the wagon would be a logical last move.

But it could just be me I agree. Damn, I only work six hours on Sunday night and it felt like I's been up all week.

Kruger said...

UN, that seems a fascinating link but I can't enlarge the file nor find it at Realstreet. Any suggestions?

Also you all might find this interesting: Who controls America? http://thezog.wordpress.com/

SAVANT said...

Franz and katana. We're kind of on parallel lines here....same direction but not meeting!

Of course there's a plan to fuck us up. My question though is this: Are the Obamas and Napolitanos of this world in on it? Do they actually know that what they're doing is destroying 'their' country and do they know that they're being manipulated and why? If they do they're traitors of the worst kind. I still find it hard to imagine though.....

Anonymous said...

Savant man do live in a monastery or
a nunery? OF COURSE the Napolitanos
and Obamas know full well that they are destroying the US state in its entirety. They have been groomed and then paid fortunes to enact the
Cloward / Piven deconstruction.

katana said...

SAVANT said...

What I certainly CAN imagine is Obama's puppet masters maneuvering such a thing. But that brings me back to the question raised in my post: Can they not see that the whole thing will come crashing down if this continues?
13 May 2013 10:07
----------------------

That's the whole point. Out of the chaos that the jews create they can then move in with their 'final solution' to the 'White Problem'.

In a way, just like they did in Russia.

Savant, I think you need to consider these types of scenarios, however outlandish they first appear.

You can start from today's world and see that the US government is in fact a Zionist Occupied Government (ZOG) and then work your way backward in history and see the hand of jews at every major step.

Or you can start with the jew takeover of Russia in 1917 and go forward. Jews declaring war on Germany in 1933 and then creating WW II via their puppet countries the UK, France, USSR and the USA.

Jumping ahead we have the mid-east wars, 9/11 and so on. All caused by jews.

Viewing current and past events through the jewish 'prism', unfortunately offers the best explanatory power to world events.

Savant, when you are able, please investigate the above 'worldview' and hopefully debunk it.

If you can't debunk it then, perhaps 1945 wasn't the end, but merely a 'setback'?

katana said...

SAVANT said...
Franz and katana. We're kind of on parallel lines here....same direction but not meeting!

Of course there's a plan to fuck us up. My question though is this: Are the Obamas and Napolitanos of this world in on it? Do they actually know that what they're doing is destroying 'their' country and do they know that they're being manipulated and why? If they do they're traitors of the worst kind. I still find it hard to imagine though.....

13 May 2013 11:00
-----------------------------

Do they know? By and large, no, I suspect, although on a sliding scale to yes. But does it matter?

Seeking the truth is not on the radar of the type of people that jews groom for political power. It's a big minus.

Our form of democracy is simply a sham, a fraud, with a jewtube brainwashed population voting for prostitutes in a brothel paid and run by jews.

All leading, slowly but surely to our enslavement.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Kruger ... this works for me, but it may be because of the setup of my web browser (I use Opera).

Go to the link, which should open with a much-reduced and slightly deformed image (flattened from left to right).

right-click on the image and you should get a drop-down menu saying (among other things) Open Image (Bilderberg.JPG)

The image should re-open at the correct aspect ratio (no horizontal crushing) and your cursor (over the image) should turn into a tiny magnifying glass with a plus in it.

Double (or left-) clicking on the image should then open the image at full size, allowing you to scroll around it using direction arrow buttons or your mouse-wheel.

The cursor will have turned into a tiny minus sign allowing you to reduce it again

Good luck.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

For those of you who have not yet read Covington's The Brigade ... here it is for free.

http://downwithjugears.blogspot.co.nz/

Covington says:-

* * *

Okay, I know some of my friends sigh and shake their heads at my habit of giving my work away for free, but these books were written to be read and not to make me money. It is more important that the message in them get out than for me to get money I will only have to give to the dictatorship for Obamacare. I will send anyone who wants one a .pdf copy of The Brigade, if you don't mind reading a long novel on a computer screen or printing off a hard copy on your printer. E-mail me at nwnet@earthlink.net


Read it, damn it.

UN
.

katana said...

13 May 2013 14:16
Uncle Nasty said...
For those of you who have not yet read Covington's The Brigade ... here it is for free.

http://downwithjugears.blogspot.co.nz/
--------------

UN, I've read it and recommend it. A great read.

But not for the faint hearted White males with only one ball. For they will tremble, and pee into their tampons.

Anonymous said...

"What I certainly CAN imagine is Obama's puppet masters maneuvering such a thing. But that brings me back to the question raised in my post: Can they not see that the whole thing will come crashing down if this continues?"

Savant, as a businessman and a generally decent sort of person, I think you are trying to fit a mindset into their heads that does not belong. An almost universal flaw of a freedom loving/libertarian person is the optimistic projection that everyone, ultimately, thinks like them.

It is an unfortunate reality that those who are the most power hungry, ambitious, and likely to sacrifice anything for that power have a very alien mindset to the industrious, long term planning type. To them, everything is a game, where the primary objective is to win power, and the next most important objective is to make sure anyone who has denied you that power has lost everything. Scorched earth tactics have been part of war for thousands of years, we've just been in a polite enough society for long enough to forget them.

In their minds, they will hang onto their authority at any cost, including the future of the nation, the fate of the people they govern, etc. If they lose power, they will spite everyone who wrested it from them. It's not much unlike a junkie who needs money for their next fix. If you thwart them from stealing your car stereo, they'll smash your window to get some satisfaction. It's an evil, parasitic mindset, and it's very very important to keep in mind that this is the mental direction these people come from.

Apologize for the poor formatting, I don't yet know all the tags necessary for quoting on this site as I'm a medium time reader but have never yet commented.

costa expat said...

Jews, shabbos goys, and British nationalists slug it out on The Telegraph comments thread while the pro-Jew moderators slash and burn:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/alanjohnson/100216030/ken-livingstones-favourite-islamist-spreads-jew-hatred-in-gaza/#disqus_thread

Last two posts:

swagger
1 minute ago
"Alan Johnson is the Editor of Fathom:
for a deeper understanding of Israel and the region and Senior Research
Fellow at the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre
(BICOM)."

Also known as a shabbos goy propagandist. Or just another Juden wannabe.

DoNotAdjustYourSet
6 minutes ago
Considering the amount of comments removed for simply stating the truth and seeing all the casual lies tossed out by those who despise the English.

It would be nice if we English could one day have our own media in which to discuss topics of our choosing freely without censor.

With Arabs you get open hostility to our society and culture only they have no power.

With Jews you get the same hostility working against our societies and culture only they control our government, legal, financial and academic apparatus not to mention the media which they dominate where they deny us from speaking freely in it.

Who do you trust?
At least Muslims openly declare their intent

Wolfhound said...

@ Kruger

Just right click on it and "save image" on to your PC.

Then open it in MS Paint or a similar programme and you will get a large version.

Anonymous said...

The Queer Norton has NOTHING on the Queer Jew Izzard who is running Marathons because of his love for the terrorist Mandela.

nemesis said...

Savant, listen to katana. He has it nailed 100%.

Ref your question as to whether the Obamas and Napolitanos of this world 'get it' - well again katana is on the button.

He really sees what's happening.

Anonymous said...

@SAVANT 10:07

"Is it really feasible that the cabinet or whatever will get together and define the plan and then carry it out. You see, this is so fiendish that I can hardly imagine such a thing."

The answer is that people have different opinions. Not everyone thinks like a national socialist.

Some people don't see races, they just see humans. Therefore, to them, there is no such thing as destroying white people.
Some people think about themselves and to hell with everyone else.
Some people think they are doing a good and honourable thing when they enact anti-white policies because non-White humans benefit.
Not everyone thinks like a national socialist.

What's needed is public debate. However, although the non-PC lot are gaining ground in this area, the national socialists are always there to hamstring any progress.

Anonymous said...

