Friday, 22 February 2013

Such moral people

"Quite frankly I don't believe in sharing the same island with them. Decent people will need to get away before they choke. The kind of policy the pair believe in will ensure that if the rest of us will have to breathe the same air as they do we will be in increasing danger of contamination."

Crikey!  Either we're in the company of somebody with an exquisitely honed moral code, and/or the subjects of the odium are truly terrible people. Would you agree? Child molesters, perhaps, or maybe brutal murderers?

Well in fact no, on all counts.  The people Emer O'Kelly chastises in the Sunday Independent are two Donegal councillors who objected to 'travellers', the Irish gypsy equivalent, being allowed to live among the settled community. Let me clarify here that travellers display those self-same characteristics which make blacks so loved and valued everywhere: Their presence is synonymous with extreme violence, theft, welfare abuse and environmental degradation. A vastly disproportionate number will fill the local jails. Bars and hotels that they frequent will be wrecked.

You know the story.

When she pauses for breath in her sanctimonious denunciation Ms. O'Kelly trots out the standard excuse......'of course they get drunk and violent, and may abuse welfare etc. but so do settled [or White] people'. So there. They're no different to the rest of us, see! Except that proportionally they do it in vastly greater numbers.  And yes, there are, as she claims, honest hard-working and law-abiding travellers and blacks. But these are the exception not the rule.

And like academics and wealthy 'liberals' everywhere she won't have to run the gauntlet of such behaviour in the wealthy Dublin 4 suburb where she lives. She, and her ilk, can vent and flaunt their superior moral standards, and gain a leg-up in the Competitive Altrusm race, secure in the knowledge that it will have no negative effects on them at all.

Hypocrisy off the Richter scale.

92 comments:

Anonymous said...

Grew up in Rathkeale, spent some time in New York, bad as they are I'd rather live among 'the boys' than the sons of Obama.

nastiestuncle said...

Just imagine if there were black travellers!

Oh shit, I hope I haven't given any visiting people of colour any ideas.

X said...

Perhaps someone could post this woman's address in order that the travellers could 'voice' their concerns.

Concerned American said...

I got my early ideas of Gypsies from reading Tintin, in "Castafiore Emerald". Captain Haddock (a big, drunk liberal) let a troupe of gypsies stay on his lawn in Marlinspike, and they caused all this commotion, and dirtiness. This was rather foolish, and a rich singer of "Oh my Jewels" was coming to sing, who had her jewels stolen. The gypsies were suspected of stealing jewels from Bianca Castafiore the singer. Well, in the end, it turns out that they didn't steal. Magpies did it.

Tintin got all self-righteous when the gypsies were accused, but wasn't he being a bit naive?
Castafiore Emerald: Is Tintin being naive about the Gypsies?

It seems that this Gypsy naivite has been carried on in Europe for a long time. The Gypsies are perfect at using the altruistic "niceness" of Europeans to their advantage. They are EVOLVED to do this, just like a certain other wandering tribe .

Why, the Gypsies are the very prototype for the second/third-worlder tribe invasion of Europe.

"Fool me once.... Fool me again."

The motto of the gullible European man in all ages.

Gypsy apologists yesterday, Islamic conquest apologists today. Now we have both, great.

Concerned American said...

By the way you all here and Irish Savant, I think Catholics will surely get the Pope they deserve:

U.S. Catholics Divided on Church’s Direction Under New Pope, Pew Research Center: 60% think a pope from the “developing world” would be a good thing

Rob said...

The Travellers in general have the deadly combined trait of fertility and psychopathy. Any society with a welfare system that facilitates psychopaths breeding more psychopaths is heading for big trouble.

They also enjoy the distinction of being the only White people convicted of keeping slaves in recent times, at least as far as I'm aware. I've read of scores of slavery cases in the European and American courts, but it was always people from Asia, Africa or the Middle East, until English police discovered the Connors family enterprise.

kulak said...

They also enjoy the distinction of being the only White people convicted of keeping slaves in recent times

Six kids the couple had.

Took whites as slaves -- good move there. They can eventually assimilate.

Other men included Martin "Tim" Howley, Michael Burke, who lived with the defendants for so long that he changed his surname to Connors

Not "nice" men, but men by God.

Anonymous said...

Are there any gypsies left in Ireland? I thought they all came over to soft-touch Britain a few years ago when the Irish govt made trespass a criminal offence. They seem to be everywhere theses days from Devon to Cumbria.

Over in England, of course, they can park their top of the range caravans and Mercs anywhere they want. Locals who complain get threatened by the police for 'hate speech' and 'racism'.

Mobile benefits offices are set up so they don't miss their regular handouts, and the council sets up toilet blocks for them all paid for by local council-tax payers, naturally.

Twice a year (May and Oct) in Stow on the Wold in the Cotswolds, all the pubs and most of the shops close for a week during the gypsy 'horse fair' when chaos, theft, and violence rule the streets and there's barely a plod to be seen, as the locals stay behind locked doors or visit relatives elsewhere until calm is restored.

Dan said...

I gypo robbed the Baclays in Burford. He used a tractor to do it.

He also stole a bronze sculpture by Henry Moore.

Gypo.

Anonymous said...

Here's another typical sneering attack on the BNP and other white nationalists in The Telegraph but many of the comments are interesting:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100203917/the-bnp-is-having-another-facelift-but-its-new-poster-boy-jack-buckby-is-just-an-old-school-nationalist/#disqus_thread

Dan said...

The trout farms in stow probably lose 50% of inventory in mysterious ways.

Fiachra O'Blodbaoith said...

Emer, Trafalgar Terrace, Monkstown; dunno the exact number.

gallowglass said...

I agree with the guy who grew up in Rathkeale, the tinker capital of Ireland. Blacks are far worse. 99% of the time tinkers will let you alone if you leave them alone. But as for Obama's sons..........

Anonymous said...

If Monkstown started to fill up with Nigerians,you can bet your bottom dollar,Emer would be the first to sell up and move.

Anonymous said...

A couple of years ago, the Roma Gypsies were ran out of Belfast.The libtards of course,were up in arms.There was no mention of the thieving,begging and pick-pocketing that went on.

Anonymous said...

Ms O'Kelly ought to be FORCED to send her children to a Dublin state school, it might help her understand
the problem she denies. But these
hypocrites never do. The same goes for everyone in any British Cabinet
of either colour. A bunch of stinking
hypocrites and traitors.

Essex boy said...

