Friday, 21 December 2012

"Oooh.....fat boy!"


32 comments:

Anonymous said...

My kids are all grown up,but I remember christmas morning when I would be under the tree with them opening the presents,all excited.My wife used to laugh and call me a big kid.Damn,I miss those days.

Anonymous said...

I'm dreaming of a white Christmas,just like the ones I used to know.

Anonymous said...

Merry Christmas Savant!

Your blog is both wonderful and utterly necessary. Keep up the good work and Happy 2013.

Masurian

Anonymous said...

Christmas is a white mans holiday.Santa Claus,the nativity,carol singers,etc.I wonder how the blacks feel about it.Does it remind them that they are not European.That they have nothing in their history,that is equal to it.

Anonymous said...

Bad ad

Best beer ad ever

Uncle Nasty looking at you!

Nandos makes me think of

Slogan of the century

Anonymous said...

Sometimes Savant I wonder about you........


Happy Christmas all

mr.a

Gem Junior said...

A disgusting sign of the times. Unfortunately it sells. Some skanky, filthy publisher, with a high probability of being owned by some of the most upright, moral citizens we know of, decided it would be a fabulous seller. And I'm sure it was. Not bought by weird goths and S&M people, but by sheeple. I could just see some middle-aged divorced sheep of a fishwife giving these to all her divorced fishwife friends and braying with laughter over how hip and funny she is. So many people crumble as the society crumbles; they don't all stand upright but when the wind blows they go down, it's sad but true. This is an example. All the people who bought this card thinking it's funny don't realize how gross it is because this type of crap is now all over "prime time" TV. Over here anyway. I don't know what we can do about this type of thing because in typical slithering, underhanded fashion, it's made to seeeeeem harmless and cute but it is not. Far from it. Like the filthy Charlie Sheen program that's huge in the U.S., but I can't remember the name of it. It's probably on over their if people have a disc. People are always telling me to lighten up because it's GREAT harmless fun. Not like the 14 year old kids are out getting pregnant with each other. There's always next year, right? Well, once again, what's t he world coming to?

Anonymous said...

Gem great post. Couldn't agree more. All just harmless fun. Right?!

And of a few kids have to die, well then so be it.

Ivan Shatov

David said...

Happy er...kwanza or maclomXmas and remember the three kings who fought for black freedom: Martin Luther, Dom and Roddy

Anonymous said...

The girl in 'slogan of the centurey' is SOOOO HOTTTT!

Perfect Aryan brood stock!

Anonymous said...

Blacks who bemoan the racist Western societies they live in should spend a couple of months in their ancestral African homelands. Then, I’d be truly interested to hear how bad their white host country is. Surely, a starvation diet of roots and hyena guts, and sh*tting in an open ditch at the back of a mud hut will give them new-found appreciation for European culture.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if Shatter has a Christmas tree in his house.Probaly to mean.Bah Humbug.

Rob said...

Christmas is a white mans holiday.Santa Claus,the nativity,carol singers,etc.I wonder how the blacks feel about it.Does it remind them that they are not European.That they have nothing in their history,that is equal to it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2251785/Drunk-advertising-manager-Alvin-Leeward-facing-sack-destroying-decorations-work-Christmas-party.html

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1EKnEmbXfRM

my kind of santa

up the villa

Anonymous said...

O/T-Sav,what's your take on the gun debate in America?Will the libtards go for the 2nd amendment?The next few weeks should be interesting.

SAVANT said...

Anon 21.15. They'll definitely take away as many guns as possible. I don't see them trying to repeal the 2nd, rather use salami tactics, one category of gun after another until the only legal one is a single shot .22.

Ian said...

Anonymous 21 Dec. 07:11
Best comment on that "Bad ad" video -
ThothXx 5 hours ago -
I thought it was going to be a monkey. I guess I was right.

Iron Felix said...

Here's a thing; the Irish Evening Herald tells us that in 2010 there were about 85 gun deaths each day in the U.S. Set aside the 2 accidents and 50 suicides, though, and we have 30 homicides. The esteemed organ leaves it there; it does NOT tell us that, pro rata the deaths from spree killings in Britain, with its rigid gun laws, significantly exceed those in the US. (That should surprise folk with fixed ideas). Nor does the meedja tell us that the US is well down the table of countries in gun murder stats; nor that for instance the Golden Boy among the nations, South Africa, has a gun murder rate some 6 times as great as the US; nor yet does it touch upon this fact; of those 30 homicides per day in the US, sixteen of the victims will be young black males, this being because whereas there is an outside chance that one of the perps involved may be a white male, the others will be other young black males. This leaves a quotidien 14 murders, with a ragbag of perps, of whom some will certainly be white.None of this is said, take note.
The Second Amendment is one of the most remarkable constitutional provisions ever framed anywhere, and what that addled old soak Cruise-O'Brien, in a lucid moment, once called the "politics of the latest atrocity" is now being manipulated to set that Amendment at nought. The longterm aim? Disarm the law-abiding, responsible citizenry; weaponise the niggers.
What did any of you think?

