Friday, 4 January 2013

Action in 2013

Many of you have taken the opportunity of the New Year to suggest taking more practical steps to defend White/Western interests. I agree and maybe a review of this post would be worthwhile.

36 comments:

Anonymous said...

OFF TOPIC.
Need a little New Years cheer? Read these comments on the Lawrence anniversary.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/stephen-lawrence-murder-marked-20-years-054620278.html#mxCmxdo
Lemmy

Anonymous said...

Do not go to Hollyweird movies

Hollyweird has been struggling so much in the past that the Federales have to give them tax breaks on their movies so that Idris Alba portrays a bad pilot who was chosen to fly a spaceship on a trillion dollar mission getting Morgan Freeman money for a sub Morgan Freeman performance.

Calculus said...

Excellent points.
'don't recoil of being called a racist' is the one we have to get used to. 'Do not go into National Socialist considerations' is also unfortunatly true. While the NS economic and social program of the NAZI party was a total and absolute success, these days you have to discuss NS measures without mentioning that they are National Socialists.
By the way, i am curious to know how a 'National Liberal' (Hispanic dictature style Pinochet or Franco)program would deal with the current crisis.
Not very well IMO, you have to implement strong social and socialist measures to get out of the well, at least initially.

Perhaps the most important is #7 "Do what you are good at".

J Bull said...

Lemmy, great to see those comments. Reassuring, man.

Maximum Herzl said...


Having read thru quite a few of the comments on the linked post, and discovered that a large number of "nationalists" who frequent this blog are really proselytizing Ho£ocaustians and ueberZionists. Perhaps you should consider adding to the 'to do' list: "Garnering European nationalists' support for an all out invasion on Iran—grrrrr.....de fecking Muzzies!"

Why not set up a "White Nationalists against Ho£ocaust Denial", and help the Lurianians and hirelings spread the mandatory faith of the Kingdom of YHWH (a.k.a. 'the new world order'): the $ix Mi££ion Ho£ocausted Judaics, the 'homicidal insecticidal chambers,' and Hitler's not-so-secret verbal plan to murder every Jew in Europe—probably the world. This gargantuan hoax is the main weapon in the multifaceted 'bellum Judaicum' on the detested European & despised Christian cultures. Why should care that it's almost entirely fabricated.

Let's pretend that the interests of the Hoaxers are "our interests." That the interests of the native people of these small isles in the NE Atlantic, are akin to those of Benjamin Netanyahu.

PreatorianXVI said...

Intresting article on defending Caucasian Insterests.

The question should be what is good for us as a Ethnic group of people, not how we can accomodate everyone else at our expense.

http://age-of-treason.blogspot.co.nz/2013/01/puttin-da-muhfugging-bullit-throo-da.html

Anonymous said...

Re:- Maximum Herzl. Translation into English please.

Anonymous said...

Afraid the cheer won't last long Savant: Immigrants flooding into Ireland despite bad economic times there
Out of the roughly 88,000 visa applications received, 91 percent were approved, with the biggest number going to natives of India
Looks like Ireland will soon become little India thanks to Shatter.

Read more: http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Immigrants-flooding-into-Ireland-despite-bad-economic-times-there--185494742.html#ixzz2H30r8rxz


Clogheen said...

Yes, and most of these Indians will get citizenship if they want it courtesy of Shatter.

Anonymous said...

Two of the lefts 'things' are immigration and global warming. Immigration is good and global warming is happening.
How in their minds do they reconcile these two things? The UK is a net importer of food. In other words we can't feed ourselves. We rely on imports. Global warning says that sea levels are going to rise as much as thirty feet. If it were to rise by three feet most of East Anglia and Kent would disappear under water. These are the most farmed lands in the UK. One thing everybody agrees on is that the price of oil will rise as resources fall. This would make the price of importing food more expensive, if not impossible to sustain.
So the lefts argument is bring in more people that will cost a fortune to feed.
On top of this you add South Africa now also a net importer of food where once their economy was driven by food export.
Am I being to pessimistic?

Lemmyhead.

Anonymous said...

When I see an Indian/Pakistani with a Texas driver's license, I don't think "American", I think "Paki".

JP

Anonymous said...

I wonder what it would take to shatter the Shitter?

Ian said...

@ Lemmy et al.On that comment thread re Doreen Lawrence - " Infidel 12 hours ago
'Its called post traumatic slavery disorder, it lasts at lest a 180 years.'"

Anonymous said...

Good news and bad news.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3D has a white female black male relationship.

The good news is the black guy gets offed quickly.

The bad news? Morgan Freeman does not play Doctor Portia Smith Ph. D. so there is no real depth to this character.

Anonymous said...

Atan Shatler is the minster of injustice?

Anonymous said...

@ 22:15

By just looking at the PHOTO, Ireland cannot withstand this bombardment invasion for much longer.

By those measures, and projecting just another 15 years into the future, Ireland will no longer be considered truly Irish.

Arriving NON-white foreigners get the "gold mine", while the indigenous White Irish get the "shaft".

That's not a good deal by any Irishman's standards of negotiation.

ELN

Piet said...

