Saturday, 12 January 2013

Ann Coulter funks out

Though Ann Coulter has variously been described as 'fearless', 'provocative',  having 'the courage of her convictions' etc. I've never been totally convinced. She always struck me as similar to Good King What's-his-name who lead his army three times up the hill........and back down again. I got confirmation of this on reading a recent piece of hers on The Daily Caller. Promisingly she turned the spotlight on America's demographic tipping point whereby Whites will in due course fall into minority status.

But she blames it on Teddy Kennedy!

Specifically for his authorship of the 1965 Immigration Act which opened the floodgates and, as she says, lead to the current demographic crisis. She also makes a few half-hearted swipes at other sources....including Mitt Romney!  All the time studiously avoiding the elephant in the room. Because the real author of the 1965 Act was a Jewish Senator, one Jacob Javits. Kennedy, a mere freshman Senator, was brought in to provide a figleaf of broader support.

It's an easily discernible fact that Jewish interests were the drivers for mass Third World immigration to the US from well before 1965, even back to the previous century. Senator Herbert Lehman(!) was active in the Senate prior to Javits, and several leading members of the House (Celler, Dickstein) did their bit in that institution.  But it went far beyond the immediate political forums. Jewish immigration interests - as they diligently pursued the long term objective - made tactical temporary alliances with various ethnic and religious groups, industrialists who wanted cheap labour, and even trade unions who supported the cause for ideological reasons.

In this post I quoted S. M. Neuringer (himself Jewish) who said what Ann Coulter should have. “In order to sway immigration in a liberal direction, Jewish spokespersons and organizations demonstrated a degree of energy unsurpassed by any other interested pressure group. Immigration had constituted a prime object of concern for practically every major Jewish defence and community relations organization. Over the years, their spokespersons had assiduously attended congressional hearings, and the Jewish effort was of the utmost importance in establishing and financing such non-sectarian groups as the National Liberal Immigration League and the Citizens Committee for Displaced Persons.”


It's bad enough, but perhaps understandable up to a point, that Coulter ignores this monstrous elephant in the room. After all, were she to point it out, even timidly and with the inevitable torrent of abject apologies and recantations, she'd have been quickly Buchanened or Derbyshired, cast into exterior darkness for all time. But what I do find unforgiveable is her foisting the blame for the 1965 Act onto Kennedy.  Don't get me wrong. Kennedy was a despicable man in all too many ways. But he would have seen his partnership with the very senior Javits on this Act as ego-boosting (a vital consideration for Ted) and probably an opportunity to ingratiate himself with his strongly Irish support base. Deep strategic thinker he was not.  Unlike Javits and his ilk.  Coulter ignores all of this, and uses him as a handy 'liberal' White patsy instead.

So Ann, you put career before principle. Which, I suppose, is what journalists are employed to do.

64 comments:

Anonymous said...

Right on! Now that Ted Kennedy is safely tucked away in his grave, he can be repeatedly "unburied" to assume his scapegoat role at anytime deemed necessary.

Kennedy was just a "useful idiot" who sold out his country, and his heritage, for reasons of his own choosing.

Now to cast a little light onto our resident "nastiest" foot soldier on this Blog, read all about the "confessions of a paid pro-Israel shill".

A defensive rebuttal should be forthcoming.

barry said...

Well Savant I remember some time ago you exonerated Alex Jones on the basis that he did everything else other than actually Name The Name. Your point being that he was going as far as we could reasonably expect him to go. I think you should cut AC the same slack on this.

former liberal said...

Does Anny really believe the sh*t she spews? Imagine the mental gymnastics she rehearses every morning! Or does she just assume the position knowing who holds the cards?

Dan said...

There is a possible explanation for this. Coulter is a Yankee. Mentioning Kennedy gets Southerners riled up. Makes the IrishCatholics feel some guilt.

Just a thought. She's got to be able to get the meme about the 1965 act out there. You could also hit Reagan on this. He amnestied 3 million Mexicans. It's at least part of the reason California has gone Leftist.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 23:22

"Now to cast a little light onto our resident "nastiest" foot soldier on this Blog, read all about the "confessions of a paid pro-Israel shill"."

Yeah, I'm sure that confession isn't made-up, just like nothing has ever been made-up to make Jews look bad.