BBC ONE 8.30 Panorama- Former Arsenal footballer Sol Campbell(black) investigates why the unemployment rate for young black British men is double that of their white counterparts. I could do with a laugh, might watch it.

Anonymous said...

"Of course there's a plan to fuck us up. My question though is this: Are the Obamas and Napolitanos of this world in on it? Do they actually know that what they're doing is destroying 'their' country and do they know that they're being manipulated and why? If they do they're traitors of the worst kind. I still find it hard to imagine though....."

Think compartmentalization. Their agenda works for the master plan. Anything that destroys is highly desirable. Their egos prevent them from seeing reality.

Alex said...

@Anon (NU?) 17:38

What's needed is public debate. However, although the non-PC lot are gaining ground in this area, the national socialists are always there to hamstring any progress.

Really? Take Germany, do you think that the national socialists are intervening in the public debate? They are not, simply because it's forbidden by law. The ones who have dared to express there point of view just once are in prison and for many years. So please explain, how could the "public debate" in Germany be disrupted by those dreadful national socialists? And what are the wonderful results of this German NS-frei public debate?

Anonymous said...

"Some people don't see races."


Rubbish.

Anonymous said...

" But that brings me back to the question raised in my post: Can they not see that the whole thing will come crashing down if this continues?"

Think harder than that. After the fire comes the fire sale. Those who are ready to buy, those who benefit from the steep discounts, will have the scent of gasoline on their hands.

Think Rothschild. Think Waterloo.

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 20:19

No, not rubbish. Just because you don't like it, it doesn't mean it's not true.
Some people buy into the whole "there is only one race, the human race" crap. They see some humans living in poverty and some humans living with riches. They then think that if you take from the rich and distribute to the poor they will be doing good and this makes them have a nice, warm fuzzy feeling. And it makes them feel smug (added bonus for them). They don't see that there is anything wrong with their attitude. You could try and persuade them otherwise, only as soon as you begin to sound like a national socialist it will only only cause them to resist your argument even more.



Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 21:04

"Think Rothschild. Think Waterloo."

Rothschild took a big loss selling his gold holdings because of the swift decisive victory of Wellington at Waterloo.

Anonymous said...

@Alex 19:28

I'm saying that if a national debate begins to go the way of the anti-immigration crowd, if a national socialist comes along and has his say, the debate is reset and all the hard work of getting to that position has been wasted.
To put it even more simply for you, I'm saying that the reasonable, sane anti-immigration people such as UKIP should be allowed to have their say and do their thing and that national socialists should shut up. At least until the leftist position has been destroyed or weakened sufficiently.

Even more simply, I'm saying that if national socialists pollute the debate, then we will never get anywhere. No one wants to hear what you say because you are insane. And dangerous. Dangerous + insane = people don't want to know you.

The leftists are also dangerous and insane and now that people have clocked onto this, they are rebelling against them. So don't fuck it up for us, please.

You just carry on reading sites which tell you that this...
http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b1598fce6b4a.jpg
... is a glowing pool of molten steel rather than the light from a powerful lamp. That should keep you nicely occupied whilst us proper people try and influence the national debate on immigration.

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 18:25

If only someone could hijack the airwaves and show some charts on IQ vs race. I'd be willing to pay the TV license for that.

Anonymous said...

21.08

On the contrary, Rothschild made a mint.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7u1cIvZsWmg#!

unhappy navy seal

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 21:40

On the contrary. He lost money due to having to sell the gold (which he was contracted to supply to Wellington) at a loss, his other dealings during the day ensuring that he broke even and made a modest profit.
The archived accounts were opened up to investigation years ago so it's known what he made that day.

By the way, that other story about the Rothschilds owning £5 trillion in gold is also false in case you were wondering.

Alex said...

@Anon 21:06

You could try and persuade them otherwise, only as soon as you begin to sound like a national socialist it will only cause them to resist your argument even more.

As soon as you will try to persuade them, you will sound like a national socialist to them because they were trained to think like that.

Anonymous said...

Can you lick my arse as well, anon of 22:25, as you seem to have your tongue permanently up the Rothschilds' rear ends.

Alex said...

Anon 21:23

Your comment is very long but you didn't answer my simple questions because you can't.

Obviously, you don't understand what's going on.

Anonymous said...

HOWARD STERN INTERVIEWS MANDELA...... HILLARIOUS!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6515W3tRTc

Dan said...

But but but Hitler!

Anyone who ends a thought there can't be white.

Anonymous said...

HOWARD STERN INTERVIEWS MANDELA...... HILLARIOUS!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6515W3tRTc

Alex said...

Anon NU 22:32

You are obviously retarded. You're even unable to read a name and your scatological thoughts reveal your roots.

Anonymous said...

There are now enough low IQ non-whites in the US and UK to forever hold down the wages of working class whites.

So obviously we now need high IQ non-whites to lower the wages of whites with college degrees.

This is called sane immigration policy that is good for our countries.

"Moderates" are horrible people.

"Moderates" are anti-white.

Anonymous said...

Just because you don't like it, it doesn't mean it's not true.

Oh.

You think they're honest.

Anonymous said...

@Alex 22:25

"As soon as you will try to persuade them, you will sound like a national socialist to them because they were trained to think like that."

The case with UKIP has proved you wrong. UKIP have managed to make large gains in the national debate about immigration without being labelled "national socialists". This is because they have given their opponents almost no justification in calling them national socialists (there were a couple of unfortunate occurrences, one with a Nazi salute and one with some Jew conspiracy crap, but not enough for the label to stick).
Now, the reason that the BNP were called national socialists is because that party was full of national socialists and the BNP was only too willing to give its opponents all the justification they needed in calling them that. Griffin himself had form with the old Jew conspiracy crap and on that basis alone, never should have been accepted as leader, since anyone with more than two braincells should know that whilst he was leader the party was never going to have the opportunity to represent the people. The BNP broke the golden rule: if you sound like national socialists you will never win in the UK.

That's why the UKIP gains in the national debate support my overall point: let the sane people take part in the argument. If you're obsessed with Jews and sound like a national socialist, all you will do is harm.

You guise don't believe this because you are the only enlightened ones and everyone else is brainwashed and cannot think for themselves and spends their time fucking blacks and turning gay, but regardless of what you think, if you get involved in the national debate then you'll turn the clock back and we'll have to start again. As far as saving the country is concerned, we don't have time for any more fuck ups. The BNP/ NF wasted 40 years of our time and condemned millions of British people to rape/ robbery/ murder at the hands of the invaders; invaders which we would not have let in necessarily had we been able to advance the cause of the native British people sooner.

nastiestuncle said...

@Alex 22:47

I didn't write the comment at 22:32, obviously.

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 23:30

Well, national socialist types think in terms of black and white, so what you're asking me is if I think all of them are honest or none of them are honest.

Would you be able to understand it if I said that some of them are honest and some of them are not?

Alex said...

@Anon 23:32

You still are unable to answer my very simple questions.

As for UKIP, it's obviously an establishment sponsored ‘safety valve’ party. As such, it's treated by our mass media as a legitimate political party. Nigel Farage is permitted regular appearances on Question Time, during which he is accorded a polite reception. This of course, can mean only one thing, that our enemies are confident that they can exercise sufficient influence to keep UKIP in check.

Dan said...

But but but Hitler!

Who was a vegetarian and kind to animals and was a war veteran... All nasty things as they sound national Socialist!

Dan said...

Most of the problem has come from an ostensibly conservative party that conserves nothing and a labour party that hates proles.

This has practically nothing to do with the far right.

Anonymous said...

@Alex 00:23

"You still are unable to answer my very simple questions."

I'm not interested in your original questions. My concern is the UK. Germany can do as it likes. Maybe they need someone like UKIP, since national socialism has no place there whatsoever.

"As for UKIP, it's obviously an establishment sponsored ‘safety valve’ party."