Ian said...

Further to my previous comment, the avatar of that commenter will please Uncle Nasty
ThothXx_Avatar

Rob said...

@Iron Felix

There's a lot of statistics being hidden from us on this, but the most amazing one I came across - if it's accurate - is that 4000 people PER DAY in America use firearms to defend themselves from attack, according to Chuck Baldwin's latest column syndicated at Vdare.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
This is, oddly, turning into a firearms thread, but what the Hell ..

Copied from Whale Oil:-

http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/

Scroll to:-

Gun Control alone won’t work

by Whaleoil on December 22, 2012

Charles Krauthammer explains why gun control alone won’t work:

Every mass shooting has three elements: the killer, the weapon and the cultural climate. As soon as the shooting stops, partisans immediately pick their preferred root cause with corresponding pet panacea. Names are hurled, scapegoats paraded, prejudices vented. The argument goes nowhere.

It goes nowhere because no politician has the stones to actually call out American society for their ills. Krauthammer examines the role of gun control:

(1) The Weapon

Within hours of last week’s Newtown, Conn., massacre, the focus was the weapon and the demand was for new gun laws. Several prominent pro-gun Democrats remorsefully professed new openness to gun control. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) is introducing a new assault weapons ban. And the president emphasized guns and ammo above all else in announcing the creation of a new task force.

I have no problem in principle with gun control. Congress enacted (and I supported) an assault weapons ban in 1994. The problem was: It didn’t work. (So concluded a University of Pennsylvania studycommissioned by the Justice Department.) The reason is simple. Unless you are prepared to confiscate all existing firearms, disarm the citizenry and repeal the Second Amendment, it’s almost impossible to craft a law that will be effective.


Mr Krauthammer is (naturally) rather Americocentric in his thinking. Go to the original and read on.

For those in the UK, I recommend a book named Guns and Violence: The English Experience by Joyce Lee Malcolm

http://tinyurl.com/cgbn46r

It is a history of arms, arms legislation and outcomes from the middle ages to the present day, and, if that is what you're interested in ... most informative.

Fascinatingly enough, Ms Malcolm estimates that even with hundreds of amnesties and many draconian arms laws, the UK is still home to tens of thousands of illicit firearms, and, literally, millions of rounds of illicit ammunition ... but the real killer is that America's homicide rate (as Iron Felix says) with all them guns, is plummeting ... and the UK's (where guns are to all intents and purposes banned) is rocketing.

Even Australia's virtual gun ban has resulted in astronomical homicidal violence figures while NZ's far saner (for the shooter, that is) laws, have seen all (violent) crime figures plummet.

The Ozzie pols are having great difficulty in explaining that away.

I cannot tell you what a kick it is to go into a gun store, scratch through all the cheap .22 rifles and say "I'll take that one ... how much? And why so much?

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
@Iron Felix

There's a lot of statistics being hidden from us on this, but the most amazing one I came across - if it's accurate - is that 4000 people PER DAY in America use firearms to defend themselves from attack, according to Chuck Baldwin's latest column syndicated at Vdare.

Indeed, Felix. Ban private firearms and add 4000 injuries or deaths, to the toll -- every day.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Another one:

Go here and follow the instructions ... most revealing.

http://www.tincher.to/deaths.htm

A good source if you have some spare time:

http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/fatal.html

As Tincher says: The definitive source for US injury death statistics is the mortality rate calculator (WISQARS) at the Centers For Disease Control National Center for Injury Prevention & Control website which provides statistics on all deaths by injury, not just gun deaths. To get the number of gun deaths for a year choose "Fatal Injury Reports" and then set the Cause of Injury to Firearm. If you only want to know the number of child gun deaths per year then choose the custom age range and input 0 years ( <1 ) as the lowest age and 17 years as the top age. Be sure to select "No Age-Adjusting Requested" if you are only interested in a particular age group.

Note that the CDC child gun death figures are typically half of the figures that the gun control lobby publishes. The difference is in the definition of a child. The gun control lobby counts young adults that are 18 or 19 years old as children, but they do not count 20 year olds as children. You can choose from one of two possible reasons, depending on your level of cynicism: 1. The standard CDC age groups used to go from 0-19, 20-39, etc and the gun control lobby couldn't figure out how to select a custom age group. 2. Counting 18 and 19 year olds as children doubles the number of so-called child gun deaths, and more child gun deaths means more support for gun control.


Enjoy,
UN
.

AnalogMan said...

Gem great post. Couldn't agree more. All just harmless fun. Right?!

Me, too.

Ian said...

Sorry. Try this link ThothXx_Avatar

Krokodil said...

The South African government is making it harder and harder to legally own firearms.

They will come up with a number of reasons for this (some reasonable), but I believe that the main reason is because they don't want Whites having guns. Of course, they don't say this, but I'm pretty sure that's the case.