The trouble is my niggers is that there have been so many lies told about Jews-did-this and Jews-did-that that we are now in a 'boy who cried wolf' type situation.

SAVANT said...

Dan, that's true. My point though is that she studiously avoids the real instigators.

AnalogMan said...

Savant, I wonder if she even knows who the real instigators are. I know that sounds naive, but this bimbo is seriously clueless - or incredibly cynical.

She jumps from cause to (contradictory) cause like a grasshopper. If she has any principles at all, it's the purely operational principle that the Republicans can do no wrong. She supported Herman Cain for president before she liked Romney, but then she loved Romney. She's pushing fifty, but she dresses and acts like a teenage hooker - right down to that ultimate degradation, bestiality with negroes. And then she has the cheek to call Democrats "Godless".

I think you're flogging a dead horse here. Is there anybody left who still takes her seriously? Is there anybody left who still reads her?

Dan said...

She'd be disappeared and you know it. Sherlock Holmes dog that didn't bark! Present in its absense. Coulter did mention the Jews one time if I recall. When John Kerry disclosed his mitteleuropean Jewish ancestors she said:"around election time they all discover their Jewishness." she then referred to Wesley Clark and Madeline Albright. I think that she does her best but enjoys her Manhattan too much to spoil it for herself. Her real job was to have a half dozen babies with flaxen hair anyway.

What I'd like to know about you Irish Nationalists is this, how did you all get to Mountbatten and can't be arsed to take on contemporary adversaries?

Mary said...

The troubling thing about Ann (whose contrarian style has always appealed to me, I just love how she rarely loses her cool whilst many of her enemies go ballistic all round her. See her 'THE VIEW' appearances with the likes of the hideous Whoopi Goldberg for some hilarious examples)......
but what I detest most is that she 'dates' non-White men.
She "dated" conservative Christian Dinesh D'Souza, a dark skinned Indian, (he was also apparently engaged to Laura Ingraham, another WASP blond bombshell, at one time ), and she is always on "high-alert" defending the GOP as the "real non-racists", etc, and trying to make the dumbed down Democrats believe that they are truly the "really racist" party, lol....
It is a genuine pity, as a racially awake and honest- about -it Ann Coulter could be a truly amazing weapon for "our side".
Ann ought to be a role model for younger White women in some ways, but she is absolutely not thanks to her real life example of "non-racist" dating, etc....
.
Ps: It ought to be noted however, that as far the jews go, Ann was a friend and admirer of the late Joe Sobran, a man not exactly noted for his love of the Tribe ;) And it is well known they hated him:

http://age-of-treason.blogspot.ie/2010/10/most-important-thing-to-know-about-joe.html
- there are brilliant pieces detailing Joe's views on da Jews in this article.

And here is Ann's article about her friend Joe after his death (it's quite beautiful really):
http://www.humanevents.com/2010/10/06/not-your-average-joe/


Shaunantijihad said...

Since the Jewish conquest of the US currency via the unlawful Federal Reserve Act, they have been financially able to dominate US politics. It doesn't matter whether a Senator is in the Democrats or the Republicans, as both rely heavily on Jewish financial support for elections, and consequently vote for Jewish interests when required.

The plan to destroy White civilisation via mass immigration from the 3rd world has been long in the planning, with clear collusion from white leaders from politicians to royalty. Liberals who see places like Detroit become African shitholes yet fail to identify race as the crucial factor are mentally unhinged displaying a form of Stockholm syndrome. This mental illness has become the dominant meme of Western political thought ever since it began. It's why they call us racists, as racist is the new political heresy.

But to point only to those who collude without mentioning the instigators is cowardice. It's the same with the US Liberty and 911. Israel and treasonous Jews in the US political and military establishment perpetrated both. Only cowards try to cover up the Jewish trail of treason for their careers.

Anonymous said...

You treat a US Senator like some new kid in high school. But worse, while sticking it to some journalist for not naming the Jew, you excuse the Senator for joining the Jew in undermining and destroying his country. One is saving her job, the other committing treason. I guess you and Teddy can't resist sticking it to the WASP establishment. Your friends in Israel support you.

David said...

Savant...

Why did you write an exclamation point after the name of Herbert Lehman?

