Sunday, 14 April 2013

Blacks really are cowards

I've heard it said time and again: Black men are cowards and will attack only in packs, and only against individual or greatly outnumbered victims.  Seems a credible case but check out this video for confirmation.  In it you'll see a White man pretending to be a zombie. Large black men, some in gangs, flee before him.  Betraying not just cowardice, I suppose, but also ignorance and stupidity on an epic scale.

180 comments:

nastiestuncle said...

I'm assuming that you are joking, but if not then perhaps not the best example to use since these guys are, as far as they can see, being chased by a lunatic. I'd run away if I didn't know the man was definitely joking, and I'm probably the toughest white man here judging by the mainly cowardly bunch who comment here.

James said...

I'm probably the toughest white man here

Not only are you definitely the toughest, you are the brainiest, and probably the best looking too.
Your modesty knows no bounds as you humbly offer your services to the white race, accepting no praise or reward.

You are a true saint of Albion, sir.

Anonymous said...

http://aryanstreet.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/white-south-africans-open-3-new-embassies/

James said...

I wondered why it was all blacks in the clip. Is it because Miami is totally black, or some other reason. Yes, it was some other reason.

"A lot of people asked why it was only black people in the video.

Black people gave the best reaction."


Black people ran away, in other words. Other people knew it was just a guy dressed up, and probably noticed the cameraman too.

Because blacks "gave the best reaction", they "took it to the hood". That's why its all blacks in the clip.

Zombie Attack - Behind the Scenes - YouTube

Nastiest Uncle said "I'd run away if I didn't know the man was definitely joking"

Maybe, like NU, all the blacks in the video are smarter and tougher than the average white on this blog, and running away is a sign of being tough and smart. Only gullible and weak white guys like Irish Savant posters would just stand and stare.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4awVqRr1eCo

Couldn't get your clip to play so I found it on youtube.
I'm not ebtirely sure if I'd like to be in the same vicinity as your Zombie pal.
Incidently, the origianal Zombie was some mad coon from Haiti ( I think) that was a mass murderer/
Paris Claims

Anonymous said...

Quebecois here

I mean, ok, black men being cowardly, stupid, etc, needing a three-to-one (at least) ratio to attack a single white male..

But what is the point to this post apart from bring forth facts that are either already well know, or studiously ignored by the MSM or those white women who cluelessly worship them ?

Anonymous said...

Check out Abe Foxman in this Israeli documentary about anti-Semitism (skip to 08:18 and 30:22).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TQTcyd1G7GY

Abe Foxman: “If a student is given an assignment to do a report on the Holocaust, 20 years ago they would go to a library, find a hundred books (translation: find a MILLION books) on the Holocaust...three books that the Holocaust didn’t exist (yeah, right!)...and they had a librarian, and so there was a BALANCE (LOL!)...today you push the button...holocaust...you got anti-Holocaust, NO PERSPECTIVE (translation: previously you had to take our word for it), no librarian (translation: no snitch to report you to the authorities).”

LOL!

Abe Foxman: “If the only nationalism that bothers you or you find racist is Jewish nationalism, you’re an ANT-SEMITE!”

This Zionist, his Zionist organisation (ADL) and its affiliates oppose all other forms of nationalism in North America, Western Europe, Australasia (white Christians are even prevented from pursuing their own ethnic interests in their OWN countries) and the Middle East (Arab States), yet anyone who opposes Jewish nationalism is all of a sudden labelled an anti-Semite. You just couldn’t make it up!

Talk about CHUTZPAH!

Frank Galton

Dan said...

Bravely he did bugger off
He shat his pants and ranaway
Bravely did Nastiest squeal and froth
He pissed his Y-fronts like a gay...

Brave brave Sir Nastiest.

James said...

@Paris Claims

Watch the behind the scenes vid I posted above.

There are plenty of white people and a couple of Hispanics.

They don't run at all. They barely even care about the guy.

Dan said...

At 2:24Demarquerious throws a bakkabal and misses from 5 ft. Lol. Bad aim.

Dan said...

Blacks freak out she little red headed women yell at them.

James said...

Miami looks like shit.

Anonymous said...

nastiestuncle isn't running away he is running towards the trayvon Martin Wannabes!

Dan said...

A good laugh. I'd probably run one on one though. Looked like rabes.

Rob said...

@Frank Galton:

Also, discrimination against Blacks or Muslims is only allowed when it's in favour of Jews.

Imagine them doing that for a White visitor to the country.

Rob said...

@Frank Galton:

Also, discrimination against Blacks or Muslims is only allowed when it's in favour of Jews.

Imagine them doing that for a White visitor to the country.

James said...

@Frank Galton

What's the problem? It was only "alleged discrimination" - nothing to worry about.

We are fortunate it wasn't David Duke visiting, then there would have been "hate", "profiling", or worse.

James said...

France has the largest Muslim population in western Europe, with up to six million living in the country, many in major cities like Paris.


There's that magic number again.

James said...

If you want to avoid "alleged discrimination" in Paris train stations, it pays to look like this.

James said...

Interesting. Very interesting. Look what I just found on Amazon.

Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World [Paperback]
Christopher Lee Bollyn


Go to Amazon and look it up.

Then look for the 5 star review by Robert David Steele, who happens to be an intelligence professional and is Amazon's top non-fiction reviewer.

He praises the book and says Bollyn spent years investigating the crime, did the job right, and proved beyond any doubt that 911 was a Zionist job.

He says:

01) Connects the dots of all the dual Israeli-US citizens in the US Government and US commercial circles (mostly in NYC) that were active participants in the 9/11 false flag operation. The role of the owners of the 81st floor and the massive bank of "batteries" that were never used but are precisely where the airlines hit, impressed me.

02) Integrates, for the first time, the history of Israeli false flag operations, the 1980 recognition by Israel that an attack on NYC and specifically against the tallest building in NYC whatever that might be, and the total complex context of 9/11 as both a catalyst for forcing the USA into a "war on terror" and a cover-up for the most massive financial crimes in history, including a special role for AIG and its specifically-identified Zionist leadership.

03) Introduces me for the first time to the facts about the Estonia that the Swedish government evidently covered up--it was carrying Russian contraband to Estonia, and two explosions blew off the front loading doors, dropping the ferry and 800 Swedes into a point almost halfway between Estonia and Sweden, as planned in a previous exercise. The author also covers NATO, the NATO presence that night, and the confounding combination of NATO being "asleep" the whole time, with the outage of the regional telephone networks for the duration.

04) Clarifies the depth of Israeli involvement in the drug trade...

James said...

One danger of focusing on the Jews too much is that they can then easily shift your focus to whatever they want. Before you know it, you are controlled opposition - completely ineffective. The trick is to not focus on them to the exclusion of all else, to gauge how much focus is too much.

Robert David Steele ran for president once and is very well connected. These are the people we should be allying with and helping, instead of bickering on blogs. We know what the problem is, we know that the answer is not turning off the public with Nazism, we know what to do. Let's do it, but do it right.

(NU will say Steele is a religious nutter, or is weak as piss or some stupid thing like that. Well, the burden of proof is on him I say.)

Anonymous said...

James 23:26 is that the Diamonds that the jewish chick ate to save herself from the holohoax?

Anonymous said...

James said: “NU will say Steele is a religious nutter...”

Or that steel loses its strength at 5 C.

Frank Galton

Dan said...

My girlfriend jut informed me that Britain is experiencing a baby boom.

Are the children increasingly niggers and migrants?

James said...

Are the children increasingly niggers and migrants?

Probably. :-(

Anonymous said...

Rob said: “Also, discrimination against Blacks or Muslims is only allowed when it's in favour of Jews. Imagine them doing that for a White visitor to the country.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2308935/French-rail-firm-BAN-black-African-workers-station-arrival-Israeli-President-mistaken-Muslims.html#ixzz2QUN3mLgj

Rob,

Even when reporting on discrimination against Muslims and Negroes they still can’t resist mentioning the Holocau$t, the poor Jews, Jewish suffering, the eternal victims etc.

“The row is particularly embarrassing for SNCF because of the part it played in the EXTERMINATION OF JEWS, and other minorities, during the Second World War.

In 2011 the organisation made its first formal public apology to HOLOCAUST VICTIMS, many of whom had been entrained to DEATH CAMPS in Germany on lines which ran out of the Gare du Nord.”

Is there no end to this Holocau$t nonsense?

Frank Galton

nastiestuncle said...

@James 22:34

White people also stand and watch as they are colonised. The blacks are at least attempting to preserve themselves.

James said...

White people also stand and watch as they are colonised. The blacks are at least attempting to preserve themselves

I noticed that.
When whitey finally acts though, it is spectacular.

James said...

NU,

Is Christopher Lee Bollyn:

A) Another borat character
B) For real and true
C) Another actor's character (a la www.wellaware1.com)
D) Insane
E) One of the 90% that has a defective mind.
F) For real, but misguided.