Bare in mind that the Muzzies and porch monkeys in Ireland will be pumping out pups at 5 times the rate of the Irish.

kulak said...

Two of the lefts 'things' are immigration and global warming. Immigration is good and global warming is happening.
How in their minds do they reconcile these two things?


As if white genocide would be just fine if not for some OTHER consideration.

Anonymous said...

We have been down this route before. On more than one occasion. We talk and that's it. However, perhaps we could make a small effort sat at our computers. With Savants permission perhaps we could attack certain left wing and middle of the road chat rooms and blogs. Someone could suggest an enemy site that we could arrange to attack? When I say attack I mean sensible arguments. Back up each others comments in chat rooms and on blogs? Not much, but better than nothing.
Lemmyhead.

SAVANT said...

@Lemmyhead. By all means. This blog is at your disposal.

eah said...

OT

East Ham indoor barbecue-clothes-drying poisons six people

Laughed out loud when I read this story. The BBC reports stuff like this rather earnestly, never bothering to mention who these people are. You get one clue:

She left the house with her four grandchildren, aged between 10 months and four, and two daughters-in-law, aged 26 and 29, inside.

Typical living arrangements of an English family.

Read these comments on the Lawrence anniversary.

Any idea where this story was linked? Usually it's some site that can be described as a choir -- dangling red meat in front of the choir. Certainly if you post a story like that in the right place there are enough like-thinkers to generate that number of un-PC comments. It's less sure how much significance that has. Especially in a country where the next twitter racism prosecution is coming soon.

As for what can be done, I'm not one to ask. I don't know. Not sure I care anymore. Nowadays I never vote. Some time ago I began concentrating on my and my family's financial security -- this is what is most important to me.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Anonymous said...

Do not go to Hollyweird movies

Hollyweird has been struggling so much in the past that the Federales have to give them tax breaks on their movies so that Idris Alba portrays a bad pilot who was chosen to fly a spaceship on a trillion dollar mission getting Morgan Freeman money for a sub Morgan Freeman performance.

A ghastly example, I am afraid, of what a played-out sellout wanker Ridley Scott has become.

His first "Alien" -- apart from being an excellent horror flick, portrayed the boog exactly as history has. A low-talent, low-rent, money-obsessed ape in a position way above his capacity ... ship's mechanic.

"Prometheus", however, on the basis of no evidence whatever, elevates an even less-talented nigger (Alba) into some kind of all-seeing all-knowing, genius -- even by his so-called superior -- the utterly wooden and talentless white sellout ... Charlize Whatsername ... who, I might add, has the ghastliest shapeless, calfless legs I have seen in years.

It is often said of vastly overrated actors, that they become blasé, and grow bored enough with a production to phone their performances in.

"Prometheus" was the first time in the history of film, that the whole cast and crew phoned in ... director and writers included.

UN
.

Keiser said...

Good Suggestions.

I play a game with the moderately PeeCee brain scrubbed, you know the ones who have osmotically soaked up the Cultural Marxism lies but haven't really thought about it too much. This is a logic game inspired by a quotation from one of my favourite philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche...

"The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments. Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, section 191, It's fun and as follows:

So what you do is you pick a fallacy that is so blatantly a lie that it actually leads to self destruction and you endorse it vigorously while simultaneously acknowledging the ill effects.

For example: You say "Yes of course we should give school places to immigrants even if that means Irish children are denied their places"

The faulty arguments are already built in to the premises of PeeCee liberalism so you just need to present premise and consequence in the same statement. They never do this of course. They just cite a positive premise. The context in which it is applied is inappropriate and it is thus twisted to suit their agenda but they refuse to state that agenda and refuse to speak about the logical consequences of the misapplication.

For example...

Premise: diversity is positive and if you don't agree you are judged a psychological regressive, one that can't engage "the other" or those with whom he or she is different. So diversity is good because you can take the psychologically positive step of interacting with "otherness".

Twist: population mixing and forced geographical association based upon the above.

Result: Overall reduction of diversity since people are not islands and rely on community to survive and this creates a drive toward interdependence/mingling. If this doesn't happen you get dissonance and segregation (like in France and Sweden) which creates further impetus to reduce tension by... as the lovely Nicolas Sarkozy demanded of l'ecole polytechnique students... "metisse" or intermixing.

We all know this of course, my point is that you state the positive premise and the negative logical conclusion of its misapplication in the same statement, and this is the important bit, continue to endorse the premise as positive. This leads to utter confusion on the part of the PeeCee pundit as you are not disagreeing with them (they thrive on that) but at the same time their argument is debased right before their eyes... and they do notice. I've had fun with it. Play around with it, see if it works on a feminist or two then move on to big game like immigration enthusiasts.

A variation on the above is called... stating the truth, e.g.

http://www.cwporter.com/environmentalcleansing.htm

This however lacks the fun crypto stealth cloak of apparent agreement with your PeeCee pal.

SAVANT said...

Keiser, that's a great suggestion.

In fact I'm going to amend that post to include it.

David said...