SAVANT said...

David asks 'Why did you write an exclamation point after the name of Herbert Lehman?'

He's one of the famous/notorious Lehman Bros. family.

Setanta said...

Is there anybody left who still takes her seriously? Is there anybody left who still reads her?

In answer, Analogman, yes, huge numbers.

Anonymous said...

''Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the enforced silence both paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you. It’s a phenomenal display not of wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.'' (Sobran 1996a, 3)
Coulter knows the drill, this is as far as she can go.

katana said...

>13 January 2013 09:47
Shaunantijihad said...

>But to point only to those who collude without mentioning the instigators is cowardice. It's the same with the US Liberty and 911. Israel and treasonous Jews in the US political and military establishment perpetrated both. Only cowards try to cover up the Jewish trail of treason for their careers.

Certainly true in the case of those who knowingly collude about the main jewish role in the destruction of White societies.

But those aware to lesser degrees of what jews are doing, and have some sense of social responsibility to their race, are still subject to the jewywood media indoctrinated opinion of the mob, the masses. In other words, blurting out aspects of the truth would be quick career suicide, while hinting at it would simply drag the suicide out.

They need to feel less threatened to speak out. This is a positive feedback loop situation, where if more people educated themselves and others about what jews and their collaborators are doing to us Whites then the better our situation becomes. This site is part of that process.

The process of educating people about the jews has a gigantic propaganda edifice to overcome that jews have been constructing for at least a century and with significantly more energy since their total takeover of Holly-jewywood and the rest of our media. That is namely their 'Holocaust' hoax.

Bring up the word 'jew' and you are not to far away from a road that leads directly to handing over your family, friends and race in reparations and apology for merely existing. Complete BS and lies.

The other night I watched Tarrantino's 'Inglorious Basterds', a film financed and produced by jews. If I had watched the film a few years ago I most likely would have been nodding in approval as jews take revenge against the 'evil Nazis'.

But all I saw was a sickening portrayal of sadistic jews. Although the top Nazis were played as cartoonish characters, the ordinary Germans came across as decent and largely principled. All it took was a change of view.

nastiestuncle said...

Hey, this guy looks like he is doing some good because he blocks the building of mosques: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2261623/Mosque-buster-claims-stop-tide-Islam-giving-free-advice-block-building-plans-new-places-worship.html

But he is affiliated with the EDL, and I heard from some true nationalists (HAHAHAHAHAHAHA) that the EDL is run by Jews, so whatever this guy does it must be bad.

Oh well.


Kruger said...

''Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the enforced silence both paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you. It’s a phenomenal display not of wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.'' (Sobran 1996a, 3)

All true. I wonder is this giving rise to major pent-up resentment that could overflow in a new set circumstances?

You know, just wait till I get my chance you bastards?

Anonymous said...

There is a common factor in Detroit, Birmingham, East Saint Louis, Gary, Atlanta being detroited but you are not allowed to mention it because evidence does not matter it is what you feel that counts yet the science is settled on global warming.

Anonymous said...

A person like Ted Kennedy is the reason not a few Southern pro-Whites and other Founding Stock members look on Irish American ethnics with suspicion at best and open hostility at worst. That slimy "journalist" Chris Matthews is another good example of a white anti-White Irish ethnic despised by the same.

I do not speak as a WASP or Founding Stock member. I'm an Irish ethnic myself. It seems too many of us, at least in America, side with our worst enemies.

That Jews hate our race and want us gone is a no brain-er. But that White traitors join them?

Anonymous said...

Mel Gibson paid the price.His career is gone down the crapper.

kulak said...

But he is affiliated with the EDL, and I heard from some true nationalists (HAHAHAHAHAHAHA) that the EDL is run by Jews, so whatever this guy does it must be bad.

It's not bad, exactly, Carbuncle.

It's just besides the point.

beppo said...

@Kruger
I think you meant basterds.

kulak said...

Coulter beats on some people that need beatin', and she has a lot of the right enemies.

Her article indicates progress for our side. But she's not on our side.

Anti-racist is code for anti-white.

kulak said...

she is always on "high-alert" defending the GOP as the "real non-racists", etc, and trying to make the dumbed down Democrats believe that they are truly the "really racist" party, lol....