The ultimate hypocrite in my view must be Diane Abbott. Ranted and raved about how private schools were pushing state schools down, and then sent her own pickaninnies to one.

Rob said...

Anon 21:37

She has no children.

Eamon Bejayzuz said...

Jeeeezuz! Romas driven out of Belfast! I didn't know that. Just learning that has made all the world seem sunnier and healthier.

Rob said...

Jeeeezuz! Romas driven out of Belfast! I didn't know that. Just learning that has made all the world seem sunnier and healthier

Not sure about that, Eamon - the whole lot of them were probably at the Social Welfare office in Dublin the next morning.

Anonymous said...

Competitive Altruism.Very nice phrase. I'll nick that and use it if you don't mind?

Anonymous said...

Many years ago Gypsies decided to make one of the beauty spots on Cannock Chase their new home. The police eventually got them moved. Unfortunately the site was closed for a further two weeks because they had contaminated the water.
Which reminds me. Have you seen the advert for an African kid who doesn't get fresh water? 'The only water source is contaminated with human and cattle faeces.'
Isn't the simple solution to say , keep the animals away but mainly don't shit in your own water. There was another add that said little Liza had to walk three miles and back to get fresh water to use in her mud hut for cooking washing etc. Move the feckin hut nearer to the water.

Keiser said...

I remember when Grainne Seoige (the less idiotic of the two) briefly presented the ill-fated Sky News Ireland. She was announcing the results of one of those press the red or blue (or whatever) buttons on your Sky Box remote viewer polls.

The poll's question was "Does Ireland need more Immigrants?"

The result was a resounding 80% polling "No".

Seoige actually voiced her incredulity at the result by saying she couldn't understand why more people wouldn't want more immigration.

It's so easy when you're in an ivory tower, isn't it.

Anonymous said...

It's so easy when you're in an ivory tower, isn't it.

Rather, it's hard to see genocide when you're anti-white.

Anonymous said...

Competitive Altruism.Very nice phrase.

Nice phrase, but it's not what's going on.

Giving money to widows and orphans of one's own people in order to get higher social status is competitive altruism.

Importing aliens who make widows and orphans among your own people is treason.

Keiser said...

""All that is necessary for the triumph of evil," said Burke, "is for good men to do nothing." Well, technically, he was right. But in practice evil will do a lot better if it can get the good men to side with the greater evil, and fight against the lesser. Being, of course, evil, it seldom overlooks this device."
Mencius Moldbug (pseudonym)

Thus and so we have the sputtering pointer Emer tricked in to fighting the "lesser evil" whom she perceives as "racists" by the "greater evil"... the Liberal Marxists.

What she doesn't realise is that the "racists" are just people who fight for their essence and believe that differentiation and the resultant diversity are a strength and whom then encourage positive interaction with others based on that strength but not subsumption by them.

The Marxists believe in homogenization and destruction of variation because in their nonsense philosophy, as we all know, everyone is equal though, and here is the sting in the tail courtesy of the Kabbalistic, Kosher Kriminals (or KKK as I refer to them as), some are more equal than others.

In demanding diversity in a nation they destroy it because the basic unit of survival is not an individual man but a nation of men.

As a result of the artificially diverse National Commune a societal pressure in induced and intermixing occurs in order to alleviate and balance the tension created by national racial diversity. They know this. In fact they count on it as the third world stock they introduce to create the "diversity" is substandard and anathema to that nation.

They also state erroneously that as people who strive for essence and differentiation we are antithetical to engaging the other or "otherness" and therefore are psychologically regressive. A specious and flawed argument to say the least. A lie designed to vilify us into the position and role of "evil" and "racist".

but I digress and restate the thesis, hopefully Quod Erat Demonstrandum

... ,"in practice evil will do a lot better if it can get the "good men" (Emer and her Cohort of DWLs) to side with the greater evil (Social Marxism), and fight against the lesser (supposedly evil, supposedly psychologically regressive, Raycist Nationalists)."

Anonymous said...

The Marxists believe in homogenization and destruction of variation

"Marxists" are not saying China and Latin America must mix.

What they are is anti-white.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 05:40

""Marxists" are not saying Latin America must mix."

Latin America is already mixed.

Keiser said...

"Marxists" are not saying China and Latin America must mix.

What they are is anti-white.


@Anonymous
I'm a big fan of Horus the Avenger too, I like his message, but I think we all agree that Cultural Marxism is synonymous with Anti-White and it all leads right back to the same Zio Camp, eh Nastiest.

nastiestuncle said...

@Keiser 06:01

"Zio Camp"

Zio = Zionist?

Because I thought we'd established that it wasn't the Zionists who were the problem but rather non-religious, non-Zionist Jews were over-represented.

I'm sure that some nutter in a settlement near Hebron would prefer that Western nations retained their white, non-Muslim character and therefore traditional support for Israel, since the more black and Muslim a country becomes the less they support Israel.

Keiser said...

@NU
I'm sure that some nutter in a settlement near Hebron would prefer that Western nations retained their white, non-Muslim character and therefore traditional support for Israel, since the more black and Muslim a country becomes the less they support Israel.

In marketing there is a term loss leader, definition: Good or service advertised and sold at below cost price. Its purpose is to bring in (lead) customers in the retail store.

In other words the business takes the hit and loss on some of its interests in order to reap a greater benefit.

Who do we know that excels in this sort of strategising?

Israel is doing a good job of pacifying the Middle East with its Golem as it is. Whites are a severe, historical, monolithic and ever-present latent threat compared with disorganized muslims.

So why fight your enemies when you can just put them in the same room and encourage them to fight each other.

Just a theory... or is it?

Eamon Bejayzuz said...

Rob, I have no doubt that the following morning the Gypsies were camped in Dublin outside the Social Welfare offices. I am just encouraged that a "driving out" took place at all.

Seneca said...

Keiser 5.32, well said. The likes of Emer believe they're being independent and progressive but of course, as you show, they are mere dupes of a 'higher' power.

Bill said...

I bet most people around the world have heard of Oxford in England with its famous university. But how many have also heard that Pakistani Muslim gangs in the town run peadophile sex slave rings of white English girls as young as 11?

It's one of dozens of English towns where this has been going on for years and, until recently, the police and social services have turned a deliberate blind eye. They even tried to jail BNP chief Griffin a few years ago when he started revealing what was going on.