Ah yes. Obviously. Because everything is a conspiracy. No one can do anything unless the government, or dare I say it, Jews, are involved, pulling the strings.

"As such, it's treated by our mass media as a legitimate political party."

It depends on which paper you read.

"Nigel Farage is permitted regular appearances on Question Time, during which he is accorded a polite reception. This of course, can mean only one thing, that our enemies are confident that they can exercise sufficient influence to keep UKIP in check."

Cuckoo.

No seriously, you're really enlightened that you can see what is going on behind the scenes. If only the 99% of people who are not national socialists were just as smart as you.

Haha.

Now shush, and let the national debate go ahead without your input.

Anonymous said...

@Dan 00:54

"Who was a vegetarian and kind to animals and was a war veteran..."

Sounds like a nice man. I wonder why he is seen as being the worst thing ever to happen to Europe. Oh, it might be because of the millions of deaths and untold misery he caused. Yup, I think that's definitely it.

Dan said...

The worst thing that ever happened to Europe was the advent of Roman Imperialism. Second, the importation of third world laborers.

WW2 was not significantly more bloody than the Napoleonic Era or the 30 Years War.

Get a grip Anon. Get a ficking grip.

Dan said...

Another distaster for Europe was the ACW... When white northerners were bamboozled into fighting white Southerners. This Enfranchised niggers enmasse and the West has been death spiraling for 150 years.

The truth will out said...

Quite prescient considering what our anony-mouse-virus is seeming to feed into the stream here.

I just had to post this radioshow link.

Y'all might want to listen to Deanna Spingola toy with these two devious juwes trying to steer Sweden's pretend-patriotic movement.

This is what happens when *i*es come unstuc*

Spingola Speaks 2013.05.13

Guest: Ingrid Carlqvist and Lars Hedegaard talks about multiculturalism in Sweden

Right Click, save link as, or left click to play

cbislarich65 said...

The welfare will eventually be cut off. The black and brown people will then eat us alive. That's the plan.

Anonymous said...

Would you be able to understand it if I said that some of them are honest and some of them are not?

Oh I understand what they say, and what you say nastiest.

But not one of them is honest.

Firstly, they only lecture whites, which shows they do in fact have eyes -- and are anti-white. They don't go around telling non-white ethnic or race-based groups to disband.

Secondly if someone genuinely believes there's just one race, then they think genocide is impossible.

But of course they do see genocide, and object to it.

They just say they don't see white genocide, because they're anti-white.

Anonymous said...

Man who killed beauty queen in NYC got off scot-free

A [nignog] dump truck driver who slaughtered a Romanian beauty queen in NYC was never punished.

Harry Robinson was driving a ten wheel dump truck late at night and crushed Roxana Sorina Buta. He then fled the scene and was hunted by police for eight days.

An unnamed DA refused to file serious charges and claimed the victim was on a cell phone. Even though her cell phone records show no call.

The man was not charged with vehicular homicide or fleeing from a fatal accident. He was given two extremely minor charges and then acquitted of both.

NY Post:

A year after a horrific hit-and-run killed an aspiring actress walking near Union Square, the city employee behind the wheel has gotten off scot-free, The Post has learned.

Harry Robinson, 64, a $105,000-a-year highway repairman for the Department of Transportation, drove the city-owned, 10-wheel Mack dump truck that ran over and crushed Roxana Sorina Buta, 21 — then kept going.

Despite heavy press coverage, Robinson did not turn himself in. Cops tracked him down eight days later after a bank security video captured the truck on tape.

On March 18 — 10 months after her death — police slapped Robinson with two summonses, for “failure to yield to a pedestrian in a crosswalk,” and “failure to exercise due care.”

But in court last week, he was found not guilty of both.

Jeremy said...

I agree with 23.32 above. If you get tagged with the NS brand you're doomed. You can argue till the cows come home that this is unfair etc. but it is a fact.

So if UKIP started 'naming the jew' or whatever it would disappear overnight. That's why criticism of them on this and related points is not only misguided, it's counter-productive.

Anonymous said...

"The black and brown people will then eat us alive." ....that might be the plan but if we get the jew between our ears out of heads that won't be the way it pans out.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lF7Cv1cQao8&feature=player_embedded

A good darkie...soaks muslim convert Ribery with beer. I'd like him more if it was pig's piss.
Paris Claims

Bill said...

Former UK government minister Peter Mandelson (Jew), admits deliberately flooding Britain with millions of third world immigrants.

Along with Mandelson, the chief architects of this treason were the then Home Secretary, Jack Straw (Jew) and his deputy, the Immigration Minister Barbara Roche (Jewess)

"Immigrants? We sent out search parties to get them to come... and made it hard for Britons to get work, says Mandelson

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2324112/Immigrants-We-sent-search-parties-to-come--hard-Britons-work-says-Mandelson.html#ixzz2TGFMkapQ

Anonymous said...

I don't think UKIP's role is 100%
a safety valve, leaving the EU would
have to be honoured if Farage is elected. Clearly Farage likes a bit of dosh in his pocket, and is open to Murdoch's millions, but if he gets us out of the EU who cares, once
that is saccomplished everything ekle will start to unravel.

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 05:27

"But not one of them is honest."

Another ridiculous blanket statement.

Anonymous said...

Another ridiculous blanket statement


They don't object to non-white groups organizing as such. They only object to white groups.


Despite saying there's one race they still manage to see genocide.


The only genocide they don't see is white.


Not one is honest.


What they are is anti-white.

Anonymous said...

Just a theory.

Maybe its an endorphin high they crave? Aren't endorphins released to reward certain behaviours such as mating or winning a fight. Perhaps endorphins are also released to reward other types of social behaviours which at one time were beneficial to the tribe. Is it possible empathy is one of those rewarded behaviours, We certainly feel good about ourselves after slipping a few spare coins into a charity box.

Of course strong feelings of empathy towards our own kind enables the kind of cooperation that makes civilizations possible, so its a good thing in this regard. The problem seems to arise when members of our kind use empathy toward alien peoples, especially pitiful peoples to experience an emotional high.( We all know the type) I mean how could such behaviour feel so good if it was bad for us, and besides any undesirable down sides are very unlikely to affect me here in my gated community.

Perhaps until the negative effects start effecting these endorphin junkies directly this will continue until there is nothing left worth saving, bar a revolution of course.



Magicmoonbeam2

Anonymous said...

@NastiestUncle .....can't you just leave !!!!

Anonymous said...

9.15am
Channel 5 Mathew Wright Show with guest queer Christopher Biggins

11.30am Channel 4
"What's Cooking" with guest queer Andi Peters

12.00 BBC2
Daily Politics presented by jew Jo Coburn with guest queer Matthew Parris (slagging off UKIP)

Radio 4skin :

9am Sanjeev Gupta

9.30 Ritula Shah

10 am Shami Chakrabati ,Yoko Ono

11.30 Jew Lord Baron Sir Robert Winston

*************

Interview with John Hardon of "Hardon's Blog"

http://hardons-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/the-realist-report-with-john-friend_14.html

GTRman

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 14:08

If someone educates you to a higher level, it isn't courageous to ask them to leave.

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 13:12

But if they truly believe that there is no such thing as race, then they are being honest in their actions. This doesn't mean that they are correct, but it does mean that they are being honest.

Not everyone thinks like national socialists.

Anonymous said...

Not everyone is scared by Nasional Socialists anymore, people are waking up and are starting to see the truth.
Your propoganda won't stop the tide.

Anonymous said...

Ivan here.

Well NU by going anonymous has made an even greater mess of thing here. I used to manage to avoid his filth but now I'm unavoidably dragged into to it. His next step will be to assume other aliases thereby still further fouling this website.

Savant needs to take control, and soon, or the odious creature will be able to announce to his controllers: mission accomplished.

Anonymous said...