Right you are Mary. It's totally retarded.

kulak said...

I wonder is this giving rise to major pent-up resentment that could overflow in a new set circumstances?

I think so.

"Coming Apart" is the direct result of Jewish supremacism and the betrayal of white elites.

There is a huge reservoir of male anger building.

Unleashed and pointed it in the right direction, the gated "communities" will burn.

jewamongyou said...

I wonder how many Jews have been murdered, beaten up or raped by the same "diversity" that those Jews invited into the country on "Jewish interests" grounds.

guess who? said...

ot
There's plenty of good white nationalist comments on this long and active thread on this Telegraph (London) story about immigration. Feel free to join in:

http://tinyurl.com/agko9oc

waterboy said...

Jewamongyou asks I wonder how many Jews have been murdered, beaten up or raped by the same "diversity" that those Jews invited into the country on "Jewish interests" grounds.

Quite a lot, in my opinion. But remember, the welfare of the ordinary 'Jew in the street' was never of much concern to the uberjuden who control all our destinies.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rqxcSinfJ9k

Dublin in 5 years?
Paris Claims

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 15:37

"Mel Gibson paid the price.His career is gone down the crapper."

Quite wrong. He is acting, screenwriting, directing and producing as he wishes. And he is making a fortune.

However his public persona has suffered due to him being quite obviously insane and a drunk.

nastiestuncle said...

@waterboy 19:06

"But remember, the welfare of the ordinary 'Jew in the street' was never of much concern to the uberjuden who control all our destinies."

Yes, because the uberjuden don't have relatives and friends and friends' relatives amongst the 'Jew in the street'. When the uberjuden attacked the Twin Towers, none of them nor their friends or relatives had friends or relatives amongst the Jewish dead.
I heard that when the uberjuden asked their friends if they wouldn't mind having their sons and daughters killed in the attacks, their friends just said "naa, that's fine, go ahead, but just make sure that some Israeli travellers don't get caught filming the burning buildings or we'll be rumbled".

And that is the undisputed truth!

nastiestuncle said...

@kulak 15:59

"It's not bad, exactly, Carbuncle.

It's just besides the point."

Naaa, if he is run by Jews then it must be bad for us. You can't have it both ways. Opposing mosques is officially bad for us because it is supported by Jews, the very Jews who support the EDL apparently.

It's fun this, isn't it?



Anonymous said...

"I wonder how many Jews have been murdered, beaten up or raped by the same "diversity" that those Jews invited into the country on "Jewish interests" grounds."

Not enough apparently. Jews circle the wagons and pay for private guards or set up patrols without their media brethren lambasting them for being vigilantes. Yet crime did drop precipitously in New York following the Crown Heights riots. Now Harlem gets gentrified and blacks replaced with Africans and West Africans: I guess Jews discovered that 25% European lineage in their pet savages.

pdf1 said...

Naaa, if he is run by Jews then it must be bad for us. You can't have it both ways. Opposing mosques is officially bad for us because it is supported by Jews, the very Jews who support the EDL apparently.

Naaa nastiest. It's you who is making this false distinction.

Franz said...

Coulter is the latest-model Midge Decter and she's supposed to funk out.

Peggy Noonan let the cat out of the bag about "Chick Neocons" when the spaceship CHALLENGER blew up.

In her book, WHAT I SAW AT THE REVOLUTION, Noonan explained the blubbering among the mourning strangers like this: "Martin's children taught us to cry."

I was confused by this. Then a friend explained: "She means non-white funerals were always screeching contests, but after Martin Luther King, whites in America are expected to behave the same way."

This explains the phenomenon of the last generation: When I was a kid, funerals among European Americans were always stoic affairs. One of my aunts broke down for a moment at my grandma's funeral in the 50s, but it was contained by the uncles and explianed away by the fact that auntie had become frail.

Now? Anyone who DON'T slobber and whine is suspected. Martin's children my foot.

Girly "conservatives" like Ann are there to make us all hysterical hussies and at least Peggy Noonan knew her instructions a bit better, and a whole lot sooner.

nastiestuncle said...

@pdf1 said...

"Naaa nastiest. It's you who is making this false distinction."