Since you are the only one on this blog that has the slightest chance of knowing, would you please do us the honour of considering this question?

nastiestuncle said...

@Dan 01:00

Yes indeed! At least one in four born to foreign mothers last I heard. This place has a decade at most to sort itself out and begin the deportations or it's lost.

Funnily enough though, over the years plenty of people wanted to vote for BNP-like parties but something was stopping them. It wasn't the media or anything like that. It was... something, and it had everything to do with a combination of closing the stable door after the horse had bolted, lack of compromise and failure to play the long game.

We could have saved ourselves but we chose not to.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 02:05

I have no idea who that nigger is.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 01:34

"When whitey finally acts though, it is spectacular."

Well it could be, if we woke up. Anders, where are you?

James said...

I have no idea who that nigger is.

What nigger?

James said...

Anders, where are you?

If you are referring to Anders Breivik, he is in prison in Norway.

I thought you knew everything?

kulak said...

Speaking of zombies, I tried to watch The Walking Dead on Netflix.

I got a sinking feeling when the first people the cop protagonist met upon waking up to the apocalypse were black. He is greeted by getting clocked with a shovel by a black child.

But it was all a misunderstanding and they turn out to be friends.

Then, in the next episode, his wife, after we're not sure how long of a period of mourning the husband she thinks dead, sleeps with his partner.

While she's fucking his partner, he makes a short trip to Atlanta, where the few thousand white zombies have apparently consumed all of Atlanta's blacks. He gets in a jam, but is saved by a multiculti crew, who he saves in turn from a racist in their ranks.

"There are no more niggers! Just dark meat and white meat!"

Just like the Superdome.

White fans of this show ARE the walking dead.

Encouragingly, despite critical acclaim, the show is not highly rated by American Netflix users.

James said...

Kulak,

I've never seen the show, not even an ad for it, but people have told me to watch it.

They are the walking dead.

Celtic Rebel did a podcast on this, and made a lot of sense. Many people in the west are actually spiritually and intellectually dead for all intents and purposes.

James said...

Even in a world infested by Zombies, watch out for racists.

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim: “This place has a decade at most to sort itself out and begin the deportations or it's lost.”

We should start by deporting you, nastiestkushim, back to your little bolt-hole in the Middle East.

nastiestkushim: “Funnily enough though, over the years plenty of people wanted to vote for BNP-like parties but something was stopping them.”

Hmm...I wonder what’s stopping them voting for “BNP-like parties”? Couldn’t possibly be the fear of being called a racist, a Nazi, a Holocaust denier (wonder which ethnic group instils this nonsense into the minds of white Christians, guilt tripping them 24/7?); the fear of losing their jobs (teachers, police officers etc); and the BNP membership list being leaked to Jew Gerry Gable’s Searchlight Magazine, which was in turn leaked to the MSM.

nastiestkushim: “It wasn't the media or anything like that.”

Of course nastiestkushim, it has nothing whatsoever to do with the media (Jew-controlled Hollywood, Jew-controlled MTV, Jew-controlled news/ad agencies etc) brainwashing the goyim 24/7.

http://www.darkmoon.me/uploads/TV-propaganda.jpg-3.jpg

http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x164/album8932/morestuff/hoax13b.gif

http://www.judithwinther.dk/grafik/holocaust_cartoon_01.gif

LOL!

Frank Galton

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 04:19

"We should start by deporting you, nastiestkushim, back to your little bolt-hole in the Middle East."

I see you've had your best man on the case.

"Hmm...I wonder what’s stopping them voting for “BNP-like parties”? Couldn’t possibly be the fear of being called a racist, a Nazi, a Holocaust denier"

Voting is anonymous. No one is going to call anyone anything.

"(wonder which ethnic group instils this nonsense into the minds of white Christians, guilt tripping them 24/7?)"

White Christians do a pretty good job of that.

"the fear of losing their jobs (teachers, police officers etc)"

No one loses their job for voting because it's anonymous.

"and the BNP membership list being leaked to Jew Gerry Gable’s Searchlight Magazine, which was in turn leaked to the MSM."

You don't have to join the BNP to vote for them.

"Of course nastiestkushim, it has nothing whatsoever to do with the media (Jew-controlled Hollywood, Jew-controlled MTV, Jew-controlled news/ad agencies etc) brainwashing the goyim 24/7."

What have they said about the BNP which would constitute brainwashing?

Anonymous said...

Voting is anonymous. No one is going to call anyone anything.


You ain't in the UK so

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 05:06

"You ain't in the UK so"

Thanks for that, brainbox. Cor blimey, guv'nor.

Yes, I do live in the UK. Born here. Will never leave here.

James said...


Voting is anonymous. No one is going to call anyone anything.


Voting may be anonymous, and you may not need to join a party to vote for it. Those are facts.

Another fact = a party that everyone is scared to join, won't get many votes.

Yet another = A party where nobody goes to work after election weekend and said they voted for it will never be popular.

And another = a party that people are too scared to support, won't have support.

Another fact = people are scared to show support for the BNP.

Given all these indisputable facts, this is yet another case of NU being pedantic, yet adding not even the slightest measure of exactitude to the debate. He should stop doing this, at least for the sake of intellectual honesty.

Everyone knows the BNP is being suppressed, if we can put these word games and struggles over minutiae to one side a proper debate on the issue could ensue.

Anyone who denies that is an idiot.
Lots of people are too scared to vote for the BNP. They know their vote is recorded, they know the govt keeps lists.

Anonymous said...

#Allyourbaselessnessbelongstousohillinformedone

Anonymous said...

When I used to go out leafleting for the BNP in Bournemouth/Poole ( hardly hotbeds of WN) we got a lot more supportive comments than abuse. Never translated into votes. One comment I heard on several occasions was "I support your policies, but couldn't vote for you". I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that democracy isn't all it's cracked up to be.
Paris Claims

James said...

NZ First had their AGM at a large venue and filled it. There were nearly 800 people.

The media, TV1, the main Govt channel, the oldest channel in NZ, said there were only 150 people and that the party leader was disappointed.

Straight out lie because it was not one of the main two parties.

Ironically, it was probably because they are friendly with the National party that it happened like this.

The media is a disgrace. Whenever I meet someone from the media I always make it known that their "profession" is worthy of the utmost contempt, and that I am not impressed just because they are on TV.

James said...

(I said ironically because the NZ National party is as establishment as they come, whereas the British National Party is a pariah. Same with Australia First, a pariah. They try to make NZ First a pariah too, but fail because NZF has a half Maori in charge.)

James said...

Does anyone have an opinion on Christopher Bollyn?
Is he a liar or not?

nastiestuncle said...

@James 05:12

That the BNP was suppressed wasn't the issue. It's quite easily exploitable.

From my experience of speaking to people about the BNP, especially if they had seen the BNP's policies, is that people liked that the BNP would stop immigration and liked that they would do things in the interests of the British people.
But, there were certain things which stopped them from voting for the BNP and it wasn't "the media" or anything like that.

Can anyone think of anything which might make people want to not vote for the BNP, without blaming it on outside forces? Is their anything the BNP or its leadership might have said or done which would make people suspicious of them? Does anyone think that perhaps the BNP was moribund from the start given Nick Griffin's past?

Anonymous said...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2309012/Kerry-Katona-shows-sparkling-new-engagement-ring-time.html

More mudsharking

Paris Claims

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim, these are the reasons why so many people won’t associate themselves with the BNP:

• BNP list may lead to sackings

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/nov/19/thefarright-freedomofinformation

• BNP members 'targeted by threats'

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7736794.stm

• Jew David Miliband bans envoys from helping the BNP

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1235393/David-Miliband-bans-envoys-helping-BNP.html#ixzz2QViTAxbF

• Civil service to consider plans to ban BNP members

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/sep/14/bnp-civil-service-ban-considered

• ACPO bans police from joining BNP

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3930175.stm

• BNP members to be barred from teaching

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/nov/02/bnp-members-barred-teaching

• Calls to ban 'nasty, racist' BNP members from nursing

http://www.nursingtimes.net/whats-new-in-nursing/unison/calls-to-ban-nasty-racist-bnp-members-from-nursing/5000675.article

• BNP nurses spark ethics debate

http://www.nursingtimes.net/whats-new-in-nursing/bnp-nurses-spark-ethics-debate/1933946.article

• Former senior military figures on new list of 'BNP members'

http://journalisted.com/article/1486z

• Members of the Armed Forces on BNP list

http://www.defencemanagement.com/news_story.asp?id=7767

• Homeless charity criticised over BNP link

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/mar/25/soldiers-bnp-charity-links

• Anger over firefighter's BNP ties

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/3660576.stm

• PC named on BNP membership list sacked

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1163907/PC-named-BNP-membership-list-sacked.html

• BNP leader Nick Griffin banned by Buckingham Palace

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10723764

• Rod Lucas dropped by TalkSPORT after BNP links emerge

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3484612/Rod-Lucas-dropped-by-TalkSPORT-after-BNP-links-emerge.html