Under White rule, getting a gun (and a damn sight more sensible system than in the US - each gun carries an individual license) meant a wait of usually no more than three months - today the Black civil service of SA routinely, and arbitrarily, deny applications or simply throw them into the waste basket. This is fact - widely documented; I'm not making this up.

Does the US need some form of gun control? I reckon so, yes, but it need not be at the federal level. How's about each state enacting a form of gun control, with the data only being available to the feds if a crime has being committed along federal or international lines?

So's I'm not confusing anyone here, I believe in the private ownership of guns, but they shouldn't be as easily available as toasters, kettles, or slabs of chocolate, to name but a few ...

Gem Junior said...

The libs are salivating over the Newtown killings because people are so disgusted and upset over it. Weakened by emotion and so not thinking. If Americans were thinking (I use the term loosely) properly after 9/11 they would not have allowed the Patriot Act like they did. They let their emotions act for them. And the scummy elites know that with all these murdered children, so many Americans are just emotional about it now and they're saying - do WHATEVER it takes to protect children from these murderous gunmen. The elites never let a good tragedy go to waste and the game is to twist emotions. In fact, everytime I've opened my mouth just to say "Wait a minute, let's not jump to knee-jerk mode here" I've been screamed at "SO YOU WANT KIDS TO DIE!! YOU WANT KIDS TO DIE! Kind of like "You're a nazi who wants to kill sixmillionjews! So I don't even say anything now.

One thing I will manage to slip in though is this: If even ONE of the staff in that school, a teacher, a janitor, the school nurse, ANYONE: had a small pistol in her purse, they could have shot that killer in the back of his head and saved countless lies. A teacher could have been in any of the closets or cloakrooms, toilets or under a desk. As he approached he could have been disabled, as he was shooting in a classroom facing the kids anyone could have shot him in the back of the neck, head, spine. It's so ridiculous how no one will THINK about what a deterrent guns can be. It's natural to think twice when you know everyone has a licensed gun. This fucker KNEW that he was going in to kill the weak and the unarmed. He wasn't worried he might be shot because he KNEW nobody would be armed. It is the mark of a society that wants to have their problems solved for them and not to confront the issue, not to think or take the responsibility to know how to operate a gun. I once told a woman at my job in response to some questions about my son that his father took him to a firing range for target practice and he took a class in proper care of a firearm. She looked horrified and I'm sure she thought "crazy mom" but at least my son knows something useful. It's not like I was teaching my 11 year old girl. Also, the society doesn't seem to notice how infantile our children are now. Babies, even when they are older school aage kids. When I was 12 I was babysitting an infant and carrying a toddler around during my time off and putting dishes in the dishwasher. If you look at 12 year olds now, they are affronted at chores. And I would NEVER trust any 12 year old with an infant nowadays. They're so stupid they would put on headphones and be listening to pop music while the child chokes to death.
I see our western societies as wussies who want a mommy for a government. It's really gross for t hose of us who want to decide our own destiny.
I understand that a family of four does not need an arsenal of assault weapons but the question really should be: WHY do they think they might need it? Why was this not an issue 50 years ago? One one law is passed, it's the slippery slope. So I say no - no laws. I think that people should be armed if they choose. The lawless boons will never obey gun laws. Do we ban forks for obese people? No - we say control your behavior! Do we ban knives when people are stabbed all the time? No way. What about the Chinese guy who killed a bunch of kids in a school by slashing them? Ban knives? Power should be in the hands of the people. We know that. Another thing: Why do we have so many shootings in these places? Over the last 10-20 years they are constant and frequent. What's up with that? Does anyone ask Hollywood to stop making moview like Hostel and Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Gun murder shows etc. It's sickening. No one is asking just like no one is thinking!

Gem Junior said...

Oh another thing: If one more celebrity opens their pie holes to flap their useless lips I think I will vomit.
The same narcissistic people have private security guards armed with 5 guns on their belts. They just want US to be helpless.
They blab on about conserving energy while they fly on private airlines to one of many homes using so much energy. Advising us to have one child? While they have 5 kids each? (Al Gore, Ted Turner?) they should hope they never fall into the hands of an angry and disgusted public. Or me :) !!!!!!

TBone said...

Gem, reminds me of a mini Pearl Harbor. A perfect excuse. If I didn't totally trust my government I'd suspect something. (Sarcasm off).

Anonymous said...

"I really don't like getting made fun of, so I put on something boring and navy and go out and try and disappear!" says Anne Hathaway who was not wearing boring navy knickers when she was photographed getting out of a car knickerless in a skimpy skirt at the premiere of her latest movie, gah!, I forgo tthe important part of the story,.

Anonymous said...

I see that the ACLU have come out and said Los Angeles council you take that menorah that is on public property you turn it sideways you shine it up real nice and you shove it straight up your candyass!

Bravo to the brave bar and bat mitvahed ones!

Anonymous said...

I am not saying Michael Moore is a fat bastard but the mountain of lard has more to worry about from Twinkies than guns.