Naaa, naaa, naaa. Jews run the EDL --> this is bad for us --> this man is endorsed by the EDL --> what he does must be bad for us --> ergo opposing mosques is bad for us and therefore we should have more of them.

Or maybe the EDL isn't run by Jews. Pick one.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said (12 January 2013 23:22): “Now to cast a little light onto our resident "nastiest" foot soldier on this Blog, read all about the "confessions of a paid pro-Israel shill".”

Read the HASBARA HANDBOOK (WJUS, 2002)

http://www.middle-east-info.org/take/wujshasbara.pdf

Look up ‘NAME CALLING’ and ‘PLAIN FOLKS’ (two of nastiestuncle’s preferred “devices”) on page 22, Seven Basic Propaganda Devices

NAME CALLING: Through the careful use of words, name calling links a person or an idea to a negative symbol. The most obvious example – “they’re a neo-Nazi group”. (Page 22)

GLITTERING GENERALITY: Name calling in reverse. Instead of trying to attach negative meanings to ideas or people, glittering generalities use positive phrases, which the audience are attached to, in order to lend positive image to things. Words such as "freedom", "civilization",…(Page 23)

TRANSFER: Transfer involves taking some of the prestige and authority of one concept and applying it to another. For example, a speaker might decide to speak in front of a United Nations flag, in an attempt to gain legitimacy for himself or his idea. (Page 23)

TESTIMONIAL: Testimonial means enlisting the support of somebody admired or famous to endorse and ideal or campaign (those associated with intelligence, like professors etc). (Page 24)

PLAIN FOLKS: The plain folks technique attempts to convince the listener that the speaker is a 'regular guy', who is trust-worthy because they are like 'you or me'. (Page 25)

FEAR: Stressing that ignoring the message will likely lead to war, terrorism etc. (Page 25)

BANDWAGON: Suggest that the stated position is mainstream and use polls to suggest this. (Page 26)

If they are still resistant to these techniques then more obviously deceitful and coercive tactics can be deployed:

1.Use of sources that can easily be seen to be completely discredited.

2.Attacking credible sources and witnesses, inventing or distorting trivial incidents.

3.Controlling language, referring to towns instead of settlements, "disputed" instead of occupied.

4.Framing of issues, the siege of Gaza and the apartheid wall as a response to terror.

5.Harassing media about its coverage.

6.Refusal to accept an alternative narrative as might come from the victims, insistence on maintaining the Zionist narrative as dominant.

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

waterboy said (13 January 2013 19:06): “Jewamongyou asks I wonder how many Jews have been murdered, beaten up or raped by the same "diversity" that those Jews invited into the country on "Jewish interests" grounds.

Waterboy: “Quite a lot, in my opinion.”

When all the MSM can come up with is a member of the “tribe” having his nose broken you know they’re clutching at straws!

Check out the Daily Telegraph’s article “Themed Drinking Game”. One member of the tribe has his nose broken and the Daily Telegraph devote a whole page to the story. It wouldn’t surprise me if this story made it to the front pages of the Daily Telegraph’s printed edition.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9016483/Students-face-censure-after-playing-Nazi-drinking-game-and-attacking-Jewish-student.html

Re the Community Security Trust (a registered British (Jewish) CHARITY?)

The Community Security Trust has now resorted to spreading lies and fabricating documents. Note: These documents were submitted to the British Home Secretary.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/apr/09/theresa-may-raed-salah-ban?newsfeed=true

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

Just found this video of nastiestuncle doing stand-up!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=f8BlnABIZgs

Check out the Comments: “Me pound on Jew long time!” LOL!!!

Frank Galton

Mary said...

Naaa, if he is run by Jews then it must be bad for us. You can't have it both ways. Opposing mosques is officially bad for us because it is supported by Jews, the very Jews who support the EDL apparently.

It's cute , nastiest, the way you try to conceal your increasing annoyance over our straight "jew-talk" under sarcasm ;)

The problem with the EDL (and other supposedly "far right" (not) orgs, is that they help spread the notion that "Jews are White", and that they are on our side, fighting for "our" interests.