• Bus driver sacked for being member of the BNP

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2229211/Bus-driver-sacked-member-BNP-wins-legal-battle-claiming-dismissal-breach-human-rights.html#ixzz2QVVNjS8t

• Ballet star is BNP supporter

http://metro.co.uk/2006/12/22/ballet-star-is-bnp-supporter-3433969/

* England football plunged into fresh racism row as new caretaker manager Stuart Pearce is revealed as brother of dedicated BNP supporter. Dennis Pearce, the current England U-21 boss's brother, is a BNP supporter who stood as a Parliamentary candidate for the far-Right party.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2099211/Stuart-Pearce-racism-row-Brother-Dennis-revealed-BNP-supporter.html#ixzz2QVaXOA2G

• Soldier among Suffolk BNP members

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/soldier_among_suffolk_bnp_members_1_168073

• Buckingham Palace storeman Paul Murray, 52, and a retired palace porter are both on the ROLL OF SHAME.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/1950604/2-Royal-flunkeys-exposed-as-BNP-members.html#ixzz2QVWlE1LZ

• Ex-tourist chief 'BNP recruit'

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1537573/Ballerina-and-ex-tourist-chief-are-BNP-recruits.html

• Police officer and vicar ‘are BNP members’
http://metro.co.uk/2008/11/19/police-officer-and-vicar-are-bnp-members-157234/



Frank Galton

James said...

Nastiest Uncle,

I agree with everything you said there. However, if the media wanted to, they could easily gloss over Griffin's past in the same way they gloss over Lord Levy's past, or Tony Blair's past.

The point is, if the media was friendly to the BNP, and relentlessly attacked labour, the BNP would get vastly more votes.

People agree with their policies, but don't vote because they think no one else will vote, or they feel guilty voting, or they are scared to vote. That's the essence of the matter. The media has the power to change that.

Perhaps Griffin's inept leadership is a major cause, or his past, but the media certainly makes the most of it don't they?

James said...

Frank Galton,

Nice list. Very informative.

I agree with you 100%.

I agree with NU on his last post too.

He fails to mention that people get much of their reluctance to vote from the media though. People simply cannot help thinking the BNP is not popular, and it takes some courage to vote for such a party after all the scary stories of lists and firings in the media.
All the reasons NU mentioned for people not voting are at least to some extent media-reinforced, or even media-driven. That much is flippin obvious to any but the most obstinate media apologist.

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim said (15 April 2013 06:38): “But, there were certain things which stopped them from voting for the BNP and it wasn't "the media..."

nastiestkushim is still insisting it has nothing to do with the media.

HaHaHa!!!!!

Frank Galton

James said...

Other BNP members revealed by the investigation included former London Tourist Board director and London Dungeon founder Annabel Geddes.

I don't know where you stoopid Nazi dolts get the idea that there is a media-driven BNP supporter witch hunt going on. Good heavens!
Nastiest Uncle's right about you guys. Paranoid freaks!

James said...

Lets imagine a little scenario shall we? Someone puts a notice up on the wall at NU's workplace saying:

Julius Codswallop (a.k.a. nastiestuncle) is a prolific poster on a Racist Anti-Semitic Hate Blog called IrishSavant.

Then his boss calls him into his office and says "How could you? Why are you so hateful? Bla bla bla PCBS PCBS PCBS, YOU'RE FIRED!!! Now F OFF!"

I would DARE nastiestuncle to say it wasn't the notice that got him fired.
"No, it wasn't the notice, it was my BOSS!"

Yeah, of course it was. It had nothing to do with the notice.

Bloody fool.

James said...

Other BNP members revealed by the investigation

No labour party membership investigation? No conservative party membership investigation?

Why not? Is the media trying to destroy the BNP, but not the other parties?
No, that wouldn't be fair. In any case it wouldn't make any difference would it? Just because 60,000 BNP members have to worry about losing their jobs won't stop people voting for the BNP will it? Of course not dumkopf.

James said...

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith insisted the fact that many BNP members were unhappy to be outed showed how shaming it was to be linked with the party.

Why is it shaming to be linked to the party?
Is it the media, or something else?

Public opinion?

Winstone Churchill said there is no such thing as public opinion, just published opinion. So WC seems to agree, the media moulds public opinion. (And that was way back in the 40s and 50s - its worse now)

James said...

Actually, I suspect the truth is in the middle somewhere. The BNP knew the media threat but didn't manage it properly.

The media just does what it does. Blaming the media for this is a bit like someone who never washes his hands blaming bacteria when he gets sick.

James said...

The jews reckon its hard supporting Israel.

They should try supporting a white country.

Anonymous said...

James,
I find it hard to believe that Little Miss Jackboots has any concept of shame.
Paris Claims
( and if I was married to her, I'd spend most of my time watching porn)

Anonymous said...

- James said...
Nastiest Uncle,

I agree with everything you said there.

15 April 2013 06:52 -

James,
Would you describe the role which you and 'nastiest' play on this zio-realist website? Do you visit other sites and post so prolifically and would you give an example?

Allan@Aberdeen

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 06:48

I'm not talking about people associating themselves with the BNP. Millions of people vote for parties of which they are not a member.

Voting is anonymous in the UK. Having a sticker in your front window or being on a list are not pre-requisites of being able to vote for a particular party.

I was asking if anyone knows why, if people like at least some of the BNP policies, are they not voting for them.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 06:52

The question is: were the media given any good reason by the BNP for not promoting the BNP? Did the BNP or its leadership do anything or say anything which would make them an easy target?

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 06:57

Well, *you* may be completely brainwashed by the media but don't project your weaknesses onto everybody else.

It's a simple answer I'm looking for. Why are people suspicious of the BNP? If the media have reported bad things about the BNP, are those things justified or not?

nastiestuncle said...

@James 07:05

And then I'd show them my posts and they'd see that I was slaughtering national socialists like Bomber Harris.

I'd probably get a pay rise.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 07:08

Voting for the BNP doees not require membership of that party. Not too smart are you?

No one's had the balls to answer my questions yet? Why are people so suspicious of the BNP? Is it something Nick Griffin said?



nastiestuncle said...

Come on people.

What mistake did Nick Griffin make early on which might make him unattractive to the average punter?

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim said: “I was asking if anyone knows why, if people like at least some of the BNP policies, are they not voting for them.”

May have something to do with the media constantly portraying the BNP and its members as neo-Nazis, fascists, racists, extremists, bigots, thugs etc.

• David Cameron attacks 'fascist' BNP
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5395358/David-Cameron-attacks-fascist-BNP.html

• Cameron rages at BNP’s ‘Nazi thugs’
David Cameron launched a scathing attack on the British National Party, calling its members ‘Nazi thugs in suits’.
http://metro.co.uk/2009/05/27/cameron-rages-at-bnps-nazi-thugs-153284/

• Gordon Brown urges voters not to back BNP
The BNP were Holocaust-denying Nazi sympathisers who would have "sold Britain out" to Hitler and whose behaviour was "an outrage to all decent law-abiding Britons",
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/5418918/Gordon-Brown-urges-voters-not-to-back-BNP.html

• Neo-Nazi former BNP members launch new far-right party
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/02/neo-nazi-former-bnp-members-launch-new-far-right-party

• Labour calls BNP 'racist and extremist'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/5836329/Labour-calls-BNP-racist-and-extremist.html

• BNP links to US extremists revealed by Anonymous
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/01/bnp-emails-far-right-anonymous

• Shock BNP council win brings fear of rise in extremism
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1151102/Shock-BNP-council-win-brings-fear-rise-extremism.html#ixzz2QWI39NFd

• You are paying for Merseyside BNP's extremist campaign
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2009/10/22/you-are-paying-for-merseyside-bnp-s-extremist-campaign-100252-24988671/

• Back from the Front: Inside the mind of a reformed UK far-right extremist
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/features/back-from-the-front-inside-the-mind-of-a-reformed-uk-farright-extremist-2334059.html

• Howard confronts BNP 'extremists'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3500689.stm

• Exposed: ugly face of BNP's leaders
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/31/bnp-european-elections-facebook-expose

• Voters must hear the truth about the BNP before it's too late
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/5325723/Voters-must-hear-the-truth-about-the-BNP-before-its-too-late.html

• Nick Griffin's BNP is STILL the party of racist lies, violent thuggery and vicious anti- semitism
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265301/Nick-Griffins-BNP-STILL-party-racist-lies-violent-thuggery-vicious-anti-semitism.html#ixzz2QWMEx3J3

• Cash-strapped BNP 'turns to racist hardcore'
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/cashstrapped-bnp-turns-to-racist-hardcore-2269628.html

• Labour in-fighting opens door for BNP racists
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/labour-in-fighting-opens-door-for-bnp-398912

• The horror story of the BNP’s success is not over
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2009/10/the-horror-story-of-the-bnps-success-is-not-over/

• BNP bigot Griffin is pelted with eggs
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/106521/BNP-bigot-Griffin-is-pelted-with-eggs


Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim: “And then I'd show them my posts and they'd see that I was slaughtering national socialists like Bomber Harris.”

nastiestkushim seems to be obsessed with national socialists. Wonder why?

http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image31.jpg

LOL!