A New Zealand video produced with a tongue-in-cheek flavour welcoming the demise of their White heritage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi4YlKRKDq8

I doubt whether this liberal enabler or his grandchildren, will be laughing in 2035 when they find themselves colonalized by the massive presence of their Chinese invaders.

Population of China - 1,354,000,000 and probably 99.99% homogeneous.

Anonymous said...

Anon 18.34
Asked is Obama behind this?
I refer to Bill Hicks for the answer. Hicks stated that every American President as soon as they are elected are taken into a room. A film of the Kennedy assassination is shown from an angle the nobody has ever seen before. A man says to the new Prez 'Now Mr. President are you going to do as we say?'

Anonymous said...

Nixon: ''every one of the bastards that are out for legalizing marijuana is Jewish''
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=126236&page=1#.UZJNXdsaLoY
Reply

Anonymous said...

Is it just me ?

I went to the bathroom , put on the radio (BBC Radio4skin) and within , I swear , less than 10 seconds , Ive heard the first mention of Hitler .

Then 'Germans' , then 'Nazis' , then 'Hitler' again , then '3rd Reich' , and finally 'concentration camps '.

I recognised the presenter's voice , the JEW Micheal Rosen , talking to a JEW woman called Judith Kerr who had had to "flee" Germany , and learn French , then English , where some un-named "very kind people" paid for her to go to an elite Girl's Boarding school!


4pm 'Word Of Mouth'

English and German
At the Brighton Festival, JEW Michael Rosen explores our linguistic links with Germany. Michael and his guests discuss our shared Anglo Saxon heritage, cultural influences from the Romantics to the Weimar Republic, and how the two languages relate to each other in the modern era. And we hear from other writers and artists having fun with words on stage in Brighton - oratory and story-telling are strong themes at this month-long festival.'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01sdg46

***************

Evil German Nazi Eugenicists ?

" "Worth Saving?"

'Baroness Tanni Grey Thompson joins the Making History team to investigate claims in a new book by Dr Sue Wheatcroft at the University of Leicester that Whitehall civil servants were seriously asking whether disabled children were "worth saving" as they planned for the evacuation of London in 1938 and 1939.'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01sdg42

GTRman

Anonymous said...

ps Now Rosen is speaking to ANOTHER JEW , a woman called Rachel whose "grandparents had to flee the Nazis " , now he's speaking to a German man who is talking about the beauty of Goebbels speeches , but he adds the caveat that "of course the content was terrible"

Two more mentions of Hitler .

Anonymous said...

followed by "Great Lives " presented by queer Matthew Paris...

Anonymous said...

Never trust a Jew

Dan said...

Let me have a bit of fun with this.

So, if race is a social construct it is impossible to commit genocide. Therefore...none have occurred.

Wolfhound said...

He just can't get it through his infantile little mind can he. And there are many more like him?

Naming the jew is a necessary and courageous act. Golden Dawn and Jobbik are both the third largest party in their respective countries which is actually better than UKIP is doing with its milquetoast message tapping into the very same fears among voters. They haven't shied away a message I would personally fight for if I were a citizen there.

They don't support gay paedophilia and that is why this poster hates National socialists so much along with his hate for Islam. Jews ofcourse love every depravity under the sun which is why they never even get a mild criticism. It's the most selfish, childish way of looking at politics.

On a different note, everyone should have a look at this footage of 20's London in colour, it's absolutely amazing!: http://vimeo.com/7638752

Anonymous said...

I actually purchased 4 0f the Covington books before I realised they are all available online.

I'm still glad I paid,but they are available on Internet Archive.org

The fifth novel Freedoms Sons I did download from his own website.

mr.a

Anonymous said...

Re : "everyone should have a look at this footage of 20's London in colour, it's absolutely amazing!"

I thought the same last night watching the film "If.." , when Malcom Macdowel went into town with his mate , to the coffeeshop . Hardly any cars , no litter , no plastic shop-fronts , no blacks , no muslims wandering around.

Its the biggest crime , what has been perpetrated on this country .

At least the news has been forced to lead with the muzzie grooming/rape/torture gangs today .

Shocking muzzie/immigrant rape facts in the Spingola audio that was posted here earlier , start around 47 mins

http://k005.kiwi6.com/hotlink/y1n3o6xupx/spingola_speaks_-_ingrid_carlqvist_lars_hedegaard_2013.05.13.mp3

GTRman

Anonymous said...

After they have made us all poor the police and military will be their private army to control us Goyim.

Anonymous said...

Radio 4Extra , 10am : 'Blitzma'

Confused by how Britain continues to defy him, Hitler and Goebbels try to create a Nazi version of Tommy Handley's popular radio show ITMA.

BBC1 , Movie :
Mississippi Burning (1988)
'Two mismatched FBI agents, one a tough former sheriff, the other a by-the-book idealist, are sent to a small town in the Deep South to investigate the disappearance of three civil rights activists, only to come up against a conspiracy of silence.'
( Ebil White Rayciss KKK Nazi's kill innocent jews and a black)

BBC2 : Jewsnight , Emily Maitliss

followed by :

The Fantastic Mr Feynman

A profile of American physicist JEW Richard Feynman, featuring interviews with the man himself as well as his friends, colleagues and family. Feynman was part of the team that designed the atomic bomb, helped to solve the mystery of the Challenger space shuttle catastrophe and won a Nobel Prize for his work in quantum electrodynamics, and is seen as one of the most influential and inspiring scientists of the 20th century'

followed by
"The Apprentice "
( Lord Sir Baron JEW Alan Sugar lords it over goyim fools .)

Channel 4 : " Shameless"
A trusting Black Lady is taken in by a conniving , coke-addicted , lying White conman , and is almost mugged by two Ebil White Thugs in hoodies

Frank Gallagher is caught sniffing knickers ...

GTRman

Anonymous said...

@Dan 17:05

"So, if race is a social construct it is impossible to commit genocide."

No, no, no. It's quite simple to understand. If a person believes that there is no such thing as race, and lots of people believe this because they get taught it in school, then they don't believe that there is anything wrong with third world immigration because they don't see races, they just see people.

That's pretty easy to understand, yes? It's because not everyone thinks like a national socialist.

If you would like to change their minds then you must engage them in discussion. The problem with this is that as soon as you say "... Jews... 911... kikes... media... Zionists... etc" then they will say "oh lordy, this guy is a national socialist, I am not listening to him any more" and they will go away and never speak to you again and you will have lost the opportunity to change their mind.
This is why the discussion should be left to the proper people and not national socialists.

Some of them can never have their minds changed because they hate "right wingers" too much but that's another topic.

Anonymous said...

"The fifth novel Freedoms Sons I did download from his own website."
mr a and others ..BUY the books it's only a few pounds and could make some difference to the cause and a decent man that has committed his life to our survival.
rob

Anonymous said...

I fully support Rio Ferdinand's idea to form a breakaway union for black footballers. I suggest they call themselves "Association for Promoting Equality in Sport"
Or APES for short.
Paris Claims

johan said...

Ribery is an ideal muslim. He fucks underage Girls.

Anonymous said...

The future for white Americans is a mirror image of South Africa:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2324291/South-Africa-hire-white-scheme-Leaders-accused-bribing-poor-whites-boost-multi-racial-reputation.html

F McCool said...

anon - never trust a jew. Well David Cole/Stein is a brave man who's after being persecuted for revealing honest research that he undertook. They must be soooooooo worried that the truth will get out.

Anonymous said...

Auntie Beeb hates you if you are White , Heterosexual ....

My neighbour tells me that tonight's "Holby City"
( BBC1 ,primetime hospital soap)
ended with a full on , lingering snog between two queer male doctors .

After that there was another mid-wifey show on BBC1 , called "Frankie" .

In the couple of minutes I saw , the nurse/midwife stood up her White boyfriend to attend the birth of a White woman...whose black husband (a soldier no less ) turned up from Afghanistan in the nick of time .
She swooned over the bairn like it was Baby Jesus himself !