Also, all the bruhaha that took place in the EDL over their head of their "jewish division" (yes, they have a a jewish division AND an "LGBT division" LOL) accusing the EDL leadership of being 'anti-semetic'*eyeroll*,
plus the addition of voices like jewess Pamela Gellar working with both Tommy Robinson/Stephen Lennon/Paul Harris and Kevin Carroll in SIOA, etc.....ought to be enough to show where they are being 'nudged' to.........

ps: I used to be able to show the EDL's stated purpose as being partly to stand against "racism", "homophobia", etc.....merely by linking to parts of their "About us" page on their website. I noticed today someone has re-worked that page, and although the tone is still the same, those kinds of statements have been scrubbed ;)

kulak said...

"Opposing mosques is officially bad for us because it is supported by Jews, the very Jews who support the EDL apparently."

Opposing mosques is bad for us indirectly because mosques help muslims resist assimilation.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 00:10

"Just found this video of nastiestuncle doing stand-up!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=f8BlnABIZgs

Check out the Comments: “Me pound on Jew long time!” LOL!!!"

It really hurts when you insult me.

:)

See you later.

Shaunantijihad said...

A film has been made about the relationship between journalists and govt. propaganda which is very insightful. Hat tip to John Hardon again:

http://hardons-blog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/the-war-you-dont-see-film-by-john-pilger.html

Ian said...

@ "guesswho" A fresh comment on that Telegraph article

haploidsoul

25 minutes ago

This is an ongoing and serious problem.

It is not widely known that the Dublin government has used much of the money generously given to it by the UK taxpayer recently to open a discreet office in Bucharest to advise Roma and others of their "rights" in the UK.

These people are then flown back to Dublin and send by train to Belfast; the pay off for Dublin is that when election time comes they will be brought to the polling booth by Sinn Fein activists and will vote accordingly.

Thus, by the back door, will a United Ireland be achieved.

People must alert their local MP to end this nefarious practice.
Any thoughts on this, Savant ?

Anonymous said...

Coulter is generally a weasel. I'm glad that she's been mentioning immigration at all recently.

As far as Ted Kennedy and his brothers JFK(TM) and RFK(TM) are concerned, all 3 were despicable traitors unworthy of defending. They grew up in England and hobnobbed with aristocrats. None of them had the slightest understanding of or care for average Americans, even Irish-Americans.

All 3 spent their lives surrounded by Jews and rose to prominence supporting the Jewish agenda.

JFK was asked by the ADL to write a book promoting immigration. Check their website - they boast about it to this day. The book was ghost written by JFK's lifelong closest adviser Ted Sorenson. A nice Nordic name, eh? But Sorenson's mother was a Jewish immigrant from Eastern Europe.

RFK and Teddy both had staffs that were crammed full of Jews and both pushed for the nation-wrecking 1965 bill.

The Jews are ultimately responsible but the Kennedy clan were shabbos goyim in a class of their own.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Not quite off-topic, but I find it ... interesting.

With the Sandy Hook narrative falling apart like a Nigeria-assembled Morris Minor, does this really sound so weird?

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=254

Was Timothy McVeigh Really Executed?

By Rixon Stewart on November 5, 2006
Rixon Stewart – 2002

No really, that’s a serious question. For throughout the whole OKC bombing saga the mainstream media has ignored some serious inconsistencies.

For example: some of those killed in the Oklahoma City bombing were not killed in the blast itself but died later in highly suspicious circumstances. One such was Mike Loudenslager who was responsible for saving the lives of many children in the Murrah Building’s day care centre.

In the weeks prior to the actual bombing, Loudenslager, a GSA employee, had been complaining about the large amounts of ordinance** and explosives being brought into the building by the B.A.T.F. and D.E.A, who had offices there. Others had been complaining too, including the building’s security director who filed a formal compliant and promptly lost his job. Thereafter fire marshals were denied access to the building when they arrived to inspect some remodelling that had been done to the day care centre.

Fearing the worst, Loudenslager and the day care operator began warning the children’s parents not to bring their children into the building. Had they not done so, the death toll probably would have been far higher.

Shortly after the actual bombing, Loudenslager was seen by many witnesses, including police officers and rescue workers, involved in a very “heated” confrontation. Much of his anger being due to the fact that he felt that the B.A.T.F. and D.E.A. were responsible for the extent of the blast damage.