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

Barrister forced out as he stands for BNP in General Election

A barrister is to stand as a British National Party candidate in the General Election.
Robert Grierson will fight the 12,000- strong Conservative majority in Birmingham's Sutton Coldfield constituency.

Last night Mr Grierson quit his law firm after coming under pressure from its chiefs over the party's racist reputation within hours of his candidacy being announced.

Mr Grierson, 42, who is divorced and lives with his parents in Sutton Coldfield, insisted his resignation was voluntary and 'not an acceptance of wrongdoing' as he vowed to fight against what he called the 'threat to our homeland'.

The former Tory voter said he was not racist but called for a complete stop to all immigration.
He said: 'I felt I had to stand up and take the flak I will no doubt get. This shows that the BNP is not a party of skinheads and knuckle-draggers.'

Andrew Mitchell, Tory MP for Sutton Coldfield since 2001, dismissed Mr Grierson as an 'EXTREMIST IN A SUIT'.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1260696/Barrister-Robert-Grierson-stand-British-National-Party.html#ixzz2QWbLB0Eh

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

http://www.srpska-mreza.com/guest/LM/lm-f97/LM97_Bosnia.html

This is how certain elements of the media go way beyond distorting the truth to black lies.

Griffin can deliver a speech well but failed badly on QT when placed under pressure. The real mud thrown at him is he sought financial help from Libya ( and hardly anyone remembers that) and that he has been labled as a Holocaust denier"
He's not the most photogenic politician I've ever seen, but I expect that won't prevent Milimarxist gaining power.
Like it or not, I suspect why the BNP generally loose their deposits, is that he has been labled a nazi and the British electorate don't seem to be drawn to politicians of that stripe. For some reason in this country you can be a sympathiser of Stalin, Mao or even Pol Pot and get away with it.
Paris Claims

Anonymous said...

The troll is trying his best to point out a detail in Griffin's past that hardly anybody is aware of or remembers as the primary reason for not voting BNP... ZZZZZZzzzzzz

Meanwhile Frank Galton demonstrates with undeniable evidence the real brainwash that is actively promoted in the anti-white jew media every day showing the persecution that BNP voters face by the jewish media.

Nick Griffin's biggest mistake was trusting jews to be let in the BNP.

Same will happen with UKIP, which is BNP lite, only they want to stop white people entering Britain from Europe to make more room for the coons and pakis they want in.

The jews hate nationalism as it only wants what's best for the country and concerns itself with its own peoples interests.

Keiser said...

Mangosauce was a well respect blog which dealt with expat issues in Thailand. It is sadly gone from the web. It had a savvy and astute owner called David. It had its peak around 2004 but, and how was it put by its deconstructionists, ah yes "It succumbed under the weight of hangers on"

It was a tail of intrigue...

Mango Obituary

where local trolls even went active AFK (away from keyboard) trying to "out" David and find out his real identity (fame would be a bulls-eye for anyone in Bangkok)

The blog was brilliant insofar as it chronicled a way of life (ex-pat) in Thailand that was in a way romanticised by the fact that the stories were off-beat expat lifestyle pieces and commentators had mostly been stung by ex-wives in costly divorces and were finding solace in the arms of Thai-girls from Issan, demonising Western Women, cheap beer, great food and the lifestyle of a "farang" outsider simultaneously hated and loved by the natives.

Anyway not unlike other great blog I know.

What was my point, oh yes...

"It succumbed under the weight of hangers on."

So there it is an object lesson.

A two horse race is not the way to go on a blog, especially when those two horses don't run; merely stand there and defaecate on each other.

nastiestuncle said...

Keiser admits defeat also?

Keiser said...

Anchor baby trend continues in the EU

Full Story

Hunsdon said...

Ron Unz on the power of media:

Above all, the transformative power of the American media is once again revealed. Some time back I joked with a conservative friend that after a few years of relentless media pressure the very same preachers then denouncing Gay Marriage as the “sin of Satan” would probably be uniting same-sex couples in holy matrimony at their own churches, and so far the social trend lines seem to be supporting my prediction. After all, in modern American society the Word of the Almighty and His Holy Book may have a powerful influence, but they are regularly trumped by whatever our electronic media tells us to believe. Perhaps churches should just install television sets in front of their pews and cut out the middle man.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/the-sidewalk-marriage-crusade/

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Keiser said:

"It succumbed under the weight of hangers on."

So there it is an object lesson.

A two horse race is not the way to go on a blog, especially when those two horses don't run; merely stand there and defaecate on each other.


I must say Keiser, I too, am getting to the point where I wish these two would either rent a room or, at the very least, swap email addresses and leave us out of it.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

thses "two" ..I'm not so sure. I think it's the muppet/sock puppet show

Dan said...

Sock puppet.

kulak said...

Does anyone have an opinion on Christopher Bollyn?

I think he's sincere.

nastiestuncle said...

@Uncle Nasty 13:37

We could rent a room whilst you guise sit in a circle wanking over the best Jew story of the day because let's face it, that's what you do when you have no opposition. The last one to cum eats the soggy matzo ball.

amirite?

Anonymous said...

@Kulak , I look at the evidence and could not care less about the messenger !

Anonymous said...

Re Paris Claims
Ditto. If half the people that said they supported the BNP had voted for them it would have been a landslide.

o saviour rescue us said...

We not worthy, we not worthy oh great and illustrious one.

Its an honour to have your pearls of wisdom strewn at our plebbian feet.

Please clone yourself, so that DNA of this pedigree is not wasted.

All you need now is a small african country full of diseased and stupid people to crown your selff king thereof.

People like you have existed before, stalin is a name that comes to mind

Anonymous said...

Frank Galton 06.48
I remember most of these cases. When listed like this it makes you realize why the BNP couldn't muster support. Considering that being in the BNP is not illegal it makes you wonder why those that where discriminated against didn't take legal action. But as we all know (NU?)discrimination is a one way street.

Dan said...

"liberals" are virtually impossible to defeat. The fanatic nature and the status seeking is insane. It's like fighting jello that's laced with C4 with your fists cased in fuse chargers.

Admitting race realism in liberal company is a good way to get a target painted on your back. Liberalism as it exists is a way to destroy whites who attempt to defend themselves.

Then you need to get into exact who liberals actually are. Rich Lowry or Norman Podhoretz are billed as conservatives like David Cameron is but what good do any of the three of them do?

nastiestuncle said...

In the UK, anything to do with national socialism is toxic and doomed to fail before it begins. Nick Griffin did not realise this. Therefore he, and everyone who supported him and the BNP, were wasting their time, always.

The key is to not sound like a national socialist. If that one little detail can be managed, then there will be some progress.

Anonymous said...

43 posts out of 86 are by james/nastiest. I would like to ask each of you what you see as your role on this zio-aware site?

Allan@Aberdeen

kulak said...

Kulak , I look at the evidence and could not care less about the messenger

Roger Ailes says You Are The Message.

He said: 'I felt I had to stand up and take the flak I will no doubt get. This shows that the BNP is not a party of skinheads and knuckle-draggers.'

True, but it shows it's a party of divorced men who live with their parents.

In a sense that's unfair to him, but that's the way it works.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 17:39

I've told you that before. Several times.

kulak said...

Yes you have Carbuncle. The message from you is that you're a nogood kike.

nastiestuncle said...

@kulak 17:58

No, you just think so because you see Jews everywhere. You are obsessed, like someone who needs to go and see their doctor about it.

Shaunantijihad said...

"...but also ignorance and stupidity on an epic scale."

No Savant. Believing the false Jewish teaching of racial equality with the firm but mostly benevolent ruling Whites - which left violent Communist Negroes overseeing the ruination of Rhodesia and South Africa (veritable paradises for Blacks compared to Black rule) - is truly ignorance and stupidity on an epic scale.

By Whites.

Blacks are evolutionary children, and devils, if given a chance to play with the matches.

nastiestuncle said...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2309359/Graduate-Max-Kpakio-rejected-Virgin-Atlantic-offered-interview-used-British-seeks-damages.html

Bunsen burner.

Anonymous said...

Man, NU and James are tiresome. The noise level is nearly crowding out the useful information even allowing for ignoring their posts. NU has very successfully hijacked this blog with his relentless indefatigable filth.

Ivan

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 18:52

All that you guise have to do is to stop sharing responsibility for the rape of white girls and the destruction of our countries and there will be no need for me to come and educate you.

kulak said...

"The guilty flee where no man pursueth."


What I said Carbuncle is:


"Your message is that you're a no good kike."


And it still is.

James said...

The question is: were the media given any good reason by the BNP for not promoting the BNP? Did the BNP or its leadership do anything or say anything which would make them an easy target?

Yes they did I would say. That is true. They are an easy target.