From today's Mail:

'He branded me so people knew I was his': Sex slave aged 11 describes how 'trafficker disfigured her flesh with heated hairpin'
Nine men are accused of grooming and abusing vulnerable girls in Oxford
Child sex ring allegedly abused several girls - aged 11 to 16 over eight years
Gang member allegedly branded one schoolgirl with 'M' for Mohammed

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2283201/Oxford-sex-gang-victim-aged-11-branded-initial-abuser.html#ixzz2LiJmX2vO

It seems that, apart from the white nationalist community, most English people are now so debased that they really couldn't give a shit.

katana said...

This OT article should be of interest to IS readers.

Exposing the hoax in the 'Holocaust' is most important in stopping our destruction through the jewish orchestrated White guilt tripping propaganda.

---------------------
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/02/16/the-importance-of-holocaust-revisionism-a-reply/

On the Importance of Holocaust Revisionism—A Reply to Alan Hart

By Thomas Dalton, Ph.D for Veterans Today

In the past two weeks, Veterans Today has published three pieces on Holocaust revisionism by Alan Hart, and one set of reflections by Jim Dean and Paul Eisen. Any discussion of this topic is welcome, given its central importance in American life today.
However, Hart, in particular, perpetuates some false and misleading ideas about the matter, and thus a reply is called for.

Let me begin with a few points that Hart has correct. There are, in fact, three essential elements to the event called the Holocaust:

(1) intention to mass murder the Jews, by Hitler and the Nazi elite;
(2) the use of gas chambers; and
(3) the 6 million deaths.

If any one of these three should undergo substantial revision, then, technically speaking, we no longer have “The Holocaust”—at least, not in any meaningful sense. (Broadly speaking, of course, any mass fatality is a holocaust.) Holocaust revisionism contends that, not one, but all three of these points are grossly in error, and thus that “The Holocaust,” as such, did not occur. Obviously, this is not to deny that a tragedy happened to the Jews, nor that many thousands died, directly and indirectly, as a result of the war. But the conventional account is an extreme exaggeration.

Hart’s treatment of these issues is woefully inadequate. On the first point, he claims that the Nazis did indeed have a program of mass murder, and that they deliberately and systematically implemented it—but only after the British abandoned their commitment to Zionism in May 1939. And yet, he offers no evidence that this was a major turning point in German policy. I am unaware that any such evidence exists.

In fact, all available evidence suggests a consistent policy of enforced evacuation and deportation, throughout the Nazi era. The Germans wanted a Reich free of Jews, and thus they corralled them into camps, and then systematically evacuated them to the Eastern regions. Yes, many would die in the process; a regrettable loss. But this is ethnic cleansing, not genocide—something the Israelis are eminently familiar with.

1/3

katana said...

2/3

To argue for mass killing, Hart relies almost entirely on ten entries from the Goebbels diary. Unfortunately he has a very superficial knowledge of this subject. Had he done even a bit of research, he would have found my on-line article, “Goebbels on the Jews” (www.inconvenienthistory.com).

There I examine 132 separate entries, covering the final nine years of his life. Roughly 90% refer only to evacuation and deportation. There is not one entry on industrial mass killings, not one entry on gas chambers, not one entry on Auschwitz. Even in the most damning cases, Goebbels uses ambiguous wording such as Vernichtung and Ausrottung, which refer simply to complete elimination or removal; neither term entails killing.

In fact only a single entry, in March 1945, refers explicitly to the killing of Jews—which is unexplainable, if his policy was indeed one of mass murder. He had no reason to cover up the truth in his own private diary.

Hart’s one other bit of evidence, Himmler’s well-known Posen speech of 1943, explicitly equates deportation with Ausrottung, or “extermination.” The full phrase is, “I am now thinking of the evacuation of the Jews, the Ausrottung [‘extermination’] of the Jewish people. … [I]t is in our program: deactivation [Ausschaltung] of the Jews…” It was their presence and their power that was to be eliminated.

Regarding the gas chambers, very little can be determined from the Jewish Auschwitz survivors, even ones we trust. What, after all, did they see? Jews forcibly sent to the camp, under appalling wartime conditions. Families separated, never to meet again. People dying from typhus, dysentery, and other diseases. Cans of deadly Zyklon poison (for fumigation of lice). Dead bodies. Corpses being burned in crematoria. But all these things are completely comprehensible—and in fact expected—in a wartime concentration camp. None of this entails mass murder in gas chambers.

What none of the survivors have seen is 2,000 live Jews forced into an underground chamber, Zyklon pellets dumped on their heads, and then 2,000 dead bodies hauled out. And the fact that no one has seen this strongly suggests that it never happened.

Independently, it is an utterly ludicrous way to kill masses of people: packing victims into an underground room with military-like precision, dumping cyanide pellets on them (that continue to out-gas for two or three hours), and then gingerly hauling out dead body after dead body without killing yourself or your worker-slaves. And the job’s not done yet: now load four or five dead bodies at a time on a small freight elevator, to send them up two floors to the crematoria ovens, where it takes one full hour to incinerate one body—hardly the streamlined industrial killing operation that we’ve been sold.

2/3

katana said...

3/3

Furthermore, few (including Hart) realize that Zyklon was the alleged murder weapon for ‘only’ one million Jews; another two million were allegedly killed in carbon monoxide gas chambers, primarily at Treblinka and Belzec. Unfortunately this is yet an even more ridiculous scheme: to pump engine exhaust into a sealed, airtight room packed with people. The alleged diesel engines put out far too little CO gas to be effective, and in any case one cannot pump exhaust gas into a sealed space. For that matter, with an airtight room available, one has only to shut the door and wait 30 minutes—and all would suffocate! The entire gassing scheme collapses into absurdity.

As to the third point, that the “6 million” figure might be a considerable exaggeration, Hart simply says, “so what!” In fact, the best revisionist estimates suggest that perhaps 500,000 Jews died during the war years—a staggering 90% reduction from the claimed number. Well—so what? Historical accuracy, for one; when speaking of the “greatest crime in the history of humanity,” we should at least get our numbers straight. Secondly, this would reduce the Jewish death toll to barely 1% of the total war dead, turning it into a mere footnote of history.
But most importantly, it makes starkly clear the degree to which the world has been bamboozled by the international Jewish Lobby. The sheer fact that large portions of the public and academia have been cowed into accepting a patently false storyline—one that serves only to benefit a small Jewish minority—is beyond reprehensible. It is criminal; and the criminals ought to be called to account.