However to the astonishment of those who had seen him in the immediate aftermath of the bombing, it was later reported that Loudenslager was found at his desk, a victim of the 9:02 A.M. bombing. This was reported only AFTER he had been seen alive and well by numerous rescue workers. Despite this he is now on the official list of victims claimed by the blast.


** "Ordnance", actually. A lot of people make that mistake.

UN
.

SAVANT said...

Ian. were it to be true I'd be overjoyed. Sadly I think this imputes intelligence and forward-thinking to the Irish 'government', concepts with which they're only dimly familiar. Far more likley they're providing an information office in Bucharest to inform gypsies of their rights in Ireland. Remember we have nation-wrecker Shatter at the helm of 'justice' here.

Anonymous said...

Who in the South wants a united Ireland now ? Financially it can't
be good, cutting Ireland off from
a country with a reasonable nuclear bite is also not such a great move.Almost immaterial whether the 4 provinces are united because it will happen when it wants to, possibly when England goes down the pan, a dead cert now, just a question of when. Someone asked about the phenomenon of leftism, why so many Whites happily join the growing ranks of those who want to see Western civilisations destroyed. I reckon it is a mixture of endemic resentment and the raised social status that consorting with an
anti-normal mixed bunch of arseholes confers. Lefties would
have been the cowards in the school playground, so they are getting their revenge with raised status. That's why they are comfy
with ignoring reality.

saighdur said...

"Who in the South wants a united Ireland now ?"

How many REALLY want it as distinct from telling some pollster they do?

10% max I'd say.

John W said...

N, the Oklahoma Bombing was another 'conspiracy theory' that I used to laugh at. Strenge, as with so many others, I ain't laughing no more.

Don't know about whether McV. was actaully executed or not, but the whole thing stinks to high heaven.

Mike Steinberg said...

I'm not sure if Irish Americans were in favour of the changes? I skimmed through Kennedy's book 'True Compass' and he mentioned he faced a lot of opposition from his voters.

What is really galling about Kennedy is he suggested it wouldn't lead to any significant change. Then in 1986, when it was clear it was leading to significant changes, supported Reagan's amnesty for illegals. At the time he said:

"“In 1986 Senator Kennedy said, ‘This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this.’

But then in 2006 he again supported Bush's failed push for Amnesty.

What is curious about the Kennedy's is that their dad, Joe, was of course quite different in his political views. Favouring US isolationism and getting recalled from his post by Roosevelt.

Gem Junior said...

As usual, expressing doubt about the OKC bombing gets you scorned as "conspiracy theory". But there are numerous inconsistancies in the story, there was a book published a year or so before the bombing in which the outlined plans for the OKC bombing were usedin a novel with the bomber's name as "Jim McVeigh". Tim McVeigh always complained about the military inserting a "chip" in his buttocks to monitor his movements. At the time, people laughed at him and the psychiatrists used this as evidence of his supposed paranoia and mental instability. Well, we all know that it's completely known to the public now so we can assume it was available or being worked on in 1994. Also look at McVeigh as he's led out of the court building shackled with a bulletproof vest on over his orange jumpsuit. What does he do - an experienced military man with knowledge of what's done to inconvenient potential storytellers? For example, Lee Harvey Oswald being escorted and then shot before he could open his mouth? McVeigh isn't looking at anything but the skyline and the buildings, because he's looking for the snipers he believed would fire on him, killing him. I'll never believe McVeigh did that bombing. His execution was necessary. Like Seal Team Six just happened to all die. Like Osama bin Laden's body fell into the ocean and was lost or whatever bullshit story we were served. FFS. Funny, that whole steaming load. Also Funny how many 9/11 witnesses just died so suddenly. I could go on but what's the point? And the school shootings? Why do we have schools full of cildren without the security being armed? If one teacher - only one - had a small gun in her purse she would have been able to shoot this ass Lanza in the back of his murdering skull. Definitely, there are many games being played here. Who? I don't know. But something funny is up.

Anonymous said...

Coming soon to a bar near you?

Ann Coulter may have flunked out but you won't will you?

How about celebrating Black History Month by listing 28 victims of the children of Obama?