How many black British soldiers have served or been killed in Afghanistan so far ?

GTRman

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 22:22

How is showing a couple of queers kissing demonstrative of hating heterosexual people?

Anonymous said...

Very true , I often wonder if the USA even know this , it is as if SA was the training ground.

Anonymous said...

Never trust a philosemite

megaman said...

@Wolfhound 17:58

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2324621/Girl-12-branded-hairpin-raped-sold-sex-600-hour.html

Every day in which national socialists stop a proper anti-immigration movement from forming, another hundred girls are raped by the invaders.
I'm sure that they would love to express their gratitude to you for the part you played in their misery.

Anonymous said...

"How is showing a couple of queers kissing demonstrative of hating heterosexual people?"

OK I'll take the bait .
You know how water can erode even the hardest rock , over time ? How many long , lingering heterosexual kisses have there been on 'Holby City ' ?
I wouldn't know .
It's just ONE EXAMPLE of a blatant agenda to push homosexuality and all things queer.

Part of the 'cultural-marxist' onslaught that includes all the blacks or mixed-race couples on adverts and other media , all the anti-White , pro-black programming , etc .

Hey , look what's on Channel 4:


Michael Johnson: Survival of the Fastest

"The four-time Olympic gold medallist embarks on a personal journey in a bid to understand whether a possible link between the transatlantic slave trade and genetic selection may be a factor in the continuing success of African-American and Caribbean athletes at top-flight events.

He also explores the appalling crimes carried out on slave ships and plantation owners' barbaric breeding programmes " LOL

See further up this thread for other examples Ive provided .

GTRman

Anonymous said...

Hey ,
look what else is on as I type :

Channel 4seven :
Queer Alan Carr with jew Jessie Ware
followed by
" Embarrassing Bodies Live " :
Queer Christian Jessen uses a camera to examine a man's anus and prostate

followed by JEW Heston Blumenthal's 80's feast

E4 The gay and jewish 'Big Bang Theory' , followed by
The 'urban' Youngers :
Ashley lines the Youngers up as special guests on the Avengers Krew mixtape launch night concert, but unbeknown to the others, Yemi has already started working with AK. Jay and Davina have a heart-to-heart, only for things to fall apart again, thanks to Mandem on the Wall. starring Ade Oyefeso and Calvin Demba.

Writer Levi David Addai
Cast
Jay -Calvin Demba
Yemi- Ade Oyefeso
Davina -Shavani Seth
Ashley -Arinze Kene
Failia -Joivan Wade
Yungah- Baby Tinie Winie
Yungah -Baker Dee Kartier
Meleka -Lil Simz

'Dave' : queer jew Stephen Fry with queer John Sessions'

'Watch' : Torchwood with queer John Barrowman and Naoki Mori


Jimbo said...

@Anonymous said...

"OK I'll take the bait .
You know how water can erode even the hardest rock , over time ? How many long , lingering heterosexual kisses have there been on 'Holby City ' ?"

So the people's heterosexuality are the rocks and the gay kisses are the water.
So what you're saying is that old men who have watched TV all their lives are gay, because the gay kiss water has eroded their heterosexuality rock over a long time.
Hmmmm, I'm pretty sure that the people would beg to differ with your expert views.

So, you think that your dad and grandad are gay. And probably are gay with niggers.


So which one is it - are you stupid or mad?

How would you explain the fact of homosexuality in nature? Have all those gay antelopes and gay squirrels been watching too much Holby City? Are they putting all the Jewish dolphins into camps because they showed the non-Jewish dolphins pictures of black dolphins relaxing on a beach with white dolphins?

People, I present to you GTRman: what not to aspire to when you are older. The brains of a flea.

Maximum Herzl said...

I use to visit Incogman's site just to read GTRman's TV/radio listings. So I was most chuffed when he started commenting here.

GTRman is a top bloke.

Jimbo, you're a prick.

Jimbo said...

@Maximum Herzl 03:00

I wasn't criticising GTRman for his TV listings. I was criticising him for his dumbass/ crazy views on gay kissing on TV. If you agree with him in that respect then you are also stupid or mad, unless you are correct in which case your dad must have an arsehole like a clown's pocket and your grandad must have a rectum like sleeve of wizard.

Take your pick.

dave said...

I echo that. GTRMan is da man!

Seriously, I'm just stunned at the amount of jews on our airwaves. Are we all blind?

Dan said...

Let me see.

This is fun. Ok. If you are experiencing a slow genocide, it's just a figment of your imagination. As race is just a social construct. No need to worry. All better now. All better. Kumbaya. Bush suxs vote Obama!

Anonymous said...

Fag antelopes,squirrels and dolphins exist only in your hasbarasexual mind Jimbo,next to: Misha the wolves mistress
Ann '' i'm not pissing through my clitoris'' Frank
Irene ''i'm shitting diamonds every morning'' Zisblatt
Elie ''where the fuck is my tatoo'' Wiesel
The list goes on and on, i love to read holohoax jokes btw.For you goims reading this blog check Ricky Gervais skit about fag animals,hilarious stuff,yes he had his moments(not any more though)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIcrCZQkSlg

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mExVasEX-lk&feature=player_embedded

Promo for the EDL. Well worth watching

Paris Claims

Anonymous said...

@Paris Claims 06:20

The EDL face various problems, but one of them is having some members who are photographed giving the Nazi salute. Huge facepalm.

Keiser said...

Hey Jimbo,

Companies like Coca-Cola don't waste millions and millions on advertising each year for nothing.

People mimic what they see. For most if an authority, TV for example, says it is OK then it is OK.

It is not a black and white, either or thing. Our Fathers and Grandfathers had a lot less of this homosexuality advertising to put up with. This is a more recent social and media trend.

You can see social attitudes changing rapidly about it from disgust and shame to tolerance to acceptance to celebration of it. So GTRman is correct. It does influence.

Younger people who are going through difficult developmental years may be even more influenced.

If someone tells a young person enough that they are stupid, they will start to believe it.

Likewise continuous bombardment with gay propaganda on a young mind might cause confusion and will certainly influence however subconsciously.

Granted a lot won't act on it and will reject the influence but the point is there is a media presentation made of the issue as if it is normal for people to consider and some will accept that treatment of the issue, especially the young and confused.

Now on a different point, a value judgement on the issue as opposed to a discussion about the efficacy of media influence.

If people choose to engage in abhorrent behaviour that is their choice, however, that doesn't mean society/media should normalise it by sticking it in our faces

(or faeces, LuLz, excuse facetiousness).

So save the either/or reasoning please Jimbo, better yet talk to NU, he thinks in similar black and white terms.

Jimbo said...

@Keiser 10:51

"Companies like Coca-Cola don't waste millions and millions on advertising each year for nothing."

There is nothing at all similar between advertising a drink and showing a drama program in which two men are having a relationship.

"People mimic what they see."

Not to the extent that they will change their sexuality because they saw two men kissing.

"For most if an authority, TV for example, says it is OK then it is OK."

Showing two men kissing on TV does not have the power to change a person's sexuality.

"It is not a black and white, either or thing. Our Fathers and Grandfathers had a lot less of this homosexuality advertising to put up with. This is a more recent social and media trend."

They had plenty of exposure to homosexuality in media. The 70s and 80s showed homosexuals in popular TV programs. Before that, homosexuality in the form of campness was a staple in pantomime and shows.

"You can see social attitudes changing rapidly about it from disgust and shame to tolerance to acceptance to celebration of it."

And what is the problem with accepting that some people are gay? Would you like to be persecuted for your sexuality as people were in less enlightened times?

"So GTRman is correct. It does influence."

Advertising Coke influences. Showing two men kissing does not. A person chooses what he drinks. He does not choose which sex he finds attractive.

"Younger people who are going through difficult developmental years may be even more influenced."