But then, if the media wasn't anti-white they would give the BNP a pass, or at least not expose their members to job loss and the like.

Why are there no articles speculating on Mandelsohn's homosexual activities in a bath house, with pictures and videos of gays rubbing each others legs? (They actually did this in NZ when exposing a gay man who allegedly spread AIDS, so they can and do engage in such assassinations.)

The media is selective. That is the point. You are right in saying the BNP maybe deserves it, but do the BNP's members deserve what was done to them?

James said...

Would you describe the role which you and 'nastiest' play on this zio-realist website? Do you visit other sites and post so prolifically and would you give an example?

Allan@Aberdeen


I agree with him when I think he's right, and disagree when I don't like what he is saying.

Understand?

James said...


Frank Galton,

Nice list. Very informative.

I agree with you 100%.


I must be working with Frank as well, whatever he's up to.

James said...


Meanwhile Frank Galton demonstrates with undeniable evidence the real brainwash that is actively promoted in the anti-white jew media every day showing the persecution that BNP voters face by the jewish media.

Nick Griffin's biggest mistake was trusting jews to be let in the BNP.

Same will happen with UKIP, which is BNP lite, only they want to stop white people entering Britain from Europe to make more room for the coons and pakis they want in.

The jews hate nationalism as it only wants what's best for the country and concerns itself with its own peoples interests.


This is probably all true and correct, however it does not provide a solution.

Why don't you infiltrate the UKIP and

A) see for yourself
B) talk to Nigel Farage
C) sabotage anti-white activities within the party

Or you could just forget it and argue on this blog all day.

We all agree the BNP was a failure. Arguing over the exact reason for the failure (when all these reasons are valid) is a waste of energy. We should admit that the BNP was a mess, and NU should admit that the media just loves to destroy any pro-white activity.

James said...

Frank Galton,

From your list there anyone would get the impression that the BNP is extremely extreme.

James said...

Voting is anonymous in the UK.

Really? Or just ostensibly anonymous? Considering all the attacks on the BNP, and the lists of members leaked to such devastating effect, and also considering that voting papers are all numbered, bar-coded and linked to the voter (to prevent fraud and double-voting), it is not inconceivable that the govt could in fact trace BNP voters.
The simple fear that this might be the case, even if it isn't, would be enough to deter a significant fraction of voters.

Am I wrong here? (I'm assuming a similar voting system to NZ)

blueboy said...

Nastiest. I agree that were I on my own I'd probably run from such a 'lunatic'. But we're looking here at GANGS of black yoofs hightailing as fast as their paws can carry them. Different story.

Anonymous said...

Yes, the "nastiest"/"james" virus have, with scornful contempt, have hijacked this blog to their own satisfaction.

Last post: katana said...

So far there has been 385 comments. Of those comments: Nastiest Uncle = 80 comments
James = 81 comments
------------------
Total = 161

In other words, 42% of comments, excluding comments in reaction.

***********************************
This post:

"43 posts out of 86 are by james/nastiest. I would like to ask each of you what you see as your role on this zio-aware site?" Allan@Aberdeen
15 April 2013 17:39

***********************************

"This proverbial thorn is but a nuisance whose only intent is to create diversion -- as has been said many previous times. He calls you out, and suckers take the bait with every cast of his kosher line.

Here's the challenge: Prove to us that you're not a kosher robot by simply remaining mute whenever the troll raises its ugly head.
"

We now know which side his alter-ego "james", stands on.

In the beginning (many moons ago) 'james' stood by and supported the "nastiest". Then he suddenly became his pretend antagonist. Now they've become the best of friends again?! Get the picture, folks?

"Man, NU and James are tiresome. The noise level is nearly crowding out the useful information even allowing for ignoring their posts. Ivan"

I hear ya, Ivan and UN (not to be confused with NU, as was "nastiest's sinister intent).

A little diversion for those who've not read this tale before.

http://www.tomatobubble.com/wonderfulrace1.html

Dan said...

The Aryan Nation killings in Texas are turning out to be a renegade Judge. No not Judge Dredd, but a relatively liberal fuckwad. Indeed that White Survival in Prison Support Group have been slandered and ought to sue.

So it doesn't matter what the right does or doesn't do, because the pathologies of the liberals will be blamed on the right anyway. Indeed it looks like all bad things are "conservative".

rambaloosa said...

Here's another enjoyable video. Look at the big fat useless nigger take a pasting from the white guy. Listen to the sheboons chimping in the background. Notice how the shitskin hardly makes a fight of it. Miserable cowardly useless POS's.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Ux6KN1MI-GY

Dan said...

The Boston Marathon bombing will no doubt attempt to establish a link...5...4...3...2...1.

Dr. Wassell said...

Frank Galton asks "Is there no end to this Holocau$t nonsense?"

Short answer? No.

James Lord said...

kulak..despite critical acclaim.

Can't imagine who those 'critical acclaimers' might be. (Scratching my head).

If Kerry Katona breeds with an erectus then it's a double win for whites. Her genetic 'loss' is actually our gain.

James said...

Do you guys actually read anything I post? Or am I wasting my time?

I've posted what I consider important practical advice, I've proven nastiestuncle wrong on many occasions, recommended books that are actually useful, relayed success stories from real world political activities I've engaged in, I have strongly recommended getting involved in BUGS so you can train yourselves to do effective battle against anti-whites, etc.

All ignored. I'm called a jew for some reason. There is very little of value in these comment sections, just the same old shit day after day. You guys certainly won't be saving the white race at this rate. You guys are ineffective. At least nastiestuncle is effective, if a little scary when he talks about taking away parental rights. (Maybe he has a negative effect, but at least its an effect. Much of the rest of you are completely useless, and anyone who points this out is automatically - no correspondence will be entered into- A JEW!!!) Its a total joke. People who think they are saving the white race who won't even listen to anyone who doesn't follow the standard WN orthodoxy - and orthodoxy which has failed miserably BTW. Can't any of you see that? And, no, I don't like nastiestuncle's mocking of you guys either, but what I truly don't understand is being called a Jew myself. It makes me despair that anyone can think straight at all here.

By your standards, Quebecois is a Jew too - look at what he said, but for some reason his jewishness was ignored. Maybe what you say isn't jewish, its how much you say?

Quebecois here

I mean, ok, black men being cowardly, stupid, etc, needing a three-to-one (at least) ratio to attack a single white male..

But what is the point to this post apart from bring forth facts that are either already well know, or studiously ignored by the MSM or those white women who cluelessly worship them ?

Anonymous said...

The following video beautifully demonstrates that parasitic blacks are a main reason why the US is
f---ed.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDrwskLYCrY&feature=player_embedded

Dan said...

Three to one they come back at the crazy white guy.

That's something to remember.

kulak said...

Look, James, I love BUGS myself. Whaddya want, a gold star and an attaboy? Nobody owes you jack.(!)

The study of mantra is not mantra, and neither are critical exhortations to do mantra.

By your standards, Quebecois is a Jew too

Not in evidence, in either sense.

But if you really want answer as to why nobody jumped on him, two answers that occur to me are, first, his comment wasn't directly critical of other commenters, and secondly, it's a fair question. IMO.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Anonymous said...

The following video beautifully demonstrates that parasitic blacks are a main reason why the US is
f---ed.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDrwskLYCrY&feature=player_embedded
15 April 2013 22:30

Sadly it also proves the difference between ignorance and stupidity.

One can inform the ignorant, but stupidity is bone deep, relentless and forever.

UN
.

The truth will out said...

Busting Out All Over: Black Mob Violence

James said...

The only person I've really criticised on here is nastiestuncle.

Any other criticism I've wrote is of something dumb someone might have said, that's all.

A lot of people here think they can solve the "Jewish Question". Marx failed, Hitler failed, Nietzsche failed, the Communists failed, the Jews have failed. Yet, there are people here who think if we just get mad enough, we can solve the Jewish Question. Why isn't the JQ being solved? Because everyone is barking up trees all over the place and doesn't stop for a minute to figure out exactly what's going on. It's getting absolutely ridiculous. We might be on the verge of WW3, and we are discussing Russian Zombies chasing blacks in Miami for God's sake.

James said...

The most disturbing thing I've read on this blog was nastiestuncle's attack on parental rights, in his support of the pernicious "SHOK resolution".

Perhaps much of humanity is doomed to become part of the idiocracy, to meld into some brown mass of morelocks. Most here would agree with that.

However, the remnant - the true seed of a bright future - these are the people that must be preserved and allowed to flourish.
(The bible mentions the remnant many times - that righteous core of humanity that always survives and rebuilds society no many what happens.) Attacking all parental rights also attacks the good parents. It is not worth saving the progeny of bad parents, if the cost is the destruction of good parents and their posterity. They are beyond hope to a certain extent. Allowing the global conspiracy to destroy the remnant is the utmost of crimes, the most profound of backfiring do-gooder meddling. Facilitating the destruction of parental freedom is the stupidest thing we could ever do. Good parents can raise better children, and these are the future, if we indeed have a future. This is why I found nastiestuncle's support for interference in parental rights to be so disagreeable.