Hart is right to say that the Holocaust is used to bully America and the European nations into subservience, and to cast a collective guilt upon all parties involved in the war. The guilt trip works the best, incidentally, on the level of the individual, and it keeps otherwise knowledgeable and ethical people from speaking out against Israeli crimes. It keeps Americans from demanding that their government stop supplying some $6 billion per year in aid to Israel; stop providing diplomatic cover in the U. N.; and stop the stranglehold on Congress and our foreign policy. By exposing this fraud, Germany and the other extorted nations would be right to demand repayment of hundreds of billions of dollars; now there would be a first step on the path to justice.

All this is only the tip of the Holocaust iceberg. The full story is spelled out in my recent book, Debating the Holocaust (www.debatingtheholocaust.com). There, the reader is invited to judge for himself.

Finally, as to Hart’s contention that the truth-seeking revisionists are evil, and the lying, fraudulent, Holocaust blackmailers ought to get a free pass—well, that speaks for itself.

--------------------

Jon said...

Savant, I'm just watching a TV programme called 'Secret Millionaire Ireland' on Channel 4 right now.

It's centered on Shandon St in North Cork, described by the 'secret millionaire' as 'vibrant multi-cultural'. It looks like an African/Asian cesspit to me with the only whites being alcoholics and the mentally infirm from what I've seen so far.

Anonymous said...

@Keiser

I think we all agree that Cultural Marxism is synonymous with Anti-White

Then don't say it's something else.

Whether you intended to or not, you gave them an out.

"Homegenization" is what THEY say they're about.

It is a lie.

What they are about is genocide.

Anonymous said...

@Keiser

P.S.

It's not a "message".

Anonymous said...

12.56
It looks like the millionaire is going to give his money to a 'support group' for freeloading African 'asylum seekers' which Cork seems to be filling up with.

Pass the sick bucket.

Keiser said...

@Seneca, Hat tip, much obliged.

@Anonymous
I think we all agree that Cultural Marxism is synonymous with Anti-White

Then don't say it's something else.

Whether you intended to or not, you gave them an out.

"Homegenization" is what THEY say they're about.


You're preaching to the choir my friend but you do know what a synonym is don't you. By saying Cultural Marxism is synonymous with Anti-White I am saying that they are exactly the same thing. Homegenization is also synonymous with genocide. I am just being specific about the mechanism of how they are going about it for the benefit of those who like to look a bit closer.

Yes I agree with having a blunt mantra, Anti-racism is a code word for Anti-White, Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for everyone. I know them all. The work well for those whom are immune to reason like the people who can only say "dats raycist" and can't think for themselves but we can and we do so we investigate and exchange ideas here. Look up the word synonym and try to understand that I am describing mechanisms, aliases and pseudonyms, techniques and strategies of an insidious enemy which is something I can't do with a mantra.

I believe that ultimately they claim that "racists" are flawed because they can't engage anyone out side their group.

Since a human does not survive outside his group at large (more technically Nation at large as it is the minimum group size necessary for the survival of a people), he does not survive as an individual but as a Nation.

Within this survivable nation group the individual is free to associate with others and still perpetuate himself.

This is a logical slight of hand that they use. They ignore the necessity for a Nation and reduce the man to an individual, an island, and then influx different people into his Nation all the while stating if you cannot engage these "others" you are racist and psychologically regressive. The truth is that they have subverted the term engage by ignoring the Nation as the fundamental unit and "engage" then becomes "be subsumed" by default of this subversion.

Yes Anonymous they want genocide of White people, they want the destruction of White people. I hope I am not being too opaque.

Also
Anonymous said...(re: my comment about Horus the Avengers "message")

P.S. It's not a "message".

Then a "method" if you prefer but perhaps it's not that either. Perhaps like a god entity we should resist any attempt to name it out of respect and reverence.

Shaunantijihad said...

"Because I thought we'd established that it wasn't the Zionists who were the problem but rather non-religious, non-Zionist Jews were over-represented."

No. We have consistently refuted your Jewish lies since around last September 11th, when you were assigned here. But like all zio-trolls, you return and pretend you have not been refuted. Again.

The end of the Holohoax is coming. Get ready to pay Germany back, and start paying compensation for your WW2 and 911 lies and wars. Or worse.

http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1000&play=1#watch

Anonymous said...

Africans are being imported from the infinite reservoir of Africa in order to miscegenate with whites thus eliminating whites and producing a dumbed-down mulatto mass which is incapable of grasping who did what to whom and why. This is the purpose. Here is Sarkozy admitting it - miscegenation for whites in France but no multi-culti in Saudi Arabia:

"What's the purpose: to take on the challenge of miscegenation. It's not a choice - it's an obligation"

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xkjdtc_sarkozy-metissage-obligatoire-pour-la-france-pas-pour-l-arabie_news

Allan@Aberdeen

Keiser said...

"I believe that ultimately they claim that "racists" are flawed because they can't engage anyone out side their group.

For clarity sake when I say "racists" I mean supposed, alleged "racists"...in big inverted commas i.e. White Nationalists.

Alleged by they way by idiotic and deluded White liberals and their ilk using upside down, back to front and inside out logic.

Iron Felix said...

I am inclined to believe that in the period 1933-1945 something serious happened to Jews in Europe, large numbers of whom seem to have come to most unpleasent ends. I have no idea what the numbers are, nor do I know for certain anything about gas-chambers etc., (notwithstanding that I once stood inside a gaschamber, looking up at the nozzle). What I might mention is this; in nearly all accounts of this or that episode of mass murder the perpetrators are said to be Germans, and photographic representation does indeed show guys in German uniform, with their unmistakable helmets. Thing is, very few of these guys were Germans; everywhere the Wehrmacht went there arose in its wake any number of volunteers--Latvians, Estonians, Belarussians, Ukrainians, Russians, Poles,what have you--all desperate to have a go at the Jews.These were the murderers, and NOT the Wehrmacht or its German personnel. Question; by holding Germany alone responsible are we exculpating much of the rest of Europe of its legacy of anti-Semitism? If so, in whose interest is it to go on forever rubbing Germany's face in it? And have said interests thought what is likely to happen if ever der Wurm turns?

Dan said...

Felix,

Whatever happened I don't care. They didn't belong there. Thats how Anglos are in fact treated today.

something horrible happened to Rhodesians. A drop in population from 200,000 to 20,000. Many of them closely related to the Irish Scots Welsh and English. What happened to them? Who weeps for these refugees and victims?

Dan said...