Sexuality is not influenced by showing two men kissing on TV.

"If someone tells a young person enough that they are stupid, they will start to believe it."

Not necessarily. In any case, a person's self worth and their sexuality are two things which are not comparable. Showing two men kissing on TV does not force people to want to kiss members of their own sex.

"Likewise continuous bombardment with gay propaganda on a young mind might cause confusion and will certainly influence however subconsciously."

It will not alter their sexuality. It may however educate them that gay people should not be persecuted because of their sexuality.

"If people choose to engage in abhorrent behaviour that is their choice, however, that doesn't mean society/media should normalise it by sticking it in our faces"

Society and media do not normalise it. Homosexuality is already there; it is already normal. The media is simply reflecting that X% of people are gay and are including them in their programs to reflect the reality of society.

As for abhorrent behaviour, I wonder why it is that you find it so disgusting. After all, it's not you who is engaging in it, and it is not harmful to those who are. Do you perhaps suspect that you yourself fancy some members of the same sex and your disgust with it is your way of proving to yourself that you are not gay or bisexual?

"So save the either/or reasoning please Jimbo, better yet talk to NU, he thinks in similar black and white terms."

It's the national socialists who think in terms of black and white. Nastiest Uncle is very much a black, white and fifty shades of grey kind of man :)

The either/ or thing works in this case. Either people do not change their sexuality when they watch TV, as I say, or they do, as you say. If I am right, then there is no more chance of your family and friends being gayer than the standard rate. If you are wrong, then you should strongly suspect any TV-watching male friends or relatives of yours of loving it up 'em.

Dan said...

Nastiest Needs to act on his deviant sexuality.

Dan said...

This is also fun,

Nastiest, do you have drawings, or photographs? See the Gervais link above. These 'natural acts' are not merely dead ends among the animals they are figments of.a queer imagination.

Anonymous said...

@Dan 12:52

If you think that heterosexuality is deviant then what does that make you? A zoophile? Paedo?

Ya daft little prick.

Anonymous said...

@Dan 12:56

Homosexuality in animals is well documented. It appears that you do not live in the real world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior

It would seem that some animals just watch way too much TV. HAHAHAHA. The Jews want to destroy all animal life by making them gay because ummm, errrr......

You sad little twat. And you lot wonder why no one takes you seriously.



Dan said...

Here's a great story about faggots in the animal kingdom.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/trial-starts-for-first-defendant-in-northwoods-assault-posted-on/article_12d1cf6e-fd54-54d4-a6ab-bc8d5d5e0439.html

Anonymous said...

Why is NU posting comments as Jimbo?

Dan said...

Why would a society discourage homosexuality?

Can anyone think of half a dozen reasons?

Anonymous said...

@Dan 13:34

Discouraged or encouraged, it isn't going to alter the number of homosexuals.

Anonymous said...

"Showing two men kissing on TV does not have the power to change a person's sexuality."

In the mid-nineties , it became normal for "straight" girls to snog each other in front of blokes .Then it became normal (usually under the influence of coke/exstacy to have some lesbian encounters . This occurred at around the same time that all the girls were getting tongues and bellies pierced , and tattoos , ususally on the lower belly or lower back.

Learned behaviour .

I wondered to myself , will boys be so easily persuaded to lose their natural revulsion to homosex ? The answer it seems is yes - we now see 'straight' boys trying their best to be camp and effeminate ( see Russell Kane for instance) , brag about how 'unmacho and camp' they are ( Jack Whitehall)and snog each other in front of girls . Not long before giving each other a cheeky handjob or blowjob whilst 'high' becomes normalised ( as happened on Peep Show)

As heard on "Shameless " :
"What's the difference between a straight bloke and a gay bloke ? --about 8 tins of lager "

Obvious bullshit , but younger people are more susceptible to this .

Your lightweight intellectual what-about-ery changes nothing , the rest of us can see whats's going on .

" A society that takes it up the arse will take anything " LOL

GTRman

PS You misunderstood my analogy : The 'Rock' represents society , traditional beliefs , etc.

The water is the drip , drip , drip of relentless propaganda .

No , it's not going to turn my dad or grandad queer ( my dad refuses to watch any of this crap , and my grandad is dead ) but to suggest that it has no influence on the children and teenagers watching is ridiculous.

Monkey see , monkey do . Most people are copy-cats , unfortunately .

PPS It's hardly reflective of reality when say , "Come Dine With Me " is 25% homosexual every episode , or "QI" is sometimes 60% homosexual , or "The News Quiz" is often 50% homosexual or more .

Anonymous said...

Wrap your brain round this.
Lenny Henry has taken to task the TV industry for........NOT EMPLOYING ENOUGH BLACKS!!!!
Perhaps Mr. Henry should take to task the TV industry for excessive use of Jews.

katana said...

Over at John Hardons site I posted this comment re his interview with John Friend.

http://hardons-blog.blogspot.jp/2013/05/the-realist-report-with-john-friend_14.html


---------------------
katana15 May 2013 14:18
Thank you John for that interview. Lots of good comments.

But, I was first dismayed when you mentioned 'the Creator', thinking, oh no, you are just another bible basher who just happens to keep it in the background.
I was so pleased to much later hear what you meant by that. That 'the Creator' is something within us, not something written down in some book.

Christianity creates and attracts idealists, all mostly born into that religion. Because of that they find it extremely hard to escape its orbit due to its emotional connections created over their formative years.

So, your wonderful host, John Friend, is 'locked into' the Christian mindset, without much chance of escape (yet). If Christianity does anything bad, then it's because it's been corrupted or because it's not the 'true' Christianity. In other words the 'True Scotsman' fallacy.

White societies, whether its members are declared Christian or not, have been brainwashed over ages into accepting Christian values such as charity and to turn the other cheek. All very good when confined to your own kind, but racial suicidal when they become universal values, applicable to the whole world. All pushed hard by our enemy the jews.

White societies are sheep bleating Christjewian lies about universalism and 'humanity' while committing racial suicide by inviting foreign 'wolves' of all kinds into their midst.

Whites need to bring back, re-remember, the honorable old fashioned human virtues of intolerance and hate if we are to save ourselves from our enemies within. If we don't, we will cease to exist as a race.

-----------------

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 13:48

"In the mid-nineties , it became normal for "straight" girls to snog each other in front of blokes ."

It's good that you used quotes around the word straight, because it's highly unlikely that most girls are straight anyway. If a female is attracted to another female then she is not straight. If a female is not attracted to another female but kisses her anyway, she is still not a lezza.

"Then it became normal (usually under the influence of coke/exstacy to have some lesbian encounters . This occurred at around the same time that all the girls were getting tongues and bellies pierced , and tattoos , ususally on the lower belly or lower back."

Fashions change. I don't get a kick out of telling people what they cannot wear. Maybe you do.

"I wondered to myself , will boys be so easily persuaded to lose their natural revulsion to homosex ?"

Boys do not have a natural revulsion to homosexuality. Heterosexual boys do, but bisexual and gay boys do not.

"The answer it seems is yes - we now see 'straight' boys trying their best to be camp and effeminate ( see Russell Kane for instance) , brag about how 'unmacho and camp' they are ( Jack Whitehall)and snog each other in front of girls ."

Fashions change. May they look back on their former selves with shame. I have identified the gradual feminisation of men to be a left wing phenomenon and not a Jewish one, however.

"Not long before giving each other a cheeky handjob or blowjob whilst 'high' becomes normalised ( as happened on Peep Show)"

Cheeky handjobs have been around for years, and particularly in macho situations such as the team bath after a rugby match. Only now is it becoming common knowledge that such things occur.

"Obvious bullshit , but younger people are more susceptible to this ."

Untrue. A young person can no more have his sexuality changed by 8 pints of beer after having watched Shameless than he can by drinking 8 pints of beer and not watching Shameless.