Julius Evola (a definite genius, even if he does sometimes disagree with the mighty nastiestuncle), argued in his book, Men Among the Ruins, that "...the crises that dominate our societies are part of a secret occult war to remove the support of spiritual and traditional values in order to turn man into a passive instrument of the powerful".

The question is, how Jewish are "the powerful"? Maybe there is something badder and meaner than the Jews? They don't mind sacrificing hundreds of thousands of Jews anyway.

Henry Makow would support this suspicion:

Are the Jews being set up for another Holocaust?

Many WNs will say "Yeah, all for it, gas the bastards."

The trouble I have with this thinking comes about by looking at how it played out last time. 1 million dead Jews, or 6 million depending on who you believe, but 100 million goys to go with it.

It will be the same next time, only next time, the USA will have the Nazis, and the Chinese will save the Jews.

Do you want that? Be careful what you wish for. Be careful what you think. You will become death if you think of death too much.

All I have written here will be ignored or smeared in favour of youtube clips of niggers I guess, but I'll say it anyway.

James said...

A very good proof of the hidden media anti-white theme is the movie "Last of the Blonde Bombshells", is meant to be about this:

"A woman tries to reunite the swing band she played with during WWII. For Judi Dench fans".

But the aware know it is about the demise of the White Race.

Here's relevant part on YouTube.

Olympia Dukakis says ""I hate snow, it's so God-damned White!

Interesting, the most Jewish character on the movie saying that.

Towards the end, Judi Dench has a flashback, and everyone is white. She snaps out of it though, and reality sets right in, surrounding everyone.

Flashback to a white past

Then there is the bit where the old ducks suddenly get cooler than before. How can you tell they are cooler? Blacks like it.
Blacks liking it

Uncle Nasty said...

.
I have obviously failed to keep informed, but what is BUGS?

Thanks in advance.

UN
.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 01:19

"The most disturbing thing I've read on this blog was nastiestuncle's attack on parental rights, in his support of the pernicious "SHOK resolution"."

What's disturbing is that you care more for the non-existent rights of the parents to determine the sexuality of their children than for the rights of the children themselves. Parents do not have the right to subject their children to damaging, bogus "therapy" just because they might not like that their child shows signs of being homosexual or transgender.

nastiestuncle said...

Hey you guise.

Any conspiracy theories on the Boston Marathon bombing yet to make you look stupid?

I'd appreciate it if I could be allowed to look like the most idiotic on this one, so I'm going to say it was done by fat people who were jealous of the BMIs of the runners. Oh and also, the fat bombers had been genetically engineered by the CIA and contrails, then taught how to make bombs by a lizard who is actually the Queen of England. The aim was to deflect attention from black on white pack attacks.

It is an undisputed fact.


nastiestuncle said...

@The truth will out 23:45

Aren't you too busy apologising to white girls to be posting links from blogs with homo-erotic names?

James said...

Nastiest Uncle,

You say I want to allow parents to harm their kids. I should sue you for libel.

What do you think this SHOK thing will actually change? What's it stopping? Unnecessary gender re-assignment therapy? Counselling to prevent kids who think they need such surgery from getting such surgery? Is it making such surgery easier to get, or harder?

What about a kid who thinks he might be homosexual, but actually isn't. What if one doctor says he isn't, and one doctor says he is. What do the parents do then? Ask the kid? How does SHOK apply to that case?

Its a vague and meaningless piece of mind warping crap that is obviously for nefarious purposes, since all such vague and meaningless crap invariably is. Otherwise, what is it really designed to achieve? What safeguards does it actually put in place? What, exactly is it supposed to be stopping?

Why do you automatically think this sort of "resolution" is necessary? Why do you think they chose to launch a "resolution" and not attempt to enact legislation? How can you be sure there is no agenda behind it? Is there an actual problem with kids being harmed by their parents in the manner described? How much power to override doctors to parents currently have? Are there any gray areas? Are there kids that are real hard cases, and there is no consensus on how to proceed, therefore the wishes of the parents are the only thing to go on. If everything were so simple, you could be dictator and we'd create heaven on earth, wouldn't we?

kulak said...

@James

WWIII is not the problem.

@James Lord

I know, it's a complete mystery!

And to think I used to be a Sliders fan. I tried to watch that on Netflix too. First goddamn episode, black leader of the anti-commie revolution kisses a white girl. And she lets him. I must have been walking dead myself back in 1995.

(Although I suppose there's BUGS message to be taken from it, too: Communism is not the problem.)

Fuckers have been working on us a long time. The other day I listened to the Oct 3 1948 radio broadcast of "Destination Freedom", a series on "The Negro in Democracy", hosted by none other than Hugh Downs. This particular episode dramatized the Haitian revolution, and the script was written by the Chicago Defender newspaper.

It was a -- if you'll pardon the expression -- total whitewash.

@UN

The B in BUGS is for Bob Whitaker. He's da man. Check it.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 03:38

"You say I want to allow parents to harm their kids. I should sue you for libel."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

"What do you think this SHOK thing will actually change? What's it stopping? Unnecessary gender re-assignment therapy? Counselling to prevent kids who think they need such surgery from getting such surgery? Is it making such surgery easier to get, or harder?"

Haven't we already gone over this a dozen times already? It stops parents from abusing their children by subjecting them to bogus, and harmful, "therapy" designed to give them the sexuality which the parent desires for their child.

"What about a kid who thinks he might be homosexual, but actually isn't."

Then that child has to go through whatever normal process to discover what he is. It'll generally involve him having a crush on one or ore of his same sex friends. It might be a fleeting crush or it might not be.

"What if one doctor says he isn't, and one doctor says he is. What do the parents do then? Ask the kid? How does SHOK apply to that case?"

You don't take your child to the doctor if you think he is gay. It isn't a treatable disease like the common cold.

"Its a vague and meaningless piece of mind warping crap that is obviously for nefarious purposes, since all such vague and meaningless crap invariably is."

Protecting the rights of children is hardly nefarious.

"Otherwise, what is it really designed to achieve?"

To stop parents from abusing their kids bu subjecting them to bogus and harmful "treatment".

"Why do you automatically think this sort of "resolution" is necessary?"

Because in the US, some parents (usually of the Bible thumping variety) think that homosexuality is a sin, a disease to be treated rather than a normal thing to be accepted.

"How can you be sure there is no agenda behind it?"

The agenda is to protect kids. And to put a stop to quacks offering fake sexuality therapy from receiving government money.

"Is there an actual problem with kids being harmed by their parents in the manner described?"

Of course.

"How much power to override doctors to parents currently have? Are there any gray areas? Are there kids that are real hard cases, and there is no consensus on how to proceed, therefore the wishes of the parents are the only thing to go on. If everything were so simple, you could be dictator and we'd create heaven on earth, wouldn't we?"

That last bit was just a noise.

James said...

Good parents will do none of what you speak of.
Good parenting should not be interfered with.
There will always be bad parents. Nobody can tell them what to do to make them good parents.
Preventing good parents acting is always an evil. We avoid this evil by not restricting parents' decisions before they have even made them.
This SHOK thing does not even discriminate between one bad practice or another, and simply puts up a blanket framework to intimidate and control parents in one more way.
Parental freedom is one of the rights given to them. The stress of parenting is being turned into a nightmare because of people like you. Having kids should be easy, it should be a delight. Less white people will have children because of this government meddling. That is a fact. You are such and idiot thinking that adding yet another state restriction on parental rights will actually benefit the white race.

As Bjerknes said "the white race does not breed well in captivity".

This is yet another constraint on us. It will go far beyond "harming gay kids" by the time they are finished.

James said...


Because in the US, some parents (usually of the Bible thumping variety) think that homosexuality is a sin, a disease to be treated rather than a normal thing to be accepted.


I've known some homosexuals whose behaviour was so far from normal it kind of makes a mockery of what you just said. Nobody would accept their behaviour at all, let alone regard it as "normal" in any way.

Anyway, these "quacks" who "treat" gays, what exactly is it that they do? How do they go about treating gays? Do you know of any of the methods they use?

James said...

For the uninformed:

The BUGS Mantra

ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 04:17

"Good parents will do none of what you speak of.
Good parenting should not be interfered with."

The legislation will not infringe on the rights of good parents then will it. Cor blimey, guv'nor.

"There will always be bad parents. Nobody can tell them what to do to make them good parents."

You can create legislation to attempt to stop their bad parenting.

"Preventing good parents acting is always an evil. We avoid this evil by not restricting parents' decisions before they have even made them."

No one is trying to restrict the actions of good parents.

"This SHOK thing does not even discriminate between one bad practice or another, and simply puts up a blanket framework to intimidate and control parents in one more way."

Are you stupid or something? The whole point of it is to protect the child from abuse from their parents.

"Parental freedom is one of the rights given to them."

Parents do not have the right to abuse their children. Hence, legislation and laws to stop the abuse.