Or a list of the 43 Detroit riot, 67 Detroit riot, Australian World War 2 riot which saw Allied troops fighting with Black troops, which shows that wherever blacks go riots follow.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 08:21

"Or a list of the 43 Detroit riot, 67 Detroit riot, Australian World War 2 riot which saw Allied troops fighting with Black troops, which shows that wherever blacks go riots follow."

To be fair though, the riots in Australia were not the fault of the blacks. It appears that it was the white American servicemen and leadership who were at fault in this particular riot. They lorded it over the Australians, downplayed Australian successes in battle and viewed the Australians as underachievers. Oh, and they flashed their cash and took the Australian women. They were also offended that the Australians didn't treat the black American servicemen as shit.

northern athiest said...

Definitely, there are many games being played here. Who? I don't know. But something funny is up.

Gem, my sentiments exactly. If you stand back and analyze all of these developments, and so many others, you're left with no alternative explanation.

What's the end game? I just don't know.

Gem Junior said...

"What's the end game? I just don't know."

Northern Athiest: Me either. I'm really starting to believe the whole scheme for getting us all under a one-world government.
MORE offensive is the jew-pushed immigration, and that we're being made invisible and unimportant, pointless members of OUR societies in all the western developed lands -- OURS, in OUR lands, OUR homes, OUR history, OUR creations, among OUR children, in streets and architecture built by OUR people - that WE endure the feces rubbed in our faces by alien-minded strangers who HATE us and can't wait till we are down enough to pose no threat so we can be murdered, and not with a quick shot to the head. Slow torture. It's OUR governments that wave us off, our needs pushed to the back burner, as they rush to cater to every whim of the immigrants. Oh, excuse me, the undocumented. Will our own sit here or get up and do something about it? or will we die off with a whimper? Is it paranoia really at this stage, is it? Try telling a friend and see ow they look at you like you're mental. So I am in full agreement about the end game, I have not got a clue at all. It's frustrating.

Anonymous said...

Uncle Nasty, interesting that you bring up Timothy McVeigh. A former co-worker of mine, not given to conspiracy theories and Jewish plots, had doubts about McVeigh's execution too.

I think more and more normal White people (I don't care about other races) distrust or outright reject the government's "Official Version" about anything: Sandy Hook, OKC, Waco, the state of the economy, "diversity", 9/11, why we are in the ME, the JFK assassination. The list continues. Our ruler's credibility with us is paper thin at best. No wonder conspiracy theories abound.

The advent of the Internet was a pivotal game changer that the ruling elites either didn't anticipate or greatly underestimated. They no longer own a monopoly on the flow of information which they once enjoyed and took for granted. The Irish Savant and thousands more throw a monkey wrench at the "Official Version" every day.

It's hurting them and they know it.

Glen C. said...

or will we die off with a whimper?

Gem, it all depends how bad it gets but also how fast. If it gets worse very slowly whites will be like the slow boiling frog. If it happens fast like in Greece there might be a violent reaction here too.

But in truth I am not very hopeful.

nastiestuncle said...

Perhaps Timothy McVeigh is on the Moon with Elvis, Hitler and a Lancaster Bomber.

/Daily Sport

Roem said...

Perhaps Timothy McVeigh is on the Moon with Elvis, Hitler and a Lancaster Bomber.

Together with the 10 million holocaust survivors still shaking down the Germans.

Anonymous said...

Roem do your sums.

15 million minus 6 million is 15 million.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Anonymous said...

Roem do your sums.

15 million minus 6 million is 15 million.


Or, as someone said, so pithily, a few weeks ago ... "Jewish population of Nazi-occupied Europe ... 2.4 million.

In 1946, 3.6 million of those jews claimed compensation for pain and suffering.

Sadly, the other six million perished ... vanishing without trace.

Yeah. Right.

Further to this:-

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4269697,00.html

You guessed it. The tribe are actually actively pursuing compensation from Palestinians.
Rather like the guy who sued for compensation because he sprained a toe, kicking his neighbor in the face.

I am put in mind of the old joke in which a guy murdered his parents -- and pled for leniency from the court because he was an orphan.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

I am put in mind of the old joke in which a guy murdered his parents -- and pled for leniency from the court because he was an orphan.

The Menendez brothers who were on trial for murdering their parents had their lawyer ask for consideration be given to the fact that they were now orphans!

It occured in the city where OJ did not murder his wife.