"Your lightweight intellectual what-about-ery changes nothing , the rest of us can see whats's going on ."

No, you can't see what's going on. Your attitudes are ultra-conservative. You cannot stand change, and blaming it on Jews makes it all too convenient because it removes the responsibility from the white people you think so infallible. That you think that seeing an image can change a person's sexuality is proof of your out of touch attitudes.

"but to suggest that it has no influence on the children and teenagers watching is ridiculous."

And I'll say it again. A person's sexuality cannot be changed by seeing an image any more than his height can be changed. Sexuality is hardwired. The society around a person can allow them to explore their sexuality, but it cannot change it. In the 50s for example, a bisexual man might only explore the hetero side of his sexuality for fear of becoming a social outcast or losing his job, whereas modern society would allow him to explore both at no cost. His sexuality remains unchanged regardless of his surroundings. Perhaps it bothers you that you cannot control the modern man.

Anonymous said...


"Monkey see , monkey do . Most people are copy-cats , unfortunately ."

Not when it comes to their own sexuality though.

"PPS It's hardly reflective of reality when say , "Come Dine With Me " is 25% homosexual every episode , or "QI" is sometimes 60% homosexual , or "The News Quiz" is often 50% homosexual or more ."

Homos, by virtue of their general liberal attitudes, makes them more likely to be over-represented in the media anyway. It's always been the case.

You should take a look at sexuality in societies. It would appear that heterosexuality in humans is not necessarily the norm, nor is monogamy. Look at humans' closest relatives, the bonobos and chimpanzees - highly complex, developed societies in which everyone fucks everyone else.
Look at the community in china in which the females have multiple male partners but the males are all monogamous - they have a zero crime society.
Look at the ancient Greeks, in which homosexuality was the norm.

What's best for my society (the UK) would appear to be a mix of the traditional and liberal. If they can be combined in the proper amounts, such as I have done in my life, then our society would work just fine. Too much harping back to bygone times is no good, just as too much liberalism is no good. Balance is needed. National socialists, being clueless, think that society would benefit from their overall control. It wouldn't. Blaming it all on Jews is childish; white people are quite capable of fucking up their own societies themselves. See Germany, Russia, France, Ireland, UK, Sweden, etc, for details.

Anonymous said...

Yuck ! I reject everything you say .

You seem to hold the most vile uber-liberal views that are ruining everything .

And your style is snidey , too .

GTRman

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 14:53

"Yuck ! I reject everything you say ."

Of course you do. You'd have to have a good sense of intellectual honesty to agree with what I say.

"You seem to hold the most vile uber-liberal views that are ruining everything ."

Again, another mistake.
I'm not "uber-liberal" at all. I oppose gay marriage, oppose immigration, am for forced repatriation, etc.
National socialists, just like ultra-leftists, see everything in black and white. The best way is to observe all those lovely shades of grey out there. You have not yet learned how to do this.

"And your style is snidey , too ."

How can a person come across as not snidey when dealing with national socialists and their ilk?

Anonymous said...

"You have not yet learned how to do this."

where have I heard that before ? Oh yes, " Europe has not yet learned to be multi-cultural "

Im a national socialist ? Says who ?

"Lovely shades of grey " How many? Fifty ? ( Sub-dom /soft porn with female -on-male buggery , for fishwives)

"white people are quite capable of fucking up their own societies themselves. See Germany, Russia, France, Ireland, UK, Sweden"

NO JEWISH CONTROL THERE, LOL !

What's on BBC Radio 4skin right now , I wonder ? "The Media Show ": An interview with Channel 4 boss , the JEW David Abraham !

15/05/2013
Duration: 30 minutes
First broadcast: Wednesday 15 May 2013
In its Annual Report this week, Channel 4 has announced higher than ever investment in original programmes and a loss of £29m. This was for 2012 which featured successes like the Paralympics coverage, which won a Bafta on Sunday. While C4 has hit many of its own financial targets, it has fallen short of its target for share (the proportion of available audience watching its programmes). Chief Executive David Abraham tells Steve where the money has been spent, what changes viewers can expect for 2013 and why he and his Chief Creative Officer Jay Hunt were paid £615k and £506k last year, respectively, plus benefits.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01sdmjy

BBC : JEWS Danny Cohen , Alan Yentob

ITV : JEW Jonathan Levi

Channel 4 : JEW David Abraham

Channel 5 : JEW pornographer Richard Desmond ( founded by JEW David Elstein)

Move along , nothing to see here ..

GTRman




Dan said...

Most queers are damaged goods, once you begin to hear about their childhoods they are often victims of predatory abuse. This alone is a reason to suppress homosexuals.

There is an old army song from ww1 which featured in Oh What A Lovely War...

In the song the soldiers coyly talk about their officers playing leapfrog, one officer "jumping" over the other officer's back. The implication is quite obvious.

Gays are not normal or a sign of general societal health. When they form a clique they generate trouble for heterosexuals.

Wolfhound said...

@ megaman (NU obviously)

No National Socialists are stopping you from holding your "respectable" anti-immigration march. Please go right ahead.

As for a gang of Pakistanis raping young girls, no Nazi has anything to do with that and to say they're responsible is insane. In fact, I would expect you to be more supportive of these Pakistani scumbags seeing as homosexuality and paedophilia are undeniably linked. Or maybe it's just a coincidence that it's usually little boys being molested and that gays always bring up the man/boy relationships common in ancient Greece as some sort of template we should follow.



Keiser said...

@ NU 15 May 2013 11:46 sorry I mean "Jimbo"... you fucking Gobshite NU sign your name to your posts, this is laughable.

Where did I say I wanted homosexuals persecuted you loaded language using shill. I don't. The behaviour is unnatural. Just because a few heifers engage in it in a field doesn't change that.

Look if people want to make a case for it that's fine let them. I just don't like the AGENDA of main stream media promoting it. If you are OK with it that's fine but this is why I don't watch TV anymore. I gets me news from da net now where I can avoid having disgusting propaganda shoved at me 24/7.

"As for abhorrent behaviour, I wonder why it is that you find it so disgusting. After all, it's not you who is engaging in it, and it is not harmful to those who are. Do you perhaps suspect that you yourself fancy some members of the same sex and your disgust with it is your way of proving to yourself that you are not gay or bisexual?"

Oh and yes I abhor serial killers and there actions too but according to your reasoning there is a little serial killer in me just dying to get out and I'm really afraid of that so I repress it just like I repress the little queer in me. Fuck off back to Tel Aviv NU please.

Excuse the language it is meant in friendly jest :-)

Keiser said...

that should have been "their actions" of course

"As for abhorrent behaviour, I wonder why it is that you find it so disgusting. After all, it's not you who is engaging in it, and it is not harmful to those who are."

Well some would argue that they are experiencing a psychologically unhealthy way of life but that is beyond the scope of a comments forum.

There are plenty of resources available if you want to follow up. I recommend searching for articles/essays written by credible psychiatrists or psychologists on "defensive detachment" as a precursor to homosexual behaviour.

Finally on the above.
Well aside from the increased risk of HIV, with any anal sex especially among a notably promiscuous populations such as gay men.

Also rectal tissue is not designed for a sustained pounding and generally tears during such activity so that's got to hurt.

I wouldn't know though so perhaps you could share your experiences with this "Jimbo" if you have them.

Bill said...

Nastiest is a conservative in exactly the same way that Jennifer Rubin is a conservative.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2013/03/12/offering-us-the-poison-apple/comment-page-1/

Don't let Nastiest's accidentally get posted Savant, we'd all weep if something happened to the boy.

Olda said...

Wolfhound in countries like Hungary and the Czech lands people are not to afraid on telling the truth about jews. You see we have seen jews operating when the communists take over our countries. They were jews almost all. We are all remembering this even today.

Dame Edith said...

GTRMan: 'Shameless' is a one-man demolition job on western civilisation. It's the degradation process that Munzenberg and Beria spoke about.