"The stress of parenting is being turned into a nightmare because of people like you."

So, because a parent may be stressed, it's ok for them to abuse their child. You're a fucking idiot.

"Less white people will have children because of this government meddling."

What utter shit. You're seriously saying that a couple won't have kids because they won't have the right to put them through harmful "therapy" if they suspect that they are gay? You really are a fucking idiot.

"You are such and idiot thinking that adding yet another state restriction on parental rights will actually benefit the white race."

It's almost as if you have no brain. There's actually something wrong with you. What an absolute fucking twat.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 04:23

"I've known some homosexuals whose behaviour was so far from normal it kind of makes a mockery of what you just said. Nobody would accept their behaviour at all, let alone regard it as "normal" in any way."

Well that's because they behave that way because they are "weird" and not because they are homosexual. Fucking hell, it's like having to explain things to a retarded child.

"Anyway, these "quacks" who "treat" gays, what exactly is it that they do? How do they go about treating gays? Do you know of any of the methods they use?"

Go and fucking google them if you want to know.

Holy mary, mother of the black jesus. This guy is as thick as pig shit.

James said...

Nastiestuncle actually believes I am an idiot.

Good, now since I am the idiot and you are the genius, you tell me why the white birth rate is dropping like a stone? Is it free choice? We all want our race to die out ASAP?

nastiestuncle said...

@James 05:03

Why don't you go and google for the information? And while you are at it, find out why the Japs are in the same boat.

James said...

Nastiest Uncle, do you honestly believe that I am incapable of rational thought, and that my brain is actually malfunctioning?

James said...

Googling...


why is the white birth rate so low? - Stormfront

www.stormfront.org › ... › Opposing Views Forum

10 posts - 8 authors - 7 Dec 2006
is higher birth rates being aggressively pursued by WN?

Why is the white fertility rate so low?‎ - 10 posts - 4 Mar 2013
Jewish activist says low white birth rate is a good thing ...‎ - 3 posts - 18 Dec 2012
Left-wing activist calls low white birth rate a “good thing ...‎ - 10 posts - 13 Dec 2012
White Birth Rates: Why So Low, and What Can Be Done?‎ - 1 post - 18 Jun 2010

More results from stormfront.org »

What is the Cause of Low Birth Rates? | Locust blog

whitelocust.wordpress.com/...of.../what-is-the-cause-of-low-birth-rate...


If you compare white Americans to white Europeans, the American birth rate ..... If white people are so “advanced” then why can't they get their low birth rates up.

Why is the white birthrate so low? - Yahoo! Answers





answers.yahoo.com › ... › Other - Cultures & Groups



8 answers - 24 Apr 2011
Top answer: Because white people are more likely to establish their careers instead of making children. Children are expensive and it would be financially silly to ...

Is low birthrate and population growth as well as ...‎ - 11 answers - 20 Mar 2013
Why is the birth rate so low in South Korea?‎ - 3 answers - 19 Feb 2011
Why is the Birth rate in Italy so low?‎ - 5 answers - 22 Jan 2011
Why is the birth rate so low in Japan are the women ...‎ - 10 answers - 12 Dec 2010

More results from answers.yahoo.com »








Some important evidence of negative white birth rate | Is white ...



James said...

Google says its the Jews for the white birth rate.

For Japan its money and work stress.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 05:13

You're either deliberately being thick, or you're actually thick.

James said...

I'm thick, but I'm in good company.

Henry Makow is a spoon fed dribbling imbecile.

Julius Evola is the worst. He can't even shit himself without help.

James said...

I've just realised the shocking truth.
The world is run by retards.

Despite being so severely mentally handicapped that he can't even do up the velro fasteners on his Reeboks, Senator J. William Fulbright, Chair of Senate Foreign Relations Committee was able to say on CBS’ Face the Nation, October 7, 1973: “The Israelis control the policy in the Congress and the Senate.”

Another complete spastic, who can't even solve a 2 piece jigsaw puzzle made of magnets somehow managed to grunt out a few words recently Dr. Kevin Barrett said, relating to Zionists: “We own the media, Hollywood, the banking system, Congress, and the White House. If we said the Fishy-Smelling Underwater Kingdom of Atlantis was a legitimate state, and a giant squid was its prime minister, we could make you believe us.”

See what passes for humanity these days? Total dribbling spastics and morons. I'm proud to be one of them. May our nappies always be full, brothers!

James said...

OK, its just getting retarded now. Look what this guy typed with his headstick in 3 weeks:


Blaming the Jewish people for Zionism seems similar to blaming Americans for being under Zionist control. Zionists have proven over centuries that Jews are, in the name of greater Zionism, expendable. Zionist sacrifice of Jews, with perceptions managed Zionistically, offers stellar opportunities for concoction of history in Zionist favor.


Someone euthanize this guy before him and his headstick harm our kids. I mean your kids. I mean our kids. I mean, who's kids are they again?
Nobody's kids? Alright, let nobody look after them then.

James said...

Damn there's so many idiots out there. Here's another one, the
lead pilot of the first wave of Israeli fighters attacking the USS liberty. He was so braindead that when they ordered him to shoot American sailors with his Tonka Buddy plastic fighter jet in the sandpit, he


...argued with headquarters about the Liberty flying three American flags. Ordered to ignore the flags and attack, the pilot refused—so did another pilot; both flew back to headquarters as the attack commenced, both were arrested after landing, and jailed for years


Some people just can't seem to follow nastiestgeneral's IDF orders. I mean, he was supposed to shoot the Americans accidently, but refused. How can there be no conspiracy if he won't shoot them accidently? Maybe he was pretending to be even more retarded than he really is?

But that's OK. There's nothing wrong with being a retard. It's totally normal.

James said...

I'm so dumb I almost believed that Israel fired on the Liberty deliberately. Then I realised nastiestuncle doesn't believe they did so I changed my mind.

Ahhh. He's so clever.

Anonymous said...

Hello there Savant, Are you familiar with Ostara Publications?
Ostara Publications intends to be the world’s primary Eurocentric resource.

Developed in response to anti-white discrimination the world over, the study and expansion of the Eurocentric worldview is vital to the continued existence of our people and civilisation.

The company was founded in 1999 as a publishing arm for March of the Titans, A History of the White Race and has since expanded its range of resources to include works specially selected because of the contribution they bring to the subject.

Please take a look, and if you see fit could you share the link with your readers.
Regards
A long time reader

Shaunantijihad said...

From 21:11 to 06:50, it's your regular ten hour slot of the James/Nastiesthasbarat show.

AnalogMan said...

UN: The full acronym stands for Bob's Underground Graduate Seminar. His blog is here.

James said...

Shaun,

Just ignore everything I said except at

16 April 2013 01:19

and

16 April 2013 01:54

They might have some interest.

AnalogMan said...

James, I was this close to assigning you to the "delete before reading" list, but you've actually posted a couple of decent comments in this thread. Just, please, knock off the continual feeding of the troll. He'll never learn anything from it, and you just encourage him.

Do you think threatening to sue him over his opinion of your intellect will impress him? You just make yourself ridiculous.

I gather it's still twittering on about the poor, poor gays and all those evil Nazis who think they're disgusting. All the while, no doubt, still denying its own perversion. It's a waste of time; do not feed.

Anonymous said...

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=tBXDlA8l6o8&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DtBXDlA8l6o8%26feature%3Dplayer_detailpage

Anonymous said...

I saw a trailer for a new CBBC series stating this week.

It's called Merlin and is another one to avoid and have your children and grandchildren avoid.

From what I saw one of the Knights of the Round Table is black.

But,even worse Guinevere is a mullato.A particularly ugly mullato at that.

Avoid

mr.a

Anonymous said...

Blacks are cowherds?

Dewds cannot look after themselves never mind farm animals.

Anonymous said...

But,even worse Guinevere is a mullato.A particularly ugly mullato at that.


I know. It was discussed here before. If they wanted crebility they should have shelled out the big bucks and got Morgan Freeman himself to give it some credibility.

I think that obnoxious waste of space Labour supporting twat Tony Robinson is in it.

He only worked as Baldric because he was not acting innit.

Anonymous said...

Savant - you are losing your blog!
This is how a jew-aware site gets effectively 'shut-down' without being shut down. Thet send in 'james' and 'nastiest' who begin their own noisy and idiotic dialogue thus ending the exhange of opinions and information which your site facilitated.

Allan@Aberdeen

Anonymous said...

Savant - you are losing your blog!
This is how a jew-aware site gets effectively 'shut-down' without being shut down. Thet send in 'james' and 'nastiest' who begin their own noisy and idiotic dialogue thus ending the exhange of opinions and information which your site facilitated.

Allan@Aberdeen

Anonymous said...

NU. Who is behind the Boston bombs please?

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 08:47

"Savant - you are losing your blog!"

No, he's now got his blog back. Before I started posting, it was just two people gloating over being able to manipulate his opinion, and a bunch of others sitting round in a circle wanking over Jews.