Here a nice opinion from one of the commentators on Amren:
“The author identifies a key component to western cultures survival, which is reducing immigration.
Most everyone here would agree. Then what is stopping us?
well....The leaders of both parties, the leadership of the churches, the media, environmental groups, academics, even unions are all against us. How can we prevail?
Here is my proposal of a way we can at least begin.... there is a video on youtube showing how a person can take a used $20 overhead projector and use it to make signs on cardboard or tyvek and post them along highways where they can be seen by tens or hundreds of thousands of drivers everyday.
I propose we begin blanketing the nation with simple slogans on home made signs and at the bottom give links to numbersusa and vdare and amren to entice those who are interested in the message to join with us.
American advertising businesses knows how to sell a product, they do it by repetition of a simple message over and over.
Imagine signs on highways all across America
asking
WANT MORE JOBS? CUT IMMIGRATION
OR
IMPEACH AMNESTY WEASELS NOW
OR
WE ARE A NATION OF CITIZENS ,NOT IMMIGRANTS
OR
WHY DID MOST NEW JOBS GO TO IMMIGRANTS 2008-2012?
or
ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS HAVE ILLEGAL EMPLOYERS
or
MAKE E VERIFY MANDATORY
OR
END THE ANCHOR BABY TOURIST SCAM

At the end of every message have a website listed like Amren or numnbersusa so people can learn more.”


Absolutely so reason why we cant cut and paste to our respective White Nations,

Anonymous said...

Has anybody else read Donovan's The Way of Men? It's pretty good.

B Boru said...

David. A brilliant and practical suggestion. I'm going to follow up immediately.

katana said...

5 January 2013 21:30
Keiser said...

For example: You say "Yes of course we should give school places to immigrants even if that means Irish children are denied their places"

................

We all know this of course, my point is that you state the positive premise and the negative logical conclusion of its misapplication in the same statement, and this is the important bit, continue to endorse the premise as positive. This leads to utter confusion on the part of the PeeCee pundit as you are not disagreeing with them (they thrive on that) but at the same time their argument is debased right before their eyes... and they do notice. I've had fun with it. Play around with it, see if it works on a feminist or two then move on to big game like immigration enthusiasts.

-----------------------

Thanks Keiser

I like this kind of practical 'argumentative' advice.

Your example can be further rubbed in by then saying, 'Yes, of course our children should suffer so that strangers' children should not suffer.'

Or even, 'Yes, of course we should sacrifice ourselves for strangers', or, 'Our babies should be aborted, so that many black babies can exist through our sacrifice.' or, 'Let's abort a White baby and adopt a black baby, just like they do in Jewywood!'

Or even, 'I used to believe that charity began at home. Now I believe it begins from the furthest possible places from home. I've received a letter, via our friendly Goldstein media representative, from a destitute Nigerian, with ten starving children, who has an empty bank account, and ... '

Whites have been conned big time.

store man said...

Katana: Superb!

AnalogMan said...

Anonymous said...
Has anybody else read Donovan's The Way of Men? It's pretty good.

5 January 2013 23:46


Didn't you post that exact same comment at SBPDL?

Why are you spamming conservative blogs touting for Jack Donovan? Are you Jack Donovan?

What makes you think anybody here (except the troll, of course) would be interested in taking advice from a homosexual on how to be a real man? Is that you, nastiest?

kulak said...

Didn't you post that exact same comment at SBPDL?

No, I didn't. I don't post there. I'm not even finished with the book yet.

Is that you, nastiest?

No, it's me kulak.

I know Donovan's gay, but I don't know that he's ever paraded in leather or anything like that.

I think he underestimates the importance of children, possibly because he's gay.

It is also perhaps unintentionally PC of him to assume prehistoric men of all races often didn't know who their children were. While it was true of many Amerinds of the past, and true of many/most blacks past and present, I don't think it was true of prehistoric whites or north asians, because they lived in very different environments and I assume were smarter, as they are today.

You can't invent animal husbandry without learning how reproduction works, and R strategies are mostly a no-go in the icy North.

Otherwise, I think it's good.

AnalogMan said...

Well, kulak, I am surprised. With your name attached, I'd be more inclined to give that endorsement greater weight; but, "thanks, but no thanks". Jack Donovan is just too weird.

eah said...

No, it's me kulak.

Did you post the original comment naming/recommending the book? If so, why did you do it as "Anonymous" when you apparently post comments regularly as "kulak"?

Keiser said...

Katana
I don't think that approach was what I was suggesting. There is a difference between pointing out a contradiction and shooting oneself in the foot and with utmost respect to your reductio ad absurdum technique I feel you may have, in your haste, missed the nuance of what I was suggesting. Other than that... yes superb!

Heraclitus said...

Keiser/Katana. I agree with Keoser's last comment..that there was a nunace you missed. As he said your post is otherwise great.

kulak said...

@Analog

It is manly to have children, and it is especially manly to have sons.

Donovan has a very interesting passage on how the gay rights movement slogan "Honor Diversity" is an oxymoron.

He doesn't say it, but I think he might agree that in a manly society he himself might have less status, less honor, on account of his orientation. But perhaps he can make up for it in other ways.