Anonymous said...

@Keiser 17:21

"Well some would argue that they are experiencing a psychologically unhealthy way of life but that is beyond the scope of a comments forum."

They can argue all they like, but reality is reality and does not change.

"Well aside from the increased risk of HIV, with any anal sex especially among a notably promiscuous populations such as gay men."

HIV is not a greater risk due to homosexuality. HIV becomes a risk due to promiscuity or lack of safe sex.

"Also rectal tissue is not designed for a sustained pounding and generally tears during such activity so that's got to hurt."

And the human spine is not designed for bipedal animals and yet we are stuck with it.

Anonymous said...

@Keiser 17:11

"Where did I say I wanted homosexuals persecuted you loaded language using shill. I don't."

You didn't. I was asking if you would like to be persecuted for your sexuality, as homosexuals were before. In times gone by when homosexuality was not accepted (and you do not accept homosexuality now), it was persecuted. If the state was run by people who did not accept homosexuality, homosexuals would be persecuted, as they were in the past.

"The behaviour is unnatural. Just because a few heifers engage in it in a field doesn't change that."

It's not just a few heifers. Homosexual behaviour has been documented in over 1500 species, from humans to tape worms. It is particularly prevalent amongst higher organisms, mammals in particular. It would appear to be a natural phenomenon.

"Look if people want to make a case for it that's fine let them. I just don't like the AGENDA of main stream media promoting it."

But the MSM doesn't promote it. It's pointless to promote it. People cannot be turned gay by watching TV. The TV channels go for audience share. if people didn't like to watch shows containing homos, there would be less homos portrayed on TV.

"If you are OK with it that's fine but this is why I don't watch TV anymore. I gets me news from da net now where I can avoid having disgusting propaganda shoved at me 24/7."

I don't watch TV either. I made the same choice as you. Everyone is responsible for their own education and therefore everyone is either free to watch the TV or not to watch it.

"Oh and yes I abhor serial killers and there actions too but according to your reasoning there is a little serial killer in me just dying to get out and I'm really afraid of that so I repress it just like I repress the little queer in me."

No, you are all mixed up. Homosexuality is not harmful to others and therefore if a person is homosexual then they have no need to repress their feelings. Serial killing IS harmful to others therefore the responsibility is on any potential serial killers to repress their feelings in this matter.

"Fuck off back to Tel Aviv NU please."

But I have never been there and it is probably last on the list of places I would like to go.

Anonymous said...

@Dan 16:58

Cuckoo.

Dan said...

You are clearly a homosexual.

Keiser said...

@Anonymous... the AES 256 bit Cryptographically, Meta-materially Stealth Cloaked, TOR proxied, Obfuscated NU

"Well aside from the increased risk of HIV, with any anal sex especially among a notably promiscuous populations such as gay men."

HIV is not a greater risk due to homosexuality. HIV becomes a risk due to promiscuity or lack of safe sex.


Yes that's what I said but there is a trend in the gay community towards promiscuity.

"And the human spine is not designed for bipedal animals and yet we are stuck with it."

That's a ridiculous argument. Bipedal motion served an evolutionary purpose so we adapted. Anal sex serves none and it's gross, yuck.
"If the state was run by people who did not accept homosexuality, homosexuals would be persecuted, as they were in the past."

That's a leap. I don't see any connection between not accepting it and persecuting people for it but that is just me perhaps you view the world differently.

"It would appear to be a natural phenomenon."

I'll concede that one but surely we hold ourselves to higher standards as Humans or at least have the choice to do so. Key word choice. If someone wants to dip it in faeces they should go for it but again it shouldn't be such a celebrated/approved activity and it is in the MSM.



"I don't watch TV either. I made the same choice as you. Everyone is responsible for their own education and therefore everyone is either free to watch the TV or not to watch it."

Agreed

"No, you are all mixed up. Homosexuality is not harmful to others and therefore if a person is homosexual then they have no need to repress their feelings. Serial killing IS harmful to others therefore the responsibility is on any potential serial killers to repress their feelings in this matter."

Point taken but I think you are still missing mine. Just because I disagree with something doesn't mean I am repressing an urge to do it. I've read Jung I understand the repressed "shadow" of the subconscious desires and how they can be projected on to others.

In Jungian terms if I am the best person in the world (assertion of the "Ego") then others must be commensurately bad (projection of the bad in me, "the shadow")

Perhaps I have transcended both Jungian Ego and Shadow through faith fellowship with the divine, an image we are created in. I don't expect you to understand. What's the weather like in the Sixth Circle.

"Fuck off back to Tel Aviv NU please."

But I have never been there and it is probably last on the list of places I would like to go.


That was only meant in jest I hope you know but still I apologies, it was a bit uncouth of me.

Dan said...

Black women get HIV because their bucks fuck each other in jail.

Most homosexuals will get it.

HIV is strongly associated with gays. When it is found in blacks it's often spread from situational homosexual contact in prisons. The buck spreads it to the sheboon.

Dan said...

Here's a zoological example of homosexual coontact. The revolting black should have been disposed of many decades ago.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2013/05/14/mario-hunt-transmitting-hiv-boy-sex-abuse_n_3273615.html?utm_hp_ref=crime


HIV, quwers, blacks, public education, affleets!

James said...

"No, you are all mixed up. Homosexuality is not harmful to others and therefore if a person is homosexual then they have no need to repress their feelings. Serial killing IS harmful to others therefore the responsibility is on any potential serial killers to repress their feelings in this matter."


Hahahaha its a little bit harmful, since they often have trouble sitting down at work on Monday morning.

Fact, BTW, I've seen it.

qeer said...

anonymous uncle must be gay.

He defends them so much,.

James said...

Look at the ancient Greeks, in which homosexuality was the norm.


untrue

Anonymous said...

@ Hasbarasexual 15 May 2013 13:08

Kiki... oops Wiki is used as a source of information mostly by junior cert students,Internet trolls and intellectual lemmings.It is also widely used as a source of the Truth and Knowledge at The Great University of Hasbara in Tel Aviv.



Stephen Hawking said...

"No, you are all mixed up. Homosexuality is not harmful to others and therefore if a person is homosexual then they have no need to repress their feelings. Serial killing IS harmful to others therefore the responsibility is on any potential serial killers to repress their feelings in this matter."


Too much university makes you think like the above.

Its an irreversible condition too I'm afraid.

Prof. Saccharides said...


And I'll say it again. A person's sexuality cannot be changed by seeing an image any more than his height can be changed. Sexuality is hardwired. The society around a person can allow them to explore their sexuality, but it cannot change it. In the 50s for example, a bisexual man might only explore the hetero side of his sexuality for fear of becoming a social outcast or losing his job, whereas modern society would allow him to explore both at no cost. His sexuality remains unchanged regardless of his surroundings. Perhaps it bothers you that you cannot control the modern man.


People, it is strange that university produces people that "think" like this. He has never heard of the process of perversion.

Apparently perversion is impossible, and images cannot change anyone. Mr University of Gifted Fools graduate anonymousuncle "thinks" that nobody ever does anything they were never "hardwired" to do, and anything else they do like stretching their anus with a can of coke is "normal" and "natural". This is strange. According to him, perversion is impossible, and no amount of imagery can change that.

The tragic cases of 6 year olds addicted to hourly masturbation (due to certain influences) is nothing to worry about because it "does not harm anyone".

Guys, the scary thing about this anonymousuncle guy is that he is not joking, he actually believes himself.

He is obviously young and has spent too much time in university talking to young gays that think they "know thyselves". Maybe they do not.

His mental condition is incurable. No amount of age, experience, or collected wisdom will ever fix it.

That's quite sad actually, because with his energy and ego he might do alot of damage, but never realise it until its too late.

Keiser said...

Here Here Prof. Saccharides, a simplistic treatment of the matter is all we can expect from that source.