"This is how a jew-aware site gets effectively 'shut-down' without being shut down."

It must be a conspiracy.

"Thet send in 'james' and 'nastiest' who begin their own noisy and idiotic dialogue"

Ah yes, I knew there'd be a conspiracy bit.

"thus ending the exhange of opinions and information which your site facilitated."

Quite wrong. Now, those opinions and information are being challenged rather than accepted without question like good little national socialists. You guise are smarter now. You know that steel loses strength when it gets hot and that Anne Frank's diary wasn't written in biro.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 09:46

"NU. Who is behind the Boston bombs please?"

I believe I already answered that question at 03:22.

Keiser said...

"You know that steel loses strength when it gets hot"

I and Alan@Aberdeen (both qualified Engineers) have cleared this up several times but that doesn't seem to matter.

I myself cited that the steel said to have failed in the WTC buildings by the official report was ASTM E119 rated steel and I showed how the annealling (softening) temp of ASTM E119 steel is over 530 degrees C and Jet A1 open air burn temp is only 315 degrees C maximum but it doesn't matter the reset button is just pushed everytime *sigh*

Same old sh!t over and over again.

AnalogMan said...

Keiser said...

I will lead by example. Not one more comment from me to "James" or "NU".

Watch and see!

14 April 2013 18:06


hmmm..

Keiser said...

"But,even worse Guinevere is a mullato.A particularly ugly mullato at that.

Avoid

mr.a"


It's as if they are saying niggers were always present in England mr.a

Shame, shame on them all.

I believe the BBC tosh "Bonekickers" also on quite a few time alluded/suggested that niggers were always present in England. Putrid revisionism.

No more TV, internet only, at least there is still choice in this medium!

nastiestuncle said...

@Keiser

Yup, same old shit over again, trying to pretend that only the jet fuel was burning in the towers. Nothing else burned, only the jet fuel. You see, all the paper, wood and plastic was specially made by Jews not to catch fire.

Keiser said...


Keiser said...

I will lead by example. Not one more comment from me to "James" or "NU".

Watch and see!

14 April 2013 18:06

hmmm..

16 April 2013 11:21


I was cognisant of that Analogman but as you can see I made no comment TO him or James.

Now let me modify what I said.

I will make no more comments either TO NU or James or ABOUT NU or James or IN RESPONSE TO NU or James.

If I break this promise you can called me a liar. :-)

nastiestuncle said...

@Keiser 11:25

There would have been blacks in the invading Roman armies, and some of these nigs would have fucked the white English women, the blackness gradually being blended out over generations.

There were plenty of "blackamoors" (North Africans) in London even during Elizabethan times, mostly working as servants. There were so many in fact, that when there was a famine she had them expelled because there was little enough food for the natives.

We've always had nigs, but not enough nigs to alter the gene pool in any noticeable way. Until now, when it is irreversible. Small amounts of nigs can be absorbed.


Keiser said...

@ Analogman

opps

I said
"If I break this promise you can called me a liar. :-) "

meant to say

If I break this promise you can call me a liar. :-)

...not "called" obviously

nastiestuncle said...

Qualified engineers, not understanding how steel behaves when it gets hot. Did these qualified engineers have a Congolese bushman untouched by modern science as tutors?

Keiser said...

@Analogman

The worst part of it Analogman is when something that you already know is said as if you don't it and the twisting that occurs in relation to previous comments.

You know if I say the it is like the BBC are implying that niggers were always a part of the fabric of British society in a real sense, i.e. queens of antiquity and knights and not just passing through moors on a slave raid or during the crusades, that this comment of mine is misinterpreted as me saying there were no niggers ever in England. Silly misinterpretation.

I hope my ability for spotting legal loopholes doesn't make a "liar" out me Analogman :-) That is the last one.

AnalogMan said...

O/T:

One of my favourite blogs is the Woodpile Report. This week he includes this photo, with the caption:

1939, Toppenish Yakima Valley, Washington

Migrant family traveling from and to field hand work by freight train. Toppenish, a wildlife refuge since 1964, is located in the agricultural Yakima Valley of south-central Washington state. Remus note - Remus will believe today's self-selected poor are "struggling" when he sees them go to where the work is, not to where the handouts are better.


This is a photo of a poor White family. Today they would probably be called "white trash". So why do I get a feeling, looking at it, of how much we have lost?

Dan said...

Very very few were present. And then only in London or Bristol channel.

Keiser said...

@ Analogman
When I look at that photo the first word I can think of is "hope".
but I understand and appreciate the harshness of the natural constant, poverty, but as you said the overriding evocation is of what we have lost.

Then I look at all that MTV Jay-Z "bling" and "cribs" shit spewed onto the media and and I despair.

Anonymous said...

Re BBC’s Merlin

Guinevere

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120926014913/merlin1/images/d/de/Gwen77.jpg

Knights of the Round Table

http://www.venusbuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/Knights-of-the-Round-Table-merlin-on-bbc-17414166-1600-1200.jpg

“Sir Elyan”

A skilled swordsman and a loyal brother to Guinevere

Adetomiwa Edun is a Nigerian-born British actor best known for his role as Sir Elyan in the television show Merlin.
http://www.flickfilosopher.com/flickfilos/art/femalegazing/adetomiwaedun2.gif

Rome and Juliet, Shakespeare's Globe
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/charles-spencer/5271965/Rome-and-Juliet-Shakespeares-Globe-review.html

Frank Galton

Dan said...

How pray tell woe the BBC dramatize the Prioress'a Tale?

Would they recast the Jewish ghetto as a white neighborhood and Hugh as a coon?

Dan said...

The Boston Massacre will likely have a Germaine Lindsay
and a Samantha Lewthwaite mud shark, plus a variety of Obama's sons.

You heard it here first.

SAVANT said...

Thanks regular reader. I'll check out Ostara Publications?

Anonymous said...

Guess who's coming to dinnertime TV tonight , AGAIN.....:

7.30 ITV

" Stephen Lawrence: 20 Years On - Tonight
Two decades after the 18-year-old was stabbed to death by a gang of racist youths in London, Julie Etchingham interviews the victim's mother, Doreen Lawrence, and examines the extent to which British society has changed over the past 20 years. In January 2012, two men were finally convicted of Stephen's murder following a trial that hinged on new scientific evidence "

GTRman


Dan said...

Certainly not Sid Poitiers.

Anonymous said...

A "natural" criminal was thought to have stabbed Steven Lawrence jus'sayin'.

James said...

nastiestuncle,

would methylated spirits be hot enough to bring down the towers?

It wasn't Bin Laden.
Here is the FINAL truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bdr_2IAJWU

James said...

1939, Toppenish Yakima Valley, Washington

Migrant family traveling from and to field hand work by freight train. Toppenish, a wildlife refuge since 1964, is located in the agricultural Yakima Valley of south-central Washington state. Remus note - Remus will believe today's self-selected poor are "struggling" when he sees them go to where the work is, not to where the handouts are better.



Wow they are poor and starving and still look clean and nice compared to even the Cosby family on TV.

Its because white people are better. (But don't listen to me, I'm an idiot. **dribble**)

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Anonymous (Frank Galton) said...

Re BBC’s Merlin ... Guinevere.

A nigger as Romeo?

I long for the day when queen Victoria is played by this:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2829737/?ref_=tt_ov_st

... Disraeli is played by Will Smiff, and Churchill is portrayed by Idris Elba or (gasp) Morgan Whatsisname -- Freeman.

That'll be a series to watch.

Why not? he's played a top scientist -- and the moral compass -- in the Batman series, a nigger president in several H'wood abortions and even God, if my memory doesn't fail me.

I'm surprised Schmuckberg didn't cast him as Lincoln.

"De whirl will li'l note
Nor long remmemmah whut is spoke hyar t'day ..."

UN
.

David said...

@Uncle Nasty
We could indeed have Morgan Freeman playing Lincoln alright in Hollywood’s version of history in which over 600,000 gallant blacks died nobly in a war to free the white slaves who have repaid them rather ungratefully ever since with the evil crime of racism.
Then perhaps we could have a film starring Will Smith as the first man on the moon, the story of a plucky astronaut who against all the odds and the evils of racism shows the Man how good he really is, and on the way manages to unite all of mankind.
Or another about Trayvon Martin the humble math genius who worked out a new unified theory of physics and solved global warming in his bedroom using his superior negro self discipline and intellect until he was lynched by the KKK.
I sure there must be a few North Korean script writers who could come up with something.

David said...

And heres a real life Doctor negro who preformed abortions on full term healthy infants, inducing labour and then plunging a scissors into their spine, on kids that were big enough to walk home, keeping memos of body parts hands and feet in jars in the clinics kitchen.
A baby mama of 15 assisted in giving out the medication and drawing blood. Another case of negro dysfunction completely ignored by the media.
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=http%3A%2F%2Fhotair.com%2Farchives%2F2013%2F04%2F15%2Ffront-row-at-the-gosnell-horror-