I wouldnt worry about the assignation of blame for the Battle of the Pale. The Jews spread it plenty already. They are just sore that someone tried to muscle them out of the biggest territory that they ever controlled directly. The German attempt to lord it over the nasi princes of Eastern Europe will not be forgiven. The Poles, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, Hungarians were nothing more than helots in revolt. The Germans were actually a competing group with some measure of competence.

Piet said...

Dan, Something horrible did indeed happen to Rhodesians but it's not as if they've all been killed or anything. Almost all have emigrated, mostly to South Africa but then re-emigrated when the porch monkeys took over. You find them all over the place really, including Ireland.

Dan said...

Remind you of anything, finding them everywhere?

Yeah most did leave. But they often left without their wealth.

Anonymous said...

I remember a few years ago,Vincent Browne (another DWL Irish broadcaster-arn't they all)was doing a piece on travellers on radio.Completely sympathetic of course.

It was a live broadcast and someone rang up.His words were something like this.

"Hello Vincent,this is Jack Smith,you know me,I live 3 doors down from you.Anyway,I've just been doing some research of my own and I have discovered that the nearest travellers site to where we live is 5 miles away.Perhaps you would like to move house so you can be closer to your new friends"

Cue a flabbergasted and extremely angry Browne.I doubt if the neighbour got an invitation for a Christmas drink.

mr.a

Iron Felix said...

Dan, not sure what you are getting at.................

Anonymous said...

Black anti-waycism football campaigner hoist by his own petard after calling one of his brudders a niggah....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21559781

LMFAO!!!!

nastiestuncle said...

@Dan 15:01

So the Jews controlled the Soviet Union and yet they wouldn't allow but a few token synagogues, the ones which were allowed were covertly and overtly monitored, the Jewish identity was discouraged, as was Zionism, and then they killed a whole bunch of themselves.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the Jews did not control the Soviet Union.

Dan said...

Nastiest,

The Troike was a 2/3 Jewish run partnership.

nastiestuncle said...

@Iron Felix 14:36

I've heard accounts of some of the Ukrainian camp guards, as well as local militia members and Einsatzgruppen killers approaching their work with gusto.
I've also heard accounts from some of the German overseers of especially the Einsatzgruppen actions that the scenes of slaughter were unbearable for them to watch, leading to alcoholism or madness.
Then again, regular Wehrmacht troops relished the taking of a new area and the consequent random shootings of any Jews they found and the raping of the women (it's estimated that ten million women were raped in the East by the Wehrmacht/ SS).
It would seem to me that some Germans were suited to barbarity, but less so than the people from the East and we all know that Russians for instance can be a bloodthirsty lot.
Also something which should be taken into account is that the invading German troops had jobs as soldiers and were in charge of the new areas, so when organising local people into murder squads, the local people had a choice of refusing and being shot as a possible subversive, or taking on the role which would provide pay, food and the preservation of their life.

Why waste employing Germans in camps or death squads when one could employ non-Germans, since the Germans were needed for front line duty?

Jew hatred was not and never was solely a German thing. It's easy to hate Jews and takes balls not to. Were the Eastern people better than the Germans? I think not.

nastiestuncle said...

@Shaunantijihad 14:22

"No. We have consistently refuted"

There has never been a refutation. We established that the Zionist Jews were the religious ones, and it is not the religious ones who work in the media; it is the non-religious, atheist, left wing, genetic Jews who work in the media. It does not serve the Israeli people to have Western countries weakened by Muslim immigration, since weaker Western countries equals a weaker Israel.

"your Jewish lies"

And yet it isn't me who is coming out with the lies, like Anne Frank's diary was written in biro, steel doesn't lose its strength when hot, Eisenhower killed 1.7 unarmed German PoWs, and so on. That is you guise.

"since around last September 11th, when you were assigned here."

My nigger. There is no "assigned", and I was here before that by a fair while :)

"But like all zio-trolls, you return and pretend you have not been refuted."

Except it's true. I haven't been refuted. I have repeatedly owned everyone, especially the 911 troofer lot. Now that was fun.

"The end of the Holohoax is coming."

You mean the Holocaust. Or in terms of the Jews, the Shoah.

"Get ready to pay Germany back"

But they have not lent me any money.

"and start paying compensation for your WW2 and 911 lies and wars."

WW2 lies? What lies?
911 wars? What wars?

"Or worse."

ROFLMAO. Shaun is getting all threatening. It's giving me a boner.

"http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1000&play=1#watch"

Was that video made by someone called 911TruthSeeker911.

nastiestuncle said...

@Dan 18:55

You're calling them Jewish, but the fact that they had a few strands of DNA from ancestors who came from the Levant was irrelevant to their actions. They were Soviets.

Anonymous said...

You are still blubbering on about a
fantasy NaZi uncle.Did you read a lot of Noddy and Big Ears when you were a kid? Enid Blyton only wrote true stories right? Watch my lips,
there was NO HOLOCAUST. Verstehen?

Keiser said...

NU said...
"I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the Jews did not control the Soviet Union."

Well, I'm going to go out on a limb and say they did!

Leaders of Jewish Marxist Russia

This official postcard, widely circulated by the Communist government in Russia following the Jewish Bolshevik takeover, is entitled "Leaders of the Proletarian Revolution." The postcard reveals the Jewishness of these original leaders of the Communist Party. All six shown, including Lenin and Trotsky, are Jews!

The Zionist Red Army by David Duke

David Duke The Soviet Holocaust of the Russians

List of Jews born in Russia and some were very influential in shaping Soviet Russia i.e Trotsky and Lenin

and lets not forget Jewish involvement in the Gulags and the Holodomor.

We have heard your opinion NU but it is just that, an opinion so please stop insisting that we accept it as Gospel.

I know what you say is the party line and all and maybe some day we will live in the utopia where "we are all equal but some more equal than others" that you seem to be desperately vying for but until then when you have the backing of the secret police you will just have to accept people have a right to disagree with your royal highness's opinions :-)

Keiser said...

NU said...
There has never been a refutation. We established that the Zionist Jews were the religious ones, and it is not the religious ones who work in the media; it is the non-religious, atheist, left wing, genetic Jews who work in the media.

What's this we established crap. "We" most certainly did not establish, you proposed you mean and I think you are just obfuscating and mudding the waters by differentiating between religious and genetic Jews, between Zionist and religious, between genetic and Zionist, between purple and mauve.

Jewish supremacy exists, it is called Zionism. It exists amongst religious and non religious Jews.

Not all Jews are Zionists but all are part of the tribe. The tribe is the religion and the religion is the tribe. I have seen video and interviews showing some Rabbis refuting Zionism and I have seen other Rabbis supporting it.

Your distinctions serve only to obfuscate the real issues, a peculiarly common and recurring theme in your writing.

Anonymous said...

I will also go out on the same limb as Keiser and state that 'nastiestuncle' is a judeo-troll, but a useful one for, as we refute each of his/her/its lies, we strengthen the case to others who read the information here and especially the source references. From the book by Douglas Reed, The Controversy of Zion:

At the time, the facts were available. The British Government's White Paper of 1919 (Russia, No.1, a Collection of Reports on Bolshevism) quoted the report sent to Mr. Balfour in London in 1918 by the Netherlands Minister at Saint Petersburg, M. Oudendyke: ~~Bolshevismis organized and worked by Jews, who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things". The United States An1bassador, Mr. David R. Francis, reported similarly: ~~The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution". M. Oudendyke's report was deleted from later editions ofthe British official publication and all such authentic documents of that period are now difficult to obtain. Fortunately for the student, one witness preserved the oficial record.
This was Mr. Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times, who experienced the Bolshevik revolution. The French edition of his book included the official Bolshevik lists of the membership of the ruling revolutionary bodies (they were omitted from the English edition).
These records show that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprized 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People's Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others. The Moscow Che-ka (secret police) was formed ofb 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918-1919 were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly '''Socialist'· or other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance of "opposition" was permitted, to beguile the masses, accuston1ed under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr. Wilton. (In parentheses, the composition of the two short-lived Bolshevik governments outside Russian 1918-1919, namely those of Hungary and Bavaria, was similar).

Allan@Aberdeen

Dan said...

Nastiest,


Your concern for the Jews is duly noted.

All the people I'm talking about were brought up with the faith and stewed in the culture.

Keiser said...

NU said
"It does not serve the Israeli people to have Western countries weakened by Muslim immigration, since weaker Western countries equals a weaker Israel."

Sorry to repeat myself (see link below) but you do it a lot. I refute the above thus.

It's just a theory, maybe I'm wrong but I don't think I am. I mean why fight the big guys when you can just get them to fight each other!

Britain vs Germany, America vs Middle East, etc

My previous comment at 23 February 2013 06:39

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Keiser said...

NU said...
There has never been a refutation. We established that the Zionist Jews were the religious ones, and it is not the religious ones who work in the media; it is the non-religious, atheist, left wing, genetic Jews who work in the media.

What's this we established crap. "We" most certainly did not establish, you proposed you mean and I think you are just obfuscating and mudding the waters by differentiating between religious and genetic Jews, between Zionist and religious, between genetic and Zionist, between purple and mauve.


Nice one Keiser.

Whenever one sees the phrases:- "We have already established ..." or "It is well-known ..." or "It is an established fact ..." ; "It is common knowledge ..." or others of that ilk, it is yehudi shorthand for the phrase:- "I am now going to lie like a cheap watch, and hope to God that you don't ask awkward questions ..."

Or closer to the point, how does a jew pronounce the phrase:- "Fuck You"?

"Trust me .."

UN
.

Keiser said...

UN "Trust me"... LoLz

Kind of like the circa 1965 line

"Trust me, this will not lead to the browning of America"

The truth will out said...

Everything you wanted to know about jewish involvement in the Soviet Union but were afraid to ask

“In the Soviet Union, under Stalin and his Communist Jews, the emptying of churches was accomplished by the simply expedient of burning the churches down—thousands of them—and building synagogues instead.”

The Mass Murder of Russian Christians and the Destruction of their Churches

nastiestuncle said...

@Keiser 06:39

"In marketing there is a term loss leader, definition: Good or service advertised and sold at below cost price. Its purpose is to bring in (lead) customers in the retail store.

In other words the business takes the hit and loss on some of its interests in order to reap a greater benefit.

Who do we know that excels in this sort of strategising?"

Supermarket managers?

"Israel is doing a good job of pacifying the Middle East with its Golem as it is. Whites are a severe, historical, monolithic and ever-present latent threat compared with disorganized muslims."

Whites are no threat to Israel. Even if the will was there, no white country would attempt to destroy Israel.

In fact the only people who have tried to destroy Israel have been.......... the Muslim Arabs.

A person's whiteness of their skin has no bearing at all on their hostility to Jews. The lack of melanin does not lead to hatred for Jews. In fact, black people are higher on the Jew-hating scale than whites.

"So why fight your enemies when you can just put them in the same room and encourage them to fight each other."

Israel's continuing strength relies upon support from white countries. As white countries become diluted with blacks and Islamics, support for Israel is lessened because the governments of these countries don't have to court the Jewish vote; they have to court the Muslim and black vote. This was proven both in the Hezbollah War of 2006 and Operation Cast Lead of 2008, both being occurrences when pressure from white countries (the governments of which need the Muslim vote or to project and Muslim-friendly face internationally) led to the premature cessation of hostilities by Israel before their objectives had been achieved, the results being a strengthened Hezbollah, now armed with over 100,000 rockets as well as new Russian anti-tank and anti-aircraft systems, and a Gaza which is as full of Katyushas as it ever was.
Contrast this with previous Israeli actions before mass immigration into white countries began - Israel could do whatever it wanted more or less, since its allies were not hamstrung by having to court Muslims and blacks.

"Just a theory... or is it?"

Just a theory methinks. Although I would acknowledge that this will not satisfy your religious needs.

nastiestuncle said...

@Keiser 20:07

"Sorry to repeat myself (see link below) but you do it a lot. I refute the above thus."

No you didn't refute it. You compared Jews to supermarket marketeers. So thanks!

"It's just a theory, maybe I'm wrong but I don't think I am. I mean why fight the big guys when you can just get them to fight each other!"

A fight between white countries and the Muslims would result in the destruction of Israel and possibly of Jews within white countries.

"Britain vs Germany"

I had no idea that Hitler was a Jew, because he had said he intended to go to war ever since the 1920s.

"America vs Middle East"

America has been fighting the Middle East since the Barbary pirates started fucking about with American trade in the Mediterranean. Undoubtedly there will appear on Youtube a video by someone called 911ForRealTruth911 who will find a way to blame that on the Jews, but in the meantime we'll just have to accept that the existence of the USA is and always will be an impediment to the conquering of the world by the Muslims, something they have been working on since a thousand years before the USA was created. If there were no Jews, there would still be conflict between Muslims and Yanks.

Keiser said...

NU said...
"Israel's continuing strength relies upon support from white countries. As white countries become diluted with blacks and Islamics, support for Israel is lessened because the governments of these countries don't have to court the Jewish vote; they have to court the Muslim and black vote."

Unless you own both candidates and one of them is a Black Muslim,

Goldman Sachs says don't forget to vote

Consider this a friendly jab, Sincerely I'm not trying to be hostile...

"your religious needs"... that's rich coming from you.

OK in fairness I can never know if you are really a Jew. Are you really a Jew Nastiest? Come on you can tell us... trust me.

nastiestuncle said...

@Keiser 19:51

"What's this we established crap. "We" most certainly did not establish, you proposed you mean and I think you are just obfuscating and mudding the waters by differentiating between religious and genetic Jews, between Zionist and religious, between genetic and Zionist, between purple and mauve."

And you lot have been saying that a little strand of DNA, in the absence of any ideology causing them to be anti-white, is responsible for these people being anti-white, and it's also complete crap.

"Jewish supremacy exists"

Undoubtedly.

"it is called Zionism."

Except it's not.

"It exists amongst religious and non religious Jews."

And yet the left wing, PC, self-hating, multi-culti Jews who are pro-immigration are also the ones against the settlements and against Zionism.

"Not all Jews are Zionists but all are part of the tribe."

That would be like me saying that I was a Viking because I have a fraction of Viking DNA in me.

"The tribe is the religion and the religion is the tribe."

What rubbish. Plenty of nominal, genetic Jews have abandoned the religion.

"I have seen video and interviews showing some Rabbis refuting Zionism and I have seen other Rabbis supporting it."

Yes, like those fruits at the Neturei Karta.

"Your distinctions serve only to obfuscate the real issues, a peculiarly common and recurring theme in your writing."

The real issue is that although Jews (genetic ones) are over-represented in the left wing community which pushes multi-culturalism, it is wrong to label Jews in general as evil, anti-white monsters and the continuation in doing so also coincides with the continuation in the general public being unable to support the anti-immigration movement, which they rightly see as a bunch of fruitcakes.
I want to get the fight done now whilst I'm still young and fit. I don't want to wait until I'm in my 60s by which time the number of the enemy in my country will be at an unmanageable level. But you lot are making it happen because you're so obsessed with Jews that you can't see what needs to be done.

Anonymous said...

If the purpose of the judeo-troll known as 'nastiestuncle' is to sow confusion and strife in amongst teh silly white goyim, he/she/it is not doing a very good job. In fact, he/she/it is establishing a strength of purpose in those who are onto what judeos get up to on the internet. here is their HQ:

http://www.thejidf.org/2008/10/about-jidf.html

- Our ACTION ALERTS are now well known throughout the Jewish and Israel advocacy world, and by our many enemies, as they have led to the removal of thousands of antisemitic and jihadist pages online. Whether it's an antisemitic Facebook page with millions of members, or a YouTube video promoting global jihad, our team is on it, monitoring it, and urging companies to adhere to their own rules. -

Watch out, Savant - when 'nastiest' gives up, this site will be targetted. The warning on the portal is just the first step.

Allan@Aberdeen

nastiestuncle said...

@Keiser 20:46

Ah yes, the US presidents are owned by Goldman Sachs.

You have religious needs, and you satisfy them by feeding them. It just so happens that your current need is blaming shit on Jews. This might change over time or may not, but whatever it is it will need feeding.

You're undoubtedly clever enough to dismiss the mainstream religions as false, but your need is still there, as it is for 95% or more of the human population. It sucks, I know.

I don't have any religious tendencies so I'm free to acknowledge such things as steel losing its strength as it gets hotter and so on :)

"OK in fairness I can never know if you are really a Jew. Are you really a Jew Nastiest? Come on you can tell us... trust me."

Sorry to disappoint. I am not a Jew, my Jew.

Right my niggers, I'm off to spin my dredel.

Keiser said...

NU said...
"I want to get the fight done now whilst I'm still young and fit."

Are you for real? What nonsense, this has been going on for 3000 years.

It isn't a problem with an on/off switch whereby I hope that by the time I am 55 the last immigrant will be loaded on a plane and sent home. You think I sound like a fruitcake.

This is about education. It is a long game, a marathon. Sure, sprint and take care of the immediate issues like immigration I agree but I will keep my eyes on the endemic problem which is not the Jews but Jewish Supremacism which is termed for better or worse Zionism.

And you lot have been saying that a little strand of DNA, in the absence of any ideology causing them to be anti-white, is responsible for these people being anti-white, and it's also complete crap."

Round and round we go... there is an ideology, it is the ideology of tribalism. We are not talking about little strands of DNA we are talking about people of the tribe with enough of those little strands to identify as having "Jewish Character" and then being ethnic supremacists, Zionists, on top of that.

You don't fix a problem by ignoring half of it. So fix the immediate issue but at least be aware of the cause. Sorry you disagree with the notion of Zionist Supremacy as that cause and you have, indeed, established that with notion is incorrect with cogent well reasoned arguments sorry I meant your opinions.

The whole "you hate Jews therefore you are a Nazi" line is a dangerous and insidious mass (Jewish) media programmed parasitic meme that leads to morbidity in a susceptible population. I mean you don't see Spielberg making movies about those good Bolshevik Jews of the Gulags do you.

The answer is not to ignore it but to reprogram it with reasonable, frank and non-hateful speech, so we actually agree on that point Nastiest. I don't hate the Jews. I resent supremacists of any colour, ethnicity or creed and before any one says it Nationalism is not the same as supremacism. Nationalism recognises the rights of others to exist along with the Nation's right to do so. Supremacism does not.

I don't want to wait until I'm in my 60s by which time the number of the enemy in my country will be at an unmanageable level. But you lot are making it happen because you're so obsessed with Jews that you can't see what needs to be done."

We do see what needs to be done, cure the infection not treat the symptom. Reprogram the parasitic memes instilled by Zionist media by open and frank discussion, some thing that you seem to be anathema to.

Keiser said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Keiser said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Keiser said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Keiser said...

deleted comments, uggh.
Mea culpa, in my haste

He really winds me up though...

NU said...
"I don't have any religious tendencies so I'm free to acknowledge such things as steel losing its strength as it gets hotter and so on"

I can only assure you I know more about the morphological properties, grain structure, miller growth planes and shear potential of steel than you ever will you vapid prima-donna :-)

"Right my niggers, I'm off to spin my dredel."

What's new.

David said...

Off topic, but indulge me, “Pretty woman” was on TV last night, yes that harmless fairy tale about a pretty street walker who meets her prince charming and lives happy ever after, I didn’t watch it but, made me ask what’s the purpose of fairy tales? I think they serve a greater purpose then perhaps we give them credit for, to explore the dark side of human nature and reveal that ugliness to children who grasp and understand the moral and educational message that lies within seemingly innocuous stories, indeed modern fairy tales can still have an impact on the adult, I watched “Let the right one in” the Swedish original film not the inferior American remake about a lonely bullied boy who befriends a vampire and was I blown away by the utterly dark moral message that it gives, perfectly crafted to the European mind: watch your children and the company they keep or something bad will happen. “Pretty woman” though a film I would have previously dismissed as a chick flick or “romcom” I now view as another weapon in the ceaseless war against us: a pretty hooker ends up living the life of her dreams, whereas the purpose of a fairy tale is to show us the darkness in order to avoid it, this sinister fairy tale is the inverse: show the light in order to drag you into darkness. How many vulnerable young girls leading miserable life’s, but girls who still had a chance if they worked hard at school etc, have been corrupted by this satanic lie - work the street and a prince charming will save you.

We are the victims of an inter-generational century old Psy-Op..that clearly wishes our destruction ..boycott Hollywood.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Probably, the most interesting interview you will ever see.

58 minutes well spent.

http://trutube.tv/video/1785/Annie-Machon-ex-MI-5-interview-talks-about-FALSE-Flag-operations

UN
.

Keiser said...

Here's another fairy tale for you a

Guess Who's Coming to Defile your Daughter

Wow, he's a Doctor, woooowww!

and its modern equivalent
Guess who doesn't even have to come to dinner anymore because MTV has sent your daughter to him

Wow, he's a criminal but he has a good heart, wooooowwww!

and the truth of the matter

A pretty girl that believed the lie

and another pretty girl whose black boyfriend (left) paid someone (right) to throw acid on her.

Throw a figurative random dart at Hollywood and you will surely hit crap like this. Stream your media, don't pay for this rot, put them out of business.

Educate your children keep them safe. Blacks with criminal records who are "turning their lives around" are not suitable life partners no matter what Hilary Duff says.

David said...

@Keiser

many young women (and young men)believe the lie, young Nicola Furlong believed the lie,

"Diversity is our strenght"

the question is who is "our"?

Dan said...

Let's have an open honest discussion...

By shutting up people who say naughty naughty things.

Keiser said...

or may be just repetitive, disingenuous things.

Keiser said...

Random Dart thrown in IMDB Top 250 Movies

Intouchables [sic] No. 62 of top 250

After he becomes a quadriplegic from a paragliding accident, an aristocrat hires a young man from the projects to be his caretaker."

I can't stop laughing. O.k. I'll bite, projects boy is a morally superior good negro and doesn't rob the White employer and rape his wife and daughter and eventually cures the degenerate White employer of his racism right before said White employer dies a necessary death as the wages for the sin of being a White man.

I laughed and laughed and laughed...

The travesty "Django Unchained" (2012) also made the list
at number 41, rating 8.5 with 220,914 votes.

What was the icing on the cake of my comedy night was reading the reviews of Django Unchained on IMDB; most of which were written in the worst, most illegible, grammatically dead on arrival, cacographical ebonics I've ever had the comic misfortune to read.

A sample if you will, please erudite, logophilic reviewer, Terrell of Philly

"Being in the filmmaking game for 20 years now, you can't deny and even reject his style in what he is bringing to the screen"

"they relax for the winter only for them to go on a mission..."

"where male slaves fight to the death and female slaves are being prostitutes and he seems to be the kind of guy to like even though he is a villain and he speaks Tarantino's dialogue like a pro."

"he can do it again by having a former slave whipping a man who used to beat him and his wife. Now, that's entertainment. This movie really is off the chain."

Thank you Terrell of Philly

I laughed and laughed and laughed...

Oh the polit bureau must be pleased.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
I don't know if I shared this before ... I think it's pretty funny.

An american friend wrote to me and told me that out of the blue his daughter had walked into the house and said:-

"Dad, I want you to stop my allowance. You must cut up my credit cards, and just throw all my clothes and makeup into the furnace. Take away my car keys, toss my iPhone in the can, smash all my cds, reformat my computer and block all emails from me. Cancel MTV and all the channels I watch on cable. Then you should rent out my room. You must never talk to me again, deny that I am your daughter and cut me out of your will completely."

Well ... what she actually said was "Hey Dad, meet Mohammed."


UN
.

AnalogMan said...

Iron Felix said...

I am inclined to believe that in the period 1933-1945 something serious happened to Jews in Europe,

Well, didn't the Jews declare war on Germany in 1933? What did they expect?

Dan said...

That's my point exactly. The Jews in Lwow took it upon themselves to remain neutral in the Polish Ukrainian war. Under what authority could they do that. The answer is that they are a nation posing as citizens elsewhere. After the Polish Ukranian war they lobbied each government that they stood apart from to protect their property and rights as a nation inside the nation. All the benefits of citizenship, none of the costs (like having to fight).

So indeed what did they expect when they mobilized against Hitler in 1933, lobbying and sanctioning and poisoning from the four corners of the earth?

Mary said...

Jew hatred was not and never was solely a German thing. It's easy to hate Jews and takes balls not to

hahahaa.....thanks for my laugh of the day! Meanwhile, in reality, good people like Sylvia Stolz serve time in prison for pointing out just a few of the many lies of the Holohoax, and many others too are living under threat of "inciting hatred/hate speech" charges for voicing their opinions about the corrosive role of Jews in White nations.

Also:

Have many here seen the Missing Links 911 film, by Mike Delaney of 'pro-Think'? It's worth a watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Mary said...

Jew hatred was not and never was solely a German thing. It's easy to hate Jews and takes balls not to

Forgive me Mary, but I think you have that exactly the wrong way round ...

UN
.

Anonymous said...

of course they get drunk and violent, but so do settled

Barry Egan and Brendan O'Connor are settled people?

Anonymous said...

nto a sealed, airtight room packed with people.

which some hoaxers managed to escape from !!!!